Abstract
According to the mathematical classification of topological band structures, there exist a number of fascinating topological states in dimensions larger than three with exotic boundary phenomena and interesting topological responses. While these topological states are not accessible in condensed matter systems, recent works have shown that synthetic systems, such as photonic crystals or electric circuits, can realize higher-dimensional band structures. Here, we argue that, because of its symmetry properties, the 4D spinless topological insulator is particularly well suited for implementation in these synthetic systems. We explicitly construct a 2D electric circuit lattice, whose resonance frequency spectrum simulates the 4D spinless topological insulator. We perform detailed numerical calculations of the circuit lattice and show that the resonance frequency spectrum exhibits pairs of 3D Weyl boundary states, a hallmark of the nontrivial topology. These pairs of 3D Weyl states with the same chirality are protected by classical time-reversal symmetry that squares to +1, which is inherent in the proposed circuit lattice. We also discuss how the simulated 4D topological band structure can be observed in experiments.
Keywords: topological circuit, 4D topological states, 4D topological Hall effect, second Chern number, Weyl states
A 4D topological insulator is simulated on a 2D board of electric circuits, where the intrinsic classical time-reversal symmetry protects two Weyl modes with the same chirality on each boundary.
1. INTRODUCTION
With the great success of topological band theory in condensed matter physics [1–6], recent research has branched out to the study of topological bands in synthetic lattices, such as, photonic crystals [7–10], ultracold atomic gases [11–16] and electric circuit networks [17–34]. These synthetic lattices have several advantages compared to their condensed matter counterparts. One is the ability to precisely control and manipulate the band structure, another is the possibility to create lattices in dimensions greater than three. The celebrated 10-fold classification of topological materials [35–39] predicts a number of interesting higher-dimensional topological states, including four-dimensional (4D) topological insulators [36,40], 4D topological superconductors and a 4D generalization of the integer quantum Hall effect [41]. These 4D topological states exhibit many interesting phenomena, for example quantized nonlinear responses [40–45], topological charge pumping and in-gap boundary modes with protected level crossings [46]. Unfortunately, these 4D states cannot be realized in condensed matter systems, which are limited to three spatial dimensions. However, recent technological advances in photonics and cold atomic gases have facilitated synthetic engineering of the 4D integer quantum Hall effect, using, for example internal degrees of freedom as additional effective dimensions [44–50]. These experiments have revealed signatures of charge pumping and topological transport [44,50]. Apart from these works, there has been no other experimental investigation of the 4D integer quantum Hall effect, and likewise no other 4D topological state has yet been realized experimentally. Among the five 4D topological states of the 10-fold classification [35–37], the spinless topological insulator, belonging to symmetry class AI, is particularly intriguing. Its energy bands are characterized by a 4D topological invariant, namely the second Chern number, which has the distinguishing property of taking on only even integer values [37]. This invariant leads to topological transport responses in the 4D bulk [43] and to pairs of Weyl fermions of the same chirality on the 3D boundary [38,39]. Hence, an experimental realization of the 4D spinless topological insulator could allow simulation of chiral lattice gauge theory of high-energy physics [51–53].
Besides these interesting properties, the 4D spinless topological insulator has the advantage that it can be realized easily and in a robust manner in bosonic synthetic or classical systems, such as photonic lattices or periodic electric circuits. This is because such systems naturally exhibit a time-reversal symmetry that squares to +1, which is the protecting symmetry of the 4D spinless topological insulator in class AI. Hence, there is no need to introduce artificial gauge fields or to engineer fine-tuned intra-unit-cell degrees of freedom for the simulation of additional symmetries. The time-reversal symmetry also guarantees that the first Chern numbers vanish, such that the topological responses originate purely from the second Chern number.
Motivated by these considerations, we propose in this paper an experimental realization of the 4D spinless topological insulator in a periodic electric circuit composed of inductors (L), capacitors (C) and operational amplifiers. By using mapping between circuit Laplacians and single-particle Hamiltonians, we explicitly construct a circuit lattice, whose resonance frequency spectrum is identical to a 4D spinless topological insulator in class AI. We perform detailed numerical simulations of the resonance frequency spectrum for various boundary conditions. For open boundary conditions we observe pairs of 3D Weyl cones that traverse a gap in the resonance frequency spectrum. As the LC circuit lattice is non-dissipative, it has a built-in time-reversal symmetry of class AI, which leads to strong and robust protection of the 3D Weyl boundary states. Even though the proposed circuit lattice realizes a 4D state, it can readily be implemented on a 2D circuit board or integrated-circuit wafer by projecting the 4D hyperlattice onto the 2D plane. The crossings of the projected lattice links can be avoided by using a bridge structure for the wiring. The predicted pairs of Weyl modes can be experimentally observed using frequency-dependent measurements.
2. 4D SPINLESS TOPOLOGICAL INSULATOR
We start by discussing a minimal model for the 4D topological insulator in class AI and its boundary Weyl modes. A minimal model can be constructed from a four-band Hamiltonian of the form,
(1) |
Here are real functions of the 4D quasi-momentum , , and γi (with i = 1, 2, …, 5) are five 4 × 4 gamma matrices, which satisfy the Clifford algebra {γi, γj} = 2δij and act on the spinors . For concreteness we choose the following representation for the gamma matrices: γ1, 2, 3 = τ1, 2, 3⊗ρ1, γ4 = τ0⊗ρ2, and γ5 = τ0⊗ρ3, with τα and ρα two sets of the Pauli matrices. Time-reversal symmetry acts on as , which implies that f0, 1, 3, 5 (f2,4) are even (odd) functions of . With this condition, one possible choice for fi that yields a finite second Chern number is: , , , , , and , similar to a previous model introduced in a general context [47]. As the term only affects the global energy at each , rather than the topological property as indicated by , we choose its form only for the convenience of the realization of the 4D topological electric circuit.
The topology of the gapped 4D class AI system can be characterized by the second Chern number. For the Dirac model, the second Chern number can be nicely simplified as the winding number of from the 4D Brillouin zone (BZ) to the 4D unit sphere S4 [40]
(2) |
where εμνλρσ is the rank-5 Levi-Civita symbol with μ, ν, λ, ρ, σ = 1, 2, …, 5, and repeated indices are summed over. Straightforward calculation gives that C2 = −2 if −t/2 < m < t, and otherwise C2 = 0 as shown in Fig. 1a, for which a detailed derivation can be found in the Supplementary data.
According to the general theory of bulk-boundary correspondence of topological insulators, a nontrivial second Chern number leads to boundary Weyl fermions. We consider a 3D boundary perpendicular to the -axis, putting the semi-infinite system in the region with r1 > 0. For simplicity we set m = 0 and the system is in the topologically nontrivial phase with C2 = −2. For the Dirac model (1) the boundary effective Hamiltonian can be derived analytically as [54]
(3) |
Here σα acts in the sub-lattices c and d, f0,3,4,5 are functions defined in (1), depending only on , where k2 ∈ (2π/3, 4π/3) and k3, 4 ∈ [0, 2π]. From the boundary spectrum , it is easy to obtain that there are two Weyl points located at 1, 2 = ±2π(5/12, 1/3, −1/3) in the 3D boundary BZ as shown in Fig. 1c and d. As the Weyl points are located at generic momenta, they have anisotropic dispersion relations because of the lack of rotational symmetry. The γ0 term in Eq. (1) leads to the unwanted σ0 term in Eq. (3), which tilts the boundary Weyl points. But, we have to make a trade off between
the simplicity of the model and the magnitude of the term. As the two Weyl points are related by time-reversal symmetry, they have the same chirality, right-handedness as shown in the Supplementary data. Generically, the boundary states decay exponentially towards the bulk, which will be confirmed by our simulation results.
3. TIGHT-BINDING MODEL AND CIRCUIT LATTICE
We now proceed to address the realization of the above 4D topological states by constructing a realistic electric-circuit in a practical way. For this purpose, it is more convenient to write the model Hamiltonian (1) in real space, that reads , where α, β label nodes in each unit cell and i labels the unit cells. are hopping vectors, which can be obtained by the inverse Fourier transform of (1), and are listed as: and s = 1, 2, 3, respectively, and with s = 1, 2, respectively. Here, each number in the parentheses is in the unit of the corresponding lattice constant for the 4D hypercube lattice. The hopping amplitudes are assumed to be tab = tbc = tad = taa = tcc = −tcd = −t, where t is a real constant so that time-reversal symmetry is preserved. Exchanging the order of the subscripts, the amplitudes tαβ are unchanged while the vectors Rαβ are reversed. The above 4D tight-binding model can be mapped to a 4D circuit lattice as detailed in the Supplementary data. As the property of a circuit lattice depends only on the connection relations among its nodes, regardless of the shape of circuit lattice, one can project the 4D circuit lattice onto a 2D plane to obtain an equivalent 2D circuit lattice as shown in Fig. 2, preserving the property of the circuit. In more detail, the circuit in Fig. 2 is constructed by the following two steps. First, the sub-circuits in the - planes, with the Born-von Karman periodic boundary conditions, are constructed as shown in Fig. 2a. The nodes and lines in Fig. 2a are detailed in Fig. 2b–d. Then, the sub-circuits on the and plane are arranged, and the nodes are connected between sub-circuits with capacitors to realize the connections in the - planes, as shown in Fig. 2e. In these two steps, we have constructed a 2D circuit that is genuinely equivalent to the 4D circuit, as the connections of nodes in the two circuits have a one-to-one correspondence. According to the Kirchhoff current law, it is easy to check that the current equations for the circuit in Fig. 2e lead to a Hamiltonian with exactly the same form as Eq. (1). Now the functions have the parameters
concretely specified in terms of capacitance values as t = C, m = (Ca0 − Cb0 + 2C)/2 and ε = (Ca0 + Cb0)/2 + 7C, as detailed in the Supplementary data. If the capacitance values satisfy Ca0 + 2C = Cb0, namely m = 0, the circuit is in a topologically nontrivial phase with the second Chern number C2 = −2.
4. SIMULATION RESULTS
To extract the resonance frequency spectrum of the circuit lattice, we performed time-domain transient simulations to obtain the voltage on each node as a function of time. Here, is the unit cell label, α = a, b, c, d is the index for the nodes in each unit cell, and t is the time. Taking periodical boundary conditions in directions, respectively, and performing the Fourier transform, the voltage can be obtained in the momentum and frequency ω space. The band-structure-like dispersions are obtained by plotting . As introduced in the Supplementary data, the eigenvalue ϵ of the tight-binding model corresponds to the resonance frequency ω of the circuit lattice, with the relation ϵ = 1/(ω2L). Therefore, the vertical axes in Fig. 3 are plotted as 1/(ω2L), to compare with the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian (1). In Fig. 3a and b, it is easy to see that the simulation results (gray points) are in good agreement with the bulk band dispersions (red dashed line) obtained from the model Hamiltonian (1).
Next we study the surface states by assuming open boundary conditions in the direction and periodic boundary conditions in the directions. The technical details are provided in the Supplementary data. The pulse voltage source is connected to the (1,1,1,1) cell on the bottom edge, and thereby the voltage is obtained for a slab geometry with nine layers in the direction. We then carried out Fourier transforms for and t, which gives , where R1 is the lattice index in the direction and . The corresponding boundary band structures for the voltage intensity along a number of selected k lines crossing one of two Weyl points, 1, are listed in Fig. 3c–h. We now briefly introduce these figures, while more information can be found in the figure caption. For all of them, the data from simulation and analytic solutions from the model Hamiltonian are plotted by gray dots and dashed red lines, respectively, for comparison. In Fig. 3c, the data from simulation show that the surface Weyl states appear in the gap of the band structure, in good agreement with the results obtained from the model Hamiltonian. To reveal the local nature of the topological boundary states, the intensity of voltage for the fifth layer to the top layers is depicted in Fig. 3d, where the surface Weyl states disappear, because the pulse source on the bottom boundary cannot excite the Weyl surface states located on the top boundary. Furthermore, according to the model Hamiltonian, the boundary states are contributed to only by the node-c and d components, and have vanishing a and b components, as confirmed by comparing the simulation result in Fig. 3f with that in Fig. 3e. The intensity of voltage for the bottom four layers is clearly visible only for the component of the c and d nodes plotted in Fig. 3f, while the component of the a and b nodes plotted in Fig. 3e is too weak to be seen. Finally, the band structures of the Weyl states along the k3 and k4 directions are depicted in Fig. 3g and h, respectively. The linear dispersion relations in the vicinity of the point 1 w.r.t. all boundary momentum components show that the point 1 is indeed a Weyl point.
5. CONCLUSION
In summary, 4D topological states exhibit many interesting phenomena that are markedly different from lower-dimensional topological phases. Unfortunately, they cannot be realized in condensed-matter materials, which are limited to three spatial dimensions. In this article we have shown that periodic electric circuits, composed of inductors, capacitors and operational amplifiers, provide a realistic and ideal platform to create higher-dimensional topological states in the laboratory. We have explicitly constructed an electric circuit lattice that realizes the 4D spinless topological insulator. By projecting onto two dimensions, this 4D circuit lattice can readily be implemented on a printed circuit board or an integrated-circuit wafer. In this way, the higher dimensions of the 4D circuit lattice are faithfully realized through long-ranged lattice connectivity, rather than by internal degrees of freedom. Furthermore, the circuit implementation of higher-dimensional topological states has the advantage of being highly controllable and easily reconfigurable. This allows, for example, investigation of topological phase transitions, non-Hermitian phenomena and the effects of nonlinear couplings [27]. Using detailed numerical simulations, we have shown that the resonance frequency spectrum of our circuit lattice exhibits a pair of 3D Weyl boundary states, which is the hallmark of nontrivial topology.
Our work opens up the possibility of realizing topological phases in arbitrarily high dimensions, for example the 5D topological Weyl state [55], or the 6D chiral topological superconductors [35–37]. Even topological states on non-orientable surfaces of any dimension could be realized, such as, topological phases on Möbius strips [17], Klein bottles, or real projective planes. Other interesting directions for future research concern the study of quantum effects and interactions in higher-dimensional topological states. The former could be simulated by use of periodic Josephson junction arrays [56,57]. Moreover, the nonlinearity effect could be achieved by bringing the electronic device into a nonlinear region. We hope that our work will stimulate further investigations along these lines.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Sheng Chang and Dong Zhang for fruitful discussion. The numerical calculations in this work have been done on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of Wuhan University.
Contributor Information
Rui Yu, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
Y X Zhao, National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
Andreas P Schnyder, Max-Planck-Institute for Solid State Research, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
7. FUNDING
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0303402 and 2017YFA0304700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11874048 and 11674077) and the GRF (HKU 173057/17P) of Hong Kong.
Conflict of interest statement . None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hasan MZ, Kane CL.. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev Mod Phys 2010; 82: 3045–67. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bernevig BA, Hughes TL.. Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Qi XL, Zhang SC.. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev Mod Phys 2011; 83: 1057–110. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chiu CK, Teo JCY, Schnyder APet al. Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries. Rev Mod Phys 2016; 88: 035005. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Armitage NP, Mele EJ, Vishwanath A.. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev Mod Phys 2018; 90: 015001. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Burkov AA. Weyl metals. Annu Rev Conden Matt Phys 2018; 9: 359–78. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lu L, Joannopoulos JD, Soljacic M.. Topological photonics. Nat Photon 2014; 8: 821–9. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rechtsman MC, Zeuner JM, Plotnik Yet al. Photonic Floquet topological insulators. Nature 2013; 496: 196–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yan Q, Liu R, Yan Zet al. Experimental discovery of nodal chains. Nat Phys 2018; 14: 461–4. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ozawa T, Price HM, Amo Aet al. Topological photonics. Rev Mod Phys 2019; 91: 015006. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Goldman N, Satija I, Nikolic Pet al. Realistic time-reversal invariant topological insulators with neutral atoms. Phys Rev Lett 2010; 105: 255302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sun K, Liu WV, Hemmerich Aet al. Topological semimetal in a fermionic optical lattice. Nat Phys 2012; 8: 67–70. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jotzu G, Messer M, Desbuquois Ret al. Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions. Nature 2014; 515: 237–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Aidelsburger M, Lohse M, Schweizer Cet al. Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms. Nat Phys 2015; 11: 162–6. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Goldman N, Budich JC, Zoller P.. Topological quantum matter with ultracold gases in optical lattices. Nat Phys 2016; 12: 639–45. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhang DW, Zhu YQ, Zhao YXet al. Topological quantum matter with cold atoms. Adv Phys 2018; 67: 253–402. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ningyuan J, Owens C, Sommer Aet al. Time- and site-resolved dynamics in a topological circuit. Phys Rev X 2015; 5: 021031. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Albert VV, Glazman LI, Jiang L.. Topological properties of linear circuit lattices. Phys Rev Lett 2015; 114: 173902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lee CH, Imhof S, Berger Cet al. Topolectrical circuits. Comm Phys 2018; 1: 39. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Luo K, Yu R, Weng H.. Topological nodal states in circuit lattice. Research 2018; 2018: 6793752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lu Y, Jia N, Su Let al. Probing the Berry curvature and Fermi arcs of a Weyl circuit. Phys Rev B 2019; 99: 020302. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Goren T, Plekhanov K, Appas Fet al. Topological Zak phase in strongly coupled LC circuits. Phys Rev B 2018; 97: 041106. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hofmann T, Helbig T, Lee CHet al. Chiral voltage propagation and calibration in a topolectrical Chern circuit. Phys Rev Lett 2019; 122: 247702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Imhof S, Berger C, Bayer Fet al. Topolectrical-circuit realization of topological corner modes. Nat Phys 2018; 14: 925–9. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Hadad Y, Soric JC, Khanikaev ABet al. Self-induced topological protection in nonlinear circuit arrays. Nat Electron 2018; 1: 178. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ezawa M. Higher-order topological electric circuits and topological corner resonance on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices. Phys Rev B 2018; 98: 201402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Serra-Garcia M, Süsstrunk R, Huber SD.. Observation of quadrupole transitions and edge mode topology in an LC circuit network. Phys Rev B 2019; 99: 020304. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Luo K, Feng J, Zhao YXet al. Nodal manifolds bounded by exceptional points on non-hermitian honeycomb lattices and electrical-circuit realizations. 2018, arXiv:181009231.
- 29. Li L, Lee CH, Gong J.. Boundary states of 4D topological matter: emergence and full 3D-imaging of nodal Seifert surfaces. 2019, arXiv:190507069.
- 30. Haenel R, Branch T, Franz M.. Chern insulators for electromagnetic waves in electrical circuit networks. Phys Rev B 2019; 99: 235110. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Eisenberg Y, Barlas Y, Prodan E.. Valley Chern effect with LC resonators: a modular platform. Phys Rev Appl 2019; 11: 044077. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zhu W, Long Y, Chen Het al. Quantum valley Hall effects and spin-valley locking in topological Kane-Mele circuit networks. Phys Rev B 2019; 99: 115410. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Liu S, Gao W, Zhang Qet al. Topologically protected edge state in two-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger circuit. Research 2019; 2019: 8609875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Helbig T, Hofmann T, Lee CHet al. Band structure engineering and reconstruction in electric circuit networks. Phys Rev B 2019; 99: 161114. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kitaev A. Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors. AIP Conference Proceedings 2009; 1134: 22–30. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Schnyder AP, Ryu S, Furusaki Aet al. Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions. Phys Rev B 2008; 78: 195125. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ryu S, Schnyder AP, Furusaki Aet al. Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy. New J Phys 2010; 12: 065010. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zhao YX, Wang ZD.. Topological classification and stability of Fermi surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 2013; 110: 240404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Zhao YX, Wang ZD.. Topological connection between the stability of Fermi surfaces and topological insulators and superconductors. Phys Rev B 2014; 89: 075111. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Qi XL, Hughes TL, Zhang SC.. Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators. Phys Rev B 2008; 78: 195424. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zhang SC, Hu J.. A four-dimensional generalization of the quantum Hall effect. Science 2001; 294: 823–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Froehlich J, Pedrini B.. New Applications of the Chiral Anomaly. London: Imperial College Press, 2000, 9–47. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ryu S, Moore JE, Ludwig AWW.. Electromagnetic and gravitational responses and anomalies in topological insulators and superconductors. Phys Rev B 2012; 85: 045104. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lohse M, Schweizer C, Price HMet al. Exploring 4D quantum Hall physics with a 2D topological charge pump. Nature 2018; 553: 55–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Price HM, Zilberberg O, Ozawa Tet al. Four-dimensional quantum Hall effect with ultracold atoms. Phys Rev Lett 2015; 115: 195303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kraus YE, Ringel Z, Zilberberg O.. Four-dimensional quantum Hall effect in a two-dimensional quasicrystal. Phys Rev Lett 2013; 111: 226401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Price HM. Four-dimensional topological lattices without gauge fields. 2018, arXiv:180605263.
- 48. Ozawa T, Price HM, Goldman Net al. Synthetic dimensions in integrated photonics: from optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum Hall physics. Phys Rev A 2016; 93: 043827. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Petrides I, Price HM, Zilberberg O.. Six-dimensional quantum Hall effect and three-dimensional topological pumps. Phys Rev B 2018; 98: 125431. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Zilberberg O, Huang S, Guglielmon Jet al. Photonic topological boundary pumping as a probe of 4D quantum Hall physics. Nature 2018; 553: 59–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Jackiw R, Rebbi C.. Solitons with fermion number 1/2. Phys Rev D 1976; 13: 3398–409. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kaplan DB. A method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice. Phys Lett B 1992; 288: 342–7. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ball RD. Chiral gauge theory. Phys Rep 1989; 182: 1–186. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Mong RSK, Shivamoggi V.. Edge states and the bulk-boundary correspondence in Dirac Hamiltonians. Phys Rev B 2011; 83: 125109. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lian B, Zhang SC.. Five-dimensional generalization of the topological Weyl semimetal. Phys Rev B 2016; 94: 041105. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Tsomokos DI, Ashhab S, Nori F.. Using superconducting qubit circuits to engineer exotic lattice systems. Phys Rev A 2010; 82: 052311. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Cosmic R, Ikegami H, Lin Zet al. Circuit-QED-based measurement of vortex lattice order in a Josephson junction array. Phys Rev B 2018; 98: 060501. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.