Skip to main content
World Journal of Stem Cells logoLink to World Journal of Stem Cells
. 2021 Aug 26;13(8):1030–1048. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i8.1030

Modulating poststroke inflammatory mechanisms: Novel aspects of mesenchymal stem cells, extracellular vesicles and microglia

Wen-Qiang Xin 1, Wei Wei 2, Yong-Li Pan 3, Bao-Long Cui 4, Xin-Yu Yang 5, Mathias Bähr 6, Thorsten R Doeppner 7
PMCID: PMC8422926  PMID: 34567423

Abstract

Inflammation plays an important role in the pathological process of ischemic stroke, and systemic inflammation affects patient prognosis. As resident immune cells in the brain, microglia are significantly involved in immune defense and tissue repair under various pathological conditions, including cerebral ischemia. Although the differentiation of M1 and M2 microglia is certainly oversimplified, changing the activation state of microglia appears to be an intriguing therapeutic strategy for cerebral ischemia. Recent evidence indicates that both mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) regulate inflammation and modify tissue repair under preclinical stroke conditions. However, the precise mechanisms of these signaling pathways, especially in the context of the mutual interaction between MSCs or MSC-derived EVs and resident microglia, have not been sufficiently unveiled. Hence, this review summarizes the state-of-the-art knowledge on MSC- and MSC-EV-mediated regulation of microglial activity under ischemic stroke conditions with respect to various signaling pathways, including cytokines, neurotrophic factors, transcription factors, and microRNAs.

Keywords: Extracellular vesicles, Mesenchymal stem cells, Microglial activation, M2 polarization, Ischemic stroke


Core Tip: Upon stroke induction, M1 microglia participate in the proinflammatory tissue response, whereas M2 microglia promote brain repair by secreting anti-inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors. This review summarizes the effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSC-extracellular vesicles on regulating microglial activity under ischemic stroke conditions through various signaling pathways, such as cytokines, neurotrophic factors, transcription factors, and microRNAs.

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation plays an important role in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke, and systemic inflammation worsens the outcome of stroke patients[1-3]. Preclinical models of focal cerebral ischemia are associated with the activation of inflammatory cells, including neutrophils, T cells, and resident microglia. The latter cells contribute to both immune defense and brain tissue repair[4]. Under physiological conditions, microglia are resting and maintain a balance with regard to the inflammatory status of the brain[5]. Ischemic stroke immediately activates microglia, prompting an inflammatory response in brain tissue[5]. Consequently, microglia migrate toward the location of the lesion and exacerbate brain damage by secreting inflammatory cytokines. On the other hand, microglia can remove debris and secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines, supporting endogenous brain repair[4,6]. These opposing roles of microglia under ischemic conditions correlate with distinct phenotypes, as indicated by the proinflammatory M1 type and the anti-inflammatory M2 type[7,8]. M1-type microglia exacerbate brain damage by secreting interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, nitric oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and other factors, whereas M2-type microglia promote brain repair by secreting IL-4, IL-10, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β[9,10]. Changing the activation state of microglia might therefore be an intriguing approach for stroke therapy.

Regulating poststroke immune responses offers novel therapeutic strategies even for patients who qualify for neither systemic thrombolysis nor endovascular thrombectomy[11,12]. Hence, modulating poststroke immune responses and stimulating endogenous repair mechanisms through the transplantation of adult stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), has gained increasing interest in recent years. In fact, preclinical work, as well as clinical trials, revealed the efficacy and tolerance of grafted MSCs in stroke settings[13-15]. However, MSCs do not typically integrate into residing neural networks within the ischemic hemisphere but rather act indirectly. Such paracrine effects are mediated, at least in part, by extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs are small vesicles in the range of 30 nm to 1000 nm that are secreted by virtually all eukaryotic cells and contain a plethora of proteins, noncoding RNAs, and DNA[16,17]. MSCs and MSC-EVs affect a great number of intracellular and extracellular signaling pathways, among which are immunoregulatory cascades.

Despite the aforementioned data on the effects of MSCs and EVs on poststroke inflammation, the precise mechanisms underlying such a therapeutic approach are unknown. Although some evidence suggests that bone marrow-derived MSCs and MSC-EVs may inhibit microglial activation and improve neurological function under pathological conditions, including stroke[18-21], data on the interaction between MSCs or MSC-EVs and microglia are limited. In this review, we summarize the therapeutic effects of MSCs and MSC-derived EVs both in preclinical studies and in clinical stroke trials. We also summarize the mutual interactions between MSCs or MSC-EVs and activated microglia under such stroke conditions.

THE ROLE OF MICROGLIA IN ISCHEMIC STROKE

Microglial activation in ischemic stroke

Under physiological conditions, microglia display a ramified structure characterized by a small soma and fine processes to maintain homeostasis within the extracellular milieu[22,23]. Stroke results in microglial activation, which represents the first step in an inflammatory response that is followed by the activation of other immune cells, such as T cells, neutrophils, and natural killer cells[24,25]. When activated after stroke, microglial cells undergo four distinct phenotypes: ramified, intermediate, amoeboid, and round[26]. Ramified microglia indicate the resting state, whereas intermediate microglia have larger cell bodies and shorter bumps. The amoeboid microglial cell body, on the contrary, is larger and displays shorter bumps or even no bumps at all, similar to round microglia, which are found in the lesion center[26]. Based on these morphological characteristics and their secretion patterns, microglia are characterized as M1 or M2.

Correlation between morphological phenotypes and microglial function in cerebral ischemia

Modifying microglial morphology changes cellular functions such as the production of cytokines[27]. The immediate activation of microglia due to cerebral ischemia results in a change in cell size, as well as in different migration and secretory properties[28]. Classic (M1 type) and alternatively (M2 type) activated microglia are most commonly reported after ischemic insult[28]. M1 microglia participate in the proinflammatory tissue response and are able to present antigens, whereas M2 microglia remove necrotic tissue and stimulate tissue repair, thus maintaining homeostasis by producing anti-inflammatory substances. Phenotypic shifts between the M1 and M2 types, therefore, has practical implications, and promoting an M2 phenotype would assist tissue repair by decreasing inflammatory factors.

Phenotypic shifts between M1 and M2 microglia involve a plethora of characteristics for which not only the aforementioned phenotype but also the secretion patterns of these cells are important. Hence, proinflammatory M1 microglia typically secrete factors such as IL-1β, interferon (IFN)-α, IL-6, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), motif chemokine ligand (CXCL10), and inducible NO synthase (iNOS)[29-32]. In contrast, anti-inflammatory M2 microglia have the capacity to produce and secrete IL-10, IL-13, IL-4, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, and IFN-β[33,34]. Of note, based on the current knowledge on M2-polarized microglia in the central nervous system, the M2 phenotype is further categorized as M2a, M2b, or M2c based on cellular function[35,36]. M2a microglia are strongly associated with IL-13 and IL-4 and exert strong anti-inflammatory effects. These cells also produce significant amounts of arginase-1, Ym-1, CD206, and Fizz1[36], while the M2b phenotype does not have the capacity to produce the latter[35,37]. The M2c phenotype, also known as deactivated microglia, is associated with promoting tissue regeneration at a later stage of disease when inflammation is declining[38,39].

Mechanisms and role of M2 microglial activation in ischemic stroke

A large number of studies have been performed to identify the main pathways and mediators that modulate M2 microglial activation. Two primary transcription factors, c-AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), are strongly associated with signaling pathways for M2 microglial polarization. Activated microglia, for instance, display reduced expression of COX-2 by suppressing the activation of NF-κB[40,41]. In addition to the aforementioned signaling cascades, other pathways, such as Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)[30], CD8[42], and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), are also involved in promoting the polarization of the M2 phenotype, as indicated by preclinical stroke studies[43]. Typically, the pathways and mediators responsible for M2 microglial activation interact with each other to some extent, and they tend to work synergistically rather than independently to achieve the maximum anti-inflammatory effect. Some of the signaling pathways associated with the polarization of the M2 phenotype are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Signaling pathways describing the process of polarization of the M2 phenotype. Damaged neurons induced by ischemic stroke activate resting microglia by producing damage-associated molecular pattern molecules. M1 phenotype microglia participate in the proinflammatory tissue response, whereas M2 microglia produce antiinflammatory substances. DAMPs: Damage-associated molecular pattern molecules; PPAR: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; CREB: c-AMP response element binding protein; NF-κB: Nuclear factor-κB; YM1: Chitinase-3 Like protein; CD: Cluster of differentiation; STAT: Signal transducer and activator of transcription; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; Arg-1: Arginase-1; TNF: Tumor necrosis factor; iNOS: Inducible nitric oxide synthase; TLR: Toll-like receptor; IGF-1: Insulin-like growth factor-1; IL: Interleukin; IFN: Interferon; FIZZI: Found in inflammatory zone 1; TGF: Transforming growth factors; MAPK: Mitogen-activated protein kinase.

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption is significantly involved in the pathology of ischemic stroke[44,45]. BBB disruption allows extracerebral substances to reach the brain parenchyma in an unregulated way, worsening brain tissue damage and inducing brain edema. The early stage of BBB disrupture occurs at 12-24 h after stroke exposure, followed by a second delayed phase at approximately 48-72 h poststroke, during which microglia are activated, which, in turn, also affects BBB integrity. Microglia initially protect BBB integrity by promoting the levels of the tight junction protein claudin-5. During sustained inflammation, however, activated M1 microglia are able to phagocytose astrocytic end-feet and destroy BBB integrity by secreting various vascular proteins[30,46]. Of note, M1 microglia induce endothelial necroptosis and impair BBB integrity by expressing TNF-α as a primary mediator of these effects[47].

Based on current studies, M2 microglia may attenuate BBB disruption by producing progranulin, which is helpful in preventing brain edema[48]. To date, studies revealing a direct interaction between microglial activation and BBB disruption have been scarce. In this context, the stroke-associated release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) also activates microglia, which further worsens the integrity of the BBB[49]. Likewise, the postischemic upregulation of NF-κB in microglia stimulates the these cells to secrete matrix metalloproteinases, which play key roles in the disruption of the BBB[50].

MSCS AND EVS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ISCHEMIC STROKE

The biological concept of MSCs and EVs

In the 1960s and 1970s, Friedenstein et al[51] first revealed that ectopic transplantation of rodent bone marrow cells into the kidney capsule has osteogenic effects. It was not until 1991, however, when Caplan et al recommended the term “mesenchymal stem cells” due to the capacity of these cells to differentiate into various cell lineages[52]. Interestingly, researchers were able to establish other tissue sources of MSCs, including adipose tissue[53,54]. In 2006, the International Society for Cellular Therapy proposed specific MSC criteria due to some controversy about the characteristics of MSCs[55]. These criteria include adhesion to the substrate in question, the ability to express the surface antigens CD73, CD90, and CD105, the absence of proteins such as CD14, CD34, CD79a, CD11b, CD45, and human leukocyte antigen-11 and the potential to differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondroblasts[55,56]. To date, MSCs have been widely studied in various preclinical models and clinical settings alike, and these studies have focused on cell migration patterns and immunosuppressive functions[57-62].

MSCs, however, act in an indirect way, which is supported by the fact that transplanted MSCs rarely reach the ischemic lesion site after intracerebral injection and even less so after systemic transplantation[63,64]. Rather, the majority of MSCs are trapped in peripheral organs such as the lung after systemic transplantation. In addition, neural differentiation, synaptogenesis, and reconstruction of neural network systems are time-consuming processes, but MSC transplantation is known to also yield quick therapeutic results within days[65]. Current evidence suggests that grafted MSCs are not integrated into residing neural networks but act in an indirect paracrine way, including the secretion of trophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), IGF, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)[66]. In addition to these soluble factors, however, recent evidence suggests that EVs secreted from MSCs might significantly contribute to exerting their biological effects in vitro and in vivo.

EVs are secreted by virtually all cells into the extracellular matrix, which is regarded as a novel mechanism of intercellular communication. EVs are a heterogeneous group of vesicular structures ranging in size from approximately 40 nm to 1000 nm, among which are endosome-derived exosomes[16,67]. EVs carry highly active biological cargo such as transmembrane proteins, RNA, and various lipids[68]. This mix of cargo is thought to mediate the biological properties of EVs and indirectly of MSCs under both physiological and pathological conditions.

Application of MSCs or MSC-EVs results in tissue regeneration upon the induction of ischemic stroke

Although the focus of the present review is on poststroke inflammation and the mutual interaction between MSCs/MSC-EVs and microglia, it stands to reason that both MSCs and MSC-EVs increase neurological recovery though mechanisms that are partly independent of MSCs. In this context, the modulation of poststroke neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and axonal plasticity is of importance.

MSCs are able to improve neurological function by promoting astrocyte-derived IGF-1, epidermal growth factor (EGF), VEGF, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)[69]. Indeed, many preclinical stroke studies have demonstrated the positive effects of MSCs on both neurogenesis and angiogenesis[19,70]. Increased tissue regeneration after MSC transplantation is at least partially a consequence of secreted factors such as VEGF and Ang-1[69,71]. Under conditions of hypoxia, neurons that synthesize γ-secretase increase the production of Hes-1 and activate the Notch-1 signaling pathway after MSC administration, which in turn may promote the production of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α and VEGF[69]. Hes-1 can further stimulate this effect by inducing a positive feedback loop with VEGF by reducing phosphatase and tension homolog levels[72]. Consistent with this, Ang-1 helps stabilize new vessels induced by VEGF expression[71].

Not only neurons but also oligodendrocytes are responsive to MSC treatment. Oligodendrocytes are also sensitive to ischemic cell injury and play an important role in the neural network. However, these cells have long been a neglected target in current stroke research[73]. Some data, however, indicate that stimulating the production of myelin sheaths by mature oligodendrocytes through MSC transplantation may result in increased axonal plasticity after stroke[74]. These neurorestorative effects are mediated by inhibiting the production of both reticulin and neurocan. The aforementioned mechanisms and signaling pathways associated with poststroke tissue regeneration have to be regarded as prominent examples only. Other factors, such as hepatocyte growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, BDNF, IGF-1, fibroblast growth factor-2, and neutrophil-activating protein 2 (NAP-2), are also involved[75,76]. An overview of how MSCs promote neurogenesis and neurological recovery is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

An overview as to how mesenchymal stem cells promote neurogenesis and neurological recovery. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are isolated and identified from various tissue sources. These MSCs produce different angiogenic and neurotrophic factors by paracrine mechanisms in order to act on astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and angiogenesis, promoting neurological recovery and neurogenesis. IGF-1: Insulin-like growth factor 1; BDNF: Brain-derived neurotrophic factors; VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factors; HGF: Hepatocyte growth factor; NAP-2: Neutrophil activating protein 2; PDGF: Platelet-derived growth factor; Ang-1: Angiopoietin-1; MSC: Mesenchymal stem cell.

As previously described, stem cell-derived EVs (MSC-EVs) and other factors induce tissue regeneration after ischemia in various organs, including the heart, kidney, and brain. Under such conditions, EVs not only reduce cell injury but also promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis. Some of these observations are related to regulating inflammation[77-79]. In fact, previous work from our group suggests that EVs from different stem cell sources, such as MSCs and neural progenitor cells, are not inferior to their host cells with regard to their therapeutic potential in a mouse stroke model[80,81]. Various preclinical stroke studies report positive effects of MSC-derived EVs on infarct volume and tissue recovery. To date, a series of preclinical studies[20,21,80,82-103] have assessed the effect of MSC-derived EVs on treating cerebral ischemia. The characteristics and primary outcomes of some of these studies are summarized in Table 1 and demonstrate that MSC-EVs are immunologically active and promote tissue repair and neurogenesis[104-107].

Table 1.

Therapeutic application of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in preclinical disease models associated with cerebral ischemia

Ref.
Country
Species
Ischemia model
Cell source
Key outcomes
Geng et al[84], 2019 China Rats MCAO Adipose Improve tissue recovery, neurogenesis, angiogenesis; Reduce Inflammation
Xin et al[93], 2013 America Rats MCAO Adipose Improve brain recovery, angiogenesis; Reduce infarct volume, inflammation
Chen et al[82], 2016 Taiwan Rats MCAO BM Improve tissue recovery, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, neuronal plasticity
Tian et al[91], 2018 China Mice MCAO BM Inhibit inflammatory response and apoptosis
Xin et al[92], 2017 America Rats MCAO BM Improve tissue recovery, neurogenesis, neuronal and neurite plasticity
Jiang et al[85], 2018 China Rats MCAO Adipose Reduce infarct volume and inflammation
Yang et al[94], 2018 China Mice Photothrombosis BM Promote angiogenesis
Zhang et al[95], 2019 China Mice MCAO BM Promote angiogenesis
Liu et al[87], 2019 China Rat MCAO BM Improved brain neuron density and neurological score
Deng et al[83], 2019 China Mice MCAO BM Reduce infarct volume and inflammation
Nalamolu et al[88], 2019 America Rats MCAO UC Improve brain recovery; Reduce infarct volume
Nalamolu et al[89], 2019 America Rats MCAO UC Improve brain recovery; Reduce infarct volume
Li et al[86], 2020 China Mice MCAO UC Reduce infarct volume; Inhibit inflammatory response and apoptosis
Zhao et al[20], 2020 China Rats MCAO BM Reduce infarct volume and inflammation; Improve neurological deficits
Zhao et al[21], 2020 China Rats MCAO BM Improve motor, learning and memory abilities; Reduce inflammation
Safakheil and Safakheil[90], 2020 Iran Rats MCAO BM Improve functional recovery; Reduce infarct volume and inflammation
Otero-Ortega et al[100], 2020 Spain Rats Endothelin-1 Adipose Improve functional recovery and cells proliferation, Reduce infarct volume
Otero-Ortega et al[103], 2017 Spain Rats Endothelin-1 Adipose Improve functional recovery and neurogenesis, Reduce infarct volume
Moon et al[101], 2019 South Korea Rats MCAO Cord blood Promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis
Doeppner et al[80], 2015 Germany Mice MCAO BM Improve tissue recovery, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis
Dabrowska et al[99], 2019 Poland Rats Ouabain BM Reduce inflammation
Haupt et al[98], 2021 Germany Mice MCAO BM Increased neurological recovery and neurogenesis
Xia et al[97], 2020 China Rats MCAO BM Reduce infarct volume neurological deficits, Enhance angiogenesis
Wang et al[102], 2020 Germany Mice Stroke BM Immunosuppression and neuroprotection
Kuang et al[96], 2020 Germany Mice MCAO Adipose Reduced neuronal death and infarct size, Increased neurological recovery

BM: Bone Marrow; UC: Umbilical cord; MCAO: Middle cerebral artery occlusion; MSCs: Mesenchymal stem cells.

MSCs and MSC-EVs suppress microglial activation and promote M2 microglial polarization in cerebral ischemia

PubMed, the Cochrane Library (last searched in November 2020), and relevant websites, such as Web of Science and EMBASE (1990 to November 2020), were searched to identify all studies on the effect of MSCs and MSC-derived EVs, including MSC-derived exosomes, on microglial activation in the treatment of brain ischemia. The following keywords in combination with Boolean logic were used: “mesenchymal stem cell”, “extracellular vehicles” or “exosomes” together with “ischemia”, “stroke”, “microglia”, “middle cerebral artery occlusion”, or “MCAO”. Beyond this, the reference list was manually checked to determine other potentially qualified trials. The process was iterated until no more publications were obtained. A total of 25 publications were found in this section from the United Kingdom, Japan, China, United States, France, Germany, Poland, and South Korea, which were performed between 2013 and 2020[19-21,84-87,91,99,102,108-122]. The most common species and animal model used were rats and the middle cerebral artery occlusion model, respectively. The most common source of cells and administration route were bone marrow and intravenous delivery, respectively. Cunningham et al[109] was the only group that used subcutaneous injection. Concerning the dose and delivery time, the studies used heterogeneous experimental paradigms to meet their own applied study purposes. Additional details are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Preclinical stroke studies assessing the effect of mesenchymal stem cells and mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles on the activation of microglia

Ref.
Country
Species
Cell type
Dosage
Route
Cell
Delivery
Microglia
Microglia
Signal
Ischemic
Source
Timing
Marker
Activation
Pathway
Model
Cunningham et al[109], 2020 United Kingdom Mice MSCs 1.4 × 106 Sub BM 1 h and 24 h Iba1 No effect IL-1α MCAO
Narantuya et al[115], 2010 Japan Rats MSCs NA IV BM NA ED1/Iba1 Inhibit NA BCAO
Ishizaka et al[111], 2013 Japan Rats MSCs 1 × 106 IA NA 1, 4 or 7 d ED1 Inhibit NA MCAO
Yamaguchi et al[120], 2018 Japan Rats MSCs 1 × 106 IA Blood 24 h Iba1 Inhibit NA MCAO
Wang et al[119], 2014 China Rats MSCs 2 × 106 IV BM 3 h CD45/CD11b Inhibit NA dMCAO
Wei et al[19], 2012 America Rats MSCs 1 × 106 IV BM 24 h Iba1/OX-42 Inhibit NA MCAO
Nakajima et al[114], 2017 Japan Rats MSCs 1 × 106 IV BM 0 or 3 h Iba1/TNF-α/IL6/IL-1β Inhibit IL-10 MCAO
McGuckin et al[113], 2013 France Rats MSCs NA Stereotaxis UC NA ED1/Iba1 Inhibit CD200/STAT3 Ouabain injection
Li et al[112], 2018 China Rats MSCs 1 × 106 IV BM 1 h CD68/Iba1 Inhibit IGF-1/BDNF dMCAO
Lv et al[108], 2016 China Cells MSCs NA NA BM NA TNF-α/IL6/IL-1β Inhibit TNF-α/MSCs/GDNF OGD
Wang et al[102], 2020 Germany Mice EVs 2 × 106 IV BM Immediately CD45/CD11b Inhibit NA MCAO
Dabrowska et al[99], 2019 Poland Rats EVs 5 × 105 IA BM 48 h ED1 Inhibit NA Ouabain injection
Geng et al[84], 2019 China Rats EVs NA NA Adipose NA Iba1, TNF-α, IL-1β Inhibit miRNA-126 MCAO
Liu et al[87], 2019 China Rats EVs 5 × 105 IV BM 2 h Iba1 Inhibit NA MCAO
Tian et al[91], 2018 China Mice EVs NA IV BM 12 h Iba1 Inhibit NA MCAO
Sheikh et al[117], 2019 Japan Rats MSCs 3 × 106 IV BM 24 h ED1/Iba1 Inhibit IL-1β/HIF-1α and VEGF MCAO
Wang et al[118], 2013 Japan Rats MSCs 3 × 106 IV BM 24 h ED1/Iba1/IL-1β/TNF-α/iNOS, MCP-1 Inhibit TLR2/CD40/NF-kB MCAO
Yoo et al[122], 2013 South Korea Rats MSCs 5 × 105 Stereotaxis BM 3 days CD68/Iba1/MCP-1; TNF-α/iNOS/IL-1β Inhibit TGF-β1/MCP-1 MCAO
Sheikh et al[116], 2011 Japan Rats MSCs 3 × 106 IV BM 24 h Iba1/iNOS/Cox-2/IL8/MCP-1 Inhibit IL5 and Fractalkine MCAO
Feng et al[110], 2020 China Mice MSCs 1 × 106/20 g IV UC 2 weeks M1: CD16/32, Iba1; M2: CD206 Polarization H3 methylation LPS
Yang et al[121], 2020 China Rats MSCs 1 × 106 IV BM 24 h before M1: iNOS/Iba1; M2: Arg 1 Polarization miR-30a* MCAO
Jiang et al[85], 2018 China Rats EVs NA IV Adipose NA M1: TNF-α/IL-6/iNOS; M2: IL-4/CD206/IL-10 Polarization miR-30d-5p MCAO
Li et al[86], 2020 China Mice EVs NA IV UC NA M1: iNOS/CD38/ IL-6/TNF-α/CCL-2; M2: Arg 1/CD206 Polarization miR-26b-5p MCAO
Zhao et al[20], 2020 China Rats EVs 200 μL IV BM 1 or 14 d M1: CD16-32/IL-6/IL-1β; M2: CD206/ IL-10 Polarization miR-223-3p/ CysLT2R MCAO
Zhao et al[21], 2020 China Rats EVs 200 μL IV BM 2 h M1: CD86 NOS/IL-12/TNF-α; M2: CD206 /TGF-β/BDNF Polarization CysLT2R and ERK1/2 MCAO

NA: Not available; IA: Intraarterial; IV: Intravenous; Sub: Subcutaneous; BM: Bone marrow; UC: Umbilical cord; OGD: Oxygen-glucose deprivation; HIF-1α: Hypoxia inducible factor-1α; dMCAO: Distal middle cerebral artery occlusion; MSCs: Mesenchymal stem cell; EVs: Extracellular vehicles; LPS: Lipopolysaccharide; BCAO: Bilateral carotid artery occlusion; c(RGDyK): Cyclo (Arg-Gly-Asp-D-Tyr-Lys); MCP-1: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; iNOS: Inducible nitric oxide; IL: Interleukin; NF-κB: Nuclear factor-κB; TLR: Toll-like receptor; VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor; TGF: Transforming growth factor; IGF: Insulin-like growth factor; BDNF: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; TNF: Tumor necrosis factor; GDNF: Glial-derived neurotrophic factor; COX-2: Cyclooxygenase-2; CysLT2R: Cysteinyl leukotrienes receptor; ERK: Extracellular regulated protein kinase.

The immediate activation of brain-resident immune cells, mainly microglia, is the primary characteristic of inflammatory reactions after ischemic stroke[4,23]. Activated microglia produce neurotoxic substances that accelerate acute brain damage, and some of these neurotoxic substances reciprocally promote further microglial activation. Attenuating microglial activation with MSCs or MSC-EVs offers great therapeutic potential. The transplantation of MSCs (2 × 106) into rats 3 h after focal cerebral ischemia, for instance, yielded a significant reduction in macrophages at day 3 after treatment[119]. Likewise, the expression of OX-42+ or Iba-1+ microglia was significantly reduced after the administration of MSCs during the acute and subacute stages of the disease[19]. Increased neurological recovery after stroke induction due to MSC transplantation, which had repeatedly been observed before, — is partly a consequence of an increase in the ratio of M2/M1 microglia[121]. This finding is consistent with similar reports on MSC-EVs, in which tissue restoration was enhanced due to the suppression of M1 microglial polarization after MSC-EV treatment[20,21,85,86]. Of note, the aforementioned effects of MSCs or MSC-EVs are not always sustained; the positive effects of treatment are sometimes only observed during the acute or subacute phase of the disease[109,115] Thus, the ability of MSCs to suppress microglial activation appears to be limited over time, and additional and reliable data are urgently needed.

The role of neurotrophic factors and cytokines in regulating microglial activity after MSC or MSC-EV treatment in ischemic stroke

Systemic or intrathecal injection of growth factors such as BDNF and IGF-1 promotes angiogenesis and reduces infarct volume in ischemic stroke[123]. However, these proteins do not cross the BBB and are prone to rapid degradation, preventing long-term effects in the ischemic milieu. MSC transplantation might therefore overcome some of these limitations. Indeed, rats that received MSC transplantation displayed increased levels of IGF-1 and BDNF in the ischemic cortex[112]. Increased secretion of these factors is likely to be a consequence of microglial activity, which was found to be increased in the ischemic core site. Likewise, ischemic stroke itself increases the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and activates CD68-positive microglia to cross the damaged BBB. Consistent with this finding, Yoo et al[122] observed that TGF-β is key to the ability of MSCs to effectively reduce the infiltration of CD68-positive microglia into the ischemic zone by downregulating MCP-1.

The amount of cytokines and growth factors that are secreted directly by MSCs or that are modulated in microglia due to stem cell transplantation is vast and cannot be discussed in full detail here. Thus, other evidence provides insights into MSC production of neurotrophic cytokines such as IL-5 and fractalkine, which in turn suppress the production of proinflammatory factors, including iNOS and TNF-α[116]. In a mutual interaction between MSCs and activated microglia, the latter secrete TNF-α to stimulate the production of glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor in MSCs, which in turn prevents neuronal damage and contributes to tissue repair[108]. Changes in the extracellular milieu due to MSC transplantation are well known and suggest increases in HIF-1α, VEGF, IL-1β, and TGFβ protein levels, all of which are highly expressed in microglia[108,114]. Thus, MSC transplantation also promotes poststroke angiogenesis by regulating HIF-1α and VEGF secretion by microglia, and IL-1β might play an important role[117].

IL-1, IL-6, and TGF-β are proinflammatory factors associated with the immune response after ischemic stroke. It has been reported that the levels of IL-1 are increased within a few hours after ischemic damage. Increased IL-1 Levels, in turn, stimulate the secretion of other cytokines, chemokines, and cell adhesion molecules that contribute to the disruption of the BBB[124]. Recent literature indicates that the transplantation of MSC-EVs reduces IL-1 secretion by microglia due to direct inhibition and modification of T helper cells, which drive microglia into an anti-inflammatory state[99,125]. Dabrowska et al[99] revealed that the transplantation of MSC-EVs significantly reduced the levels of IL-6 and TGF-β in the focally injured rat brain through the inhibitory effect of EVs on local immunologically effective cells, such as microglia and macrophages. Other work describes that CH25H, a hydroxylating enzyme that alters cholesterol into its 25-hydroxycholesterol form, is activated by proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6[126]. CH25H, in turn, exacerbates cerebral inflammation and significantly activates Iba-1-positive microglia[127]. MSC-EVs might therefore contribute to suppressing microglial activation by inhibiting IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6, further reducing CH25H activation. Information regarding this phenomenon, however, is scarce.

The role of transcription factors, ligands and surface receptors in regulating microglial activity after MSC or MSC-EV treatment in ischemic stroke

The effects of TLR4 on worsening ischemic injury have been discussed for over a decade[128]. Reduced TLR4 inhibit the NF-κB signaling pathway and decrease the expression of iNOS and COX-2[129]. NF-κB is known to promote various proinflammatory mediators, and the inhibition of NF-κB signaling has beneficial effects on cerebral ischemia[130]. Wang et al[118] showed that MSC transplantation suppressed the NF-κB signaling pathway in microglia during stroke due to soluble factors such as TNF-α and prostaglandin E2 produced by MSCs. In addition, TLR2 and CD40 have important roles in modulating NF-kB pathways activation, and the expression levels of these factors are lower after MSC treatment, as described in the same scientific report. Previously, it was reported that spontaneous microglial activation occurs in mice with CD200 knockout[113]. Neurons have been shown to produce CD200, which in turn suppresses the activity of microglia that produce CD200R. McGuckin et al[113] found that IL-4 induced MSCs to produce CD200 when cocultured with activated glia, which suppressed the expression of IL-6 and IL-1β in glial cells. Furthermore, the ability to modulate CD200 expression was successfully reversed by anti-IL-4 and anti-CD200 antibodies. Inflammation in ischemic stroke is also related to STAT3 signaling pathway activation in microglia, which is affected by MSCs in cerebral ischemia[113].

With regard to the administration of MSC-EVs significantly inhibits stroke-induced inflammation and M1 microglial polarization, increases the expression of anti-inflammatory factors and enhances the polarization of M2 microglia. Finally, MSC-EVs regulate the expression of phosphorylated ERK 1/2 and CysLT2R, which were downregulated in vitro and in vivo[20].

MicroRNAs are key players in regulating microglial activity

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a family of noncoding RNAs containing 20-25 nucleotides, play key roles in the remodeling process under stroke conditions[131]. Current evidence has revealed that miRNAs are effective treatment candidates due to their capacity to promote angiogenesis and neuronal recovery in ischemic diseases. Studies have demonstrated the anti-inflammatory effects of specific miRNAs that are highly expressed in MSCs and MSC-EVs.

MSCs carrying miR-30a and EVs carrying miRNA-126, miR-30d-5p, miR-26b-5p, or miR-223-3p modulate microglial activation and anti-inflammatory abilities[21,84-86,121]. EVs exert a regulatory effect by delivering prewrapped miRNAs to recipient cells. As discussed previously, CysLT2R is involved in the regulation of microglial activation. EV-derived miR-223-3p increases functional recovery after cerebral ischemia by promoting microglial M2 polarization because of its inhibitory effect on CysLT2R[21]. Similarly, miR-26b-5p promotes microglial M2 polarization by regulating CH25H to repress the TLR pathway and reduce tissue injury[86]. Both stroke patients and rats exhibited significantly reduced levels of miRNA-126, and EVs containing miRNA-126 could suppress microglial activation and increase neurogenesis and angiogenesis[84]. In addition, some EVs that carry miR-30d-5p have increased potential to suppress neuronal damage by inhibiting autophagy-mediated M1 microglial polarization[85]. Similarly, miR-30a* (known as miR-30a-3p) also participates in several pathways to drive M2 polarization[121]. Hence, a plethora of miRNAs are found in MSCs and their corresponding EVs, but the precise signaling cascades that are regulated under stroke conditions are not yet fully known.

MSCs and MSC-EVs in clinical stroke trials

Taking into account the numerous preclinical reports on MSCs and stroke, as well as the easy access to these cells via the bone marrow or adipose tissue[132-134], MSCs are important in the novel adjuvant treatment paradigm against stroke. In fact, MSC transplantation is considered to be safe. Apart from transient febrile reactions, no research has reported signs of intoxication, thrombogenesis, central nervous system deterioration, or increased mortality after MSC transplantation in humans[135,136].

Rigorous evaluation of the literature available on the effects of MSCs on stroke patients published in electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) until January 31, 2021 yielded a total of 18 studies including 631 participants[14,137-153]. Of these 631 patients with ischemic stroke, 323 patients were treated with MSCs, and 308 were assigned to the control group. Prasad et al[144] organized a clinical stroke trial on MSCs with the primary endpoint as the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Barthel Index (BI) score that includes the highest number of patients enrolled to date: a total of 120 patients with ischemic stroke were equally assigned to either the MSC group (n = 60) or the control group (n = 60)[144]. MSCs were intravenously administered at a dose of 280.5×106 cells at a median of 18.5 d after stroke onset. Patients who received MSC treatment displayed better outcomes according to the BI and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at a one-year follow-up. Similarly, Savitz et al[137] found that intravenous autologous transplantation of bone marrow mononuclear cells (8.5 × 107) significantly improved the BI, mRS, and NIHSS scores without any side effects. Although long-term observations are still rare, some data indicate that MSC treatment is associated with a lower rate of mortality compared to that of the control group during a 5-year observation period[144]. The data showed that MSC treatment can increase neurological recovery in stroke patients, even though additional data are urgently needed. Table 3 summarizes recent clinical trials on stroke and MSC transplantation. Although MSC-EVs have been shown to be as effective as MSCs in improving functional outcomes in preclinical stroke studies[154], to date, no article has reported the use of EVs under clinical stroke conditions. Therefore, more evidence-based information is needed in this respect.

Table 3.

The key parameter of clinical trials using transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in treating ischemic stroke

Ref.
Country
Design
Type
Route
MSCs source
Sample size (cases)
Dose
How long
Follow-up
Auto or allo
MSCs
Control
(Mean)     
(Mean)
(Mean)
Savitz et al[137], 2011 America Non-RCT Acute IV BM/Auto 10 NA 100 × 106 1-3 d 0.5 yr
Lee et al[138], 2010 South Korea RCT Acute IV PIC/Auto 16 36 50 × 106 1 wk 5 yr
Bhasin et al[151], 2011 India Non-RCT Chronic IV BM/Auto 4 5 50-60 × 106 8 wk 24 wk
Bhasin et al[139], 2012 India Non-RCT Chronic IV PIC/Auto 12 12 50-60 × 106 3-24 mo 0.5 yr
Bhasin et al[140], 2016 India Non-RCT Chronic IV PIC/Auto 20 20 50-60 × 106 3-24 mo 0.5 yr
Chen et al[141], 2014 China RCT Chronic Stereotactic PB/Auto 15 15 3-8 × 106 0.5-5 yr 1 yr
Jiang et al[149], 2013 China Non-RCT NA Catheterization UC/Allo 3 NA 20 × 106 11-22 d 0.5 yr
Laskowitz et al[14], 2018 America RCT Acute IV UC/Allo 10 10 3.34 × 106 3-9 d 1 yr
Levy et al[142], 2019 America Non-RCT Chronic IV NA/Allo 15 and 20 NA NA NA 1 yr
Moniche et al[143], 2012 Spain RCT Subacute IA PIC/Auto 10 10 159 × 106 5-9 d 0.5 yr
Prasad et al[144], 2014 India RCT Subacute IV PIC/Auto 60 60 280.5 × 106 1-4 mo 0.5 yr
Suárez-Monteagudo et al[150], 2009 Cuba Non-RCT NA IV BM/Auto 3 NA NA NA 3 M
Vahidy et al[145], 2019 America RCT Acute IV BM/Auto 25 30 NA 1-3 d 2 yr
Zhang et al[146], 2019 China Non-RCT NA Stereotactic FSC/Allo 9 NA NA 494 d 2 yr
Díez-Tejedor et al[148], 2014 Spain RCT Acute IV Adipose/Allo 20 20 NA 0.5 mo 2 yr
Feng et al[147], 2014 China NA Subacute Stereotactic UC/Allo 50 50 100 × 106 0.5-1 mo 0.25 yr
Jaillard et al[153], 2020 France RCT Subacute IV BM/Allo 16 15 100-300 × 106 3 wk 24 mo
De Keyser[152], 2005 South Korea Non-RCT Acute IV BM/Allo 5 25 50 × 106 4-9 wk 12 mo

NA: Not available; MSCs: Mesenchymal stem cells; Auto: Autologous; Allo: Allogenicr; PIC: Posterior iliac crest; IV: Intravenous; IA: Intraarterial; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; UC: Umbilical cord; BM: Bone marrow; FSC: Fetal spinal cord; PB: Peripheral blood.

CONCLUSION

The application of MSCs and MSC-EVs offers a great opportunity for adjuvant stroke treatment, and inflammation is an excellent target. The differentiation of M1 and M2 microglia has practical implications, and promoting the M2 phenotype enhances tissue repair by decreasing inflammatory factors. Currently, the application of MSCs and MSC-EVs appears to inhibit microglial activation and promote M2 polarization, which results in the modification of various signaling pathways, such as cytokines, neurotrophic factors, transcription factors, and miRNAs.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest statement: Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Peer-review started: March 16, 2021

First decision: May 5, 2021

Article in press: August 6, 2021

Specialty type: Cell and tissue engineering

Country/Territory of origin: Germany

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B, B, B, B

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Cheng YH, Fathi E, Liu N, Scuteri A, Thi CHC S-Editor: Gao CC L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang YL

Contributor Information

Wen-Qiang Xin, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.

Wei Wei, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.

Yong-Li Pan, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.

Bao-Long Cui, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.

Xin-Yu Yang, Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.

Mathias Bähr, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.

Thorsten R Doeppner, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany. thorsten.doeppner@med.uni-goettingen.de.

References

  • 1.Emsley HC, Hopkins SJ. Acute ischaemic stroke and infection: recent and emerging concepts. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:341–353. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70061-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McColl BW, Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Systemic infection, inflammation and acute ischemic stroke. Neuroscience. 2009;158:1049–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McColl BW, Rothwell NJ, Allan SM. Systemic inflammatory stimulus potentiates the acute phase and CXC chemokine responses to experimental stroke and exacerbates brain damage via interleukin-1- and neutrophil-dependent mechanisms. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4403–4412. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5376-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ma Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Yang GY. The biphasic function of microglia in ischemic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;157:247–272. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hu X, Leak RK, Shi Y, Suenaga J, Gao Y, Zheng P, Chen J. Microglial and macrophage polarization—new prospects for brain repair. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11:56–64. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wen YD, Zhang HL, Qin ZH. Inflammatory mechanism in ischemic neuronal injury. Neurosci Bull. 2006;22:171–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tang Y, Le W. Differential Roles of M1 and M2 Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53:1181–1194. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-9070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cheng Q, Shen Y, Cheng Z, Shao Q, Wang C, Sun H, Zhang Q. Achyranthes bidentata polypeptide k suppresses neuroinflammation in BV2 microglia through Nrf2-dependent mechanism. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:575. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang L, Zhang J, You Z. Switching of the Microglial Activation Phenotype Is a Possible Treatment for Depression Disorder. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:306. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ma L, Niu W, Lv J, Jia J, Zhu M, Yang S. PGC-1α-Mediated Mitochondrial Biogenesis is Involved in Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Agonist AM1241-Induced Microglial Phenotype Amelioration. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2018;38:1529–1537. doi: 10.1007/s10571-018-0628-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Campbell BCV, De Silva DA, Macleod MR, Coutts SB, Schwamm LH, Davis SM, Donnan GA. Ischaemic stroke. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:70. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0118-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ganesh A, Goyal M. Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Recent Insights and Future Directions. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018;18:59. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0869-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Borlongan CV. Concise Review: Stem Cell Therapy for Stroke Patients: Are We There Yet? Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8:983–988. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Laskowitz DT, Bennett ER, Durham RJ, Volpi JJ, Wiese JR, Frankel M, Shpall E, Wilson JM, Troy J, Kurtzberg J. Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood Infusion for Adults with Ischemic Stroke: Clinical Outcomes from a Phase I Safety Study. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7:521–529. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Toyoshima A, Yasuhara T, Kameda M, Morimoto J, Takeuchi H, Wang F, Sasaki T, Sasada S, Shinko A, Wakamori T, Okazaki M, Kondo A, Agari T, Borlongan CV, Date I. Intra-Arterial Transplantation of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Mounts Neuroprotective Effects in a Transient Ischemic Stroke Model in Rats: Analyses of Therapeutic Time Window and Its Mechanisms. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bang OY, Kim EH. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Therapy for Stroke: Challenges and Progress. Front Neurol. 2019;10:211. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim H, Lee MJ, Bae EH, Ryu JS, Kaur G, Kim HJ, Kim JY, Barreda H, Jung SY, Choi JM, Shigemoto-Kuroda T, Oh JY, Lee RH. Comprehensive Molecular Profiles of Functionally Effective MSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Immunomodulation. Mol Ther. 2020;28:1628–1644. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ohmi K, Greenberg DS, Rajavel KS, Ryazantsev S, Li HH, Neufeld EF. Activated microglia in cortex of mouse models of mucopolysaccharidoses I and IIIB. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1902–1907. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252784899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wei L, Fraser JL, Lu ZY, Hu X, Yu SP. Transplantation of hypoxia preconditioned bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhances angiogenesis and neurogenesis after cerebral ischemia in rats. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;46:635–645. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhao Y, Gan Y, Xu G, Yin G, Liu D. MSCs-Derived Exosomes Attenuate Acute Brain Injury and Inhibit Microglial Inflammation by Reversing CysLT2R-ERK1/2 Mediated Microglia M1 Polarization. Neurochem Res. 2020;45:1180–1190. doi: 10.1007/s11064-020-02998-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao Y, Gan Y, Xu G, Hua K, Liu D. Exosomes from MSCs overexpressing microRNA-223-3p attenuate cerebral ischemia through inhibiting microglial M1 polarization mediated inflammation. Life Sci. 2020;260:118403. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guruswamy R, ElAli A. Complex Roles of Microglial Cells in Ischemic Stroke Pathobiology: New Insights and Future Directions. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18 doi: 10.3390/ijms18030496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qin C, Zhou LQ, Ma XT, Hu ZW, Yang S, Chen M, Bosco DB, Wu LJ, Tian DS. Dual Functions of Microglia in Ischemic Stroke. Neurosci Bull. 2019;35:921–933. doi: 10.1007/s12264-019-00388-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Iadecola C, Anrather J. The immunology of stroke: from mechanisms to translation. Nat Med. 2011;17:796–808. doi: 10.1038/nm.2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jin R, Yang G, Li G. Inflammatory mechanisms in ischemic stroke: role of inflammatory cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;87:779–789. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1109766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lehrmann E, Christensen T, Zimmer J, Diemer NH, Finsen B. Microglial and macrophage reactions mark progressive changes and define the penumbra in the rat neocortex and striatum after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Comp Neurol. 1997;386:461–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xu S, Lu J, Shao A, Zhang JH, Zhang J. Glial Cells: Role of the Immune Response in Ischemic Stroke. Front Immunol. 2020;11:294. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhao SC, Ma LS, Chu ZH, Xu H, Wu WQ, Liu F. Regulation of microglial activation in stroke. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38:445–458. doi: 10.1038/aps.2016.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yenari MA, Kauppinen TM, Swanson RA. Microglial activation in stroke: therapeutic targets. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:378–391. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2010.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang J, Xing H, Wan L, Jiang X, Wang C, Wu Y. Treatment targets for M2 microglia polarization in ischemic stroke. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;105:518–525. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li L, Gan H, Jin H, Fang Y, Yang Y, Zhang J, Hu X, Chu L. Astragaloside IV promotes microglia/macrophages M2 polarization and enhances neurogenesis and angiogenesis through PPARγ pathway after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;92:107335. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shu ZM, Shu XD, Li HQ, Sun Y, Shan H, Sun XY, Du RH, Lu M, Xiao M, Ding JH, Hu G. Ginkgolide B Protects Against Ischemic Stroke Via Modulating Microglia Polarization in Mice. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016;22:729–739. doi: 10.1111/cns.12577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang Y, Huang Y, Xu Y, Ruan W, Wang H, Zhang Y, Saavedra JM, Zhang L, Huang Z, Pang T. A Dual AMPK/Nrf2 Activator Reduces Brain Inflammation After Stroke by Enhancing Microglia M2 Polarization. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;28:141–163. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xiong XY, Liu L, Yang QW. Functions and mechanisms of microglia/macrophages in neuroinflammation and neurogenesis after stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2016;142:23–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chhor V, Le Charpentier T, Lebon S, Oré MV, Celador IL, Josserand J, Degos V, Jacotot E, Hagberg H, Sävman K, Mallard C, Gressens P, Fleiss B. Characterization of phenotype markers and neuronotoxic potential of polarised primary microglia in vitro. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;32:70–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Latta CH, Sudduth TL, Weekman EM, Brothers HM, Abner EL, Popa GJ, Mendenhall MD, Gonzalez-Oregon F, Braun K, Wilcock DM. Determining the role of IL-4 induced neuroinflammation in microglial activity and amyloid-β using BV2 microglial cells and APP/PS1 transgenic mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2015;12:41. doi: 10.1186/s12974-015-0243-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mecha M, Feliú A, Carrillo-Salinas FJ, Rueda-Zubiaurre A, Ortega-Gutiérrez S, de Sola RG, Guaza C. Endocannabinoids drive the acquisition of an alternative phenotype in microglia. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;49:233–245. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fumagalli S, Perego C, Pischiutta F, Zanier ER, De Simoni MG. The ischemic environment drives microglia and macrophage function. Front Neurol. 2015;6:81. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim E, Cho S. Microglia and Monocyte-Derived Macrophages in Stroke. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13:702–718. doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0463-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hsia CH, Jayakumar T, Sheu JR, Hsia CW, Huang WC, Velusamy M, Lien LM. Synthetic Ruthenium Complex TQ-6 Potently Recovers Cerebral Ischemic Stroke: Attenuation of Microglia and Platelet Activation. J Clin Med. 2020;9 doi: 10.3390/jcm9040996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lu D, Shen L, Mai H, Zang J, Liu Y, Tsang CK, Li K, Xu A. HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Attenuate Neuronal Damage by Suppressing Oxygen Glucose Deprivation-Induced Activated Microglial Cells. Neural Plast. 2019;2019:7675496. doi: 10.1155/2019/7675496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boddaert J, Bielen K, 's Jongers B, Manocha E, Yperzeele L, Cras P, Pirici D, Kumar-Singh S. CD8 signaling in microglia/macrophage M1 polarization in a rat model of cerebral ischemia. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0186937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gaire BP, Song MR, Choi JW. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor subtype 3 (S1P3) contributes to brain injury after transient focal cerebral ischemia via modulating microglial activation and their M1 polarization. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:284. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1323-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.D'Souza A, Dave KM, Stetler RA, S Manickam D. Targeting the blood-brain barrier for the delivery of stroke therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;171:332–351. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yan BC, Cao J, Liu J, Gu Y, Xu Z, Li D, Gao L. Dietary Fe3O4 Nanozymes Prevent the Injury of Neurons and Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity from Cerebral Ischemic Stroke. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7:299–310. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Haruwaka K, Ikegami A, Tachibana Y, Ohno N, Konishi H, Hashimoto A, Matsumoto M, Kato D, Ono R, Kiyama H, Moorhouse AJ, Nabekura J, Wake H. Dual microglia effects on blood brain barrier permeability induced by systemic inflammation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5816. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13812-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen AQ, Fang Z, Chen XL, Yang S, Zhou YF, Mao L, Xia YP, Jin HJ, Li YN, You MF, Wang XX, Lei H, He QW, Hu B. Microglia-derived TNF-α mediates endothelial necroptosis aggravating blood brain-barrier disruption after ischemic stroke. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:487. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1716-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kanazawa M, Kawamura K, Takahashi T, Miura M, Tanaka Y, Koyama M, Toriyabe M, Igarashi H, Nakada T, Nishihara M, Nishizawa M, Shimohata T. Multiple therapeutic effects of progranulin on experimental acute ischaemic stroke. Brain. 2015;138:1932–1948. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kacimi R, Giffard RG, Yenari MA. Endotoxin-activated microglia injure brain derived endothelial cells via NF-κB, JAK-STAT and JNK stress kinase pathways. J Inflamm (Lond) 2011;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-8-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.da Fonseca AC, Matias D, Garcia C, Amaral R, Geraldo LH, Freitas C, Lima FR. The impact of microglial activation on blood-brain barrier in brain diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:362. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, Frolova GP. Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation. 1968;6:230–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Andrzejewska A, Lukomska B, Janowski M. Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem Cells: From Roots to Boost. Stem Cells. 2019;37:855–864. doi: 10.1002/stem.3016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P, De Ugarte DA, Huang JI, Mizuno H, Alfonso ZC, Fraser JK, Benhaim P, Hedrick MH. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:4279–4295. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-02-0105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Weiss ML, Medicetty S, Bledsoe AR, Rachakatla RS, Choi M, Merchav S, Luo Y, Rao MS, Velagaleti G, Troyer D. Human umbilical cord matrix stem cells: preliminary characterization and effect of transplantation in a rodent model of Parkinson's disease. Stem Cells. 2006;24:781–792. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop Dj, Horwitz E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, Deans RJ, Krause DS, Keating A International Society for Cellular Therapy. Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2005;7:393–395. doi: 10.1080/14653240500319234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chamberlain G, Fox J, Ashton B, Middleton J. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2739–2749. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.De Becker A, Van Hummelen P, Bakkus M, Vande Broek I, De Wever J, De Waele M, Van Riet I. Migration of culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells through bone marrow endothelium is regulated by matrix metalloproteinase-2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3. Haematologica. 2007;92:440–449. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ji JF, He BP, Dheen ST, Tay SS. Interactions of chemokines and chemokine receptors mediate the migration of mesenchymal stem cells to the impaired site in the brain after hypoglossal nerve injury. Stem Cells. 2004;22:415–427. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-3-415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tse WT, Pendleton JD, Beyer WM, Egalka MC, Guinan EC. Suppression of allogeneic T-cell proliferation by human marrow stromal cells: implications in transplantation. Transplantation. 2003;75:389–397. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000045055.63901.A9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Le Blanc K. Immunomodulatory effects of fetal and adult mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotherapy. 2003;5:485–489. doi: 10.1080/14653240310003611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Djouad F, Plence P, Bony C, Tropel P, Apparailly F, Sany J, Noël D, Jorgensen C. Immunosuppressive effect of mesenchymal stem cells favors tumor growth in allogeneic animals. Blood. 2003;102:3837–3844. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kopen GC, Prockop DJ, Phinney DG. Marrow stromal cells migrate throughout forebrain and cerebellum, and they differentiate into astrocytes after injection into neonatal mouse brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:10711–10716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhao LR, Duan WM, Reyes M, Keene CD, Verfaillie CM, Low WC. Human bone marrow stem cells exhibit neural phenotypes and ameliorate neurological deficits after grafting into the ischemic brain of rats. Exp Neurol. 2002;174:11–20. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jiao Y, Liu YW, Chen WG, Liu J. Neuroregeneration and functional recovery after stroke: advancing neural stem cell therapy toward clinical application. Neural Regen Res. 2021;16:80–92. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.286955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Asgari Taei A, Dargahi L, Nasoohi S, Hassanzadeh G, Kadivar M, Farahmandfar M. The conditioned medium of human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviates neurological deficits and improves synaptic recovery in experimental stroke. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236:1967–1979. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zheng X, Bähr M, Doeppner TR. From Tumor Metastasis towards Cerebral Ischemia-Extracellular Vesicles as a General Concept of Intercellular Communication Processes. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20 doi: 10.3390/ijms20235995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tkach M, Théry C. Communication by Extracellular Vesicles: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Cell. 2016;164:1226–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhu J, Liu Q, Jiang Y, Wu L, Xu G, Liu X. Enhanced angiogenesis promoted by human umbilical mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in stroked mouse is Notch1 signaling associated. Neuroscience. 2015;290:288–299. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cho SE, Kim YM, Jeong JS, Seo YK. The effect of ultrasound for increasing neural differentiation in hBM-MSCs and inducing neurogenesis in ischemic stroke model. Life Sci. 2016;165:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Toyama K, Honmou O, Harada K, Suzuki J, Houkin K, Hamada H, Kocsis JD. Therapeutic benefits of angiogenetic gene-modified human mesenchymal stem cells after cerebral ischemia. Exp Neurol. 2009;216:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ma J, Sawai H, Ochi N, Matsuo Y, Xu D, Yasuda A, Takahashi H, Wakasugi T, Takeyama H. PTEN regulates angiogenesis through PI3K/Akt/VEGF signaling pathway in human pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009;331:161–171. doi: 10.1007/s11010-009-0154-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pantoni L, Garcia JH, Gutierrez JA. Cerebral white matter is highly vulnerable to ischemia. Stroke. 1996;27:1641–6; discussion 1647. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.9.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Li Y, Chen J, Zhang CL, Wang L, Lu D, Katakowski M, Gao Q, Shen LH, Zhang J, Lu M, Chopp M. Gliosis and brain remodeling after treatment of stroke in rats with marrow stromal cells. Glia. 2005;49:407–417. doi: 10.1002/glia.20126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bronckaers A, Hilkens P, Martens W, Gervois P, Ratajczak J, Struys T, Lambrichts I. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells as a pharmacological and therapeutic approach to accelerate angiogenesis. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;143:181–196. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wang F, Tang H, Zhu J, Zhang JH. Transplanting Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Ischemic Stroke. Cell Transplant. 2018;27:1825–1834. doi: 10.1177/0963689718795424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shi Y, Shi H, Nomi A, Lei-Lei Z, Zhang B, Qian H. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a new impetus of promoting angiogenesis in tissue regeneration. Cytotherapy. 2019;21:497–508. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Massa M, Croce S, Campanelli R, Abbà C, Lenta E, Valsecchi C, Avanzini MA. Clinical Applications of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Therapeutic Potential of an Acellular Product. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10120999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Qiu G, Zheng G, Ge M, Wang J, Huang R, Shu Q, Xu J. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles affect disease outcomes via transfer of microRNAs. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9:320. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1069-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Doeppner TR, Herz J, Görgens A, Schlechter J, Ludwig AK, Radtke S, de Miroschedji K, Horn PA, Giebel B, Hermann DM. Extracellular Vesicles Improve Post-Stroke Neuroregeneration and Prevent Postischemic Immunosuppression. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015;4:1131–1143. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zheng X, Zhang L, Kuang Y, Venkataramani V, Jin F, Hein K, Zafeiriou MP, Lenz C, Moebius W, Kilic E, Hermann DM, Weber MS, Urlaub H, Zimmermann WH, Bähr M, Doeppner TR. Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Neural Progenitor Cells--a Preclinical Evaluation for Stroke Treatment in Mice. Transl Stroke Res. 2021;12:185–203. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00814-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chen KH, Chen CH, Wallace CG, Yuen CM, Kao GS, Chen YL, Shao PL, Chai HT, Lin KC, Liu CF, Chang HW, Lee MS, Yip HK. Intravenous administration of xenogenic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSC) and ADMSC-derived exosomes markedly reduced brain infarct volume and preserved neurological function in rat after acute ischemic stroke. Oncotarget. 2016;7:74537–74556. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Deng Y, Chen D, Gao F, Lv H, Zhang G, Sun X, Liu L, Mo D, Ma N, Song L, Huo X, Yan T, Zhang J, Miao Z. Exosomes derived from microRNA-138-5p-overexpressing bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells confer neuroprotection to astrocytes following ischemic stroke via inhibition of LCN2. J Biol Eng. 2019;13:71. doi: 10.1186/s13036-019-0193-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Geng W, Tang H, Luo S, Lv Y, Liang D, Kang X, Hong W. Exosomes from miRNA-126-modified ADSCs promotes functional recovery after stroke in rats by improving neurogenesis and suppressing microglia activation. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11:780–792. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jiang M, Wang H, Jin M, Yang X, Ji H, Jiang Y, Zhang H, Wu F, Wu G, Lai X, Cai L, Hu R, Xu L, Li L. Exosomes from MiR-30d-5p-ADSCs Reverse Acute Ischemic Stroke-Induced, Autophagy-Mediated Brain Injury by Promoting M2 Microglial/Macrophage Polarization. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;47:864–878. doi: 10.1159/000490078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li G, Xiao L, Qin H, Zhuang Q, Zhang W, Liu L, Di C, Zhang Y. Exosomes-carried microRNA-26b-5p regulates microglia M1 polarization after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. Cell Cycle. 2020;19:1022–1035. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2020.1743912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 87.Liu Y, Fu N, Su J, Wang X, Li X. Rapid Enkephalin Delivery Using Exosomes to Promote Neurons Recovery in Ischemic Stroke by Inhibiting Neuronal p53/Caspase-3. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:4273290. doi: 10.1155/2019/4273290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nalamolu KR, Venkatesh I, Mohandass A, Klopfenstein JD, Pinson DM, Wang DZ, Veeravalli KK. Exosomes Treatment Mitigates Ischemic Brain Damage but Does Not Improve Post-Stroke Neurological Outcome. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2019;52:1280–1291. doi: 10.33594/000000090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Nalamolu KR, Venkatesh I, Mohandass A, Klopfenstein JD, Pinson DM, Wang DZ, Kunamneni A, Veeravalli KK. Exosomes Secreted by the Cocultures of Normal and Oxygen-Glucose-Deprived Stem Cells Improve Post-stroke Outcome. Neuromolecular Med. 2019;21:529–539. doi: 10.1007/s12017-019-08540-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Safakheil M, Safakheil H. The Effect of Exosomes Derived from Bone Marrow Stem Cells in Combination with Rosuvastatin on Functional Recovery and Neuroprotection in Rats After Ischemic Stroke. J Mol Neurosci. 2020;70:724–737. doi: 10.1007/s12031-020-01483-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Tian T, Zhang HX, He CP, Fan S, Zhu YL, Qi C, Huang NP, Xiao ZD, Lu ZH, Tannous BA, Gao J. Surface functionalized exosomes as targeted drug delivery vehicles for cerebral ischemia therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;150:137–149. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Xin H, Katakowski M, Wang F, Qian JY, Liu XS, Ali MM, Buller B, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. MicroRNA cluster miR-17-92 Cluster in Exosomes Enhance Neuroplasticity and Functional Recovery After Stroke in Rats. Stroke. 2017;48:747–753. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Xin H, Li Y, Cui Y, Yang JJ, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Systemic administration of exosomes released from mesenchymal stromal cells promote functional recovery and neurovascular plasticity after stroke in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:1711–1715. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Yang Y, Cai Y, Zhang Y, Liu J, Xu Z. Exosomes Secreted by Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Contribute to Angiogenesis of Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells Following Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation In Vitro Through MicroRNA-181b/TRPM7 Axis. J Mol Neurosci. 2018;65:74–83. doi: 10.1007/s12031-018-1071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zhang H, Wu J, Fan Q, Zhou J, Liu S, Zang J, Ye J, Xiao M, Tian T, Gao J. Exosome-mediated targeted delivery of miR-210 for angiogenic therapy after cerebral ischemia in mice. J Nanobiotechnology. 2019;17:29. doi: 10.1186/s12951-019-0461-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kuang Y, Zheng X, Zhang L, Ai X, Venkataramani V, Kilic E, Hermann DM, Majid A, Bähr M, Doeppner TR. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce autophagy in stroke mice by extracellular vesicle transfer of miR-25. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;10:e12024. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Xia Y, Ling X, Hu G, Zhu Q, Zhang J, Li Q, Zhao B, Wang Y, Deng Z. Small extracellular vesicles secreted by human iPSC-derived MSC enhance angiogenesis through inhibiting STAT3-dependent autophagy in ischemic stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11:313. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01834-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Haupt M, Zheng X, Kuang Y, Lieschke S, Janssen L, Bosche B, Jin F, Hein K, Kilic E, Venkataramani V, Hermann DM, Bähr M, Doeppner TR. Lithium modulates miR-1906 Levels of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles contributing to poststroke neuroprotection by toll-like receptor 4 regulation. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2021;10:357–373. doi: 10.1002/sctm.20-0086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Dabrowska S, Andrzejewska A, Strzemecki D, Muraca M, Janowski M, Lukomska B. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles attenuate neuroinflammation evoked by focal brain injury in rats. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:216. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1602-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Otero-Ortega L, Laso-García F, Frutos MCG, Diekhorst L, Martínez-Arroyo A, Alonso-López E, García-Bermejo ML, Rodríguez-Serrano M, Arrúe-Gonzalo M, Díez-Tejedor E, Fuentes B, Gutiérrez-Fernández M. Low dose of extracellular vesicles identified that promote recovery after ischemic stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11:70. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01601-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Moon GJ, Sung JH, Kim DH, Kim EH, Cho YH, Son JP, Cha JM, Bang OY. Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Stroke: Biodistribution and MicroRNA Study. Transl Stroke Res. 2019;10:509–521. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0668-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wang C, Börger V, Sardari M, Murke F, Skuljec J, Pul R, Hagemann N, Dzyubenko E, Dittrich R, Gregorius J, Hasenberg M, Kleinschnitz C, Popa-Wagner A, Doeppner TR, Gunzer M, Giebel B, Hermann DM. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles Induce Ischemic Neuroprotection by Modulating Leukocytes and Specifically Neutrophils. Stroke. 2020;51:1825–1834. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Otero-Ortega L, Laso-García F, Gómez-de Frutos MD, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Pascual-Guerra J, Fuentes B, Díez-Tejedor E, Gutiérrez-Fernández M. White Matter Repair After Extracellular Vesicles Administration in an Experimental Animal Model of Subcortical Stroke. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44433. doi: 10.1038/srep44433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Harrell CR, Fellabaum C, Jovicic N, Djonov V, Arsenijevic N, Volarevic V. Molecular Mechanisms Responsible for Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Secretome. Cells. 2019;8 doi: 10.3390/cells8050467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zhang B, Yin Y, Lai RC, Tan SS, Choo AB, Lim SK. Mesenchymal stem cells secrete immunologically active exosomes. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:1233–1244. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hu GW, Li Q, Niu X, Hu B, Liu J, Zhou SM, Guo SC, Lang HL, Zhang CQ, Wang Y, Deng ZF. Exosomes secreted by human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuate limb ischemia by promoting angiogenesis in mice. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:10. doi: 10.1186/scrt546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zhu YG, Feng XM, Abbott J, Fang XH, Hao Q, Monsel A, Qu JM, Matthay MA, Lee JW. Human mesenchymal stem cell microvesicles for treatment of Escherichia coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in mice. Stem Cells. 2014;32:116–125. doi: 10.1002/stem.1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Lv B, Li F, Fang J, Xu L, Sun C, Han J, Hua T, Zhang Z, Feng Z, Wang Q, Jiang X. Activated Microglia Induce Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Produce Glial Cell-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Protect Neurons Against Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation Injury. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:283. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cunningham CJ, Wong R, Barrington J, Tamburrano S, Pinteaux E, Allan SM. Systemic conditioned medium treatment from interleukin-1 primed mesenchymal stem cells promotes recovery after stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11:32. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-1560-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Feng YW, Wu C, Liang FY, Lin T, Li WQ, Jing YH, Dai P, Yu HX, Lan Y, Pei Z, Xu GQ. hUCMSCs Mitigate LPS-Induced Trained Immunity in Ischemic Stroke. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1746. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ishizaka S, Horie N, Satoh K, Fukuda Y, Nishida N, Nagata I. Intra-arterial cell transplantation provides timing-dependent cell distribution and functional recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2013;44:720–726. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.677328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Li X, Huang M, Zhao R, Zhao C, Liu Y, Zou H, Chen L, Guan Y, Zhang YA. Intravenously Delivered Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Bidirectionally Regulate Inflammation and Induce Neurotrophic Effects in Distal Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Rats Within the First 7 Days After Stroke. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46:1951–1970. doi: 10.1159/000489384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.McGuckin CP, Jurga M, Miller AM, Sarnowska A, Wiedner M, Boyle NT, Lynch MA, Jablonska A, Drela K, Lukomska B, Domanska-Janik K, Kenner L, Moriggl R, Degoul O, Perruisseau-Carrier C, Forraz N. Ischemic brain injury: a consortium analysis of key factors involved in mesenchymal stem cell-mediated inflammatory reduction. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013;534:88–97. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Nakajima M, Nito C, Sowa K, Suda S, Nishiyama Y, Nakamura-Takahashi A, Nitahara-Kasahara Y, Imagawa K, Hirato T, Ueda M, Kimura K, Okada T. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Overexpressing Interleukin-10 Promote Neuroprotection in Experimental Acute Ischemic Stroke. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2017;6:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Narantuya D, Nagai A, Sheikh AM, Wakabayashi K, Shiota Y, Watanabe T, Masuda J, Kobayashi S, Kim SU, Yamaguchi S. Microglia transplantation attenuates white matter injury in rat chronic ischemia model via matrix metalloproteinase-2 inhibition. Brain Res. 2010;1316:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sheikh AM, Nagai A, Wakabayashi K, Narantuya D, Kobayashi S, Yamaguchi S, Kim SU. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation modulates neuroinflammation in focal cerebral ischemia: contribution of fractalkine and IL-5. Neurobiol Dis. 2011;41:717–724. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Sheikh AM, Yano S, Mitaki S, Haque MA, Yamaguchi S, Nagai A. A Mesenchymal stem cell line (B10) increases angiogenesis in a rat MCAO model. Exp Neurol. 2019;311:182–193. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang H, Nagai A, Sheikh AM, Liang XY, Yano S, Mitaki S, Ishibashi Y, Kobayashi S, Kim SU, Yamaguchi S. Human mesenchymal stem cell transplantation changes proinflammatory gene expression through a nuclear factor-κB-dependent pathway in a rat focal cerebral ischemic model. J Neurosci Res. 2013;91:1440–1449. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Wang LQ, Lin ZZ, Zhang HX, Shao B, Xiao L, Jiang HG, Zhuge QC, Xie LK, Wang B, Su DM, Jin KL. Timing and dose regimens of marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation affect the outcomes and neuroinflammatory response after ischemic stroke. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014;20:317–326. doi: 10.1111/cns.12216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Yamaguchi S, Horie N, Satoh K, Ishikawa T, Mori T, Maeda H, Fukuda Y, Ishizaka S, Hiu T, Morofuji Y, Izumo T, Nishida N, Matsuo T. Age of donor of human mesenchymal stem cells affects structural and functional recovery after cell therapy following ischaemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38:1199–1212. doi: 10.1177/0271678X17731964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Yang F, Li WB, Qu YW, Gao JX, Tang YS, Wang DJ, Pan YJ. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induce M2 microglia polarization through PDGF-AA/MANF signaling. World J Stem Cells. 2020;12:633–658. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i7.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yoo SW, Chang DY, Lee HS, Kim GH, Park JS, Ryu BY, Joe EH, Lee YD, Kim SS, Suh-Kim H. Immune following suppression mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in the ischemic brain is mediated by TGF-β. Neurobiol Dis. 2013;58:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Shi Q, Zhang P, Zhang J, Chen X, Lu H, Tian Y, Parker TL, Liu Y. Adenovirus-mediated brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression regulated by hypoxia response element protects brain from injury of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice. Neurosci Lett. 2009;465:220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Sobowale OA, Parry-Jones AR, Smith CJ, Tyrrell PJ, Rothwell NJ, Allan SM. Interleukin-1 in Stroke: From Bench to Bedside. Stroke. 2016;47:2160–2167. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Maggini J, Mirkin G, Bognanni I, Holmberg J, Piazzón IM, Nepomnaschy I, Costa H, Cañones C, Raiden S, Vermeulen M, Geffner JR. Mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells turn activated macrophages into a regulatory-like profile. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Magoro T, Dandekar A, Jennelle LT, Bajaj R, Lipkowitz G, Angelucci AR, Bessong PO, Hahn YS. IL-1β/TNF-α/IL-6 inflammatory cytokines promote STAT1-dependent induction of CH25H in Zika virus-infected human macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:14591–14602. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Jang J, Park S, Jin Hur H, Cho HJ, Hwang I, Pyo Kang Y, Im I, Lee H, Lee E, Yang W, Kang HC, Won Kwon S, Yu JW, Kim DW. 25-hydroxycholesterol contributes to cerebral inflammation of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy through activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13129. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Caso JR, Pradillo JM, Hurtado O, Lorenzo P, Moro MA, Lizasoain I. Toll-like receptor 4 is involved in brain damage and inflammation after experimental stroke. Circulation. 2007;115:1599–1608. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.603431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Yang MY, Yu QL, Huang YS, Yang G. Neuroprotective effects of andrographolide derivative CX-10 in transient focal ischemia in rat: Involvement of Nrf2/AE and TLR/NF-κB signaling. Pharmacol Res. 2019;144:227–234. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zhao R, Ying M, Gu S, Yin W, Li Y, Yuan H, Fang S, Li M. Cysteinyl Leukotriene Receptor 2 is Involved in Inflammation and Neuronal Damage by Mediating Microglia M1/M2 Polarization through NF-κB Pathway. Neuroscience. 2019;422:99–118. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Liu XS, Chopp M, Zhang RL, Zhang ZG. MicroRNAs in cerebral ischemia-induced neurogenesis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72:718–722. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31829e4963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.He H, Zeng Q, Huang G, Lin Y, Lin H, Liu W, Lu P. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation exerts neuroprotective effects following cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting autophagy via the PI3K/Akt pathway. Brain Res. 2019;1707:124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ryu B, Sekine H, Homma J, Kobayashi T, Kobayashi E, Kawamata T, Shimizu T. Allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell sheet that produces neurological improvement with angiogenesis and neurogenesis in a rat stroke model. J Neurosurg. 2019;132:442–455. doi: 10.3171/2018.11.JNS182331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Lam PK, Wang KKW, Chin DWC, Tong CSW, Wang Y, Lo KKY, Lai PBS, Ma H, Zheng VZY, Poon WS, Wong GKC. Topically applied adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell treatment in experimental focal cerebral ischemia. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;71:226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Lalu MM, McIntyre L, Pugliese C, Fergusson D, Winston BW, Marshall JC, Granton J, Stewart DJ Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Safety of cell therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells (SafeCell): a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Hess DC, Sila CA, Furlan AJ, Wechsler LR, Switzer JA, Mays RW. A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical evaluation of MultiStem for the treatment of ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:381–386. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Savitz SI, Misra V, Kasam M, Juneja H, Cox CS Jr, Alderman S, Aisiku I, Kar S, Gee A, Grotta JC. Intravenous autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2011;70:59–69. doi: 10.1002/ana.22458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lee JS, Hong JM, Moon GJ, Lee PH, Ahn YH, Bang OY STARTING collaborators. A long-term follow-up study of intravenous autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with ischemic stroke. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1099–1106. doi: 10.1002/stem.430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Bhasin A, Srivastava M, Bhatia R, Mohanty S, Kumaran S, Bose S. Autologous intravenous mononuclear stem cell therapy in chronic ischemic stroke. J Stem Cells Regen Med. 2012;8:181–189. doi: 10.46582/jsrm.0803011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Bhasin A, Srivastava MVP, Mohanty S, Vivekanandhan S, Sharma S, Kumaran S, Bhatia R. Paracrine Mechanisms of Intravenous Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Stem Cells in Chronic Ischemic Stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2016;6:107–119. doi: 10.1159/000446404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Chen DC, Lin SZ, Fan JR, Lin CH, Lee W, Lin CC, Liu YJ, Tsai CH, Chen JC, Cho DY, Lee CC, Shyu WC. Intracerebral implantation of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in stroke patients: a randomized phase II study. Cell Transplant. 2014;23:1599–1612. doi: 10.3727/096368914X678562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Levy ML, Crawford JR, Dib N, Verkh L, Tankovich N, Cramer SC. Phase I/II Study of Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Intravenous Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Chronic Stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:2835–2841. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Moniche F, Gonzalez A, Gonzalez-Marcos JR, Carmona M, Piñero P, Espigado I, Garcia-Solis D, Cayuela A, Montaner J, Boada C, Rosell A, Jimenez MD, Mayol A, Gil-Peralta A. Intra-arterial bone marrow mononuclear cells in ischemic stroke: a pilot clinical trial. Stroke. 2012;43:2242–2244. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.659409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Prasad K, Sharma A, Garg A, Mohanty S, Bhatnagar S, Johri S, Singh KK, Nair V, Sarkar RS, Gorthi SP, Hassan KM, Prabhakar S, Marwaha N, Khandelwal N, Misra UK, Kalita J, Nityanand S InveST Study Group. Intravenous autologous bone marrow mononuclear stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: a multicentric, randomized trial. Stroke. 2014;45:3618–3624. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Vahidy FS, Haque ME, Rahbar MH, Zhu H, Rowan P, Aisiku IP, Lee DA, Juneja HS, Alderman S, Barreto AD, Suarez JI, Bambhroliya A, Hasan KM, Kassam MR, Aronowski J, Gee A, Cox CS Jr, Grotta JC, Savitz SI. Intravenous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Safety, Feasibility, and Effect Size from a Phase I Clinical Trial. Stem Cells. 2019;37:1481–1491. doi: 10.1002/stem.3080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Zhang G, Li Y, Reuss JL, Liu N, Wu C, Li J, Xu S, Wang F, Hazel TG, Cunningham M, Zhang H, Dai Y, Hong P, Zhang P, He J, Feng H, Lu X, Ulmer JL, Johe KK, Xu R. Stable Intracerebral Transplantation of Neural Stem Cells for the Treatment of Paralysis Due to Ischemic Stroke. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8:999–1007. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Feng Y, Tian GP, Li L, Zhou J. Effect of Human Umbilical Cord Blood-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Cerebral Infarction. Shiyong Xin Nao Fei Xueguan Bing Zazhi . 2014;22:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Díez-Tejedor E, Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Martínez-Sánchez P, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Ruiz-Ares G, Lara ML, Gimeno BF. Reparative therapy for acute ischemic stroke with allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue: a safety assessment: a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, pilot clinical trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:2694–2700. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Jiang Y, Zhu W, Zhu J, Wu L, Xu G, Liu X. Feasibility of delivering mesenchymal stem cells via catheter to the proximal end of the lesion artery in patients with stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. Cell Transplant. 2013;22:2291–2298. doi: 10.3727/096368912X658818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Suárez-Monteagudo C, Hernández-Ramírez P, Alvarez-González L, García-Maeso I, de la Cuétara-Bernal K, Castillo-Díaz L, Bringas-Vega ML, Martínez-Aching G, Morales-Chacón LM, Báez-Martín MM, Sánchez-Catasús C, Carballo-Barreda M, Rodríguez-Rojas R, Gómez-Fernández L, Alberti-Amador E, Macías-Abraham C, Balea ED, Rosales LC, Del Valle Pérez L, Ferrer BB, González RM, Bergado JA. Autologous bone marrow stem cell neurotransplantation in stroke patients. An open study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27:151–161. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Bhasin A, Srivastava MV, Kumaran SS, Mohanty S, Bhatia R, Bose S, Gaikwad S, Garg A, Airan B. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells in chronic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2011;1:93–104. doi: 10.1159/000333381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.De Keyser J. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in stroke patients. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:653–4; author reply 654. doi: 10.1002/ana.20612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Jaillard A, Hommel M, Moisan A, Zeffiro TA, Favre-Wiki IM, Barbieux-Guillot M, Vadot W, Marcel S, Lamalle L, Grand S, Detante O (for the ISIS-HERMES Study Group) Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Motor Recovery in Subacute Ischemic Stroke: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Transl Stroke Res. 2020;11:910–923. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00787-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Lee JY, Kim E, Choi SM, Kim DW, Kim KP, Lee I, Kim HS. Microvesicles from brain-extract-treated mesenchymal stem cells improve neurological functions in a rat model of ischemic stroke. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33038. doi: 10.1038/srep33038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Stem Cells are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES