Skip to main content
Neural Regeneration Research logoLink to Neural Regeneration Research
. 2021 Aug 4;17(3):543–549. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.320970

Pathological mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease

Yaojun Ju 1, Kin Yip Tam 1,*
PMCID: PMC8504384  PMID: 34380884

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease is a rather complex neurodegenerative disease, which is attributed to a combination of multiple factors. Among the many pathological pathways, synaptic dysfunctions, such as synapses loss and deficits in synaptic plasticity, were thought to be strongly associated with cognitive decline. The deficiencies in various sorts of neurotransmissions are responsible for the multifarious neurodegenerative symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease, for example, the cholinergic and glutamatergic deficits for cognitive decline, the excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission dyshomeostasis for synaptic plasticity deficits and epileptiform symptoms, and the monoamine neurotransmission for neuropsychiatric symptoms. Amyloid cascade hypothesis is the most popular pathological theory to explain Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis and attracts considerable attention. Multiple lines of genetic and pathological evidence support the predominant role of amyloid beta in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Neurofibrillary tangles assembled by microtubule-associated protein tau are other important histopathological characteristics in Alzheimer’s disease brains. Cascade of tau toxicity was proved to lead to neuron damage, neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in brain. Ageing is the main risk factor of neurodegenerative diseases, and is associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, reduced metabolism, endocrine insufficiencies and organ failures. These aging related risk factors were also proved to be some of the risk factors contributing to Alzheimer’s disease. In Alzheimer’s disease drug development, many good therapeutic strategies have been investigated in clinical evaluations. However, complex mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease and the interplay among different pathological factors call for the come out of all-powerful therapies with multiple curing functions. This review seeks to summarize some of the representative treatments targeting different pathological pathways currently under clinical evaluations. Multi-target therapies as an emerging strategy for Alzheimer’s disease treatment will be highlighted.

Key Words: Alzheimer’s disease, pathological pathways, drug development, multiple pathologies

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, and is estimated to affect 131.5 million by 2050 if no effective therapies are available (Cummings et al., 2016). The only 4 available Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved agents for AD treatment offered limited effects on cognitive improvement. Though considerable efforts have been directed to tackle this disease, AD remains inexorable and incurable. The high failure rate of AD drug development was thought to be mainly due to our poor knowledge about the complex pathological mechanism of this disease (Cao et al., 2018). There are numerous factors playing a role in the prognosis of AD. A number of hypotheses concerning the root cause of AD reveal the complexity of the disease. Cholinergic deficiency (Ferreira-Vieira et al., 2016), amyloid beta (Aβ) toxicity (Selkoe and Hardy, 2016), tau protein hyperphosphorylation (Lewis and Dickson, 2016), synaptic dysfunction (Briggs et al., 2016), oxidative-stress (Kumar and Singh, 2015), and neuroinflammation (Calsolaro and Edison, 2016) were proposed to be responsible for AD development. Regardless what the root cause of AD is, all these factors intensify the progression of disease. For decades, the “one drug for one target” strategy has been dominant, but is still unable to conquer this multifactorial disease. It is hypothesized that the multifunctional strategy, which could simultaneously modify different pathological pathways, would be helpful to treat this multifaceted disease (Savelieff et al., 2019).

In this review, we will describe the pathological mechanisms of the multiple etiologies of AD, establish the associations with some potential therapeutic targets and follow with an outline of the treatments currently under clinical evaluations for tackling these therapeutic targets. Finally we will briefly highlight some studies using multi-target drug development for AD treatment.

Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

Studies cited in this review published from 1990 to 2020 were searched on PubMed or Google Scholar database using the following keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, neurodegenerative disease, therapeutic, choline, amyloid, tau, synapse, antioxidant, neuroinflammation, multifunction, synaptic plasticity, glutamatergic, GABA, dopaminergic, adrenergic, serotonergic, cannabinoid, orexin, presinilin, APOE, vascular, diabetes. All clinical trial references cited in this review were taken from U.S. National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov on November 22, 2020.

Synaptic Dysfunctions in Alzheimer’s Disease

The most common symptom of AD is learning and memory decline. Synaptic connectivity between neurons is dynamic and plastic, which is fundamental in learning and memory (Stuchlik, 2014). Compared with other biochemical indices [e.g., senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs)], synapse loss was reported to be strongly correlated with cognitive impairment in AD (Terry et al., 1991). Synapse loss decreased the efficacy of neural signal transmission and disintegrated the neuronal network leading to cognitive dysfunctions in AD transgenic mice (Kashyap et al., 2019). Multiple studies have demonstrated that alteration of synaptic protein expression and synaptic plasticity were early events during AD progression in human and AD mouse brain samples (Mango et al., 2019). “Synaptic plasticity” regulates the number, structure, and strength of the synaptic connections between neurons. Long term synaptic plasticity mainly consists of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), in which potentiation and depression demonstrate the increase and decrease of synaptic signal strength. The inhibition of LTP and enhancement of LTD were found to be associated with the progressive memory impairment in AD (Jang and Chung, 2016).

The most extensively studied forms of synaptic plasticity are the LTP and LTD in CA1 region of the hippocampus. The predominant hypothesis is that the postsynaptic calcium signal within dendritic spines dictates whether LTP or LTD triggered, with LTP requiring a calcium increase beyond a threshold and LTD requiring a modest calcium increase (Malenka and Nicoll, 1993; Citri and Malenka, 2008). Specifically, LTP involves preferential activation of protein kinases such as the calcium/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), the cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase (PKA), the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Src kinase and protein kinase C; while LTD involves activation of phosphatases such as the calcium/calmodulin-dependent phosphatase calcineurin, protein phosphatase 1 or dephosphorylation of PKA and protein kinase C substrates. Following LTP, there is enhanced α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptors (AMPARs) exocytosis and incorporation of AMPARs into postsynaptic density involving the phosphorylation by CaMKII, accompanied by growth of new dendritic spines; while following LTD, there is enhanced endocytosis and dissociation of AMPARs from postsynaptic density regulated by calcium-dependent dephosphorylation, accompanied by shrinkage in the size of dendritic spines. The increase of synapse size in LTP is dependent upon dendritic protein synthesis, thus transcription factors such as cAMP response element-binding protein presumably to supply critical proteins, are required for maintaining synapse strength.

To ameliorate synaptic dysfunctions in AD, drug development strategies to improve synaptic plasticity and neural regeneration have been tested in clinical trials (Additional Table 1). Four clinical trials have been undertaken on 3 phosphodiesterase inhibitors to improve synaptic functions in AD. Among these four clinical trials, cilostazol has been advanced in phase 3, indicating phosphodiesterase inhibitors could be promising in AD treatment. Moreover, sigma-1 receptor agonists have been investigated in AD drug development in 7 ongoing clinical trials with 6 of which in phase 3. Interestingly stem cell therapies have attracted considerable attention in recent years. All these therapies are currently in phase 1 or phase 2.

Additional Table 1.

Agents modifying synaptic dysfunction of AD in clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov on November 22, 2020)

Therapeutic purpose Agent ClinicalTrials.gov ID/Phase/Status Mechanism of action
To improve synaptic plasticity Tacrolimus NCT04263519/2/N Calcineurininhibitor
(By enhancingLTP and decreasing LTD) Tacrolimus inhibits calcineurin-dependent LTD whichmay mediate synapticloss inthe AD brain.
DAOI NCT03752463/2/U D-aminoacid oxidaseinhibitor
DAOI increase the level of D-serine, a co-agonist of NMDARs.
L-serine NCT03062449/2/R L-serineis the precursor of D-serine, a co-agonist of NMDARs.
SAGE718 NCT04602624/2/N Positive allosteric modulator of NMDARs
Bryostatin1 NCT04538066/2/R PKC modulator
AR1001 NCT03625622/2/AN PDE inhibitors
BPN14770 NCT03817684/2/AN PDEs are responsible for hydrolysis of cAMP and cGMP. The inhibition of PDEs increase brain
Cilostazol NCT02491268/2/AN cAMP and cGMP concentrations, which activate PKA or PKG and subsequent CREB phosphorylation in brain tissue.
NCT03451591/3/R
To improve synaptic plasticity AMX0035 (sodium phenylbutyrateand tauroursodeoxycholic acid combination) NCT03533257/2/AN Sodiumphenylbutyrate induces astrocyticBDNF and NT-3 expression via PKC-CREBpathway.
(By enhancingLTP and decreasing LTD)
ANAVEX2-73 (blarcamesine) NCT03790709/3/R Sigma-1receptor agonist
NCT04314934/3/R Blarcamesine is a sigma-1 receptor agonist (highaffinity), M1 receptor agonist and M2 receptor
NCT02756858/2/AN antagonist(low affinity)
Sigmareceptor locates in endoplasmic reticulum.Agents regulate endoplasmic reticulum functions toimprove synaptic plasticity byactivating sigma-1 receptor.
AVP786(combination of dextromethorphanand quinidine) NCT03393520/3/R Sigma-1receptor agonist
NCT02446132/3/R Dextromethorphan is a Sigma-1 receptor agonist.
NCT04464564/3/R
NCT04408755/3/R
T-817MA (endonerpic) NCT04191486/2/R Sigmareceptor activator
CT1812 NCT03507790/2/AN Sigma-2receptor antagonist
NCT03493282/2/AN
NCT03522129/1/R
Neflamapimod(VX-745) NCT03435861/2/R Inhibitor of p38MAPKα (p38α)
Endosome-associated proteinRab5 plays critical role in dysregulation of the endo-lysosomal system inearly pathogenesis of AD and is mainly regulated byp38α. Inhibition of p38α reduced synaptic dysfunction bynormalizing dysregulated Rab5 activity.
ORY-2001 (vafidemstat) NCT03867253/2/AN LSD1 inhibitor
To restore transcription equilibrium inneurodegenerative disorders.
Nilotinib NCT02947893/2/AN Tyrosinekinase inhibitor
Tyrosinekinase inhibition increases functional parkin-Beclin-1 interactionand enhances amyloid clearance and cognitive performance.
To reduce synapses loss Allogenichuman MSCs NCT02833792/2/R Stem cell therapy
(By promotingregeneration and reducing apoptosis) Allogenichuman MSCs Allogenichuman MSCs Astrostem NCT04040348/1/R NCT02600130/1/AN NCT04482413/2/N Cells derived from stem cells can bedifferentiated intonormal neurons, which mayintegrate into neuronalcircuits and improve their functions. Secretions from stem cells regulate the microenvironment toresist neurodegeneration and promote neuro-regeneration.
Autologous adipose-derived MSCs NCT04228666/2/AN
Placenta-derived MSCs (CB-AC-02) NCT02899091/2/R
Human umbilicalcord blood-derived MSCs NCT03172117/2/R
Human umbilicalcord blood-derived MSCs NCT02672306/2/U
MSCs-Exos NCT04388982/2/R Stem cell-derived exosome
MSCs-Exos include active cargos such as proteins (Aβ degradation enzymes, anti-oxidative enzymes, neuron-supporting proteins, anti-inflammatory cytokines), lipid raft, nucleic acid (mRNA and miRNA).
ATH-1017(NDX-1017) NCT04488419/2/R Neurotrophic factors
NCT04491006/2/R Neurotrophic factors regulate proliferation and survivalof differenttypes of cells and promote synapticplasticityand cognition. ATH-1017 activates the HGF.
Allopregnanolone NCT03748303/1/R Growth hormones
Allopregnanolone promotes neurogenesis.
NNI-362 NCT04074837/1/R NNI-362selectively activate neural progenitor cells to neurons.
GV1001 NCT03959553/2/N A 16-amino-acid peptide comprisinga sequencefrom the hTRET
GV1001mimics TERT’s functions.
AAV-hTERT NCT04133454/1/R hTERT delivered byAAV transduction
Extendtelomeres tobenefit AD

AD: Alzheimer’s disease; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate; cGMP: cyclic guanosine monophosphate; CREB: cAMP-response element binding protein; HGF: hepatocyte growth factor; hTERT: human enzyme telomerase reverse transcriptase; LSD1: lysine-specific demethylase 1; LTD: long-term depression; LTP: long-term potentiation; MSCs: mesenchymal stem cells; NMDAR: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; PDE: phosphodiesterase; PKA: cAMP-dependent protein kinase; PKC: protein kinase C; PKG: cGMP-dependent protein kinase. Status: AN: Active, not recruiting; N: not yet recruiting; R: recruiting; U: unknown. There are 22 agents and 30 clinical trials related to modification of synaptic plasticity and reduction of synapses loss for AD treatment.

Neurotransmission in Alzheimer’s Disease

Cholinergic hypothesis of AD

The nucleus basalis of Meynert in the basal forebrain is a major source of cortical acetylcholine, which was reported with significant neuronal loss in AD patients (Doucette et al., 1986). In cholinergic presynaptic neurons, acetylcholine is synthesized by the enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) from choline and acetyl-coenzyme A, and transported to synaptic vesicles by vesicular acetylcholine transporter. Following the depolarization of neurons, acetylcholine is released into the synaptic cleft. Acetylcholine binds to acetylcholine receptors (namely the ligand-gated channel nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, and the G-protein coupled muscarinic acetylcholine receptors) to enable neurotransmission. The acetylcholine presented at the synaptic cleft is rapidly decomposed by acetylcholinesterase into choline and acetate. The extracellular free choline can be uptake by choline transporters into the presynaptic neurons for acetylcholine synthesis.

Evidence shows that the brain cortical cerebrospinal fluid acetylcholine levels were significantly lower in AD patients, which was correlated with cognitive impairment (Jia et al., 2004). Significant ChAT depletions were observed in postmortem AD brains, and the reduction of ChAT was reported to be correlated with the severity of dementia (Pappas et al., 2000). According to a longitudinal clinical study over 3 ± 1.5 years, the cholinergic basal forebrain atrophy rates were higher than the global brain shrinkage rates in the aging process, which was further increased in AD patients (Grothe et al., 2013). Significantly reduced nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in nucleus basalis of Meynert of AD brains were observed according to the previous ligand binding studies in autopsied brains (Shimohama et al., 1986). The evidence of cholinergic innervation losses correlated with cognitive declines in AD patients formed the foundation of the “cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease”. Moreover, association between several strong anticholinergic drug exposure and increased risk of incident dementia were found in aged people (Coupland et al., 2019).

Based on the “cholinergic hypothesis”, three acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, including donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine were approved by US FDA for AD treatment. To modify the deficits of cholinergic neurotransmission in AD, more cholinesterase inhibitors were developed and some of them are undergoing clinical trials (Additional Table 2). Nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors agonists or positive allosteric modulators have entered clinical trials to evaluate the effects on enhancing cholinergic neurotransmission (Additional Table 2).

Additional Table 2.

Neurotransmission modifying agents for AD drug development in clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov on November 22, 2020)

Therapeutic purpose Agent ClinicalTrials.gov ID/Phase/Status Mechanism of action
To improve cholinergic neurotransmission inAD patients AD-35 NCT03625401/2/AN AChE inhibitor
Octohydroaminoacridine succinate NCT03283059/3/R InhibitAChE activity toenhance acetylcholinelevel
Nicotine Transdermal Patch NCT02720445/2/R Nicotinicacetylcholine receptors agonists
Nicotine NCT01778946/2/R Nicotinicacetylcholine receptors agonists
ANAVEX2-73 (blarcamesine) NCT03790709/3/R Muscarinicacetylcholine receptors
NCT04314934/3/R NCT02756858/2/AN Blarcamesineis a sigma-1 receptor agonist (highaffinity), M1 receptor agonist and M2receptor antagonist(low affinity)
To restore E/I balance AVP786(combination of NCT03393520/3/R NMDA receptor antagonist
(By reducingglutamatergic excitotoxicity) dextromethorphan and quinidine) NCT02446132/3/R Dextromethorphan is an NMDA receptor antagonist.
NCT04464564/3/R
NCT04408755/3/R
BHV4157 (troriluzole, the prodrug of riluzole) NCT03605667/3/AN Sodium channel blockers
Riluzole blocks sodium channel toreduce glutamaterelease.
To restore E/I balance Allopregnanolone NCT03748303/1/R Positive allosteric GABAARs modulators
(By enhancinginhibitory neurotranmission)
To restore E/I balance Levetiracetam (AGB101) NCT03486938/3/R SV2A modulator
(By modulatingneurotransmitter release) NCT02002819/2/AN Reducehyperactivityand epileptiform symptoms
NCT03461861/2/R Reduceneurotoxins damage
NCT03489044/2/AN
NCT03875638/2/R
NCT04004702/2/N
To enhance dopaminergic neurotransmission Brexpiprazole NCT03620981/3/R D2 receptor partial agonist
NCT03594123/3/R
NCT03548584/3/R
NCT03724942/3/R
Bromocriptine NCT04413344/2/R Dopaminereceptor agonist
To enhance adrenergic neurotransmission Guanfacine NCT03116126/3/R Alpha-2 adrenergic agonist
Dexmedetomidine NCT04205539/1/E Alpha-2 adrenergic agonist
Mirtazapine NCT03031184/3/AN Alpha-2 adrenergic antagonist
Mirtazapinewas supposed toexert an anti-agitation effect may by blocking the presynaptic α2 adrenergic receptor toimprove central noradrenergic and serotonergic activity.
To inhibit adrenergic activity Prazosin NCT03710642/2/R Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor
Prazosin antagonizes NE effects at brain postsynaptic α1 adrenergic receptor and is primarilyused to treat hypertension and benign prostatic hypertrophy.
To enhance serotonergic neurotransmission Brexpiprazole NCT03620981/3/R NCT03594123/3/R 5-HT receptor agonist Brexipiprazole is a partial agonistof the serotonin5-HT1A receptor.
NCT03548584/3/R
NCT03724942/3/R
Escitalopram NCT03108846/3/R SSRI
ORY-2001 (vafidemstat) NCT03867253/2/AN MAO-B inhibitor
Inhibitthe degradation of dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine
To modulate endocannabinoid neurotransmission Nabilone THC-free CBD (Cannabidiol) oil NCT04516057/3/N NCT04436081/2/N CB1 and CB2endocannabinoid receptor agonist Phytocannabinoid targeting theendocannabinoid system
Dronabinol NCT02792257/2/R CB1 and CB2endocannabinoid receptor agonist
To modulate orexinergic neurotransmission Suvorexant NCT04629547/2/N Dual antagonist of orexin receptor OX1R andOX2R
To modulate adenosine neurotransmission Caffeine NCT04570085/2/N Adenosine receptors antagonist
AR antagonists inhibit PDEs, promote calcium release from intracellular stores, and interfere withGABA-A receptors. Caffeine affects brain functions such as sleep, cognition, learning, and memory, and modifies brain dysfunctions and diseases through antagonism of ARs.

5-HT: 5-Hydroxytryptamine; AChE: acetylcholine; AD: Alzheimer’s disease; AR: adenosine receptor; CB1: cannabinoid receptor type 1; CB2: cannabinoid receptor type 2; MAO-B: monoamine oxidase B; NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate; GABAARs: γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors; NE: norepinephrine; OX1R: orexin receptor type 1; OX2R: orexin receptor type 2; SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; SV2A: synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. Status: AN: Active, not recruiting; E: Enrolling by invitation; N: Not yet recruiting; R: Recruiting; U, Unknown. There are 23 agents and 39 clinical trials to modulate neurotransmission for AD treatment.

Glutamatergic neurotransmission in AD

Glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain. Glutamate can be produced from glutamine by glutaminase and is the precursor of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), an inhibitory neurotransmitter. L-Glutamate is the most abundant free amino acid in brain and is the major excitatory neurotransmitter of the vertebrate central nervous system. Glutamatergic neurotransmission plays an important role in LTP, which is thought to be extremely important for learning and memory formation (Granger et al., 2013). Glutamate receptors are classified into two families: G protein-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and the ligand-gated ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) (Reiner and Levitz, 2018). Glutamate binding to mGluRs leads to the production of inositol phosphate and second message signaling, affecting multiple signaling pathways within the cells. Glutamate binding to iGluRs [which comprises three subfamilies: AMPA receptors, kainate receptors, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors] produces fast excitatory currents. AMPA receptors and kainate receptors are extremely fast receptors at high glutamate concentrations. AMPA receptors are permeable to Na+ and Ca2+ and kainate receptors are mainly permeable to Na+ and K+. NMDA receptors show slower activation and higher Ca2+ permeability than AMPA and kainate receptors. Glutamate, together with the receptor co-agonist (glycine or D-serine) binding to NMDA receptors, combined with a strong postsynaptic membrane depolarization to release the magnesium ions (Mg2+) block of the receptor channels. The opened NMDA receptors allow the flow of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ into the cell leading to excitatory postsynaptic current.

Synapse losses and glutamatergic dysfunctions with AMPA receptors and NMDA receptors downregulation in the hippocampus were observed in AD patients (Jacob et al., 2007). However, AD drug development targeting on glutamatergic neurotransmission has been mainly focused on reducing glutamatergic neurotransmission. The inappropriate activation of glutamatergic signaling (mainly through NMDA receptors activation) results in excitotoxicity. Amyloid deposition increased the activation of Fyn to phosphorylate GluN2B subunit of NMDA receptors (NMDARs), and subsequently to strengthen the activity of NMDARs, through which excessive harmful levels of calcium ions fluxed into postsynaptic neurons and impaired synaptic functions (Rudy et al., 2015). Based on this theory, memantine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist was developed and approved for moderate to severe AD treatment in clinic. There are agents in clinical trials for AD drug development to exert neuroprotective effect via the reduction of glutamate release (Additional Table 2).

GABAergic neurotransmission in AD

GABA is the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. It plays an important role in maintaining excitatory and inhibitory balance in the brain (Smart and Stephenson, 2019). Literature evidence suggested that GABAergic remodeling contributed to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (Govindpani et al., 2017). GABA is generated via α-decarboxylation of L-glutamate by the glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) with pyridoxal-5’-phosphate as cofactor to converse the inactive apo-GAD to the active holo-GAD. There are two isoforms of GAD [GAD65 (65 kDa) and GAD67 (67 kDa)] expressed in the brain; GAD65 is primarily located in presynaptic terminals and GAD67 is widely distributed in the cytosol. In presynaptic neurons, GABA is recruited into synaptic vesicles mediated by vesicular GABA transporter (vGAT). After being released into the synaptic cleft, GABA binds to either the ionotropic GABAA receptors (GABAARs) or metabotropic GABAB receptors (GABABRs) located on the postsynaptic membrane, to generate the inhibitory postsynaptic potential. GABA is cleared from the synaptic cleft and is taken up by neurons and astrocyte through membrane-bound GABA transporters [GATs, GABA transporter 1 (GAT1), GABA transporter 2 (GAT2), GABA transporter 3 (GAT3), and betaine-GABA transporter (BGT1)]. In astrocytes, GABA is catalyzed to succinate in a two-step reaction by GABA transaminase (GABA-T) and succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase. Succinate is then recycled into the tricarboxylic acid cycle to generate glutamate, which is then converted to glutamine by glutamine synthase. Glutamine is then released from the astrocytes and transported to the presynaptic neurons.

The binding of GABA to the orthosteric site of GABAARs triggers the influx of Cl- and subsequent hyperpolarization and inhibition (Sivilotti and Nistri, 1991). The binding of GABA to the orthosteric site of GABABRs results in the dissociation of the coupled G protein into Gαi and Gβγ, and subsequently leads to the inhibition of the presynaptic Ca2+ influx channel and the activation of the postsynaptic K+ efflux channel (Sivilotti and Nistri, 1991; Terunuma, 2018). Gαi can reduce the intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) level by inhibiting the activity of adenylate cyclase. The cAMP signaling regulates the excitatory glutamatergic and cholinergic synaptic plasticity. Gβγ suppresses the influx of Ca2+ and triggers the release of the transmitter. Gβγ also promotes the K+ efflux through the K+ channel resulting in hyperpolarization and inhibition (Terunuma, 2018).

Up to 22% of AD patients experienced seizures (Mendez and Lim, 2003). Epileptiform discharge was observed in 22% of AD patients with no history or risk factors for epilepsy (Lam et al., 2020). Excitatory and inhibitory balance was found to be essential for brain oscillations, and disruption of functional oscillation contributed to memory deficits (Missonnier et al., 2020). GABAergic dysfunction has long been suggested to involve in the development of epilepsy and status epilepticus (Jones-Davis and Macdonald, 2003). Therefore, it has been hypothesized that targeting the enhanced GABAergic inhibition might be a valuable therapeutic option for AD treatment (Xu et al., 2020). Agents with anti-epilepsy efficacy (Additional Table 2) have been in clinical trials for AD treatment.

Monoaminergic neurotransmission in AD

Deficits in monoaminergic neurotransmission such as dopaminergic, noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission were reported to be involved in AD. The monoamine neurotransmitters, which are synthesized and released from their presynaptic neurons, bind to the corresponding receptors on the postsynaptic membrane to exert functions. The excessive amount of monoamine neurotransmitters in the synaptic cleft is then degraded by monoamine oxidase or catechol-O-methyltransferase, or undergoes reuptake into the presynaptic terminal by monoamine transporters.

Dopaminergic deficits were most seen and investigated in Parkinson’s disease, a movement disorder characterized by rigidity, resting tremor, and bradykinesia (Cacabelos, 2017). More than 50% of patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD were diagnosed with concomitant Parkinsonism with rigidity, resting tremor, and DA transporter reduction in the basal ganglia (Sasaki, 2018). Dopaminergic deficits were associated with cognitive dysfunctions in AD patients, and restoration of dopaminergic neurotransmission rescued the pathologies and cognitive deficits in AD patients and AD mouse models (Koch et al., 2014; Cordella et al., 2018). Dopaminergic stimulation is identified as a potential therapeutic strategy for AD. However, the dopaminergic system is closely related to the brain reward. It has been suggested that dopaminergic dysfunction might account for neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD (Mitchell et al., 2011). Dopamine agonists and dopamine reuptake inhibitors have been in clinical trials (Additional Table 2) to improve neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD.

There have been reports of significant Locus coeruleus (LC) noradrenergic neurodegeneration, such as neuron loss and atrophy, associated with the severity of cognitive dysfunction in AD (Bondareff et al., 1987; Theofilas et al., 2017). Cognitive impairment exhibited correlations with LC tauopathy in aging, mild cognitive impairment and AD (Grudzien et al., 2007). Enhancing brain NE levels can reverse AD dysfunction, such as long-term potentiation deficits, cognitive decline, and neuroinflammation in AD animal models (Ardestani et al., 2017). Thus, the LC noradrenergic system is essential for maintaining cognitive function and could be targeted to improve cognition in AD. Agents aimed at maintaining normal noradrenergic neurotransmission are in clinical trials for AD treatment (Additional Table 2).

Extensive serotonergic denervation and serotonergic alteration were observed in both AD patients and AD animal models, and were suggested to be associated with AD pathogenesis (Ouchi et al., 2009; Ramos-Rodriguez et al., 2013). Restoration of serotonergic function by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or serotonin receptor agonists or antagonists was proven to modulate behavioral and cognitive symptoms (Bianco et al., 2016; Bostancıklıoğlu, 2020). Thus, targeting the serotonergic system would be a promising approach for treating AD symptoms. Agents targeting serotonergic system in clinical trials for AD treatment are listed in Additional Table 2.

Other neurotransmission in AD

Other neurotransmissions such as the cannabinoid neurotransmission and orexinergic neurotransmission are also involved in motor learning and neuropsychiatric aspects. In the endogenous cannabinoid system, the endocannabinoids anandamide, for example, was generated firstly by transacylase to catalyze the conversion of phosphatidylethanolamine to N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine and then by phospholipase D cleavage. CB1 receptor activation was found to regulate intracellular Ca2+ concentration, glutamate release, neurotrophin expression and neurogenesis. CB2 activation was involved in the release of cytokine in microglia and had been suggested to play a role in the inflammatory pathology of AD (Talarico et al., 2019). Orexin is a hypothalamic neurotransmitter with functions to regulate wakefulness, appetite and mood. Investigations suggested that orexinergic signaling activation altered the sleep-wake cycle and induced Aβ and tau pathology mediated neurodegeneration (Liguori, 2017). Thus, there are cannabinoid and orexin related agents in clinical trials to modulate the symptoms in AD (Additional Table 2).

The agents targeting neurotransmission system in AD drug clinical trials are mainly for modulating AD symptoms, such as cognitive decline, epileptiform symptoms, insomnia and agitation. As shown in Additional Table 2, many agents are repurposed drugs specifically for these symptoms. It would be helpful to modulate AD symptoms based on the treatments developed for other neural disorders.

Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis in Alzheimer’s Disease

Senile plaques, which composed of Aβ peptides, are one of the most important pathological hallmarks in AD brains (Xiao et al., 2015). In pathological conditions, Aβ is the proteolytic product of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-secretase and then γ-secretase via an amyloidogenic pathway, while in physiological conditions, APP is catalyzed by α-secretase instead of β-secretase via a non-amyloidogenic pathway to form soluble APPα fragment (Soldano and Hassan, 2014).

The strongest support for the initial role of Aβ in this disease comes from the genetic evidence clarifying the formation of AD. APP, presenilin 1 (PSEN1), and presenilin 2 (PSEN2) are mutation genes responsible for familial AD or early-onset AD. Aβ, the major subunit composed of amyloid plaques, is the cleavage product of APP, whose coding gene is located on human chromosome 21 (Masters et al., 1985). The AD-like anatomy characteristics, namely the senile plaques and NFTs, were formed and distributed in people with Down syndrome, even at young ages, indicating the importance of APP in AD pathology (Mann and Esiri, 1989). Missense mutations in APP genes were shown to alter Aβ metabolism with either an accelerating or restraining effect on Aβ aggregation and cognitive decline in AD patients (Godbolt et al., 2006; Lan et al., 2014). AD symptoms formed in APP transgene mice models further verified the Aβ hypothesis (Hsiao et al., 1996). Mutations in PSEN1 and PSEN2 lead to an “aggressive forms of” Alzheimer’s disease by affecting γ-secretase activity to aggravate Aβ aggregation in AD patients (Bentahir et al., 2006). The strongest genetic risk factor for sporadic AD or late-onset AD is the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) (Musiek and Holtzman, 2015). APOE isoforms influence AD by regulating Aβ clearance differently, with the APOE ε4 allele markedly increases AD risk while the APOE ε2 allele decreases Aβ accumulation (Castellano et al., 2011).

Another strong support for the crucial role of Aβ is the synergistic neurotoxic effects on other pathologies. It was shown that plaques formed by Aβ aggregation activated the microglia and ensued progressive neural changes and dysmorphic neurites in in vivo models (Meyer-Luehmann et al., 2008). Aβ is considered a driving force for tau propagation. For instance, injection of Aβ42 into the brains of P301L mutant tau transgenic mice accelerated the AD symptom formation (Gotz et al., 2001). This was further supported by the test of crossing rTgTauEC transgenic mice with APP/PS1 mice, in which the amyloid deposition dramatically increased tau propagation and spread, as well as the tau-induced neuron loss (Pooler et al., 2015). Amyloid cascade was also supposed to be a driving force of neuronal hyperexcitation in AD. A recent study revealed that Aβ induced hyperexcitation in sensitive neurons and sustained the vicious cycle of neuronal hyperactivation (Zott et al., 2019). Another study revealed that secreted APP (sAPP) specifically bound to GABABR1a and suppressed synaptic release, suggesting that secreted APP-GABABR1a interaction might play a role in maintaining neural circuits homeostasis (Rice et al., 2019).

The amyloid cascade hypothesis has gained continuous support for nearly 30 years. Moreover, targeting amyloid transport, APP secretase enzyme, and amyloid aggregation and clearance were suggested as viable therapeutic strategies (Kumar et al., 2015). Therapies targeting Aβ have been studied extensively and intensively. The on-going anti-amyloid clinical trial studies are summarized in Additional Table 3. In these anti-amyloid strategies, targeting amyloid clearance seems to be rather popular. There are 10 immunotherapies in 18 clinical trials aiming to remove Aβ monomers, oligomers and plaques. Amongst them, 4 immunotherapies are currently in 10 phase 3 studies.

Additional Table 3.

Anti-amyloid agents for AD treatment in clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov on November 22, 2020)

Therapeutic purpose Agent ClinicalTrials.gov ID/Phase/Status Mechanism of action
To reduce Aβ production APH-1105 NCT03806478/2/N Alpha-secretase modulator
E2609 (Elenbecestat) NCT03036280/3/AN BACE inhibitor
NCT02956486/3/AN
Posiphen NCT02925650/2//R APP inhibitor
NCT04524351/2/R Posiphen selectively inhibit APP production
PQ912 NCT03919162/2/N Glutaminyl cyclase enzyme inhibitor
NCT04498650/2/R Reduce production of pyroglutamateAβ
To reduce Aβ aggregation toxicity PTI-125 (sumifilam) NCT04388254/2/R FilaminA (FLNA) protein inhibitor
FLNA recruitment contributes toα7nAChR-Aβ42 toxicitysignaling resulted tau phosphorylation and formation of NFTs.
AMX0035 (combination of tauroursodeoxycholic acidand sodium phenylbutyrate) NCT03533257/3/AN Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) inhibitor CTGF is highly expressed invicinity of plaques and NFTs and influenceγ-secretases activity. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid downregulate CTGF expression.
BEY2153 NCT04476303/1//R Aβ aggregation inhibitor
To enhance Aβ clearance Thiethylperazine(TEP) NCT03417986/2/AN ABCC1 transporter activator
ABCC1 was discovered tobe a major β-amyloid-exporting molecule at the BBB.
AAVrh.10hAPOE2 vector NCT03634007/1/R APOE
APOE4 and APOE2 alleles are associated witha higher and lower riskof Alzheimer’s dementia, respectively. AAVrh.10hAPOE2 covert ApoE4 homozygotes proteinisoforms to ApoE2-ApoE4 isoforms inCSF.
Aducanumab NCT04241068/3/E Monoclonal antibody directed at plaques and oligomers
Gantenerumab NCT02051608/3/AN Monoclonal antibody directed at plaques and oligomers
NCT03444870/3/R
NCT03443973/3/AN
NCT04339413/3/R
NCT04374253/3/N
NCT04592341/2/R
RO7126209 NCT04639050/2/N Monoclonal antibody directed at plaques and oligomers RO7126209 is a new version of gantenerumab, more easily crossing the blood-brain barrier.
Solanezumab NCT02008357/3/AN Monoclonal antibody directed at monomers
Ganternerumab and solanezumab NCT01760005/3/R Combination therapy
BAN2401 NCT03887455/3/R Monoclonal antibody directed at protofibrils
NCT04468659/3/R
NCT01767311/2/AN
Crenezumab NCT01998841/2/AN Monoclonal antibody targeting soluble oligomers
LY30028123(donanemab) NCT03367403/2/AN Monoclonal antibody specific for pyroglutamic peptide fragment of Aβ
NCT04437511/2/R
LY3372993 NCT04451408/1/R Anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody
ABvac40 NCT03461276/2/R Active immunotherapy

AAV: Adeno-associated virus; ABCC1: ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 1; AD: Alzheimer’s disease; APOE: apolipoprotein E; APP: amyloid precursor protein; Aβ: amyloid beta; BACE: beta-site APP cleaving enzyme; BBB: blood-brain barrier; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; CTGF: connective tissue growth factor; FLNA: filamin A; nAChR: nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Status: AN: Active, not recruiting; E: Enrolling by invitation; N: Not yet recruiting; R: Recruiting. There are 18 agents and 30 clinical trials on-going targeting Aβ pathology for AD treatment.

Tau Toxicity Cascade in Alzheimer’s Disease

NFTs are another important histopathological characteristics in AD brains (Lewis and Dickson, 2016). The NFTs comprise of paired helical filaments, which assembled by microtubule-associated protein known as tau. Tau protein assembles tubulin into microtubules and stabilizes microtubules (Goodson and Jonasson, 2018). As major cytoskeletal components of the neuron, microtubules play a fundamental role in neuronal development and function (Kapitein and Hoogenraad, 2015). The dissociation of microtubule stabilizer tau protein in AD induces depolymerization of microtubules and then further destroys neural functions. Tau phosphorylation is a normal metabolic process in physiological conditions. In contrast, in some pathological conditions, Aβ toxicity, neuroinflammation, and other stress conditions lead to aberrant tau phosphorylation (Gao et al., 2018). In particular, dysequilibrium of tau kinase and phosphatase activities leads to abnormal tau phosphorylation, thereby contributing to tau aggregation. A variety of tau kinases, such as CK1/2, glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), PKA, p38MAPK, Erk1/2, JNK1/3, CDK5, TTBK1/2, and CaMKII, have been summarized elsewhere (Martin et al., 2013). The hyperphosphorylated tau is prone to dissociation from microtubules and aggregation to form NFTs (Wang et al., 2013). The existence of NFTs and the dissociation of microtubules then lead to axonal transport impairment, mitochondrial and cytoskeletal dysfunction, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and synapses loss (Hoover et al., 2010). Messing et al. (2013) reported that in the tau toxicity cascade, dendritic spine loss was observed before aggregation and cell death in an early stage, and tau aggregation and cell death in the later stage, were found to be accompanied by caspase-3 activation. These authors also proved that a tau aggregation inhibitor could prevent the phosphorylation, aggregation, and dendritic spine loss in tau pathology. The repeat domain located in paired helical filaments showed a high binding affinity to truncated tau and was responsible for tau-tau binding. These have led to the study of inhibitors targeting this repeat domain to stop tau aggregation.

In clinical trials of AD drug development, strategies targeting microtubule stability, tau protein aggregation, tau production and clearance were adopted to treat tau toxicity. Additional Table 4 summarizes the agents to modulate tauopathy in AD clinical trials. Among these agents, therapies targeting tau protein clearance occupied most of the seats. However, none of these immunotherapies for tau protein clearance has entered phase 3 study yet. Tau aggregation inhibitor, TRx0237 (LMXT), is the only anti-tau agent currently in phase 3 study for AD treatment.

Additional Table 4.

Anti-tau agents for AD treatment in clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov on November 22, 2020)

Therapeutic purpose Agent ClinicalTrials.gov ID/Phase/Status Mechanism of action
To maintain microtubule stability Nicotinamide NCT03061474/2/R Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor
Vorinostat NCT03056495/1/R HDAC inhibitors reduce tau-induced microtubule depolymerization.
To inhibit tau protein aggregation TRx0237 (LMXT) NCT03446001/3/R Tau aggregation inhibitor
BEY2153 NCT04476303/1//R Tau aggregation inhibitor
BDPP (bioactive dietary polyphenol preparation) NCT02502253/1/R Grape seed polyphenolic extract andresveratrol prevent tau aggregation.
To reduce tauproduction IONIS MAPTRx (BIIB080) NCT03186989/2/AN Antisense oligonucleotideto reduce MAPT expression
To enhance tau proteinclearance ABBV-8E12 NCT02880956/2/AN Anti-tau antibody
NCT03712787/2/E
BIIB092 NCT03352557/2/AN Monoclonal antibody targeting truncated form of tau
LY3303560 (zagotenemab) NCT03518073/2/AN Monoclonal antibody targeting soluble tau
Semorinemab (RO07105705) NCT03289143/2/AN Monoclonal antibody targeting extracellular tau
NCT03828747/2/AN
NCT04639050/2/N
JNJ-63733657 NCT04619420/2/N Monoclonal antibody to recognize mid-region of tau
Lu AF87908 NCT04149860/1/R Monoclonal antibody to phosphorylated tauprotein
ACI-35.030 NCT04445831/1/R Tau targeted vaccine
JACI-35.054 NCT04445831/1/R

AD: Alzheimer’s disease; BDPP: bioactive dietary polyphenol preparation; HDAC: histone deacetylase; MAPT: microtubule associated protein tau. Status: AN: Active, not recruiting; E: Enrolling by invitation; N: Not yet recruiting; R: Recruiting. There are 14 agents and 17 clinical trials targeting tau protein pathology for AD treatment.

Ageing Related Risk Factors in Alzheimer’s Disease

Ageing facilitates and accelerates cognitive impairment and is the most predominant risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases, including AD (Hou et al., 2019). In aged population, there are dysregulations of the immune system and decreased metabolism levels with higher risk of neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and vascular diseases as well as diabetes (Donato et al., 2018; Rea et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2020). These ageing related risk factors are supposed to involve in AD pathologies.

Multiple studies have shown that there were elevated inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and accumulated activated microglial at the damage region in AD brains (Calsolaro and Edison, 2016). In recent years, genome-wide association studies have identified several AD-risk single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with or related to microglial function, including TREM2, CD33, CR1, CLU, CD2AP, EPHA1, ABCA7, and INPP5D (Spangenberg and Green, 2017), indicating that microglia played a critical role in the development of AD. An updated meta-analysis from the cohort of the year 1995 to 2016 demonstrated that the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was significantly associated with the reduced risk of AD (Zhang et al., 2018). Anti-inflammatory agents for AD treatment currently in clinical trials are listed in Additional Table 5.

Additional Table 5.

Neuroprotective agents for AD treatment in clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov on November 22, 2020)

Therapeutic purpose Agent ClinicalTrials.gov ID/Phase/Status Mechanism of action
Anti-inflammation ALZT-OP1 (cromolyn + ibuprofen) NCT02547818/3/AN NCT04570644/2/R Combinationtherapy (mastcell stabilizer + NSAID) Cromolyn is a mastcell stabilizer. Mast cells release proinflammatory mediators and regulate BBB’s permeability. Ibuprofen is an NSAID.
Mastinib NCT01872598/3/AN Tyrosinekinase inhibitor Masitinib is a selective tyrosinekinase inhibitor target on c-kit on mast cells. Mast cells release proinflammatory mediators and regulateBBB’s permeability.
Azeliragon NCT03980730/3/R RAGE inhibitor
COR388 NCT03823404/3/AN Gingipain inhibitor COR388inhibit P. gingivalis infection in AD.
Curcumin+ aerobicyoga NCT01811381/2/AN Herb extract with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties
Daratumumab NCT04070378/2/R Monoclonalantibody targeting CD38
Dasatinib+ Quercetin NCT04063124/2/R Combinationtherapy (tyrosine kinaseinhibitor + flavonoid)
GB301 NCT03865017/2/N Cell therapy RegulatoryT cells (CD4+CD25+CD127dimFOXP3+) with immunosuppressive functions.
Lenalidomide NCT04032626/2/R Immunomodulator
Montelukast NCT03402503/2/R NCT03991988/2/R Leukotrieneantagonist
Pepinemab NCT04381468/2/R Monoclonalantibody of SEMA4D (CD100)
Rapamycin NCT04629495/2/N mTOR inhibitor
Rapamycin inhibitT cells and B cells by reducing interleukin-2 (IL-2) through mTOR inhibition.
Rifaximin NCT03856359/2/AN Antibioticto reduceproinflammatory cytokines from the harmful gut bacterial.
Valacyclovir NCT03282916/2/R Antiviral againstHSV-1 and HSV-2 infection
3TC NCt04552795/2/N Antiretroviral therapy
Emtriva NCT04500847/1/N Antiviral
Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
AL002 NCT04592874/2/R Monoclonalantibody targeting TREM2 receptors
NCT03635047/1/AN
AL003 NCT03822208/1/R Monoclonalantibody targeting SIGLEC-3 (CD33)
JNJ-40346527 NCT04121208/1/N CSF1R antagonist
CSF1R is also known as macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (M-CSFR), and CD115 (Cluster of Differentiation115). It is a receptor for a cytokine called colony stimulatingfactor 1.
Salsalate NCT03277573/1/AN NSAID
XPro1595 NCT03943264/1/R TNF inhibitor
Anti-oxidation Ginkgo biloba NCT03090516/3/R Plantextract withantioxidant properties
Curcumin+ aerobicyoga NCT01811381/2/AN Herb extract with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties
Grapeseed Extract NCT02033941/2/R Antioxidant polyphenolic compound
BDPP (bioactive dietary polyphenol preparation) NCT02502253/2/R The antioxidantgrapeseed polyphenolic extract and resveratrol
Grape Power NCT03361410/2/R Antioxidant polyphenolic components
Deferiprone NCT03234686/3/R Iron chelatingagent
Reducevascular risk Losartan + amlodipine + atorvastatin NCT02913664/3/AN AngiotensinⅡ receptor blocker: losartan
Calcium channel blocker: amlodipine
Cholesterol agent: atorvastatin
Icosapent ethyl (IPE) NCT02719327/3/R Omega-3 fatty acid
IPE is a purified form of omega-3 fattyacid EPA.
Omega-3 (DHA + EPA) NCT03691519/3/R Omega-3 fatty acid
Omega-3 PUFA NCT01953705/2/AN Omega-3 fatty acid
DHA NCT03613844/2/R Omega-3 fatty acid
PMZ-1620 (sovateltide) NCT04052737/2/R Endothelin-Breceptor agonist
Telmisartan+Perindopril NCT02085265/2/R AngiotensinⅡ receptor blocker: telmisartan
Angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor: perindopril
Dabigatran NCT03752294/1/N Direct thrombin inhibitor
Telmisartan NCT02471833/1/R AngiotensinⅡ receptor blocker
Improve metabolism function Azeliragon NCT03980730/3/R RAGE inhibitor
Metformin NCT04098666/3/N Insulinsensitizer
Ketones NCT04466735/R Ketones toimprove glucose use
Tricaprilin NCT04187547/3/N Ketone body stimulant; caprylic triglyceride
Improve glucose metabolism
Benfotiamine NCT02292238/2/AN Synthetic thiamine
Improve glucose use
Dapagliflozin NCT03801642/2/R SGLT2 inhibitor
Improve insulinsensitivity and glucose metabolism
Empagliflozin NCT03852901/1/R SGLT2 inhibitor
Liraglutide NCT01843075/2/AN Glucagon-like peptide1 receptor agonist
Metabolic cofactor supplementation NCT04044131/2/R Mixture of N-acetylcysteine, L-carnitine, tartrate, nicotinamideroboside, and serine.
S-equol (AUS-131) NCT03101085/2/R Agonistof non-hormonal estrogen receptor B located on mitochondrial
Improve mitochondrial function
T3D-959 NCT04251182/2/S Dual agonist of PPAR-σ and PPAR-γ
Regulateglucose and lipid metabolism and reduce insulinresistance
Efavirenz NCT03706885/1/R CytochromeP450 46A1 activator and the antiretroviral
Enhance endocrinefunction Lupron (leuprolide acetate depot) NCT03649724/2/R GnRH receptor agonist
Reduce negative effect of elevated GnRH and gonadotrophins inbrain.
CORT108297 NCT04601038/2/R Glucocorticoidreceptor antagonist

AD: Alzheimer’s disease; BBB: blood-brain barrier; CD115: cluster of differentiation 115; CSF1R: colony stimulating factor 1 receptor; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; GnRH: gonadotrophin-releasing hormones; M-CSFR: macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; NSAID: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PPAR: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; RAGE: receptor for advanced glycation end products; SEMA4D: semaphorin-4D; SGLT2: sodium-glucose co-transporter-2; SIGLEC-3: sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 3. Status: AN: Active, not recruiting; N: Not yet recruiting; R: Recruiting; S, suspended. There are 50 agents and 53 clinical trials to modify the aging related risk factors for AD treatment.

Oxidative stress, an imbalance between reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in biological system, is related to aging and involved in AD pathology to induce tau phosphorylation and synapse dysfunction in the brain (Kumar and Singh, 2015). Glutathione redox imbalance in the brain was found to contribute to the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting that therapies aimed at improving the anti-oxidant level could be promising approaches for AD treatment (Gu et al., 2015). Natural products could provide many antioxidant agents, and have proved beneficial to AD patients. Polyphenols, such as curcumin, resveratrol and epigallocatechin-3-gallate, were suggested to have good potential for AD treatment with low frequency of adverse events (Syarifah-Noratiqah et al., 2018). The currently antioxidant agent in clinical trials for AD treatment are summarized in Additional Table 5.

Certain vascular lesions such as cerebral amyloid angiopathy, microvascular degeneration, and periventricular white matter lesions are evident in almost all cases of AD (Kalaria and Ballard, 1999). In the two-hit vascular hypothesis of AD etiology, on one hand, the disrupted BBB leads to a reduced clearance of neurotoxins including Aβ; on the other hand, brain oligemia leads to overexpression and enhanced processing of APP, and brain hypoperfusion (Nelson et al., 2016). According to a meta-analysis, treatment of vascular risk factors with antihypertensives and statins reduced the incidence of dementia and AD (Larsson and Markus, 2018). Thus, vascular risk factors treatment might be a potential strategy to slow cognitive decline in AD. To restore vascular function in AD, some vascular protection agents, such as angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, calcium channel blocker, cholesterol agent, omega-3 fatty acid, and direct thrombin inhibitor are now in clinical evaluations for AD treatment (Additional Table 5).

Diabetes has been implicated as a major risk factor of AD development (Vignini et al., 2013; Baglietto-Vargas et al., 2016). The pathological features of diabetes, such as insulin/insulin-like growth factor resistance, hyperglycemia and glucose metabolism dysfunction, were observed to induce AD pathologies in Aβ production, tauopathy, neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment. Antidiabetic agent or agent regulating metabolism are thought to be helpful against AD. Sex steroid hormones, such as estrogen and androgen, exert neuroprotective benefit in adult brains (Pike, 2017). Insufficiency of sex hormones in male and female both enhance the vulnerability to AD. In Additional Table 5, agents in AD drug development clinical trials with potential to modulate metabolism and endocrine related risk factors are summarized.

Although the mechanisms of how these aging related risk factors play roles in AD etiology are still poorly understood, considerable research effort has been undertaken to tackle these factors for AD treatment. As shown in Additional Table 5, there are 50 agents (including 21 anti-inflammatory agents, 6 anti-oxidation agents, 9 vascular modifying agents, 12 metabolism modifying agents and 2 endocrine modifying agents) and 53 clinical trials to modulate the aging related risk factors for AD treatment.

Conclusions

AD is a complex neurodegenerative disease with various pathological factors. Although a number of promising therapeutic strategies have been evaluated, more extensive and intensive fundamental studies are still needed. To date, there is still no effective drug that can cure AD patients. Therapies developed based on cholinergic deficiency offered only limited cognitive improvement. The up-to-now disease modifying drugs failed to improve cognition in clinical trials. What the previous failures indicating is that targeting on single factor alone may not necessarily work well on disease caused by multiple factors. Consequently, the disease’s complex mechanisms and the interplay between the multiple factors call for the come out of all-powerful therapies with multiple curing functions.

Indeed, multitarget strategy has already been put into practice in the clinic and clinical trials. A combination of one of the cholinesterases inhibitors (donepezil) with memantine is the fifth FDA approved prescription for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s patients (Bennett et al., 2019). Blarcamesine, a multifunctional drug as the sigma-1 and muscarinic dual agonist and GSK-3β inhibitor, is currently in phase 3 clinical trial for AD treatment. Multitarget therapies, mainly the combination of several agents with different aspects of anti-AD functions, and multitarget agents currently in AD drug clinical trials are summarized in Additional Table 6. 13 multi-targeting agents and 22 clinical trials are on-going for AD treatment, including 6 agents in phase 3, 6 agents in phase 2 and 1 agent in phase 1 clinical studies. Among these therapies, ANAVEX2-73 is expected to modulate synaptic dysfunction, cholinergic neurotransmission, tauopathy by regulating the sigma-1 receptor, muscarinic receptors and GSK-3β.

Additional Table 6.

Multitarget therapies for AD treatment in clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov on November 22, 2020)

Therapies Mechanism of action on targets ClinicalTrials.gov ID/Phase/Status
ALZT-OP1 (Combination of cromolyn and Mast cell stabilizer (cromolyn) NCT02547818/3/AN
ibuprofen) Anti-inflammation (ibuprofen) NCT04570644/2/R
ANAVEX2-73 (blarcamesine) Sigma-1 receptor agonist NCT03790709/3/R
M1 receptor agonist and M2 receptor antagonist NCT04314934/3/R
GSK-3β inhibitor NCT02756858/2/AN
AVP786 (Combination of dextromethorphan and Sigma-1 receptor agonist (dextromethorphan) NCT03393520/3/R
quinidine) NMDA receptor antagonist (dextromethorphan) NCT02446132/3/R
NCT04464564/3/R
NCT04408755/3/R
Brexpiprazole D2 receptor agonist NCT03620981/3/R
5-HT receptor agonist NCT03594123/3/R
NCT03548584/3/R
NCT03724942/3/R
Gantenerumab and solanezumab Monoclonal antibody directed at plaques and oligomers (ganenerumab) NCT02008357/3/AN
Monoclonal antibody directed at monomers (solanzumab)
Losartan + amlodipine + atorvastatin Angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blocker: losartan NCT02913664/3/AN
Calcium channel blocker: amlodipine
Cholesterol agent: atorvastatin
AMX0035 (sodium phenylbutyrate and tauroursodeoxycholic acid combination) Chemical chaperone to inhibit endoplasmic reticulum stress responses. (Sodium phenylbutyrate) NCT03533257/2/AN
Naturally occurring bile acid to tackle mitochondrial dysfunction. (tauroursodeoxycholic acid)
Dasatinib + Quercetin (Combination therapy) Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Dasatinib) NCT04063124/2/R
Flavonoid with antioxidant and anti-Aβ fibrilization properties (Quercetin)
Grapeseed Extract Polyphenolic compound with antioxidant property NCT02033941/2/R
Anti-oligomerization
L-serine Synthesis of sphingolipids and phosphatidylserine NCT03062449/2/R
The precursor of D-serine, a co-agonist of NMDARs.
ORY-2001 (vafidemstat) LSD1 inhibitor NCT03867253/2/AN
MAO-B inhibitor
Telmisartan+Perindopril Angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blocker (telmisartan) NCT02085265/2/R
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (perindopril)
Allopregnanolone Growth hormones to promote neurogenesis NCT03748303/1/R
Positive allosteric GABAARs modulators

5-HT: 5-hydroxytryptamine; AD: Alzheimer’s disease; GABAARs: γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors; GSK-3β: glycogen synthase kinase 3; LSD1: Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A; MAO-B: monoamine oxidase B; NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate; NMDARs: N-methyl-D-aspartate. Status: AN: Active, not recruiting; R: Recruiting. 13 multi-targeting agents are on-going in 22 clinical trials for AD treatment.

It is noted that many therapeutic targets play roles in multiple pathological pathways. Thus, therapeutically modulations of these targets could be beneficial in AD treatment via multiple mechanisms of action. For example, apart from metabolic function, GLP-1R agonists were observed to modulate neuroinflammation (Yun et al., 2018) and neurovascular functions (Zhao et al., 2020) in neurodegenerative disease models. Moreover, sigma-1 receptor (Jin et al., 2015) and GSK-3β (Lauretti et al., 2020) are regarded as multi-functional therapeutic targets. These therapeutic targets with multiple mechanisms of action could offer great potential in multitarget AD drug development.

Considering the complexity of AD pathology, multifunctional agents designed with multitarget potential could lead to a breakthrough in AD therapeutic development. Preclinical studies on different pathologies and multitarget treatments (Wang et al., 2019; Ju et al., 2020; Ju and Tam, 2020) may provide a pool of lead compounds for future clinical investigations. There is no royal road to overcome AD, but multifunctional drug is likely to give hope for AD treatment.

Additional Table 1: Agents modifying synaptic dysfunction of AD in clinical trials.

Additional Table 2: Neurotransmission modifying agents for AD drug development in clinical trials.

Additional Table 3: Anti-amyloid agents for AD treatment in clinical trials.

Additional Table 4: Anti-tau agents for AD treatment in clinical trials.

Additional Table 5: Neuroprotective agents for AD treatment in clinical trials.

Additional Table 6: Multitarget therapies for AD treatment in clinical trials.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Financial support: This work was funded by University of Macau (File No. MYRG2016-00102-FHS) (to KYT).

Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Open peer reviewer: Vasily Vorobyov, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.

Funding: This work was funded by University of Macau (File No. MYRG2016-00102-FHS) (to KYT).

P-Reviewer: Vorobyov V; C-Editors: Zhao M, Liu WJ, Qiu Y; T-Editor: Jia Y

References

  • 1.Ardestani PM, Evans AK, Yi B, Nguyen T, Coutellier L, Shamloo M. Modulation of neuroinflammation and pathology in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease using a biased and selective beta-1 adrenergic receptor partial agonist. Neuropharmacology. 2017;116:371–386. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baglietto-Vargas D, Shi J, Yaeger DM, Ager R, LaFerla FM. Diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease crosstalk. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;64:272–287. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bennett CF, Krainer AR, Cleveland DW. Antisense oligonucleotide therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2019;42:385–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bentahir M, Nyabi O, Verhamme J, Tolia A, Horre K, Wiltfang J, Esselmann H, De Strooper B. Presenilin clinical mutations can affect gamma-secretase activity by different mechanisms. J Neurochem. 2006;96:732–742. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03578.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bianco OA, Manzine PR, Nascimento CM, Vale FA, Pavarini SC, Cominetti MR. Serotoninergic antidepressants positively affect platelet ADAM10 expression in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28:939–944. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bondareff W, Mountjoy CQ, Roth M, Rossor MN, Iversen LL, Reynolds GP, Hauser DL. Neuronal degeneration in locus ceruleus and cortical correlates of Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1987;1:256–262. doi: 10.1097/00002093-198701040-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bostancıklıoğlu M. Optogenetic stimulation of serotonin nuclei retrieve the lost memory in Alzheimer’s disease. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:836–847. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Briggs CA, Chakroborty S, Stutzmann GE. Emerging pathways driving early synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;483:988–997. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cacabelos R. Parkinson’s disease: from pathogenesis to pharmacogenomics. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:551. doi: 10.3390/ijms18030551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Calsolaro V, Edison P. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: current evidence and future directions. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12:719–732. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cao J, Hou J, Ping J, Cai D. Advances in developing novel therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2018;13:64. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0299-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Castellano JM, Kim J, Stewart FR, Jiang H, DeMattos RB, Patterson BW, Fagan AM, Morris JC, Mawuenyega KG, Cruchaga C, Goate AM, Bales KR, Paul SM, Bateman RJ, Holtzman DM. Human apoE isoforms differentially regulate brain amyloid-beta peptide clearance. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:89ra57. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Citri A, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions , and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:18–41. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cordella A, Krashia P, Nobili A, Pignataro A, La Barbera L, Viscomi MT, Valzania A, Keller F, Ammassari-Teule M, Mercuri NB, Berretta N, D’Amelio M. Dopamine loss alters the hippocampus-nucleus accumbens synaptic transmission in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;116:142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coupland CAC, Hill T, Dening T, Morriss R, Moore M, Hippisley-Cox J. Anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: a nested case-control study. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:1084–1093. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cummings J, Aisen PS, DuBois B, Frolich L, Jack CR, Jones RW, Morris JC, Raskin J, Dowsett SA, Scheltens P. Drug development in Alzheimer’s disease: the path to 2025. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016;8:12. doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0207-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Donato AJ, Machin DR, Lesniewski LA. Mechanisms of dysfunction in the aging vasculature and role in age-related disease. Circ Res. 2018;123:825–848. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Doucette R, Fisman M, Hachinski VC, Mersky H. Cell loss from the nucleus basalis of Meynert in Alzheimer’s disease. Can J Neurol Sci. 1986;13:435–440. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100037070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ferreira-Vieira TH, Guimaraes IM, Silva FR, Ribeiro FM. Alzheimer’s disease: targeting the cholinergic system. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14:101–115. doi: 10.2174/1570159X13666150716165726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gao Y, Tan L, Yu JT, Tan L. Tau in Alzheimer’s Disease: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15:283–300. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170417111859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Godbolt AK, Beck JA, Collinge JC, Cipolotti L, Fox NC, Rossor MN. A second family with familial AD and the V717L APP mutation has a later age at onset. Neurology. 2006;66:611–612. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000197791.53828.2C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Goodson HV, Jonasson EM. Microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10:a022608. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gotz J, Chen F, van Dorpe J, Nitsch RM. Formation of neurofibrillary tangles in P301L tau transgenic mice induced by A beta 42 fibrils. Science (New York, NY) 2001;293:1491–1495. doi: 10.1126/science.1062097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Govindpani K, Guzman BCF, Vinnakota C, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RL, Kwakowsky A. Towards a better understanding of GABAergic remodeling in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:41. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Granger AJ, Shi Y, Lu W, Cerpas M, Nicoll RA. LTP requires a reserve pool of glutamate receptors independent of subunit type. Nature. 2013;493:495. doi: 10.1038/nature11775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grothe M, Heinsen H, Teipel S. Longitudinal measures of cholinergic forebrain atrophy in the transition from healthy aging to Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:1210–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grudzien A, Shaw P, Weintraub S, Bigio E, Mash DC, Mesulam MM. Locus coeruleus neurofibrillary degeneration in aging, mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28:327–335. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gu F, Chauhan V, Chauhan A. Glutathione redox imbalance in brain disorders. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015;18:89–95. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hoover BR, Reed MN, Su J, Penrod RD, Kotilinek LA, Grant MK, Pitstick R, Carlson GA, Lanier LM, Yuan LL, Ashe KH, Liao D. Tau mislocalization to dendritic spines mediates synaptic dysfunction independently of neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2010;68:1067–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hou Y, Dan X, Babbar M, Wei Y, Hasselbalch SG, Croteau DL, Bohr VA. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15:565–581. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0244-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hsiao K, Chapman P, Nilsen S, Eckman C, Harigaya Y, Younkin S, Yang FS, Cole G. Correlative memory deficits, A beta elevation, and amyloid plaques in transgenic mice. Science (New York, NY) 1996;274:99–102. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5284.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jacob CP, Koutsilieri E, Bartl J, Neuen-Jacob E, Arzberger T, Zander N, Ravid R, Roggendorf W, Riederer P, Grunblatt E. Alterations in expression of glutamatergic transporters and receptors in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2007;11:97–116. doi: 10.3233/jad-2007-11113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jang SS, Chung HJ. Emerging link between Alzheimer’s disease and homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Neural Plasticity. 2016;2016:7969272. doi: 10.1155/2016/7969272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jia JP, Jia JM, Zhou WD, Xu M, Chu CB, Yan X, Sun YX. Differential acetylcholine and choline concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Chin Med J. 2004;117:1161–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jin JL, Fang M, Zhao YX, Liu XY. Roles of sigma-1 receptors in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:4808–4820. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jones-Davis DM, Macdonald RL. GABA(A) receptor function and pharmacology in epilepsy and status epilepticus. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2003;3:12–18. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4892(02)00015-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ju Y, Tam KY. 9R, the cholinesterase and amyloid beta aggregation dual inhibitor, as a multifunctional agent to improve cognitive deficit and neuropathology in the triple-transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Neuropharmacology. 2020;181:108354. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ju Y, Chakravarty H, Tam KY. An isoquinolinium dual inhibitor of cholinesterases and amyloid beta aggregation mitigates neuropathological changes in a triple-transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11:3346–3357. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kalaria RN, Ballard C. Overlap between pathology of Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 13 Suppl. 1999;3:S115–123. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199912003-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kapitein LC, Hoogenraad CC. Building the neuronal microtubule cytoskeleton. Neuron. 2015;87:492–506. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kashyap G, Bapat D, Das D, Gowaikar R, Amritkar RE, Rangarajan G, Ravindranath V, Ambika G. Synapse loss and progress of Alzheimer’s disease - A network model. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43076-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Koch G, Di Lorenzo F, Bonnì S, Giacobbe V, Bozzali M, Caltagirone C, Martorana A. Dopaminergic modulation of cortical plasticity in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39:2654–2661. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kumar A, Singh A. A review on mitochondrial restorative mechanism of antioxidants in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological conditions. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:206. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kumar A, Singh A, Ekavali A review on Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology and its management: an update. Pharmacol Rep. 2015;67:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lam AD, Sarkis RA, Pellerin KR, Jing J, Dworetzky BA, Hoch DB, Jacobs CS, Lee JW, Weisholtz DS, Zepeda R, Westover MB, Cole AJ, Cash SS. Association of epileptiform abnormalities and seizures in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2020;95:e2259–2270. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lan MY, Liu JS, Wu YS, Peng CH, Chang YY. A novel APP mutation (D678H) in a Taiwanese patient exhibiting dementia and cerebral microvasculopathy. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:513–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.03.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Larsson SC, Markus HS. Does treating vascular risk factors prevent dementia and Alzheimer’s disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64:657–668. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lauretti E, Dincer O, Pratico D. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2020;1867:118664. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lewis J, Dickson DW. Propagation of tau pathology: hypotheses, discoveries , and yet unresolved questions from experimental and human brain studies. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:27–48. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1507-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liguori C. Orexin and Alzheimer’s disease. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences. 2017;33:305–322. doi: 10.1007/7854_2016_50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Luo J, Mills K, le Cessie S, Noordam R, van Heemst D. Ageing, age-related diseases and oxidative stress: What to do next? Ageing Res Rev. 2020;57:100982. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.100982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity: multiple forms and mechanisms. Trends in neurosciences. 1993;16:521–527. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90197-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mango D, Saidi A, Cisale GY, Feligioni M, Corbo M, Nisticò R. Targeting synaptic plasticity in experimental models of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:778. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mann DM, Esiri MM. The pattern of acquisition of plaques and tangles in the brains of patients under 50 years of age with Down’s syndrome. J Neurol Sci. 1989;89:169–179. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(89)90019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Martin L, Latypova X, Wilson CM, Magnaudeix A, Perrin M-L, Yardin C, Terro F. Tau protein kinases: Involvement in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12:289–309. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Masters CL, Simms G, Weinman NA, Multhaup G, McDonald BL, Beyreuther K. Amyloid plaque core protein in Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:4245–4249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mendez MF, Lim GTH. Seizures in elderly patients with dementia. Drugs Aging. 2003;20:791–803. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200320110-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Messing L, Decker JM, Joseph M, Mandelkow E, Mandelkow EM. Cascade of tau toxicity in inducible hippocampal brain slices and prevention by aggregation inhibitors. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:1343–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Meyer-Luehmann M, Spires-Jones TL, Prada C, Garcia-Alloza M, de Calignon A, Rozkalne A, Koenigsknecht-Talboo J, Holtzman DM, Bacskai BJ, Hyman BT. Rapid appearance and local toxicity of amyloid-beta plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2008;451:720–724. doi: 10.1038/nature06616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Missonnier P, Prévot A, Herrmann FR, Ventura J, Padée A, Merlo MCG. Disruption of gamma-delta relationship related to working memory deficits in first-episode psychosis. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2020;127:103–115. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02126-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mitchell RA, Herrmann N, Lanctôt KL. The role of dopamine in symptoms and treatment of apathy in Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2011;17:411–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00161.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Musiek ES, Holtzman DM. Three dimensions of the amyloid hypothesis: time, space and ‘wingmen’. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:800–806. doi: 10.1038/nn.4018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nelson AR, Sweeney MD, Sagare AP, Zlokovic BV. Neurovascular dysfunction and neurodegeneration in dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862:887–900. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ouchi Y, Yoshikawa E, Futatsubashi M, Yagi S, Ueki T, Nakamura K. Altered brain serotonin transporter and associated glucose metabolism in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1260–1266. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pappas BA, Bayley PJ, Bui BK, Hansen LA, Thal LJ. Choline acetyltransferase activity and cognitive domain scores of Alzheimer’s patients. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:11–17. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00090-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pike CJ. Sex and the development of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95:671–680. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pooler AM, Polydoro M, Maury EA, Nicholls SB, Reddy SM, Wegmann S, William C, Saqran L, Cagsal-Getkin O, Pitstick R, Beier DR, Carlson GA, Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT. Amyloid accelerates tau propagation and toxicity in a model of early Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:11. doi: 10.1186/s40478-015-0199-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ramos-Rodriguez JJ, Molina-Gil S, Rey-Brea R, Berrocoso E, Garcia-Alloza M. Specific serotonergic denervation affects tau pathology and cognition without altering senile plaques deposition in APP/PS1 mice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rea IM, Gibson DS, McGilligan V, McNerlan SE, Alexander HD, Ross OA. Age and age-related diseases: role of inflammation triggers and cytokines. Front Immunol. 2018;9:586. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Reiner A, Levitz J. Glutamatergic signaling in the central nervous system: Ionotropic and metabotropic receptors in concert. Neuron. 2018;98:1080–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rice HC, de Malmazet D, Schreurs A, Frere S, Van Molle I, Volkov AN, Creemers E, Vertkin I, Nys J, Ranaivoson FM, Comoletti D, Savas JN, Remaut H, Balschun D, Wierda KD, Slutsky I, Farrow K, De Strooper B, de Wit J. Secreted amyloid-beta precursor protein functions as a GABABR1a ligand to modulate synaptic transmission. Science (New York, NY) 2019;363:eaao4827. doi: 10.1126/science.aao4827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rudy CC, Hunsberger HC, Weitzner DS, Reed MN. The role of the tripartite glutamatergic synapse in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Dis. 2015;6:131–148. doi: 10.14336/AD.2014.0423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sasaki S. High prevalence of parkinsonism in patients with MCI or mild Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:1615–1622. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.3054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Savelieff MG, Nam G, Kang J, Lee HJ, Lee M, Lim MH. Development of multifunctional molecules as potential therapeutic candidates for Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the last decade. Chem Rev. 2019;119:1221–1322. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Selkoe DJ, Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8:595–608. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201606210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Shimohama S, Taniguchi T, Fujiwara M, Kameyama M. Changes in nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in Alzheimer-type dementia. J Neurochem. 1986;46:288–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb12960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sivilotti L, Nistri A. GABA receptor mechanisms in the central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 1991;36:35–92. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(91)90036-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Smart TG, Stephenson FA. A half century of γ-aminobutyric acid. Brain Neurosci Adv. 2019;3:2398212819858249. doi: 10.1177/2398212819858249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Soldano A, Hassan BA. Beyond pathology: APP, brain development and Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;27:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Spangenberg EE, Green KN. Inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: lessons learned from microglia-depletion models. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;61:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Stuchlik A. Dynamic learning and memory, synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis: an update. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:6. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Syarifah-Noratiqah SB, Naina-Mohamed I, Zulfarina MS, Qodriyah HMS. Natural polyphenols in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Drug Targets. 2018;19:927–937. doi: 10.2174/1389450118666170328122527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Talarico G, Trebbastoni A, Bruno G, de Lena C. Modulation of the cannabinoid system: a new perspective for the treatment of the Alzheimer’s disease. Current neuropharmacology. 2019;17:176–183. doi: 10.2174/1570159X16666180702144644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, Hansen LA, Katzman R. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:572–580. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Terunuma M. Diversity of structure and function of GABA(B) receptors: a complexity of GABA(B)-mediated signaling. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B-Phys Biol Sci. 2018;94:390–411. doi: 10.2183/pjab.94.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Theofilas P, Ehrenberg AJ, Dunlop S, Di Lorenzo Alho AT, Nguy A, Leite REP, Rodriguez RD, Mejia MB, Suemoto CK, Ferretti-Rebustini REDL, Polichiso L, Nascimento CF, Seeley WW, Nitrini R, Pasqualucci CA, Jacob Filho W, Rueb U, Neuhaus J, Heinsen H, Grinberg LT. Locus coeruleus volume and cell population changes during Alzheimer’s disease progression: a stereological study in human postmortem brains with potential implication for early-stage biomarker discovery. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:236–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Vignini A, Giulietti A, Nanetti L, Raffaelli F, Giusti L, Mazzanti L, Provinciali L. Alzheimer’s disease and diabetes: new insights and unifying therapies. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013;9:218–227. doi: 10.2174/1573399811309030003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wang JZ, Xia YY, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K. Abnormal hyperphosphorylation of tau: sites, regulation , and molecular mechanism of neurofibrillary degeneration. J Alzheimers Dis 33 Suppl. 2013;1:S123–139. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-129031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wang T, Liu XH, Guan J, Ge S, Wu MB, Lin JP, Yang LR. Advancement of multi-target drug discoveries and promising applications in the field of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;169:200–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.02.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Xiao YL, Ma BY, McElheny D, Parthasarathy S, Long F, Hoshi M, Nussinov R, Ishii Y. A beta(1-42) fibril structure illuminates self-recognition and replication of amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22:499–505. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Xu Y, Zhao M, Han Y, Zhang H. GABAergic inhibitory interneuron deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for treatment. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:660–660. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yun SP, Kam TI, Panicker N, Kim S, Oh Y, Park JS, Kwon SH, Park YJ, Karuppagounder SS, Park H, Kim S, Oh N, Kim NA, Lee S, Brahmachari S, Mao X, Lee JH, Kumar M, An D, Kang SU, et al. Block of A1 astrocyte conversion by microglia is neuroprotective in models of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Med. 2018;24:931–938. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0051-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhang C, Wang Y, Wang D, Zhang J, Zhang F. NSAID exposure and Risk of Alzheimer’s disease: an updated meta-analysis from cohort studies. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:83. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhao L, Li Z, Vong JSL, Chen X, Lai HM, Yan LYC, Huang J, Sy SKH, Tian X, Huang Y, Chan HYE, So HC, Ng WL, Tang Y, Lin WJ, Mok VCT, Ko H. Pharmacologically reversible zonation-dependent endothelial cell transcriptomic changes with neurodegenerative disease associations in the aged brain. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4413. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18249-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zott B, Simon MM, Hong W, Unger F, Chen-Engerer HJ, Frosch MP, Sakmann B, Walsh DM, Konnerth A. A vicious cycle of beta amyloid-dependent neuronal hyperactivation. Science. 2019;365:559–565. doi: 10.1126/science.aay0198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neural Regeneration Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES