Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2021 Jun 15;26(12):3651. doi: 10.3390/molecules26123651

Boswellic Acids Show In Vitro Activity against Leishmania donovani

Hippolyt L Greve 1, Marcel Kaiser 2,3, Pascal Mäser 2,3, Thomas J Schmidt 1,*
Editor: Philippe M Loiseau
PMCID: PMC8232742  PMID: 34203815

Abstract

In continuation of our search for leads from medicinal plants against protozoal pathogens, we detected antileishmanial activity in polar fractions of a dichloromethane extract from Boswellia serrata resin. 11-keto-β-boswellic acid (KBA) could be isolated from these fractions and was tested in vitro against Leishmania donovani axenic amastigotes along with five further boswellic acid derivatives. 3-O-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA) showed the strongest activity with an IC50 value of 0.88 µM against axenic amastigotes but was inactive against intracellular amastigotes in murine macrophages

Keywords: Boswellia serrata, frankincense, Burseraceae, Leishmania donovani, antiprotozoal activity, boswellic acids

1. Introduction

Vector-borne diseases caused by protozoal pathogens remain a major health problem, especially in low-income countries in sub-tropical and tropical areas [1]. We recently reported results of bioactivity-guided fractionations of Burseraceae resins aiming to find compounds with activity against the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) [2,3]. In continuation of our search for antiprotozoal leads from plants, we also tested extracts and fractions obtained from Boswellia and Commiphora spp. for their antileishmanial activity. Leishmaniases are classified as a Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD) according to the World Health Organization (WHO). They are endemic in large parts of Africa, (South) America and Asia and, therefore, are a health hazard for millions of people. The causative agents are about 20 human-pathogenic species from the genus Leishmania that are transmitted to humans by the bite of infected female sandflies from the genera Lutzomyia or Phlebotomus. The disease occurs in three different clinical manifestations (cutaneous, mucocutaneous or visceral). The visceral form (“kala-azar”), caused among other species by L. donovani (Ldon), and affecting the inner organs is the most dangerous form. Although axenic culture of Leishmania is possible in the laboratory, in mammals, the parasites are obligatory intracellular residing in their amastigote form in the host’s macrophages. This is one reason why present treatment options such as pentavalent antimonials, pentamidine or amphotericin B are problematic due to severe side effects. As developing resistances, as well as the expensiveness of existing therapies, remains a problem, safe and affordable new treatment options are urgently needed [1].

The plant family of Burseraceae contains several members that have been used in ethnopharmacology for centuries. Boswellia serrata Roxb. is a deciduous tree native to India with a greyish papery bark. It exudes a fragrant, yellowish oleo-gum-resin, called Indian frankincense or Olibanum, that is valued for its anti-inflammatory properties. The main components of oleo-gum resins are terpenoids, gums and essential oils [4]. Boswellic acids, terpenoid compounds that occur in considerable amounts in the drug, have been shown to contribute to these effects. In our bioactivity-guided search for antiplasmodial compounds, the dichloromethane extract of the oleo-gum resin displayed the highest activity, indicating that terpenoid compounds might be involved. Fractionation of this extract revealed that triterpenoid compounds, in particular, contribute to its antiplasmodial effects [2]. Whereas antimicrobial activities of essential oils are well known in general, reports about the application of Boswellia oleo-gum-resin or its constituents against Leishmaniasis are scarce [5,6]. A commercially available essential oil, mainly obtained from B. carteri alongside further Boswellia spp., showed an IC50 value of < 12.5 µg/mL against promastigotes and 22.1 ± 4.2 µg/mL against intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania amazonensis [7]. Serratol, a diterpene isolated from B. serrata, showed antiplasmodial activity in vitro but was essentially inactive against L. donovani axenic amastigotes [8]. A methanolic extract of B. carteri resin showed no activity against L. infantum amastigotes [9].

2. Results and Discussion

Based on a repurposing screening of herbal medicinal products [10] and results from in vitro tests of serratol [8], antiplasmodial effects of different Burseraceae were investigated in a systematical manner. Resins were successively extracted with solvents of increasing polarity (DCM, EtOH, H2O). While aqueous extracts did not show any activity, DCM extracts from B. serrata and Commiphora myrrha appeared most promising for a bioactivity-guided isolation of their constituents active against Plasmodium falciparum as reported previously [2,3]. Besides their antiplasmodial effects, the non-aqueous extracts from B. serrata and B. carteri displayed considerable activity against L. donovani as well, whereas they were less active against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (Tbr) and T. cruzi (Tc) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Bioactivity data (IC50 values in µg/mL) of extracts from selected Burseraceae resins. Results of double determinations are given as geometric mean; maximum and minimum values are given in parentheses. Further values are results from single determinations.

Tbr Tc Ldon Pf L6
Boswellia serrata
DCM 12 15 (14; 17) 4.5 (3.9; 5.1) 2.6 (2.4; 2.8) 46 (45; 47)
EtOH 11 (9.3; 11) 23 (20; 26) 4,7 (4.6; 4.9) 3.4 (2.9; 3.9) 54 (54; 54)
H2O 45 65 > 100 > 50 > 100
Boswellia carteri
DCM 14 12 (9.9; 15) 3.0 (2.4; 3.8) 3.4 (2.4; 4.7) 39 (37; 42)
EtOH 15 14 (12; 17) 3.0 (2.4; 3.7) 3.8 (3.2; 4.4) 44 (43; 45)
H2O 34 77 > 100 > 50 > 100
Commiphora myrrha
DCM 5.2 (5.1; 5.4) 16 (12; 21) 6.1 (5.5; 6.7) 1.0 (1.0; 1.0) 8 (6; 11)
EtOH 13 41 15 1.8 (1.2; 2.6) 42 (39; 46)
H2O 45 61 > 100 > 50 > 100

A growth inhibition assay of fractions Bs-1–Bs-20 obtained from the DCM-extract of B. serrata by column chromatography on silica [2] showed that antileishmanial activity is associated with increasing polarity of the fractions (Table 2).

Table 2.

Results from activity tests of fractions (Bs-1–Bs-20) of increasing polarity obtained by column chromatography of a DCM extract from B. serrata resin. Each value represents growth inhibition in %, in comparison to untreated control. As these assays were meant to give only preliminary information on whether fractions show any bioactivity or not, they have only been conducted once. Fractions Bs-2 and Bs-18 were not tested because of strong similarity of their chemical profiles to neighboring fractions.

Fraction L. donovani
10 µg/mL 2 µg/mL
Bs-1 31 0.0
Bs-3 0.0 0.0
Bs-4 1.0 0.0
Bs-5 79 0.0
Bs-6 76 0.0
Bs-7 21 0.0
Bs-8 21 0.0
Bs-9 85 31
Bs-10 47 25
Bs-11 51 27
Bs-12 42 24
Bs-13 70 28
Bs-14 61 25
Bs-15 81 31
Bs-16 89 30
Bs-17 100 41
Bs-19 100 36
Bs-20 100 37

11-keto-β-boswellic acid (KBA, 1) could be isolated from these fractions and further boswellic acid derivatives could be determined as constituents of respective fractions by TLC and HPLC analysis in comparison with reference substances (data not shown). Consequently, the IC50 values of the isolated KBA, as well as five related boswellic acid derivatives against axenic amastigotes of L. donovani, were determined (see Table 3): 3-O-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA, 2), β-boswellic acid (3), 3-O-acetyl-β-boswellic acid (4), α-boswellic acid (5), and 3-O-acetyl-α-boswellic acid (6) (Figure 1).

Table 3.

In vitro activity data of boswellic acid derivatives against amastigote forms of Leishmania donovani; values represent geometric means of two independent determinations, the lower and upper values are reported in parentheses.

No. Leishmania donovani
Axenic Amastigotes
Cytotoxicity against
L6 Rat Skeletal Myoblasts
IC50 (µg/mL) IC50 (µM) IC50 (µg/mL) IC50 (µM) SI
1 0.9 (0.51; 1.7) 1.9 43 (42; 45) 91 46
2 0.45 (0.37; 0.54) 0.88 17 (17; 18) 33 38
3 2.4 (1.5; 3.7) 5.3 15 (14; 16) 33 6.2
4 6.1 (3.1; 12) 12 16 (16; 17) 32 2.7
5 n.a. (2.3; >100) n.a. 14 (14; 15) 31 n.a.
6 3.1 (1.4; 6.9) 6.2 7.2 (6.4; 8.0) 14 2.3
PCMa 0.047 (0.035; 0.064) 0.12 n.a. n.a. n.a.
PCPb n.a. n.a. 0.009 (0.007; 0.011) 0.02 n.a.
Intracellular Amastigotes c Cytotoxicity against
Macrophages
2 > 10 n.a. 20 (20; 20) 39 n.a.
PCMa 1.9 (2.6; 1.4) 4.7 n.a. n.a. n.a.

SI: selectivity index; a positive control: miltefosine; b positive control: podophyllotoxin; c in peritoneal murine macrophages; n.a. = not available.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structures of boswellic acids 16.

KBA (1) and AKBA (2) showed the best results with 1.9 µM and 0.88 µM, respectively, against axenic amastigotes and thus were considerably more active than the congeners lacking the keto group at C-11 (IC50 ranging from 2.4 to >6 µM). This indicates that the 11-keto-group increases antileishmanial activity. The positive control miltefosine displayed an IC50 value of 0.12 µM in this assay. Most of the tested derivatives showed a similar degree of low cytotoxicity (IC50 ranging from 14 to 33 µM) against L6 rat skeletal myoblasts, while KBA (1) was even less cytotoxic (IC50 = 91 µM). KBA (1) and AKBA (2) showed the best selectivity indices with values of 46 and 38, respectively (Table 3). Due to its strong activity against axenic amastigotes, AKBA (2) was tested against intracellular amastigotes in peritoneal murine macrophages in a further assay, but at a concentration of 10 µg/mL, no activity could be determined. This may be related to the compound’s acidic nature. Intracellular Leishmania amastigotes reside within macrophages in parasitophorous vacuoles which provide an acidic environment (pH 4.7–5.2) [11]. It can be expected that carboxylic acids with otherwise non-polar molecular structures such as the compounds under study will be poorly soluble under these conditions so that they may not reach the intracellular parasites. Fusing of parasitophorous vacuoles with phagolysosomes leads to an environment with increased hydrolytic activity. Therefore, the fate of hydrolysable moieties, such as the 3-O-acetyl-group, remains unclear [12]. Moreover, it has to be considered that exogenous compounds have to pass multiple membranes until they can come in contact with the amastigote [13]. It will, hence, be interesting to investigate the antileishmanial activity of non-acidic 11-ketotriterpenes and/or steroids. Such studies have been initiated.

3. Materials and Methods

The oleo-gum resins were purchased from commercial sources. Resin of B. serrata was obtained from Pharmasan GmbH (Freiburg, Germany, batch no. PS0208030), resin of B. carteri (“Olibanum in granis”, batch no. 14107801) and myrrh resin (“Myrrha conc.”, batch no. 12269911) from Caesar and Loretz GmbH (Hilden, Germany;). Voucher samples (number PB226, HG_Cm1 and HG_Bc1, resp.) were deposited at the documentation file of the Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology and Phytochemistry, IPBP, University of Münster.

The extraction and fractionation process leading to the fractions tested in this study (Table 2) and to the isolation of 11-keto-β-boswellic acid (KBA, 1), including all experimental details, is described in our previous communication [2]. Briefly, 125 g of powdered Boswellia serrata resin was extracted exhaustively using DCM in a Soxhlet apparatus. Then, 25 g of the 78 g yielded was fractionated by column chromatography on 1.3 kg silica (7.5 × 80 cm) using a step gradient of a hexane:ethyl acetate mixture (98:2—3.7 L; 95:5—12.4 L; 90:10—5.2 L; 80:20—3.4 L; 70:30—4.05 L; 50:50—4.35 L; 0:100—4.5 L). Elution volumes and yields of the 20 resulting fractions were as follows: Bs-1: 2190–3900 mL, 158 mg; Bs-5: 10,250–11,780 mL, 268 mg; Bs-7:12,650–13,560 mL, 48 mg; Bs-13: 22,670–23,460 mL, 463 mg; Bs-15:24,930–27,030 mL, 486 mg; Bs-17: 28,150–29,580 mL, 1344 mg; Bs-20: 32,440–37,560 mL, 5270 mg. In total, 200 mg of fraction Bs-20 was purified with a Jasco HPLC system on a Reprosil 100 C-18 column (5 µm, 250 × 20 mm) using a methanol:water gradient (start—70:30; 8–25 min—100:0; 9 mL/min: tR = 17–18 min) to yield 6.3 mg of KBA (1). 3-O-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA, 2), β-boswellic acid (3), 3-O-acetyl-β-boswellic acid (4), α-boswellic acid (5), and 3-O-acetyl-α-boswellic acid (6) were kindly provided by Phytolab GmbH & Co. KG, (Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany). The purity of the compounds was >95%.

In vitro tests for determination of activity against axenic amastigotes of Leishmania donovani (MHOM-ET-67/L82 strain) and cytotoxicity against mammalian cells (L6-cell-line from rat skeletal myoblasts) as well as against intramacrophage amastigotes of L. donovani were conducted at Swiss TPH according to an established protocol as reported before [14,15]. For a repetition of these methods, see Supplementary File.

Miltefosine (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) and podophyllotoxin (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) were used as positive controls. Growth inhibition assays were meant to give only preliminary information on whether fractions show any bioactivity or not. Due to this explorative nature, this was conducted once. IC50 values represent geometric means of two independent determinations and were calculated by linear regression [16] from the sigmoidal dose inhibition curves using SoftmaxPro (Molecular Devices Cooperation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) software.

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Cal, S. Keller-Maerki and R. Rocchetti for assistance with parasite assays. The authors gratefully acknowledge the donation of test compounds by Phytolab, Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany. This project is an activity within the Research Network Natural Products against Neglected Diseases (ResNetNPND; www.resnetnpnd.org).

Supplementary Materials

Experimental details and dose-effect diagrams from the biological tests of the compounds for antileishmanial and cytotoxic activity are available as Supporting Information (Figures S1–S3).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.J.S. and H.L.G.; methodology (phytochemistry), T.J.S. and H.L.G.; methodology (bioassays) P.M. and M.K.; investigation, H.L.G., M.K.; resources, T.J.S., P.M.; data curation, H.L.G., M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.G., T.J.S.; writing—review and editing, P.M., M.K.; supervision, T.J.S., P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received external funding from Cusanuswerk, Germany in the form of a doctoral scholarship for H.L.G. and financial support by Apothekerstiftung Westfalen-Lippe as part of the project “Inhaltsstoffe pflanzlicher Arzneimittel als Leitstrukturen für neue Chemotherapeutica gegen vernachlässigte Tropenkrankheiten”.

Data Availability Statement

Data reported in this study is contained within the article and supplementary material. The underlying raw data is available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compound 1 are available from the authors.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Schmidt T.J., Khalid S.A., Romanha A.J., Alves T.M.A., Biavatti M.W., Brun R., da Costa F.B., de Castro S.L., Ferreira V.F., de Lacerda M.V.G., et al. The Potential of secondary metabolites from plants as drugs or leads against protozoan neglected diseases-part II. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012;19:2176–2228. doi: 10.2174/092986712800229087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Greve H.L., Kaiser M., Brun R., Schmidt T.J. Terpenoids from the oleo-gum-resin of boswellia serrata and their antiplasmodial effects in vitro. Planta Med. 2017;83:1214–1226. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-116943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Greve H.L., Kaiser M., Schmidt T.J. Investigation of antiplasmodial effects of terpenoid compounds isolated from myrrh. Planta Med. 2020;86:643–654. doi: 10.1055/a-1157-9463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bansal N., Mehan S., Kalra S., Khanna D. Boswellia serrata-frankincense (A Jesus Gifted Herb); An updated pharmacological profile. Pharmacologia. 2013;4:457–463. doi: 10.5567/pharmacologia.2013.457.463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eskandari E.G., Setorki M., Doudi M. Medicinal plants with antileishmanial properties: A review study. Pharm. Biomed. Res. 2020;6:1–16. doi: 10.18502/pbr.v6i1.3422. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parvizi M.M., Zare F., Handjani F., Nimrouzi M., Zarshenas M.M. Overview of herbal and traditional remedies in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis based on Traditional Persian Medicine. Dermatol. Ther. 2020;33:e13566. doi: 10.1111/dth.13566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Monzote L., Herrera I., Satyal P., Setzer W.N. In-vitro evaluation of 52 commercially-available essential oils against Leishmania amazonensis. Molecules. 2019;24:1248. doi: 10.3390/molecules24071248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schmidt T.J., Kaiser M., Brun R. Complete structural assignment of serratol, a cembrane-type diterpene from Boswellia serrata, and evaluation of its antiprotozoal activity. Planta Med. 2011;77:849–850. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1250612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Okba M.M., Sabry O.M., Matheeussen A., Abdel-Sattar E. In vitro antiprotozoal activity of some medicinal plants against sleeping sickness, Chagas disease and leishmaniasis. Future Med. Chem. 2018;10:2607–2617. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2018-0180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Montesino N.L., Kaiser M., Brun R., Schmidt T.J. Search for antiprotozoal activity in herbal medicinal preparations; new natural leads against neglected tropical diseases. Molecules. 2015;20:14118–14138. doi: 10.3390/molecules200814118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chakraborty P., Basu M.K. Leishmania phagolysosome: Drug trafficking and protein sorting across the compartment. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1997;23:253–268. doi: 10.3109/10408419709115139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burchmore R.J.S., Barrett M.P. Life in vacuoles–nutrient acquisition by Leishmania amastigotes. Int. J. Parasitol. 2001;31:1311–1320. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00259-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Berry S.L., Hameed H., Thomason A., Maciej-Hulme M.L., Abou-Akkada S.S., Horrocks P., Price H.P. Development of NanoLuc-PEST expressing Leishmania mexicana as a new drug discovery tool for axenic- and intramacrophage-based assays. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12:e0006639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bernal F.A., Kaiser M., Wünsch B., Schmidt T.J. Structure-activity relationships of cinnamate ester analogues as potent antiprotozoal agents. Chem. Med. Chem. 2020;15:68–78. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201900544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mahmoud A.B., Danton O., Kaiser M., Khalid S., Hamburger M., Mäser P. HPLC-based activity profiling for antiprotozoal compounds in Croton gratissimus and Cuscuta hyalina. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:1246. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huber W., Koella J.C. A comparison of three methods of estimating EC50 in studies of drug resistance of malaria parasites. Acta Trop. 1993;55:257–261. doi: 10.1016/0001-706X(93)90083-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data reported in this study is contained within the article and supplementary material. The underlying raw data is available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES