Abstract
Background
Previous recurrences, tumor category (Ta, T1), the presence of CIS with superficial bladder tumors, the number of tumors, tumor size and multiplicity are predictors of bladder tumor recurrence. Recurrence is better predicted by multiplicity, size and previous recurrence.
Methods
This is retrospective descriptive study. All patients with urinary bladder tumor admitted to TASH from January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2019 is the study population. Information was retrieved using structured questionnaire.
Results
Most of the recurrent tumors 55 (76.4%) had huge size and were multiple 62 (86.1%) in the primary presentation. Most recurrent tumors 47 (65.3%) are low grade bladder tumors. About 17 (23.6%) were high grade tumor in their primary presentation. European studies showed size and multiplicity increase risk of recurrence. However, our patients have late presentations which probably made the proportion of recurrence higher.
Conclusion
Most of the recurrent bladder tumors have huge size and multiple in number at their initial presentation. All histological variants of Urothelial carcinomas recur.
Keywords: Bladder Tumor, Recurrence, Clinical Character, Pathologic character
Introduction
Bladder tumor is the second commonest tumors of the urinary tract (1). World-wide it has different incidence in males and females (7th in males and 14th in females) and it ranks 5th in cancer occurrence in the USA (2,3). The most common type of bladder tumor is histologically transitional cell carcinoma (4). Transitional carcinoma of the bladder is classified as non-muscle invasive tumor (NMIBT) and muscle invasive tumor (MIBT). The most common type of transitional cell carcinoma is NMIBT which is about 75% (5).
Painless hematuria is the hallmark of bladder tumor. The hematuria is usually terminal hematuria which could become throughout as the disease progresses. Bladder tumor can also present with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and suprapubic pain. At a later stage it can obstruct the ureters and may present with loin pain and signs of renal failure (6).
This classification determines the modality of treatment. Whereas NMIBTs are treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) and intravesical therapies, muscle invasive tumor requires radical cystectomy, radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (7). TURBT is the gold standard treatment for NMIBT (8). TURBT is the Gold standard treatment for NMIBT and carcinoma in situ tumors. It is both diagnostic and therapeutic. (9).
Bladder tumor after TURBT can recur and/or progress. Recurrence is occurrence of the same grade and stage tumor after complete resection while progression is a change from a NMIBT to MIBT (8,10).
Bladder tumor is a recurrent tumor at a rate of 15% to 70% in the first year (11). Factors associated with bladder tumor recurrence are size, multiplicity, tumor category (Ta, T1) CIS and superficial bladder tumor, grade of tumor and previous recurrence. Bladder tumor size of greater than 3 centimeters, tumors more than one and high-grade histology predict the likelihood of recurrence. Recurrence of more than once in a year is also predictive of recurrence (11, 12,13).
Many studies describe several predictors of bladder tumor recurrence. These include patient demographics (Age, sex) and tumor characteristics. The different tumor characters include size, grade, multiplicity, previous recurrence and T category and CIS. These tumor characters are put together in a scoring system out of 17 and patients are sorted in different risk categories. The categories are low risk, intermediate risk and high risk (14).
Tumor size is segregated in to tumor less than 3cms and greater than or equal to 3cms. And it is scored as 0 or 3. Tumor grades are given grades 1, 2, or 3 based on the World Health Organization 2004 classification. Grade 1 is UNLMP while grade 2 and 3 are low grade and high-grade tumors, respectively (15, 16,17). The main objective of the study is to describe clinical and pathologic characteristics of recurrent bladder tumor. It is also to identify the demography of patients and to describe pathologic characters of recurrent bladder tumor.
Bladder tumor is one of the common tumors treated at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH). Most of the patients undergo TURBT and in one survey it accounts for 14.1% of all urologic procedures in the hospital (18). Some of the patients come with recurrent bladder tumors.
Post-TURBT patients are kept on follow-up to detect recurrence early and treat accordingly. Protocols of follow-up vary from centers to centers. There is no follow up protocol in TASH. However, it is wise to follow patients with higher probability of recurrence frequently with short intervals. This helps to schedule patients at different time tables depending on their risk of recurrence. This reduces hospital burden and early detection of recurrence. Therefore, this study helps to identify patient characteristics and develop a follow up protocol for patients with recurrent bladder tumor at TASH.
Methods
This is a retrospective study to assess clinical and tumor characteristics of recurrent bladder tumor in TASH from January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2019. The study site is Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Data was collected from patient records on a predesigned questionnaire prepared by modifying and incorporating the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables. We tried to describe patient demography, clinical conditions, tumor characters and treatment protocols. The study population is all patients with recurrent bladder tumor. Sampling is done with 95% confidence interval and 0.05 margin of error. A finite source population the period is taken to be 316. We took a sample size of 177 patients randomly for the study.
Data was entered in SSPS version 21 statistical program. The data was analyzed for patient demography, clinical and diagnostic parameters. In addition, we tried to make a descriptive assessment of tumor characteristics in recurrent bladder tumor patients. Patients with NMIBT, recurrent bladder tumor and biopsy (histological) proven are included in the study. Patients with MIBT and for whom biopsy not done are excluded. The study obtained ethical approval by the surgical department research and publication committee and College of Health Sciences institutional review board.
Operational definitions:
Non-muscle invasive tumor: Bladder tumor that has not involved the muscularis propria of the bladder
Recurrent bladder tumor: non-muscle invasive tumor that has appeared again after complete removal by transurethral resection.
Patients: are persons admitted to TASH and who had undergone surgical treatment for bladder tumor
This is a single hospital based retrospective study. This is a limitation; however, this study is going to be done at the main referral hospital in the country and the information from this study contribute a lot to feel the existing information gap and it will be used as base line study to do further country wide study.
Results
We retrieved the medical records of 177 patients. Seven of them have incomplete data record and we excluded them. Of the 170 patients 129 (75.9%) males and 41 (24.1%) females. When we stratify by age 19 (11.2%) are less 40 years, 99 (58.2%) between 40 and 60 years and 52 (30.6%) above 60 years. Most patients 58 (32.6%) are from Oromia region followed by Amhara region and Addis Ababa city accounting 42 (23.7%) each (Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic characters of patients admitted to TASH (n=170)
| Variables and category | Frequency | Percent | |
| Age | <40 | 19 | 11.2 |
| 40–60 | 99 | 58.2 | |
| >60 | 52 | 30.6 | |
| Total | 170 | 100 | |
| Sex | Male | 129 | 75.9 |
| Female | 41 | 24.1 | |
| Total | 170 | 100 | |
| Address | Oromia | 58 | 34.1 |
| Addis | 42 | 24.7 | |
| Ababa | |||
| Amhara | 42 | 24.7 | |
| *SNNPR | 17 | 10.0 | |
| Harari | 4 | 2.4 | |
| Dire Dawa | 3 | 1.7 | |
| Not | 4 | 2.4 | |
| recorded | |||
| Total | 170 | 100 | |
*SNNPR: Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region
Ninety-eight (57.6%) patients appeared with primary bladder tumors while 72 (42.4%) came with recurrent bladder tumor. Of the 72 patients 33 (45.8%) had a single recurrence, 32 (44.4%) had 2 to 5 recurrences and about 7 (9.8%) had more than 5 recurrences. When we see the first-year recurrences 15 (20.8%) had none, 38 (52.8%) had 1 recurrence and19 (26.4%) had 2 to8 recurrences (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Pattern of recurrence of bladder tumor
Patients presented with hematuria 111 (65.3%), combined hematuria and lower urinary tract Symptoms (LUTS) 52 (30.6%), LUTS alone 4 (2.3%) and other symptoms like suprapubic pain and dysuria 3 (1.8%). Forty (23.5%) patients have abnormal (>1.2mg per dl) Creatinine. Ultrasonographic evaluation showed 95 (55.9%) bladder mass, 37 (21.8%) bladder mass with hydronephrosis and 38 (22.3%) other results like bladder wall thickening and normal results (Table 2).
Table 2.
Characteristics of bladder tumor patients at presentation (n=170)
| Variables and category | Frequency | percent | |
| Symptoms | Hematuria | 111 | 65.3 |
| Hematuria and LUTS | 52 | 30.6 | |
| LUTS | 4 | 2.3 | |
| Other | 3 | 1.8 | |
| Creatinine | Normal (<1.2mg/dl) | 130 | 76.5 |
| Abnormal (>1.2mg/dl) | 40 | 23.5 | |
| Ultrasonography | Bladder mass | 95 | 55.9 |
| Bladder mass and | |||
| hydronephrosis | 37 | 21.8 | |
| Other | 38 | 22.3 | |
Most of the recurrent tumors 55 (76.4%) had huge size and were multiple 62 (86.1%) in the primary presentation. Most recurrent tumors 47 (65.3%) are low grade bladder tumors. about 17 (23.6%) were high grade tumor in their primary presentation (Table 3).
Table 3.
Tumor characteristics of recurrent bladder tumors (n=72)
| Variable | Frequency | percent | |
| Size | Huge | 55 | 76.4 |
| Small | 17 | 23.6 | |
| Multiplicity | Multiple | 62 | 86.1 |
| Single | 10 | 13.9 | |
| Grade | Low grade | 47 | 65.3 |
| High grade | 17 | 23.6 | |
| UNLMP | 7 | 9.7 | |
| Not recorded | 1 | 1.4 |
Discussion
In our study bladder tumor is common in ages 40 to 60 years which is one to two decades younger age than the developed countries. Whereas bladder tumor is rare below the age of 40 years, in our study it accounts 11.2% (19, 20). Even though, our study is hospital based, like most other studies, bladder tumor predominates in males with a 3 to 1 ratio, approximately. The ratio is about 4 to 1 in one study in the United Kingdom (21) and similar ratio is described in another review (19). The majority (83.5%) of patents are from the three regions namely Oromia, Amhara and Addis Ababa. this could probably be due to the population size of the regions and their proximity to the study hospital (TASH).
Both primary and recurrent bladder tumor patients were admitted to the hospital with approximately 3: 2 ratios. This indicates recurrent bladder tumor is a significant proportion of bladder tumors that should be tackled with all means of surgical and medical management. Recurrence is an important issue in bladder tumor management in other centers as well. Of the 72 patients with recurrent bladder tumor 57 (79 %) have recurred within the first year and 19 (26.4%) had multiple recurrences within the first year. This shows bladder tumor is a highly recurrent tumor (12).
The main symptom of presentation in 163 (96%) of bladder tumor patients observed in our study is hematuria which similar to many other studies. This is followed by LUTS either combined with hematuria or LUTS alone and suprapubic pain (22, 23).
Upper urinary tract obstruction is one of the complications of bladder tumor. In our study a significant proportion of patients (n=40, 23 %) had elevated serum Creatinine (>1.2mg/dl). In addition, 40 patients (21.8%) had hydronephrosis on ultrasound during their presentation. Both elevated Creatinine and hydronephrosis show advanced bladder tumor. the presence of hydronephrosis has prognostic value in bladder cancer (24).
Most of the recurrent tumors are huge (76.4%) and multiple (86.1%) at their initial presentation. However, small and single tumors at initial presentations have also recurred in this study. Though many European studies showed size and multiplicity increase risk of recurrence, our patients have late presentations which probably made the proportion of recurrence higher in this group. It needs further prospective studies to make a conclusion (9,19).
In conclusions most bladder tumor patients present with hematuria and LUTS. Recurrent bladder tumors are significant portion of bladder tumor patients. Most of the recurrent bladder tumors have huge size and multiple in number at their initial presentation. All histological variants of urothelial carcinomas recur. We recommend a prospective study for better characterization of recurrent bladder tumors.
References
- 1.Zamboni Stefania, Moschini Marco, Simeone Claudio, Antonelli Alessandro, Mattei Agostino, Baumeister Philipp, et al. Prediction tools in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2019;8(1):39–45. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.01.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leiblich A, Bryant RJ, McCormick R, Crew J. The management of non-muscleinvasive bladder cancer: A comparison of European and UK guidelines. Journal of Clinical Urology. 2018;11(2):144–148. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang Yawei, Zhu Cairong, Curado Maria Paula, Zheng Tongzhang, Boyle Peter. Changing patterns of bladder cancer in the USA: evidence of heterogeneous disease. BJU Int. 2012;109(1):52–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10283.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kassouf Wassim, Traboulsi Samer L, Kulkarni Girish S, Breau Rodney H, Zlotta Alexandre, Fairey Andrew, et al. CUA guidelines on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(9–10):690–704. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Babjuk Marko, Burger Maximilian, Zigeuner Richard, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. Update European Urology. 2013:64. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Babjuk M, Bohle Andreas, Burger Maximilian, et al. EAU Guidelins on Non-Muscle Invasice Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. European Urology. 2017;71(Update 2016):447–461. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaufman D S. Challenges in the treatment of bladder cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2006;17(Supplement 5):106–112. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Monteiro Leonardo L, Witjes J Alfred, Agarwal Piyush K, Anderson Christopher B, Bivalacqua Trinity J, Bochner Bernard H, et al. ICUD-SIU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2017: Management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World Journal of Urology. 2019;37(1):61–60. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2438-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim Lawrence HC, patel Manish L. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) Translational Andrology and Urology. 2019:1–17. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hall M Craig, Chang Sam S, Dalbagni Guido, Pruthi Raj Som, Seigne John Derek, Skinner Eila Curlee, et al. Guideline for the Management of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: (Stges Ta, T1, and Tis) Journal of Urology. 2007 Dec;178(6):2314. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sylvesster Richard J, van der Meijdan Adrian PM, Osterlinck Willem, Witjes J Alfred, Bouffioux Christian, Denis Louis, et al. Predicting Recurrence and Progression in Individual Patients with Stage Ta T1 Bladder Cancer Using EORTC Risk Tables: A Combined Analysis of 2596 Patients from Seven EORTC Trials. European Urology. 2006;69(3):466–477. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.van der Heijden Antoine G, Witjes Alfred. Recurrence, Progression and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. European Urology. 2009;(Supplements 8):556. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kurth Karl-Heinz, Sylvester Richard J. Prognostic Factors in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Tumors, I. Clinical Prognostic Factors: A Review of the Experience of, the EORTC Genito-Urinary Group, II. Biologic Prognostic Markers. European Urology. 2007;(Supplements 6):789–799. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Palou Juan. Patient Risk Profiles. Prognostic Factors of Recurrence and Progression. European Urology. 2006;(Supplements 5):648. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vedder Moniek M, Márquez Mirari, de Bekker-Grob Esther W, et al. Risk Prediction Scores for Recurrence and Progression of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: An International Validation in Primary Tumours. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(6):1–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hassana Taha MM, Al-Zahranib IH. Bladder cancer: Analysis of the 2004 WHO classification in conjunction with pathological and geographic variables. African Journal of Urology. 2012;18:118–123. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kaasinen Eero, Rintala Erkki, Hellstro Pekka, Viitanen Jouko, Juusela Harri, Rajala Pertti. Factors Explaining Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Frequently Recurring Superficial Bladder Carcinoma. European Urology. 2002;42:167. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00260-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Feldhaus I, Temesgen G W, Laytin A, Odisho A Y, Beyene A D. Uncovering the Burden of Urologic Disease: Admissions Patterns at the main Teaching Hospital of Ethiopia. East and Central African Journal of Surgery. 2016;21(3):77–84. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saginala Kalyan, Barsouk Adam, Aluru3 John Sukumar, Rawla Prashanth, Padala Sandeep Anand, Barsouk Alexander. Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer. Medical sciences. 2020;8(15):1–12. doi: 10.3390/medsci8010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yavari1 Parvin, Sadrolhefazi B, Mohagheghi MA, Mehrazin R. A Descriptive Retrospective Study of Bladder Cancer at a Hospital in Iran (1973–2003) Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2009;10:681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Robinson Simon Paul, Farooq Assad, Laniado Marc, Motiwala Hanif. The demographic features, clinical outcomes, prognosis and treatment options for patients with sarcomatoid carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a single center experience. The International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2018;44(1):45. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Matulewicz Richard S, Steinberg Gary D. Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Overview and Contemporary Treatment Landscape of Neoadjuvant Chemoablative Therapies. Reviews in Urology. 2020;22(2):43–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cassella Ayun, Yunusab Bashir, Jalloha Mohamed, Mbodjia Mouhamadou M, Dialloa Abdourahmane. Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Review of the Current Trend in Africa. World J Oncol. 2019;10(3):123–131. doi: 10.14740/wjon1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fernandez Mario I, Williams Stephen B, Willis Daniel L, Slack Rebecca S, Dickstein Rian J, Parikh Sahil. Clinical risk stratification in patients with surgically resectable micro papillary bladder cancer. BJU International. 2017;119:684–691. doi: 10.1111/bju.13689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

