Skip to main content
Communications Biology logoLink to Communications Biology
. 2021 Aug 23;4:996. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02510-6

Salvaging high-quality genomes of microbial species from a meromictic lake using a hybrid sequencing approach

Yu-Hsiang Chen 1,2,3, Pei-Wen Chiang 3, Denis Yu Rogozin 4,5, Andrey G Degermendzhy 4, Hsiu-Hui Chiu 3, Sen-Lin Tang 2,3,
PMCID: PMC8382752  PMID: 34426638

Abstract

Most of Earth’s bacteria have yet to be cultivated. The metabolic and functional potentials of these uncultivated microorganisms thus remain mysterious, and the metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) approach is the most robust method for uncovering these potentials. However, MAGs discovered by conventional metagenomic assembly and binning are usually highly fragmented genomes with heterogeneous sequence contamination. In this study, we combined Illumina and Nanopore data to develop a new workflow to reconstruct 233 MAGs—six novel bacterial orders, 20 families, 66 genera, and 154 species—from Lake Shunet, a secluded meromictic lake in Siberia. With our workflow, the average N50 of reconstructed MAGs greatly increased 10–40-fold compared to when the conventional Illumina assembly and binning method were used. More importantly, six complete MAGs were recovered from our datasets. The recovery of 154 novel species MAGs from a rarely explored lake greatly expands the current bacterial genome encyclopedia.

Subject terms: Water microbiology, Bacterial genetics


Chen and colleagues develop a workflow for assembling high quality metagenome-associated genomes for microbial species using long and short reads, in this case from a meromictic lake. A full, detailed workflow is provided in for use by the community.

Introduction

Rapid developments in bioinformatics and sequencing methods enable us to reconstruct genomes directly from environmental samples using a culture-independent whole-genome-shotgun metagenomic approach. These genomes, also called metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), have become a crucial information source to explore metabolic and functional potentials of uncultivated microorganisms14. Mining MAGs quickly expands our knowledge of microbial genome, diversity, phylogeny, evolution, and taxonomy14. For example, 18,365 MAGs were identified out of a total of 410,784 microorganisms in the Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD)5. A total of 52,515 MAGs were assembled from diverse habitats, and the MAG collection contains 12,556 potentially novel species and expands the known phylogenetic diversity in bacterial and archaeal domains by 44%3.

Although genome-resolved metagenomics has revolutionized research in microbiology, significant challenges need to be overcome to make MAGs more accurate, reliable, and informative1. First, most MAGs are derived from the metagenomic assembly of short reads1,6, and these short-read-derived MAGs usually comprise numerous short contigs rather than complete or nearly complete genomic sequences, and thus important information on genomic characters is missed, such as operons, gene order, gene synteny, and promoter/regulatory regions. As of March 2021, only 177 out of 84,768 MAGs released in NCBI were complete7. Second, fragmented MAGs usually miss some gene sequences and comprise unknown contaminant sequences, mistakenly assembled into the contigs1. Hence, low contiguity, high fragmentation, and unwanted contamination in short-read MAGs greatly affect further analyses in a variety of microbial genome-related studies.

The emergence of long-read sequencing platforms (also called third-generation sequencing platforms), such as Nanopore and PacBio, provides an opportunity to improve the contiguity of MAGs and even reconstruct complete MAGs from complex microbial communities8,9. Recently, researchers started to develop new assemblers to reconstruct microbial genomes with high accuracy and long contiguous fragments from long-read metagenomic datasets. In 2019, Nagarajan et al. developed a hybrid assembler called OPERA-MS10. The assembler yielded MAGs with 200 times higher contiguity than short-read assemblers used on human gut microbiomes. In October 2020, Pevzner et al. developed metaFlye, a long-read metagenome assembler that can produce highly accurate assemblies (approximately 99% assembly accuracy)11,12. The success of these newly developed assemblers becomes an important stepping-stone for reconstruction of complete MAGs with high accuracy. However, there is still much room to improve the procedures around data processing and assembling MAGs with long reads. The current study presents a new workflow for this purpose.

Our workflow combines Illumina sequencing reads and Nanopore long sequencing reads to recover many novel high-quality and high-contiguity prokaryotic MAGs from Lake Shunet, southern Siberia, one of only four meromictic lakes in all of Siberia. The lake contains stratified water layers, including a mixolimnion layer at 3.0 m, chemocline at 5.0 m, and monimolimnion at 5.5 m. The mixolimnion is dominated by Cyanobacteria, and the chemocline contains dense and visible purple sulfur bacteria populations (>108 cells/mL). Our previous 16 rRNA amplicon survey showed that the lake contains diverse microbial communities with a higher Shannon diversity index and Chao1 richness estimator than Lake Shira and Lake Oigon, two another saline meromictic lakes near the center of Asia13. More importantly, it showed that the lake comprises at least hundreds of unknown bacteria and archaea14, highlighting the importance of mining microbial MAGs from this rarely explored lake. However, though we attempted to recover MAGs from these layers using deep Illumina sequencing with approximately 150 Gb, only one high-quality but still fragmented MAG was obtained14. Hence, in this study, we developed a new workflow combining Illumina and Nanopore sequencing reads by integrating several cutting-edge bioinformatics tools to recover and reconstruct MAGs with high contiguity and accuracy. We demonstrate that our newly built workflow can be used to reconstruct hundreds of complete high-quality MAGs from environmental samples in a high-complexity microbial community.

Results and discussion

Reconstruction of metagenome-assembled genomes with high contiguity from Lake Shunet by combining Nanopore and Illumina sequences

To recover novel metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) with high contiguity without compromising accuracy, 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m depth Lake Shunet samples were sequenced by Nanopore machines individually, and the resulting long reads (LRs) were analyzed together with short reads (SRs) using a workflow we developed for this study (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 1). Originally, we only used metaFlye, a state-of-art long-read metagenome assembler that can provide 99% accuracy11,12, to assemble the LRs. However, recent studies found that assemblies from long reads contain numerous in-del errors, leading to erroneous predictions of open reading frames and biosynthetic gene clusters1,11. Incorrectly predicting open reading frames also affects the estimation of genome completeness by single-copy marker gene method, such as CheckM15. Hence, the contigs generated by LRs were polished using pilon16 with SRs from Illumina sequencing. The SRs were first mapped to the assemblies from LRs with BWA-MEM17. Sequentially, pilon was used to automatically evaluate the read alignments to identify the disagreement between assemblies and SRs and makes corrections to fix base errors and small indels based on the evidence from alignments weighted by base coverage and quality of the SRs.

Fig. 1. Recovery of genomes from Lake Shunet using long- and short-read sequencing.

Fig. 1

a The workflow for assembling metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). b The value of log (N50) at 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m depth using SRs only, combining SRs an LRs (Hybrid), and reassembly of bins using the hybrid method. c Scatter plot of SR coverage and log (N50) in the final Shunet MAG collection (Reassembly). d Scatter plot of LR coverage and log (N50) in the final Shunet MAG collection (Reassembly). e The completeness and contamination of MAGs recovered from the hybrid assembly with reassembly. f Venn diagram from the ratio of MAGs of the hybrid assembly, containing 5 S, 16 S, and 23 S rRNA gene sequences. g The GC ratio of MAGs recovered from the 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m depth datasets. For each box plot, the center line represents median, box limits represent upper and lower quartiles, and whisker represents 1.5X interquartile range.

To recover more MAGs and improve contiguity, the assemblies from SRs and LRs were combined before binning. The contiguity of MAGs generated by combining two sequencing reads was dramatically higher than that from the Illumina assembly alone. The average N50 of MAGs from SRs only were 12.4, 6.0, and 7.2 kb in the 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m dataset, respectively. Average N50 increased to 476.5, 269.5, and 91.2 kb (Fig. 1b), respectively, when assembling with a combination of the two sequencing methods. A previous study showed that the qualities of MAGs can be improved by reassembly18, so the step was incorporated into our workflow. When the MAGs were reassembled and selected, the average N50 increased from 476.5 kb to 530.0 kb in the 3.0 m dataset and 91.2 kb to 107.3 kb in the 5.5 m datasets (Fig. 1b).

The correlations between read coverages and contiguity were determined (Fig. 1c, d). The results revealed that the N50 values were more correlated with the Nanopore read coverage (Spearman’s r = 0.7) than the Illumina coverage (Spearman’s r = 0.33). This is consistent with the previous observation that contiguity plateaued when the coverage of SRs reached a certain point because the assembly of SRs cannot solve repetitive sequences10. Nevertheless, LRs can address the issue by spanning repetitive regions. We also found that using SR assembly only, we cannot obtain MAGs with N50 > 100kbp. By comparison, using our workflow, we can obtain 73 MAGs with N50 > 100kbp. The mean SR coverage of these MAGs was 187 times, and mean LR coverage of them was only 67. Additionally, our data size of LRs is about 1/3 that of SRs. Taken together, it represents that the contiguity of MAGs can be greatly improved with one-third LRs. The results highlighted that (1) combining two sequencing methods yield significant improvements in the qualities of MAGs that are recovered from high-complexity metagenomic datasets, and (2) with only extra one-third LRs, we could retrieve genome information, such gene order, from previous SR-derived MAG collections.

Using our workflow, a total of 233 MAGs with completeness >50% and contamination <10% were reconstructed. For Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) species representatives, the genome quality index, defined as completeness − 5 × contamination, should be larger than 5019,20. To meet the GTDB standard, the MAGs were filtered by this criterion, and the MAGs with low SR coverages (<80%) were discarded, resulting in 187 MAGs (Supplementary Data 1). All the MAGs satisfied or surpassed the MIMAG standard for a medium-quality draft21. The median completeness of MAGs was 76.92% for SR-only and 81.26% for hybrid assembly. The median contamination was 1.61% and 1.14% for SR-only and hybrid assembly, respectively (Fig. 1e). Moreover, 45.3% of the MAGs contained 16 S rRNA gene sequences, and 34.5% of MAGs had 23 S, 16 S, and 5 S rRNA gene sequences (Fig. 1f). The median GC ratio of MAGs from 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m were 52.75, 44.1, and 46.4%, respectively (Fig. 1g). We also used OPERA-MS to retrieve MAGs from SRs and LRs. However, only 26 medium-quality or high-quality MAGs were recovered, indicating that the method is suboptimal in our case.

Phylogenetic diversity and novelty of MAGs

To explore the diversity of MAGs, we clustered and de-replicated the genomes based on a 95% ANI cutoff for bacterial species demarcation22, since identical microbial species may be detected and assembled from the three different layers. The procedure led to 165 species-level non-redundant MAGs (Supplementary Data 1). The majority (93%) of the species-level MAGs could not be assigned to any known species after taxonomy annotation by the GTDB-Tk, revealing that a great deal of novel MAGs at the species and higher taxonomic ranks were detected (Supplementary Data 2). The novel MAGs comprised six unknown bacterial orders, 20 families, and 66 genera (Fig. 2a). The six MAGs assigned as unknown bacterial orders were all from 5.5-m dataset, which is consistent with our previous observation that water from 5.5 m deep (monimolimnion) contained more unknown bacteria based on the 16 S rRNA survey. Additionally, the novel MAGs contained novel Cyanobacteria and Thiocapsa species that were predominate in the mixolimnion and chemocline, respectively (Supplementary Data 2).

Fig. 2. Taxonomical and molecular phylogenetic analyses of recovered bacterial MAGs.

Fig. 2

a The numbers of novel taxonomic ranks of MAGs assigned by GTDB-Tk. b The phylum frequencies in the MAG collection from the Shunet dataset, GTDB representative genomes, and GEM dataset. c A phylogenetic tree based on the concatenation of 120 single-copy gene protein sequences. After masking, 5040 amino acid sites were used in the analysis. The phylogenetic tree includes 188 recovered bacterial MAGs and 30,238 bacterial representative genomes in GTDB-r95. The blue points represent the placement of MAGs that are classified as novel species, the green points represent novel genera, the red points represent novel families, and the black points represent novel orders. The numbers in the circle are phyla in the legend. Scale bar represents changes per amino acid site.

To examine the phylogenetic diversity in the novel MAGs, a phylogenomic tree was reconstructed using all these bacterial MAGs and representative bacterial genomes in GTDB (Fig. 2b). The result demonstrated that the MAGs widely span the bacterial phylogeny. The MAGs were distributed across 24 phyla, and 11 MAGs belonged to Candidatus Patescibacteria (also known as Candidate Phyla Radiation, CPR), so-called microbial dark matter because not enough is known about their biology23. Recovered MAGs also included “Margulisbacteria,” “Bipolaricaulota,” “Cloacimonadota,” and “Caldatribacteriota,” phyla that were novel and poorly characterized in the current bacterial genome databases GTDB and IMG compared to the common phyla, such as Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Cyanobacteria. Margulisbacteria” was first identified in 2016 from metagenomes of groundwater and sediment24. “Bipolaricaulota” (previously known as “Acetothermia”) was first recovered from the metagenome of the thermophilic microbial mat community in 201225. “Cloacimonadota“ (“Cloacimonetes”) was first described in 2008 from anaerobic digesters26. These phyla have not yet been cultivated, except the first “Caldatribacteriota“ isolate published in 202027. There are only 37 “Margulisbacteria,” 21 “Bipolaricaulota,” 27 “Cloacimonadota,” and 19 “Caldatribacteriota” species representative genomes in GTDB-r95. Our newly recovered MAGs of these uncultivated phyla will be useful tools for exploring these phyla.

The phylum frequencies differed between the genome collections of the standard database and the Shunet datasets (Fig. 2c). The GTDB and GEM mainly comprised Proteobacteria28,29. In contrast, in genome collections from the Shunet datasets, the phylum frequency was enriched in the Desulfobacterota, Verrucomicrobiota, Bacteroidota, and “Omnitrophota.” The major phyla recovered in this study also differed from MAG studies from other ancient lakes. For example, a study also recovered MAGs from Siberia in Lake Baikal30. The major phyla of recovered MAGs are Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobiota, and Chloroflexi. On the other hand, a 2021 metagenomics study that reconstructed MAGs from Lake Tanganyika, a freshwater meromictic lake, had higher fractions of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota. In both datasets, “Margulisbacteria,” “Bipolaricaulota,” and “Caldatribacteriota” were not seen. These results suggest that, to gain a comprehensive picture of the microbial genomes on earth, there is a strong need for future studies to explore microbiomes from various habitats, especially overlooked or understudied ones28,31.

Desulfobacterota was formally proposed as a novel phylum that includes the taxa previously classified in the class Deltaproteobacteria32. Many Desulfobacterota are sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), and play importance roles in the sulfur cycle. For example, a study recovered numerous Desulfobacterota MAGs from a Siberian soda lake with complete cycling between sulfate and sulfide33. In some anaerobic aquatic systems, GSB formed syntrophic interactions with SRB via sulfur exchange, which were also observed in meromictic lakes such as Lake Faro and Ace Lake3436. Desulfobacterota MAGs recovered in this study were from 5.0- and 5.5-m datasets. These two layers were dominated by purple sulfur bacteria (PSB) and green sulfur bacteria (GSB), respectively. The enrichment of recovered Desulfobacterota MAGs may be due to GSB having syntrophic interactions with diverse Desulfobacterota in the monimolimnion.

Verrucomicrobiota and “Omnitrophota” belong to the PVC group, and both were found and proposed recently. Verrucomicrobiota are abundant and ubiquitous in various soil and water systems. Although they have received more attention recently, only a few of them have been isolated, and their functions and ecophysiologies in water systems are not widely understood. A study in four Swedish lakes showed that the Verrucomicrobiota are associated with cyanobacterial blooms37. On the other hand, many studies showed that Verrucomicrobia contain higher proportions of carbohydrate-active enzymes-related genes38,39 and can digest complex polysaccharides for growth40. Verrucomicrobia may also serve as important (poly)saccharide degraders in Lake Shunet.

Novel predicted secondary-metabolite biosynthetic clusters and carbohydrate-active enzymes from newly recovered MAGs

Here we demonstrate (a) the value of recovering MAGs from rarely investigated habitats to mine novel functional genes and (b) the advantage of combining SRs and LRs using two examples: secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) and carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes). Secondary metabolites are usually unique in one or a few species, and not related to the normal growth of the organisms41. The secondary metabolites, associated with ecological interactions, can serve as toxins, factors participating in symbiosis with other hosts, defense mechanisms41,42. Identifying structurally and functionally novel secondary metabolites enables us to understand the ecological interactions among the microbes. The majority of bacteria remain uncultivated, so mining novel BGCs in metagenomes provides the opportunity to discover new secondary metabolites43,44.

In our MAG collection, we identified 414 putative BGCs from 140 MAGs out of a total 165 recovered MAGs (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Among them, 134 BGCs were annotated as terpenes and 64 BGCs as bacteriocins. To determine the novelty of these BGCs, the BGCs were searched against the NCBI database using the cutoffs of 75% identity and 80% query coverage based on a previous study28. The results demonstrated that 384 BGCs (92%) could not be matched with these thresholds, indicating that most of these could be novel BGCs. Comparably, only 83% of BGCs were predicted to be novel BGCs in the recently published Genomes from Earth’s Microbiome catalog (GEM)28.

Complete BGCs are important because they help us identify the metabolites that these BGCs produce using molecular approaches42. 72% of BGCs identified from MAGs in the 3.0 m dataset were not on the edge of the contigs, suggesting that the majority of BGCs may be complete. However, only 22% of BGCs in the 5.0 and 5.5 m datasets were not on the edges, which could be because the MAGs from 3.0 m were more contiguous because they had a 10-fold larger median N50 (Fig. 1b). In total, 213 BGCs (51%) we recovered were not on the edges. By comparison, only 34% BGCs predicted in the GEM MAG collection were not on the edge. In the 414 BGCs, 552 core biosynthetic genes, 1224 additional biosynthetic genes, 205 regulator genes, and 185 transporter genes were identified. This information will enable us to examine the products of the BGC, the function of these genes, and the roles of the products in the individual bacterium. Additionally, the results also showed that the increased contiguity of MAGs by LRs enables us to obtain more complete BGCs.

Carbohydrate-active enzymes have a range of applications. For instance, CAZymes are used for food processing and food production4548. Exploring novel CAZymes in the metagenome can benefit food industries45,46. On the other hand, identifying novel CAZymes modules enables us to produce novel bioactive oligosaccharides that can be used to develop new drugs and supplements47,48. From the MAGs reconstructed in this study, we identified 8750 putative CAZymes: 3918 glycosyltransferases, 3304 glycoside hydrolases, 738 carbohydrate esterases, and 92 polysaccharide lyases (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Previous studies indicated that 60–70% protein identity can be used as a threshold for the conservation of the enzymatic function4951. Among the CAZymes we identified, 1745 (44%) glycosyltransferases, 1456 (44%) glycoside hydrolases, 267 (36%) carbohydrate esterases, and 57 (62%) polysaccharide lyases shared less than 60% protein identity with their closest homologs in the NCBI nr database (Supplementary Fig. 1c). This indicates that these CAZymes could have novel carbohydrate-active functions, which future research efforts can explore further.

Novel candidate archaeal families identified from Lake Shunet

From the 5.5 m dataset, we identified two MAGs belonging to candidate novel families under Methanomassiliicoccales and Iainarchaeales (MAG ID: M55A1 and M55A2, respectively) based on the relative evolutionary divergence (RED) and phylogenetic placement determined by GTDB-Tk (Supplementary Data 2), and one MAG belonging to a potential novel species under Nanoarchaeota based on a 95% ANI cutoff for species boundary (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Data 2). In the archaeal phylogenomic tree, M55A1 formed a clade basal to the clade containing species within the Methanomethylophilaceae family, a group of host-associated methanogens, and the branch was supported by a 94.7% UFBoot value (probability that a clade is true) (Fig. 3)52. The M55A1 and Methanomethylophilaceae-related clade formed a superclade that is adjacent to Methanomassiliicoccaceae-related clade, a group of environmental methanogens53. These clades formed the order Methanomassiliicoccales, the hallmark of which is the ability to produce methane. However, M55A1 did not contain genes encoding for a methane-producing key enzyme complex (Supplementary Fig. 2). For example, genes encoding methyl-coenzyme M reductase alpha (mcrA), beta (mcrB), and gamma subunit (mcrG), a key enzyme complex involved in methane production, were absent in the M55A1. On the other hand, we did not find Methanomassiliicoccaceae-related mcrA, mcrB, or mcrG genes in the other bins and unbinned sequences in the 5.5 m dataset. Furthermore, M55A1 lacks most of the core methanogenesis marker genes identified in Methanomassiliicoccales.

Fig. 3. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of recovered archaeal MAGs.

Fig. 3

The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on the concatenation of 122 single-copy gene protein sequences. After masking, 5124 amino acid sites were used in the analysis. The phylogenetic tree including three MAGs from Lake Shunet and 1672 archaeal representative genomes in GTDB-r95. The blue dot represents the placement of MAG M55A2, the red dot represents MAG M55A1, and the green dot represents MAG M55A3. The numbers in the circle are phyla in the legend. Scale bar represents changes per amino acid site.

The absence of these methanogenesis marker genes implies that the archaea may have lost their methane-producing ability. If this is true, then a phylogenetic group of Methanomassiliicoccales may have lost the ability to perform methanogenesis after its ancestor evolved the ability to produce methane. The results not only showed the potential functional diversity in this clade but also highlighted how much such a little-studied environment can reveal about functional diversity in known microbial lineages.

Five complete MAGs of a candidate novel genus and species from Lake Shunet

The assemblies of Shunet datasets yielded six complete and circulated bacterial genomes (Fig. 4). Among these six complete MAG, two belonged to a novel Simkaniaceae genus, and the other four were classified as novel Cyanobium species, Thiocapsa species, and species under GCA-2401735 (an uncharacterized genus defined previously based on phylogeny), according to the GTDB taxonomy inference based on ANI and phylogenomic analyses (Supplementary Data 1 and 2). The following are individual descriptions of their unique taxonomic and metabolic features. The nitrogen, carbon, sulfur, and energy metabolisms are described in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Fig. 4. Representation of the six complete MAGs.

Fig. 4

The rings from the inside to outside represent GC content (black), GC skew- (purple), and GC skew + (green). The next two blue rings represent coding sequences on the forward and reverse strands, respectively. On the outmost ring are the rRNA gene sequences (black), transfer-messenger RNA (red), and secondary metabolite gene clusters (yellow). MAG ID M30B6 is classified as Alcanivorax sp002354605, M30B1 and M30B2 are Simkaniaceae sp., M30B3 is Cyanobium sp., M30B5 is “Methylofavorus khakassia”., and M50B4 is “Thiocapsa halobium”.

A candidate novel Simkaniaceae genus was identified. According to GTDB-TK, there were two complete MAGs—M30B1 and M30B2—assigned as an unclassified genus under Simkaniaceae, a family in the class Chlamydiia, based on the topology of the phylogenetic tree. M30B1 and M30B2 formed a monophyletic group and shared 72.48% percentage of conserved protein (PCOP), above the genus boundary of 50% PCOP54. The genomes shared 77% ANI, below the 95% cutoff for the same species22, and the identity of their rRNA gene sequences was 98.45%. Together, the results showed that the two MAGs were two different new species under a novel genus. Therefore, we propose a new genus, Candidatus Andegerimia, to include the two MAGs, and renamed the two MAGs as Candidatus Andegerimia shunetia M30B1 and Candidatus Andegerimia siberian M30B2, abbreviated as M30B1 and M30B2, respectively.

Simkaniaceae, like all Chlamydia, are obligately intracellular bacteria that live in eukaryotic cells55. Validated natural hosts include various multicellular eukaryotic organisms like vertebrates. That some Simkaniaceae PCR clones were identified from drinking water implies that Simkaniaceae may also live in unicellular eukaryotes56. Our samples were collected from saline water. 10-μm plankton nets were used to filter large organisms. Hence, Ca. A. shunetia and Ca. A. siberian may be derived from tiny or unicellular eukaryotic organisms.

Leveraging long- and short-read sequencing together to improve MAG reconstruction can result in comprehensive genomes with less genome contamination and fewer binning errors. The two Simkaniaceae MAGs we recovered contained five KEGG orthologues that were not present in known Simkaniaceae genomes (Table 1). First, the genomes have cold shock protein genes, and the genes were highly conserved (93% amino acid identity) between the two Simkaniaceae genomes. Cold shock proteins are used to deal with the sudden drop in temperature57. The proteins are thought to be able to bind with nucleic acids to prevent the disruption of mRNA transcription and protein translation caused by the formation of mRNA secondary structures due to low temperature57. The water temperature of samples in the mixolimnion we collected in July 2010 ranges from 6.5 to 15.5 °C13,14. In winter, ice cover the lake surface, and the temperature is below 0 °C down to 4 m deep58. The existence of the genes in the genomes may confer cold resistance on the Simkaniaceae bacteria in the mixolimnion of Lake Shunet, allowing them to withstand cold environments or rapid temperature change.

Table 1.

KEGG orthologues that are present in the novel MAGs but absent in their sister taxa.

KO number Definition
Simkaniaceae
 K00954 Pantetheine-phosphate adenylyltransferase
 K01580 Glutamate decarboxylase
 K15736 L-2-hydroxyglutarate
 K01607 Carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase
 K03704 Cold shock protein
Thiocapsa
 K07306 Anaerobic DMSO reductase subunit A
 K07307 Anaerobic DMSO reductase subunit B
 K01575 Acetolactate decarboxylase
 K13730 Internalin A
 K05793 Tellurite resistance protein TerB
 K05794 Tellurite resistance protein TerC
 K05791 Tellurium resistance protein TerZ
Cyanobium
 K07012 CRISPR-associated endonuclease/helicase
 K07475 Cas3
 K15342 CRISP-associated protein Cas1
 K19046 CRISPR system cascade subunit CasB
 K19123 CRISPR system cascade subunit CasA
 K19124 CRISPR system cascade subunit CasC
 K19125 CRISPR system cascade subunit CasD
 K19126 CRISPR system cascade subunit CasE

Besides the cold shock protein genes, the two Simkaniaceae also had glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) genes. GAD is an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of glutamate into γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and carbon dioxide. Many bacteria can utilize the GAD system to tolerate acidic stress by consuming protons during a chemical reaction59. The system usually accompanies glutamate/GABA antiporters, responsible for coupling the efflux of GABA and influx of glutamate. The antiporter can also be found in the two novel Simkaniaceae genomes, indicating that the bacteria can use the system to tolerate acidic external or host intracellular environments.

Along with the unique features in the genus, we identified a difference between the two MAGs in terms of metabolism. Taking sulfur metabolism as an example, the M30B2 had all the genes for assimilatory sulfate reduction (ASR), except for cysH, and contained the sulfate permease gene (Supplementary Fig. 3). On the contrary, M30B1 did not contain ASR or the sulfate permease gene. This indicates that M30B2 can take up and use sulfate as a sulfur source, but M30B1 cannot.

The MAG M30B3 was classified as a novel Cyanobacteria species genome under the genus Cyanobium, based on phylogenomic tree and 84.28% ANI shared with the Cyanobium_A sp007135755 genome (GCA_007135755.1), its closest phylogenetic neighbor. We named the genome Candidatus Cyanobium sp. M30B3, abbreviated as M30B3. The M30B3 is the predominant bacterium in Lake Shunet at 3.0 m and plays a pivotal role in providing organic carbon in the lake ecosystem14.

Our analysis of the M30B3 genome revealed that the bacterium harbors an anti-phage system that its known relatives lack. In the novel cyanobacterial genome under the Cyanobium genus, we found that the genome harbored several CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein genes that were not in other Cyanobium genomes (Table 1). The CRISPR-Cas system is a prokaryotic immune system that enables prokaryotic cells to defend against phages60. The system can be classified into six types and several subtypes according to protein content. The signature protein of type I is Cas3, which has endonuclease and helicase activities60. cas3 genes can be found in the novel Cyanobium genome but not in other known Cyanobium genomes. Furthermore, the genome also had cse1 and cse2 genes, signature protein genes for the I-E subtype. Our results show that the novel genome harbors a type I-E CRISPR system and that this system is absent in its phylogenetic-close relatives.

Lake Shunet features dense purple sulfur bacteria (PSB) in its chemocline (5.0 m) layer (>108 cells/mL)14, and the density is comparable to that of Lake Mahoney (Canada), renowned for containing the most PSB of any lake in the world (4 × 108 cells/mL)61. A complete MAG of Thiocapsa species, the predominant PSB in the 5.0 m layer, was recovered from the 5.0 m dataset. The MAG was classified as a candidate novel species because it shared 90.71% ANI with the genome of Thiocapsa rosea. Therefore, we propose the creation of a new species, Candidatus Thiocapsa halobium, abbreviated as M50B4.

The complete genome of the predominant PSB M50B4 will help us understand carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling in Lake Shunet. Thiocapsa can perform photosynthesis by reducing sulfur as an electron donor, and Thiocapsa can fix nitrogen62,63. M50B4 contained genes for bacteriochlorophyll synthesis and the Calvin cycle for carbon fixation. A previous study revealed that Thioflavicoccus mobilis, a bacterium close to Thiocapsa, can utilize rTCA and the Calvin cycle to fix carbon64. In M50B4, all genes for the reverse TCA cycle (rTCA), except for the ATP citrate lyase gene, were identified. Whether the M50B4 can use both rTCA and the Calvin cycle like T. mobilis needs to be determined. For sulfur metabolism, the MAG carried intact gene sets involved in SOX system dissimilatory sulfate reduction/oxidation. The sulfate importer gene was also seen in the MAG, which equipped the bacterium with the ability to import extracellular thiosulfate and sulfate and to use them as sulfur sources. In terms of nitrogen metabolism, like other Thiocapsa, the bacterium had a gene cluster to conduct nitrogen fixation and a urea transporter and urease gene cluster to utilize urea. Besides nitrogen fixation, currently available Thiocapsa have all genes for denitrification, and some Thiocapsa have genes to convert nitrite to nitrate. However, the genes were not seen in our MAG.

There are currently five cultured Thiocapsa species. Two of these, T. rosea and T. pendens, contain gas vesicles. Our genomic analysis revealed that M50B4 contained two copies of the gas vesicle structure protein gene gvpA. The gene is also present in T. rosea and T. pendens, but not in any other Thiocapsa genomes, indicating that the genes are critical for vesicles to exist in Thiocapsa, and therefore the novel species have gas vesicles. Gas vesicles enable T. sp. M50B4 cells to modulate their buoyancy so they can move to the locations with optimal conditions for anoxygenic photosynthesis65. For example, the position of the chemocline, a zone with a H2S concentration and illumination that are optimal for anoxygenic photosynthesis, fluctuated between 4.5 and 5.5 m deep from 2003 to 200958. During the period, the corresponding change in the PSB peak location was also observed, indicating that gas vesicles may help M50B4 move along with the location change in the chemocline58. On the other hand, 16 S rRNA analysis showed that M50B4 can also be found in Lake Shira, a less stable meromictic lake near Lake Shunet. In summer 2004, the redox zone of Lake Shira was recorded to have shifted upwards in two days66. This showed that the PSB are able to maintain their position near the zone by shifting upwards, indicating that gas vesicles may help M50B4 deal with rapid environmental changes.

We found that the novel Thiocapsa complete MAG have genes that encode dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) reductase subunits A and B (Supplementary Table 2). DMSO reductase is an enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of DMSO into dimethyl sulfide (DMS). The reductase enables bacteria to use DMSO as terminal electron acceptors instead of oxygen during cellular respiration67. The DMSO reduction reaction could impact the environment. DMS, the product of the reaction, can be emitted into the atmosphere and be oxidized into sulfuric acid68. Sulfuric acid can act as a cloud condensation nucleus and leads to cloud formation, blocking radiation from the sun. The flux of the anti-greenhouse gas DMS is mainly investigated and discussed in oceanic environments69,70. The flux and role of DMS in lake ecosystems are overlooked and rarely documented71. Our finding that the dense PSB in Lake Shunet carried the genes for DMS metabolism shows the need to investigate the impact and importance of DMS from bacteria in lake ecosystems and sulfur cycling.

A complete MAG, named M30B5, was classified as a novel Methylophilaceae species under a genus-level lineage, called GCA-2401735, which was defined based on phylogenetic placement20. The GCA-2401735 lineage currently only comprises two genomes—GCA-2401735 sp006844635 and GCA-2401735 sp002401735—neither of which meet high-quality genome standards due to their low completeness and lack of 16 S rRNA gene sequence. The novel complete genome can serve as a representative species of the genus and can be used to infer the capability of the genus (Supplementary Table 2). Here, we propose the genus Candidatus Methylofavorus to include the three GCA-2401735 genomes, and the M30B5 was renamed as Candidatus Methylofavorus khakassia.

The isolation locations of the three genomes imply that their habitats were distinct from those of other Methylophilaceae. The three “Methylofavorus” genomes were isolated from a cold subseafloor aquifer, shallow marine methane seep, and saline lake, indicating that the bacteria can live in saline environments. By comparison, most other Methylophilaceae members live in soil and freshwater or are associated with plants (except for the OM43 lineage)72. This indicates that the ancestor of “Methylofavorus” gained the ability to live in saline habitats and diverged from the ancestor of the genus Methylophilus, its closest phylogenetic relatives.

The complete genome of M30B5 enables us to comprehensively study metabolic potentials. Methylophilaceae is a family of Proteobacteria that can use methylamine or methanol as carbon or energy sources72,73. In our analysis, methanol dehydrogenase gene existed in our genome, and methylamine dehydrogenase gene was absent, indicating that the bacteria use methanol as a carbon source instead of methylamine. For motility, flagella are found in some Methylophilaceae. Interestingly, flagella- and chemotaxis-related genes were not identified in the MAG but were identified in the other two “Methylofavorus” species, suggesting that M30B5 lacks mobility comparing to the other two “Methylofavorus” species (Supplementary Fig. 4).

The comparative analysis of M30B5 and other “Methylofavorus” species revealed that the bacteria use different types of machinery to obtain nitrogen (Supplementary Fig. 4). The formamidase, urease, and urea transporters were present in M30B5 but not the other two “Methylofavorus” species. Instead, the two “Methylofavorus” species had nitrite reductase, which was not in our MAG. The results indicate that M30B5 can convert formamide into ammonia and formate, and take up extracellular urea as a nitrogen source. On the contrary, the other two “Methylofavorus” can use nitrite as nitrogen resources. Our analysis revealed that “Methylofavorus” is metabolically heterogeneous.

Conclusions

In this study, we successfully developed a workflow to recover MAGs by combining SRs and LRs. This workflow reconstructed hundreds of high-quality and six complete MAGs—including six candidate novel bacterial orders, 20 families, 66 genera, and 154 species—from water samples of Lake Shunet, a meromictic lake with a diverse microbial community. It demonstrates that with extra less LRs, we can salvage important genome information from previous SR metagenomes. Using comparative genomics, unique and intriguing metabolic features are identified in these complete MAGs, including two predominant novel species: Thiocapsa sp, and Cyanobium sp14. The findings show that it is advantageous to apply this method in studies of microbial ecology and microbial genomics by revising and improving the shortcomings of SRs-based metagenomes. Additionally, we show that the MAGs contain a high proportion of potential novel BGCs and CAZymes, which can be valuable resources to validate and examine the metabolic flexibility of various microbial lineages through further experimental approaches and comparative genomics. Finally, this study found a high ratio of poorly detectable taxa in the public databases, suggesting that the investigation into rarely explored environments is necessary to populate the genomic encyclopedia of the microbial world, explore microbial metabolic diversity, and fill the missing gaps in microbial evolution.

Methods

Sample collection and information

Water samples at 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m depth were collected from Lake Shunet (54° 25’N, 90° 13’E) on July 21, 2010. The collection procedure was described in our previous research14. 20 L of water were pumped from each depth into four sterile 5-L polypropylene bottles. Water was filtered through 10-μm plankton net to remove large particles. The water was stored for 3 h in the bottles, and part of the water was then transferred into sterile 2.0-ml screw tubes (SSIbio®) and stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction. The rest of water was concentrated using tangential flow filtration (TFF) system (Millipore) with 0.22-μm polycarbonate membrane filters. The bacteria in the retentate were then retained on cellulose acetate membranes (0.2 μm pore size; ADVANTEC, Tokyo, Japan) and stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction. The physicochemical properties of samples were mentioned in a previous study14. The pH was 8.1, 7.6, and 6.7; water temperature was 15.5, 9.5, and 7.5 °C; and salinity was 26, 40, and 71 g/L in the 3.0-, 5.0-, and 5.5-m samples, respectively.

DNA extraction and sequencing

Reads from Illumina and Nanopore sequencing platforms were used in this study. The sequencing reads from Illumina were described in our previous study14 (Supplementary Table 1). DNA for Illumina sequencing was extracted from a TFF-concentrated sample using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method74. In terms of Nanopore sequencing for 3.0-m samples, the same DNA batch used for Illumina sequencing of 3.0-m was sent to Health GeneTech Corp. (Taiwan) for Nanopore sequencing. For 5.0- and 5.5-m samples, there was no DNA remaining after Illumina sequencing, so in 2020 the DNA was extracted again from frozen water samples using the CTAB method by retaining the bacteria on cellulose acetate membranes without TFF concentration. The amounts of DNA were still insufficient for Nanopore sequencing, so the DNA samples were mixed with the DNA of a known bacterium, Endozoicomonas isolate, at a 1:2 ratio. No Endozoicomonas was detected in the water samples according to our 16 S rRNA amplicon survey14. The mixed DNA was then sent to the NGS High Throughput Genomics Core at Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica for Nanopore sequencing. To remove reads that had originated from the Endozoicomonas isolate, Kaiju web server75 and Kraken 276 were used to assign the taxonomy for each read; reads that were classified as Endozoicomonas by Kaiju or Kraken were removed from our sequencing results. The Nanopore sequencing and processing yielded 13.83, 12.57, and 4.79 Gbp of reads from the 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m samples, respectively (Supplementary Table 1).

Metagenome assembly

MAG assembly was performed by combining short reads (SRs) from Illumina sequencing and long reads (LRs) from Nanopore sequencing; this workflow is described in Fig. 1a. First, the LRs from 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m datasets were individually assembled by metaFlye v2.812 with default settings, and the assemblies were polished with corresponding SRs using Pilon v1.2316. On the other hand, SRs were also assembled by MEGAHIT v1.2.9 with k-mer of 21, 31, 41, and 5177. The assemblies from SRs and LRs were then merged by quickmerge v0.3 with parameters -ml 7500 -c 3 -hco 878. The merge assemblies were then binned using MaxBin279, MetaBAT280, and CONCOCT81 in metaWRAP v1.318. The bins from the three bin sets were then refined by the bin refinement module in metaWRAP v1.3. The resulting bins were then polished again by Pilon v1.23 five times. To reassemble the bin, sorted reads that belonged to individual bin were extracted by BWA-MEM v0.7.1717 for SRs and by minimap2 for LRs82. The extracted long reads were assembled by Flye v2.8, or metaFlye v2.8 if the assembly failed using Flye v2.812,83. The bins were then reassembled individually using Unicycler v0.4.8 using the extracted reads and reassembled long-read contigs which were used as bridges84. To determine whether the original or reassembled bin was better, the bin with higher value of genome completeness—2.5 × contamination, estimated by CheckM v1.1.315, was chosen and retained. Contigs labeled as circular by Flye or metaFlye, >2.0 Mb in size, and completeness >95% were considered “complete” MAGs. The complete MAGs were visualized using CGView Server85.

While we were preparing this manuscript, Van Damme et al. published a hybrid assembler, called MUFFIN, that also integrates metaFlye and metaWRAP to recover MAGs and Unicycler for reassembly86. However, our workflow has a step to merge the assemblies from SRs and LRs to increase the contiguity and assembly size. Moreover, for the reassembly, we use contigs from metaFlye, instead of default setting: miniasm, as the bridge, which we found can produce a better quality reassembly.

Annotation of metagenome-assembly genomes

The completeness, contamination, and other statistics on metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were evaluated using CheckM v1.1.315. The genome statistics were processed in R87 and visualized using the ggplot2 package88. The taxonomy of MAGs was inferred by GTDB-Tk v1.3.019. Average Nucleotide Identities (ANIs) between MAGs were determined by FastANI v1.3222. MAGs were annotated using Prokka v1.14.5 with ‘rfam’ options89. To annotate MAGs with KEGG functional orthologs (K numbers), putative protein sequences predicted by Prodigal v2.6.390 were annotated using EnrichM v0.6.091. The K number annotation results were then used to reconstruct the transporter systems and metabolic pathways using KEGG mapper92, and the completeness of KEGG modules was evaluated using EnrichM. Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in each MAG were identified using antiSMASH v5.093. Ribosomal RNA sequences were inferred by barrnap v0.994.

Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes (CAZymes) in MAGs were predicted and classified using run_dbcan v2 by HMMER search against the dbCAN HMM (hidden Markov model) v9 database95. The putative CAZymes were blasted against the NCBI nr database using BLASTp96 to search their closest homologs and determine the protein identities between predicted CAZymes and their homologs.

Taxonomy assignment and phylogenetic analysis

Taxonomic assignment was performed by GTDB-Tk v1.3.019. GTDB-Tk classifies bacterial and archaeal genomes and identifies novel taxa by determining the phylogenetic placement and relative evolutionary divergence (RED) values of query genomes in the GTDB reference tree, using a 95% ANI cutoff for species boundary. Bacterial and archaeal phylogenomic trees were inferred by a de novo workflow in GTDB-Tk v1.3.0. All species-level non-redundant MAGs recovered in this study were analyzed together with the reference genomes in Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB)20. In the de novo workflow, marker genes in each genome were identified using HMMER 3.1b297. Multiple sequence alignments based on the bacterial or archaeal marker sets were then generated and masked with default settings. Trees of bacteria and archaea were then inferred from the masked multiple sequence alignment using FastTree with the WAG + GAMMA models and 1000 bootstraps98. The trees were visualized with the interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v499.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Data 1 (30.8KB, txt)
Supplementary Data 2 (140.4KB, txt)
Reporting Summary (322.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan through the Taiwan–Russia Joint Project Grant NSC 102-2923-B-001-004-MY3 and Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grant 21-54-52001 and MOST 105-2923-B-001-001-MY3. Y.H.C. would like to acknowledge the Taiwan International Graduate Program (TIGP) for its fellowship towards his graduate studies. We would like to thank Noah Last of Third Draft Editing for his English language editing.

Author contributions

Y.H.C. and S.L.T. conceived the idea for this study. Y.H.C. assembled the genomes, performed the bioinformatics analysis, and wrote the manuscript. P.W.C. and H.H.C. prepared the DNA samples. D.R. and A.D. collected water samples. S.L.T. supervised the overall study.

Data availability

All sequencing data and assembled genomes are available through National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) repositories under BioProject ID: PRJNA721826. Sequence reads of metagenomes from samples at 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m deep can be found under SRA accession numbers SRR14300307, SRR14300308, SRR14300309, SRR14307495, SRR14307795, and SRR14307796. The accession numbers of MAGs can be found in Supplementary Data 1 and 2.

Code availability

The workflow based on snakemake is available at https://github.com/SeanChenHCY/metaLAS.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review informationCommunications Biology thanks Renaud Van Damme and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Luke Grinham. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-021-02510-6.

References

  • 1.Chen LX, Anantharaman K, Shaiber A, Eren AM, Banfield JF. Accurate and complete genomes from metagenomes. Genome Res. 2020;30:315–333. doi: 10.1101/gr.258640.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Che Y, et al. Mobile antibiotic resistome in wastewater treatment plants revealed by nanopore metagenomic sequencing. Microbiome. 2019;7:44. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0663-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nayfach S, Shi ZJ, Seshadri R, Pollard KS, Kyrpides NC. New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome. Nature. 2019;568:505–510. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1058-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dong, X. Y. et al. Metabolic potential of uncultured bacteria and archaea associated with petroleum seepage in deep-sea sediments. Nat. Commun.10, 10.1038/s41467-019-09747-0 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Mukherjee S, et al. Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.8: overview and updates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D723–D733. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ayling M, Clark MD, Leggett RM. New approaches for metagenome assembly with short reads. Brief. Bioinform. 2020;21:584–594. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D67–D72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moss EL, Maghini DG, Bhatt AS. Complete, closed bacterial genomes from microbiomes using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020;38:701. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0422-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu, L. et al. High-quality bacterial genomes of a partial-nitritation/anammox system by an iterative hybrid assembly method. Microbiome8, 10.1186/s40168-020-00937-3 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Bertrand D, et al. Hybrid metagenomic assembly enables high-resolution analysis of resistance determinants and mobile elements in human microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:937–944. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0191-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Latorre-Perez A, Villalba-Bermell P, Pascual J, Vilanova C. Assembly methods for nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing: a comparative study. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:13588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70491-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kolmogorov M, et al. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:1103–1110. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-00971-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baatar, B. et al. Bacterial Communities of Three Saline Meromictic Lakes in Central Asia. Plos One11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0150847 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Wu, Y. T. et al. Comprehensive Insights Into Composition, Metabolic Potentials, and Interactions Among Archaeal, Bacterial, and Viral Assemblages in Meromictic Lake Shunet in Siberia. Front. Microbiol.9, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01763 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walker BJ, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome. 2018;6:158. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chaumeil, P. A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Parks DH, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bowers RM, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:725–731. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jain C, Rodriguez RL, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jiao, J.-Y. et al. Microbial dark matter coming to light: challenges and opportunities. National Sci. Rev.8, 10.1093/nsr/nwaa280 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Anantharaman K, et al. Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13219. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Takami H, et al. A deeply branching thermophilic bacterium with an ancient acetyl-CoA pathway dominates a subsurface ecosystem. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e30559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pelletier E, et al. “Candidatus Cloacamonas acidaminovorans”: genome sequence reconstruction provides a first glimpse of a new bacterial division. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190:2572–2579. doi: 10.1128/JB.01248-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Katayama T, et al. Isolation of a member of the candidate phylum ‘Atribacteria’ reveals a unique cell membrane structure. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:6381. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20149-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nayfach, S. et al. A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol.10.1038/s41587-020-0718-6 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Parks DH, et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2017;2:1533–1542. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cabello-Yeves PJ, et al. Microbiome of the deep Lake Baikal, a unique oxic bathypelagic habitat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2020;65:1471–1488. doi: 10.1002/lno.11401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Obbels, D. et al. Bacterial and eukaryotic biodiversity patterns in terrestrial and aquatic habitats in the Sor Rondane Mountains, Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Fems Microbiol. Ecol.92, 10.1093/femsec/fiw041 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32.Waite DW, et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020;70:5972–6016. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vavourakis, C. D. et al. Metagenomes and metatranscriptomes shed new light on the microbial-mediated sulfur cycle in a Siberian soda lake. Bmc Biol.17, 10.1186/s12915-019-0688-7 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Ng C, et al. Metaproteogenomic analysis of a dominant green sulfur bacterium from Ace Lake, Antarctica. ISME J. 2010;4:1002–1019. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lentini V, Gugliandolo C, Maugeri TL. Vertical distribution of Archaea and Bacteria in a meromictic lake as determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Curr. Microbiol. 2012;64:66–74. doi: 10.1007/s00284-011-0028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lauro FM, et al. An integrative study of a meromictic lake ecosystem in Antarctica. Isme J. 2011;5:879–895. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Eiler A, Bertilsson S. Composition of freshwater bacterial communities associated with cyanobacterial blooms in four Swedish lakes. Environ. Microbiol. 2004;6:1228–1243. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cabello-Yeves PJ, et al. Reconstruction of diverse verrucomicrobial genomes from metagenome datasets of freshwater reservoirs. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:2131. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.He, S. et al. Ecophysiology of freshwater verrucomicrobia inferred from metagenome-assembled genomes. mSphere2, 10.1128/mSphere.00277-17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Sichert A, et al. Verrucomicrobia use hundreds of enzymes to digest the algal polysaccharide fucoidan. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:1026–1039. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0720-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Demain AL, Fang A. The natural functions of secondary metabolites. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2000;69:1–39. doi: 10.1007/3-540-44964-7_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Beedessee, G. et al. Diversified secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene repertoire revealed in symbiotic dinoflagellates. Sci Rep-Uk9, 10.1038/s41598-018-37792-0 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Medema MH, Fischbach MA. Computational approaches to natural product discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11:639–648. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chavali AK, Rhee SY. Bioinformatics tools for the identification of gene clusters that biosynthesize specialized metabolites. Brief. Bioinform. 2018;19:1022–1034. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gong, G., Zhou, S. S., Luo, R. B., Gesang, Z. & Suolang, S. Metagenomic insights into the diversity of carbohydrate-degrading enzymes in the yak fecal microbial community. Bmc Microbiol.20, 10.1186/s12866-020-01993-3 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Sathya TA, Khan M. Diversity of glycosyl hydrolase enzymes from metagenome and their application in food industry. J. Food Sci. 2014;79:R2149–R2156. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nakamura AM, Nascimento AS, Polikarpov I. Structural diversity of carbohydrate esterases. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2017;1:35–51. doi: 10.1016/j.biori.2017.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Alagawany M, Elnesr SS, Farag MR. The role of exogenous enzymes in promoting growth and improving nutrient digestibility in poultry. Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2018;19:157–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Espadaler, J. et al. Prediction of enzyme function by combining sequence similarity and protein interactions. Bmc Bioinform.9, 10.1186/1471-2105-9-249 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Addou S, Rentzsch R, Lee D, Orengo CA. Domain-based and family-specific sequence identity thresholds increase the levels of reliable protein function transfer. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;387:416–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Radivojac P, et al. A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:221–227. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:1188–1195. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Borrel, G. et al. Comparative genomics highlights the unique biology of Methanomassiliicoccales, a Thermoplasmatales-related seventh order of methanogenic archaea that encodes pyrrolysine. Bmc Genomics15, 10.1186/1471-2164-15-679 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 54.Qin QL, et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:2210–2215. doi: 10.1128/JB.01688-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Everett KDE, Bush RM, Andersen AA. Emended description of the order Chlamydiales, proposal of Parachlamydiaceae fam. nov. and Simkaniaceae fam. nov., each containing one monotypic genus, revised taxonomy of the family Chlamydiaceae, including a new genus and five new species, and standards for the identification of organisms. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1999;49:415–440. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lienard J, et al. Prevalence and diversity of Chlamydiales and other amoeba-resisting bacteria in domestic drinking water systems. N. Microbes N. Infect. 2017;15:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2016.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Keto-Timonen R, et al. Cold shock proteins: a minireview with special emphasis on Csp-family of enteropathogenic Yersinia. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1151. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rogozin D, Zykov VV, Degermendzhi AG. Ecology of the purple sulfur bacteria in the highly stratified meromictic lake Shunet (Siberia, Khakasia) in 2002-2009. Mikrobiologiia. 2012;81:786–795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Feehily C, Karatzas KA. Role of glutamate metabolism in bacterial responses towards acid and other stresses. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;114:11–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Makarova KS, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;9:467–477. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Overmann J, Beatty JT, Hall KJ, Pfennig N, Northcote TG. Characterization of a dense, purple sulfur bacterial layer in a meromictic salt lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1991;36:846–859. doi: 10.4319/lo.1991.36.5.0846. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Caumette P, Guyoneaud R, Imhoff JF, Suling J, Gorlenko V. Thiocapsa marina sp. nov., a novel, okenone-containing, purple sulfur bacterium isolated from brackish coastal and marine environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004;54:1031–1036. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02964-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schott J, Griffin BM, Schink B. Anaerobic phototrophic nitrite oxidation by Thiocapsa sp. strain KS1 and Rhodopseudomonas sp. strain LQ17. Microbiology. 2010;156:2428–2437. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.036004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rubin-Blum, M., Dubilier, N. & Kleiner, M. Genetic evidence for two carbon fixation pathways (the Calvin-Benson-Bassham Cycle and the Reverse Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle) in symbiotic and free-living bacteria. mSphere4, 10.1128/mSphere.00394-18 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65.Walsby AE. Gas vesicles. Microbiol. Rev. 1994;58:94–144. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.1.94-144.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rogozin DY, Zykova VV, Tarnovskii MO. Dynamics of purple sulfur bacteria in a meromictic saline lake Shunet (Khakassia, Siberia) in 2007-2013. Mikrobiologiia. 2016;85:73–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bilous PT, Weiner JH. Dimethyl sulfoxide reductase activity by anaerobically grown Escherichia coli HB101. J. Bacteriol. 1985;162:1151–1155. doi: 10.1128/jb.162.3.1151-1155.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Veres PR, et al. Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:4505–4510. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919344117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Andreae MO, Raemdonck H. Dimethyl sulfide in the surface ocean and the marine atmosphere - a global view. Science. 1983;221:744–747. doi: 10.1126/science.221.4612.744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yoch DC. Dimethylsulfoniopropionate: its sources, role in the marine food web, and biological degradation to dimethylsulfide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:5804–5815. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.5804-5815.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Steinke, M., Hodapp, B., Subhan, R., Bell, T. G. & Martin-Creuzburg, D. Flux of the biogenic volatiles isoprene and dimethyl sulfide from an oligotrophic lake. Sci Rep-Uk8, 10.1038/s41598-017-18923-5 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 72.Salcher MM, Schaefle D, Kaspar M, Neuenschwander SM, Ghai R. Evolution in action: habitat transition from sediment to the pelagial leads to genome streamlining in Methylophilaceae. Isme J. 2019;13:2764–2777. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0471-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kalyuzhnaya MG, Bowerman S, Lara JC, Lidstrom ME, Chistoserdova L. Methylotenera mobilis gen. nov., sp nov., an obligately methylamine-utilizing bacterium within the family Methylophilaceae. Int J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006;56:2819–2823. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64191-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wilson K. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2001;Chapter 2:Unit 2 4. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0204s56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Menzel P, Ng KL, Krogh A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11257. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20:257. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chakraborty M, Baldwin-Brown JG, Long AD, Emerson JJ. Contiguous and accurate de novo assembly of metazoan genomes with modest long read coverage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:e147. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wu YW, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:605–607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kang DD, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Alneberg J, et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:1144–1146. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:540. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Grant JR, Stothard P. The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W181–W184. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Van Damme, R. et al. Metagenomics workflow for hybrid assembly, differential coverage binning, metatranscriptomics and pathway analysis (MUFFIN). PLoS Comput. Biol.17, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008716 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 87.R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
  • 88.Villanueva RAM, Chen ZJ. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis, 2nd edition. Meas.-Interdiscip. Res. 2019;17:160–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hyatt D, et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Joel A Boyd, Ben J Woodcroft & Tyson., G. W. Comparative genomics using EnrichM. In preparation. (2019).
  • 92.Kanehisa M, Sato Y. KEGG Mapper for inferring cellular functions from protein sequences. Protein Sci. 2020;29:28–35. doi: 10.1002/pro.3711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Blin K, et al. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W81–W87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Seemann, T. barrnap 0.9: rapid ribosomal RNA prediction. https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap (2013).
  • 95.Zhang H, et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W95–W101. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Camacho C, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011;7:e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W256–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data 1 (30.8KB, txt)
Supplementary Data 2 (140.4KB, txt)
Reporting Summary (322.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All sequencing data and assembled genomes are available through National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) repositories under BioProject ID: PRJNA721826. Sequence reads of metagenomes from samples at 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m deep can be found under SRA accession numbers SRR14300307, SRR14300308, SRR14300309, SRR14307495, SRR14307795, and SRR14307796. The accession numbers of MAGs can be found in Supplementary Data 1 and 2.

The workflow based on snakemake is available at https://github.com/SeanChenHCY/metaLAS.


Articles from Communications Biology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES