ABSTRACT
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is a valuable second-line antimicrobial agent to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Discrepancies between various antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) methods for SXT susceptibility in S. aureus have been described. Here, we describe a hemin-inducible heteroresistance phenotype in S. aureus. We compared the results of the Vitek 2 AST on a set of 95 S. aureus clinical isolates with broth microdilution, disk diffusion using standard Mueller-Hinton agar, and disk diffusion using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood (MHF). To investigate the potential clinical relevance of SXT heteroresistance, an in vivo Galleria mellonella infection assay was performed. All Vitek 2 SXT-susceptible (n = 17) isolates were concordant with AST results by other methods applied in this study. In 32/78 (41%) of Vitek 2 SXT-resistant isolates, we observed a heteroresistant growth phenotype on MHF. The heteroresistance phenotype was associated with the presence of dfr genes, encoding trimethoprim resistance. The addition of a hemin-impregnated disk in a double disk diffusion method on standard Mueller-Hinton agar was able to induce growth in the SXT zone of inhibition. An in vivo infection assay with G. mellonella suggested that the SXT heteroresistance phenotype resulted in lethality similar to that of the SXT-resistant phenotype. In this study, we describe a novel hemin-inducible heteroresistance phenotype in S. aureus. This heteroresistance phenotype may be missed by standard AST methods but can be detected by performing disk diffusion using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood, commonly used for AST of fastidious organisms. This phenomenon may partly explain the discrepancies of AST methods in determining SXT resistance in S. aureus.
IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus is one of most important pathogens in clinical medicine. Besides its virulence, the acquisition or emergence of resistance toward antibiotic agents, in particular to beta-lactam antibiotics (methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]), poses a major therapeutic challenge. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is one of the effective antimicrobial agents of last resort to treat MRSA infections. Here, we report the detection of a SXT-heteroresistant phenotype which is inducible by hemin and can be detected using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with horse blood. Heteroresistance describes the presence or emergence of resistant subpopulations, which may potentially lead to inaccurate antibiotic susceptibility testing results and influence the success of antibiotic therapy.
KEYWORDS: MRSA, Staphylococcus aureus, antibiotic susceptibility testing, co-trimoxazole, hemin, heteroresistance, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial resistance is an ongoing global concern which has led infectious diseases specialists to resort to older, less frequently used antibiotics. The antifolate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is orally available and an important and valuable antibiotic agent that is considered one of the antibiotics of last resort to treat infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (1–3). Over the past few years, SXT has experienced a renaissance, as reflected in numerous efficacy studies involving SXT to treat S. aureus infections (4, 5). A recent randomized control trial demonstrated the noninferiority of SXT to vancomycin for the treatment of severe infections caused by MRSA, highlighting the importance of this agent for the treatment of MRSA (5).
SXT is a combination of two antifolate drugs, trimethoprim (TMP) and sulfamethoxazole (SMZ). Its antibacterial activity relies on the inhibition of two sequential key enzymes in the bacterial folic acid synthesis pathway (dihydrofolate reductase [DHFR] and dihydropteroate synthase [DHPS]), which can be bypassed in the presence of exogenous thymidine (6).
Since SXT resistance in S. aureus is on the rise (7–10), the accuracy of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is essential for the success of antimicrobial therapy. Recently, various reports on the discrepancy of different AST methods for SXT have been reported independently (11–13), casting doubts on the accuracy and reliability of AST for SXT in S. aureus. Until now, there are no definite explanations for this discrepancy. In this study, we initially aimed to compare the performance of Vitek 2 with various solid testing media in determining phenotypic SXT susceptibility in clinical S. aureus isolates. In doing so, we encountered a heteroresistance phenotype which was inducible by hemin and can be detected by performing disk diffusion using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood. Here, we present our findings of this heteroresistance phenomenon. Furthermore, we investigated the potential clinical relevance of these findings using an in vivo Galleria mellonella infection assay.
RESULTS
We compared the performance of disk diffusion in determining SXT resistance in S. aureus using two commercially available Mueller-Hinton agar (MHBD and MHBM) from two manufacturers (BD Diagnostics and bioMérieux, respectively) along with Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood (MHF). AST was performed additionally on MHF, since horse blood naturally contains the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase, which degrades thymidine in the culture medium, thus creating a low-thymidine environment (14). The presence of exogenous thymidine in the culture medium can overcome both TMP and SMZ activity, which may deliver false-resistant results (14, 15). Overall, 95 isolates were tested, 17/95 (18%) were SXT susceptible, and 78/95 (82%) were SXT resistant according to the Vitek 2 AST. The differences in the diameters of the zone of inhibition are displayed in Fig. 1a. All Vitek 2 SXT-susceptible isolates exhibited SXT susceptibility on all tested agar media (MHBD, MHBM, and MHF). Out of 78 isolates with Vitek 2 SXT resistance, only 3/78 (4%) tested resistant, while 9/78 (12%) tested susceptible (with increased exposure) on MHBD. Similarly, only 2/78 (3%) tested resistant on MHBM. On MHF, 5/78 (6%) tested susceptible (with increased exposure) and 2/78 (3%) tested resistant (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
AST resultb | Vitek 2 result |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
S (n = 17) |
R (n = 78) |
|||
n | % | n | % | |
Mueller-Hinton agar 1 (MHBD)c | ||||
Susceptible (standard dosing regime) | 17 | 100 | 66 | 84.6 |
Susceptible (with increased exposure) | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11.5 |
Resistant | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3.9 |
Mueller-Hinton agar 2 (MHBM)d | ||||
Susceptible (standard dosing regime) | 17 | 100 | 76 | 97.4 |
Susceptible (with increased exposure) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Resistant | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.6 |
Mueller-Hinton agar with 5% horse blood (MHF)c | ||||
Susceptible (standard dosing regime) | 17 | 100 | 71 | 91.0 |
Susceptible (with increased exposure) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6.4 |
Resistant | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.6 |
Broth microdilution | ||||
Susceptible (standard dosing regime) | 17 | 100 | 44 | 56.4 |
Susceptible (with increased exposure) | 0 | 0 | 32 | 52.6 |
Resistant | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.6 |
Trimethoprim susceptibility (DD)e | ||||
Susceptible | 13 | 76.5 | 1 | 1.3 |
Resistant | 4 | 23.5 | 77 | 98.7 |
S, susceptible; R, resistant; AST, antibiotic susceptibility testing; DD, disk diffusion.
AST was interpreted according to EUCAST clinical breakpoints (v11.0) using the following categories: susceptible (standard dosing regime), susceptible (increased exposure), and resistant.
MHBD purchased from Becton, Dickinson, Germany.
MHBM purchased from bioMérieux, Germany.
Trimethoprim susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion on MHBD, MHBM, and MHF (all results were concordant). Phenotypic trimethoprim resistance is associated with Vitex 2 SXT resistance (P < 0.001 using chi-square test).
Phenotypic heteroresistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
In 32.6% (32/95) of the study isolates, we noticed visible colony growth within the SXT zone of inhibition on MHF, resembling heteroresistance growth characteristics, which was not present when using standard Mueller-Hinton agar as the testing medium (Fig. 1b). This phenomenon was observed in both disk diffusion and Etest on MHF. While most isolates with the heteroresistant phenotype (30/32; 93.8%) exhibited only slight growth (low density), two of the isolates (2/32; 6.3%) exhibited substantial growth (high density) within the inhibition zone (Fig. 1c). We did not observe the heteroresistance phenotype in any of the 17 Vitek 2 SXT-susceptible isolates, whereas 32/78 (41.0%) Vitek 2 SXT-resistant isolates exhibited the heteroresistance growth phenotype (Table 1). Of those isolates with discordant Vitek, and disk diffusion results (i.e., SXT resistant by Vitek 2 and SXT susceptible by disk diffusion), the heteroresistance phenotype was overrepresented (>50%) in isolates with an MIC of <2 mg/liter (Fig. 2). Of the 78 Vitek 2 SXT-resistant isolates, 44 (56.4%) isolates were nonheteroresistant and 2 (2.6%) exhibited the full (high-level) resistance phenotype.
Molecular characteristics and stability of the heteroresistance phenotype.
There was no apparent association between the genetic background (multilocus sequence type [MLST]) of the isolates and the heteroresistance phenotype (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). All isolates exhibiting the heteroresistance phenotype were trimethoprim resistant and harbored an extrachromosomal dfr gene, either the trimethoprim resistance gene dfrG (23/32; 72%) or dfrA (9/32; 28%). The presence of dfr genes, however, is not an ideal determinant of the heteroresistance phenotype. Of the 44 nonheteroresistant isolates, 42 (95.5%) harbored extrachromosomal dfr genes (9/42 [21.4%] with dfrA, 29/42 [69.1%] with dfrG, 1/42 [2.4%] with dfrK, 1/42 [2.4%] with dfrD, and 2/42 [4.8%] with dfrA and dfrG).
Next, to test the stability of this phenotype, a daily subculture and subsequent repeated disk diffusion over 4 days (over 40 generations) without antibiotic pressure of a single colony from inside the SXT inhibition zone displayed a heteroresistance phenotype similar to that of the initial disk diffusion, suggesting that the heteroresistant phenotype is in fact stable and monoclonal (Fig. S1). To investigate if the heteroresistant phenotype is an artifact produced by the presence of thymidine in the testing medium, we performed a modified population analysis profile (mPAP) using a photometric approach (optical density at 590 nm [OD590]) in the presence and absence of 5 IU/ml thymidine phosphorylase (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). The growth characteristics in the mPAP were consistent with the PAP of phenotypic heteroresistance as proposed by Andersson et al. (16). The addition of 5 IU/ml thymidine phosphorylase to the liquid medium did not have any effect on the PAP, suggesting that this phenomenon was independent of the thymidine content in the testing medium.
The heteroresistance phenotype is inducible by hemin.
Reduced susceptibility to SXT has been described for the S. aureus small colony variant (SCV) (17), often involving either thymidine, menadione, or hemin auxotrophy. Both KE7160 and D2198 showed normal growth on MH agar and Columbia blood agar. Phenotypic testing did not indicate thymidine, menadione, or hemin auxotrophy (Fig. S4). Since the heteroresistance phenotype was present only on the MHF medium, not on standard MH agar, we compared the components of both culture media (from the same manufacturer) and identified defibrinated horse blood and 20 mg/liter β-NAD as additional supplements in the MHF. Since MHF is used for AST of fastidious organisms, such as Haemophilus influenzae, which required β-NAD (synonym, factor V) and hemin (synonym, factor X) to grow (18), we then tested if either substance induces phenotypic heteroresistance toward SXT using the double disk diffusion method. β-NAD did not affect the growth of either KE7160 or D2198 in the presence of SXT (data not shown). However, the presence of hemin distorted the SXT zone of inhibition in a manner similar to the inducible clindamycin resistance in S. aureus (data for hemin in D2198 are shown in Fig. 3; data for KE7160 are not shown) (19).
Infection assay with Galleria mellonella.
To investigate the potential clinical implication of SXT heteroresistance for S. aureus infections, we performed an in vivo infection assay with Galleria mellonella to determine the outcome of infections with a heteroresistant strain of S. aureus following SXT administration. D2201, an S. aureus strain with a high level of SXT resistance, was used as a positive control, and ATCC 25923 was used as a susceptible control. In initial experiments, we determined 5 × 106 CFU as the optimal infection dose to induce mortality in G. mellonella within 36 h postinfection (p.i.). The injection of a single dose of 10 mg/kg SXT (1:19) 2 h p.i. significantly increased survival/delayed mortality in ATCC 25923-infected G. mellonella larvae (log rank P < 0.0001) but not in D2201-infected larvae (Fig. 4). Infection with both low-density-growth (KE7160) and high-density-growth (D2198) heteroresistant S. aureus strains showed similar outcomes as infection with D2201, with most larvae dead by 36 h p.i. There was a slight delay in time to endpoint for KE7160 with statistical significance (P = 0.01); however, the outcome in terms of survival was comparable to that of D2201- and D2198-infected larvae (Fig. 4).
DISCUSSION
Heteroresistance is a challenge for both clinical microbiologists and infectious diseases practitioners alike. Falsely interpreted susceptible microorganisms can jeopardize therapy success, leading to higher morbidity and mortality, while false-resistant organisms can lead to overuse of second-line and last-resort antibiotics. Hence, the accuracy and reliability of AST are essential to guide antimicrobial therapy management. Recently, discordance in SXT AST for S. aureus between the Vitek 2 system, disk diffusion, and broth microdilution have been reported (11–13). In our study isolates, we saw discrepancies between the Vitek 2 and disk diffusion AST for Vitek 2 SXT-resistant isolates, which is in line with the findings of Coombs et al, who found that Vitek-based diagnosis of resistance can often not be confirmed by other methods (11). In our case, over 40% of Vitek 2 SXT-resistant isolates were either SXT susceptible at the standard dosage or with increased exposure, with substantial colony growth within the zone of inhibition. In other studies reporting higher proportions of SXT resistance by Vitek 2, the authors reported that they could not detect any acquired genes or mutations, which may provide an explanation for this discrepancy. By testing TMP and SMZ separately, we found that the TMP-resistant phenotype and the presence of extrachromosomal dfr is overrepresented in isolates of the Vitek 2 SXT-resistant group.
In this study, we report a hemin-inducible SXT heteroresistance phenomenon in S. aureus, which can be detected by performing disk diffusion on Mueller-Hinton agar with 5% horse blood. The concept of SXT heteroresistance in S. aureus is not completely novel (13, 20). In contrast to the findings by Coelho et al. (20) and Scholtzek et al. (13), our heteroresistance phenotype was visible only in the presence of hemin and SXT, which would remain undetected in standard AST by disk diffusion using conventional MH agar. In the studies by Coelho et al. and Scholtzek et al., the AST was not performed in a thymidine-free environment, so that slight growth or a hazy inhibition zone due to the presence of exogenous thymidine cannot be fully ruled out. Furthermore, Scholtzek et al. described in their study that the heteroresistant growth was visible after 48 h of incubation, which is definitively longer than the recommended incubation time for AST (18 h), so that SXT degradation is possible. In our study, the phenotypic detection of hemin-inducible SXT heteroresistance was performed using MHF. Horse blood naturally contains thymidine phosphorylase, so we are confident that the inducible resistant phenotype in our study was not an artifact due to exogenous thymidine in the testing medium. This was also confirmed by the results of the mPAP with and without thymidine phosphorylase.
A potential explanation for this heteroresistance phenomenon is the induction of the small colony variant (SCV) of S. aureus. This SCV phenotype is usually an expression of thymidine, menadione, or hemin auxotrophy, has been linked to reduced susceptibility to SXT (21), and is commonly encountered in S. aureus isolates from cystic fibrosis patients (22). Although the normal (wild-type) colony morphology on both Columbia blood agar and standard Mueller-Hinton agar, together with the negative auxotrophy results, does not support the SCV theory, we cannot definitely rule out the possibility that our heteroresistance phenotype was not the result of SCV emergence due to spontaneous morphological or transcriptional changes through stress conditions. Indeed, SCV and other phenotypic changes can occur spontaneously in S. aureus during replication (23), so that the observed heteroresistance can be the result of a spontaneous phenotypic switch or the emergence of a hemin-auxotrophic subpopulation. Although the exact underlying mechanism is still unclear, our data indicate that the heteroresistance phenotype was not lineage (MLST) specific and was associated with the presence of the TMP resistance determinant, extrachromosomal dfr genes. That being said, neither of these parameters (TMP resistance or extrachromosomal dfr genes) was a reliable parameter to predict or detect our heteroresistance phenotype, since a significant proportion of nonheteroresistant isolates also harbor extrachromosomal dfr genes and exhibit TMP resistance.
The idea of heterogeneous phenotypic resistance is not completely novel and has been described for several species previously (16, 24). In S. aureus, phenotypic heteroresistance has been described for SXT, β-lactams, and vancomycin (20, 25, 26). Even though the clinical implication of heteroresistance is still unclear, some studies have reported clinical significance of heteroresistance in S. aureus (27, 28). Our simplified G. mellonella in vivo infection model suggested that the outcome (survival) of infection with SXT-heteroresistant S. aureus was similar to that with SXT-resistant S. aureus, suggesting that SXT heteroresistance in S. aureus may have some clinical relevance. Further clinical investigations are needed to reliably determine the clinical significance of SXT heteroresistance in S. aureus.
Our study has limitations. We randomly chose 95 clinical isolates, and therefore the data presented here cannot estimate the real prevalence of heteroresistance in the general S. aureus population. However, over one-third of the study isolates exhibited SXT heteroresistance, and published data suggest that the occurrence of SXT heteroresistance is not a rare event (12). Furthermore, our proposed testing medium using MHF is not the generally recommended medium for S. aureus AST. Nevertheless, MHF is commercially available and is a guideline-conforming medium for AST of fastidious organisms. Despite the lack of consensus on the definition of heteroresistance, we adhered, whenever possible, to the recommended criteria (clonality, level of resistance, and stability) and nomenclature proposed by Andersson et al. in defining heteroresistance (29).
In conclusion, we demonstrated that hemin could induce monoclonal SXT heteroresistance in S. aureus, which can be detected using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood. This phenomenon may partly explain the discrepancies in SXT susceptibility between various AST methods. In this study, we demonstrate the potential impact of heteroresistance in therapeutic failure. Therefore, this knowledge may be valuable for microbiological diagnostics, especially in the case of persistent S. aureus infections despite SXT therapy. However, further investigations are needed to determine the underlying mechanisms and evaluate the clinical significance of SXT heteroresistance in S. aureus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Microbiological methods.
Ninety-five characterized S. aureus clinical isolates from a prior study were chosen at random (30). Antibiotic susceptibility for all isolates was determined using Vitek 2 and disk diffusion using various media. AST for SXT by the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux GmbH, Germany) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol using the P654 AST card for staphylococci. Disk diffusion for trimethoprim (5 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25 μg plus 23.75 μg) (Sensi-Disc, BD Diagnostics, Germany), and sulfamethoxazole (300 μg) (Oxoid, Germany) was performed according to EUCAST standards using two different Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar plates from BD Diagnostics (Germany) (MHBD) and bioMérieux (Germany) (MHBM) and Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood and 20% NAD (MHF) (bioMérieux, Germany). The zone of inhibition (in mm) was measured after 18 ± 2 h of incubation at 35 ± 1°C. S. aureus ATCC 25923 served as a control. An MIC test strip for SXT (Liofilchem, Italy) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MIC by broth microdilution was performed using a commercially available testing panel (Merlin Diagnostika GmbH, Germany). Antibiotic susceptibility was interpreted according to the EUCAST clinical breakpoints (v11.0). Double disk diffusion was performed using β-NAD-impregnated disks (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and 200 μg/ml hemin-impregnated disks (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Since variations in the thymidine content in the testing medium may affect AST results for SXT, we adhered to the EUCAST disk diffusion reading guide (v8.0). For disk diffusion and MIC gradient strip, a hazy zone of inhibition or weak growth within a clear zone of inhibition was ignored. The reading for MHF was performed according to the reading guide for standard MH agar. The reading of broth microdilution adhered to EUCAST broth microdilution reading guide v3.0, by reading the MIC at the lowest concentration that inhibits ≥80% of growth compared to the growth control. Quality control for AST methods (disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and MIC gradient strip) was performed regularly using S. aureus ATCC 29213 and ATCC 25923 in the routine microbiological diagnostics.
Modified (photometric) population analysis profile.
Population analysis profile (PAP) was performed using a photometric approach. Briefly, broth microdilution was performed according to current diagnostic standards using Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco, USA) with SXT (1:19) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) in the concentration range of 0.06 to 32 mg/liter (referring to the TMP concentration) in a flat-bottom 96-well plate, using a similar setting as the standard broth microdilution (31). Stock SXT solution was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and there was no antibacterial effect of DMSO (highest concentration, 1% for 32 mg/liter SXT). After 18 h of incubation, bacterial growth was semiquantified by determining the optical density at 590 nm (OD590). To check for thymidine dependency, the mPAP was also performed in Mueller-Hinton broth, which was supplemented with 5 IU/ml thymidine phosphorylase (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C to deplete the thymidine. The thymidine phosphorylase concentration of 5 IU/ml was chosen based on an estimation of the thymidine phosphorylase activity in bacterial growth medium supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood, as previously described by Ferone et al. (14). An SXT-resistant S. aureus isolate (D2201) and an SXT-susceptible S. aureus isolate (ATCC 25923) were used as controls.
Auxotrophy testing.
Phenotypic testing for thymidine, menadione, and hemin auxotrophy was performed using impregnated disks on Mueller-Hinton agar as described by Maduka-Ezeh et al. (32). Colony growth and morphology were inspected after overnight incubation at 37°C.
Galleria mellonella infection model.
The wax moth larva infection model of Desbois and Coote was adapted to test for the efficacy of SXT in preventing larval mortality after infection with viable S. aureus (29). Batches of wax moth larvae (Galleria mellonella) (TZ Terraristik, Germany) were stored in the dark at room temperature (±20°C) for up to 3 days upon receipt. Since the larval size was nonuniform, only similarly sized larvae (typical mass, ∼250 mg) were used for the experiments. TMP and SMZ were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany) and dissolved at a 1:19 ratio, which is the typical ratio of TMP to SMZ measured in the body (33), in sterile DMSO. Antibiotic was administered at the usual dosage for human therapy of 10 mg/kg body mass. Viable S. aureus bacteria in the mid-log phase grown in tryptic soy broth at 37°C with gentle shaking were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and adjusted to the desired concentration using the McFarland turbidity standard. Experiments were performed 3 times on different occasions with 10 larvae in each group. Each experiment batch was performed with three negative controls: (i) nonmanipulated control, (ii) PBS (trauma) control, and (iii) PBS-SXT (trauma and DMSO) control. The infection was performed using SXT-resistant isolate S. aureus D2201, two SXT-heteroresistant isolates, KE7160 and D2198, and ATCC 25923 as an SXT-susceptible control. Each larva was infected using an inoculum of 5 × 106 CFU, injected into the last proleg. Two hours after initial infection, all larvae were confirmed alive and then treated with either PBS or SXT. Larvae were stored in plastic petri dishes at 37°C in the dark. Larvae were inspected every 12 h for up to 36 h. Antibiotic was administered as a single dose (2 h p.i.). Dead larvae were defined as touch nonresponsive and melanized (black).
Statistical analysis.
Descriptive statistics were performed using Stata 13 software (StataCorp, USA). Statistical testing and visualization of survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) were performed using PRISM v9 (GraphPad, USA). For survival analysis figures, data from the three experiments were pooled to achieve n = 30 for each group, and statistical comparison between groups was performed using the log rank test.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Dennis Nurjadi, Email: dennis.nurjadi@uni-heidelberg.de.
Kunyan Zhang, University of Calgary.
REFERENCES
- 1.Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Kaplan SL, Karchmer AW, Levine DP, Murray BE, J Rybak M, Talan DA, Chambers HF, Infectious Diseases Society of America . 2011. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 52:e18-55. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goldberg E, Paul M, Talker O, Samra Z, Raskin M, Hazzan R, Leibovici L, Bishara J. 2010. Co-trimoxazole versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1779–1783. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown NM, Brown EM, Guideline Development Group . 2021. Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): updated guidelines from the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother 76:1377–1378. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Talan DA, Lovecchio F, Abrahamian FM, Karras DJ, Steele MT, Rothman RE, Krishnadasan A, Mower WR, Hoagland R, Moran GJ. 2016. A randomized trial of clindamycin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for uncomplicated wound infection. Clin Infect Dis 62:1505–1513. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Paul M, Bishara J, Yahav D, Goldberg E, Neuberger A, Ghanem-Zoubi N, Dickstein Y, Nseir W, Dan M, Leibovici L. 2015. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus vancomycin for severe infections caused by meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 350:h2219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stokes A, Lacey RW. 1978. Effect of thymidine on activity of trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole. J Clin Pathol 31:165–171. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.2.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nurjadi D, Olalekan AO, Layer F, Shittu AO, Alabi A, Ghebremedhin B, Schaumburg F, Hofmann-Eifler J, Van Genderen PJJ, Caumes E, Fleck R, Mockenhaupt FP, Herrmann M, Kern WV, Abdulla S, Grobusch MP, Kremsner PG, Wolz C, Zanger P. 2014. Emergence of trimethoprim resistance gene dfrG in Staphylococcus aureus causing human infection and colonization in sub-Saharan Africa and its import to Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:2361–2368. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nurjadi D, Schäfer J, Friedrich-Jänicke B, Mueller A, Neumayr A, Calvo-Cano A, Goorhuis A, Molhoek N, Lagler H, Kantele A, Van Genderen PJJ, Gascon J, Grobusch MP, Caumes E, Hatz C, Fleck R, Mockenhaupt FP, Zanger P. 2015. Predominance of dfrG as determinant of trimethoprim resistance in imported Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:1095.e5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Khamash DF, Voskertchian A, Tamma PD, Akinboyo IC, Carroll KC, Milstone AM. 2019. Increasing clindamycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in pediatric Staphylococcus aureus infections. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 8:351–353. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piy062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nurjadi D, Friedrich-Jänicke B, Schäfer J, Van Genderen PJJ, Goorhuis A, Perignon A, Neumayr A, Mueller A, Kantele A, Schunk M, Gascon J, Stich A, Hatz C, Caumes E, Grobusch MP, Fleck R, Mockenhaupt FP, Zanger P. 2015. Skin and soft tissue infections in intercontinental travellers and the import of multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:567.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Coombs GW, Mowlaboccus S, Daley D, Lee T, Pearson J, Pang S, Robinson JO. 2019. Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim resistance overcall by VITEK(R) 2 and BD Phoenix in community-associated MRSA and MSSA. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:3639–3641. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harris TM, Bowen AC, Holt DC, Sarovich DS, Stevens K, Currie BJ, Howden BP, Carapetis JR, Giffard PM, Tong SYC. 2018. Investigation of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance in an emerging sequence type 5 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone reveals discrepant resistance reporting. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:1027–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Scholtzek AD, Hanke D, Eichhorn I, Walther B, Lübke-Becker A, van Duijkeren E, Köck R, Schwarz S, Feßler AT. 2020. Heterogeneity of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim obtained from clinical equine Staphylococcus aureus isolates using different methods. Vet Microbiol 242:108600. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ferone R, Bushby SR, Burchall JJ, Moore WD, Smith D. 1975. Identification of Harper-Cawston factor as thymidine phosphorylase and removal from media of substances interfering with susceptibility testing to sulfonamides and diaminopyrimidines. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 7:91–98. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.1.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Swenson JM, Thornsberry C. 1978. Susceptibility tests for sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim by a broth microdilution procedure. Curr Microbiol 1:189–193. doi: 10.1007/BF02601676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Andersson DI, Nicoloff H, Hjort K. 2019. Mechanisms and clinical relevance of bacterial heteroresistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:479–496. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0218-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kriegeskorte A, Lorè NI, Bragonzi A, Riva C, Kelkenberg M, Becker K, Proctor RA, Peters G, Kahl BC. 2015. Thymidine-dependent Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants are induced by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) and have increased fitness during SXT challenge. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7265–7272. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00742-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Holt LB. 1962. The growth-factor requirements of Haemopiius influenzae. J Gen Microbiol 27:317–322. doi: 10.1099/00221287-27-2-317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, McElmeel ML, Jorgensen JH. 2003. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 41:4740–4744. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4740-4744.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Coelho C, de Lencastre H, Aires-de-Sousa M. 2017. Frequent occurrence of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole hetero-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in different African countries. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36:1243–1252. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-2915-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.von Eiff C, Peters G, Becker K. 2006. The small colony variant (SCV) concept—the role of staphylococcal SCVs in persistent infections. Injury 37(Suppl 2):S26–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kahl B, Herrmann M, Everding AS, Koch HG, Becker K, Harms E, Proctor RA, Peters G. 1998. Persistent infection with small colony variant strains of Staphylococcus aureus in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Infect Dis 177:1023–1029. doi: 10.1086/515238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Edwards AM. 2012. Phenotype switching is a natural consequence of Staphylococcus aureus replication. J Bacteriol 194:5404–5412. doi: 10.1128/JB.00948-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Falagas ME, Makris GC, Dimopoulos G, Matthaiou DK. 2008. Heteroresistance: a concern of increasing clinical significance? Clin Microbiol Infect 14:101–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01912.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Deresinski S. 2009. Vancomycin heteroresistance and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 199:605–609. doi: 10.1086/596630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim C, Mwangi M, Chung M, Milheiriço C, Milheirço C, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A. 2013. The mechanism of heterogeneous beta-lactam resistance in MRSA: key role of the stringent stress response. PLoS One 8:e82814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Khatib R, Jose J, Musta A, Sharma M, Fakih MG, Johnson LB, Riederer K, Shemes S. 2011. Relevance of vancomycin-intermediate susceptibility and heteroresistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1594–1599. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.El-Halfawy OM, Valvano MA. 2015. Antimicrobial heteroresistance: an emerging field in need of clarity. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:191–207. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00058-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Desbois AP, Coote PJ. 2011. Wax moth larva (Galleria mellonella): an in vivo model for assessing the efficacy of antistaphylococcal agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1785–1790. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nurjadi D, Zizmann E, Chanthalangsy Q, Heeg K, Boutin S. 2020. Integrative analysis of whole genome sequencing and phenotypic resistance toward prediction of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol 11:607842. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.607842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock RE. 2008. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3:163–175. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maduka-Ezeh A, Seville MT, Kusne S, Vikram HR, Blair JE, Greenwood-Quaintance K, Arabia F, Patel R. 2012. Thymidine auxotrophic Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variant endocarditis and left ventricular assist device infection. J Clin Microbiol 50:1102–1105. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01170-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reeves DS, Wilkinson PJ. 1979. The pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim and trimethoprim/sulphonamide combinations, including penetration into body tissues. Infection 7(Suppl 4):S330–41. doi: 10.1007/BF01639009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.