Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2021 Jul 2;71(7):004866. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004866

Mangrovivirga cuniculi gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from bioturbated Red Sea mangrove sediment, and proposal of the novel family Mangrovivirgaceae fam. nov.

Fatmah O Sefrji 1, Grégoire Michoud 1, Ramona Marasco 1, Giuseppe Merlino 1, Daniele Daffonchio 1,*
PMCID: PMC8489838  PMID: 34214025

Abstract

A strictly aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, non-motile, rod-shaped bacterium, designated strain R1DC9T, was isolated from sediments of a mangrove stand on the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia via diffusion chamber cultivation. Strain R1DC9T grew at 20–40 °C (optimum, 37 °C), pH 6–10 (optimum, pH 8) and 3–11 % NaCl (optimum, 7–9 %) in the cultivation medium. The genome of R1DC9T was 4 661 901 bp long and featured a G+C content of 63.1 mol%. Phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence and whole-genome multilocus sequence analysis using 120 concatenated single-copy genes revealed that R1DC9T represents a distinct lineage in the order Cytophagales and the phylum Bacteroidetes separated from the Roseivirgaceae and Marivirgaceae families. R1DC9T displayed 90 and 89 % 16S rRNA gene sequence identities with Marivirga sericea DSM 4125T and Roseivirga ehrenbergii KMM 6017T, respectively. The predominant quinone was MK7. The polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, two unknown phospholipids and two unknown lipids. The predominant cellular fatty acids were the saturated branch chain fatty acids iso-C15 : 0, iso-C17 : 0 3-OH and iso-C17 : 0, along with a low percentage of the monounsaturated fatty acid C16 : 1  ω5c. Based on differences in phenotypic, physiological and biochemical characteristics from known relatives, and the results of phylogenetic analyses, R1DC9T (=KCTC 72349T=JCM 33609T=NCCB 100698T) is proposed to represent a novel species in a new genus, and the name Mangrovivirga cuniculi gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The distinct phylogenetic lineage among the families in the order Cytophagales indicates that R1DC9T represents a new family for which the name Mangrovivirgaceae fam. nov. is proposed.

Keywords: Bacteroidetes, cultivation, mangrove crabs, Mangrovivirgaceae, Mangrovivirga, mangrove sediments


Mangroves represent one of the most productive ecosystems, playing an important role in nutrient cycling and energy flow at the dynamic interface between land and sea [1, 2]. Mangrove sediments harbour an enormous microbial biomass (1×109–1×1011 cells per gram of sediment [3, 4]) rich in functional and phylogenetic diversity [5–7]. Bacteroidetes account for a significant fraction of the bacterial community (i.e., 5–45 % in mangrove sediments and contiguous environmental niches such as mangrove plant tissues [6–10]), indicating their importance in marine ecosystems, similar to other coastal and offshore sediments, seawater and hydrothermal vents [11–14].

The phylum Bacteroidetes comprises four classes: Bacteroidia, Flavobacteriia, Sphingobacteriia and Cytophagia [15]. The taxonomy of this last class—including only the order Cytophagales—was recently revised with the inclusion of the families Cesiribacteraceae, Flexibacteraceae, Fulvivirgaceae, Marivirgaceae, Reichenbachiellaceae, Roseivirgaceae and Thermoflexibacteraceae [16–21]. Notably, the number of recognized genera in the phylum Bacteroidetes has increased exponentially [22–25], suggesting that this phylum contains untapped diversity.

In this study, we describe Mangrovivirga cuniculi gen. nov., sp. nov. (R1DC9T), which was isolated from crab-bioturbated mangrove sediment of the Red Sea coast, as the first representative species of a new genus (Mangrovivirga) and family (Mangrovivirgaceae) within the order Cytophagales.

Isolation and habitat

Strain R1DC9T was isolated from mangrove sediment bioturbated by crabs of the genus Uca at the Ibn Sina Field Research Station and Nature Conservation Area (22.34° N, 39.09° E), a coastal area encompassing 152 hectares at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). For isolation, a diffusion chamber (DC)-based approach [26] was used. Crab-bioturbated mangrove sediments (Fig. 1a) were sampled with sterile spoons and used as inocula for bacteria cultivation experiments. Aliquots of sediment and dead mangrove leaves from the site were also sampled for use as supplementary nutrient sources in the growth medium. Briefly, the DC contained an agar seawater matrix [1.5 % agar in filtered seawater (FSW) from the Red Sea] supplemented with 0.1 % sediment extract inside a confined environment (stainless steel washer) that was separated from the environment by two 0.03 µm pore-size polycarbonate membranes. Sediment extracts were prepared by mixing sediments with Milli-Q water at a 1 : 10 ratio. The obtained mixture was autoclaved for 30 min, centrifuged for 10 min at 11 000 r.p.m. and then filter-sterilized using 0.22 µm pore-size filters. The melted DC agar matrix (40 °C) was inoculated with bioturbated sediment diluted in FSW to 1×10−4 [27]. The sealed DCs were incubated in an aquarium (30×46×30 cm3) filled with the original sediments (5–8 cm thick layer) and seawater (5 cm thick layer above the sediments; Fig. 1b, c) for 21 days at room temperature (25±2 °C). After incubation, the DCs were opened under sterile conditions in a flow hood, and the FSW agar was homogenized via passage through a syringe equipped with a 25-gauge needle, diluted with FSW, and mixed with medium (molten FSW agar 1.5 % w/v and sediment extract at a final concentration of 0.1 % v/v) to a final dilution of 1×10−4. The obtained microbial culture was used to prepare standard plate cultures on Petri dishes containing FSW agar supplemented with 0.1 % sediment extract (incubated at 25 °C for 14 days). Colonies that grew on the dishes were further collected and picked up using long-tip glass Pasteur pipettes (Sigma-Aldrich), followed by sub-culture on plates containing 1 l 0.1×lysogeny broth (LB; supplemented with 10 g of tryptone, 5 g yeast extract and 20 g agar) prepared with FSW and supplemented with 0.1 % sterile sediments. R1DC9T inoculated on this medium was grown under aerobic conditions at 25 °C for 4 days to ensure bacterial colony development. This last step was repeated three times to obtain pure bacterial colonies. Pure cultures of R1DC9T were stored in 30 % glycerol at −80 °C and routinely cultivated in 1×LB prepared with FSW (therefore, LB+FSW). This medium had a final salinity of 4 % based on refractometry.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(a) Sediments in the mangrove forest at KAUST bioturbated by Uca species crabs; crab barrows are indicated by yellow arrows. Leaves forming mangrove litter are also visible. Bar, 10 cm. (b) Aquarium filled with mangrove bioturbated sediments and FSW for the incubation of DCs; bar, 6 cm. (c) Aerial view of DCs placed on the surface of mangrove sediments and cover with FSW inside the aquarium; bar, 6 cm.

Phylogeny based on the 16S rRNA and genome sequences

Fresh bacterial cultures grown in LB+FSW at 37 °C were used for total genomic DNA extraction using the Maxwell RSC Automated Nucleic Acid Purification system and a Maxwell RSC Cultured Cells DNA kit (Promega). The DNA concentration was quantified using a Qubit dsDNA assay and a high-sensitivity kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA quality was examined via electrophoresis on 1 % agarose gels with Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent). The genome of R1DC9T was sequenced using a PacBio RS2 sequencer (Pacific Biosciences) at the Bioscience Core Lab (KAUST, Saudi Arabia). The reads were assembled using SMRT analysis software (PacBio) and the HGAP.3 workflow [28]. The genome was annotated using the automated annotation pipeline Prokka [29]. The annotation and functionality of the new species were completed using RAST and KEGG [30–32]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence obtained from the R1DC9T genome was analysed using the RDP Classifier and blast to search the NCBI database for all available 16S rRNA sequences. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using the maximum-likelihood and neighbour-joining methods available in the megaX software package [33]. The topologies of the phylogenetic trees were evaluated via bootstrap analyses (based on 1000 replicates). Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) of the phylogenetic tree was performed with 120 concatenated single-copy genes using the GTDB-Tk software [34]. A bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates was used to evaluate the tree topology [35]. In silico DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH), blast-based average nucleotide identity (ANIb), and average amino acid identity (AAI) scores of R1DC9T and related species were calculated using GGDC, JSpeciesWS and AAI-profiler, respectively [36–39], with the default parameters. The 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MT146883 and CP028923.1, respectively.

The comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of R1DC9T with those of related taxa revealed that the closest related species were in the families Roseivirgaceae (Roseivirga echinicomitans KCTC 12370T, Roseivirga ehrenbergii KMM 6017T, Roseivirga seohaensis subsp. aquiponti D-25T, Roseivirga spongicola UST030701-084T) and Marivirgaceae (Marivirga sericea DSM 4125T, Marivirga tractuosa DSM 4126T), which exhibited blast similarities of 89%–89.2 % and 89.5%–89.7 %, respectively. We also noted that a 16S rRNA gene sequence relating to Flammeovirgaceae bacterium GY-1 (JX254915) exhibited 97.32 % similarity to our strain; however, as nothing else is known about this species (genome, physiology and chemotaxonomy) we did not include it in the subsequent analyses. The RDP classifier assigned R1DC9T to the family Flammeovirgaceae with 99 % confidence, but it designated the strain as an unclassified Flammeovirgaceae species with 44 % bootstrap confidence with the genus Marivirga. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence placed R1DC9T in a branch separated from the families Marivirgaceae, Cesiribacteraceae, Fulvivirgaceae, Reichenbachiellaceae and Roseivirgaceae (Fig. 2a). Notably, all these families were previously part of the family Flammeovirgaceae [20], explaining the results obtained using the RDP classifier. Similarly, the MLSA phylogenetic tree of 120 concatenated single-copy genes of R1DC9T (obtained from the genome) and related taxa illustrated that our strain formed a separated branch from the aforementioned families (Fig. 2b), supporting that our strain belongs to a new family within the order Cytophagales.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(a) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences presenting the position of Mangrovivirga cuniculi R1DC9T (MT146883). Only bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1000 replications) exceeding 50 % are shown at branching points. Psychroflexus torquis ATCC 700755T (GenBank accession no. U85881) was used as an outgroup. Bar, 0.040 substitutions per nucleotide position. Filled circles indicate branches that were also recovered using the neighbour-joining method. (b) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of R1DC9T relative to the other type strains within the order Cytophagales, including members of the families Marivirgaceae, Roseivirgaceae, Reichenbachiellaceae, Fulvivirgaceae, Cesiribacteraceae and Flammeovirgaceae. The phylogenetic tree was built using 120 concatenated single-copy genes obtained using GTDB-Tk software [34]. Bootstrap values greater than 50 % based on 1000 replications are indicated at branching nodes. Bar, 0.2 substitutions per nucleotide position.

In silico DDH, AAI and ANIb values were analysed to investigate the genetic relatedness of isolate R1DC9T with 12 fully sequenced genomes representing the families Cesiribacteraceae, Fulvivirgaceae, Marivirgaceae, Reichenbachiellaceae and Roseivirgaceae (Table 1). The DDH, AAI and ANIb values ranged 17–27.5 %, 55.4–61.4 % and 64–65 %, respectively, compared with the other described species (Table 1). As the standard criterion of DDH is 70 % for species discrimination, and 45–75 % for genus discrimination by AAI and ANIb, respectively [36, 40, 41], our data illustrated that R1DC9T represents a novel genus. Furthermore, to investigate the possibility that R1DC9T forms also a new family, we compared the pairwise AAI values of all sequenced genomes available within the families Cesiribacteraceae, Flammeovirgaceae, Fulvivirgaceae, Marivirgaceae, Reichenbachiellaceae, Roseivirgaceae and Thermonemataceae in the order Cytophagales. Results showed that average AAI values among each family range from 65.8%–91.9 % (i.e., all pairwise comparison between genomes of the same family), while average AAI values between families range from 56.7% to 62.6 % (i.e., all pairwise comparisons between genomes of different families; (Fig. S1, available in the online version of this article). As AAI similarities between strain R1DC9T and the other families range from 57.4% to 60.8 %, and a clear branching in the genome-based phylogenetic analysis separated R1DC9T from the aforementioned families (Fig. 2b), the new isolate was classified into the novel genus Mangrovivirga as the type species Mangrovivirga cuniculi gen. nov., sp. nov. (R1DC9T=KCTC 72349T=JCM 33609T=NCCB 100698T) in the new family Mangrovivirgaceae of the order Cytophagales and the phylum Bacteroidetes.

Table 1.

Average nucleotide identity via blast (ANIb), average amino acid identity (AAI) and in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH) matrix of the isolate R1DC9T relative to its closest related type strains

The cutoff for species discrimination was ≥70 % for DDH, whereas the cutoffs for genus discrimination was 45% and 75 % for AAI and ANIb, respectively.

Reference genome

Accession no.

ANIb (%)

Aligned nucleotide (%)

DDH (%)

AAI (%)

Marivirga tractuosa DSM 4126T

 GCF_000183425.1

65.9

21.5

18.2

60.2

Marivirga sericea DSM 4125T

 GCF_900177665.1

65.6

19.7

19.9

60.6

Roseivirga ehrenbergii KMM 6017T

 GCF_001593005.1

65.6

18.4

19.9

60.8

Roseivirga pacifica CGMCC 1.12402T

 GCF_900111145.1

65.5

16.9

20.1

55.4

Roseivirga seohaensis subsp. aquiponti D-25T

 GCF_001267955.1

65.5

18.5

22.1

61.4

Roseivirga spongicola UST030701-084T

 GCF_001592965.1

65.5

17.9

20.1

61.2

Roseivirga echinicomitans KMM 6058T

 GCF_900142205.1

65.4

18.4

22.4

60.1

Roseivirga misakiensis SK-8T

 GCF_001747105.1

65.1

17.4

21.4

60.4

Reichenbachiella agariperforans DSM 26134T

 GCF_900142205.1

65

13.7

21.2

59.6

Fulvivirga kasyanovii KMM6220T

 GCA_009711405.1

65

15.6

20

60.2

Nafulsella turpanensis ZLM-10T

 GCF_000346615.1

64.9

16.2

17

59.8

Cesiribacter andamanensis AMV16T

 GCF_000348925.1

64

12.6

27.5

59.8

Morphological, physiological and chemotaxonomic characterization

Cells were grown on LB+FSW for 3 days at 37 °C, harvested, washed with distilled water and fixed as described in Supplementary Method S1. Cell morphology was determined using an FEI Teneo scanning electron microscope at the Imaging Core Lab at KAUST. Colony morphology, size and colour were examined on LB+FSW plates incubated for 3 days at 37 °C. Gram staining was performed following the standard protocol [42]. Cell motility was assessed on a tube containing semisolid (0.3 % agar) LB+FSW medium using the hanging drop technique [43, 44]. The effect of temperature (15, 20, 25, 30, 37, 40, 45 and 50 °C) on growth was assessed using LB+FSW medium. Growth of the strain under different salt concentrations (0%–20 % NaCl, increased at intervals of 1 %) was also evaluated using LB medium. The temperature range and NaCl requirement for growth were recorded every 12 h over 4 days of incubation by measuring the optical density at 600 nm using a UV-1600PC spectrophotometer (VWR). Growth at pH 3.5–10 (increased at intervals of 0.5 pH units) was determined using Biolog Phenotype MicroArray PM10 and LB+FSW medium. The Biolog Phenotype Microarray was also used to assess the bacterial growth on different carbon sources (PM1 and PM2 plates) using IF-0a medium supplemented with 4 % NaCl. Growth in the presence of antibiotic compounds was also tested using PM11 and PM12 with LB+FSW medium. Bacterial culture and plate inoculation were performed by using Biolog products and following the manufacturer’s instructions for Gram-stain-negative bacteria; all plates were incubated at 37 °C for 7 days in in the Biolog OmniLog incubator. Additional enzyme activities and biochemical properties were examined. Oxidase activity was determined using oxidase test strips (Sigma-Aldrich). Catalase activity was determined by assessing bubble production in 3 % (v/v) H2O2 [45]. Indole production was evaluated by adding 500 µl of Kovac’s reagent (Sigma) to bacterial culture grown 3 days in LB+FSW and l-tryptophan. The nitrate reduction reaction was performed using a nitrate reduction kit (Sigma) and nitrate broth prepared with FSW, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Siderophore production was detected qualitatively with blue chrome azurol sulphonate agar plates, mineral phosphate solubilization was determined in Pikovskaya’s liquid medium amended with 0.5 % [Ca3(PO4)2] [46] and indole acetic acid (IAA) production was evaluated in LB+FSW medium supplemented with l-tryptophan using Salkowski’s reagent [47]. Ammonia production was evaluated by growing the bacterial strain in peptone FSW (peptone 10 g l-1) and mixing 0.2 ml of the culture supernatant with 1 ml Nessler’s reagent; development of a yellow to brown colour was evaluated as a proxy for ammonia production. Amylase, protease, lipase and cellulase activities were evaluated using LB+FSW medium containing 1.5 % starch, casein, Tween 80 and cellulose, respectively, as substrates. The formation of transparent halos or colour changes in the medium around the colonies indicated positive activities [9]. Analyses of fatty acid, polar lipid and respiratory quinone levels in R1DC9T cells cultivated in LB+FSW medium were performed by the Identification Service and Dr. Brian Tindall at the DSMZ (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany).

Cells of strain R1DC9T were Gram-stain-negative, non-spore-forming, strictly aerobic and rod-shaped (0.3–0.5 µm wide, 1–1.2 µm long; Fig. 3). When R1DC9T was cultivated on LB+FSW for 48 h at 37 °C, its colonies were circular with regular edges, smooth, shiny, orange and 1–2 mm in diameter. R1DC9T grew between 20 and 40 °C (optimum, 37 °C; Fig. S2a). The permissive pH range for growth was pH 6–10 (optimum, pH 8). The doubling time of the bacterium under optimal growth conditions was 6.5 h. The strain grew in the presence of 3%–11% NaCl (optimum, 7%–9 %) at 37 °C (Fig. S2b), indicating that the strain was halophilic [48]. This result revealed an adaptation to/dependence on the saline conditions of the mangrove sediments of the Red Sea, in which dilution with freshwater never occurs because of the extremely limited freshwater input (no rivers and extremely rare rainfall), and the sediments are cyclically water-logged by seawater during tides [6, 49]. The carbon sources used by R1DC9T for growth included pectin, 2-deoxy-d-ribose, d-ribose, 5-keto-d-gluconic acid, l-ornithine and dihydroxyacetone. The strain exhibited weak growth in the presence of thymidine, uridine and adenosine as the sole carbon source. The strain was positive for cytochrome oxidase, lipase activity and nitrate reduction, and it was negative for catalase, cellulase, amylase, protease and indole production. In addition, among the plant growth promoting (PGP) traits tested, R1DC9T was negative for siderophore production and phosphate solubilization, whereas it was positive for auxin (IAA) and ammonia production. While indole and IAA are catalysed from tryptophane, two different enzymes classes are responsible for their formation (tryptophanase and tryptophan N-monooxygenase for indole and IAA, respectively [50, 51]), thus explaining why R1DC9T cannot produce indole but can produce IAA. The morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of R1DC9T and its closest relatives are summarized in (Table 2). We chose these closest relatives based on their 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities to R1DC9T. Regarding antibiotics, R1DC9T was susceptible (i.e. bacterial growth was inhibited at all four antibiotic concentrations present in Biolog Phenotype Microarray plates) to rifampicin, spiramycin, penicillin G, nafcillin, lincomycin, cloxacillin, oxacillin, vancomycin, novobiocin and erythromycin, whereas strain R1DC9T was resistant (i.e., bacterial growth was observed at all four antibiotic concentrations present in Biolog plates) to spectinomycin, amikacin, kanamycin, lomefloxacin, gentamicin, neomycin, amoxicillin, bleomycin, colistin, minocycline, capreomycin, demeclocycline, tetracycline, sulfathiazole, sulfamethazine, sulfadiazine, sulfamethoxazole, paromomycin, sisomicin, tobramycin, cefazolin, enoxacin and ceftriaxone (Table S1). R1DC9T displayed resistance to low concentrations (i.e., first and second wells of each antibiotic in Biolog Phenotype Microarray plates) of chloramphenicol, chlortetracycline, carbenicillin, penimepicycline, polymyxin B, potassium tellurite, cephalothin and ofloxacin. It is important to note that antibiotic resistance is strain-specific; thus, these results are only attributable to the isolated strain.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Scanning electron microscopy image of Mangrovivirga cuniculi R1DC9T (bar, 1 µm).

Table 2.

General features and genomic and phenotypic characteristics of R1DC9T and its closest related members of the order Cytophagales

Strains: 1, R1DC9T (data from this study); 2, Marivirga tractuosa DSM 4126T [17]; 3, Roseivirga ehrenbergii SW-152T [18]; 4, Roseivirga misakiensis SK-8T [62]; 5, Fulvivirga kasyanovii KMM 6220T [63]. Characteristics are scored as (+) positive, (−) negative or no data available (na).

Characteristic

1

2

3

4

5

General features:

 Habitat

Mangrove sediment

Beach sand

Seawater

Coastal water

Seawater

 Morphology

Rod

Long-rod

Rod

Rod

Rod

 Pathogenicity

Growth at/with:

 Temperature (optimum)

20–40 (37)

10–40 (28–32)

4–40 (30)

10–30 (20–25)

14–44 (35–37)

 NaCl (optimum)

3–11 (7–9)

0.5–10 (4–7)

2–9 (2–3)

1–5

0–10 (2–3)

 pH (optimum)

6–10 (8)

na

5.5–9 (7–8)

6–10 (7–9)

na

Genome features:

 Genome size (bp)

4 661 901

4 516 490

4 160 330

4 452 385

7 174 826

 DNA G+C content (mol%)

36.1

35.5

40.3

39.1

59.9

Predominant menaquinone

MK-7

MK-7

MK-7

MK-7

MK-7

Utilization of:

d-Glucose

+

+

l-Arabinose

+

na

na

d-Mannose

+

 Arbutin

+

na

+

na

l-Ornithine

+

na

na

d-Ribose

+

na

na

na

 Maltose

+

+

 Mannitol

+

+

 Sucrose

+

 Sorbitol

+

na

Enzyme activities:

 Oxidase

+

+

+

+

+

 Catalase

+

+

+

+

 Cellulase

+

+

 Amylase

+

+

+

 Lipase

+

 Nitrate reduction

+

 Indole production

The major fatty acids (>5 %) of R1DC9T included the saturated branched chain fatty acids iso-C15 : 0 (57.1 %), iso-C17 : 0 3-OH (12.8 %) and iso-C17 : 0 (5.1 %), whereas the monounsaturated fatty acid C16 : 1  ω5c comprised 5.8 % of the total fatty acid content. The cellular fatty acid composition may change depending on the medium where cells have been grown, so the comparison of R1DC9T fatty acids with the published fatty acids of strains from the related families should be taken with caution, because fatty acids of strain R1DC9T were obtained from cells cultivated on LB+FSW, while most of the other compared strains were grown in marine broth (Table 3). R1DC9T differed from related families in the order Cytophagales based on its significantly higher proportion of iso-C15 : 0. The presence of C16 : 1  ω5c was also detected, whereas unsaturated chain fatty acids were poorly represented. The major respiratory quinone was MK7, which is the predominant quinone in the order Cytophagales. The polar lipid profile of R1DC9T included one phosphatidylethanolamine, two unknown phospholipids and two unknown lipids. Meanwhile, the absence of two aminolipids, one glycolipid and two unidentified polar lipids differentiated R1DC9T from the related species of the genera Marivirga and Roseivirga. Taken together, the chemotaxonomic results confirmed that R1DC9T belongs to the order Cytophagales but differs from the current families belonging to said order.

Table 3.

Cellular fatty acid composition (%) of R1DC9T (grown in LB+FSW) and closely related members (generally, grown in marine broth; growth medium specifications in the reference articles in the note) of Cytophagales

Strains: 1, R1DC9T (data from this study); 2, Marivirga tractuosa DSM 4126T [17]; 3, Roseivirga ehrenbergii SW-152T [64]; 4, Roseivirga misakiensis SK-8T [62]; 5, Fulvivirga kasyanovii KMM 6220T [63]. nd, Not detected. Bold indicates the prevalent fatty acid components in strain R1DC9T (i.e., > 5 %). Fatty acids accounting for less than 1 % in all the strains are not reported; tr, trace (<1 %).

Fatty acid

1

2

3

4

5

Saturated straight chain:

 C16 : 0

2.8

 C15 : 0

tr

4.4

Saturated branched chain:

 iso-C13 : 0

tr

1.2

4.3

 iso-C15 : 0

57.1

36.8

26.4

18.1

31.2

 anteiso-C15 : 0

tr

4.3

2.9

 iso-C16 : 0

tr

3.7

tr

 iso-C17 : 0

5.1

1.2

tr

Unsaturated branched chain:

 iso-G-C15 : 1

1.5

23

27.0

47.6

5.1

 iso-G-C16 : 1

1.4

tr

1.8

 C16 : 1  ω5c

5.8

 anteiso-C15 : 1

0.8

1.71

Hydroxylated:

 iso-C15 : 0 3-OH

3.2

5.7

6.2

7.0

 C16 : 0 3-OH

3.4

2.8

1.9

6.2

 iso-C16 : 0 3-OH

tr

2.8

5.7

4.7

 C17 : 0 2-OH

1.4

 iso-C17 : 0 3-OH

12.8

12.2

11.1

9.8

23.7

Summed feature 3*

tr

tr

2.4

24.7

Summed feature 4*

1.8

*Summed features are groups of two or three fatty acids that could not be separated via GLC using the midi system. Summed feature 3 comprises iso-C15 : 0 2-OH and/or C16 : 1  ω7c and/or C16 : 1  ω6c and/or and/or iso-C15 : 0 2-OH. Summed feature 4 comprises iso-C17 : 1 and/or anteiso-C17 : 1 B.

Genome features

The genome of R1DC9T is 4 661 901 bp long and its G+C content is 36.1 mol% (Fig. S3a). Among the 4316 annotated genes, 4247 are protein-coding sequences (CDS) and 12 are rRNA-coding genes, including four identical 16S rRNA genes (1544 bp) and 43 tRNA. In total, 54 % of the protein-coding genes were assigned putative functions, whereas the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins. As noted for other Bacteroidetes species, the R1DC9T genome revealed the presence of polysaccharide-utilization loci [52]. We detected the presence of genes involved in osmoprotectant biosynthesis, such as proC (proline biosynthesis, DCC35_RS09745), lysC/asd (ectoine biosynthesis, DCC35_RS01520) and glgA/glgB (trehalose biosynthesis, DCC35_RS02325, DCC35_RS11445). These compounds are used by halophilic bacteria to counteract the effects of salinity and related osmotic stress induced by high concentrations of salt ions in the ‘salt-out’ strategy [53, 54]. In addition, we identified the transporter genes opuBA, opuBB and opuBC (DCC35_RS10255, DCC35_RS10260) involved in the import of osmoprotectants, such as glycine betaine/proline, inside the cells. To confirm the use of the ‘salt-out’ strategy by R1DC9T (i.e., the use of osmoprotectants to counteract the effects of salinity), we inferred the isoelectric point (pI) of the proteome using the ExPASy server [55]. R1DC9T had a sub-acidic pI, similar to that of the halophilic strain Desulfohalobium retbaense DSM 5692T known to use the ‘salt-out’ strategy [56] and slightly lower than those of the closest known species (R. ehrenbergii SW-152T, R. misakiensis SK-8T, M. tractuosa DSM 4126T; Fig. S3b), whereas the halophilic bacterium Salinibacter ruber M31T (Fig. S3b) which adopts a ‘salt-in’ strategy in which K+ ions are accumulated in the cytoplasm and adaptation of the cellular machinery to a charged cytoplasm and acid proteome is necessary, had an acidic pI [57]. These results confirmed the capacity of our strain to quickly adapt to changing salinity occurring in mangroves as the production and/or importation of osmoprotectants by the cell is a high-turnover mechanism.

Additionally, the genome of R1DC9T contains several genes encoding proteins involved in the production of carotenoids (crtB, lcyB, crtI, crtO, crtZ, miaA, ispB, DCC35_01745, DCC35_05035, DCC35_01740, DCC35_05045, DCC35_RS13000, DCC35_RS01730, DCC35_RS08495, DCC35_RS06995), indicating the ability to synthesize pigments, such as beta-carotene, astaxanthin and lycopene, which counteract photooxidative stress under unfavourable conditions [58] by quenching singlet oxygen and lipid peroxidation or scavenging hydroxyl radicals [59, 60]. Although some of the genes related to gliding motility were predicted in the genome of this bacterium (gldA, gldC, gldD, gldE, gldF, glcG, gldJ, gldL, gldM, gldN, DCC35_RS07255, DCC35_RS14410, DCC35_RS02560, DCC35_RS02550, DCC35_RS07260, DCC35_RS07265, DCC35_RS02080, DCC35_RS02985, DCC35_RS02990, DCC35_RS02995), it was non-motile in an in vitro test in semisolid medium. However, we noted the absence of some of the genes of the cluster (gldB, gldH, gldK, gldI), which could explain the absence of gliding motility [61]. As this strain was found in bioturbated sediments, the sole strict adhesion to surfaces may allow it to thrive in an environment in which nutrients are constantly renewed by the tide cycles and crab bioturbation [6]. Regarding PGP genes, it should be noted that none of the known proteins involved in IAA production [50] could be found with a high enough identity (>60 %) to confirm their presence in our genome; the closest match possessed only a 40 % identity with indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, which is part of the indole-3-pyruvate pathway [50]. This is probably due to the fact that our strain is part of a novel family obtained from a poorly studied environment and with a limited number of closest-related genomes available. We also noted that R1DC9T possesses genes involved in the ammonia production via the dissimilatory nitrate reduction pathway (nrfA, nrfH, DCC35_16515, DCC35_16510).

The low level of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, the independent phylogenetic position, the relatively low AAI, ANIb and DDH values, and the differences in numerous phenotypic properties, cellular fatty acid composition, polar lipid profiles and DNA G+C content between R1DC9T and its closest phylogenetic described species (M. tractuosa DSM 4126T, R. ehrenbergii SW-152T, R. misakiensis SK-8T and F. kasyanovii KMM 6220T) indicated that the strain diverged from such taxa. Therefore, we suggest that R1DC9T represents a novel species in a novel genus within the new family Mangrovivirgaceae of the order Cytophagales, for which the name Mangrovivirga cuniculi gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed.

Description of Mangrovivirga gen. nov.

Mangrovivirga (Man.gro.vi.vir′ga. N.L. neut. n. mangrovum a mangrove; L. fem. n. virga rod; N.L. fem. n. Mangrovivirga for a mangrove rod, referring to the isolation of a rod-shaped bacterium from the mangrove environment).

Cells of the species are strictly aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, long-rod-shaped, moderately halophilic, non-spore-forming, non-motile, catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. The major respiratory quinone is MK7 and the major polar lipids are phosphatidylethanolamine, two unknown phospholipids and two unknown lipids. The major cellular fatty acids (>5 %) are iso-C15 : 0, C16 : 1  ω5c, iso-C17 : 0 and iso-C17 : 0 3-OH. The G+C content of the genomic DNA is 63.1 mol%. The type species is Mangrovivirga cuniculi.

Description of Mangrovivirga cuniculi sp. nov.

Mangrovivirga cuniculi (cu.ni.cu′li. L. gen. n. cuniculi of a burrow, named because the type species was isolated from a crab burrow).

The cell morphology and chemotaxonomic characteristics are given in the genus description. Cells are 0.3–0.5 µm wide and 1–1.2 µm long. Its colonies are circular with a diameter of 1–2 mm and feature regular edges, a smooth and shiny surface, and an orange colour caused by the production of orange carotenoids. The permissive conditions for growth are a temperature of 20–40 °C (optimum, 37 °C), pH 6–10 (optimum, pH 8) and 3%–11 % NaCl for salinity (optimum, 7%–9 % NaCl). The carbon sources used for growth are pectin, 2-deoxy-d-ribose, d-ribose, 5-keto-d-gluconic acid, l-ornithine, dihydroxyacetone, thymidine, uridine and adenosine. The genome harbours genes responsible for protection against oxidative, osmotic and salinity stresses, and includes genes encoding proteins that produce osmoprotectants and carotenoids. The cells are negative for amylase, protease, lipase, cellulase, indole, siderophore production and phosphate solubilization, and are positive for auxin (IAA) and ammonia production. The strain is unable to reduce nitrate to nitrite.

The type strain, R1DC9T (=KCTC 72349T=JCM 33609T=NCCB 100698T), was isolated from bioturbated mangrove sediment at the Ibn Sina Field Research Station and Nature Conservation Area in KAUST, Saudi Arabia. The genomic DNA G+C content and genome size of the type strain are 63.1 mol% and 4 661 901 bp, respectively.

Description of Mangrovivirgaceae fam. nov.

Mangrovivirgaceae (Man.gro.vi.vir′ga’ce.ae, N.L. fem. n. Mangrovivirga type genus of the family; -aceae, ending to denote a family; N.L. fem. pl. n. Mangrovivirgaceae, the family of the genus Mangrovivirga).

On the basis of 16S rRNA gene and genome sequence analyses, the species is a member of the order Cytophagales in the phylum Bacteroidetes. The description is the same as that for the genus Mangrovivirga, which is the type and currently sole genus of the family.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

This work was financially supported by King Abdullah University and Technology (KAUST) through project FCC/1/1973-56-01 of the Red Sea Research Centre and the Circular Carbon Economy Initiative, grant number REI/1/4483-01-01.

Acknowledgements

We thank Sadaf Umer for her support in organizing the laboratory work, and the editor and anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

Author contributions

F.O.S., G.M. and D.D. designed the study; F.O.S., G.M., Gr.M. and R.M. performed the experiments; F.O.S., G.M., Gr.M. and R.M., analysed the data; D.D. supported the research; F.O.S., Gr.M., R.M. and D.D. wrote the paper with contributions from the other authors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AAI, average amino acid identity; ANI, average nucleotide identity; DC, diffusion chamber; DDH, DNA–DNA hybridization; FSW, filtered seawater; IAA, indole acetic acid; KAUST, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology; LB, lysogeny broth; MLSA, multilocus sequence analysis.

Three supplementary figures and one supplementary table are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Sheaves M. Consequences of ecological connectivity: the coastal ecosystem mosaic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2009;391:107–115. doi: 10.3354/meps08121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Donato DCC, Kauffman JBB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, et al. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci. 2011;4:293–297. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pramanik A, Sengupta S, Bhattacharyya M, editors. Microbial Diversity in the Genomic Era. Academic Press; 2019. Microbial diversity and community analysis of the Sundarbans mangrove, a world heritage site; pp. 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alongi DM. In: Interactions Between Macro‐ and Microorganisms in Marine Sediments. Kristensen E, Haese R, Kostka J, editors. 2005. Mangrove-microbe-soil relations; pp. 85–103. eds. In. pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Santana CO, Spealman P, Melo VMM, Gresham D, Jesus TB, et al. Microbial community structure and ecology in sediments of a pristine mangrove forest. bioRxiv. 2019:814–833. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Booth JM, Fusi M, Marasco R, Mbobo T, Daffonchio D. Fiddler crab bioturbation determines consistent changes in bacterial communities across contrasting environmental conditions. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40315-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Booth JM, Fusi M, Marasco R, Michoud G, Fodelianakis S, et al. The role of fungi in heterogeneous sediment microbial networks. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43980-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Soldan R, Mapelli F, Crotti E, Schnell S, Daffonchio D, et al. Bacterial endophytes of mangrove propagules elicit early establishment of the natural host and promote growth of cereal crops under salt stress. Microbiol Res. 2019;223–225:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu Y-L, Meng D, Li R-R, Gu P-F, Fan X-Y, et al. Rhodoligotrophos defluvii sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019:3830–3836. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Al-Amoudi S, Razali R, Essack M, Amini MS, Bougouffa S, et al. Metagenomics as a preliminary screen for antimicrobial bioprospecting. Gene. 2016;594:248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alonso-Sáez L, Gasol JM. Seasonal variations in the contributions of different bacterial groups to the uptake of low-molecular-weight compounds in northwestern Mediterranean coastal waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:3528–3535. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02627-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pommier T, Canback B, Riemann L, Bostrom KH, Simu K, et al. Global patterns of diversity and community structure in marine bacterioplankton. Mol Ecol. 2006;16:867–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03189.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huo Y-Y, Xu L, Wang C-S, Yang J-Y, You H, et al. Fabibacter pacificus sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:3710–3714. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.051276-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin C-Y, Zhang X-Y, Liu A, Liu C, Song X-Y, et al. Marivirga atlantica sp. nov., isolated from seawater and emended description of the genus Marivirga . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:1515–1519. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ludwig W, Euzéby J, Whitman WB. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2010. Road map of the phyla Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, Tenericutes (Mollicutes), Acidobacteria, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, Dictyoglomi, Gemmatimonadetes, Lentisphaerae, Verrucomicrobia, Chlamydiae, and Planctomycetes; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nedashkovskaya OI, Kim SB, Lysenko AM, Park MS, Mikhailov VV, et al. Roseivirga echinicomitans sp. nov., a novel marine bacterium isolated from the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius, and emended description of the genus Roseivirga . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:1797–1800. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63621-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nedashkovskaya OI, Vancanneyt M, Kim SB, Bae KS. Reclassification of Flexibacter tractuosus (Lewin 1969) Leadbetter 1974 and ‘Microscilla sericea’ Lewin 1969 in the genus Marivirga gen. nov. as Marivirga tractuosa comb. nov. and Marivirga sericea nom. rev., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:1858–1863. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.016121-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lau S, Tsoi MMY, Li X, Plakhotnikova I, Dobretsov S, et al. Description of Fabibacter halotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov. and Roseivirga spongicola sp. nov., and reclassification of [Marinicola] seohaensis as Roseivirga seohaensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:1059–1065. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64104-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Naas AE, Solden LM, Norbeck AD, Brewer H, Hagen LH, et al. "Candidatus Paraporphyromonas polyenzymogenes” encodes multi-modular cellulases linked to the type IX secretion system. Microbiome. 2018;6:44. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0421-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, et al. Analysis of 1,000 type-strain genomes improves taxonomic classification of Bacteroidetes . Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2083. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oren A, Garrity GM. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:2960–2966. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Khan ST, Nakagawa Y, Harayama S. Sediminitomix flava gen. nov., sp. nov., of the phylum Bacteroidetes, isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:1689–1693. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64854-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lau KWK, Ren J, Wai NLM, Qian PY, Wong PK, et al. Lishizhenia caseinilytica gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium of the phylum Bacteroidetes . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2317–2322. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64415-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vaisman N, Oren A. Salisaeta longa gen. nov., sp. nov., a red, halophilic member of the Bacteroidetes . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:2571–2574. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.010892-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sun L, Toyonaga M, Ohashi A, Tourlousse DM, Matsuura N, et al. Lentimicrobium saccharophilum gen. nov., sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium representing a new family in the phylum Bacteroidetes, and proposal of Lentimicrobiaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:2635–2642. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaeberlein T, Lewis K, Epstein SS. Isolating “uncultivable” microorganisms in pure culture in a simulated natural environment. Science. 2002;296:1127–1129. doi: 10.1126/science.1070633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bollmann A, Lewis K, Epstein SS. Incubation of environmental samples in a diffusion chamber increases the diversity of recovered isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:6386–6390. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01309-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2013;10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bertini I, Hu X, Luchinat C. Global metabolomics characterization of bacteria: pre-analytical treatments and profiling. Metabolomics. 2014;10:241–249. doi: 10.1007/s11306-013-0571-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best A, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D457–D462. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K, Dudley J. Mega7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: A toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Burall LS, Grim CJ, Mammel MK, Datta AR. Whole genome sequence analysis using Jspecies tool establishes clonal relationships between Listeria monocytogenes strains from epidemiologically unrelated listeriosis outbreaks. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Medlar AJ, Törönen P, Holm L. AAI-profiler: fast proteome-wide exploratory analysis reveals taxonomic identity, misclassification and contamination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W479–W485. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI, et al. Report of the Ad Hoc committee on Reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1987;37:463–464. doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-4-463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 2017;11:2399–2406. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Dunlap P, Clark DP. Measuring microbial growth. Brock Biol Microorg. 2008;11:128–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tittsler RP, Sandholzer LA. The use of semi-solid agar for the detection of bacterial motility. J Bacteriol. 1936;31:575–580. doi: 10.1128/JB.31.6.575-580.1936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jain A, Jain R, Jain S. Basic Techniques in Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Biology. New York: Humana; 2020. Motility testing – hanging drop method and stab; pp. 121–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aladame N. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: vol. 2 (J.G. Holt & P.H.A. Sneath), 1 vol. (22×28,5 cm), 1599 + xix pages. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, London, 1986. Annales de l’Institut Pasteur / Microbiologieannales de l’Institut Pasteur / Microbiologie. 1987;138:146. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Marasco R, Rolli E, Ettoumi B, Vigani G, Mapelli F, et al. A drought resistance-promoting microbiome is selected by root system under desert farming. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bric JM, Bostock RM, Silverstone SE. Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:535–538. doi: 10.1128/AEM.57.2.535-538.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhu D, Niu L, Wang C, Nagata S. Isolation and characterisation of moderately halophilic bacterium Halomonas ventosae DL7 synthesizing ectoine as compatible solute. Ann Microbiol. 2007;57:401–406. doi: 10.1007/BF03175080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Arshad M, Eid EM, Hasan M. Mangrove health along the hyper-arid southern Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia. Environ Monit Assess. 2020;192:189. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-8140-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J. Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:a001438. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li G, Young KD. Indole production by the tryptophanase TnaA in Escherichia coli is determined by the amount of exogenous tryptophan. Microbiology (Reading) 2013;159:402–410. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.064139-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bjursell MK, Martens EC, Gordon JI. Functional genomic and metabolic studies of the adaptations of a prominent adult human gut symbiont, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, to the suckling period. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:36269–36279. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606509200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xu Z, Sun H, Jiang X, Sun H, Dang X, et al. Glycinebetaine biosynthesis in response to osmotic stress depends on jasmonate signaling in watermelon suspension cells. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1469. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Oren A. Microbial life at high salt concentrations: phylogenetic and metabolic diversity. Saline Syst. 2008;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1746-1448-4-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, et al. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server; pp. 571–607. In. pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Spring S, Nolan M, Lapidus A, Glavina Del Rio T, Copeland A, et al. Complete genome sequence of Desulfohalobium retbaense type strain (HR(100. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;2:38–48. doi: 10.4056/sigs.581048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Antón J, Oren A, Benlloch S, Rodríguez-Valera F, Amann R, et al. Salinibacter ruber gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel, extremely halophilic member of the Bacteria from saltern crystallizer ponds. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:485–491. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-2-485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li Y, Sommerfeld M, Chen F, Hu Q. Consumption of oxygen by astaxanthin biosynthesis: A protective mechanism against oxidative stress in Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae . J Plant Physiol. 2008;165:1783–1797. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sanchez S, Ruiz B, Rodríguez-Sanoja R, Flores-Cotera LB. Microbial Production of Food Ingredients, Enzymes and Nutraceuticals. Elsevier; 2013. Microbial production of carotenoids; pp. 194–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nishino A, Maoka T, Yasui H. Analysis of reaction products of astaxanthin and its acetate with reactive oxygen species using LC/PDA ESI-MS and ESR spectrometry. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016;57:1967–1970. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.03.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McBride MJ, Zhu Y. Gliding motility and por secretion system genes are widespread among members of the phylum Bacteroidetes . J Bacteriol. 2013;195:270–278. doi: 10.1128/JB.01962-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wong SK, Park S, Lee J-S, Chul Lee K, Xavier Chiura H, et al. Fabibacter misakiensis sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from coastal surface water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:3276–3280. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nedashkovskaya OI, Kim SB, Shin DS, Beleneva IA, Mikhailov VV. Fulvivirga Kasyanovii gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the phylum Bacteroidetes isolated from seawater in a mussel farm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:1046–1049. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64641-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Selvaratnam C, Thevarajoo S, Goh KM, Chan KG, Chong CS. Proposal to reclassify Roseivirga ehrenbergii (Nedashkovskaya et al., 2008) as Roseivirga seohaensis comb. nov., description of Roseivirga seohaensis subsp. aquiponti subsp. nov. and emendation of the genus Roseivirga . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:5537–5543. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES