Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jul 20;11:14775. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94139-y

Rapid and real-time monitoring of bacterial growth against antibiotics in solid growth medium using a contactless planar microwave resonator sensor

Mandeep Chhajer Jain 1, Anupama Vijaya Nadaraja 1, Rakesh Narang 1, Mohammad Hossein Zarifi 1,
PMCID: PMC8292355  PMID: 34285253

Abstract

Infection diagnosis and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) are pertinent clinical microbiology practices that are in dire need of improvement, due to the inadequacy of current standards in early detection of bacterial response to antibiotics and affordability of contemporarily used methods. This paper presents a novel way to conduct AST which hybridizes disk diffusion AST with microwave resonators for rapid, contactless, and non-invasive sensing and monitoring. In this research, the effect of antibiotic (erythromycin) concentrations on test bacterium, Escherichia coli (E. coli) cultured on solid agar medium (MH agar) are monitored through employing a microwave split-ring resonator. A one-port microwave resonator operating at a 1.76 GHz resonant frequency, featuring a 5 mm2 sensitive sensing region, was designed and optimized to perform this. Upon introducing uninhibited growth of the bacteria, the sensor measured 0.005 dB/hr, with a maximum change of 0.07 dB over the course of 15 hours. The amplitude change decreased to negligible values to signify inhibited growth of the bacteria at higher concentrations of antibiotics, such as a change of 0.005 dB in resonant amplitude variation while using 45 µg of antibiotic. Moreover, this sensor demonstrated decisive results of antibiotic susceptibility in under 6 hours and shows great promise to expand automation to the intricate AST workflow in clinical settings, while providing rapid, sensitive, and non-invasive detection capabilities.

Subject terms: Biomedical engineering, Electrical and electronic engineering

Introduction

Bacterial infections have become a public health crisis around the world in recent years. Due to the over-prescription of antibiotics and non-compliance with their usage, more types of pathogens have begun to take a route towards further resistance against antibiotics14. Accordingly, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a list of 12 pathogen families which are highly resistant to antibiotics and pose a threat to public health on a global scale3. The new found resistance of these pathogens towards antibiotics has created a need for faster and more high-throughput antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) practices4,5.

Current AST methods often suffer from the pitfalls of being extremely expensive, time-consuming, labor-intensive, prone to cross-contamination, and have unstandardized practices5. Disk diffusion and broth dilution methods are currently the most widely utilized tests which use various antibiotics in different concentrations against bacterial colonies to test for antibiotic susceptibility or resistance48. These methods are extremely time-consuming and require upwards of 24 hours of incubation of the bacteria. Furthermore, they display poor performance when analyzing slow-growing bacteria and both methods require expensive resources such as large volumes of reagents and sizeable experimental equipment. Recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been deemed efficient in differentiating between various bacteria strains, however, it is far too expensive to operate and maintain for most clinics globally9,10. Additionally, newly emerging genotypic methods have been used which utilize polymerase chain reaction (PCR)11,12, DNA microarrays13, or loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)14, however, their complex and user intensive protocols make them hard to implement in various clinics and situations4,11. Other emerging methods of AST which utilize fluorescence15, electrochemical16, impedimetric17, microfluidics1822, microscopy23, and bioluminescence15 techniques are currently improving the scope of AST. However, they are far too expensive and complex to develop, require laborious protocols to execute, require direct contact with the sample growth medium and need various expensive reagents and equipment, making testing cumbersome4. This creates a crucial need for a more efficient and faster method of AST, which is cheap enough to implement and does not require a plethora of resources to operate and maintain.

Microwave sensing technology has recently been adopted in a myriad of applications including ice sensing24,25, liquid and gas sensing2629, dielectric spectroscopy3032, monitoring cancer33,34, detection of glucose and electrolyte level in aqueous solutions35,36, and recently in clinical microbiology practices3745. Microwave resonators have recently shown to be highly sensitive in sensing and monitoring bacteria39,40,46,47. Through translating variations of dielectric properties to quantifiable signals such as resonant amplitude and resonant frequency, microwave sensing has shown to be adaptive towards the needs of various biosensing applications and inexpensively implemented without the need to execute laborious protocols36,39,46,48. Among the various microwave resonators, planar microwave resonators are easily fabricated, can be reused for multiple assays, and have shown highly sensitive, real-time, and high-throughput results25,27,4951. Microwave resonators have been coupled with microfluidic chips to simulate broth dilution tests and have already displayed high levels of sensitivity in monitoring bacterial growth in various conditions39,40,52,53. Furthermore, differential microwave resonators have been implemented to reduce environmental noise in performing a more robust analysis on bioassays36,46. However, AST has only been proposed through microwave sensing and not yet demonstrated39. This lays on the premise in which antibiotics have proven to impact the growth of microorganisms by targeting protein synthesis, DNA and RNA multiplication, and other metabolic activities to inhibit bacterial growth54,55. The change of concentration of charged by-products released during antibiotic-bacterial interaction can indirectly aid in monitoring the metabolic activity through measuring conductivity and permittivity changes resulting in a change of resonant profiles overtime39,40,47. Therefore, to tackle the need for faster and more efficient AST practices, microwave sensing can address all of the pitfalls suffered by the current methods employed for AST.

In this study, a simplified model of AST on Escherichia Coli (E. coli) using microwave split ring-resonators is demonstrated in the absence or presence of various antibiotic concentrations. Among the existing microstrip resonator variations, a frequency variation resonator consisting of a single split ring was employed to monitor and detect the impact of various concentrations of antibiotics on the growth of E. coli. Solid MH agar inoculated with E. coli is cultured on a microwave resonator ring gap and the transient resonant response of the resonator is dictated by the growth, of the bacterial cells. Upon introducing various concentrations of the antibiotic erythromycin (E), bacteria growth is inhibited which dampens the resonant response of this test, when compared to growing bacteria. This electrical signal is analyzed by a vector network analyzer (VNA) in a real-time, non-invasive, and sensitive manner. Each sample was tested for 15 hours; however, decisive signals of growth inhibition were determined as early as 6 hours. This study not only calibrates a microwave resonator for AST on E. coli using erythromycin, but it demonstrates the efficacy of microwave sensors in clinical microbiological practices and has shown to vastly enhance the efficiency of AST.

Results and discussion

Electromagnetic field analysis of the sensor

A planar microstrip ring resonator structure was modelled in High-Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) to study the operation of the resonator. The resonator was designed to operate at a frequency of 1.76 GHz due to the low effective loss of the solid MH agar media. The resonant structure consists of a half-wavelength split-ring resonator and a feed line, as shown in Fig. 1a. The microstrip resonator was designed on a low loss dielectric substrate (Rogers 5880) with permittivity of 2.2, loss tangent of 0.0009, and thickness of 0.79 mm to minimize losses in the feed line or along the structure. The split ring resonator length was calculated using Eq. (1):56.

l=c2fεr 1

where l is the length of the split ring resonator (m), c is the speed of light (3 × 108 m/s), f is the resonant frequency (1.76 GHz), and εr is the relative permittivity of the substrate (2.2). Based on Eq. (1), the length of the split ring resonator was calculated to be 57.5 mm. However, the resonant frequency is also governed by the capacitance of the resonant circuit56. Since the ring gap of the resonator was modified to monitor an area of 5 mm2, the length of the resonator was modified to 73.8 mm to compensate for the increase in the capacitive area and achieve the desired resonant frequency. The coupling gap width was selected as 0.8 mm to achieve maximum magnetic coupling between the feed line and the split ring, as shown in Fig. 1b. The feedline was matched to the electromagnetic (EM) source impedance i.e. 50 Ohm using LineCalc (by Advanced Design Systems 2020), to allow maximum power transfer from the source to the resonator structure. The dimensions of the feed line and the split ring resonator are shown in Fig. 1a.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Modelled one port split ring resonator in High-Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS). (b) Magnetic field distribution on the resonator. (c) Electric field distribution on the resonator with the sensitive zone found in the ring gap. (d) Simulated vs measured reflection coefficient of the sensor in the absence and presence of a sample under test (SUT) on the sensitive region of the resonator. Impact of variation in (e) permittivity and (f) loss tangent of the SUT on the resonant amplitude and resonant frequency of the resonator.

The resonant structure was designed as a one-port device. One-port devices are widely used for accurately detecting and characterizing conductive dielectric materials57. As shown in Fig. 1a, one end of the feedline was connected to an EM source, and the other end was terminated to the ground (through a via extending through the substrate) using a high impedance quarter wavelength microstrip stub. The impedance of the stub was calculated using LineCalc by Advanced Design Systems 2021 and found to be 132.7 Ω. The stub was added to discharge the accumulated charge between the plastic plate sample container and the feed line due to the presence of weak capacitances between them. The high impedance of the stub prevented loading of the matched feed line while simultaneously acting as an open circuit to generate a microwave signal at the resonance frequency and short circuit at DC frequencies. An alignment marker was added to the design to align the inoculated bacterial culture with the sensitive region of the resonator. Since the most sensitive area of the resonator lies around its ring gap, bacterial growth must occur close to the ring gap to achieve successful bacterial growth monitoring. The simulated response of the bare sensor in the absence of test materials is presented in Fig. 1d, shown in black, in which the resonant frequency and amplitude were found to be 1.76 GHz and − 11.58 dB, respectively.

To determine the sensitive region of the resonator, full 3D electromagnetic field simulations were performed in HFSS. The sensitive regions of the resonator are the regions displaying the maximum magnitude of the electric field (E-field) shown in red within Fig. 1c. This figure presents the E-field distribution on the microstrip resonator sensor at the operating resonant frequency of 1.76 GHz. The electric field density reached a maximum magnitude around the ring gap as compared to other regions of the sensor and was thus selected as the sensitive region of the resonator. Additionally, to validate the determined sensitive region, a system under test (SUT) was placed on the ring gap, and the simulated response was analyzed as shown in Fig. 1d. For the SUT in this instance, a standard test material with a permittivity of 2.2, loss tangent of 0.0009, and physical dimensions of 6 × 9 × 1.57 mm was used. In effect, the overall effective dielectric properties at the sensitive region were modified, resulting in a shift of the resonant profile of the resonator. The material was placed at a distance of 0.1 mm above the ring gap to further validate contactless sensing as a viable application for microwave-based sensing for AST. Based on the simulation results, a − 3.42 dB and 44 MHz shift in the resonant amplitude and resonant frequency, respectively, was observed, indicating that the ring gap was the most sensitive to the presence of material and was chosen for further analysis.

In another study, an investigation to understand the impact of variation in the dielectric properties of the SUT on the response of the resonator was undertaken, and the results are presented in Fig. 1e,f. The permittivity and loss tangent of the SUT were varied independently and the other physical properties of the material were held constant. Based on the simulation results, resonant amplitude and resonant frequency were found to be inversely proportional to the variation in the permittivity of the SUT. However, variation in the loss tangent or conductivity only impacted the resonant amplitude of the sensor whereas, the resonant frequency remained unchanged. Since bacterial growth significantly impacts the conductivity of the growth medium, resonant amplitude variations were selected as a dominant parameter to study the variation in the loss tangent or conductivity of the SUT.

Finally, the measured reflection gain of the fabricated resonator was measured and compared against the simulated results. In the absence of any test material, the resonant frequency and resonant amplitude of the fabricated sensor was found to be 1.76 GHz and − 13.5 dB, respectively, resulting in a 0.05% and 16.75% error between the simulated and measured values for the resonant frequency and amplitude, respectively, which closely follows the simulation results shown in Fig. 1d. The deviation in the resonant amplitude between the simulated and measured values can be attributed to imperfections in the fabrication process, which includes soldering of SMA connectors, and the placement of the via for a ground. Furthermore, the sensitive region of the fabricated resonator was verified by placing a standard test sample (Rogers RT/duroid 5880) with a relative permittivity (εr) of 2.2, loss tangent (tan δ) of 0.0009, and dimensions of 6 × 9 × 1.79 mm on the ring gap of the resonator. A distinct shift in the resonant amplitude and resonant frequency by − 1.48 dB and 42 MHz, respectively, was observed when the material was placed on the ring gap, resulting in a 0.05% and 1.925% error between the experimental and theoretical values of the resonant amplitude and frequency, respectively, which agrees with the simulation results shown in Fig. 1d. This confirmed the sensitivity of the selected region to the presence of test material and was therefore employed to monitor the impact of antibiotics on the growth of E. coli.

Initial antibiotic susceptibility disk diffusion calibration discussion

Prior to utilizing the microwave resonator to monitor the impact of antibiotics on the growth of microorganisms, a preliminary disk diffusion test was performed. In this test, the growth of E. coli was visually observed against various concentrations of erythromycin. Based on the captured images presented in Fig. 2, different microbial responses were observed at various concentrations of erythromycin. Low concentrations of erythromycin (E-0 and E-7.5) did not inhibit microbial growth as there were no visible zones of inhibited growth. However, E-30 and E-45 resulted in the formation of zones of inhibited growth (171 mm and 280 mm respectively). This experiment verifies that E. coli HB101 is susceptible to E-30 and E-45, as used in this study. However, it should be noted that the bacteria are more susceptible to E-45 than E-30.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Captured images revealing the impact of (a) 0, (b) 7.5, (c) 30, and (d) 45 µg of erythromycin on the growth of E. coli.

Microwave and image-based detection of bacterial growth against antibiotics

A study to determine the impact of a hydrated blank paper disk (without antibiotics) and a 45 µg erythromycin disk on the response of the resonator was performed to establish a baseline response to distinguish between detectable and undetectable regions of microbial growth (Fig. 3a). It is evident from the measured results that the presence of a blank disk on a solid agar plate (with no bacteria) had a negligible impact on the response of the resonator as opposed to the ΔAmplitude (dB) measured for an inoculated solid agar plate with a blank disk (E-0 µg). The impact of an E-45 disk placed on a solid agar plate (with no bacteria) on the response of the resonator is also presented in Fig. 3a. The measured resonant amplitude variation was insignificant in comparison to the measured resonant amplitude variation for a solid agar plate inoculated with bacteria and accompanied with a blank disk (E-0 µg). Hence, the maximum variation in the resonant amplitude, i.e., 0.015 dB, was considered as a threshold to determine the regions of undetectable and detectable bacterial growth.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Impact of a blank paper disk (without antibiotics) with inoculated and un-inoculated agar samples, and a 45 µg erythromycin disk with inoculated agar sample on the response of the resonator. (b) ΔAmplitude (dB) vs time (hr) depicting the detectable (green) and undetectable (red) regions of bacterial growth, (cf) microscope images, of 0, 7.5, 30, and 45 µg of erythromycin with bacterial growth or inhibition shown in the dotted white circle.

Figure 3b presents the variation in the resonant amplitude corresponding to bacterial growth at tested antibiotic concentrations (0, 7.5, 30, and 45 µg). The figure shows a clear distinction between the measured E. coli growth at various concentrations of erythromycin. During bacterial growth, bacteria consume the nutrients readily available in their vicinity while synthesizing proteins and several charged byproducts55,5862. The charged byproducts expelled into the surrounding media leads to conductivity changes in the growth medium, which is reflected in the resonant amplitude variation of the microstrip resonator sensor.

In the absence of erythromycin, a maximum resonant amplitude variation of 0.07 dB was observed for the control plate (E- 0 µg) due to unrestricted bacterial growth around the sensitive region of the sensor (Fig. 3c). However, in the presence of erythromycin, the protein synthesis during bacterial metabolism was hindered, thereby impacting bacterial growth. As evident from Fig. 3b, the rate of change of resonant amplitude, which can be associated with the growth rate of bacteria, decreased as the concentration of erythromycin increased, which is in positive correlation with the microscopic images captured at constant time intervals (Fig. 3c–f). The slope of the measured resonant amplitude variation in the detectable bacterial growth region was calculated and found to be 0.005, 0.003, 0.002 dB/hr. with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.999, 0.998, and 0.997 for 0, 7.5, and 30 µg of erythromycin, respectively. Furthermore, an insignificant change in the ΔAmplitude (dB) of 0.005 dB at 45 µg erythromycin concentration indicated a complete inhibition of bacteria growth and was supported by microscopic images captured at constant time intervals (Fig. 3f). All the experiments were repeated thrice and the average of maximum ΔAmplitude (dB) vs erythromycin concentration (µg) with their corresponding uncertainties in the measurement are presented in Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table ST1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Maximum resonant amplitude variation (Δ Amplitude (dB)) for various concentrations of erythromycin and their corresponding mean and standard deviation.

Bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics has shown to be concentration-dependent63,64. Low doses of erythromycin decrease protein synthesis in bacteria, thereby reducing the growth rate rather than inhibiting bacterial growth completely. This is in accordance with the bacteriostatic nature of erythromycin. However, higher concentrations of erythromycin completely inhibited bacteria growth leading to the formation of zones of inhibition as shown in Fig. 2 in the previous experiement6365. It is evident from the figure that a high concentration of erythromycin leads to a large zone of inhibition, and vice versa. Correlating these results with Fig. 3 explains not only the greater zone of inhibition for E-45 compared to E-30 and E-7.5 but also the difference of rates of change in the differential resonant amplitude over the course of the 15 hours measured by the microwave resonator. A noticeable difference can be seen in Fig. 3b when comparing the differential responses of E-30 and E-7.5. Although subtle, E-30 showed a more dampened response in resonant amplitude change over time and had a lesser overall change than E-7.5, which is attributed to the reduced growth or metabolic activity of the bacteria. Therefore, it can be concluded that as the concentration of the erythromycin increased, the diameter of the zone of inhibition increased, overlapping the sensitive region of the microwave sensor. Consequently, the bacteria growth in the sensitive region decreased, which is in positive correlation with the measured microwave sensor’s response and is supported by microscope images captured at constant time intervals (Fig. 3c–f). Thus, it can be concluded that placing the antibiotic disks closer to the resonator will also impact the time at which decisive AST can be conclusive. However, the distance between the antibiotic disk and the resonator gap can be optimized as low concentrations marginally inhibiting growth can lead to inaccuracies for susceptibility in different concentrations.

A noteworthy outcome of this work was the sensor’s ability to successfully distinguish the impact of different concentrations of erythromycin on the growth of E. coli before any visible cues. The impact of various concentrations of antibiotics on E. coli only became apparent through visual inspection at T = 15 hr with no distinct or observable impact in the initial hours of the study. However, the microwave sensor was able to clearly distinguish the impact of erythromycin on E. coli growth within the first 6 hours of the experiment, which is far lower than the technical capacity of conventional microbiological disk diffusion studies. The strength of the proposed sensing technique in contrast to so some of the state-of-the-art biosensors for AST is presented in Table 1. Therefore, the rapid, contactless, non-invasive, portable, inexpensive, and reusable nature of the planar microwave resonator makes it a promising tool in the field of microbiology.

Table 1.

Comparison of the state-of-the-art biosensors for antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Sensor type/technique Time taken for AST Potential limitations Reference
Electrochemical biosensor 60 min Sensor is in direct contact with the growth medium, complex and expensive fabrication process 66
Impedimetric biosensor 1–2 h Sensor is in direct contact with the growth medium 17
Kirby Bauer AST Technique 24- 48 h Labor intensive, time-consuming 7
Bio-electrodes 4 h Electrodes need to be in direct contact with the growth medium and limit reusability 67
Microwave resonator sensor 6 h Alignment of antibiotic can impact the time to affect the inoculated bacterial culture This work

In summary, a planar microwave resonator sensor was implemented to monitor the impact of antibiotics on the growth of microorganisms. The proposed sensing platform offers the early detection of microbial growth by monitoring the conductivity variations of the growth medium due to microbial growth under the influence of antibiotics. Early detection of the response of microbial growth to antibiotics can be beneficial in developing treatment strategies against infections. The positive correlation between the measured microwave response of E. coli growth against the tested erythromycin concentrations along with the microscopic images and the preliminary analysis of zones of inhibition successfully demonstrated the efficacy of the proposed system. This work has shown promise for further automation of AST and increasing efficiencies within clinical microbiology labs for faster and more robust results for the proper care of bacterial infections.

Methods and materials

Reagents and materials

HB101 E.coli was used as the test microorganism, which was cultured in Muller Hinton agar (C6421) (MH Agar) as the growth media was purchased from Hardy Diagnostics CRITERION. BD BBL 15 µg Erythromycin paper disk, BD BBL 6 mm Blank paper disk, and MilliporeSigma Erythromycin (powdered form) were procured from Fisher Scientific, Canada. Ammonium persulfate as an etchant to fabricate a microstrip sensor was purchased from MG Chemicals (Surrey, Canada). Dielectric laminates were provided by Rogers Corp. USA. A Rohde and Schwarz ZNB20 VNA was used for the sensor measurement.

Bacterial samples preparation

Mueller Hinton Agar (MH agar) was used to prepare growth media for this experiment. 1.91 mg of MH agar was thoroughly mixed with 50 mL of deionized water and sterilized for 15 minutes at 121 °C using an autoclave. The media was cooled down to 50 °C, and 3 mL of the sterilized media was poured into a Petri dish to achieve an agar thickness of 1 mm. The plates were cooled down to room temperature, and 3 µL of E. coli at OD600 = 1.5 were inoculated at the predesignated position.

The antibiotic disks were prepared by soaking a blank paper disk with 30 µL of the desired erythromycin concentration. The disk was transferred to the inoculated plate and placed at a constant distance of 10 mm from the inoculated E. coli. The Petri dish was sealed using a parafilm to avoid changes in the Petri dish due to external ambient factors.

Fabrication of microwave resonator

A microstrip planar ring resonator sensor was fabricated on a Rogers RO5880 laminate from Rogers Corporation Pvt. Ltd. with a dielectric thickness of 0.79 mm, copper cladding thickness of 35 µm, permittivity of 2.2, and loss tangent of 0.0009. The resonator pattern was etched following previously used protocols53. Briefly, the split ring design was designed and simulated in ANSYS HFSS to optimize parameters and operating resonant profiles. Subsequently, the layout of the resonator was patterned using a laminator by incorporating several heating and pressing cycles. The patterned laminate was etched using ammonium persulfate. One end of the feedline was connected to a soldered SMA connector, and the other end was grounded. The modelled resonator structure and the simulation and fabrication results are discussed in detail in the above sections.

Initial antibiotic susceptibility disk diffusion calibration

To demonstrate the impact of 0, 7.5, 30, and 45 µL of erythromycin on the growth of E. coli, MH agar plates were inoculated using the streak plate method. Blank paper disks were soaked in 30 µL of RO water with 7.5, 30, and 45 µg of erythromycin, and tapped on the surface of the growth medium. The petri dish was sealed using parafilm to avoid precipitation and fungal contamination. The petri dish was incubated at 22 °C for 36 h and the diameters of the zone of inhibition were measured. The captured visual microbial growth at the end of this study is discussed in detail in the above sections.

Experimental setup of the sensor and VNA

The fabricated sensor arrangement shown in Fig. 5a was enclosed in a thermally insulated and mechanically stabilized styrofoam enclosure equipped with a LED light source, a digital microscope, and a temperature probe. The temperature probe was employed to monitor the variations in the ambient temperature. The ambient temperature was recorded to be 23.25 ± 0.25 °C. The bacterial growth images were captured at fixed time intervals using a 10 × Celestron digital microscope. The experimental setup is demonstrated in Fig. 5b.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Fabricated sensor arrangement and the experimental setup for measurement of bacterial growth against antibiotics. (a) The fabricated planar microstrip resonator with sample petri dish placed strategically on the resonator. (b) Experimental setup consisting of a thermally insulated styrofoam enclosure equipped with the sensor, temperature probe, microscope with LED, and vector network analyzer (VNA).

The inoculated plate was strategically positioned (Fig. 5a) and firmly secured on the sensor such that the distance between the paper disk and the ring gap was 1 cm. The sensor was connected to a ZNB20 Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) by Rohde and Schwarz. The VNA was calibrated every 15 hours to minimize the impact of drift in the measurement instrument on the response of the resonator. The VNA was operated between 1.55 GHz to 1.8 GHz. The intermediate frequency (IF) bandwidth was set to 300 Hz to minimize the broadband noise, and the number of points was selected as 6401 to increase the sampling resolution. The output power of the VNA was set to 0 dBm i.e. 1 mW which was sufficiently low to have no impact on the growth of E. coli through adverse effects just as Joule heating68,69. The VNA was triggered to measure the reflection coefficient (S11 dB) every two minutes using an automated LabVIEW program made in-house.

To test the ability of the sensor to monitor the susceptibility of E.coli to various concentrations of the antibiotic, erythromycin (7.5, 30, and 45 µg), the reflection gain (S11 (dB)) of the sensor was measured and recorded using VNA and LabVIEW, respectively. The measured S11 (dB) was normalized by subtracting from the initially measured value due to day-to-day variations of ambient conditions. Furthermore, the data pertaining to the initial 90 minutes were excluded to account for the stabilization of the measurement apparatus.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Syilx Okanagan Nation for the use of their unceded territory, the land on which the research was conducted. We would like to acknowledge Professor Deborah June Roberts (Biological Solutions Laboratory, UBC Okanagan) for providing facilities to conduct microbiology experiments. We also acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Discovery Grant Program (RGPIN-2018-04288), Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) program no.38148, and CMC Microsystems software and equipment. We also extend our gratitude to the Department of National Defence for funding support.

Author contributions

M.C.J performed simulation modelling and designed the microwave resonator. M.C.J fabricated microwave resonator, A.V.N and M.C.J prepared bacteria and antibiotic samples and collected experimental data. M.H.Z. interpret the results, developed the idea and designed the experiments. M.C.J, R.N and M.H.Z wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-94139-y.

References

  • 1.Ventola CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis: Causes and threats. P T J. 2015;40:277–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ayukekbong JA, Ntemgwa M, Atabe AN. The threat of antimicrobial resistance in developing countries: Causes and control strategies. Antimicrob. Resis. Infect. Control. 2017;6:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0208-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tacconelli, E. & Magrini, N. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. Essential Medicines and Health Products 7 https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/global-priority-list-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/en/ (2017).
  • 4.Khan ZA, Siddiqui MF, Park S. Current and emerging methods of antibiotic susceptibility testing. Diagnostics. 2019;9:49. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9020049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jorgensen JH, Ferraro MJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: A review of general principles and contemporary practices. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009;49:1749–1755. doi: 10.1086/647952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sader HS, Pignatari AC. E test: A novel technique for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. São Paulo Med. J. = Rev. Paulista Med. 1994;112:635–638. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31801994000400003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966;45:493–496. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guardino, R. F. Early History of Microbiology and Microbiological Methods.
  • 9.Hrabák J, Chudácková E, Walková R. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDITOF) mass spectrometry for detection of antibiotic resistance mechanisms: From research to routine diagnosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013;26:103–114. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00058-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bernardo K, et al. Identification and discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus strains using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Proteomics. 2002;2:747–753. doi: 10.1002/1615-9861(200206)2:6<747::AID-PROT747>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cockerill FR. Genetic methods for assessing antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999;43:199–212. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.2.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park S, Zhang Y, Lin S, Wang TH, Yang S. Advances in microfluidic PCR for point-of-care infectious disease diagnostics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011;29:830–839. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Frye JG, et al. Development of a DNA microarray to detect antimicrobial resistance genes identified in the National Center for Biotechnology information database. Microb. Drug Resist. 2010;16:9–19. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2009.0082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fluit AC, Visser MR, Schmitz FJ. Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001;14:836–871. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.4.836-871.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Webb JS, et al. Green fluorescent protein as a novel indicator of antimicrobial susceptibility in Aureobasidium pullulans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001;67:5614–5620. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5614-5620.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu T, Lu Y, Gau V, Liao JC, Wong PK. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing with electrokinetics enhanced biosensors for diagnosis of acute bacterial infections. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2014;42:2314. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1040-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brosel-Oliu S, et al. 3D impedimetric sensors as a tool for monitoring bacterial response to antibiotics. Lab Chip. 2019;19:1436–1447. doi: 10.1039/C8LC01220B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yasaki H, et al. A real-time simultaneous measurement on a microfluidic device for individual bacteria discrimination. Sens. Actuators B. 2018;260:746–752. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boedicker JQ, Li L, Kline TR, Ismagilov RF. Detecting bacteria and determining their susceptibility to antibiotics by stochastic confinement in nanoliter droplets using plug-based microfluidics. Lab Chip. 2008;8:1265. doi: 10.1039/b804911d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.He J, et al. A novel microbead-based microfluidic device for rapid bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014;33:2223–2230. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2182-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tang Y, Zhen L, Liu J, Wu J. Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing in a microfluidic pH sensor. Anal. Chem. 2013;85:2787–2794. doi: 10.1021/ac303282j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen CH, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using high surface-to-volume ratio microchannels. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:1012–1019. doi: 10.1021/ac9022764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baltekin Ö, Boucharin A, Andersson DI, Elf J. Fast Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing ( FASTest ) based on single cell growth rate measurements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:9170–9175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708558114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wiltshire B, Mirshahidi K, Golovin K, Zarifi MH. Robust and sensitive frost and ice detection via planar microwave resonator sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019;301:126881. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kozak R, Wiltshire BD, Khandoker MAR, Golovin K, Zarifi MH. Modified microwave sensor with a patterned ground heater for detection and prevention of ice accumulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:55483–55492. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c17173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zarifi MH, Daneshmand M. Liquid sensing in aquatic environment using high quality planar microwave resonator. Sens. Actuators B. 2016;225:517–521. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.11.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zarifi MH, Daneshmand M. Monitoring solid particle deposition in lossy medium using planar resonator sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2017;17:7981–7989. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2017.2757027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tanguy NR, Wiltshire B, Arjmand M, Zarifi MH, Yan N. Highly sensitive and contactless ammonia detection based on nanocomposites of phosphate-functionalized reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline immobilized on microstrip resonators. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:9746–9754. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b21063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wiltshire BD, Zarifi MH. 3-D printing microfluidic channels with embedded planar microwave resonators for RFID and liquid detection. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2019;29:65–67. doi: 10.1109/LMWC.2018.2883715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Suster, M. A. & Mohseni, P. An RF/microwave microfluidic sensor based on a center-gapped microstrip line for miniaturized dielectric spectroscopy. In 2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT) 1–3 (IEEE, 2013). 10.1109/MWSYM.2013.6697555.
  • 31.Suster, M. A., Maji, D., Vitale, N., Gurkan, U. & Mohseni, P. An RF/microwave microfluidic sensor for miniaturized dielectric spectroscopy based on sensor transmission characteristics. In 2015 IEEE SENSORS 1–4 (IEEE, 2015). 10.1109/ICSENS.2015.7370678.
  • 32.Maji D, et al. A novel, point-of-care, whole-blood assay utilizing dielectric spectroscopy is sensitive to coagulation factor replacement therapy in haemophilia A patients. Haemophilia. 2019;25:885–892. doi: 10.1111/hae.13799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Afshar S, et al. Dielectric properties of single cells subjected to heat shock using DEP cytometry. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2018;66:5933–5940. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2018.2879350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang LYY, et al. Discrimination of colorectal cancer cell lines using microwave biosensors. Sens. Actuators A. 2014;216:405–416. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2014.03.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mohammadi S, et al. Gold coplanar waveguide resonator integrated with a microfluidic channel for aqueous dielectric detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2020 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2991349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mohammadi S, Nadaraja AV, Roberts DJ, Zarifi MH. Real-time and hazard-free water quality monitoring based on microwave planar resonator sensor. Sens. Actuators A. 2020;303:111663. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2019.111663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen Y-F, Wu H-W, Hong Y-H, Lee H-Y. 40 GHz RF biosensor based on microwave coplanar waveguide transmission line for cancer cells (HepG2) dielectric characterization. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014;61:417–421. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim NY, Dhakal R, Adhikari KK, Kim ES, Wang C. A reusable robust radio frequency biosensor using microwave resonator by integrated passive device technology for quantitative detection of glucose level. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015;67:687–693. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Narang R, et al. Sensitive, real-time and non-intrusive detection of concentration and growth of pathogenic bacteria using microfluidic-microwave ring resonator biosensor. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:15807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34001-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mohammadi S, et al. Real-time monitoring of Escherichia coli concentration with planar microwave resonator sensor. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019;61:2534–2539. doi: 10.1002/mop.31913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ferrier GA, Romanuik SF, Thomson DJ, Bridges GE, Freeman MR. A microwave interferometric system for simultaneous actuation and detection of single biological cells. Lab Chip. 2009;9:3406. doi: 10.1039/b908974h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Govind G, Akhtar MJ. Metamaterial-inspired microwave microfluidic sensor for glucose monitoring in aqueous solutions. IEEE Sens. J. 2019;19:11900–11907. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2938853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grenier K, et al. Integrated broadband microwave and microfluidic sensor dedicated to bioengineering. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2009;57:3246–3253. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2009.2034226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kim N-Y, et al. Rapid, sensitive and reusable detection of glucose by a robust radiofrequency integrated passive device biosensor chip. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:7807. doi: 10.1038/srep07807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chhajer Jain M, Vijaya Nadaraja A, Mohammadi S, Vizcaino B, Zarifi MH. Passive microwave biosensor for real-time monitoring of subsurface bacterial growth. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2021 doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2021.3055227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jain MC, Nadaraja AV, Vizcaino BM, Roberts DJ, Zarifi MH. Differential microwave resonator sensor reveals glucose-dependent growth profile of E. coli on solid agar. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2020 doi: 10.1109/LMWC.2020.2980756. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Oberoi, S., Daya, K. S. & Tirumalai, P. S. Microwave sensor for detection of E. coli in water. In 2012 Sixth International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST) 614–617 (IEEE, 2012). 10.1109/ICSensT.2012.6461753.
  • 48.Mohammadi S, et al. A label-free, non-intrusive, and rapid monitoring of bacterial growth on solid medium using microwave biosensor. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2020;14:2–11. doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2952841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zarifi, M. H. Sensitivity and Selectivity Enhancement in Coupling Ring Resonator Sensors Using Splitting Resonant Frequencies. In 2018 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium—IMS 36–39 (IEEE, 2018). 10.1109/MWSYM.2018.8439564.
  • 50.Rafi MA, Wiltshire BD, Zarifi MH. Wideband tunable modified split ring resonator structure using liquid metal and 3-D printing. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2020;30:469–472. doi: 10.1109/LMWC.2020.2980740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Muñoz-Enano J, Vélez P, Gil M, Martín F. Planar microwave resonant sensors: A review and recent developments. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:2615. doi: 10.3390/app10072615. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kaushik AM, Hsieh K, Chen L, Shin DJ, Liao JC, Wang TH. Accelerating bacterial growth detection and antimicrobial susceptibility assessment in integrated picoliter droplet platform. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;97:260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zarifi MH, Sadabadi H, Hejazi SH, Daneshmand M, Sanati-Nezhad A. Noncontact and nonintrusive microwave-microfluidic flow sensor for energy and biomedical engineering. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18621-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ. How antibiotics kill bacteria: From targets to networks. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:423–435. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jurtshuk P. Bacterial metabolism. In: Samuel B, editor. Medical Microbiology. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. pp. 32–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pozar DM. Microwave Engineering. 3. New York: Wiley; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ray. J. K. Microwave Reflection Resonator Sensors 1–16 (1994).
  • 58.Sanchis A, et al. Dielectric characterization of bacterial cells using dielectrophoresis. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28:393–401. doi: 10.1002/bem.20317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bai W, Zhao KS, Asami K. Dielectric properties of E coli cell as simulated by the three-shell spheroidal model. Biophys. Chem. 2006;122:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2006.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schaechter M. A brief history of bacterial growth physiology. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:289. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Allison JB, Anderson JA, Cole WH. The method of electrical conductivity in studies on bacterial metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 1938;36:571–586. doi: 10.1128/jb.36.6.571-586.1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Negrete A, Ng WI, Shiloach J. Glucose uptake regulation in E. coli by the small RNA SgrS: Comparative analysis of E. coli K-12 (JM109 and MG1655) and E. coli B (BL21) Microb. Cell Fact. 2010 doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bernier SP, Surette MG. Concentration-dependent activity of antibiotics in natural environments. Front. Microbiol. 2013;4:20. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Udekwu KI, Parrish N, Ankomah P, Baquero F, Levin BR. Functional relationship between bacterial cell density and the efficacy of antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009;63:745–757. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kapoor G, Saigal S, Elongavan A. Action and resistance mechanisms of antibiotics: A guide for clinicians. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017;33:300–305. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_349_15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bolotsky A, et al. Organic redox-active crystalline layers for reagent-free electrochemical antibiotic susceptibility testing (ORACLE-AST) Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021;172:112615. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mishra P, et al. Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing by resazurin using thin film platinum as a bio-electrode. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2019;162:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Banik S, Bandyopadhyay S, Ganguly S. Bioeffects of microwave: A brief review. Bioresour. Technol. 2003;87:155–159. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00169-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jankovic S, Milosev M, Novakovic M. The effects of microwave radiation on microbial cultures. Hosp. Pharmacol. 2014;1:102–108. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES