Abstract
Since the end of 2019, the medical-scientific community has been facing a terrible pandemic caused by a new airborne viral agent known as SARS-CoV2. Already in the early stages of the pandemic, following the discovery that the virus uses the ACE2 cell receptor as a molecular target to infect the cells of our body, it was hypothesized that the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Since then, numerous studies have been published on the subject, but the exact role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is still a matter of debate. RAAS represents an important protagonist in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, providing the virus with the receptor of entry into host cells and determining its organotropism. Furthermore, following infection, the virus is able to cause an increase in plasma ACE2 activity, compromising the normal function of the RAAS. This dysfunction could contribute to the establishment of the thrombo-inflammatory state characteristic of severe forms of COVID-19. Drugs targeting RAAS represent promising therapeutic options for COVID-19 sufferers.
Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV2, ACE2, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, ACE inhibitors, sartans, zinc-chelating agents
1. Introduction
From the end of the year 2019, the world is struggling for a deadly pandemic used by a new emerging viral agent, known as SARS-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2), which have caused almost 2.5 million deaths so far [1].
Since the very beginning of the global emergency, the scientific community put all its effort to better understand the nature of the new pathogen, providing more and more information about the structure, the vital cycle and the pathophysiology of the virus.
It was soon evident that, likewise its predecessor SARS-CoV1, responsible for the 2002 outbreak, SARS-CoV2 is able to infect our cells thanks to the interaction with angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2) [2,3,4], a recently discovered transmembrane glycoprotein with enzymatic activity, belonging to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Given these premises, many research groups set themselves the goal of understanding whether and to what extent the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was involved in the pathogenesis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
In this article, more than a year after the beginning of the pandemic, we review the current literature on the subject, trying to clarify what we think to know, what we are still trying to understand and where this can lead us.
2. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
RAAS is an endocrine and paracrine system widely expressed across different body tissues and essential for the maintenance of several homeostatic functions, such as blood pressure, fluid and electrolytes balance and local tissues perfusion.
First element in the system, renin, is actually the active enzymatic form of the zymogen prorenin, produced by the kidney granular cells in response to various triggers, such as low blood pressure, low sodium concentration and sympathetic stimulation [5,6,7]; prorenin is then either proteolytically activated directly into the kidney by neuroendocrine convertase 1 and cathepsin B, or released in the blood and then non-proteolytically activated by tissues expressing prorenin-receptor [6]. Once in its active form, renin is able to bind and hydrolyse the circulating, liver secreted, alfa2-globulin angiotensinogen, generating angiotensin I (AT1) which is further cleaved by another membrane protease, named angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), exposed by the endothelial cells in lung and other organs’ vascular beds [8,9]. Final product of this proteolytic cascade, angiotensin II (AT2) acts by binding to angiotensin 2 receptors (AT2Rs), a group of G proteins coupled receptors with different subtypes, that allow AT2 to elicit pleiotropic effects in human body [6,10,11]: it produces arteriolar and venous vasoconstriction, raising blood pressure and heart rate; it stimulates the adrenal cortex to release aldosterone, which in turns, acting on the distal tubules in the kidney, produces sodium retention and potassium loss; in the central nervous system, it acts on the hypothalamus promoting thirst sensation, antidiuretic hormone secretion and—as a result-fluid retention and hypertension. In addition, AT2 might promote lipogenesis, thus increasing adipose tissue mass [12].
Moreover, beside the rapid effects mediated by G proteins, the AT2 type 1 receptor (AT2R1) is able to activate intracellular pathways that lead to the production of transcription factors and mediators involved in the genesis of several pathophysiological processes.
First of all, AT2 via AT2 type 1 receptors determines the activation of intracellular signaling systems, including the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade and Rho proteins, that lead to the upregulation of a multitude of pro-inflammatory genes [10,13,14,15,16,17]. In fact, AT2 promotes numerous key steps of the inflammatory process such as the increase in vascular permeability, through the release of VEGF, and the recruitment of inflammatory cells, through the expression of cytokines and chemokines such as IL-6 and MCP-1, as well as adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and integrins [16]. Furthermore, by determining the activation of NADPH-oxidase, AT2 stimulates the production of ROS [18,19].
Secondly, the activation of local RAAS systems is able to produce prothrombotic effects: in fact, AT2 increases the expression of platelet adhesion molecules, tissue factor and tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) [20].
In addition, the RAAS system takes part in the processes of tissue fibrosis and hypertrophy. Evidence indicates that AT2 via AT2R1 regulates extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation mediated by the endogenous production of profibrotic growth factors such as fibroblast growth factors (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) [21,22,23]. In addition, AT2 upregulates connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), the downstream mediator of TGF-beta [22].
RAAS-mediated inflammation and fibrosis have been implicated in a multitude of chronic pathologies, such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, steatohepatitis and neurodegenerative diseases [6,24]. This knowledge led almost half a century ago to the development of ACE-inhibitors (ACEIs) and, later on, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs, also called sartans). In addition to their antihypertensive properties, these drugs have demonstrated to slow down disease progression and prolong survival in many of the above conditions, thanks to their ability to reduce AT2-related inflammation and fibrosis [25].
In an evolutionary perspective, given RAAS central role in human physiology and the consequences his dysfunction can lead to, it is natural for its activity to be finely regulated both at the systemic and local level. As already described, renin release is strictly regulated in response to perturbations in blood pressure, acid-base status and hydroelectrolytic homeostasis; plasma level of angiotensinogen can be increased by corticosteroid, estrogen, thyroid hormone and AT2 levels [6]; aldosterone secretion is stimulated not only by AT2 but also by ACTH, increase in plasma potassium level and acidosis [25].
In addition, AT2R1 is not the only AT2 active target, as this hormone can interact with at least one other receptor types, namely AT2R2 [26,27,28]. This receptor is usually thought to mediate anti-inflammatory effect by inducing NO production and by activating several signaling pathways, such as intracellular phosphatases and PI3K, that inhibit MAPK and NF-Kb, thus mitigating many of the effects of AT2R1 activation. However, AT2R2 role is still controversial, as other studies showed that it can also mediate pro-inflammatory effects [29].
Furthermore, in the last decades it was discovered the existence of a RAAS counter-regulatory system headed by another membrane protein, named angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [6,27,28,30]. Similarly, to ACE, ACE2 is a transmembrane glycoprotein with an extracellular enzymatic domain; it is almost ubiquitous expressed in human organs but is localized in specific cell types in many tissues and its level and activity vary in response to various local and systemic stimulus (see later). ACE2 cleaves circulating angiotensin I and II to generate several active peptides, among them Ag 1–7 and Ag 1–9, with different properties: by interacting with AT2R2 and MasR receptors, these peptides have shown to produce vasodilatation, reduce blood pressure, promote natriuresis and inhibit thrombotic, flogistic and fibrotic processes, counteracting as a result the effects produced by the activation of AT2R1 by AT2 [27,28,30] (Figure 1).
Hence, it is now believed that effects of RAAS activation depend on the tissue ACE/ACE2 balance, which determines the availability of different angiotensin peptides and hence the balance between pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic, and anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic pathways.
3. Virology of SARS-CoV2
SARS-CoV 2 is a member of Coronaviridae, a family of enveloped positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses, named after their characteristic appearance under the electron microscope which resembles that of a crown. Together with its relatives SARS-CoV1 and MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV 2 belongs to the β-CoV genre in the Coronavirinae subfamily [31]. It is composed of a nucleocapsid (protein N)—which contains the viral genome—and an envelope formed by viral structural protein S (spike), E (envelope) and M (membrane) inserted in a double layer phospholipid membrane (Figure 2) [32].
Coronavirus spike proteins are responsible for viral binding to host cells, as they act as class I membrane fusion proteins; they contain a receptor binding domain (RBD), which can recognize various cell surface targets, including proteins, carbohydrates and heparan sulfate. Several receptors were evaluated as potential target of SARS-CoV2 infection, such as DPP4 (dipeptidyl peptidase 4, already know to be MERS-CoV receptor), KIM1 (kidney injury molecules 1), NRP1 (neuropilin-1) and cluster of differentiation 147 (an extracellular matrix-metalloprotease expressed on erythrocytes, leucocytes, platelets and endothelial cells) [33,34,35,36,37,38]. Nevertheless, it is likely that, similarly to its predecessor SARS-CoV1, SARS-CoV2 uses ACE2 as his main receptor to infect human cells [3,4,39]. It was also proved that SARS-CoV2 affinity for ACE2 receptors is 10–20 times higher than the one shown by SARS-CoV1 [4], a fact that can potentially explain its more infective potential.
The mechanisms used by the virus to enter the cell and replicate itself was also studied [2,4,39,40,41]: the interaction between RBD on the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV2 spike proteins and ACE2 receptors on the target cell membrane, provokes a conformational shift in protein S which promotes viral endocytosis and exposes a short amino acid sequence at the S1/S2 junction; this domain seems capable of interacting with several cellular protease families, including furins, cathepsins, trypsins and type II transmembrane serine proteases (TTSP) [42], allowing the fusion between the viral envelope and the plasma membrane; the S2 subunit then undergoes proteolytic priming, releasing the virus into the cytosol. Among the various protease, TMPRSS2 seems to play a central role, as it is co-expressed along with ACE2 receptors in many tissues targeted by the virus, and inhibitors of TMPRSS2 are proved to prevent viral entry into the cell in vitro [2,43,44].
SARS-Cov2 genomic RNA contains a 5’ CAP and a 3’ poly(A) tail which allows it to be directly translated by cell ribosome in the RER (rough endoplasmic reticulum) to produce two replicase polyproteins (pp1a and pp1ab) that are then cleaved by the action of viral proteases nsp3-PLpro and nsp5-Mpro into nonstructural proteins (nsps) [31,41]. Nonstructural proteins, in turn, promote rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) rearrangement to generate double membrane vesicles and are further assembled to form the replicase-transcriptase complex, essential to produce anti-sense copies of viral genome which are used as templates to synthesize positive-sense genome and structural proteins encoding mRNA. Newly synthesized structural proteins are inserted in the RER membrane and pass through the secretory ER-Golgi apparatus pathway, while positive-sense copies of the viral genome form a complex with N proteins. So-formed virions are eventually transported to the cell surface inside vesicles and exocytosed [41].
4. ACE2 and Organ Tropism of SARS-CoV2
SARS-CoV2 is transmitted by air through respiratory droplets. In fact, the main gate for the virus to enter and leave the human body is represented by the airways [45,46,47].
The natural history of disease shows a triphasic course: COVID-19 usually begins as a influenza-like syndrome with fever, dry cough, throat pain, fatigue, arthromyalgia and GI symptoms. Typical is also the involvement of olfactory and taste sensations, with anosmia and ageusia. In about 80% of cases, the disease has a benign course and these symptoms are the sole manifestations of the infection; on the contrary, around 20% of patients develop clinical evident pneumonia, characterized by dyspnea, chest pain, reduced blood oxygen and bilateral lung infiltrates on chest imaging. In some of these patients, the disease further progresses with the development of a systemic hyperinflammatory state that leads to ARDS, thrombotic manifestations, multi-organ damage and eventually death [40].
At the beginning of infection, SARS-CoV2 may pass through the nasal and pharyngeal mucosa or directly affect the lower respiratory tract, infecting bronchial and alveolar cells. ACE2 receptor was found in nasal and bronchial epithelium, and is also highly expressed by type II pneumocytes [47,48,49]; the latter also co-express transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), which, as already mentioned, is believed to be crucial for viral entry and replication [2,43].
Type 2 pneumocytes are essential cells for the maintenance of lung function: in fact they produce the so-called surfactant [25,47], a mixture of phospholipids which, by reducing the alveolar surface tension, prevents their collapse and promotes respiratory exchanges; they also possess immune-modulatory functions and can proliferate and differentiate into type 1 pneumocytes, guaranteeing their natural turnover. At the basement membrane level, type 2 pneumocytes border directly with the endothelial cells of the pulmonary microcirculation, which in turn express ACE-2 receptors as well as TMPRSS2 [50,51]. For all this reasons, it is believed that these cells represent a fundamental actor in the pathogenesis of lung damage during COVID-19 [45,47,52,53,54]: the cytotoxic effects produced by the infection and replication of the virus in type II pneumocytes would determine their apoptosis, as well as the production of cytokines and chemokines with the recall of a massive cellular infiltrate of monocyte-macrophages and neutrophils and further release of cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory factors, in an actual cytokine storm. To this regard, endothelial dysfunction represents another key player in the development of COVID-19 [55,56,57]: imaging and isthopathological findings demonstrated vascular damage and flogosis (vasculitis) in affected lungs, along with microvascular thrombosis; this is due to the fact that SARS-CoV2 is capable of determine endothelial damage either directly, by infecting the endothelium, with consequent cellular dysfunction and apoptosis or indirectly via cytokine release. This would lead to impairment of the normal function of the pulmonary microcirculation, promoting thrombosis, further pro-inflammatory cytokine production and loss of alveolar-capillary barrier integrity. Subsequently, the activation of cellular repair mechanisms would lead to hyperplasia of type 2 pneumocytes and proliferation of fibroblasts with remodeling of the pulmonary interstitium. This would result in the picture of diffuse alveolar damage, fibrinous exudate, hyaline membranes formation and, in the most advanced forms, interstitial fibrosis, observed in autopsy studies on patients who died from COVID-19 [58,59,60,61,62]. At the same time, the cytokine storm would have repercussions on the whole organism, predisposing to thrombotic phenomena and favoring the onset of multi-organ damage.
Additionally, in the initial phase, the virus can enter the bloodstream via the lungs endothelial cells and then proceed to affect other organs expressing ACE2. Accordingly, in autopsy studies on COVID-19 patients, the presence of the virus has been demonstrated in many organs other than the lungs, such as the GI tract, kidneys, heart, liver and brain [63]. However, viral particles are rarely detected in blood samples from infected patients [64,65,66], suggesting that viremia is not the primary mechanism for viral spreading through the body. An alternative diffusion route may be represented by replication into the reticular-endothelial system, as alveolar macrophage seems able to uptake, amplificate and then release the virus [67].
Several studies have shown that ACE2 is highly expressed in the epithelial cells of the esophagus and in the brush border of enterocytes, where it is co-expressed with TMPRSS2 [47,68]. Not surprisingly, many patients with COVID-19 show signs of involvement of the digestive tract already in the early stages of the disease. Gastrointestinal symptoms have been reported in up to 17% of patients [69], and include inappetence, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Copies of viral RNA are detectable in the feces in up to half of COVID-19 patients, even in cases with undetectable viral RNA in airway samples [70,71]. Therefore, it is believed that SARS-CoV2 is able to infect intestinal cells directly or following hematogenous dissemination, to the point that some authors have invited to consider the fecal-oral route as a possible secondary route of viral transmission.
In the kidneys, ACE2 is expressed mostly in the brush borders of the proximal tubular epithelium and in podocytes, at the glomerular level [72]. Accordingly, histopathological analyses show that COVID-19 patients can develop diffuse proximal tubule damage, with presence of virus-like particles in tubular epithelial cells and podocytes [73,74,75]. Alternatively, it was proposed that SARS-CoV2 may also be able to interact with a different receptor in the kidneys, namely kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM1), which is overexpressed during renal damage [34,35]. These findings could account for the clinical picture of acute kidney injury and proteinuria which affects up to 15% of COVID-19 patients [76].
Cardiac involvement is a prominent feature in COVID-19 and is associated with a worse prognosis [77,78]. Acute myocardial injury, in the form of increased levels of high-sensitive Troponin I, can be detected in up to 28% of patients [79,80]. Several mechanisms have been proposed, including oxygen delivery- demand imbalance due to hypoxia, atherosclerotic plaque rupture in the context of a hypercoagulatory state, cytokine storm-induced damage and myocarditis secondary to either inflammation, autoimmunity or direct infection by the virus [81,82]. Even though the last mechanism is still a matter of debate, it is known that ACE2 is expressed in heart tissues [83], especially by pericytes as well as in the endothelium, and presence of viral RNA has been demonstrated in cardiac cells [63]; furthermore, some authors reported presence of interstitial inflammatory infiltrates, with monocytes-macrophages containing viral-like particles [84].
Signs of mild to moderate liver damage, such as elevated liver function tests (AST, ALT, γ-GT and ALP), hypoalbuminemia and prolonged prothrombin time, are also frequently reported in COVID-19 patients and histopathological alteration in liver tissue of deceased patient were reported [85,86]. Direct viral infection of perivenular hepatocytes and endothelial cells, the main ACE2-expressing cells in the liver, cannot be ruled out [87]. In this regard, hypoxic conditions upregulate ACE2 protein expression on human hepatocytes [88], thus increasing liver susceptibility to virus infection that could lead to a liver dysfunction and possibly to a liver-mediated hypercoagulatory state [27,89].
Last but not least, there are clues of a potential involvement of the brain by the virus [90,91]. Neurological abnormalities have been described in more than one third of patients [92], including malaise, dizziness, headache, alterations in mental status (confusion, disorientation, agitation and somnolence) and loss of smell and taste; also, ischemic stroke and encephalitis have been described [93,94,95]. Brains of deceased COVID-19 patients showed evidence of oedema and partial neuronal degeneration [85], white matter lesions [94] and direct presence of the SARS-CoV-2 in the brain has been reported [63,96], although other studies were not able to confirm this finding. There are two primary pathways by which SARS-CoV-2 may reach the central nervous system (CNS):
The virus may travel by retrograde axonal transport through sensory and olfactory nerves [97]. This pathway could account for COVID-19 related anosmia and ageusia.
An alternative route is through the dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 into the systemic circulation following infection of the respiratory tract [98].
In the CNS, ACE2 is expressed by neurons and glial cells, particularly in the brainstem and cardiovascular regulatory areas, such as nucleus of tractus solitarius, paraventricular nucleus and the rostral ventrolateral medulla [99,100]. Previous studies showed that SARS-CoV1 and MERS-CoV directly infect the brainstem [101]. It was hypothesized that the respiratory breakdown in COVID-19 patients may be at least in part caused by SARS-CoV-2 infecting respiratory centers in the medulla oblongata and the pons [90,91]. It was also proposed that neuropilin-1 (NRP1), a transmembrane receptor expressed in the respiratory and olfactory epithelium as well as in the CNS endothelial cells, may serve as an alternative cell receptor and facilitate SARS-CoV2 entry into the brain [36,37,102].
5. RAAS Dysfunction in COVID-19 Pathogenesis
According to various authors, the role of RAAS in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is not limited to providing the virus with an access path to cells. In fact, there are numerous observations that suggest that a dysregulation of the tissue ACE/ACE2 balance during the course of the infection can contribute to the onset of organ damage and hyperinflammatory state.
For example, numerous conditions known to increase the risk of infection and/or disease severity, such as age, smoking, exposure to environmental pollutants, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, lung, liver, kidney and heart disease, are characterized by an increased activity in the canonical ACE-AgII-AT2R1 axis [103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115]. At the same time, in several of these conditions, the circulating ACE2 activity also increases [88,116,117].
Furthermore, it was observed that, after binding to the cell, SARS-CoV2 can promote the shedding of transmembrane ACE2 receptors by stimulating ADAM17 activity [45,46], with concomitant increase of the soluble circulating form (sACE2) levels. Thus, several authors hypothesize that a down-modulation of ACE2 tissue activity-due to its shedding or internalization into the cells along with the virus—and the subsequent ACE/ACE2 imbalance could substantially contribute to the genesis of the hyperinflammatory state seen in COVID-19 [47,48]. However, it was demonstrated that sACE2 retains not only the capability of binding the virus, forming circulating sACE2-spike protein complexes, but also its enzymatic activity [45,52,53], and that in COVID-19 patients circulating ACE2 activity is actually increased, correlates positively with disease severity and remain elevated even after disease resolution [53,118,119,120,121].
For these reasons, other authors suggested that, at the systemic level, SARS-CoV2 induces ACE2 up-modulation and that such an up-modulation represents a co-factor in the development of severe disease [27,89]. This statement may sound contradictory, as ACE2 activity is usually thought to mediate beneficial effects in many pathological states through its vasodilatory, natriuretic and anti-inflammatory properties [27,28,30]. However, ACE2 protective effects were usually observed in models where canonical ACE pathway was upregulated or ACE2 itself was downregulated, therefore balancing an unbalanced situation. In different models, (s)ACE2, Ag (1–7) or Ag (1–9) upregulation has been associated to pathological conditions such as inflammation of the kidneys and gastrointestinal tract, cardiac dysfunction, human cirrhosis, lung injury/fibrosis and microvascular thrombosis [59,60,61,62,68,107,108,122,123,124,125]; also, Ag (1–7) antiproliferative and apoptotic effects, possibly in part through IL-10 upregulation [110], may mediate eosinopenia and lymphopenia (two features commonly seen in COVID-19 patients), potentially impairing immune system ability to counteract viral infection [126,127,128,129]. Of note, IL-10 is significantly upregulated in the most severe forms of COVID-19 [130,131,132]. On the other hand, Ag (1–9), has been shown to enhance venous thrombosis mediated by fibrinolytic impairment [123] and that it’s receptor AT2R2 can mediate pro-inflammatory effects under certain circumstances [29]. Furthermore, it is known that hypoxia in combination or not with hypercapnia, can upregulate the activity of both arms of the renin–angiotensin system by inducing renin, ACE and ACE2 synthesis, which in turn can increase expression of AT1, AT2, Ag (1–7) and Ag (1–9) [123,132,133,134,135]. Accordingly, it was observed that, in lung aspirates of acid- and/or spike-treated mice, AT2 and ACE2 are synergistically upregulated and cell surface downregulated (shed), respectively, suggesting their involvement in the increased lung microvascular permeability and pulmonary oedema [136,137]. Finally, recent experimental data show that sACE2 may also contribute to viral spreading into the body. In fact, in vitro, sACE2-spike protein complex was able to enter cells directly through receptor-mediated endocytosis via the AT1 surface receptor, or indirectly through the interaction with vasopressin and the formation of an sACE2- sACE2-spike protein-vasopressin complex, which can bind to vasopressin receptor AVPR1B allowing cell infection [138]; of note ACE2 is one of the key regulators controlling the release of vasopressin into the plasma [139]. Accordingly with these findings, administration of recombinant ACE2 (rACE2) was seen to facilitate infection in vitro as well as in vivo [118,138].
In conclusion, it is likely that enhancement of both the canonical and non-canonical RAAS pathways by SARS-CoV2 infection, especially in subjects in which both arms of the system are already upregulated due to comorbidities, contributes to the development of acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and other organ dysfunctions characteristics of severe COVID-19 forms.
6. RAAS Targeting Drugs and COVID-19
As it was discovered that ACE2 is the receptor for SARS-CoV2 entry into the cells, many authors raised a concern for the potential negative interactions between RAAS-targeting drugs (ACEI and ARBs) and SARS-Cov2: in fact, previous studies found that these medications may increase ACE2 levels, a fact that could potentially increase individual susceptibility to infection. On the other hand, some authors suggested potential benefits from such a therapy, advocating that inhibition of ACE-AT2-AT2R1 downstream pathways could possibly mitigate the thrombo-inflammatory state seen in severe COVID-19 cases.
The scientific community answered the call, and a multitude of researchers investigated the role of these medications in Coronavirus disease, with various results.
First preliminary data on RAAS-targeting drugs and COVID-19 interactions came from Chinese papers. In a retrospective cohort study that included 78 COVID-19 patients with hypertension, Liu et al. didn’t observe associations between previous treatment with any cardiovascular medication class and severe COVID-19, but the risk of severe COVID-19 in a subgroup of 46 patients older than 65 was lower in those who had received previous treatment with an ARB [140]. In a small retrospective study on 126 hypertensive COVID-19 patients in the province of Wuhan, Guang and colleagues found significantly lower C Reactive Protein (CRP) and procalcitonin levels in patients on ACE-inhibitors or ARBs therapy, as well as a non-significant trend toward reduced incidence of severe disease (9.3% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.061) and death (4.7% vs. 13.3% p = 0.283) [141]. Similar results were obtained by Meng and colleagues [142].
As the pandemic spread all around the world and the number of cases exponentially grew, more and more data on the subject became available. A large retrospective analysis [143], published in May 2020 on the NEJM, involving a total of 12,594 patients tested for SARS-CoV2 in New York City, explored the relations between the use of several anti-hypertensive drugs (ACE-inhibitors, ARBs, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, thiazide diuretics) and the risk of infection or severe illness. Previous treatment with drugs acting on RAAS was not associated with a higher risk of testing positive for COVID-19, neither was any of the above-mentioned medications associated with a substantial increase in the risk of severe illness among patients who tested positive.
In the same month, NEJM published the results of another multicentre observational study by Mandeep R. Mehra et al. [144]: in a cohort of 8910 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, use of ACE inhibitors was associated with better survival (odds ratio for mortality 0.33; 95% CI 0.20–0.54). However, the paper was then retired by the publisher because the authors did not grant access to the raw data of the study.
The positive results on RAAS targeting drugs in COVID-19 were further reinforced by the meta-analysis of Lu Ren and colleagues [145], which included 53 retrospective studies, for a total of 2,100,587 patients: hypertensive patients treated with ACE inhibitor/ARBs showed a lower risk of severe disease (odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.66–0.99, p < 0.05) and death (odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.66–0.99, p < 0.05), while no difference in COVID-19 incidence was observed.
Nonetheless, many of the above-mentioned studies presented different kinds of biases, and all of them were affected by their retrospective nature.
Unfortunately, at this date, there is only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the subject, published on The Lancet in January 2021 [146]. In this study, that included 175 hospitalized patients who were prescribed ACEI or ARB therapy as an outpatient before the hospital admission, participants were randomly allocated to continuation or discontinuation of such therapy. No difference between the two groups was found in a composite endpoint including days to death during the hospitalization, days on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, days on renal replacement therapy or inotropic or vasopressor therapy and area under the curve (AUC) of a modified SOFA score.
7. Future Directions
Given the important role it likely plays in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, the RAAS system represents a promising therapeutic target.
As we have seen, there is sufficient evidence to affirm that ACE inhibitors and sartans, classic RAAS targeting drugs, can be used safely in patients with COVID-19; however, more data is needed to understand if they can be beneficial. Currently, several prospective randomized trials on the use of ACEI or ARB as a therapy for COVID-19 patients are underway (e.g., NCT04335786, NCT04311177, NCT04328012).
However, if it is true that upregulation of ACE2 activity by the virus contributes to COVID-19 pathogenesis, targeting only the canonical ACE-AT2-AT2R1 axis might not be enough and that could explain the mild results obtained so far. Thus, on these bases, it could be reasonable trying to pharmacologically inhibit both arms of RAAS.
Several molecules have been developed to specifically inhibit human ACE2, and some of them have been widely used in mouse/rat models [27]. Among them, MLN-4760 seems of particular interest, as it was not associated to any significant adverse effect in animal models [147,148,149,150,151,152], can be administer by several routes (including inhalation) and has shown to retain its inhibitory effects on soluble ACE2 bound to spike proteins [52], indicating that it is able to bind and inhibit ACE2 activity regardless ACE2 binding to SARS-CoV-2 particles (Figure 1).
Another possibility, is to act upstream on the RAAS pathways using a direct renin inhibitor, such as the FDA approved aliskiren, to reduce production of AT1, thus subtracting the fuel for both ACE and ACE2 pathways (Figure 1) [27,153].
Last but not least, an intriguing alternative approach is represented by zinc-chelating agents (Figure 1): as ACE, ACE2 and even ADAM17 are all zinc-metalloprotease, administration of zinc chelants could at the same time mitigate the hyperactivation of both arms of the RAAS and counteract the shedding of ACE2 induced by the virus [27,45,46,69]. On this regard, bismuth compounds (which have been widely used in humans for Helicobacter pylori treatment) have shown to exhibit potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in vitro and in vivo [154,155]. In fact, bismuth compounds, in vitro, inhibit SARS-CoV-2 helicase via an irreversible displacement of zinc ions, but it’s not excluded that bismuth-mediated zinc displacement of other metalloproteases may also contribute to produce beneficial effect in vivo. Similarly, the cation chelator CaNa2EDTA has been used in humans as a treatment for heavy metal poisoning [89,156] and has been shown to be able to inhibit ACE2 activity [156].
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.Z. and M.F.T.; methodology, T.R.; software, F.P.; validation, L.A., F.F. and A.P.; formal analysis, V.O.; investigation, F.R. and A.S.; resources, B.C.; data curation, M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z., C.Z. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, C.R. and Y.L. with F.R.; supervision, Y.L. and L.Z.; project administration, C.R. and M.A.; funding acquisition, L.Z. and C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.World Health Organization Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Situation Reports. [(accessed on 10 May 2021)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/
- 2.Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., Krüger N., Herrler T., Erichsen S., Schiergens T.S., Herrler G., Wu N.H., Nitsche A., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wan Y., Shang J., Graham R., Baric R.S., Li F. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: An Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. J. Virol. 2020;94 doi: 10.1128/JVI.00127-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wrapp D., Wang N., Corbett K.S., Goldsmith J.A., Hsieh C.L., Abiona O., Graham B.S., McLellan J.S. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Drenjančević-Perić I., Jelaković B., Lombard J.H., Kunert M.P., Kibel A., Gros M. High-salt diet and hypertension: Focus on the renin-angiotensin system. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2011;34:1–11. doi: 10.1159/000320387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Patel S., Rauf A., Khan H., Abu-Izneid T. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS): The ubiquitous system for homeostasis and pathologies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;94:317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kopp U.C. Neural Control of Renal Function. Colloq. Ser. Integr. Syst. Physiol. From Mol. Funct. 2011;3:1–96. doi: 10.4199/C00034ED1V01Y201106ISP022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crisan D., Carr J. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme: Genotype and disease associations. J. Mol. Diagn. 2000;2:105–115. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60624-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kokubu T., Ueda E., Joh T., Nishimura K. Purification and properties of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) in human lung and its role on the metabolic regulation of vasoactive peptides in pulmonary circulation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1979;120:467–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peach M.J., Dostal D.E. The angiotensin II receptor and the actions of angiotensin II. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1990;16:S25–S30. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199016004-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hunyady L., Catt K.J. Pleiotropic AT1 receptor signaling pathways mediating physiological and pathogenic actions of angiotensin II. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006;20:953–970. doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yvan-Charvet L., Quignard-Boulangé A. Role of adipose tissue renin-angiotensin system in metabolic and inflammatory diseases associated with obesity. Kidney Int. 2011;79:162–168. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wei H., Ahn S., Shenoy S.K., Karnik S.S., Hunyady L., Luttrell L.M., Lefkowitz R.J. Independent β-arrestin 2 and G protein-mediated pathways for angiotensin II activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:10782–10787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834556100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thomas W.G., Qian H. Arresting angiotensin type 1 receptors. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;14:130–136. doi: 10.1016/S1043-2760(03)00023-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.El Bekay R., Álvarez M., Monteseirín J., Álba G., Chacón P., Vega A., Martín-Nieto J., Jiménez J., Pintado E., Bedoya F.J., et al. Oxidative stress is a critical mediator of the angiotensin II signal in human neutrophils: Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase, calcineurin, and the transcription factor NF-κB. Blood. 2003;102:662–671. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ruiz-Ortega M., Lorenzo O., Suzuki Y., Rupérez M., Egido J. Proinflammatory actions of angiotensins. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2001;10:321–329. doi: 10.1097/00041552-200105000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ruiz-Ortega M., Lorenzo Ó., Rupérez M., Blanco J., Egido J. Systemic infusion of angiotensin II into normal rats activates nuclear factor-κB and AP-1 in the kidney role of A T1 and AT2 receptors. Am. J. Pathol. 2001;158:1743–1756. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64130-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Griendling K.K., Minieri C.A., Ollerenshaw J.D., Alexander R.W. Angiotensin II stimulates NADH and NADPH oxidase activity in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ. Res. 1994;74:1141–1148. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.74.6.1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang H., Schmeisser A., Garlichs C.D., Plötze K., Damme U., Mügge A., Daniel W.G. Angiotensin II-induced superoxide anion generation in human vascular endothelial cells. Role of membrane-bound NADH-/NADPH-oxidases. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999;44:215–222. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00183-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Feener E.P., Northrup J.M., Aiello L.P., King G.L. Angiotensin II induces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and -2 expression in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. J. Clin. Investig. 1995;95:1353–1362. doi: 10.1172/JCI117786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ruiz-Ortega M., Rupérez M., Esteban V., Rodríguez-Vita J., Sánchez-López E., Carvajal G., Egido J. Angiotensin II: A key factor in the inflammatory and fibrotic response in kidney diseases. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2006;21:16–20. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rupérez M., Lorenzo Ó., Blanco-Colio L.M., Esteban V., Egido J., Ruiz-Ortega M. Connective tissue growth factor is a mediator of angiotensin II-induced fibrosis. Circulation. 2003;108:1499–1505. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089129.51288.BA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhao Q., Ishibashi M., Hiasa K.I., Tan C., Takeshita A., Egashira K. Essential role of vascular endothelial growth factor in angiotensin II-induced vascular inflammation and remodeling. Hypertension. 2004;44:264–270. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000138688.78906.6b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Verdecchia P., Angeli F., Mazzotta G., Gentile G., Reboldi G. The renin angiotensin system in the development of cardiovascular disease: Role of aliskiren in risk reduction. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:971–981. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S3215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brunton L., Hilal-Dandan R., Knollmann B.C. Goodman & Gilman’s. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 13th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; New York, NY, USA: 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Matavelli L.C., Siragy H.M. AT2 receptor activities and pathophysiological implications. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2015;65:226–232. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zamai L. The Yin and Yang of ACE/ACE2 Pathways: The rationale for the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in COVID-19 Patients. Cells. 2020;9:1704. doi: 10.3390/cells9071704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Paz Ocaranza M., Riquelme J.A., García L., Jalil J.E., Chiong M., Santos R.A.S., Lavandero S. Counter-regulatory renin–angiotensin system in cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17:116–129. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0244-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sabuhi R., Ali Q., Asghar M., Al-Zamily N.R.H., Hussain T. Role of the angiotensin II AT 2 receptor in inflammation and oxidative stress: Opposing effects in lean and obese Zucker rats. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2011;300:F700–F706. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00616.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Santos R.A.S., Oudit G.Y., Verano-Braga T., Canta G., Steckelings U.M., Bader M. The renin-angiotensin system: Going beyond the classical paradigms. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2019;316:H958–H970. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00723.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Neerukonda S.N., Katneni U. A review on SARS-CoV-2 virology, pathophysiology, animal models, and anti-viral interventions. Pathogens. 2020;9:426. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9060426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Davidson A.M., Wysocki J., Batlle D. Interaction of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronavirus with ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme)-2 as their main receptor: Therapeutic implications. Hypertension. 2020;76:1339–1349. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li F. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016;3:237–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang C., Zhang Y., Zeng X., Chen H., Chen Y., Yang D., Shen Z., Wang X., Liu X., Xiong M., et al. Kidney injury molecule-1 is a potential receptor for SARS-CoV-2. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021;13:183–196. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjab003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ichimura T., Mori Y., Aschauer P., Padmanabha Das K.M., Padera R.F., Weins A., Nasr M.L., Bonventre. J. V.KIM-1/TIM-1 is a Receptor for SARS-CoV-2 in Lung and Kidney. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.09.16.20190694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cantuti-Castelvetri L., Ojha R., Pedro L.D., Djannatian M., Franz J., Kuivanen S., van der Meer F., Kallio K., Kaya T., Anastasina M., et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science. 2020;370:856–860. doi: 10.1126/science.abd2985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Davies J., Randeva H., Chatha K., Hall M., Spandidos D., Karteris E., Kyrou I. Neuropilin-1 as a new potential SARS-CoV-2 infection mediator implicated in the neurologic features and central nervous system involvement of COVID-19. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020;22:4221–4226. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang K., Chen W., Zhou Y.-S., Lian J.-Q., Zhang Z., Du P., Gong L., Zhang Y., Cui H.-Y., Geng J.-J., et al. SARS-CoV-2 invades host cells via a novel route: CD147-spike protein. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.14.988345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou P., Yang X.L., Wang X.G., Hu B., Zhang L., Zhang W., Si H.R., Zhu Y., Li B., Huang C.L., et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Walls A.C., Park Y.J., Tortorici M.A., Wall A., McGuire A.T., Veesler D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181:281–292.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fehr A.R., Perlman S. Coronaviruses: Methods and Protocols. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2015. Coronaviruses: An overview of their replication and pathogenesis; pp. 1–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jaimes J.A., Millet J.K., Whittaker G.R. Proteolytic Cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and the Role of the Novel S1/S2 Site. iScience. 2020;23:101212. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hoffmann M., Schroeder S., Kleine-Weber H., Müller M.A., Drosten C., Pöhlmann S. Nafamostat mesylate blocks activation of SARS-CoV-2: New treatment option for COVID-19. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020;64 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00754-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sungnak W., Huang N., Bécavin C., Berg M., Queen R., Litvinukova M., Talavera-López C., Maatz H., Reichart D., Sampaziotis F., et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat. Med. 2020;26:681–687. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0868-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Haga S., Yamamoto N., Nakai-Murakami C., Osawa Y., Tokunaga K., Sata T., Yamamoto N., Sasazuki T., Ishizaka Y. Modulation of TNF-α-converting enzyme by the spike protein of SARS-CoV and ACE2 induces TNF-α production and facilitates viral entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:7809–7814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711241105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Glowacka I., Bertram S., Herzog P., Pfefferle S., Steffen I., Muench M.O., Simmons G., Hofmann H., Kuri T., Weber F., et al. Differential Downregulation of ACE2 by the Spike Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus and Human Coronavirus NL63. J. Virol. 2010;84:1198–1205. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01248-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Domingo P., Mur I., Pomar V., Corominas H., Casademont J., de Benito N. The four horsemen of a viral Apocalypse: The pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) EBioMedicine. 2020;58:102887. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bourgonje A.R., Abdulle A.E., Timens W., Hillebrands J.L., Navis G.J., Gordijn S.J., Bolling M.C., Dijkstra G., Voors A.A., Osterhaus A.D.M.E., et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) J. Pathol. 2020;251:228–248. doi: 10.1002/path.5471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hong P.J., Look D.C., Tan P., Shi L., Hickey M., Gakhar L., Chappell M.C., Wohlford-Lenane C., McCray P.B. Ectodomain shedding of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 in human airway epithelia. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2009;297 doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00071.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Matarese A., Gambardella J., Sardu C., Santulli G. miR-98 Regulates TMPRSS2 Expression in Human Endothelial Cells: Key Implications for COVID-19. Biomedicines. 2020;8:462. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8110462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gambardella J., Santulli G. What is linking COVID-19 and endothelial dysfunction? Updates on nanomedicine and bioengineering from the 2020 AHA Scientific Sessions. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacother. 2021;7:e2–e3. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li W., Zhang C., Sui J., Kuhn J.H., Moore M.J., Luo S., Wong S.K., Huang I.C., Xu K., Vasilieva N., et al. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J. 2005;24:1634–1643. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Patel S.K., Juno J.A., Lee W.S., Wragg K.M., Hogarth P.M., Kent S.J., Burrell L.M. Plasma ACE2 activity is persistently elevated following SARS-CoV-2 infection: Implications for COVID-19 pathogenesis and consequences. Eur. Respir. J. 2021;57:2003730. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03730-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Moore M.J., Dorfman T., Li W., Wong S.K., Li Y., Kuhn J.H., Coderre J., Vasilieva N., Han Z., Greenough T.C., et al. Retroviruses Pseudotyped with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein Efficiently Infect Cells Expressing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2. J. Virol. 2004;78:10628–10635. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.19.10628-10635.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Amraei R., Rahimi N. COVID-19, Renin-Angiotensin System and Endothelial Dysfunction. Cells. 2020;9:1652. doi: 10.3390/cells9071652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pearce L., Davidson S.M., Yellon D.M. The cytokine storm of COVID-19: A spotlight on prevention and protection. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2020;24:723–730. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2020.1783243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kaur S., Tripathi D.M., Yadav A. The Enigma of Endothelium in COVID-19. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:989. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Haga S., Nagata N., Okamura T., Yamamoto N., Sata T., Yamamoto N., Sasazuki T., Ishizaka Y. TACE antagonists blocking ACE2 shedding caused by the spike protein of SARS-CoV are candidate antiviral compounds. Antiviral Res. 2010;85:551–555. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Epelman S., Shrestha K., Troughton R.W., Francis G.S., Sen S., Klein A.L., Wilson Tang W.H. Soluble Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Human Heart Failure: Relation with Myocardial Function and Clinical Outcomes. J. Card. Fail. 2009;15:565–571. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Esteban V., Heringer-Walther S., Sterner-Kock A., de Bruin R., van den Engel S., Wang Y., Mezzano S., Egido J., Schultheiss H.P., Ruiz-Ortega M., et al. Angiotensin-(1-7) and the G protein-coupled receptor Mas are key players in renal inflammation. PLoS ONE. 2009;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Velkoska E., Dean R.G., Griggs K., Burchill L., Burrell L.M. Angiotensin-(1-7) infusion is associated with increased blood pressure and adverse cardiac remodelling in rats with subtotal nephrectomy. Clin. Sci. 2011;120:335–345. doi: 10.1042/CS20100280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ortiz-Pérez J.T., Riera M., Bosch X., De Caralt T.M., Perea R.J., Pascual J., Soler M.J. Role of Circulating Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 in Left Ventricular Remodeling following Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Controlled Study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Puelles V.G., Lütgehetmann M., Lindenmeyer M.T., Sperhake J.P., Wong M.N., Allweiss L., Chilla S., Heinemann A., Wanner N., Liu S., et al. Multiorgan and Renal Tropism of SARS-CoV-2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:590–592. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2011400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wiersinga W.J., Rhodes A., Cheng A.C., Peacock S.J., Prescott H.C. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA. 2020;324:782. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wang W., Xu Y., Gao R., Lu R., Han K., Wu G., Tan W. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens. JAMA. 2020;323:1843–1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wölfel R., Corman V.M., Guggemos W., Seilmaier M., Zange S., Müller M.A., Niemeyer D., Jones T.C., Vollmar P., Rothe C., et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581:465–469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lv J., Wang Z., Qu Y., Zhu H., Zhu Q., Tong W., Bao L., Lv Q., Cong J., Li D., et al. Distinct uptake, amplification, and release of SARS-CoV-2 by M1 and M2 alveolar macrophages. Cell Discov. 2021;7:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41421-021-00258-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Masson R., Nicklin S.A., Craig M.A., Mcbride M., Gilday K., Gregorevic P., Allen J.M., Chamberlain J.S., Smith G., Graham D., et al. Onset of experimental severe cardiac fibrosis is mediated by overexpression of Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Hypertension. 2009;53:694–700. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.122333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cheung K.S., Hung I.F.N., Chan P.P.Y., Lung K.C., Tso E., Liu R., Ng Y.Y., Chu M.Y., Chung T.W.H., Tam A.R., et al. Gastrointestinal Manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Virus Load in Fecal Samples from a Hong Kong Cohort: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:81–95. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chen Y., Chen L., Deng Q., Zhang G., Wu K., Ni L., Yang Y., Liu B., Wang W., Wei C., et al. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the feces of COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:833–840. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wu J., Liu J., Li S., Peng Z., Xiao Z., Wang X., Yan R., Luo J. Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020;37:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hamming I., Timens W., Bulthuis M., Lely A., Navis G., van Goor H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004;203:631–637. doi: 10.1002/path.1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pan X.-W., Xu D., Zhang H., Zhou W., Wang L.-H., Cui X.-G. Identification of a potential mechanism of acute kidney injury during the COVID-19 outbreak: A study based on single-cell transcriptome analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1114–1116. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06026-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Su H., Yang M., Wan C., Yi L.X., Tang F., Zhu H.Y., Yi F., Yang H.C., Fogo A.B., Nie X., et al. Renal histopathological analysis of 26 postmortem findings of patients with COVID-19 in China. Kidney Int. 2020;98:219–227. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Diao B., Wang C., Wang R., Feng Z., Tan Y., Wang H., Wang C., Liu L., Liu Y., Liu Y., et al. Human Kidney is a Target for Novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection Running title: SARS-CoV-2 infects human kidney. medRxiv Prepr. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.04.20031120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Durvasula R., Wellington T., Mcnamara E., Watnick S. COVID-19 and Kidney Failure in the Acute Care Setting: Our Experience from Seattle. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2020;76:4–6. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Akhmerov A., Marbán E. COVID-19 and the Heart. Circ. Res. 2020;126:1443–1455. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bansal M. Cardiovascular disease and COVID-19. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2020;14:247–250. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Shi S., Qin M., Shen B., Cai Y., Liu T., Yang F., Gong W., Liu X., Liang J., Zhao Q., et al. Association of Cardiac Injury with Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:802–810. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Guo T., Fan Y., Chen M., Wu X., Zhang L., He T., Wang H., Wan J., Wang X., Lu Z. Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:811–818. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hendren N.S., Drazner M.H., Bozkurt B., Cooper L.T. Description and Proposed Management of the Acute COVID-19 Cardiovascular Syndrome. Circulation. 2020;141:1903–1914. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Madjid M., Safavi-Naeini P., Solomon S.D., Vardeny O. Potential Effects of Coronaviruses on the Cardiovascular System: A Review. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:831–840. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Chen L., Li X., Chen M., Feng Y., Xiong C. The ACE2 expression in human heart indicates new potential mechanism of heart injury among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020;116:1097–1100. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tavazzi G., Pellegrini C., Maurelli M., Belliato M., Sciutti F., Bottazzi A., Sepe P.A., Resasco T., Camporotondo R., Bruno R., et al. Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2020;22:911–915. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Xu Z., Shi L., Wang Y., Zhang J., Huang L., Zhang C., Liu S., Zhao P., Liu H., Zhu L., et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:420–422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Xu L., Liu J., Lu M., Yang D., Zheng X. Liver injury during highly pathogenic human coronavirus infections. Liver Int. 2020;40:998–1004. doi: 10.1111/liv.14435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Chai X., Hu L., Zhang Y., Han W., Lu Z., Ke A., Zhou J., Shi G., Fang N., Fan J., et al. Specific ACE2 expression in cholangiocytes may cause liver damage after 2019-nCoV infection. bioRxiv Prepr. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.02.03.931766. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Paizis G., Tikellis C., Cooper M.E., Schembri J.M., Lew R.A., Smith A.I., Shaw T., Warner F.J., Zuilli A., Burrell L.M., et al. Chronic liver injury in rats and humans upregulates the novel enzyme angiotensin converting enzyme 2. Gut. 2005;54:1790–1796. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.062398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zamai L. Upregulation of the Renin–Angiotensin System Pathways and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Rationale for the Administration of Zinc-Chelating Agents in COVID-19 Patients. Cells. 2021;10:506. doi: 10.3390/cells10030506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Achar A., Ghosh C. COVID-19-Associated Neurological Disorders: The Potential Route of CNS Invasion and Blood-Brain Barrier Relevance. Cells. 2020;9:2360. doi: 10.3390/cells9112360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Bougakov D., Podell K., Goldberg E. Multiple Neuroinvasive Pathways in COVID-19. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021;58:564–575. doi: 10.1007/s12035-020-02152-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mao L., Jin H., Wang M., Hu Y., Chen S., He Q., Chang J., Hong C., Zhou Y., Wang D., et al. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:683–690. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Varatharaj A., Thomas N., Ellul M.A., Davies N.W.S., Pollak T.A., Tenorio E.L., Sultan M., Easton A., Breen G., Zandi M., et al. Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: A UK-wide surveillance study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:875–882. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30287-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Paterson R.W., Brown R.L., Benjamin L., Nortley R., Wiethoff S., Bharucha T., Jayaseelan D.L., Kumar G., Raftopoulos R.E., Zambreanu L., et al. The emerging spectrum of COVID-19 neurology: Clinical, radiological and laboratory findings. Brain. 2020;143:3104–3120. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Tsivgoulis G., Palaiodimou L., Katsanos A.H., Caso V., Köhrmann M., Molina C., Cordonnier C., Fischer U., Kelly P., Sharma V.K., et al. Neurological manifestations and implications of COVID-19 pandemic. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2020;13:175628642093203. doi: 10.1177/1756286420932036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wang H.Y., Li X.L., Yan Z.R., Sun X.P., Han J., Zhang B.W. Potential neurological symptoms of COVID-19. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2020;13:175628642091783. doi: 10.1177/1756286420917830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Briguglio M., Bona A., Porta M., Dell’Osso B., Pregliasco F.E., Banfi G. Disentangling the Hypothesis of Host Dysosmia and SARS-CoV-2: The Bait Symptom That Hides Neglected Neurophysiological Routes. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:671. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Baig A.M. Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2020;26:499–501. doi: 10.1111/cns.13372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Gowrisankar Y.V., Clark M.A. Angiotensin II regulation of angiotensin-converting enzymes in spontaneously hypertensive rat primary astrocyte cultures. J. Neurochem. 2016;138:74–85. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Xia H., Lazartigues E. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: Central regulator for cardiovascular function. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2010;12:170–175. doi: 10.1007/s11906-010-0105-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Li Y.C., Bai W.Z., Hashikawa T. The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:552–555. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Mone P., Gambardella J., Wang X., Jankauskas S.S., Matarese A., Santulli G. miR-24 Targets the Transmembrane Glycoprotein Neuropilin-1 in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Non-coding RNA. 2021;7:9. doi: 10.3390/ncrna7010009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Thethi T., Kamiyama M., Kobori H. The link between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and renal injury in obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2012;14:160–169. doi: 10.1007/s11906-012-0245-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Segura J., Ruilope L.M. Obesity, essential hypertension and renin-angiotensin system. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:1151–1155. doi: 10.1017/S136898000700064X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Conti S., Cassis P., Benigni A. Aging and the renin-angiotensin system. Hypertension. 2012;60:878–883. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.155895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Oakes J.M., Fuchs R.M., Gardner J.D., Lazartigues E., Yue X. Nicotine and the renin-angiotensin system. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2018;315:R895–R906. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00099.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Uhal B.D., Li X., Piasecki C.C., Molina-Molina M. Angiotensin signalling in pulmonary fibrosis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012;44:465–468. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Møller S., Bendtsen F., Henriksen J.H. Determinants of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cirrhosis with special emphasis on the central blood volume. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2006;41:451–458. doi: 10.1080/00365520500292962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Paschos P., Tziomalos K. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the renin-angiotensin system: Implications for treatment. World J. Hepatol. 2012;4:327–331. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v4.i12.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Munshi M.K., Uddin M.N., Glaser S.S. The role of the renin-angiotensin system in liver fibrosis. Exp. Biol. Med. 2011;236:557–566. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2011.010375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Brewster U.C., Perazella M.A. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the kidney: Effects on kidney disease. Am. J. Med. 2004;116:263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Blacklock C.L., Hirst J.A., Taylor K.S., Stevens R.J., Roberts N.W., Farmer A.J. Evidence for a dose effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibition on progression of microalbuminuria in Type2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabet. Med. 2011;28:1182–1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Rahimi Z., Rahimi Z., Moradi M., Nasri H. A systematic review of the role of renin angiotensin aldosterone system genes in diabetes mellitus, Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic neuropathy. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014;19:1090–1098. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Unger T. The Role of the Renin-Angiotensin System in the Development of Cardiovascular Disease. Elsevier Inc.; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2002. pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Unger T., Li J. The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in heart failure. JRAAS J. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2004;5 doi: 10.3317/jraas.2004.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Leung J.M., Niikura M., Yang C.W.T., Sin D.D. COVID-19 and COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;56 doi: 10.1183/13993003.02108-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Paital B., Agrawal P.K. Air pollution by NO2 and PM2.5 explains COVID-19 infection severity by overexpression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in respiratory cells: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021;19:25–42. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01091-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Reindl-Schwaighofer R., Hödlmoser S., Eskandary F., Poglitsch M., Bonderman D., Strassl R., Aberle J.H., Oberbauer R., Zoufaly A., Hecking M. ACE2 Elevation in Severe COVID-19. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021;203:1191–1196. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202101-0142LE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Nagy B., Fejes Z., Szentkereszty Z., Sütő R., Várkonyi I., Ajzner É., Kappelmayer J., Papp Z., Tóth A., Fagyas M. A dramatic rise in serum ACE2 activity in a critically ill COVID-19 patient. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;103:412–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kragstrup T.W., Søgaard Singh H., Grundberg I., Nielsen A.L.-L., Rivellese F., Mehta A., Goldberg M.B., Filbin M., Qvist P., Bibby B.M. Plasma ACE2 levels predict outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. medRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.03.08.21252819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Patel S., Juno J., Lee W.S., Wragg K., Hogarth P.M., Kent S., Burrell L. Plasma ACE2 activity is increased in patients recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection: Implications for the prolonged consequences oF COVID-19. J. Hypertens. 2021;39:e394. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000749140.12677.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Donoghue M., Wakimoto H., Maguire C.T., Acton S., Hales P., Stagliano N., Fairchild-Huntress V., Xu J., Lorenz J.N., Kadambi V., et al. Heart block, ventricular tachycardia, and sudden death in ACE2 transgenic mice with downregulated connexins. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2003;35:1043–1053. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2828(03)00177-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Mogielnicki A., Kramkowski K., Hermanowicz J.M., Leszczynska A., Przyborowski K., Buczko W. Angiotensin-(1-9) enhances stasis-induced venous thrombosis in the rat because of the impairment of fibrinolysis. JRAAS J. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2014;15:13–21. doi: 10.1177/1470320313498631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Burrell L.M., Risvanis J., Kubota E., Dean R.G., MacDonald P.S., Lu S., Tikellis C., Grant S.L., Lew R.A., Smith A.I., et al. Myocardial infarction increases ACE2 expression in rat and humans. Eur. Heart J. 2005;26:369–375. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Meng Y., Yu C.H., Li W., Li T., Luo W., Huang S., Wu P.S., Cai S.X., Li X. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2/angiotensin-(1-7)/mas axis protects against lung fibrosis by inhibiting the MAPK/NF-κB pathway. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014;50:723–736. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0451OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Magalhaes G.S., Barroso L.C., Reis A.C., Rodrigues-Machado M.G., Gregório J.F., Motta-Santos D., Oliveira A.C., Perez D.A., Barcelos L.S., Teixeira M.M., et al. Angiotensin-(1-7) promotes resolution of eosinophilic inflammation in an experimental model of asthma. Front. Immunol. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Rodrigues-Machado M.G., Magalhães G.S., Cardoso J.A., Kangussu L.M., Murari A., Caliari M.V., Oliveira M.L., Cara D.C., Noviello M.L.M., Marques F.D., et al. AVE 0991, a non-peptide mimic of angiotensin-(1-7) effects, attenuates pulmonary remodelling in a model of chronic asthma. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013;170:835–846. doi: 10.1111/bph.12318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Schülke S. Induction of interleukin-10 producing dendritic cells as a tool to suppress allergen-specific T helper 2 responses. Front. Immunol. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Van Scott M.R., Justice J.P., Bradfield J.F., Enright E., Sigounas A., Sur S. IL-10 reduces Th2 cytokine production and eosinophilia but augments airway reactivity in allergic mice. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2000;278 doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.4.L667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Qin C., Zhou L., Hu Z., Zhang S., Yang S., Tao Y., Xie C., Ma K., Shang K., Wang W., et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:762–768. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., Ren L., Zhao J., Hu Y., Zhang L., Fan G., Xu J., Gu X., et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Wan S., Yi Q., Fan S., Lv J., Zhang X., Guo L., Lang C., Xiao Q., Xiao K., Yi Z., et al. Relationships among lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, and the pulmonary inflammation index in coronavirus (COVID-19) infected patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2020;189:428–437. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Joshi S., Wollenzien H., Leclerc E., Jarajapu Y.P.R. Hypoxic regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and Mas receptor in human CD34+ cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:20420–20431. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Zhang R., Wu Y., Zhao M., Liu C., Zhou L., Shen S., Liao S., Yang K., Li Q., Wan H. Role of HIF-1α in the regulation ACE and ACE2 expression in hypoxic human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2009;297 doi: 10.1152/ajplung.90415.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Kramer B.K., Ritthaler T., Schweda F., Kees F., Schricker K., Holmer S.R., Kurtz A. Proceedings of the Kidney International, Supplement. Volume 54. Nature Publishing Group; Berlin, Germany: 1998. Effects of hypoxia on renin secretion and renal renin gene expression. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Kuba K., Imai Y., Rao S., Gao H., Guo F., Guan B., Huan Y., Yang P., Zhang Y., Deng W., et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat. Med. 2005;11:875–879. doi: 10.1038/nm1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Imai Y., Kuba K., Rao S., Huan Y., Guo F., Guan B., Yang P., Sarao R., Wada T., Leong-Poi H., et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436:112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature03712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Yeung M.L., Teng J.L.L., Jia L., Zhang C., Huang C., Cai J.-P., Zhou R., Chan K.-H., Zhao H., Zhu L., et al. Soluble ACE2-mediated cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 via interaction with proteins related to the renin-angiotensin system. Cell. 2021;184:2212–2228.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Matsukawa T., Miyamoto T. Angiotensin II-stimulated secretion of arginine vasopressin is inhibited by atrial natriuretic peptide in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2011;300:R624–R629. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00324.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Liu Y., Huang F., Xu J., Yang P., Qin Y., Cao M., Wang Z., Li X., Zhang S., Ye L., et al. Anti-hypertensive Angiotensin II receptor blockers associated to mitigation of disease severity in elderly COVID-19 patients. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.20.20039586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Yang G., Tan Z., Zhou L., Yang M., Peng L., Liu J., Cai J., Yang R., Han J., Huang Y., et al. Effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and ACE (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme) Inhibitors on Virus Infection, Inflammatory Status, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 and Hypertension: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Hypertension. 2020;76:51–58. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Meng J., Xiao G., Zhang J., He X., Ou M., Bi J., Yang R., Di W., Wang Z., Li Z., et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020;9:757–760. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1746200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Reynolds H.R., Adhikari S., Pulgarin C., Troxel A.B., Iturrate E., Johnson S.B., Hausvater A., Newman J.D., Berger J.S., Bangalore S., et al. Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Risk of Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2441–2448. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Mehra M.R., Desai S.S., Kuy S., Henry T.D., Patel A.N. Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2021225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 145.Ren L., Yu S., Xu W., Overton J.L., Chiamvimonvat N., Thai P.N. Lack of association of antihypertensive drugs with the risk and severity of COVID-19: A meta-analysis. J. Cardiol. 2020;77 doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Cohen J.B., Hanff T.C., William P., Sweitzer N., Rosado-Santander N.R., Medina C., Rodriguez-Mori J.E., Renna N., Chang T.I., Corrales-Medina V., et al. Continuation versus discontinuation of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: A prospective, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021;9:275–284. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30558-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kim M.A., Yang D., Kida K., Molotkova N., Yeo S.J., Varki N., Iwata M., Dalton N.D., Peterson K.L., Siems W.E., et al. Effects of ACE2 inhibition in the post-myocardial infarction heart. J. Card. Fail. 2010;16:777–785. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Tikellis C., Bialkowski K., Pete J., Sheehy K., Su Q., Johnston C., Cooper M.E., Thomas M.C. ACE2 deficiency modifies renoprotection afforded by ACE inhibition in experimental diabetes. Diabetes. 2008;57:1018–1025. doi: 10.2337/db07-1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Trask A.J., Groban L., Westwood B.M., Varagic J., Ganten D., Gallagher P.E., Chappell M.C., Ferrario C.M. Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 exacerbates cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in ren-2 hypertensive rats. Am. J. Hypertens. 2010;23:687–693. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Byrnes J.J., Gross S., Ellard C., Connolly K., Donahue S., Picarella D. Effects of the ACE2 inhibitor GL1001 on acute dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice. Inflamm. Res. 2009;58:819–827. doi: 10.1007/s00011-009-0053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Shenoy V., Gjymishka A., Jarajapu Y.P., Qi Y., Afzal A., Rigatto K., Ferreira A.J., Fraga-Silva R.A., Kearns P., Douglas J.Y., et al. Diminazene attenuates pulmonary hypertension and improves angiogenic progenitor cell functions in experimental models. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013;187:648–657. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201205-0880OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Evans C.E., Miners J.S., Piva G., Willis C.L., Heard D.M., Kidd E.J., Good M.A., Kehoe P.G. ACE2 activation protects against cognitive decline and reduces amyloid pathology in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;139:485–502. doi: 10.1007/s00401-019-02098-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Ding W., Li X., Wu W., He H., Li Y., Gao L., Gan L., Wang M., Ou S., Liu J. Aliskiren inhibits angiotensin II/angiotensin 1-7(Ang II/Ang1-7) signal pathway in rats with diabetic nephropathy. Chin. J. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2018;34:891–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Yang N., Tanner J.A., Zheng B.J., Watt R.M., He M.L., Lu L.Y., Jiang J.Q., Shum K.T., Lin Y.P., Wong K.L., et al. Bismuth complexes inhibit the SARS coronavirus. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2007;46:6464–6468. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Yuan S., Wang R., Chan J.F.W., Zhang A.J., Cheng T., Chik K.K.H., Ye Z.W., Wang S., Lee A.C.Y., Jin L., et al. Metallodrug ranitidine bismuth citrate suppresses SARS-CoV-2 replication and relieves virus-associated pneumonia in Syrian hamsters. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:1439–1448. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00802-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Vickers C., Hales P., Kaushik V., Dick L., Gavin J., Tang J., Godbout K., Parsons T., Baronas E., Hsieh F., et al. Hydrolysis of biological peptides by human angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:14838–14843. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200581200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]