Abstract
The application of molecular genetics has reinvigorated and improved how species are defined and investigated scientifically, especially for morphologically cryptic micro-organisms. Here we show how species recognition improves understanding of the ecology and evolution of mutualisms between reef-building corals and their mutualistic dinoflagellates (i.e. Symbiodiniaceae). A combination of genetic, ecological, and morphological evidence defines two sibling species of Cladocopium (formerly Symbiodinium Clade C), specific only to host corals in the common genus Pocillopora, which transmit their obligate symbionts during oogenesis. Cladocopium latusorum sp. nov. is symbiotic with P. grandis/meandrina while the smaller-celled C. pacificum sp. nov. associates with P. verrucosa. Both symbiont species form mutualisms with Pocillopora that brood their young. Populations of each species, like their hosts, are genetically well connected across the tropical and subtropical Pacific Ocean, indicating a capacity for long-range dispersal. A molecular clock approximates their speciation during the late Pliocene or early Pleistocene as Earth underwent cycles of precipitous cooling and warming; and corresponds to when their hosts were also diversifying. The long temporal and spatial maintenance of high host fidelity, as well as genetic connectivity across thousands of kilometers, indicates that distinct ecological attributes and close evolutionary histories will restrain the adaptive responses of corals and their specialized symbionts to rapid climate warming.
Subject terms: Phylogenetics, Biodiversity
Introduction
Taxonomy is critical for quantifying biodiversity, deducing underlying ecological and evolutionary processes, improving conservation practices, and ultimately enhancing our understanding and appreciation of the natural world [1, 2]. Improved taxonomic resolution through the use of genetic data has greatly accelerated recognition of the processes governing the ecology and evolution of long established and more recently discovered species of microbial eukaryote [3–7]. However, formal descriptions of morphologically ambiguous eukaryotic microbes from many cryptically diverse and/or evolutionarily divergent phyla remain limited. This is especially the case for mutualisms between microalgae (i.e. dinoflagellates) and their marine invertebrate hosts, whose partnerships are the foundation of coral reef ecosystems around the world. Revisions to the systematic framework of these symbionts have helped to focus recent scientific discussions of these microbes [8–13], but much of their species taxonomy remains unresolved and undermines scientific efforts to improve awareness about their biology.
As the foremost taxonomic unit in biology, considerable importance is placed on the correct resolution of species. Ideally, a robust approach to defining a species supplies evidence that satisfies each of the morphological, ecological, phylogenetic, and biological species concepts. Each species definition emphasizes different stages in the process of speciation, including genetic isolation, population subdivision, and lineage divergence [14], and resulting changes in morphology and ecology. However, resolving single-celled species is often hindered by their size, lack of morphological features, and difficulties in culturing. Accepting these limitations, genetic data sourced from multiple independent phylogenetic and population genetic markers ultimately provides the best proxy for objectively delimiting species of eukaryotic microbes [3, 15].
When resolved to species, microalgal endosymbionts can serve as model systems to examine processes of dispersal, gene flow, and speciation among unicellular organisms [16]. A wide range of marine invertebrates that are mutualistic with photosynthetic dinoflagellates (Symbiodiniaceae; Dinophyceae) occur in shallow marine habitats across the world’s oceans. Reef-building corals are amongst the most diverse and abundant group of hosts to these symbionts and dominate tropical marine habitats where they build the framework supporting coral reef ecosystems. Dense dinoflagellate populations found in the tissues of corals provide sufficient biomass harvested from small samples that are easily and repeatedly obtained over space and time from hosts living in distinct habitats [17, 18]. The widespread distribution of many host coral species provides, in effect, a suite of biotic and abiotic environments from which to sample microalgal symbionts, allowing detailed investigations of their diversity, connectivity, ecology, and evolution over broad geographic scales and exposure to a range of physical–environmental conditions.
Worldwide, the genus Cladocopium is the foremost group of dinoflagellates associated with marine invertebrates. This genus has been characterized extensively using several genetic markers, which indicate that it comprises numerous genetically distinct, albeit closely related, lineages created by several adaptive radiations since the late Miocene [19–25]. Many genetically distinct Cladocopium lineages, many referred to by their ‘ITS2 type’ designation, vary in their biogeographic distributions and in their ecology. Indeed, genetically distinct Cladocopium exhibit clear differences in prevalence across reef environments and each associates with distinct kinds of host taxa [26]. Correspondingly, these Cladocopium often exhibit marked differences in physiology [27–30]. Thus, collective differences in their physiological, ecological, and biogeographic traits define genetic ‘types’ as distinct biological entities; and signify that they are discrete species [19, 20]. By this reasoning, the genus Cladocopium likely contains hundreds of species [25, 31].
Niche diversification via host specialization often appears to be the main cause of symbiont speciation [31–33]. To evaluate this mechanism in more detail, research presented herein examined Cladocopium associated with widespread coral species in the genus Pocillopora. These reef corals are prevalent throughout the Indo-Pacific [34], capable of long-range dispersal [35], rapid growth, relatively fast generational turnover [36], and may display marked differences in stress tolerance among individual colonies (e.g., sensitive or resistant to episodes of rapid ocean warming) [37, 38]. The extensive branching morphology of colonies provides critical habitat for many kinds of reef fish and invertebrates [39, 40]. Moreover, they are early colonizers repopulating reefs damaged by typhoons and events of mass coral bleaching and mortality [41]. They are therefore subjects of frequent physiological, ecological, and genetic investigations [42–45]. Species of Pocillopora often harbor specific ‘ITS2 types’ of Cladocopium not associated with other coral taxa [19, 20, 26, 46–48]. Here, we use a combination of genetic markers for phylogenetic and population genetic analyses to formally describe two new sibling species of Cladocopium. Each exhibited host fidelity over vast geographic ranges under varied environmental conditions and their age of origin is estimated using a calibrated molecular clock. With this clear taxonomic insight, we discuss the implications of reef corals dependent on symbionts that have adapted to, and evolved with, hosts through millions of years of changing climate.
Methods
Specimen collection
Pocillopora verrucosa (mt-ORF Type 3; n = 28), Pocillopora acuta (mt-ORF Type 5; n = 30), Pocillopora damicornis (mt-ORF Type 4; n = 15) Pocillopora meandrina (mt-ORF Type 1; n = 10), Pocillopora grandis (=eydouxi, mt-ORF Type 1; n = 64) and Pocillopora sp. (no mt-ORF data; n = 11) colonies were sampled by SCUBA at 17 sites throughout the Indo-Pacific from 2004–2017 (Fig. 1A and Table S1) and many of these samples have been included in previous studies [19, 20, 32, 38, 47, 49–54]. Fragments of coral between 1 and 3 cm2 were collected using a hammer and chisel and preserved in 20% DMSO buffer or 100% ethanol and stored at −20 °C.
Cell imaging and size measurements
Cells of Cladocopium were isolated from preserved fragments of both P. verrucosa and P. grandis. Cell size can vary with latitude, thus representative cells isolated only from host colonies in similar habitats from Palau were used. Ten microliters of macerated tissue was drawn into a pipette tip and placing on a microscope slide with a coverslip. The cells were visualized using bright-field microscopy on an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan), and imaged using the ORCA ER (Model C4742-80) and Olympus DP71 at the Penn State Microscopy Facility. The average and standard deviations of lengths and widths of at least 55 cells from 5 colonies per host species harboring each symbiont type were measured using ImageJ and calculated in Microsoft Excel.
Genomic DNA extraction, rRNA gene fingerprinting, amplification, and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from 1 cm2 fragment of each sample using a modified Promega Wizard protocol [46, 55] (Promega Madison, WI). The Pocillopora-specific mitochondrial open reading frame (mt-ORF), which resolves many Pocillopora species [19, 42, 45, 49], was amplified to confirm host species (Table S2).
All samples had the symbiont ‘type’ initially identified using the Symbiodiniaceae internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 (ITS2) of the rRNA gene region (primers and thermal cycling conditions listed in Table S2). Amplified products were electrophoresed using a CBScientific system with 45–80% denaturing gradient gels. Resultant gels were visualized using SYBR Green stain, where characteristic fingerprints for each sample were compared to known standards and/or sequenced to confirm identity to the ITS2 “type” designation (cf. [56]). Cladocopium samples identified as ITS2 “types” C1c, C1b-c, C42, C42a, C42b and C1c-ff, C1c-42-jj, C1c-42-ff, C1d, and C1c-d-t were analyzed with additional genetic markers.
Genetic markers including the D1/D2 domain of the large ribosomal subunit (LSU rRNA gene), internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the rRNA gene region, partial chloroplast large-subunit cp23S, mitochondrial cytochrome b (cob), mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (cox 1), and non-coding plastid minicircle (psbAncr) were amplified using the primers and protocols listed in Table S2. The conserved mitochondrial cob and cox 1 gene are conserved genes commonly used to distinguish between members of different genera, while the plastid cp23S and ITS2 genes are often applied for species designations within a genus. While ITS2 has been used to distinguish lineages of Symbiodiniaceae, though intragenomic variation often limits its use in reliable species designation. The nuclear large-subunit LSU rRNA gene is commonly used to distinguish species across genera of Symbiodiniaceae while the psbAncr is a rapidly evolving region that provides resolution between species as well as phylogeographic evidence resolution within species [25, 57, 58].
Amplicons were Sanger sequenced in the forward direction only for LSU, cp23S, cob, and cox 1, reverse for mt-ORF, and in both directions for psbAncr using the BigDye Terminator 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Sequences were analyzed on the Applied Biosciences Sequencer (Applied Biosciences, Foster City, CA) at the Penn State University Genomics Core Facility. Sequences were checked and edited in Geneious v 11.0.5 (Biomatters Ltd, Auckland, NZ).
DNA alignment, phylogenetic analysis, and divergence dating
The ITS2, cp23, cob, cox 1, and LSU sequences were concatenated and aligned with the same order of concatenated genes obtained from Cladocopium goreaui, Cladocopium infistulum, and Cladocopium thermophilum. PAUP v 2.3 [59] was used to create an unrooted maximum parsimony phylogeny based on a heuristic search. Gaps (and insertions) were treated as a 5th character and scored as one change. Bootstrap values based on 1000 iterations were evaluated to statistically assess branch support. Maximum likelihood was also employed to compare branching topologies produced by a different phylogenetic reconstruction. Branch support was also assessed using Bayesian Inference using MrBayes v3.2.1 [60] implementing General Time Reversible. Each MCMC analysis was run for 1.0 × 106 generations and sampled every 100 generations. The first quarter of trees were discarded as burn-in corresponding with the convergence of chains.
Sequences of the entire psbAncr were initially aligned using ClustalW2 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/) and optimized manually. MrModelTest v2 [61] was used to estimate the best model of nucleotide substitution, and the Akaike Information Criterion was used to parameterize Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis 2 (BEAST v2.5.2) [62, 63]. Both strict and relaxed clock models were tested under an HKY + G substitution model and calibrated based on the closing of the Central American Seaway. The Isthmus of Panama land barrier was established 4.2–4.7 million years ago (mya) [64] and the land barrier 3.1 mya at the latest [65, 66], and caused the isolation of once-connected populations of Eastern Pacific and Caribbean coral species, such as Porites panamensis and Porites colonensi containing Cladocopium symbionts. Following this timing, a gamma distribution with an alpha of 2.0 and beta 1.0 with an offset of 3.0 million years (my) was used. The MCMC chain was sampled every 1000 generations and run for 100,000,000 generations. The first 10% of iterations were discarded as a burn-in and the remaining convergence of independent runs and random starting seeds was analyzed using TRACER v1.7.1. TreeAnnotator [67] was used to find the maximum clade credibility tree and visualized in FigTree v1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). Densitree v2.2.6 [68] was used to visualize tree posteriors.
Microsatellite analysis
One hundred and eighty four samples from 5 of the 17 locations (Palau, Hawaii, Australia, Mexico, and Panama) were analyzed using eight previously published microsatellite markers including C1.05 [69], Sgr_21, Sgr_33, Sgr_37, Sgr_40, SgrSpl_22, SgrSpl_25, and SgrSpl_30 (Table S3) [23, 69]. Microsatellites were amplified according to corresponding published annealing temperatures listed in Table S3 and fragment sizes were analyzed using a LIZ500 base-pair standard on the ABI 3730 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) at the Penn State Genomics Core Facility. The Geneious v 11.0.5 microsatellite plugin was used to score allele sizes. GenAlEx v6.5 [70] was used to identify and remove clones so only individual multi-locus genotypes (MLGs) were analyzed (Supplemental Data). One hundred seven unique MLGs were retained and GenAlEx v6.5 [70] was used to calculate summary statistics including number of different alleles, number of effective alleles, observed and expected heterozygosity, and probability of identity (Table 1). Two alleles were frequently observed at each locus, consistent with previous Cladocopium microsatellite studies [23, 25, 51, 71] and the hypothesis that Cladocopium genome is all or partially duplicated [72, 73]. A test for linkage disequilibrium was conducted for each pair of loci in each lineage using the log-likelihood ratio statistic with GenePop on the Web (http://genepop.curtin.edu.au/) [74, 75] (Supplemental Material).
Table 1.
Cladocopium latusorum | Cladocopium pacificum | |
---|---|---|
Na | 8.375 1.475 | 8.750 0.861 |
Ne | 4.498 0.497 | 4.339 0.472 |
Ho | 0.832 0.081 | 0.754 0.071 |
He | 0.758 0.027 | 0.752 0.023 |
PI | 3.30E−09 | 4.90E−09 |
Na = number of different alleles, Ne = number of effective alleles = 1/(Sum pi2), Ho = observed heterozygosity = No. of Hets/N, He = expected heterozygosity = 1 − Sum pi2. Probability of identity = 2*[Sum (pi2)2]-Sum(pi)4. Superscripts indicate standard error.
Two separate and unsupervised (i.e. without a priori designations such as species, host species, or geography) clustering methods (STRUCTURE and principal components analysis (PCA) embedding using t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE)) were used to determine the number of clusters of multi-locus genotypes and the probability of membership of each sample to those clusters. First, Bayesian clustering analyses of the allele frequencies at each locus were performed with STRUCTURE v2.3.4 [76], assuming no-admixture, no location prior for seeding initial groupings, and no correlation of allele frequencies. The analyses ran 1,000,000 iterations with a burn-in of 10,000 for 100,000 replicates for each of tested K values from 1 to 10. The results of this analysis were plotted using the PlotSTR script [51]. To confirm consistency between analytical methods, a second unsupervised clustering technique was utilized. A multi-locus genotype table was used to run a PCA, after which the principal components (PCs) were embedded into 2 dimensions using t-SNE. This technique utilizes all PCs weighted by the amount of variance explained aimed at preserving high-dimensional structure [77]. A series (K = 1–10) was then fit of Gaussian mixture models on these embeddings to determine the number of groups as well as the probability of membership of each sample to each group. To determine the alleles at each locus responsible for clustering, the results of the clustering techniques were then analyzed using the BayesAllele script [51] to develop allele frequency by cluster plots. These analyses were performed in R (R Development Core Team 2018) and code for these analyses is available at https://github.com/KiraTurnham/ISME.Turnham.et.al.2021. Also available at this site are all supplemental datasets including multi-locus microsatellite alleles, summary statistics, DNA sequence nexus files, and BEAST input files.
Results
Taxonomic summary
Cladocopium latusorum Turnham, Sampayo & LaJeunesse, sp. nov. (Fig. 1B)
Phylum Dinoflagellata
Class Dinophyceae
Order Suessiales
Family Symbiodiniaceae
Genus Cladocopium LaJeunesse and Jeong 2018 [78]
Species Cladocopium latusorum,. sp. nov. Turnham, Sampayo & LaJeunesse.
Description
Vegetative ovate cells range in mean length between 10.5 µm (±0.72 µm; SD) and 11.2 µm (±0.68 µm; SD), and range in mean widths from 9.8 µm (±0.85 µm; SD) to 9.9 µm (±0.67 µm; SD) (Fig. 1B, D; Table S4). Nucleotide sequences of the large ribosomal subunit rRNA gene (GenBank MW711730–MW711732), abundant intragenomic variants of the internal transcribed spacer 2 of the rRNA gene region (MW757029–MW757034), partial chloroplast large-subunit, cp23S (MW711735), mitochondrial cytochrome b, cob, (MW713374), mitochondrial cox 1 (MW713056), and the full sequence of the psbAncr (MW819755–MW819779), genetically define this species. Two haploid alleles typically occur at microsatellite loci.
Holotype
The designated holotype are cells within DMSO preserved tissues of P. grandis deposited in the Algal Collection of the National Herbarium, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA; and assigned the catalog number: US Alg. Coll 227752.
Type locality
Republic of Palau, Oceania, Pacific Ocean (7°14.93′N, 134°14.149′E).
Habitat
Associated predominantly with the broadcasting corals P. grandis and P. meandrina, and also forms mutualisms with the brooding species P. damicornis and P. acuta.
Etymology
From the Latin word latus, meaning side, in reference to its broad longitudinal distribution from the western the Indian Ocean and Red Sea to the eastern Pacific Ocean.
Other notes
Species previously referred to in the literature ITS2 “type” C1c, C1b-c, C42, C42a, C42b and C1c-ff, C1c-42-ff.
Cladocopium pacificum Turnham & LaJeunesse, sp. nov. (Fig. 1C)
Phylum Dinoflagellata
Class Dinophyceae
Order Suessiales
Family Symbiodiniaceae
Genus Cladocopium LaJeunesse and Jeong 2018 [78]
Species Cladocopium pacificum Turnham & LaJeunesse, sp. nov.
Description
Vegetative ovate cells range in mean length between 10.3 µm (±0.70 µm; SD) and 10.6 µm (±0.77 µm; SD), and range in mean widths from 9.3 µm (±0.77 µm; SD) to 9.6 µm (±0.76 µm; SD) (Fig. 1C, D and Table S4). Nucleotide sequences of the large ribosomal subunit rRNA gene (GenBank MW711733, MW711734), abundant intragenomic variants of the internal transcribed spacer 2 of the rRNA gene region (MW757035–MW757037), partial chloroplast large subunit, cp23S (MW711736), mitochondrial cytochrome b, cob, (MW713375), mitochondrial cox 1 (MW713057), and full sequence of the psbAncr (MW861711–MW861727), genetically define this species. Two haploid alleles typically occur at microsatellite loci.
Holotype
The designated holotype are cells within DMSO preserved tissues of P. verrucosa deposited in the Algal Collection of the National Herbarium, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA; and assigned the catalog number: US Alg. Coll 227753.
Type locality
Republic of Palau, Oceania, Pacific Ocean (7°14.93′N, 134°14.149′E).
Habitat
Associated with the broadcasting coral P. verrucosa, and the brooding species P. acuta, and P. damicornis.
Etymology
From the Latin word pacificus meaning peacemaking, peaceful, of peace.
Other notes
Species previously referred to in the literature as ITS2 “type” C1d, C1d-t.
Morphology
Cells of both species were spherical ovate and brown in pigmentation (Fig. 1B, C). Mean cell sizes C. latusorum obtained from independent samples of P. grandis (=eydouxi) in Palau were larger than C. pacificum obtained from nearby colonies of P. verrucosa (Fig. 1D; Table S4). Each species has a single pyrenoid and a reticulated chloroplast that envelopes the periphery of the cell cytoplasm.
Phylogenetic relationships based on conserved genes
The examination of a sequence alignment comprising nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genes resolves discreet phylogenetic lineages separate from currently described species of Cladocopium (Fig. 2A). Fixed nucleotide differences in the rRNA gene region (LSU and ITS2) resolves each species lineage. LSU sequences differed between C. latusorum and C. pacificum by 4–5 base substitutions and were distinctive from C. goreaui and C. thermophilum by 8 base substitutions and C. infistulum by 9 base substitutions (Fig. 2A). Direct Sanger sequencing of the D1/D2 variable domain of LSU shows intragenomic variation within each species; some nucleotide positions share two possible bases (mostly transitions T/C and A/G) and are viewed as double peaks in electropherograms. This inter-individual, intragenomic variation occurs consistently among genotypes obtained from locations separated by thousands of kilometers (Fig. 1A and Table S1).
The ITS2 for both species is characterized by high levels of intragenomic variation. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoreses of PCR products or next-generation sequencing provides a profile of the state of fixed sequence heterogeneity in the genomes of each species (e.g., see figure four in LaJeunesse et al. [79]). The genomes of C. latusorum are typically dominated by three or more co-abundant ITS2 sequences that together are diagnostic for this species [20, 79]. The ancestral “C1” sequence is most frequently paired with two co-dominant sequences designated “b” and “c”. Alternatively, the genomes among certain genotypes contain additional co-dominant sequences including “C42”, and related sequence derivatives including, “42a” and “42b” on the Great Barrier Reef [20] or ‘ff’ on the Western Australian coast [50]. Evidence from more rapidly evolving genetic markers indicates that these differences in ITS2 sequence and/or differences in the relative abundances of intragenomic variants constitute examples of inter-individual variation, i.e. population-level differences within a species. Compared to C. latusorum, the ribosomal array of C. pacificum is much less ‘fragmented’, meaning that less intragenomic variation in the ITS2 region exists and corresponds to fewer co-dominant repeats. Similar to C. latusorum, it possesses the ancestral “C1” sequence, which is co-dominant with a second sequence designated “d”. Some profiles of the rRNA gene array from C. pacificum may additionally contain low abundance of “c” sequence variant.
Sequences of conserved plastid genes (cp23S, cob, cox 1) provided limited phylogenetic resolution. Sequences of the partial chloroplast 23S (cp23S) were identical for C. latusorum, C. pacificum, C. goreaui, and C. thermophilum, while distinct from C. infistulum by three base substitutions (Fig. 2A). Sequences of the mitochondrial cox 1 were identical for both C. latusorum and C. pacificum but differed from C. goreaui by seven fixed base substitutions (Fig. 2A). The mitochondrial cob was also identical for C. latusorum and C. pacificum but differed from C. goreaui by four base substitutions. The combination of rRNA gene and mitochondrial sequences identified C. latusorum and C. pacificum as a monophyletic group divergent from other described Cladocopium species (Fig. 2A). The nexus file containing alignments of concatenated ITS2, LSU, cp23S, cob and cox 1 sequences for each formally described species of Cladocopium is available in the Supplemental Data.
Microsatellite multi-locus genotypes
One hundred and seven multi-locus genotypes were assembled using neutral microsatellite loci from samples obtained at 5 locations spanning the Pacific Ocean (Supplemental Data). Markers in both species showed high heterozygosity, with a mean of observed heterozygosity of 0.832 for C. latusorum and 0.754 for C. pacificum (Table 1). The probability that non-clonal individuals have the same multi-locus genotype (probability of identity) was equal to 3.3E−09 for C. latusorum and 4.9E−09 for C. pacificum (Table 1). Tests for linkage disequilibrium between each pair of loci were significant for only one pair of loci (22 and 40, p = 0.06377; Supplemental Material). Furthermore, the rapidly increasing number of recovered genotypes from subsampling accumulative loci creates a graph consistent with a population having sexually recombinant individuals (Fig. S1).
Each iteration of the t-SNE distance metric method supported three distinct clusters (K = 3). All C. pacificum genotypes clustered in one group regardless of their collection location, while C. latusorum subdivided into two clusters, albeit in close approximation (Fig. 2B). STRUCTURE analyses determined that C. pacificum and C. latusorum represent genetically isolated populations even with large overlaps in their geographical distributions (Fig. 2C). When clustered by STRUCTURE into two or more groups, C. pacificum and C. latusorum species boundaries remained separate, and further structure occurred within each species, indicating that population structure occurred within each species according to their biogeographical location (Fig. S2). The differentiation of two reproductively isolated species was supported by differences in allele frequencies observed at many loci, and the occurrence of certain alleles found in one lineage and not observed in the other (private alleles; Fig. 2D).
Phylogeographic patterning within an evolutionary divergence between species
Large differences in psbAncr nucleotide sequences differentiated Cladocopium latusorum from C. pacificum; and both were well-diverged from the outgroup taxon, C. goreaui (Fig. 3A). The psbAncr sequences from other described Cladocopium (e.g. C. infistulum and C. thermophilum) could not be unambiguously aligned with the sequences obtained here. While the differentiation of C. latusorum at K = 3 by STRUCTURE (Fig. S2) was not supported by the psbAncr phylogeny, the phylogeny resolved fine-scale phylogeographic patterns where some related haplotypes occurred more frequently in particular geographic locations. For instance, C. latusorum from high latitude Taiwan contained closely related haplotypes that were very distinct from others within the species (indicated by red triangles in Fig. 3A). The psbAncr haplotypes of C. latusorum from Eastern (blue triangles) and Western Australia (green squares) also are distinguished from other regions. Finally, both populations of C. latusorum and C. pacificum from the Eastern Pacific contained haplotypes not found in other Pacific regions (Fig. 3A). The nexus file containing psbAncr sequences alignments are available in the Supplemental Data.
The ecological attributes and geographic distribution of C. latusorum differed from C. pacificum. C. latusorum associated with Pocillopora grandis and P. meandrina (Table S1 and Fig. 3B). The biogeographic distribution of C. latusorum extended from the western Indian Ocean to the eastern Pacific Ocean (Fig. 3C). By contrast, C. pacificum was found in P. verrucosa (Table S1 and Fig. 3D), and its biogeographic distribution extended from the Indo-west Pacific to the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean (Fig. 3E). While each species associated with distinct lineages of broadcast spawning species (mitochondrial genetic types 1, 8 & 9 for C. latusorum and types 3 & 7 for C. pacificum), both were found to associate with larval brooding species, including P. acuta and P. damicornis (genetic types 5 and 4, respectively; Fig. 4A).
Molecular clock for estimating the age of Pocillopora symbionts
Bayesian posterior probabilities estimated that C. latusorum and C. pacificum diverged from each other during the late Pliocene approximately 2.7 mya (±1.0 my) when calibrated by sibling symbionts specific to sibling Porites corals separated by the Isthmus of Panama, a geological barrier known to be at least 3.1 million years old, (Fig. 4B). Both the relaxed log clock normal and default strict models were tested. Both resulted in similar mean ages, and the strict clock model is drawn in Fig. 4A. The comparison of this divergence time corresponds to the estimated mean divergence time of the broadcasting Pocillopora taxa with which each symbiont uniquely associates (Fig. 4B; [42]).
Discussion
Numerous biotic and abiotic factors influence the diversification of lineages and the origination of species. While geographic isolation and habitat depth can influence the diversification of symbiotic dinoflagellates [32, 80, 81], life with different host taxa exerts considerable selective pressures that guide lineage sorting and the origination of species having stringent host affiliations [25, 32, 33, 82]. Given the Pocillopora symbionts studied here and the existence of numerous other examples only provisionally examined, this form of “ecological speciation” (as defined in 83) appears to be a prevailing process behind the creation of most symbiodiniacean species, especially in the genus Cladocopium [25]. In some instances, this diversification appears to have proceeded alongside that of the host (Fig. 4A; [66]).
Multiple species concepts are satisfied
The descriptions of C. latusorum and C. pacificum fulfill expectations of the morphological, ecological, phylogenetic (evolutionary), and biological species concepts [3, 14]. As each concept differs in its emphasis of early, middle, or late stages of speciation, the evidence in support of each species concept strengthens confidence that taxonomic designations accurately reflect biological reality. Furthermore, this combination of support provides fundamental insight into the ecology and evolution of the species in question.
While mating experiments are unrealistic for most micro-eukaryotes, especially for those that are resistant to cultivation, evidence from population genetic markers provides direct evidence of sexual recombination. Differences in microsatellite allele sizes and frequencies between C. latusorum and C. pacificum (especially when co-occurring geographically) indicate that they are reproductively isolated biological species (Fig. 2B, C; [83]). Each population contains recombinant genotypes that differentiate most unique individual genotypes (due to random sampling a subset of loci out of 8 total (Fig. S1; [84])) and are therefore indicative of a sexual population, a finding supported by the lack of linkage disequilibrium of alleles between loci (Supplemental Material). The maintenance of two distinct, non-recombining, gene pools both in sympatry and over thousands of kilometers satisfies the biological species concept for C. latusorum and C. pacificum.
Some of the possible morphological attributes that can be used to distinguish members of the family Symbiodiniaceae include the number and shape of amphiesmal plates [78], chloroplast morphology [31, 85], chromosome numbers [86], and mean cell size. While simple to measure, cell size is perhaps the most meaningful feature. Differences in cell volume are known to affect cellular and physiological functions among Symbiodiniaceae and many other microalgae [87–92]. Here, C. latusorum and C. pacificum showed differences in mean cell volumes from samples taken at the same location (to avoid the influence of external environmental conditions on cell size; Fig. 1B, C). Cell volume differences among other symbiodiniacean species correspond to dissimilarities in light-harvesting and growth rates [88], and may affect how each species and its host tolerates thermal stress (e.g. [32]). While species most tolerant of thermal stress are often members of the genus Durusdinium [29, 93, 94], thermal tolerance and other physiological differences have also been documented among corals hosting closely related species of Cladocopium [27, 30, 95]. Indeed, there are large size ranges among Cladocopium species, which may ultimately influence their physiological attributes [31]. It is currently unknown to what extant C. latusorum and C. pacificum differ in physiology and how this may influence the distribution of their respective hosts.
Species that occupy separate ecological niches, by definition, possess intrinsic functional differences. During the process of ecological specialization, the preferential utilization of certain resources is reinforced by disruptive selection. This form of natural selection causes genetic diversification and ultimately speciation [96, 97]. From the symbiont perspective, the host as habitat is the major ecological resource upon which they depend; where external environmental conditions and nutritional resources are modulated through the host. In these symbiotic relationships, therefore, the host cellular and biochemical attributes comprise a major axis of natural selection driving niche diversification. Preferential colonization of certain host species by a portion of the symbiont population that share similar genetic attributes will lead to genetic diversification if reproductive success is enhanced. While both Cladocopium spp. associate with larval brooding Pocillopora, they are ecologically differentiated by the species of broadcast spawning Pocillopora with which they associate (Fig. 4A).
The host’s biology of transmitting the symbiont to developing eggs (vertical transmission) appears to have further promoted the evolution of C. latusorum and C. pacificum from a recent common ancestor. The family Pocilloporidae (genera Pocillopora, Stylophora, and Seriatopora), together with members of the genera Montipora and Porites, incorporate symbionts into the egg during oogenesis [98–100]. The sequestration of symbiont cells to the host’s germline exerts additional selection pressure that favors well-adapted symbiont genotypes and more rapidly advances the process of speciation [101]. Therefore, it is not surprising that numerous independent monophyletic lineages in Cladocopium correspond to each of these three groups of common reef-forming coral [24, 26, 102]. In contrast, the majority of Indo-Pacific corals display open modes of symbiont acquisition (relying on environmental sources to obtain their symbionts) and associate with different species of Cladocopium, some of which are capable of forming stable mutualisms with many distantly related coral taxa [24, 102].
Relationship between coral and dinoflagellate diversification
The late Pliocene/early Pleistocene evolution of C. latusorum and C. pacificum corresponds to the origins of Pocillopora species around this same time [42]. There is no indication that long-term co-diversification, or co-speciation, is sustained between corals and their dinoflagellate symbionts [22, 103]. However, these findings support the concept that co-diversification does occur over shorter time frames of geological epochs, probably during intervals between major shifts in the planet’s environment [33]. Genetic and paleontological evidence placed the origination of modern Pocillopora species during the Pliocene and Pleistocene (~3.0 mya; 42), epochs that are characterized by cycles of intense cooling and warming [104]. Consistent with this timing, we calculated the diversification of C. latusorum and C. pacificum at approximately 2.7 mya (± 1.0 my; Fig. 4B). While the evolution of host specialized symbiont species may occur rapidly [97] once these new mutualisms had evolved, they have persisted for a long interval of time (Fig. 4B). The long co-existence of these partnerships, over large geographic ranges, has implications in their conservation and the extent to which these partnerships can respond to rapid changes in climate (discussed below).
Geographic mosaic of symbionts with Pocillopora: the effect of latitude and isolation
The populations comprising C. latusorum and C. pacificum, respectively, appear connected genetically across much of the Pacific Ocean (Figs. 2C and 3A). However, fine-scale phylogeographic patterns and allele frequency differences in each species suggest some partitioning among populations (Figs. 3A and S2). Slight genetic differences between populations from distant regions are probably influenced by a number of factors including local adaptation to seasonal variability in temperature and light, ocean upwelling, and isolation by distance [32, 105, 106]. While sample sizes across geographic locations preclude population genetic analyses from microsatellite data, there were indications that some geographically separated regions contained distinct populations (Fig. 2B, S2). Populations of C. latusorum from eastern and western Australia possess psbAncr haplotypes similar to each other (Fig. 3A). Moreover, psbAncr haplotypes of C. latusorum from around Taiwan clustered together (Fig. 3A). Consistent with the Eastern Pacific being among the most isolated region the Indo-Pacific, the psbAncr haplotypes in this remote location clustered together and, when considered with microsatellite data, support that these populations are somewhat isolated genetically (Fig. S2). Interestingly, the psbAncr haplotypes were basal in the phylogenies of both species (Fig. 3A). Ultimately, more intensive sampling and application of additional population genetic markers are needed to substantiate and discover the detailed population-level structure within C. latusorum and C. pacificum across the biogeographical range of their hosts (e.g. [106]).
In addition to the symbiont species described here, Pocillopora form mutualisms with several other undescribed Cladocopium ‘species’ across the breadth of their geographic range, as well as Durusdinium glynnii [82]. Cladocopium C1h is particularly common in animals across the Indian Ocean [24, 50], while certain regionally endemic Cladocopium spp. are found in colonies from subtropical to temperate latitudes (23°–40°), characterized by turbid, cold water, environments [24, 107]. Some of these symbionts are monophyletic with C. latusorum and C. pacificum (such as C1ee and C1h); [19, 38], while others appear to have evolved independently [20, 50, 108]. Where these other Pocillopora-specific Cladocopium spp. overlap in geography with C. latusorum and C. pacificum, their local distributions among colonies of Pocillopora appear to be zoned by water depth [26, 108]. Such biogeographic and ecological patterns indicate a geographic mosaic of co-diversification between Pocillopora and Cladocopium [109]. Having evolved over several millions of years, these mutualisms are adapted to a broad range of environmental extremes and thus represent valuable study system to provide insights into the response of coral mutualisms to major shifts in climate.
Implications of widely distributed host-symbiont mutualisms that are millions of years old
The associations between Pocillopora and specific Cladocopium species across thousands of kilometers, covering environmental gradients and reef habitats found over large spans of latitude and longitude exemplify the fidelity exhibited by many of these animal–algal partnerships (Fig. 3C, E). Therefore, while prevailing environmental conditions and past episodes of severe thermal stress can influence the prevalence and ecological dominance of certain symbiont species, even among corals that vertically transmit their symbionts [38], high specificity between hosts and their adapted symbionts appears to often supersede external environmental influences [18, 110].
As with the two species described here, the majority of Cladocopium diversity appears to have originated during a time frame spanning 5–6 my to the present [25, 78]. The Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs have been the coldest times on Earth since the beginning of the Cenozoic era (65 mya) [104] when reef communities began recovery from the K/T boundary mass extinction event. Therefore, the sensitivity of corals to warming ocean temperatures may be explained by the evolution and ecological dominance of relatively “cold-adapted” Cladocopium-coral associations.
Nonetheless, both host and symbiont species lineages have endured numerous cooling and warming cycles of the planet, which intensified during the Mid-Pleistocene transition (~1 mya; e.g. [111, 112]). This longevity indicates that reef corals like Pocillopora, and their symbionts, have the capacity to adjust to modern-day increases in ocean warming, at least over the coming decades [113]. While, the pocilloporids that possess attributes of rapid generational times, high dispersal capacity, and successful early colonizers following disturbances, are susceptible to regional extinctions [114, 115]. The apparent capacity for dispersal and gene flow across populations of Pocillopora and their symbionts over thousands of kilometers likely expedited adaptation to past changes in climate; and may help them persist through current shifts in climate [49, 106].
Ultimately, the broad geographic distributions and geological age of these and other host–symbiont combinations must be considered in forecasting their response to ocean warming, and guide decisions when planning for their conservation [116]. The characterization of genetic variation captured in the sampling of C. latusorum and C. pacificum may offer some insight in forecasting the fate of these mutualisms. It should be noted that C. latusorum appears more genetically diverse than C. pacificum, assuming that microsatellite diversity (Table 1, Figs. S1 and S2) and psbAncr haplotype sequence variation (Fig. 3A) provide accurate proxies for the total genetic variation contained in the populations of these species. As selection pressure intensifies with rising ocean temperatures, this difference in haplotype diversity may influence the relative adaptive potential of each of these symbiont species and their mutualisms.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Jorge Pinzon, Andie Chan, Chaolun Allen Chen, Linda Tonk, Iliana Baums, Rachel Silverstein, Sarah Davies, David Suggett’s lab, and Adrienne Correa’s lab, who contributed Pocillopora samples, as well as Ove Hoegh-Guldberg and Allison M. Lewis for photos of Pocillopora. We are grateful to Allison M. Lewis and Scott R. Santos and for assistance with data analysis. We are grateful for the valuable feedback from Adrienne Correa and two anonymous reviewers, which improved the paper. We would like to also thank Palau International Coral Reef Center (PICRC) for providing support during sample collections, which were made possible with permission from the Ministry of Natural Resources, Environment and Tourism, Palau, and from the Koror State Government, Department of Conservation and Law Enforcement. This project was supported by the USA National Science Foundation (IOS-1258058 and OCE-1636022 to TCL), NTRGP Australian Biodiversity Resources Study (ID 4-EHOJ1F5) to ES and TCL, the Society of Systematic Biologists (to KET), and the Pennsylvania State University.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Kira E. Turnham, Email: keturnham@gmail.com
Todd C. LaJeunesse, Email: tcl3@psu.edu
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41396-021-01007-8.
References
- 1.Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, et al. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:148–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tewksbury JJ, Anderson JGT, Bakker JD, Billo TJ, Dunwiddie PW, Groom MJ, et al. Natural history’s place in science and society. Bioscience. 2014;64:300–10. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Leliaert F, Verbruggen H, Vanormelingen P, Steen F, López-Bautista JM, Zuccarello GC, et al. DNA-based species delimitation in algae. Eur J Phycol. 2014;49:179–96. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2014.904524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Potter D, LaJeunesse TC, Saunders GW, Anderson RA. Convergent evolution masks extensive biodiversity among marine coccoid picoplankton. Biodivers Conserv. 1997;6:99–107. doi: 10.1023/A:1018379716868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Vargas C, Norris R, Zaninetti L, Gibb SW, Pawlowski J. Molecular evidence of cryptic speciation in planktonic foraminifers and their relation to oceanic provinces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:2864–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.John U, Litaker RW, Montresor M, Murray S, Brosnahan ML, Anderson DM. Formal revision of the alexandrium tamarense species complex (dinophyceae) taxonomy: the introduction of five species with emphasis on molecular-based (rDNA) classification. Protist. 2014;165:779–804. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hoppenrath M, Reñé A, Satta CT, Yamaguchi A, Leander BS. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of a new marine, sand-dwelling dinoflagellate genus, Pachena (Dinophyceae), with descriptions of three new species. J Phycol. 2020;56:798–817. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sproles AE, Oakley CA, Krueger T, Grossman AR, Weis VM, Meibom A, et al. Sub-cellular imaging shows reduced photosynthetic carbon and increased nitrogen assimilation by the non-native endosymbiont Durusdinium trenchii in the model cnidarian Aiptasia. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22:3741–53. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hume BCC, Mejia-Restrepo A, Voolstra CR, Berumen ML. Fine-scale delineation of Symbiodiniaceae genotypes on a previously bleached central Red Sea reef system demonstrates a prevalence of coral host-specific associations. Coral Reefs. 2020;39:583–601. doi: 10.1007/s00338-020-01917-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gabay Y, Parkinson JE, Wilkinson SP, Weis VM, Davy SK. Inter-partner specificity limits the acquisition of thermotolerant symbionts in a model cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. ISME J. 2019;13:2489–99. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0429-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tivey TR, Parkinson JE, Weis VM. Host and symbiont cell cycle coordination is mediated by symbiotic state, nutrition, and partner identity in a model cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. MBio. 2020;11:1–17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02626-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lawson CA, Possell M, Seymour JR, Raina JB, Suggett DJ. Coral endosymbionts (Symbiodiniaceae) emit species-specific volatilomes that shift when exposed to thermal stress. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53552-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reich HG, Rodriguez IB, LaJeunesse TC, Ho TY. Endosymbiotic dinoflagellates pump iron: differences in iron and other trace metal needs among the Symbiodiniaceae. Coral Reefs. 2020;39:915–27. doi: 10.1007/s00338-020-01911-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.de Queiroz A, Gatesy J. The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Queiroz K. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst Biol. 2007;56:879–86. doi: 10.1080/10635150701701083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schönrogge K, Barr B, Wardlaw JC, Napper E, Gardner MG, Breen J, et al. When rare species become endangered: Cryptic speciation in myrmecophilous hoverflies. Biol J Linn Soc. 2002;75:291–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02070.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pettay DT, Wham DC, Pinzón JH, LaJeunesse TC. Genotypic diversity and spatial-temporal distribution of Symbiodinium clones in an abundant reef coral. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:5197–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05357.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baums IB, Devlin-Durante MK, LaJeunesse TC. New insights into the dynamics between reef corals and their associated dinoflagellate endosymbionts from population genetic studies. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:4203–15. doi: 10.1111/mec.12788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pinzón JH, LaJeunesse TC. Species delimitation of common reef corals in the genus Pocillopora using nucleotide sequence phylogenies, population genetics and symbiosis ecology. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:311–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04939.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sampayo EM, Dove S, LaJeunesse TC. Cohesive molecular genetic data delineate species diversity in the dinoflagellate genus Symbiodinium. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:500–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lien AY, Fukami H, Yamashita Y, Lien Y, Fukami H, Yamashita Y. Symbiodinium Clade C dominates zooxanthellate corals (Scleractinia) in the temperate region of Japan. Zool Sci. 2012;29:173–80. doi: 10.2108/zsj.29.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.LaJeunesse TC. ‘Species’ radiations of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific since the Miocene-Pliocene transition. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:570–81. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wham DC, Carmichael M, LaJeunesse TC. Microsatellite loci for Symbiodinium goreaui and other Clade C Symbiodinium. Conserv Genet Resour. 2014;6:127–9. doi: 10.1007/s12686-013-0023-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.LaJeunesse TC, Pettay DT, Sampayo EM, Phongsuwan N, Borwn B, Obura DO, et al. Long standing environmental conditions, geographic isolation and host-symbiont specificity influence the relative ecological dominance and genetic diversification of coral endosymbionts in the genus Symbiodinium. J Biogeogr. 2010;11:674–5. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thornhill DJ, Lewis AM, Wham DC, LaJeunesse TC. Host-specialist lineages dominate the adaptive radiation of reef coral endosymbionts. Evolution. 2014;68:352–67. doi: 10.1111/evo.12270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.LaJeunesse TC, Bhagooli R, Hidaka M, DeVantier L, Done T, Schmidt GW, et al. Closely related Symbiodinium spp. differ in relative dominance in coral reef host communities across environmental, latitudinal and biogeographic gradients. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004;284:147–61. doi: 10.3354/meps284147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fitt WK, Gates RD, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bythell JC, Jatkar A, Grottoli AG, et al. Response of two species of Indo-Pacific corals, Porites cylindrica and Stylophora pistillata, to short-term thermal stress: The host does matter in determining the tolerance of corals to bleaching. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2009;373:102–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hume B, D’Angelo C, Burt J, Baker AC, Riegl B, Wiedenmann J. Corals from the Persian/Arabian Gulf as models for thermotolerant reef-builders: Prevalence of clade C3 Symbiodinium, host fluorescence and ex situ temperature tolerance. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;72:313–22. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hoadley KD, Lewis AM, Wham DC, Pettay DT, Grasso C, Smith R, et al. Host – symbiont combinations dictate the photo-physiological response of reef-building corals to thermal stress. Sci Rep. 2019:9:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Sampayo EM, Ridgway T, Bongaerts P, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Bleaching susceptibility and mortality of corals are determined by fine-scale differences in symbiont type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:10444–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708049105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee SY, Jeong HJ, Lajeunesse TC. Cladocopium infistulum sp. nov. (Dinophyceae), a thermally tolerant dinoflagellate symbiotic with giant clams from the western Pacific Ocean. Phycologia. 2020;59:515–26. doi: 10.1080/00318884.2020.1807741. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.LaJeunesse TC, Wham DC, Pettay DT, Parkinson JE, Keshavmurthy S, Chen CA. Ecologically differentiated stress-tolerant endosymbionts in the dinoflagellate genus Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae) Clade D are different species. Phycologia. 2014;53:305–19. doi: 10.2216/13-186.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lewis AM, Chan AN, LaJeunesse TC. New species of closely related endosymbiotic dinoflagellates in the greater caribbean have niches corresponding to host coral phylogeny. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2019;66:469–82. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Veron JEN. Corals of the world. In: Stafford-Smith M, editor. Australian Institute of Marine Science; Townsville, Australia, 2000.
- 35.Richmond RH. Energetics, competency, and long-distance dispersal of planula larvae of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol. 1987;93:527–33. doi: 10.1007/BF00392790. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Harrison PL, Wallace CC. A review of reproduction, larval dispersal and settlement of scleractinian corals. In: Dubinsky Z, editor. Ecosystems of the World 25 Coral Reefs; New York, NY, USA, 1990. p. 133–96
- 37.Glynn PW. Coral reef bleaching: ecological perspectives. Coral Reefs. 1993;12:1–17. doi: 10.1007/BF00303779. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.LaJeunesse TC, Smith R, Walther M, Pinzon J, Pettay DT, McGinley M, et al. Host-symbiont recombination versus natural selection in the response of coral-dinoflagellate symbioses to environmental disturbance. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;277:2925–34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stella JS, Pratchett MS, Hutchings PA, Jones GP. Coral-associated invertebrates: diversity, ecological importance and vulnerability to disturbance. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev. 2011;49:43–104. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Austin AD, Austin SA, Sale PF. Community structure of the fauna associated with the coral Pocillopora damicornis (L.) on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Freshw Res. 1980;31:163–74. doi: 10.1071/MF9800163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Glynn PW, Maté JL, Baker AC. Coral bleaching and mortality in Panama and Ecuador during the 1997 – 1998 El Niño – southern oscillation event: spatial/temporal patterns and comparisons with the 1982 – 1983 event. Bull Mar Sci. 2001;69:79–109. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Johnston EC, Forsman ZH, Flot J, Schmidt-Roach S, Pinzón H, Knapp ISS, et al. A genomic glance through the fog of plasticity and diversification in Pocillopora. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Iglesias-Prieto R, Beltrán VH, LaJeunesse TC, Reyes-Bonilla H, Thomé PE. Different algal symbionts explain the vertical distribution of dominant reef corals in the eastern Pacific. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2004;271:1757–63. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bahr KD, Tran T, Jury CP, Toonen RJ. Abundance, size, and survival of recruits of the reef coral Pocillopora acuta under ocean warming and acidification. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Flot JF, Tillier S. The mitochondrial genome of Pocillopora (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) contains two variable regions: The putative D-loop and a novel ORF of unknown function. Gene. 2007;401:80–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.LaJeunesse TC, Loh WKW, Van Woesik R, Schmidt GW, Fitt WK. Low symbiont diversity in southern Great Barrier Reef corals, relative to those of the Caribbean. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48:2046–54. doi: 10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.2046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tonk L, Sampayo EM, LaJeunesse TC, Schrameyer V, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae) diversity in reef-invertebrates along an offshore to inshore reef gradient near Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. J Phycol. 2014;50:552–63. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Magalon H, Baudry E, Husté A, Adjeroud M, Veuille M. High genetic diversity of the symbiotic dinoflagellates in the coral Pocillopora meandrina from the South Pacific. Mar Biol. 2006;148:913–22. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-0133-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pinzón JH, Sampayo E, Cox E, Chauka LJ, Chen CA, Voolstra CR, et al. Blind to morphology: genetics identifies several widespread ecologically common species and few endemics among Indo-Pacific cauliflower corals (Pocillopora, Scleractinia) J Biogeogr. 2013;40:1595–608. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Silverstein RN, Correa AMS, LaJeunesse TC, Baker AC. Novel algal symbiont (Symbiodinium spp.) diversity in reef corals of Western Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2011;422:63–75. doi: 10.3354/meps08934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wham DC, LaJeunesse TC. Symbiodinium population genetics: testing for species boundaries and analysing samples with mixed genotypes. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:2699–712. doi: 10.1111/mec.13623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Baums IB, Devlin-durante M, Laing BAA, Feingold J, Smith T, Bruckner A, et al. Marginal coral populations: the densest known aggregation of Pocillopora in the Galápagos Archipelago is of asexual origin. Front Mar Sci. 2014;1:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2014.00059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.McGinley MP, Aschaffenburg MD, Pettay DT, Smith RT, LaJeunesse TC, Warner ME. Symbiodinium spp. in colonies of eastern Pacific Pocillopora spp. are highly stable despite the prevalence of low-abundance background populations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2012;462:1–7. doi: 10.3354/meps09914. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Camp EF, Nitschke MR, Rodolfo-metalpa R, Gardner SG, Smith DJ, Zampighi M, et al. Reef-building corals thrive within hot-acidic and deoxygenated waters. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2434. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02383-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.LaJeunesse TC, Trench RK. Biogeography of two species of Symbiodinium (Freudenthal) inhabiting the intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt) Biol Bull. 2000;199:126–34. doi: 10.2307/1542872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.LaJeunesse TC. Investigating the biodiversity, ecology, and phylogeny of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium using the its region: In search of a “species” level marker. J Phycol. 2001;880:866–80. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01031.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Moore RB, Ferguson KM, Loh WKW, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Carter DA. Highly organized structure in the non-coding region of the psbA minicircle from clade C Symbiodinium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:1725–34. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02594-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.LaJeunesse TC, Thornhill DJ. Improved resolution of reef-coral endosymbiont (Symbiodinium) species diversity, ecology, and evolution through psbA non-coding region genotyping. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e29013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Swofford D. PAUP 4.0: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Washington DC, USA: Smithson Inst.; 2014.
- 60.Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. Mrbayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539–42. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nylander JAA. MrModeltest v2. Uppsala, Sweden: Progr Distrib by author Evol Biol Centre, Uppsala Univ.; 2004.
- 62.Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH, Xie D, et al. BEAST 2: a software platform for bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:1–6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 2018;67:901–4. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jackson JBC, O’Dea A. Timing of the oceanographic and biological isolation of the Caribbean sea from the tropical eastern pacific ocean. Bull Mar Sci. 2013;89:779–800. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Haug G, Tiedemann R. Effect of the formation of the Isthmus of Panama on Atlantic Ocean thermohaline circulation. Nature. 1998;394:1699–701. [Google Scholar]
- 66.O’Dea A, Lessios HA, Coates AG, Eytan RI, Restrepo-Moreno SA, Cione AL, et al. Formation of the Isthmus of Panama. Sci Adv. 2016;2:1–12. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:214. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bouckaert R, Heled J DensiTree 2: seeing trees through the forest. 2014. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/012401v1.
- 69.Bay LK, Howells EJ, van Oppen MJH. Isolation, characterisation and cross amplification of thirteen microsatellite loci for coral endo-symbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium clade C) Conserv Genet Resour. 2009;1:199–203. doi: 10.1007/s12686-009-9048-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenALEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2537–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Davies SW, Moreland KN, Wham DC, Kanke MR, Matz MV. Cladocopium community divergence in two Acropora coral hosts across multiple spatial scales. Mol Ecol. 2020;29:4559–72. doi: 10.1111/mec.15668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4:359–61. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Liu H, Stephens TG, González-Pech RA, Beltran VH, Lapeyre B, Bongaerts P, et al. Symbiodinium genomes reveal adaptive evolution of functions related to coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Commun Biol. 2018;1:95. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0098-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Heredity. 1995:248–9.
- 75.Rousset F. GENEPOP’007: A complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008;8:103–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–59. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.van der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res. 2008;9:2579–605. [Google Scholar]
- 78.LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, Jeong HJ, Reimer JD, Voolstra CR, et al. Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol. 2018;28:2570–2580.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.LaJeunesse TC, Bonilla HR, Warner ME, Wills M, Schmidt GW, Fitt WK. Specificity and stability in high latitude eastern Pacific coral-algal symbioses. Limnol Oceanogr. 2008;53:719–27. doi: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.2.0719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ramsby BD, Hill MS, Thornhill DJ, Steenhuizen SF, Achlatis M, Lewis AM, et al. Sibling species of mutualistic Symbiodinium Clade G from bioeroding sponges in the western Pacific and western Atlantic oceans. J Phycol. 2017;53:951–60.. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Prada C, McIlroy SE, Beltrán DM, Valint DJ, Ford SA, Hellberg ME, et al. Cryptic diversity hides host and habitat specialization in a gorgonian-algal symbiosis. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:3330–40. doi: 10.1111/mec.12808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wham DC, Ning G, LaJeunesse TC. Symbiodinium glynnii sp. nov., a species of stress-tolerant symbiotic dinoflagellates from pocilloporid and montiporid corals in the Pacific Ocean. Phycologia. 2017;56:396–409. doi: 10.2216/16-86.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Mayr E. The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA, USA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1982.
- 84.Arnaud-Haond S, Duarte CM, Alberto F, Serrão EA. Standardizing methods to address clonality in population studies. Mol Ecol. 2007;16:5115–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jeong HJ, Lee SY, Kang NS, Yoo YD, Lim AS, Lee MJ, et al. Genetics and morphology characterize the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium voratum, n. sp., (dinophyceae) as the sole representative of Symbiodinium Clade E. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2014;61:75–94. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Blank RJ, Trench RK. Speciation and symbiotic dinoflagellates. Science. 1985;229:656–8. doi: 10.1126/science.229.4714.656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Suggett DJ, Moore CM, Hickman AE, Geider RJ. Interpretation of fast repetition rate (FRR) fluorescence: Signatures of phytoplankton community structure versus physiological state. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2009;376:1–19. doi: 10.3354/meps07830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Suggett DJ, Goyen S, Evenhuis C, Szabó M, Pettay DT, Warner ME, et al. Functional diversity of photobiological traits within the genus Symbiodinium appears to be governed by the interaction of cell size with cladal designation. New Phytol. 2015;208:370–81. doi: 10.1111/nph.13483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Geider R, Piatt T, Raven J. Size dependence of growth and photosynthesis in diatoms: a synthesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1986;30:93–104. doi: 10.3354/meps030093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Finkel ZV. Light absorption and size scaling of light-limited metabolism in marine diatoms. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001;46:86–94. doi: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Irwin AJ, Finkel ZV, Schofield OME, Falkowski PG. Scaling-up from nutrient physiology to the size-structure of phytoplankton communities. J Plankton Res. 2006;28:459–71. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbi148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wu Y, Campbell DA, Irwin AJ, Suggett DJ, Finkel ZV. Ocean acidification enhances the growth rate of larger diatoms. Limnol Oceanogr. 2014;59:1027–34. doi: 10.4319/lo.2014.59.3.1027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rowan R. Coral bleaching: thermal adaptation in reef coral symbionts. Nature. 2004;430:742. doi: 10.1038/430742a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Berkelmans R, Van, Oppen MJH. The role of zooxanthellae in the thermal tolerance of corals: a “nugget of hope” for coral reefs in an era of climate change. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2006;273:2305–12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Abrego D, Ulstrup KE, Willis BL, Van Oppen MJH. Species-specific interactions between algal endosymbionts and coral hosts define their bleaching response to heat and light stress. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2008;275:2273–82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Schluter D. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science. 2009;323:737–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1160006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hendry AP, Nosil P, Rieseberg LH. The speed of ecological speciation. Funct Ecol. 2007;21:455–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Glynn PW, Gassman NJ, Eakin CM, Cortes J, Smith DB, Guzman HM. Reef coral reproduction in the eastern Pacific: Costa Rica, Panama, and Galapagos Islands (Ecuador) Mar Biol. 1991;109:355–68. doi: 10.1007/BF01313501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hirose M, Kinzie RA, Hidaka M. Early development of zooxanthella-containing eggs of the corals Pocillopora verrucosa and P. eydouxi with special reference to the distribution of zooxanthellae. Biol Bull. 2000;199:68–75. doi: 10.2307/1542708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Chavez-Romo H. Sexual reproduction of the coral Pocillopora damicornis in the southern Gulf of California. Mex Cienc Mar. 2007;33:495–501. doi: 10.7773/cm.v33i4.1141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Russell SL, Chappell L, Sullivan W. A symbiont’s guide to the germline. 1st ed. In: Current topics in developmental biology. Vol 135. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.; 2019. p. 351. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 102.LaJeunesse TC, Thornhill DJ, Cox EF, Stanton FG, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW. High diversity and host specificity observed among symbiotic dinoflagellates in reef coral communities from Hawaii. Coral Reefs. 2004;23:596–603. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Rowan ROB, Powers DA. A molecular genetic classification of zooxanthellae and the evolution of animal-algal symbioses. Science. 1991;251:1348–51. doi: 10.1126/science.251.4999.1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zachos JC, Dickens GR, Zeebe RE. An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature. 2008;451:279–83. doi: 10.1038/nature06588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Reimer JD. A genetics-based description of Symbiodinium minutum sp. nov. and S. psygmophilum sp. nov. (dinophyceae), two dinoflagellates symbiotic with cnidaria. J Phycol. 2012;48:1380–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Pettay DT, LaJeunesse TC. Long-range dispersal and high-latitude environments influence the population structure of a “stress-tolerant” dinoflagellate endosymbiont. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Wicks LC, Sampayo E, Gardner JPA, Davy SK. Local endemicity and high diversity characterise high-latitude coral- Symbiodinium partnerships. Coral Reefs. 2010;29:989–1003. doi: 10.1007/s00338-010-0649-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Sampayo EM, Franceschinis L, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Dove S. Niche partitioning of closely related symbiotic dinoflagellates. Mol Ecol. 2007;16:3721–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Thompson JN. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
- 110.Sampayo EM, Ridgway T, Franceschinis L, Roff G, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Dove S. Coral symbioses under prolonged environmental change: living near tolerance range limits. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36271. doi: 10.1038/srep36271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Janis CM. Tertiary mammal evolution in the context of changing climates, vegetation, and tectonic events. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1993;24:467–500. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Willeit M, Ganopolski A, Calov R, Brovkin V. Mid-Pleistocene transition in glacial cycles explained by declining CO2 and regolith removal. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaav7337. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav7337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Palumbi SR, Barshis DJ, Bay RA. Mechanisms of reef coral resistance to future climate change. Science. 2014;344:895–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1251336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Pandolfi JM, Jackson JBC, Geister J. Geologically sudden extinction of two widespread late Pleistocene Caribbean reef corals. In: Evolutionary patterns: growth, form and tempo in the fossil record. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press; 2001. p. 120–58.
- 115.Toth LT, Aronson RB, Cobb KM, Cheng H, Edwards RL, Grothe PR, et al. Climatic and biotic thresholds of coral-reef shutdown. Nat Clim Chang. 2015;5:369–74. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2541. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Baums IB, Baker AC, Davies SW, Grottoli AG, Kenkel CD, Kitchen SA, et al. Considerations for maximizing the adaptive potential of restored coral populations in the western Atlantic. Ecol Appl. 2019;29:1–23. doi: 10.1002/eap.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.