Abstract
Airway epithelial barrier dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a key feature of asthma and other lung diseases. Respiratory viruses are responsible for a large fraction of asthma exacerbations, and are particularly potent at disrupting epithelial barrier function through pattern recognition receptor engagement leading to tight junction dysfunction. Although different mechanisms of barrier dysfunction have been described, relatively little is known about whether barrier integrity can be promoted to limit disease. Here, we tested three classes of drugs commonly prescribed to treat asthma for their ability to promote barrier function using a cell culture model of virus-induced airway epithelial barrier disruption. Specifically, we studied the corticosteroid budesonide, the long acting beta-agonist formoterol, and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast for their ability to promote barrier integrity of a monolayer of human bronchial epithelial cells (16HBE) before exposure to the viral mimetic double-stranded RNA. Of the three, only budesonide treatment limited transepithelial electrical resistance and small molecule permeability (4 kDa FITC-dextran flux). Next, we used a mouse model of acute dsRNA challenge that induces transient epithelial barrier disruption in vivo, and studied the effects budesonide when administered prophylactically or therapeutically. We found that budesonide similarly protected against dsRNA-induced airway barrier disruption in the lung, independently of its effects on airway inflammation. Taken together, these data suggest that an under-appreciated effect of inhaled budesonide is to maintain or promote airway epithelial barrier integrity during respiratory viral infections.
Introduction
Airway epithelial cells form a physical barrier to the outside world. They are among the first cells to encounter inhaled pathogens, and contribute to airway inflammation by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines and other mediators [1–3]. Airway epithelial cells are normally tightly connected by adheren junctional proteins that join cells together and tight junctional proteins that promote barrier integrity. Regulation of these junctional protein complexes is critical for maintenance of epithelial barrier integrity, and for epithelial differentiation and activation [3–5]. Epithelial barrier dysfunction is increasingly associated with airway diseases including asthma and COPD, and can be caused by different environmental exposures [1]. Respiratory viruses in particular are notable for their ability to cause marked and sustained perturbation of epithelial barrier integrity [6–10]. The molecular mechanisms by which respiratory viruses disrupt barrier function include inhibiting the assembly of junctional complexes at the cell surface, which render epithelial monolayers “leaky”, facilitating paracellular movement of macromolecules in and out of the airway lumen [11]. Synthetic double stranded RNA (dsRNA) engages Toll-like Receptor 3 and can mimic the effects of virus-induced epithelial barrier dysfunction, which has been a useful tool to investigate mechanisms of virally-induced pathogenesis [12,13].
The host inflammatory response must maintain the delicate balance between sufficient potency to clear infection but avoid excessive inflammation that can lead to barrier disruption and tissue injury [14–16]. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) such as budesonide, are commonly prescribed to attenuate airway inflammation and lessen airway hyperreactivity [17–20]. ICS suppress the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in asthma. In asthmatic subjects with neutrophilic airway inflammation, potential targets of ICS include the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the neutrophil-attracting chemokine CXCL1. In addition to their role in suppressing airway inflammation, ICS might also promote epithelial barrier integrity, but this has not been as well studied in asthma or models of airway inflammation.
Although epithelial barrier dysfunction has been observed in asthma, and is associated with asthma severity, [1,21,22] relatively little is known about the effects of therapeutic compounds in regulating or promoting epithelial barrier integrity. Asthma medications are primarily thought to exert anti-inflammatory effects or act as bronchodilators. For instance, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) such as budesonide are the mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy in asthma, and target many cell types in the lung including pro-inflammatory Th2 cells and eosinophils [17,18]. ICS are frequently combined with long-acting beta agonists (LABA) such as formoterol, which have potential anti-inflammatory effects in addition to their bronchodilation properties [20,23]. The leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast is frequently used to treat subjects with allergic asthma, and works to block the pro-inflammatory effects of leukotrienes [19].
Here we studied the effects of the ICS budesonide, the LABA formoterol, and leukotriene receptor agonist montelukast in a cell culture model of dsRNA-induced barrier dysfunction. We previously demonstrated that double-stranded RNA (polyI:C) is a potent disruptor of barrier integrity in 16HBE cells [12]. Many viruses generate dsRNA during replication and so the dsRNA polyI:C has often been used as simplified model of viral infection [24,25]. We report that budesonide has barrier protective effects, limiting dsRNA-induced paracellular permeability of a model epithelial monolayer. We also used a mouse model of acute dsRNA inhalation that leads to barrier disruption, and studied the effects of inhaled budesonide on barrier function in vivo. We report that budesonide protects against dsRNA-induced barrier dysfunction in vivo, independently of its effects on airway inflammation.
Materials and methods
16HBE TEER and small molecule flux assay
Monolayers of human 16HBE bronchial epithelial cells passage 17–20 (a gift from Dr. D. C. Gruenert, University of California San Francisco, CA) were grown on Transwell inserts (Corning; polyester inserts with 0.4 um pores and 0.33 cm2 growth area) then exposed to low-dose poly I:C (0.05 or 0.5 μg/ml, InvivoGen Cat#tlrl-pic; Version#11C21-MM), a synthetic analog of viral double stranded RNA. Barrier function was measured with trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) at 6, 24, and 48 hrs after polyI:C treatment using a voltometer (World Precision Instruments EVOM2). At 48 hrs after treatment, 4 kDa fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) dextran (Sigma, used at 10 μg/ml) was applied apically and accumulation of FITC-dextran into the basal chamber was quantified with a Beckman Coulter DTX 880 Multimode fluorescent plate reader 2 hrs later. To assess the effects of selected medications on cell permeability, monolayers were treated with 1–10 μM budesonide (Sigma), montelukast (Sigma), or formoterol (Sigma) 18 hrs prior to polyI:C challenge.
Western Blot
Monolayers of human 16HBE bronchial epithelial cells passage 17–20 were grown on 6 well plates (Corning), treated with 0.1–1 μM budesonide 18hr prior to addition of low-dose poly I:C (0.5 μg/ml) for an additional 24hrs. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors (). 40μg protein was loaded onto a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and the gel run at 100V. The protein was transferred to PVDF membranes via TurboBlot semi-dry transfer (BoiRad) and blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA from Sigma). Primary antibodies were diluted as noted below and incubated with membranes overnight. Secondary antibodies were diluted as noted below and incubated with membrane 1hr. Bands were developed with Clarity Chemiluminescence (BioRad), visualized with BioBlot BXR film (Laboratory Product Sales) and densitometry was assessed with ImageJ.
Primary antibodies
Anti-occludin (Invitrogen OC-3F10), 1:1000 dilution in 5% BSA
Anti-claudin-4 (Invitrogen ZMD.306), 1:1000 dilution in 5% BSA
Anti-E-cadherin (ThermoFischer 20874-1-AP), 1:1000 dilution in 5% BSA
Anti-GAPDH (AbCam 8245), 1:50,000 dilution in 5% milk
Anti-mouse-HRP (GE Healthcare NA934V), 1:10,000 in 5% milk
Anti-rabbit-HRP (GE Healthcare NA931V), 1:10,000 in 5% milk
Mice and polyI:C inhalation challenge
Wild-type C57BL/6 were obtained from the National Cancer Institute. All animals were age and sex matched, and treated according to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Institutional Review Board approval. Mice were administered 10 μg high molecular weight polyI:C (InvivoGen Cat#tlrl-pic; Version#11C21-MM, oropharyngeally (o.p.) daily for three days to induce airway inflammation. This procedure is well-tolerated and results in no overt signs of distress or weight loss. Budesonide (Sigma CAS51333-22-3) was dosed o.p. at 350 or 700 μg/kg for 1–5 days (depending on the experiment). Twenty-four hours after the last instillation, mice were euthanized and the trachea was cannulated. Bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed with two instillations of 750 μL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The type and approximate quantity of cells was analyzed by hemacytometry. The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was then spun down onto glass slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (FisherBrand 122–911), and leukocytes were quantified. Cell-free supernatants were analyzed for total protein (via Bradford assay), albumin levels (Abcam ab108792 ELISA), and CXCL1 levels (R&D DuoSet DY453 ELISA) according to manufacturer instructions.
Outside/In leak assay
At 23 hrs post final instillation and 1 hr prior to harvest, 0.2 mg 4kDa FITC-dextran (Sigma#46944) was administered o.p. to mice. BALF was collected as above. Blood was collected via cardiac puncture, and centrifuged for 12 min at 12,000 rpm at 4°C to separate serum from cellular component. FITC-dextran levels were assessed using a fluorescent plate reader (Beckman Coulter DTX 880 Multimode plate reader).
Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as means ± 95% standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test for two groups and ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test for multiple groups. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5.
Results
Double-stranded RNA disrupts barrier in 16HBE cells
Before testing the ability of different drug classes to promote barrier integrity, we optimized the dose of polyI:C that transiently disrupts barrier integrity as measured by both TEER and small molecule permeability in 16HBE cells culture. We demonstrate that polyI:C TEER and increases permeability to 4 kDa FITC-dextran in a dose-dependent manner across a monolayer of 16HBE cells (Fig 1A and 1B). We further found that barrier integrity began to recover by 24hrs post-polyI:C treatment with a low dose (0.05μg/ml polyI:C) (Fig 1A). As 0.05μg/ml polyI:C only mildly disrupted barrier, we chose to proceed with 0.5μg/ml polyI:C for our investigation into whether asthma controller medications can prevent barrier disruption and/or promote more rapid barrier recovery.
Budesonide, but not formoterol or montelukast promotes barrier integrity in 16HBE cells
We assessed the ability of three asthma medications to prevent/promote barrier recovery following polyI:C-mediated barrier disruption. 16HBE cells were treated with budesonide, formoterol or montelukast 18hrs prior to 0.5μg/ml polyI:C challenge. At concentrations thought to approximate those achieved in epithelial lining fluids in vivo, none of the drugs tested had a measurable effect on TEER (Fig 2A). However, the steroid budesonide limited polyI:C-mediated barrier disruption as assayed by small molecule flux (1.983e-6±3.676e-7 vs. 1.429e-6±2.504e-7 cm/sec in 0.5μg/ml polyI:C vs. 0.5μg/ml polyIC+0.1 μM budesonide treated cells; p<0.01). The LABA formoterol, and the leukotriene receptor agonist montelukast, failed to mitigate polyI:C-mediated barrier disruption (Fig 2B). To further assess the barrier promoting effect of budesonide, we quantified levels of junctional proteins in 16HBE cells following treatment with polyI:C ± budesonide. Budesonide treatment promoted the maintenance of tight junctional proteins Occludin and Claudin-4 following polyI:C treatment, while the adhesion protein E-cadherin was not altered by either polyI:C or budesonide treatment (Fig 2C).
Budesonide limits outside/in leak, but not inside/out leak in vivo
We next asked if budesonide could similarly promote barrier integrity in vivo. Pre-treatment of mice with 700 μg/kg inhaled budesonide attenuated polyI:C-mediated outside/in barrier break as seen by less 4kDa FITC-dextran leak out of the airspace and into serum (59.0±9.6 vs. 80.4±14.0 percent change over vehicle-treated in BAL of polyI:C vs. polyIC+700 μg budesonide treated mice; p<0.01) (Fig 3A and 3B). However, budesonide did not limit inside/out leak as the amount of total protein and albumin in the BAL fluid was not significantly changed with budesonide treatment (Fig 3C and 3D).
Budesonide does not limit neutrophil accumulation or pro-inflammatory cytokines in vivo
Mice challenged with inhaled polyI:C also developed neutrophilic airway inflammation, as previously reported [13]. Budesonide treatment did not alter levels of the neutrophil chemoattractant CXCL1 (Fig 4A), but levels of IL-6 and interferon-lambda were reduced with budesonide pre-treatment (Fig 4B and 4C). Furthermore, budesonide did not attenuate polyI:C-induced neutrophil recruitment, but in fact enhanced neutrophil accumulation at the highest dose used (Fig 4D).
Budesonide given at the time of polyI:C challenge limits barrier disruption in vivo
We next interrogated the therapeutic potential of budesonide given after polyI:C challenge to mitigate barrier disruption in vivo. Budesonide given the same day as (Group A), or after (Groups B-C), polyI:C inhalation attenuated outside/in leak, as seen by less FITC-dextran leak out of the airspace (Fig 5A and 5B). Same day budesonide similarly limited inside/out leak (Fig 5C and 5D). Finally, therapeutic dosing of budesonide (administered after polyI:C challenge) did not attenuate neutrophil accumulation or CXCL1 levels following polyI:C inhalation, consistent with finding from prophylactic dosing (Fig 5E and 5F).
Discussion
While the anti-inflammatory effects of asthma medications are well known, less is known about the ability of these medications to directly promote epithelial barrier integrity. Using dsRNA as a model of acute inflammation and barrier disruption, we show that budesonide, but not formoterol or montelukast, is able to promote barrier integrity in both a human bronchial epithelial cell monolayer, as well as an in vivo mouse model. Specifically, budesonide given before polyI:C challenge (mimicking long-term asthma controller medication) in 16HBE cells, or in an in vivo mouse model, limits the degree of barrier break (reduced FITC-dextran flux in vitro, as well as reduced outside/in leak in vivo). Importantly, budesonide treatment did not attenuate neutrophil accumulation or inside/out leak in vivo- suggesting normal ability to control pathogens remains un-impaired when barrier is enhanced. Further study is needed to determine the mechanism by which budesonide promotes airway epithelial barrier integrity.
Inhaled corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for asthma, and exert multiple beneficial anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects to counter allergic airway inflammation [26]. As these medications are often taken long-term as maintenance therapies, we investigated treatment with budesonide, formoterol or montelukast administered prior to polyI:C challenge. With this model we found budesonide significantly enhances outside/in barrier integrity (Fig 3), suggesting that one of the beneficial effects of maintenance inhaled corticosteroids might be their ability to promote epithelial barrier integrity following respiratory viral infections. Airway barrier function is challenging to study in human subjects, but future studies using non-invasive approaches will provide new insights into how asthma therapeutics impact this important aspect of airway dysfunction in asthma.
Our results confirm and extend the results of Heijink et al who found that 16 nM budesonide attenuated polyI:C-induced airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in vitro, as determined by electrical cell-surface impedance sensing [27]. Importantly we show that a lower dose of budesonide protects against polyI:C-induced increase in epithelial permeability to small molecule flux (Fig 2). Prophylactic dosing with inhaled budesonide in vivo also significantly attenuated polyI:C-induced barrier disruption, as reflected by reduced translocation of inhaled FITC-dextran out of the airspaces and into serum (outside/in leak, Fig 3). Interestingly, this barrier protective effect of budesonide was apparent despite an increase recovery of BAL neutrophils from budesonide-treated mice. Increased neutrophils and no change in BAL CXCL1 levels, are consistent with the known effects of glucocorticoids in potentiating neutrophil survival [28] and argue that the pro-barrier integrity effects of budesonide on the epithelial barrier in vivo are not simply due to overall reduced levels of airway inflammation. Taken together, we conclude that budesonide promotes barrier integrity without hindering normal leukocyte accumulation to the site of injury or promoting inflammation.
We observed that prophylactic budesonide attenuated the translocation of FITC-dextran out of the airspaces and into serum (outside/in leak), without significantly inhibiting BAL protein or albumin levels (inside/out leak). This difference in outside/in vs. inside/out leak highlights that small molecule flux is not a simple opening of a hole in the barrier, but is a highly regulated process with directionality. One potential caveat to these findings is that total protein/albumin leak into the BALF quantifies what has leaked over the 4 days of treatment, whereas the FITC-dextran leak out of BALF measures leak over only 1hr. It is therefore possible that budesonide treatment attenuates acute leak but has less effect on long-term leak. This seems unlikely as the last budesonide treatment is 24 hrs prior to FITC-dextran administration thereby minimizing any "acute" effects of the drug at the time of FITC-dextran administration. Furthermore, budesonide given after polyI:C inhalation attenuated inside/out leak as well as outside/in leak (Fig 5), indicating budesonide is capable of limiting inside/out barrier integrity in specific contexts. Future work is needed to understand the mechanism by which budesonide promotes inside/out barrier integrity when given after, but not prior to, polyI:C challenge.
Ideally, promoting barrier integrity would not come at the expense of hindering immune cell infiltration during an infection. Budesonide is well known as a steroid that does not increase risk of severe viral infections [18]. In alignment with this, here we report budesonide treatment did not prevent neutrophil accumulation into the airspace following polyI:C challenge, and may even promote leukocyte accumulation (Fig 4). However, the boost in immune cells is not accompanied by elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines as budesonide treatment did not lower CXCL1 levels. Therefore, budesonide promotes barrier integrity without hindering normal leukocyte accumulation to the site of injury or promoting inflammation. Future work aims to extend these studies by investigating the mechanism by which budesonide promotes barrier integrity during virally-induced asthma exacerbations.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Dr. Patrick Donohue, Kristie Stiles and Traci Pressley for their help with conducting experiments.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
The work reported here was supported by the following grants: R01 HL12424 (SG) from National Institute of Health/ National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/) R01 AI144241 (SG) from National Institute of Health/ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/) F31 HL14079501 (JV) from National Institute of Health/ National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/) T32AI007285 (JV) from National Institute of Health/ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Georas SN, Rezaee F. Epithelial barrier function: at the front line of asthma immunology and allergic airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(3):509–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.049 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ganesan S, Comstock AT, Sajjan US. Barrier function of airway tract epithelium. Tissue Barriers. 2013;1(4):e24997. doi: 10.4161/tisb.24997 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schleimer RP, Kato A, Kern R, Kuperman D, Avila PC. Epithelium: at the interface of innate and adaptive immune responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(6):1279–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.046 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shen L, Weber CR, Raleigh DR, Yu D, Turner JR. Tight Junction Pore and Leak Pathways: A Dynamic Duo. Annual Review of Physiology. 2011;73(1):283–309. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rusu AD, Georgiou M. The multifarious regulation of the apical junctional complex. Open Biology. 2020;10(2):190278. doi: 10.1098/rsob.190278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Walters RW, Freimuth P, Moninger TO, Ganske I, Zabner J, Welsh MJ. Adenovirus Fiber Disrupts CAR-Mediated Intercellular Adhesion Allowing Virus Escape. Cell. 2002;110(6):789–99. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00912-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sajjan U, Wang Q, Zhao Y, Gruenert DC, Hershenson MB. Rhinovirus disrupts the barrier function of polarized airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(12):1271–81. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200801-136OC . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Comstock AT, Ganesan S, Chattoraj A, Faris AN, Margolis BL, Hershenson MB, et al. Rhinovirus-Induced Barrier Dysfunction in Polarized Airway Epithelial Cells Is Mediated by NADPH Oxidase 1. 2011;85(13):6795–808. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02074-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rezaee F, DeSando SA, Ivanov AI, Chapman TJ, Knowlden SA, Beck LA, et al. Sustained protein kinase D activation mediates respiratory syncytial virus-induced airway barrier disruption. J Virol. 2013;87(20):11088–95. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01573-13 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smallcombe CC, Linfield DT, Harford TJ, Bokun V, Ivanov AI, Piedimonte G, et al. Disruption of the airway epithelial barrier in a murine model of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2019;316(2):L358–L68. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00345.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rezaee F, Georas SN. Breaking barriers. New insights into airway epithelial barrier function in health and disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014;50(5):857–69. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0541RT . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rezaee F, Meednu N, Emo JA, Saatian B, Chapman TJ, Naydenov NG, et al. Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid induces protein kinase D-dependent disassembly of apical junctions and barrier dysfunction in airway epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(6):1216–24.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.08.035 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Veazey JM, Chapman TJ, Smyth TR, Hillman SE, Eliseeva SI, Georas SN. Distinct roles for MDA5 and TLR3 in the acute response to inhaled double-stranded RNA. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0216056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Veazey J, Smyth T, Georas SN. Epithelial barrier dysfunction in asthma. In: Koval M, Sidhaye V, editors. Sidhaye/Koval -Lung Epithelial Biology in the Pathogenesis of Pulmonary Disease: Elsevier; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Saatian B, Rezaee F, Desando S, Emo J, Chapman T, Knowlden S, et al. Interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 cause barrier dysfunction in human airway epithelial cells. Tissue Barriers. 2013;1(2):e24333. doi: 10.4161/tisb.24333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pulendran B, Maddur MS. Innate Immune Sensing and Response to Influenza. 386. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 23–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pelaia G, Vatrella A, Busceti MT, Fabiano F, Terracciano R, Matera MG, et al. Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of budesonide in asthma. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2016;40:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2016.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim S-R, Song J-H, Ahn J-H, Lee G-S, Ahn H, Yoon S-I, et al. Antiviral and anti-inflammatory activity of budesonide against human rhinovirus infection mediated via autophagy activation. Antiviral Research. 2018;151:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peng W-S, Chen X, Yang X-Y, Liu E-M. Systematic Review of Montelukast’s Efficacy for Preventing Post-Bronchiolitis Wheezing. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2014;25(2):143–50. doi: 10.1111/pai.12124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lötvall J. The Long and Short of β2-agonists. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2002;15(6):497–501. doi: 10.1006/pupt.2002.0400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xiao C, Puddicombe SM, Field S, Haywood J, Broughton-Head V, Puxeddu I, et al. Defective epithelial barrier function in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(3):549–56 e1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.05.038 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boer WId, Sharma HS, Baelemans SMI, Hoogsteden HC, Lambrecht BN, Braunstahl GJ. Altered expression of epithelial junctional proteins in atopic asthma: possible role in inflammation. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;86(3):105–12. doi: 10.1139/y08-004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sindi A, Todd DC, Nair P. Antiinflammatory effects of long-acting beta2-agonists in patients with asthma: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest. 2009;136(1):145–54. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Slater L, Bartlett NW, Haas JJ, Zhu J, Message SD, Walton RP, et al. Co-ordinated role of TLR3, RIG-I and MDA5 in the innate response to rhinovirus in bronchial epithelium. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(11):e1001178. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001178 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Guillot L, Le Goffic R, Bloch S, Escriou N, Akira S, Chignard M, et al. Involvement of toll-like receptor 3 in the immune response of lung epithelial cells to double-stranded RNA and influenza A virus. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(7):5571–80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410592200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Heffler E, Nascimento L, Madeira G, Ferrando M, Puggioni F, Racca F, et al. Inhaled Corticosteroids Safety and Adverse Effects in Patients with Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;6(3):776–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Heijink IH, Jonker MR, De Vries M, Van Oosterhout AJM, Telenga E, Ten Hacken NHT, et al. Budesonide and fluticasone propionate differentially affect the airway epithelial barrier. Respiratory Research. 2016;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0318-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liles W, Dale D, Klebanoff S. Glucocorticoids inhibit apoptosis of human neutrophils. Blood. 1995;86(8):3181–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.v86.8.3181.3181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]