Abstract
Small, soluble metabolites not only are essential intermediates in intracellular biochemical processes, but can also influence neighbouring cells when released into the extracellular milieu1–3. Here we identify the metabolite and neurotransmitter GABA as a candidate signalling molecule synthesized and secreted by activated B cells and plasma cells. We show that B cell-derived GABA promotes monocyte differentiation into anti-inflammatory macrophages that secrete interleukin-10 and inhibit CD8+ T cell killer function. In mice, B cell deficiency or B cell-specific inactivation of the GABA-generating enzyme GAD67 enhances anti-tumour responses. Our study reveals that, in addition to cytokines and membrane proteins, small metabolites derived from B-lineage cells have immunoregulatory functions, which may be pharmaceutical targets allowing fine-tuning of immune responses.
Subject terms: Metabolomics, Tumour immunology
A paper in Nature demonstrates that B cell-derived GABA promotes monocyte differentiation into anti-inflammatory macrophages able to limit anti-tumour T cell cytotoxicity.
Main
Lymphocytes are regulated v a variety of receptor interactions with soluble and cell-bound proteins. However, small metabolites derived from immune cells are also abundant in certain tissues, and many may have signalling potential that has yet to be understood. A growing body of research addresses the flux in metabolic products produced and consumed by different immune cells in various stages of differentiation and activation1–3. We hypothesized that water-soluble metabolites can serve as environmental cues, and mediate interactions between immune cells.
GABA is a B cell-associated metabolite
Contrasting homeostatic (non-draining, contralateral; cLN) and activated (draining, ipsilateral; iLN) lymph nodes (LNs) were generated from mice using classic foot-pad immunization with ovalbumin (OVA) protein emulsified in complete Freud’s adjuvant (CFA), and subjected to non-targeted profiling of water-soluble metabolites (Fig. 1a). Principal-component analysis revealed that a strong metabolic shift separated iLNs from cLNs in wild-type (WT) mice (Fig. 1b). Pathway analysis of around 200 metabolites with significantly different abundance between iLNs and cLNs revealed that the alanine, aspartate and glutamate pathway was the strongest metabolic feature differentiating resting and activated immune sites (Fig. 1c). Purine and pyrimidine metabolism and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle were also strongly associated with immune activation (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Fig. 1a).
We assessed the contribution of the main lymphocyte lineages to the metabolic landscape by performing metabolome analyses on activated and resting LNs from immunodeficient mice lacking T cells (Cd3e–/–), B cells (Ighm–/–; referred to hereafter as muMt–/–) or all mature T and B cells (Rag1–/–). Despite the presence of many pathogen-associated molecules in CFA expected to stimulate pattern recognition receptors on myeloid cell subsets, the iLN profile of Rag1–/– mice was similar to that of cLNs, suggesting that lymphocyte activation is the dominant factor contributing to the metabolic shift in this acute inflammatory model (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 1a). B cells strongly influenced the immunized LN metabolic landscape, as muMt–/– samples were distinct from their WT and Cd3e–/– counterparts (Fig. 1b). The neurotransmitter GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid), not previously known to be synthesized by B cells, was identified as the major metabolite upregulated in iLNs in a B cell-dependent manner with respect to both fold change and P value (Fig. 1d). GABA was also detected in resting cLNs from WT and Cd3e–/– mice, at lower levels (Fig. 1e). However, very little GABA could be detected in LNs from either B cell-deficient mice (muMt–/–) or Rag1–/– mice, indicating that GABA is a signature B cell metabolite, which was confirmed in random forest algorithm analyses (Fig. 1e and Extended Data Fig. 1c). Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) confirmed co-localization of GABA and the B cell compartment in iLNs (Extended Data Fig. 1b). In contrast to previous studies4,5, we found a positive correlation of plasma GABA levels with disease activity scores and autoantibody titres in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting that GABA is indicative of B cell activation in humans (Fig. 1f). Together, the results indicate that GABA synthesis in LNs is enhanced by antigenic stimulation, in a B cell-dependent manner.
B cells synthesize and secrete GABA
GABA is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter regulating inter-neuron communication. Outside the brain, GABA has been detected in the gut, spleen, liver and pancreas6,7. Quantitative measurements in non-immunized WT mice revealed higher amounts of GABA in peripheral and mucosal LNs than in liver or pancreas, supporting the notion that B cell-enriched lymphoid tissues are important sources of GABA production (Extended Data Fig. 2a). However, aside from pancreatic beta cells, the cellular source of GABA outside neurons remains unknown. Although the GABA precursors glutamine and glutamate were abundant in B cells and myeloid cells, B cells were characterized by an enrichment in GABA, in either resting (contralateral) or activated (ipsilateral) popliteal LNs (Fig. 2a). B cells from bone marrow, spleen, Peyer’s patches and IgA+ plasma cells from the small intestine lamina propria were also characterized by elevated GABA levels (Fig. 2b). Additionally, GABA and other glutamate metabolism components were relatively more abundant in B cells in non-targeted MS analyses of lymphocytes from mouse LNs or peripheral human blood (Extended Data Fig. 2b, c). Analysis of two key enzymes that convert glutamate to GABA showed that transcripts encoding glutamate decarboxylase 67 (GAD67), but not GAD65, were elevated in both mouse and human B cells compared with T cells (Extended Data Fig. 2d, e), suggesting that glutamate metabolism characterizes B-lineage cells in both species.
Next, B cells were activated in vitro in the presence of 13C5,15N2-labelled glutamine, and glutamine catabolism and labelled metabolite distribution were traced in cell lysate or supernatant in reference to stimulated T cells. Tracing indicated that glutamine was readily converted to glutamate and used for energy generation, control of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and as a source for carbon and nitrogen for building the biomass in activated B and T cells (Extended Data Fig. 3a, b). However, the abundance of labelled intracellular GABA increased in a time-dependent manner almost exclusively in B cells (Fig. 2c). Labelled glutamine-derived GABA was also detected in B cell media 72 h after stimulation, suggesting that GABA is also released from the cell (Fig. 2c). Other modes of B cell activation, including Toll-like receptor (TLR) stimulation by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or cross-linking the B cell antigen receptor (BCR) with anti-IgM antibody alone, also induced production and secretion of GABA, albeit to a lesser extent (Fig. 2d). Various modes of stimulation of human tonsil or blood B cells also facilitated the conversion of glutamine to GABA (Fig. 2e) and increased the levels of both intracellular and secreted GABA derived from labelled glutamine (Fig. 2f and Extended Data Fig. 3c). IMS analysis of tonsil confirmed high glutamine and GABA levels in B cell follicles (Extended Data Fig. 3d). The metabolic profile of in vivo and in vitro antigen-exposed lymphocytes indicated that active glutamine and glutamate metabolism contributes to GABA production and secretion in both mouse and human B cells.
B cells limit cytotoxic T cells via GABA
We next addressed the effect of GABA on cellular immune responses, using the MC38 colon carcinoma model in which B cells have been shown to inhibit anti-tumour T cell responses through antigen-non-specific mechanisms8,9. We confirmed that muMt–/– mice controlled tumour growth better than their WT counterparts (Fig. 3a). However, implantation of a slow-release GABA pellet led to a significant increase in tumour growth in muMt–/– mice compared with mice receiving a placebo (Fig. 3a). muMt–/– tumour tissues were enriched in infiltrating CD8+ T cells with enhanced cytotoxic and inflammatory properties (Fig. 3b, c, and Extended Data Fig. 4a–c), which was suppressed in muMt–/– mice with GABA implants (Fig. 3b, c, and Extended Data Fig. 4a–c). This phenotype was confirmed by gene expression analyses showing that upregulation of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) target gene transcripts characterized CD8+ T cells from muMt–/– mice, and was considerably reduced by exogenous GABA treatment (Extended Data Fig. 4d). Exogenous GABA did not change tumour growth in WT mice, suggesting that endogenous GABA production (by B cells, macrophages and possibly tumour cells) saturates the system, and additional GABA cannot further impede T cell responses (Fig. 3a). However, picrotoxin, a prototypic GABAA receptor antagonist, limited tumour growth and enhanced the cytotoxic activity of tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in WT mice (Fig. 3d, e). Neither GABA nor picrotoxin treatment affected the proliferation and viability of MC38 cells in vitro (Extended Data Fig. 4e). Together, these results indicate that reduced GABA, or GABAA signalling, enhances cytotoxic T cell responses and anti-tumour immunity, while secretion of GABA conditions the host towards immune tolerance permissive of tumour growth.
GABAA receptors modulate CD8+ T cells
Previous studies have shown that peripheral murine and human lymphocytes express functional GABA receptors10–14. Engagement of ionotropic GABAA receptor by GABA has been proposed to induce depolarization of membrane potential, leading to inhibition of T cell responses10–12,15. We examined the effect of the GABAA receptor antagonist picrotoxin on intracellular Ca2+ concentration, and observed enhanced Ca2+ mobilization in mouse CD8+ T cells and human Jurkat T cells (Extended Data Fig. 4f). Furthermore, picrotoxin enhanced thapsigargin (TG)-induced store-operated calcium entry in mouse and human T cells (Extended Data Fig. 4g). This confirmed that functional GABAA receptors on the surface of T cells modulate a pivotal signalling pathway, confirming previous studies suggesting that GABA may directly inhibit CD8+ T cells16,17. Purified naive CD8+ T cells stimulated in the presence of GABA secreted less inflammatory cytokines, and stimulation in the presence of muscimol, a selective GABAA receptor agonist, significantly decreased activation and proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (Extended Data Fig. 4h, i). These results indicate that direct signalling via GABAA receptors is one mechanism by which GABA released by activated B cells may influence the functional properties of nearby T cells.
GABA elicits anti-inflammatory TAMs
Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) are known to inhibit anti-tumour immune responses18. In the MC38 tumour model, macrophage depletion significantly reduced tumour growth in WT mice (Extended Data Fig. 5a, b), consistent with previous studies19,20. Conversely, depletion of macrophages led to an increase in tumour size in muMt–/– mice (Extended Data Fig. 5a, b), suggesting that macrophages have distinct immune-regulatory properties in the presence or absence of B cells. The TAM gene transcription profile of muMt–/– mice differed significantly from that of WT mice, but resembled that of WT mice following treatment with exogenous GABA (Extended Data Fig. 5c). Differential gene expression analyses revealed that expression of transcripts related to cytokines, particularly in the TNF signalling pathway, was enhanced in TAMs from placebo-treated muMt–/– mice compared with those of WT mice, and this phenotype was significantly disrupted when muMt–/– mice were supplemented with GABA (Fig. 3f). Upstream regulator analysis highlighted that many target genes of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and interferon-γ (IFNγ) with increased expression in muMt–/– TAMs were also downregulated by GABA supplementation (Fig. 3g and Extended Data Fig. 5d, e). Conversely, GABA supplementation in muMt–/– mice enhanced expression of transcripts related to translation, the cell cycle and energy homeostasis such as oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), which were downregulated in TAMs from muMt–/– mice compared with those from WT mice (Fig. 3f and Extended Data Fig. 5f). GABAA receptor agonists have been shown to diminish the production of inflammatory cytokines by antigen-presenting cells21. We found that TAMs isolated from picrotoxin-treated WT mice upregulated expression of transcripts related to calcium signalling and inflammatory cytokines, such as IFNγ-targeted genes (Fig. 3h and Extended Data Fig. 5g). Genes related to translation, the cell cycle and mitochondria and genes targeted by the interleukin-10 receptor (IL-10R) were downregulated by picrotoxin (Fig. 3h and Extended Data Fig. 5g). These results strongly suggest that GABA affects fundamental processes of macrophage physiology and facilitates polarization towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype.
Macrophage conditioning by GABA
Because TAMs are mostly derived from monocytes22,23, we assessed whether GABA influenced differentiation of mouse and human monocytes into macrophages. GABA added to macrophages differentiated under neutral conditions (M-0) increased cell number, cell viability and expression of folate receptor β (FRβ), which characterizes anti-inflammatory macrophages24 (Fig. 4a, b, and Extended Data Fig. 6a–c). Gene transcripts related to the cell cycle (such as Mki67, Ccnd1 and Myc) and folate metabolism (such as Folr2, Mthfd2 and Dhfr) were upregulated by GABA (Extended Data Fig. 6d). Transcriptome and proteome profiling identified a distinct GABA M-0 signature, characterized by activation of pathways related to energy metabolism such as OXPHOS and PPAR signalling and downregulation of pathways related to neuroinflammation and nitric oxide (NO) and ROS production (Fig. 4c). Indeed, real-time measurements confirmed that GABA conditioning increased macrophage bioenergetics, particularly mitochondrial respiration (Extended Data Fig. 6e).
Like GABA, IL-10 has also been shown to elicit anti-inflammatory macrophages by metabolic reprogramming promoting OXPHOS25, and is known to be secreted by B cells and IgA+ plasma cells26,27. We observed that the IL-10 receptor A signalling pathway was upregulated in TAMs from WT mice compared with muMt–/– mice and downregulated in WT mice by picrotoxin (Extended Data Fig. 5d, g). We next investigated how these two immune-regulatory molecules might influence macrophage generation and function. Monocytes were differentiated in the presence or absence of GABA, followed by the addition of IL-10 to cell cultures (hereafter, GABA M-IL-10 and M-IL-10), before transcriptional, bioenergetic and functional analyses (Extended Data Fig. 7a). Most transcripts of cytokines, cytokine receptors and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) presentation pathway molecules were downregulated by GABA pre-treatment, while IL-10 and OXPHOS transcripts were significantly upregulated (Fig. 4d and Extended Data Fig. 7h). GABAA receptors were involved in these transcriptomic changes, as the addition of picrotoxin partially reverted the effect of GABA on M-IL-10 cells, including IL-10 transcripts (Extended Data Fig. 7h). Real-time PCR and bioenergetic profiling confirmed that combined GABA and IL-10 increased IL-10 transcription and enhanced mitochondrial respiration, indicating generation of macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties (Extended Data Fig. 7b–d). Indeed, M-IL-10 cells conditioned with GABA or B cells significantly suppressed CD8+ T cell activation in a co-culture assay, reducing granzyme B production and IFNγ and TNF secretion relative to M-IL-10 cells (Extended Data Figs. 7e, f, 8). The inhibitory effect was partially dependent on IL-10, as IL-10-blocking antibodies restored granzyme B to control levels, without affecting inflammatory cytokine production (Extended Data Figs. 7e, f, 8). In vivo, the transfer of GABA M-IL-10 cells facilitated MC38 tumour growth compared with controls receiving no cells or M-IL-10 cells (Extended Data Fig. 7g).
We next asked whether there is a specific convergence of GABA signalling on the TNF signalling pathway. Monocytes isolated from MC38 tumours were differentiated in vitro in the presence of GABA, before stimulation with TNF or IL-1β to induce nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation. GABA greatly reduced the nuclear localization of total p65 induced by TNF, while only partially attenuating its translocation induced by IL-1β (Fig. 4e). Together, these results indicate that GABA facilitates differentiation, expansion and survival of macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties.
B cell-specific deletion of GAD67
We finally asked whether B cell-specific reduction of GABA synthesis is sufficient to restore anti-tumour responses. Mice carrying a loxP-flanked Gad1 gene encoding GAD67 (Gad1fl/fl) were crossed to transgenic mice with B cell-specific expression of Cre (Cd79a-cre; referred to hereafter as Mb1-cre) to generate Mb1cre/+;Gad1fl/fl mice. Mb1cre/+;Gad1fl/fl mice developed normally, and the frequency and number of B cells and their precursors in the bone marrow were similar to those in control Mb1cre/+;Gad1fl/+ mice, as were the frequency and number of B and T cell subsets in peripheral lymphoid tissues, the gut and the peritoneal cavity (Extended Data Fig. 9). We confirmed that conditional inactivation of GAD67 in Mb1cre/+;Gad1fl/fl mice reduced GABA in B cells to levels similar to those observed in T cells (Extended Data Fig. 10a). Mb1cre/+;Gad1fl/fl mice significantly controlled growth of implanted MC38 tumours compared with Mb1cre/+;Gad1fl/+ mice (Fig. 4f), with tumour tissues characterized by infiltrating CD8+ T cells with enhanced cytotoxic and inflammatory properties (Fig. 4g and Extended Data Fig. 10b). Together, these results indicate that GABA produced by B cells significantly limits anti-tumour T cell responses.
Discussion
The demands for biomass building and synthesis of effector molecules during immune activation require large adjustments in cell metabolism, and generate countless small molecules. Small metabolites have great evolutionary potential as communication molecules, as they can be synthesized and secreted much more rapidly, using fewer cellular resources, than components of classical cell signalling pathways mediated by cytoplasmic, membrane-bound or secreted proteins. This research builds on a body of work describing GABA acting on mature immune cells, such as CD4+ T cell effector subsets and haematopoietic precursors in the bone marrow. For many of these studies, the source of GABA remained unclear16,28–33. We show that GABA is produced and secreted by both mouse and human B cells, and demonstrate that B cell- or plasma cell-derived GABA is a decisive factor regulating macrophage and CD8+ T cell responses and tumour growth in a mouse model of colon cancer.
The presence of IgA+ plasma cells expressing PD-L1 and IL-10 within the tumour environment has been linked with poor T cell immunity in human prostatic and liver cancers34,35. Increased tumour-infiltrating IL-10-producing regulatory B cells also correlated with immune evasion in patients with gastric cancer36. We observed little infiltration of tumours by B cells or IgA+ plasma cells in the MC38 tumour model, suggesting that B cell conditioning of CD8+ T cells or monocytes in this model may occur upstream, during cell differentiation, migration or priming in the LN. However, in human renal cell tumours heavily infiltrated with B cells and IgA+ plasma cells, GABA was almost exclusively detected in B cell and IgA+ plasma cell areas (Extended Data Fig. 10c), suggesting that GABA produced in the tumour microenvironment may also regulate T cells and monocytes in some settings, perhaps explaining the poor prognosis for renal cell cancers with high infiltration of B-lineage cells37.
The fluctuations in metabolite uptake and secretion that accompany cell activation during immune responses appear to influence both nearby cells and immune outcomes in distant organs. Understanding how intracellular metabolite networks extend into the extracellular milieu to mediate interactions between cells may facilitate development of targeted therapeutic approaches to inhibit tumour cell growth while sparing, or even enhancing, cellular immunity to cancer.
Methods
Mice
muMt–/– (C57BL/6J), Cd3e–/– (C57BL/6J)38 Rag1–/– (C57BL/6J) and WT mice were bred and maintained under specific-pathogen-free conditions at the RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences. Mb1cre/+ (C57BL/6J)39 and Gad1fl/+ (C57BL/6J)40 mice were provided by M. Reth (University of Freiburg) and Y. Yanagawa (Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine), respectively. Male Mb1cre/+; Gad1fl/+ and female Gad1fl/+ mice were crossed to generate mice with B cell-specific Gad1 knockout (Mb1cre/+; Gad1fl/fl) or control mice (Mb1cre/+; Gad1fl/+). Littermate or appropriate age- and sex-matched mice were used for analyses. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at RIKEN.
Human tissue samples
The tonsil samples were collected from donors who (or whose parent(s), in the case of children) provided informed consent on the study, which has been approved by the IRB board at Kyoto University (IRB number: G-1250). Renal cancer samples were collected from the donors who provided informed consent on the study, which has been approved by the IRB board at Kyoto University (IRB number: G-1012).
Foot-pad immunization
Mice were immunized with CFA-emulsified (1:1) OVA in the left foot pad (20 μg per mouse in approximately 20 μl). Seven days later, cLNs and iLNs were isolated for further analyses.
Metabolome analysis
Metabolome analysis was performed as described previously41. In brief, frozen tissues or cells were homogenized in methanol, followed by addition of chloroform and ultrapure water. After centrifugation and filtration (Ultrafree-MC, UFC3 LCC NB, Human Metabolome Technologies), the solvent was removed using a vacuum concentrator (SpeedVac, Thermo). The concentrated filtrate was used for metabolite analysis. For quantification of GABA, 600 nM of 4-aminobutyric-2,2,3,3,4,4-d6 acids (Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in methanol before lysis of the samples. MetaboAnalystR 5.0 was used for statistical analysis (Auto scaling), enrichment analysis and metabolic pathway analysis to calculate pathway impact values (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/home.xhtml).
Imaging mass spectrometry
On-tissue derivatization of glutamine and GABA was performed as described previously41. In brief, to perform matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) MS imaging of amino acids, 5 mg ml–1 of p-N,N,N-trimethylammonioanilyl N′-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate iodide (TAHS) reagent dissolved in acetonitrile was applied to the surface of thin sections using an airbrush with a 0.2-mm nozzle calibre (Procon Boy FWA Platinum, Mr. Hobby). Tissue sections were incubated for 15 min at 55 °C, followed by application of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid dissolved in acetonitrile containing 0.2% formate. IMS was performed using a MALDI ion trap mass spectrometer (MALDI LTQ XL, Thermo Scientific) equipped with a 60-Hz N2 laser at 337 nm. The laser scan pitch was set at 40 µm, and the laser was irradiated 50 times for each pixel at a repetition rate of 20 Hz. Mass spectra were acquired in positive-ion mode in conjunction with consecutive reaction monitoring mode. Ion transitions at m/z 323.2 > 177.1 and m/z 280.2 > 177.1 (mass window, 0.75 u) were used to detect specific signals of TAHS-derivatized glutamine and GABA, respectively. Acquired data were analysed and ion images were constructed using ImageQuest (version 1.0.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled in the Kyoto University Rheumatoid Arthritis Management Alliance (KURAMA) cohort in 2018. The SDAI and DAS28-CRP scores were used to evaluate disease severity. The levels of anti-CCP antibodies and GABA in plasma were examined. This study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its procedures and protocols were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Kyoto University Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine (approval no. R0357). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Flow cytometry
Cells were stained with the following antibodies, and flow cytometry was then performed on a BD FACSAria II flow cytometry system (BD Biosciences): anti-CD8a (BioLegend, clone 53-6.7), anti-TCRβ (BioLegend, clone H57-597), anti-CD4 (BioLegend, clone RM4-5), anti-CD62L (BioLegend, clone MEL-14), anti-CD11c (BioLegend, clone N418), anti-CD11b (BioLegend, clone M1/70), anti-CD3ε (BioLegend, clone 145-2C11), anti-CD45.2 (BioLegend, clone 104), anti-granzyme B (BioLegend, clone QA16A02), anti-perforin (BioLegend, clone S16009B), anti-F4/80 (BioLegend, clone BM8), anti-cKit (BioLegend, clone 2B8), anti-SCA-1 (BioLegend, clone D7), anti-CD48 (BioLegend, clone HM48-1), anti-CD150 (BioLegend, clone TC15-12F12.2), anti-CD93 (BioLegend, clone AA4.1), anti-CD38 (BioLegend, clone 90), anti-IFNγ (eBioscience, clone XMG1.2), anti-CD44 (eBioscience, clone IM7), anti-B220 (eBioscience, clone RA3-6B2), anti-TNF (eBioscience, clone MP6-XT22), anti-IgD (eBioscience, clone 11-26c), anti-CD21/CD35 (eBioscience, clone eBio4E3), anti-FOXP3 (eBioscience, clone FJK-16s), anti-CD25 (BD Biosciences, clone PC61), anti-TCRβ (BD Biosciences, clone H57-597), anti-IL-2 (BD Biosciences, clone JES6-5H4), anti-CD23 (BD Biosciences, clone B3B4), anti-CD43 (BD Biosciences, clone S7), anti-CD16/32 (BD Biosciences, clone 2.4G2), anti-CD19 (BD Biosciences, clone 1D3), anti-CD5 (BD Biosciences, clone 53-7.3), anti-CD95 (BD Biosciences, clone Jo2), anti-γδ TCR (BD Biosciences, clone GL3), anti-IgM (SouthernBiotech, polyclonal) and anti-IgA (SouthernBiotech, polyclonal). Apoptotic cells were stained using FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences). Proliferating cells were analysed using the CellTrace-Violet Cell Proliferation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). To measure intracellular cytokine production, cells were re-stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; 50 ng ml–1) and ionomycin (500 ng ml–1) (Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of GolgiStop (BD Biosciences) for 4 h. Intracellular staining was performed using the Fixation/Permeabilization Solution kit (BD Biosciences). Data were analysed with FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Cell sorting
CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (CD11c–CD11b–B220– and CD4+ or CD8+), naive CD4+ T cells (CD11c–CD11b–B220–CD8–CD4+CD44lowCD62L+), B cells (CD11c–CD11b–CD4–CD8–B220+) and CD11b/c (B220–CD11c+ and/or CD11b+) cells were sorted from LNs (pooled axillary, brachial and inguinal LNs); follicular (FO) B cells (CD19+CD21midCD23+) were sorted from spleen; Peyer’s patch B cells (B220+IgDhi) and lamina propria IgA+ plasma cells (B220–IgA+) were sorted from small intestine; and bone marrow B cells (B220hiTCRβ–) were sorted from the bone marrow of WT mice (Supplementary Fig. 1). Tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (CD45+TCRβ+CD8+), monocytes (CD45+CD11b+F4/80–Ly6Chi) and macrophages (CD45+CD11b+F4/80hi) were sorted 7 d after inoculation with MC38 cells (Supplementary Fig. 2). Fresh human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by Ficoll gradient centrifugation. Fresh PBMCs, frozen PBMCs (Lonza) or frozen human tonsil cells were stained with biotin-labelled anti-CD20 (BioLegend, clone 2H7) and anti-CD19 (BioLegend, clone HIB19), and B cells were captured by magnetic selection using anti-biotin MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec). T cells were enriched with the Human Pan-T Cell Negative Isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec).
Real-time PCR
Total RNA was purified using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA synthesis was performed using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) after DNase I treatment (Invitrogen), and real-time PCR was then run using Thunderbird SYBR Green qPCR mix (Toyobo) and results were analysed with LightCycler 96 SW 1.1 software (Roche). The relative expression levels of mRNAs were normalized to the expression of Actb (mouse) or 18S rRNA (human) and are represented relative to control cells. The following primers were used. Mouse primers: Gad1 (ref. 42): F, 5′-AGGCAGTCCTCCAAGAACCT-3′; R, 5′-CCGTTCTTAGCTGGAAGCAG-3′; Gad2 (ref. 43): F, 5′-TCAACTAAGTCCCACCCTAAG-3′; R, 5′-CCCTGTAGAGTCAATACCTGC-3′; Il10 (ref. 44): F, 5′-CAAGGAGCATTTGAATTCCC-3′; R, 5′-GGCCTTGTAGACACCTTGGTC-3′; Actb: F, 5′-CACCCTGTGCTGCTCACCGA-3′; R, 5′-AGTGTGGGTGACCCCGTCTCC-3′. Human primers: 18S rRNA45: F, 5′-GGCCCTGTAATTGGAATGAGTC-3′; R, 5′-CCAAGATCCAACTACGAGCTT-3′; GAD1 (ref. 46): F, 5′-CGAGTCCCTGGAGCAGATCCTGGTT-3′; R, 5′-GTCAGCCATTCTCCAGCTAGGCCAATAATA-3′; GAD2 (ref. 46): F, 5′-CAACCAAATGCATGCCTCCTACCTCTTTCA-3′; R, 5′-TGCCAACTCCAAACATTTATCAACATGCGCTTCA-3′.
In vitro activation and [13C5,15N2]glutamine tracing
Mouse T or B cells were purified from LNs with B cell (positive selection) or T cell (negative selection) magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec) and cultured for 24 or 72 h in RPMI-1640 (Wako) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) dialysed FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1× MEM NEAA, 10 mM HEPES, 50 µM of 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U ml–1 penicillin and 100 U ml–1 streptomycin. T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 (2.5 µg ml–1; 145-2C11, BD Biosciences) bound to a 96-well plate in the presence of anti-CD28 (2 µg ml–1; 37.51, BD Biosciences) and IL-2 (20 ng ml–1; R&D Systems). B cells were stimulated with anti-IgM (8 µg ml–1; Jackson Immuno Research) alone, anti-IgM (8 µg ml–1) plus anti-CD40 (10 µg ml–1; BD Biosciences) or LPS (100 ng ml–1; Sigma-Aldrich). For [13C5,15N2]glutamine tracing, glutamine-free medium was supplemented with 2 mM of 13C5,15N2-labelled l-glutamine (Taiyo Nippon Sanso).
For human B cell culture, PBMCs or tonsil-derived B cells were stimulated with a mix of human IL-21 (50 ng ml–1; BioLegend), human CD40L (100 ng ml–1; BioLegend) and human IL-2 (10 ng ml–1; R&D Systems) or a mix of F(ab′)2 goat anti-human IgG/IgM (1 µg ml–1; Invitrogen), CpG oligonucleotides (ODN 2006; 4 µg ml–1; InvivoGen), human IFNα (1,000 U ml–1; R&D Systems) and human IL-2 (10 ng ml–1; R&D Systems) as described previously47 for 5 d in the medium containing 13C5,15N2-labelled l-glutamine described above.
Monocyte-derived macrophage culture
Bone marrow cells were isolated from mouse femurs. Red blood cells were removed with lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA). Monocytes were further purified from bone marrow cells using the EasySep Mouse Monocyte Isolation kit (STEMCELL Technologies). Total bone marrow cells (2 × 106 cells per ml) or purified monocytes (0.5 × 106 cells per ml) were suspended in complete RPMI-1640 (supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) dialysed FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1× MEM NEAA, 10 mM HEPES, 50 µM of 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 U ml–1 streptomycin) with 20 ng ml–1 M-CSF (R&D Systems), and seeded on 24-well or 48-well plates. On day 3, non-adherent cells were discarded and adherent cells were further cultured for three more days with fresh medium supplemented with 20 ng ml–1 M-CSF. Adherent cells confirmed to be CD11b+F4/80+ were considered to be mature BMDMs (M-0).
For polarization, M-0 cells were stimulated with 10 ng ml–1 IL-10 (R&D Systems) for 6 h (M-IL-10). For GABA conditioning, 1 mM GABA (Sigma-Aldrich) was added from the start of the cultures, refreshed on day 3 (termed M-0 and GABA M-0) and also during the polarization period (termed M-IL-10 and GABA M-IL-10).
For culture of human monocyte-derived macrophages, human peripheral blood CD14+ monocytes (Lonza) were cultured in RPMI-1640 (supplemented with 20% (vol/vol) dialysed FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1× MEM NEAA, 10 mM HEPES, 50 µM of 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 U ml–1 streptomycin) with 100 ng ml–1 human M-CSF (R&D Systems) and left untreated or treated with GABA (1 mM) for 7 d. Adherent cells were analysed by flow cytometry.
Co-culture assays
For macrophage–T cell co-cultures, 2 × 104 BMDMs differentiated in the above conditions were seeded together with 5 × 104 sorted CD8+ T cells and stimulated for 3 d with anti-CD3 (1 µg ml–1; 145-2C11, BD Biosciences) and anti-CD28 (0.5 µg ml–1; 37.51, BD Biosciences), in the presence or absence of anti-IL-10 blocking antibodies (4 or 10 μg ml–1; JES5-2A5, eBioscience).
For macrophage conditioning with B cells followed by T cell co-cultures, purified LN B cells were stimulated with anti-IgM (8 µg ml–1) plus anti-CD40 (10 µg ml–1; BD Biosciences) for 3 d. Bone marrow cells were differentiated with M-CSF for 1 d, and adherent cells were then cultured with or without activated B cells (1 × 105 cells) for five more days in the presence of M-CSF and further polarized for 6 h with IL-10 (10 ng ml–1). Macrophage–T cell co-cultures were performed as described above. After 3 d of co-culture, CD8+ T cells were analysed by flow cytometry, and the concentration of IFNγ and TNF in the supernatant was quantified using the Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Mouse Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytokine kit (BD Biosciences).
Imaging of NF-κB nuclear translocation
Monocytes (CD45.2+CD11b+Ly6ChiF4/80–) infiltrated into MC38 tumour tissues (day 7) were sorted and differentiated in vitro with or without GABA (1 mM) for 6 d and then seeded onto a 35-mm glass-bottom dish (Iwaki) and analysed by immunocytochemistry as previously described48,49. Cells were stimulated with recombinant mouse TNF (100 ng ml–1) or recombinant mouse IL-1β (100 ng ml–1) for 30 min. They were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Nacalai) for 15 min and processed for immunocytochemistry to examine the intracellular localization of total NF-κB p65. The fixed cells were permeabilized by incubation with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min at 25 °C. Cells were then incubated for 90 min at room temperature with rabbit anti-human total p65 antibody (1:200; clone D14E12, Cell Signaling Technology). After washing with PBS containing 0.2% polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated F(ab′)2 fragments of goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (1:1,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 60 min in the dark at 25 °C. Samples were washed three times with PBS containing 0.2% polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate and incubated with TO-PRO-3-iodide (1:1,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 15 min. They were then mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade reagent and visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM-510, Carl Zeiss). Co-localization analysis was performed using ZEN software (Carl Zeiss).
Immunofluorescence analysis
For immunofluorescence, tissues were immediately isolated, fixed for 2 h with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 °C and soaked in 30% sucrose in PBS overnight at 4 °C. Tissues were then embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT blocks (Sakura) and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen samples were sectioned at a thickness of 10 μm by cryostat (Leica, CM3050S). The following antibodies were used: anti-mouse CD3ε (BioLegend, clone 145-2C11), anti-mouse B220 (eBioscience, clone RA3-6B2) and anti-mouse CD11c (SouthernBiotech, polyclonal). Tissue sections were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) and mounted with Fluoromount-G antifade reagent (SouthernBiotech).
For human tissue staining, tissues were freshly isolated, embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT blocks (Sakura) or SCEM (SECTION-LAB) and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen samples were sectioned at a thickness of 10 μm by cryostat (Leica, CM3050S). The following antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry staining: anti-human CD68 (eBioscience, clone 815CU17), anti-human CD19 (Abcam, clone EPR5906) and anti-human IgA (SouthernBiotech, polyclonal). Fluorescence images were obtained using a BZ-X700 fluorescence microscope (Keyence).
Extracellular flux analysis
BMDMs differentiated as described above were seeded on Seahorse XF poly(d-lysine)-coated microplates (Agilent) at 1 × 105 cells per well in Seahorse XFp RPMI medium containing 1 mM XFp sodium pyruvate, 2 mM XFp l-glutamine and 10 mM XFp glucose (Agilent) and incubated for 45 min at 37 °C in a non-CO2 incubator before starting the assay using a Seahorse XFp analyser (Agilent). Oligomycin (1.5 μM), FCCP (2 μM) and rotenone/antimycin A (0.5 μM) were added sequentially, and the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were measured in real time. The maximal respiratory capacity was calculated as (maximum OCR after FCCP injection) – (OCR after rotenone/antimycin A injection).
Measurement of intracellular Ca2+ concentrations
Cells were incubated with 2 µM Fluo-3-AM in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark, washed in PBS and seeded on 35-mm glass-base dishes with Ca2+ imaging buffer (120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.96 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgCl2, 11.1 mM glucose, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mg ml–1 BSA and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4)) or Ca2+-free imaging buffer (120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.96 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgCl2, 11.1 mM glucose, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mg ml–1 BSA and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4)). A confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM510) was used to capture images every 1 s. After baseline image acquisition, cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or 5 μM thapsigargin (TG). To examine the effects of antagonists for the GABAergic receptor, cells were pre-treated with 100 μM picrotoxin for 5 min. The relative change in intracellular Ca2+ concentration (n = 60 cells) over time is expressed as the change relative to baseline fluorescence.
Tumour model
The MC38 (mouse colon adenocarcinoma) cell line was originally provided by J. P. Allison (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). Mice were implanted subcutaneously with placebo or GABA pellets designed to release GABA over 21 d (31.5 mg per pellet; Innovative Research) or injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with DMSO or picrotoxin (40 μg per mouse; Abcam) 1 d before intradermal inoculation with 5 × 105 tumour cells in the right flank. DMSO or picrotoxin injection in 200 μl of saline was performed every other day. For macrophage depletion, control liposomes or liposomal clodronate (Hygieia Bioscience) was injected into mice i.p. 1 d before (50 µl per mouse) and on day 6 after (25 µl per mouse) inoculation. For co-injection experiments, MC38 cells (5 × 105 cells per mouse) were injected into mice together with M-IL-10 or GABA M-IL-10 cells (2.5 × 105 cells per mouse) generated in vitro as described above. Tumour tissues were collected on day 7 or day 15 and digested with collagenase (1.5 mg ml–1; Wako) for flow cytometry or sequencing analysis. Tumour volumes were measured with calipers according to the following formula: tumour volume = π × (length × breadth × height)/6.
RNA sequencing
One hundred intratumoural CD45.2+TCRβ+CD8+ T cells and CD45.2+CD11b+F4/80hi macrophages were purified on day 7 after tumour injection using a FACSAria III Cell Sorter (BD Biosciences). Cells were collected in SingleCellProtect Single Cell Stabilizing Solution (Avidin) and frozen in liquid nitrogen for digital RNA sequencing50. Each library (one per mouse) was sequenced using an indexed pooling method on the MiSeq platform (150 cycles; Illumina kit). Sequencing data were mapped to the mouse genome (mm10 assembly from the UCSC Genome Browser; annotation refFlat from the UCSC Genome Browser) using STAR v.2.5.4b50. The normalized number of molecules was calculated using DESeq2 (1.30.1). Genes with significantly different expression (DEGs; two-sided Wald test, P < 0.05; average value of normalized number of molecules for all samples >1; log2(fold change) >0 or <0) were analysed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Qiagen). DAVID was used for annotation analysis of DEGs (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp). Principal-component analysis (average value of normalized number of molecules of all samples >1) was performed through ClustVis (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis/). Sequencing datasets have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession codes GSE169543 and GSE183246.
Gene chip assays
Total cellular RNA was purified using TRIzol (Invitrogen), and the quality was confirmed using Agilent RNA 6000 Pico reagent (Agilent Technologies). The Clariom S Array (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to analyse the transcriptome profile (Takara), and data were analysed with Transcriptome Analysis Console Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Pathway analysis was performed using IPA (Qiagen).
Proteome analysis
For preparation of tryptic peptide samples for MS, the phase transfer surfactant method of refs. 51,52 was used to prepare BMDM samples for MS, with minor modifications. In brief, cell pellets of 100,000 cells were lysed in 20 µl lysis buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl pH 9.0, 12 mM sodium deoxycholate, 12 mM sodium N-dodecanoylsarcosinate, with cOmplete EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche)). The protein concentration of each sample was determined using a Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein amount varied from sample to sample (3.2–10.0 µg), and the whole amount of each sample was prepared for MS. Samples were reduced with 10 mM DL-dithiothreitol at 50 °C for 30 min, free thiol groups were alkylated with 40 mM iodoacetamide in the dark at room temperature for 30 min and 55 mM cysteine was then added at room temperature for 10 min to quench the reactions. Samples were diluted 1:2.76 with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Lysyl endopeptidase (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical) and modified trypsin (Promega) were both added at 200 ng, and proteins were digested at 37 °C for 14 h. Tryptic digestion reactions were treated with 1.83 volumes of ethyl acetate and then acidified with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to 0.5% (vol/vol) TFA. After centrifugation at 12,000g for 5 min, the upper organic phase containing detergent was discarded and a lower aqueous phase containing digested tryptic peptides was dried using a vacuum centrifuge. The samples were desalted with ZipTip Pipette Tips with 0.6 μl of C18 resin (MilliporeSigma) and dried. Afterwards, samples were dissolved in 10 µl of 0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid and 3% (vol/vol) acetonitrile in water. The peptide concentrations were determined using a Pierce Quantitative Colorimetric Peptide Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). From each sample, 600 ng of tryptic peptides was measured with MS.
To generate a spectral library, aliquots of tryptic peptides from each sample were combined for a 10-μg tryptic peptide sample, which was fractionated using a Pierce High-pH Reversed-Phase Peptide Fractionation (HPRP) kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For MS, each fraction was dissolved in 6.5 µl of 0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid and 3% (vol/vol) acetonitrile in water and 5.0 µl was measured.
Liquid chromatography and tandem MS (LC–MS/MS) measurements were made using a Q-Exactive Plus Orbitrap mass spectrometer together with a Nanospray Flex ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For LC, an EASY-nLC 1200 system was used (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Solvent A consisted of MS-grade 0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid in water and solvent B consisted of 0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid in 80% (vol/vol) acetonitrile. Samples were measured with a 2-h gradient and a flow rate of 300 nl min–1: the gradient increased from 2% solvent B to 34% solvent B from 0–108 min, then from 34% solvent B to 95% solvent B from 108–110 min and finally to 95% solvent B from 110–120 min to wash the system. Peptides were separated using an analytical column with 3-µm C18 particles, an inner diameter of 75 µm and a length of 12.5 cm (Nikkyo Technos), which was preceded by an Acclaim PepMap 100 trap column with 3-µm C18 particles, an inner diameter of 75 µm and a filling length of 2 cm (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The ion transfer capillary temperature was 250 °C and a spray voltage of 2.0 kV was applied during sample measurement.
To generate a spectral library, the HPRP-fractionated samples were measured with data-dependent acquisition (DDA). Full MS spectra were acquired from 380 to 1,500 m/z at 70,000 resolution. The automatic gain control (AGC) target was 3 × 106, and the maximum injection time (IT) was 100 ms. MS2 scans were recorded for the top 20 precursors at 17,500 resolution, and the dynamic exclusion was set to 20 s with the default charge state set to 2. The AGC target was 1 × 105 with a 60-ms maximum IT. The normalized collision energy was 27% for HCD fragmentation. The intensity threshold was 1.3 × 104, and charge states 2–5 were included.
To quantify proteins across samples, they were measured with data-independent acquisition (DIA). Data were acquired with one full MS scan and 32 overlapping isolation windows covering the precursor mass range of 400–1,200 m/z. For the full MS scan, the resolution was 70,000, 5 × 106 was the AGC target and the maximum IT was set to 120 ms. DIA segments were acquired at a resolution of 35,000, a 3 × 106 AGC target and an automatic maximum IT. The first mass was fixed at 150 m/z. The normalized collision energy was 27% for HCD fragmentation.
For generation of the spectral library, the eight raw data files obtained from DDA of the HPRP-fractionated tryptic peptides fractions were analysed using Proteome Discoverer version 2.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) together with eight raw data files obtained from DDA of eight HPRP-fractionated tryptic peptide fractions derived from BMDM samples, which we had measured previously. The UniProt-reviewed Mus musculus (taxon 10090) database was used to process the data files to generate a single results file. Digestion enzyme specificity was set to trypsin (full). Mass tolerance for the precursors was set to 10 p.p.m., and for the fragments the tolerance was 0.02 Da. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as a static modification. Methionine oxidation, N-terminal protein acetylation, methionine loss and methionine loss with N-terminal protein acetylation were set as dynamic modifications. To calculate the false discovery rate (FDR), a concatenated decoy database was used. At both the peptide and protein levels, an FDR of 0.01 was used to filter the search results. To generate the specific spectral library, the results file from Proteome Discoverer was then imported into Spectronaut software (Biognosys).
For quantification of proteins, raw data files from DIA measurements were used to extract protein quantities with the generated spectral library using Spectronaut software (Biognosys). FDR was estimated with the mProphet approach53, and set to 0.01 at both the peptide precursor and protein level54. Data filtering parameters for quantification were a q-value percentile fraction of 0.5 with global imputing and cross-run normalization with global normalization on the median. Pathway analysis based on IPA (Qiagen) was performed to analyse significantly differentially expressed proteins (two-tailed unpaired t-test, P < 0.05). The MS proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE55 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD028403.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism (GraphPad) or DESeq2. Analyses were conducted using the Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation test, the Wald test, the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test or repeated-measures ANOVA. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-021-04082-1.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank all members of the Fagarasan laboratory for discussions. We thank Y. Yanagawa (Gunma University) for Gad1fl/+ mice; M. Reth (University of Freiburg) and T. Kurosaki (IMS RIKEN) for Mb1cre/+ mice; T. Kitami (IMS RIKEN) for the use of the Seahorse Analyser and assistance with Seahorse assays; T. Saito (IMS RIKEN) for the Jurkat cell line; the Iskikawa laboratory (IMS RIKEN) for advice on human tissue staining; M. Li (IMS RIKEN) for help with macrophage cultures; K. Fukuhara (IMS RIKEN) for RNA-seq; and S. Kato for her administrative assistance. This work was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development–Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (grant 14532135 to S.F.), the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development-FORCE (grant JP21gm4010008 to S.F.), the RIKEN Aging Project Grant (to S.F.), the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development–Precursory Research for Innovative Medical Care (JP21gm6110019 to M. Miyajima), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Research (Exploratory) (grant 21K19392 to M. Miyajima), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant 18H05411 (K.S.) and the Yanai Fund (Kyoto University); B.Z., A.V., N.H. and T.O. were supported by the RIKEN Special Postdoctoral Researcher (SPDR) Program. The KURAMA cohort study is supported by a grant from Daiichi Sankyo. The funder had no role in the design of the study, the collection or analysis of the data, the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Extended data figures and tables
Source data
Author contributions
S.F., B.Z. and A.V. designed the study. B.Z., A.V. and M. Miyajima carried out in vivo and in vitro cell characterization in immunization and tumour experiments. Y.S. and K. Sonomura performed metabolomic studies under the supervision of M.S. and F.M. Y.S. performed tracing experiments and IMS studies on mouse and human tissues. Y.W. performed proteomic studies. K.C., R.J.M. and R.H. contributed to tumour experiments and human blood cell sorting and stimulation under the supervision of T. Honjo. N.H., T.O. and K. Shiroguchi performed 100-cell transcriptome analyses. R.N. performed experiments related to calcium mobilization and NF-κB activation under the supervision of H.S. W.K., Y.T., S.Y., M. Maruya, S.N. and K. Suzuki provided technical help with mouse generation, phenotyping, analyses and metabolome and transcriptome sample preparation. K.M. and M.H. provided samples and data for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. H.U. provided tonsil samples, and T.K., K.I. and T. Hirano provided renal tumour samples. S.F. supervised the work and analysed data, and S.F., A.V. and B.Z. wrote the manuscript.
Data availability
The RNA-seq datasets analysed are publicly available in the Gene Expression Omnibus with accession codes GSE169543 and GSE183246. The proteomics datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD028403. The gene chip datasets are provided in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The DESeq2 (1.30.1) package was used to analyse RNA-seq data (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html).
Competing interests
S.F., B.Z. and M. Miyajima, through RIKEN Innovation, have filed a patent application on the methods and findings in this manuscript. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature thanks Daniel Kaufman, Carola Vinuesa and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Alexis Vogelzang, Michio Miyajima, Yuki Sugiura
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41586-021-04082-1.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41586-021-04082-1.
References
- 1.Loftus RM, Finlay DK. Immunometabolism: cellular metabolism turns immune regulator. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:1–10. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R115.693903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Geltink RIK, Kyle RL, Pearce EL. Unraveling the complex interplay between T cell metabolism and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018;36:461–488. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Makowski L, Chaib M, Rathmell JC. Immunometabolism: from basic mechanisms to translation. Immunol. Rev. 2020;295:5–14. doi: 10.1111/imr.12858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen R, et al. Perturbations in amino acids and metabolic pathways in osteoarthritis patients determined by targeted metabolomics analysis. J. Chromatogr. B. 2018;1085:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhou Y, et al. Serum amino acid metabolic profiles of ankylosing spondylitis by targeted metabolomics analysis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020;39:2325–2336. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-04974-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tsuji M, Nakajima T. Studies on the formation of γ-aminobutyric acid from putrescine in rat organs and purification of its synthetic enzyme from rat intestine. J. Biochem. 1978;83:1407–1412. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a132050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garry DJ, Sorenson RL, Coulter HD. Ultrastructural-localization of γ amino butyric-acid immunoreactivity in B-cells of the rat pancreas. Diabetologia. 1987;30:115–119. doi: 10.1007/BF00274582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang Y, Morgan R, Podack ER, Rosenblatt J. B cell regulation of anti-tumor immune response. Immunol. Res. 2013;57:115–124. doi: 10.1007/s12026-013-8472-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Akrami M, et al. Circulation of gut-preactivated naive CD8+ T cells enhances antitumor immunity in B cell-defective mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:23674–23683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010981117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tian J, Chau C, Hales TG, Kaufman DL. GABAA receptors mediate inhibition of T cell responses. J. Neuroimmunol. 1999;96:21–28. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(98)00264-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alam S, Laughton DL, Walding A, Wolstenholme AJ. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells express GABAA receptor subunits. Mol. Immunol. 2006;43:1432–1442. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bjurstöm H, et al. GABA, a natural immunomodulator of T lymphocytes. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008;205:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dionisio L, Jose De Rosa M, Bouzat C, Esandi Mdel C. An intrinsic GABAergic system in human lymphocytes. Neuropharmacology. 2011;60:513–519. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mendu SK, Bhandage A, Jin Z, Birnir B. Different subtypes of GABA-A receptors are expressed in human, mouse and rat T lymphocytes. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tian J, et al. γ-Aminobutyric acid inhibits T cell autoimmunity and the development of inflammatory responses in a mouse type 1 diabetes model. J. Immunol. 2004;173:5298–5304. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.8.5298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Soltani N, et al. GABA exerts protective and regenerative effects on islet beta cells and reverses diabetes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:11692–11697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102715108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mendu SK, et al. Increased GABAA channel subunits expression in CD8+ but not in CD4+ T cells in BB rats developing diabetes compared to their congenic littermates. Mol. Immunol. 2011;48:399–407. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Noy R, Pollard JW. Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy. Immunity. 2014;41:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nandi B, et al. Stromal CCR6 drives tumor growth in a murine transplantable colon cancer through recruitment of tumor-promoting macrophages. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1189052. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1189052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ries CH, et al. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages with anti-CSF-1R antibody reveals a strategy for cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:846–859. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhat R, et al. Inhibitory role for GABA in autoimmune inflammation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:2580–2585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915139107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Movahedi K, et al. Different tumor microenvironments contain functionally distinct subsets of macrophages derived from Ly6Chigh monocytes. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5728–5739. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shand FHW, et al. Tracking of intertissue migration reveals the origins of tumor-infiltrating monocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:7771–7776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402914111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Puig-Kroger A, et al. Folate receptor β is expressed by tumor-associated macrophages and constitutes a marker for M2 anti-inflammatory/regulatory macrophages. Cancer Res. 2009;69:9395–9403. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ip WKE, Hoshi N, Shouval DS, Snapper S, Medzhitov R. Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 mediated by metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Science. 2017;356:513–519. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rojas OL, et al. Recirculating intestinal IgA-producing cells regulate neuroinflammation via IL-10. Cell. 2019;177:492–493. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meng LZ, et al. Bone marrow plasma cells modulate local myeloid-lineage differentiation via IL-10. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1183. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tian J, et al. Oral treatment with γ-aminobutyric acid improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity by inhibiting inflammation in high fat diet-fed mice. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tian J, Dang H, Nguyen AV, Chen Z, Kaufman DL, et al. Combined therapy with GABA and pdroinsulin/alum acts synergistically to restore long-term normoglycemia by modulating T-cell autoimmunity and promoting β-cell replication in newly diabetic NOD mice. Diabetes. 2014;63:3128–3134. doi: 10.2337/db13-1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bhandage AK, et al. GABA regulates release of inflammatory cytokines from peripheral blood mononuclear cells and CD4+ T cells and is immunosuppressive in type 1 diabetes. EBioMedicine. 2018;30:283–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Januzi L, et al. Autocrine GABA signaling distinctively regulates phenotypic activation of mouse pulmonary macrophages. Cell Immunol. 2018;332:7–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shao L, et al. The neurotransmitter receptor Gabbr1 regulates proliferation and function of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 2021;137:775–787. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019004415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tian J, Song M, Kaufman DL. Homotaurine limits the spreading of T cell autoreactivity within the CNS and ameliorates disease in a model of multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:5402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84751-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shalapour S, et al. Immunosuppressive plasma cells impede T-cell-dependent immunogenic chemotherapy. Nature. 2015;521:94–98. doi: 10.1038/nature14395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shalapour S, et al. Inflammation-induced IgA+ cells dismantle anti-liver cancer immunity. Nature. 2017;551:340–234. doi: 10.1038/nature24302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murakami Y, et al. Increased regulatory B cells are involved in immune evasion in patients with gastric cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:13083. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49581-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sjoberg E, et al. A minority-group of renal cell cancer patients with high infiltration of CD20+ B-cells is associated with poor prognosis. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;119:840–846. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0266-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Malissen M, et al. Altered T-cell development in mice with a targeted mutation of the Cd3-ε gene. EMBO J. 1995;14:4641–4653. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00146.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hobeika E, et al. Testing gene function early in the B cell lineage in Mb1-cre mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:13789–13794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605944103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Obata K, et al. GABA and synaptic inhibition of mouse cerebellum lacking glutamate decarboxylase 67. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008;370:429–433. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.03.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Miyajima M, et al. Metabolic shift induced by systemic activation of T cells in PD-1-deficient mice perturbs brain monoamines and emotional behavior. Nat. Immunol. 2017;18:1342–1352. doi: 10.1038/ni.3867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zeisel A, Yitzhaky A, Bossel Ben-Moshe N, Domany E. An accessible database for mouse and human whole transcriptome qPCR primers. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1355–1356. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhao C, Driessen T, Gammie SC. Glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 and 67 expression in the lateral septum is up-regulated in association with the postpartum period in mice. Brain Res. 2012;1470:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Deng B, Wehling-Henricks M, Villalta SA, Wang Y, Tidball JG. IL-10 triggers changes in macrophage phenotype that promote muscle growth and regeneration. J. Immunol. 2012;189:3669–3680. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kiselak EA, et al. Transcriptional regulation of an axonemal central apparatus gene, sperm-associated antigen 6, by a SRY-related high mobility group transcription factor, S-SOX5. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:30496–30505. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.121590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gallos G, et al. Airway epithelium is a predominant source of endogenous airway GABA and contributes to relaxation of airway smooth muscle tone. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2013;304:L191–L197. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00274.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang M, et al. Methionine commits cells to differentiate into plasmablasts through epigenetic regulation of BTB and CNC homolog 2 by the methyltransferase EZH2. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:1143–1153. doi: 10.1002/art.41208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nakano R, Kitanaka T, Namba S, Kitanaka N, Sugiya H. Protein kinase Cε regulates nuclear translocation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, which contributes to bradykinin-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:8535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26473-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nakano R, et al. Non-transcriptional and translational function of canonical NF-κB signaling in activating ERK1/2 in IL-1β-induced COX-2 expression in synovial fibroblasts. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:579266. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.579266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shiroguchi K, Jia TZ, Sims PA, Xie XS. Digital RNA sequencing minimizes sequence-dependent bias and amplification noise with optimized single-molecule barcodes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:1347–1352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118018109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Masuda T, Tomita M, Ishihama Y. Phase transfer surfactant-aided trypsin digestion for membrane proteome analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2008;7:731–740. doi: 10.1021/pr700658q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Masuda T, Saito N, Tomita M, Ishihama Y. Unbiased quantitation of Escherichia coli membrane proteome using phase transfer surfactants. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2009;8:2770–2777. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900240-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Reiter L, et al. mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:430–435. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rosenberger G, et al. Statistical control of peptide and protein error rates in large-scale targeted data-independent acquisition analyses. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:921–927. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D442–D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq datasets analysed are publicly available in the Gene Expression Omnibus with accession codes GSE169543 and GSE183246. The proteomics datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD028403. The gene chip datasets are provided in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. Source data are provided with this paper.
The DESeq2 (1.30.1) package was used to analyse RNA-seq data (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html).