Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2021 Oct 26;10(21):4937. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214937

Blood Differential Gene Expression in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Systemic Iron Deficiency: Pathways Involved in Pathophysiology and Impact on Clinical Outcomes

Carles Díez-López 1,2,3,4, Marta Tajes Orduña 1, Cristina Enjuanes Grau 1,2,5, Pedro Moliner Borja 1,2,5, José González-Costello 1,2,3,4, Elena García-Romero 1,2,3, Josep Francesch Manzano 1, Sergi Yun Viladomat 1,5,6, Santiago Jiménez-Marrero 1,2,4,5, Raul Ramos-Polo 1,2,5, Maria del Mar Ras Jiménez 1,5,6, Josep Comín-Colet 1,2,4,5,*
Editor: Andrea Frustaci
PMCID: PMC8585093  PMID: 34768457

Abstract

Background: Iron deficiency is a common disorder in patients with heart failure and is related with adverse outcomes and poor quality of life. Previous experimental studies have shown biological connections between iron homeostasis, mitochondrial metabolism, and myocardial function. However, the mechanisms involved in this crosstalk are yet to be unfolded. Methods: The present research attempts to investigate the intrinsic biological mechanisms between heart failure and iron deficiency and to identify potential prognostic biomarkers by determining the gene expression pattern in the blood of heart failure patients, using whole transcriptome and targeted TaqMan® low-density array analyses. Results: We performed a stepwise cross-sectional longitudinal study in a cohort of chronic heart failure patients with and without systemic iron deficiency. First, the full transcriptome was performed in a nested case-control exploratory cohort of 7 paired patients and underscored 1128 differentially expressed transcripts according to iron status (cohort1#). Later, we analyzed the messenger RNA levels of 22 genes selected by their statistical significance and pathophysiological relevance, in a validation cohort of 71 patients (cohort 2#). Patients with systemic iron deficiency presented lower mRNA levels of mitochondrial ferritin, sirtuin-7, small integral membrane protein 20, adrenomedullin and endothelin converting enzyme-1. An intermediate mitochondrial ferritin gene expression and an intermediate or low sirtuin7 and small integral membrane protein 20 mRNA levels were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and heart failure admission ((HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.04–5.50, p-value = 0.039), (HR 5.49, 95% CI 1.78–16.92, p-value = 0.003), (HR 9.51, 95% CI 2.69–33.53, p-value < 0.001), respectively). Conclusions: Patients with chronic heart failure present different patterns of blood gene expression depending on systemic iron status that affect pivotal genes involved in iron regulation, mitochondrial metabolism, endothelial function and cardiovascular physiology, and correlate with adverse clinical outcomes.

Keywords: heart failure, iron deficiency, cardiac metabolism, mitochondria

1. Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is a world-wide epidemic caused by functional and structural myocardial abnormalities that result in congestion, functional impairment and eventually, multiorgan dysfunction [1]. Contemporary medical treatment is based on the prevention of disease progression by extensive pharmacological neurohormonal blockade and device therapies [2]. Yet, despite the recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of HF and the advent of new pharmacologic and device-based treatments, these patients present progressive clinical deterioration, limited life expectancy and great limitations in quality of life [3].

In the last years, iron deficiency (ID) has emerged as a key element in the current understanding of HF pathophysiology. Derangements in iron homeostasis are frequent in HF patients [4] and come along with a negative clinical impact regarding functional capacity, disease progression and mortality, independent of the hemoglobin levels [5,6,7,8]. Moreover, patients with impaired iron transport capacity (functional ID), have worse prognosis, independent of the presence of absolute ID [9,10]. Indeed, the treatment with intravenous iron has demonstrated to have a positive impact in functional capacity, quality of life and HF-related hospitalizations [11,12,13].

Nonetheless, little is known about the mechanisms by which ID occurs in HF patients, the interplay between systemic and myocardial iron status with the HF syndrome itself and the precise role of iron in myocardial performance. A combination of different clinical factors such as a reduced iron uptake, increased iron loss and impaired iron utilization explains at least part of the etiologies of ID in HF patients [14]. Recent clinical data demonstrate that patients with increased neurohormonal sympathetic activation present an impaired iron transport and increased iron demand [15], and myocardial iron content is reduced, and mitochondrial function is impaired in patients with end-stage disease [16]. Also, experimental data have disclosed part of the potential role of iron in heart function and myocardial metabolism. Iron regulation is impaired in the cardiomyocytes of patients with HF [17] and cardiomyocyte contractility is reduced in the presence of myocardial ID [18]. Moreover, recent experimental data suggest that HF neurohormonal activation induces myocardial iron depletion leading to impaired mitochondrial inducing structural and functional modifications in biological pathways in cardiomyocyte iron regulating elements that could provoke an increase in iron release and a reduction in iron uptake [19].

Despite the accumulating data, the intrinsic pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the interplay between ID and HF progression are yet to be defined. The study of ‘omics’ allows collection and characterization of diverse biological processes at different levels [20]. In this regard, the study of RNA expression (transcriptome) using high throughput technology offers a unique opportunity to massively investigate the genetic transcription and discover new mechanisms of disease [21]. Data investigating the proteomics in chronic HF patients have disclosed a few insights on the multifactorial origin of ID in patients with HF [22].

In the present study we aimed to define the biological pathways connecting ID and HF by using transcriptome analysis in a cohort of HF patients with and without systemic ID, and to explore the potential impact of genetic modifications with clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that our work might help to unveil new regulation pathways involved in intracellular and systemic iron homeostasis, to clarify its interrelation with neurohormonal activation, mitochondrial function and oxidative stress, and to identify new potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets to be used in the management of HF patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Study Population and Ethics

The definition of the neurohormonal activation, myocardial function, genomic expression and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients (DAMOCLES) study was a single-center, observational, prospective cohort study of 1236 consecutive patients diagnosed with chronic HF recruited between January 2004 and January 2013.

The methodology of the DAMOCLES study has been published previously by our group [6,15,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Briefly, for inclusion, patients had to be diagnosed with chronic HF according to the European Society of Cardiology diagnostic criteria, have had at least one recent acute decompensation of HF requiring intravenous diuretic therapy (either hospitalized or in the day-care hospital), and had to be in stable condition at the time of study entry. Exclusion criteria were significant primary valvular disease, clinical signs of fluid overload, pericardial disease, restrictive cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, hemoglobin (Hb) levels < 8.5 g/dL, active malignancy, and chronic liver disease. The patients were recruited regardless of the percentage of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In the DAMOCLES study, HF with reduced LVEF (HFrEF) was defined as LVEF ≤ 45%. The study was approved by the local committee of ethics for clinical research and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave written informed consent before study entry.

The objectives of the present study were (1) to define the pathophysiological pathways and its key biological components involved in ID in patients with chronic HFrEF and (2) explore the association of these components with clinical outcomes. First, we planned to perform a full transcriptome analysis of peripheral blood in a first cohort of patients (cohort #1) with HFrEF and ID (cases) and compare the blood RNA expression profiles of these patients with the patterns of expression in matched patients with HFrEF without ID (controls). As a second step, the differences of blood gene expression observed in the transcriptome analysis of cohort #1 were planned to be explored and replicated in a second nested case-control (ID vs. non-ID) cohort (cohort #2) of patients with HFrEF using real-time PCR. Finally, we explored the association between the gene expression of those genes significantly associated with iron status and clinical outcomes including the composite endpoint of all-cause death or HF hospitalization (primary endpoint) and all-cause death (secondary endpoint).

2.2. Selection Criteria and Definition of Study Cohorts

For the purpose of the present analysis, we selected 2 different nested case-control samples of patients with HFrEF. The first cohort (cohort #1) consisted in a nested-case control sample of 14 non-anemic (hemoglobin ≥ 12.5 g/dL) patients with HF (7 cases with ID and 7 matched controls without ID) from the overall DAMOCLES cohort study. The second cohort (cohort #2) was a larger nested case-control sample consisting in 71 patients with HF (35 cases with ID and 36 matched controls without ID) from the DAMOCLES study irrespective of hemoglobin levels (Hb > 9 g/dL). In both cohorts, ID and non-ID subsamples were matched according to the following variables: sex, LVEF, estimated glomerular filtration rate, etiology, hemoglobin, age and BMI.

2.3. Baseline Clinical Assessment

A detailed baseline evaluation was performed for all participants at study entry. This included collection of information about demographic characteristics, exhaustive medical history to gather clinical and disease related factors such as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, comorbidities, laboratory information, medical treatments, and the most recent LVEF. Sources of information were the medical history and standardized questionnaires.

2.4. Blood Sample Management and Laboratory Assessments

Laboratory data and blood sample management methods have been previously re-ported by our group [6,10,15,24,25]. Briefly, patients were resting in a supine position in a quiet room for 30–60 min after venous cannulation. Blood samples were collected using Vacutainer® (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and 10 mL EDTA tubes and immediately processed as follows: 4 plasma aliquots 250–500 µL each from one 10 mL EDTA tube, 4 serum aliquots 250–500 µL each from 5 mL serum Vacutainer® tubes. Resulting plasma and serum aliquots were frozen and stored at −80 °C using the Micronics® (Micronics Ltd., High Wycombe, Bucks, UK) system. Blood for DNA and/or RNA studies was stored in 10 mL EDTA tubes at −80 °C until being processed for extraction. Additional blood samples collected on EDTA and Vacutainer® tubes were immersed in melting ice and frozen until they were processed for routine local laboratory analyses.

Serum N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were measured in pg/mL using an immunoassay based on chemiluminescence using Elecsys System (Roche®, Basel, Switzerland). Serum iron (mg/dL) was measured using spectrophotometry; serum ferritin (ng/mL) and transferrin (mg/dL) were measured using immunoturbidimetry. Transferrin saturation (TSAT) was estimated using the formula: TSAT = serum iron (mg/dL)/(serum transferrin (mg/dL) × 1.25). Iron status was also assessed by measuring serum soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR in mg/L) levels using an enzyme immunoassay. Hb (g/dL) was measured with impedance laser colorimetry. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated from serum creatinine using the formula of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD equation). Iron deficiency was defined using the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) criteria which categorizes ID as ferritin < 100 ng/mL and/or TSAT < 20% [10,15].

2.5. RNA Extraction and Blood Gene Expression Analyses

First, total RNA was isolated from whole blood samples using Nucleospin RNA II kit (Macherey-Nagel©, Düren, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. RNA was quantified by a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific©, Waltham, MA, USA).

The transcriptome analyses were undertaken in the blood samples of patients from cohort#1. Transcriptome processing protocol was performed as previously described by García-Díez et al. [30] Briefly, sample processing, amplification, labeling, and hybridizations were performed according to the protocol for the GeneChip WT PLUS Reagent kit and then hybridized to GeneChip Human Gene 2.0 ST Array (Affymetrix) in a GeneChip Hybridization Oven 640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific©, Waltham, MA, USA). Washing and scanning were performed using the Expression Wash, Stain and Scan Kit and the GeneChip System of Affymetrix (GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 and GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G). After quality control of raw data, they were background corrected, quantile normalized and summarized to a gene level using the robust multichip average (RMA) [31], resulting in a total of 48,144 transcript clusters, which roughly corresponded to genes or other mRNAs as miRNAs or lncRNAs. Linear Models for Microarray (LIMMA) was used to detect paired differentially expressed genes between the two different samples, with a p-value less than 0.05 and an absolute fold change above 1.2 considered as significant. The omics data generated in this study have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus [20] and are available through GEO Series accession number GSE175739.

Based on transcriptome analyses, the 1128 transcripts that were differentially expressed in ID samples compared to controls were classified in 20 main ontology clusters using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis performed by Metascape [32]. Based on that classification, statistical significance and pathophysiology, 22 genes were selected to be explored in cohort #2. The 22 candidate genes were also classified in 8 main ontology clusters using GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis performed by Metascape.

As a second step, the RNA expression levels of the 22 candidate genes selected from transcriptome analysis were further explored in the blood samples of cohort #2 using real time (rt) quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis by TaqMan® Low Density Array (TLDA) technology (Thermo Fisher Scientific©, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, gene expression was evaluated by generating a custom-made Applied Biosystems TaqMan® Low Density Array (TLDA). Accordingly, the gene expression of selected genes was assessed by TLDA in a nested case-control sample of 71 patients with HFrEF (cohort #2) consisting of 35 patients with ID and 36 patients with normal iron status. Data were normalized to 18s, and relative quantification was performed using the comparative Ct (cycle threshold) method (2-DDCt). According to this, mRNA levels of ID patients (cases) were expressed as fold change vs. control (samples without ID). In addition, we explored the relationship between individual gene expression, expressed as delta Ct values of individual genes, and clinical outcomes. Delta Ct values corresponded to the difference between CtSOI (sequence of interest) and Ct of gene 18s, our reference housekeeping gene sequence (CtRS). Delta Ct was calculated subtracting CtRS from CtSOI. This approach has been used in previous research [33,34,35].

2.6. Follow Up and Major Heart Failure Events Ascertainment

Follow-up in DAMOCLES lasted until November 2015. Study participants were followed for a median of 2.93 years (mean 3.3 years). Follow-up was conducted by trained study personnel. Specifically, data on mortality and on cause of death were obtained from hospital and primary care electronic medical records, and/or by direct interview with the patients’ relatives.

2.7. Statistical Methods

Using the baseline and follow-up data from the DAMOCLES cohort, cross-sectional and longitudinal descriptive analyses were performed. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as laboratory tests results were summarized using basic descriptive statistics according to iron status strata in both cohorts.

For categorical variables, number and percentage were reported, and for continuous variables, mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) were used, depending on the distribution of the variables. χ2, Student’s T, and non-parametric tests were used to compare characteristics across strata.

In the PCR-Real time analysis, relative gene expression data from blood samples were expressed as the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) and significant differences between strata were established by Student’s t-test.

To explore the association between RNA expression of these genes and the primary composite (all-cause death or HF hospitalization) and secondary (all-cause death) endpoints, we developed several generalized additive models (GAM). These models were designed to explore parametric and non-parametric relationships between blood gene expression, expressed as delta Ct values of individual genes, and outcomes, expressed as the beta estimates of primary and secondary endpoints. Ct levels are inversely proportional to the amount of target nucleic acid in the sample (i.e., the lower the Ct level the greater the amount of target nucleic acid in the sample). All models were adjusted for important prognostic variables.

Furthermore, these adjusted models were replicated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses exploring associations of gene expression with outcomes. In these models, gene expression expressed as delta Ct values of individual genes was divided in tertiles and tertiles were grouped considering the predominance of linear or non-linear patterns of association for each gene.

All statistical tests and confidence intervals (CI) were constructed with a type I error alpha level of 5%. For transcriptome analyses, adjusted p-value for multiple hypothesis testing was evaluated using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. p-Values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 25.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, U.S.), InStat GraphPad, and R software (versions 4.0.2 and 3.1.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Bioinformatic analyses of the transcriptome were conducted using the R packages aroma Affymetrix, Biobase and Limma [30].

3. Results

In total, a nested case-control sample of 14 patients with HF (7 cases with ID and 7 matched controls without ID) from the DAMOCLES study defined cohort #1 (transcriptome cohort). Equally, a larger nested case-control sample of 71 patients with HF (35 cases with ID and 36 matched controls without ID) from the DAMOCLES study defined cohort #2 (rt-PCR evaluation cohort).

As shown in Table 1, study groups in both cohorts were well balanced according to baseline characteristics other than iron status. One third of patients were female, most of patients where in NYHA functional class I or II, mean LVEF was below 40%, and the most common HF etiology was ischemic cardiomyopathy. No between-groups differences were found regarding the use of beta-blockers, angiotensin receptor antagonists or diuretics in any of the cohorts. Finally, the prevalence of common HF comorbidities was similar between ID and non-ID patients, although in cohort 2# patients with ID where more frequently diabetic when compared to patients without ID (28 (77.8%) vs. 18 (51.5%); p: 0.002). A similar trend was found in Cohort 1# (5 (71.4% vs. 2 (28.6%) p: 0.286)).

Table 1.

Characteristics of cohorts included into the study. Cohort #1 (n = 14, transcriptome analysis), Cohort #2 (n = 71, TLDA-PCR).

Cohort #1 (Transcriptome) n = 14 Cohort #2 (TLDA PCR) n = 71
ID Non-ID ID Non-ID
N = 7 N = 7 P-Value N = 35 N = 36 p-Value
Demographic and Clinical Factors
Age, years 70 (9) 71 (10) 0.762 70 (12) 72 (11) 0.472
Sex (male), n (%) 6 (86) 6 (86) 1.0 23 (64) 22 (63) 1.0
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 135 (19) 124 (22) 0.309 123 (20) 120 (17) 0.495
NYHA functional class
I-II 5 (71) 5 (71) 1.0
III-IV 2 (29) 2 (29)
LVEF, % 36 (5) 35 (6) 0.772 33 (7) 34 (6) 0.908
Ischemic etiology of HF, n (%) 5 (71) 5 (71) 1.0 22 (61) 18 (51) 0.477
6 mwt distance 248 (138) 287 (155) 0.618 230 (141) 257 (172) 0.488
Comorbidities
Hypertension, n (%) 6 (86) 6 (86) 1.0 29 (81) 27 (77) 0.778
Diabetes Mellitus, n (%) 5 (71) 2 (29) 0.286 28 (78) 18 (51) 0.026
Previous MI, n (%) 2 (29) 2 (29) 1.0 11 (31) 9 (26) 0.793
CKD a, n (%) 2 (29) 2 (29) 1.0 16 (44) 17 (49) 0.814
Anemia WHO, n (%) 3 (43) 2 (29) 1.0 23 (64) 21 (60) 0.809
Anemia, Hb < 12 g/dL, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.0 16 (44) 13 (37) 0.631
Comorbidity index 3 (1) 3 (1) 1.0 4 (1) 3 (1) 0.266
Treatments (%)
ACEI or ARBs 5 (71) 5 (71) 1.0 24 (67) 27 (77) 0.430
Beta-blockers 6 (86) 5 (71) 1.0 34 (94) 32 (91) 0.674
Diuretics 7 (100) 6 (86) 1.0 32 (89) 31 (89) 1.0
Laboratory
Hemoglobin, g/dL 13.6 (1.2) 13.4 (0.6) 0.645 11.9 (1.5) 12.2 (1.3) 0.321
eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 65 (21) 65 (19) 0.975 67 (28) 65 (33) 0.839
NT-proBNP, pg/mL 1574 (497–1028) 536 (481–1178) 0.318 1892 (832–4776) 1450 (536–5901) 0.890
hs-CRP 0.4 (0.2–1.4) 0.5 (0.2–6.2) 0.628 0.6 (0.3–1.4) 0.3 (0.2–0.9) 0.086
Iron status and hematinic
Serum iron 50.9 (9.2) 85.3 (29.3) 0.012 45.8 (17.2) 89.6 (32.8) <0.001
Serum ferritin 57.3 (32.2) 262.0 (132.8) 0.002 45.4 (26.9) 322.9 (238.8) <0.001
TSAT 13.2 (2.0) 25.4 (6.3) <0.001 11.4 (3.6) 27.1 (10.7) <0.001
sTfR 2.1 (0.4) 1.5 (0.8) 0.095 2.0 (0.6) 1.2 (0.4) <0.001

Data presented as mean ± SD, N (%) or median (interquartile range). ACEI (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor), ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker), BMI (body mass index), BP (blood pressure), CKD (chronic kidney disease), HF (heart failure), Hb (Hemoglobin), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate), hs-CPR (high sensitive reactive c protein), LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction), MRA (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist), NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide), NYHA (New York Heart Association), sTfR (serum soluble transferrin receptor), TSAT (transferrin saturation), WHO (world health organization). a CKD was defined as eGFR < 60 (MDRD).

The peripheral blood samples from cohort #1 underwent a full transcriptome analysis to study the differential transcripts levels between both populations. The first analysis of the whole transcriptome highlighted 1128 differentially expressed transcripts. From all these transcripts, we performed an enriched gene analysis of the differentially expressed genes from the transcriptome study using Metascape (Supplementary Figure S1). Statistical tests for multiple hypothesis testing were not significant. Among the unadjusted analyses of the transcripts, 22 genes involved in deranged metabolic pathways in HF, cellular iron regulation and metabolism were selected for further evaluation according to statistical significance and/or pathophysiological relevance.

Table 2 presents the description of the 22 candidates genes selected to from transcriptome analysis of cohort #1. Enriched gene ontology of the 22 selected candidate genes is presented in Figure 1. Briefly, the selected genes were important components of HF neurohormonal axis, iron homeostasis and mitochondrial metabolism.

Table 2.

General function of the 22 candidate genes analyzed by TLDA (TaqMan® Low Density Array) in cohort #2.

Gene Name Symbol Function
Aconitase 1 ACO1 Essential enzyme in the TCA cycle and interacts with mRNA to control de levels of iron inside cells
Adrenomedullin ADM Vasodilation, regulation of hormone secretion, promotion of angiogenesis and antimicrobial activity
ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 2 ATP6AP2 Associated with ATPases (fundamental roles in energy conservation, secondary active transport…)
Cytochrome C oxidase assembly factor 3 COA3 Localized to mitochondria and essential for cytochrome c oxidase function. Component of MITRAC
Cytochrome C oxidase copper chaperone 17 COX17 Copper metallochaperone essential for the assembly of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase)
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 CXCL8 Member of C-X-C chemokine family and is a major mediator of the inflammation response
Endothelin-converting enzyme 1 ECE1 Proteolytic processing of endothelin precursors to biologically active peptides
Mitochondrial Ferritin FTMT Stores iron in a soluble, non-toxic, readily available form (ferric iron binding) and ferroxidase activity
Hydroxyacyl-coA dehydrogenase trifunctional multienzyme complex subunit alpha HADHA Subunit of the mitochondrial protein which catalyzes the last 3 steps of mitochondrial beta-oxidation of long chain fatty acids
Hypoxia inducible domain family member 1A HIGD1A Subunit of cytochrome c oxidase, may play a role in the assembly of respiratory super complexes in mitochondria
Hemopexin HPX Plasma glycoprotein that binds heme with high affinity and may be involved in protecting cells from oxidative stress
Lipocalin-2 LCN2 Iron-trafficking protein involved in multiple processes (apoptosis, innate immunity and renal development)
DNA Ligase 3 LIG3 Member of the DNA ligase family, involved in excision repair and is in mitochondria and nucleus
Mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1 MCUR1 Key regulator of MCU (Mitochondrial calcium uniporter) required for calcium entry into mitochondria
Metallothionein 2A MT2A Member of the metallothionein family, act as anti-oxidant, important in homeostatic control of metal in cell
Myosin heavy chain 7B MYH7B Encodes a heavy chain of myosin II, involved in muscle contraction
Sirtuin 7 SIRT7 NAD-dependent protein-lysine deacylase; functions of huma sirtuins have not yet been well determined
Small integral membrane protein 20 SMIM20 Component of MITRAC complex, that regulates cytochrome c oxidase assembly in mitochondria
STEAP3 metalloreductase STEAP3 Multipass membrane protein that functions as an iron transporter
Transferrin Receptor TFRC Cell surface receptor necessary for cellular iron uptake by receptor-mediated endocytosis
ATP-dependent Zinc metalloprotease YME1L1 ATP-dependent metalloprotease that catalyzes the degradation of folded and unfolded proteins in mitochondria
Zinc finger protein 260 ZNF260 Transcription factor that acts as a cardiac regulator and an effector of alpha1-adrenergic signaling

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Enriched gene ontology (GO) terms of the 22 candidate genes evaluated in cohort #2. Analysis was carried out by Metascape. The x-axis denotes −log10 (p) values based on the cumulative hypergeometric distributions. The colors denote de relative value of −log10 (p): darker colors indicate a greater value of −log10 (p).

Finally, to deepen our understanding of these metabolic pathways and corroborate our previous results, we used TaqMan low-density array (TLDA) cards for real-time PCR detection (TLDA PCR) tests, to measure the RNA expression of these 22 genes and evaluated their association with ID status in a larger cohort of patients from the DAMOCLES study (cohort 2#).

As shown in Table 3 and Figure 2, only 6 genes showed significant differences in gene expression depending on iron status: transferrin receptor (TFRC), mitochondrial ferritin (FTMT), sirtuin 7 (SIRT7), small integral membrane protein 20 (SMIM20), adrenomedullin (ADM) and endothelin converting enzyme 1 (ECE1). The RNA expressions of FTMF, SIRT7, SMIM20, ADM and ECE1 were significantly reduced in blood samples of patients with systemic ID compared to control patients with normal iron status. Fold changes in mRNA levels comparing ID vs. non-ID patients ranged from 0.62 to 0.70 (all p-values < 0.05). On the other hand, patients with systemic ID showed an increased ex-pression of TFRC with a statistically significant (p-value 0.03) 1.31 increased fold change in RNA expression compared to control patients without ID.

Table 3.

Fold-change of candidate genes in a chronic HF population with systemic ID versus no-ID.

Symbol ID vs. Ct (Fold Change) p-Value
ACO1 0.76 0.18
ADM 0.62 0.03
ATP6AP2 0.98 0.87
COA3 0.85 0.42
COX17 0.66 0.08
CXCL8 1.18 0.53
ECE1 0.70 0.03
FTMT 0.26 0.02
HADHA 0.95 0.74
HIGD1A 1.01 0.95
HPX 1.04 0.85
LCN2 0.86 0.36
LIG3 0.71 0.09
MCUR1 0.76 0.15
MT2A 1.05 0.79
MYH7B 0.87 0.56
SIRT7 0.63 0.02
SMIM20 0.68 0.04
STEAP3 1.02 0.92
TFRC 1.31 0.03
YME1L1 0.82 0.28
ZNF260 0.51 0.13

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ADM, ECE1, FTMT, SIRT7, SMIM20 and TFRC genes are differentially expressed in the whole blood of ID (iron deficiency) patients versus the control ones. Graph representation of the 6 mRNA levels from blood in both studied populations. Data were normalized by the 18 s and expressed as mean ± SEM (* p < 0.05 vs. Control).

To further explore the prognostic clinical implications of these 6 differentially expressed genes, we evaluated the associations between their mRNA expression and the primary composite (all-cause death or HF hospitalization) and secondary (all-cause death) endpoints, by developing several generalized additive models (GAM). These models were designed to explore parametric and non-parametric relationships between blood gene expression, expressed as delta Ct values of individual genes, and outcomes, expressed as the beta estimates of primary and secondary endpoints. Models were adjusted for important prognostic variables including age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, use of disease-modifying drugs, comorbidities, functional capacity, natriuretic peptide levels and renal function. As a result of these multivariable GAM, smooth spline estimates of the primary composite endpoint (all-cause death or HF hospitalization, Figure 3) and the secondary endpoint (all-cause death, Supplementary Figure S2) according to blood gene expression of ADM, ECE1, FTMT, SIRT7, SMIM20 and TFRC were plotted. Significant linear and non-linear relationships between gene expression and the primary endpoint were found for ADM, ECE1, FTMT, SIRT7, SMIM20 but not for TFRC. These associations were also confirmed for the secondary endpoint only for FTMT and SMIM20.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Smooth spline estimates of the composite endpoint (all-cause death or HF hospitalization) according to gene expression of ADM (A), ECE1 (B), FTMT (C), SIRT7 (D), SMIM20 (E) and TFRC (F). Δct: change in gene expression cycle threshold). Ct levels are inversely proportional to the amount of target nucleic acid in the sample (i.e., the lower the Ct level the greater the amount of target nucleic acid in the sample). Plots show the beta estimates of the outcome.

Furthermore, these models were replicated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses exploring associations of gene expression with outcomes. Gene expression was divided in tertiles and tertiles were grouped in categories. To improve clinical interpretation of the results, grouping was conducted considering the predominance of linear or non-linear patterns of association for each gene. As shown in Table 4 and Supplementary Figure S3, intermediate FTMT gene expression compared to high or low FTMT gene expression was associated with and increased risk of the primary endpoint (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.04–5.50, p-value = 0.039). Similar results were observed for intermediate or low SIRT7 gene expression compared to high SIRT7 gene expression (HR 5.49, 95% CI 1.78–16.92, p-value = 0.003) and for intermediate or low SMIM20 gene expression compared to high SMIM20 gene expression (HR 9.51, 95% CI 2.69–33.53, p-value < 0.001).

Table 4.

Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses exploring associations of gene expression with outcomes.

Composite Primary Endpoint
HR 95% CI p-Value
FTMT Δct, T2 vs. T1 + T3 2.396 1.043–5.502 0.039
SIRT71 Δct, T2 + T3 vs. T1 5.495 1.784–16.923 0.003
SMIM20 Δct, T2 + T3 vs. T1 9.511 2.698–33.530 0.000459
TFRC Δct, T3 vs. T1 + T2 1.042 0.347–3.126 0.942
ADM Δct, T2 + T3 vs. T1 1.296 0.456–3.683 0.626
ECE1 Δct, T2 + T3 vs. T1 1.489 0.588–3.767 0.401
All-Cause Death
HR 95% CI p-Value
FTMT Δct, T2 vs. T1 + T3 4.448 1.497–13.216 0.007
SIRT71 Δct, T2 + T3 vs. T1 7.122 1.848–27.438 0.004
SMIM20 Δct, T2 + T3 vs. T1 7.44 1.882–27.930 0.03
TFRC Δct, T3 vs. T1 + T2 2.056 0.700–6.036 0.19
ADM Δct, T2 + T3 vs. T1 1.497 0.460–4.869 0.502
ECE1 Δct, T2 + T3 vs. T1 1.083 0.310–3.783 0.9

Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models using backwards methods. Δct (change in change in gene expression cycle threshold) gene expression tertiles according to generalized additive models of mRNA levels: T1 (lower expression), T2 (intermediate expression), T3 (higher expression). ADM (adrenomedullin), ECE1 (endothelin converting enzyme 1), FTMT (mitochondrial ferritin), TFRC (transferrin receptor), SMIM20 (small integral membrane protein 10), SIRT7 (sirtuin-7).

Moreover, as presented in Table 4 and Supplementary Figure S4, the association of intermediate FTMT gene expression and intermediate or low SIRT7 or SMIM20 gene expressions with all-cause death was also confirmed in multivariable analyses. Cox proportional hazards model analyses did not confirm associations with outcomes for the remaining genes studied for any of the outcomes.

4. Discussion

This is the first study to find consistent gene transcription differences in key functional pathways that connect iron homeostasis with mitochondrial function, oxidative stress and cardiovascular physiology, in patients with chronic HF. Moreover, we found an association between these transcriptomic signals and prognosis.

HF is a complex multisystemic disease involving numerous biological processes that influence the myocardial structure and function [36,37]. Despite optimal gold-standard treatment, a significant number of patients present higher clinical deterioration [3], suggesting that there are unknown biologic components playing a role in disease progression beyond the typical neurohormonal activation. In this scenario, systemic and myocardial iron homeostasis have emerged as relevant factors that participate in the HF syndrome given that: (1) a significant number of HF patients have systemic ID [4], (2) patients with ID have a worse clinical course when compared with non-ID patients [5,6,8,25], and (3) treatment of ID patients with intravenous iron results in significant clinical improvements [12,13,38,39].

Limited investigational data have disclosed a few of the mechanisms that connect HF and ID. From a pathophysiological point of view, clinical data indicate that ID in HF may be related to low intake, gut losses, persistent congestion, chronic kidney disease, malnourishment and inflammation [22]. In this regard, functional ID has been shown to be one of the main mechanisms that explain ID at a tissue level and to correlate with prognosis [9,10]. Our group has been long investigating the relationship between HF neurohormonal activation and systemic and myocardial iron homeostasis. We have previously demonstrated that patients with ID presented higher noradrenaline levels and that this increased neurohormonal activation was related with impaired iron homeostasis [15]. Moreover, we have recently demonstrated that key iron regulating elements were altered in mice with HF, leading to myocardial ID, and we have shown that the stimulation of cardiac cells with norepinephrine and angiotensin, altered critical iron regulation components, generating intracellular ID and mitochondrial dysfunction [19].

In the present study, we exposed some of these biological crosstalks by analyzing the transcriptomic footprint in a two-phase stepwise cross-sectional study using two nested case control matched cohorts with and without ID: the exploratory cohort (cohort1 #) and the validation cohort (cohort 2#). Full transcriptome results underscored clusters of genes related to myocardial metabolism, iron homeostasis and cardiovascular physiology that were subject to the iron status. Among these, we selected 22 candidate genes according to the highlighted biological pathways by the enriched gene ontology analyses, statistical significance and biological interest, whose expression levels were subsequently analyzed by rt-PCR analyses in the validation cohort 2#. In this cohort, we found that patients with ID presented a lower expression of FTMT, SIRT7, SMIM20, ADM and ECE1 genes compared to non-ID patients, confirming the initial insights outlined in the exploratory transcriptome. Furthermore, in multivariable regression analyses, we found a statistically significant correlation between the levels of FTMT, SIRT7 and SMIM20 gene expression, with the risk of all-cause death and HF hospitalizations.

Transcriptome analyses constitute both a challenge and an opportunity to better understand the mechanistic insights of diseases and a gateway to discover new biomarkers and treatments to improve the management of patients. Indeed, the dysregulation of both coding and non-coding RNA are important elements in cardiac physiology [40,41,42]. In HF, RNA high throughput analyses have underscored the importance of mRNA in cardiac homeostasis tackling the control of the vascular system, inflammation and cardiac regeneration [21], and previous works have shown that the analysis of specific mRNA might have prognostic implications in HF patients [43]. Similarly, the analysis of proteomic profiles in HF patients have emphasized the importance of these metabolic pathways [44,45].

In our cohort of chronic HF patients, we found that HF and ID are indeed connected in a way that patients with systemic ID have a significant dysregulation in the ex-pression of pivotal genes related with iron regulation, mitochondrial metabolism, endothelial function and neurohormonal activation. Moreover, we found that an intermediate FTMT gene expression and intermediate or low SIRT7 or SMIM20 gene expressions were related with worse outcomes. Cardiac metabolism and mitochondrial function are critical elements in HF progression and a matter of study for future treatments [46,47]. In this regard, SIRT7 gene is a member of the mammalian sirtuins, a group of NAD + -dependent deacylases with roles in genes transcription and DNA repair, which are responsible for the control of oxidative stress, energy metabolism and cellular senescence [48]. From a cardiovascular point of view, sirtuins are known to participate in lipid metabolism and endothelial function, and to protect from inflammation, the development of atherosclerosis, left ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis [49,50,51]. SMIM20 is situated in the inner mitochondrial membrane and takes part of the regulation of the cytochrome c oxidase complex [52] and in the heart, it is thought to play a cardioprotective role [53]. Finally, FTMT acts as an antioxidant in the mitochondrial matrix and has a critical role in the management of iron and DNA repair [54].

Together, the results of our study point to genetic transcription differences in ID patients that affect critical elements of pathophysiological pathways that involve iron regulation, mitochondrial function, oxidative stress and cardiovascular physiology. These findings demonstrate the biological interplay between ID, HF typical neurohormonal activation and mitochondrial metabolism as key elements that might help in the understanding of the underlaying mechanisms that participate in HF progression. Moreover, the prognostic relevance of our findings regarding these gene transcription modifications paves the way to the potential use of these critical metabolic pathways as biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, and its use as a target for future treatments.

Our study has several limitations to be acknowledged. First, this study was a single-center study and hence, our findings may not be representative of all HF patients. Second, we performed a cross-sectional study and therefore, the statistical correlations that we found merely point to an association between ID and the differences in transcriptomics. Indeed, although our statistical findings suggest that patients with ID presented derangements in the metabolic pathways that implicate mitochondrial function, oxidative stress and iron regulation, it could also be possible that such gene transcription differences caused systemic ID and that the prognostic implications found indicated that patients were in a sicker condition. Third, as we have demonstrated previously, the pathophysiological pathways involving ID, mitochondrial function and HF are multiple and therefore, the genes underscored by our analyses are only a part of a wider complex network. Finally, by using the standard definition of ID we indirectly estimated the true iron status of patients, yet this is the most common method used daily practice.

5. Conclusions

In patients with chronic HF, we determined differences in the transcription of genes according to the presence of ID that affect the pathophysiological pathways of mitochondrial metabolism, iron regulation and cardiovascular physiology. Future research may confirm the prognostic implications found in the transcription levels of FTMT, SIRT7 and SMIM20 genes. These new insights underscore the importance of iron homoeostasis in the interplay between heart metabolism and myocardial dysfunction.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Lara Nonell and MARGenomics from IMIM for their support in data analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10214937/s1. Supplementary Figure S1: Enriched gene ontology (GO) analysis of differential expression genes observed in the transcriptome analyses of blood samples in cohort #1. Supplementary Figure S2: Smooth spline estimates of all-cause death according to gene expression. Supplementary Figure S3: Adjusted survival curves of significant associations between gene expression and primary composite endpoint (all-cause death or HF hospitalization). Supplementary Figure S4. Adjusted survival curves of significant associations between gene ex-pression and all-cause death.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.D.-L., M.T.O. and J.C.-C.; methodology, C.D.-L., M.T.O., C.E.G. and J.C.-C.; software, C.D.-L., M.T.O., J.F.M. and J.C.-C.; validation, C.D.-L., M.T.O., J.C.-C., P.M.B., J.G.-C. and J.C.-C.; formal analysis, C.D.-L., M.T.O. and J.C.-C.; investigation, C.D.-L., M.T.O., E.G.-R., S.Y.V. and J.C.-C.; resources, J.C.-C.; data curation, J.C.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.D.-L., M.T.O. and J.C.-C.; writing—review and editing, J.G.-C., E.G.-R., S.J.-M., R.R.-P. and M.d.M.R.J.; visualization, S.J.-M., E.G.-R. and R.R.-P.; supervision, M.T.O., J.G.-C. and J.C.-C.; project administration, M.T.O. and J.C.-C.; funding acquisition, J.C.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a Basic Research Competitive Grant in Cardiology from the Spanish Society of Cardiology 2015.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the local institution (approval code: 2004/1788/I).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

Josep Comín-Colet has received honoraria for speaking for Vifor Pharma and consultancy fees from Vifor Pharma.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bozkurt B., Coats A.J., Tsutsui H., Abdelhamid M., Adamopoulos S., Albert N., Anker S.D., Atherton J., Böhm M., Butler J., et al. Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure. J. Card. Fail. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maddox T.M., Januzzi J.L., Jr., Allen L.A., Breathett K., Butler J., Davis L.L., Fonarow G.C., Ibrahim N.E., Lindenfeld J., Masoudi F.A., et al. 2021 Update to the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021;77:772–810. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Farré N., Vela E., Clèries M., Bustins M., Cainzos-Achirica M., Enjuanes C., Moliner P., Ruiz S., Verdú-Rotellar J.M., Comín-Colet J. Real world heart failure epidemiology and outcome: A population-based analysis of 88,195 patients. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klip I.T., Comin-Colet J., Voors A.A., Ponikowski P., Enjuanes C., Banasiak W., Lok D.J., Rosentryt P., Torrens A., Polonski L., et al. Iron deficiency in chronic heart failure: An international pooled analysis. Am. Heart J. 2013;165:575–582.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Enjuanes C., Klip I.T., Bruguera J., Cladellas M., Ponikowski P., Banasiak W., van Veldhuisen D.J., van der Meer P., Jankowska E.A., Comín-Colet J. Iron deficiency and health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure: Results from a multicenter European study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014;174:268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Enjuanes C., Bruguera J., Grau M., Cladellas M., Gonzalez G., Meroño O., Moliner-Borja P., Verdú J.M., Farré N., Comín-Colet J. Iron Status in Chronic Heart Failure: Impact on Symptoms, Functional Class and Submaximal Exercise Capacity. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. Engl. Ed. 2016;69:247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2015.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.von Haehling S., Ebner N., Evertz R., Ponikowski P., Anker S.D. Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure: An Overview. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.González-Costello J., Comín-Colet J., Lupón J., Enjuanes C., de Antonio M., Fuentes L., Moliner-Borja P., Farré N., Zamora E., Manito N., et al. Importance of iron deficiency in patients with chronic heart failure as a predictor of mortality and hospitalizations: Insights from an observational cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2018;18:206. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0942-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campodonico J., Nicoli F., Motta I., Migone De Amicis M., Bonomi A., Cappellini M., Agostoni P. Prognostic role of transferrin saturation in heart failure patients. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2021:zwaa112. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moliner P., Jankowska E.A., van Veldhuisen D.J., Farre N., Rozentryt P., Enjuanes C., Polonski L., Meroño O., Voors A.A., Ponikowski P., et al. Clinical correlates and prognostic impact of impaired iron storage versus impaired iron transport in an international cohort of 1821 patients with chronic heart failure. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017;243:360–366. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anker S.D., Comin Colet J., Filippatos G., Willenheimer R., Dickstein K., Drexler H., Lüscher T.F., Bart B., Banasiak W., Niegowska J., et al. Ferric carboxymaltose in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:2436–2448. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ponikowski P., van Veldhuisen D.J., Comin-Colet J., Ertl G., Komajda M., Mareev V., McDonagh T., Parkhomenko A., Tavazzi L., Levesque V., et al. Beneficial effects of long-term intravenous iron therapy with ferric carboxymaltose in patients with symptomatic heart failure and iron deficiency†. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:657–668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ponikowski P., Kirwan B.A., Anker S.D., McDonagh T., Dorobantu M., Drozdz J., Fabien V., Filippatos G., Göhring U.M., Keren A., et al. Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1895–1904. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32339-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maeder M.T., Khammy O., dos Remedios C., Kaye D.M. Myocardial and systemic iron depletion in heart failure implications for anemia accompanying heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;58:474–480. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moliner P., Enjuanes C., Tajes M., Cainzos-Achirica M., Lupón J., Garay A., Jimenez-Marrero S., Yun S., Farré N., Cladellas M., et al. Association Between Norepinephrine Levels and Abnormal Iron Status in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Is Iron Deficiency More Than a Comorbidity? J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e010887. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Melenovsky V., Petrak J., Mracek T., Benes J., Borlaug B.A., Nuskova H., Pluhacek T., Spatenka J., Kovalcikova J., Drahota Z., et al. Myocardial iron content and mitochondrial function in human heart failure: A direct tissue analysis. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2017;19:522–530. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haddad S., Wang Y., Galy B., Korf-Klingebiel M., Hirsch V., Baru A.M., Rostami F., Reboll M.R., Heineke J., Flögel U., et al. Iron-regulatory proteins secure iron availability in cardiomyocytes to prevent heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:362–372. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoes M.F., Grote Beverborg N., Kijlstra J.D., Kuipers J., Swinkels D.W., Giepmans B.N.G., Rodenburg R.J., van Veldhuisen D.J., de Boer R.A., van der Meer P. Iron deficiency impairs contractility of human cardiomyocytes through decreased mitochondrial function. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2018;20:910–919. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tajes M., Díez-López C., Enjuanes C., Moliner P., Ferreiro J.L., Garay A., Jiménez-Marrero S., Yun S., Sosa S.G., Alcoberro L., et al. Neurohormonal activation induces intracellular iron deficiency and mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiac cells. Cell Biosci. 2021;11:89. doi: 10.1186/s13578-021-00605-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bayes-Genis A., Liu P.P., Lanfear D.E., de Boer R.A., González A., Thum T., Emdin M., Januzzi J.L. Omics phenotyping in heart failure: The next frontier. Eur. Heart J. 2020;41:3477–3484. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gomes C.P.C., Schroen B., Kuster G.M., Robinson E.L., Ford K., Squire I.B., Heymans S., Martelli F., Emanueli C., Devaux Y. EU-CardioRNA COST Action (CA17129). Regulatory RNAs in Heart Failure. Circulation. 2020;141:313–328. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van der Wal H.H., Grote Beverborg N., Dickstein K., Anker S.D., Lang C.C., Ng L.L., van Veldhuisen D.J., Voors A.A., van der Meer P. Iron deficiency in worsening heart failure is associated with reduced estimated protein intake, fluid retention, inflammation, and antiplatelet use. Eur. Heart J. 2019;40:3616–3625. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Calero-Molina E., Hidalgo E., Rosenfeld L., Verdú-Rotellar J.M., Verdú-Soriano J., Garay A., Alcoberro L., Jimenez-Marrero S., Garcimartin P., Yun S., et al. The relationship between self-care, long-term mortality, and heart failure hospitalization: Insights from a real-world cohort study. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2021:zvab011. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gavaldà-Manso M., Jimenez-Marrero S., Cainzos-Achirica M., Garay A., Enjuanes C., Yun S., Diez C., Gonzalez-Costello J., Tajes M., Farre N., et al. Reduced levels of vasopressin, an independent mechanism in the obesity paradox in patients with chronic heart failure: Insights from the DAMOCLES study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019;276:171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alcaide-Aldeano A., Garay A., Alcoberro L., Jiménez-Marrero S., Yun S., Tajes M., García-Romero E., Díez-López C., González-Costello J., Mateus-Porta G., et al. Iron Deficiency: Impact on Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:1199. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coma M., González-Moneo M.J., Enjuanes C., Velázquez P.P., Espargaró D.B., Pérez B.A., Tajes M., Garcia-Elias A., Farré N., Sánchez-Benavides G., et al. Effect of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation on Cognitive Function in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 2016;117:233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Comín-Colet J., Enjuanes C., González G., Torrens A., Cladellas M., Meroño O., Ribas N., Ruiz S., Gómez M., Verdú J.M., et al. Iron deficiency is a key determinant of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure regardless of anaemia status. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2013;15:1164–1172. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.González-Moneo M.J., Sánchez-Benavides G., Verdu-Rotellar J.M., Cladellas M., Bruguera J., Quiñones-Ubeda S., Enjuanes C., Peña-Casanova J., Comín-Colet J. Ischemic aetiology, self-reported frailty, and gender with respect to cognitive impairment in chronic heart failure patients. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2016;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0349-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Farré N., Aranyó J., Enjuanes C., Verdú-Rotellar J.M., Ruiz S., Gonzalez-Robledo G., Meroño O., de Ramon M., Moliner P., Bruguera J., et al. Differences in neurohormonal activity partially explain the obesity paradox in patients with heart failure: The role of sympathetic activation. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015;181:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.García-Díez I., Hernández-Muñoz I., Hernández-Ruiz E., Nonell L., Puigdecanet E., Bódalo-Torruella M., Andrades E., Pujol R.M., Toll A. Transcriptome and cytogenetic profiling analysis of matched in situ/invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas from immunocompetent patients. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019;58:164–174. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Irizarry R.A., Hobbs B., Collin F., Beazer-Barclay Y.D., Antonellis K.J., Scherf U., Speed T.P. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4:249–264. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhou Y., Zhou B., Pache L., Chang M., Khodabakhshi A.H., Tanaseichuk O., Benner C., Chanda S.K. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.von Schnakenburg C., Strehlau J., Ehrich J.H., Melk A. Quantitative gene expression of TGF-beta1, IL-10, TNF-alpha and Fas Ligand in renal cortex and medulla. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2002;17:573–579. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.4.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang Z., Meng Q., Zhu X., Sun S., Gao S., Gou Y., Liu A. Evaluation and Validation of Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Hemiptera: Miridae) Sci. Rep. 2019;9:13291. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49479-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Peng Z., Andersson K., Lindholm J., Dethlefsen O., Pramana S., Pawitan Y., Nistér M., Nilsson S., Li C. Improving the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Overall Survival by Supplementing Readily Available Clinical Data with Gene Expression Levels of IGFBP3 and F3 in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Core Needle Biopsy Material. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0145545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hartupee J., Mann D.L. Neurohormonal activation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2017;14:30–38. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pfeffer M.A., Shah A.M., Borlaug B.A. Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction In Perspective. Circ. Res. 2019;124:1598–1617. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.313572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Comin-Colet J., Lainscak M., Dickstein K., Filippatos G.S., Johnson P., Lüscher T.F., Mori C., Willenheimer R., Ponikowski P., Anker S.D. The effect of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency: A subanalysis of the FAIR-HF study. Eur. Heart J. 2013;34:30–38. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gonzalez-Costello J., Cainzos-Achirica M., Lupón J., Farré N., Moliner-Borja P., Enjuanes C., de Antonio M., Fuentes L., Díez-López C., Bayés-Genis A., et al. Use of intravenous iron in patients with iron deficiency and chronic heart failure: Real-world evidence. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2020;80:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Klattenhoff C.A., Scheuermann J.C., Surface L.E., Bradley R.K., Fields P.A., Steinhauser M.L., Ding H., Butty V.L., Torrey L., Haas S., et al. Braveheart, a long noncoding RNA required for cardiovascular lineage commitment. Cell. 2013;152:570–583. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chistiakov D.A., Orekhov A.N., Bobryshev Y.V. Cardiac-specific miRNA in cardiogenesis, heart function, and cardiac pathology (with focus on myocardial infarction) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2016;94:107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Duan Q., Yang L., Gong W., Chaugai S., Wang F., Chen C., Wang P., Zou M.H., Wang D.W. MicroRNA-214 Is Upregulated in Heart Failure Patients and Suppresses XBP1-Mediated Endothelial Cells Angiogenesis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015;230:1964–1973. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Qiang L., Hong L., Ningfu W., Huaihong C., Jing W. Expression of miR-126 and miR-508-5p in endothelial progenitor cells is associated with the prognosis of chronic heart failure patients. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013;168:2082–2088. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ferreira J.P., Verdonschot J., Collier T., Wang P., Pizard A., Bär C., Björkman J., Boccanelli A., Butler J., Clark A., et al. Proteomic Bioprofiles and Mechanistic Pathways of Progression to Heart Failure. Circ. Heart Fail. 2019;12:e005897. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eulalio A., Mano M., Dal Ferro M., Zentilin L., Sinagra G., Zacchigna S., Giacca M. Functional screening identifies miRNAs inducing cardiac regeneration. Nature. 2012;492:376–381. doi: 10.1038/nature11739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Brown D.A., Perry J.B., Allen M.E., Sabbah H.N., Stauffer B.L., Shaikh S.R., Cleland J.G., Colucci W.S., Butler J., Voors A.A., et al. Expert consensus document: Mitochondrial function as a therapeutic target in heart failure. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2017;14:238–250. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sabbah H.N. Targeting the Mitochondria in Heart Failure: A Translational Perspective. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2020;27:88–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haigis M.C., Sinclair D.A. Mammalian sirtuins: Biological insights and disease relevance. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2010;5:253–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vakhrusheva O., Smolka C., Gajawada P., Kostin S., Boettger T., Kubin T., Braun T., Bober E. Sirt7 increases stress resistance of cardiomyocytes and prevents apoptosis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy in mice. Circ. Res. 2008;102:703–710. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.164558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Winnik S., Auwerx J., Sinclair D.A., Matter C.M. Protective effects of sirtuins in cardiovascular diseases: From bench to bedside. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:3404–3412. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kane A.E., Sinclair D.A. Sirtuins and NAD+ in the Development and Treatment of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases. Circ. Res. 2018;123:868–885. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dennerlein S., Oeljeklaus S., Jans D., Hellwig C., Bareth B., Jakobs S., Deckers M., Warscheid B., Rehling P. MITRAC7 Acts as a COX1-Specific Chaperone and Reveals a Checkpoint during Cytochrome c Oxidase Assembly. Cell Rep. 2015;12:1644–1655. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rocca C., Scavello F., Granieri M.C., Pasqua T., Amodio N., Imbrogno S., Gattuso A., Mazza R., Cerra M.C., Angelone T. Phoenixin-14: Detection and novel physiological implications in cardiac modulation and cardioprotection. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75:743–756. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2661-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Campanella A., Rovelli E., Santambrogio P., Cozzi A., Taroni F., Levi S. Mitochondrial ferritin limits oxidative damage regulating mitochondrial iron availability: Hypothesis for a protective role in Friedreich ataxia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009;18:1–11. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included in this published article.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES