Skip to main content
Gut Microbes logoLink to Gut Microbes
. 2021 Aug 10;13(1):1957408. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1957408

Imbalance of the intestinal virome and altered viral-bacterial interactions caused by a conditional deletion of the vitamin D receptor

Jilei Zhang a, Yongguo Zhang a, Yinglin Xia a,, Jun Sun a,b,c,d,
PMCID: PMC8366551  PMID: 34375154

ABSTRACT

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) deficiency is associated with cancer, infection, and chronic inflammation. Prior research has demonstrated VDR regulation of bacteria; however, little is known regarding VDR and viruses. We hypothesize that VDR deficiency impacts on the intestinal virome and viral-bacterial interactions. We specifically deleted VDR from intestinal epithelial cells (VDRΔIEC), Paneth cells (VDRΔPC), and myeloid cells (VDRΔLyz) in mice. Feces were collected for shotgun metagenomic sequencing and metabolite profiling. To test the functional changes, we evaluated pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and analyzed microbial metabolites. Vibrio phages, Lactobacillus phages, and Escherichia coli typing phages were significantly enriched in all three conditional VDR-knockout mice. In the VDRΔLyz mice, the levels of eight more virus species (2 enriched, 6 depleted) were significantly changed. Altered virus species were primarily observed in female VDRΔLyz (2 enriched, 3 depleted) versus male VDRΔLyz (1 enriched, 1 depleted). Altered alpha and beta diversity (family to species) were found in VDRΔLyz. In VDRΔIEC mice, bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 was significantly enriched. A significant correlation between viral and bacterial alterations was found in conditional VDR knockout mice. There was a positive correlation between Vibrio phage JSF5 and Cutibacterium acnes in VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz mice. Also, there were more altered viral species in female conditional VDR knockout mice. Notably, there were significant changes in PRRs: upregulated TLR3, TLR7, and NOD2 in VDRΔLyz mice and increased CLEC4L expression in VDRΔIEC and VDRΔPC mice. Furthermore, we identified metabolites related to virus infection: decreased glucose in VDRΔIEC mice, increased ribulose/xylulose and xylose in VDRΔLyz mice, and increased long-chain fatty acids in VDRΔIEC and VDRΔLyz female mice. Tissue-specific deletion of VDR changes the virome and functionally changes viral receptors, which leads to dysbiosis, metabolic dysfunction, and infection risk. This study helps to elucidate VDR regulating the virome in a tissue-specific and sex-specific manner.

KEYWORDS: (5-10): myeloid cells, microbiome, metabolites, nod, pattern recognition receptors, paneth cells, TLR

Introduction

During the pandemic, the correlation of vitamin D status and risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are inspiring the heath-workers and researchers for prevention and treatment of this deathful diseases.1, 2 Actually, the role of vitamin D in viral infection is not a new topic. Vitamin D acts through the VDR, an ancient nuclear receptor and a transcription factor highly conserved in mammals.3,4 The expression level of VDR is very high in the small intestine and colon and plays an important role in local and systemic immunity, host defense, and host-microbial interactions.5–11 Vitamin D/VDR deficiency is not only associated with various digestive diseases, but also plays an important role in viral infection, including influenza infections,12–16 Epstein-Barr virus infection,17 varicella-zoster virus infection,18 cytomegalovirus infection,17 and hepatitis C virus infection.19 An epidemiological study showed an inverse association between vitamin D levels in the serum and infections of the upper and lower respiratory tracts.20 Vitamin D deficiency also contributes to the pathogenesis of HIV infection by negatively modulating innate and adaptive immune responses.21,22 At the gene level, a meta-analysis determined that the VDR gene polymorphism FokI is consistently associated with host susceptibility to infection by respiratory syncytial virus.23 Gene variation in VDR was also reported to correlate with persistent hepatitis B infection in clinical patient samples.24 Consistent with the epidemiological data, activation of the vitamin D/VDR pathway in response to respiratory syncytial virus infection occurs in lung cells via TLR3 signaling, which results in the induction of the CAMP gene.25,26 These observations highlighted the critical role in host defense by altering inductions of antimicrobial peptides and inflammatory cytokines in response to virus infection.

The human microbiota is consisted of bacteria, viruses, fungi, multicellular parasites and archaea. The virome is a collection of nucleic acids. Both RNA and DNA that compose the viral community associated with a particular ecosystem of microbiota. The virome includes viruses that infect host cells, virus-derived elements in the genome, and viruses that infect the broad array of other types of microorganisms that inhabit the host.27 The virome includes eukaryotic viruses, endogenous retroviruses, bacterial viruses (i.e., bacteriophages), and archaeal viruses and is one of the least understood components of the microbiota.28,29 Fecal virome was involved in many diseases using samples from both human patients and mouse model, such as colitis and diabetes.30–34 Dysbiosis of the microbiome not only leads to intestinal inflammatory and infectious diseases but also to diseases beyond the gastrointestinal tract.5,35 Moreover, dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota could influence internally through interaction and metabolites, such as bacteriophages and bacteria.36 At present, we are beginning to understand the influence of VDR on microbial homeostasis, which is critical in various diseases.5,37–40 However, the effects and mechanisms of VDR on the virome have not been fully elucidated.

In this study, we hypothesize that host factors (e.g., VDR status in specific tissues) are regulators of the intestinal virome, virus-bacterial interactions, and microbial metabolites. We conditionally deleted VDR from intestinal epithelial cells (VDRΔIEC), Paneth cells (VDRΔPC), and myeloid cells (VDRΔLyz) of mice. Fecal samples from VDR knockout mice and their control VDRloxp mice were collected for microbial DNA extraction, shotgun metagenomic sequencing, and metabolite analysis. Specifically, we used these novel animal models and statistical and bioinformatic tools/models to understand the interactions between host genetic factors and aspects of metabolites and intestinal microbiome, including bacteria and viruses. From a functional perspective, we investigated the virus infection-associated metabolites and virome-related PRRs of colonic epithelial cells. Understanding the role of VDR in altering the multi-kingdom aspects of the microbiome, including bacteria and viruses, may help to elucidate the mechanisms by which VDR regulates microbial homeostasis in terms of health and disease.

Results

Overall virome community composition in conditional VDR knockout mice

In all 40 fecal samples in 4 groups (each group had 10 mice equally 5 male and 5 female mice for the conditional VDR knockout groups and the control VDRLoxP group had 7 female and 3 male mice), totally 4,048 viral species were identified. Distinct viral compositions and communities, which differed in both diversity and composition, were present between the control mice (VDRLoxP) and the conditional VDR knockout mice (VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, and VDRΔLyz mice) (Figure 1). We presented the 10 most abundant viral species for individual samples in each group (Figure 1). The most abundant species in the groups were Vibrio phage JSF5, Vibrio phage JSF6, BVDV-1 (Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus 1), Escherichia coli O157 typing phage 7, human alphaherpesvirus 1, Lactobacillus prophage Lj771, influenza A virus, Lactobacillus phage KC5a, and viruses incertae sedis unidentified phage (Figure 1a). When individually analyzing the species, it was apparent that Vibrio phages JSF5 and JSF6 were significantly more abundant in all three VDR KO mouse models compared to control VDRLoxP mice. Escherichia coli O157 typing phage 7 was found to be significantly more abundant in VDRΔPC mice, compared to the control mice. Meanwhile, Lactobacillus phage phiadh was considerably less abundant in VDRΔLyz mice compared to control VDRLoxP mice (Figure 1b) (P < .01).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Altered taxa abundance of viruses in feces of the three conditional VDR-knockout (VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz) and control VDRLoxP mice. (a) Relative viral abundance at the species level (family/f_; s_; the unidentified species were named with super level and other) is shown with the top 10 species, and less abundant species were grouped as “others”. Species were colored using the key as listed on the right side of the figure. Each bar represents an individual mouse. n = 10 each group. VDRLoxP: 7 females & 3 males; VDR-knockout groups: 5 females & 5 male per group. (b) The virus differential abundance at count per million of the top 10 species in four studied mouse genotypes are illustrated with different colors. Statistical analysis in each group was compared to control VDRLoxP mice. Mean ± SD, n = 10 per group; ** P-value < 0.01, * P-value < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks

Altered diversity of the virome in conditional VDR knockout mice

Shannon diversity is commonly used to characterize species diversity in a community.41 We found that the Shannon diversity at the viral species level was significantly lower in VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, and VDRΔLyz mice than in VDRLoxP control mice (P = .05, P = .05, and P = .04, respectively) (Figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Alpha and beta diversity of viral abundance in feces from the four genotypes of mice. (a) Violin plots presenting alpha diversity measurements. The Shannon diversity index was used to determine the alpha diversity differences of intestinal viruses between the control group (VDRLoxP) and conditional VDR-knockout mice (VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz), n = 10 each group. P-value as indicated above the plots. (b) The principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot of the mouse fecal samples was produced to inspect the homogeneity multivariate dispersions. The samples collected from different mouse genotypes are colored in the illustration, n = 10 per group. (c) Plots of between- and within-means Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) was performed to compare between dissimilarity and within dissimilarity of VDRLoxP, VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz mice based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, n = 10 each group

The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index was used in this study to measure the dissimilarities of samples.42 We first performed PCoA and found viral dissimilarities between conditional VDR knockout mice and control mice (Figure 2b). VDRΔIEC mice partially overlapped with control VDRLoxP mice, whereas VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz mice were completely separated from VDRLoxP mice. Thus, PCoA suggested that the sample dissimilarities among these four groups and the group differences can explain a total of 37.2% (29.3% + 7.9%) of the variations among the animals.

