Skip to main content
PMC home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2021 Jul 19;19(10):1921–1936. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13658

Contributions of the international plant science community to the fight against infectious diseases in humans—part 2: Affordable drugs in edible plants for endemic and re‐emerging diseases

Wenshu He 1, † , Can Baysal 1, † , Maria Lobato Gómez 1, Xin Huang 1, Derry Alvarez 1, Changfu Zhu 1, Victoria Armario‐Najera 1, Aamaya Blanco Perera 1, Pedro Cerda Bennaser 1, Andrea Saba‐Mayoral 1, Guillermo Sobrino‐Mengual 1, Ashwin Vargheese 1, Rita Abranches 2, Isabel Alexandra Abreu 2, Shanmugaraj Balamurugan 3, Ralph Bock 4, Johannes F Buyel 5,6, Nicolau B da Cunha 7, Henry Daniell 8,✉, Roland Faller 9, André Folgado 2, Iyappan Gowtham 3, Suvi T Häkkinen 10, Shashi Kumar 11, Ramalingam Sathish Kumar 3, Cristiano Lacorte 12, George P Lomonossoff 13, Ines M Luís 2, Julian K‐C Ma 14, Karen A McDonald 9,15, Andre Murad 12, Somen Nandi 9,15, Barry O’Keef 16, Subramanian Parthiban 3, Mathew J Paul 14, Daniel Ponndorf 13, Elibio Rech 12, Julio CM Rodrigues 12, Stephanie Ruf 4, Stefan Schillberg 5,17, Jennifer Schwestka 18, Priya S Shah 9,19, Rahul Singh 8, Eva Stoger 18, Richard M Twyman 20, Inchakalody P Varghese 3, Giovanni R Vianna 12, Gina Webster 14, Ruud H P Wilbers 21, Paul Christou 1,22, Kirsi‐Marja Oksman‐Caldentey 10,✉, Teresa Capell 1,✉
PMCID: PMC8486237  NIHMSID: NIHMS1720196  PMID: 34181810

Summary

The fight against infectious diseases often focuses on epidemics and pandemics, which demand urgent resources and command attention from the health authorities and media. However, the vast majority of deaths caused by infectious diseases occur in endemic zones, particularly in developing countries, placing a disproportionate burden on underfunded health systems and often requiring international interventions. The provision of vaccines and other biologics is hampered not only by the high cost and limited scalability of traditional manufacturing platforms based on microbial and animal cells, but also by challenges caused by distribution and storage, particularly in regions without a complete cold chain. In this review article, we consider the potential of molecular farming to address the challenges of endemic and re‐emerging diseases, focusing on edible plants for the development of oral drugs. Key recent developments in this field include successful clinical trials based on orally delivered dried leaves of Artemisia annua against malarial parasite strains resistant to artemisinin combination therapy, the ability to produce clinical‐grade protein drugs in leaves to treat infectious diseases and the long‐term storage of protein drugs in dried leaves at ambient temperatures. Recent FDA approval of the first orally delivered protein drug encapsulated in plant cells to treat peanut allergy has opened the door for the development of affordable oral drugs that can be manufactured and distributed in remote areas without cold storage infrastructure and that eliminate the need for expensive purification steps and sterile delivery by injection.

Keywords: molecular farming, plant‐made pharmaceuticals, oral delivery, endemic disease, re‐emerging disease

Introduction

Infectious diseases can be classified according to prevalence, with rare diseases affecting a small proportion of the population (less than one in 1500–2500 people, depending on the jurisdiction) either due to a stable low transmission rate or because the disease is emerging or re‐emerging (resurgent) and the incidence is low but increasing. Infectious diseases can also be divided into categories based on their epidemiology and are often described as epidemic or pandemic (discussed in our sister article in this issue Lobato Gómez et al., 2021) or endemic in a given region.

An endemic disease is prevalent in a particular geographic area due to sustained local transmission, but broader dissemination is prevented by factors such as vector range/habitat (e.g. malaria is restricted by the natural range of mosquito vectors) or technologies (e.g. helminth infections are restricted to areas that lack water purification). A hyperendemic disease has a high level of incidence in an endemic area and can even trigger local epidemics, in which a more serious outbreak is sudden and unexpected (CDC, 2020b). When an endemic disease affects almost all individuals in an endemic area, it is described as holoendemic, although the symptoms may differ in severity through the population, as seen for malaria (WHO, 2016). Travel can spread endemic diseases beyond their normal range (Wilson, 2005). However, the establishment of such diseases in new ranges is limited by the factors described above and by the strict imposition of vaccination programmes for travellers (CDC, 2020a).

This review article assesses the use of plant biotechnology as a means to tackle endemic diseases, focusing on the use of plants as bioreactors for the production of pharmaceutical products including protein drugs, vaccines, antibodies and antivirals for established endemic diseases as well as neglected and re‐emerging diseases. The diseases covered by the article are summarized in Table 1, with more details on the incidence, prevalence and burden associated with these diseases provided in Table S1.

Table 1.

Classification of infectious diseases based on their epidemiology, showing the number of people affected in a specific time and place. The fatality rate was calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the total number of identified cases in the specific time and place. References are listed in Table S1

Classification Disease Number of people affected Fatality rate
Endemic diseases Dengue fever 4.2 million (total of global cases, 2019) 1%
West Nile fever 2645 (USA, 2018) 6.2%
Yellow fever 2399 (December 2015–February 2018) 29%
Rabies 59,000/year (total of global cases estimate) 100% (once symptoms appear)
Malaria 229 million (total of global cases, 2019) 0.18%
Tuberculosis 7.6 million (total of global cases, 2018) 19.7%
Helminth diseases 1.5 billion (total of global cases, 2019) < 1%
Re‐emerging or rare/neglected diseases Cholera 131,121 (total of global cases, 2016) 1.8%
Measles 9.7 million (total of global cases, 2015) 1.4%
CCHF >1000 people/year (south‐eastern Europe) 32.4%
Polio Varies from <100 to ˜1000 (Pakistan, Afghanistan) 0.1%
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: CCHF = Crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever.

Plants for the mucosal delivery of pharmaceuticals

Plant biotechnology has multiple roles in the fight against infectious diseases, from the provision of emergency testing infrastructure (Webb et al., 2020) to the manufacture of small‐molecule drugs, biologics (vaccines and therapeutics) and diagnostic reagents (Capell et al., 2020; McDonald and Holtz, 2020; Rosales‐Mendoza, 2020; Tusé et al., 2020). The utilization of plants to provide injectable drugs for the treatment of epidemic and pandemic diseases is reviewed in detail in our sister article in this issue (Lobato Gómez et al., 2021). However, the most dangerous human pathogens cause respiratory or gastroenteric diseases and enter the body through mucosal surfaces. In addition to inducing systemic immunity, it is therefore advantageous to achieve passive or active mucosal immunity via oral or nasal administration in order to prevent infection and decrease transmission. Indeed, mucosal and systemic immune responses often differ both qualitatively and in terms of potency. However, a major challenge for mucosal vaccines and therapeutics is the need for them to withstand degradation, especially following oral delivery. To ensure that the active components remain intact upon arrival at their effector site, they must be fortified to prevent degradation. Infections of the mucosal surfaces of the lungs and upper airways can also be treated with surface‐acting antimicrobials that do not require uptake, such as bacteriophage‐derived endolysins (Bock and Warzecha, 2010; Oey et al., 2009a,b).

Oral delivery of proteins bioencapsulated in plant cells

Plant cell walls contain polysaccharides with β(1,4) and β(1,6) linkages that resist hydrolysis by enzymes in the mammalian upper digestive tract, thus protecting protein drugs and vaccine antigens from the acids and enzymes in the stomach. The survival of recombinant proteins encapsulated in plant cells after passing through the stomach has been demonstrated for reporter proteins (Xiao et al., 2016) as well as many therapeutic proteins (Daniell et al., 2016, 2019a, 2021; Kwon and Daniell, 2016). The plant cell wall is subsequently digested by enzymes produced by commensal bacteria in the small intestine, where most absorption occurs (Kumar et al., 2020). The next major challenge is to ensure that recombinant proteins released from plant cells cross the gut epithelium (Rosales‐Mendoza and Salazar‐Gonzalez, 2014). Unless the proteins naturally contain epithelial receptor‐binding ligands or possess the ability to cross using another mechanism, fusion tags are required comprising receptor ligands or cell‐penetrating peptides, allowing orally administered proteins to reach targets such as the immune system or to enter the systemic circulation. This is often achieved using the non‐toxic cholera toxin B subunit (CTB), which binds specifically to GM1 ganglioside receptors enriched in the membrane lipid rafts of intestinal epithelial cells and travels in a retrograde direction through the trans‐Golgi network into the endoplasmic reticulum.

The mucosal area of the human small intestine is ˜30 m2 (Helander and Fandriks, 2014). Up to 15,000 CTB molecules can bind to each intestinal epithelial cell and the GM1 receptor is rapidly turned over on the cell surface (Fishman et al., 1983). This facilitates the efficient uptake of vaccine antigens and other proteins. The efficiency of CTB‐mediated transmucosal delivery allows drug doses to be reduced by 500‐fold compared to proteins without a CTB tag (Petersen et al., 2003). The CTB allows delivery to the immune system or circulation, but the presence of a protein transduction domain (PTD) ensures delivery to the circulatory system whereas the presence of a dendritic cell peptide ensures delivery solely to dendritic cells (Xiao et al., 2016). When fusion proteins cross the epithelium, tags are removed by the furin protease present in most cell types if an engineered cleavage site is present (Daniell et al., 2016, 2019a; Kwon and Daniell, 2016; Xiao et al., 2016). In addition to these in vivo studies, cell‐based models have shown that fluorescent protein bodies are taken up by immune cells, potentially into late endosomes, where antigen processing takes place (Schwestka et al., 2020; Snapper, 2018;).

Not all oral drugs are designed to cross the epithelial lining but may instead be intended to work in the lumen or in the mucosal layer. For example, successful passive immunization has been demonstrated by feeding chickens with pea seeds expressing antibodies against gut parasites (Zimmermann et al., 2009) and feeding piglets with soybean containing monomeric IgA to prevent enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (F4‐ETEC) infection (Virdi et al., 2019).

The importance of protein expression levels and compartmentalization within plant cells

One of the major limitations of molecular farming for oral drug delivery is the requirement for high yields of the recombinant protein in edible plant tissues. The administration of edible plant tissues removes the opportunity for purification or concentration, but these processes also add to the costs of production and introduce the requirement for a cold chain (Kashima et al., 2016). To address this issue, several approaches have been developed to increase the quantity of recombinant proteins within edible plant tissues, including the expression of proteins in chloroplasts, targeting proteins to storage organelles, enhancing protein stability in starch granules and the production of self‐assembling virus‐like particles (VLPs) (Hofbauer et al., 2016; Khan et al., 2012; Marsian and Lomonossoff, 2016; Schwestka et al., 2020; Takagi et al., 2008; Whitehead et al., 2014). Significant progress has been made using the lettuce chloroplast system (Figure 1a‐e) because each cell typically contains up to 10,000 chloroplast genomes, resulting in expression levels of up to 70% total leaf protein (Daniell et al., 2016, 2019a; Ruhlman et al., 2010;). Thin lettuce leaves facilitate rapid lyophilization and the antigens remain stable for years in the dry plant material (Daniell et al., 2020, 2021; Herzog et al., 2017; Park et al., 2020; Su et al., 2015;).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Mechanism of oral drug delivery and examples of chloroplast therapeutics and booster vaccines. (a) The cGMP growing facility for lettuce leaf biomass production. (b) The lyophilizer that dehydrates lettuce biomass through optimized programming for freeze‐drying. (c) Optimized grinding to maintain the intactness of plant cells. (d) The capsule/gum preparation maintaining antigen stability. (e) The oral delivery of proteins bioencapsulated in plant cells. (f) Mechanism of immune suppression/tolerance or conferring immunity. GM1 ganglioside receptors on intestinal epithelial cells facilitate uptake CTB‐fused proteins. DCs are antigen‐presenting cells, induce antigen‐specific T and B cells. The IFN‐γ and Th2 cytokines (IL‐4, IL‐10) are critical for cell‐mediated and humoral immunity. After TGF‐β production, FoxP3+ Treg cells are induced by DCs. The immune tolerance via induction and maintenance of FoxP3+ Treg cells is mediated by TGF‐β. (g) Examples of potential chloroplast‐derived booster vaccines against viral (polio, COVID‐19) and bacterial (anthrax, cholera, tuberculosis) diseases. (h) Oral tolerance induction and immune suppression in haemophilia and the prevention of peanut allergy.

Many protein drugs have now been expressed in plastids, ranging from small regulatory proteins such as Ang1‐7 (Shenoy et al., 2014; Shil et al., 2014;), exendin (Kwon et al., 2013), antimicrobial peptides (DeGray et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2011b), insulin (Boyhan and Daniell, 2011) and growth hormones (Daniell et al., 2009; Park et al., 2020; Staub et al., 2000) to very large proteins (Daniell et al., 2020, 2021; Kwon et al., 2016, 2018; Sherman et al., 2014; Su et al., 2015). Plastid‐derived vaccine antigens against several diseases have induced high antibody titres, conferring mucosal and/or systemic immunity and in some cases protection against multiple pathogen challenges (Figure 1f,g), including tetanus (Tregoning et al., 2003, 2005), cholera (Daniell et al., 2001; Davoodi‐Semiromi et al., 2010;), bubonic plague (Arlen et al., 2008), tuberculosis (Lakshmi et al., 2013), anthrax (Koya et al., 2005; Ruhlman et al., 2010; Watson et al., 2004;), malaria (Davoodi‐Semiromi et al., 2010), dengue (van Eerde et al., 2019; Kanagaraj et al., 2011;) and polio (Chan et al., 2016; Daniell et al., 2019b; Xiao and Daniell, 2017). There is also some potential for the treatment of COVID‐19 (Daniell, 2020; Daniell et al., 2021;). More recent iterations of this technology can generate vaccine‐producing marker‐free lettuce plants (Daniell et al., 2019c, 2020; Kumari et al., 2019; Park et al., 2020).

Oral delivery of proteins to confer immunity or tolerance

The oral delivery of vaccine antigens in edible plant tissues has been explored for decades, with the first clinical trials taking place more than 20 years ago (Tacket et al., 1998, 2000). However, the gut immune system works towards immune suppression and the induction of oral tolerance rather than immunity (Figure 1f,h). Oral drug delivery is therefore ideal for the development of tolerance to peanut allergy via the gut immune system. This recently resulted in the approval of Palforzia, an oral drug based on endogenous Arah proteins in peanut cells (Berglund et al., 2017; Du Toit et al., 2015; Tilles and Petroni, 2018; Vickery et al., 2018). The same principle has been used to produce recombinant allergy vaccines in rice seeds for allergen‐specific oral immunotherapy (Takaiwa et al., 2015). A peptide vaccine‐containing seven linked human‐predominant T‐cell epitopes derived from Japanese cedar pollen allergens were also produced in rice (Saito et al., 2020), and the efficacy and safety of the transgenic rice grains were confirmed after oral administration to JC pollinosis patients (Endo et al., 2021).

The ability of the gut immune system to switch from tolerance to immunity is induced by the administration of adjuvants, which may be supplied orally (along with the antigen) or by injection. The failure of previous vaccine trials may in some cases therefore reflect the lack of oral adjuvants to prime the gut immune system (Daniell et al., 2019b). Orally delivered antigens bioencapsulated in plant cells elicit high levels of systemic (IgG1) and mucosal (IgA) antibodies but do not confer protection against virus challenge without priming by injected antigens and adjuvants (Chan et al., 2016; Daniell et al., 2019a; Xiao and Daniell, 2017). Nevertheless, the COVID‐19 pandemic clearly illustrates the need for cold chain‐free booster vaccines, and antigens made in plant cells could thus play an important role by producing booster vaccines rather than primary vaccines. The SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein is common to all current COVID‐19 vaccines regardless of their mode of delivery (mRNA, protein or viral vectors). Therefore, the spike protein expressed in edible plant cells could potentially be used to develop cold chain‐free affordable booster vaccines for developing countries (Figure 1a‐g), in combination with any one of the currently available primary vaccines.

Topical drug delivery using plant cells

The topical delivery of a plant‐derived antibody was first demonstrated for a secretory IgA/G against Streptococcus mutans surface antigen I/II, indicated for the prevention of dental caries (Ma et al., 1998). Other examples include the HIV‐neutralizing antibody 2G12 produced in tobacco (Ma et al., 2015) and Mapp66 produced in N. benthamiana, recognizing the receptor αCCR5 required for HIV‐1 attachment (Bogers et al., 2004). A monoclonal antibody against herpes simplex virus (HSV‐2) was produced in soybean and was able to diffuse into the vaginal mucus and prevent HSV‐2 infection in mice (Zeitlin et al., 1998). Topical application requires a high local dose of the antibody, and this can be readily achieved using the plastid expression system as shown for the antimicrobial peptides retrocyclin and protegrin. These products were expressed in tobacco plastids with yields of 38% and 26% of total soluble protein, respectively (Lee et al., 2011b). They were shown to kill S. mutans and prevent biofilm formation following a single topical application to a tooth mimetic surface (Liu et al., 2016) but their broader antimicrobial activity could make them useful against multiple bacterial and even viral pathogens, as confirmed by their ability to protect host tobacco plants against the plant pathogens Erwinia carotovora and tobacco mosaic virus.

Molecular farming as a strategy to address endemic diseases

Dengue fever

Dengue is an endemic disease of tropical and subtropical regions caused by one of four dengue virus serotypes (DENV‐1, DENV‐2, DENV‐3 and DENV‐4) carried mainly by the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Khetarpal and Khanna, 2016; Pang et al., 2017;). Most infections are asymptomatic, but in 25% of cases viraemia may be present for 24–48 h before the onset of mild febrile dengue fever, which may progress in 0.5–5% of cases to severe and occasionally fatal dengue haemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome (Yoshikawa et al., 2020). Dengue prevention mostly relies on vector control (Deng et al., 2020) but a live‐attenuated tetravalent vaccine is available (Dengvaxia) consisting of chimaeras of structural pre‐membrane and envelope genes of the four DENV serotypes combined with the non‐structural genes of the yellow fever 17D vaccine (Thomas and Yoon, 2019; Wilder‐Smith, 2020). At least six other vaccine formulations are under development (Pinheiro‐Michelsen et al., 2020).

As is the case for other endemic diseases that affect primarily developing countries, plants offer a promising platform for vaccine and antibody production because of the low costs, ease of distribution and the particular efficacy of VLP candidates. Recombinant proteins based on consensus envelope protein domain III (cEDIII) and non‐structural protein 1 (NS1) have been produced by transient expression in N. benthamiana (Kim et al., 2018; Marques et al., 2019; Pang et al., 2019) and in transgenic tobacco (Amaro et al., 2015; Gottschamel et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2010, 2015, 2017b;), lettuce (van Eerde et al., 2019; Kanagaraj et al., 2011; Maldaner et al., 2013), rice (Kim et al., 2013, 2014, 2016) and potato (Kim et al., 2017a). Transient expression produces soluble antigens with maximum yields of 600 mg/kg fresh leaf biomass (Martinez et al., 2010) although an HBcAg‐cEDIII fusion protein was mostly insoluble and the soluble fraction was not detected by Western blot (Pang et al., 2019). Transgenic plants produced lower yields than transient expression, achieving yields in the range 0.002–3.45% of total soluble protein (van Eerde et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2017a) or up to 18.5 mg/kg fresh leaf biomass (Kim et al., 2014).

The NS1 protein from DENV‐2 was expressed in tobacco as a diagnostic reagent for ELISA tests because it has a greater sensitivity than DENV‐1 with only a slightly lower specificity (Amaro et al., 2015; Marques et al., 2019;). The first dengue VLP vaccines were produced based on DENV‐3 polyprotein in lettuce chloroplasts (Kanagaraj et al., 2011) and cross‐reacted with the anti‐dengue primary polyclonal antibody. DENV‐1 VLPs produced in N. benthamiana by transient co‐expression of structural and non‐structural proteins were immunogenic in mice (Ponndorf et al., 2020). To improve oral tolerance, cEDIII was fused to CTB. The CTB–cEDIII fusion protein showed strong affinity for GM1 ganglioside (Kim et al., 2017a) and orally immunized mice generated high IgG and faecal IgA titres, and the sera reacted with all four DENV serotypes with similar potency (Kim et al., 2016). Without exogenous adjuvants, cEDIII fused to the binding epitope of the Ebola‐specific antibody 6D8 induced a virus‐neutralizing anti‐cEDIII humoral immune response in mice (Kim et al., 2015). A chimaeric antibody against the dengue EDII fusion loop (pE60) retained its antigen‐binding specificity and affinity compared to mE60 and its effective neutralizing activity against DENV‐2 and DENV‐4, but showed no antibody‐dependent enhancement in human K562 cells (Dent et al., 2016).

West Nile fever

West Nile fever is caused by the neurotropic West Nile virus, which is primarily transmitted by mosquitoes (which acquire the virus from infected birds) but occasionally via infected blood or from mother to infant (Colpitts et al., 2012). The virus was discovered in Uganda in 1937, but has since spread to many parts of Europe, Asia and North America, where there are thousands of cases every year (Clark and Schaefer, 2020). Most infections are asymptomatic, but in about 20% of cases the infected individual suffers fever, headache, joint pains, vomiting, and diarrhoea, and ˜1% of cases can progress to severe encephalitis or meningitis (Bai et al., 2019; Rizzo et al., 2020;). The young and old are particularly at risk (Colpitts et al., 2012). The early phase of infection involves viral replication in dermal dendritic cells and keratinocytes, followed by a visceral organ dissemination phase and finally spreading to the central nervous system (Clark and Schaefer, 2020). West Nile virus also infects horses, and four veterinary vaccines are available (three inactivated and one live recombinant canarypox vaccine) but a vaccine has not yet been approved for humans (Kaiser and Barrett, 2019) although several have been tested in clinical trials (Ulbert, 2019).

Several West Nile vaccine candidates and antibodies based on domain III (DIII) of the envelope (E) protein have been expressed in plants, either by transient expression in tobacco (He et al., 2012; 2014a,b; Lai et al., 2010, 2012, 2014, 2018;) with a maximum yield of 8.1 g/kg fresh leaf biomass (Lai et al., 2010) or in transient lettuce with a maximum yield of 350 mg/kg fresh leaf biomass (He et al., 2012; Lai et al., 2012;). The recombinant DIII protein accumulated to the highest levels when directed to the endoplasmic reticulum rather than the plastids or cytosol and showed a potency equivalent to the same protein expressed in bacteria (He et al., 2014b). In a disease challenge experiment, the protein protected 100% of infected mice (Lai et al., 2018). Plant‐produced antibodies with different N‐linked glycan profiles retained the efficacy of the same antibodies produced in mammalian cells (He et al., 2014a; Lai et al., 2014;).

Yellow fever

Yellow fever is another mosquito‐borne disease caused by a virus that infects humans and non‐human primates. It is endemic in Africa, where 90% of infections occur, but also in tropical/subtropical regions of South America and Asia, the Pacific and Australia, resulting in 80,000–200,000 infections per year, causing 30,000–60,000 deaths (Douam and Ploss, 2018). Yellow fever virus binds to glycosaminoglycan heparan sulphate on the surface of host cells, but the specific receptor that recognizes the major envelope protein (YFE) before virus fusion is unknown (Douam and Ploss, 2018). The virus initially replicates in the lymph nodes, particularly in dendritic cells, before invading the liver and infecting hepatocytes. Fatal cases reflect the loss of hepatocytes by apoptosis or necrosis and the resulting cytokine storm and shock (Quaresma et al., 2013). An efficacious yellow fever vaccine (YFV‐17D) is available based on a live‐attenuated strain (Barrett, 2017) and a single dose confers lifelong immunity that becomes effective within 30 days for 99% of recipients (Simon et al., 2020). The availability of an efficacious vaccine means that the molecular farming community has shown only limited interest in this disease. However, the YFE protein has been transiently expressed in tobacco, either alone or as a fusion with the bacterial enzyme lichenase (YFE‐LicKM), protecting up to 88% of immunized mice from lethal challenge and eliciting neutralizing antibodies in more than 80% of immunized non‐human primates (Tottey et al., 2018).

Rabies

Rabies is an infection caused by lyssaviruses such as rabies virus, which is mainly transmitted by animal bites (Brunker and Mollentze, 2018; Rupprecht and Dietzschold, 2017). If an infection is identified promptly, rabies symptoms can be prevented by post‐exposure prophylaxis using injections of recombinant immunoglobulin (RIG) around the wound (Terryn et al., 2016). In the absence of treatment, the initial fever leads in almost all cases to lethal encephalitis, which kills 40,000–70,000 people per year, mostly in endemic areas of Asia, Central America, the Caribbean and North Africa (Jackson, 2016). Most cases recorded outside these areas involve migrants or travellers (Gautret et al., 2020).

As well as post‐exposure prophylaxis in humans, pre‐exposure vaccination of humans and potential animal reservoirs can help to reduce the spread of this disease. Rabies virus proteins and antibodies have been expressed in plants as a means to provide inexpensive reagents for developing countries to replace the very expensive human RIG and the less expensive but also less efficacious equine RIG. Examples of relevant proteins expressed in plants include rabies‐specific single‐chain antibodies and fusion proteins, the anti‐rabies monoclonal antibodies E559 and 62‐71‐3, a rabies glycoprotein fusion to the ricin toxin B chain (rgp‐rtxB), and the rabies virus surface glycoprotein and nucleoprotein, either as complete proteins or as epitopes. These have been expressed transiently in spinach and tobacco, as well as in transgenic maize, tobacco and tomato plants or cell lines (Girard et al., 2006; Loza‐Rubio et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2015; Tsekoa et al., 2016; Van Dolleweerd et al., 2014; Yusibov et al., 2002; Table  S1).

The analysis of these plant‐derived rabies reagents has shown that they are functional and suitable for further development as therapeutics. For example, antibodies produced in tobacco cell suspension cultures were able to bind and neutralize the rabies virus in vitro (Girard et al., 2006). The rabies virus glycoprotein produced by transient expression in spinach using viral vectors was shown, after oral administration, to elicit significant antibody responses in three of five volunteers previously immunized against rabies with a conventional vaccine and five of nine volunteers who had not received a conventional vaccine (Yusibov et al., 2002). Furthermore, the glycoprotein of the Vnukovo rabies virus strain expressed in maize was orally administered to mice, inducing neutralizing antibodies and cross‐protecting against a challenge with a lethal rabies virus strain (Loza‐Rubio et al., 2008).

Malaria

Malaria is an infectious disease caused by unicellular parasites of the genus Plasmodium, which are transmitted to humans and other mammals via mosquito bites (Talapko et al., 2019). The most severe form of malaria is caused by P. falciparum, which is often carried by female mosquitoes of the species Anopheles gambiae. This disease is endemic in Africa and parts of Asia, causing more than 400,000 deaths per year (WHO, 2020a). Infection of the human host commences when an infected mosquito takes a blood meal, causing motile parasites (sporozoites) to enter the blood stream. When these forms reach the liver, they invade hepatocytes and switch to an asexual reproductive form (merozoites) that proliferates, causing liver damage and infecting more red blood cells to perpetuate the asexual cycle. The damage caused during this process varies between individuals, in some cases causing asymptomatic parasitaemia but in others a range of symptoms ranging from mild fever to life‐threatening anaemia, metabolic acidosis and multi‐organ failure (Beales et al., 2000; Miller et al., 2002; Wassmer et al., 2015;). Some merozoites develop into gametocytes, which are taken up by mosquitoes to continue the parasitic life cycle.

Malaria can be treated with drugs such as chloroquine and artemisinin that inactivate the parasite, or can be prevented by interrupting the transmission cycle, for example by using mosquito nets and other vector control methods. However, these methods are only partially effective and parasite strains have evolved resistance to chloroquine, with emerging resistance to artemisinin also reported in some endemic regions. The extraction and purification of artemisinin from Artemisia annua are a very expensive process, but the oral delivery of artemisinin in the form of dried A. annua leaves has proven effective even against parasite strains resistant to artemisinin combination therapy and intravenous artesunate (Daddy et al., 2017).

The key goal in malaria prevention is a vaccine that covers multiple parasite strains and stages (pre‐erythrocytic/liver stage, erythrocytic stage and transmission‐blocking). A commercial vaccine (RTS,S/AS01, Mosquirix) based on the P. falciparum pre‐erythrocytic circumsporozoite protein (CSP) has been approved (efficacy = 30–40%) and is undergoing extended testing in Ghana, Kenya and Malawi as part of the WHO’s Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme (WHO, 2020b). As for other diseases that disproportionately affect developing countries, the production costs of this vaccine are critical and plants offer a platform to produce multiple vaccines or vaccine cocktails while exploiting the economy of scale offered by greenhouse cultivation. Among the candidates that have been evaluated, P. falciparum surface proteins Pfs25, Pf38, Pfs230, PfGAP50, MSP19, MSP142 and AMA1, and the P. vivax merozoite surface protein MSP1 (as well as combinations thereof) have been expressed in tobacco, Arabidopsis, lettuce and rice (Beiss et al., 2015; Blagborough et al., 2016; Boes et al., 2015, 2016; Chen et al., 2016a; Lee et al., 2011a; Menzel et al., 2016; Voepel et al., 2014; Table  S1). The maximum yield was 800 mg/kg fresh leaf biomass for the transient expression of Pfs230 in N. benthamiana (Farrance et al., 2011), and simple, cost‐effective heat‐based purification methods have been developed for some of the candidates (Buyel et al., 2014).

Oral immunization of BALB/c mice with P. vivax chimaeric recombinant MSP1/CSP induced antigen‐specific IgG1 production. The rabbit immune sera reacted well with the P. falciparum native protein and strongly inhibited the growth of blood‐stage parasites in vitro (Lee et al., 2011a). In another study, plasma from 31 semi‐immune African blood donors was assayed for reactivity against the antigens Pf38, AMA1 and MSP119 by ELISA. Positive reactivity was defined as a reading greater than twice the negative control value (Feller et al., 2013). Immunization of mice with one or two doses of Pfs25/coat protein VLPs plus the adjuvant Alhydrogel induced serum antibodies with complete transmission‐blocking activity throughout the 6‐month study period. The candidate vaccine (Pfs25‐FhCMB) was purified, characterized and evaluated for immunogenicity and efficacy using multiple adjuvants in a transgenic rodent model. Transmission‐blocking activity of ≤ 65% reduction in intensity and ≤ 54% reduction in prevalence was observed using Abisco‐100 adjuvant (Blagborough et al., 2016). Transmission‐blocking antibodies persisted for up to 6 months post‐immunization in mice and rabbits. Phase I testing revealed that the Pfs25‐FhCMB vaccine was safe in healthy volunteers, with no vaccine‐related serious adverse events and no evidence of any dose‐limiting or dose‐related toxicity. However, although Pfs25‐specific IgG was elicited in vaccinated patients in a dose‐dependent manner, the transmission‐reducing activity was weak, suggesting the need for an alternative adjuvant formulation (Chichester et al., 2018).

Malarial and cholera antigens have been fused together (CTB‐AMA1 and CTB‐MSP1) to develop dual cholera–malaria vaccines (Davoodi‐Semiromi et al., 2010). The yields obtained by plastid transformation were up to 600‐fold higher in tobacco and up to 400‐fold higher in lettuce compared to nuclear transformation. Increasing numbers of boosters with the malarial vaccine antigens increased the anti‐MSP1 antibody titres in immunized mice. Orally immunized mice generated both systemic and mucosal immune responses against the malarial antigens, but injected mice failed to generate IgA. Anti‐AMA1 antibodies in the serum of immunized mice bound to the Plasmodium schizont protein as an 83‐kDa polypeptide and also bound the apical end of the parasite at the ring stage as a further confirmation of specificity. The anti‐MSP1 antibodies in orally immunized mice bound to the Plasmodium ring and schizont proteins as a 190‐kDa polypeptide. Fluorescence‐labelled sera from immunized mice stained schizont stage parasites, further confirming the specificity of antibodies generated by oral vaccination. The ring stage was the predominant parasitic stage as determined by microscopy. The lowest parasitaemia was observed in the MSP119 group with the highest mean antibody titre. Relative inhibition of Plasmodium with the sera from vaccinated mice was equivalent to or better than the efficacy of the positive serum. The oral and injectable AMA1 vaccines conferred 102% and 105% inhibition in parasitemia assays, respectively.

Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis is a disease primarily affecting the lungs, which is caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Fogel, 2015). Most cases are asymptomatic (latent tuberculosis) but about 10% progress to the active form of the disease, characterized by fever, chest pains and coughing, which is fatal in 50% of patients left untreated. Most of the 1.5–2 million deaths per year occur in developing countries, where it is more difficult to access the cocktail of first‐line antibiotics required for treatment (Fogel, 2015). The only approved vaccine against tuberculosis is the Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine developed in 1921. This is an attenuated vaccine derived from M. bovis, and when administered to children, it reduces the risk of infection by ˜20% and the risk of active disease by ˜60% (Cernuschi et al., 2018; Escobar et al., 2020). Other vaccines are under development, and as for other endemic diseases affecting developing countries, plants offer an inexpensive platform for the production of antigenic proteins or VLPs.

The development of subunit vaccines against tuberculosis has focused on M. tuberculosis secreted antigens such as ESAT‐6, Ag85B, Ag85A, MPT64, MPT83, CFP10 and dIFN. These antigens have been transiently expressed in tobacco and broccoli and stably expressed in tobacco, Arabidopsis, potato, lettuce and carrot (Dorokhov et al., 2007; Floss et al., 2010; Lakshmi et al., 2013; Permyakova et al., 2015; Rigano et al., 2006; Uvarova et al., 2013; Zelada et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2012). High levels of M. tuberculosis antigens sufficient for purification have been produced by transient expression (Dorokhov et al., 2007; Floss et al., 2010; Zelada et al., 2006;), reaching 800 mg/kg fresh leaf biomass in tobacco (Dorokhov et al., 2007). In contrast, the stable expression of ESAT‐6, Ag85B, Ag85A, MPT64, MPT83, CFP10 and dIFN in potato leaves and carrot roots achieved yields of less than 0.01% of total soluble protein (Permyakova et al., 2015; Rigano et al., 2006; Uvarova et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2012). Oral administration of antigens in mice has been shown to induce both cell‐mediated and humoral immunity (Floss et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2020; Permyakova et al., 2015; Saba et al., 2019, 2020; Uvarova et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2012;).

Helminth infections

Helminths are parasitic worms, including tapeworms, nematodes, schistosomes and filarial worms. More than one quarter of the world’s population is infected by one or more helminths, and such diseases are endemic in South America, sub‐Saharan Africa and South‐East Asia (WHO, 2020c). Helminths cause severe morbidity, including persistent diarrhoea and abdominal pain, and chronic infections in children can lead to malnutrition, impaired growth and delayed cognitive development. Helminth infections can be controlled using anthelmintic drugs, but overuse has led to the increasing prevalence of drug‐resistant worms in livestock and the same challenge could arise in humans (Sutherland and Leathwick, 2011). More than 100 vaccine trials have been carried out with 80 different recombinant antigens targeting 22 helminth species (Geldhof et al., 2007) but few have demonstrated efficacy in challenge studies, possibly due to the presence of complex glycan structures that are difficult to mimic in recombinant proteins (Hokke and van Diepen, 2017).

The first helminth vaccine candidates expressed in transgenic plants were Schistosoma japonicum ferritin in alfalfa (Yuan et al., 2008), Fasciola hepatica FH3 antigen in rapeseed (Li et al., 2003) and Ascaris suum As16 antigen fused to CTB in rice (Matsumoto et al., 2008). More recently, transient expression in N. benthamiana has become the dominant platform. For example, the aspartic protease‐1 antigen from the human hookworm Necator americanus (Na‐APR‐1 (M74)) was expressed at high levels in N. benthamiana (up to 300 mg/kg fresh leaf biomass), exceeding the yields achieved in the yeast Pichia pastoris (Seid et al., 2015). Na‐APR‐1 was directed to the secretory pathway using the tobacco PR1a signal peptide and the construct also included a KDEL sequence for retrieval to the endoplasmic reticulum and a His6 tag for protein purification. This plant‐derived Na‐APR‐1 is now part of a bivalent human hookworm vaccine developed by the Sabin Vaccine Institute Product Development Partnership and has entered phase I clinical trials (Hotez et al., 2016). N. benthamiana has also been used to produce glycoproteins from the human blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni, although not directly for vaccine purposes (Wilbers et al., 2017). The glycoproteins omega‐1 and kappa‐5 were targeted to the secretory pathway using an Arabidopsis chitinase signal peptide, causing ˜90% of the protein to reach the apoplast. This highly efficient secretion allowed product recovery by apoplast fluid extraction, a non‐destructive single‐step purification method yielding > 0.5 mg of omega‐1 or kappa‐5 per plant (each plant produces 3–4 g of fresh leaf material). This study showed that the native helminth glycan structures (Lewis X and LDN‐F) could be synthesized on omega‐1 and kappa‐5 by fine‐tuning the co‐expression of glycosyltransferases. Although N. benthamiana provides an efficient platform for the expression of glyco‐engineered proteins, the diverse and complex glycan structures of helminths are poorly understood. Here, also plants can offer a helping hand, as shown by the functional characterization of 10 S. mansoni fucosyltransferases by transient expression in N. benthamiana, allowing the synthesis of the helminth glycan motif F‐LDN‐F (van Noort et al., 2020).

Neglected and re‐emerging diseases

Cholera

Cholera is an acute bacterial disease caused by serotypes O1 and O139 of Vibrio cholerae, which infect the intestine and cause severe diarrhoea and dehydration. The historical prevalence of the disease has been reduced by improvements in water quality, sanitation and hygiene, and the development of oral and intravenous rehydration therapy has reduced morbidity and mortality. However, cholera still causes up to 100,000 deaths every year, mostly in cholera‐endemic developing countries. Vaccines against cholera are designed to provide intestinal mucosal immunity; hence, the most widely used vaccines are orally delivered inactivated or live‐attenuated bacterial strains (Clemens et al., 2017). These elicit antibodies against the bacterial lipopolysaccharide and also the CTB subunit. The latter is secreted by the bacteria when they penetrate the intestinal mucosa and form a biofilm. The hexameric toxin, comprising five CTB subunits and the cholera toxin A (CTA) subunit, enters cells and causes the secretion of water and electrolytes into the intestinal lumen, thus triggering the disease symptoms. Antibodies against the bacterium and its toxin work synergistically to prevent infection (Lange and Holmgren, 1978). Inactivated oral vaccines are effective against both epidemic and endemic cholera, whereas live‐attenuated vaccines are unsuitable for endemic settings but useful for travellers (Chen et al., 2016b; Richie et al., 2000). Inactivated oral cholera vaccines also confer herd immunity (Ali et al., 2005; Longini et al., 2007).

Interest in the production of cholera vaccines in plants reflects the opportunity to present the vaccine antigens either in fresh edible tissues such as fruits and leaves, or in dry and inert edible tissues such as seeds, if the dose and moisture content can be controlled. In both cases, oral vaccination can be achieved simply by the consumption of vaccine‐containing foods after minimal preparation, and the seeds also allow the storage and distribution of vaccines in remote areas without a cold chain. In the fresh tissue category, CTB has been expressed in tomato fruits (Jani et al., 2002) and in the leaves of N. benthamiana plants (Hamorsky et al., 2013, 2015), the latter achieving remarkable yields of ˜1 g/kg fresh leaf biomass (transgenic plants) and ˜3 g/kg fresh leaf biomass (transient expression). These experiments confirmed that recombinant CTB forms a pentamer and interacts with GM1 ganglioside like the native toxin and that both glycan‐free and glycosylated versions raise protective antibodies in mice. The production of cholera vaccines in dry seeds has been pursued by Hiroshi Kiyono’s group at the University of Tokyo, which has published a series of articles concerning the expression of CTB in transgenic rice seeds, named MucoRice‐CTB. These studies have shown that CTB remains stable in seeds for more than 3 years and elicits both secretory IgA (mucosal response) and IgG (systemic response) after oral administration in mice (Yuki and Kiyono, 2008) and macaques (Nochi et al., 2009). Interestingly, the inclusion of CTA did not broaden the immune response—antibodies were elicited against CTB but not CTA or native rice proteins (Yuki et al., 2009). The group also found that CTB was processed in planta into two forms that assembled into heterocomplexes. Accordingly, they mutated an N‐linked glycan acceptor site to produce a uniform vaccine (MucoRice‐CTB/Q) which elicited an immune response similar to that of the original formulation in mice and macaques (Yuki et al., 2013). Although one of the challenges involved in the production of edible plant tissues containing vaccine antigens is the control of yields to ensure consistent dosing, the MucoRice‐CTB content of rice endosperm was consistent across multiple harvests of rice plants grown in a closed hydroponic system due to the carefully controlled environmental conditions (Kashima et al., 2016).

Davood‐Semiromi et al., (2010) reported the longest cholera vaccine study using plant‐derived vaccines. Animals were boosted until 267 days with CTB expressed in tobacco or lettuce chloroplasts and were challenged on day 303. Protection against cholera toxin challenge was observed following oral immunization (100%) or subcutaneous immunization, and protection correlated well with CTB‐specific titres of intestinal IgA and serum IgG1 in orally immunized mice, but only IgG1 was detected in subcutaneously injected mice. Multiple oral boosters conferred durable immunity, lasting more than half of the mouse life span. With the current cholera vaccine, immunity is lost in children within 3 years and adults are not fully protected.

Measles

Measles is a highly contagious viral disease that causes more than 100,000 deaths every year, with 1.5–2.9% fatality based on computer models (Portnoy et al., 2019). Following the onset of fever, cough and runny nose, the characteristic symptom is a rash covering the entire body. In some cases, the virus induces immunosuppression, leading to complications such as diarrhoea, ear infections and pneumonia. Less common complications include seizures, blindness and encephalopathy. Measles can be prevented by vaccination, which involves the administration of an attenuated wild‐type strain that elicits the production of neutralizing antibodies (Griffin, 2018). Herd immunity is achieved by administering two doses of the vaccine to > 90% of the population at 9–15 months and 3–4 years of age, often combined with the vaccines for mumps, rubella and in some cases also chickenpox (Moss, 2017). This has led to the effective control of the disease in most developed countries, with occasional spikes resulting from vaccine hesitancy (Larson et al., 2014).

As discussed above for cholera, interest in the use of plants for the production of measles virus is primarily driven by the potential of an oral vaccine (Muller et al., 2003). All studies published thus far have involved the expression of the immunodominant measles virus hemagglutinin (MVH) protein or an epitope derived therefrom and have examined the immunogenicity of the antigen either purified and injected or delivered orally in plant tissue. The first studies expressed MVH in transgenic tobacco and found that the recombinant antigen was immunogenic in mice both orally and following intraperitoneal injection (Huang et al., 2001) and that the mucosal (secretory IgA) and systemic (IgG) immune response was stronger if a single dose of a DNA vaccine was followed by multiple oral boosters of tobacco leaves containing the antigen (Webster et al., 2002, 2005). The same group reported similar results when the antigen was expressed in lettuce and administered via the nasal route (Webster et al., 2006). MVH is one of a small number of vaccines to be expressed in carrot, and the recombinant antigen was shown to generate high titres of neutralizing antibodies when leaf or root extracts were injected into mice (Marquet‐Blouin et al., 2003). The same group later studied a range of epitopes based on the MVH protein, including the [L4T4]2 polyepitope combining 2 × 4 repeats of the loop‐forming hemagglutinin noose epitope (L, residues 386–400) and the tetanus toxoid T‐cell epitope (T, residues 830–844) (Bouche et al., 2003, 2005). Interestingly, although the L epitope was derived from a single isolate, the immune response was sufficient to neutralize all field isolates of the virus, suggesting that the polyepitope adopted multiple conformations to induce a diverse repertoire of B cells.

Crimean‐Congo haemorrhagic fever

Crimean‐Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is the most important tick‐borne viral disease in humans, causing sporadic cases or outbreaks of severe illness across a huge geographic area, from western China to the Middle East and south‐eastern Europe and throughout most of Africa, with fatality rates of 5–80% (Blair et al., 2019). The virus responsible for this disease (CCHFV) is carried by many species of ticks, including at least 30 from the genera Haemaphysalis and Hyalomma. Most infections are directly transmitted by tick bites, but transmission also occurs by contact with infected domestic animals/livestock and other humans. The eradication of ticks that carry CCHFV has proven inefficient and expensive because infected domestic animals are often asymptomatic and act as disease reservoirs following tick repopulation (Mendoza et al., 2018). Nosocomial outbreaks of CCHFV occur in endemic areas and are difficult to detect because the non‐specific flu‐like symptoms lead to late recognition and diagnosis (Fletcher et al., 2017). There are no specific treatment options for CCHF, and the only effective vaccine is an inactivated formulation developed in the 1960s by Soviet researchers, which was licensed in Bulgaria in 1974 for use in endemic regions (Keshtkar‐Jahromi et al., 2011). Although safety and efficacy data for the vaccine have not been established in controlled trials, it has a good track record based on the decline in reported cases and can induce low levels of CCHFV‐neutralizing antibodies after multiple doses (Mousavi‐Jazi et al., 2012). However, the crude nature of vaccine preparation makes it unlikely to be adopted more widely (Buttigieg et al., 2014). A more effective and refined vaccine is therefore required now that the WHO has added CCHF to its Blueprint List of Priority Diseases in second position after COVID‐19.

Interest in the use of plants for the production of CCHF vaccines primarily reflects the opportunities presented by the ability to grow plants locally so that vaccines can be made available in rapid response to an outbreak of the disease. It is also important to note that the oral vaccination of animals by feeding them on plants expressing CCHFV components may be an effective strategy to eliminate disease reservoirs and therefore increase the efficacy of tick elimination programmes. Like other Bunyaviridae, CCHFV has a tripartite RNA genome encoding two external glycoproteins (GN, GC) produced by the proteolytic cleavage of a precursor, a nucleocapsid protein (N) and a large transcriptase (L). Both the glycoprotein and nucleocapsid protein have been expressed in plants and evaluated as vaccine candidates. The glycoprotein was expressed in tobacco leaves and hairy roots, with yields of 1.4 and 1.8 g/kg fresh biomass, respectively (Ghiasi et al., 2011). Mice were fed on the leaves or roots (fed group) with or without a subcutaneous injection of the same plant‐derived vaccine candidate (fed‐boost group) and these were compared to controls injected with the attenuated CCHFV vaccine (positive control) and an untreated negative control. All the immunized mice showed a serum response (IgG) as well as a mucosal response (IgA) with the highest titres of both antibodies in the fed‐boost group (Ghiasi et al., 2011). The CCHFV nucleocapsid protein has also been expressed in plants (N. benthamiana) and cross‐reacted with anti‐CCHFV IgG in sera from convalescent patients, but its immunogenicity has not been evaluated directly (Atkinson et al., 2016).

Polio

Polio (poliomyelitis) is an infectious disease caused by poliovirus, which is spread via the oral‐faecal route. Most cases occur without symptoms, but in a minority (˜0.5%), there is a period of muscle weakness often but not exclusively affecting the legs. Most people recover, but up to 5% of children and 30% of adults within this group can progress to a more serious and often fatal disease stage. The disease is preventable by vaccination with multiple doses of inactivated or live‐attenuated virus. Coordinated global vaccination programmes have led to the near eradication of poliovirus types 2 and 3 and wild‐type polio infections were reduced to just 46 cases in 2016, rising to 176 in 2019 (mainly in Pakistan and Afghanistan). However, both vaccines have drawbacks such as the need to cultivate live virus, the risk of vaccine‐derived poliomyelitis (365 cases in 2019) and production bottlenecks. Because these drawbacks prevent the total global eradication of polio, a virus‐free vaccine is of interest for the WHO polio eradication programme. Since 2013, the WHO has funded an ongoing project for the development of a VLP polio vaccine. The consortium that works on this project includes eight members using different expression platforms and analysis methods to achieve the main goal of the project, the production of antigenic VLPs of all three polio serotypes. However, the development of polio VLPs has been hampered because, in the absence of the genomic RNA, the virus capsid is antigenically unstable, rapidly converting to the C form which does not stimulate protective immunity. To develop antigenically stable VLPs, predominantly in the D form, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) selected thermostable empty capsids representing all three serotypes (Fox et al., 2017), which are now used to produce polio VLPs in different expression systems.

To produce VLPs in plants, the P1 capsid precursor region from each of the stabilized mutants was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana in the presence of the poliovirus 3CD protease to produce the mature capsid proteins (Marsian et al., 2017). The plant‐derived stabilized VLPs representing serotype 3 were comparable to the standard inactivated polio vaccine in terms of immunogenicity when tested in a mouse model expressing the poliovirus receptor. Similar results were found for polio serotype 1 (unpublished) and work is ongoing to produce VLPs representing serotype 2 (which have proven more difficult to generate regardless of the expression platform). The yield of stabilized VLPs representing serotypes 1 and 3 produced in the N. benthamiana transient expression platform was equivalent to or better than that achieved in yeast, mammalian cells, baculovirus‐infected insect cells and a cell‐free expression system.

Although a mucosal vaccine against poliovirus is highly desirable, the Sabin Vaccine Institute’s live‐attenuated vaccine (OPV2) was withdrawn by the WHO due to circulating vaccine‐derived polioviruses and polio virus transmission (Hird and Grassly, 2012; Minor, 2009; Yarri et al., 2013). The Daniell laboratory has developed a virus‐free oral booster vaccine that does not require a cold chain by expressing the vaccine antigen VP1 common to all poliovirus serotypes in chloroplasts. The oral delivery of lyophilized plant cells expressing CTB‐VP1 induced strong mucosal and systemic immunity, with high antigen‐specific titres of both IgG1 and IgA. Poliovirus neutralization studies using sera from immunized animals confirmed protection against all three poliovirus serotypes, with high‐level neutralization titres and seropositivity (Chan et al., 2016). The first study used 15 booster doses over 400 days (Xiao and Daniell, 2017) whereas subsequent studies reduced the number of boosters to three doses over 300 days and explored the efficacy of oral plant‐derived adjuvants (saponin or squalene) and antimicrobial peptides (LL37 and PG1) to enhance immune response (Daniell et al., 2019b). Long‐term maintenance of IgG1 and IgA titres and protection against all three poliovirus serotypes were achieved with only three boosters.

The future of molecular farming for endemic diseases

Molecular farming has received substantial recent press coverage focusing on its potential to satisfy the demand for vaccines, research reagents and therapeutics in the face of a rapidly spreading epidemic or pandemic diseases. Such diseases threaten to overwhelm traditional production platforms and the extra production capacity offered by plants would be welcome. However, the COVID‐19 pandemic has also brought to light major deficiencies, including the cost implications of global vaccination programmes and the need for a cold chain. More than 130 countries have yet to receive a single dose of COVID‐19 vaccine while wealthy countries have stockpiled available doses. When the WHO withdrew the oral polio vaccine in 2015 due to vaccine‐derived poliovirus infections, most developing countries could afford a single intravenous vaccine but not a booster. Therefore, the COVID‐19 pandemic is not the only example of an inadequate vaccine supply and affordability issues. Plant‐derived oral booster vaccines offer a timely and affordable solution that eliminates the cold chain requirement.

Oral vaccines are particularly valuable as a means to tackle endemic diseases, which are the scourge of healthcare systems particularly in developing countries (Rybicki et al., 2013). Such diseases have persisted for decades and often lead to epidemic outbreaks when cases suddenly spike in a particular region. The current focus on responses to epidemics and pandemics has drawn attention from perhaps the most enduring benefits of molecular farming, namely the ability to grow plants in local regions to allow the inexpensive production of drugs and vaccines for local healthcare systems. Such local production facilities could be paired with portable downstream processing suites when the product is intended for purification, but the oral or topical application of plant tissues or crude extracts releases plants from the demands of extensive product purification, in some cases allowing the consumption of medicines as unprocessed or part‐processed edible tissues (Daniell et al., 2019a, 2021; Ma et al., 2013).

We have considered the potential of molecular farming to address endemic and re‐emerging diseases, particularly when the drugs can be manufactured, stored and distributed in remote areas without a cold chain. In such cases, the important aspects of molecular farming are not the speed of production, but the scalability, ease of integration into local cultivation and distribution systems, and the development of innovative strategies to achieve both local (mucosal) and systemic immunity through the delivery of recombinant proteins presented in plant tissues. Another important issue that is particularly relevant for the treatment and prevention of endemic diseases in developing regions is to ensure that the technology and product can be made available to local stakeholders without the encumbrance of IP restrictions and onerous licensing requirements, therefore allowing these valuable medicines to be delivered to those most in need (Drake and Thangaraj, 2010). Even so, it is clear that much of the effort thus far has been directed towards the optimization of gene expression in plants to demonstrate the principle of molecular farming, with less focus on clinical development. Historically, the path to the clinic has been obstructed by the unwillingness of pharmaceutical companies to transition from established platform technologies and the lack of a regulatory framework, but this is no longer the case. The COVID‐19 pandemic has shown that new technologies can be embraced and developed quickly, with the Moderna vaccine as a key example, and the plant‐based subunit and VLP vaccines developed by companies such as Medicago as another, specifically related to molecular farming. The slow progress towards clinical development for molecular farming may reflect the lack of production facilities, although several construction projects around the world are underway to address this (Fischer and Buyel, 2020). In the case of orally administered products, progress has also been slowed by the challenge of achieving precise antigen doses (Kashima et al., 2016), and the perceived risk that pharmaceutical products could end up in the food chain (Spok et al., 2008). However, the clinical advancement of antigens produced in edible leaves will be encouraged by recent progress in the high‐level expression of antigens, the accurate control of antigen doses, the removal of antibiotic resistance genes, the large‐scale production of leaves in FDA‐approved hydroponic growth facilities, the tightly controlled removal of moisture, batch‐to‐batch records for regulatory compliance and strict bioburden validation of microbes on the leaf surface accomplished recently (Daniell et al., 2019a, 2020, 2021; Srinivasan et al., 2021; Su et al., 2015;).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

PC and TC conceived the topic. All authors contributed sections to this article based on their expertise and experience, provided comments and recommendations on the combined draft and approved the final version.

Supporting information

Table S1 Classification of endemic and re‐emerging diseases based on their epidemiology.

Click here for additional data file. (55.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (project AGL2017‐85377‐R), the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (projects RTI2018‐097613‐B‐I00 and PGC2018‐097655‐B‐I00), the EU Horizon 2020 project Pharma‐Factory (774078) and the Generalitat de Catalunya (Grups Consolidats2017‐SGR828); Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR), Departament d'Empresa i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya (PANDÈMIES 2020); Project LISBOA‐01‐0145‐FEDER‐007660 (Microbiologia Molecular, Estrutural e Celular funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020)—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by the FCT (Portugal) through the R&D Unit, UIDB/04551/2020 (GREEN‐IT—Bioresources for Sustainability); UKIERI and the Hotung Foundation for sustained support of the Bharathiar University / St. George’s Univ. of London collaboration and the Molecular Immunology Unit at St. George’s Univ. of London. The Max Planck Society, the EU Horizon 2020 project Newcotiana (760331‐2) and a grant from the European Research Council (ERC‐ADG‐2014; grant agreement 669982) to RB. KMOC, RMT and STH acknowledge support from the InnCoCells project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 101000373. PSS, KAM, RF and SN are partially supported by a CRAFT award (COVID‐19 Research Accelerator Funding Track) by the University of California Davis. KAM and SN were partially supported by NASA Space Technology Research (award number NNX17AJ31G) and by the Translational Research Institute through NASA (grant number NNX16AO69A); EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Corporation), INCT BioSyn (National Institute of Science and Technology in Synthetic Biology), CNPq, CAPES, Brazilian Ministry of Health, FAPDFnd Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB), Brasília, Brazil; BBSRC Grant BB/L020955/1, the JIC Strategic Programme Grant ‘Molecules from Nature – Enhanced Research Capacity’ (BBS/E/J/000PR9794), the John Innes Foundation and the Department of Health and Social Care using UK Aid funding managed by the BBSRC; and The Austrian Science Fund FWF (project W1224). TTW Veni Grant 16740 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. Research in the Daniell laboratory was supported by NIH grants R01 GM 63879, R01 107904, R01 HL 109442, R01 133191 and grants from Bayer, Novo Nordisk and Shire/Takeda. The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, through the Science Moving TowArds Research Translation and Therapy (SMARTT) programme contracts # HHSN268201600014C, HHSN268201600011C supported IND enabling regulatory, toxicology and pharmacokinetic studies. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of California, Davis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) or the Translational Research Institute for Space Health (TRISH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. Views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the employing institutions or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.

He, W., Baysal, C., Lobato Gómez, M., Huang, X., Alvarez, D., Zhu, C., Armario‐Najera, V., Blanco Perera, A., Cerda Bennaser, P., Saba‐Mayoral, A., Sobrino‐Mengual, G., Vargheese, A., Abranches, R., Alexandra Abreu, I., Balamurugan, S., Bock, R., Buyel, J. F., da Cunha, N. B., Daniell, H., Faller, R., Folgado, A., Gowtham, I., Häkkinen, S. T., Kumar, S., Sathish Kumar, R., Lacorte, C., Lomonossoff, G. P., Luís, I. M., K.‐C. Ma, J., McDonald, K. A., Murad, A., Nandi, S., O’Keef, B., Parthiban, S., Paul, M. J., Ponndorf, D., Rech, E., Rodrigues, J. C. M., Ruf, S., Schillberg, S., Schwestka, J., Shah, P. S., Singh, R., Stoger, E., Twyman, R. M., Varghese, I. P., Vianna, G. R., Webster, G., Wilbers, R. H. P., Christou, P., Oksman‐Caldentey, K.‐M. and Capell, T. (2021) Contributions of the international plant science community to the fight against infectious diseases in humans—part 2: Affordable drugs in edible plants for endemic and re‐emerging diseases. Plant Biotechnol. J., 10.1111/pbi.13658

Contributor Information

Henry Daniell, Email: hdaniell@upenn.edu.

Kirsi‐Marja Oksman‐Caldentey, Email: Kirsi-Marja.Oksman@vtt.fi.

Teresa Capell, Email: teresa.capell@udl.cat.

References

  1. Ali, M., Emch, M., von Seidlein, L., Yunus, M., Sack, D.A., Rao, M., Holmgren, J.et al. (2005) Herd immunity conferred by killed oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh: a reanalysis. Lancet, 366, 44–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amaro, M.O.F., Xisto, M.F., Dias, A.C.F., Versiani, A.F., Cardoso, S.A., Otoni, W.C., da Silva, C.C.et al. (2015) Antigen production using heterologous expression of dengue virus‐2 non‐structural protein 1 (NS1) in Nicotiana tabacum (Havana) for immunodiagnostic purposes. Plant Cell Rep., 34, 919–928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arlen, P.A., Singleton, M., Adamovicz, J.J., Ding, Y., Davoodi‐Semiromi, A. and Daniell, H. (2008) Effective plague vaccination via oral delivery of plant cells expressing F1‐V antigens in chloroplasts. Infect. Immun., 76, 3640–3650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson, R., Burt, F., Rybicki, E.P. and Meyers, A.E. (2016) Plant‐produced Crimean‐Congo haemorrhagic fever virus nucleoprotein for use in indirect ELISA. J. Virol. Methods, 236, 170–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai, F., Thompson, E.A., Vig, P. and Leis, A.A. (2019) Current understanding of West Nile Virus clinical manifestations, immune responses, neuroinvasion, and immunotherapeutic implications. Pathogens, 8, 193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrett, A. (2017) Yellow fever live attenuated vaccine: A very successful live attenuated vaccine but still we have problems controlling the disease. Vaccine, 35, 5951–5955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beales, P.F., Brabin, B., Dorman, E., Gilles, H.M., Loutain, L., Marsh, K., Molyneux, M.E.et al. (2000) Severe falciparum malaria. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 94, 1–90.10748883 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beiss, V., Spiegel, H., Boes, A., Scheuermayer, M., Reimann, A., Schillberg, S. and Fischer, R. (2015) Plant expression and characterization of the transmission‐blocking vaccine candidate PfGAP50. BMC Biotechnol., 15, 108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berglund, J.P., Szczepanski, N., Penumarti, A., Beavers, A., Kesselring, J., Orgel, K., Burnett, B.et al. (2017) Preparation and analysis of peanut flour used in oral immunotherapy clinical trials. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract., 5, 1098–1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blagborough, A.M., Musiychuk, K., Bi, H., Jones, R.M., Chichester, J.A., Streatfield, S., Sala, K.A.et al. (2016) Transmission blocking potency and immunogenicity of a plant‐produced Pvs25‐based subunit vaccine against Plasmodium vivax . Vaccine, 34, 3252–3259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blair, P.W., Kuhn, J.H., Pecor, D.B., Apanaskevich, D.A., Kortepeter, M.G., Cardile, A.P., Ramos, A.P.et al. (2019) A emerging biothreat: Crimean‐Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in Southern and Western Asia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 100, 16–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bock, R. and Warzecha, H. (2010) Solar‐powered factories for new vaccines and antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol., 28, 246–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boes, A., Reimann, A., Twyman, R.M., Fischer, R., Schillberg, S. and Spiegel, H. (2016) A plant‐based transient expression system for the rapid production of malaria vaccine candidates. Methods Mol. Biol., 1404, 597–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boes, A., Spiegel, H., Voepel, N., Edgue, G., Beiss, V., Kapelski, S., Fendel, R.et al. (2015) Analysis of a multi‐component multi‐stage malaria vaccine candidate–tackling the cocktail challenge. PLoS One, 10, e0131456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bogers, W.M.J.M., Bergmeier, L.A., Ma, J., Oostermeijer, H., Wang, Y., Kelly, C.G., ten Haaft, P.et al. (2004) A novel HIV‐CCR5 receptor vaccine strategy in the control of mucosal SIV/HIV infection. AIDS, 18, 25–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bouche, F.B., Marquet‐Blouin, E., Yanagi, Y., Steinmetz, A. and Muller, C.P. (2003) Neutralizing immunogenicity of a polyepitope antigen expressed in a transgenic food plant: a novel antigen to protect against measles. Vaccine, 21, 2065–2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bouche, F.B., Steinmetz, A., Yanagi, Y. and Muller, C.P. (2005) Induction of broadly neutralizing antibodies against measles virus mutants using a polyepitope vaccine strategy. Vaccine, 23, 2074–2077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Boyhan, D. and Daniell, H. (2011) Low‐cost production of proinsulin in tobacco and lettuce chloroplasts for injectable or oral delivery of functional insulin and C‐peptide. Plant Biotechnol. J., 9, 585–598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Brunker, K. and Mollentze, N. (2018) Rabies virus. Trends Microbiol., 2, 886–887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Buttigieg, K.R., Dowall, S.D., Findlay‐Wilson, S., Miloszewska, A., Rayner, E., Hewson, R. and Carroll, M.W. (2014) A novel vaccine against Crimean‐Congo Haemorrhagic Fever protects 100% of animals against lethal challenge in a mouse model. PLoS One, 9, e91516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Buyel, J.F., Gruchow, H.M., Boes, A. and Fischer, R. (2014) Rational design of a host cell protein heat precipitation step simplifies the subsequent purification of recombinant proteins from tobacco. Biochem. Eng. J., 88, 162–170. [Google Scholar]
  22. Capell, T., Twyman, R.M., Armario‐Najera, V., Ma, J.‐K.‐C., Schillberg, S. and Christou, P. (2020) Potential applications of plant biotechnology against SARS‐CoV‐2. Trends Plant Sci., 25, 635–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. CDC (2020a) Disease directory | travelers’ health. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/diseases
  24. CDC (2020b) Introduction to epidemiology. https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/lesson1/section11.html
  25. Cernuschi, T., Malvolti, S., Nickels, E. and Friede, M. (2018) Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin (BCG) vaccine: a global assessment of demand and supply balance. Vaccine, 36, 498–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan, H.T., Xiao, Y., Weldon, W.C., Oberste, S.M., Chumakov, K. and Daniell, H. (2016) Cold chain and virus‐free chloroplast‐made booster vaccine to confer immunity against different poliovirus serotypes. Plant Biotechnol. J., 14, 2190–2200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen, Q., Liang, W., Qian, F., Qian, B., Cao, J., Zhang, D., Xu, Y.et al. (2016a) Rice‐produced MSP142 of Plasmodium falciparum elicits antibodies that inhibit parasite growth in vitro. Parasite Immunol., 38, 635–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen, W.H., Cohen, M.B., Kirkpatrick, B.D., Brady, R.C., Galloway, D., Gurwith, M., Hall, R.H.et al. (2016b) Single‐dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103‐HgR protects against human experimental infection with Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor. Clin. Infect. Dis., 62, 1329–1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chichester, J.A., Green, B.J., Jones, R.M., Shoji, Y., Miura, K., Long, C.A., Lee, C.K.et al. (2018) Safety and immunogenicity of a plant‐produced Pfs25 virus‐like particle as a transmission blocking vaccine against malaria: a phase 1 dose‐escalation study in healthy adults. Vaccine, 36, 5865–5871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Clark, M.B. and Schaefer, T.J. (2020) West Nile Virus. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544246/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Clemens, J.D., Nair, G.B., Ahmed, T., Qadri, F. and Holmgren, J. (2017) Cholera. Lancet, 390, 1539–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Colpitts, T.M., Conway, M.J., Montgomery, R.R. and Fikrig, E. (2012) West Nile Virus: Biology, Transmission, and Human Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 25, 635–648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Daddy, N.B., Kalisya, L.M., Bagire, P.G., Watt, R.L., Towler, M.J. and Weathers, P.J. (2017) Artemisia annua dried leaf tablets treated malaria resistant to ACT and i.v. artesunate: Case reports. Phytomedicine, 32, 37–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Daniell, H. (2020) From conception to COVID‐19: an arduous journey of tribulations of racism and triumphs. Plant Biotechnol. J., 18, 2147–2154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Daniell, H., Chan, H.‐T. and Pasoreck, E.K. (2016) Vaccination via chloroplast genetics: affordable protein drugs for the prevention and treatment of inherited or infectious human diseases. Annu. Rev. Genet., 50, 595–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Daniell, H., Jin, S., Zhu, X.G., Gitzendanner, M.A., Soltis, D.E. and Soltis, P.S. (2021) Green giant – a tiny chloroplast genome with mighty power to produce high value proteins: history and phylogeny. Plant Biotechnol. J., 19, 430–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Daniell, H., Kulis, M. and Herzog, R.W. (2019a) Plant cell‐made protein antigens for induction of oral tolerance. Biotech. Adv., 37, 107413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Daniell, H., Lee, S.‐B., Panchal, T. and Wiebe, P.O. (2001) Expression of the native cholera toxin B subunit gene and assembly as functional oligomers in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. J. Mol. Biol., 311, 1001–1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Daniell, H., Mangu, V., Yakubov, B., Park, J., Habibi, P., Shi, Y., Gonnella, P.A.et al. (2020) Investigational new drug enabling angiotensin oral‐delivery studies to attenuate pulmonary hypertension. Biomaterials, 233, 119750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Daniell, H., Rai, V. and Xiao, Y. (2019b) Cold chain and virus‐free oral polio booster vaccine made in lettuce chloroplasts confers protection against all three poliovirus serotypes. Plant Biotechnol. J., 17, 1357–1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Daniell, H., Ribeiro, T., Lin, S., Saha, P., McMichael, C., Chowdhary, R. and Agarwal, A. (2019c) Validation of leaf and microbial pectinases: commercial launching of a new platform technology. Plant Biotechnol. J., 17, 1154–1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Daniell, H., Ruiz, G., Denes, B., Sandberg, L. and Langridge, W. (2009) Optimization of codon composition and regulatory elements for expression of human insulin like growth factor‐1 in transgenic chloroplasts and evaluation of structural identity and function. BMC Biotechnol., 9, 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Davoodi‐Semiromi, A., Schreiber, M., Nalapalli, S., Verma, D., Singh, N.D., Banks, R.K. and Chakrabarti, D. (2010) (2010) Chloroplast‐derived vaccine antigens confer dual immunity against cholera and malaria by oral or injectable delivery. Plant Biotechnol. J., 8, 223–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. DeGray, G., Rajasekaran, K., Smith, F., Sanford, J. and Daniell, H. (2001) Expression of an antimicrobial peptide via the chloroplast genome to control phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Plant Physiol., 127, 852–862. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Deng, S.‐Q., Yang, X., Wei, Y., Chen, J.‐T., Wang, X.‐J. and Peng, H.‐J. (2020) A review on dengue vaccine development. Vaccines, 8, 63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dent, M., Hurtado, J., Paul, A.M., Sun, H., Lai, H., Yang, M. and Chen, Q. (2016) Plant‐produced anti‐dengue virus monoclonal antibodies exhibit reduced antibody‐dependent enhancement of infection activity. J. Gen. Virol., 97, 3280–3290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Dorokhov, Y.L., Sheveleva, A.A., Frolova, O.Y., Komarova, T.V., Zvereva, A.S., Ivanov, P.A. and Atabekov, J.G. (2007) Superexpression of tuberculosis antigens in plant leaves. Tuberculosis, 87, 218–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Douam, F. and Ploss, A. (2018) Yellow Fever Virus: knowledge gaps impeding the fight against an old foe. Trends Microbiol., 26, 913–928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Drake, P.M. and Thangaraj, H. (2010) Molecular farming, patents and access to medicines. Expert. Rev. Vaccines., 9, 811–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Du Toit, G., Roberts, G., Sayre, P.H., Bahnson, H.T., Radulovic, S., Santos, A.F., Brough, H.A.et al. (2015) Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy. N. Engl. J. Med., 372, 803–813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. van Eerde, A., Gottschamel, J., Bock, R., Hansen, K.E.A., Munang'andu, H.M., Daniell, H. and Liu Clarke, J. (2019) Production of tetravalent dengue virus envelope protein domain III‐based antigens in lettuce chloroplasts and immunologic analysis for future oral vaccine development. Plant Biotechnol. J., 17, 1408–1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Endo, T., Asaka, D., Nakayama, T., Saito, S., Kodama, H., Mitsuyoshi, R., Takaishi, S.et al. (2021) Immunological and symptomatic effects of oral intake of transgenic rice containing 7 linked major T‐cell epitopes from Japanese cedar pollen allergens. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 182, 109–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Escobar, L.E., Molina‐Cruz, A. and Barillas‐Mury, C. (2020) BCG vaccine protection from severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 17720–17726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Farrance, C.E., Rhee, A., Jones, R.M., Musiychuk, K., Shamloul, M., Sharma, S., Mett, V.et al. (2011) A plant‐produced Pfs230 vaccine candidate blocks transmission of Plasmodium falciparum . Clin. Vaccine Immunol., 18, 1351–1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Feller, T., Thom, P., Koch, N., Spiegel, H., Addai‐Mensah, O., Fischer, R., Reimann, A.et al. (2013) Plant‐based production of recombinant Plasmodium surface protein pf38 and evaluation of its potential as a vaccine candidate. PLoS One, 8, e79920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Fishman, P.H., Bradley, R.M., Hom, B.E. and Moss, J. (1983) Uptake and metabolism of exogenous gangliosides by cultured cells: effect of choleragen on the turnover of GM1. J. Lipid Res., 24, 1002–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Fletcher, T.E., Gulzhan, A., Ahmeti, S., Al‐Abri, S.S., Asik, Z., Atilla, A., Beeching, N.J.et al. (2017) Infection prevention and control practice for Crimean‐Congo hemorrhagic fever: a multi‐center cross‐sectional survey in Eurasia. PLoS One, 12, e0182315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Floss, D.M., Mockey, M., Zanello, G., Brosson, D., Diogon, M., Frutos, R., Bruel, T.et al. (2010) Expression and immunogenicity of the mycobacterial Ag85B/ESAT‐6 antigens produced in transgenic plants by elastin‐like peptide fusion strategy. J. Biomed. Biotechnol., 2010, 274346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Fogel, N. (2015) Tuberculosis: a disease without boundaries. Tuberculosis, 95, 527–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Fox, H., Knowlson, S., Minor, P.D. and Macadam, A.J. (2017) Genetically thermo‐stabilised, immunogenic Poliovirus empty capsids; a strategy for non‐replicating vaccines. PLoS Pathog., 13, e1006117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Gautret, P., Diaz‐Menendez, M., Goorhuis, A., Wallace, R.M., Msimang, V., Blanton, J., Dacheux, L.et al. (2020) Epidemiology of rabies cases among international travellers, 2013–2019: a retrospective analysis of published reports. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis., 36, 101766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Geldhof, P., De Maere, V., Vercruysse, J. and Claerebout, E. (2007) Recombinant expression systems: the obstacle to helminth vaccines? Trends in Parasitol., 23, 527–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ghiasi, S.M., Salmanian, A.H., Chinikar, S. and Zakeri, S. (2011) Mice orally immunized with a transgenic plant expressing the glycoprotein of Crimean‐Congo hemorrhagic fever virus. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18, 2031–2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Girard, L.S., Fabis, M.J., Bastin, M., Courtois, D., Pétiard, V. and Koprowski, H. (2006) Expression of a human anti‐rabies virus monoclonal antibody in tobacco cell culture. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 345, 602–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Gottschamel, J., Lossl, A., Ruf, S., Wang, Y., Skaugen, M., Bock, R. and Clarke, J.L. (2016) Production of dengue virus envelope protein domain III‐based antigens in tobacco chloroplasts using inducible and constitutive expression systems. Plant Mol. Biol. 91, 497–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Griffin, D.E. (2018) Measles vaccine. Viral Immunol. 31, 86–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hamorsky, K.T., Kouokam, J.C., Bennett, L.J., Baldauf, K.J., Kajiura, H., Fujiyama, K. and Matoba, N. (2013) Rapid and scalable plant‐based production of a cholera toxin B subunit variant to aid in mass vaccination against cholera outbreaks. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7, e2046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Hamorsky, K.T., Kouokam, J.C., Jurkiewicz, J.M., Nelson, B., Moore, L.J., Husk, A.S., Kajiura, H.et al. (2015) N‐glycosylation of cholera toxin B subunit in Nicotiana benthamiana: impacts on host stress response, production yield and vaccine potential. Sci. Rep., 5, 8003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. He, J., Lai, H., Brock, C. and Chen, Q. (2012) A novel system for rapid and cost‐effective production of detection and diagnostic reagents of West Nile virus in plants. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 106783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. He, J., Lai, H., Engle, M., Gorlatov, S., Gruber, C., Steinkellner, H., Diamond, M.S.et al. (2014a) Generation and analysis of novel plant‐derived antibody‐based therapeutic molecules against West Nile virus. PLoS One, 9, e93541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. He, J., Peng, L., La, H., Hurtado, J., Stahnke, J. and Chen, Q. (2014b) A plant‐produced antigen elicits potent immune responses against West Nile virus in mice. Biomed. Res. Int., 2014, 952865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Helander, H.F. and Fandriks, L. (2014) Surface area of the digestive tract ‐ revisited. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 49, 681–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Herzog, R.W., Nichols, T.C., Su, J., Zhang, B., Sherman, A., Merricks, E.P., Raymer, R.et al. (2017) Oral tolerance induction in Hemophilia B dogs fed with transplastomic lettuce. Mol. Ther. 25, 512–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hird, T.R. and Grassly, N.C. (2012) Systematic review of mucosal immunity induced by oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines against virus shedding following oral poliovirus challenge. PLoS Pathog. 8, 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hofbauer, A., Melnik, S., Tschofen, M., Arcalis, E., Phan, H.T., Gresch, U., Lampel, J.et al. (2016) The encapsulation of hemagglutinin in protein bodies achieves a stronger immune response in mice than the soluble antigen. Front. Plant. Sci. 7, 142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Hokke, C.H. and van Diepen, A. (2017) Helminth glycomics ‐ glycan repertoires and host‐parasite interactions. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 215, 47–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Hotez, P.J., Beaumier, C.M., Gillespie, P.M., Strych, U., Hayward, T. and Bottazzi, M.E. (2016) Advancing a vaccine to prevent hookworm disease and anemia. Vaccine, 34, 3001–3005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Huang, Z., Dry, I., Webster, D., Strugnell, R. and Wesselingh, S. (2001) Plant‐derived measles virus hemagglutinin protein induces neutralizing antibodies in mice. Vaccine, 19, 2163–2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Jackson, A.C. (2016) Human Rabies: a 2016 update. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 18, 38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Jani, D., Meena, L.S., Rizwan‐ul‐Haq, Q.M., Singh, Y., Sharma, A.K. and Tyagi, A.K. (2002) Expression of cholera toxin B subunit in transgenic tomato plants. Transgenic Res. 11, 447–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Jones, R.M., Manceva, S.D., Rhee, A., Tottey, S., Norikane, J., Guimarães, R.C., Chichester, J.A.et al. (2018) Plant‐produced subunit vaccine candidates against Yellow Fever induce virus neutralizing antibodies and confer protection against viral challenge in animal models. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 98, 420–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Kaiser, J.A. and Barrett, A. (2019) Twenty years of progress toward west nile virus vaccine development. Viruses, 11, 823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kanagaraj, A.P., Verma, D. and Daniell, H. (2011) Expression of dengue‐3 premembrane and envelope polyprotein in lettuce chloroplasts. Plant Mol. Biol. 76, 323–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Kashima, K., Yuki, Y., Mejima, M., Kurokawa, S., Suzuki, Y., Minakawa, S., Takeyama, N.et al. (2016) Good manufacturing practices production of a purification‐free oral cholera vaccine expressed in transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell Rep. 35, 667–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Keshtkar‐Jahromi, M., Kuhn, J.H., Christova, I., Bradfute, S.B., Jahrling, P.B. and Bavari, S. (2011) Crimean‐Congo hemorrhagic fever: current and future prospects of vaccines and therapies. Antiviral Res. 90, 85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Khan, I., Twyman, R.M., Arcalis, E. and Stoger, E. (2012) Using storage organelles for the accumulation and encapsulation of recombinant proteins. Biotechnol. J. 7, 1099–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Khetarpal, N. and Khanna, I. (2016) Dengue fever: causes, complications, and vaccine strategies. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 6803098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kim, H., Kwon, K.W., Park, J., Kang, H., Lee, Y., Sohn, E.‐J., Hwang, I.et al. (2020) Plant‐produced N‐glycosylated Ag85A exhibits enhanced vaccine efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis HN878 through balanced multifunctional Th1 T cell immunity. Vaccines, 8, 189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kim, M.Y., Copland, A., Nayak, K., Chandele, A., Ahmed, M.S., Zhang, Q. and Reljic, R. (2018) Plant‐expressed Fc‐fusion protein tetravalent dengue vaccine with inherent adjuvant properties. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1283–1294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kim, M.Y., Kim, B.Y., Oh, S.M., Reljic, R., Jang, Y.S. and Yang, M.S. (2016) Oral immunisation of mice with transgenic rice calli expressing cholera toxin B subunit fused to consensus dengue cEDIII antigen induces antibodies to all four dengue serotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 92, 347–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kim, M.Y., Li, J.Y., Tien, N.Q. and Yang, M.S. (2017a) Expression and assembly of cholera toxin B subunit and domain III of dengue virus 2 envelope fusion protein in transgenic potatoes. Protein Expr. Purif. 139, 57–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Kim, M.Y., Reljic, R., Kilbourne, J., Ceballos‐Olvera, I., Yang, M.S., Reyes‐del Valle, J. and Mason, H.S. (2015) Novel vaccination approach for dengue infection based on recombinant immune complex universal platform. Vaccine, 33, 1830–1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Kim, M.‐Y., Van Dolleweerd, C., Copland, A., Paul, M.J., Hofmann, S., Webster, G.R., Julik, E.et al. (2017b) Molecular engineering and plant expression of an immunoglobulin heavy chain scaffold for delivery of a dengue vaccine candidate. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 1590–1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kim, T.G., Kim, M.Y. and Yang, M.S. (2010) Cholera toxin B subunit‐domain III of dengue virus envelope glycoprotein E fusion protein production in transgenic plants. Protein Expr. Purif. 7, 236–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kim, T.G., Kim, M.Y., Huy, N.X., Kim, S.H. and Yang, M.S. (2013) M cell‐targeting ligand and consensus dengue virus envelope protein domain III fusion protein production in transgenic rice calli. Mol. Biotechnol. 54, 880–887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Kim, T.G., Kim, M.Y., Tien, N.Q., Huy, N.X. and Yang, M.S. (2014) Dengue virus E glycoprotein production in transgenic rice callus. Mol. Biotechnol. 56, 1069–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Koya, V., Moayeri, M., Leppla, S.H. and Daniell, H. (2005) Plant‐based vaccine: mice immunized with chloroplast‐derived anthrax protective antigen survive anthrax lethal toxin challenge. Infect. Immun. 73, 8266–8274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Kumar, S.R.P., Wang, X., Avuthu, N., Bertolini, T.B., Terhorst, C., Guda, C., Daniell, H.et al. (2020) Role of small intestine and gut microbiome in plant‐based oral tolerance for hemophilia. Front. Immunol. 11, 844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Kumari, U., Singh, R., Ray, T., Rana, S., Saha, P., Malhotra, K. and Daniell, H. (2019) Validation of leaf enzymes in the detergent and textile industries: launching of a new platform technology. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 1167–1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Kwon, K.C., Chan, H.T., León, I.R., Williams‐Carrier, R., Barkan, A. and Daniell, H. (2016) Codon optimization to enhance expression yields insights into chloroplast translation. Plant Physiol. 172, 62–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Kwon, K.C. and Daniell, H. (2016) Oral delivery of protein drugs bioencapsulated in plant cells. Mol. Ther. 24, 1342–1350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Kwon, K.C., Nityanandam, R., New, J.S. and Daniell, H. (2013) Oral delivery of bioencapsulated exendin‐4 expressed in chloroplasts lowers blood glucose level in mice and stimulates insulin secretion in beta‐TC6 cells. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 77–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Kwon, K.C., Sherman, A., Chang, W.J., Kamesh, A., Biswas, M., Herzog, R.W. and Daniell, H. (2018) Expression and assembly of largest foreign protein in chloroplasts: oral delivery of human FVIII made in lettuce chloroplasts robustly suppresses inhibitor formation in haemophilia A mice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1148–1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Lai, H., Engle, M., Fuchs, A., Keller, T., Johnson, S., Gorlatov, S., Diamond, M.S.et al. (2010) Monoclonal antibody produced in plants efficiently treats West Nile virus infection in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 2419–2424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Lai, H., He, J., Engle, M., Diamond, M.S. and Chen, Q. (2012) Robust production of virus‐like particles and monoclonal antibodies with geminiviral replicon vectors in lettuce. Plant Biotechnol. J. 10, 95–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Lai, H., He, J., Hurtado, J., Stahnke, J., Fuchs, A., Mehlhop, E., Gorlatov, S.et al. (2014) Structural and functional characterization of an anti‐West Nile virus monoclonal antibody and its single‐chain variant produced in glycoengineered plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 1098–1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Lai, H., Paul, A.M., Sun, H., He, J., Yang, M., Bai, F. and Chen, Q. (2018) A plant‐produced vaccine protects mice against lethal West Nile virus infection without enhancing Zika or dengue virus infectivity. Vaccine, 36, 1846–1852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Lakshmi, P.S., Verma, D., Yang, X., Lloyd, B. and Daniell, H. (2013) Low cost tuberculosis vaccine antigens in capsules: expression in chloroplasts, bio‐encapsulation, stability and functional evaluation in vitro. PLoS One, 8, e54708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Lange, S. and Holmgren, J. (1978) Protective antitoxic cholera immunity in mice: influence of route and number of immunizations and mode of action of protective antibodies. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. C. 86, 145–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Larson, H.J., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D.M. and Paterson, P. (2014) Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature. Vaccine, 32, 2150–2159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Lee, C., Kim, H.H., Choi, K.M., Chung, K.W., Choi, Y.K., Jang, M.J., Kim, T.S.et al. (2011a) Murine immune responses to a Plasmodium vivax‐derived chimeric recombinant protein expressed in Brassica napus . Malar. J. 10, 106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Lee, S.B., Li, B., Jin, S. and Daniell, H. (2011b) Expression and characterization of antimicrobial peptides Retrocyclin‐101 and Protegrin‐1 in chloroplasts to control viral and bacterial infections. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9, 100–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Li, W.K., Chen, Y.Z., Zhou, Y. and Xu, H. (2003) Regeneration of F. hepatica protective antigenic gene transgenic alfalfa plants by Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer. J. Sichuan Univ. 40, 144–147. [Google Scholar]
  114. Liu, Y., Kamesh, A.C., Xiao, Y., Sun, V., Hayes, M., Daniell, H. and Koo, H. (2016) Topical delivery of low‐cost protein drug candidates made in chloroplasts for biofilm disruption and uptake by oral epithelial cells. Biomaterials, 105, 156–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Lobato Gómez, M., Huang, X., Alvarez, D., He, W., Baysal, C., Zhu, C., Armario‐Najera, V.et al. (2021) Contributions of the international plant science community to the fight against human infectious diseases – part 1: epidemic and pandemic diseases. Plant Biotechnol. J., (in press) . 10.1111/pbi.13657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Longini, I.M.Jr, Nizam, A., Ali, M., Yunus, M., Shenvi, N. and Clemens, J.D. (2007) Controlling endemic cholera with oral vaccines. PLoS Medicine, 4, e336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Loza‐Rubio, E., Rojas, E., Gómez, L., Olivera, M.T. and Gómez‐Lim, M.A. (2008) Development of an edible rabies vaccine in maize using the Vnukovo strain. Dev. Biol., 131, 477–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Ma, J.‐K.‐C., Christou, P., Chikwamba, R., Haydon, H., Paul, M., Pujol, M., Ramalingam, S.et al. (2013) Realising the value of plant molecular pharming to benefit the poor in developing countries and emerging economies. Plant Biotechnol. J., 11, 1029–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Ma, J.K., Drossard, J., Lewis, D., Altmann, F., Boyle, J., Christou, P., Cole, T.et al. (2015) Regulatory approval and a first‐in‐human phase I clinical trial of a monoclonal antibody produced in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Biotechnol. J., 13, 1106–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Ma, J.K.C., Hikmat, B.Y., Wycoff, K., Vine, N.D., Chargelegue, D., Yu, L. and Hein, M.B. et al. (1998) Characterization of a recombinant plant monoclonal secretory antibody and preventive immunotherapy in humans. Nat. Med. 4, 601–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Maldaner, F.R., Aragão, F.J.L., dos Santos, F.B., Franco, O.L., Lima, M.D.R.Q., de Oliveira Resende, R. and Nagata, T. (2013) Dengue virus tetra‐epitope peptide expressed in lettuce chloroplasts for potential use in dengue diagnosis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 5721–5729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Marques, L.E.C., Silva, B.B., Dutra, R.F., Florean, E., Menassa, R. and Guedes, M.I.F. (2019) Transient expression of dengue virus NS1 antigen in Nicotiana benthamiana for use as a diagnostic antigen. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Marquet‐Blouin, E., Bouche, F.B., Steinmetz, A. and Muller, C.P. (2003) Neutralizing immunogenicity of transgenic carrot (Daucus carota L.)‐derived measles virus hemagglutinin. Plant Mol. Biol. 51, 459–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Marsian, J., Fox, H., Bahar, M.W., Kotecha, A., Fry, E.E., Stuart, D.I., Macadam, A.J.et al. (2017) Plant‐made polio type 3 stabilized VLPs‐a candidate synthetic polio vaccine. Nat. Comm. 8, 245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Marsian, J. and Lomonossoff, G.P. (2016) Molecular pharming ‐ VLPs made in plants. Curr. Opin. in Biotechnol. 37, 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Martinez, C.A., Topal, E., Giulietti, A.M., Talou, J.R. and Mason, H. (2010) Exploring different strategies to express Dengue virus envelope protein in a plant system. Biotechnol. Lett. 32, 867–875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Matsumoto, Y., Suzuki, S., Nozoye, T., Yamakawa, T., Takashima, Y., Arakawa, T., Tsuji, N.et al. (2008) Oral immunogenicity and protective efficacy in mice of transgenic rice plants producing a vaccine candidate antigen (As16) of Ascaris suum fused with cholera toxin B subunit. Transgenic Res. 18, 185–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. McDonald, K.A. and Holtz, R.B. (2020) From farm to finger prick ‐ a perspective on how plants can help in the fight against COVID‐19. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Mendoza, E.J., Warner, B., Safronetz, D. and Ranadheera, C. (2018) Crimean‐Congo haemorrhagic fever virus: past, present and future insights for animal modelling and medical countermeasures. Zoonoses Public Health, 65, 465–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Menzel, S., Holland, T., Boes, A., Spiegel, H., Bolzenius, J., Fischer, R. and Buyel, J.F. (2016) Optimized blanching reduces the host cell protein content and substantially enhances the recovery and stability of two plant‐derived malaria vaccine candidates. Front. Plant Sci., 7, 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Miller, L.H., Baruch, D.I., Marsh, K. and Doumbo, O.K. (2002) The pathogenic basis of malaria. Nature, 415, 673–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Minor, P. (2009) Vaccine‐derived poliovirus (VDPV): impact on poliomyelitis eradication. Vaccine, 27, 2649–2652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Moss, W.J. (2017) Measles. Lancet, 390, 2490–2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Mousavi‐Jazi, M., Karlberg, H., Papa, A., Christova, I. and Mirazimi, A. (2012) Healthy individuals immune response to the Bulgarian Crimean‐Congo hemorrhagic fever virus vaccine. Vaccine, 30, 6225–6229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Muller, C.P., Marquet‐Blouin, E., Fack, F., Damien, B., Steinmetz, A. and Bouche, F.B. (2003) Immunogenic measles antigens expressed in plants: role as an edible vaccine for adults. Vaccine, 21, 816–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Nochi, T., Yuki, Y., Katakai, Y., Shibata, H., Tokuhara, D., Mejima, M., Kurokawa, S.et al. (2009) A rice‐based oral cholera vaccine induces macaque‐specific systemic neutralizing antibodies but does not influence pre‐existing intestinal immunity. J. Immunol. 183, 6538–6544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. van Noort, K., Nguyen, D.L., Kriechbaumer, V., Hawes, C., Hokke, C.H., Schots, A. and Wilbers, R.H.P. (2020) Functional characterization of Schistosoma mansoni fucosyltransferases in Nicotiana benthamiana . Sci. Rep. 10, 18528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Oey, M., Lohse, M., Kreikemeyer, B. and Bock, R. (2009a) Exhaustion of the chloroplast protein synthesis capacity by massive expression of a highly stable protein antibiotic. Plant J., 57, 436–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Oey, M., Lohse, M., Scharff, L.B., Kreikemeyer, B. and Bock, R. (2009b) Plastid production of protein antibiotics against pneumonia via a new strategy for high‐level expression of antimicrobial proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 6579–6584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Pang, E.L., Peyret, H., Ramirez, A., Loh, H.S., Lai, K.S., Fang, C.M. and Lomonossoff, G.P. (2019) Epitope presentation of dengue viral envelope glycoprotein domain III on Hepatitis B core protein virus‐like particles produced in Nicotiana benthamiana . Front. Plant. Sci., 10, 455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Pang, J., Chia, P.Y., Lye, D.C. and Leo, Y.S. (2017) Progress and challenges towards point‐of‐care diagnostic development for dengue. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 3339–3349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Park, J., Yan, G., Kwon, K.C., Liu, M., Gonnella, P.A., Yang, S. and Daniell, H. (2020) Oral delivery of novel human IGF‐1 bioencapsulated in lettuce cells promotes musculoskeletal cell proliferation, differentiation and Diabetic fracture healing. Biomaterials, 233, 119591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Permyakova, N.V., Zagorskaya, A.A., Belavin, P.A., Uvarova, E.A., Nosareva, O.V., Nesterov, A.E., Novikovskaya, A.A.et al. (2015) Transgenic carrot expressing fusion protein comprising M. tuberculosis antigens induces immune response in mice. Biomed. Res. Int., 2015, 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Petersen, J.S., Bregenholt, S., Apostolopoulous, V., Homann, T., Wolfe, T., Hughes, A., De Jongh, K.et al. (2003) Coupling of human or porcine insulin to the B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) overcomes critical antigenic differences for prevention of Type 1 diabetes. Clin. Exp. Immunol., 134, 38–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Pinheiro‐Michelsen, J.R., Souza, R., Santana, I., da Silva, P.S., Mendez, E.C., Luiz, W.B. and Amorim, J.H. (2020) Anti‐dengue vaccines: from development to clinical trials. Front. Inmunol., 11, 1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Ponndorf, D., Meshcheriakova, Y., Thuenemann, E.C., Dobon Alonso, A., Overman, R., Holton, N., Dowall, S.et al. (2020) Plant‐made dengue virus‐like particles produced by co‐expression of structural and non‐structural proteins induce a humoral immune response in mice. Plant Biotechnol. J., 19, 745–756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Portnoy, A., Jit, M., Ferrari, M., Hanson, M., Brenzel, L. and Verguet, S. (2019) Estimates of case‐fatality ratios of measles in low‐income and middle‐income countries: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob. Health., 7, e472–e481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Quaresma, J.A., Pagliari, C., Medeiros, D.B., Duarte, M.I. and Vasconcelos, P.F. (2013) Immunity and immune response pathology and pathologic changes: progress and challenges in the immunopathology of yellow fever. Rev. Med. Virol., 23, 305–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Richie, E.E., Punjabi, N.H., Sidharta, Y.Y., Peetosutan, K.K., Sukandar, M.M., Wasserman, S.S., Lesmana, M.M.et al. (2000) Efficacy trial of single‐dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103‐HgR in North Jakarta, Indonesia, a cholera‐endemic area. Vaccine, 18, 2399–2410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Rigano, M.M., Dreitz, S., Kipnis, A.P., Izzo, A.A. and Walmsley, A.M. (2006) Oral immunogenicity of a plant‐made, subunit, tuberculosis vaccine. Vaccine, 24, 691–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Rizzo, S., Imperato, P., Mora‐Cárdenas, E., Konstantinidou, S., Marcello, A. and Sblattero, D. (2020) Selection and characterization of highly specific recombinant antibodies against West Nile Virus E protein. J. Biotechnol. 311, 35–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Rosales‐Mendoza, S. (2020) Will plant‐made biopharmaceuticals play a role in the fight against COVID‐19? Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 20, 545–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Rosales‐Mendoza, S. and Salazar‐Gonzalez, J.A. (2014) Immunological aspects of using plant cells as delivery vehicles for oral vaccines. Expert. Rev. Vaccines, 13, 737–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Ruhlman, T., Verma, D., Samson, N. and Daniell, H. (2010) The role of heterologous chloroplast sequence elements in transgene integration and expression. Plant Physiol. 152, 2088–2104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Rupprecht, C.E. and Dietzschold, B. (2017) Special issue: rabies symptoms, diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2, 59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Rybicki, E.P., Hitzeroth, I.I., Meyers, A., Dus Santos, M.J. and Wigdorovitz, A. (2013) Developing country applications of molecular farming: case studies in South Africa and Argentina. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19, 5612–5621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Saba, K., Gottschamel, J., Younus, I., Syed, T., Gull, K., Lössl, A.G., Mirza, B.et al. (2019) Chloroplast‐based inducible expression of ESAT‐6 antigen for development of a plant‐based vaccine against tuberculosis. J. biotechnol. 305, 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Saba, K., Sameeullah, M., Asghar, A., Gottschamel, J., Latif, S., Lössl, A.G., Mirza, B.et al. (2020) Expression of ESAT‐6 antigen from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in broccoli: An edible plant. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 67, 148–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Saito, S., Takagi, H., Wakasa, Y., Ozawa, K. and Takaiwa, F. (2020) Safety and efficacy of rice seed‐based oral allergy vaccine for Japanese cedar pollinosis in Japanese monkeys. Mol. Immunol. 125, 63–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Schwestka, J., Tschofen, M., Vogt, S., Marcel, S., Grillari, J., Raith, M., Swoboda, I.et al. (2020) Plant‐derived protein bodies as delivery vehicles for recombinant proteins into mammalian cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 117, 1037–1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Seid, C.A., Curti, E., Jones, R.M., Hudspeth, E., Rezende, W., Pollet, J., Center, L.et al. (2015) Expression, purification, and characterization of the Necator americanus aspartic protease‐1 (Na‐APR‐1 (M74)) antigen, a component of the bivalent human hookworm vaccine. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother., 11, 1474–1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Shenoy, V., Kwon, K.‐C., Rathinasabapathy, A., Lin, S., Jin, G., Song, C., Shil, P.et al. (2014) Oral delivery of Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 and Angiotensin‐(1–7) bioencapsulated in plant cells attenuates pulmonary hypertension. Hypertension, 64, 1248–1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Sherman, A., Su, J., Lin, S., Wang, X., Herzog, R.W. and Daniell, H. (2014) Suppression of inhibitor formation against FVIII in a murine model of hemophilia A by oral delivery of antigens bioencapsulated in plant cells. Blood, 124, 1659–1668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Shil, P.K., Kwon, K.C., Zhu, P., Verma, A., Daniell, H. and Li, Q. (2014) Oral delivery of ACE2/Ang‐(1–7) bioencapsulated in plant cells protects against experimental uveitis and autoimmune uveoretinitis. Mol. Ther. 22, 2069–2082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Simon, L.V., Hashmi, M.F., and Torp, K.D. (2020) Yellow Fever. 2020 Dec 1. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan–. PMID: 29262028. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470425/. [PubMed]
  166. Singh, A., Srivastava, S., Chouksey, A., Panwar, B.S., Verma, P.C., Roy, S., Singh, P.K.et al. (2015) Expression of rabies glycoprotein and ricin toxin B chain (RGP‐RTB) fusion protein in tomato hairy roots: a step towards oral vaccination for rabies. Mol. Biotechnol., 57, 359–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Snapper, C.M. (2018) Distinct immunologic properties of soluble versus particulate antigens. Front. Immunol., 9, 598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Spök, A., Twyman, R.M., Fischer, R., Ma, J.‐K.‐C., and Sparrow, P.A.C. (2008) Evolution of a regulatory framework for pharmaceuticals derived from genetically modified plants. Trends Biotechnol., 26, 506–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Srinivasan, A., Herzog, R.W., Khan, I., Sherman, A., Bertolini, T., Wynn, T. and Daniell, H. (2021) Preclinical development of plant‐based oral immune modulatory therapy for haemophilia B. Plant Biotechnol J. (online first, 10.1111/pbi.13608) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Staub, J.M., Garcia, B., Graves, J., Hajdukiewicz, P.T.J., Hunter, P., Nehra, N., Paradkar, V.et al. (2000) High yield production of a human therapeutic protein in tobacco chloroplasts. Nature Biotechnol., 18, 333–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Su, J., Zhu, L., Sherman, A., Wang, X., Lin, S., Kamesh, A., Norikane, J.H.et al. (2015) Low cost industrial production of coagulation factor IX bioencapsulated in lettuce cells for oral tolerance induction in hemophilia B. Biomaterials, 70, 84–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Sutherland, I.A. and Leathwick, D.M. (2011) Anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of cattle: a global issue? Trends Parasitol., 27, 176–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Tacket, C.O., Mason, H.S., Losonsky, G., Clements, J.D., Levine, M.M. and Arntzen, C.J. (1998) Immunogenicity in humans of a recombinant bacterial‐antigen delivered in transgenic potato. Nat. Med., 4, 607–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Tacket, C.O., Mason, H.S., Losonsky, G., Estes, M.K., Levine, M.M. and Arntzen, C.J. (2000) Human immune responses to a novel norwalk virus vaccine delivered in transgenic potatoes. J. Infect. Dis., 182, 302–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Takagi, H., Hiroi, T., Yang, L., Takamura, K., Ishimitsu, R., Kawauchi, H. and Takaiwa, F. (2008) Efficient induction of oral tolerance by fusing cholera toxin B subunit with allergen‐specific T‐cell epitopes accumulated in rice seed. Vaccine, 26, 6027–6030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Takaiwa, F., Wakasa, Y., Takagi, H. and Hiroi, T. (2015) Rice seed for delivery of vaccines to gut mucosal immune tissues. Plant Biotechnol J., 13, 1041–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Talapko, J., Škrlec, I., Alebić, T., Jukić, M. and Včev, A. (2019) Malaria: the past and the present. Microorganisms, 7, 179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Terryn, S., Francart, A., Rommelaere, H., Stortelers, C. and Van Gucht, S. (2016) Post‐exposure treatment with Anti‐Rabies VHH and vaccine significantly improves protection of mice from lethal rabies infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., 10, e0004902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Thomas, S.J. and Yoon, I.K. (2019) A review of Dengvaxia®: development to deployment. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother., 15, 2295–2314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Tilles, S.A. and Petroni, D. (2018) FDA‐approved peanut allergy treatment: the first wave is about to crest. Ann. Allergy Asthma. Immunol., 121, 145–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Tregoning, J.S., Clare, S., Bowe, F., Edwards, L., Fairweather, N., Qazi, O., Nixon, P.J.et al. (2005) Protection against tetanus toxin using a plant‐based vaccine. Eur. J. Immunol., 35, 1320–1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Tregoning, J.S., Nixon, P., Kuroda, H., Svab, Z., Clare, S., Bowe, F., Fairweather, N.et al. (2003) Expression of tetanus toxin fragment C in tobacco chloroplasts. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 1174–1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Tsekoa, T.L., Lotter‐Stark, T., Buthelezi, S., Chakauya, E., Stoychev, S.H., Sabeta, C., Shumba, W.et al. (2016) Efficient in vitro and in vivo activity of glyco‐engineered plant‐produced Rabies monoclonal antibodies E559 and 62–71‐3. PLoS One, 11, e0159313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Tusé, D., Nandi, S., McDonald, K.A. and Buyel, J.F. (2020) The emergency response capacity of plant‐based biopharmaceutical manufacturing‐what it is and what it could be. Front. Plant. Sci. 11, 504019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Ulbert, S. (2019) West Nile virus vaccines ‐ current situation and future directions. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 15, 2337–2342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Uvarova, E.A., Belavin, P.A., Permyakova, N.V., Zagorskaya, A.A., Nosareva, O.V., Kakimzhanova, A.A. and Deineko, E.V. (2013) Oral immunogenicity of plant‐made Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT6 and CFP10. Biomed. Res. Int., 2013, 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Van Dolleweerd, C.J., Teh, A.Y., Banyard, A.C., Both, L., Lotter‐Stark, H.C., Tsekoa, T., Phahladira, B.et al. (2014) Engineering, expression in transgenic plants and characterisation of E559, a rabies virus‐neutralising monoclonal antibody. J. Infect. Dis., 210, 200–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Vickery, B.P., Vereda, A., Casale, T.B., Beyer, K., du Toit, G., Hourihane, J.O., Jones, S.M.et al. (2018) AR101 Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy. N. Engl. J. Med., 379, 1991–2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Virdi, V., Palaci, J., Laukens, B., Ryckaert, S., Cox, E., Vanderbeke, E., Depicker, A.et al. (2019) Yeast‐secreted, dried and food‐admixed monomeric IgA prevents gastrointestinal infection in a piglet model. Nature Biotechnol., 37, 527–530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Voepel, N., Boes, A., Edgue, G., Beiss, V., Kapelski, S., Reimann, A., Schillberg, S.et al. (2014) Malaria vaccine candidate antigen targeting the pre‐erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum produced at high level in plants. Biotechnol. J., 9, 1435–1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Wassmer, S.C., Taylor, T.E., Rathod, P.K., Mishra, S.K., Mohanty, S., Arevalo‐Herrera, M., Duraisingh, M.T.et al. (2015) Investigating the pathogenesis of severe malaria: a multidisciplinary and cross‐geographical approach. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 93, 42–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Watson, J., Koya, V., Leppla, S.H. and Daniell, H. (2004) Expression of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen in transgenic chloroplasts of tobacco, a non‐food/feed crop. Vaccine, 22, 4374–4384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Webb, S.R., Twyman, R.M. and Moloney, M. (2020) Agtech infrastructure for pandemic preparedness. Nat. Biotechnol., 38, 1025–1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Webster, D.E., Cooney, M.L., Huang, Z., Drew, D.R., Ramshaw, I.A., Dry, I.B., Strugnell, R.A.et al. (2002) Successful boosting of a DNA measles immunization with an oral plant‐derived measles virus vaccine. J. Virol., 76, 7910–7912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Webster, D.E., Smith, S.D., Pickering, R.J., Strugnell, R.A., Dry, I.B. and Wesselingh, S.L. (2006) Measles virus hemagglutinin protein expressed in transgenic lettuce induces neutralising antibodies in mice following mucosal vaccination. Vaccine, 24, 3538–3544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Webster, D.E., Thomas, M.C., Huang, Z. and Wesselingh, S.L. (2005) The development of a plant‐based vaccine for measles. Vaccine, 23, 1859–1865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Whitehead, M., Öhlschläger, P., Almajhdi, F.N., Alloza, L., Marzábal, P., Meyers, A.E., Hitzeroth, I.I.et al. (2014) Human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E7 protein bodies cause tumour regression in mice. BMC Cancer, 14, 367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. WHO (2016) Malaria terminology. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/208815/WHO_HTM_GMP_2016.6_eng.pdf?sequence=1
  199. WHO (2020a) Malaria ‐ key facts. https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/malaria
  200. WHO (2020b) Malaria vaccine implementation programme: One year on. https://www.who.int/immunization/diseases/malaria/malaria_vaccine_implementation_programme/en/
  201. WHO (2020c) Soil‐transmitted helminth infections. https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/soil‐transmitted‐helminth‐infections
  202. Wilbers, R.H.P., Westerhog, L.B., van Noort, K., Obieglo, K., Driessen, N.N., Everts, B., Gringhuis, S.I.et al. (2017) Production and glyco‐engineering of immunomodulatory helminth glycoproteins in plants. Sci. Rep., 7, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Wilder‐Smith, A. (2020) Dengue vaccine development: status and future Entwicklung von Impfstoffen gegen Dengue: aktueller Stand und Zukunft. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 63, 40–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Wilson, M.E. (2005) Travel and the Emergence of Infectious Diseases. J. Agromedicine., 9, 159–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Xiao, Y. and Daniell, H. (2017) Long‐term evaluation of mucosal and systemic immunity and protection conferred by different polio booster vaccines. Vaccine, 35, 5418–5425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Xiao, Y., Kwon, K.‐C., Hoffman, B.E., Kamesh, A., Jones, N.T., Herzog, R.W. and Daniell, H. (2016) Low cost delivery of proteins bioencapsulated in plant cells to human non‐immune or immune modulatory cells. Biomaterials, 80, 68–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Yaari, R., Kaliner, E., Grotto, I., Katriel, G., Moran‐Gilad, J., Sofer, D., Mendelson, E.et al. (2016) Modeling the spread of polio in an IPV‐vaccinated population: lessons learned from the 2013 silent outbreak in southern Israel. BMC. Med., 14, 95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Yoshikawa, M.J., Kusriastuti, R. and Liew, C. (2020) An interdisciplinary study: disseminating information on dengue prevention and control in the world‐famous travel destination, Bali. Indonesia. Evolut. Inst. Econ. Rev., 17, 265–293. [Google Scholar]
  209. Yuan, X., Huang, F.S., Qiu, Y., Hao, Z.Y. and Chen, E.M. (2008) Expression of Schistosoma japonicum ferritin in Brassia napus . Chinese. J. Vet. Sci., 28, 926–929. [Google Scholar]
  210. Yuki, Y. and Kiyono, H. (2008) MucoRice: development of rice‐based oral vaccine. Japanese. J. Clin. Immunol., 31, 369–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Yuki, Y., Mejima, M., Kurokawa, S., Hiroiwa, T., Takahashi, Y., Tokuhara, D., Nochi, T.et al. (2013) Induction of toxin‐specific neutralizing immunity by molecularly uniform rice‐based oral cholera toxin B subunit vaccine without plant‐associated sugar modification. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 11, 799–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Yuki, Y., Tokuhara, D., Nochi, T., Yasuda, H., Mejima, M., Kurokawa, S., Takahashi, Y.et al. (2009) Oral MucoRice expressing double‐mutant cholera toxin A and B subunits induces toxin‐specific neutralising immunity. Vaccine, 27, 5982–5988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Yusibov, V., Hooper, D.C., Spitsin, S.V., Fleysh, N., Kean, R.B., Mikheeva, T., Deka, D.et al. (2002) Expression in plants and immunogenicity of plant virus‐based experimental rabies vaccine. Vaccine, 20, 3155–3164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Zeitlin, L., Olmsted, S.S., Moench, T.R., Co, M.S., Martinell, B.J., Paradkar, V.M., Russell, D.R.et al. (1998) A humanized monoclonal antibody produced in transgenic plants for immunoprotection of the vagina against genital herpes. Nat. Biotechnol., 16, 1361–1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Zelada, A.M., Calamante, G., de la Paz Santangelo, M., Bigi, F., Verna, F., Mentaberry, A. and Cataldi, A. (2006) Expression of tuberculosis antigen ESAT‐6 in Nicotiana tabacum using a potato virus X‐based vector. Tuberculosis, 86, 263–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Li, J., Liu, Y., Hu, Y. and Cai, H. (2012) Oral immunogenicity of potato‐derived antigens to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Acta. Biochim. Biophys. Sin., 44, 823–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Zimmermann, J., Saalbach, I., Jahn, D., Giersberg, M., Haehnel, S., Wedel, J., Macek, J.et al. (2009) Antibody expressing pea seeds as fodder for prevention of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in chickens. BMC Biotechnol., 9, 79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1 Classification of endemic and re‐emerging diseases based on their epidemiology.

Click here for additional data file. (55.8KB, docx)

Articles from Plant Biotechnology Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES