Abstract
Background
In terms of maternal morbidity and mortality, the puerperium is just as significant as pregnancy and childbirth. Nearly half of all maternal deaths occur in the time after delivery.
Methods
This review is based on pertinent articles in English and German from the years 2000–2020 that were retrieved by a selective search in MEDLINE and EMBASE, as well as on the available guidelines in English and German and on German-language textbooks of obstetrics.
Results
The most common and severe complications are, in the post-placental phase, bleeding and disturbances of uterine involution; in the first seven days after delivery, infection (e.g., endomyometritis, which occurs after 1.6% [0.9; 2.5] of all births) and hypertension-related conditions. Thromboembolism, incontinence and disorders of the pelvic floor, mental disease, and endocrine disturbances can arise at any time during the puerperium. In an Australian study, the incidence of embolism was 0.45 per 1000 births, with 61.3% arising exclusively after delivery.
Conclusion
Basic familiarity with the most common and severe diseases in the puerperium is important for non-gynecologists as well, among other things because highly acute, life-threatening complications can arise that demand urgent intervention.
The period following delivery of the placenta and the 6 weeks thereafter are referred to as the postpartum period or puerperium (1). This period is subdivided into:
The immediate postnatal period (the first 3 h postpartum, during which the risk of hemorrhage is high)
The early postnatal period (the first 7 days postpartum, during which the risk of infections and maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is high)
The late postnatal period (6–8 weeks) (1).
Definition.
The period following delivery of the placenta and the 6 weeks thereafter are referred to as the postpartum period or puerperium. It it subdivided into the immediate postnatal period, the early postnatal period, and the late postnatal period.
Mortality.
In terms of global maternal mortality, almost 50% of deaths occur in the puerperium and thereafter. The Global Burden of Disease Study reported maternal mortality in Germany for 2013 to be 6.5 (95% confidence interval: [5.0; 7.9]) per 100,000 births.
In terms of maternal morbidity and mortality, the puerperium is as important as the pregnancy and birth. Although a number of pregnancy-related diseases do not appear until the puerperium (for example, delayed uterine atony), they may occur equally as frequently (for example, HELLP syndrome) or even more frequently (for example, embolisms) during this period. With regard to global maternal mortality, approximately one quarter of deaths occur in the antenatal and one quarter in the perinatal period, while almost half occur in the puerperium and thereafter (2, 3). The Global Burden of Disease Study reported maternal mortality in Germany for 2013 to be 6.5 (95% confidence interval: [5.0; 7.9]) per 100 000 births (2). One can assume underrecording since recording is primarily done by the maternity units and after transfer to another department/hospital (for example, for intensive care), recording is oftentimes not continued; additionally, in the case of sickness and death following a prolonged period after the birth (for example, due to pulmonary embolism), it is likely that many deaths are no longer correctly recorded as maternal deaths. Although postnatal care is usually provided by midwives and gynecologists, women also turn to physicians in other disciplines. It is important for the latter to be familiar with the most common and serious clinical pictures in the puerperium in order to be able to assess when and how urgently a patient should present to a gynecologist or colleagues in other specialties. Potentially life-threatening diseases (table 1) primarily include: severe hemorrhage immediately postpartum; hypertensive complications as well as infections (in particular endomyometritis) in the early postnatal period; and thrombosis/embolism, as well as complications due to pre-existing diseases, such as cardiac diseases, throughout the puerperium. Potentially non-life-threatening conditions include other infections (urinary tract infection, mastitis, and wound infections), breastfeeding disorders, incontinence, pelvic floor dysfunction, and postpartum thyroiditis.
Table 1. Potentially life-threatening diseases: symptoms and incidences.
Disease | Symptoms | Incidence |
Delayed uterine atony(> 24 h postpartum) |
Signs of poor uterine involution (uterine subinvolution): Increased uterine height (abdominal palpation), soft-doughy uterus, pain at the uterine border, possible subfebrile temperature, frontal headache, intermittent, persistent, possibly increasing bleeding Also additional severe bleeding, possibly symptoms of shock |
Atonic bleeding (postpartum overall): 2.5%; 95% CI: [2.32; 2.62] (36) Delayed uterine atony (> 24 h postpartum): 0.2–2.5% (industrialized countries) (e93– e96) |
Endomyometritis(chorioamnionitis and sepsis) | Fever, tachycardia, lower abdominal pain, relatively soft uterus that is painful on palpation, foul-smelling lochia, general feeling of being unwell, increased leukocytes (e29) | Chorionamnionitis 3.9% (8) Endomyometritis 1.6–1.9% (8, e97) Sepsis 0.05% (8) |
Group A streptococcal sepsis | Acute disease course, usually within the first 48 h postpartum: high fever (in 73%), diffuse abdominal pain, putrid vaginal discharge, uterine tenderness, fever, chills, increased leukocytes, thrombocytopenia, hypotension (15) | 6/100,000 Births (14) |
Pre-eclampsia (modified from [4]) | Blood pressure > 140/90 mm Hg Headache, photopsia/impaired vision, upper abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, general malaise, weight gain Impairment to: kidneys, liver, CNS, hematological or respiratory system, IUGR or placental insufficiency |
Hypertensive disorders (overall) 5–10% (e98) Pre-eclampsia ca. 4.6% Eclampsia ca. 1.4% (e97) Of which: Eclampsia 11–44% HELLP 7–30% (e100, e101) are postpartum (in relation to eclampsia/HELLP overall) |
Eclampsia | Additional tonic-clonic seizures | |
HELLP syndrome | Upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, thrombocytopenia | |
Thrombosis/embolism | As in outside of pregnancy/puerperium Cave: misclassification as physiological symptoms of the puerperium |
Thrombosis 0.05–0.3% (23, 24) Embolism 0.08/1000 births (postpartum) (27) and 0.14/1000 (28) to 0.45/1000 (pre- and postpartum) (31) Pulmonary embolism 60.5 (28) to 61.3% postpartum (31) |
Sheehan’s syndrome | Hypopituitarism: (reduced lactation, amenorrhea, genital and axillary hair loss, asthenia and weakness, premature skin aging, dry skin, and hypopigmentation) | See Table 2 |
IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; CNS, central nervous system; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval
Learning objectives
After reading this article, the reader should:
Be able to name common and typical disorders of the puerperium and the most important characteristics of their clinical course
Even as a non-gynecologist, be able to assess when and how rapidly a gynecologist or colleague in another discipline should be consulted
Know the basics of treatment of these disorders.
Methods
A selective literature search was performed chapter-wise covering the last 20 years in Medline and Embase, taking into consideration German- and English-language articles. The individual chapters were divided between the authors. In addition, the online information platform “Uptodate,” as well as German- and English-language guidelines issued by the following medical societies were included: German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG/Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany [AWMF] guidelines), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidelines, and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC). For more details on the search, please see the eMethods Section.
Potentially life-threatening diseases.
These primarily include severe hemorrhage in the immediate postnatal period, hypertensive complications and infections in the early postnatal period, and thrombosis/embolism throughout the puerperium, as well as complications due to preexisting diseases, such as cardiac disease.
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
The care of patients with hypertensive complications of pregnancy is also important in the puerperium and thereafter, since these indicate a generally increased cardiovascular risk. Risk factors for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are presented in Box 1. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy include gestational or pregnancy-induced hypertension (new-onset hypertension 140/90 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation), pre-eclampsia (plus proteinuria ≥ 300 mg/day and/or protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmoL and/or organ manifestation), eclampsia (plus tonic-clonic seizures), and HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets = hemolysis, elevated transaminases, and thrombocytopenia < 100 G/L) (4). The view that pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension are resolved after delivery is deemed to be outdated (e1– e6). The risk for exacerbation or initial manifestation of these diseases persists for up to 7 days postpartum (4, e1– e3, e7). Blood pressure and proteinuria generally normalize within the first week postpartum (e1– e3). In the case of pregnancy-induced hypertension, the current guideline recommends monitoring blood pressure for at least 2 days after delivery. Following pre-eclampsia, blood pressure should be measured: at least 4 × a day until discharge (at least once daily between days 3 and 5 postpartum). In the case of abnormal measurements on day 3–5, measurements should be taken at least every other day during the 2 weeks following discharge, and blood pressure and renal function should always be checked at 12 weeks (5). A clear recommendation in this regard should be made upon discharge from the maternity hospital. Persistent hypertension following delivery (150/100 mmHg and higher) should be treated with drugs according to current recommendations (6, e8).
BOX 1. Risk factors for hypertensive disorders*1 and thrombosis/embolisms in the puerperium.
For hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
-
Antiphospholipid syndrome
RR: 9.72; 95% CI: [4.34; 21.75] (37)
-
Status following pre-eclampsia
-
Elevated BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 :
-
Pre-existing diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2
RR: 3.56 [2.54; 4.99] (37)
-
Positive family history
RR: 2.9 [1.70; 4.93] (37)
-
Primiparity
-
Maternal age
-
Chronic hypertension
-
Autoimmune diseases
-
Increased resistance/uterine artery notching:
-
Multiple pregnancy
-
In-vitro fertilization (IVF)
IVF after oocyte donation: RR: 6.60 [4.55; 9.57] compared to spontaneously pregnant women (e109)
Versus autologous IVF: AOR: 2.45 [1.53; 3.93] (e110) to 2.64 [2.29; 3.04] (e111); meta-analysis: calculated OR: 2.57 [1.91; 3.47] (e109)
Autologous IVF vs. spontaneous pregnancy: RR: 1.71 [1.11; 2.62] (e110) to pooled RR: 1.8 [1.6; 2.1] (e113)
-
Gestational diabetes
RR: 1.93 [1.66; 2.25] (e105)
-
Other:
Hydatidiform mole, trisomy, hydrops fetalis, inter alia (4)
*1 Modified from (4)
Risk factors for thrombosis and embolism
-
Cesarean section (overall) RR: 3.86 [2.97; 5.01] (31)
-
Maternal age
-
Multiple pregnancy
RR: 3.35 [1.87; 5.99] (31)
-
Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy
RR: 3.07 [2.25; 4.18] (31)
-
Parity
≥ 3 RR: 1.65 [1.13; 2.42] (31)
-
Lupus erythematosus
RR: 19.7 [8.07; 47.9] (31)
-
Status following stillbirth RR 2.26 [0.84; 6.07] (31)
Stillbirth in the current pregnancy RR: 6.97 [3.70; 13.2] (31)
-
Preterm birth
RR: 3.95 [2.84; 5.50] (31)
-
SGA < 10th percentile
RR: 1.43 [0.98; 2.07] (31)
-
LGA > 90th percentile
RR 1.48 [1.02; 2.13] (31)
-
Peripartum bleeding (≥ 1000 mL)
-
Immobilization
During hospital stay: RR 17.5 [7.69; 40.0]
Following discharge: RR: 6 [3.74; 10.5] (e63)
-
Thrombophilia, primarily antiphospholipid syndrome
-
Status following thrombosis in a previous pregnancy
-
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30)
RR 1.4 [0.7; 2.6] (24)
-
Pre-existing maternal heart disease
RR: 5.4 [2.6; 11.3] (24)
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; BMI, body mass index; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; LR, likelihood ratio; LGA, large for gestational age; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; SGA, small for gestational age; GW, gestational week
Potentially non-life-threatening conditions.
Potentially non-life-threatening conditions include other infections (urinary tract infection, mastitis, and wound infections), breastfeeding disorders, incontinence, pelvic floor dysfunction, and postpartum thyroiditis.
From the 4th postpartum day, or when the clinical situation has normalized (blood pressure regularly below 140/90) (5), antihypertensive medication can be phased out. In general, blood pressure reduction can proceed more rapidly following delivery, since uteroplacental perfusion pressure no longer needs to be taken into consideration. During breastfeeding, the available medications include alpha-methyldopa, labetalol, nifedipine, enalapril, captopril, atenolol, and metoprolol (e3, e9). For women in the puerperium with severe pre-eclampsia or following eclamptic seizure, the administration of intravenous magnesium should be continued for up to 48 h postpartum (4, e10). Even in the case of more intensive monitoring of women in the puerperium, as well as in the case of preterm birth or antihypertensive treatment, breastfeeding and the promotion of mother–infant bonding should nevertheless be made possible. If symptoms such as hemolysis, low platelet count, renal failure, or neurological symptoms (seizures, visual changes, paresis) persist, it is essential from a differential diagnostic perspective to consider thrombotic microangiopathies (e.g., aHUS), especially if symptoms worsen (4).
Uterine subinvolution and delayed uterine atony
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy include:
Gestational or pregnancy-induced hypertension
Pre-eclampsia
Eclampsia
HELLP syndrome
Uterine subinvolution refers to the failure of the uterus to sufficiently return to its normal state. Physiological involution to the original size of the uterus (approximately 50 g) takes between 5 and 6 weeks. Uterine involution is usually assessed by means of transabdominal palpation of the uterine fundus. This measurement is limited in its objectivity (e11) and lacks a measurable correlation between the rate of involution and the risk of further complications, most notably severe atonic postpartum hemorrhage (e11– e13); it also lacks accurate data on incidence. Risk factors for (physiologically) delayed involution are considered to include cesarean section, multiple pregnancy, fetal macrosomia or polyhydramnios, and uterine fibroids, although quantifiable data on the individual risk factors are not available (e14).
Uterine subinvolution.
Uterine subinvolution refers to the failure of the uterus to sufficiently return to its normal state. Physiological involution to the original size of the uterus of approximately 50 g takes between 5 and 6 weeks.
Lochiostasis (lochia = [physiological] hemorrhage/discharge from the area of the uterine wound/site of placental attachment) is usually the result of a mechanical displacement of the cervix, for example, due to a clot or residual fetal membrane (e15). The retained lochia (lochiometra) cause insufficient uterine involution and create the risk of developing postpartum endomyometritis. From a clinical perspective, uterine subinvolution is striking on abdominal palpation due to the greater uterine height (uterus is soft and doughy, pain at the uterine border is possible in the further course) (table 1). In the case of lochiometra, lochial flow is decreased, and subfebrile temperatures and frontal headache are often present (e16). Sonographically, the uterus appears lax, possibly with a narrow, hypoechoic border, but may also be unremarkable. In addition to adequate mobilization, regular breastfeeding (e17), and abdominal massages, prone positioning of patients is recommended (promoting drainage of lochia through anteversion of the uterus in the prone position) (e15, e16). Oxytocin infusions are used to promote uterine contraction. Methylergometrine, on the other hand, is no longer recommended due to its negative effect on lactation (e18).
Delayed uterine atony.
This occurs within 24 h to 12 weeks postpartum and is potentially life-threatening, especially since women in the puerperium have often already left hospital. Common causes include placental and ovarian remnants, placental polyps, and endomyometritis.
Delayed uterine atony occurs within 24 h and 12 weeks postpartum and is potentially life-threatening, especially since women in the puerperium have often already left hospital (e19). Common causes include placental and ovarian remnants, placental polyps, and endomyometritis (e20). Intermittent or increasing vaginal bleeding is characteristic (7, e21, e22). Specific risk factors for delayed uterine atony are shown in Table 2. There are currently no screening recommendations for early detection (7). On ultrasound, clots and/or perfused or calcified, hypoechoic parietal areas can be visualized. To avoid uterine perforation, therapeutic curettage is performed with blunt instruments under ultrasound guidance. Prophylactic antibiotic administration in the absence of signs of infection is controversial. Depending on the severity of atony, uterotonic drugs (intravenous injection) or prostaglandins can be administered as an adjunct. The material obtained from uterine abrasion should undergo histopathological analysis to exclude trophoblastic neoplasia. From a differential diagnostic perspective, the first menstrual bleeding needs to be considered, especially in non-breastfeeding mothers (e23).
Table 2. Non-infectious diseases in the puerperium (excluding hypertensive disorders and thrombosis/embolism): incidences and risk factors.
Disease and symptoms | Incidence (relative to overall birth numbers) | Risk factors aOR/OR [95% confidence interval], references |
Uterine subinvolution Atonic postpartum hemorrhage Delayed uterine atony (> 24 h postpartum) Symptoms see Text and Table 1 |
Uterine subinvolution: common (Atony see Table 1 “Potentially life-threatening diseases”) |
General risk factors for atonic postpartum hemorrhage: Status post severe atonic postpartum hemorrhage aOR 8.97 [5.25; 15.33] (36) Placenta previa or premature placental separation aOR 7.0 [6.6; 7.3] (36) Uterine rupture aOR, 11.6 [9.7; 13.8] (39) Cervical tear aOR 94.0 [87.3; 101.2] (39) Anticoagulant medication aOR 4.79 [2.72; 8.41] (36) Anemia on admission to the maternity unit aOR 4.27 [2.79; 6.54] (36) Severe pre-eclampsia or HELLP aOR 3.03 [1.74; 5.27] (36)to 3.1 [2.9; 3.3] (39) Chorionamnionitis aOR 2.9 [2.5; 3.4] (39) Uterine fibroids aOR 2.0 [1.8; 2.2] (39) to 2.71 [1.69; 4.35] (36) Multiple birth aOR 2.11 [1.39; 3.22] (35) to 2.8 [2.6; 3.0] (39) Assisted reproduction aOR 1.88 [1.33; 2.65] (36) Secondary cesarean section aOR 1.95; [1.53; 2.47] (35); Cesarean section in general aOR 1.4 [1.3; 1.5] (39) Operative vaginal delivery aOR 1.5 [1.17; 1.93] (36); aOR 1.5 [1.4; 1.6] (39) Induction of labor aOR 1.69 [1.39; 2.05] (36) Augmentation of labor aOR 1.59 [1.32; 1.91) (36) Specific risk factors for delayed uterine atony: Delayed uterine atony (previous pregnancy) OR 6.0 [2.1; 16.8] (e21) Status post early uterine atony (current pregnancy) OR 4.7 [1.9; 11.6] (e21) Vaginal bleeding before 24 weeks gestational age OR 3.0 [1.6; 5.9] (e21) Prolonged econd stage of labour OR 3.1 [1.2; 7.5] (e21) Arrested labor during econd stage of labour OR 2.1 [1.0; 4.2] (e21) |
Urinary incontinence | Prevalence for all women > 20 years: 20% (Norway, population-based) (19) After cesarean section 15.9% Following vaginal birth 21.0% (at any time) (19) 3 Months postpartum in general: 24% (17) to 29% (18) 20 years after vaginal birth 40.3% and after cesarean section 28.8% (20) |
Vaginal birth aOR 2.3 [2.0; 2.6] compared to nulliparous women and 1.7 [1.3; 2.1] compared to cesarean section (19) Cesarean section: aOR 0.28 [0.19; 0.41] (18) to OR 0.54 [0.43; 0.68] (17) compared to vaginal birth, and aOR 1.5 [1.2; 1.9] compared to nulliparous women (19) Maternal age ≥ 35 OR 2.02 [1.35; 3.02] (18) |
Urinary retention > 6 hours postpartum | 0.45–0.7% (e58– e60) | |
Urinary retention (increased residual urine >= 100 ml) | Data vary widely: 1.5–47% (e62, e63) |
Protracted expulsion period (>10 h), operative vaginal delivery, episiotomy OR 1.7 [1.02; 2.71] (22), high birth weight OR 1.03 [1.01; 1.06] (22), EPA OR 2.08 [1.36; 3.19] (22) |
Postpartum thyroiditis | 1–16.7% (e69– e82) |
Anti-TPO Ab detection RR 5.7 [5.3; 6.1] (e86) In persistent anti-TPO Ab in the 3rd trimester, incidence > 80 % (34, 35, e88), compared to 2% in anti-TPO Ab-negative women (e89) Type 1 diabetes mellitus: incidence 10.5 % (e84) to 25 % (e85) (19.6% [19.5; 19.7] (e83) and 25 % [12.7; 41.2] (e86) compared to 8.8% in non-diabetics (e86) |
Sheehan’s syndrome | Rare in industrialized countries (e.g., 5/100,000 in Iceland (e115) Likely to be more common in the case of poor healthcare (e.g., 3% of all women > 20 years in an Indian study (e116) |
(Insufficiently treated) hemorrhagic shock (e92) |
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; anti-TPO Ab, anti-thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies; HELLP, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low levels of platelets; OR, odds ratio; EPA, epidural anesthesia; RR, relative risk; GW, gestational week
Fever, infection, and sepsis
Fever and infection are common complications in the puerperium and range from mild rises in temperature (for example, in the context of lactation), wound infections, urinary tract infections, and mastitis to a severe, sometimes septic course due to endomyometritis. As a general rule, the patient with fever should present promptly to a gynecologist, since the abovementioned infections, as well as serious infections of other causes, always need to be ruled out and treatment initiated immediately if necessary.
Postpartum endomyometritis
Puerperal endometritis is an infection of the decidua that can develop following vaginal birth or cesarean section (e24). In severe cases, the infection may spread to the myometrium, peritoneum, and beyond, and may also lead to a septic course. A recent meta-analysis reported the incidence of chorioamnionitis (infection of the fetal membranes) to be 3.9%, endometritis to be 1.6%, wound infection to be 1.2%, and sepsis to be 0.05% of all births (vaginal, operative vaginal, and cesarean section) (8). These are mostly polymicrobial infections involving various aerobic and individual anaerobic bacteria (e25, e26). Cesarean section, in particular secondary cesarean section, is the most important risk factor. A large cohort study published in 2009 reported a five-fold increased risk of postoperative infection in the case of cesarean section compared to vaginal delivery (e24). See Box 2 for further risk factors.
BOX 2. Further risk factors for endomyometritis.
Chorioamnionitis (OR: 5.37) (9).
Prolonged second stage of delivery > 2h: RR: 3.7; [1.4; 8.5] (e27)
Labor > 12 h: OR: 4.86) (9)
Premature rupture of membranes 5.81; [5.12; 6.59] (e28) and > 18 h: 6.9; [2.5; 18.9] (e27))
Multiple vaginal examinations (> eight compared to ≤ two examinations: OR for chorioamnionitis 5.02) (9)
Operative vaginal births (OR: 1.86) (9)
Preterm birth < 32nd GW (OR: 3.05; [1.32; 7.06] (e29) to 3.8; [1.07; 13.7] (e30) obesity (BMI ≥ 40 OR: 4.63; [1.25; 17.14]) (e29)
Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (OR: 1.4–2.28 for chorioamnionitis) (9, e31)
Gestational diabetes mellitus
Manual removal of the placenta
Pre-existing bacterial vaginosis (OR 3.26 to 5.8) (e32, e33)
B-streptococcal colonization (OR: for chorioamnionitis 1.88 (9) to 7.2; [2.4; 21.2]) (e34, e35)
BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; GW, gestational week
Fever, infection, and sepsis:
Fever and infection are common complications in the puerperium and range from mild rises in temperature (for example, in the context of lactation), wound infections, urinary tract infections, and mastitis to a severe, sometimes septic course due to endomyometritis.
Specific risk factors for uterine atony include:
Delayed uterine atony in a previous pregnancy
Status following early uterine atony
Vaginal bleeding before the 24th GW
Prolonged second stage of labour or arrested labor during the expulsion period
Postpartum thyroiditis.
Postpartum thyroiditis occurs significantly more frequently in women positive for anti-TPO Ab and with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Group A streptococcal sepsis.
This is one of the most severe, albeit nowadays rare, infections in the puerperium. The disease follows a highly acute course. In 50% of cases, symptoms develop within the first 48 h after birth.
Typical symptoms include fever, tachycardia, lower abdominal pain, a soft uterus that is painful on palpation, foul-smelling lochia, a general feeling of being unwell, and a (progressive) increase in leukocytes. In the case of fever during the puerperium, one must always assume endomyometritis until another cause of infection is confirmed, and liberal intravenous antibiotic therapy should be initiated. A systematic review published in 2015, as well as several older randomized controlled trials demonstrate good efficacy for clindamycin and gentamicin compared to other regimens (10, e26, e36 - e42), or alternatively, for example, piperacillin with tazobactam (e43 - e46) (Box 3). The most important prophylactic measure is antibiotic administration prior to or during cesarean section (RR 0.38 for endometritis) (10). In some cases, antibiotic administration after cutting the umbilical cord is recommended due to concerns regarding infant side effects. However, a recent Cochrane analysis and meta-analysis demonstrate that administration prior to skin incision offers better protection against postoperative infections without posing any risk to the infant (11, 12) (drop in postoperative infection rate with pre-skin incision administration from 6.2 to 2.5%) (e47). In the case of cesarean section, manual placental separation increases the risk of endometritis compared to spontaneous placental separation (e48– e51). A recent randomized trial (ANODE trial) showed a significant reduction in postpartum infections (RR 0.58; 95% CI: [0.49; 0.69]; p < 0.0001) after operative vaginal deliveries with antibiotic prophylaxis (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) (13).
BOX 3. Treatment of infections in the puerperium.
Endometritis
Clindamycin 900 mg i.v. every 8 h together with gentamicin 1,5 mg/kg i.v. evey 8 h (10), alternatively, e.g., piperacillin plus tazobactam (e43)
Up to 48 h free of fever
Endometritis with group A streptococci
Penicillin and clindamycin (penicillin G, 4 MU i.v. every 4 h und clindamycin 900 mg i.v. every 8 h), plus vancomycin if necessary (e117)
Early surgical intervention and debridement of the focus of infection, possibly hysterectomy
Urinary tract infection
Preferred antibiotics/without restrictions: pivmecillinam, penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides, nitrofurantoin; with restrictions/second choice: fosfomycin, trimethoprim; attention should be paid to contraindications (www.embryotox.de (www.embryotox.de [e118])
Mastitis
Oral flucloxacillin 4 × 250–500 mg/day or cephalospor 3 × 250–500 mg/day or a macrolide in the case of penicillin allergy (clarithromycin 4 × 500 mg/day) or clindamycin 3 × 600 mg/day for at least 10–14 days (e119)
In the case of an abscess, possible surgical debridement
Fungal mastitis: initially, oral fluconazole 2 × 100–200 mg/day for 1–2 weeks, reduced thereafter to 100–150 mg/day (e120)
Group A streptococcal sepsis represents one of the most severe, albeit nowadays rare, infections in the puerperium (incidence in the US for 1997: 6 per 100,000 births, population-based observational study, maternal mortality 3.5%) (14). The disease follows a highly acute course. In 50% of cases, symptoms develop within the first 48 h after birth (high fever in 73%) (15). Other typical symptoms include: diffuse abdominal pain, purulent vaginal discharge, uterine tenderness, gastrointestinal symptoms, fever, chills, increased leukocytes, thrombocytopenia, and hypotension (15), although its diagnostic differentiation from postpartum infections with other pathogens is often challenging. An acute postoperative course or infection in the pharyngeal region in the postpartum woman or members of her family should attract attention. Emergent intervention involving antibiotic therapy (usually with penicillin and clindamycin) and early surgical debridement of the focus of infection are essential, since the mortality rate in the event of associated secondary toxic shock is still 30–50% (e52) (Box 3).
Breast disorders
Common breast diseases associated with breastfeeding include: nipple soreness, breast engorgement, and mastitis. Symptoms of sore nipples can include fissures, skin abrasions, rhagades, scabbing, or signs of inflammation such as redness, edema, and heat. Signs of infection include a purulent or yellowish coating on the nipples (16). Breast disorders in the puerperium should prompt rapid presentation to a gynecologist or midwife. Details on treatment can be found in the eMethods Section “Breast disorders.”
Bladder and pelvic floor disorders
Breast disorders.
Common breast disorders associated with breastfeeding include: nipple soreness, milk stasis, and mastitis. Symptoms of sore nipples can include fissures, skin abrasions, rhagades, scabbing, or signs of inflammation such as redness, edema, and heat.
During the puerperium, acute disorders such as urinary tract infections and urinary retention can occur. Unexplained fever should always prompt consideration of a urinary tract infection, and appropriate diagnostic and treatment steps should be taken (e53).
At the same time, birth and the puerperium are closely associated with incontinence and pelvic floor disorders, which stay with women for life (often causing a high burden of disease). Therefore, attention should already be paid to these disorders in the puerperium in order to enable prompt access to support and treatment. The focus here is on physiotherapy. For conditions ranging from uterine descent to uterine prolapse, the use of vaginal pessaries is increasingly recommended as early on as in the puerperium; having said that, no studies are available to date that adequately demonstrate the effect of vaginal pessaries. Women with uterine prolapse report experiencing significant symptoms and express a desire for more comprehensive information (as early as prepartum) (e54).
Rates of postpartum urinary incontinence range from 15.9% to 29% 3 months following delivery (17– 19). Virtually all studies demonstrate an increased risk among women that have had vaginal delivery compared to nulliparous women and women that have had cesarean section (17, 18, 20) (table 2). A population-based Norwegian study (EPINCONT) reported an age-adjusted risk of urinary incontinence following vaginal delivery of 2.3 [2.0; 2.6], but of 1.5 [1.2; 1.9] following cesarean section (19). While this study demonstrated a significant association between mode of delivery and urinary incontinence only up to the more advanced age of 50 years, a recent Swedish cohort study in women between 40 and 64 years of age showed no age dependence for significantly increased incontinence rates after vaginal delivery (20, e55). For prepartum counseling, there is a validated algorithm that takes into consideration relevant risk factors such as urinary incontinence before pregnancy, age, BMI and mother’s height, estimated fetal weight, and family history: the UR-CHOICE risk calculator (e56). A 2017 Cochrane analysis showed a marked reduction in risk for postpartum urinary incontinence when pelvic floor muscle training is performed antepartum (RR: 0.71; [0.54; 0.95]) (21), but no clear effect for pelvic floor training started postpartum (RR 0.55; [0.29; 1.07]) (RR 0.55; [0.29; 1.07]) (21).
Incontinence and pelvic floor disorders.
Birth and the puerperium are closely associated with incontinence and pelvic floor disorders. These conditions often accompany women lifelong. Attention should already be paid to these disorders in the puerperium in order to enable prompt access to support and treatment.
As yet, no studies investigating a protective effect on the prevention of permanent pelvic floor damage and uterine prolapse have been conducted on the benefit of a vaginal pessary in the puerperium. In addition to urinary incontinence, fecal (or anal) incontinence represents a particularly serious and distressing disorder. A 2017 Cochrane analysis reported the postpartum incidence here to be as high as 10% (21). Affected women report a significant lack of information regarding anal injuries and fecal incontinence (e57).
Postpartum urinary retention is rarer (incidence, 0.45–0.7% [e58–e60], scant data, potentially high number of unreported cases) and defined as the inability to micturate within 6 h of delivery or catheter removal. Increased residual urine is defined as a bladder filling of 100–150mL or more after spontaneous micturition (e61). Postpartum urinary retention, in particular, often goes unnoticed since it is mostly asymptomatic (22) (variable incidence data: 1.5 [e62] to 47% [e63]). In the intrapartum period, damage due to mechanical pressure to the inferior hypogastric plexus may occur, accompanied by soft tissue edema with obstruction of the bladder neck (e64). Peripartum risk factors are shown in Table 2. The patient’s first spontaneous micturition should occur before transfer from the delivery room, or at the latest 2–3 h after delivery. In the case of urinary retention, a single-use catheter is used to empty the bladder and a speculum insertion is immediately performed to rule out injury/hematoma. Re-evaluation should be carried out after 4 h: if spontaneous micturition is still not possible, a 24-h indwelling catheter and urine sediment analysis (to exclude a urinary tract infection) are recommended. An attempt at treatment with an indirect parasympathomimetic drug can also be made (for example, ubretide 5 mg/day).
Thrombosis and thromboembolism
Thrombosis and thromboembolism.
The incidence of thromboembolic complications (during pregnancy and the puerperium) is reported to be 0.54–1.27/1000 births (23– 28). It must be assumed that thromboembolism is one of the most frequent causes of maternal death.
The incidence of thromboembolic complications (during pregnancy and the puerperium) is reported to be 0.54–1.27/1000 births (23– 28). During this period, women are in a hypercoagulable state, probably to protect against high blood loss during childbirth. Despite incomplete mortality statistics in Germany, it must be assumed that thromboembolism is one of the most frequent causes of maternal death. In the case of thrombosis in a previous pregnancy, a risk recurrence without thromboprophylaxis of 5–15.5% has been reported (23, 29, 30). Other risk factors include maternal age, severe peripartum hemorrhage, multiple pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, parity ≥ 3, lupus, stillbirth, prematurity, obesity, pre-existing thrombophilia, and immobilization (24, 31, e65) (box 1). Cesarean section represents one of the most important risk factors: an odds ratio of 2.2 is reported (e66) for planned (and also performed) cesarean section (in patients with a breech presentation) versus planned vaginal delivery (irrespective of the ultimate mode of delivery), and an odds ratio of 3.7 [2.73; 5.01] (31) for primary (that is to say, performed before the onset of labor) cesarean section versus successful vaginal delivery, with the risk following secondary (i.e., after the onset of labor) cesarean section being even higher (RR: 4.09; [2.96; 5.63]) (31) (box 1). In accordance with the current S3 guideline on cesarean section, there is a general recommendation for thromboprophylaxis following this intervention. Low-molecular-weight heparins are the treatment of choice for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications. Thromboprophylaxis initiated antepartum should be continued for approximately 6 weeks after delivery due to the ongoing risk following delivery, given that many thromboembolic complications occur following discharge from the maternity unit. While several studies showed thrombosis to be more common during pregnancy, the incidence of pulmonary embolism in the puerperium tends to be higher compared to prepartum (27, 28, 31). The risk seems to return to its pre-pregnancy level after approximately 4 weeks postpartum (31). A Scottish retrospective study including 72,000 births reported a prepartum incidence of thrombosis of 0.5/1000 versus 0.21/1000 births postpartum, and 0.07/1000 prepartum versus 0.08/1000 births postpartum for pulmonary embolism (27). In an Australian study including more than 500,000 births (2001–2007) and with at an incidence of pulmonary embolism of 0.45 per 1000 births, 61.3% of pulmonary embolisms occurred exclusively in the postpartum period, 2.7% occurred postpartum but were preceded by prepartum thrombosis, and 4.5% occurred both prepartum and postpartum (31). Similar results were found in a US study including 268,525 births (incidence of embolism, 0.14/1000 births) for the observation period 1978–1996 in which 60.5% of embolisms occurred postpartum (28).
The clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is challenging after birth due to the fact that symptoms cannot always be differentiated from (physiological) postpartum symptoms. The diagnostic work-up and treatment of venous thrombotic events do not differ significantly from treatment outside of pregnancy and childbirth (e67, e68).
Mental disorders in the puerperium
Mental disorders in the puerperium.
Mental disorders such as depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorders represent yet another group of important diseases in the puerperium that are underestimated in terms of incidence.
Mental disorders such as depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorders represent yet another group of important diseases in the puerperium that are underestimated in terms of incidence. For more details on these disorders, the reader is referred to the eSupplement “ Mental disorders in the puerperium.”
Endocrine disorders
Endocrine disorders in the puerperium often go undetected or are misinterpreted as postpartum depression. The most common disorders include postpartum thyroiditis (PPT), which develops in 1–16.7% (e69– e82) of women following delivery, with onset 4–24 weeks postpartum, as well as post-miscarriage (32). Characteristic features include symptoms of transient hyperthyroidism, such as tremor, nervousness, tachycardia, and hyperdrosis, potentially progressing in later stages to lack of drive and extreme fatigue as symptoms of hypothyroidism (33). PPT is more common in patients with type I diabetes mellitus (incidence, 10.5–25%) (e83– e86). It is also strongly associated with the presence of anti-thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibodies (34, 35, e83, e87 - e89, Table 2). Between 12% and 30% of patients go on to develop persistent hypothyroidism (34, e90). Basal TSH levels and, where appropriate, autoantibodies should be regularly monitored: initially every 4–8 weeks (34), and annually once a euthyroid metabolic state has been reached (32) in order to detect persisting dysfunction. From a treatment perspective, oral levothyroxine can be administered for hypothyroidism, while beta-blockers can be used short-term for tachycardia symptoms (in the setting of hyperthyroidism) (33, 34). From a differential diagnostic perspective, it is important to rule out exacerbated autoimmune thyroiditis (AIT). The risk of recurrence of PPT is reported to be 42.4% – 69.2% (e70, e91).
Endocrine disorders.
These often go undetected or are misinterpreted as postpartum depression. The most common disorder is postpartum thyroiditis (PPT), which develops in 1–16.7% of women following delivery, with onset 4–24 weeks postpartum, as well as post-miscarriage.
Rarer endocrine disorders in the puerperium include Sheehan’s syndrome, which is caused by ischemic pituitary necrosis, usually following severe peripartum hemorrhage and shock. In developing countries, it is one of the most frequent causes of hypopituitarism (e92). The diagnosis is often missed and not made until decades later. Characteristic symptoms are caused by insufficient production of pituitary hormones (lactation disorders, amenorrhea, genital and axillary hair loss, weakness, premature skin aging, dry skin, and hypopigmentation). The onset of lactation or menstruation does not rule out its diagnosis. In addition to the hormone deficiencies, frequent normocytic normochromic anemia, and low platelet count that can be detected in laboratory tests, magnetic resonance imaging reveals a completely or partially empty sella turcica as a result of pituitary gland atrophy. Due to the risk of developing severe, life-threatening disease, early diagnosis and prompt replacement of deficient hormones are essential, particularly in hypothyroidism and hypocortisolism (e92).
Supplementary Material
eMethods Section
Search terms
In particular regarding definitions and rare clinical pictures for which there is only scant primary literature, German-language standard textbooks were consulted. The search terms used included, for example: general: “postpartum complications,” “postpartum morbidity and mortality”; hypertensive disorders: “hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy AND postpartum,” “HELLP,” “preeclampsia” AND “postpartum”; Subinvolutio uterine/Spätatonie: “delayed uterine involution,” “(secondary) postpartum hemorrhage”; endometritis: “postpartum infection”, “postpartum endometritis”, “postpartum sepsis”, “antibiotic prophylaxis AND cesarean section”, “antibiotic therapy AND endometritis”, “group A-streptococcal endometritis”; milk stasis/mastitis: “mastitis puerperalis”, “breast feeding complications”, “breast disorders AND pregnancy OR lactation”; urinary retention/infection: “urinary retention AND postpartum”, “postpartum urinary tract infection”, “postpartum urinary incontinence”; thrombosis/embolism: “thrombosis, pulmonary embolism AND postpartum”; mental disorders: “postpartum mental disease”, “mental disease AND pregnancy”, “postpartum depression”, “postpartum anxiety disorder”, “postpartum PTDS”, “postpartum psychosis”, “postpartum eating disorders”; endocrine disorders: “postpartum endocrine disorders,” “postpartum thyreoditis,” “Sheehan syndrome”.
Breast disorders in the puerperium
Common breast disorders associated with breastfeeding include: nipple soreness, milk stasis, and mastitis. Symptoms of sore nipples can include fissures, skin abrasions, rhagades, scabbing, or signs of inflammation such as redness, edema, and heat. Signs of infection include a purulent or yellowish coating on the nipples (16). Treatment options, in addition to optimizing and changing the breastfeeding position, include topical application of breast milk and highly purified lanolin (e121). The increased initial swelling of the mammary glands seen within the first 10–14 days postpartum need to be differentiated from milk stasis and mastitis. Regular breast emptying (8–12 times/24 h) during this phase promotes venous and lymphatic drainage and milk production (e53). Causes of milk stasis (= insufficient emptying of the breast [e122]) include mechanical obstruction (poor breastfeeding technique, short periods of breastfeeding, or constriction by clothing), lack of let-down reflex (stress or sleep deprivation: catecholamines inhibit oxytocin release centrally and peripherally) or, less frequently, excessive milk production (e123). In contrast to mastitis, milk stasis is not associated with impaired general condition and temperature > 38.4 °C (e124). The local symptoms (redness, heat, hardening, and pain) are similar and generally develop unilaterally. Puerperal mastitis is milk stasis- or infection-related inflammation of the mammary gland that peaks in incidence 2–3 weeks postpartum. The most common pathogens include Staphylococcus aureus at > 90%, more rarely coagulase-negative staphylococci, streptococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli (e119). Bacterial mastitis requires antibiotic therapy. Milk stasis-related mastitis also requires antibiotics to be started if there is no improvement after 24–48 h. Before starting calculated therapy (oral ß-lactamase-resistant penicillin [flucloxacillin 4 × 250–500 mg/day] or first- and second-generation cephalosporins [cephaclor 3 × 250–500 mg/day], in the case of penicillin allergy, macrolide antibiotics [clarithromycin 4 × 500 mg/day] or clindamycin 3 × 600 mg/day, Table 3) for at least 10–14 days), material should be obtained for microbiological analysis (e117, e123). In the case of resistance to treatment > 2 weeks, histological investigation is mandatory to exclude inflammatory breast cancer (e126). In all breast disorders during the lactation period, regular emptying of the breast, manually or mechanically if necessary, is essential alongside an evaluation of the causes (e127). Adjunctive analgesia with acetaminophen (500–1500 mg/day) or ibuprofen (800–1 600 mg/day) can be given, as well as warming the breast before/cooling the breast after breastfeeding (e128). Between 4 and 11% of cases of mastitis develop into an abscess, which should undergo fine-needle aspiration while the patient is on concurrent antibiotic therapy. If the abscess persists or findings are extensive, surgical incision with drainage and irrigation is performed (e129). Weaning is not necessary in breast disorders during breastfeeding and should be avoided above all in the case of stasis-related disorders and in the acute phase. An exception here is the rare bilateral mastitis due to group B ß-hemolytic streptococci: in addition to pausing breastfeeding, the infant should receive simultaneous antibiotic therapy (e53). Another rare special form is candida infection of the milk ducts. Fungal mastitis is a common cause of treatment-refractory nipples that are painful during breastfeeding, with a burning pain radiating deep into the breast (e130), often without external signs of inflammation. Pathogen detection can be challenging. Treatment with oral fluconazole (initially, 2 × 100–200 mg/day) continues until symptoms resolve (usually for 1 or more weeks), then reduced to 1 × 100–150 mg/day for a few more days (e120). To prevent re-infection, the infant must also be treated (oral gel for infants 4 × daily) (e131).
Mental disorders in the puerperium
The spectrum of mental disorders in the puerperium ranges from mild low mood and adjustment disorders to severe psychoses. Typical clinical pictures include depressive and anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, eating disorders, and personality disorders (e132).
For depressive disorders, a prevalence of 6.5%–16% is reported (e132– e134), whereby the data in the literature vary and often do not distinguish between major and minor depression. A systematic review published in 2005 describes a point prevalence for major depression in high-income countries of 3.1%–4.9% during pregnancy and of 4.7% in the first 3 months postpartum (for minor depression, 11%, and 13%, respectively) (e135). The incidence in low-income countries is likely to be higher (e132, e136). In addition to pre-existing mental disorders or depressive syndromes (e137– e140), the following are considered to be important risk factors: difficult psychosocial situations (domestic violence [e140, e141]), negative life events/low levels of social support (e137– e140), migrant background (e142) and/or low social status (e137, e138, e140, e143), pregnancy/birth complications, and a positive family history (e137– e139); having said that, depression can also occur in patients with no pre-existing conditions or risk factors (e132, e144). The differentiation between what can be considered “normal stress” and a manifest mental disorder is a difficult one to make. It is assumed that only 20%–50% of women with depressive symptoms in the puerperium report these to their physician or midwife (e145– e148). The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EDPS) is a widely used screening tool that has been translated into numerous languages (e149).
The mildest form of depressive disorder that is not a mental illness in the proper sense is the so-called “baby blues.” According to ICD-10, this is not a distinct diagnostic entity, but is classified instead as “postpartum depression, not otherwise specified” (e150). Therefore, this term applies only to those cases that do not meet the definition for any other mental disorder (e151). A systematic review published in 2020 reported a prevalence of “baby blues” of between 13.7% and 76.0% (e152). These maternity blues usually peak after a few days, with an improvement generally seen within 2 weeks. Important treatment measures for mild depressive episodes include support in caring for the infant and ensuring adequate sleep.
Postpartum depression meets the DSM-5 and ICD-10 criteria for a manifest depressive disorder. By definition, onset is within the first 4–6 weeks after birth, with the initial manifestation tending to occur later compared to the “baby blues” and, thus, following discharge from the maternity unit. ICD-10 makes a distinction between mild, moderate, and severe depressive episodes (e153). Postpartum depression differs little in terms of symptoms from non-pregnancy-related depression (e132). If a patient fulfills the criteria for depression, treatment should be initiated by a psychiatrist, since possible suicidality needs to be ruled out and drug treatment initiated if necessary. An important aspect of the care of patients with mental illness is to assess whether the infant’s well-being is at risk; this should be done by a psychiatrist.
The prevalence of anxiety disorders in the puerperium is reported to be between 9% and 17.1% (e154– e156), showing little difference from that outside of pregnancy/breastfeeding; it is also unclear what effect pregnancy and the puerperium have on the course of anxiety disorders (e132).
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can occur either after pregnancy-related events (including events in previous pregnancies) or after non-pregnancy-related trauma. The prevalence in high-income countries is estimated to be 1–2% (e157). The true rate may be higher, given that often only pregnancy-related trauma are recorded (rate otherwise, 6%–8%) (e158).
Patients with eating disorders often appear to go into remission during pregnancy, although symptoms nevertheless re-emerge in a large proportion of women some time after pregnancy and the puerperium (e159).
Severe psychiatric disorders such as psychosis, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorders are rare in the puerperium, although the exact prevalence is unknown and it is unclear whether it differs from that outside of pregnancy. A large epidemiological study conducted in the United States reported the incidence of psychotic disorders and bipolar disorders in the puerperium to be 0.5% and 2.9%, respectively (e154). Pregnancy and childbirth represent major life changes and, as such, an important potential trigger for manic episodes and psychosis, which have a considerable impact on maternal–infant morbidity and mortality, as well as on the mother–child relationship (e160). Compared to postpartum depression, psychotic disorders tend to be short-term and are of comparatively sudden onset within the first 2 weeks, and usually within the first 1–3 days after birth (e161) (ebox).
Further Information on cme.
Participation in the CME certification program is possible only via the Internet: cme.aerzteblatt.de. The submission deadline is 24.06.2022. Submissions by letter, email, or fax cannot be considered.
The completion time for all newly started CME units is 12 months. The results can be accessed 4 weeks following the start of the CME unit. Please note the respective submission deadline at: cme.aerzteblatt.de.
This article has been certified by the North Rhine Academy for Continuing Medical Education. CME points can be managed using the “uniform CME number” (einheitliche Fortbildungsnummer, EFN). The EFN must be stated during registration on www.aerzteblatt.de (“Mein DÄ”) or entered in “Meine Daten,” and consent must be given for results to be communicated. The 15-digit EFN can be found on the CME card (8027XXXXXXXXXXX).
Participation is possible at cme.aerzteblatt.de. The submission deadline is 24 June 2022.
Only one answer is possible per question. Please select the answer that is most appropriate.
Question 1
Mrs Miller is scheduled to give birth by cesarean section in the 34th GW due to severe pre-eclampsia. For how long should postpartum seizure prophylaxis with i.v. magnesium be continued?
Up to 6 h following delivery
Up to 12 h following delivery
Up to 24 h following delivery
Up to 48 h following delivery
Until blood pressure normalizes
Question 2
In the presence of which pre-existing disease does postpartum thyroiditis occur particularly frequently?
Pre-existing lipedema
Psoriasis
Ulcerative colitis
Type-1 diabetes mellitus
Crohn‘s disease
Question 3
What is the risk of thrombosis in the puerperium if the patient has a history of previous thrombosis?
1–2.5%
5–15.5%
15.6–30%
35–40.5%
46–60%
Question 4
What is a characteristic feature of postpartum urinary incontinence?
The inability to spontaneously micturate 2 h following delivery
A residual urine volume of at least 300–350 mL following spontaneous micturition
It affects 50–60% of all women following childbirth
Age peak in women over 40 years
Frequently occurs following operative vaginal delivery
Question 5
Which measure is shown to reduce the risk of postpartum endometritis?
Manual removal of the placenta during cesarean section
Routine curettage of the uterine cavity during cesarean section
Treatment of vaginal colonization with Candida albicans at the beginning of the pregnancy
Prophylactic antibiotic administration during cesarean section
Regular administration of anti-inflammatory drugs during the first 48 h postpartum
Question 6
What, on the basis of the existing medical history, should arouse suspicion of A streptococcal infection in the puerperal woman?
Slow-onset lymphadenitis postpartum
An infection in the pharyngeal region of the 2-year-old sibling
Pre-existing bacterial vaginosis
Pre-existing autoimmune disease
Gradual disease onset 6 days following delivery
Question 7
What is a risk factor for a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy?
Kidney disease
Premature rupture of membranes
Immobilization
Hashimoto‘s thyroiditis
Marfan syndrome
Question 8
What is a characteristic correlate in the diagnosis of Sheehan syndrome?
Empty sella on MRI
Detection of a degenerative intramedullary lesion
Diaphragma sellae that is painful on palpation
Presence of Wernicke–Korsakow psychosis
Subcortical substance loss
Question 9
How long does physiological postpartum uterine involution to the original size of approximately 50 g usually take?
1–2 Weeks
3–4 Weeks
5–6 Weeks
7–8 Weeks
9–10 Weeks
Question 10
What is a risk factor for thrombosis/embolism in the puerperium?
BMI < 20 kg/m2
Excessive physical activity
Gingivitis
Primiparity
Stillbirth in the current pregnancy
► Participation is only possible online: cme.aerzteblatt.de
eBOX. Risk factors for mental disorders in the puerperium (excluding psychoses) (modified from [e132]).
Pre-existing mental illness or depressive syndromes (e137– e140); OR 5.1–5.6 (e137)
Acknowledgments
Translated from the original German by Christine Rye.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.
References
- 1.Schmidt S. Rath W, Gembruch U, Schmidt S, editors. Das normale Wochenbett. Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin. 2010 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:980–1004. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60696-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, et al. Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013-2017. MMWR Morbidity and Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68:423–429. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6818e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG) S2K-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie hypertensiver Schwangerschaftserkrankungen Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) - Ständige Kommission Leitlinien. AWMF-Regelwerk „Leitlinien“. 1. Auflage 2012., korrigierte Auflage. www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/015-018l_S2k_Diagnostik_Therapie_hypertensiver_Schwangerschaftserkrankungen_2019-07.pdf (last accessed on 02 February 2021) 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 5.National Institute of Health and Excellence. Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Clinical guideline (CG107) 2011 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1122–1131. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weinzierl A, Ciresa-König A, Fischer-Colbrie J, Marth C. The incidence of placental residues after vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2003;63:774–777. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Woodd SL, Montoya A, Barreix M, et al. Incidence of maternal peripartum infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS medicine. 2019;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002984. e1002984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, et al. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1024–1029. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mackeen AD, Packard RE, Ota E, Speer L. Antibiotic regimens for postpartum endometritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001067.pub3. CD001067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3. CD007482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Costantine MM, Rahman M, Ghulmiyah L, et al. Timing of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.077. e1-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Knight M, Chiocchia V, Partlett C, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of infection after operative vaginal delivery (ANODE): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393:2395–2403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30773-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chuang I, Van Beneden C, Beall B, Schuchat A. Population-based surveillance for postpartum invasive group a streptococcus infections, 1995-2000. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:665–670. doi: 10.1086/342062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hamilton SM, Stevens DL, Bryant AE. Pregnancy-related group a streptococcal infections: temporal relationships between bacterial acquisition, infection onset, clinical findings, and outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:870–876. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG) 015/071 - S3-Leitlinie. Therapie entzündlicher Brusterkrankungen in der Stillzeit (aktueller Stand 02/2013; in Überarbeitung) [Google Scholar]
- 17.MacArthur C, Glazener CM, Wilson PD, Lancashire RJ, Herbison GP, Grant AM. Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG. 2006;113:218–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Glazener CM, Herbison GP, MacArthur C, et al. New postnatal urinary incontinence: obstetric and other risk factors in primiparae. BJOG. 2006;113:208–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S, for the Norwegian EPINCONT study Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:900–907. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. The prevalence of urinary incontinence 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2013;120:144–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Woodley SJ, Boyle R, Cody JD, Mørkved S, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;12 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007471.pub3. CD007471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mulder FE, Oude Rengerink K, van der Post JA, Hakvoort RA, Roovers JPWR. Delivery-related risk factors for covert postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:55–60. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2768-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Richter ON, Rath W. Thrombembolische Erkrankungen in der Schwangerschaft. [Thromboembolic diseases in pregnancy]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2007;211:1–7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-942222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Simpson EL, Lawrenson RA, Nightingale AL, Farmer RD. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and the puerperium: incidence and additional risk factors from a London perinatal database. BJOG. 2001;108:56–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton LJ. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:697–706. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-10-200511150-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lindqvist P, Dahlback B, Marsal K. Thrombotic risk during pregnancy: a population study. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:595–599. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00308-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McColl MD, Ramsay JE, Tait RC, et al. Risk factors for pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 1997;78:1183–1188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Leung B, Byrne JD, Hethumumi R, Montoro M. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and timing of objectively diagnosed venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:730–734. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00426-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Greer IA. Thrombosis in pregnancy: maternal and fetal issues. Lancet. 1999;353:1258–1265. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10265-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.De Stefano V, Martinelli I, Rossi E, et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium without antithrombotic prophylaxis. Br J Haematol. 2006;135:386–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Morris JM, Algert CS, Roberts CL. Incidence and risk factors for pulmonary embolism in the postpartum period. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:998–1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.De Groot L, Abalovich, M., Alexander, E.K., et al. Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2543–2565. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Postpartum Thyreoiditis: Schilddrüsenentzündung nach der Entbindung häufig verkannt. Erschienen. www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/69364/Postpartum-Thyreoiditis-Schilddruesenentzuendung-nach-der-Entbindung-haeufig-verkannt. 2016. (last accessed on 02. February 2021) 2016 [Google Scholar]
- 34.Naji Rad S, Deluxe L. Postpartum Thyroiditis StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2020 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gerstein HC. How common is postpartum thyroiditis? A methodologic overview of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1397–1400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nyflot LT, Sandven I, Stray-Pedersen B, et al. Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17 doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1217-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005;330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.E0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cnossen JS, Morris RK, ter Riet G, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008;178:701–711. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kramer MS, Berg C, Abenhaim H, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends in severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.007. e1-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E1.Makkonen N, Harju M, Kirkinen P. Postpartum recovery after severe pre-eclampsia and HELLP-syndrome. J Perinat Med. 1996;24:641–649. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1996.24.6.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E2.Stepan H, Nordmeyer AK, Faber R. Proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy diseases is associated with a longer persistence ofhypertension postpartum. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20:125–128. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E3.Bramham K, Nelson-Piercy C, Brown MJ, Chappell LC. Postpartum management of hypertension. BMJ. 2013;346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f894. f894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E4.Walters BN, Walters T. Hypertension in the puerperium. Lancet. 1987;2 doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)90912-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E5.Walters BN, Thompson ME, Lee A, de Swiet M. Blood pressure in the puerperium. Clin Sci. 1986;71:589–594. doi: 10.1042/cs0710589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E6.Podymow T, August P. Postpartum course of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2010;29:294–300. doi: 10.3109/10641950902777747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E7.Townsend R, O‘Brien P, Khalil A. Current best practice in the management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Integr Blood Press Control. 2016;9:79–94. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S77344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E8.Gorgui J, Gorshkov M, Khan N, Daskalopoulou SS. Hypertension as a risk factor for ischemic stroke in women. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:774–782. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E9.Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–1357. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E10.Which anticonvulsant for women with eclampsia? Evidence from the Collaborative Eclampsia Trial. Lancet. 1995;345:1455–1463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E11.Mulic-Lutvica A, Bekuretsion M, Bakos O, Axelsson O. Ultrasonic evaluation of the uterus and uterine cavity after normal, vaginal delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:491–498. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E12.Montgomery E, Alexander J. Assessing postnatal uterine involution: a review and a challenge. Midwifery. 1994;10:73–76. doi: 10.1016/s0266-6138(05)80248-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E13.Bergstrom S, Libombo A. Puerperal measurement of the symphysis-fundus distance. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1992;34:76–78. doi: 10.1159/000292730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E14.Bryan CS. Bryan C, editor. Subinvolutio uteri und Lochialstau. Klinikstandards in der Geburtsmedizin. 2015 [Google Scholar]
- E15.Hohmann M. Wochenbett - Physiologie und Pathologie. Frauenheilkunde up2date. 2010;4:9–20. [Google Scholar]
- E16.Heller A. Beschwerden und Probleme im Früh- und Spätwochenbett: Lochialstauung. In: Heller A, editor. Nach der Geburt Wochenbett und Rückbildung. Stuttgart Thieme: 2002. pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
- E17.Arabin B, Ruttgers H, Kubli F. [Effects of routine administration of methylergometrin during puerperium on involution, maternal morbidity and lactation] Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1986;46:215–220. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E18.Henrich W. Pathologie der Plazentarperiode - peripartale Blutungen/ Pathologisches Wochenbett. In: Rath W GU, Schmidt S, editors. Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin: Pränataldiagnostik - Erkrankungen - Entbindung. Stuttgart Thieme: 2010. pp. 657–682. [Google Scholar]
- E19.Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e168–e186. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E20.Winkler M, Rath W. Nachgeburtsblutungen und Erkrankungen im Wochenbett. In: Dudenhausen JW SH, Baster G, editors. Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe. Berlin, De Gruyter: 2003. pp. 309–315. [Google Scholar]
- E21.Marchant S, Alexander J, Thomas P, Garcia J, Brocklehurst P, Keene J. Risk factors for hospital admission related to excessive and/or prolonged postpartum vaginal blood loss after the first 24 h following childbirth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20:392–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00743.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E22.Schlembach D, Schleußner E, Stepan H. Schlembach D, Schleußner E, Stepan H, editors. Komplikationen im Wochenbett. Klinische Geburtsmedizin: Ein Praxisbuch für Kreisssaal und Station. 2017:77–85. [Google Scholar]
- E23.Jarka M. Zur Bedeutung des Körperlebens für den weiblichen Kindeswunsch, Schwangerschaft, Geburt und die Ziele nach der Entbindung. In: Brähler E, editor. Körpererleben: Ein subjektiver Ausdruck von Leib und Seele Beiträge zur psychosomatischen Medizin. Berlin, Heidelberg Springer: 1986. 173 pp. [Google Scholar]
- E24.Leth RA, Moller JK, Thomsen RW, Uldbjerg N, Norgaard M. Risk of selected postpartum infections after cesarean section compared with vaginal birth: a five-year cohort study of 32,468 women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:976–983. doi: 10.1080/00016340903147405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E25.Rosene K, Eschenbach DA, Tompkins LS, Kenny GE, Watkins H. Polymicrobial early postpartum endometritis with facultative and anaerobic bacteria, genital mycoplasmas, and Chlamydia trachomatis: treatment with piperacillin or cefoxitin. J Infect Dis. 1986;153:1028–1037. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.6.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E26.Sweet RL, Roy S, Faro S, O‘Brien WF, Sanfilippo JS, Seidlin M. Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/ tazobactam Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:280–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E27.Rickert VI, Wiemann CM, Hankins GD, McKee JM, Berenson AB. Prevalence and risk factors of chorioamnionitis among adolescents. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:254–257. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00135-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E28.Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Froggatt JW. Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. Am J of Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:304–309. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70139-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E29.DeNoble AE, Heine RP, Dotters-Katz SK. Chorioamnionitis and Infectious Complications after vaginal delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36:1437–1441. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E30.Daifotis HA, Smith MM, Denoble AE, Dotters-Katz SK. Risk factors for Postpartum Maternal Infection following spontaneous vaginal delivery complicated by Chorioamnionitis. AJP Rep. 2020;10:e159–e164. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E31.Tran SH, Caughey AB, Musci TJ. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid is associated with puerperal infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:746–750. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00767-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E32.Jacobsson B, Pernevi P, Chidekel L, Jorgen Platz-Christensen J. Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy may predispose for preterm birth and postpartum endometritis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:1006–1010. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.811103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E33.Watts DH, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for post-cesarean endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:52–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E34.Anderson BL, Simhan HN, Simons KM, Wiesenfeld HC. Untreated asymptomatic group B streptococcal bacteriuria early in pregnancy and chorioamnionitis at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.006. e1-e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E35.Yancey MK, Duff P, Clark P, Kurtzer T, Frentzen BH, Kubilis P. Peripartum infection associated with vaginal group B streptococcal colonization. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:816–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E36.diZerega G, Yonekura L, Roy S, Nakamura RM, Ledger WJ. A comparison of clindamycin-gentamicin and penicillin-gentamicin in the treatment of post-cesarean section endomyometritis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:238–242. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E37.Faro S, Phillips LE, Baker JL, Goodrich KH, Turner RM, Riddle GD. Comparative efficacy and safety of mezlocillin, cefoxitin, and clindamycin plus gentamicin in postpartum endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:760–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E38.Alvarez RD, Kilgore LC, Huddleston JF. A comparison of mezlocillin versus clindamycin/gentamicin for the treatment of postcesarean endomyometritis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:425–429. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90170-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E39.Faro S, Martens M, Hammill H, Phillips LE, Smith D Riddle. Ticarcillin/clavulanic acid versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of post-cesarean endometritis following antibiotic prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:808–812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E40.Gibbs RS, Blanco JD, Castaneda YS, St Clair PJ. A double-blind, randomized comparison of clindamycin-gentamicin versus cefamandole for treatment of post-cesarean section endomyometritis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:261–267. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90576-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E41.Gibbs RS, Blanco JD, Duff P, Castaneda YS, St Clair PJ. A double-blind, randomized comparison of moxalactam versus clindamycin-gentamicin in treatment of endomyometritis after cesarean section delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:769–772. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91075-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E42.Axelsson D, Brynhildsen J, Blomberg M. Postpartum infection in relation to maternal characteristics, obstetric interventions and complications. J Perinat Med. 2018;46:271–278. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E43.Phares CR, Lynfield R, Farley MM, et al. Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999-2005. JAMA. 2008;299:2056–2065. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.17.2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E44.Back EE, O‘Grady EJ, Back JD. High rates of perinatal group B Streptococcus clindamycin and erythromycin resistance in an upstate New York hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:739–742. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05794-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E45.DiPersio LP, DiPersio JR. High rates of erythromycin and clindamycin resistance among OBGYN isolates of group B Streptococcus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;54:79–82. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E46.Castor ML, Whitney CG, Como-Sabetti K, et al. Antibiotic resistance patterns in invasive group B streptococcal isolates. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2008;2008 doi: 10.1155/2008/727505. 727505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E47.Kaimal AJ, Zlatnik MG, Cheng YW, et al. Effect of a change in policy regarding the timing of prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of postcesarean delivery surgical-site infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.009. e1-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E48.Atkinson MW, Owen J, Wren A, Hauth JC. The effect of manual removal of the placenta on post-cesarean endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:99–102. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00359-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E49.Lasley DS, Eblen A, Yancey MK, Duff P. The effect of placental removal method on the incidence of postcesarean infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:1250–1254. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70342-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E50.Dehbashi S, Honarvar M, Fardi FH. Manual removal or spontaneous placental delivery and postcesarean endometritis and bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;86:12–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E51.Baksu A, Kalan A, Ozkan A, Baksu B, Tekelioglu M, Goker N. The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:266–269. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E52.Anderson BL. Puerperal group A streptococcal infection: beyond Semmelweis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:874–882. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E53.Ochsenbein-Kölble N. Wochenbett. In: Schneider H, Husslein P, Schneider KTM, editors. Die Geburtshilfe. Heidelberg Springer: 2016. 1076 pp. [Google Scholar]
- E54.Du C, Lee W, Amin KA, Lucioni A, Kobashi KC, Lee UJ. „Beyond the bump“ - insight into the postpartum women‘s experience of pelvic organ prolapse as expressed on reddit. Urology. 2021;150:99–102. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E55.Buchsbaum GM, Chin M, Glantz C, Guzick D. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in a cohort of nuns. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:226–229. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02076-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E56.Milsom I, Gyhagen M. Breaking news in the prediction of pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;54:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E57.Beck CT. Effects of fourth-degree perineal lacerations on women‘s physical and mental health. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021;50:133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E58.Kearney R, Cutner A. Postpartum voiding dysfunction. Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;10:71–74. [Google Scholar]
- E59.Carley ME, Carley JM, Vasdev G, et al. Factors that are associated with clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:430–433. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E60.Glavind K, Bjork J. Incidence and treatment of urinary retention postpartum. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:119–121. doi: 10.1007/s00192-002-1014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E61.AK Dietl MF, Kunze M Farthmann. Peri- und postpartale Harnretention. Frauenarzt. 2019;60:588–590. [Google Scholar]
- E62.Andolf E, Iosif CS, Jorgensen C, Rydhstrom H. Insidious urinary retention after vaginal delivery: prevalence and symptoms at follow-up in a population-based study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;38:51–53. doi: 10.1159/000292445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E63.Hée P, Lose, G, Beier-Holgersen, R, Engdahl E, Falkenlove P. Postpartum voiding in the primiparous after vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 1992;3:95–99. [Google Scholar]
- E64.Quinn M. Obstetric denervation-gynaecological reinnervation: disruption of the inferior hypogastric plexus in childbirth as a source of gynaecological symptoms. Med Hypotheses. 2004;63:390–393. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E65.Abdul Sultan A, West J, Tata LJ, Fleming KM, Nelson-Piercy C, Grainge MJ. Risk of first venous thromboembolism in pregnant women in hospital: population based cohort study from England. BMJ. 2013;347 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6099. 6099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E66.Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ. 2007;176:455–460. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E67.Goecke TW, Rath W. Thrombembolische Erkrankungen in Schwangerschaft und Wochenbett. In: Rath W GU, Schmidt S, editors. Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin: Pränataldiagnostik - Erkrankungen - Entbindung. Stuttgart Thieme: 2010. pp. 352–371. [Google Scholar]
- E68.Sucker C. Prophylaxis and therapy of venous thrombotic events (VTE) in pregnancy and the postpartum Period. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020;80:48–59. doi: 10.1055/a-1030-4546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E69.Nguyen CT, Mestman JH. Postpartum Thyroiditis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;62:359–364. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E70.Stagnaro-Green A. Postpartum thyroiditis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;18:303–316. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2004.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E71.Stagnaro-Green A, Roman SH, Cobin RH, el-Harazy E, Wallenstein S, Davies TF. A prospective study of lymphocyte-initiated immunosuppression in normal pregnancy: evidence of a T-cell etiology for postpartum thyroid dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74:645–653. doi: 10.1210/jcem.74.3.1740500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E72.Rajatanavin R, Chailurkit LO, Tirarungsikul K, Chalayondeja W, Jittivanich U, Puapradit W. Postpartum thyroid dysfunction in Bangkok: a geographical variation in the prevalence. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1990;122:283–287. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1220283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E73.Lervang HH, Pryds O, Ostergaard Kristensen HP. Thyroid dysfunction after delivery: incidence and clinical course. Acta Med Scand. 1987;222:369–374. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1987.tb10685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E74.Kuijpens JL, Pop VJ, Vader HL, Drexhage HA, Wiersinga WM. Prediction of post partum thyroid dysfunction: can it be improved? Eur J Endocrinol. 1998;139:36–43. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1390036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E75.Walfish PG, Meyerson J, Provias JP, Vargas MT, Papsin FR. Prevalence and characteristics of post-partum thyroid dysfunction: results of a survey from Toronto, Canada. J Endocrinol Invest. 1992;15:265–272. doi: 10.1007/BF03348726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E76.Pop VJ, de Rooy HA, Vader HL, van der Heide D, van Son MM, Komproe IH. Microsomal antibodies during gestation in relation to postpartum thyroid dysfunction and depression. Acta Endocrinol. 1993;129:26–30. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1290026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E77.Lucas A, Pizarro E, Granada ML, Salinas I, Foz M, Sanmarti A. Postpartum thyroiditis: epidemiology and clinical evolution in a nonselected population. Thyroid. 2000;10:71–77. doi: 10.1089/thy.2000.10.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E78.Roti E, Bianconi L, Gardini E, et al. Postpartum thyroid dysfunction in an Italian population residing in an area of mild iodine deficiency. J Endocrinol Invest. 1991;14:669–674. doi: 10.1007/BF03347891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E79.Barca MF, Knobel M, Tomimori E, Cardia MS, Medeiros-Neto G. Prevalence and characteristics of postpartum thyroid dysfunction in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clin Endocrinol. 2000;53:21–31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E80.Yip SK, Fung TY, Chung TK. Ultrasonographic estimation of postpartum postvoid residual bladder volume: a comparison between transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography. Int Urogynecol J. 1998;9:9–12. doi: 10.1007/BF01900533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E81.Shahbazian HB, Sarvghadi F, Azizi F. Prevalence and characteristics of postpartum thyroid dysfunction in Tehran. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;145:397–401. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1450397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E82.Zargar AH, Shah IH, Masoodi SR, Laway BA, Salahuddin M, Bhat IA. Postpartum thyroiditis in India: prevalence of postpartum thyroiditis in Kashmir Valley of Indian sub-continent. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2002;110:171–175. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E83.Nicholson WK, Robinson KA, Smallridge RC, Ladenson PW, Powe NR. Prevalence of postpartum thyroid dysfunction: a quantitative review. Thyroid. 2006;16:573–582. doi: 10.1089/thy.2006.16.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E84.Bech K, Hoier-Madsen M, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Jensen BM, Molsted-Pedersen L, Kuhl C. Thyroid function and autoimmune manifestations in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during and after pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol. 1991;124:534–539. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1240534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E85.Alvarez-Marfany M, Roman SH, Drexler AJ, Robertson C, Stagnaro-Green A. Long-term prospective study of postpartum thyroid dysfunction in women with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:10–16. doi: 10.1210/jcem.79.1.8027213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E86.Gerstein HC. Incidence of postpartum thyroid dysfunction in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:419–423. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-6-199303150-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E87.Benvenga S, Di Bari F, Vita R, et al. Relatively high rate of postpartum thyroiditis in the Straits of Messina area Predictivity of both postpartum thyroiditis and permanent hypothyroidism by performing, in the first trimester of gestation, thyroid ultrasonography and measurement of serum thyroperoxidase and thyroglobulin autoantibodies. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2019;15:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E88.Solomon BL, Fein HG, Smallridge RC. Usefulness of antimicrosomal antibody titers in the diagnosis and treatment of postpartum thyroiditis. J Fam Pract. 1993;36:177–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E89.Lazarus JH, Hall R, Othman S, et al. The clinical spectrum of postpartum thyroid disease. QJM. 1996;89:429–435. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/89.6.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E90.Muller AF, Drexhage HA, Berghout A. Postpartum thyroiditis and autoimmune thyroiditis in women of childbearing age: recent insights and consequences for antenatal and postnatal care. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:605–630. doi: 10.1210/edrv.22.5.0441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E91.Lazarus JH, Ammari F, Oretti R, Parkes AB, Richards CJ, Harris B. Clinical aspects of recurrent postpartum thyroiditis. Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47:305–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E92.Shivaprasad C. Sheehan‘s syndrome: Newer advances. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2011;15:S203–S207. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.84869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E93.Alexander J, Thomas P, Sanghera J. Treatments for secondary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002867. CD002867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E94.Dossou M, Debost-Legrand A, Dechelotte P, Lemery D, Vendittelli F. Severe secondary postpartum hemorrhage: a historical cohort. Birth. 2015;42:149–155. doi: 10.1111/birt.12164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E95.Hoveyda F, MacKenzie IZ. Secondary postpartum haemorrhage: incidence, morbidity and current management. BJOG. 2001;108:927–930. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E96.Reale SC, Easter SR, Xu X, Bateman BT, Farber MK. Trends in Postpartum Hemorrhage in the United States From 2010 to 2014. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:e119–e122. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E97.Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:907–912. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124568.71597.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E98.Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25:391–403. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E99.Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, Chou D, Say L. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E100.Sibai BM. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:402–410. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152351.13671.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E101.Sibai BM, Ramadan MK, Usta I. Maternal morbidity and mortality in 442 pregnancies with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP syndrome) Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:1000–1006. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90043-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E102.Stamilio DM, Sehdev HM, Morgan MA, Propert K, Macones GA. Can antenatal clinical and biochemical markers predict the development of severe preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:589–594. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.103890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E103.Stone JL, Lockwood CJ, Berkowitz GS, Alvarez M, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Risk factors for severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:357–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E104.Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, et al. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1003–1010. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E105.Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in a large cohort of Latin American and Caribbean women. BJOG. 2000;107:75–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11582.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E106.Lockshin MD. Lupus erythematosus and allied disorders in pregnancy. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1987;63:797–802. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E107.Davies AM, Czaczkes JW, Sadovsky E, Prywes R, Weiskopf P, Sterk VV. Toxemia of pregnancy in Jerusalem. I. Epidemiological studies of a total community. Isr J Med Sci. 1970;6:253–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E108.Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstetr Gynecol. 1996;87:917–922. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00045-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E109.Pecks U, Maass N, Neulen J. Oocyte donation: a risk factor for pregnancy-induced hypertension: a meta-analysis and case series. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:23–31. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E110.Storgaard M, Loft A, Bergh C, et al. Obstetric and neonatal complications in pregnancies conceived after oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017;124:561–572. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E111.Moreno-Sepulveda J, Checa MA. Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes after oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:2017–2037. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01552-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E112.Almasi-Hashiani A, Omani-Samani R, Mohammadi M, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19 doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2291-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E113.Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG High risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;353 doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1753. i1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E114.Pabinger I, Grafenhofer H, Kyrle PA, et al. Temporary increase in the risk for recurrence during pregnancy in women with a history of venous thromboembolism. Blood. 2002;100:1060–1062. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E115.Kristjansdottir HL, Bodvarsdottir SP, Sigurjonsdottir HA. Sheehan‘s syndrome in modern times: a nationwide retrospective study in Iceland. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:349–354. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E116.Zargar AH, Singh B, Laway BA, Masoodi SR, Wani AI, Bashir MI. Epidemiologic aspects of postpartum pituitary hypofunction (Sheehan‘s syndrome) Fertil Steril. 2005;84:523–528. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E117.Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:e10–e52. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E118.Pharmakovigilanz- und Beratungszentrum für Embryonaltoxikologie, Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum. www.embryotox.de/ (last accessed on 19 December 2020) 2020 [Google Scholar]
- E119.Stachs A, Stubert J, Reimer T, Hartmann S. Benign breast disease in women. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116:565–574. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E120.Andrews JI, Fleener DK, Messer SA, Hansen WF, Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. The yeast connection: is Candida linked to breastfeeding associated pain? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.053. e1-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E121.Abou-Dakn M, Fluhr JW, Gensch M, Wockel A. Positive effect of HPA lanolin versus expressed breastmilk on painful and damaged nipples during lactation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24:27–35. doi: 10.1159/000318228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E122.World Health Organization. Mastitis: causes and management. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66230 (last accessed on 4 February 2021) [Google Scholar]
- E123.Abou-Dakn MWA. Verstärkter initialer Milcheinschuss, Milchstau, Mastitis puerperalis und Abszess der laktierenden Brust. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2007;67:1166–1169. [Google Scholar]
- E124.Betzold CM. An update on the recognition and management of lactational breast inflammation. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52:595–605. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E125.Boakes E, Woods A, Johnson N, Kadoglou N. Breast infection: a review of diagnosis and management practices. Eur J Breast Health. 2018;14:136–143. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E126.Strauss A. Malignant breast diseases as differential diagnoses in mastitis. Senologie. 2016;13:69–75. [Google Scholar]
- E127.Thomsen AC, Espersen T, Maigaard S. Course and treatment of milk stasis, noninfectious inflammation of the breast, and infectious mastitis in nursing women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149:492–495. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E128.Amir LH. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #4: Mastitis Revision, March 2014. Breastfeed Med. 2014;9:239–243. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.9984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E129.Lam E, Chan T, Wiseman SM. Breast abscess: evidence based management recommendations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014;12:753–762. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.913982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E130.Amir LH, Garland SM, Dennerstein L, Farish SJ. Candida albicans: is it associated with nipple pain in lactating women? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1996;41:30–34. doi: 10.1159/000292031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E131.Bodley V, Powers D. Long-term treatment of a breastfeeding mother with fluconazole-resolved nipple pain caused by yeast: a case study. J Hum Lact. 1997;13:307–311. doi: 10.1177/089033449701300416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E132.Howard LM, Molyneaux E, Dennis CL, Rochat T, Stein A, Milgrom J. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet. 2014;384:1775–1788. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61276-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E133.Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, et al. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2005:1–8. doi: 10.1037/e439372005-001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E134.Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Pedersen CB, Mors O, Mortensen PB. New parents and mental disorders: a population-based register study. JAMA. 2006;296:2582–2589. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.2582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E135.Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1071–1083. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E136.Parsons CE, Young KS, Rochat TJ, Kringelbach ML, Stein A. Postnatal depression and its effects on child development: a review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Br Med Bull. 2012;101:57–79. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E137.Fisher J, Cabral de Mello M, Patel V, et al. Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:139–149. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.091850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E138.Sawyer A, Ayers S, Smith H. Pre- and postnatal psychological wellbeing in Africa: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2010;123:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E139.Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26:289–295. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E140.Villegas L, McKay K, Dennis CL, Ross LE. Postpartum depression among rural women from developed and developing countries: a systematic review. J Rural Health. 2011;27:278–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00339.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E141.Howard LM, Oram S, Galley H, Trevillion K, Feder G. Domestic violence and perinatal mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001452. e1001452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E142.Collins CH, Zimmerman C, Howard LM. Refugee, asylum seeker, immigrant women and postnatal depression: rates and risk factors. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011;14:3–11. doi: 10.1007/s00737-010-0198-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E143.Vigod SN, Villegas L, Dennis CL, Ross LE. Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression among women with preterm and low-birth-weight infants: a systematic review. BJOG. 2010;117:540–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E144.Lanczik MH, Brockington IF. Postpartal auftretende psychische Erkrankungen. Dtsch Arztebl. 1997;94:3104–3108. [Google Scholar]
- E145.Cooper PJ, Tomlinson M, Swartz L, Woolgar M, Murray L, Molteno C. Post-partum depression and the mother-infant relationship in a South African peri-urban settlement. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;175:554–558. doi: 10.1192/bjp.175.6.554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E146.Nonacs R, Cohen LS. Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:34–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E147.Beck CT, Records K, Rice M. Further development of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:735–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E148.Beck CT. Postpartum depression: it isn‘t just the blues. Am J Nurs. 2006;106:40–50. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200605000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E149.Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E150.Saß H WH, Zaudig M, Houben I. Diagnostisches und Statistisches Manual Psychischer Störungen - DSM IV. 2003 [Google Scholar]
- E151.Henshaw C. Mood disturbance in the early puerperium: a review. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2003;6:S33–S42. doi: 10.1007/s00737-003-0004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E152.Rezaie-Keikhaie K, Arbabshastan ME, Rafiemanesh H, Amirshahi M, Ostadkelayeh SM, Arbabisarjou A. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of the Maternity Blues in the Postpartum Period. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2020;49:127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E153.The World Health Organization. ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnosis criteria for research. World Health Organization. 1991 www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/bluebook.pdf (last accessed on 4 February 2021) [Google Scholar]
- E154.Vesga-Lopez O, Blanco C, Keyes K, Olfson M, Grant BF, Hasin DS. Psychiatric disorders in pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:805–815. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.7.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E155.Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210:315–323. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E156.Fairbrother N, Janssen P, Antony MM, Tucker E, Young AH. Perinatal anxiety disorder prevalence and incidence. J Affect Disord. 2016;200:148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E157.Ayers S. Delivery as a traumatic event: prevalence, risk factors, and treatment for postnatal posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;47:552–567. doi: 10.1097/01.grf.0000129919.00756.9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E158.Seng JS, Rauch SA, Resnick H, et al. Exploring posttraumatic stress disorder symptom profile among pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;31:176–187. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2010.486453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E159.Knoph C, Von Holle A, Zerwas S, et al. Course and predictors of maternal eating disorders in the postpartum period. Int J Eat Disord. 2013;46:355–368. doi: 10.1002/eat.22088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E160.Jones I, Chandra PS, Dazzan P, Howard LM. Bipolar disorder, affective psychosis, and schizophrenia in pregnancy and the post-partum period. Lancet. 2014;384:1789–1799. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61278-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E161.Heron J, McGuinness M, Blackmore ER, Craddock N, Jones I. Early postpartum symptoms in puerperal psychosis. BJOG. 2008;115:348–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
eMethods Section
Search terms
In particular regarding definitions and rare clinical pictures for which there is only scant primary literature, German-language standard textbooks were consulted. The search terms used included, for example: general: “postpartum complications,” “postpartum morbidity and mortality”; hypertensive disorders: “hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy AND postpartum,” “HELLP,” “preeclampsia” AND “postpartum”; Subinvolutio uterine/Spätatonie: “delayed uterine involution,” “(secondary) postpartum hemorrhage”; endometritis: “postpartum infection”, “postpartum endometritis”, “postpartum sepsis”, “antibiotic prophylaxis AND cesarean section”, “antibiotic therapy AND endometritis”, “group A-streptococcal endometritis”; milk stasis/mastitis: “mastitis puerperalis”, “breast feeding complications”, “breast disorders AND pregnancy OR lactation”; urinary retention/infection: “urinary retention AND postpartum”, “postpartum urinary tract infection”, “postpartum urinary incontinence”; thrombosis/embolism: “thrombosis, pulmonary embolism AND postpartum”; mental disorders: “postpartum mental disease”, “mental disease AND pregnancy”, “postpartum depression”, “postpartum anxiety disorder”, “postpartum PTDS”, “postpartum psychosis”, “postpartum eating disorders”; endocrine disorders: “postpartum endocrine disorders,” “postpartum thyreoditis,” “Sheehan syndrome”.
Breast disorders in the puerperium
Common breast disorders associated with breastfeeding include: nipple soreness, milk stasis, and mastitis. Symptoms of sore nipples can include fissures, skin abrasions, rhagades, scabbing, or signs of inflammation such as redness, edema, and heat. Signs of infection include a purulent or yellowish coating on the nipples (16). Treatment options, in addition to optimizing and changing the breastfeeding position, include topical application of breast milk and highly purified lanolin (e121). The increased initial swelling of the mammary glands seen within the first 10–14 days postpartum need to be differentiated from milk stasis and mastitis. Regular breast emptying (8–12 times/24 h) during this phase promotes venous and lymphatic drainage and milk production (e53). Causes of milk stasis (= insufficient emptying of the breast [e122]) include mechanical obstruction (poor breastfeeding technique, short periods of breastfeeding, or constriction by clothing), lack of let-down reflex (stress or sleep deprivation: catecholamines inhibit oxytocin release centrally and peripherally) or, less frequently, excessive milk production (e123). In contrast to mastitis, milk stasis is not associated with impaired general condition and temperature > 38.4 °C (e124). The local symptoms (redness, heat, hardening, and pain) are similar and generally develop unilaterally. Puerperal mastitis is milk stasis- or infection-related inflammation of the mammary gland that peaks in incidence 2–3 weeks postpartum. The most common pathogens include Staphylococcus aureus at > 90%, more rarely coagulase-negative staphylococci, streptococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli (e119). Bacterial mastitis requires antibiotic therapy. Milk stasis-related mastitis also requires antibiotics to be started if there is no improvement after 24–48 h. Before starting calculated therapy (oral ß-lactamase-resistant penicillin [flucloxacillin 4 × 250–500 mg/day] or first- and second-generation cephalosporins [cephaclor 3 × 250–500 mg/day], in the case of penicillin allergy, macrolide antibiotics [clarithromycin 4 × 500 mg/day] or clindamycin 3 × 600 mg/day, Table 3) for at least 10–14 days), material should be obtained for microbiological analysis (e117, e123). In the case of resistance to treatment > 2 weeks, histological investigation is mandatory to exclude inflammatory breast cancer (e126). In all breast disorders during the lactation period, regular emptying of the breast, manually or mechanically if necessary, is essential alongside an evaluation of the causes (e127). Adjunctive analgesia with acetaminophen (500–1500 mg/day) or ibuprofen (800–1 600 mg/day) can be given, as well as warming the breast before/cooling the breast after breastfeeding (e128). Between 4 and 11% of cases of mastitis develop into an abscess, which should undergo fine-needle aspiration while the patient is on concurrent antibiotic therapy. If the abscess persists or findings are extensive, surgical incision with drainage and irrigation is performed (e129). Weaning is not necessary in breast disorders during breastfeeding and should be avoided above all in the case of stasis-related disorders and in the acute phase. An exception here is the rare bilateral mastitis due to group B ß-hemolytic streptococci: in addition to pausing breastfeeding, the infant should receive simultaneous antibiotic therapy (e53). Another rare special form is candida infection of the milk ducts. Fungal mastitis is a common cause of treatment-refractory nipples that are painful during breastfeeding, with a burning pain radiating deep into the breast (e130), often without external signs of inflammation. Pathogen detection can be challenging. Treatment with oral fluconazole (initially, 2 × 100–200 mg/day) continues until symptoms resolve (usually for 1 or more weeks), then reduced to 1 × 100–150 mg/day for a few more days (e120). To prevent re-infection, the infant must also be treated (oral gel for infants 4 × daily) (e131).
Mental disorders in the puerperium
The spectrum of mental disorders in the puerperium ranges from mild low mood and adjustment disorders to severe psychoses. Typical clinical pictures include depressive and anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, eating disorders, and personality disorders (e132).
For depressive disorders, a prevalence of 6.5%–16% is reported (e132– e134), whereby the data in the literature vary and often do not distinguish between major and minor depression. A systematic review published in 2005 describes a point prevalence for major depression in high-income countries of 3.1%–4.9% during pregnancy and of 4.7% in the first 3 months postpartum (for minor depression, 11%, and 13%, respectively) (e135). The incidence in low-income countries is likely to be higher (e132, e136). In addition to pre-existing mental disorders or depressive syndromes (e137– e140), the following are considered to be important risk factors: difficult psychosocial situations (domestic violence [e140, e141]), negative life events/low levels of social support (e137– e140), migrant background (e142) and/or low social status (e137, e138, e140, e143), pregnancy/birth complications, and a positive family history (e137– e139); having said that, depression can also occur in patients with no pre-existing conditions or risk factors (e132, e144). The differentiation between what can be considered “normal stress” and a manifest mental disorder is a difficult one to make. It is assumed that only 20%–50% of women with depressive symptoms in the puerperium report these to their physician or midwife (e145– e148). The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EDPS) is a widely used screening tool that has been translated into numerous languages (e149).
The mildest form of depressive disorder that is not a mental illness in the proper sense is the so-called “baby blues.” According to ICD-10, this is not a distinct diagnostic entity, but is classified instead as “postpartum depression, not otherwise specified” (e150). Therefore, this term applies only to those cases that do not meet the definition for any other mental disorder (e151). A systematic review published in 2020 reported a prevalence of “baby blues” of between 13.7% and 76.0% (e152). These maternity blues usually peak after a few days, with an improvement generally seen within 2 weeks. Important treatment measures for mild depressive episodes include support in caring for the infant and ensuring adequate sleep.
Postpartum depression meets the DSM-5 and ICD-10 criteria for a manifest depressive disorder. By definition, onset is within the first 4–6 weeks after birth, with the initial manifestation tending to occur later compared to the “baby blues” and, thus, following discharge from the maternity unit. ICD-10 makes a distinction between mild, moderate, and severe depressive episodes (e153). Postpartum depression differs little in terms of symptoms from non-pregnancy-related depression (e132). If a patient fulfills the criteria for depression, treatment should be initiated by a psychiatrist, since possible suicidality needs to be ruled out and drug treatment initiated if necessary. An important aspect of the care of patients with mental illness is to assess whether the infant’s well-being is at risk; this should be done by a psychiatrist.
The prevalence of anxiety disorders in the puerperium is reported to be between 9% and 17.1% (e154– e156), showing little difference from that outside of pregnancy/breastfeeding; it is also unclear what effect pregnancy and the puerperium have on the course of anxiety disorders (e132).
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can occur either after pregnancy-related events (including events in previous pregnancies) or after non-pregnancy-related trauma. The prevalence in high-income countries is estimated to be 1–2% (e157). The true rate may be higher, given that often only pregnancy-related trauma are recorded (rate otherwise, 6%–8%) (e158).
Patients with eating disorders often appear to go into remission during pregnancy, although symptoms nevertheless re-emerge in a large proportion of women some time after pregnancy and the puerperium (e159).
Severe psychiatric disorders such as psychosis, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorders are rare in the puerperium, although the exact prevalence is unknown and it is unclear whether it differs from that outside of pregnancy. A large epidemiological study conducted in the United States reported the incidence of psychotic disorders and bipolar disorders in the puerperium to be 0.5% and 2.9%, respectively (e154). Pregnancy and childbirth represent major life changes and, as such, an important potential trigger for manic episodes and psychosis, which have a considerable impact on maternal–infant morbidity and mortality, as well as on the mother–child relationship (e160). Compared to postpartum depression, psychotic disorders tend to be short-term and are of comparatively sudden onset within the first 2 weeks, and usually within the first 1–3 days after birth (e161) (ebox).