Next, we performed nonparametric PERMANOVA to evaluate whether VDR status impacts the overall intestinal viral profile. The sequential test “Group and Gender” showed that the dissimilarities among groups were significantly different (P = .011). Because the overall dissimilarity among groups was significantly different, we performed a pairwise PERMANOVA and found that the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of viruses of the VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, and VDRΔLyz mice had significantly different dissimilarities in the VDRLoxP mice. Furthermore, the differences in dissimilarity among groups were confirmed by ANOSIM (analysis of similarity), where the rank dissimilarities between and within groups were significantly different (P = .001). VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, and VDRΔLyz mice had higher dissimilarities (i.e., lower similarity) than VDRLoxP mice (Figure 2c).

Altered abundance of the virome in conditional VDR knockout mice

We observed that a total of 12 viral species were differential in the conditional VDR knockout mice compared to the control VDRLoxP mice, of which 6 had q-values <0.001, 2 had q-values <0.01 and 4 had q-values <0.05 (Figure 3a). The log-ratio of fold change with significant differences (q < 0.05) is shown with colored histograms (Figure 3). There were two enriched viral species in the comparison of VDRΔIEC/VDRLoxP, Vibrio phage JSF5 (q < 0.001) and bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 (q < 0.05), and one enriched viral species in the comparison of VDRΔPC/VDRLoxP, Vibrio phage JSF5 (q < 0.01). Vibrio phage JSF5 was more abundant in both VDRΔIEC and VDRΔPC mice, whereas enriched BVDV1 was only found in VDRΔIEC compared with the other groups (Figure 3a). For the comparison of VDRΔLyz and VDRLoxP, nine virus species were found to be significantly altered (5 with a q value <0.001, 1 with q < 0.01, and 3 with a q value <0.05). Of these species, three were enriched (Vibrio phage JSF5, bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 and Vibrio phage JSF6), while six were depleted (Lactobacillus prophage phiadh, Cherry green ring mottle virus, Lactobacillus phage KC5a, avian avulavirus 1, Mycobacterium virus Phayonce, and one unidentified species in the Podoviridae family) (Figure 3a).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Differential analysis of viral genes in the feces of mice of four genotypes. (a) Log2-fold changes (FC) of viral species with a P-value ≤ 0.05 are shown by increasing (red) or decreasing (blue) in three pairwise comparisons: VDRΔIEC/VDRLoxP, VDRΔPC/VDRLoxP and VDRΔLyz/VDRLoxP, n = 10 each group. *** indicates q value (FDR-corrected p-value) <0.001, ** indicates q-value < 0.01, * indicates q-value < 0.05, # indicates q-value < 0.1. (b) Viral species with q-values ≤0.05 in both female and male pairwise comparisons are shown with fold-changes (logFCs) and q-values in three comparisons between the conditional VDR knockout groups (VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, and VDRΔLyz) and control mice (VDRLoxP). Both fold-change and q-value were colored using the key as listed on the right side of the figure, n = 10 each group

Sex-based differences in the gut virome altered by VDR status

To investigate the impact of sex on the alteration of the virome community in the intestines of the studied mice, we illustrated significantly different virus species abundances in male and female mice with logarithmic fold-changes and q-values (Figure 3b). In our study, both male and female mice were included in all the investigated groups, VDRLoxP: male n = 3 and female n = 7; VDRΔIEC: male n = 5 and female n = 5; VDRΔPC: male n = 5 and female n = 5; VDRΔLyz: male n = 5 and female n = 5. Seven species were detected to be significantly altered in the female VDRΔIEC/VDRLoxP comparison but not when comparing males of the same two groups, the altered species included 2 enriched species, Vibrio phages JSF5 and BVDV1, and 5 depleted species, Lactobacillus prophage phiadh, Lactobacillus prophage KC5a, Lactobacillus prophage Lj771, macacine alphaherpesvirus 1 and Catovirus CTV1. However, only Vibrio phage JSF5 was enriched in female VDRΔPC mice compared to control VDRLoxP mice (Figure 3b), which is the same as in the group-factor analysis. Five species in the female VDRΔLyz/VDRLoxP comparison were found to be significantly differential (q < 0.05), including 2 enriched species: Vibrio phage JSF5 and bovine viral diarrhea virus 1, and 3 depleted species, Lactobacillus prophage phiadh, Cherry green ring mottle virus and Lactobacillus prophage KC5a, while in males, only Vibrio phage JSF5 was enriched and only Lactobacillus prophage phiadh was depleted (Figure 3b). Overall, more altered viral species in all conditional VDR knockout mice were found in the female mice than in male mice, which indicated the impact of VDR status on sex differences.

VDR deletion led to significantly enriched Vibrio phages

Vibrio phages target Vibrio cholerae bacteria, which can secrete cholera toxin and cause watery diarrhea in patients and mouse models.43–46 In this study, we found a markedly enriched abundance of Vibrio phage JSF5 and Vibrio phage JSF6 in VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, and VDRΔLyz mice compared with control VDRLoxP mice (Figure 1). Moreover, differential analysis found that Vibrio phage JSF5 was significantly enriched in all three conditional VDR-knockout mice (q < 0.01) compared to the control mice, and Vibrio phage JSF6 was also more enriched in VDRΔLyz mice in comparison to VDRLoxP mice (q < 0.01) (Figure 3). When the sex factor was included in the analysis, the fold-changes of Vibrio phage JSF5 were found to be significant in both female and male VDRΔLyz mice but only in female VDRΔIEC and VDRΔPC mice (Figure 3).

Altered bacterial abundance in conditional VDR knockout mice

We reasoned that the abundance of bacteria in the intestines of the mice should be altered based on our findings of the dysbiosis of bacteriophages. In this study, we found that Vibrio cholerae, the host of Vibrio phage JSF5 and Vibrio phage JSF6, which were largely enriched in conditional VDR knockout mice (Figure 1b), was detected at low concentrations in knockout mice compared with control mice (Figure 4a). Significantly lower abundance of this bacterium was found in VDRΔLyz mice, which matches the finding that both Vibrio phage JSF5 and Vibrio phage JSF6 were enriched in VDRΔLyz mice. A similar situation was also found in Lactobacillus gasseri, the bacterial host of Lactobacillus prophage phiadh and Lactobacillus prophage KC5a (Figure 1b; Figure 4a). Furthermore, as the target host of Escherichia coli O157 typing phage 7, E. coli bacterial abundance was found altered in a opposite way as phage species in the mice studied here (Figure 1b; Figure 4a). The altered bacterial abundance in the microbial community supports our findings of virome changes.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Altered bacterial abundance and correlations with viral alteration. (a) Bacterial species related to the altered bacteriophages were shown with bacterial differential abundance at count per million, including Vibrio cholerae, Lactobacillus gasseri and Escherichia coli. Mean ± SD, n = 10 per group; Kruskal-Wallis test. (b) Log2-fold changes (FCs) of bacterial species with q-values ≤ 0.1 are shown by increasing (red) or decreasing (blue) in three pairwise comparisons: VDRΔIEC/VDRLoxP, VDRΔPC/VDRLoxP and VDRΔLyz/VDRLoxP, n = 10 each group. *** indicates q value (FDR-corrected p-value) <0.001, ** indicates q < 0.01, * indicates q < 0.05, # indicates q < 0.1. (c) Correlation matrix of bacteria and viruses in the feces of conditional VDR knockout mice. The correlation of viral (vertical) and bacterial (horizontal) species with a q-value ≤0.05 in differential analysis was analyzed using the Hmisc package in R. The positive-correlation (red background) and negative-correlation (green background) values are shown in the map. *** indicates P < .001, * indicates P ≤ 0.05, n = 10 each group

To further evaluate the altered bacterial composition, we showed the altered bacterial species with q-values <0.1 in differential analysis in our three mouse models (Figure 4b). We found that Haemophilus ducreyi and Mesorhizobium huakuii were significantly depleted in VDRΔIEC mice compared with control VDRLoxP mice (Figure 4b). Meanwhile, five bacterial species were significantly depleted, and three bacterial species were significantly enriched in VDRΔPC mice, compared with the control. These depleted species were Haemophilus ducreyi Kushneria konosiri, Microbacterium sp. LKL04, Isosphaera pallida, and Actinomyces radingae. Three enriched bacterial species were Bacteroides uniformis, Faecalibaculum rodentium, and Cutibacterium acnes (q < 0.01. Figure 4b). Furthermore, we found that nine bacterial species were significantly depleted, and three bacterial species were enriched in VDRΔLyz mice. These depleted bacterial species were Bifidobacterium pseudolongum, Bifidobacterium choerinum, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bordetella pseudohinzii, Haemophilus ducreyi, Clostridium perfringens, Streptomyces peucetius, and Bacteroides acidifaciens. The three enriched bacterial species were Ralstonia solanacearum, Chroococcidiopsis thermalis, and Cutibacterium acnes (Figure 4b). The less abundant Haemophilus ducreyi is a gram-negative bacterium and causative agent of genital ulcer disease chancroid47 and was detected in the three conditional VDR knockout mice. Similar to viruses, more bacterial species were enriched (7 in total) or depleted (24 in total) in VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz mice compared to the control mice (Figure 4b).

Correlation of viral and bacterial alterations in conditional VDR KO mice

Bacteria and viruses are essential for protective, metabolic, and physiological functions.48 We found that the viral (consisting mostly of bacteriophages) and bacterial species abundances were altered in conditional VDR KO mice. To investigate the interactions between bacteria and viruses, we performed a correlation analysis of viruses and bacteria. All the bacterial and viral species with significant fold changes in the differential analysis (q < 0.05) were included in the correlation analysis (Figure 4c and Supplement Table 1).

Table 1.

Primers for real-time PCR used in this study

Primer Gene Sequence (5ʹ – 3ʹ) Reference
TLR3-F tlr3 GTGAGATACAACGTAGCTGACTG 49
TLR3-R tlr3 TCCTGCATCCAAGATAGCAAGT  
TLR7-F tlr7 ATGTGGACACGGAAGAGACAA 50
TLR7-R tlr7 GGTAAGGGTAAGATTGGTGGTG  
NOD1-F nod1 GAAGGCACCCCATTGGGTT 51
NOD1-R nod1 AATCTCTGCATCTTCGGCTGA  
NOD2-F nod2 CAGGTCTCCGAGAGGGTACTG 51
NOD2-R nod2 GCTACGGATGAGCCAAATGAAG  
NLRp6-F nlr6 CTCGCTTGCTAGTGACTACAC 52
NLRp6-R nlr6 AGTGCAAACAGCGTCTCGTT  
CLEC4L-F clec4l CCTGAACACAAGTGCTGGTTA This study
CLEC4L-R clec4l CACATCGTTCCCAATCTTGGT  

In VDRΔIEC mice, bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 was significantly negatively correlated with the bacteria Mesorhizobium huakuii (correlation coefficient (r) = −0.63; P = .05) (Figure 4c). M. huakuii induces the formation of nitrogen-fixation nodules on its host plant Astragalus sinicus and has been assigned to a new biovariety based on its host range and taxonomic characteristics. 49 M. huakuii isolates were also found to have endotoxic activity against lipopolysaccharides.53 In VDRΔPC mice, the Vibrio phage JSF5 was dramatically positively correlated with the bacteria Cutibacterium acnes (r = 0.98; P < .0001) (Figure 4c). Cutibacterium acnes, formerly known as Propionibacterium acnes, is an anaerobic, aerotolerant, bacillus-shaped bacterium. It is ubiquitously found as a commensal on the surface of skin in areas rich in oleic and palmitic acids.54 Moreover, variable results for the association between C. acnes and ulcerative colitis were found.55 In VDRΔLyz mice, 11 pairs of virus-bacteria were found to be significantly correlated (5 positive-correlation, 6 negative-correlation), including Vibrio phage JSF5 and Bordetella pseudohinzii (r = 0.65; P = .04), Vibrio phage JSF5 and Cutibacterium acnes (r = 0.68; P = .03), bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 and Bifidobacterium animalis (r = −0.64; P = .05), bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 and Haemophilus ducreyi (r = 0.65; P = .04), bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 and Bacteroides acidifaciens (r = −0.66; P = .04), bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 and Bifidobacterium sp. (r = −0.66; P = .04), Lactobacillus phage phiadh and Clostridium perfringens (r = −0.71; P = .02), Vibrio phage JSF6 and Bifidobacterium animalis (r = −0.67; P = .03), Vibrio phage JSF6 and Ralstonia solanacearum (r = 0.65; P = .04), Vibrio phage JSF6 and Haemophilus ducreyi (r = 0.75; P = .01), and Podoviridae (family level) and Chroococcidiopsis thermalis (r = −0.75; P = .01) (Figure 4c). In addition, we found a positive correlation between Vibrio phage JSF5 and Cutibacterium acnes in VDRΔPC mice and VDRΔLyz mice. Taken together, these data indicate the critical role of viral and bacterial interactions in intestinal microbial homeostasis with the support of VDR.

VDR status altered the expression of PRRs in colonic epithelial cells

To examine the impact of virome dysbiosis, virus-related receptors in the colon were evaluated (Figure 5). TLR3 and TLR7 are transmembrane PRRs located in endosomes that recognize nucleic acids and mediate cell extrinsic virus recognition.56 We observed that expression of TLR3 and TLR7 was upregulated in the conditional VDR knockout mice compared with the control mice, with a significant difference in the VDRΔLyz group vs. the control group (P < .05) (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Altered pattern recognition receptors in the colon of VDR conditional knockout mice. Expression of virus translocation-related PRRs in the intestine, including TLR3, TLR7, NOD1, NOD2, NLRP6, and CLEC4L, was performed with colon epithelial cells using real-time quantitative PCR. Mean ± SD, n = 3; ** P-value < 0.01, * P-value < 0.05, one-way ANOVA

NLRs characterized by the presence of a conserved NOD motif, comprise a large receptor family, including NOD1, NOD2, and NLRPs.57,58 NLRs are activated not only in response to viruses but are also important modulators of other virus sensing pathways.56 Here, we observed upregulated expression of NOD1 and NLRP6 and significantly increased NOD2 RNA in VDRΔLyz mice compared with control VDRLoxP mice (P < .05) (Figure 5). C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) also mediate cell-extrinsic sensing of specific viruses by binding viral glycans.59 Compared with the control VDR group, the expression of CLEC4L, one of the CLRs, was significantly upregulated in all three conditional VDR knockout mice, especially in VDRΔIEC and VDRΔPC mice (Figure 5). Overall, the significant alterations of PRRs in conditional VDR knockout mice suggest the influence of VDR on intestinal homeostasis and expression of PRRs.

VDR status altered metabolites related to bacteriophage infection in feces

Microbiota-derived metabolites are chemical messengers that elicit a profound impact on host physiology. Thus, we investigated bacterial metabolites that are related to bacteriophage infection as reported before36 (Figure 6). We found that glucose in glycolysis pathway was significantly decreased in VDRΔIEC mice compared with the control (P < .05), while ribulose/xylulose and xylose were significantly increased in VDRΔLyz mice compared with the control (P < .05) (Figure 6a). Moreover, most of the long-chain fatty acids were significantly increased in both VDRΔIEC and VDRΔLyz female mice compared to control mice, while some fatty acids were only increased in VDRΔIEC mice. 10-Hydroxystearate, which was significantly changed after phage infection as reported before,36,48 was decreased in VDRΔLyz mice and increased in female VDRΔIEC mice compared to control mice (P < .05) (Figure 6b). Metabolic alterations of nucleotides were also detected in both conditional knockout mice, such as uridine in VDRΔIEC mice and 3-ureidoisobtyrate in VDRΔLyz mice (P < .05) (Figure 6c). Similarly, we observed amino acid alterations in the feces of conditional VDR knockout mice when compared to those of the control mice. For instance, we observed decreased phage infection-related serine in both VDRΔIEC and VDRΔLyz female mice and decreased cellular virus infection-related glutamine in VDRΔIEC and VDRΔLyz female mice compared to the control (Figure 6d).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Altered virus infection-related metabolites in the feces of VDR conditional knockout mice and controls. A heatmap of fold changes of metabolites related to virus infection (regular font) and bacteriophage infection (bold font) is shown in both male and female VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, VDRΔLyz and control mice (VDRLoxP) with different pathways, including carbohydrates (a), lipids (b), nucleotides (c) and amino acids (d). Mean ± SD, n = 5–10; * P-value indicated as the color bar on the right and together with the number inside the blocks, two-way ANOVA

Discussion

In the current study, we found that conditionally deleted VDR from mouse intestinal epithelial cells, Paneth cells, and myeloid cells could significantly alter the virome profile and virome-bacterial interactions in the gut (summarized in Figure 7). Overall, the components of Vibrio phages, Lactobacillus phages, and E. coli typing phage in the gut were significantly altered in the conditional VDR knockout mice. The viral alteration was variable due to different VDR deletion, such as seven more virus species were significantly changed in VDRΔLyz mice, while BVDV1 was significantly enriched in VDRΔIEC mice compared to control mice. Meanwhile, a significant correlation between viral and bacterial alterations was found in conditional VDR knockout mice. For instance, a positive correlation between Vibrio phage JSF5 and Cutibacterium acnes in VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz mice. Moreover, we found the gender difference in our VDR deficiency mouse model, which was supported by the greater alteration of viral abundance in female mice than in male mice. As we know, bacteriophages could modulate their hosts directly by affecting their mortality and horizontal gene transfer or indirectly by impacting target/host bacteria and hence may alter the microbiome.60 After conditionally deleting VDR, the virome and other aspects of the microbiota in the gut were changed, which further led to microbial dysbiosis. From a functional perspective, the significant changes in PRRs and metabolites related to infection suggest the influence of VDR on intestinal virus homeostasis.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Summary of animal models, groups, cellular changes, metabolites, and microbiome in the VDR conditional knockout mice. Three conditional VDR-knockout (VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, and VDRΔLyz: 5 females & 5 male each group) and control VDRLoxP mice (7 females & 3 males). n = 10 each group

One of primary goals of this study is to build an appropriate statistical method to analyze interactions among intestinal bacteria, phages, and virome. Vibrio phages JSF5 and JSF6 are organisms hosted by Vibrio cholera, which can secrete cholera toxin and cause watery diarrhea in patients.43,44 The Lactobacillus phages phiadh and KC5a are members of the viral family Siphoviridae and can preferentially infect the bacteria Lactobacillus gasseri, which is a common component of intestinal mucosae and plays an important role in modulating the gut immune system.61 These observations were consistent with our results that VDR deletion in myeloid cells had a more severe influence on the intestinal virome balance. Similarly, the interactions in the microbial community are important to maintain homeostasis and host health. For instance, viruses can bind to bacterial products (e.g., lipopolysaccharide or HBGA (human blood group antigen)-like substances), increase virome stability and protect virome from physical stresses.62 We also found that the Lactobacillus phage KC5a and E. coli O157 typing phage 7, which belong to the family Myoviridae, and Lactobacillus phage phiadh, which belongs to the family Siphoviridae, were altered in our conditional VDR knockout mouse models compared with the control mice. A study indicated that the Crohn’s disease (CD) susceptibility gene ATG16L1 was phenocopied in mice infected with murine norovirus.63–65 Meanwhile, we have previously demonstrated that VDR transcriptionally regulates ATG16L1, and VDR status may be a determinant of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) risk through its actions on ATG16L1.37,66 However, these results may support a model in which bacteriophages contribute to the development of bacterial dysbiosis associated with IBD. Bacteriophages modulate their hosts directly by affecting their mortality and horizontal gene transfer and by further altering the components of the intestinal community and contributing to dysbiosis.28 The virome could be a candidate biomarker for human IBD67 because IBD were associated with a significant expansion of Caudovirales bacteriophages. The phage families of the Caudovirales order, including the Siphoviridae, Myoviridae and Podoviridae, were found to be altered in murine colitis and human IBD patients.68 Therefore, further studies are needed to elucidate the important and real role of the intestinal virome in the development and progression of IBD.

Our previous reports demonstrated that VDR could promote healthy microbial metabolites and a healthy microbiome to prevent obesity.69 Furthermore, it has been reported that increased serum 25(OH)D was associated with increased beneficial bacteria, such as Parabacteroides, which were suppressed in IBD patients and were altered in an obesity mouse model.69,70 We have reported that human VDR gene variation determines the abundance of Parabacteroides.39 In this study, we also found a decreased abundance of Parabacteroides in three VDR knockout mice (VDRΔPC, VDRΔIEC and VDRΔLyz) compared with VDRLoxP controls. This further confirms the critical role of VDR in shaping the gut microbiome, including the eukaryotic virus and bacteriophages, at the genetic level.

Paneth cells play an integral role in shaping the microbiome and host defenses. The absence of VDR in Paneth cells impairs antimicrobial function, affects microbial assemblage, and increases susceptibility to colitis and infection.37,71 The altered virome in VDRΔPC mice further indicated the important role of VDR and Paneth cells in shaping the intestinal microbiome and secreting antimicrobial peptides or metabolites. Paneth cells may indirectly impact the intestinal microbiota or the outcome of a viral infection by adjusting the population of bacteria. Paneth cells also play a key role in host defense by sensing microorganisms through TLRs.72 It is clear from our data that VDR deficiency in Paneth cell could lead to viral dysbiosis, which may further result in a compromised epithelial barrier.72

Eukaryotic viruses, such as adenoviruses, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus,73 are also present in the intestinal virome of some individuals, which indicates the potential infectious capability of these eukaryotic viruses in the host. BVDV1 can infect mice and cause significant histopathological damage.74 The significantly increased abundance of intestinal BVDV1 in VDR conditional knockout mice suggested the importance of VDR in viral infection and survival inside the host. Furthermore, the association between vitamin D deficiency and the pathogenesis and course of HIV disease has also been recognized recently. Infants born from HIV-infected women with vitamin D deficiency are at an increased risk of infection and a decreased survival rate.75 In addition, the VDR polymorphism FokI was evaluated using a meta-analysis to be consistently associated with susceptibility to infection to respiratory syncytial virus.23

The innate immune response is nonspecific, is the first line of defense against infectious agents and initiates antigen presentation, including responses to viral infection. PRRs and related pathways involved in intestinal virus sensing, such as TLRs, are mainly mediated by cell-extrinsic virus recognition.76 We found significant alterations in PRRs, including upregulated expression of TLR3, TLR7 and NOD2 in VDRΔLyz mice and increased expression of CLEC4L in VDRΔIEC and VDRΔPC mice, suggesting the influence of VDR on intestinal virus homeostasis. Our data further suggest that the impacts of tissue-specific VDR deletion on intestinal receptors are different. For instance, VDR deletion in myeloid cells would significantly increase the expression of TLR3, TLR7 and NOD2, while VDR deletion in intestinal epithelial cells would more likely increase CLEC4L levels. TLRs are known to be affected by VDR in monocytes and epidermal keratinocytes.12 In mice administered an antiviral drug cocktail, the depletion of gut viral entities could increase susceptibility to Dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis via TLR3 and TLR7 signaling, with a final increased level of Caudovirales, which is observed in IBD patients.67,77 Viral dysbiosis in the intestine is consistent with our reports that VDR deletion leads to a higher risk of infection and chronic inflammation.38,71,78 Vitamin D metabolites have long been known to support innate antiviral effector mechanisms, including induction of antimicrobial peptides and autophagy.

The diversity and abundance of bacteriophages have been proposed to affect bacterial communities in the gut.79 We found a significant correlation between the virome and bacteria altered by VDR status. The enrichment of bacteriophages and related bacteria were consistent, such as Vibrio phages and their host Vibrio cholerae. Bifidobacterium animalis, one of the bacteria widely used for probiotics in clinical trials,80,81 was negatively correlated with BVDV1 and Vibrio phage JSF6. The impaired protection of B. animalis in the intestinal barrier may further enhance host infection with pathogenic viruses like BVDV1, and intestinal bacteria with bacteriophages like Vibrio phage JSF6. Similarly, Bacteroides acidifaciens, which was found to have strong protective effects against colitis,82 was found to be less abundant and thus negatively correlated with BVDV1. Meanwhile, Bordetella pseudohinzii showed a positive correlation with Vibrio phage JSF5. As a new member of the genus Bordetella, B. pseudohinzii was first identified and isolated from laboratory-raised mice and has now been detected in mouse facilities worldwide.83 The infected mice presented elevated numbers of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and inflammatory signs in histopathology, although no obvious clinical symptoms were shown.84 These causative agents may induce more severe inflammation through cooperation with intestinal microbes. Similarly, the abundances of Vibrio phage JSF5 and Bordetella pseudohinzii, were changed in VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz mice compared to control mice.

Microbial metabolites are important players in diverse cellular processes and functions. We found marked changes in virus-related metabolites and pathways, such as fatty acid metabolism. It has been suggested that most eukaryotic viruses require lipids or intermediates of lipid synthesis to replicate, and many of them actively induce lipid metabolic pathways to sustention a favorable replication environment.85 Pathogenic eukaryotic viruses use lipid droplets as a platform for viral replication, and many non-oncogenic eukaryotic viruses are related to various metabolic alterations during infection, such as glycolysis, nucleotide synthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis and glutaminolysis.73,86 This finding may explain our results that many long-chain fatty acid and fatty acid metabolites were increased in VDRΔIEC and VDRΔLyz mice.

Although among the most abundant microbes in the gut, phages are also among the least understood.87 Using gnotobiotic mice, Hsu et al. found that phage predation not only directly impacts susceptible bacteria but also leads to cascading effects on other bacterial species via interbacterial interactions. Moreover, the shifts in the microbiome caused by phage predation have a direct consequence on the intestinal metabolome as revealed by metabolomic profiling.36 We also found that the levels of some phage infection-related metabolites were altered in the conditional VDR knockout mice compared to the control. For example, VDR deletion decreased fecal serine amino acids, which is consistent with a previous study.36 Even though various aspects of host central carbon metabolism have been shown to be related to eukaryotic virus infection, several eukaryotic viruses were also found to increase the consumption of key nutrients such as glucose and glutamine and converge on similar metabolic pathways for anabolism,73 which was different from our results. It should be mentioned that all these reports are based on host cell metabolic data, while our analysis is based on intestinal microbial metabolites. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the precise metabolic changes induced by specific viruses are often context-dependent and can vary even within the same viral family or largely depend on the individual host.73 However, the regulatory complexity of viral metabolism in chronic diseases is an area of investigation for the future.

The main limitation of our current study is its descriptive nature. However, it is stage appropriate given the virome/phage field at its early stage. Currently, shotgun metagenomics study of phage and virome as well as their interactions with bacteria is in its infancy stage, an association study is still necessary to explore novel animal models. One goal of this study was to build an appropriate statistical method to analyze the interactions among host, phages, virome and bacteria. The current study did not collect the same fecal samples from the same mice for microbiome and metabolite analysis. It missed an opportunity to identify the metabolic variations in response to the virome and bacteria change from the same host.

In summary, our data have demonstrated that conditional VDR knockout causes changes in the abundance and diversity of the virome and functional changes in viral intestinal receptors, which may further induce intestinal dysbiosis and the risk of infection (Figure 8). We also found that the related fecal metabolites were altered in the mice with tissue-specific deletion, which further confirmed the consequences of dysbiosis. The marked alteration of gut viruses (especially bacteriophages) by VDR status may aid the development of intestinal phage-bacteria or intestinal virus-bacteria therapy against pathobionts.62,88 Our study fills the knowledge gaps of how the virome is affected by VDR in a tissue-specific manner. The physiological relevance of these changes will be assessed in the future in digestive disease and infectious models. Notably, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that VDR activation has a regulatory role in mutualistic intestinal virome-host interactions, and more information on the interactions between the sensing of vitamin D and VDR is needed.89

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

The interrelations of the host, bacteria, and virus. In the host, microbiota, including both bacteria and viruses, could be affected by immune activities, diet, health status and genetic background (e.g., vdr gene). In turn, the homeostasis of bacteria and viruses is essential to keep the host healthy. Moreover, bacterial metabolites and viral particles play an important role in host health and the progression of diseases. As one of the viruses, bacteriophages can infect host bacteria and impact bacterial homeostasis. Bacterial products, such as LPS, could be used by the virus for replication. However, the interactions between eukaryotic viruses and bacteria need more study

Materials and Methods

Experimental animals

We conditionally deleted vitamin D receptor from intestinal epithelial cells, Paneth cells, and myeloid cells of the mice by crossbreeding VDRLoxP mouse and cre mouse (indicated in Figure 7).

The genetic background of the mice strains. The VDRLoxP mice were originally developed by Dr. Geert Carmeliet.90 Briefly, the VDR targeting vector was established and electroporated to the R1 embryonic stem cells which was established from a 3.5-day blastocyst produced by crossing two 129 substrains. Then these cells were selected and assessed to get the targeted ES cell clones. Chimeric mice were generated by morula aggregation and bred for germline transmission with Swiss mice. We further backcrossed this strain with C57BL/6 mice for more than 10 generations after arriving our animal facility.

The villin-cre (stock No.: 004586) transgenic mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA), which were generated with C57BL/6 background, based on the information from JAX. Briefly, the designed VilCre transgene was injected into the pronuclei of fertilized C57BL/6 J x SJL/J mouse eggs. Several founder animals were bred to C57BL/6 mice for germline transmission, and founder line 997 was established. The Vil1-Cre 997 mice were subsequently backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice for five generations, and were further crossed to C57BL/6 J at least once to establish the colony after arriving at The Jackson laboratory.

The Lyz-cre mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (stock No.: 004781). Briefly, the targeting vector was designed and electroporated into 129P2/OlaHsd-derived E14.1 embryonic stem (ES) cells. Correctly targeted ES cells were injected into blastocysts. The resulting chimeric animals were crossed to C57BL/6 mice for at least six generations prior to sending to The Jackson Laboratory Repository.

The Defa6-cre mice were provided by Dr. Richard Blumberg.71,91 This Paneth cell-specific Defa6-cre mouse strain was generated by injecting the designed plasmid into the pronuclear of C57BL/6 mice.

VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz mice were obtained by crossing the VDRLoxP mice with villin-cre, Defa6-cre and Lyz-cre mice, respectively. All the mice used in this study were with C57BL/6 genetic background by generating or crossing with C57BL/6 mice.

Breeding method. Conditional knockout (KO) mice were derived from heterozygous mating pairs such that conditional KO mice came from the same litter. The same breeding method was used for the VDRLoxP mice. All the animals are asymptomatic when the samples were collected.37,71,92 The breeders were setup at the similar time to get enough knockout and control mice with the similar age for sample collection.

Biosecurity and routine pathogen screening. All the animals were housed in the Biologic Resources Laboratory (BRL) at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) and utilized in accordance with the UIC Animal Care Committee (ACC) and Office of Animal Care and Institutional Biosafety (OACIB) guidelines. The animal work was approved by the UIC Office of Animal Care (ACC15-231, ACC17-218, and ACC18-216).

Mice from the approved sources, such as JAX, are commercial vendors who conduct regular and comprehensive colony health monitoring, exclude specific murine pathogens as identified by the veterinary staff, practice high management standards, and ship animals directly via a dedicated ground transportation network. Sources that do not meet these criteria are considered non-approved vendors. The UIC BRL veterinary staff did quarantine or rederivation after the indicated mice were shipped to UIC.

Many methods are used to maintain biosecurity within the UIC animal facilities. Firstly, the health monitoring program for mice utilizes sentinel animals to assess the pathogen status of UIC colonies. Sentinel mice are tested quarterly by serology, PCR, and parasitology. Comprehensive serologic testing of sentinel mice is performed annually. Secondly, animal housing is used to control the spread of infectious agents. The mice are housed in sterilized static microisolator cages, which provide an effective barrier to the entry and spread of microbial agents. Another means to decrease pathogen exposure and spread is through disinfection of all shared-use equipment and space prior to use. In doing so, it helps ensure animal health which in turn minimizes confounding variables to research models and maintain the specific pathogen status of animal colonies.

The BRL veterinary staff monitors the health status of the institution’s rodent colonies through a dirty bedding sentinel program. Sentinel animals within a room are exposed weekly to dirty bedding from a designated section of research animal cages. Dirty bedding sentinels are most effective at detecting pathogens transmitted primarily by fecal-oral contamination. This method of health surveillance detects agents without the need to directly test research animals. Sentinel animals are tested quarterly for murine pathogens including endo and ectoparasites. The information obtained from sentinel animal health assessments is used for the early detection of a disease outbreak, to generate health reports for animals being exported, and to maintain a high level of quality control within animal rooms and facilities. The personal protective equipment for operators and strategies for the animals to maintain biosecurity within the UIC animal facilities were followed according to the animal facility guidelines.93

Study design and power analysis.The animals (male and female; aged 6 to 8 weeks) studied in this research include three conditional VDR-knockout (VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz) and control VDRLoxP mice. Power analysis suggested that the number of 10 animals used in each group can provide sufficient power to detect the differences among groups for metagenomic analysis. All the animals were randomly assigned to each group. All the animals used in our study were apparently healthy when the fecal sample collection was performed.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNAs were extracted from colon epithelial cells of four genotype mice of VDRLoxP, VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC and VDRΔLyz, using TRIzol reagent (15,596–018, Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNAs were first reverse-transcribed into cDNA with the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (1,708,890, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s manual. The CTFX 96 Real-time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and SYBR Green Supermix (172–5120, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were used for the quantitative real-time PCR with the RT-cDNA reaction products according to the manufacturer’s directions. All expression levels were normalized to β-actin levels of the same sample. Percent expression was calculated as the ratio of the normalized value of each sample to that of the corresponding untreated ones. All real-time PCR reactions were performed in triplicate. Optimal primer sequences target for PRRs were obtained from Primer Bank94 (http://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/primerbank/) as listed in Table 1.

Fecal sample collection and shotgun metagenomic sequencing

We used whole-genome shotgun sequencing to sequence fecal samples. Fresh fecal samples from each group (VDRLoxP: male n = 3 and female n = 7; VDRΔIEC: male n = 5 and female n = 5; VDRΔPC: male n = 5 and female n = 5; VDRΔLyz: male n = 5 and female n = 5) were collected from the colon and placed into the sterile tubes. The samples were kept at low temperature with dry ice and were sent to the University of Illinois at Chicago Research Resources Center for genomic sequencing. The DNAs of samples were extracted using DNeasy Power Fecal Kit (12,830, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) based on manufacturer’s instructions with a slight modification. The samples were heated at 65°C for 10 min before homogenizing with FastPre-24 5 G bead-beating device (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) at 6 m/s for 40 s. These genomic DNAs were fragmented into relatively small pieces (generally 250–600 bp fragments) before sequencing. Sequencing was performed using a Illumina HiSeq system, as in our previous publications.69,71 Following quality checking, filtering the reads, removing noisy sequences, and metagenomic assembly,95 the resulting assemblies were filtered to exclude contigs shorter than 1,000 nucleotides and all remaining set of DNA reads (or contigs) were classified with Centrifuge,96 an efficient metagenomic classifier capable of indexing the entirety of nucleotide (nt). Next, the taxonomic annotation of each contig (genes) was obtained by searching for the comprehensive NCBI GenBank non-redundant nucleotide database (as described in https://merenlab.org/2016/06/18/importing-taxonomy97). After removing the identical sequences with ≥99% identity of each other to make it nonredundant, 289,629,756 readable sequences were yielded in 40 studied samples with an average of 7,240,744 reads per sample. Of these sequences, a total of 100,013,480 reads were taxonomic alignments with an average of 2,500,337 reads per sample.

Metabolite sample preparation and metabolomic data analysis

Sample preparation and process. As in our pervious report,69 metabolite profiling was performed on Metabolon platform (Metabolon, Inc., Durham, NC, USA). Briefly, fecal samples from a different set of animals from each group (VDRLoxP: male n = 6 and female n = 10; VDRΔIEC: male n = 8 and female n = 9; VDRΔLyz: male n = 5 and female n = 5)69 were maintained at −80°C and were prepared using the automated MicroLab STAR® system from Hamilton Company. Several recovery standards were added prior to the first step in the extraction process for QC purposes. The proteins were precipitated with methanol under vigorous shaking for 2 min (Glen Mills GenoGrinder 2000) followed by centrifugation to remove protein, dissociate small molecules bound to protein or trapped in the precipitated protein matrix, and to recover chemically diverse metabolites. Next, samples were placed on a TurboVap® (Zymark) briefly to remove the organic solvent. The sample extracts were stored overnight under nitrogen before preparation for analysis. The resulting extract was divided into five fractions for analysis by four methods using Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) (see details in the bioinformatic analysis below) and one for backup.

Bioinformatic analysis of metabolomic data. Bioinformatic analysis was performed using the Metabolon informatic system (the LAN backbone, and a database server running Oracle 10.2.0.1 Enterprise Edition), which consists of four major components, including the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), the data extraction and peak-identification software, data processing tools for QC and compound identification, and a collection of information interpretation and visualization tools for use by data analysis. The hardware and software foundations for these informatic components were the LAN backbone and a database server running Oracle 10.2.0.1 Enterprise Edition.

Data extraction and compound identification. After raw data extraction, peak-identification and QC process using Metabolon’s hardware and software in its platform (https://www.metabolon.com), compounds were identified by comparison to library entries of more than 3300 currently commercially available purified standard compounds or recurrent unknown entities. Metabolon maintains a library based on authenticated standards that contains the retention time/index (RI), mass to charge ratio (m/z), and chromatographic data (including MS/MS spectral data) on all molecules present in the library. Furthermore, biochemical identifications are based on three criteria: retention index within a narrow RI window of the proposed identification, accurate mass match to the library ± 10 ppm, and the MS/MS forward and reverse scores between the experimental data and authentic standards.

Metabolite quantification and data normalization. Peaks were quantified using area-under-the-curve. A data normalization step was performed to correct variation resulting from instrument inter-day tuning differences as necessary or for purposes of data visualization. Additionally, biochemical data were normalized to other factors (e.g., cell counts, total protein as determined by Bradford assay, and osmolality) to account for differences in metabolite levels due to differences in the amount of material present in each sample.

Statistical analysis

All the tests as specified in related analysis performed in study were two-sided. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. For a large number of tests, the P-values were adjusted to account for false positives using the False Discovery Rate (FDR)98 and the q-value (FDR-corrected p-value) ≤0.05 was reported to be significant. For all the data, we ran Shapiro-Wilk test to determine whether parametric ANOVA or non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test is used to group comparisons.

Alpha (within-sample) diversity (e.g., Shannon diversity) measures the number (richness) and/or distribution (evenness) of species within a single sample, while beta (between-sample) diversity (e.g., Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) measures the differences of microbial composition in one sample compared to another41 For the metagenomic sequencing data, the raw read counts were normalized to Counts Per Million (CPM). Shannon diversity was used to examine the diversity of the gut microbiome in conditional VDR KO and control mice and the differences between groups were tested with Kruskal-Wallis test.

Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index was used to detect the differences or dissimilarities among studied groups. We first performed principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) to visualize the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities among groups. Next, we performed the nonparametric PERMANOVA to evaluate whether the group (VDRΔIEC, VDRΔPC, and VDRΔLyz mice vs. VDRLoxP mice) has a significant effect on overall gut microbiota composition. Next, we performed pairwise PERMANOVA using RVAideMemoire package. Finally, we conducted analysis of similarity (ANOSIM), another nonparametric procedure, based on a permutation test for rank dissimilarities among between- and within-groups to confirm the hypothesis testing results from those of PERMANOVA and obtained the pairwise-comparison results. The Spearman correlation analysis of viruses and bacteria was performed via the Hmisc package.99

The statistical analysis of metabolites was performed using Welch’s two-sample t-test on log transformed data. Welch’s two-sample t-test is used to test whether two unknown means are different from two independent populations, which enables unequal variances and has an approximatet-distribution with degrees of freedom estimated using Satterthwaite’s approximation. The log2 fold-changes were reported as the effect sizes in comparisons between groups.100 The statistical analyses for microbiome and metabolomic data were performed using R,101 R packages of ampvis2, microbiome, phyloseq and vegan,41 as well as ggplot2102 and ggpubr packages.103

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

List of abbreviations

ATG16L1: Autophagy Related 16 Like 1

BVDV 1: Bovine viral diarrhea virus 1

CD: Crohn’s disease

CLEC4L: C-type lectin domain family 4

CLRs: C-type lectin receptors

COVID19: coronavirus disease 2019

CRC: Colorectal cancer

HBGA: human blood group antigen

IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease

LPS: Lipopolysaccharide

TLR: Toll-like receptor

NOD: nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain

NLRs: nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor

PCoA: performed principal coordinate analysis

PERMANOVA: nonparametric permutational multivariate analysis of variance

PRR: Pattern recognition receptors

UC: Ulcerative colitis

Declarations

  • Ethics approval and consent to participate: The animal work was approved by the Office of Animal Care and Institutional Biosafety (OACIB) and UIC Animal Care Committee (ACC) with accession number of ACC15-231, ACC17-218, and ACC18-216.·  The contents do not represent the views of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

No human study. All animal studies were performed following ACC guidelines at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), IL, U.S.A.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Availability of data and material: the metagenomic data was submitted to Github:

https://github.com/jileiz/Shotgun-Virome

Competing interests: There are no competing interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplemental material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on thepublisher’s website

References

  • 1.Martineau AR, Forouhi NG.. Vitamin D for COVID-19: a case to answer? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(9):735–24. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30268-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang JG, Sun, J. S. Gastrointestinal symptoms, pathophysiology, and treatment in COVID-19. Genes & Diseases 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Bakke D, Chatterjee I, Agrawal A, Dai Y, Sun J. Regulation of microbiota by vitamin d receptor: a nuclear weapon in metabolic diseases.Nuclear receptor research. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Haussler MR, Whitfield GK, Kaneko I, Haussler CA, Hsieh D, Hsieh JC, Jurutka PW. Molecular mechanisms of vitamin D action. Calcified Tissue International. 2013;92(2):77–98. doi: 10.1007/s00223-012-9619-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bakke D, Sun J. Ancient nuclear receptor VDR with new functions: microbiome and inflammation. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2018;24(6):1149–1154. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barbáchano A, Fernández-Barral A, Ferrer-Mayorga G, Costales-Carrera A, Larriba MJ, Muñoz A. The endocrine vitamin D system in the gut. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2017;453:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barragan M, Good M, Kolls JK. Regulation of dendritic cell function by vitamin D. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):8127–8151. doi: 10.3390/nu7095383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bashir M, Prietl B, Tauschmann M, Mautner SI, Kump PK, Treiber G, Wurm P, Gorkiewicz G, Högenauer C, Pieber TR, et al. Effects of high doses of vitamin D 3 on mucosa-associated gut microbiome vary between regions of the human gastrointestinal tract. European Journal of Nutrition. 2016;55(4):1479–1489. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0966-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Korf H, Wenes M, Stijlemans B, Takiishi T, Robert S, Miani M, Eizirik DL, Gysemans C, Mathieu C. 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 curtails the inflammatory and T cell stimulatory capacity of macrophages through an IL-10-dependent mechanism. Immunobiology. 2012;217(12):1292–1300. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ooi JH, Li Y, Rogers CJ, Cantorna MT. Vitamin D regulates the gut microbiome and protects mice from dextran sodium sulfate–induced colitis. The Journal of Nutrition. 2013;143(10):1679–1686. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.180794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Young VB, Kahn SA, Schmidt TM, Chang EB. Studying the enteric microbiome in inflammatory bowel diseases: getting through the growing pains and moving forward. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2011;2:144. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vitamin G-B-B. D and influenza—prevention or therapy? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(8):2419. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cannell J, Vieth R, Umhau J, Holick M, Grant W, Madronich S, GARLAND CF, GIOVANNUCCI E. Epidemic influenza and vitamin D. Epidemiology & Infection. 2006;134(6):1129–1140. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Helming L, Böse J, Ehrchen J, Schiebe S, Frahm T, Geffers R, Probst-Kepper M, Balling R, Lengeling A. 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 is a potent suppressor of interferon gamma-mediated macrophage activation. Blood. 2005;106(13):4351–4358. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khare D, Godbole NM, Pawar SD, Mohan V, Pandey G, Gupta S, Kumar D, Dhole TN, Godbole MM. Calcitriol [1, 25[OH]2 D3] pre- and post-treatment suppresses inflammatory response to influenza A (H1N1) infection in human lung A549 epithelial cells. Eur J Nutr. 2013;52(4):1405–1415. doi: 10.1007/s00394-012-0449-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Laaksi I, Ruohola JP, Mattila V, Auvinen A, Ylikomi T, Pihlajamäki H. Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of acute respiratory tract infection: a randomized, double-blinded trial among young Finnish men. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(5):809–814. doi: 10.1086/654881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mowry EM, James JA, Krupp LB, Waubant E. Vitamin D status and antibody levels to common viruses in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2011;17(6):666–671. doi: 10.1177/1352458510394398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chao C-T, Lee S-Y, Yang W-S, Yen C-J, Chiang C-K, Huang J-W, Hung K-Y. Serum vitamin D levels are positively associated with varicella zoster immunity in chronic dialysis patients. Scientific Reports. 2014;4:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Villar LM. Association between vitamin D and hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2013;19(35):5917. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i35.5917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jolliffe DA, Greiller CL, Mein CA, Hoti M, Bakhsoliani E, Telcian AG, Simpson A, Barnes NC, Curtin JA, Custovic A, et al. Vitamin D receptor genotype influences risk of upper respiratory infection. British Journal of Nutrition. 2018;120(8):891–900. doi: 10.1017/S000711451800209X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.MÁ J-S, Martínez I, Medrano LM, Fernández-Rodríguez A, Vitamin RS. D in human immunodeficiency virus infection: influence on immunity and disease. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9:458. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Villamor E. A potential role for vitamin D on HIV infection? Nutrition Reviews. 2006;64(5):226–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Laplana M, Royo JL, Fibla J. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and risk of enveloped virus infection: a meta-analysis. Gene. 2018;678:384–394. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bellamy R, Ruwende C, Corrah T, McAdam K, Thursz M, Whittle H, Hill A. Tuberculosis and chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Africans and variation in the vitamin D receptor gene. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1999;179(3):721–724. doi: 10.1086/314614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hansdottir S, Monick MM, Hinde SL, Lovan N, Look DC, Hunninghake GW. Respiratory epithelial cells convert inactive vitamin D to its active form: potential effects on host defense. The Journal of Immunology. 2008;181(10):7090–7099. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.7090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gombart AF. The vitamin D–antimicrobial peptide pathway and its role in protection against infection. Future Microbiology. 2009;4(9):1151–1165. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Virgin Herbert W. The virome in mammalian physiology and disease. Cell. 2014;157(1):142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mukhopadhya I, JP S, SR C, AL H, Hold GL. The gut virome: the ‘missing link’between gut bacteria and host immunity? Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology. 2019;12:1756284819836620. doi: 10.1177/1756284819836620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lugli GA, Alessandri G, Milani C, Viappiani A, Fontana F, Tarracchini C, Mancabelli L, Argentini C, Ruiz L, Margolles A, et al. Genetic insights into the dark matter of the mammalian gut microbiota through targeted genome reconstruction. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23(6):3294–3305. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li Y, Handley SA, Baldridge MT. The dark side of the gut: virome-host interactions in intestinal homeostasis and disease. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2021;218(5):e20201044. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rasmussen TS, Mentzel CMJ, Kot W, Castro-Mejía JL, Zuffa S, Swann JR, Hansen LH, Vogensen FK, Hansen AK, Nielsen DS, et al. Faecal virome transplantation decreases symptoms of type 2 diabetes and obesity in a murine model. Gut. 2020;69(12):2122–2130. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schulfer A, Santiago-Rodriguez TM, Ly M, Borin JM, Chopyk J, Blaser MJ, et al. Fecal viral community responses to high-fat diet in mice. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zuo T, Lu XJ, Zhang Y, Cheung CP, Lam S, Zhang F, Tang W, Ching JYL, Zhao R, Chan PKS, et al. Gut mucosal virome alterations in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2019;68(7):1169–1179. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rasmussen TS, de Vries L, Kot W, Hansen LH, Castro-Mejía JL, Vogensen FK, Hansen AK, Nielsen DS. Mouse vendor influence on the bacterial and viral gut composition exceeds the effect of diet. Viruses. 2019;11(5):435. doi: 10.3390/v11050435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang YG, Wu S, Yi J, Xia Y, Jin D, Zhou J, Sun J. Target intestinal microbiota to alleviate disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clinical Therapeutics. 2017;39(2):322–336. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hsu BB, Gibson TE, Yeliseyev V, Liu Q, Lyon L, Bry L, Silver PA, Gerber GK. Dynamic modulation of the gut microbiota and metabolome by bacteriophages in a mouse model. Cell host & microbe 201925(6):803-814.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Wu S, Y- g Z, Lu R, Xia Y, Zhou D, Petrof EO, Claud EC, Chen D, Chang EB, Carmeliet G, et al. Intestinal epithelial vitamin D receptor deletion leads to defective autophagy in colitis. Gut. 2015;64(7):1082–1094. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wu S, Liao AP, Xia Y, Li YC, Li J-D, Sartor RB, Sun J. Vitamin D receptor negatively regulates bacterial-stimulated NF-κB activity in intestine. The American Journal of Pathology. 2010;177(2):686–697. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang J, Thingholm LB, Skiecevičienė J, Rausch P, Kummen M, Hov JR, Degenhardt F, Heinsen FA, Rühlemann MC, Szymczak S, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies variation in vitamin D receptor and other host factors influencing the gut microbiota. Nature Genetics. 2016;48(11):1396. doi: 10.1038/ng.3695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ethnicity May JS. Be important for studying the role of the microbiome and vitamin D receptor in IBD. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2019;25:e54–e54. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xia Y, Sun J, Chen D-G. 2018. Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R. 847. Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bray J, Curtis J. An ordination of upland forest communities of southern wisconsin. Ecological monographs (27).Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. 1957. 325–349. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Naser IB, Hoque MM, Nahid MA, Tareq TM, Rocky MK, Faruque SM. Analysis of the CRISPR-Cas system in bacteriophages active on epidemic strains of vibrio cholerae in Bangladesh. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):14880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14839-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.hun Yoon S, Waters CM. Vibrio cholerae. Trends in microbiology 2019; 27:806–807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Matson JS. Infant mouse model of vibrio cholerae infection and colonization. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, NJ). 2018;1839:147–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sawasvirojwong S, Srimanote P, Chatsudthipong V, Muanprasat C. An adult mouse model of vibrio cholerae-induced diarrhea for studying pathogenesis and potential therapy of cholera. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2013;7(6):e2293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.González-Beiras C, Marks M, Chen CY, Roberts S, Mitjà O. Epidemiology of haemophilus ducreyi infections. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2016;22(1):1–8. doi: 10.3201/eid2201.150425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thursby E, Juge N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. The Biochemical Journal. 2017;474(11):1823–1836. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shen Y, Wang S, Sun F, Zheng G, Wu T, Du Y, Zhang S, Qian J, Sun R. Inhibition of murine herpesvirus-68 replication by IFN-gamma in macrophages is counteracted by the induction of SOCS1 expression. PLoS Pathogens. 2018;14(8):e1007202. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ramirez-Ortiz ZG, Prasad A, Griffith JW, Pendergraft WF 3rd, Cowley GS, Root DE, Tai M, Luster AD, El Khoury J, Hacohen N, et al. The receptor TREML4 amplifies TLR7-mediated signaling during antiviral responses and autoimmunity. Nature Immunology. 2015;16(5):495–504. doi: 10.1038/ni.3143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kwon MY, Hwang N, Park YJ, Perrella MA, Chung SW. NOD2 deficiency exacerbates hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension and enhances pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Oncotarget. 2018;9(16):12671–12681. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hou L, Yang L, Chang N, Zhao X, Zhou X, Dong C, Liu F, Yang L, Li L. Macrophage sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 2 blockade attenuates liver inflammation and fibrogenesis triggered by NLRP3 inflammasome. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020;11:1149. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Komaniecka I, Zdzisinska B, Kandefer-Szerszen M, Choma A. Low endotoxic activity of lipopolysaccharides isolated from bradyrhizobium, mesorhizobium, and azospirillum strains. Microbiology and Immunology. 2010;54(12):717–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fournière M, Latire T, Souak D, Feuilloley MGJ, Bedoux G. Staphylococcus epidermidis and cutibacterium acnes: two major sentinels of skin microbiota and the influence of cosmetics. Microorganisms. 2020;8(11):1752. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sakhamuru S, Kambampati S, Wasim S, Kukkar V, Malik BH. The role of propionibacterium acnes in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis and ulcerative colitis: how this connection may inspire novel management of these conditions. Cureus. 2020;12:e10812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Metzger RN, Krug AB, Eisenächer K. Enteric virome sensing—Its role in intestinal homeostasis and immunity. Viruses. 2018;10(4):146. doi: 10.3390/v10040146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Elinav E, Strowig T, Henao-Mejia J, Flavell RA. Regulation of the antimicrobial response by NLR proteins. Immunity. 2011;34(5):665–679. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wang -T-T, Dabbas B, Laperriere D, Bitton AJ, Soualhine H, Tavera-Mendoza LE, Dionne S, Servant MJ, Bitton A, Seidman EG, et al. Direct and indirect induction by 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 of the NOD2/CARD15-defensin β2 innate immune pathway defective in crohn disease. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(4):2227–2231. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C109.071225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Monteiro J, Lepenies B. Myeloid C-type lectin receptors in viral recognition and antiviral immunity. Viruses. 2017;9(3):59. doi: 10.3390/v9030059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sutton TDS, Gut bacteriophage: HC, Understanding C. Challenges. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019;10:784. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yolken RH, Severance EG, Sabunciyan S, Gressitt KL, Chen O, Stallings C, Origoni A, Katsafanas E, Schweinfurth LAB, Savage CLG, et al. Metagenomic sequencing indicates that the oropharyngeal phageome of individuals with schizophrenia differs from that of controls. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2015;41(5):1153–1161. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Monedero V, Collado MC, Therapeutic R-DJ. Opportunities in intestinal microbiota-virus interactions. Trends in Biotechnology. 2018;36(7):645–648. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cadwell K, Liu JY, Brown SL, Miyoshi H, Loh J, Lennerz JK, Kishi C, Kc W, Carrero JA, Hunt S, et al. A key role for autophagy and the autophagy gene Atg16l1 in mouse and human intestinal paneth cells. Nature. 2008;456(7219):259–263. doi: 10.1038/nature07416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cadwell K, Patel KK, Maloney NS, Liu T-C, Ng AC, Storer CE, Head RD, Xavier R, Stappenbeck TS, Virgin HW, et al. Virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction determines Crohn’s disease gene Atg16L1 phenotypes in intestine. Cell. 2010;141(7):1135–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sartor RB, Wu GD. Roles for intestinal bacteria, viruses, and fungi in pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases and therapeutic approaches. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(327–339):e324. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sun J. VDR/vitamin D receptor regulates autophagic activity through ATG16L1. Autophagy. 2016;12(6):1057–1058. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1072670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Norman JM, Handley SA, Baldridge MT, Droit L, Liu CY, Keller BC, Kambal A, Monaco C, Zhao G, Fleshner P, et al. Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2015;160(3):447–460. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Duerkop BA, Kleiner M, Paez-Espino D, Zhu W, Bushnell B, Hassell B, Winter SE, Kyrpides NC, Hooper LV. Murine colitis reveals a disease-associated bacteriophage community. Nature Microbiology. 2018;3(9):1023. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0210-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chatterjee I, Lu R, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Dai Y, Xia Y, Sun J. Vitamin D receptor promotes healthy microbial metabolites and microbiome. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):7340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64226-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.CHAROENNGAM N, SHIRVANI A, TA KALAJIAN, SONG A, MF HOLICK. The effect of various doses of oral vitamin D3 supplementation on gut microbiota in healthy adults: a randomized, double-blinded, dose-response study. Anticancer Research. 2020;40:551–556. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lu R, Zhang Y, Xia Y, Zhang J, Kaser A, Blumberg R, Sun J. Paneth cell alertness to pathogens maintained by vitamin D receptors. Gastroenterology. 202. 1;160(4):1269-1283. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Holly MK, Smith JG. Paneth cells during viral infection and pathogenesis. Viruses. 2018;10(5):225. doi: 10.3390/v10050225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Thaker SK, Ch’ng J, Christofk HR. Viral hijacking of cellular metabolism. BMC Biology. 2019;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12915-019-0678-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Seong G, Oem J-K, Lee K-H, Choi K-S. Experimental infection of mice with bovine viral diarrhea virus. Archives of Virology. 2015;160(6):1565–1571. doi: 10.1007/s00705-015-2412-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Spector SA. Vitamin D and HIV: letting the sun shine in. Topics in Antiviral Medicine. 2011;19:6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nature Immunology. 2015;16(4):343–353. doi: 10.1038/ni.3123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yang JY, Kim MS, Kim E, Cheon JH, Lee YS, Kim Y, Lee S-H, Seo S-U, Shin S-H, Choi S, et al. Enteric viruses ameliorate gut inflammation via toll-like receptor 3 and toll-like receptor 7-mediated interferon-β. Immunity. 2016;44(4):889–900. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Luo S, Yin J, Peng Y, Xie J, Wu H, He D, Li X, Cheng G. Glutathione is involved in detoxification of peroxide and root nodule symbiosis of mesorhizobium production huakuii. Current Microbiology. 2020;77(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00284-019-01784-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rodriguez-Brito B, Li L, Wegley L, Furlan M, Angly F, Breitbart M, Buchanan J, Desnues C, Dinsdale E, Edwards R, et al. Viral and microbial community dynamics in four aquatic environments. The ISME Journal. 2010;4(6):739–751. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Boontun C, Vatanyoopaisarn S, Hankla S, Eisuke K, Yasutomo T. Modification of media using food-grade components for the fermentation of bifidobacterium and lactobacillus strains in large-scale bioreactors. Preparative biochemistry & biotechnology. 2021;6:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2020.1861009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Penhasi A, Reuveni A, Baluashvili I. Microencapsulation may preserve the viability of probiotic bacteria during a baking process and digestion: a case study with bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis in bread. Current Microbiology. 2021;78(2):576–589. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02292-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Han R, Ma Y, Xiao J, You L, Pedisić S, Liao L. The possible mechanism of the protective effect of a sulfated polysaccharide from gracilaria lemaneiformis against colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium in mice. Food and chemical toxicology: an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 2021:112001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ma L, Huang S, Luo Y, Min F, He L, Chen M, Pan J, Zhang Y, Wang J. Isolation and characterization of bordetella pseudohinzii in mice in China. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine. 2019;2(3):217–221. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Perniss A, Schmidt N, Gurtner C, Dietert K, Schwengers O, Weigel M, Hempe J, Ewers C, Pfeil U, Gärtner U, et al. Bordetella pseudohinzii targets cilia and impairs tracheal cilia-driven transport in naturally acquired infection in mice. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):5681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23830-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lange PT, Lagunoff M, Tarakanova VL. Chewing the fat: the conserved ability of DNA viruses to hijack cellular lipid metabolism. Viruses. 2019;11(2):119. doi: 10.3390/v11020119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wong AC, Vanhove AS, Watnick PI. The interplay between intestinal bacteria and host metabolism in health and disease: lessons from drosophila melanogaster. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2016;9(3):271–281. doi: 10.1242/dmm.023408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Keen EC, Dantas G. Close encounters of three kinds: bacteriophages, commensal bacteria, and host immunity. Trends in Microbiology. 2018;26(11):943–954. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Fujimoto K, Kimura Y, Shimohigoshi M, Satoh T, Sato S, Tremmel G, Uematsu M, Kawaguchi Y, Usui Y, Nakano Y, et al. Metagenome data on intestinal phage-bacteria associations aids the development of phage therapy against pathobionts. Cell Host & Microbe. 2020;28(3):380–389.e389. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Waldschmitt N, Chamaillard M. Time for epithelial sensing of vitamin D to step into the limelight. Gut. 2015;64(7):1013–1014. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Van Cromphaut SJ, Dewerchin M, Hoenderop JG, Stockmans I, Van Herck E, Kato S, Bindels RJ, Collen D, Carmeliet P, Bouillon R, et al. Duodenal calcium absorption in vitamin D receptor–knockout mice: functional and molecular aspects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2001; 98(23):13324-13329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231474698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Adolph TE, Tomczak MF, Niederreiter L, Ko HJ, Böck J, Martinez-Naves E, Glickman JN, Tschurtschenthaler M, Hartwig J, Hosomi S, et al. Paneth cells as a site of origin for intestinal inflammation. Nature. 2013;503(7475):272–276. doi: 10.1038/nature12599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chatterjee I, Lu R, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Dai Y, Xia Y, Sun J. Vitamin D receptor promotes healthy microbial metabolites and microbiome. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:7340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.UIC biologic resources laboratory bulletin- rodent biosecurity. 2017.
  • 94.PrimerBank : PCR primers for gene expression detection and quantification.
  • 95.Xia Y, Sun J, Chen D-G. Bioinformatic analysis of microbiome data. In: Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kim D, Song L, Breitwieser FP, Salzberg SL. Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Research. 2016;26(12):1721–1729. doi: 10.1101/gr.210641.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Importing taxonomy into contigs database.
  • 98.Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2003; 100(16):9440-9445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Frank EHarrell Jr wcfCDamo. hmisc: harrell miscellaneous. R package version 4.4-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc2020.
  • 100.MAQC Consortium, Shi L, Reid LH, Jones WD, Shippy R, Warrington JA, Baker SC, Collins PJ, de Longueville F, Kawasaki ES, et al. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nature Biotechnology. 2006;24:1151–1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wickham. H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York; (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kassambara Aggpubr: ‘ggplot2ʹ based publication ready plots. R package version 0.4.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr2020.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material

Articles from Gut Microbes are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES