Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2021 Jun 23;156:106729. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106729

Prospective associations of mid-childhood plasma per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and pubertal timing

Jenny L Carwile a, Shravanthi M Seshasayee a, Izzuddin M Aris b, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman b, Birgit Claus Henn c, Antonia M Calafat d, Sharon K Sagiv e, Emily Oken b, Abby F Fleisch a,f
PMCID: PMC8380705  NIHMSID: NIHMS1719792  PMID: 34171588

Abstract

Background

Exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) may disrupt pubertal timing. Higher PFAS plasma concentrations have been associated with later pubertal timing in girls, but cross-sectional findings may be explained by reverse causation.

Objectives

To assess prospective associations between PFAS plasma concentrations in mid-childhood and markers of pubertal timing in male and female adolescents.

Methods

We studied 640 children in Project Viva, a Boston-area prospective cohort. We examined associations of plasma concentrations of 6 PFAS measured at mean 7.9 (SD 0.8) years (2007–2010) with markers of pubertal timing. Parents reported a 5-item pubertal development score at early adolescence (mean 13.1 (SD 0.8) years) and reported age at menarche annually. We calculated age at peak height velocity using research and clinical measures of height. We used sex-specific linear and Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate associations of single PFAS with outcomes, and we used Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) to estimate associations of the PFAS mixture with outcomes.

Results

Plasma concentrations were highest for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) [median (IQR) 6.4(5.6) ng/mL], followed by perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) [4.4(3.0) ng/mL]. In early adolescence, girls were further along in puberty than boys [pubertal development score mean (SD) 2.9 (0.7) for girls and 2.2(0.7) for boys; age at peak height velocity mean (SD) 11.2y (1.0) for girls and 13.1y (1.0) for boys]. PFAS was associated with later markers of pubertal timing in girls only. For example, each doubling of PFOA was associated with lower pubertal development score (−0.18 units; 95% CI: −0.30, −0.06) and older age at peak height velocity (0.23 years; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.40)]. We observed similar associations for PFOS, perfluorodecanoate (PFDA), and the PFAS mixture. PFAS plasma concentrations were not associated with age at menarche or markers of pubertal timing in boys.

Discussion

Higher PFAS plasma concentrations in mid-childhood were associated with later onset of puberty in girls.

Keywords: PFAS, environmental exposure, puberty, menarche, height velocity

Introduction

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of synthetic chemicals with water, oil, and dirt resistant properties used in the manufacture of everyday consumer products, including food packaging, nonstick cookware, and clothing (Lindstrom et al. 2011). As a result of both pervasive exposure to and the biological persistence of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), and other long-alkyl chain PFAS (Olsen et al. 2007), nearly all U.S. children and adolescents have detectable concentrations of these PFAS in their blood (Calafat et al. 2019; Ye et al. 2018).

PFAS exposure has been linked to endocrine health outcomes, including markers of pubertal timing (Rappazzo et al. 2017; White et al. 2011). PFAS may delay puberty in girls by lowering estradiol concentrations (Knox et al. 2011; Shi et al. 2009), and in boys by lowering testosterone concentrations (Lopez-Espinosa et al. 2016) and antagonizing the androgen receptor (Kjeldsen and Bonefeld-Jorgensen 2013). Consistent with this physiology, some, but not all, rodent studies (Butenhoff et al. 2004; Lau et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2009) have shown prenatal PFOA exposure to be associated with delayed vaginal opening in female offspring (Lau et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2009) and delayed preputial separation in male (Butenhoff et al. 2004) offspring. Epidemiologic studies similarly support an association between maternal PFAS plasma concentrations during pregnancy and delayed pubertal development (e.g., menarche) in offspring, particularly girls (Christensen et al. 2011; Kristensen et al. 2013). Only one previous study has investigated the association between childhood PFAS plasma concentrations and markers of pubertal timing. In a cross-sectional analysis of the C8 Health Project, girls with higher PFAS concentrations were less likely to have achieved menarche compared to their peers (Lopez-Espinosa et al. 2011); however, cross-sectional associations may be explained by reverse causation related to potential decreases in PFAS plasma concentrations as body volume increases during puberty (Wu et al. 2015). Prospective studies are needed to better understand associations between childhood PFAS concentrations and pubertal timing. Here, we investigate prospective associations of PFAS plasma concentrations measured in mid-childhood with markers of pubertal timing in adolescents in the Project Viva cohort, a Boston-area prospective cohort. In addition to incorporating several markers of pubertal development in boys and girls, our study is the first to relate complex PFAS mixtures to markers of pubertal timing. We hypothesized that higher PFAS plasma concentrations would be associated with later puberty in both boys and girls.

Materials and Methods

Study population

Participants were enrolled in Project Viva, a Boston-area prospective pre-birth cohort. Women were recruited between 1999 and 2002 at their first prenatal visit at one of eight participating Atrius Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates clinics (Oken et al. 2015). Women were considered eligible to participate in Project Viva if they had a singleton pregnancy, were <22 weeks gestation at their initial visit, could participate in English, and planned to stay in the area following delivery. Of 2,128 mother-infant dyads, 1,122 (52.7%) had follow-up in mid-childhood. Among the 653 children who had a blood draw in mid-childhood [mean 7.9 (SD 0.8) years (2007–2010)], 640 (98%) reported at least one pubertal marker and were therefore eligible for this analysis. Participants included in the analysis (N=640) were more likely to have an annual household income below $70,000 and had a slightly different race/ethnicity distribution compared to excluded participants (N=482), but otherwise appeared similar (Table S1).

The institutional review boards of participating institutions approved this study. Mothers provided written informed consent, and children provided verbal assent at the mid-childhood visit. The involvement of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) did not constitute engagement in human subjects research.

Quantification of PFAS plasma concentrations

We measured PFAS concentrations in plasma collected in mid-childhood in 2007–2010, as described previously (Harris et al. 2017). Samples were shipped overnight to the laboratory at the CDC to measure PFAS using online solid-phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, the same method used to measure PFAS concentrations in 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey samples (CDC 2013). Low-concentration quality control materials (QCs) and high-concentration QCs, prepared from a calf serum pool, were analyzed with the study samples, analytical standards, and with reagent and serum blanks to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data (Kato et al. 2011). We replaced concentrations below the limit of detection (LOD) of 0.1 ng/mL (Table S2) with the LOD/2 (Hornung and Reed 1990). We calculated total PFOA as the sum of its isomers [i.e., n-PFOA and the sum of perfluoromethylheptanoates and perfluorodimethylhexanoates (Sb-PFOA)]. Similarly, we calculated total PFOS as the sum of its isomers [i.e., n-PFOS, sum of perfluoromethylheptane sulfonates (Sm-PFOS), and sum of perfluorodimethylhexane sulfonates (Sm2-PFOS)]. We a priori decided to restrict analyses to PFAS detected in >60% of samples, which included n-PFOA, n-PFOS, Sm-PFOS, PFOA, PFOS, perfluorodecanoate (PFDA), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamide) acetate (MeFOSAA), and perfluorononanoate (PFNA).

Age at peak height velocity

Linear growth accelerates during puberty due to activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, and age at peak height velocity is a common marker of pubertal timing. We estimated age at peak height velocity as previously described (Aris et al. 2019). Briefly, we used longitudinal height data from multiple research visits and medical records [mean (range): 13.3 (3 to 34) height measurements per child; age range: 2.5–18.3 years] and fitted subject-specific height growth curves across childhood and adolescence using the SITAR (SuperImposition by Translation and Rotation) growth model (Cole et al. 2010). Subsequently, we differentiated the individually predicted height curves and located the maximum inflection point during adolescence for each individually differentiated curve to obtain the age at peak height velocity.

Pubertal development score

We calculated a pubertal development score using a 5-item written pubertal development scale (Petersen et al. 1988) completed by a parent or guardian at the early adolescent visit [mean 13.1 (SD 0.8) years]. Ninety-nine percent of reporters were mothers. Items included on the boys’ pubertal development scale were voice deepening, body hair growth, facial hair growth, acne, and growth spurt. Items included on the girls’ pubertal development scale were breast development, body hair growth, acne, growth spurt, and menarche. Response options and scores for each pubertal development scale item except menarche were: 1 point for “not yet started”, 2 points for “barely started”, 3 points for “definitely started”, and 4 points for “seems complete”. We coded menarche as 4 points if menarche was present and 1 point if not present. To assign a summary pubertal development score to each participant, we calculated the average score across all items. Previous studies have reported moderate to strong correlations between pubertal development score and other markers of pubertal development, including physician breast Tanner staging in girls (Brooks-Gunn et al. 1987; Koopman-Verhoeff et al. 2020) and growth velocity (Petersen et al. 1988).

Age at menarche

We queried mothers on their daughters’ menarcheal status and the month and year of menarche via annual questionnaires from ages 9–12 years and at age 14 years and used the first reported age at menarche to minimize misclassification (Dorn et al. 2013).

Covariates

Mothers reported their age at enrollment in the cohort, educational attainment (categorized as with or without a college degree), annual household income (categorized as <$40,000, $40,000–$70,000, or >$70,000), pregnancy smoking status (smoked during pregnancy, former smoker, never smoked), and age at menarche. Mothers also reported their child’s race/ethnicity, which we categorized as white, Black, Asian, Hispanic, or other, and their child’s breastfeeding duration (months). We obtained child date of birth and sex from medical records. Mothers reported their child’s sugar-sweetened beverage (i.e., non-diet soda) intake using the PrimeScreen administered at mid-childhood (Rifas-Shiman et al. 2001).

Statistical analyses

We examined distributions of PFAS plasma concentrations and calculated Spearman correlations between individual PFAS. As our primary approach, we used sex-specific linear regression to evaluate the associations between plasma concentrations of each individual PFAS as continuous variables with age at peak height velocity and pubertal development score. After confirming associations were generally linear via generalized additive models, we used single PFAS linear regression models as our primary approach because they provide a quantifiable measure of association that can be easily compared to other studies. For all analyses, PFAS plasma concentrations were log-2 transformed to satisfy model assumptions and aid interpretation.

We first ran unadjusted models (except for models of pubertal development score, which we adjusted for age at outcome to improve precision and align with the other two outcomes, which are age-based). Next, we ran covariate-adjusted models. We selected the following covariates a priori based on previously described associations with PFAS and/or pubertal timing: mother’s education, household income, mother married/cohabiting, maternal age at enrollment, maternal smoking history, maternal age at menarche, child race/ethnicity, and breastfeeding duration (Ellis 2004; Herman-Giddens et al. 1997; Mogensen et al. 2015). To account for time trends in PFAS concentrations, we also adjusted for year of mid-childhood blood draw. Because PFAS have been associated with body composition in children (Domazet et al. 2016; Lin et al. 2009; Nelson et al. 2010), and adiposity is an important predictor of pubertal timing (Biro et al. 2006b; Dunger et al. 2005), we considered child BMI to be a potential mediator and did not include it in multivariable models.

For the primary analysis, we used chained equation multiple imputation to impute values for missing covariate data (N=188, 29%). Using an imputation model that included all PFAS concentrations, outcomes, and covariates for all 2,128 mother-child pairs in Project Viva, we generated 50 imputed data sets using PROC MI (SAS) (Harel et al. 2018).

Single PFAS models do not account for the complex mixture of PFAS that constitutes human exposure. Therefore, we additionally used Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) to simultaneously account for all mid-childhood PFAS plasma concentrations, while also allowing for potential non-linear and non-additive associations between PFAS and markers of pubertal timing (Bobb et al. 2018; Bobb et al. 2015). We used the variable selection option, which calculates the relative importance of each PFAS, the Gaussian kernel, and 10,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo iterations to model associations and 95% credible intervals. We used BKMR to examine the strength and linearity of the associations between a) the overall PFAS mixture and each pubertal outcome, comparing the effect of setting all PFAS at a given quantile versus the median and b) each PFAS and each pubertal outcome, setting other PFAS to the median. Next, we examined whether a given PFAS acted synergistically with the other PFAS. To do this, we examined the change in each pubertal outcome when a given PFAS was at the 75th vs 25th percentile a) when all other PFAS were set to the 75th percentile and b) when all other PFAS were set to the 25th percentile, and we compared these two values. If we detected interaction, we additionally investigated relevant pairwise (single PFAS-single PFAS) interactions. For BKMR models, we standardized PFAS plasma concentrations by dividing by the SD and modeled categorical covariates using indicator variables. We collapsed the values of several covariates (household income >$70,000/≤$70,000; smoked/ did not smoke during pregnancy; white/ nonwhite) due to small cell counts. We singly-imputed missing covariate data using stochastic imputation.

We additionally calculated the hazard ratio (HR) of time to menarche (in years and months) per doubling of plasma PFAS using singly-imputed Cox proportional hazards models with a time scale of age in years. We censored girls who never reported menarche at their last menarcheal status report. We evaluated the proportional hazards assumption using Schoenfeld residuals. Several covariates (child race, income, and maternal smoking) violated the proportional hazards assumption; however, after stratifying these variables by age at follow-up (<11 years, 11–12.9 years, ≥13 years) the proportional hazards assumption were met for all analyses. Due to sparse cell counts, we collapsed race (white/nonwhite). We used the Kaplan Meier method to calculate the median unadjusted age at menarche. We present only single-PFAS regression models for PFAS plasma concentrations and age at menarche, as BKMR models have not yet been adapted for use with survival models.

We performed several sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our findings. First, we investigated PFAS-pubertal outcome associations for PFAS isomers, which may have different associations with health outcomes than other isomers (Cardenas et al. 2017; Lin et al. 2020). Second, because emerging literature has linked prenatal PFAS exposure to delayed puberty (Christensen et al. 2011; Kristensen et al. 2013), we tested the degree to which our findings were driven by PFAS concentrations measured in childhood (rather than maternal prenatal PFAS concentrations) by additionally adjusting models for log-2 transformed individual PFAS plasma concentrations measured in mothers in early pregnancy (median=10 weeks). Correlations between maternal prenatal PFAS and mid-childhood PFAS were generally weak, ranging from 0.02 for PFNA to 0.36 for PFHxS. Third, we also considered sugar-sweetened beverage intake, and maternal and paternal height; however, including these variables did not substantially change our results. We limited our analysis of dietary factors to sugar-sweetened beverages because previous studies by our group and others have related sugar-sweetened beverages, but not other dietary factors (Carwile et al. 2015b; Gaskins et al. 2017), to both plasma PFAS (Seshasayee et al. 2021) and age at menarche (Carwile et al. 2015a; Carwile et al. 2015b; Gaskins et al. 2017; Mueller et al. 2015). Finally, we conducted a complete case analysis in which analyses were restricted to participants without missing covariate data (for pubertal development score, N=221 for girls and N=264 for boys; for age at peak height velocity, N=219 for girls and N=256 for boys; for menarche, N=221).

We used R (Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna Austria:R Foundation for Statistical Computing) for BKMR and menarche survival models; other analyses were performed in SAS EG (version 7.1, SAS Institute Inc.).

Results

Overall, our study population was 47% female and 60% white, with 70% reporting a household income >$70,000 (Table 1). PFAS were measured at (mean ± SD) 7.9 ± 0.8 years and pubertal development score was reported at 13.1 ± 0.8 years. The mean pubertal development score in early adolescence (mean ± SD) was 2.9 ± 0.7 for girls and 2.2 ± 0.7 for boys. As expected, mean pubertal development score increased with age (data not shown). Peak height velocity (mean ± SD) was 11.2 ± 1.0 years for girls and 13.1 ± 1.0 years for boys. The majority (71%) of girls reported menarche during follow-up, and the remaining 29% were censored due to non-response; none reported being premenarcheal at the end of follow-up at age 14 years. The median age at menarche was 12.6 years. Mothers of children who had higher PFAS plasma concentrations were slightly older, more likely to be white, and have a higher household income. Plasma concentrations were highest [median (interquartile range (IQR))] for PFOS 6.4 (5.6) ng/mL, followed by PFOA [4.4 (3.0) ng/mL] and PFHxS [1.9 (2.3) ng/mL]. Individual PFAS were correlated, with the strongest correlation observed between PFOA and PFOS (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.72). PFOA and PFOS were also moderately correlated with PFDA, PFHxS, and MeFOSAA (e.g., for PFOS and MeFOSAA, Spearman correlation coefficient 0.59) (Table S2).

Table 1.

Participant characteristics overall (N=640) and by quartiles of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in mid-childhood, N (%).

Quartiles of PFOAa
Overall
N=640
Q1
N=173
Q2
N=152
Q3
N=153
Q4
N=162
Parental/neighborhood characteristics
 Maternal age at enrollment (y), mean ± SD 31.9 ± 5.6 30.1 ± 6.4 32.0 ± 5.7 32.4 ± 5.0 33.1 ± 4.5
 Maternal age at menarche (y), mean ± SD 12.6 ± 1.5 12.5 ± 1.8 12.5 ± 1.4 12.7 ± 1.4 12.8 ± 1.4
 Maternal pregnancy smoking statusb
  Smoked during pregnancy 68 (11) 23 (13) 13 (9) 15 (10) 17 (11)
  Former 123 (19) 26 (15) 31 (21) 37 (24) 29 (18)
  Never 448 (70) 124 (72) 107 (71) 101 (66) 116 (72)
 Married/cohabiting 568 (89) 132 (77) 136 (91) 143 (94) 157 (97)
 Mother college graduate 414 (65) 75 (44) 100 (66) 110 (72) 129 (80)
 Annual household incomeb
  <$40,000 86 (14) 41 (26) 17 (12) 16 (11) 12 (8)
  $40,000–70,000 96 (16) 33 (21) 20 (14) 23 (16) 20 (13)
  >$70,000 418 (70) 81 (52) 104 (74) 108 (73) 125 (80)
Child characteristics
 Female 303 (47) 83 (48) 76 (50) 66 (43) 78 (48)
 Race/ethnicityb
  White 381 (60) 55 (32) 90 (59) 104 (68) 132 (81)
  Black 134 (21) 72 (42) 29 (19) 22 (14) 11 (7)
  Asian 17 (3) 8 (5) 2 (1) 3 (2) 4 (3)
  Hispanic 32 (5) 13 (8) 11 (7) 6 (4) 2 (1)
  Other 74 (12) 24 (14) 20 (13) 17 (11) 13 (8)
 Breastfeeding duration (months) 6.4 ± 4.5 5.0 ± 4.2 6.4 ± 4.6 6.8 ± 4.3 7.4 ± 4.5
 Year of mid-childhood blood draw
  2007 68 (11) 8 (5) 17 (11) 16 (10) 27 (17)
  2008 220 (34) 25 (14) 41 (27) 62 (41) 92 (57)
  2009 205 (32) 64 (37) 58 (38) 50 (33) 33 (20)
  2010 147 (23) 76 (44) 36 (24) 25 (16) 10 (6)
Age (y) at mid-childhood blood draw, mean ± SD 7.9 ± 0.8 8.3 ± 1.0 8.0 ± 0.8 7.8 ± 0.7 7.7 ± 0.6
Age (y) at early adolescent visit, mean ± SDc 13.1 ± 0.8 13.1 ± 0.8 13.0 ± 0.8 13.1 ± 0.9 13.1 ± 0.8
a

PFOA quartile minimum and maximum values (in ng/mL): Q1, < 0.1–3.1; Q2 >3.1–4.4; Q3, >4.4–6.0; Q4, >6.0–14.3.

b

Numbers do not sum to 100 due to rounding.

c

Age at early adolescent questionnaire

Missing data for participants overall: maternal age at menarche, N=93; maternal pregnancy smoking status, N=1; married/cohabiting, N=5; mother college graduate, N=4; annual household income, N=40; child race/ethnicity, N=2; breastfeeding duration, N=52

Abbreviations: PFOA, perfluorooctanoate; SD, standard deviation

PFAS plasma concentrations and puberty in girls

Girls with higher plasma concentrations of several PFAS had later pubertal timing in single PFAS models. In covariate-adjusted models, each doubling of PFOA was associated with a 0.18 unit lower [95% confidence interval (CI): −0.30, −0.06] pubertal development score and a 0.23 year (95% CI: 0.06, 0.40) older age at peak height velocity [i.e., 2.76 months (95% CI: 0.72, 4.8)] (Figures 1 & 2, Table S3). We observed similar though weaker associations for PFOS and PFDA, and null associations for PFHxS and MeFOSAA. Point estimates for PFNA indicated associations with lower pubertal development score and older age at peak height velocity, but 95% confidence intervals crossed the null. A doubling of PFOA plasma concentrations was associated with a 12% lower hazard of menarche [HR: 0.88 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.13)] (Figure 3, Table S4)]. We observed similar associations for PFOS [HR: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78, 1.13)] and PFDA [HR: 0.91 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.06)].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Associations of mid-childhood per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) plasma concentrations with pubertal development score in girls (N=258) and boys (N=297). Adjusted for age at outcome, mother’s education, household income, married/cohabiting, maternal age at enrollment, maternal smoking history, maternal age at menarche, child race/ethnicity, breastfeeding duration, and year of blood draw. Missing covariate data was multiply imputed. For effect estimates, see Table S3.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval, PFOA, perfluorooctanoate; PFOS, perfluorooctane sulfonate; PFDA, perfluorodecanoate; PFHxS, perfluorohexane sulfonate; MeFOSAA, 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamide) acetate; PFNA, perfluorononanoate

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Associations of mid-childhood per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) plasma concentrations with age at peak height velocity in girls (N=297) and boys (n=329). Adjusted for mother’s education, household income, married/cohabiting, maternal age at enrollment, maternal smoking history, maternal age at menarche, child race/ethnicity, breastfeeding duration, and year of blood draw. Missing covariate data was multiply imputed. For effect estimates, see Table S3.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval, PFOA, perfluorooctanoate; PFOS, perfluorooctane sulfonate; PFDA, perfluorodecanoate; PFHxS, perfluorohexane sulfonate; MeFOSAA, 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamide) acetate; PFNA, perfluorononanoate

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Adjusted1 Cox proportional hazards survival curves (log scale) for time until menarche (years) (N=258).

1 Adjusted for mother’s education, household income, married/cohabiting, maternal age at enrollment, maternal smoking history, maternal age at menarche, child race/ethnicity, breastfeeding duration, and year of blood draw. Missing covariate data was multiply imputed. For effect estimates, see Table S4.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval, PFOA, perfluorooctanoate; PFOS, perfluorooctane sulfonate; PFDA, perfluorodecanoate; PFHxS, perfluorohexane sulfonate; MeFOSAA, 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamide) acetate; PFNA, perfluorononanoate

Results from mixture models were generally consistent with those from the single PFAS models. Among girls, higher concentrations of the overall PFAS mixture were linearly associated with lower pubertal development score (i.e., less pubertal development in early adolescence) (Figure S1, panel A, Table S3) and an older age at peak height velocity (Figure S2, panel A, Table S3), although confidence intervals for mixture-outcome associations crossed the null. When we used the mixture model framework to examine individual PFAS-outcome associations, we observed that higher plasma concentrations of PFOA, PFOS, and PFNA were associated with a lower pubertal development score, and higher plasma concentrations of PFOA and PFDA were associated with older age at peak height velocity. In contrast, higher concentrations of PFHxS and MeFOSAA were associated with a higher pubertal development score (Figure S1, panel B). PFNA and PFHxS contributed most to the overall fit for the pubertal development score model, and PFOA and PFDA contributed most to the fit of the age at peak height velocity model (Table S5). Individual PFAS-outcome associations were not modified by other PFAS for either pubertal outcome (Figure S1 and S2, panel C).

PFAS plasma concentrations and puberty in boys

PFAS plasma concentrations were not associated with pubertal development score (Figure 1) or age at peak height velocity in boys (Figure 2) in single PFAS models. In mixture models, we similarly observed no effect of the overall PFAS mixture on pubertal development score (Figure S1, panel D), although the overall PFAS mixture was associated with an increase in age at peak height velocity (Figure S2, panel D). In mixture models, associations between individual PFAS and pubertal development scores were null with wide 95% CIs (Figure S1, panel E). Higher PFOA plasma concentrations were non-linearly associated with older age at peak height velocity, and higher PFNA plasma concentrations were linearly associated with younger age at peak height velocity (Figure S2, panel E). Individual PFAS were otherwise not associated with either pubertal outcome, and the individual PFAS-outcome associations were not modified by other PFAS (Figure S1 & S2, panel F).

Sensitivity analyses

The magnitude of the associations between PFOA or PFOS isomers and pubertal outcomes were similar to that of the associations between the sum of their respective isomers and pubertal outcomes. For example, in girls, each doubling of n-PFOA plasma concentrations was associated with a 0.20 unit (95% CI: −0.33, −0.08) lower pubertal development score compared to a 0.18 lower (95% CI: −0.30, −0.06) pubertal development score for PFOA (other isomer data not shown). Our findings were robust to additional adjustment for individual prenatal PFAS plasma concentrations (Tables S3 and S4, Model 3). Effect estimates from complete case analyses were similar to models in which missing covariates were imputed (data not shown).

Discussion

In this large prospective study of US children, we found that mid-childhood plasma concentrations of select PFAS were associated with later puberty in girls, but not boys.

We found the strongest associations between plasma concentrations of PFOA, PFOS, and PFDA in mid-childhood and later puberty in girls, consistent with a previous epidemiological study of childhood PFAS plasma concentrations and pubertal outcomes. In a cross-sectional analysis of girls aged 8–18 years in the C8 Health Project, a large sample of Mid-Ohio Valley residents exposed to PFOA via water contamination, girls in the highest PFOA and PFOS quartiles were less likely to have reached menarche than those in the lowest PFAS quartiles (Lopez-Espinosa et al. 2011). Similar findings have also been reported in studies examining prenatal PFAS plasma concentrations. Kristensen et al. found that prenatal PFOA concentrations were associated with later age at menarche in a population-based birth cohort in Denmark (Kristensen et al. 2013), and prenatal PFOS, but not other PFAS, was associated with a non-statistically significant reduced odds of reaching menarche before age 11.5 years in a case-control study of UK girls (Christensen et al. 2011). In the Danish National Birth Cohort, prenatal PFDA was non-monotonically associated with later menarche; however, there was no clear pattern of an association between prenatal PFAS and markers of pubertal timing (e.g., age at menarche and Tanner stages 2–5) in girls (Ernst et al. 2019). Our findings suggest that some, but not all, PFAS are associated with delayed pubertal timing in girls, although this conclusion requires replication in additional cohorts.

The association between higher PFAS plasma concentrations and later puberty in girls may be due to a lowering of estradiol levels or reduction in estrogen receptor expression by PFAS. Pre-pubertal female rats treated with 3 mg/kg-d PFDA had lower estradiol concentrations and reduced expression of estrogen receptors α and β relative to untreated mice (Shi et al. 2009). Similarly, in a cross-sectional analysis of peri-menopausal and menopausal women in the C8 Health Project, PFOS was inversely associated with estradiol (Knox et al. 2011), although PFOS concentrations were much higher than those observed in Project Viva (median 18–33 ng/mL vs. 6.4 ng/mL). Consistent with a reduction in estradiol, treatment of mouse dams with PFOA delayed vaginal opening, a sign of puberty, in female offspring (Lau et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2009).

Our findings also align with previous epidemiological studies that have reported mixed findings for PFAS concentrations and puberty in boys. In boys in the Danish National Birth Cohort, higher PFHxS concentrations were associated with younger age at self-reported markers of pubertal development (e.g., voice break and acne), but other PFAS-pubertal outcome associations were generally non-monotonic with confidence intervals that crossed the null (Ernst et al. 2019). In contrast, in the cross-sectional analysis of the C8 Health Project, boys aged 8–18 years with higher PFOS, but not PFOA, had lower odds of having reached puberty, defined as a total testosterone concentration >50 ng/dL (Lopez-Espinosa et al. 2011). Due to exposure to industrially-contaminated drinking water, PFAS plasma concentrations in C8 Health Project participants were around three-times higher than in those of Project Viva participants (e.g, median 19.4 vs. 6.4 ng/mL).

The present study is the first to our knowledge to examine the role of PFAS mixtures in childhood on pubertal timing. Mixture models may be less biased than single PFAS models because they account for correlations and interactions between chemicals. We present single PFAS models as our primary results because they are more interpretable and facilitate comparison to other studies; however, the observation that results from BKMR mixture models were generally consistent with results from single PFAS linear regression models adds credibility to our findings. In both models, we found higher plasma concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in mid-childhood to be associated with less pubertal development (i.e., lower pubertal development score) in early adolescence in girls. Contrary to our findings from single PFAS models, in BKMR models, girls with higher concentrations of MeFOSAA and PFHxS appeared to have greater pubertal development (i.e., higher pubertal development score) in early adolescence. One possible explanation is that BKMR models account for correlations between chemicals whereas single PFAS models do not, and concentrations of MeFOSAA, and to a lesser extent, PFHxS, were correlated with PFOS and PFOA. PFOS and PFOA were associated with less pubertal development in early adolescence, which may explain null findings for MeFOSAA and PFHxS in single PFAS models. Correlations between PFNA and other PFAS (PFOS, PFOA, and PFDA) could also, in part, explain our observation that associations between the overall PFAS mixture and pubertal development score were most strongly driven by PFNA, even though this PFAS did not have the strongest association with pubertal development score in single PFAS models. Another possible reason that results from BKMR and single PFAS models may differ is because BKMR takes into account interactions among PFAS (Bobb et al. 2015); however, we did not find evidence for strong interactions between any PFAS and the rest of the PFAS mixture.

Our finding of an association between higher plasma concentrations of select PFAS and later pubertal timing in girls has implications for bone health. The majority of bone mass accumulates during puberty, and children with later puberty have an abbreviated window for bone mass to accrue, resulting in reduced peak bone mass (Chevalley et al. 2008). Consequently, women who experienced later menarche are at increased risk of fractures across the life course (Chevalley et al. 2012; Johnell et al. 1995). We previously reported a cross-sectional association between PFAS concentrations and lower bone mineral density in Project Viva in 8-year old children. This association was evident even when we restricted to prepubertal children, suggesting that PFAS may impact bone mineral density through mechanisms other than through later pubertal timing (Cluett et al. 2019). Future studies should explore whether the observed association between PFAS exposure in childhood and lower bone mineral density persists through adolescence and whether this may be partly driven by later puberty. The extent to which a 2–3 month older age at puberty impacts bone outcomes remains unclear, and its public health importance should be considered in the context of the many known adverse health effects associated with earlier puberty in girls, including early sexual debut, depression, and increased risk of breast cancer (Golub et al. 2008; Graber 2013; Hsieh et al. 1990).

Our study has several potential limitations. First, the pubertal development score, which is a subjective report of pubertal status, is subject to misclassification. We considered differential misclassification of the pubertal development score unlikely because participants were unaware of their PFAS plasma concentrations; however, it is possible that misclassification could vary based on other factors (e.g., socioeconomic status) associated with PFAS plasma concentrations. Also, the pubertal development score was typically reported by the participants’ mothers, and maternal report of pubertal status is less accurate than clinical assessment, and possibly, assessments performed by the children themselves (Terry et al. 2016). Mothers may also report pubertal development scores more accurately for their daughters compared to their sons (Carskadon and Acebo 1993). Our null findings in boys could be explained by greater misclassification of the pubertal development score in boys, but this finding was present across pubertal outcomes, and misclassification is unlikely for age at peak height velocity, which was based on objective height measurements and calculated using a SITAR model, considered to be the least biased method (Simpkin et al. 2017). Mean pubertal development score and median age at menarche in our study was similar to those of other US studies (Carwile et al. 2015a; Chumlea et al. 2003; Duncan Cance and Ennett 2012). However, the mean age at peak height velocity in our study population was slightly younger than those from other US and UK cohorts (Abbassi 1998; Cole 2020), which could be due to differences in participant characteristics or methods of calculating age at peak height velocity, or temporal changes in pubertal timing. Additionally, while Cox proportional hazards models are limited in their ability to account for changing hazards and potential for selection bias (Hernan 2010), they allow for comparison to other studies.

Our study was limited to select markers of pubertal timing (i.e., pubertal development score in early adolescence, age at peak height velocity, and age at menarche), and we did not directly test whether PFAS are also associated with earlier or later markers of pubertal timing, including age at pubertal onset. However, while puberty trajectory can be nonlinear, onset of puberty is moderately correlated with age at menarche and age at peak height velocity (Biro et al. 2006a; German et al. 2018), and associations of PFAS with delayed vaginal opening and preputial separation in rodents further support an association between PFAS and onset of puberty (Butenhoff et al. 2004; Lau et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2009). Direct characterization of the association of PFAS with earlier and later markers of pubertal timing, as well as pubertal tempo (Pantsiotou et al. 2008), require further investigation.

Our study also has several important strengths. We examined multiple validated markers of puberty and found that PFAS-pubertal timing associations were generally consistent across all pubertal outcomes. In addition to self- and parent-reported outcomes, we calculated age at peak height velocity from repeated height measures obtained at research and clinical visits, providing an objective measure of pubertal timing. Another strength of our study is that we were able to account for PFAS concentrations during gestation, supporting an independent association between PFAS concentrations during childhood and pubertal timing. Third, the prospective design of our study allowed us to avoid reverse causation, which may be introduced in cross-sectional analyses if PFAS plasma concentrations decrease following the initiation of menses (i.e., PFAS loss via excretion) or when body volume increases during the growth spurt (i.e., PFAS dilution) (Wu et al. 2015). Although many Project Viva participants are white and college education, the generalizability of our findings is supported by the similarity of the median age at menarche (Adgent et al. 2012; Herman-Giddens et al. 1997) and PFAS plasma concentrations (Ye et al. 2018) to other populations.

In this prospective study of US children, we found higher plasma concentrations of select PFAS at mid-childhood to be associated with later puberty in girls, but not boys. Our findings add to a growing body of literature supporting the ability of certain PFAS, particularly PFOA and PFOS, to disrupt normal endocrine function at concentrations detected in the general US population.

Supplementary Material

1
  1. We examined associations of mid-childhood PFAS and markers of pubertal timing.

  2. In girls, PFOS, PFOA, and PFDA were associated with later markers of pubertal timing.

  3. PFAS were not associated with markers of pubertal timing in boys.

  4. Results from single PFAS models were generally consistent with BKMR models.

Acknowledgements

The authors are supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (R01ES030101, K23ES024803, R01ES021447, R01HD034568, UG3OD023286). We thank Jessica Young, PhD for her assistance with statistical analyses.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the CDC, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Competing financial interests: The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Abbassi V Growth and Normal Puberty. Pediatrics 1998;102:507–511 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adgent MA; Daniels JL; Rogan WJ; Adair L; Edwards LJ; Westreich D; Maisonet M; Marcus M Early-life soy exposure and age at menarche. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012;26:163–175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aris IM; Rifas-Shiman SL; Li LJ; Fleisch AF; Hivert MF; Kramer MS; Oken E Parental obesity and offspring pubertal development: Project Viva. J Pediatr 2019;215:123–131.e122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biro FM; Huang B; Crawford PB; Lucky AW; Striegel-Moore R; Barton BA; Daniels S Pubertal correlates in black and white girls. J Pediatr 2006a;148:234–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Biro FM; Khoury P; Morrison JA Influence of obesity on timing of puberty. International Journal of Andrology 2006b;29:272–277; discussion 286–290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bobb JF; Claus Henn B; Valeri L; Coull BA Statistical software for analyzing the health effects of multiple concurrent exposures via Bayesian kernel machine regression. Environ Health 2018;17:67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bobb JF; Valeri L; Claus Henn B; Christiani DC; Wright RO; Mazumdar M; Godleski JJ; Coull BA Bayesian kernel machine regression for estimating the health effects of multi-pollutant mixtures. Biostatistics 2015;16:493–508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brooks-Gunn J; Warren MP; Rosso J; Gargiulo J Validity of self-report measures of girls’ pubertal status. Child Dev 1987;58:829–841 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Butenhoff JL; Kennedy GL Jr.; Frame SR; O’Connor JC; York RG The reproductive toxicology of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO) in the rat. Toxicology 2004;196:95–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Calafat AM; Kato K; Hubbard K; Jia T; Botelho JC; Wong LY Legacy and alternative per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the U.S. general population: Paired serum-urine data from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environ Int 2019;131:105048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cardenas A; Gold DR; Hauser R; Kleinman KP; Hivert MF; Calafat AM; Ye X; Webster TF; Horton ES; Oken E Plasma Concentrations of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances at Baseline and Associations with Glycemic Indicators and Diabetes Incidence among High-Risk Adults in the Diabetes Prevention Program Trial. Environ Health Perspect 2017;125:107001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carskadon MA; Acebo C A self-administered rating scale for pubertal development. Journal of Adolescent Health 1993;14:190–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carwile JL; Willett WC; Spiegelman D; Hertzmark E; Rich-Edwards J; Frazier AL; Michels KB Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and age at menarche in a prospective study of US girls. Hum Reprod 2015a;30:675–683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carwile JL; Willett WC; Wang M; Rich-Edwards J; Frazier AL; Michels KB Milk Consumption after Age 9 Years Does Not Predict Age at Menarche. Journal of Nutrition 2015b;145:1900–1908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Laboratory Procedure Manual for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (NHANES 2013–2014) (Method No. 6304.06). Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013–2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chevalley T; Bonjour JP; Ferrari S; Rizzoli R Influence of age at menarche on forearm bone microstructure in healthy young women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:2594–2601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chevalley T; Bonjour JP; van Rietbergen B; Rizzoli R; Ferrari S Fractures in healthy females followed from childhood to early adulthood are associated with later menarcheal age and with impaired bone microstructure at peak bone mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:4174–4181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Christensen KY; Maisonet M; Rubin C; Holmes A; Calafat AM; Kato K; Flanders WD; Heron J; McGeehin MA; Marcus M Exposure to polyfluoroalkyl chemicals during pregnancy is not associated with offspring age at menarche in a contemporary British cohort. Environ Int 2011;37:129–135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chumlea WC; Schubert CM; Roche AF; Kulin HE; Lee PA; Himes JH; Sun SS Age at Menarche and Racial Comparisons in US Girls. Pediatrics 2003;111:110–113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cluett R; Seshasayee SM; Rokoff LB; Rifas-Shiman SL; Ye X; Calafat AM; Gold DR; Coull B; Gordon CM; Rosen CJ; Oken E; Sagiv SK; Fleisch AF Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Plasma Concentrations and Bone Mineral Density in Midchildhood: A Cross-Sectional Study (Project Viva, United States). Environ Health Perspect 2019;127:87006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cole TJ Tanner’s tempo of growth in adolescence: recent SITAR insights with the Harpenden Growth Study and ALSPAC. Annals of Human Biology 2020;47:181–198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cole TJ; Donaldson MD; Ben-Shlomo Y SITAR--a useful instrument for growth curve analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:1558–1566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Domazet SL; Grøntved A; Timmermann AG; Nielsen F; Jensen TK Longitudinal Associations of Exposure to Perfluoroalkylated Substances in Childhood and Adolescence and Indicators of Adiposity and Glucose Metabolism 6 and 12 Years Later: The European Youth Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1745–1751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dorn LD; Sontag-Padilla LM; Pabst S; Tissot A; Susman EJ Longitudinal reliability of self-reported age at menarche in adolescent girls: variability across time and setting. Developmental Psychology 2013;49:1187–1193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Duncan Cance J; Ennett ST Demographic differences in self-report pubertal status among rural adolescents in the US. Annals of Human Biology 2012;39:84–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dunger DB; Ahmed ML; Ong KK Effects of obesity on growth and puberty. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2005;19:375–390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ellis BJ Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: an integrated life history approach. Psychological Bulletin 2004;130:920–958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ernst A; Brix N; Lauridsen LLB; Olsen J; Parner ET; Liew Z; Olsen LH; Ramlau-Hansen CH Exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances during fetal life and pubertal development in boys and girls from the Danish National Birth Cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2019;127:17004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gaskins AJ; Pereira A; Quintiliano D; Shepherd JA; Uauy R; Corvalán C; Michels KB Dairy intake in relation to breast and pubertal development in Chilean girls. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2017;105:1166–1175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. German A; Shmoish M; Belsky J; Hochberg Z Outcomes of pubertal development in girls as a function of pubertal onset age. European Journal of Endocrinology of the European Federation of Endocrine Societies 2018;179:279–285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Golub MS; Collman GW; Foster PM; Kimmel CA; Rajpert-De Meyts E; Reiter EO; Sharpe RM; Skakkebaek NE; Toppari J Public health implications of altered puberty timing. Pediatrics 2008;121Suppl 3:S218–230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Graber JA Pubertal timing and the development of psychopathology in adolescence and beyond. Hormones and Behavior 2013;64:262–269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Harel O; Mitchell EM; Perkins NJ; Cole SR; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Sun B; Schisterman EF Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Data in Epidemiologic Studies. Am J Epidemiol 2018;187:576–584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harris MH; Rifas-Shiman SL; Calafat AM; Ye X; Mora AM; Webster TF; Oken E; Sagiv SK Predictors of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) plasma concentrations in 6–10 year old American children. Environ Sci Technol 2017;51:5193–5204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Herman-Giddens ME; Slora EJ; Wasserman RC; Bourdony CJ; Bhapkar MV; Koch GG; Hasemeier CM Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in office practice: a study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network. Pediatrics 1997;99:505–512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hernan MA The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiology 2010;21:13–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hornung RW; Reed LD Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 1990;5:46–51 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hsieh CC; Trichopoulos D; Katsouyanni K; Yuasa S Age at menarche, age at menopause, height and obesity as risk factors for breast cancer: associations and interactions in an international case-control study. International Journal of Cancer 1990;46:796–800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnell O; Gullberg B; Kanis JA; Allander E; Elffors L; Dequeker J; Dilsen G; Gennari C; Lopes Vaz A; Lyritis G; et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:1802–1815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kato K; Basden BJ; Needham LL; Calafat AM Improved selectivity for the analysis of maternal serum and cord serum for polyfluoroalkyl chemicals. Journal of Chromatography A 2011;1218:2133–2137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kjeldsen LS; Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC Perfluorinated compounds affect the function of sex hormone receptors. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2013;20:8031–8044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Knox SS; Jackson T; Javins B; Frisbee SJ; Shankar A; Ducatman AM Implications of early menopause in women exposed to perfluorocarbons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:1747–1753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Koopman-Verhoeff ME; Gredvig-Ardito C; Barker DH; Saletin JM; Carskadon MA Classifying Pubertal Development Using Child and Parent Report: Comparing the Pubertal Development Scales to Tanner Staging. Journal of Adolescent Health 2020;66:597–602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kristensen SL; Ramlau-Hansen CH; Ernst E; Olsen SF; Bonde JP; Vested A; Halldorsson TI; Becher G; Haug LS; Toft G Long-term effects of prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances on female reproduction. Hum Reprod 2013;28:3337–3348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lau C; Thibodeaux JR; Hanson RG; Narotsky MG; Rogers JM; Lindstrom AB; Strynar MJ Effects of perfluorooctanoic acid exposure during pregnancy in the mouse. Toxicol Sci 2006;90:510–518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lin CY; Chen PC; Lin YC; Lin LY Association among serum perfluoroalkyl chemicals, glucose homeostasis, and metabolic syndrome in adolescents and adults. Diabetes Care 2009;32:702–707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lin PD; Cardenas A; Hauser R; Gold DR; Kleinman KP; Hivert MF; Calafat AM; Webster TF; Horton ES; Oken E Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and blood pressure in pre-diabetic adults-cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of the diabetes prevention program outcomes study. Environ Int 2020;137:105573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lindstrom AB; Strynar MJ; Libelo EL Polyfluorinated compounds: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 2011;45:7954–7961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lopez-Espinosa MJ; Fletcher T; Armstrong B; Genser B; Dhatariya K; Mondal D; Ducatman A; Leonardi G Association of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) with age of puberty among children living near a chemical plant. Environ Sci Technol 2011;45:8160–8166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lopez-Espinosa MJ; Mondal D; Armstrong BG; Eskenazi B; Fletcher T Perfluoroalkyl substances, sex hormones, and insulin-like growth factor-1 at 6–9 years of age: a cross-sectional analysis within the C8 Health Project. Environ Health Perspect 2016;124:1269–1275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mogensen UB; Grandjean P; Nielsen F; Weihe P; Budtz-Jorgensen E Breastfeeding as an Exposure Pathway for Perfluorinated Alkylates. Environ Sci Technol 2015;49:10466–10473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mueller NT; Jacobs DR Jr.; MacLehose RF; Demerath EW; Kelly SP; Dreyfus JG; Pereira MA Consumption of caffeinated and artificially sweetened soft drinks is associated with risk of early menarche. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2015;102:648–654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nelson JW; Hatch EE; Webster TF Exposure to polyfluoroalkyl chemicals and cholesterol, body weight, and insulin resistance in the general U.S. population. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118:197–202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Oken E; Baccarelli AA; Gold DR; Kleinman KP; Litonjua AA; De Meo D; Rich-Edwards JW; Rifas-Shiman SL; Sagiv S; Taveras EM; Weiss ST; Belfort MB; Burris HH; Camargo CA Jr.; Huh SY; Mantzoros C; Parker MG; Gillman MW Cohort profile: Project Viva. Int J Epidemiol 2015;44:37–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Olsen GW; Burris JM; Ehresman DJ; Froehlich JW; Seacat AM; Butenhoff JL; Zobel LR Half-life of serum elimination of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorohexanesulfonate, and perfluorooctanoate in retired fluorochemical production workers. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:1298–1305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pantsiotou S; Papadimitriou A; Douros K; Priftis K; Nicolaidou P; Fretzayas A Maturational tempo differences in relation to the timing of the onset of puberty in girls. Acta Paediatrica 2008;97:217–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Petersen AC; Crockett L; Richards M; Boxer A A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1988;17:117–133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rappazzo KM; Coffman E; Hines EP Exposure to perfluorinated alkyl substances and health outcomes in children: a systematic review of the epidemiologic literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rifas-Shiman SL; Willett WC; Lobb R; Kotch J; Dart C; Gillman MW PrimeScreen, a brief dietary screening tool: reproducibility and comparability with both a longer food frequency questionnaire and biomarkers. Public Health Nutrition 2001;4:249–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Seshasayee SM; Rifas-Shiman SL; Chavarro JE; Carwile JL; Lin PD; Calafat AM; Sagiv SK; Oken E; Fleisch AF Dietary patterns and PFAS plasma concentrations in childhood: Project Viva, USA. Environ Int 2021;151:106415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shi Z; Zhang H; Ding L; Feng Y; Xu M; Dai J The effect of perfluorododecanonic acid on endocrine status, sex hormones and expression of steroidogenic genes in pubertal female rats. Reprod Toxicol 2009;27:352–359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Simpkin AJ; Sayers A; Gilthorpe MS; Heron J; Tilling K Modelling height in adolescence: a comparison of methods for estimating the age at peak height velocity. Annals of Human Biology 2017;44:715–722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Terry MB; Goldberg M; Schechter S; Houghton LC; White ML; O’Toole K; Chung WK; Daly MB; Keegan TH; Andrulis IL; Bradbury AR; Schwartz L; Knight JA; John EM; Buys SS Comparison of Clinical, Maternal, and Self Pubertal Assessments: Implications for Health Studies. Pediatrics 2016;138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. White SS; Fenton SE; Hines EP Endocrine disrupting properties of perfluorooctanoic acid. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2011;127:16–26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu H; Yoon M; Verner MA; Xue J; Luo M; Andersen ME; Longnecker MP; Clewell HJ 3rd. Can the observed association between serum perfluoroalkyl substances and delayed menarche be explained on the basis of puberty-related changes in physiology and pharmacokinetics? Environ Int 2015;82:61–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yang C; Tan YS; Harkema JR; Haslam SZ Differential effects of peripubertal exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid on mammary gland development in C57Bl/6 and Balb/c mouse strains. Reprod Toxicol 2009;27:299–306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ye X; Kato K; Wong LY; Jia T; Kalathil A; Latremouille J; Calafat AM Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in sera from children 3 to 11 years of age participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2014. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2018;221:9–16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES