Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2020 Dec 30;184(6):998–999. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19698

Advancing novel therapies for ichthyoses

M Schmuth 1,, J Reichelt 1, R Gruber 1
PMCID: PMC8246918  PMID: 33378090

Short abstract

Linked Article: Valentin et al. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:1123–1131.


Sequencing technology increasingly allows for clarification of the genetic basis of disease pathogenesis in rare genodermatoses such as the ichthyoses. While there has been great progress in the discovery of genetic variations underlying ichthyoses and the elucidation of the pathomechanisms, therapeutic developments have been sparse. Too often, no therapeutic benefit follows from research advances in the field, and, to date, there are few examples for targeted therapy that address the molecular cause of the disease. Thus, patient options are still mostly limited to keratolytics, topical anti‐inflammatory agents, rather unspecific emollient therapies, and topical and systemic retinoids.

However, it is likely that this will change. An increasing number of researchers are dedicated to devising new, targeted therapies based on progress in the understanding of disease pathogenesis, and powerful advances are being made in the area of genodermatoses. With regard to the ichthyoses, therapeutic intervention can take multiple and diverse forms. It remains unclear if a single one of the strategies will prevail. A competitive ‘best athlete approach’ is likely to yield optimal benefit for patients. Some examples of mechanism‐targeted treatments currently being developed are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Targeted therapies for ichthyoses

At the DNA level, mutations can be excised or corrected, or expression vectors can be introduced 3 , 4
Small molecules modulate relevant signalling pathways, e.g. nitric oxide synthase inhibitors or Janus kinase inhibitors improve tissue models of harlequin ichthyosis 5
Protease inhibitors are being developed to antagonize protease overactivity in Netherton syndrome 6
Monoclonal antibodies neutralize mediators of skin inflammation in patients with ichthyosis 7 , 8
Deficient lipid components that are essential for the epidermal barrier have been exogenously added and shown to improve the scaling phenotype in ichthyosis 9
Decreased or absent proteins can be delivered to diseased skin grafts 2 , 10

In 2010, Oji et al. reported that permeability barrier impairment in peeling skin syndrome 1 (PSS‐1) is caused by corneodesmosin deficiency, resulting in a distinct ichthyosis phenotype, which includes decreased corneocyte coherence, food allergies and failure to thrive. 1 As in other related ichthyoses, this disease has a significant impact on patient quality of life and years lost due to disability, and there are no good therapies.

In this issue, Dr Oji’s group presents compelling evidence of successful liposome‐based delivery of recombinantly synthesized corneodesmosin to patient‐derived PSS‐1 keratinocytes both in monolayer and in three‐dimensional (3D) cultures. 2 Aside from choosing protein supplementation as the method of disease modification, the efficient and precise delivery of the compounds to the crime scene – the tissue or the cell – represents a major hurdle. The carrier system used by Valentin et al. consists of 1‐palmitoyl‐2‐oleoyl‐glycero‐3‐phosphocholine, mimicking cellular lipid membranes. Lamellar vesicles were optimized in size for efficient uptake of the corneodesmosin cargo, and for good penetration properties. Importantly, liposomes loaded with corneodesmosin and tagged with the lipopeptide P2K12 showed a localization at the plasma membrane of the keratinocytes. Consequently, corneodesmosin was successfully delivered to the cytoplasm of keratinocytes, and functional studies showed improvements of histopathological alterations and epidermal barrier function in 3D human skin equivalents.

As demonstrated, delivery remains a major hurdle to overcome when trying to deliver nucleic acids or peptides/proteins to viable epidermal cells. The skin barrier, as created by the stratum corneum, normally prevents large molecules from entering the body. Multiple strategies to penetrate the skin barrier for delivery of bioactive therapeutic molecules have shown promise. Other than the liposomes and cationic lipopeptide described here, additional carrier options include nanocarriers such as thermoresponsive nanogels or spherical nucleic nanoparticle conjugates. Also effective are disruptive biophysical interventions such as iontophoresis, sonophoresis, electroporation, laser abrasion, microneedles, high‐velocity jets, intradermal injections and – most invasive – skin transplants. Optimization for enhanced delivery must be carried out for each specific cargo and each specific entity.

Although liposome‐based corneodesmosin delivery to PSS‐1 skin appears highly attractive, the approach requires replication, refinement and in vivo confirmation. Nevertheless, the work is seminal and will be followed by more detailed descriptions of in vivo efficacy and potential adverse effects. This is a very exciting area of investigation, which opens up possibilities for treatment of PSS‐1 and related disorders of cornification, i.e. ichthyoses.

Author Contribution

Matthias Schmuth: Conceptualization (lead). Julia Reichelt: Data curation (equal); Validation (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Robert Gruber: Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal).

Conflicts of interest M.S. has received research grants from ExpanScience; has participated as a Principal Investigator in trials sponsored by Roche, Amgen, MSD, GSK, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, and Orfagen; and has received travel funds from Nogra Pharma. M.S. has not accepted any honoraria from industry for advisory boards or speakers’ bureau participation, and does not own pharma stocks, equity or patent licenses.

References

  • 1. Oji V, Eckl KM, Aufenvenne K et al. Loss of corneodesmosin leads to severe skin barrier defect, pruritus, and atopy: unraveling the peeling skin disease. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 87:274–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Valentin F, Wiegmann H, Tarinski T et al. Development of a pathogenesis‐based therapy for peeling skin syndrome type 1. Br J Dermatol 2021; 10.1111/bjd.19546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. March OP, Lettner T, Klausegger A et al. Gene editing‐mediated disruption of epidermolytic ichthyosis‐associated KRT10 alleles restores filament stability in keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2019; 139:1699–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Freedman JC, Parry TJ, Zhang P et al. Preclinical evaluation of a modified HSV‐1 vector encoding human TGM1 for the treatment of autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis (ARCI). J Invest Dermatol 2020; 10.1016/j.jid.2020.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Enjalbert F, Dewan P, Caley MP et al. 3D model of harlequin ichthyosis reveals inflammatory therapeutic targets. J Clin Invest 2020; 130:4798–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Walker AL, Denis A, Bingham RP et al. Design and development of a series of borocycles as selective, covalent kallikrein 5 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2019; 29:126675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Haiges D, Fischer J, Hörer S et al. Biologic therapy targeting IL‐17 ameliorates a case of congenital ichthyosiform cornification disorder. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2019; 17:70–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Steuer AB, Cohen DE. Treatment of Netherton syndrome with dupilumab. JAMA Dermatol 2020; 156:350–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Paller AC, van Steensel MAM, Rodriguez‐Martín M et al. Pathogenesis‐based therapy reverses cutaneous abnormalities in an inherited disorder of distal cholesterol metabolism. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131:2242–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Plank R, Yealland G, Miceli E et al. Transglutaminase 1 replacement therapy successfully mitigates the autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis phenotype in full‐thickness skin disease equivalents. J Invest Dermatol 2019; 139:1191–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES