Skip to main content
Nutrients logoLink to Nutrients
. 2021 Nov 8;13(11):3977. doi: 10.3390/nu13113977

Special Low Protein Foods Prescribed in England for PKU Patients: An Analysis of Prescribing Patterns and Cost

Georgina Wood 1,*, Alex Pinto 2, Sharon Evans 2, Anne Daly 2, Sandra Adams 3, Susie Costelloe 4, Joanna Gribben 5, Charlotte Ellerton 6, Anita Emm 7, Sarah Firman 5, Suzanne Ford 8, Moira French 9, Lisa Gaff 10, Emily Giuliano 11, Melanie Hill 12, Inderdip Hunjan 13, Camille Newby 14, Allison Mackenzie 15, Rachel Pereira 16, Celine Prescott 10, Louise Robertson 17, Heidi Seabert 18, Rachel Skeath 19, Simon Tapley 20, Allyson Terry 21, Alison Tooke 22, Karen van Wyk 23, Fiona J White 23, Lucy White 24, Alison Woodall 25, Júlio César Rocha 26,27,28, Anita MacDonald 2
Editor: Adamasco Cupisti
PMCID: PMC8620831  PMID: 34836232

Abstract

Patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) are reliant on special low protein foods (SLPFs) as part of their dietary treatment. In England, several issues regarding the accessibility of SLPFs through the national prescribing system have been highlighted. Therefore, prescribing patterns and expenditure on all SLPFs available on prescription in England (n = 142) were examined. Their costs in comparison to regular protein-containing (n = 182) and ‘free-from’ products (n = 135) were also analysed. Similar foods were grouped into subgroups (n = 40). The number of units and costs of SLPFs prescribed in total and per subgroup from January to December 2020 were calculated using National Health Service (NHS) Business Service Authority (NHSBSA) ePACT2 (electronic Prescribing Analysis and Cost Tool) for England. Monthly patient SLPF units prescribed were calculated using patient numbers with PKU and non-PKU inherited metabolic disorders (IMD) consuming SLPFs. This was compared to the National Society for PKU (NSPKU) prescribing guidance. Ninety-eight percent of SLPF subgroups (n = 39/40) were more expensive than regular and ‘free-from’ food subgroups. However, costs to prescribe SLPFs are significantly less than theoretical calculations. From January to December 2020, 208,932 units of SLPFs were prescribed (excluding milk replacers), costing the NHS £2,151,973 (including milk replacers). This equates to £962 per patient annually, and prescribed amounts are well below the upper limits suggested by the NSPKU, indicating under prescribing of SLPFs. It is recommended that a simpler and improved system should be implemented. Ideally, specialist metabolic dietitians should have responsibility for prescribing SLPFs. This would ensure that patients with PKU have the necessary access to their essential dietary treatment, which, in turn, should help promote dietary adherence and improve metabolic control.

Keywords: special low protein foods, phenylketonuria, England, prescribing patterns, costs

1. Introduction

Phenylketonuria (PKU), an inborn error of amino acid metabolism, is caused by phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency, an enzyme that converts phenylalanine to tyrosine [1]. This leads to neurotoxicity, causing severe intellectual disability if untreated [2]. It is managed by a life-long phenylalanine-restricted diet supplemented with a phenylalanine free/low phenylalanine protein substitute, although adjunct pharmacological therapies may also be prescribed to some patients [2,3]. In particular, patients with classical PKU require severe restrictions of natural protein, commonly tolerating ≤25% of a normal protein intake [1,2]. Regular protein containing foods e.g., bread, flour and pasta, are replaced with special low protein foods (SLPFs) that contain minimal protein [2,3]. These deliver a substantial source of energy, providing up to 50% of daily energy intake [4,5,6], fibre [7], they offer essential bulk, add variety and so help to sustain dietary adherence and ultimately aid metabolic control [8,9,10].

The cost of SLPFs to patients in England is reimbursed by the National Health Service (NHS), as these foods are considered borderline substances and are available on NHS prescription [11,12,13]. Borderline substances are nutritional or dermatological products specifically formulated to manage a medical condition [12]. There are around 150 SLPFs available on borderline substance prescription in England [13]. Each SLPF is approved by the United Kingdom (UK) Advisory Committee on Borderline Substances (ACBS) [12,13,14], which considers the clinical need of a product, its efficacy and the total price to the NHS [15]. Manufacturers/suppliers of SLPFs provide the ACBS with a statement outlining the proposed NHS list price and any distribution costs charged to dispensers [15]. For SLPFs that are broadly similar to existing products, the ACBS recommends a maximum benchmark cost to the NHS for that category [15]. When a company chooses to increase their NHS list price and maintain ‘ACBS status’, price increases are benchmarked against a standard inflation comparator [15].

General Practitioners (GPs) issue prescriptions for SLPFs monthly on request, which are then dispensed through local pharmacists or specialist home delivery companies linked to the suppliers of SLPFs [16]. The NHS then pays pharmacists or dispensing doctors a fee for each item they dispense [17,18]. The National Society for PKU (NSPKU) has produced a guide outlining the maximum monthly number of units of SLPFs (e.g., 1 unit = 1 pack of pasta up to 500 g—see Appendix A for full list of definitions for each product) which can be prescribed [19,20]. This guide considers patient age and circumstances to support GPs in prescribing these products and to ensure that expenditure on SLPFs is controlled. This guide has been widely adopted by GPs. In England, NHS prescriptions are free of charge for patients in the following categories: under 16 years of age; aged 16–18 years if in full time education; over 60 years of age; pregnant; receive income support or in other specific circumstances [21]. All other patients must pay a set fee per item, or they can purchase a three-monthly or annual prescription prepayment certificate which covers all of their NHS prescriptions [21].

However, there are many challenges in accessing SLPFs with the current prescribing system [16,22]. Some patients with PKU report that they have had their prescription requests refused; some describe how their GPs advise that they should purchase these foods rather than obtain them on prescription [16]. Others report that their GPs refuse to prescribe the appropriate range of products, as they consider some foods luxury items (e.g., cake mix or cereal bars) or the quantity of SLPFs is reduced due to their costs [16]. In a study by MacDonald et al., 2019, 43% (n = 25/58) of caregivers and parents said they needed more SLPFs for their children than they had been prescribed [22]. These challenges will impact on nutritional intake, directly affecting nutritional status and ultimately metabolic control.

Although studies have considered the cost of SLPFs, the majority were conducted outside the UK, where different reimbursement systems exist [23,24,25,26]. One study compared the theoretical costs in 10 international centres, where costs of SLPFs in the UK appeared to be higher than in many other countries [11]. Two nonpeer reviewed articles also discussed the theoretical cost of SLPFs in the UK and suggested that some SLPFs are expensive, but emphasised they are essential in the management of PKU [27,28]. Several papers have discussed costs when looking at the challenges of living with PKU in the UK, but this has not been the single focus of their work [3,16,22,29,30]. No study has compared the costs of SLPFs with regular foods or foods used in other therapeutic diets. Furthermore, no study has considered the prescribing pattern of SLPFs for low protein diets in England, or the UK as a whole.

This study therefore aimed to:

  • (1)

    examine the cost of all SLPFs on NHS prescription in England and compare these with similar regular equivalent protein containing and ‘free-from’ dietary foods available in the supermarkets; and

  • (2)

    determine NHS expenditure on SLPFs and examine the number of SLPF units prescribed annually in England

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cost of SLPFs in England in Comparison to Regular Foods and ‘Free-From’ Foods

Data was collected from August to October 2020 on the price of all individual SLPFs available on ACBS prescription in England using British National Formulary (BNF) resources (Website, mobile phone app and book) and from the following suppliers or manufacturers websites if prices were stated:

  1. Promin—https://prominpku.com/shop (accessed on 3 October 2020) [31]

  2. Taranis—https://prominpku.com/shop (accessed on 3 October 2020) [31]

  3. Metax—https://prominpku.com/shop (accessed on 3 October 2020) [31]

When individual prices of items were unavailable or unclear, companies were contacted directly via email. The cost per kg of each SLPF was calculated. SLPFs were divided into 40 subgroups of equivalent food product types, e.g., low protein burgers, sausages, cookies/biscuits, cake mixes. The mean and range costs across subgroups of similar products were calculated.

The mean and range cost per kg were collected and calculated for at least two regular protein-containing comparable foods and at least two ‘free-from’ comparable foods, from major supermarkets in England with data available online (ASDA, Morrisons, Sainsburys, Tesco, Waitrose, Ocado and Marks & Spencer). A ‘free-from’ food was defined as a food made without one or more specific ingredients, designed for people with food allergies or other intolerances/diseases e.g., coeliac disease. If data was unavailable from a supermarket’s website, it was obtained from alternative online shops or directly from the manufacturer. Where prices differed between supermarkets for the same regular protein-containing food or ‘free-from’ food, the mean value was recorded. Percentage differences between SLPFs and regular/’free-from’ food subgroups for all mean costs were determined. Variations within ± 10% were considered comparable.

2.2. NHS Prescribing Patterns for SLPFs and Expenditure in England

One of the authors (A.P.) was given approval to access and extract prescribing data about SLPFs from the NHS Business Service Authority (NHSBSA) ePACT2 (electronic Prescribing Analysis and Cost Tool 2) for the costs and quantity of SLPFs prescribed in total and for each subgroup in England. This tool provided access to prescription data from the NHSBSA from January to December 2020. An ePACT2 bespoke training session was arranged with NHSBSA to ensure that all data was obtained and interpreted correctly. NSPKU prescribing guidance describing the definition of one unit for each SLPF was used to calculate the number of units of SLPFs prescribed in total and for each subgroup (Appendix A) [19,20].

In order to estimate the number of patients with PKU cared for by NHS centres in England, all NHS centres known to treat and monitor PKU patients were contacted in order to determine the number of patients with PKU (paediatric and adult), the number on dietary treatment (defined as those receiving prescribed protein substitutes and therefore potentially SLPFs), the number of shared care patients and the number of non-PKU inherited metabolic disorders (IMD) patients accessing SLPFs. Information was supplied by dietitians working in n = 26 NHS England hospitals/centres who care for patients with PKU. These data were used to calculate how many units of SLPFs were being prescribed per patient per month and the cost to the NHS per patient per month in England. This was then compared to NSPKU prescribing guidance.

3. Results

3.1. SLPFs, Regular Foods and Free-From Foods Costing Comparison

One hundred and forty-six SLPFs were identified as being available on ACBS prescription in England, with these products grouped and further subcategorised for comparison with at least two regular food products per subgroup. Regular and ‘free-from’ comparators for four SLPFs (Calogen neutral, Calogen banana, Calogen strawberry and Duocal—Nutricia) were unavailable. Thus, 142 SLPFs were available for comparison with 182 regular products and 135 ‘free-from’ products. Table 1 displays all SLPF, regular product and ‘free-from’ food subgroups (n = 40), the mean cost per kg of products within each subgroup and % differences between costs.

Table 1.

Cost of low protein, regular and ‘free-from’ food products for each subgroup and the % differences between costs.

Subgroup SLPFs Regular Protein-Containing Foods Free-From’ Foods % Difference between SLPFs and Regular Foods % Difference between SLPFs and ‘Free-From’ Foods
n Cost (£/kg) n Cost (£/kg) n Cost (£/kg)
Bread/pizza bases
Bread 12 11.11 12 2.67 11 6.30 316% 76%
(8.23–16.13) (1.31–5.00) (3.27–11.40)
Pizza base 1 19.80 2 5.17 2 9.93 283% 99%
(4.00–6.33) (9.86–10.00)
Pasta/rice/noodles
Pasta/rice/ 33 15.28 23 2.60 16 3.65 488% 319%
noodles (8.80–19.10) (1.20–5.04) (1.20–7.50)
Pasta and sauces (prepared) 5 16.16 10 2.61 6 9.36 519% 73%
(8.82–26.25) (1.11–4.98) (7.50–13.32)
Risotto 1 22.00 2 6.82 2 7.50 223% 193%
(6.49–7.14) (7.50–7.50)
Xpots/pot noodles 4 92.50 8 7.44 4 24.32 1143% 280%
(92.50–92.50) (4.00–9.09) (16.67–40.32)
Flour/mixes
Bread mix 1 11.96 2 1.64 2 1.72 629% 595%
(1.28–2.00) (1.69–1.75)
Cake mix 4 15.64 4 4.27 4 6.95 266% 125%
(13.94–19.36) (1.20–5.29) (4.57–9.97)
Flour/All Purpose Mix 5 14.80 2 1.37 2 1.60 980% 825%
(11.90–18.02) (1.21–1.54) (1.50–1.70)
Pancake/ 1 15.33 2 5.14 2 8.34 198% 84%
waffle mix (5.00–5.28) (7.00–9.68)
Egg/replacers
Egg (prepared) 3 3.01 2 3.24 2 1.46 -7% 106%
(1.89–4.08) (2.46–4.02) (1.36–1.55)
Egg whites (powder) 1 108.10 2 49.92 2 16.02 117% 575%
(40.00–59.83) (15.00–17.04)
Milk/replacers
Milk (liquid) 5 5.84 2 0.48 2 1.06 1117% 451%
(4.05–6.75) (0.48–0.48) (0.59–1.53)
Milk (powder) 1 22.38 2 7.64 2 17.56 193% 27%
(5.89–9.39) (15.16–19.96)
Meat/replacers
Burgers (prepared) 3 16.88 4 6.04 4 7.44 179% 127%
(8.82–20.91) (5.02–7.35) (4.02–10.00)
Fish (prepared) 1 18.07 2 10.03 2 11.78 80% 53%
(8.25–11.81) (11.67–11.88)
Sausages 3 23.72 6 5.10 4 8.47 365% 180%
(prepared) (23.72–23.72) (3.06–6.88) (6.67–9.26)
Breakfast and cereal bars
Breakfast bar 4 42.08 8 11.30 4 13.83 272% 204%
(42.08–42.08) (6.42–15.28) (8.57–18.18)
Breakfast cereal (dry) 3 23.35 6 4.84 6 6.18 382% 278%
(23.07–23.92) (2.37–6.17) (4.50–10.56)
Fruit bar 1 37.60 2 6.63 2 13.23 467% 184%
(4.28–8.99) (11.25–15.20)
Hot breakfast cereal (dry) 4 25.11 4 10.61 4 11.45 137% 119%
(25.00–25.45) (6.00–20.52) (8.33–14.55)
Snacks
Biscuits/ 7 43.37 10 8.03 8 10.39 440% 317%
cookies (33.60–68.52) (1.05–25.00) (6.50–17.86)
Breadsticks 1 41.87 2 8.20 2 14.69 411% 185%
(5.60–10.79) (12.76–16.62)
Cake 3 26.00 2 5.58 2 13.04 366% 99%
(26.00–26.00) (5.41–5.75) (11.58–14.49)
Chocolate 2 52.32 2 7.62 2 12.08 587% 332%
(49.10–55.54) (7.44–7.81) (11.30–12.86)
Crackers 3 25.38 6 7.07 4 12.58 259% 102%
(24.00–26.07) (3.25–9.56) (12.00–13.81)
Crisps 4 37.50 8 8.46 4 16.05 343% 134%
(37.50–37.50) (6.67–10.33) (14.71–17.39)
Crispbread crackers 1 32.80 2 2.66 2 8.93 1133% 267%
(1.33–3.98) (8.89–8.98)
French toast crackers 1 20.00 2 6.35 2 11.24 215% 78%
(6.25–6.45) (10.80–11.67)
Hazelnut spread 1 35.43 2 5.16 2 10.55 587% 236%
(2.88–7.43) (9.30–11.80)
Desserts
Dessert pot 2 20.30 4 5.99 2 7.71 239% 163%
(20.30–20.30) (4.69–7.14) (2.93–12.50)
Flavoured pudding (powder) 4 30.68 7 9.79 2 29.00
(13.00–45.00)
213% 6%
(30.68–30.68) (6.65–11.43)
Jelly (unprepared) 2 25.59 2 4.18 2 15.88 512% 61%
(25.59–25.59) (4.16–4.19) (15.88–15.88)
Rice pudding 4 24.35 6 3.26 2 8.25 647% 195%
(24.35–24.35) (2.17–3.86) (8.00–8.50)
Yogurt 1 7.19 2 2.68 2 3.13 168% 130%
(2.30–3.05) (2.50–3.75)
Other snacks/meals
Cheese sauce 1 24.18 2 7.47 2 13.02 224% 86%
(6.58–8.36) (10.77–15.27)
Croutons 1 42.94 2 10.26 2 25.84 319% 66%
(10.00–10.52) (18.51–33.17)
Potato cakes 1 8.68 2 3.07 2 4.37 183% 99%
(2.68–3.45) (1.33–7.41)
Potato pots/dehydrated potato 3 87.25 4 9.21 2 23.46 847% 272%
(87.25–87.25) (6.25–12.62) (20.00–26.93)
Soup 4 53.85 8 13.03 4 26.67 313% 102%
(48.57–59.18) (9.26–16.29) (15.88–34.10)

Abbreviations: n = number of products; SLPFs = special low protein foods. Values displayed as mean (range).

Sixty-eight of 142 SLPFs (48%) were unavailable on BNF resources at the time of data collection (August to October 2020), and therefore, their costs had to be obtained directly from the manufacturer or supplier’s website or through email contact with the manufacturer/supplier.

When analysed by subgroup, all SLPFs were more expensive than regular foods and ‘free-from’ foods, except for regular eggs and ‘free-from’ flavour puddings, where their cost per kg was comparable to low protein equivalents.

Low protein crispbread crackers, Xpots (low protein equivalent of a pot noodle) and milk replacements (liquid) had the highest percentage cost difference, being 1117% to 1143% more expensive than the regular food comparator. When compared to ‘free-from’ foods, low protein flour, bread mix and egg whites had the highest percentage differences (575% to 825%) in costs. In contrast, low protein milk powder, fish substitute and jelly were only 27% to 61% more expensive than their ‘free-from’ food comparators. Basic SLPFs, including bread, pasta, rice, noodles and milk replacers (liquid), were 76% to 451% more expensive than ‘free-from’ equivalent foods.

3.2. NHS Prescribing and Costing Data in England for SLPFs

Table 2 displays the prescribing and costing data for SLPFs from January–December 2020.

Table 2.

Number of units, actual cost of prescribing SLPFs, and percentage of total units and total actual costs of all SLPFs by subgroup from January to December 2020 by the NHS for England.

Subgroup Number of Units Prescribed from January to December 2020 Actual Costs * from January to December 2020 (£) For the Year of January to December 2020
Total Monthly Average Total Monthly Average % of Total Units of SLPFs Prescribed % of Total Actual Cost of SLPFs Prescribed
Bread/pizza bases
Bread (n = 12) 42,171 3514 232,873 19,406 20.2% 10.8%
Pizza base (n = 1) 3382 282 38,566 3214 1.6% 1.8%
Pasta/rice/noodles
Pasta/rice/noodles (n = 33) 39,043 3254 295,619 24,635 18.7% 13.7%
Pasta and sauces (prepared) (n = 5) 3574 298 37,592 3133 1.7% 1.7%
Risotto (n = 1) 258 22 2758 230 0.1% 0.1%
Xpots (n = 4) 1682 140 36,023 3002 0.8% 1.7%
Flour/mixes
Bread mix (n = 1) 2111 176 11,780 982 1.0% 0.5%
Cake mix (n = 4) 6790 566 53,697 4475 3.2% 2.5%
Flour/All Purpose Mix (n = 5) 32,720 2727 239,559 19,963 15.7% 11.1%
Pancake/waffle mix (n = 1) 700 58 3565 297 0.3% 0.2%
Egg replacers
Egg replacer (n = 3) 1312 109 16,412 1368 0.6% 0.8%
Egg white replacer (n = 1) 334 28 3398 283 0.2% 0.2%
Milk replacers
Milk replacer (liquid) (n = 5) n/a n/a 655,437 54,620 n/a 30.5%
Milk replacer (powder) (n = 1) n/a n/a 1623 135 n/a 0.1%
Meat/fish replacers
Burger replacements (n = 3) 4601 383 53,038 4420 2.2% 2.5%
Fish replacement (n = 1) 358 30 4069 339 0.2% 0.2%
Sausage replacements (n = 3) 7591 633 59,545 4962 3.6% 2.8%
Breakfast and cereal bars
Breakfast bar (n = 4) 1595 133 16,876 1406 0.8% 0.8%
Breakfast cereal (dried) (n = 3) 6073 506 50,533 4211 2.9% 2.3%
Fruit bar (n = 1) 6424 535 28,863 2405 3.1% 1.3%
Hot breakfast cereal (n = 4) 3264 272 27,511 2293 1.6% 1.3%
Snacks
Biscuits/cookies (n = 7) 9841 820 65,126 5427 4.7% 3.0%
Breadsticks (n = 1) 653 93 ** 3928 561 ** 0.3% 0.2%
Cake (n = 3) 3827 319 26,619 2218 1.8% 1.2%
Chocolate (n = 2) 7299 608 46,714 3893 3.5% 2.2%
Crackers (n = 3) 12,331 1028 50,952 4246 5.9% 2.4%
Crisps (n = 4) 1015 85 7528 627 0.5% 0.3%
Crispbread crackers (n = 1) 180 15 920 77 0.1% 0.0%
French toast crackers (n = 1) 270 23 1402 117 0.1% 0.1%
Hazelnut spread (n = 1) 812 68 7219 602 0.4% 0.3%
Desserts
Dessert pot (n = 2) 1548 129 14,782 1232 0.7% 0.7%
Flavoured pudding (dried) (n = 4) 3188 266 21,439 1787 1.5% 1.0%
Jelly (dried) (n = 2) 196 16 1728 144 0.1% 0.1%
Rice pudding (n = 4) 1156 96 7961 663 0.6% 0.4%
Yogurt substitute (n = 1) 203 17 3855 321 0.1% 0.2%
Other snacks/meals
Cheese sauce (n = 1) 288 24 1716 143 0.1% 0.1%
Croutons (n = 1) 328 27 2292 191 0.2% 0.1%
Potato cakes (n = 1) 311 26 2002 167 0.1% 0.1%
Potato pots (n = 3) 676 56 11,677 973 0.3% 0.5%
Soup (n = 4) 827 69 4776 398 0.4% 0.2%
TOTAL 208,932 17,451 2151,973 179,566 100% 100%

Abbreviations: n = number of products; SLPFs = special low protein foods * Actual Costs on ePACT2 is calculated as the Net Ingredient Cost of the item(s) supplied, less the National Average Discount Percentage (NADP) plus Payment for Consumables, Out of Pocket Expenses and Payment for Containers. ** Data from June 2020–December 2020 only.

In total, 208,932 units of SLPFs (monthly mean of 17,451 units) were prescribed from January to December 2020. This equated to a total actual cost of £2,151,973 (monthly mean cost of £179,566). The most frequently prescribed subgroups were bread, pasta/rice and flour, in total equating to 54.6% of all SLPFs prescribed. Milk replacers accounted for the highest percentage (30.5%) of the total actual cost of these products. There is not a definition for a unit of milk replacer, as the amount prescribed should be determined on an individual patient basis (Appendix A) [19,20]. Flour, pasta/rice and bread each accounted for just over 10% of total actual cost of SLPFs from January to December 2020 (11.1%, 13.7% and 10.8%, respectively).

Other expenses included payment for containers, consumables and out of pocket expenses, contributing 4.4% (£94,669) of the annual SLPFs costs to the NHS in England. Out of pocket expenses reimbursed to the pharmacy may include: postage and packaging costs; handling costs; and the cost of phone calls to manufacturers or suppliers to order products [32]. Payment at a rate of 10p for every prescription item is paid for containers where the quantity of a prescription item is ordered outside of the pack size or a multiple of the pack size (except for those granted ‘special container status’ where it is not practical to split a pack) [33]. An additional payment of 1.24p is made for all prescriptions including SLPFs in case additional consumables may need to be dispensed by the pharmacist (e.g., oral syringes, measuring spoons), although SLPFs usually do not need additional consumables. [33]. Also, a dispensing fee of £1.29 is allocated for each item prescribed [18].

3.3. NHS Patient Prescribing and Costing Data for SLPFs in England Compared to NSPKU Guidelines

Patients with PKU are the major consumers of SLPFs. It is estimated that there were 2359 patients with PKU in hospital follow-up in England (1436 adult patients, 923 paediatric patients), with n = 1814 (77%) on dietary treatment (Table 3). There were a further 422 patients using SLPFs with other inherited metabolic disorders of protein metabolism in England, suggesting that approximately 2236 patients in total were accessing SLPFs. On average, 93 units were prescribed per patient per year, which equates to approximately 8 units per month per patient. This is significantly less than the recommended maximum number of units per patient that could be prescribed each month as outlined by the NSPKU (Table 4). Actual cost data suggest that it costs a monthly mean of £80 per patient.

Table 3.

Number of patients in England with PKU and/or using SLPFs under the care of an NHS hospital/centre.

Centre Number of PKU Paediatric
Patients ***
Number of PKU Adult
Patients ***
Number of Patients on Full/Partial Phe-Restricted Diet Number of Non-PKU Inherited Metabolic Disorder Patients Using SLPFs
Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital 110 0 110 15
Evelina London Children’s Healthcare—part of Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust 168 0 144 55
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust—Adult IMD service 0 195 145 10
Great Ormond Street Hospital 163 0 159 53
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust—Queen Elizabeth Hospital 0 153 134 30
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 0 378 235 30
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 58 0 58 21
Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital 96 0 96 27
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children 71 0 67 18
North Bristol NHS Trust 0 58 41 1
Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust 54 0 54 17
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust 0 334 186 58
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 14 36 47—of which 14 are paediatric patients 3
Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust 52 0 42 21
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 0 160 90 20
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust 13 0 10 12
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust 24 0 24 9
Great North Children’s Hospital—within the Royal Victoria Infirmary 64 0 63 9
Royal Victoria Infirmary—Adult IMD services 0 74 43 5
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital 15 0 15 -
Royal Derby Hospital 6 6 6—all of which are paediatric patients -
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (1) 8 (+1) 5 (+1) 3
Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust 1 (+1) 9 5 (+1)—1 of which is a paediatric patient and not shared care 2
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust 4 (+7) 23 (+1) 23 (+8)—4 of which are paediatric patients and not shared care 3
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust 10 2 12—10 of which are paediatric patients 0
University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust 0 (21) (20) 0
TOTAL 923 1436 1814—877 of which are paediatric patients 422

Abbreviations: SLPFs = special low protein foods; PKU = phenylketonuria; Phe = phenylalanine. ( ) shared care with another unit so numbers not included in totals. *** This includes patients with mild PKU/hyperphenylalaninaemia who maintain phenylalanine levels within target therapeutic range without dietary treatment.

Table 4.

NSPKU guideline for recommended amounts of special low protein products per month [19] compared with monthly average per patient estimated in the current study which does not include milk replacers.

Age of Patient with PKU Recommended Maximum Number of SLPFs to Prescribe Each Month (Not Including Milk Replacers) Estimated Number of SLPFs Prescribed Per Person Each month (Not Including Milk Replacers)
4 months–3 years 20 units 8 units
4–6 years 25 units
7–10 years 30 units
11–18 years 50 units
Adults 50 units
Pre-conception/Pregnancy 50 units

Abbreviations: SLPFs = special low protein foods; PKU = phenylketonuria; NSPKU = The National Society for Phenylketonuria.

For the 877 paediatric patients with PKU on full or partial diet, it was estimated that 20% were aged 4 months–3 years (n = 175), 20% 4–6 years (n = 175), 20% 7–10 years (n = 175) and 40% 11–18 years (n = 352). Therefore, if all of these children, combined with adults with PKU on a full or partial diet (n = 937) were receiving the maximum number of low protein items on prescription each month, as per NSPKU guidance (Table 4), this would equate to 77,575 units each month. This is much higher than the average monthly prescribed units of 17,451 (excluding milk replacers) for the calendar year of 2020.

4. Discussion

This is the first study to examine the cost of all SLPFs available on prescription in England compared to regular and ‘free-from’ foods available in supermarkets. It is also the first study to examine the number and type of low protein items prescribed and expenditure on individual SLPFs and total SLPFs prescribed by the NHS in England over 1 year. There is a lower than expected volume of SLPFs prescribed in England, meaning that the costs to prescribe these products are significantly less than theoretically calculated [11,28], with a total of 17,451 units per month, costing £179,566. This equates to an estimated annual cost to the NHS per person with PKU in England of £962 with just 8 units (excluding low protein milk) prescribed per person per month, indicating that patients are receiving significantly less than the upper NSPKU prescribing guidance [16,19,20].

Over half (54.6%) of the units of SLPFs prescribed from January to December 2020 were basic foods such as bread, flour/mixes and pasta/rice. This accounted for just over one-third (35.6%) of the total annual costs. Just under a third (30.5%) of the costs were attributed to prescribing special low protein milks (liquid). It is likely that it is primarily children accessing SLPFs, as recent research suggested that it is mainly children aged <10 years with PKU who use prescribed special low protein milks [6]. There was previous concern that there may be over prescription of sweet SLPFs [8]. In Scotland, a 2014 survey found that special low protein pasta/rice/couscous, biscuits and flour were most commonly ordered by children, whereas adults with PKU mainly ordered pasta/rice/couscous, flour and bread [8]. In contrast, the amount of special low protein snacks and desserts (n = 14/40 subgroups including low protein chocolate, cookies, biscuits, cakes, and crisps) prescribed in England was minimal, with each subgroup only accounting for 0.1–5.9% of all SLPFs prescribed and contributing just 0.1–3.0% of the total NHS expenditure on SLPFs from January to December 2020. This is consistent with research reporting that special low protein cakes, biscuits and chocolate provide minimal contributions to daily energy intake in children with PKU [6]. It is clear that the expenditure on prescribing SLPFs is limited, particularly for sweet foods.

Overall, very little is known about SLPFs usage by adults with PKU in England. Our study suggests that 35% of adults with PKU were not following a phenylalanine restricted diet (Table 3). Although some adult patients may use SLPFs, others may not attempt to access them due to the complexity of the access system or the costs of the prescription fee for every food item ordered, unless the individual is entitled to free prescriptions. In one UK survey, 15% of patients with PKU stated that recurrent access problems with SLPFs was frustrating, and even led them to abandon their dietary treatment [16]. GP administration staff have been described as unhelpful, judgemental or obstructive when ordering SLPFs [8,16]; home delivery services are complex and sometimes unreliable, and SLPFs may arrive out of date or damaged, or of poor quality [16]. Some children with PKU were not on dietary treatment or not accessing SLPFs; this was associated with mild PKU, a higher natural protein tolerance, using sapropterin as an adjunct therapy, young infants not yet on solids or a dislike of SLPFs.

It is understandable that SLPFs cost more than regular and ‘free-from’ foods. The demand for SLPFs is small in a limited global market. Few companies manufacture or distribute SLPFs in the UK [13]. Production runs are small scale with high staffing ratios, leading to increased costs. Some of the raw ingredients and packaging materials are purchased in low volumes, increasing productions costs. Packaging may be subject to frequent label changes due to alterations in legislation. Manufacturing wastage may be high if final products do not meet the necessary standards. Manufacturers also need to make some profit to allow them to invest in research and development to improve and expand their SLPF range.

The availability, accessibility and cost of SLPFs vary between countries [5,7,8,11,13,23,24,25,34]. Comparisons are challenging due to differences in currency, age of patients, degree of dietary adherence and study methodology. China reported a mean cost of $573 (American dollars or approximately £415) a year per patient for SLPFs [25], whereas the United States of America found a mean cost of $1615 (approximately £1171) for children aged 0–17 years for SLPFs and just $967 (approximately £701) for adults [23]. The Netherlands reported a mean annual cost of €680 (approximately £576) on SLPFs, whereas the Czech Republic found this value to be significantly higher at €1560 (approximately £1321) [24,26].

The overall use of SLPFs is affected by the national access system and any consequential economic burden [11,23,24,25,26]. Some countries do not reimburse SLPFs costs; but may be funded by insurance coverage [11,24]. When national reimbursement schemes do not exist, families have to self-finance the purchase of SLPFs [11,23,25,26]. This is a huge financial burden for patients, which influences their ability to adhere to dietary treatment [11,23,25,26].

For patients with PKU to have better access to SLPFs through the NHS, several recommendations should be implemented. Consistent with previous suggestions by MacDonald et al. and Ford et al. [16,22], specialist metabolic dietitians should play a key role in prescribing SLPFs, as they control dietary management and oversee any dietary changes according to the individual patient’s metabolic control, nutritional needs, growth and overall nutritional status. This would be more efficient, minimise administration time and professional and patient confusion and enable patients with PKU to have minimal contact with healthcare professionals/prescribers who know very little about their condition and how it is managed. Instead, their SLPF prescriptions would be managed by those who are most equipped to support them in meeting their dietary needs and maintaining good metabolic control.

This study has some limitations. When obtaining the cost of each SLPF in August–October 2020, 68 products were not visible on any BNF resource, and therefore, prices were obtained directly from the manufacturer or supplier of SLPFs. The selection of protein-containing foods and ‘free-from’ foods as comparators, and how the products were grouped, was subjective. Certain powdered/dried SLPF products e.g., burger mix, had to be compared to a prepared regular protein-containing or ‘free-from’ product e.g., cooked burger; therefore, the cost of the SLPF in its prepared form per kg was estimated. This study only examined products accessible on prescription in England compared with protein-containing products and ‘free-from’ foods available from supermarket websites in England. Also, NHS prescribing and costing data were only available for England and not the whole of the UK, and were only collected from January to December 2020. From March 2020 onwards, England experienced multiple ‘lockdowns’ due to the coronavirus pandemic, and it is possible that this may have affected food behaviours and, consequently, the number and/or types of SLPFs that patients were requesting on prescription. However, there was no evidence from clinical practice that use or supplies of SLPFs were affected in England.

When calculating the number of units of SLPF and the costs per person with PKU in England, the numbers of patients on dietary treatment were estimated. However, dietetic colleagues throughout England provided representative and recent data from their clinics. It is difficult to state exactly how many patients were requesting SLPFs, as we did not examine individual prescribing data for each patient. On ePACT2, there were nine occasions in 2020 where a SLPF appeared on a prescription, but the quantity prescribed was unclear. Consequently, these data were removed from our spreadsheet. It is possible that there may be under-reporting of SLPFs by the NHSBSA ePACT2. The NHSBSA ePACT2 trainers/help team stated that there was a small possibility that data can be incorrectly processed, but that data is scanned from each prescription form directly, so the NHSBSA ePACT2 should accurately reflect all the prescriptions issued in England.

5. Conclusions

The annual cost to the NHS in England to prescribe SLPFs is £962 per patient with PKU and non-PKU IMD conditions. Surveys have repeatedly shown that patients or caregivers have access difficulties with current systems. If patients with PKU are expected to adhere to their dietary treatment for life, they must be able to easily access all SLPFs on prescription in a timely manner via the NHS. Given how little is currently being spent on prescribing SLPFs in England in comparison to the upper NSPKU guidance, cost should not be given as a reason to restrict a patient’s access to their essential dietary treatment. A review of how SLPFs are prescribed, supplied and controlled is warranted to improve the system, which, in turn, could lead to increased dietary adherence and improved patient outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to the manufacturers and suppliers of special low protein foods for providing data on their products. Thank you to the NHSBSA for giving A.P. permission to access prescribing data on special low protein foods and providing support and guidance with running our reports on ePACT2.

Appendix A

Table A1.

Definition of 1 unit for each SLPF (table adapted slightly from NSPKU special low protein foods on prescription document) [20].

Burger Mixes, Sausage Mixes Pack Size Number of Units
Firstplay Dietary Foods:
Promin Low Protein Burger Mix: -
Lamb & Mint Flavour 4 × 62 g 1
Original Flavour 4 × 62 g 1
Promin Low Protein Sausage Mix: -
Apple and Sage 4 × 30 g 1
Original 4 × 30 g 1
Tomato and Basil 4 × 30 g 1
Mevalia
Low Protein Burger Mix 350 g 1
Taranis
Low Protein Fish Substitute 4 × 62 g sachets 1
Bread, Flour and Mixes Pack Size Number of Units
Fate Special Foods
Fate Low Protein All-Purpose Mix 500 g 1
Fate Low Protein Cake Mix 2x 250 g 1
Fate Low Protein Chocolate Flavour Cake Mix 2 × 250 g 1
Firstplay Dietary Foods
Promin Low Protein All Purpose Baking Mix 1000 g 2
Promin Low Protein Fresh Baked Bread Buns 6 × 75 g 1
Promin Low Protein Fresh Baked Sliced Brown Bread 4 × 400 g loaves 4
Promin Low Protein Fresh Baked Sliced White Bread 4 × 800 g loaves 4
Promin Low Protein Potato Cake Mix 300 g 1
Taranis:
Taranis Low Protein Natural Cake Mix 300 g 1
Taranis Low Protein Pancakes & Waffles Mix 300 g 1
Gluten Free Foods (PK Foods):
PK Foods All Purpose Low Protein Flour Mix 750 g 1.5
PK Foods Low Protein White Sliced Bread 300 g 1
Juvela
Juvela Low protein Bread Rolls 5 rolls 1
Juvela Low Protein Loaf—sliced 400 g 1
Juvela Low Protein Mix 500 g 1
Mevalia
Mevalia Low Protein Bread Mix 500 g 1
Mevalia Low Protein Ciabattine 4 × 65 g 0.5
Mevalia Low Protein Grissini (Breadsticks) 150 g (3 × 50 g) 1
Mevalia Low Protein Mini Baguette 2 × 100 g 0.5
Mevalia Low Protein Pan Carre 2 × 200 g 0.5
Mevalia Low Protein Pan Rustico 2 × 200 g 0.5
Mevalia Low Protein Pane Casereccio 220 g 0.5
Mevalia Low Protein Pizza Base 2 × 150 g 0.5
Nutricia:
Loprofin Low Protein Part-Baked Sliced Bread 400 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Mix 500 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Chocolate Cake Mix 500 g 1
Pasta and Rice Pack Size Number of Units
Firstplay Dietary Foods
Promin Low Protein Pasta:
Low Protein Alphabets 500 g 1
Low Protein Elbows 500 g 1
Low Protein Flat Noodles 500 g 1
Low Protein Macaroni 500 g 1
Low Protein Shells 500 g 1
Low Protein Short Cut Spaghetti 500 g 1
Low Protein Spirals 500 g 1
Promin Low Protein Tricolour:
Low Protein Alphabets 500 g 1
Low Protein Elbows 500 g 1
Low Protein Shells 500 g 1
Low Protein Spirals 500 g 1
Promin Low Protein Specialty Pasta:
Low Protein Couscous 500 g 1
Low Protein Lasagne Sheets 200 g 0.5
Low Protein Pastameal 500 g 1
Low Protein Rice 500 g 1
Promin Pasta in Sauce:
Low Protein Cheese and Broccoli 4 × 66 g 1
Low Protein Moroccan Flavour Tomato, 4 × 72 g 1
Low Protein Tomato Pepper & Herb 4 × 72 g 1
Promin Mac Pots:
Low Protein Macaroni Cheese 4 × 61 g 1
Low Protein Tomato Macaroni 4 × 61 g 1
Promin Low Protein Pasta Plus (with fibre): 1
Promin Plus Low Protein Flat Noodles 500 g 1
Promin Plus Low Protein Macaroni 500 g 1
Promin Plus Low Protein Spaghetti 500 g 1
Promin Plus Low Protein Spirals 500 g
Promin Potato Pots:
Low Protein Cabbage & Bacon Flavour and croutons 4 × 50 g 1
Low Protein Onion Flavour and croutons 4 × 50 g 1
Low Protein Sausage Flavour and croutons 4 × 50 g 1
Promin X-Pots:
Low Protein All Day Scramble 4 × 60 g 1
Low Protein Beef & Tomato 4 × 60 g 1
Low Protein Chip Shop Curry 4 × 60 g 1
Low Protein Rogan Style Curry 4 × 60 g 1
Taranis
Low Protein Risotto Substitute 4 × 300 g 2.5
Mevalia
Mevalia Low Protein Ditali 500 g 1
Mevalia Low Protein Fusilli 500 g 1
Mevalia Low Protein Penne 500 g 1
Mevalia Low Protein Rice 400 g 1
Mevalia Low Protein Spaghetti 500 g 1
Nutricia
Loprofin Low Protein Animal pasta 500 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Fusilli 500 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Lasagne 250 g 0.5
Loprofin Low Protein Long Spaghetti 500 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Macaroni Elbows 250 g 0.5
Loprofin Low Protein Penne 500 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Rice 500 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Tagliatelle 250 g 0.5
Gluten Free Foods (PK Foods):
PK Foods Pasta spirals 250 g 0.5
Breakfast Cereals Pack Size Number of Units
Firstplay Dietary Foods
Low Protein Hot Breakfast:
Low Protein Apple and Cinnamon Flavour 6 × 57 g 1
Low Protein Banana Flavour 6 × 57 g 1
Low Protein Chocolate Flavour 6 × 57 g 1
Low Protein Original Flavour 6 × 56 g 1
Low Protein Breakfast Bars:
Low Protein Apple & Cinnamon 6 × 40 g 1
Low Protein Banana 6 × 40 g 1
Low Protein Chocolate & Cranberry 6 × 40 g 1
Low Protein Cranberry 6 × 40 g 1
Nutricia
Low Protein Loprofin Cereal Loops 375 g 1
Low Protein Loprofin Flakes—Chocolate 375 g 1
Low Protein Loprofin Flakes—Strawberry 375 g 1
Biscuits/Crackers Pack Size Number of Units
Gluten Free Foods (PK Foods):
PK Foods Low Protein Crispbread 75 g 0.5
Mevalia:
Low Protein Cookies 200 g 1
Low Protein Frollini 200 g 1
Low Protein Fruit Bar 5 × 25 g 1
Nutricia:
Loprofin Low Protein Crackers (Savoury) 150 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Herb Crackers 150 g 1
Taranis:
Taranis Chocolate Chip Cookies 135 g 1
Taranis Shortbread Biscuits 120 g 1
Taranis Raspberry Shortbread Biscuits 120 g 1
Taranis Chocolate Chip Biscuits 120 g 1
Biscuits with caramel shards 130 g 1
Taranis French Toasts 250 g 1
Vitaflo:
Vitaflo Choices Low Protein Mini Crackers 40 g (15 × 40 g) 3
Puddings, Desserts & Cakes Pack Size Number of Units
Firstplay Dietary Foods:
Metax Low Protein YoguMaxx 400 g 1
(yoghurt substitute) (23 servings)
Promin Low Protein Desserts:
Caramel Dessert 6 × 36.5 g 1
Chocolate and Banana Dessert 6 × 36.5 g 1
Custard Dessert 6 × 36.5 g 1
Strawberry and Vanilla Dessert 6 × 36.5 g 1
Promin Low Protein Rice Pudding Mix:
Low Protein Apple 4 × 69 g 1
Low Protein Banana 4 × 69 g 1
Low Protein Original 4 × 69 g 1
Low Protein Strawberry 4 × 69 g 1
Taranis Low Protein Cakes:
Taranis Low Protein Apricot Cake 6 × 40 g 1
Taranis Low Protein Lemon Cake 6 × 40 g 1
Taranis Low Protein Pear Cake 6 × 40 g 1
Taranis Low Protein Desserts:
Taranis Low Protein Pause Caramel Dessert pack of four pots (×125 g) 1
Taranis Low Protein Pause Strawberry Dessert pack of four pots (× 125 g) 1
Gluten Free Foods:
PK Foods Low Protein Cherry Jelly Mix 4 × 80 g 1
PK Foods Low Protein Orange Jelly Mix 4 × 80 g 1
Egg Replacers Pack Size Number of Units
Gluten Free Foods:
PK Foods Low Protein Egg Replacer 200 g 1
Mevalia:
Low Protein Egg Replacer 400 g 1
Nutricia:
Loprofin Low Protein Egg Replacer 2 × 250 g 1
Loprofin Low Protein Egg White Replacer 100 g 1
Low Protein Energy Bars Pack Size Number of Units
Mevalia:
Low Protein Chocotino 100 g 1
Vitaflo:
Low Protein Vitabite 7 × 25 g 1
Miscellaneous Foods Pack Size Number of Units
Promin Low Protein Salted Croutons 4 × 40 g 1
Promin Low Protein Cheese Sauce Mix 225 g 1
Promin Low Protein Snax:
4 flavours: Ready Salted, Jalapeno, 12 × 25 g 1.5
Cheese & Onion and Salt & Vinegar in a mixed box
Promin Low Protein Soups:
Low Protein Chicken Flavour with Croutons 4 × 28 g 1
Low Protein Creamy Tomato with Croutons 4 × 23 g 1
Low Protein Minestrone with Croutons 4 × 28 g 1
Low Protein Pea & Mint with Croutons 4 × 23 g 1
Taranis:
Taranis Low Protein Hazelnut Spread 230 g tub 1
Low Protein Drinks Pack Size Number of Units
Taranis:
Taranis Dalia Liquid milk 24 × 200 mL n/a
Taranis Dalia powder milk 400 g n/a
Mevalia:
Low Protein Lattis 500 mL n/a
Nutricia:
Loprofin PKU Milk 27 × 200 ml n/a
Sno-Pro 27 × 200 ml n/a
Vitaflo:
ProZero Protein Free Drink 18 × 250 mL or 6 × 1 L n/a

Abbreviations: SLPFs = special low protein foods; NSPKU = The National Society for Phenylketonuria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. (Anita MacDonald) and A.P.; methodology, G.W., A.M. (Anita MacDonald) and A.P.; formal analysis, G.W. and S.E.; investigation, all authors except J.C.R. and A.D.; data curation, G.W., A.P. and S.E.; writing—original draft preparation, G.W.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, G.W., A.P., S.E. and A.M. (Anita MacDonald); supervision, A.M (Anita MacDonald). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

NHSBSA prescribing data on special low protein foods in England was obtained from ePACT2.

Conflicts of Interest

A.M. (Anita MacDonald) is a member of, the advisory board ELEMENT Danone-Nutricia, the advisory board for Arla and Applied Pharma Research, and received research funding and honoraria from Nutricia, Vitaflo International, Biomarin, MetaHealth, Metax and Merck Serono. S.E. receives research funding from Nutricia, and has received financial support and honoraria from Nutricia and Vitaflo to attend/speak at study days and conferences. A.P. received an educational grant from Cambrooke Therapeutics and grants from Vitaflo International, Nutricia, Merck Serono, Biomarin and Mevalia to attend scientific meetings. A.D. received research funding from Vitaflo International, financial support from Nutricia, Mevalia and Vitaflo International to attend study days and conferences. J.C.R. is a member of the European Nutritionist Expert Panel (Biomarin), the Advisory Board for Applied Pharma Research and Nutricia, and has received honoraria as a speaker from APR, Merck Serono, Biomarin, Nutricia, Vitaflo, Cambrooke, PIAM, and Lifediet. S.F. (Suzanne Ford) is a member of the advisory board for Nutricia, and MetaHealth and has received financial support and honoraria from Cambrooke and Vitaflo. R.S. has received sponsorship to attend conferences and study days, payment to present at conferences from Nutricia Metabolics, Vitaflo Internation and Mevalia. C.E. has received honoraria and educational grants to attend events from Vitaflo, Nutricia, Meta Healthcare and SOBI and is a member of the Advisory Commitee on Borderline Substances. S.F. (Sarah Firman) has received funding to attend conferences and study days from Nutricia, Vitaflo International and Dr. Schär UK Ltd., and consulting fees from Vitaflo International and Meta Healthcare Ltd. C.N. has received financial support and honoraria from Nutricia and Vitaflo to attend/speak at study days and conferences. L.R. is a member of the Nutricia adult advisory board and received honorarium from Nutricia and Vitaflo in the past. F.J.W. receives honoraria, educational and travel grants from Nutricia and Vitaflo. M.H. is a member of advisory board Nutricia Danone and Applied Pharma and has received financial support and honoraria from Nutricia, Vitaflo, Cambrooke, Mevalia, Promin for attendance at conferences/meetings and speakers fee. A.T. (Allyson Terry) has received payment from Vitaflo International for speaking at a patient event. K.vW. receives honoraria and educational grants from Nutricia, Vitaflo and Meta Healthcare. S.T. is expected to receive honoraria from Vitaflo International for providing feedback and reviewing guidelines for PKU Sphere. G.W., M.F., L.G., C.P., S.A., A.M. (Allison Mackenzie), A.T. (Alison Tooke), A.W., E.G., L.W., I.H., H.S., J.G., A.E., S.C., R.P. have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Van Wegberg A.M.J., MacDonald A., Ahring K., Bélanger-Quintana A., Blau N., Bosch A.M., Burlina A., Campistol J., Feillet F., Giżewska M., et al. The complete European guidelines on phenylketonuria: Diagnosis and treatment. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2017;12:162. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0685-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.MacDonald A., Van Wegberg A.M.J., Ahring K., Beblo S., Bélanger-Quintana A., Burlina A., Campistol J., Coşkun T., Feillet F., Giżewska M., et al. PKU dietary handbook to accompany PKU guidelines. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2020;15:171. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01391-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.MacDonald A., van Rijn M., Feillet F., Lund A.M., Bernstein L., Bosch A.M., Gizewska M., van Spronsen F.J. Adherence issues in inherited metabolic disorders treated by low natural protein diets. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2012;61:289–295. doi: 10.1159/000342256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moretti F., Pellegrini N., Salvatici E., Rovelli V., Banderali G., Radaelli G., Scazzina F., Giovannini M., Verduci E. Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load and metabolic profile in children with phenylketonuria. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017;27:176–182. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pena M.J., Almeida M.F., van Dam E., Ahring K., Bélanger-Quintana A., Dokoupil K., Gokmen-Ozel H., Lammardo A.M., MacDonald A., Robert M., et al. Special low protein foods for phenylketonuria: Availability in Europe and an examination of their nutritional profile. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2015;10:162. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0378-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Daly A., Evans S., Pinto A., Ashmore C., Rocha J.C., Macdonald A. A 3 year longitudinal prospective review examining the dietary profile and contribution made by special low protein foods to energy and macronutrient intake in children with phenylketonuria. Nutrients. 2020;12:3153. doi: 10.3390/nu12103153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wood G., Evans S., Pointon-Bell K., Rocha J.C., MacDonald A. Special Low Protein Foods in the UK: An Examination of Their Macronutrient Composition in Comparison to Regular Foods. Nutrients. 2020;12:1893. doi: 10.3390/nu12061893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cochrane B., Schwahn B., Galloway P., Robinson P., Gerasimidis K. A questionnaire survey on the usage of low protein staple foods by people with phenylketonuria in Scotland. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014;27:533–541. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rocha J.C., MacDonald A. Dietary intervention in the management of phenylketonuria: Current perspectives. Pediatr. Health Med. Ther. 2016;7:155–163. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S49329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Handoom B., Megdad E., Al-Qasabi D., Al Mesned M., Hawary R., Al-Nufiee S., Al-Hassnan Z., Alsayed M.D., Eldali A. The effects of low protein products availability on growth parameters and metabolic control in selected amino acid metabolism disorders patients. Int. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2018;5:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Belanger-Quintana A., Dokoupil K., Gokmen-Ozel H., Lammardo A.M., MacDonald A., Motzfeldt K., Nowacka M., Robert M., van Rijn M., Ahring K. Diet in phenylketonuria: A snapshot of special dietary costs and reimbursement systems in 10 international centers. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2012;105:390–394. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Department of Health and Social Care Advisory Committee on Borderline Substances. [(accessed on 26 August 2021)]; Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/advisory-committee-on-borderline-substances.
  • 13.Wood G., Evans S., Pointon-Bell K., MacDonald A. Special low protein foods: The challenges in obtaining accurate information about the availability of special low protein foods (SLPFs) and their nutritional composition. Netw. Health Dig. 2020;153:36–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Department of Health and Social Care Appendix 1: Categorisation of Nutritional Products Submitted for Approval by the Advisory Committee on Borderline Substances. [(accessed on 18 August 2020)]; Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/792993/Appendix1.pdf.
  • 15.Department of Health and Social Care Information on the Pricing of ACBS Products. [(accessed on 18 August 2020)]; Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidelines-on-the-pricing-of-acbs-products/information-on-the-pricing-of-acbs-products.
  • 16.Ford S., O’Driscoll M., MacDonald A. Prescribing issues experienced by people living with phenylketonuria in the UK. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2019;21:100527. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.NHS Prescription Services NHS and LA Reforms Factsheet 4: Payment, Charging and Apportioning Arrangements of Costs Associated with NHS Pharmaceutical Service Provision from 1 April 2013. [(accessed on 25 October 2020)]. Available online: https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/2017-07/NHS_Reforms_factsheet_4_v2.0.pdf.
  • 18.Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee Fees and Allowances. [(accessed on 25 October 2020)]. Available online: https://psnc.org.uk/dispensing-supply/endorsement/fees-allowances.
  • 19.The National Society for Phenylketonuria (NSPKU) The Prescription of Low Protein Foods for Patients with PKU. [(accessed on 19 September 2021)]. Available online: https://www.nspku.org/download/unit-guidelines-for-the-prescription-of-low-protein-foods.
  • 20.The National Society for Phenylketonuria (NSPKU) Special Low Protein/Low Phenylalanine Foods on Prescription. [(accessed on 19 September 2021)]. Available online: https://www.nspku.org/download/low-protein-foods-available-on-prescription-for-patients-with-pku/#.pdf.
  • 21.NHS Business Services Authority Are you Claiming Free Prescriptions? [(accessed on 19 September 2021)]. Available online: https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/2018-09/Freeprescriptionsbooklet%28V3%2909.2018.pdf.
  • 22.MacDonald A., Pinto A., Evans S., Ashmore C., MacDonald J., Daly A. Home delivery service of low protein foods in inherited metabolic disorders: Does it help? Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2019;19:100466. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rose A.M., Grosse S.D., Garcia S.P., Bach J., Kleyn M., Simon N.J.E., Prosser L.A. The financial and time burden associated with phenylketonuria treatment in the United States. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2019;21:100523. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eijgelshoven I., Demirdas S., Smith T.A., van Loon J.M.T., Latour S., Bosch A.M. The time consuming nature of phenylketonuria: A cross-sectional study investigating time burden and costs of phenylketonuria in the Netherlands. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2013;109:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang L., Zou H., Ye F., Wang K., Li X., Chen Z., Chen J., Han B., Yu W., He C., et al. Household financial burden of phenylketonuria and its impact on treatment in China: A cross-sectional study. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2017;40:369–376. doi: 10.1007/s10545-016-9995-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mlčoch T., Puda R., Ješina P., Lhotáková M., Šterbová, Doležal T. Dietary patterns, cost and compliance with low-protein diet of phenylketonuria and other inherited metabolic diseases. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018;72:87–92. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kidd C. Low-protein foods: Cost-effective prescribing. Netw. Health Dig. 2019;145:40–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ford S. The costs of a special diet. Netw. Health Dig. 2019;141:35–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.MacDonald A., Smith T.A., de Silva S., Alam V., van Loon J.M.T. The personal burden for caregivers of children with phenylketonuria: A cross-sectional study investigating time burden and costs in the UK. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2016;9:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2016.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ford S., O’Driscoll M., MacDonald A. Living with Phenylketonuria: Lessons from the PKU community. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2018;17:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Promin Web Shop. [(accessed on 3 October 2020)]. Available online: https://prominpku.com/shop.
  • 32.Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee Out of Pocket Expenses. [(accessed on 27 October 2021)]. Available online: https://psnc.org.uk/dispensing-supply/endorsement/fees-allowances/oop.
  • 33.Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee Consumables and Container Allowance. [(accessed on 24 September 2021)]. Available online: https://psnc.org.uk/dispensing-supply/endorsement/fees-allowances/consumables-containers.
  • 34.Camp K.M., Lloyd-Puryear M.A., Huntington K.L. Nutritional treatment for inborn errors of metabolism: Indications, regulations, and availability of medical foods and dietary supplements using phenylketonuria as an example. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2012;107:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

NHSBSA prescribing data on special low protein foods in England was obtained from ePACT2.


Articles from Nutrients are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES