Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Jun 18;15(6):e0009537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009537

Spatio-temporal modelling of the first Chikungunya epidemic in an intra-urban setting: The role of socioeconomic status, environment and temperature

Laís Picinini Freitas 1,2, Alexandra M Schmidt 3, William Cossich 4, Oswaldo Gonçalves Cruz 2, Marilia Sá Carvalho 2,*
Editor: Pedro F C Vasconcelos5
PMCID: PMC8244893  PMID: 34143771

Abstract

Three key elements are the drivers of Aedes-borne disease: mosquito infestation, virus circulating, and susceptible human population. However, information on these aspects is not easily available in low- and middle-income countries. We analysed data on factors that influence one or more of those elements to study the first chikungunya epidemic in Rio de Janeiro city in 2016. Using spatio-temporal models, under the Bayesian framework, we estimated the association of those factors with chikungunya reported cases by neighbourhood and week. To estimate the minimum temperature effect in a non-linear fashion, we used a transfer function considering an instantaneous effect and propagation of a proportion of such effect to future times. The sociodevelopment index and the proportion of green areas (areas with agriculture, swamps and shoals, tree and shrub cover, and woody-grass cover) were included in the model with time-varying coefficients, allowing us to explore how their associations with the number of cases change throughout the epidemic. There were 13627 chikungunya cases in the study period. The sociodevelopment index presented the strongest association, inversely related to the risk of cases. Such association was more pronounced in the first weeks, indicating that socioeconomically vulnerable neighbourhoods were affected first and hardest by the epidemic. The proportion of green areas effect was null for most weeks. The temperature was directly associated with the risk of chikungunya for most neighbourhoods, with different decaying patterns. The temperature effect persisted longer where the epidemic was concentrated. In such locations, interventions should be designed to be continuous and to work in the long term. We observed that the role of the covariates changes over time. Therefore, time-varying coefficients should be widely incorporated when modelling Aedes-borne diseases. Our model contributed to the understanding of the spatio-temporal dynamics of an urban Aedes-borne disease introduction in a tropical metropolitan city.

Author summary

Viruses transmitted by the Aedes mosquitoes represent a major public health concern. With the abundance of the mosquito and susceptible human population, the entry of new Aedes-transmitted viruses brings the risk of large epidemics. The first-ever chikungunya epidemic in Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil, happened in 2016. We used neighbourhood information on the environment, socioeconomic status, and weekly temperature, to study the disease spread within the city. Our results show that better socioeconomic status plays a major role in preventing the disease, with poorer areas being affected first and harder by the epidemic. This highlights that improving sanitary and socioeconomic conditions is essential for Aedes-borne diseases prevention and control. The temperature increased the risk of chikungunya cases, and this effect persisted for longer in areas where the epidemic was concentrated. This indicates that interventions should be designed to be long-lasting in such locations. Our results contribute to understanding better the dynamics of a first urban Aedes-borne disease epidemic in a tropical metropolitan city, with the potential to help design better interventions for disease prevention and control.

Introduction

The first chikungunya virus (CHIKV) epidemic in Rio de Janeiro city, the second most populated city in Brazil and its leading tourist destination, occurred in 2016 [1]. CHIKV is transmitted to humans by the same vectors as dengue viruses (DENV), the Aedes mosquitoes [2]. Vector-control activities have not prevented Rio de Janeiro from being endemic for dengue for years, nor from having experienced large dengue epidemics every three to four years, in general [35].

For a chikungunya epidemic to occur, three main elements are necessary, represented by the blue area in Fig 1: mosquito population, susceptible human population, and the virus circulating [68]. The Ae. aegypti mosquito is present all over the city of Rio de Janeiro, facilitating the establishment of a new arbovirus. Because CHIKV and DENV belong to different families, previous immunity to DENV does not protect against CHIKV infection, and the population of Rio de Janeiro can be considered equally naïve to CHIKV before 2016. Therefore, given the presence of the mosquito population and susceptible human population, the occurrence of local CHIKV transmission in Rio de Janeiro was conditioned by the entry of the virus. Once the virus is circulating and established, how it will spread within the city depends on multiple factors. As a consequence, some areas of the city will experience the epidemic at different times, and will also have different attack rates.

Fig 1. A theoretical model for a chikungunya epidemic in a given region.

Fig 1

Direct associations are represented by black arrows and indirect associations by red arrows. The blue area includes the necessary elements for the epidemic to occur.

Reliable data regarding the intra-urban level of vector population, the susceptible human population over time, and the entry time of the virus in each location are necessary to understand the spatio-temporal dynamics of an epidemic. However, these data are not usually available. Alternatively, measured factors–such as temperature, socioeconomic and environmental factors–indirectly associated with the number of chikungunya cases (represented by red arrows in Fig 1) can be used as proxies. These factors have a direct effect (represented by black arrows in Fig 1) on the necessary elements for an epidemic to occur (inside the blue area), which are unmeasured. The temperature varies with time, and also present different effects on the epidemic over time. Socioeconomic and environmental characteristics take long periods to show important changes and can be considered fixed during the period of an epidemic. However, the way these factors impact the number of cases can change as the epidemic progresses, i.e., with time-varying effects.

The temperature affects the Ae. aegypti population, the virus, and the mosquito-virus interaction [9]. Ideal temperature conditions accelerate all stages of the mosquito life cycle, increasing the population in the long term. In the short term, the temperature influences the mosquito activity as well as the length of the virus incubation period, with maximal transmission occurring around 26–29°C [10]. Regarding the environment, the Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are highly adapted to urban settings, and the level of urbanisation is inversely correlated with the proportion of green areas [11]. In Rio de Janeiro city, previous studies found the Ae. aegypti mosquito to be more abundant in urban locations compared to rural and forested areas [12,13]. The socioeconomic status impacts the mosquito population as disorderly urbanisation and inadequate sanitary conditions favour the presence of the mosquito most common reproduction site: containers filled with water found inside or in the surroundings of domiciles [12,14]. Furthermore, high population densities favour contact between mosquitoes and humans, increasing the chance of infection and transmission [15].

In the last decades, models that take into account the spatial dependency structure of the cases have been applied to better estimate covariates’ association with Aedes-borne diseases epidemics [1619]. The application of spatial models for intra-urban settings is growing more recently [2023]. These model types, including intrinsic conditional autoregressive (ICAR) models [24], are built under the assumption that adjacent areas share similar characteristics. The inclusion of a latent spatial random effect accounts for both the spatial structure and unmeasurable factors [25]. The inclusion of time-varying coefficients allows us to explore how the effect of the covariates change throughout the epidemic. The temperature is usually included in statistical models for Aedes-borne diseases in a linear fashion and with a pre-defined lag. We propose to estimate the temperature effect in a non-linear framework using a transfer function, including an immediate effect and a memory effect that propagates to future times. Another advantage of using a transfer function is that the estimation of the lag of the effect is data-driven [26].

We used this methodological approach (ICAR models with time-varying coefficients and a transfer function) to identify how temperature, socioeconomic and environmental factors are related to the space-time progression of an Aedes-borne disease epidemic in an intra-urban setting. The first chikungunya epidemic in Rio de Janeiro, a large tropical city with environmental and socioeconomic disparities, presents ideal conditions to this end.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca (ENSP)–Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, approval number 2.879.430. Informed consent was not required as this is a study using secondary data and the data were analysed anonymously.

Study site

Rio de Janeiro is the second-largest city in Brazil, with 6.3 million inhabitants (2010), and its primary tourist destination. Rio’s area is 1204 km2, with 160 neighbourhoods grouped into four large regions (Downtown, South, North and West). These regions are subdivided in 10 health districts called programmatic areas: area 1.0 (Downtown region); areas 2.1 and 2.2 (South region); areas 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 (North region); and areas 4.0, 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 (West region) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Rio de Janeiro city by programmatic areas and neighbourhoods, 2010, Brazil.

Fig 2

Map created using QGIS version 3.12. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/) and Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (https://www.ibge.gov.br/). Map tiles by Stamen Design (http://maps.stamen.com/), under CC BY 3.0. Data by OpenStreetMap.

With three mountain massifs and 84 km of beaches, Rio has a diverse geography that is directly associated with the history of occupation and with socioeconomic disparities [27]. The Downtown region is the historical, commercial and financial centre of the city, with many cultural establishments. The South region is the most popular tourist destination, with famous beaches and wealthy neighbourhoods. In the North region, there are very large slums (“favelas”) and nearly 27% of the population, almost 2.4 million people, live in such communities [28]. The West region has more heterogeneous characteristics among its neighbourhoods, being the area 5.1 more densely populated, areas 5.2 and 5.3 less urbanised, and area 4.0 wealthier.

Data

Chikungunya cases

In Brazil, all suspected chikungunya cases attending a health care facility must be notified to the Ministry of Health. This is done by a health care worker–usually, the physician–filling a form at the Notifiable Diseases Information System (Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação–SINAN).

We obtained data on chikungunya cases from SINAN via the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Secretariat of Heath and are publicly available [29]. The data corresponded to notified cases of chikungunya (confirmed by laboratory or clinical-epidemiological criteria) occurring in Rio de Janeiro municipality between January and December 2016, by week and neighbourhood of the patient’s residence.

Case definitions follow the Ministry of Health protocols. A suspected case of chikungunya is defined as a patient with sudden fever of over 38.5°C and severe arthralgia or arthritis not explained by other conditions, and who either lives in endemic areas or has visited one up to two weeks before the onset of symptoms or has an epidemiological link with a confirmed case. A confirmed case is a suspected case with at least one positive specific laboratory test for CHIKV or confirmed by clinical-epidemiological criteria [30].

Socioeconomic data

To characterise the socioeconomic status, we obtained the sociodevelopment index data by neighbourhood from the Instituto Pereira Passos [31]. This index is based on eight indicators from the 2010 Demographic Census: 1) the percentage of domiciles with adequate water supply; 2) the percentage of domiciles with adequate sewage; 3) the percentage of domiciles with garbage collection; 4) the average number of toilets per resident; 5) the percentage of illiteracy among residents between 10 and 14 years old; 6) per capita income of the domiciles, expressed as minimum wages; 7) the percentage of domiciles with per capita income up to one minimum wage, and 8) the percentage of domiciles with per capita income greater than five minimum wage. The sociodevelopment index is calculated as the arithmetic average of the normalised indicators (each ranging from 0 to 1, being 0 the worst socioeconomic condition and 1, the best) [31].

We also obtained data on the population by neighbourhood from the Instituto Pereira Passos [32].

Environment and temperature data

Land use data for the city of Rio de Janeiro were obtained from the Instituto Pereira Passos as a shapefile [33]. We created the category “green areas” by aggregating: agricultural areas, areas with swamps and shoals, areas with tree and shrub cover, and areas with woody-grass cover. After that, we calculated the proportion of green areas for each neighbourhood.

Temperature information for 2016 was obtained from 38 meteorological weather stations in Rio de Janeiro, from five different meteorological and environmental institutes. The institutes are the Brazilian National Institute of Meteorology [34], the Brazilian Airspace Control Department [35], the Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Institute [36], the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Environmental Secretariat [37] and the Alerta Rio System [38]. All measurements are made according to the recommendations of the World Meteorological Organization [39]. The institutes make their meteorological data publicly available, being that the frequency of measurements of the first four organisations is hourly, while the Alerta Rio System measurements are made every 15 minutes.

From the temperature measurements, we computed the daily maximum, minimum and mean temperature. We also evaluated the availability of daily data in terms of missing measurements. The daily records that had more than 60% of missing measurements were excluded. We decided to use the minimum temperature as in tropical climates it acts as a limiting factor for the Ae. aegypti activity and population [40,41]. We then obtained the minimum temperature for each week and station, and, to obtain the minimum temperature by neighbourhood, we applied universal kriging. Briefly, kriging is a method that uses a sample of data points to estimate the value of a given variable over a continuous space [42]. First, we interpolated the minimum temperature to a grid with each unit measuring 500m x 500m. The grid with the meteorological weather stations locations is displayed in the S1 Fig. Then we obtained the minimum temperature of the neighbourhood by calculating the average of the minimum temperature of the grid units whose centroids were within the boundaries of the neighbourhood.

To process and organise the environmental data, we used R version 3.6.1 [43] and packages sf [44], geoR [45] and tidyverse [46].

Statistical analysis

We used the Stan platform [47,48] to fit spatio-temporal models, more specifically ICAR models, to a dataset consisting of neighbourhoods counts of chikungunya cases, exploring the relationship with sociodevelopment index, the proportion of green areas and minimum temperature. Let Yi,t be the counts of chikungunya cases at neighbourhood i = 1, 2, …, n = 160, and week t = 1, 2, …, T, where Yi,t∼Poisson(μi,t). We explored different structures for μi,t, presented in the S1 Appendix along with each Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (WAIC) [49]. The model selected based on the WAIC has the following structure:

log(μi,t)=log(ei)+β0+Xiβk,t+Ui,t+ϕiUi,t=ρiUi,t1+ζiTemperaturei,t (1)

The latent spatial effect is represented by ϕ, which, a priori, follows a conditional autoregressive distribution [24]; that is, the conditional distribution of each ϕi follows a normal distribution whose mean and variance depend on the neighbourhood structure wij. Assuming a binary neighbourhood structure, where wij = 1 if areas i and j share borders and 0 otherwise, each ϕi follows a conditional normal distribution whose mean is equal to the average of its neighbours, and its variance is inversely proportional to the number of neighbours di, that is:

p(ϕi|ϕij)=N(ijϕidi,σ2di) (2)

The expected number of chikungunya cases at neighbourhood i (ei) represents the number of cases that would have been observed if there were no differences in the incidence of cases across time and space:

ei=(i=1nt=1TYi,ti=1npopulationipopulationi)/T, (3)

β0 is the intercept, X’i represents a vector of k covariates and βk,t is the coefficient of covariate k in week t. We decided to allow for time-varying coefficients for the covariates to explore if their association with the number of cases vary as the epidemic progresses. The covariates included in the X’i vector were the sociodevelopment index and the proportion of green areas. The proportion of green areas showed a skewed distribution. Therefore, this variable was transformed to the cubic root. We also fitted models including the population density. However, the 90% credible interval (CI) of the population density coefficient included 0 for most weeks, and the inclusion of this variable increased the WAIC. Therefore, the population density was not considered in the final model.

We estimated the temperature effect in a non-linear fashion using a transfer function (Ui,t), considering that the temperature has an immediate effect (ζi) and that a proportion (ρi) of this effect propagates to future times. This proportion ρi is called the memory effect and we considered it to be any value between 0 and 1 [26]. To combine and visualise both effects of the temperature, we obtained the impulse response function of the temperature for each neighbourhood. This function expresses the effect of a 1 unit increase in the temperature of one week propagating in time [26]. The temperature was standardised.

The models were fitted under the Bayesian framework using the Stan platform [47,48] to run four chains of 10000 iterations each where the first 5000 were the warmup. Relatively vague, proper prior distributions were used. We visually inspected the chains and used the R-hat statistic to check convergence [47,50,51]. Model validation was performed by comparing the fitted number of cases (mean and 90% CI) with the observed number of cases [49]. We also computed the Bayesian p-values of the different models and the nonrandomized Probability Integral Transform (PIT) [52] to investigate model adequacy (S2 Appendix). It is worth mentioning that we also fitted models that considered the reparametrisation of the Besag-York-Mollié (BYM2) as proposed by Riebler et al. [53]. However, the random component was over 90% spatial, and the unstructured effect 90% CI included zero for all neighbourhoods.

For the statistical analysis, we used R version 3.6.1 [43] and packages RStan [54] and loo, which was used to obtain the WAIC [55]. The R script and models codes in Stan are available at https://github.com/laispfreitas/ICAR_chikungunya [56]. Maps and graphs were created using QGIS version 3.12 [57] and ggplot2 version 3.2.0 [58].

Results

Between January and December 2016, 13,627 cases of chikungunya were notified in the city of Rio de Janeiro, corresponding to an incidence of 21.6 cases per 10,000 inhabitants. The number of cases peaked at week 17/2016, with 1118 chikungunya cases (Fig 3A). The cumulative number of cases by neighbourhood ranged from 0 (Grumari, area 4.0) to 721 (Realengo, area 5.1). The highest incidence was found in Catumbi (area 1.0), of 211.0 cases per 10,000 inhabitants (Fig 3B).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Notified chikungunya cases by week (A) and chikungunya cases cumulative incidence per 10,000 inhabitants by neighbourhood (B), January to December 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil. Map created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

The mean sociodevelopment index was 0.6080, ranging from 0.282 in Grumari (area 4.0) to 0.819 in Lagoa (area 2.1). Higher sociodevelopment indexes were observed in areas 2.1 and 4.0 (Fig 4A). Fifteen neighbourhoods did not have any green areas, mostly located in areas 1.0, 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 (Fig 4B). Alto da Boa Vista (area 2.2) presented the highest percentage of green areas, of 90.4%. The average minimum temperature was 19.9°C, ranging from 10.7°C in Campo dos Afonsos (area 5.1) to 26.1°C in Cidade Nova (area 1.0). Neighbourhoods in the east coastal region of Rio had higher temperatures on average (Fig 4C). The temperature decreased in the city around week 17, starting to increase again around week 35 (Fig 4D).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Sociodevelopment index in 2010 (A), percentage of green areas in 2015 (B), minimum temperature (°C) average in 2016 by neighbourhood (C) and boxplot of the minimum temperature (°C) by neighbourhood and week (D), Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil. Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

Due to the small numbers of chikungunya cases at the beginning of 2016, we decided to model the cases starting at week 9, when the number of cases in the city exceeded 50 for the first time.

The posterior summary (mean and 90% CI) of the time-varying coefficients for the sociodevelopment index and the proportion of green areas is presented in Fig 5. The sociodevelopment index presented a strong protective effect at the beginning of the epidemic. The sociodevelopment index effect was inversely associated with the epidemic curve: as the number of cases increased, the protective effect decreased, remaining almost constant during the peak of the epidemic, and increasing again once the number of cases started decreasing. The effect of the sociodevelopment index was null during the peak of the epidemic (around week 17). The proportion of green areas effect included 0 in the 90% CI in most of the weeks. However, when the spatial component was not included in the model, it presented a protective effect (S2C Fig).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Time-varying coefficients (in the log scale, mean and 90% credible interval) for sociodevelopment index (SDI) (A) and proportion of green areas (B) for a spatial model for chikungunya cases from weeks 9 to 52 2016 and controlling for minimum temperature, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

The latent spatial structure has a clear trend of positive spatial effects in areas where the epidemic was concentrated (areas 1.0, 2.2, the mainland part of 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 5.1) and negative spatial effects in less affected areas (Fig 6). The inclusion of the covariates in the final model decreased the spatial effects in 102 of the 160 neighbourhoods compared to the model with only the spatial effect (S3 Fig).

Fig 6. Chikungunya cases mean spatial effects (in the log scale) controlling for sociodevelopment index, proportion of green areas, and minimum temperature, weeks 9 to 52 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Fig 6

Map created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

The posterior distributions (mean and 90% CI) of the instantaneous and memory effects of the minimum temperature are displayed in Fig 7. For most neighbourhoods (113/160, or 70.6%) the instantaneous effect of the temperature increased the risk of chikungunya cases (Fig 7A). The instantaneous temperature effect, however, was in general small, reaching its maximum in Catumbi (area 1.0), where the temperature relative risk was 2.28 (90%CI 2.07–2.53). The memory effect (Fig 7B) represents the propagation in time of the instantaneous effect. Therefore, in neighbourhoods where the instantaneous temperature effect was null, the memory effect is irrelevant.

Fig 7.

Fig 7

Minimum temperature instantaneous effect (in the same week) (A) and memory effect (B) on chikungunya cases (in the log scale) by neighbourhood, mean and 90% credible interval, controlling for sociodevelopment index and proportion of green areas, and the latent spatial effect, weeks 9 to 52 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

The combined effect of the minimum temperature, represented by the impulse response function, presented three patterns. These patterns are exemplified with nine selected neighbourhoods in Fig 8: null effect (Fig 8 first row), rapid decay of the effect (second row), and slow decay of the effect (third row). The impulse response functions for all neighbourhoods are available in the S4 Fig.

Fig 8. Impulse response function of the minimum temperature effect on chikungunya cases over time, posterior mean and 90% credible interval, controlling for sociodevelopment index and proportion of green areas, and the latent spatial effect, in selected neighbourhoods, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Fig 8

The impulse response function is represented in time and space in Fig 9 and S1 Video. The first map depicts the mean temperature instantaneous relative risk, the impulse. The following maps show the propagation of the impulse on subsequent weeks. When the temperature relative risk is null (90% CI includes the 1), the neighbourhood is depicted blank. The strong memory effect in some neighbourhoods (Fig 7B) is observed by the persistence of the temperature effect for several weeks after the impulse. However, such effect declines to values very close to 1. These neighbourhoods were concentrated in areas 1.0, 2.2, mainland 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 5.1.

Fig 9. Minimum temperature instantaneous effect on chikungunya cases and its propagation in time by neighbourhood in selected weeks, controlling for sociodevelopment index and green areas proportion, and the latent spatial effect, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Fig 9

Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

The mean estimated chikungunya relative risk increased rapidly in the first weeks, peaking at week 17 and then decaying progressively (S2 Video and Fig 10). The decrease in the chikungunya relative risk coincided with the decrease in the minimum temperature in the city (Fig 4D). High relative risks for chikungunya were mostly observed in areas 1.0, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 5.1. The neighbourhoods of the remaining areas presented chikungunya relative risks below 1 for almost the entire study period. The classification of the neighbourhoods in terms of chikungunya relative risk considering the 90% CI is available in the S5 Fig.

Fig 10. Posterior mean chikungunya relative risk by neighbourhood in selected weeks, controlling for sociodevelopment index, proportion of green areas, and minimum temperature, and the latent spatial effect, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Fig 10

Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

Discussion

In this study, we estimated the associations of socioeconomic status, environment, and temperature with the spatio-temporal distribution of the first chikungunya epidemic in Rio de Janeiro city. The sociodevelopment index and the proportion of green areas were included in the model with time-varying coefficients, allowing us to explore how the effects of these factors changed throughout the epidemic. The temperature was included in the model in a non-linear fashion using a transfer function, considering that the temperature has an immediate effect and that a proportion of this effect propagates to future times. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a transfer function is applied for temperature when modelling Aedes-borne diseases.

The sociodevelopment index was inversely associated with the risk of chikungunya in all models (Figs 5A and S2A and S2B). In fact, the sociodevelopment index presented the strongest effect in the models, which strengthens the hypothesis of chikungunya being a disease of social determination. This index is composed of sanitary conditions indicators, among others, and poor sanitary conditions are known to favour the reproduction of the Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. The association of low socioeconomic locations with increased risk of chikungunya was also found in a study in French Guiana [59] and a study in Barraquilla, a Colombian city [22]. Our results indicate that poor neighbourhoods were affected first and hardest by the chikungunya epidemic, highlighting the importance of vector control activities in socioeconomically vulnerable locations.

When the spatial dependency was not included in the model, the proportion of green areas was negatively associated with the number of chikungunya cases (S2C Fig). Such association was observed for dengue in São Paulo, where low vegetation cover areas presented higher dengue incidence rates [23]. However, with the inclusion of the spatial component, the effect of the proportion of green areas moved towards the null. This is possible due to spatial confounding, which happens when covariates that are spatially smooth are collinear with spatial random effects [60]. In Rio de Janeiro, the majority of the green areas are in the mountain massifs (Fig 2), which trespasses different neighbouring borders.

The temperature was associated with an increase in the risk of chikungunya in most neighbourhoods. In our models, we assumed that the temperature presents an effect that is a combination of an instantaneous effect and of a proportion of this that propagates in time (the memory effect). Although the instantaneous association is relatively low across the different neighbourhoods, it can persist for a long period of time for some of the districts. This was only possible because we allowed the parameters present in the transfer function to change across neighbourhoods. Different areas experiencing heterogeneous temperature effects for Aedes-borne diseases were also observed in previous studies [61,62]. The inclusion of space-varying coefficients for the temperature improved the fitting of our models.

The instantaneous association represents the effect of the temperature on the activity of the mosquito, human behaviour and the mosquito-virus interaction. The biting rate of the Ae. aegypti increases with the temperature until around 35°C [10], and people become more exposed to mosquitoes in warm temperatures. The temperature also accelerates the virus extrinsic incubation period in the mosquito, and transmission was estimated to peak around 28.5°C [10]. On the other hand, the temperature affects the population of mosquitoes by increasing fecundity, egg-to-adult survival, development rate and lifespan [10]. This effect is not only on the same week but also accumulates in time, which is captured by the memory effect.

Interestingly, the CHIKV epidemic in Rio de Janeiro in 2016 did not reach the whole city, with high-risk areas mostly concentrated in the North and Downtown regions. The decrease in the number of cases coincided with the drop in the minimum temperature, around week 17 (Figs 3A and 4D). These two observations combined suggest that the epidemic was interrupted not because of susceptible human population depletion in the city, but because the drop in temperature caused a reduction in the transmission in such a way that the epidemic was not sustained. It is important to note that although the number of cases diminished substantially, there were still chikungunya cases being reported until the end of the year. Rio de Janeiro is a tropical city, and the minimum temperature rarely is below the minimum temperature needed for transmission to occur, of 13.5°C [10]. A previous study conducted in the city showed that the Ae. aegypti population varies seasonally, but the mosquito is endemic all over the year [63]. This could explain the long persistence of the temperature effect in time in some neighbourhoods (Fig 9 and S1 Video).

The application of spatial models considering intra-urban scenarios is still growing for Aedes-borne diseases. Our study identified high-risk neighbourhoods for the first chikungunya epidemic in Rio de Janeiro city, which concentrated mostly in the North and Downtown regions (Fig 10 and S2 Video). Such regions were already identified as high-risk locations for dengue [64]. In our previous study, neighbourhoods from these regions were more likely to constitute simultaneous clusters for dengue, Zika and chikungunya [65]. These regions have a combination of factors that favours the Ae. aegypti’s ecology and transmission of diseases: low vegetation, low socioeconomic status and increased temperature (Fig 4). Vector control activities should be prioritised and intensified in the identified high-risk areas, as they also appear to be the first ones affected by the epidemic. Additionally, the long persistence of the temperature effect (Fig 9 and S1 Video) and a small number of cases even after the decline of the epidemic, indicate that the mosquito continues to circulate and transmit the disease throughout the year. Therefore, interventions must be designed to be continuous and to work in the long term in these locations.

Our study has some limitations. As for any study using passive surveillance data on Aedes-borne diseases, there is an uncertainty on the diagnosis of the reported cases as well as under-reporting. Because the data are generated from suspected cases attending health care facilities, asymptomatic and mild cases who do not seek medical assistance are usually not detected. However, SINAN has been implemented for decades, representing an important and robust data source for the study of Aedes-borne diseases in Brazil [66]. It should be noted that, in the same year, the city of Rio de Janeiro was also experiencing dengue and Zika epidemics [65]. Because of the association between Zika and severe congenital manifestations, the disease awareness around Zika may have improved the search for medical care and the reporting rates [67]. On the other hand, the simultaneous occurrence of three arbovirus epidemics may have impaired the differential diagnosis, as they cause similar symptoms. Another limitation is the spatial unit. We analysed the data aggregated at the neighbourhood level. Although the data are more reliable at this spatial unit, smaller areas inside the same neighbourhood can present different socioeconomic and environmental characteristics. Finer scales such as census tracts should be considered in future studies. Finally, an important limitation is the assumption that the chikungunya risk is related to the neighbourhood of residence, while some people may get infected in other locations. This is an unavoidable limitation when using surveillance data. It is not a trivial task to identify where the person was infected when dealing with Aedes-borne diseases. Entomological surveillance research and human population mobility data could be explored in future studies and potentially bring insight on where the most common places of transmission are.

The model here presented has the potential to be applied to other cities and other urban Aedes-borne diseases. Mosquito population information is expensive to collect and often unreliable. Therefore not depending on such data is a strength of our model. Another strength is the application of a transfer function to estimate the non-linear effect of the temperature and its duration. By using temperature, socioeconomic status and proportion of green areas data as proxies of the key elements of CHIKV transmission, our model contributed to the better understanding of the spatio-temporal dynamics associated with first chikungunya epidemic in a tropical metropolitan city. Importantly, our results indicate that even considering the environment and the temperature, the socioeconomic status plays a major role in affecting the incidence and distribution of a first Aedes-borne disease epidemic in a large city. This strengthens the importance of improving sanitary conditions and taking measures to diminish social inequality as necessary actions to control and prevent Aedes-borne diseases.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Meteorological weather stations (red dots) in the 500m X 500m grid and neighbourhoods, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

(PNG)

S2 Fig

Time-varying coefficients (in the log scale, mean and 90% credible interval) for sociodevelopment index (SDI) (A,B) and proportion of green areas (C,D) without (model 1) and with (model 2) spatial dependency, for chikungunya cases from weeks 9 to 52 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

(PNG)

S3 Fig. Correlation between the spatial effects (in the log scale) of Model 0 versus Model 4, by neighbourhood, weeks 9 to 52 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

(PNG)

S4 Fig. Impulse response of the minimum temperature, posterior mean and 90% credible interval, by neighbourhood, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Classification of the chikungunya relative risk by neighbourhood in selected weeks based on the 90% credible interval (controlling for sociodevelopment index, proportion of green areas and minimum temperature, and the latent spatial effect), Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Risk: 90%CI >1. Protection: 90%CI <1. None: 90%CI includes 1. Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

(PNG)

S1 Video. Minimum temperature instantaneous effect on chikungunya cases and its propagation in time by neighbourhood, controlling for sociodevelopment index and proportion of green areas, and the latent spatial effect, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

(MP4)

S2 Video. Posterior chikungunya relative risk by neighbourhood, controlling for sociodevelopment index, proportion of green areas and minimum temperature, and the latent spatial effect, weeks 9 to 52 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

(MP4)

S1 Appendix. Models structures explored to estimate μi,t and each Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (WAIC).

(PDF)

S2 Appendix. Model checking.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Municipal Secretariat of Health for providing the data on reported cases, and the meteorological and environmental institutes (INMET, DECEA, INEA, SMAC and Alerta Rio), for making their meteorological data publicly available.

Data Availability

All data analysed during this study are secondary data and are publicly available. The data on chikungunya cases can be downloaded at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Secretariat of Heath website at http://www.rio.rj.gov.br/web/sms/exibeConteudo?id=4769664. Population, sociodevelopment index and land use data from the Instituto Pereira Passos can be found at www.data.rio. Temperature data were obtained from the Brazilian National Institute of Meteorology (https://tempo.inmet.gov.br/), the Brazilian Airspace Control Department (https://www.redemet.aer.mil.br/?i=produtos&p=consulta-de-mensagens-opmet), the Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Institute (http://200.20.53.25/qualiar/home/index), the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Environmental Secretariat (http://www.data.rio/datasets/dados-hor%C3%A1rios-do-monitoramento-da-qualidade-do-ar-monitorar?orderBy=Data) and the Alerta Rio System (http://alertario.rio.rj.gov.br/download/dados-meteorologicos/), and can be downloaded at their websites. However we made the co-variables datasets available in the format used for the statistical analysis at https://github.com/laispfreitas/ICAR_chikungunya.

Funding Statement

This study was partially supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES) - Finance Code 001, to MSC and LPF. LPF received funds from the Emerging Leaders in the Americas Program (ELAP), Government of Canada. AMS acknowledges the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (RGPIN-2017-04999). MSC received grants from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, grant n° E_26/201.356/2014) and support from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, grant n° 304101/2017-6). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.de Souza T, Ribeiro E, Corrêa V, Damasco P, Santos C, de Bruycker-Nogueira F, et al. Following in the Footsteps of the Chikungunya Virus in Brazil: The First Autochthonous Cases in Amapá in 2014 and Its Emergence in Rio de Janeiro during 2016. Viruses. 2018;10: 623. doi: 10.3390/v10110623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO. Chikungunya. In: World Health Organization [Internet]. 12 Apr 2017 [cited 16 Jul 2018]. Available: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chikungunya
  • 3.Honório NA, Nogueira RMR, Codeço CT, Carvalho MS, Cruz OG, Magalhães M de AFM, et al. Spatial Evaluation and Modeling of Dengue Seroprevalence and Vector Density in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Gubler D, editor. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2009;3: e545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nogueira RMR, Miagostovich MP, Schatzmayr HG, Santos FB dos, Araújo ESM de, Filippis AMB de, et al. Dengue in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1986–1998. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1999;94: 297–304. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761999000300004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Santos JPC dos, Honório NA, Nobre AA. Definition of persistent areas with increased dengue risk by detecting clusters in populations with differing mobility and immunity in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2019;35. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00248118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kuno G. Review of the Factors Modulating Dengue Transmission. Epidemiologic Reviews. 1995;17: 321–335. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Randolph SE, Rogers DJ. The arrival, establishment and spread of exotic diseases: patterns and predictions. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2010;8: 361–371. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Teixeira MG, Costa M da CN, Barreto F, Barreto ML. Dengue: twenty-five years since reemergence in Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2009;25: S7–S18. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009001300002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zouache K, Fontaine A, Vega-Rua A, Mousson L, Thiberge J-M, Lourenco-De-Oliveira R, et al. Three-way interactions between mosquito population, viral strain and temperature underlying chikungunya virus transmission potential. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;281: 20141078. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mordecai EA, Cohen JM, Evans MV, Gudapati P, Johnson LR, Lippi CA, et al. Detecting the impact of temperature on transmission of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya using mechanistic models. Althouse B, editor. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2017;11: e0005568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rosa-Freitas MG, Tsouris P, Reis IC, Magalhães M de AFM, Nascimento TFS, Honório NA. Dengue land cover heterogeneity in Rio de Janeiro. Oecologia Australis. 2010;14: 641–667. doi: 10.4257/oeco.2010.1403.04 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Honório NA, Castro MG, Barros FSM de, Magalhães M de AFM, Sabroza PC. The spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in a transition zone, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2009;25: 1203–1214. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009000600003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lima-Camara TN de, Honório NA, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R. Freqüência e distribuição espacial de Aedes aegypti e Aedes albopictus (Diptera, Culicidae) no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2006;22: 2079–2084. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001000013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carvalho MS, Honorio NA, Garcia LMT, Carvalho LC de S. Aedes ægypti control in urban areas: A systemic approach to a complex dynamic. Reiner RC, editor. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2017;11: e0005632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flauzino RF, Souza-Santos R, Oliveira RM. Dengue, geoprocessamento e indicadores socioeconômicos e ambientais: um estudo de revisão. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 2009;25: 456–461. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892009000500012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carvalho MS, Freitas LP, Cruz OG, Brasil P, Bastos LS. Association of past dengue fever epidemics with the risk of Zika microcephaly at the population level in Brazil. Scientific Reports. 2020;10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58407-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lowe R, Gasparrini A, Van Meerbeeck CJ, Lippi CA, Mahon R, Trotman AR, et al. Nonlinear and delayed impacts of climate on dengue risk in Barbados: A modelling study. Thomson M, editor. PLOS Medicine. 2018;15: e1002613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lowe R, Bailey TC, Stephenson DB, Graham RJ, Coelho CAS, Sá Carvalho M, et al. Spatio-temporal modelling of climate-sensitive disease risk: Towards an early warning system for dengue in Brazil. Computers & Geosciences. 2011;37: 371–381. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.01.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Puggioni G, Couret J, Serman E, Akanda AS, Ginsberg HS. Spatiotemporal modeling of dengue fever risk in Puerto Rico. Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology. 2020;35: 100375. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2020.100375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martínez-Bello D, López-Quílez A, Torres Prieto A. Spatio-Temporal Modeling of Zika and Dengue Infections within Colombia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15: 1376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Martínez-Bello DA, López-Quílez A, Torres Prieto A. Relative risk estimation of dengue disease at small spatial scale. International Journal of Health Geographics. 2017;16. doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0104-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McHale TC, Romero-Vivas CM, Fronterre C, Arango-Padilla P, Waterlow NR, Nix CD, et al. Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in the Distribution of Chikungunya and Zika Virus Case Incidences during their 2014 to 2016 Epidemics in Barranquilla, Colombia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16: 1759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Teixeira TR de A, Cruz OG. Spatial modeling of dengue and socio-environmental indicators in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2011;27: 591–602. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000300019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Besag J. Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 1974;36: 192–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Morris M, Wheeler-Martin K, Simpson D, Mooney SJ, Gelman A, DiMaggio C. Bayesian hierarchical spatial models: Implementing the Besag York Mollié model in stan. Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology. 2019;31: 100301. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2019.100301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alves MB, Gamerman D, Ferreira MA. Transfer functions in dynamic generalized linear models. Statistical Modelling: An International Journal. 2010;10: 03–40. doi: 10.1177/1471082X0801000102 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro. Rio em Síntese. In: Data Rio [Internet]. [cited 11 Jun 2018]. Available: http://www.data.rio/pages/rio-em-sntese-2
  • 28.Cavallieri F, Vial A. Favelas na cidade do Rio de Janeiro: o quadro populacional com base no Censo 2010. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Instituto Pereira Passos; 2012 p. 20. Report No.: 20120501. Available: http://portalgeo.rio.rj.gov.br/estudoscariocas/download%5C3190_FavelasnacidadedoRiodeJaneiro_Censo_2010.PDF
  • 29.Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde. Chikungunya. Available: http://www.rio.rj.gov.br/web/sms/exibeConteudo?id=4769664
  • 30.Ministério da Saúde. Chikungunya: manejo clínico. Brasília, DF; 2017. Available: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/chikungunya_manejo_ clinico_1ed.pdf
  • 31.Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro. Índice de Desenvolvimento Social (IDS) por Áreas de Planejamento (AP), Regiões de Planejamento (RP), Regiões Administrativas (RA), Bairros e Favelas do Município do Rio de Janeiro—2010. In: Data Rio [Internet]. 29 May 2019 [cited 10 Sep 2019]. Available: http://www.data.rio/datasets/fa85ddc76a524380ad7fc60e3006ee97
  • 32.Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro. População residente, por idade e por grupos de idade, segundo as Áreas de Planejamento (AP), Regiões Administrativas (RA) e Bairros em 2000/2010. In: Data Rio [Internet]. 30 May 2019 [cited 10 Sep 2019]. Available: http://www.data.rio/datasets/e68e54eaa6bb484dbb40828acf2b3e7e
  • 33.Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro. Uso do Solo 2015. In: Data Rio [Internet]. 18 Jul 2019 [cited 10 Sep 2019]. Available: http://www.data.rio/datasets/e74a94ac95d440d19b3e18c23bc485de_6
  • 34.INMET. Estações Automáticas. In: INMET—Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia [Internet]. [cited 8 June 2021]. Available: https://tempo.inmet.gov.br/
  • 35.DECEA. REDEMET—Painel de consulta. In: Rede de Meteorologia do Comando da Aeronáutica [Internet]. [cited 25 May 2020]. Available: https://www.redemet.aer.mil.br/?i=rodutos&p=consulta-de-mensagens-opmet
  • 36.INEA. Dados do Monitoramento da Qualidade do Ar e Meteorologia. In: Instituto Estadual do Ambiente Rio de Janeiro [Internet]. [cited 24 May 2020]. Available: http://200.20.53.25/qualiar/home/index
  • 37.SMAC. Dados horários do monitoramento da qualidade do ar—MonitorAr. In: Data Rio [Internet]. [cited 25 May 2020]. Available: http://www.data.rio/datasets/dados-hor%C3%A1rios-do-monitoramento-da-qualidade-do-ar-monitorar?orderBy=Data
  • 38.Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro. Dados Meteorológicos. In: Sistema Alerta Rio [Internet]. [cited 24 May 2020]. Available: http://alertario.rio.rj.gov.br/download/dados-meteorologicos/
  • 39.World Meteorological Organization, editor. Guide to the global observing system. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gomes AF, Nobre AA, Cruz OG. Temporal analysis of the relationship between dengue and meteorological variables in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2001–2009. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2012;28: 2189–2197. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2012001100018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lowe R, Stewart-Ibarra AM, Petrova D, García-Díez M, Borbor-Cordova MJ, Mejía R, et al. Climate services for health: predicting the evolution of the 2016 dengue season in Machala, Ecuador. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2017;1: e142–e151. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30064-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Diggle P, Ribeiro PJ. Model-based Geostatistics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2007. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-48536-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R. The R Foundation; 2020. Available: https://www.r-project.org/
  • 44.Pebesma E, Bivand R, Racine E, Sumner M, Cook I, Keitt T, et al. sf: Simple Features for R. 2019. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sf
  • 45.Ribeiro PJ, Diggle PJ. geoR: A Package for Geostatistical Analysis. R-NEWS. 2001;1: 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wickham H, RStudio. tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the “Tidyverse.” 2017. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse
  • 47.Stan Development Team. Stan Reference Manual. Version 2.23. Available: https://mc-stan.org/docs/2_23/reference-manual/notation-for-samples-chains-and-draws.html
  • 48.Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman MD, Lee D, Goodrich B, Betancourt M, et al. Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Watanabe S. Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory. 2010; 24. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences. Statistical Science. 1992;7: 457–472. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vehtari A, Gelman A, Simpson D, Carpenter B, Bürkner P-C. Rank-Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved R-hat for Assessing Convergence of MCMC. Bayesian Anal. 2020. [cited 15 Apr 2021]. doi: 10.1214/20-BA1221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Czado C, Gneiting T, Held L. Predictive Model Assessment for Count Data. Biometrics. 2009;65: 1254–1261. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01191.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Riebler A, Sørbye SH, Simpson D, Rue H. An intuitive Bayesian spatial model for disease mapping that accounts for scaling: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2016. [cited 29 Apr 2020]. doi: 10.1177/0962280216660421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guo J, Gabry J, Goodrich B, Lee D, Sakrejda K, Martin M, et al. rstan: R Interface to Stan. 2019. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstan
  • 55.Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing. 2017;27: 1413–1432. doi: 10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Freitas LP, Schmidt AM. laispfreitas/ICAR_chikungunya: The role of socioeconomic status, environment, and temperature in the spatio-temporal distribution of the first Chikungunya epidemic in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Zenodo; 2020. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.3936204 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project; 2020. Available: https://qgis.org/en/site/
  • 58.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag. 2016. Available: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bonifay T, Douine M, Bonnefoy C, Hurpeau B, Nacher M, Djossou F, et al. Poverty and Arbovirus Outbreaks: When Chikungunya Virus Hits More Precarious Populations Than Dengue Virus in French Guiana. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2017;4. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Clayton DG, Bernardinelli L, Montomoli C. Spatial Correlation in Ecological Analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1993;22: 1193–1202. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.6.1193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xu Z, Bambrick H, Yakob L, Devine G, Lu J, Frentiu FD, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns and climatic drivers of severe dengue in Thailand. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;656: 889–901. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lauer SA, Sakrejda K, Ray EL, Keegan LT, Bi Q, Suangtho P, et al. Prospective forecasts of annual dengue hemorrhagic fever incidence in Thailand, 2010–2014. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115: E2175–E2182. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714457115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Honório NA, Codeço CT, Alves FC, Magalhães M de AFM, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R. Temporal Distribution of Aedes aegypti in Different Districts of Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, Measured by Two Types of Traps. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2009;46: 1001–1014. doi: 10.1603/033.046.0505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xavier DR, Magalhães M de AFM, Gracie R, Reis IC dos, Matos VP de, Barcellos C. Difusão espaço-tempo do dengue no Município do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, no período de 2000–2013. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2017;33. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00186615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Freitas LP, Cruz OG, Lowe R, Sá Carvalho M. Space–time dynamics of a triple epidemic: dengue, chikungunya and Zika clusters in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2019;286: 20191867. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Barbosa JR, Barrado JC dos S, Zara AL de SA, Siqueira JB. Avaliação da qualidade dos dados, valor preditivo positivo, oportunidade e representatividade do sistema de vigilância epidemiológica da dengue no Brasil, 2005 a 2009. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2015;24: 49–58. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742015000100006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lowe R, Barcellos C, Brasil P, Cruz OG, Honório NA, Kuper H, et al. The Zika Virus Epidemic in Brazil: From Discovery to Future Implications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15: 96. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009537.r001

Decision Letter 0

Pedro F C Vasconcelos

3 Apr 2021

Dear Dr Freitas,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Spatio-temporal modelling of the first Chikungunya epidemic in an intra-urban setting: the role of socioeconomic status, environment and temperature" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Pedro F. C. Vasconcelos

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Pedro Vasconcelos

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The data source is introduced, but little discussion is given to the data generating mechanism. That is, how does the epidemic in the population relate to the observations. Is there evidence for asymptomatic and undetected transmission? Are there disparities in recording cases? This should be addressed.

Line 221: It may not make a difference, but a quantitative convergence diagnostic like the Gelman and Rubin diagnostic is preferable to visual assessment.

Statistical Analysis Generally: I'd be interested to see a posterior predictive p-value to assess the final model fit. I think the model is meaningful and useful even if the fit is questionable, but it would be good to higlight this kind of limitation.

The proposed model is not dynamic in the same way that compartmental techniques are, so this is one area where limitations of the proposed method may arise.

I applaud the authors for making their code available.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: I found the results to be well articulated.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Overall the conclusions are well stated and the limitations well articulated. One area where this should be expanded is the same as mentioned previously - the difference between the techniques proposed and mechanistic models which account for transmission dynamics. To be clear, I think the authors' approach is reasonable, but it should be placed in the context of the wider stochastic epidemic modelling literature.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Overall, the manuscript is well written and clear, both in terms of methodology and problem description. There are a few minor language issues to double check, mainly consisting of issues of word choice and numerical agreement. Here are a few examples - overall the writing is quite good.

Abstract

"Green" areas should be clarified. Environments with vegetation are likely heterogeneous with respect to the factors identified.

Summary

- Line 42: "transmitted viruses"

- Line 45: "status plays"

- Line 47: "improving ... is"

Introduction

- Line 61: facilitating the establishment of a

- Line 63: citation needed - antibody tests can certainly be cross-reactive between these viruses

- Line 66: "conditioned by" -> "favorable to"

- Line 73: "data regarding the"

- Line 93: "favor contact" (remove "the"), "the human" -> "humans"

- Line 96: "disease epidemics"

- Line 98: "including intrinsic conditional"

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Overall this is a strong manuscript in need of a few additional areas of discussion, and ideally some investigation of model fit (beyond the relative measures of information criteria).

Reviewer #2: The authors present a study of the first chikungunya outbreak in Rio de Janeiro in 2016, and analyze this dataset of notified cases by neighborhood and week using Bayesian (intrinsic conditional autoregressive [ICAR]) spatio-temporal models to understand the drivers of this outbreak. They investigate effects of temperature, and include this as both a direct and a decaying effect, socioeconomic status, and green space. Covariate effects are allowed to vary over time, so that they can tease apart whether the importance of different factors changes as the epidemic progresses. I think this is a strong and helpful piece of work. The insights on how socioeconomic status of neighborhoods is tied to transmission early on in the pandemic, and as it fades, but is essentially absent during the peak, is particularly interesting. I offer the following comments in the hope they can improve the paper further:

Socioeconomic status was based on an index, which was an average of eight normalized indicators. I am always somewhat uncomfortable with indicator variables, because the interpretation of an arithmetic average of normalized values becomes difficult to interpret – why not use a subset of the indicators directly as variables? Would it not be much more helpful to know whether it is water supply that leads to vulnerability, or sewage or garbage collection, and how important these different factors are relative to each other?

Green areas: can you explain in more detail why you combined these various “natural” areas into green space for your analysis? Areas like agricultural land are not associated typically with Ae. aegypti, while something like canopy cover could certainly lead to more favorable microclimates for this species. (in other words, the composite variable might end up not having an effect because it combines both positive and negative land use elements).

Although the minimum temperature can certainly be important, so can the maximum (e.g., temperatures that are overly hot can impair mosquitoes as well). Why only pick the minimum here?

I appreciate the mention of limitations in the discussion. For the third of those (people potentially getting infected in neighborhoods other than where they live), I’d like to see some more discussion, as with the other limitations: what do we know about this, how likely is it, how would you change your modelling approach to account for it if you think it likely is important?

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009537.r003

Decision Letter 1

Pedro F C Vasconcelos

3 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Freitas,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Spatio-temporal modelling of the first Chikungunya epidemic in an intra-urban setting: the role of socioeconomic status, environment and temperature' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Pedro F. C. Vasconcelos

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Pedro Vasconcelos

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The authors did a good job of responding to both my comments and those of the other reviewer.

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The figures generally appear pixelated, and should be regenerated as high resolution raster or as vector image files.

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: My comments have been addressed, via the expanded discussion of the authors' techniques relative to alternatives.

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: I recommend to accept this manuscript.

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009537.r004

Acceptance letter

Pedro F C Vasconcelos

14 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Freitas,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Spatio-temporal modelling of the first Chikungunya epidemic in an intra-urban setting: the role of socioeconomic status, environment and temperature," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Meteorological weather stations (red dots) in the 500m X 500m grid and neighbourhoods, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

    Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

    (PNG)

    S2 Fig

    Time-varying coefficients (in the log scale, mean and 90% credible interval) for sociodevelopment index (SDI) (A,B) and proportion of green areas (C,D) without (model 1) and with (model 2) spatial dependency, for chikungunya cases from weeks 9 to 52 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

    (PNG)

    S3 Fig. Correlation between the spatial effects (in the log scale) of Model 0 versus Model 4, by neighbourhood, weeks 9 to 52 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

    (PNG)

    S4 Fig. Impulse response of the minimum temperature, posterior mean and 90% credible interval, by neighbourhood, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

    (PDF)

    S5 Fig. Classification of the chikungunya relative risk by neighbourhood in selected weeks based on the 90% credible interval (controlling for sociodevelopment index, proportion of green areas and minimum temperature, and the latent spatial effect), Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

    Risk: 90%CI >1. Protection: 90%CI <1. None: 90%CI includes 1. Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

    (PNG)

    S1 Video. Minimum temperature instantaneous effect on chikungunya cases and its propagation in time by neighbourhood, controlling for sociodevelopment index and proportion of green areas, and the latent spatial effect, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

    Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

    (MP4)

    S2 Video. Posterior chikungunya relative risk by neighbourhood, controlling for sociodevelopment index, proportion of green areas and minimum temperature, and the latent spatial effect, weeks 9 to 52 2016, Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

    Maps created using R version 3.6.1. Map layers by Instituto Pereira Passos (https://www.data.rio/).

    (MP4)

    S1 Appendix. Models structures explored to estimate μi,t and each Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (WAIC).

    (PDF)

    S2 Appendix. Model checking.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response_to_comment_may04.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All data analysed during this study are secondary data and are publicly available. The data on chikungunya cases can be downloaded at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Secretariat of Heath website at http://www.rio.rj.gov.br/web/sms/exibeConteudo?id=4769664. Population, sociodevelopment index and land use data from the Instituto Pereira Passos can be found at www.data.rio. Temperature data were obtained from the Brazilian National Institute of Meteorology (https://tempo.inmet.gov.br/), the Brazilian Airspace Control Department (https://www.redemet.aer.mil.br/?i=produtos&p=consulta-de-mensagens-opmet), the Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Institute (http://200.20.53.25/qualiar/home/index), the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Environmental Secretariat (http://www.data.rio/datasets/dados-hor%C3%A1rios-do-monitoramento-da-qualidade-do-ar-monitorar?orderBy=Data) and the Alerta Rio System (http://alertario.rio.rj.gov.br/download/dados-meteorologicos/), and can be downloaded at their websites. However we made the co-variables datasets available in the format used for the statistical analysis at https://github.com/laispfreitas/ICAR_chikungunya.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES