Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most dominant pathogens in cystic fibrosis (CF) airway disease and contributes to significant inflammation, airway damage, and poorer disease outcomes. The CF airway is now known to be host to a complex community of microorganisms, and polymicrobial interactions have been shown to play an important role in shaping P. aeruginosa pathogenicity and resistance. P. aeruginosa can cause chronic infections that once established are almost impossible to eradicate with antibiotics. CF patients that develop chronic P. aeruginosa infection have poorer lung function, higher morbidity, and a reduced life expectancy. P. aeruginosa adapts to the CF airway and quickly develops resistance to several antibiotics. A perplexing phenomenon is the disparity between in vitro antimicrobial sensitivity testing and clinical response. Considering the CF airway is host to a diverse community of microorganisms or ‘microbiome’ and that these microorganisms are known to interact, the antimicrobial resistance and progression of P. aeruginosa infection is likely influenced by these microbial relationships. This review combines the literature to date on interactions between P. aeruginosa and other airway microorganisms and the influence of these interactions on P. aeruginosa tolerance to antimicrobials.
Keywords: cystic fibrosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, polymicrobial interactions, microbiome, antibiotic resistance
1. Introduction
It is estimated that approximately >70,000 people are living with cystic fibrosis (CF) worldwide [1]. Despite being a multi-organ disease affecting the pancreas, sweat glands and intestines, airway infections and the associated inflammation are the largest contributors to morbidity and mortality in CF [2]. Even with modern medical advances, the median life expectancy for people with CF is approximately 40 years [3]. CF is caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene. Lack of functional CFTR protein results in defective secretion of Cl− with enhanced Na+ absorption and mucus secretion [4]. The airway surface fluid becomes viscous, which leads to impaired mucociliary clearance, creating an ideal environment for colonisation of microorganisms. CF airway disease is characterized by a continuous cycle of persistent infection and inflammation culminating in reduced lung function and eventually respiratory failure.
The most commonly cultured bacteria from CF airway samples during periods of exacerbation are Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, non-tuberculous mycobacteria, and Burkholderia species [5,6]. P. aeruginosa is an important opportunistic pathogen that causes acute infections in immunocompromised patients. P. aeruginosa has robust virulence systems and is capable of forming multidrug-resistant biofilms which allow for persistent colonisation of the CF airways; thus, P. aeruginosa is the most common cause of exacerbation and mortality in people with CF [7,8]. Early intervention is paramount as P. aeruginosa is very difficult to eradicate once it has established chronic colonisation of the airways. P. aeruginosa infection is linked to decreased life expectancy of 30 years, compared with 40 years in non-colonised patients, and these patients experience a more rapid decline in pulmonary function with more frequent hospitalisations [9,10]. Chronic P. aeruginosa infection is associated with antibiotic resistance [11,12], poor response to antibiotic therapy [12], rapid decline in lung function, and poor clinical outcomes [13,14,15,16].
With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the discovery of a diverse community of microorganisms in the CF airway, it is now known that P. aeruginosa does not colonise the airways alone. Inter-species, cross-genera, and cross-Kingdom interactions have been shown to influence pathogen virulence [17,18,19], reduce susceptibility to antibiotics [20,21], and impact patient health [17,22,23]. The virulence of P. aeruginosa is influenced by its co-colonisers in the CF lung microbiome [24,25,26]. Several studies have now shown that P. aeruginosa responds differently to antibiotics when cultured alone and in co-culture with other microorganisms [20,21,27,28]. Furthermore, clinical trials have shown a lack of association between clinical response to antibiotic therapy and in vitro susceptibility of the cultured bacteria [29,30]. Changes in virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility in polymicrobial communities have the potential to drive poorer clinical outcomes in CF.
In this review, we focus on the impact of polymicrobial interactions on P. aeruginosa resistance/tolerance to antibiotics and the potential implications this has on therapeutic approaches in CF.
2. P. aeruginosa Infection in CF
P. aeruginosa infection is known to transition from sporadic colonisation to an intermittent infection before becoming established, and approximately 80% of CF patients are chronically colonised by P. aeruginosa by the age of 20 [31,32]. Development of chronic P. aeruginosa colonisation is a significant disease milestone in CF and has been observed to mark the beginning of significant lung function decline [33]. Chronic P. aeruginosa colonisation is considered a major limiting factor in patient survival, with estimates of 10 years reduced life expectancy in chronically colonised patients [9,10,31]. Early diagnosis and eradication are extremely important in delaying chronic infection. P. aeruginosa has several virulence factors that contribute to colonisation and airway inflammation within the CF lung, including Type III secretion system (T3SS) [34], lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [35], exopolysaccharide (EPS) [36], proteases [37,38], pyocyanin [39], and siderophore production [40]. Some of these virulence factors directly damage host tissue [35] and redirect immune cell functions [41] and can specifically target neutrophils [37,42]. Microorganisms exhibit social behaviours and live-in communities termed biofilms, which are embedded in EPS which protects them from the surrounding environment. The majority of P. aeruginosa EPS are Psl, Pel, and alginate; these play distinct roles in attachment and biofilm formation [43]. P. aeruginosa planktonic cells attach to the surface initially through weak and reversible adhesion, followed by formation of microcolonies [44]. The cells then embed themselves in a matrix of EPS which comprises proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids to facilitate maturation [45]. The EPS in biofilms affects the structure, including its density and stability. Finally, there is the dispersal stage where cells from the microcolonies leave the biofilm and colonise a new surface. P. aeruginosa can form biofilms that are associated with multidrug resistance (MDR) [46]. P. aeruginosa biofilms have been shown to be up to 1000 times more resistant to antimicrobials than planktonic cells [47,48]. There are numerous mechanisms involved in biofilm resistance, including adaptive stress responses, reduced penetration, and increased horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) [27,49,50]. Biofilm antimicrobial tolerance results from restricted penetration of antimicrobials through the exopolysaccharide matrix and different physiological activity which is caused by the hypoxic environment [51]. P. aeruginosa utilises its quorum sensing (QS) molecules, such as N-acyl homoserine lactones (HSLs) and alkyl quinolone (AQ), as part of its major cell–cell signalling. This QS system regulates expression of virulence factors, including the formation of biofilms [52,53] and the production of pyocyanin [54], proteases [55], and rhamnolipids [54,56].
P. aeruginosa adapts to its environment and overcomes many challenges, such as osmotic stress [57], competition from other organisms [58], decreased nutrient availability [59], antibiotics [60], and oxidative stress [61], to survive in the CF airways. Genes associated with QS, iron acquisition, phenazine biosynthesis, and multidrug efflux were shown to have mutated to promote survival and progression to chronic infection [62]. Chronic colonisation is associated with genotypic and phenotypic changes, such as reduced QS [63], metabolism [64], and motility [65] and overproduction of alginate [66] and increased antibiotic resistance [67,68]. During the chronic colonisation stage, P. aeruginosa changes from a non-mucoid motile phenotype to a mucoid biofilm former that is capable of evading host responses and antibiotics, at which point it becomes very difficult to eradicate.
MDR P. aeruginosa pose a number of therapeutic and diagnostic challenges in the CF population. As stated by the World Health Organisation (WHO), new antipseudomonal antibiotics are needed, but the introduction of new antibiotics is often closely followed by the emergence of resistance. A better understanding of the drivers and mechanisms of resistance is needed. There is a growing body of evidence showing that interactions within and among species in the microbiome can alter the virulence and antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa. These interactions may shape the evolution, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of P. aeruginosa. Increased understanding of community dynamics in the CF microbiome could provide new opportunities for therapeutic interventions. Understanding more about how chronic P. aeruginosa interacts with the other airway community members may provide insights into novel therapeutic approaches for these patients, and it may be possible to suppress P. aeruginosa indirectly by manipulating biologically relevant interactions.
3. The CF Airway Microbiome
There is a diverse array of bacteria, fungi, and viruses present in the airways, many of which have not previously been associated with the CF [69,70]. NGS has improved the detection of previously under-identified genera, such as Streptococcus, and has identified anaerobic genera such as Prevotella and Veillonella as not only common in the CF airway but highly abundant [71,72,73]. Microbiome studies corroborate culture data showing that species such as S. aureus, H. influenzae, and Streptococcus are dominant in early childhood, and pathogens, such as P. aeruginosa, become dominant in adulthood [74,75,76]. The diversity of the CF airway microbiome decreases with age and pathogen dominance [74,77,78,79].
The CF airway is known to be a hypoxic microenvironment, and it is becoming increasingly evident that anaerobes are important in CF disease [76,77,80,81]. Anaerobes such as Streptococcus, Haemophilus, Veillonella, Neisseria, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Propionibacterium, Actinomyces, Gemella, and Granulicatella are commonly detected in the CF airway using culture-independent techniques, but anaerobes are rarely detected using standard culture-based diagnostics [80,82,83,84]. In early childhood, anaerobic bacteria are in significantly lower abundance in children with CF when compared with children without CF [85]. A higher relative abundance of anaerobes has recently been linked to milder disease in CF, with better nutritional status, pancreatic sufficiency, and better lung function. Reductions in anaerobes were associated with the emergence of pathogenic bacteria genera, such as Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas [79,81]. While there is mounting evidence supporting anaerobes as beneficial in CF, little is understood about how anaerobes may behave in the host. Anaerobes in the airway can produce short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) by fermentation of mucins in the CF airway [86]. SCFAs have been detected in CF sputum at a mean concentration of 1.99 mM and were positively correlated with sputum neutrophil counts [87]. SCFAs have been shown to either increase or decrease P. aeruginosa growth in a concentration-dependent manner and stimulate neutrophil chemotactic agents and production of interleukin-8 (IL-8) in CF epithelial cells [87,88]. P. aeruginosa cannot derive SCFAs from mucins but can utilise those formed by other microbiota members, suggesting a potential cross-feeding mechanism in the CF airway microbiome that requires further exploration.
Linking microbial community composition to measures of disease severity such as exacerbation and lung function is vital to establishing the significance of the microbiome in CF lung disease. Community composition fluctuations were monitored in a 10-year study of 111 CF patients [89]. Changes to the microbiome during exacerbation were shown to be largely dependent on community composition and diversity at baseline, with particular genera such as Pseudomonas and Gemella acting as important drivers of change [78]. Alternatively, other studies have shown there to be little change in microbial community composition in patients during exacerbation and when clinically stable [90,91]. While the link between exacerbation and microbial community composition is not clear, poor lung function is clearly correlated with reduced microbiome diversity, as has been reported in a number of studies [92,93,94].
Antibiotics and the CF Airway Microbiome
Antibiotic treatment is a cornerstone of CF care. Antibiotics are prescribed based on the resistance profile of microorganisms cultured from sputum during exacerbation. Unfortunately, clinical responses do not often correlate with in vitro sensitivity tests, and so treatments are often unsuccessful [29,30].
Antibiotics and lung function have been found to be the main drivers of changes in microbiome composition [95]. In a study of 126 sputum samples from 6 age-matched male CF patients, spanning nearly a decade, antibiotics, rather than age or lung function, were the primary driver of decreasing diversity [96]. Despite this, communities demonstrated both short-term and long-term resilience after antibiotic-driven changes. Corroborating these findings, another study revealed that any changes in the CF airway microbiota caused by antibiotics were transient and that taxa linked to CF infection were still detected post-antibiotic treatment [97]. Practices around antistaphylococcal prophylaxis in children with CF differs from country to country, with prophylaxis currently recommended in the United Kingdom [98] and advised against in the United States [99], while in Ireland there is no consensus, with individual clinics differing in their approach. In a prospective observational study of 32 infants with CF, microbial diversity was lower in those receiving amoxicillin-clavulanate anti-staphylococcal prophylaxis [100]. In contrast, another study recently published found that prophylactic antistaphylococcal flucloxacillin treatment did not perturb the early CF airway microbiome or significantly reduce the relative abundance of Staphylococcus [85]. These contrasting outcomes call into question the benefits of prophylactic antistaphylococcal treatment in children with CF [101,102,103]. Some microbiome studies have revealed that the use of antibiotics such as azithromycin significantly reduced the relative abundance of the Pseudomonas genus [85], while other studies report that P. aeruginosa abundance was either not affected by antibiotics [91] or actually increased while non-pseudomonal taxa decreased during antibiotic treatment [104]. Anaerobes were more abundant in CF patients who took fewer antibiotics during their lifetime [89], and mean short chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were significantly lower after antibiotic treatments [87], suggesting a reduction in anaerobes after antibiotic treatment. A very interesting study published in 2017 monitored the microbiome in 24 CF patients receiving Aztreonam lysine for inhalation (AZLI) for chronic P. aeruginosa infection [105]. While no significant changes were noted in alpha or beta diversity following AZLI, specific sub-populations of organisms, Prevotella and Granulicatella, declined. Perhaps most interesting was that patients with high Staphylococcus and anaerobic organisms, Prevotella and Fusobacterium, responded less favourably to therapy. This suggests that certain species in the microbiome may determine the success of antipseudomonal therapy. This was one of the first published indications that polymicrobial interactions may influence antimicrobial therapy success in CF.
Studies have reported that the impact of antibiotics on the airway microbiome is transient and that baseline composition returns after 1 week [106] to 1-month post-treatment [94]. Many of these studies differ in the antibiotic used, dosage (if disclosed), oral versus intravenous delivery, severity of infection requiring treatment, and patient age groups, and thus are likely not comparable. Large, multicentre, prospective controlled studies are required to make an ultimate statement on the impact of antibiotics on the CF airway microbiome. The first microbiome-based, interventional clinical trial called CFMATTERS (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02526004; www.cfmatters.eu, accessed 1 July 2021) began in 2017 aims to determine whether targeting nonclassical (e.g., anaerobic) species with antibiotics will improve CF outcomes.
4. Polymicrobial Interactions with P. aeruginosa in the CF Airway Microbiome
The complex network of microorganisms in the CF airway microbiome have been shown to interact with each other and their environment, and this has the potential to influence clinical outcomes. P. aeruginosa colonisation changes the surrounding microbiome, but how diverse members of the community interact in general is not well understood. Some studies have begun to shed light on the polymicrobial interactions taking place among these bacteria (Table 1). These studies provide evidence that inter-species, cross-species, cross-genera, and cross-Kingdom interactions can influence not only pathogen virulence and host responses but also resistance and tolerance to antibiotics. The impact of these interactions in CF airway disease are yet mostly unexplored.
Table 1.
Sp Interacting with PA | Microbial/Host Response | Potential Implications on Disease | Ref(s). |
---|---|---|---|
Gram-positives | ↑ lytic activity by PA ↓ Gram+ in vivo models |
PA more toxic in co-infections with Gram+ | [114] |
↑ pyocyanin production by PA | PA mechanisms of dominance | [115] | |
S. aureus | Co-infection strains less competitive than mono-infection strains | Adaptation to coexistence in the lung | [116] |
PA induces bronchial epithelial cells to produce phospholipase, sPLA2-IIA | Manipulation of host immune response, enhanced survival of PA, and killing of SA and other Gram+ | [117] | |
PA EPS can affect mixed species biofilm architecture | Proximity of SA and PA in mixed biofilms | [118] | |
↑ PA siderophore production Lysis of SA |
Iron competition LasA protease |
[112] [119,120] |
|
PA LPS inactivation mutations ↓ production of PA LPS in anoxia |
Reduced recognition by immune system, persistence Immune evasion |
[112] [112] |
|
↑ PA swimming motility in anoxia | Reseeding of infection in lung | [17] | |
S. maltophilia | Co-colonise the CF airway | Opportunity to interact | [121] |
↓ SM growth ↑ PA biofilm |
Altered virulence and persistence | [18] [111] |
|
↓ Adhesion of PA to CFBE | Evasion of immune system and persistence | [18] | |
Streptococci spp. | ↓ SMG growth—PA competition for iron ↓ S. anginosus growth and biofilm formation ↑ Strep spp. biofilm formation—hijacks PA EPS ↓ PA viability—Strep H2O2 production |
Pathogen dominance and persistence Altered virulence and persistence Persistence Strep beneficial to host |
[122] [123] [124,125] [126] |
Burkholderia cepacia complex | ↓ PA virulence factors | Altered virulence | [127] |
PA enhances Bcc virulence | Altered virulence | [128] | |
↓ PA growth in vivo | Altered persistence | [129] | |
Reduced growth of Bcc and PA | Competition beneficial to host? | [130] | |
Co-infection ↑ inflammatory markers | Increased host inflammation | [19] | |
A. fumigatus | Co-colonise the CF airway | Opportunity to interact in airway | [131] |
Co-colonised patients—↓ lung function, ↑ hospitalisations, exacerbations and Abx usage | Poorer disease outcome | [16] | |
PA SNs stimulate AF growth | Increased AF abundance in co-infections * | [131] | |
Metacaspases from Pa SNs inhibit and damage AF biofilms | Reduced AF abundance in co-infections | [132] | |
↑ elastase production by PA in presence of AF | More damaging pathology | [133] | |
SNs from co-cultures more toxic to epithelial cells lines | More damaging pathology | [133] | |
Mutually antagonistic | Competition beneficial to host? | [134] | |
Gliotoxin produced by AF reduces PA biofilm | Competition beneficial to host? | [134] | |
Co-infections cause altered inflammatory response | Evasion of the immune system and persistence | [134] | |
PA dirhamnolipids induce AF ECM production | Inhibits AF growth and facilitates PA binding | [135] | |
PA phenazines inhibit AF growth by direct contact | Reduced AF abundance in co-infections | [136] | |
Subinhibitory concentrations of PA phenazines can promote AF growth | Increased AF abundance in co-infections * | [136] | |
Iron competition | Reduced AF abundance in co-infections | [137,138] | |
Development of PA SCVs | Reduced AF abundance in co-infections | [139] | |
Expression of QS molecules | Reduced AF abundance in co-infections | [135,140,141,142] | |
C. albicans | PA expressed LPS inhibits CA biofilm formation and hyphal development | Reduced CA abundance and virulence in co-infections | [143] |
PA QS molecule, 3-oxo-C12HSL | Reduced CA abundance in co-infections | [144] | |
PA 2-heptyl-3-hydroxyl-4-quinolone | Reduced CA abundance in co-infections | [145] | |
CA secreted Farnesol reduces PA pyocyanin Farnesol inhibits PA haemolysin Farnesol inhibits PA swarming motility |
PA less virulent | [146] | |
PA less virulent | [147] | ||
PA less virulent | [144] | ||
CA secreted tyrosol inhibits PA haemolysin and protease production | PA less virulent | [147] |
PA = P. aeruginosa, SA = S. aureus, SM = S. maltophilia, AF = A. fumigatus, CA = C. albicans, Bcc = Burkholderia cepacia complex, SMG = Streptococcus milleri group, SNs = supernatants, EPS = exopolysaccharide, LPS = lipopolysaccharide, CFBE = cystic fibrosis bronchial epithelial cells, ECM = extracellular matrix, Abx = antibiotics, QS = quorum sensing, SCVs = small colony variants. * contradictory findings.
During co-infection, P. aeruginosa remains prevalent and dominant, due to its great genomic plasticity, high virulence, and its ability to form biofilm. The pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa can be directly shaped by interactions with other species [107,108,109,110]. In vitro studies have been conducted on P. aeruginosa co-colonising and interacting with S. aureus, Streptococci, B. cepacia complex, A. fumigatus, C. albicans, and S. maltophilia (Table 1). Furthermore, studies have shown that these interactions can be synergistic and/or antagonistic, shaping P. aeruginosa virulence, thus enhancing its pathogenicity and persistence [69,111,112]. For a more comprehensive review of polymicrobial interactions impacting virulence in CF, there are some excellent reviews already published [6,69,113]. The present review will focus on the impact of polymicrobial interactions on P. aeruginosa resistance/tolerance to antibiotics and the potential implications this has on therapeutic approaches in CF.
4.1. P. aeruginosa and S. aureus Interactions
One of the most studied co-infections to date in this field is P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. S. aureus is often the first bacteria detected in people with CF and is more common in childhood [148,149,150]. One-third of patients with CF are estimated to be co-infected with S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, and their interactions have been linked to a more rapid lung function decline [151,152]. A 13-year study recently demonstrated an increased trend in prevalence of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa coinfections, from 30.6% in 2004 to 50.7% in 2016. In contrast with previous understanding, largely based on the US CFF reports, P. aeruginosa infections did not overtake S. aureus infections. Instead, CF patients were co-colonised with both bacteria at the same time [110].
Several studies have been conducted in this area, and there have been reports of competitive and cooperative P. aeruginosa–S. aureus interactions (Table 1). P. aeruginosa has been shown to compete with S. aureus by expressing exoproducts, such as elastase [120] and rhamnolipids [153,154]. Other studies have shown a synergistic interaction between these pathogens, with S. aureus stimulating the production of staphyloxanthin pigment [155], and these synergistic interactions have been linked to decreased pulmonary function [17]. A recent study has shed some light on the potential reason for the disparity in these studies. Sixty-four S. aureus clinical isolates from CF patients were tested for their ability to interact with P. aeruginosa and ranged from highly sensitive to completely tolerant to P. aeruginosa [156]. Many studies have now reported that long-term co-adaption of these two pathogens results in a more commensal, cooperative relationship [154,157,158].
Impacts on Antibacterial Resistance
Several studies have shown that there is a bidirectional alteration in growth and resistance of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus when in co-culture (Table 2). In planktonic growth states, P. aeruginosa has been shown to be the dominant pathogen and to suppress S. aureus growth [20,155]. Some studies have found P. aeruginosa to suppress S. aureus biofilm formation [159], while others have found compounds produced by P. aeruginosa to increase S. aureus biofilm formation [160,161]. S. aureus completely avoided vancomycin, ampicillin, and ceftriaxone by ‘hiding’ in P. aeruginosa biofilms; however, the mixed biofilms were found to be more susceptible to the broad-spectrum antibiotics ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides [162] (Figure 1). Many of these studies have focused on interactions between reference strains, with PA01 or PA14 commonly outcompeting S. aureus isolates. A study published in 2014 reported that early adapted strains of P. aeruginosa in a chronically colonised CF patient outcompeted S. aureus, while later-adapted strains showed commensal-like interactions [157]. Corroborated by another study in 2016, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were shown to have a proto-cooperative relationship when human-adapted strains were studied [158]. Radlinski et al. (2017) also reported strain-dependent differences in the production of several factors by P. aeruginosa–S. aureus biofilms linked to antimicrobial resistance [154]. Pathogens are known to adapt to the host environment during chronic infections; therefore, testing reference strains alongside clinical isolates is extremely important in polymicrobial communication studies.
Table 2.
Species Interacting | Resistance (Increased/Decreased) | Antibiotic | Mechanism | Ref/s. |
---|---|---|---|---|
S. aureus
(+PA) |
Increased | Aminoglycoside (gentamicin), tetracycline |
|
[155] |
Tetracycline and fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) |
|
[27] | ||
Aminoglycosides |
|
[20,160] | ||
Vancomycin, ampicillin, and ceftriaxone |
|
[162] | ||
Glycopeptide (vancomycin) |
|
[47] | ||
Aminoglycoside (tobramycin) |
|
[158] | ||
MDR tolerance |
|
[154] | ||
Decreased | Aminoglycoside (tobramycin), glycopeptide (vancomycin) |
|
[154] | |
Fluoroquinolones, membrane targeting antimicrobials, antiseptics |
|
[163] | ||
P. aeruginosa
(+SA) |
Unchanged | Aminoglycoside (gentamicin), tetracycline |
|
[155] |
Increased | Aminoglycoside (Inhaled tobramycin) |
|
[28] | |
β-lactams |
|
[112] | ||
Aminoglycoside (tobramycin) |
|
[157] | ||
S. maltophilia (+PA) | Increased | Aminoglycoside (tobramycin) |
|
[18] |
P. aeruginosa (+SM) | Increased | B-lactams (imipenem) Cephalosporin (ceftazidime) |
|
[168] |
Increased | Polymyxins |
|
[111] | |
Prevotella (+PA) | Increased | β-lactams (ceftazidime) |
|
[169] |
P. aeruginosa (+AF) | Increased | NA |
|
[170] |
Increased | Cephalosporin (Cefepime) |
|
[21] | |
P. aeruginosa (+CA) | Increased | NA |
|
[171] |
Increased | β-lactams (Meropenem) |
|
[172] |
PA = P. aeruginosa, SA = S. aureus, SM = S. maltophilia, AF = A. fumigatus, CA = C. albicans, SCV = small colony variant, HQNO = 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline-N-oxide, HAQ = 4-hydroxy-2-, QS = quorum sensing, ATP = adenosine triphosphate, LPS = lipopolysaccharide, DFS = diffusible signal factor, OMP = outer membrane proteins, ECM = extracellular matrix, NA = not applicable.
Efflux of antibiotics from cells via transport pumps is a well-known mechanism of AMR, and several antibiotic pumps belonging to the Nor family (tet38, norA, and norC) were upregulated in S. aureus during co-cultures and exposure to P. aeruginosa supernatants, leading to an increase in antibiotic resistance of S. aureus to tetracycline and ciprofloxacin [27].
P. aeruginosa produces several AQ small molecules involved in QS. The AQ 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline-N-oxide (HQNO) has been shown to suppress S. aureus planktonic growth, while transiently protecting it from killing by aminoglycosides [20] (Figure 1). The authors hypothesize that this may be directly related to the ability of HQNO to inhibit S. aureus electron transport. HQNO is known to inhibit electron transport through cytochrome b in S. aureus, resulting in decreased ATP generation, a shift to fermentative metabolism, and decreased active transport, which is required for uptake of AMG [159]. Another group have also recently found that HQNO induces multidrug tolerance in S. aureus via respiratory inhibition and reducing cellular ATP [154]. In contrast, HQNO in supernatants of P. aeruginosa was found to be responsible for increasing preformed S. aureus biofilm sensitivity to several antimicrobial agents, including fluoroquinolones and the antiseptic, chloroxylenol [163]. HQNO has been shown to increase S. aureus biofilm formation, and long-term exposure was shown to induce formation of difficult to detect, slow-growing mutants of S. aureus known as small colony variants (SCVs) [160]. SCVs are known to aid persistence inside viable human cells and to be resistant to several antibiotics [47,164,165]. A second AQ, 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinoline (HAQ), is an intracellular QS molecule produced by P. aeruginosa, and its expression was increased in a human-adapted P. aeruginosa isolate and upon interaction with S. aureus conveying resistance to tobramycin [158]. A third AQ, Pseudomonas Quinolone Signal (PQS), has been shown to be positively correlated with S. aureus biofilm formation [161]. P. aeruginosa mutants deficient in PQS and HQNO were less capable of stimulating biofilm formation by S. aureus than the wild type. It is evident that QS molecules are important in inducing resistance to several antimicrobials via their influence on electron transport and biofilm formation.
Siderophores are high-affinity iron-chelating compounds involved in transporting iron across microbial membranes. Most bacteria and fungi produce siderophores altruistically, and other species can benefit from their siderophore production. Increased siderophore production, pyochelin and pyoverdin, by P. aeruginosa in co-biofilms was observed to be linked to increased antibiotic tolerance [47]. In a study of 100 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, a correlation between siderophore production and AMR emerged [166]. No mechanism for this siderophore-directed resistance has been elucidated.
Exoproducts of P. aeruginosa such as LasA endopeptidase and rhamnolipids have been shown to increase killing of S. aureus by vancomycin and tobramycin, respectively [154]. Rhamnolipids are glycolipid surface-active molecules with several virulence-related activities in P. aeruginosa, and their biosynthetic pathway is metabolically linked to numerous bacterial products, such as alginate, LPS, and HAQ [167].
Descriptions of the other side of this relationship are sparse. P. aeruginosa SCVs are also selected for in co-cultures with S. aureus [157] (Figure 1). The staphylococcal protein A (SpA) produced by S. aureus has been shown to bind to the P. aeruginosa EPS, Psl, modifying biofilm architecture and increasing resistance of P. aeruginosa to inhaled tobramycin [28]. Another recent study has shown bi-directional changes in resistance of both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in mixed biofilms [162]. P. aeruginosa evolved for 150 generations in the presence of S. aureus and became more resistant to ß-lactam antibiotics but not ciprofloxacin or polymyxin due to a loss of a glycosyltransferase, wbpLPA14, involved in the biosynthesis of polysaccharide antigen and the O-specific antigen (OSA). The authors conclude that the production of a truncated LPS devoid of OSA during adaptation to S. aureus led to increased resistance of P. aeruginosa to ß-lactam antibiotics [112]. These findings suggest that P. aeruginosa in mixed biofilms is more resistant to antibiotics targeting cell wall biosynthesis and protein synthesis but that other resistance mechanisms may be less affected.
4.2. P. aeruginosa and S. Maltophilia Interactions
S. maltophilia is an opportunistic nosocomial Gram-negative bacterium and is inherently MDR. It has been linked to higher mortality rates and lung transplantations in CF patients [173]. S. maltophilia is present in roughly 8% of CF patients in Europe [174]. The frequency of co-colonisation with P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia in CF patients ranges between 10% and 60% [175,176,177].
Only a small number of studies have examined the interactions of S. maltophilia and P. aeruginosa and the effect co-colonisation has on both bacteria and the host. S. maltophilia abundance increases during co-infection with P. aeruginosa, possibly due to the protection P. aeruginosa biofilms afford to S. maltophilia, suggesting S. maltophilia benefits from co-infection [50]. Nas et al. (2019) showed that S. maltophilia encodes a type IV VirB/D4 secretion system (T4SS) that promotes competition between other bacterial species (69). This T4SS system has a role in the interplay between the two organisms: it enhances S. maltophilia growth while reducing P. aeruginosa growth [178] (Table 1).
S. maltophilia also influences biofilm formation by some P. aeruginosa strains by reducing EPS production and thus compromising biofilm attachment to the epithelial cell surface [18]. These findings suggest that S. maltophilia in a mixed co-infection may benefit from increased abundance and growth while disrupting the biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa.
Impacts on Antibacterial Resistance
In a mixed biofilm, S. maltophilia increases P. aeruginosa biomass and indirectly protects S. maltophilia from tobramycin activity [18] Table 2. Kataoka et al. (2003) showed S. maltophilia provides passive resistance to P. aeruginosa by producing β-lactamases, allowing P. aeruginosa to grow in the presence of imipenem and ceftazidime [168], suggesting S. maltophilia can protect P. aeruginosa from eradication in the host.
When grown in mixed biofilm with S. maltophilia, P. aeruginosa over-expressed alkaline protease (AprA) and alginate, while the QS-related rhlR and lasI genes were downregulated [18]. Moreover, the downregulation or inactivation of lasR was previously shown to increase P. aeruginosa resistance to ceftazidime [63]. It was also shown that mutation of PA1396, a sensor kinase in P. aeruginosa, or addition of the diffusible signal factor (DSF) by S. maltophilia to P. aeruginosa resulted in increased levels of proteins implicated in resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides; this effect was associated with increased tolerance to polymyxins [111]. Collectively, these findings suggest that S. maltophilia is capable of changing the virulence and antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa.
4.3. Anaerobes Impact P. aeruginosa Antibiotic Resistance
Anaerobic bacteria are not traditionally tested for in medical laboratories and therefore have not been commonly reported in CF. However, it is well established that the CF airways are hypoxic and that hypoxia is greater in later and more severe CF. Employing culture-independent approaches, anaerobes have now been shown to be key members of the CF airway microbiome. Up to 91.1% of CF sputa have been shown to be positive for at least one anaerobic bacterial species [179]. Anaerobes are increasingly dominant in patients with better lung function [95], and several studies have reported the negative impact of antibiotics on anaerobic populations in the CF airway [87,89,104,105]. The general consensus forming is that anaerobes may be beneficial in the airway microbiome.
Anaerobes have been shown to provide ‘passive resistance’ or indirect resistance to surrounding members of the community by producing extracellular metabolites or enzymes capable of degrading antibiotics in the vicinity. Species in the strictly anaerobic genus Prevotella are now commonly detected in the CF airways and represent around 70% of the anaerobes in the CF airway microbiome [180,181]. A study analysing the antibiotic resistance of 107 Prevotella isolates from CF and non-CF patients found that 50% of isolates produced ß-lactamases. In another study by the same group, up to 76% of Prevotella isolates cultured from adults and young children with CF produced extended-spectrum ß-lactamases which correlated with higher MICs to ß-lactam antibiotics [169]. They performed a co-culture experiment and a ß-lactamase-positive Prevotella protected P. aeruginosa from ß-lactam activity. This highlighted the real prospect of ‘emerging’ anaerobic bacteria being key roadblocks in the treatment of CF airway infections.
Several other anaerobic genera are now known to colonise the CF airway, including Veillonella, Porphyromonas, Streptococci, and Fusobacterium. While interactions between species in these genera and P. aeruginosa have been studied and reported changes in virulence [122,126,182] few studies have explored the ability of the interactions to change P. aeruginosa antibiotic tolerance.
In a multispecies microaerophilic biofilm model of species commonly co-colonising the CF lung—P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus anginosus, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Rothia mucilaginosa, and Gemella haemolysan—there was no difference in antibiotic susceptibility when compared with single species biofilms. Not only did adding anaerobic species P. melaninogenica, Veillonella parvula, and Fusobacterium nucleatum to the multispecies biofilm not influence antibiotic susceptibility, but they also found that the common CF bacteria in multispecies biofilms had similar susceptibility to antibiotics as their single-species biofilm correlates [183]. While this model is possibly one of the most sophisticated airway-relevant polymicrobial biofilm models published, it is still quite simplified and AMR profiles of the anaerobic bacteria included were not reported, specifically whether the P. melaninogenica strain was a ß-lactamase producer was not disclosed. With the full appreciation of the complexity involved in establishing in vitro multispecies models of the microbiome, further developments to include a variety of strains that would be representative of the types of resistant strains encountered in CF could yield very powerful results.
4.4. P. aeruginosa and Fungal Interactions
Although much attention is given to the bacteria that colonise the CF airway, fungi are also important in CF lung infections. The most commonly isolated fungi from the CF airways include Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, Scedosporium spp., Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Exophiala dermatitidis.
4.4.1. P. aeruginosa Interacts with A. fumigatus
A. fumigatus is isolated from 11% to 60% of patients [184,185,186]. Generally intermittent or persistent A. fumigatus colonisation is not treated unless allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is confirmed. However, it was shown that administration of itraconazole to non-ABPA CF population with Aspergillus colonisation resulted in reducing Aspergillus bioburden, stabilising lung function while reducing exacerbations, and improving quality of life [187], suggesting a pathogenic role for A. fumigatus in CF.
The prevalence of A. fumigatus and P. aeruginosa co-colonisation in patients with CF is 15% [109]; however, P. aeruginosa colonises 54% of CF patients with persistent A. fumigatus infection [116]. Co-colonisation with these two microorganisms results in reduced lung function, increased number of hospitalisations, respiratory exacerbations, and increased usage of antimicrobials relative to colonisation with either pathogen alone [16].
Complex antagonistic and synergistic interactions have been reported between A. fumigatus and P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa has been reported to inhibit A. fumigatus growth using a number of mechanisms, such as phenazine production [135,136], iron competition [137,138] development of SCVs [139], metacaspases [132], and expression of QS molecules [135,140,141,142]. A. fumigatus also reduces P. aeruginosa growth, and this is largely due to the production of gliotoxin [21,134]. P. aeruginosa and A. fumigatus interactions contribute to an altered pro-inflammatory response and increased pathogenicity, which could have significant implications for the treatment of this mixed infection [133,134].
4.4.2. Impact on Antimicrobial Resistance
Bacterial and fungal cells embedded in mixed microbial extracellular matrix are highly resistant to antimicrobials. Manavathu et al. (2014) performed in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility studies in monomicrobial and polymicrobial biofilms of A. fumigatus and P. aeruginosa [21]. Polymicrobial biofilms were significantly less susceptible to cefepime, suggesting that A. fumigatus may be changing the resistance profile of P. aeruginosa by enhancing its biofilm make-up.
Margarlit et al. (2020) demonstrated that the A. fumigatus secretome alters the proteome of P. aeruginosa and, of particular interest, increases the levels of proteins involved in efflux pumps and outer membrane proteins (OMPs) [170]. OMPs regulate the influx and efflux of nutrients and toxic compounds from the cell. In this study, the abundance of the OMP OprM was significantly increased; OprM forms the ejection component of the MexAB-OprM efflux system and is responsible for β-lactam and quinolone resistance in P. aeruginosa [188,189].
4.5. P. aeruginosa and C. albicans Interactions
C. albicans is an opportunistic pathogenic yeast and is one of the most commonly isolated microorganisms from CF sputum, with approximately 75% prevalence [184]. Candida spp. are generally considered colonisers of the upper respiratory tract and usually regarded as not clinically relevant. However, there are now several studies showing evidence of interactions and interplay between P. aeruginosa and C. albicans that may influence antibiotic resistance and host response to infection.
P. aeruginosa inhibits C. albicans growth in the host [190,191], and P. aeruginosa-expressed LPS [143] and the QS molecules 3-oxo-C12HSL [145] and 2-heptyl-3-hydroxyl-4-quinolone [192] have been shown to inhibit C. albicans biofilm formation and hyphal development. In particular, 3-oxo-C12HSL can even reverse the switch from yeast to hyphal growth in C. albicans and is important for adherence of bacterial cells to C. albicans [144]. Competition between these microorganisms may be strain- and growth-state dependent. Hogan and Kolter (2002) showed some strains of P. aeruginosa are cytotoxic to the filamentous form of C. albicans but are unable to attach to or kill C. albicans yeast cells [193].
The interaction between these two organisms has been shown to be bidirectional. Farnesol, a virulence factor secreted by C. albicans, leads to decreased PQS production in P. aeruginosa, resulting in a reduction of the PQS-regulated virulence factor pyocyanin [146]. Farnesol also influences expression of P. aeruginosa virulence-related proteins including haemolysin [147] and inhibits swarming motility [144]. P. aeruginosa and C. albicans are clearly capable of interacting, and this has an impact on their virulence mechanisms.
Impact on Antimicrobial Resistance
C. albicans enhanced P. aeruginosa ECM production, consisting of proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids, through increased expression of the alginate genes AlgU and mucA [171]. Alam et al. (2019) showed C. albicans can enhance meropenem tolerance of P. aeruginosa in a dual-species biofilm [172]. They concluded that fungal mannan and glucan secreted into the ECM of a dual species biofilm of P. aeruginosa and C. albicans increases P. aeruginosa tolerance to meropenem. These studies highlight that cross-Kingdom co-infections can have a direct impact on antibiotic tolerance of pathogenic bacteria.
4.6. Other Fungi
Scedosporium apiospermum species complex are the second most prevalent filamentous fungi cultured in CF after A. fumigatus [194]. A few studies to date have examined the interplay between P. aeruginosa and Scedosporium. P. aeruginosa was shown to inhibit S. aurantiacum in vitro [195]. Chen et al. (2017) used florescence microscopy to reveal poorly formed hyphae when cultured with P. aeruginosa, with non-mucoid strains more commonly having an inhibitory effect [195]. P. aerugionosa inhibited the growth S. aurantiacum, which was shown to be mediated by the production of biologically active metabolites. Biofilm formation and colonisation of fungal hyphae by P. aeruginosa were also important for S. aurantiacum growth inhibition [196]. Homa et al. (2019) also confirmed that P. aeruginosa is inhibitory towards Scedosporium through direct cell contact but also showed growth-promoting effects revealing that P. aeruginosa was able to enhance the growth of Scedosporia via VOCs [194]. These studies show that Scedosporium have been shown to alter the virulence of P. aerugionosa; however, fungi, other than A. fumigatus and C. albicans, have not been tested for their ability to increase bacterial tolerance to antibiotics.
5. Direct Transfer of Resistance in the CF Airway Microbiome
The co-colonisation of the CF airway by several microbial species provides vast opportunity for transfer of mobile genetic elements carrying ARGs. Crosstalk between members of the CF airway microbial community and horizontal gene transfer shape the microbial community for adaptation to the host environment. Whole genome shotgun sequencing has been employed in a number of studies to date to study the metabolic capabilities, virulence mechanisms, and resistance profiles or ‘resistome’ of the CF microbial community.
The ARG repertoire appears to be consistent among patients of similar disease status and not related to pre-exposure to antibiotics. A study monitoring 22 CF patients with more severe lung disease over 15 months reported that despite differing exposures to antibiotics among their patient cohort, the same repertoire of ARGs was present among almost all patients [97]. Other studies have also reported that the variety of ARGs detected in the diseased airway resistome was independent of prior exposure to antibiotics [197]. While the taxa present differed between patients, the ARGs present in the community were less variable. The resistome was shown to be different among patients with mild and severe disease. Adults with CF that had poorer lung function and more severe disease had increased abundance of efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance genes [198]. Ultra-deep metagenomic shotgun sequencing of 85 individuals with chronic respiratory disease revealed a ‘core’ airway resistome dominated by macrolide, ß-lactam, fluoroquinolone, and tetracycline resistance genes [197]. They delved further to explore the source of the ARGs and found that Streptococcus and Actinomyces were the main microbial reservoirs of macrolide resistance.
Bacteriophages are vehicles for transfer of mobile genetic elements between bacteria in the microbiome. DNA viral sequencing of CF sputum has revealed a CF phageome distinct from the phageome of people without CF [199]. Studies investigating the CF airway virome have revealed widespread genomic rearrangements and phage activity in the CF airway during periods of exacerbation and intravenous antibiotic treatment [200]. Important CF pathogens including, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and B. cenocepacia, have been shown to contain antimicrobial inducible prophages in their accessory genome [201,202]. Metagenomic studies of CF airway viral communities have revealed the presence of ARGs in bacteriophage. One such study identified a large number of resistant genes on mobile elements in antibiotic naive samples from infants with CF [203], suggesting that resistant genes are present in the community before antibiotic exposure. Up to 32.9% of ß-lactamase genes detected in this study were on mobile genetic elements, highlighting the risk for ARG transfer within the CF microbiome. Another study of 130 nasal swabs from 26 infants with CF found that the CF airway microbiome of antibiotic naïve patients had a large number of ARGs, including mobile elements [203].
The presence of resistance mechanisms, in particular ARGs on mobile elements, in the microbiome may be more relevant than identifying specific bacteria and their resistance profiles. This area requires further large multicentre studies in order to establish the role that monitoring the resistome could play in clinical decision making.
6. Summary
Facing the very real threat of AMR and MDR infections limiting our use of antibiotics in the future, research must focus on understanding all mechanisms by which microorganisms develop resistance. P. aeruginosa is one of the microorganisms listed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) for which new antibiotics are urgently required due to the high levels of MDR in this pathogen. This review has collated extensive evidence that P. aeruginosa is less susceptible to antibiotics when co-cultured with several microorganisms of the airway microbiome, such as S. aureus, S. maltophilia, Prevotella, and A. fumigatus. The mechanisms of polymicrobial antibiotic tolerance can be broadly divided into passive and active categories (Figure 2). Passive mechanisms include pathogens benefiting from the production of antibiotic cleaving enzymes produced by other members of the microbial community and ‘hiding’ in polymicrobial biofilms. Active mechanisms of resistance involve more direct changes in P. aeruginosa, including increased expression of EPS, increased biofilm formation, changes in membrane architecture (increased expression of efflux pumps, truncated LPS, and reduced activity of membrane transporters), changes in metabolism, and the acquisition of ARGs via horizontal transfer of mobile genetic elements.
Two studies have modelled multispecies biofilms in vitro, both containing anaerobes, and both reported that P. aeruginosa was not more resistant to antibiotics in these models than when cultured alone [123,183]. Tavernier et al. (2017) created a multispecies biofilm model composed of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and S. anginosis and found that P. aeruginosa was not more susceptible or tolerant to antibiotics when in a mixed species biofilm [123]. These studies model simplistic polymicrobial communities but contradict all other findings from co-culture studies reviewed here. Further studies in this area are required, and there is a significant requirement for developing representative in vitro multispecies models to further explore the impacts of inter-species, cross-species, and cross-Kingdom interactions on the resistance of important pathogens. The ability of microorganisms within a polymicrobial community such as the CF airway microbiome to share ARGs and antibiotic-cleaving enzymes and to encourage tolerance at a community level may explain why in vitro sensitivity tests do not correlate with clinical outcomes in CF.
The evidence is undeniably complex, and with many studies reporting contradictory findings, the overall picture is difficult to decipher. Mode of microbial growth, strain type (adapted/non-adapted), duration of mixed biofilm growth, antibiotic mode of action, and environmental conditions under which all are tested are all significant factors to consider when interpreting the outcome of mixed species relationships. Collectively, the findings from studies to date suggest that P. aeruginosa mixed infections may be more resistant to antibiotics and more persistent in the host.
7. Conclusions
Studies that report increased resistance due to polymicrobial interactions suggest combination antibiotic therapy; however, this is already practiced in CF therapy, and a recent meta-analysis found that there was no significant difference between single versus combination anti-pseudomonal antibiotic therapy on outcomes such as lung function symptom scores, adverse effects, and microbial burden reduction [204]. With the limited development of new antibiotics, one avenue in the future development of alternative antimicrobial therapies could target polymicrobial interactions that promote resistance or antibiotic tolerance.
The QS molecule HQNO produced by P. aeruginosa is known to cause respiratory deficiency in S. aureus when in co-culture, and respiratory deficient S. aureus is hypersensitive to the plant alkaloid tomatidine (TO). Boulanger et al. (2015) tested to see if this polymicrobial interaction could in fact make S. aureus more susceptible to killing by tobramycin [205]. TO increased the killing of S. aureus by 3.4 log10 CFU/mL in comparison with that observed in a co-culture without TO. Employing several mutant strains, this increased killing was shown to be linked to lasR rhlR, pqsA, pqsL, or lasA, and supplementing the pqsl mutant with HQNO restored bactericidal activity. The bactericidal activity of TO was also observed against a tobramycin-resistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and P. aeruginosa in co-culture. HQNO (0.39 to 1.24µg/g) has been detected in the sputa of CF patients colonized with P. aeruginosa in a bioburden-dependent fashion [20]. Long-term exposure of S. aureus to HQNO in co-culture with P. aeruginosa induces formation of difficult-to-detect, slow-growing, antimicrobial-resistant SCVs of S. aureus [160]. HQNO may also be useful as a biomarker of persistent P. aeruginosa–S. aureus co-infection and the development of SCVs which are much harder to treat [47,164,165]. These studies are excellent examples of how polymicrobial interactions could be manipulated to enhance treatment of mixed microbial infections.
Competition for limited iron availability in the host can be a key driver of competitive relationships within polymicrobial communities. P. aeruginosa produces higher levels of its siderophores, pyochelin and pyoverdin, in co-biofilms [47] and increased siderophore production has been linked with emergence of AMR [47,166]. Siderophore–antibiotic conjugates that essentially hijack the iron-mediated active transport systems of microorganisms have been designed and enhance uptake of antibiotics. Cefiderocol (S-649266), a cephalosporin–catechol conjugate and the first to make it to phase III trials, has shown potent activity against P. aeruginosa and several other MDR Gram-negatives [206,207]. Some bacteria naturally perform this ‘Trojan horse strategy’ by producing their own siderophore–antibiotic conjugates, sideromycins, to compete with other species in the community. These siderophore–antibiotic conjugates could be important therapies in polymicrobial infections, where iron uptake systems of P. aeruginosa have been shown to be particularly active due to increased competition for limited iron sources in the host environment.
The CF airway is host to a large population of anaerobic bacteria, and these bacteria produce SCFAs such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate [86,87] which among other functions are part of a complex cross-feeding network in microbial communities. SCFAs have been shown to either increase or decrease P. aeruginosa growth in a concentration-dependent manner and stimulate neutrophil chemotactic agents and production of interleukin-8 (IL-8) in CF epithelial cells [87,88]. SCFAs are well-known to have anti-inflammatory properties in the gut and to promote gut epithelial health; however, studies of their therapeutic potential in gut disease have resulted in disparate outcomes [208]. SCFAs have been shown to induce excessive production of IL-8 in CF epithelium cell lines [88], and while using SCFAs therapeutically in CF is unlikely, disrupting cross-feeding mechanisms may reduce P. aeruginosa fitness. P. aeruginosa cannot derive SCFAs from mucins but uses those formed by other microbiota members, and disrupting or manipulating cross-feeding mechanisms between community members as a therapeutic approach warrants further study.
A perplexing phenomenon in CF and other chronic respiratory diseases is the disparity between in vitro antimicrobial sensitivity of cultured bacteria and clinical response to antibiotic therapy [29,30]. Many traits of polymicrobial community behaviour discussed in this review could contribute to this discrepancy. In particular, the production of antibiotic cleaving enzymes by community members unculturable by standard diagnostic practices go completely undetected and are not considered when planning therapy. The main reservoir of macrolide resistance in the CF airway microbiome has been shown to be in Streptococcus and Actinomyces species [197], two anaerobic bacteria rarely detected by culture and traditionally not considered as significant in CF disease. Relying solely on culture-based diagnostics and only looking at the resistance profiles of the common CF pathogens in isolation is not representative of the host environment. Monitoring the CF airway resistome and focusing on the ARGs present in the microbiome as a whole may provide more clinically relevant information that clinicians can use when planning therapy. For instance, detecting ß-lactamase genes in any member of the microbiome may be a good indicator for prescribing ß-lactamase inhibitors alongside ß-lactams. Few studies have been published on the ‘resistome’ in CF, and further studies are required to assess the impact of community resistome data on prescribing and improved health outcomes.
Passive resistance and resistance/tolerance acquired due to polymicrobial interactions are understudied. As the world is on the cusp of an antibiotic resistance crisis, it is vital that we gain a keen understanding of all mechanisms by which microorganisms can avoid, tolerate, and resist antimicrobial agents.
Author Contributions
E.R., P.H.d.A.B. and J.R.; writing-original draft preparation. E.R. and J.R.; writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study did not require ethical approval.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable. No new data were created or analysed in this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.CFF . Cystic Fibrosis Foundation 2018 Report. CFF; Bethesda, MD, USA: 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rao S., Grigg J. New insights into pulmonary inflammation in cystic fibrosis. Arch. Dis. Child. 2006;91:786–788. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.069419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elborn J.S., Bell S.C., Madge S.L., Burgel P.R., Castellani C., Conway S., De Rijcke K., Dembski B., Drevinek P., Heijerman H.G., et al. Report of the European Respiratory Society/European Cystic Fibrosis Society task force on the care of adults with cystic fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2019;47:420–428. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00592-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Saint-Criq V., Gray M.A. Role of CFTR in epithelial physiology. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2017;74:93–115. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2391-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bhagirath A.Y., Li Y., Somayajula D., Dadashi M., Badr S., Duan K. Cystic fibrosis lung environment and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. BMC Pulm. Med. 2016;16:174. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0339-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Granchelli A.M., Adler F.R., Keogh R.H., Kartsonaki C., Cox D.R., Liou T.G. Microbial interactions in the cystic fibrosis airway. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018;56:e00354-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00354-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nixon G.M., Armstrong D.S., Carzino R., Carlin J.B., Olinsky A., Robertson C.F., Grimwood K. Clinical outcome after early Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. J. Pediatrics. 2001;138:699–704. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.112897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Emerson J., Rosenfeld M., McNamara S., Ramsey B., Gibson R.L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other predictors of mortality and morbidity in young children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatric Pulmonol. 2002;34:91–100. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kosorok M.R., Zeng L., West S.E., Rock M.J., Splaingard M.L., Laxova A., Green C.G., Collins J., Farrell P.M. Acceleration of lung disease in children with cystic fibrosis after Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2001;32:277–287. doi: 10.1002/ppul.2009.abs. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li Z., Kosorok M.R., Farrell P.M., Laxova A., West S.E., Green C.G., Collins J., Rock M.J., Splaingard M.L. Longitudinal development of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and lung disease progression in children with cystic fibrosis. JAMA. 2005;293:581–588. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.5.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Smith D.J., Ramsay K.A., Yerkovich S.T., Reid D.W., Wainwright C.E., Grimwood K., Bell S.C., Kidd T.J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic resistance in Australian cystic fibrosis centres. Respirology. 2016;21:329–337. doi: 10.1111/resp.12714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lucca F., Guarnieri M., Ros M., Muffato G., Rigoli R., Da Dalt L. Antibiotic resistance evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients (2010–2013) Clin. Respir. J. 2018;12:2189–2196. doi: 10.1111/crj.12787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lechtzin N., John M., Irizarry R., Merlo C., Diette G.B., Boyle M.P. Outcomes of adults with cystic fibrosis infected with antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Respiration. 2006;73:27–33. doi: 10.1159/000087686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stanojevic S., McDonald A., Waters V., MacDonald S., Horton E., Tullis E., Ratjen F. Effect of pulmonary exacerbations treated with oral antibiotics on clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2017;72:327. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hahn A., Burrell A., Fanous H., Chaney H., Sami I., Perez G.F., Koumbourlis A.C., Freishtat R.J., Crandall K.A. Antibiotic multidrug resistance in the cystic fibrosis airway microbiome is associated with decreased diversity. Heliyon. 2018;4:e00795. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reece E., Segurado R., Jackson A., McClean S., Renwick J., Greally P. Co-colonisation with Aspergillus fumigatus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with poorer health in cystic fibrosis patients: An Irish registry analysis. BMC Pulm. Med. 2017;17:70. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0416-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pallett R., Leslie L.J., Lambert P.A., Milic I., Devitt A., Marshall L.J. Anaerobiosis influences virulence properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis isolates and the interaction with Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:6748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42952-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pompilio A., Crocetta V., De Nicola S., Verginelli F., Fiscarelli E., Di Bonaventura G. Cooperative pathogenicity in cystic fibrosis: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia modulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in mixed biofilm. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:951. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bragonzi A., Farulla I., Paroni M., Twomey K.B., Pirone L., Lorè N.I., Bianconi I., Dalmastri C., Ryan R.P., Bevivino A. Modelling co-infection of the cystic fibrosis lung by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cenocepacia reveals influences on biofilm formation and host response. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hoffman L.R., Deziel E., D’Argenio D.A., Lepine F., Emerson J., McNamara S., Gibson R.L., Ramsey B.W., Miller S.I. Selection for Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants due to growth in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:19890–19895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606756104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Manavathu E.K., Vager D.L., Vazquez J.A. Development and antimicrobial susceptibility studies of in vitro monomicrobial and polymicrobial biofilm models with Aspergillus fumigatus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fourine R., Pohl C.H. Beyond Antagonism: The Interaction Between Candida Species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Fungy. 2019;5:34. doi: 10.3390/jof5020034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Briard B., Mislin G.L.A., Latge J.P., Beauvais A. Interactions between Aspergillus fumigatus and Pulmonary Bacteria: Current State of the Field, New Data, and Future Perspective. J. Fungi. 2019;5 doi: 10.3390/jof5020048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Folkesson A., Jelsbak L., Yang L., Johansen H.K., Ciofu O., Høiby N., Molin S. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: An evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. 2012;10:841–851. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tariq M.A., Everest F.L.C., Cowley L.A., Wright R., Holt G.S., Ingram H., Duignan L.A.M., Nelson A., Lanyon C.V., Perry A., et al. Temperate Bacteriophages from Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infections Show Disease-Specific Changes in Host Range and Modulate Antimicrobial Susceptibility. mSystems. 2019;4 doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00191-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vandeplassche E., Tavernier S., Coenye T., Crabbe A. Influence of the lung microbiome on antibiotic susceptibility of cystic fibrosis pathogens. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2019;28 doi: 10.1183/16000617.0041-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Briaud P., Camus L., Bastien S., Doleans-Jordheim A., Vandenesch F., Moreau K. Coexistence with Pseudomonas aeruginosa alters Staphylococcus aureus transcriptome, antibiotic resistance and internalization into epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:16564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52975-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Beaudoin T., Yau Y.C.W., Stapleton P.J., Gong Y., Wang P.W., Guttman D.S., Waters V. Staphylococcus aureus interaction with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm enhances tobramycin resistance. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2017;3:25. doi: 10.1038/s41522-017-0035-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Smith A.L., Fiel S.B., Mayer-Hamblett N., Ramsey B., Burns J.L. Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates and Clinical Response to Parenteral Antibiotic Administration: Lack of Association in Cystic Fibrosis. Chest. 2003;123:1495–1502. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.5.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hurley M.N., Ariff A.H.A., Bertenshaw C., Bhatt J., Smyth A.R. Results of antibiotic susceptibility testing do not influence clinical outcome in children with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2012;11:288–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Koch C. Early infection and progression of cystic fibrosis lung disease. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2002;34:232–236. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tingpej P., Smith L., Rose B., Zhu H., Conibear T., Al Nassafi K., Manos J., Elkins M., Bye P., Willcox M., et al. Phenotypic characterization of clonal and nonclonal Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from lungs of adults with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:1697–1704. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02364-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pamukcu A., Bush A., Buchdahl R. Effects of pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization on lung function and anthropometric variables in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1995;19:10–15. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950190103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Anantharajah A., Mingeot-Leclercq M.P., Van Bambeke F. Targeting the Type Three Secretion System in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2016;37:734–749. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.King J.D., Kocincova D., Westman E.L., Lam J.S. Review: Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Innate Immun. 2009;15:261–312. doi: 10.1177/1753425909106436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leid J.G., Willson C.J., Shirtliff M.E., Hassett D.J., Parsek M.R., Jeffers A.K. The exopolysaccharide alginate protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria from IFN-gamma-mediated macrophage killing. J. Immunol. 2005;175:7512–7518. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bleves S., Viarre V., Salacha R., Michel G.P., Filloux A., Voulhoux R. Protein secretion systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A wealth of pathogenic weapons. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010;300:534–543. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhao K., Li W., Li J., Ma T., Wang K., Yuan Y., Li J.S., Xie R., Huang T., Zhang Y., et al. TesG is a type I secretion effector of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that suppresses the host immune response during chronic infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:459–469. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0322-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hall S., McDermott C., Anoopkumar-Dukie S., McFarland A.J., Forbes A., Perkins A.V., Davey A.K., Chess-Williams R., Kiefel M.J., Arora D., et al. Cellular Effects of Pyocyanin, a Secreted Virulence Factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Toxins. 2016;8:236. doi: 10.3390/toxins8080236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cornelis P., Dingemans J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa adapts its iron uptake strategies in function of the type of infections. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2013;3:75. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Faure E., Mear J.B., Faure K., Normand S., Couturier-Maillard A., Grandjean T., Balloy V., Ryffel B., Dessein R., Chignard M., et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa type-3 secretion system dampens host defense by exploiting the NLRC4-coupled inflammasome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014;189:799–811. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201307-1358OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rangel S.M., Logan L.K., Hauser A.R. The ADP-ribosyltransferase domain of the effector protein ExoS inhibits phagocytosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during pneumonia. mBio. 2014;5 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01080-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhao K., Tseng B.S., Beckerman B., Jin F., Gibiansky M.L., Harrison J.J., Luijten E., Parsek M.R., Wong G.C. Psl trails guide exploration and microcolony formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature. 2013;497:388–391. doi: 10.1038/nature12155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Favre-Bonté S., Köhler T., Van Delden C. Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Role of the C4-HSL cell-to-cell signal and inhibition by azithromycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003;52:598–604. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ryder C., Byrd M., Wozniak D.J. Role of polysaccharides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:644–648. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Abdulhaq N., Nawaz Z., Zahoor M.A., Siddique A.B. Association of biofilm formation with multi drug resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. EXCLI J. 2020;19:201–208. doi: 10.17179/excli2019-2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Orazi G., O’Toole G.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alters Staphylococcus aureus Sensitivity to Vancomycin in a Biofilm Model of Cystic Fibrosis Infection. mBio. 2017;8 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00873-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Karami P., Khaledi A., Mashoof R.Y., Yaghoobi M.H., Karami M., Dastan D., Alikhani M.Y. The correlation between biofilm formation capability and antibiotic resistance pattern in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene Rep. 2020;18:100561. doi: 10.1016/j.genrep.2019.100561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schurr M.J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alginate Benefits Staphylococcus aureus? J. Bacteriol. 2020 doi: 10.1128/JB.00040-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McDaniel M.S., Schoeb T., Swords W.E. Cooperativity between Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa during polymicrobial airway infections. Infect. Immun. 2020 doi: 10.1128/IAI.00855-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sousa A.M., Pereira M.O. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Diversification during Infection Development in Cystic Fibrosis Lungs-A Review. Pathogens. 2014;3:680–703. doi: 10.3390/pathogens3030680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rasamiravaka T., Labtani Q., Duez P., El Jaziri M. The formation of biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A review of the natural and synthetic compounds interfering with control mechanisms. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015:759348. doi: 10.1155/2015/759348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.De Kievit T.R., Gillis R., Marx S., Brown C., Iglewski B.H. Quorum-sensing genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: Their role and expression patterns. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001;67:1865–1873. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1865-1873.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Carty N.L., Layland N., Colmer-Hamood J.A., Calfee M.W., Pesci E.C., Hamood A.N. PtxR modulates the expression of QS-controlled virulence factors in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1. Mol. Microbiol. 2006;61:782–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Oh J., Li X.H., Kim S.K., Lee J.H. Post-secretional activation of Protease IV by quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:4416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03733-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zulianello L., Canard C., Kohler T., Caille D., Lacroix J.S., Meda P. Rhamnolipids are virulence factors that promote early infiltration of primary human airway epithelia by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2006;74:3134–3147. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01772-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Govan J.R., Deretic V. Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiol. Rev. 1996;60:539–574. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.3.539-574.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lujan A.M., Macia M.D., Yang L., Molin S., Oliver A., Smania A.M. Evolution and adaptation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms driven by mismatch repair system-deficient mutators. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Palmer K.L., Aye L.M., Whiteley M. Nutritional cues control Pseudomonas aeruginosa multicellular behavior in cystic fibrosis sputum. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:8079–8087. doi: 10.1128/JB.01138-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Winstanley C., O’Brien S., Brockhurst M.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Evolutionary Adaptation and Diversification in Cystic Fibrosis Chronic Lung Infections. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Boles B.R., Singh P.K. Endogenous oxidative stress produces diversity and adaptability in biofilm communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:12503–12508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801499105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Marvig R.L., Sommer L.M., Jelsbak L., Molin S., Johansen H.K. Evolutionary insight from whole-genome sequencing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:599–611. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.D’Argenio D.A., Wu M., Hoffman L.R., Kulasekara H.D., Deziel E., Smith E.E., Nguyen H., Ernst R.K., Larson Freeman T.J., Spencer D.H., et al. Growth phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants adapted to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Mol. Microbiol. 2007;64:512–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05678.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jorgensen K.M., Wassermann T., Johansen H.K., Christiansen L.E., Molin S., Hoiby N., Ciofu O. Diversity of metabolic profiles of cystic fibrosis Pseudomonas aeruginosa during the early stages of lung infection. Microbiology. 2015;161:1447–1462. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mahenthiralingam E., Campbell M.E., Speert D.P. Nonmotility and phagocytic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from chronically colonized patients with cystic fibrosis. Infect. Immun. 1994;62:596–605. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.2.596-605.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hentzer M., Teitzel G.M., Balzer G.J., Heydorn A., Molin S., Givskov M., Parsek M.R. Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:5395–5401. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.18.5395-5401.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pang Z., Raudonis R., Glick B.R., Lin T.J., Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019;37:177–192. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Santi I., Manfredi P., Maffei E., Egli A., Jenal U. Evolution of Antibiotic Tolerance Shapes Resistance Development in Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. mBio. 2021;12 doi: 10.1128/mBio.03482-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.O’Brien S., Fothergill J.L. The role of multispecies social interactions in shaping Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenicity in the cystic fibrosis lung. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017;364 doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Armbruster C.R., Coenye T., Touqui L., Bomberger J.M. Interplay between host-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bittar F., Richet H., Dubus J.C., Reynaud-Gaubert M., Stremler N., Sarles J., Raoult D., Rolain J.M. Molecular detection of multiple emerging pathogens in sputa from cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rogers G.B., Hart C.A., Mason J.R., Hughes M., Walshaw M.J., Bruce K.D. Bacterial diversity in cases of lung infection in cystic fibrosis patients: 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) length heterogeneity PCR and 16S rDNA terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:3548–3558. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3548-3558.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zemanick E.T., Wagner B.D., Robertson C.E., Ahrens R.C., Chmiel J.F., Clancy J.P., Gibson R.L., Harris W.T., Kurland G., Laguna T.A., et al. Airway microbiota across age and disease spectrum in cystic fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2017;50 doi: 10.1183/13993003.00832-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gangell C., Gard S., Douglas T., Park J., de Klerk N., Keil T., Brennan S., Ranganathan S., Robins-Browne R., Sly P.D., et al. Inflammatory Responses to Individual Microorganisms in the Lungs of Children With Cystic Fibrosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011;53:425–432. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Brown P.S., Pope C.E., Marsh R.L., Qin X., McNamara S., Gibson R., Burns J.L., Deutsch G., Hoffman L.R. Directly sampling the lung of a young child with cystic fibrosis reveals diverse microbiota. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2014;11:1049–1055. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-383OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Coburn B., Wang P.W., Diaz Caballero J., Clark S.T., Brahma V., Donaldson S., Zhang Y., Surendra A., Gong Y., Elizabeth Tullis D., et al. Lung microbiota across age and disease stage in cystic fibrosis. Sci. Rep. 2015 doi: 10.1038/srep10241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cox M.J., Allgaier M., Taylor B., Baek M.S., Huang Y.J., Daly R.A., Karaoz U., Andersen G.L., Brown R., Fujimura K.E., et al. Airway Microbiota and Pathogen Abundance in Age-Stratified Cystic Fibrosis Patients. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Carmody L.A., Zhao J., Schloss P.D., Petrosino J.F., Murray S., Young V.B., Li J.Z., LiPuma J.J. Changes in cystic fibrosis airway microbiota at pulmonary exacerbation. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2013;10:179–187. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201211-107OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Flight W.G., Smith A., Paisey C., Marchesi J.R., Bull M.J., Norville P.J., Mutton K.J., Webb A.K., Bright-Thomas R.J., Jones A.M., et al. Rapid Detection of Emerging Pathogens and Loss of Microbial Diversity Associated with Severe Lung Disease in Cystic Fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015;53:2022–2029. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00432-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tunney M.M., Field T.R., Moriarty T.F., Patrick S., Doering G., Muhlebach M.S., Wolfgang M.C., Boucher R., Gilpin D.F., McDowell A., et al. Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria in High Numbers in Sputum from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:995–1001. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200708-1151OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Muhlebach M.S., Hatch J.E., Einarsson G.G., McGrath S.J., Gilipin D.F., Lavelle G., Mirkovic B., Murray M.A., McNally P., Gotman N., et al. Anaerobic bacteria cultured from cystic fibrosis airways correlate to milder disease: A multisite study. Eur. Respir. J. 2018;52:1800242. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00242-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Chmiel J.F., Aksamit T.R., Chotirmall S.H., Dasenbrook E.C., Elborn J.S., LiPuma J.J., Ranganathan S.C., Waters V.J., Ratjen F.A. Antibiotic management of lung infections in cystic fibrosis. II. Nontuberculous mycobacteria, anaerobic bacteria, and fungi. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2014;11:1298–1306. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201405-203AS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lamoureux C., Guilloux C.A., Beauruelle C., Jolivet-Gougeon A., Héry-Arnaud G. Anaerobes in cystic fibrosis patients’ airways. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;45:103–117. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2018.1549019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Guss A.M., Roeselers G., Newton I.L., Young C.R., Klepac-Ceraj V., Lory S., Cavanaugh C.M. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of bacteria associated with cystic fibrosis. ISME J. 2011;5:20–29. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Linnane B., Walsh A.M., Walsh C.J., Crispie F., O’Sullivan O., Cotter P.D., McDermott M., Renwick J., McNally P. The Lung Microbiome in Young Children with Cystic Fibrosis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Microorganisms. 2021;9 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Flynn J.M., Niccum D., Dunitz J.M., Hunter R.C. Evidence and Role for Bacterial Mucin Degradation in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Disease. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005846. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ghorbani P., Santhakumar P., Hu Q., Djiadeu P., Wolever T.M., Palaniyar N., Grasemann H. Short-chain fatty acids affect cystic fibrosis airway inflammation and bacterial growth. Eur. Respir. J. 2015;46:1033–1045. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00143614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Mirkovic B., Murray M.A., Lavelle G.M., Molloy K., Azim A.A., Gunaratnam C., Healy F., Slattery D., McNally P., Hatch J., et al. The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids, Produced by Anaerobic Bacteria, in the Cystic Fibrosis Airway. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015;192:1314–1324. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-0943OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Carmody L.A., Caverly L.J., Foster B.K., Rogers M.A.M., Kalikin L.M., Simon R.H., VanDevanter D.R., LiPuma J.J. Fluctuations in airway bacterial communities associated with clinical states and disease stages in cystic fibrosis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Fodor A.A., Klem E.R., Gilpin D.F., Elborn J.S., Boucher R.C., Tunney M.M., Wolfgang M.C. The adult cystic fibrosis airway microbiota is stable over time and infection type, and highly resilient to antibiotic treatment of exacerbations. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Cuthbertson L., Rogers G.B., Walker A.W., Oliver A., Green L.E., Daniels T.W., Carroll M.P., Parkhill J., Bruce K.D., van der Gast C.J. Respiratory microbiota resistance and resilience to pulmonary exacerbation and subsequent antimicrobial intervention. ISME J. 2016;10:1081–1091. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Acosta N., Whelan F.J., Somayaji R., Poonja A., Surette M.G., Rabin H.R., Parkins M.D. The Evolving Cystic Fibrosis Microbiome: A Comparative Cohort Study Spanning 16 Years. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2017;14:1288–1297. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201609-668OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Delhaes L., Monchy S., Frealle E., Hubans C., Salleron J., Leroy S., Prevotat A., Wallet F., Wallaert B., Dei-Cas E., et al. The airway microbiota in cystic fibrosis: A complex fungal and bacterial community--implications for therapeutic management. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Stressmann F.A., Rogers G.B., van der Gast C.J., Marsh P., Vermeer L.S., Carroll M.P., Hoffman L., Daniels T.W., Patel N., Forbes B., et al. Long-term cultivation-independent microbial diversity analysis demonstrates that bacterial communities infecting the adult cystic fibrosis lung show stability and resilience. Thorax. 2012;67:867–873. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Cuthbertson L., Walker A.W., Oliver A.E., Rogers G.B., Rivett D.W., Hampton T.H., Ashare A., Elborn J.S., De Soyza A., Carroll M.P., et al. Lung function and microbiota diversity in cystic fibrosis. Microbiome. 2020;8:45. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00810-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Zhao J., Schloss P.D., Kalikin L.M., Carmody L.A., Foster B.K., Petrosino J.F., Cavalcoli J.D., VanDevanter D.R., Murray S., Li J.Z., et al. Decade-long bacterial community dynamics in cystic fibrosis airways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:5809–5814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120577109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Bacci G., Taccetti G., Dolce D., Armanini F., Segata N., Di Cesare F., Lucidi V., Fiscarelli E., Morelli P., Casciaro R., et al. Untargeted Metagenomic Investigation of the Airway Microbiome of Cystic Fibrosis Patients with Moderate-Severe Lung Disease. Microorganisms. 2020;8 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8071003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Cystic Fibrosis Trust UK . Antibiotic Treatment for Cystic Fibrosis—Recommendations. Cystic Fibrosis Trust; London, UK: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lahiri T., Hempstead S.E., Brady C., Cannon C.L., Clark K., Condren M.E., Guill M.F., Guillerman R.P., Leone C.G., Maguiness K., et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines From the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation for Preschoolers With Cystic Fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2016;137 doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Pittman J.E., Wylie K.M., Akers K., Storch G.A., Hatch J., Quante J., Frayman K.B., Clarke N., Davis M., Stick S.M., et al. Association of Antibiotics, Airway Microbiome, and Inflammation in Infants with Cystic Fibrosis. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2017;14:1548–1555. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-121OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Stutman H.R., Lieberman J.M., Nussbaum E., Marks M.I. Antibiotic prophylaxis in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis: A randomized controlled trial. J. Pediatr. 2002;140:299–305. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.121930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Smyth A., Walters S. Prophylactic antibiotics for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2003:CD001912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.McCaffery K., Olver R.E., Franklin M., Mukhopadhyay S. Systematic review of antistaphylococcal antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 1999;54:380–383. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.5.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Daniels T.W., Rogers G.B., Stressmann F.A., van der Gast C.J., Bruce K.D., Jones G.R., Connett G.J., Legg J.P., Carroll M.P. Impact of antibiotic treatment for pulmonary exacerbations on bacterial diversity in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2013;12:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Heirali A.A., Workentine M.L., Acosta N., Poonja A., Storey D.G., Somayaji R., Rabin H.R., Whelan F.J., Surette M.G., Parkins M.D. The effects of inhaled aztreonam on the cystic fibrosis lung microbiome. Microbiome. 2017;5:51. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0265-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Smith D.J., Badrick A.C., Zakrzewski M., Krause L., Bell S.C., Anderson G.J., Reid D.W. Pyrosequencing reveals transient cystic fibrosis lung microbiome changes with intravenous antibiotics. Eur. Respir. J. 2014;44:922–930. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00203013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Medina G., Juárez K., Díaz R., Soberón-Chávez G. Transcriptional regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhlR, encoding a quorum-sensing regulatory protein. Microbiology. 2003;149:3073–3081. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26282-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Dekimpe V., Déziel E. Revisiting the quorum-sensing hierarchy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: The transcriptional regulator RhlR regulates LasR-specific factors. Microbiology. 2009;155:712–723. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.022764-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zhao J., Cheng W., He X., Liu Y. The co-colonization prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus fumigatus in cystic fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2018;125:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Fischer A.J., Singh S.B., LaMarche M.M., Maakestad L.J., Kienenberger Z.E., Peña T.A., Stoltz D.A., Limoli D.H. Sustained Coinfections with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020 doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1322OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Ryan R.P., Fouhy Y., Garcia B.F., Watt S.A., Niehaus K., Yang L., Tolker-Nielsen T., Dow J.M. Interspecies signalling via the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia diffusible signal factor influences biofilm formation and polymyxin tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;68:75–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Tognon M., Kohler T., Gdaniec B.G., Hao Y., Lam J.S., Beaume M., Luscher A., Buckling A., van Delden C. Co-evolution with Staphylococcus aureus leads to lipopolysaccharide alterations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISME J. 2017;11:2233–2243. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Magalhães A.P., Azevedo N.F., Pereira M.O., Lopes S.P. The cystic fibrosis microbiome in an ecological perspective and its impact in antibiotic therapy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;100:1163–1181. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7177-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Korgaonkar A., Trivedi U., Rumbaugh K.P., Whiteley M. Community surveillance enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence during polymicrobial infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:1059–1064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214550110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Korgaonkar A.K., Whiteley M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa enhances production of an antimicrobial in response to N-acetylglucosamine and peptidoglycan. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:909–917. doi: 10.1128/JB.01175-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Amin R., Dupuis A., Aaron S.D., Ratjen F. The effect of chronic infection with Aspergillus fumigatus on lung function and hospitalization in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest. 2010;137:171–176. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Pernet E., Guillemot L., Burgel P.R., Martin C., Lambeau G., Sermet-Gaudelus I., Sands D., Leduc D., Morand P.C., Jeammet L., et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa eradicates Staphylococcus aureus by manipulating the host immunity. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5105. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Chew S.C., Kundukad B., Seviour T., van der Maarel J.R., Yang L., Rice S.A., Doyle P., Kjelleberg S. Dynamic remodeling of microbial biofilms by functionally distinct exopolysaccharides. mBio. 2014;5:e01536-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01536-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Kessler E., Safrin M., Olson J.C., Ohman D.E. Secreted LasA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a staphylolytic protease. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:7503–7508. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53203-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Mashburn L.M., Jett A.M., Akins D.R., Whiteley M. Staphylococcus aureus Serves as an Iron Source for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during In Vivo Coculture. J. Bacteriol. 2004;187:554–556. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.2.554-566.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Wainwright C.E., France M.W., O’Rourke P., Anuj S., Kidd T.J., Nissen M.D., Sloots T.P., Coulter C., Ristovski Z., Hargreaves M., et al. Cough-generated aerosols of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Gram-negative bacteria from patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2009;64:926–931. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.112466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Scott J.E., Li K., Filkins L.M., Zhu B., Kuchma S.L., Schwartzman J.D., O’Toole G.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Can Inhibit Growth of Streptococcal Species via Siderophore Production. J. Bacteriol. 2019;201 doi: 10.1128/JB.00014-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Tavernier S., Crabbe A., Hacioglu M., Stuer L., Henry S., Rigole P., Dhondt I., Coenye T. Community Composition Determines Activity of Antibiotics against Multispecies Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00302-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Scoffield J.A., Duan D., Zhu F., Wu H. A commensal streptococcus hijacks a Pseudomonas aeruginosa exopolysaccharide to promote biofilm formation. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006300. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Price K.E., Naimie A.A., Griffin E.F., Bay C., O’Toole G.A. Tobramycin-Treated Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 Enhances Streptococcus constellatus 7155 Biofilm Formation in a Cystic Fibrosis Model System. J. Bacteriol. 2016;198:237–247. doi: 10.1128/JB.00705-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Scoffield J.A., Wu H. Nitrite reductase is critical for Pseudomonas aeruginosa survival during co-infection with the oral commensal Streptococcus parasanguinis. Microbiology. 2016;162:376–383. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Malesevic M., Stanisavljevic N., Novovic K., Polovic N., Vasiljevic Z., Kojic M., Jovcic B. Burkholderia cepacia YtnP and Y2-aiiA lactonases inhibit virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa via quorum quenching activity. Microb. Pathog. 2020;149:104561. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.McKenney D., Brown K.E., Allison D.G. Influence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoproducts on virulence factor production in Burkholderia cepacia: Evidence of interspecies communication. J. Bacteriol. 1995;177:6989–6992. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.23.6989-6992.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Schwab U., Abdullah L.H., Perlmutt O.S., Albert D., Davis C.W., Arnold R.R., Yankaskas J.R., Gilligan P., Neubauer H., Randell S.H., et al. Localization of Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria in cystic fibrosis lungs and interactions with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hypoxic mucus. Infect. Immun. 2014;82:4729–4745. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01876-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Bakkal S., Robinson S.M., Ordonez C.L., Waltz D.A., Riley M.A. Role of bacteriocins in mediating interactions of bacterial isolates taken from cystic fibrosis patients. Microbiology. 2010;156:2058–2067. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.036848-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Briard B., Heddergott C., Latge J.P. Volatile Compounds Emitted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Stimulate Growth of the Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio. 2016;7:e00219. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00219-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Shirazi F., Ferreira J.A., Stevens D.A., Clemons K.V., Kontoyiannis D.P. Biofilm Filtrates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Cystic Fibrosis Patients Inhibit Preformed Aspergillus fumigatus Biofilms via Apoptosis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0150155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Smith K., Rajendran R., Kerr S., Lappin D.F., Mackay W.G., Williams C., Ramage G. Aspergillus fumigatus enhances elastase production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-cultures. Med. Mycol. 2015;53:645–655. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Reece E., Doyle S., Greally P., Renwick J., McClean S. Aspergillus fumigatus Inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Co-culture: Implications of a Mutually Antagonistic Relationship on Virulence and Inflammation in the CF Airway. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1205. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Briard B., Rasoldier V., Bomme P., ElAouad N., Guerreiro C., Chassagne P., Muszkieta L., Latge J.P., Mulard L., Beauvais A. Dirhamnolipids secreted from Pseudomonas aeruginosa modify anjpegungal susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus by inhibiting beta1,3 glucan synthase activity. ISME J. 2017;11:1578–1591. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Briard B., Bomme P., Lechner B.E., Mislin G.L.A., Lair V., Prévost M.-C., Latgé J.-P., Haas H., Beauvais A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa manipulates redox and iron homeostasis of its microbiota partner Aspergillus fumigatus via phenazines. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:8220. doi: 10.1038/srep08220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Phelan V.V., Moree W.J., Aguilar J., Cornett D.S., Koumoutsi A., Noble S.M., Pogliano K., Guerrero C.A., Dorrestein P.C. Impact of a transposon insertion in phzF2 on the specialized metabolite production and interkingdom interactions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:1683–1693. doi: 10.1128/JB.01258-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Sass G., Nazik H., Penner J., Shah H., Ansari S.R., Clemons K.V., Groleau M.C., Dietl A.M., Visca P., Haas H., et al. Studies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mutants Indicate Pyoverdine as the Central Factor in Inhibition of Aspergillus fumigatus Biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 2018;200 doi: 10.1128/JB.00345-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Anand R., Moss R.B., Sass G., Banaei N., Clemons K.V., Martinez M., Stevens D.A. Small Colony Variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Display Heterogeneity in Inhibiting Aspergillus fumigatus Biofilm. Mycopathologia. 2018;183:263–272. doi: 10.1007/s11046-017-0186-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Moree W.J., Phelan V.V., Wu C.H., Bandeira N., Cornett D.S., Duggan B.M., Dorrestein P.C. Interkingdom metabolic transformations captured by microbial imaging mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:13811–13816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206855109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Mowat E., Rajendran R., Williams C., McCulloch E., Jones B., Lang S., Ramage G. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their small diffusible extracellular molecules inhibit Aspergillus fumigatus biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010;313:96–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Reen F.J., Phelan J.P., Woods D.F., Shanahan R., Cano R., Clarke S., McGlacken G.P., O’Gara F. Harnessing Bacterial Signals for Suppression of Biofilm Formation in the Nosocomial Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:2074. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Bandara H.M., Cheung B.P., Watt R.M., Jin L.J., Samaranayake L.P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide inhibits Candida albicans hyphae formation and alters gene expression during biofilm development. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2013;28:54–69. doi: 10.1111/omi.12006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.McAlester G., O’Gara F., Morrissey J.P. Signal-mediated interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008;57:563–569. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47705-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Reen F.J., Mooij M.J., Holcombe L.J., McSweeney C.M., McGlacken G.P., Morrissey J.P., O’Gara F. The Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS), and its precursor HHQ, modulate interspecies and interkingdom behaviour. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011;77:413–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01121.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Cugini C., Calfee M.W., Farrow J.M., 3rd, Morales D.K., Pesci E.C., Hogan D.A. Farnesol, a common sesquiterpene, inhibits PQS production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 2007;65:896–906. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Abdel-Rhman S.H., El-Mahdy A.M., El-Mowafy M. Effect of Tyrosol and Farnesol on Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance of Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015:456463. doi: 10.1155/2015/456463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Goss C.H., Muhlebach M.S. Review: Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2011;10:298–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.CFF . Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. CFRI; Bethesda, MD, USA: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Cystic Fibrosis Registry Ireland . CFRI Annual Data Report 2016. CFI Cystic Fibrosis Registry of Ireland; Dublin, Irleand: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 151.Limoli D., Yang J., Khansaheb M., Helfman B., Peng L., Stecenko A., Goldberg J. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-infection is associated with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and poor clinical outcomes. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016;35 doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2621-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Limoli D.H., Hoffman L.R. hinder, hide and harm: What can we learn from the interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus during respiratory infections? Thorax. 2019;74:684–692. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Diaz De Rienzo M.A., Stevenson P.S., Marchant R., Banat I.M. Effect of biosurfactants on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a BioFlux channel. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;100:5773–5779. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7310-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Radlinski L., Rowe S.E., Kartchner L.B., Maile R., Cairns B.A., Vitko N.P., Gode C.J., Lachiewicz A.M., Wolfgang M.C., Conlon B.P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoproducts determine antibiotic efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2003981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.DeLeon S., Clinton A., Fowler H., Everett J., Horswill A.R., Rumbaugh K.P. Synergistic interactions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro wound model. Infect. Immun. 2014;82:4718–4728. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02198-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Bernardy E.E., Petit R.A., 3rd, Raghuram V., Alexander A.M., Read T.D., Goldberg J.B. Genotypic and Phenotypic Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patient Lung Infections and Their Interactions with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio. 2020;11 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00735-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Michelsen C.F., Christensen A.M., Bojer M.S., Hoiby N., Ingmer H., Jelsbak L. Staphylococcus aureus alters growth activity, autolysis, and antibiotic tolerance in a human host-adapted Pseudomonas aeruginosa lineage. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:3903–3911. doi: 10.1128/JB.02006-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Frydenlund Michelsen C., Hossein Khademi S.M., Krogh Johansen H., Ingmer H., Dorrestein P.C., Jelsbak L. Evolution of metabolic divergence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during long-term infection facilitates a proto-cooperative interspecies interaction. ISME J. 2016;10:1323–1336. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Filkins L.M., Graber J.A., Olson D.G., Dolben E.L., Lynd L.R., Bhuju S., O’Toole G.A. Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Drives S. aureus towards Fermentative Metabolism and Reduced Viability in a Cystic Fibrosis Model. J. Bacteriol. 2015;197:2252–2264. doi: 10.1128/JB.00059-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Mitchell G., Seguin D.L., Asselin A.E., Deziel E., Cantin A.M., Frost E.H., Michaud S., Malouin F. Staphylococcus aureus sigma B-dependent emergence of small-colony variants and biofilm production following exposure to Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline-N-oxide. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Fugere A., Lalonde Seguin D., Mitchell G., Deziel E., Dekimpe V., Cantin A.M., Frost E., Malouin F. Interspecific small molecule interactions between clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus from adult cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Trizna E.Y., Yarullina M.N., Baidamshina D.R., Mironova A.V., Akhatova F.S., Rozhina E.V., Fakhrullin R.F., Khabibrakhmanova A.M., Kurbangalieva A.R., Bogachev M.I., et al. Bidirectional alterations in antibiotics susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus-Pseudomonas aeruginosa dual-species biofilm. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71834-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Orazi G., Ruoff K.L., O’Toole G.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Increases the Sensitivity of Biofilm-Grown Staphylococcus aureus to Membrane-Targeting Antiseptics and Antibiotics. mBio. 2019;10 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01501-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Proctor R.A., von Eiff C., Kahl B.C., Becker K., McNamara P., Herrmann M., Peters G. Small colony variants: A pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006;4:295–305. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Biswas L., Biswas R., Schlag M., Bertram R., Gotz F. Small-colony variant selection as a survival strategy for Staphylococcus aureus in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:6910–6912. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01211-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Sadeqi Nezhad M., Pordeli H., Ghasemi N., Ahani A. Evaluation of multidrug resistance patterns in siderophore-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa from clinical and environmental samples in Gorgan, Iran. New Microbes New Infect. 2018;24:38–41. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Soberon-Chavez G., Lepine F., Deziel E. Production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005;68:718–725. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-0150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Kataoka D., Fujiwara H., Kawakami T., Tanaka Y., Tanimoto A., Ikawa S., Tanaka Y. The indirect pathogenicity of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2003;22:601–606. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00244-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Sherrard L.J., McGrath S.J., McIlreavey L., Hatch J., Wolfgang M.C., Muhlebach M.S., Gilpin D.F., Elborn J.S., Tunney M.M. Production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and the potential indirect pathogenic role of Prevotella isolates from the cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiota. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2016;47:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Margalit A., Carolan J.C., Sheehan D., Kavanagh K. The Aspergillus fumigatus Secretome Alters the Proteome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Stimulate Bacterial Growth: Implications for Co-infection. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2020;19:1346–1359. doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA120.002059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Phuengmaung P., Somparn P., Panpetch W., Singkham-In U., Wannigama D.L., Chatsuwan T., Leelahavanichkul A. Coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa With Candida albicans Enhances Biofilm Thickness Through Alginate-Related Extracellular Matrix but Is Attenuated by N-acetyl-l-cysteine. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:594336. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.594336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Alam F., Catlow D., Di Maio A., Blair J.M.A., Hall R.A. Candida albicans enhances meropenem tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a dual-species biofilm. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020;75:925–935. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Waters V., Atenafu E.G., Lu A., Yau Y., Tullis E., Ratjen F. Chronic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection and mortality or lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis patients. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2013;12:482–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.ECFS Patient Registry ECFS Patient Registry Annual Data Report. 2018.
- 175.Spicuzza L., Sciuto C., Vitaliti G., Di Dio G., Leonardi S., La Rosa M. Emerging pathogens in cystic fibrosis: Ten years of follow-up in a cohort of patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009;28:191–195. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0605-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Blau H., Linnane B., Carzino R., Tannenbaum E.L., Skoric B., Robinson P.J., Robertson C., Ranganathan S.C. Induced sputum compared to bronchoalveolar lavage in young, non-expectorating cystic fibrosis children. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2014;13:106–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Zemanick E.T., Wagner B.D., Robertson C.E., Stevens M.J., Szefler S.J., Accurso F.J., Sagel S.D., Harris J.K. Assessment of airway microbiota and inflammation in cystic fibrosis using multiple sampling methods. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015;12:221–229. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201407-310OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Nas M.Y., White R.C., DuMont A.L., Lopez A.E., Cianciotto N.P. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Encodes a VirB/VirD4 Type IV Secretion System That Modulates Apoptosis in Human Cells and Promotes Competition against Heterologous Bacteria, Including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2019;87 doi: 10.1128/IAI.00457-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Lamoureux C., Guilloux C.A., Beauruelle C., Gouriou S., Ramel S., Dirou A., Le Bihan J., Revert K., Ropars T., Lagrafeuille R., et al. An observational study of anaerobic bacteria in cystic fibrosis lung using culture dependant and independent approaches. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:6845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85592-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Field T.R., Sibley C.D., Parkins M.D., Rabin H.R., Surette M.G. The genus Prevotella in cystic fibrosis airways. Anaerobe. 2010;16:337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Sherrard L.J., Graham K.A., McGrath S.J., McIlreavey L., Hatch J., Muhlebach M.S., Wolfgang M.C., Gilpin D.F., Elborn J.S., Schneiders T., et al. Antibiotic resistance in Prevotella species isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013;68:2369–2374. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Scoffield J.A., Wu H. Oral streptococci and nitrite-mediated interference of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2015;83:101–107. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02396-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Vandeplassche E., Sass A., Ostyn L., Burmolle M., Kragh K.N., Bjarnsholt T., Coenye T., Crabbe A. Antibiotic susceptibility of cystic fibrosis lung microbiome members in a multispecies biofilm. Biofilm. 2020;2:100031. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2020.100031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Bakare N., Rickerts V., Bargon J., Just-Nübling G. Prevalence of Aspergillus fumigatus and other fungal species in the sputum of adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Mycoses. 2003;46:19–23. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2003.00830.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Valenza G., Tappe D., Turnwald D., Frosch M., Konig C., Hebestreit H., Abele-Horn M. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from sputa of patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2008;7:123–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2007.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Ziesing S., Suerbaum S., Sedlacek L. Fungal epidemiology and diversity in cystic fibrosis patients over a 5-year period in a national reference center. Med. Mycol. 2016;54:781–786. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Coughlan C.A., Chotirmall S.H., Renwick J., Hassan T., Low T.B., Bergsson G., Eshwika A., Bennett K., Dunne K., Greene C.M., et al. The effect of Aspergillus fumigatus infection on vitamin D receptor expression in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012;186:999–1007. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0478OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Wang H., Meng J., Jia M., Ma X., He G., Yu J., Wang R., Bai H., Hou Z., Luo X. oprM as a new target for reversion of multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by antisense phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2010;60:275–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00742.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Horna G., Lopez M., Guerra H., Saenz Y., Ruiz J. Interplay between MexAB-OprM and MexEF-OprN in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:16463. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34694-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Gupta N., Haque A., Mukhopadhyay G., Narayan R.P., Prasad R. Interactions between bacteria and Candida in the burn wound. Burns. 2005;31:375–378. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Kaleli I., Cevahir N., Demir M., Yildirim U., Sahin R. Anticandidal activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from clinical specimens. Mycoses. 2007;50:74–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01322.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Hogan D.A., Vik A., Kolter R. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecule influences Candida albicans morphology. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;54:1212–1223. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Hogan D.A., Kolter R. Pseudomonas-Candida interactions: An ecological role for virulence factors. Science. 2002;296:2229–2232. doi: 10.1126/science.1070784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Homa M., Sandor A., Toth E., Szebenyi C., Nagy G., Vagvolgyi C., Papp T. In vitro Interactions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa With Scedosporium Species Frequently Associated With Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:441. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Chen S.C., Patel S., Meyer W., Chapman B., Yu H., Byth K., Middleton P.G., Nevalainen H., Sorrell T.C. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Inhibits the Growth of Scedosporium and Lomentospora In Vitro. Mycopathologia. 2018;183:251–261. doi: 10.1007/s11046-017-0140-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Kaur J., Pethani B.P., Kumar S., Kim M., Sunna A., Kautto L., Penesyan A., Paulsen I.T., Nevalainen H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibits the growth of Scedosporium aurantiacum, an opportunistic fungal pathogen isolated from the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:866. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Mac Aogain M., Lau K.J.X., Cai Z., Kumar Narayana J., Purbojati R.W., Drautz-Moses D.I., Gaultier N.E., Jaggi T.K., Tiew P.Y., Ong T.H., et al. Metagenomics Reveals a Core Macrolide Resistome Related to Microbiota in Chronic Respiratory Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020;202:433–447. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201911-2202OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Bacci G., Mengoni A., Fiscarelli E., Segata N., Taccetti G., Dolce D., Paganin P., Morelli P., Tuccio V., De Alessandri A., et al. A Different Microbiome Gene Repertoire in the Airways of Cystic Fibrosis Patients with Severe Lung Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18 doi: 10.3390/ijms18081654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Willner D., Furlan M., Haynes M., Schmieder R., Angly F.E., Silva J., Tammadoni S., Nosrat B., Conrad D., Rohwer F. Metagenomic analysis of respiratory tract DNA viral communities in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis individuals. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Fothergill J.L., Mowat E., Ledson M.J., Walshaw M.J., Winstanley C. Fluctuations in phenotypes and genotypes within populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the cystic fibrosis lung during pulmonary exacerbations. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010;59:472–481. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.015875-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Winstanley C., Langille M.G., Fothergill J.L., Kukavica-Ibrulj I., Paradis-Bleau C., Sanschagrin F., Thomson N.R., Winsor G.L., Quail M.A., Lennard N., et al. Newly introduced genomic prophage islands are critical determinants of in vivo competitiveness in the Liverpool Epidemic Strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genome Res. 2009;19:12–23. doi: 10.1101/gr.086082.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Rolain J.M., Francois P., Hernandez D., Bittar F., Richet H., Fournous G., Mattenberger Y., Bosdure E., Stremler N., Dubus J.C., et al. Genomic analysis of an emerging multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus strain rapidly spreading in cystic fibrosis patients revealed the presence of an antibiotic inducible bacteriophage. Biol. Direct. 2009;4:1. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Allemann A., Kraemer J.G., Korten I., Ramsey K., Casaulta C., Group S.S., Wuthrich D., Ramette A., Endimiani A., Latzin P., et al. Nasal Resistome Development in Infants With Cystic Fibrosis in the First Year of Life. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:212. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Elphick H.E., Scott A. Single versus combination intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;12:CD002007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002007.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Boulanger S., Mitchell G., Bouarab K., Marsault E., Cantin A., Frost E.H., Deziel E., Malouin F. Bactericidal Effect of Tomatidine-Tobramycin Combination against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Enhanced by Interspecific Small-Molecule Interactions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:7458–7464. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01711-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Aoki T., Yoshizawa H., Yamawaki K., Yokoo K., Sato J., Hisakawa S., Hasegawa Y., Kusano H., Sano M., Sugimoto H., et al. Cefiderocol (S-649266), A new siderophore cephalosporin exhibiting potent activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative pathogens including multi-drug resistant bacteria: Structure activity relationship. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018;155:847–868. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Saisho Y., Katsube T., White S., Fukase H., Shimada J. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin for Gram-Negative Bacteria, in Healthy Subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018;62 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02163-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Parada Venegas D., De la Fuente M.K., Landskron G., Gonzalez M.J., Quera R., Dijkstra G., Harmsen H.J.M., Faber K.N., Hermoso M.A. Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)-Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable. No new data were created or analysed in this study.