Abstract
Most studies of bacterial reproduction have centered on organisms that undergo binary fission. In these models, complete chromosome copies are segregated with great fidelity into two equivalent offspring cells. All genetic material is passed on to offspring, including new mutations and horizontally acquired sequences. However, some bacterial lineages employ diverse reproductive patterns that require management and segregation of more than two chromosome copies. Epulopiscium spp., and their close relatives within the Firmicutes phylum, are intestinal symbionts of surgeonfish (family Acanthuridae). Each of these giant (up to 0.6 mm long), cigar-shaped bacteria contains tens of thousands of chromosome copies. Epulopiscium spp. do not use binary fission but instead produce multiple intracellular offspring. Only ∼1% of the genetic material in an Epulopiscium sp. type B mother cell is directly inherited by its offspring cells. And yet, even in late stages of offspring development, mother-cell chromosome copies continue to replicate. Consequently, chromosomes take on a somatic or germline role. Epulopiscium sp. type B is a strict anaerobe and while it is an obligate symbiont, its host has a facultative association with this intestinal microorganism. Therefore, Epulopiscium sp. type B populations face several bottlenecks that could endanger their diversity and resilience. Multilocus sequence analyses revealed that recombination is important to diversification in populations of Epulopiscium sp. type B. By employing mechanisms common to others in the Firmicutes, the coordinated timing of mother-cell lysis, offspring development and congression may facilitate the substantial recombination observed in Epulopiscium sp. type B populations.
Keywords: Epulopiscium, endospore, intracellular offspring, comparative genomics, fish gut microbiota
Significance
The giant bacterium Epulopiscium sp. type B maintains tens of thousands of copies of its genome throughout its lifecycle. These highly polyploid bacteria reproduce solely by the formation of internal offspring. A limited number of genome copies is passed on to each offspring, but most copies remain in the mother cell and are needed to support metabolism of the mother cell and growing offspring. Since not all copies of the genome are inherited, Epulopiscium populations run the risk of losing genetic diversity acquired in the somatic genome copies. Epulopiscium sp. type B populations bypass this loss by the coordinated release of DNA from dying mother cells and recombination of these fragments in genome copies within newly emerged offspring cells.
Populations of Bacteria That Exhibit a Germline/Soma Division
Most scientists do not think about bacteria when considering germline dynamics. That is entirely reasonable because most of our models for bacteriology use binary fission for reproduction. In binary fission, a bacterium grows to about twice its starting size, while it replicates and then segregates copies of its genome to distal parts of the cell. Reproduction culminates in division of the cytoplasm at the midcell to produce two equivalent and self-sufficient offspring cells, each with a complete complement of the parent cell’s genomic material. All genetic material is preserved in this process.
Several, perhaps less-familiar bacterial models have communication systems used to coordinate multicellular behaviors and regulate alternative reproductive programs (Angert 2005; Claessen et al. 2014). A number have independently evolved developmental processes that allow cells to specialize, with some members of a population transforming into highly dispersible propagules. In these patterns of development, the propagules (usually spores) could be considered the “germline” of a population or colony of cells.
Members of the myxobacteria (phylum Proteobacteria), such as Myxococcus xanthus, exhibit multicellular behaviors for finding prey and for dispersing myxospores when nutrients become limited (Bretl and Kirby 2016; Keane and Berleman 2016). Myxobacteria are motile, typical-looking, rod-shaped bacteria that live in the soil or in detritus. Cells can live as independent operators, seeking out and finding prey bacteria to lyse and consume. Members of a population of M. xanthus can alternatively coordinate their activities and even exhibit a strategy in which the population organizes into a “bacterial wolfpack” to hunt down, kill and consume large numbers of prey bacteria (Berleman and Kirby 2009). When prey or nutrients are depleted, cells send out additional peptide and amino acid-based signals to help redirect their behavior. These signals may assist with a quorum sensing checkpoint to ensure enough cells are in the vicinity to engage in the development of a fruiting body (Kroos 2017). The M. xanthus population aggregates and cells within the aggregate begin to differentiate. The majority of cells in the responding population become the structural and/or nutritional support used to erect the fruiting body, which rises above the surface of the soil. Housed within, a subset of cells (∼10% of the aggregate) differentiates into myxospores (Kroos 2017). The structural cells of the fruiting body eventually die, while the resilient spores are carried off to start over in a new site.
In contrast, the filamentous growth of Streptomyces coelicolor, and related genera in the phylum Actinobacteria, keeps cells of the colony physically connected to one another throughout vegetative growth and arthrospore development (Barka et al. 2016; Chater 2016). Streptomyces spp. are common free-living, saprophytic soil microbes, although many species in this group form symbiotic relationships with eukaryotic organisms (Lewin et al. 2016). Streptomycetes are known for their ability to produce diverse secondary compounds, including bioactive compounds we use as antibiotics (Barka et al. 2016). At the start of vegetative growth, the single-nucleoid containing spore germinates. A germ tube emerges and the vegetative hypha extends into its surroundings by tip growth (Chater 2016). DNA replication within the hyphal filament and infrequent division of the cytoplasm leads to the formation of long, multi-nucleoid cells (Flardh and Buttner 2009). The complex, branched network of hyphae that comprises the substrate mycelium spreads out to find and extract nutrients from the local environment. The success of the sessile colony relies on its keen ability to sense environmental change and respond in an appropriate manner (McCormick and Flardh 2012). As nutrients are depleted, a developmental shift begins. Responses of individual cells within the colony are dictated not only by their position within the colony but also by the production and reception of peptide signals that coordinate the colony response (McCormick and Flardh 2012). Hyphae on the surface of the colony become enrobed in sheaths composed of hydrophobic peptides which allows these unbranched filaments to break any surface tension and rise above the substrate producing a forest of aerial hyphae (Flardh and Buttner 2009; McCormick and Flardh 2012). The terminal cell of an aerial hypha differentiates. Tip growth stops and rounds of replication may lead to the production of 50 or more copies of the genome within the terminal cell (Flardh and Buttner 2009). The nucleoids condense, and the terminal cell undergoes simultaneous, multiple division to produce a chain of small, single-nucleoid cells. These cells develop into spores. Meanwhile, the colony may produce a variety of secondary compounds, as the substrate mycelial cells undergo a form of programmed cell death (Barka et al. 2016). The antimicrobials may reserve nutrients in the lysate for the colony to support spore development by preventing consumption of these resources by motile competitors. The substrate mycelium is sacrificed for the production of highly dispersible propagules.
The processes by which cells are “chosen” to become spores in a population or colony are not known, but it appears that the process is not random for Streptomycetes. The production of spores only in terminal cells of aerial hyphae could diminish the genetic diversity of the next generation. The exceptionally efficient conjugal transfer of DNA and high frequency of genetic exchange observed in Streptomycetes (Chater 2016) may allow these populations to compensate for this potential loss in diversity.
The focus of this review is bacteria in the Firmicutes phylum that establish a germline/soma division within an individual cell as part of its normal life cycle. These bacterial giants (fig. 1) are called Epulopiscium spp. and their relatives, also known as “epulos” (Clements et al. 1989). To date, no member of this group of intestinal symbionts of surgeonfish (family Acanthuridae) has been cultured in the laboratory and what we know about the biology of these microorganisms comes from observations and analyses of cells collected from wild surgeonfish. In these large and extremely polyploid bacteria, only some genome copies are inherited by offspring. The majority of the genome copies are not directly passed on as intact chromosomes. In some ways, this pattern of genomic inheritance resembles the colony and population level responses described above, except in Epulopiscium spp. the germline/soma divide happens within a single cell. Like Streptomycetes, the selection of the germline in Epulopiscium spp. may compromise diversity of future generations.
Fig. 1.
Epulopiscium sp. type B is an obligate symbiont of the surgeonfish Naso tonganus. (A) Epulopiscium sp. type B, also known as “Ca. Epulopiscium viviparus.” The two large structures within this Epulopiscium are offspring. (B) The surgeonfish Naso tonganus inhabits tropical coral reef systems and its native range includes the Great Barrier Reef. Epulopiscium sp. type B is often, but not always, found in high numbers in the intestinal tract of N. tonganus. The photo of N. tonganus was taken by Kendall Clements.
Evolution of a Novel Form of Bacterial Reproduction in Epulopiscium spp.
The largest Epulopiscium cells are cigar-shaped and can reach lengths in excess of 0.6 mm (Hutchison et al. 2014). When they were first discovered, the size of Epulopiscium cells, their complex ultrastructure and the manner in which they reproduce led to their taxonomic placement in the Eukarya domain, though their affiliation with any known protist was not apparent (Fishelson et al. 1985). The symbionts were located in the intestinal tract of several species of surgeonfish collected from coral reef ecosystems in the Red Sea. These putative protists were given the name Epulopiscium fishelsoni (Montgomery and Pollak 1988). Their specific association with herbivorous species of surgeonfish led to the hypothesis that these giant microbes play a role in host nutrition (Fishelson et al. 1985). Later, surveys of the gut microbiota of marine fish collected in the south Pacific revealed a great variety of similar intestinal symbionts, and further supported the link between these intestinal microbes and primarily herbivorous or detritivorous surgeonfish species (Clements et al. 1989). Phylogenetic studies based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences demonstrated that epulos are Bacteria, and that E. fishelsoni is a complex of at least two distinct genera (Angert et al. 1993). Epulos form a clade within the Firmicutes phylum, Clostridia class, and the Lachnospiraceae family (Flint et al. 2005; Miyake et al. 2016). The epulo group comprises diverse bacteria from small, micron-long rods to giant cigar-shaped cells.
The unusual cell and reproductive biology of the largest Epulopiscium spp. contributed to some of the early confusion about the fundamental nature of these cells. When viewed with an epifluorescence microscope, cells stained with the DNA-specific dye 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) appeared to contain one or two well-defined nuclei (Montgomery and Pollak 1988). These ostensible nuclei were inconstant and a nuclear envelop was never observed in thin sections of cells viewed with transmission electron microscopy. Differences in the sizes of nuclei and the observed location of DNA in cells were interpreted as changes leading to the development of offspring around segregated nuclei. Closer inspection revealed the diffuse staining of cellular DNA in a fine network just under the cytoplasmic membrane, entirely encasing the cytoplasm (fig. 2). The intense nucleus-like staining pattern described in early studies came from the tightly packed DNA within small, intracellular offspring cells (Robinow and Kellenberger 1994; Robinow and Angert 1998).
Fig. 2.
DNA in Epulopiscium sp. type B forms a network beneath the cytoplasmic membrane. These images show two different focal planes of the same DAPI-stained cell. The image on the left is a medial focal plane. To the right is a focal plane just under the cell surface. In large cells, most of the DNA is located in a layer at the cytoplasmic periphery, just under the cell membrane. The two bright structures at the poles of this cell are offspring. Note that only a portion of the mother-cell DNA is directly inherited. Scale bar represents 50 µm. Reprinted with permission from (Robinow and Angert 1998).
A remarkable feature of giant Epulopiscium cells is that intracellular offspring development follows a daily cycle (Montgomery and Pollak 1988). Epulopiscium sp. type B (“Ca. Epulopiscium viviparus”), a symbiont of the surgeonfish Naso tonganus (fig. 1), is the most studied Epulopiscium species (Angert et al. 1993; Angert and Clements 2004; Mendell et al. 2008; Ward et al. 2009; Miller et al. 2011, 2012; Hutchison et al. 2018; Arroyo et al. 2019). These phylogenetically distinct and often abundant populations of intestinal symbionts have been used as a model for studying the cellular and developmental biology of giant bacteria.
Epulopiscium sp. type B cells are usually 100–300 µm long and they reproduce once every day. Timing of offspring growth parallels the diurnal feeding pattern of their host. As a result, a population of cells collected from single fish is well synchronized with respect to offspring development (Angert and Clements 2004; Mendell et al. 2008; Miller et al. 2011). How developmental progression is coordinated within a population is currently unknown.
Compared with other members of the Firmicutes, an extraordinary proportion of the Epulopiscium sp. type B genome is dedicated to carbohydrate transport and metabolism (Miller et al. 2012). This supports the hypothesis that these gut symbionts provide nutritional benefits to their host by degrading recalcitrant polysaccharides in the algae that the fish consumes. The simple sugars and sugar alcohols released are fermented by Epulopiscium and other gut microbes, which produces short chain fatty acids, such as acetate, that can be used by the host (Clements and Choat 1995; Clements 1997). Furthermore, the daily and coordinated lysis of mother cells can release organic nutrients (nucleic acids, proteins, vitamins, etc.) into the intestinal lumen, which could provide a benefit to other microbial residents and the host but in a manner that does not compromise the Epulopiscium population (Ward et al. 2009).
One of the first visual changes in an Epulopiscium cell as reproduction begins is the coalescence of DNA at both poles of the cell (Angert and Clements 2004). Compared to most of the mother-cell DNA, the polar DNA is highly condensed and often appears tethered to the inner cell poles (Robinow and Angert 1998; Hutchison et al. 2018). Generally, Epulopiscium sp. type B divides near both cell poles (fig. 3), trapping some of the pole-associated DNA within each tiny polar offspring primordium (Angert and Clements 2004). It has been estimated that only about 1% of the total DNA in a mother cell is packaged into offspring cells. The polar primordial cells are engulfed by the mother cell. Offspring grow within a membrane-bound compartment in the cytoplasm of the mother cell. It takes only a few hours of growth for the intracellular offspring to nearly fill the mother-cell cytoplasm. Late in the offspring growth cycle, the mother cell appears to undergo a programmed cell death (Ward et al. 2009). DNA in the mother cell diminishes, and the mother-cell envelope splits open to release its offspring. All that appears to be left behind after offspring release is an empty shell (Montgomery and Pollak 1988).
Fig. 3.
The Epulopiscium spp. life cycle produces internal offspring once every 24 h. (A) The two polar offspring primordia are engulfed by the mother cell. (B) The polar offspring are contained within a membrane-bound compartment in the cytoplasm of the mother cell. (C) Offspring cells grow within the mother cell until they nearly fill the mother cell. (D) The offspring are released through a tear in the mother-cell envelop. The mother cell is killed in this process. In Epulopiscium sp. type B, asymmetric division usually occurs in offspring (to produce “granddaughter cells”) prior to their release from the mother cell.
The offspring developmental program in Epulopiscium spp. shares morphological features with endospore formation in other members of the Firmicutes, including extreme asymmetric division and engulfment of a polar cell (Angert et al. 1996). Gene-based analyses have shown that this unusual reproductive program is a derived form of endosporulation (Flint et al. 2005; Miller et al. 2011, 2012). However, in Epulopiscium sp. type B, the ability to produce mature, phase-bright endospores has been lost. Endospore formation is a complex developmental program that requires the coordinated progression of divergent genetic cascades in the developing spore (forespore) and within its mother cell (Khanna et al. 2020). In Bacillus subtilis and spore-forming Clostridium spp., this requires modulation of the expression of hundreds of genes (Miller et al. 2012; Al-Hinai et al. 2015). The core sporulation program, conserved among all endospore-forming members of the Firmicutes, is comprised of approximately 60 genes (Galperin et al. 2012), and another 80 genes are widely conserved (Miller et al. 2012). Collectively the sporulation programs of all spore forming Firmicutes (the sporulation pangenome) is enormous but poorly characterized. Comparative studies of endospore developmental programs have shown that this complex genetic program has been fodder for selection that has tuned the process to the needs of specific lineages (Galperin et al. 2012; Miller et al. 2012; Hutchison et al. 2014; Al-Hinai et al. 2015; Davidson et al. 2018). In some, it has transformed from a standby survival program to an effective reproductive process.
Genome comparisons have shown that Epulopiscium sp. type B has almost all of the highly conserved genes needed for endospore formation in spore-forming Clostridia and Bacilli (Miller et al. 2012). For example, the Epulopiscium sp. type B genome codes for the master regulator Spo0A, a linchpin transcription factor that when activated starts the sporulation program (Miller et al. 2012; Yutin and Galperin 2013; Davidson et al. 2018). Epulopiscium sp. type B contains other key transcription factors and all sporulation-specific sigma factors. The engulfment machinery is also conserved. However, some genes required for spore maturation appear to be missing. Cellulosyliticum lentocellum is one of the closest known endospore-forming, cultured relatives of the Epulopiscium group (Miller et al. 2012; Hutchison et al. 2018). When the genome content of C. lentocellum and Epulopiscium sp. type B were compared, only one of the nine genes that C. lentocellum has for the synthesis and transport of dipicolinic acid (DPA) could be located in the Epulopiscium sp. type B genome (Miller et al. 2012). DPA could be considered a signature molecule of endospores. DPA is synthesized in the mother cell and transported into the developing spore where it forms a calcium–DPA complex (Setlow et al. 2006). The accumulation of calcium–DPA and concurrent reduction in water within the cytoplasm are responsible for the phase-bright appearance of mature endospores and their resistance to wet heat. The phase-bright spores of endospore producing epulos contain large amounts of DPA as well (Flint et al. 2005). Arguably, endospore formation is a survival strategy that enhances resistance to environmental assaults and improves the dispersal of many members of the Firmicutes that are strict anaerobic gut symbionts (Klaasen et al. 1992; Angert and Losick 1998; Browne et al. 2016; Moeller et al. 2016). For now, it is uncertain why Epulopiscium sp. type B lost its ability to make mature spores while other epulos have not (Flint et al. 2005).
The model for studying the genetics and biochemistry of endosporulation is the soil bacterium B. subtilis (Bate et al. 2014; Khanna et al. 2020). The majority of endospore-forming Bacilli normally produce a single endospore when a cell is nutrient stressed (Setlow and Johnson 2019; Khanna et al. 2020). The program begins only when options for finding alternative resources have been exhausted (Lopez and Kolter 2010). During normal growth, B. subtilis uses binary fission for reproduction. As a starving B. subtilis cell enters sporulation, it suppresses chromosome replication initiation (Setlow and Johnson 2019). Assembly of the cell division complex at the midcell is blocked, and instead, division complexes form at both cell poles. Only one of these polar complexes becomes fully active, leading to asymmetric division (Khanna et al. 2020). It has been suggested that the other division complex may act as a failsafe if the first attempt at asymmetric division fails. Two copies of the chromosome are present in the B. subtilis sporangium as the cell divides asymmetrically to form the mother cell and smaller forespore. One chromosome copy is packaged into the tiny forespore while the other remains in the mother cell. Both are necessary for expression of the divergent genetic programs that play out in each cell type as spore development progresses.
Mutations in certain early sporulation genes can cause division at both cell poles (Eichenberger et al. 2001). In these mutants, the two chromosome copies are packaged into the two polar forespores, leaving the mother cell devoid of a genome. Without the genetic contributions of the mother cell, sporulation arrests prior to forespore engulfment. Surprisingly, only two genetic changes in the B. subtilis are needed to convert it to a viable disporic (Eldar et al. 2009). One relaxes the repression of DNA replication initiation during sporulation so that three or more chromosome copies are present in the sporangium. The other change relaxes controls over the cell division machinery to allow bipolar division.
These genetic modifications, and likely others, come into play in wildtype, multiple endospore-forming bacteria such as Metabacterium polyspora. In this bacterium, binary fission appears to be a vestigial form of reproduction, which largely has been replaced by formation of multiple endospores (Angert and Losick 1998). This shift toward reliance on sporulation may help reinforce the symbiotic association of this gastrointestinal symbiont with a guinea pig by taking advantage of the coprophagous behavior of its host. Despite being anaerobes, the mature and metabolically quiescent spores of M. polyspora are not affected by oxygen encountered outside of the guinea pig intestinal tract. Thus, reproduction by sporulation prepares the symbiont for cycling out of and back into the host intestinal tract. As the host consumes its feces, the M. polyspora spores survive passage through the mouth and stomach, and then germinate in the small intestine. Often, germinating spores bypass binary fission and immediately begin the next cycle of sporulation. The M. polyspora mother cell divides at both poles producing two viable forespores (Angert and Losick 1998). Genomic DNA continues to replicate during sporulation in the mother cell and within developing forespores (Ward and Angert 2008). To form more than two endospores, fully engulfed forespores may undergo a form of binary fission (Angert and Losick 1998).
Epulopiscium sp. type B appears to have further modified the highly conserved endosporulation program into a novel, and required, mode of cellular reproduction (Angert et al. 1996). Remarkably, evidence of binary fission has never been observed in Epulopiscium sp. type B. Phase-bright offspring that resemble mature endospores have also never been detected. Based on genome content, Epulopiscium sp. type B appears incapable of producing mature endospores (Miller et al. 2012), and likely their offspring are much less resilient than endospores. Instead of cycling in and out of the host frequently, like M. polyspora, Epulopiscium sp. type B populations reside in the host fish over many reproductive cycles which may have relaxed selection to maintain the ability to produce mature spores (Angert and Losick 1998). Like M. polyspora, an Epulopiscium sp. type B cell divides at both poles (Angert and Clements 2004). Only a small proportion of the mother cell genomic resources are partitioned into the newly formed offspring primordia. Epulopiscium sp. type B often produces two offspring but it can produce as many as 12 (Hutchison et al. 2014). How more than two intracellular offspring are formed is still mysterious. The regulators or conditions that support different numbers of offspring are unknown. It is also not known if Epulopiscium sp. type B might undergo binary fission under certain conditions since they do assemble a fully functional division complex at each cell pole (Angert and Clements 2004).
Evidence of Extreme Polyploidy in Giant Bacterial Cells
Bacterial and archaeal model organisms are generally small and highly efficient organisms that grow well in laboratory culture. These small cells have a high surface area relative to their cytoplasmic volume to maximize diffusive exchange of molecules with their environment and timely movement of biomolecules within the cytoplasm (Koch 1996; Schulz and Jorgensen 2001; Westfall and Levin 2017). Cell size is tightly regulated; it is essential for a cell to maintain enough volume to contain everything it needs for survival, but it must remain small enough to keep the relative surface area high. Space is at a premium. Consequently, bacterial and archaeal cells are often under selection to maintain one or only a few copies of their genomes. Alternatively, selection for specific metabolic functions or cell attributes may lead to the amplification of parts of a chromosome (van der Woude and Baumler 2004; Blount et al. 2020).
It has come to light in recent years that many bacteria and archaea, will maintain at least two genome copies at all times while others maintain multiple copies or are polyploid (Angert 2012). Maintaining multiple genome copies is valuable and may serve a variety of functions for bacteria and archaea (Zerulla and Soppa 2014). Additional chromosome copies may provide intact templates for DNA repair in stressful environments that are inherently damaging due to ionizing radiation or oxidative stress (Ohbayashi et al. 2019). Polyploidy is seen in obligate and facultative intracellular symbionts (Moran et al. 2005; Mergaert et al. 2006). The additional genome copies may help support the metabolic demands of the eukaryotic host. It has been suggested that copies of the genome may serve as an organic phosphate reserve, and extra chromosome copies may be dismantled and used as needed (Soppa 2014). Polyploidy in bacteria can impact the timing that newly acquired mutations are fully expressed as newly acquired mutations proliferate in the cell (Sun et al. 2018).
Eukaryotic examples of polyploidy or gene amplification are widespread and vary in their function. Polyploidy is important to support elevated expression needs and is seen in bacteriocytes (that host intracellular symbionts), in specialized cells (from hepatocytes to insect salivary glands) and in cancer cells (supporting aberrant growth and seen in cells responsible for recurrence), just to name a few examples (Shu et al. 2018; Donne et al. 2020; White-Gilbertson and Voelkel-Johnson 2020). Polyploidy may be a response to stress, as it expands the genomic options for adaptation (Fox et al. 2020). Whole genome duplication has been an important contributor to the evolution of fungi, animals and plants (Otto and Whitton 2000; Priest et al. 2020). One of the most complex genomic resource management systems known has been described in Ciliates (Prescott 2000). Here the micronucleus (germline) contains a single copy of the genome. The cell guards this copy in a transcriptionally inactive state. The macronucleus is transcriptionally active and contains an amplified subset of genes (Pilling et al. 2017). Examples of polyploidy or regional genetic amplification are known across the tree of life and these genomic configurations can provide immediate cellular benefits as well as offer substantial evolutionary options.
Epulopiscium sp. type B cells contain an astonishing amount of DNA. When examined under high magnifications, the stained DNA appeared to be the equivalent of thousands of bacterial nucleoids interconnected in a web-like structure (Robinow and Angert 1998). Quantifying DNA extracted from collections of cells revealed that large mother cells with large internal offspring contained on average 250 pg of DNA, while smaller mother cells with tiny offspring contained an average of 85 pg (Mendell et al. 2008). In comparison, the genome of Escherichia coli K-12 is approximately 4.6 fg and a human diploid cell would contain approximately 6 pg of DNA. The exceptional amount of DNA in Epulopiscium sp. type B begged the questions: why does a bacterium need so much DNA and what is the makeup of this cellular DNA (Mendell et al. 2008)? This particular giant bacterium is packed full of ribosomes, it has a high metabolic rate and offspring growth happens rapidly during a defined period of the day. The massive amount of cellular DNA is likely needed for the timely expression of genes to support the metabolic demands of rapid growth and offspring development. The DNA may also reinforce the host/symbiont relationship by allowing for a more substantial contribution to the host. It has been hypothesized that the predictable and abundant carbon and energy sources supplied to Epulopiscium cells by their host fish may be key to supporting these genomic resources (Angert 2012). Addressing the question about the composition of the DNA was challenging, especially in a bacterium that could not be grown in pure culture. If Epulopiscium sp. type B had a genome that was similar in size to most other bacterial genomes (1–10 Mbp), large Epulopiscium cells could contain thousands of genome copies (Mendell et al. 2008). However, it was also possible that the genome structure of Epulopiscium sp. type B had been modified to better support specific metabolic needs. Portions of the genome that contain genes essential for rapid growth could be amplified. For many microorganisms, the genome size of an isolate can be estimated from banding patterns of the genomic DNA cut with restriction endonucleases and then fractionated on a pulsed-field gel. Unfortunately, the DNA complexity in natural Epulopiscium sp. type B populations prevented the resolution of distinct bands from genomic DNA digests. Instead, less direct methods were used to estimate genome size and copy number.
As a proxy for genome copy number, quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting single-copy house-keeping genes, revealed that Epulopiscium sp. type B cells contained an extraordinary number of genome copies (Mendell et al. 2008). Copy number varied from cell to cell, and individuals yielded tens of thousands, to hundreds of thousands of copies of single genes in qPCR assays. Prior to qPCR, cells were photographed so measurements could be used to estimate cell volume. The cells varied in volume by almost 10-fold and gene copy number positively correlated with cell size across this range (Mendell et al. 2008). Quantitative multiplex PCR was not feasible in this study and only one marker could be reliably quantified from a single cell. With extracted genomic DNA from Epulopiscium sp. type B populations and the use of highly specific Taqman probes, multiple unlinked single-copy genes were interrogated instead. Although the investigation was limited in scope, all single-copy genes recovered similar results; only a replication origin-linked marker (dnaA) yielded significantly higher copy numbers than the other markers tested. The results supported the model that these giant cells contained a typical-sized genome for a bacterium, and moreover Epulopiscium sp. type B is highly polyploid throughout its life cycle (Mendell et al. 2008). More recently, chromosomal regions were visualized in intact cells using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) which confirmed that epulos, including Epulopiscium sp. type B, are polyploid throughout their life cycle (Hutchison et al. 2018). A high-quality draft genome derived from an Epulopiscium sp. type B population has confirmed that these cells possess a typical bacterial genome comprised of a circular chromosome of approximately 3.28 Mbp.
Unusual DNA Metabolism and Management of Chromosomes in Epulopiscium sp. type B
Most bacterial genomes contain one or two covalently closed, circular chromosomes. Although bacterial binary fission is conceptually simple, cells need to carry out chromosome segregation in such a way as to ensure that each daughter cell receives a complete complement of genomic material (Badrinarayanan et al. 2015). Within a bacterial cell, the chromosome(s) form a nucleoprotein complex called the nucleoid. For rapidly growing, rod-shaped bacteria, chromosome orientation in a cell follows the management of the chromosomal origin of replication, oriC. Bacterial chromosome replication generally begins at this single site, which is flanked by binding sites for the replication initiation protein DnaA and for proteins involved in partitioning the chromosomes (Ekundayo and Bleichert 2019). Proteins involved in replication, including DnaA, are generally coded for near the replication origin (Ogasawara and Yoshikawa 1992). Once replication begins, partitioning proteins bind origin-proximal sites and guide the replication origins toward opposite ends of the cell (Shen and Landick 2019). Nucleoid associated proteins condense and organize parts of each chromosome and nucleoid occlusion proteins prevent cytoplasmic fission from damaging the chromosomes as they segregate (Badrinarayanan et al. 2015; Dame et al. 2020).
Surprisingly, the physical location of a specific genetic locus within a bacterial cell (i.e., E. coli, B. subtilis, Caulobacter crescentus etc.) corresponds with the position of the locus on the chromosome (Viollier et al. 2004; Gitai et al. 2005). Therefore, the orientation of a chromosome in a bacterium is generally predictable. Physical constraints, DNA condensation proteins and entropic forces likely contribute to the ordered positions of chromosomes and their segregation within a bacterium (Jun and Wright 2010). These forces are important for the organization of chromosome copies in polyploid bacteria as well (Jain et al. 2012; Hutchison et al. 2018) but how a cell manages multiple copies of a chromosome is poorly understood. Further, how Epulopiscium determines which chromosome copies will be inherited is unknown.
The Epulopiscium sp. type B genome contains many of the common partitioning and condensation proteins of bacteria (Hutchison et al. 2018). However, for Epulopiscium sp. type B, chromosomes are not subjected to physical confinement, except perhaps in very small offspring cells. The peripheral arrangement of DNA in large cells may be dictated in part by transertion, the linked processes of transcription, translation, and insertion of membrane proteins that can occur in bacteria that tethers a chromosome to the cell membrane (Roggiani and Goulian 2015). Chromosome positional studies in large Epulopiscium sp. type B cells using FISH suggested that chromosomes in large epulos are subject to some of the same positional controls as more typical-sized cells (Hutchison et al. 2018). Chromosomal replication origins labeled with FISH were found to be regularly spaced around the cell periphery, but when multiple loci were simultaneously localized, chromosomes in a mother cell appeared to be more relaxed and less positionally constrained than what is observed in bacteria with only a few chromosome copies. The chromosomes inside small offspring were significantly more closely packed than in the mother cell. Based on FISH foci counts, equivalent numbers of chromosomes were partitioned into offspring within a mother cell (Hutchison et al. 2018). Despite the tethered appearance of pole-associated DNA, chromosomes did not appear to take on a particular orientation with respect to the cell poles. Since more than 100 chromosome copies are captured in an offspring cell when the mother cell divides asymmetrically, selection for highly effective chromosome compaction and the need to maintain chromosome order are likely relaxed in Epulopiscium sp. type B compared to small bacteria.
As mentioned above, Epulopiscium sp. type B mother cells appear to undergo a programmed cell death just prior to offspring emergence (Ward et al. 2009). Mother-cell DNA diminishes near the end of its life and the cell envelop loses its structural integrity. Nucleic acids are rich in carbon, nitrogen, and phosphate. The ability to retain at least some of these organic compounds and provide them to the growing offspring would be advantageous (Ward et al. 2009). Looking for evidence of transfer of DNA, oligonucleotides or even nucleotides between an Epulopiscium mother cell and its offspring is technically challenging. One possible approach could employ pulse-labeling of DNA with a nucleotide analog that could be tracked through development. With three generations present in some stages of development (see fig. 3D), clear patterns of transfer could be obscured. Nevertheless, pulse-labeling proved to be highly informative in revealing aspects of DNA metabolism in Epulopiscium sp. type B cells (Ward et al. 2009). The nucleotide analog bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) is taken up by most cells, phosphorylated by thymidine kinase, and incorporated into DNA by DNA polymerase. BrdU labeling has been used in eukaryotic cells to detect sites of replication and it has been used in bacterial populations to tag active cells (Lewis and Errington 1997; Urbach et al. 1999; Pernthaler et al. 2002; Ward and Angert 2008). In Epulopiscium sp. type B cells, it was effective in labeling locations of newly replicated DNA (Ward et al. 2009). As expected, evidence of replication was seen in nucleoids throughout small offspring cells. Surprisingly, BrdU was also incorporated into chromosomes in mother cells that contained large offspring (fig. 4). This led to the hypothesis that mother-cell nucleoids have an important somatic role and continue to replicate even in terminally differentiated mother cells (Ward et al. 2009). These mother-cell chromosomes likely support the transcription of genes important for mother-cell metabolism and offspring growth, and thus have a somatic role in the lifecycle.
Fig. 4.

After intracellular offspring are formed, DNA continues to replicate in the terminally differentiated mother cell. To follow the fate of DNA in Epulopiscium cells, BrdU was introduced to live cells within the fish intestinal tract. Immunolocalization of the BrdU showed DNA replication had occurred within growing offspring cells but replication was also taking place in mother-cell DNA. Shown here is a medial optical section of the tip of a mother cell. BrdU immunolocalization is shown in green.
Limited Inheritance of Genome Copies in Epulopiscium sp. type B
Mutations, virus-mediated transduction and horizontal gene transfer may all contribute to the genetic diversity of a bacterial population. With its unusual reproductive strategy, genetic novelty acquired in mother-cell chromosomes in Epulopiscium sp. type B would likely be lost, as most of the genome copies are held within a terminally differentiated cell (Arroyo et al. 2019). Genetic changes in chromosomes near the poles of the mother cell would be maintained in the population, if they are packaged into offspring primordia. This daily genetic bottleneck could potentially have a negative impact on Epulopiscium sp. type B populations.
The interactions between Epulopiscium sp. type B and its host may further impact Epulopiscium population diversity. Like many fish species, N. tonganus adults do not tend their eggs (Randall 2001; Doherty et al. 2004). When eggs hatch, the larval offspring join the pelagic zooplankton. Within 2–3 months, larval N. tonganus reach a few centimeters in length, and settle on a reef. The transition from larval to juvenile fish, and then to adult, involves substantial changes in gut morphology and the diet of these fish. Juvenile fish obtain their gut microbiota from their environment and Epulopiscium spp. are most likely acquired by eating feces of adult fish (Clements 1997). Adult and juvenile N. tonganus school together so juvenile fish may have regular access to live Epulopiscium sp. type B. Unlike spore-forming epulos, Epulopiscium sp. type B may only survive for a limited amount of time outside of the host intestinal tract. The immediate need to find a receptive host may present another bottleneck that could impact population diversity and resilience. One additional factor that may influence Epulopiscium sp. type B populations is retention of cells by the host fish. It is not known how long an Epulopiscium sp. type B lineage (mother, daughter, granddaughter, great-granddaughter…) remains associated with an individual fish or what proportion of the population is expelled on a regular basis. Surgeonfish, including N. tonganus, are long lived and may reach ages of 20–45 years (Choat and Axe 1996). Lineages of gut symbionts are potentially retained for decades and the behavior of a host fish would dictate the influx of new individuals and new genes.
Epulopiscium sp. type B populations face a number of barriers to maintaining diversity. Surveys of 16S rRNA gene sequences suggested that Epulopiscium sp. type B populations harbored little genetic diversity (Angert and Clements 2004; Mendell et al. 2008). A more recent multilocus sequence type (MLST) analysis of cells was used to investigate population diversity using higher resolution data sets (Arroyo et al. 2019). Cells were taken from several individual hosts inhabiting reef systems in and around Lizard Island, Australia. For the MLST study, individual bacteria were hand-selected, cleaned, and subjected to whole genome amplification (WGA). From the WGA DNA, the 16S rRNA genes, along with seven single-copy genes, were amplified by PCR. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were used only for quality control in this study because Epulopiscium sp. type B cells are known to harbor multiple rRNA operons (Mendell et al. 2008). The single-copy gene sequences were concatenated and used to explore population diversity (Arroyo et al. 2019). Of the 113 Epulopiscium sp. type B cells examined, 88 sequence types were recovered but these symbiont sequence types were not randomly distributed among the 12 fish examined. All but one of the host-associated subsets of Epulopiscium sp. type B cells, showed high haplotype diversity. Furthermore, within-host factors influenced symbiont populations. Significant codiversification links were found between individual hosts and their associated symbionts in both Parafit and Principal Coordinates Analysis. However, only a few significant Parafit links in these data contributed to the overall pattern. Together with the observation that some healthy adult N. tonganus collected in this study area do not appear to harbor Epulopiscium sp. type B cells, these results indicated that the symbionts are dependent on their host, but the host has a facultative relationship with Epulopiscium sp. type B (Arroyo et al. 2019).
Mechanisms to Maintain Genetic Diversity in Epulopiscium sp. type B Populations
Based on analyses of the MLSA surveys, recombination is more important than simple mutations for maintaining genomic diversity in Epulopiscium sp. type B populations (Arroyo et al. 2019). Unexpectedly, these populations exhibit linkage disequilibrium despite this reliance on recombination. A model to reconcile these two observations is based on features common to many bacterial transformation systems. Competent bacterial cells can take up multiple, unlinked fragments of DNA and incorporate them into their genome at surprisingly high frequencies (Erickson and Copeland 1973; Dalia et al. 2014; Mell et al. 2014). In bacteria, transformation of multiple, unlinked fragments simultaneously is referred to as congression (Erickson and Copeland 1973). Residual mother-cell DNA, released at the time that offspring emerge, would provide diverse, unlinked fragments available for uptake by competent cells (Arroyo et al. 2019). Epulopiscium sp. type B contains orthologs for many of the B. subtilis competence genes, which produce proteins needed for processing and uptake of environmental DNA and recombination (Dubnau and Blokesch 2019). Specifically, the genome codes for comC, comEA, comEC, comGB, recA, ssb and appears to contain more divergent homologs of comGA and comFA. Although genes required for assembly and anchoring of a DNA uptake pilus are present in Epulopiscium sp. type B, a convincing ortholog for the comGC pilin gene has not been identified. An alternative DNA uptake pilus may be used by Epulopiscium sp. type B, and the genome encodes an ortholog for a type II secretion system pilin, which is used for DNA uptake in other Firmicutes (Muschiol et al. 2015). In B. subtilis and some other competent bacteria, the DNA uptake machinery is located at the poles of a competent cell (Chen et al. 2005; Dubnau and Blokesch 2019). If this is also the location of competence machinery in Epulopiscium sp. type B cells, DNA would be brought into offspring primordial cells or in the vicinity of pole-associated chromosomes (fig. 5). This location would be advantageous because it would only require the DNA to traverse a single cell membrane. DNA entering Epulopiscium sp. type B would likely recombine with germline chromosomes and generate new sequence combinations in developing offspring.
Fig. 5.

Genetic diversity in Epulopiscium sp. type B populations is likely maintained by recombination. A model of inheritance of diverse DNA fragments via congression is shown here. Offspring emerging from their mother cells may be in the process of polar division or harbor pole-associated offspring primordia. Before engulfment is complete, the chromosomes within these primordia would be separated from the environment by only one cell membrane, as illustrated here. If like B. subtilis, DNA uptake proteins (competence proteins) assemble at cell poles, newly acquired DNA would be transported into the polar offspring primordia. In this image, fragments of DNA released by the synchronized lysis of diverse mother cells are shown as different colored double helices. Competence proteins are shown as purple transport complexes bringing in single-stranded DNA into the polar offspring. Cell membranes are show as black outlines, the cell envelop is shown in gray, and Epulopiscium nucleoids are shown as thick light blue lines.
Conclusions
As with any bacterium, novel functions may be hidden among the genes unique to Epulopiscium sp. type B. It is noteworthy that although Epulopiscium sp. type B is an exceptional bacterium, common bacterial mechanisms of cell cycle control and host/symbiont interactions appear to be operating and are flexible enough to support this unusual bacterium. Selection to maintain a productive association with a host has been a major force in shaping the developmental and cellular biology of Epulopiscium sp. type B. Being a giant and highly motile bacterium, may allow Epulopiscium sp. type B to maintain its place in the intestinal tract and a long-term relationship with an individual fish (Arroyo et al. 2019). In this competitive environment, being large may confer several additional benefits. The intestinal ecosystem within N. tonganus supports a diverse microbial community, including an abundance of flagellates and ciliates. Giant Epulopiscium sp. type B cells may avoid some predation by ciliates like Balantidium jocularum, but not entirely (Grim 2006). Furthermore, sequestration of nutrients (e.g. oligosaccharides, etc.) within the cytoplasm of these giants may provide a competitive advantage as it appears to in E. coli (Gallet et al. 2017). However, the unusual cellular biology of Epulopiscium sp. type B may have driven the emergence of a novel form of reproduction that limits genetic inheritance.
Multiple essential cellular mechanisms and external factors collaborate to provide a means of overcoming genetic bottlenecks that have the potential to endanger the diversity of Epulopiscium sp. type B populations. The host provides a carbon-rich environment and dependable source of energy, needed to maintain polyploidy throughout the lifecycle of Epulopiscium sp. type B. In addition, densely populated regions of the host intestinal tract ecosystem allow for close associations, which may help facilitate gene exchange. The synchronized development of offspring appears to be important for effective transfer of residual chromosomal DNA from dying mother cells to offspring primordia. Competence machinery at the poles of Epulopiscium, as seen in other bacteria, would enable transfer specifically to offspring genomes. If the competence machinery were randomly distributed around the cell periphery, it would be less likely that transforming DNA would be incorporated into the germline (offspring) chromosomes. Here “simple” modifications of a developmental program, and a lifestyle that affords predictable and reliable access to usable carbon and energy, can lead to the evolution of giant microorganisms with complex germline dynamics.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank all of the members of her laboratory and collaborators who contributed to many of the studies described here. Her research has been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and Cornell University.
Data Availability
The Epulopiscium sp. morphotype B draft genome assembly was deposited under the NCBI BioProject accession PRJNA20181. MLST data were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MH259595-MH259695 (16S rRNA genes), MH268406-MH269196 (Epulopiscium sp. type B MLSA genes). Additional gene data referenced in this review are available under GenBank accession numbers EF127641-EF127642, EU500234-EU500237 and JN402982-JN402987.
Literature Cited
- Al-Hinai MA, Jones SW, Papoutsakis ET.. 2015. The Clostridium sporulation programs: diversity and preservation of endospore differentiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 79(1):19–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angert ER. 2005. Alternatives to binary fission in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 3(3):214–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angert ER. 2012. DNA replication and genomic architecture of very large bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 66:197–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angert ER, Brooks AE, Pace NR.. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of Metabacterium polyspora: clues to the evolutionary origin of daughter cell production in Epulopiscium species, the largest bacteria. J Bacteriol. 178(5):1451–1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angert ER, Clements KD.. 2004. Initiation of intracellular offspring in Epulopiscium. Mol Microbiol. 51(3):827–835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angert ER, Clements KD, Pace NR.. 1993. The largest bacterium. Nature. 362(6417):239–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angert ER, Losick RM.. 1998. Propagation by sporulation in the guinea pig symbiont Metabacterium polyspora. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95(17):10218–10223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arroyo FA, Pawlowska TE, Choat JH, Clements KD, Angert ER.. 2019. Recombination contributes to population diversification in the polyploid intestinal symbiont Epulopiscium sp. type B. ISME J. 13(4):1084–1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Badrinarayanan A, Le TB, Laub MT.. 2015. Bacterial chromosome organization and segregation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 31:171–199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barka EA, et al. 2016. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 80(1):1–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bate AR, Bonneau R, Eichenberger P.. 2014. Bacillus subtilis systems biology: applications of -omics techniques to the study of endospore formation. Microbiol Spectr. 2:TBS-0019-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berleman JE, Kirby JR.. 2009. Deciphering the hunting strategy of a bacterial wolfpack. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 33(5):942–957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blount ZD, et al. 2020. Genomic and phenotypic evolution of Escherichia coli in a novel citrate-only resource environment. eLife. 9: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bretl DJ, Kirby JR.. 2016. Molecular Mechanisms of Signaling in Myxococcus xanthus Development. J Mol Biol. 428(19):3805–3830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Browne HP, et al. 2016. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature. 533(7604):543–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chater KF. 2016. Recent advances in understanding Streptomyces. F1000Res. 5:2795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen I, Christie PJ, Dubnau D.. 2005. The ins and outs of DNA transfer in bacteria. Science. 310(5753):1456–1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choat JH, Axe LM.. 1996. Growth and longevity in acanthurid fishes an analysis of otolith increments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 134:15–26. [Google Scholar]
- Claessen D, Rozen DE, Kuipers OP, Søgaard-Andersen L, van Wezel GP.. 2014. Bacterial solutions to multicellularity: a tale of biofilms, filaments and fruiting bodies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 12(2):115–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clements KD. 1997. Fermentation and gastrointestinal microorganisms of fishes. In: Mackie RI, White BA, editors. Gastrointestinal microbiology: gastrointestinal ecosystems and fermentations. New York: Chapman & Hall. p. 156–198. [Google Scholar]
- Clements KD, Choat JH.. 1995. Fermentation in tropical marine herbivorous fishes. Phys Zool. 68(3):355–378. [Google Scholar]
- Clements KD, Sutton DC, Choat JH.. 1989. Occurrence and characteristics of unusual protistan symbionts from surgeonfishes Acanthuridae of the Great Barrier Reef Australia. Marine Biol. 102(3):403–412. [Google Scholar]
- Dalia AB, McDonough E, Camilli A.. 2014. Multiplex genome editing by natural transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(24):8937–8942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dame RT, Rashid FM, Grainger DC.. 2020. Chromosome organization in bacteria: mechanistic insights into genome structure and function. Nat Rev Genet. 21(4):227–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidson P, et al. 2018. Flexibility and constraint: evolutionary remodeling of the sporulation initiation pathway in Firmicutes. PLoS Genet. 14(9):e1007470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doherty PJ, et al. 2004. High mortality during settlement is a population bottleneck for a tropical surgeonfish. Ecology. 85(9):2422–2428. [Google Scholar]
- Donne R, Saroul-Aïnama M, Cordier P, Celton-Morizur S, Desdouets C.. 2020. Polyploidy in liver development, homeostasis and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17(7):391–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubnau D, Blokesch M.. 2019. Mechanisms of DNA uptake by naturally competent bacteria. Annu Rev Genet. 53:217–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eichenberger P, Fawcett P, Losick R.. 2001. A three-protein inhibitor of polar septation during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 42(5):1147–1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ekundayo B, Bleichert F.. 2019. Origins of DNA replication. PLoS Genet. 15(9):e1008320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eldar A, et al. 2009. Partial penetrance facilitates developmental evolution in bacteria. Nature. 460(7254):510–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erickson RJ, Copeland JC.. 1973. Congression of unlinked markers and genetic mapping in the transformation of Bacillus subtilis 168. Genetics. 73(1):13–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fishelson L, Montgomery WL, Myrberg AA.. 1985. A unique symbiosis in the gut of a tropical herbivorous surgeonfish (Acanthuridae: teleostei) from the Red Sea. Science. 229:49–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flardh K, Buttner MJ.. 2009. Streptomyces morphogenetics: dissecting differentiation in a filamentous bacterium. Nat Rev Microbiol. 7(1):36–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flint JF, Drzymalski D, Montgomery WL, Southam G, Angert ER.. 2005. Nocturnal production of endospores in natural populations of Epulopiscium-like surgeonfish symbionts. J Bacteriol. 187(21):7460–7470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fox DT, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Ashman TL, Van de Peer Y.. 2020. Polyploidy: a biological force from cells to ecosystems. Trends Cell Biol. 30(9):688–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallet R, et al. 2017. The evolution of bacterial cell size: the internal diffusion-constraint hypothesis. ISME J. 11(7):1559–1568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galperin MY, et al. 2012. Genomic determinants of sporulation in Bacilli and Clostridia: towards the minimal set of sporulation-specific genes. Environ Microbiol. 14(11):2870–2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gitai Z, Thanbichler M, Shapiro L.. 2005. The choreographed dynamics of bacterial chromosomes. Trends Microbiol. 13(5):221–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grim JN. 2006. Food vacuole contents in the ciliate, Balantidium jocularum (Balantididae), a symbiont in the intestine of the surgeonfish, Naso tonganus (Acanthuridae). J Eukaryot Microbiol. 53(4):269–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hutchison E, et al. 2018. Developmental stage influences chromosome segregation patterns and arrangement in the extremely polyploid, giant bacterium Epulopiscium sp. type B. Mol Microbiol. 107(1):68–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hutchison EA, Miller DA, Angert ER.. 2014. Sporulation in bacteria: beyond the standard model. Microbiol Spectr. 2:TBS-0013-2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jain IH, Vijayan V, O'Shea EK.. 2012. Spatial ordering of chromosomes enhances the fidelity of chromosome partitioning in cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(34):13638–13643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jun S, Wright A.. 2010. Entropy as the driver of chromosome segregation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 8(8):600–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keane R, Berleman J.. 2016. The predatory life cycle of Myxococcus xanthus. Microbiology (Reading) 162(1):1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Pogliano K.. 2020. Shaping an endospore: architectural transformations during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Annu Rev Microbiol. 74:361–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klaasen HL, Koopman JP, Poelma FG, Beynen AC.. 1992. Intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 8(3–4):165–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koch AL. 1996. What size should a bacterium be? A question of scale. Annu Rev Microbiol. 50:317–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kroos L. 2017. Highly signal-responsive gene regulatory network governing Myxococcus development. Trends Genet. 33(1):3–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewin GR, et al. 2016. Evolution and ecology of Actinobacteria and their bioenergy applications. Annu Rev Microbiol. 70:235–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis PJ, Errington J.. 1997. Direct evidence for active segregation of oriC regions of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome and co-localization with the SpoOJ partitioning protein. Mol Microbiol. 25(5):945–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lopez D, Kolter R.. 2010. Extracellular signals that define distinct and coexisting cell fates in Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 34(2):134–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormick JR, Flardh K.. 2012. Signals and regulators that govern Streptomyces development. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 36(1):206–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mell JC, Lee JY, Firme M, Sinha S, Redfield RJ.. 2014. Extensive cotransformation of natural variation into chromosomes of naturally competent Haemophilus influenzae. G3 (Bethesda). 4(4):717–731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mendell JE, Clements KD, Choat JH, Angert ER.. 2008. Extreme polyploidy in a large bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105(18):6730–6740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mergaert P, et al. 2006. Eukaryotic control on bacterial cell cycle and differentiation in the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103(13):5230–5235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller DA, Choat JH, Clements KD, Angert ER.. 2011. The spoIIE homolog of Epulopiscium sp. type B is expressed early in intracellular offspring development. J Bacteriol. 193(10):2642–2646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller DA, Suen G, Clements KD, Angert ER.. 2012. The genomic basis for the evolution of a novel form of cellular reproduction in the bacterium Epulopiscium. BMC Genomics 13:265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyake S, Ngugi DK, Stingl U.. 2016. Phylogenetic diversity, distribution, and cophylogeny of giant bacteria (Epulopiscium) with their surgeonfish hosts in the Red Sea. Front Microbiol. 7:285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moeller AH, et al. 2016. Cospeciation of gut microbiota with hominids. Science. 353(6297):380–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montgomery WL, Pollak PE.. 1988. Epulopiscium fishelsoni n. g., n. sp., a protist of uncertain taxonomic affinities from the gut of an herbivorous reef fish. J Protozool. 35(4):565–569. [Google Scholar]
- Moran NA, Tran P, Gerardo NM.. 2005. Symbiosis and insect diversification: an ancient symbiont of sap-feeding insects from the bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 71(12):8802–8810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muschiol S, Balaban M, Normark S, Henriques-Normark B.. 2015. Uptake of extracellular DNA: competence induced pili in natural transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Bioessays. 37(4):426–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogasawara N, Yoshikawa H.. 1992. Genes and their organization in the replication origin region of the bacterial chromosome. Mol Microbiol. 6(5):629–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohbayashi R, et al. 2019. Coordination of polyploid chromosome replication with cell size and growth in a cyanobacterium. mBio. 10(2):e00510-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otto SP, Whitton J.. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu Rev Genet. 34:401–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pernthaler A, Pernthaler J, Schattenhofer M, Amann R.. 2002. Identification of DNA-synthesizing bacterial cells in coastal North Sea plankton. Appl Environ Microbiol. 68(11):5728–5736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pilling OA, Rogers AJ, Gulla-Devaney B, Katz LA.. 2017. Insights into transgenerational epigenetics from studies of ciliates. Eur J Protistol. 61(Pt B):366–375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prescott DM. 2000. Genome gymnastics: unique modes of DNA evolution and processing in ciliates. Nat Rev Genet. 1(3):191–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Priest SJ, Yadav V, Heitman J.. 2020. Advances in understanding the evolution of fungal genome architecture. F1000Res. 9:776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Randall JE. 2001. Surgeonfishes of Hawai’i and the world. Honolulu (HI: ): Mutual Publishing and Bishop Museum Press. [Google Scholar]
- Robinow C, Angert ER.. 1998. Nucleoids and coated vesicles of “Epulopiscium” spp. Arch Microbiol. 170(4):227–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinow C, Kellenberger E.. 1994. The bacterial nucleoid revisited. Microbiol Rev. 58(2):211–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roggiani M, Goulian M.. 2015. Chromosome-membrane interactions in bacteria. Annu Rev Genet. 49:115–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulz HN, Jorgensen BB.. 2001. Big bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 55(1):105–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Setlow B, Atluri S, Kitchel R, Koziol-Dube K, Setlow P.. 2006. Role of dipicolinic acid in resistance and stability of spores of Bacillus subtilis with or without DNA-protective alpha/beta-type small acid-soluble proteins. J Bacteriol. 188(11):3740–3747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Setlow P, Johnson EA.. 2019. Spores and their significance. In: Doyle MPDiez‐Gonzalez FHill C, editors. Food microbiology. Washington (DC): American Society for Microbiology Press. p. 23–63. [Google Scholar]
- Shen BA, Landick R.. 2019. Transcription of bacterial chromatin. J Mol Biol. 431(20):4040–4066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shu Z, Row S, Deng WM.. 2018. Endoreplication: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Trends Cell Biol. 28(6):465–474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soppa J. 2014. Polyploidy in archaea and bacteria: about desiccation resistance, giant cell size, long-term survival, enforcement by a eukaryotic host and additional aspects. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 24(5–6):409–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun L, et al. 2018. Effective polyploidy causes phenotypic delay and influences bacterial evolvability. PLoS Biol. 16(2):e2004644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Urbach E, Vergin KL, Giovannoni SJ.. 1999. Immunochemical detection and isolation of DNA from metabolically active bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 65(3):1207–1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Woude MW, Baumler AJ.. 2004. Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 17(3):581–611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viollier PH, et al. 2004. Rapid and sequential movement of individual chromosomal loci to specific subcellular locations during bacterial DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101(25):9257–9262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward RJ, Angert ER.. 2008. DNA replication during endospore development in Metabacterium polyspora. Mol Microbiol. 67(6):1360–1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward RJ, Clements KD, Choat JH, Angert ER.. 2009. Cytology of terminally differentiated Epulopiscium mother cells. DNA Cell Biol. 28(2):57–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westfall CS, Levin PA.. 2017. Bacterial cell size: multifactorial and multifaceted. Annu Rev Microbiol. 71:499–517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White-Gilbertson S, Voelkel-Johnson C.. 2020. Giants and monsters: unexpected characters in the story of cancer recurrence. Adv Cancer Res. 148:201–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yutin N, Galperin MY.. 2013. A genomic update on clostridial phylogeny: gram-negative spore formers and other misplaced clostridia. Environ Microbiol. 15(10):2631–2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zerulla K, Soppa J.. 2014. Polyploidy in haloarchaea: advantages for growth and survival. Front Microbiol. 5:274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The Epulopiscium sp. morphotype B draft genome assembly was deposited under the NCBI BioProject accession PRJNA20181. MLST data were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MH259595-MH259695 (16S rRNA genes), MH268406-MH269196 (Epulopiscium sp. type B MLSA genes). Additional gene data referenced in this review are available under GenBank accession numbers EF127641-EF127642, EU500234-EU500237 and JN402982-JN402987.



