Abstract
A key challenge for the effective treatment of gastrointestinal diseases including inflammatory bowel disease is to develop an orally administered drug delivery system capable of prolonged retention in the gastrointestinal tract. Herein we report a bioadhesive liquid coacervate based on hydrogen bonding-driven nanoparticle assembly. Free from electrostatic interactions, our fluid nanoparticle-assembled coacervate demonstrates significant pH- and salt-independent structural stability and forms a physically adhesive coating on a large surface area of intestinal tract with an extended residence time of more than 2 days to mediate the sustained release of preloaded water-soluble small molecule drugs in vivo. The orally administered drug-laden nanoparticle-assembled coacervate significantly mitigates the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease, restores the diversity of gut microbiota, reduces systemic drug exposure, and improves the therapeutic efficacy in a rat acute colitis model compared with the oral administration of the same amount of drug in solution form. We suggest that the nanoparticle-assembled coacervate provides a promising drug delivery platform for management and treatment of numerous gastrointestinal diseases where controlled drug release with extended residence time is desired.
Subject terms: Drug delivery, Ulcerative colitis, Self-assembly, Biomedical materials, Biomedical materials
The development of a drug delivery system capable of prolonged retention in the gastrointestinal tract remains a clinical challenge. Here the authors present a bio-adhesive liquid coacervate coating on the intestinal tract that acts as a flowable drug carrier, mediates the sustained release of diverse drugs, and potentially enhances therapeutic efficacy against gastrointestinal diseases.
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) causes chronic relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract1. IBD significantly increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer and imposes a lifelong healthcare burden on millions of patients worldwide2–4. Oral dosage formulations of drugs such as corticosteroids are the most desirable delivery systems available to treat IBD and are vastly superior to enema and subcutaneous and intravenous injection in terms of patient compliance5. However, many patients require lifelong administration of drugs to control IBD symptoms; therefore, reducing the severity of side effects attributable to systemic drug exposure resulting from frequent oral dosing via conventional delivery systems, such as enteric-coated tablets and capsules, is essential6.
Although many forms of oral drug delivery vehicles have been developed, the insufficient residence time within the intestinal tract and the complex design of delivery vehicles limit their widespread clinical applications7–10. Endowing oral drug delivery vehicles with wet bioadhesion may prolong intestinal residence time. However, solid adhesives with high adhesion energy on wet tissues11–14 may not be suitable as orally administered intestine-coating drug delivery platforms. For example, we recently reported a bioadhesive hydrogel, which can adhere to gastric ulcer sites upon in situ gelation15. However, such adhesive hydrogel cannot form the extensive and uniform adhesive coating layer on the convoluted intestinal tract surfaces due to its solid nature after rapid gelation.
Distinct from the solid bioadhesives, conventional complex coacervates are polymer-concentrated and water-immiscible liquids formed by fluid–fluid phase separation of complexed polyanions and polycations and represent an exciting class of drug delivery vehicles16–18. However, the complex coacervation process is driven by electrostatic attraction between polyanions and polycations within narrow pH/salt ranges19. Considering that the GI tract routinely undergoes substantial changes in motility, fluid content, and acidity (from pH 1.5 in the stomach to pH 6.15–7.88 in intestines)5,20, conventional complex coacervates can be easily disrupted by pH/salt variations (Fig. 1a, b)21–23. One recent groundbreaking work reported the precise engineering of low molecular weight sucralfate into complex coacervate to increase the residence time in intestines to several hours24. Despite these advances, the limited choices of polyelectrolytes species for preparing complex coacervates that can adapt to the harsh in vivo environment, together with the insufficient intestinal residence time, greatly hamper the development of fluid coacervates as the orally administrated drug delivery systems.
Here we report a universal strategy to prepare water-immiscible, bioadhesive, and noncomplex liquid coacervates derived from bidentate hydrogen bonding-driven self-assembly of nanoparticles as an orally administered intestinal-coating formulation (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1). Driven by the gastrointestinal peristalsis, the nanoparticle-assembled fluid coacervate (named NPA coacervate hereafter) can effectively spread to coat and adhere on the large intestinal surface area with a prolonged residence time of more than 2 days to mediate the sustained release of loaded drugs (Fig. 1c). Using the water-soluble dexamethasone sodium phosphate (Dex-P) as a model small molecule drug, we demonstrated that the oral administration of drug-laden NPA coacervate significantly enhanced the IBD therapeutic outcomes, improved the richness and diversity of gut microbiota, and reduced the systemic drug exposure compared with the treatment with Dex-P aqueous solution in a rat model of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced acute colitis—one of the most widely used models due to its shared clinical and histopathological characteristics with human IBD25 and its validation as a relevant model to treat human diseases26.
Results and discussion
The design of noncomplex NPA coacervates via nanoparticle assembly
Nanoparticles required for fabricating NPA coacervates contain a hydrophobic core and end-functionalized (e.g., catechol) hydrophilic polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains as the shell (Fig. 1d). In this study, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was used to confirm the successful synthesis of the hydrophobic core (Supplementary Fig. 2). The molecular weight distribution of the hydrophilic PEG chains was further determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC, Supplementary Fig. 2). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis confirmed the formation of the as-prepared NP1, NP2, and NP3 nanoparticles with hydrodynamic radii of ~50–150 nm (Supplementary Fig. 3). The bidentate hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions derived from the catechol27–29 and phenyl30,31 end groups of the hydrophilic PEG chains provided the driving force to induce the assembly of NP2 and NP3 nanoparticles and formation of the liquid NPA2 and NPA3 coacervates (G′ < G″), respectively (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 4)32–34. In contrast, the control NP1 nanoparticles with no end groups failed to form coacervates via fluid–fluid phase separation, thereby confirming the importance of the physical interactions of end groups to the formation of NPA coacervates (Supplementary Fig. 5).
The NPA2 coacervate was chosen as the model for further investigations because hydrogen-bonding interactions provided by the functionalized catechol groups that drive the coacervation of NP2 nanoparticles can mediate adhesion of the NPA2 coacervate to wet tissue surfaces35–38. The coacervation behaviors of NPA2 can be visualized by fluid–fluid phase separation and further examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and DLS (Fig. 1e). The dark spots marked by red circles in the TEM images are supposed to be the hydrophobic cores of the assembled NP2 nanoparticles, while the catechol-functionalized hydrophilic PEG shell acts as a flexible polymer matrix that connects the hydrophobic cores to form the stable NPA2 coacervate dense phase. It is noted that the free hydroxyl (-OH) groups generally exhibit narrow and intense absorption bands, while -OH groups involved in hydrogen bonding show a broader absorption band in FTIR39,40. The FTIR result of freeze-dried NPA2 coacervate showed an obvious broad -OH band, indicating the existence of hydrogen bonding interactions derived from catechol groups (Supplementary Fig. 6). DLS analysis further showed hydrogen bonding-mediated assembly of NP2 nanoparticles to form coacervate micro-droplets as confirmed by the increasing hydrodynamic radius of NP2 nanoparticles after 3.5 h of dialysis (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Free from electrostatic interactions, our noncomplex NPA2 coacervate is believed to be pH- and salt-independent. Compared with conventional complex coacervates that depend on pH values21, our NPA2 coacervate remained stable after 2 days and did not become a single-phase solution under a wide range of pH conditions (Fig. 1f). The frequency-dependent storage (G′) and loss (G″) moduli of the liquid NPA2 coacervate as revealed by rheological analysis demonstrates its highly dynamic polymeric structure due to the presence of supramolecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonding derived from the catechol groups (Supplementary Fig. 8)41. Furthermore, our noncomplex NPA2 coacervate exhibited a salting-out effect42,43, and the shear moduli (G′ and G″) and viscosity increased with increasing salt concentrations (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 9). It should be noted that electrostatic interactions between polyanions and polycations weaken with increasing salt concentrations; therefore, a critical salt concentration of 0.8–2.0 M NaCl generally can lead to the rapid dissociation of complex coacervates19,22. However, our NPA2 coacervate remained as a viscous liquid (G′ < G″) in 5.0 M NaCl, further confirming that the noncomplex NPA coacervation should be attributed to hydrogen bonding-induced nanoparticle assembly rather than electrostatic interactions. The rheological analysis confirmed the shear-thinning behavior of the NPA coacervates (Supplementary Figs. 8, 9). The viscosity of the NPA2 coacervate decreased quickly with an increasing shear rate from 0.1 to 20.0 s−1, thus insuring the easy injection of the NPA2 coacervate through a 21 G needle. In contrast, the NPA3 coacervate demonstrated a much lower viscosity than that of the NPA2 coacervate, and this can be attributed to the weak interaction energy of π–π interactions (<10 kJ mol−1) (Fig. 1d)30.
Biocompatible and digestive enzyme-resistant NPA2 coacervate possesses reversible wet bioadhesion
Fluid NPA2 coacervate with a solid content of about 15 wt% flowed out from a tilted glass bottle and formed a durable adhesive coating on the medical nitrile glove (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 10). Furthermore, the catechol-mediated wet bioadhesion of NPA2 coacervate was sufficiently strong to glue two ribbons of the porcine skin tissue together and hold the tissue weight (Fig. 2b)15. The adhesive energy (Gad) of NPA2 coacervate was estimated to be ~7.07 J m−2, similar to the previously reported values (around 2–10 J m−2) for nanoparticle-based44 and polymeric adhesives (Fig. 2c, d, e and Supplementary Fig. 11)45,46. The NPA2 coacervate-bonded porcine skin joints can withstand an applied force five times greater than that of the homolog control groups (NPA1 nanoparticle solution and NPA3 coacervate). Furthermore, the peak adhesion force of the NPA2 coacervate was achieved at a much larger deformation, indicating the capability to effectively dissipate a large amount of energy under a mechanical challenge (Fig. 2d). The low adhesion energy of the control homologs can be attributed to the weak bulk cohesion (NPA1 solution) or interfacial adhesion (NPA3 coacervate), respectively. Therefore, although the π–π interaction can facilitate coacervation, the negligible bioadhesion of the NPA3 coacervate makes it less suitable for drug delivery in the intestinal tract. Furthermore, reversible hydrogen bonding interactions derived from the catechol groups ensure the stable adhesion energy level of the NPA2 coacervate during the bonding/debonding cycles (Fig. 2f). Consistent with the observed bioadhesion on porcine skins, the NPA2 coacervate showed decent mucoadhesion (~2.74 J m−2) on the luminal surface of porcine intestines (Supplementary Fig. 12), which can be attributed to the physical interactions between the catechol/PEG structure of coacervate and glycosylated mucins47,48.
To evaluate the safety of oral administration, we first tested the cytotoxicity of our NPA2 coacervate by incubating it with human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). Viability staining and cell metabolic assays (MTT) of hMSCs incubated with NPA2 coacervate for 7 days suggested excellent cytocompatibility of the NPA2 coacervates (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. 13). Furthermore, Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were gavaged with NPA2 coacervate (4 g per kg rat) every other day for 10 days. During the 10-day exposure period, the rats receiving oral administration of coacervate did not develop any abnormal symptoms such as diarrhea and showed no significant weight change compared with the untreated healthy rats, further confirming the minimal toxicity of NPA coacervates (Fig. 2h).
We next investigated the influence of the physical peristalsis and chemical environment (gastric acid and intestinal fluid) of the GI tract on NPA2 coacervate coating by using simulated ex vivo experiments. When deposited on the upright intestinal mucosa surface, the fluid NPA2 coacervate can adhere to the fresh and wet mucosa and steadily flow down driven by gravity, leaving a trailing adhesive coating layer (Fig. 2i). After soaking the NPA2 coacervate-coated intestinal mucosa tissues in simulated gastric fluid (Ga) or simulated intestinal fluid (In) at 37 °C for 2 h, respectively, the adherent coacervate coatings remained undiluted and maintained adhesion on the mucosa surface (Fig. 2j and Supplementary Fig. 14). The NPA2 coacervate also remained largely stable in the 25 mg/ml pig bile salt or under the high shear strain (up to 1000%) despite a slight dip in shear moduli toward the high shear range (Supplementary Figs. 15, 16). In addition, the digestive enzyme-resistant polymeric structure of the NPA2 coacervate was further confirmed by incubating NPA2 coacervate in simulated gastric fluid (Ga) and simulated intestinal fluid (In) at 37 °C for 3 days, respectively (Fig. 2k). GPC analysis showed that no degraded or dissolved NPA2 coacervate components were found in the simulated body fluids (Ga′, In’) after 3 days of incubation (Fig. 2l). It is noted that the nontoxic, biologically, and chemically inert polyurethanes are widely used in clinical practices49,50, and a polyurethane-based surgical adhesive (TissuGlu®) has been approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for various clinical applications. Therefore, we believe that the stable polyurethane network of NPA2 coacervate helps establish the feasibility for the following in vivo evaluations. Besides, our laboratory-scale synthesis yielded ~300 ml of NPA2 coacervates per batch and showed stable batch-to-batch reproducibility, indicating the promising potential for large-scale production of NPA2 coacervates.
NPA2 coacervate optimizes drug release with extended GI residence time in vivo
We believe that the water‐immiscible, bioadhesive, and liquid nature of our noncomplex NPA2 coacervate can adapt to the complex motility, fluid content, and sharp pH variation within the GI tract, and establish a large-area durable coating on the intestinal mucosa to ensure sufficient intestinal retention for sustained drug release. To further test this hypothesis, the capability of NPA coacervates as bioadhesive coatings on the gastrointestinal mucosa was further evaluated in vivo (Fig. 3a). Sprague Dawley (SD) rats with unrestricted access to water and standard laboratory diet received a single oral gavage of 1.0 ml NPA2 or NPA3 coacervate (modified with a Cy7 tag, a near-infrared fluorescent dye) and were sacrificed after 0, 6, 24, or 48 h to evaluate the fluorescence retention in the harvested GI tract (Fig. 3b). In agreement with the in vitro bioadhesive property, the NPA2 coacervate adhered to the rat GI tract for at least 48 h as evidenced by the intense fluorescence signal, whereas the NPA3 coacervate had limited retention in the GI tract after 1 day (Fig. 3b). Normal gastric emptying takes place within 2 h, and colonic arrival occurs after 5 h51. Therefore, the in vivo intestinal retention experiments demonstrated the prolonged retention of our NPA2 coacervate in the GI tract.
We further evaluated the efficacy of the NPA2 coacervate to mediate sustained drug release both in vivo and in vitro. We utilized Dex-P, a water-soluble sodium phosphate salt of dexamethasone (Dex), as a model anti-inflammatory drug52. The NPA2 coacervate showed a high Dex-P encapsulation efficiency (the amount of Dex-P loaded in the NPA2 coacervate divided by the total Dex-P input) of ~42% (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 17). The partition coefficient (K), which was defined as the ratio between the concentration of Dex-P in the NPA2 coacervate and the supernatant Dex-P concentration, was around 3.62 (Fig. 3d). In addition to the excellent drug loading capacity, our NPA2 coacervate showed prolonged release of preloaded Dex-P under both in vitro (Fig. 3e) and in vivo conditions (Fig. 3f). We next examined the drug release kinetics in vivo by monitoring the serum levels of Dex-P at selected time points after oral gavage of Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervate or Dex-P aqueous solution (Fig. 3f). The serum concentration of Dex in SD rats spiked at 1 h after oral gavage of the Dex-P solution and then decreased rapidly (Dex-P/PBS). In contrast, the serum Dex concentration in the SD rats receiving oral gavage of Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervate (Dex-P/NPA2) remained consistently at the lower therapeutic level for over 40 h (Fig. 3f). The total dosage of Dex-P administered in the two groups was the same. Therefore, our NPA2 coacervate can mediate sustained release and improve the pharmacokinetics of the preloaded drug in the SD rat model, thereby reducing dosing frequency and systemic drug exposure.
It is noted that ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder limited to the colonic and rectal mucosa53 and shows similar gastric and small intestinal transit time as that of healthy controls54,55. Because absorption of the Dex-P, a water-soluble small molecule drug, mainly occurs in the small intestine in the absence of a drug carrier56, the serum Dex concentrations of DSS-induced colitic rats and healthy rats receiving the equivalent amount of Dex-P in PBS (Dex-P/PBS) were similar (Supplementary Fig. 18). We further tested the capability of NPA2 coacervates as bioadhesive coatings to mediate the sustained release of drugs in a DSS-induced colitic rat model. The observed retention of fluorescently-label coacervate in the harvested GI tract revealed that the NPA2 coacervate can adhere to the GI tract of colitic rats for at least 48 h, thus confirming the similar retention time of our NPA2 coacervate in the GI tract of colitic rats compared with that of the healthy rats (Supplementary Fig. 19), and this explained the observed similar release and uptake kinetics of coacervate-delivered Dex-P (as indicated by serum Dex concentration) between the colitic and healthy rats (Supplementary Figs. 19, 20).
To demonstrate the versatility of NPA2 coacervate to mediate sustained drug release, other first-line small molecule drugs used to treat IBD including antibiotic metronidazole, anti-inflammatory 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), and immunoregulatory methotrexate disodium salt (MTX) were also encapsulated into the NPA2 coacervate to investigate the release kinetics (Fig. 3g). The NPA2 coacervate showed high encapsulation efficiency and prolonged release kinetics of these drugs (Supplementary Fig. 17). In addition, the dried drug-laden NPA2 coacervate that is desirable for oral administration could be prepared via lyophilization, and simply adding dried drug-laden NPA2 coacervate into simulated gastric fluid or water could realize the rehydration to form fluid NPA2 coacervate with sustained-release kinetics of diverse drugs similar to the freshly prepared drug-laden NPA2 coacervate before lyophilization (Supplementary Fig. 21).
We hypothesized that the capability of NPA2 coacervates to mediate the sustained release of water-soluble small molecules such as Dex-P can be ascribed to the relatively hydrophobic environment within the NPA2 coacervate. We confirmed the above hypothesis by examining the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curve of the NPA2 coacervate (Fig. 3h). Our NPA2 coacervate showed a catechol oxidation potential (E0) of 0.596 V in deionized water, which was significantly higher than the E0 of soluble small molecule 4-methylcatechol (0.455 V)57. The high catechol oxidation potential suggests that the NPA2 coacervate with a high mass ratio of hydrophobic cores provides a highly stabilizing hydrophobic environment against catechol oxidation by shielding from the aqueous solvent58, thus facilitating the efficient loading and sustained release of a wide array of drugs.
Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervate shows potent therapeutic efficacy against acute colitis in a rodent model
We next evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of the Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervate in the rat model of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis (Fig. 4a). SD rats weighing around 250 g were given 4.5% DSS in drinking water for 7 days to develop acute colitis25. Clinical manifestations of the colitis, such as severe rectal bleeding, watery diarrhea, and colonic edema were observed after 7 days (Supplementary Fig. 22). After successfully establishing the colitis model in rats, colitic SD rats received oral gavages of Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervates (Dex-P/NPA2) or the equivalent amount of Dex-P in PBS (Dex-P/PBS) on days 1, 3, and 5 (Fig. 4b). Untreated colitic SD rats were used as the negative control. All SD rats were allowed unrestricted access to water and standard laboratory diet before and after oral gavage and sacrificed on day 7 for further evaluation of colon weight and length, histological severity, IBD-associated colonic myeloperoxidase (MPO)-activity, mRNA levels, and protein expressions of tight junction-associated proteins (ZO-1 and occludin-1) and pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in the distal colon.
Our results demonstrated the significant therapeutic efficacy of Dex-P/NPA2 treatment against DSS-induced acute colitis. Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervate significantly alleviated colonic edema and diarrhea caused by DSS-induced acute colitis (Fig. 4c). Relieved edema in colitic SD rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2 was further confirmed by the lower colon (cecum) weight/length ratio (Fig. 4d). Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining demonstrated significantly reduced histological inflammation in the colitic SD rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2, while histological damages, such as the compromised integrity of the mucosal epithelial lining, decrease in villus height and crypt depth, interstitial edema, and inflammatory infiltration were observed in untreated colitic SD rats (Control) or rats treated with the equivalent amount of Dex-P solution in PBS (Dex-P/PBS, Fig. 4e). Furthermore, histopathology scoring of H&E-stained tissue sections was used to evaluate the severity of colonic histological damage in a blinded fashion by a trained pathologist. Disease severity in colitic SD rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2 decreased significantly (mean histopathology score, 0.500) compared with colitic SD rats in the Dex-P/PBS group (mean histopathology score, 1.917) and the untreated control group (mean histopathology score, 3.000). Histopathology scores of colitic SD rats in the Dex-P/PBS group were not significantly different from the untreated control group (P = 0.056, Fig. 4f).
Colonic MPO activity in colitic SD rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2 was also significantly reduced compared with the untreated control group (Fig. 4g)59. Although we also observed a reduction of MPO activity in the Dex-P/PBS group due to the therapeutic activity of Dex-P against IBD, the high serum Dex level associated with such administration of Dex-P aqueous solution indicates an increased risk of complications related to severe systemic drug exposure (Fig. 3f). We have also tested the therapeutic efficacy of NPA2 alone to treat colitic rats via oral gavage on days 1, 3, and 5 and then analyzed the MPO activity and histopathology score of colon tissues on day 7 (Supplementary Fig. 23). The therapeutic efficacy of treatment with NPA2 alone did not show a significant difference compared with that of the non-treated colitic rats (Control) as evidenced by the similar MPO activity, histopathology score, and H&E staining, thus confirming that the NPA2 coacervate only served as a drug delivery vehicle and did not mitigate the colitic symptoms. In addition, colitic SD rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2 recovered the expression of tight junction-associated proteins including ZO-1 and occludin-1 and showed significantly reduced local levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF compared with the untreated group and Dex-P/PBS group (Fig. 4h, i and Supplementary Figs. 24,25). Taken together, oral delivery of Dex-P encapsulated in NPA2 coacervate to colitic SD rats showed significantly enhanced therapeutic outcomes and reduced systemic exposure than administering the equivalent amount of Dex-P in an aqueous solution (Supplementary Fig. 26).
Dex-P/NPA2 regulates innate immune responses and restores the gut microbiota
Macrophage activation can be broadly classified into the pro-inflammatory M1 polarization or anti-inflammatory M2 polarization60, and macrophages play a key role in the maintenance of mucosal homeostasis by secreting many cytokines61. Therefore, we next investigated the intestinal immune responses of colitic SD rats by analyzing macrophage polarizations in the harvested colon tissues from colitic rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2 or Dex-P/PBS and untreated colitic SD rats (Control) on day 5 (Fig. 5a). Many studies have shown that dexamethasone (Dex), a corticosteroid, can promote anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization and suppress pro-inflammatory M1 polarization62–64, thus enhancing the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1065. Immunohistochemistry staining against CD206 (M2 marker) or iNOS (M1 marker) showed increasing M2 macrophage polarization in the colitic SD rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2 (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 27). Furthermore, Dex-P/NPA2 treatment significantly reduced the local levels of pro-inflammatory IL-1β and IL-6 released by M1 macrophages (Fig. 5e) and increased the level of anti-inflammatory IL-10 (Fig. 5f)66. Taken together, oral administration of Dex-P/NPA2 to colitic SD rats promoted the M2 polarization of intestinal macrophages61 and mediated strong anti-inflammatory effects against acute colitis, thereby creating a favorable immune microenvironment to promote colon repair and regeneration (Fig. 5c, d).
Dysbiosis of gut microbiota, which is implicated in various inflammatory and immune diseases67, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of IBD, while the chronic inflammation caused by IBD, in turn, promotes dysbiosis of gut microbiota68. Therefore, restoring gut microbiota and recovery of gut immune homeostasis can complement each other in the successful treatment of acute colitis. Although orally administered Dex-P may not directly modulate the gut microbiota69, we expected the enhanced gut immune microenvironment by Dex-P/NPA2 treatment can positively regulate the gut microbiota. Analyses of fecal samples collected from colitic SD rats on day 5 by sequencing the V4 region of the 16 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene showed that Dex-P/NPA2 treatment indeed increased the bacterial richness (observed operational taxonomic units, OTUs) and diversity (Chao and Shannon indices) in colitic SD rats (Fig. 5g, h). In addition, a heatmap of β-diversity distance distribution was generated, and samples with similar β-diversity were clustered to reflect the similar compositions of gut microbiota (Fig. 5i). The β-diversities between colitic SD rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2 and healthy SD rats were clustered more closely compared with colitic SD rats in the Dex-P/PBS group and the untreated control group (Control), thus suggesting the enhanced recovery of gut microbiota in colitic SD rats by Dex-P/NPA2 treatment. This was further confirmed by the taxonomic bacterial distribution histogram and clustered heatmap based on the relative abundance of gut microbiota at the family level (Fig. 5j, k).
In conclusion, we have developed a simple yet highly efficient strategy for oral drug delivery by using a nanoparticle-assembled (NPA) bioadhesive noncomplex coacervate. The NPA coacervate exhibited: (1) pH and salt-independent stability under the complex environment within the GI tract; (2) effective coating of large intestinal surface and prolonged intestinal retention for several days; and (3) enhanced therapeutic efficacy for IBD and gut microbiota restoration with reduced systemic drug exposure via the controlled release of a loaded drug. When used for clinical treatments, these highly desired attributes of NPA coacervate-based oral drug delivery will potentially enhance patient compliance and acceptance and therefore the eventual therapeutic outcomes, especially compared with conventional therapies such as enema, subcutaneous and intravenous injection. Although we used Dex-P as a model drug to treat IBD in this study, our bioadhesive NPA2 coacervate can effectively deliver many other drugs, especially the water-soluble small molecule drugs, which are usually difficult to achieve sustained-release kinetics by using the existing oral drug delivery platforms. Therefore, we believe that the NPA coacervate-based drug delivery represents a promising approach to the treatment of numerous gastrointestinal diseases, including mucosal wound healing, gastrointestinal cancers, peptic ulcers, and viral infections.
Methods
In situ assembly of as-prepared core-shell nanoparticles into NPA coacervate
The concentrated amphiphilic polymers composed of hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and hydrophobic segments in 20 ml DMF (~27 wt%) were dropped into cold deionized water (60 mL) with 600 rpm magnetic stirring to form the core-shell nanoparticles (NP1, NP2, and NP3), respectively. The nanoparticle solutions then were dialyzed against deionized water (standard regenerated cellulose (RC) dialysis membrane with 3.5 kDa cutoff, Spectrum Chemical) at room temperature for 24 h to form NPA coacervates via nanoparticle assembly. To determine the successful synthesis and the molecular weight of the hydrophobic segment of the amphiphilic polymers, 1.5 μL of the hydrophobic segment in methanol (1 mg/ml) was premixed with 1.5 μL of matrix solution (saturated α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, Sigma). Then this mixture was applied to a ground steel target that was ready for mass spectrometry. Finally, the analyses of air-dried samples were performed in an AutoFlex Speed LRF MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) under reflector mode.
In vitro biocompatibility test
Passage 4 hMSCs (8 × 104 cells/well, Lonza, Catalog #: PT-2501) were incubated in six-well plates. Each well was added 2 mL growth medium consisting of α-minimum essential medium (Gibco) supplemented with 16.7% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 1% glutamine (Sigma), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma). NPA2 coacervates with a final concentration of 5 mg/mL were added. The control groups were not added NPA2 coacervates. The medium was changed every 2 days. Live/dead staining (Thermo Fisher) was performed on day 7. hMSCs were imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon C2). For the MTT assay, hMSCs (0.6 × 104 cells/well) were incubated in a 96-well plate in the growth medium. About 5 mg/mL NPA2 coacervates were used to culture the cells for 7 days. After that, 10 μL MTT (0.5 mg/mL) was added to each well to produce formazan crystals according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher), which were further dissolved by 200 μL of DMSO (Sigma). Finally, a Multiskan microplate reader (Thermo Fisher) was used to collect the absorbance value of each well at 540 nm for cell metabolic calculation.
Animals
Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (200–300 g, female, 8–12 weeks) were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Services Centre (Chinese University of Hong Kong) and cohoused for a week before being randomly assigned to different groups. Animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (19-152-MIS) and were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animals Ordinance (Chapter 340), Department of Health, Hong Kong.
Oral toxicity test
SD rats (200–300 g, female, 8–12 weeks) receiving oral administration of NPA2 coacervate (4 g per kg rat) on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 during the 10-day toxicity evaluation and untreated healthy rats were used as the control group. Body weights were measured. Any abnormal symptoms such as diarrhea were recorded.
Ex vivo adhesion experiments
Fresh intestinal tissues were bought from Sha Tin Market (Hong Kong), stored on ice, and washed with PBS buffer (1×) three times before use. For ex vivo adhesion testing, NPA2 coacervate stained by Fast Green FCF (Sigma) was deposited on the upright wet intestinal mucosa surface to monitor gravity-induced fluid adhesion behaviors of NPA2 coacervate over time. Then the above NPA2 coacervate-coated intestinal tissues were soaked in simulated gastric fluid (Ga) or simulated intestinal fluid (In) at 37 °C for 2 h respectively. To monitor changes of the adherent coacervate coatings, photos were taken before and after the soaking and analyzed by ImageJ 1.8.0_172. Simulated gastric fluid (Ga) and simulated intestinal fluid (In) with enzymes were prepared following United States Pharmacopoeias (USP).
Digestive enzyme-resistant test
NPA2 coacervates were incubated in simulated gastric fluid (Ga) and simulated intestinal fluid (In) at 37 °C for 3 days, respectively. GPC (Agilent system, 1260 Infinity II) with a refractive index detector was used to detect whether the degraded or dissolved NPA2 coacervate components existed in the simulated body fluids (Ga′, In′) after 3 days of incubation. PBS (1×, Gibco) was used as the elution phase. NPA2 coacervate was also placed in 1x PBS buffer with pig bile salt (25 mg/ml, Solarbio) for 24 h at 37 °C to test its stability.
In vivo NPA coacervates adhesion experiments
Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (female, 8–12 weeks) weighing around 250 g were housed in groups of three rats per cage. SD rats were allowed unrestricted access to water and a standard laboratory diet before and after oral gavage. SD rats weighing around 250 g received 4.5% Dextran sodium sulfate (DSS, 40 kDa, Alfa Aesar) supplemented in the drinking water for 7 days to induce colitis, followed by normal water during the treatment. Healthy SD rats or DSS-induced colitic rats received a single oral gavage of 1.0 ml NPA2 or NPA3 coacervate (modified with a Cy7 tag, a near-infrared fluorescent dye). Briefly, an amine-NCO reaction between Cyanine 7 amine (0.2 mg, Lumiprobe) and polymerized PEG with terminated NCO groups (1 at Supplementary Method 1) was used to modify the hydrophilic PEG shell of NP nanoparticles with a Cy7 tag. Then SD rats were sacrificed after 0, 6, 24, or 48 h, and GI tracts were harvested to evaluate the fluorescence retention by an in vivo live imaging system IVIS200 (Xenogen) with an ICG filter channel to measure the fluorescent signal intensity.
In vitro and in vivo drug release
For in vitro Dex-P release, 2 ml of Dex-P in PBS (1.5 mg/ml, TCI) was added to 1 ml NPA2 coacervate followed by vortex for 15 s for Dex-P encapsulation. The changes of supernatant Dex-P concentrations were measured by a Shimadzu UV-3600 UV–vis–NIR spectrophotometer at 242 nm. Then 2 ml fresh PBS buffer (1×, Gibco) was added to the as-prepared Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervate (1 ml). Dex-P concentrations in the above PBS were measured at 242 nm. The protocols for in vitro release of other first-line small molecule drugs used to treat IBD including antibiotic metronidazole (Metro, J&K), anti-inflammatory 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, J&K), and immunoregulatory methotrexate disodium salt (MTX, Alfa Aesar) were the same as in vitro Dex-P release, but the release of Metro, 5-ASA, and MTX was measured at 320, 331, and 371 nm, respectively.
For in vivo Dex-P release, healthy SD rats or DSS-induced colitic rats (200–300 g, female, 8–12 week) received a single oral gavage of 1.0 ml as-prepared Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervate (Dex-P/NPA2) or Dex-P aqueous solution (Dex-P/PBS). The total dosage of Dex-P administered in the two groups was the same (~1.15 mg). SD rats were allowed unrestricted access to water and a standard laboratory diet before and after oral gavage. Blood was collected from the tail vein at selected time points after oral gavage of Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervate or Dex-P aqueous solution to measure the serum Dex concentrations by a commercial Dexamethasone ELISA assay (Neogen Corporation) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
DSS-induced rat models of colitis
SD rats (female, 8–12 weeks) weighing around 250 g received 4.5% Dextran sodium sulfate (DSS, 40 kDa, Alfa Aesar) supplemented in the drinking water for 7 days to induce colitis, followed by normal water during the treatment25. Healthy SD rats were provided with normal water only. Then NPA2 coacervate only, Dex-P-laden NPA2 coacervates (Dex-P/NPA2) or the equivalent amount of Dex-P (1.15 mg, MCE, USA) in PBS (Dex-P/PBS) on days 1, 3, and 5 was administered via an oral route into colitic SD rats. We have also tried to treat DSS-induced colitic rats with the equivalent amount of Dex-P (1.15 mg, MCE, USA) in PBS (Dex-P/PBS) via enema on days 1, 3, and 5. Dex-P was used at 1.15 mg per dose based on the published reports related to treatments in rodent colitis models52,70,71. Untreated colitic SD rats were used as a negative control. All SD rats were allowed unrestricted access to water and a standard laboratory diet before and after oral gavage. All SD rats were sacrificed on day 7, and the entire colon was excised and gently washed with physiological saline for further evaluation of colon weight and length, histological severity, IBD-associated colonic myeloperoxidase (MPO)-activity, expression of related mRNAs, immunofluorescence staining against tight junction-associated proteins including ZO-1 and occludin-1 (Santa Cruz), and ELISA tests for IL-6 and TNF (MultiSciences).
On day 5 of the treatment, colon tissues from colitic rats receiving Dex-P/NPA2 or Dex-P/PBS on days 1, and 3 and untreated colitic SD rats (Control) were harvested to study the intestinal immune responses of colitic SD rats by analyzing macrophage polarization. And fresh fecal samples were collected from the above colitic SD rats in each group on day 5 and stored at −80 °C in autoclaved sterile vials for further analysis of gut microbiota.
Immunol staining
Immunohistochemical staining for macrophage polarization was performed using an antibody against CD206 (M2 marker, Abcam, ab64693, dilution of 1:200) or iNOS (M1 marker, Abcam, ab283655, dilution of 1:200), followed by Vectastain ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories) and the DAB (3, 3-diaminobenzidine) Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories). Briefly, paraffin sections (7-μm thick) of distal colon tissues were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Then antigen retrieval of sections was performed in microwave-assistant hot antigen retrieval buffer (1×, citrate buffer pH 6.0, Abcam). Sections were further incubated with 10% horse serum (Thermo Fisher) for 30 min to block nonspecific binding sites. Next sections were incubated at 4 °C overnight with primary antibody directed against CD206 or iNOS (dilution of 1:200), followed by incubation with a biotinylated secondary antibody (Abcam, ab207995, dilution of 1:500). The staining was further developed using the Vectastain ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories) and the DAB (3, 3-diaminobenzidine) Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories) for peroxidase. Finally, sections were stained with hematoxylin.
Immunofluorescence staining for tight junction-associated proteins was performed using antibodies against ZO-1 (Santa Cruz, sc-33725) and occludin-1 (Santa Cruz, sc-271842), respectively. After rehydrating and performing antigen retrieval of the paraffin sections (7-μm thick) of distal colon tissues, nonspecific binding sites were blocked by 10% horse serum (Thermo Fisher) for 30 min. Next, sections were incubated at 4 °C overnight with primary antibodies directed against ZO-1 conjugated with Alexa Fluor® 488 (dilution of 1:200) and occludin-1 conjugated with Alexa Fluor® 594 (dilution of 1:200). Nuclei were then stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Thermo Fisher, dilution of 1:1000). Immunofluorescence images were obtained by using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon C2).
Statistical analysis
All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed by using ordinary one‐way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc testing or two-tailed Student’s t-test to compare multiple groups or two groups (Graphpad Prism 7.0), respectively. P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant differences among the compared groups, to which different asterisks were assigned (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). For all multiple comparisons, compare the mean of each column with the mean of every other column.
Reporting Summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from General Research Fund Grants from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (Project no. 14202920 and 14204618; Grant recipient: L.B.). The work was partially supported by Hong Kong Research Grants Council Theme-based Research Scheme (Ref. T13-402/17-N; Grant recipient: L.B.).
Source data
Author contributions
P.Z., X.F.X., X.X., P.W.Y.C., and L.B. designed the study, conducted the analysis, and prepared the manuscript. P.Z. synthesized coacervate and performed coacervate characterization procedures. X.F.X., K.K.C.L., and A.R. performed the in vivo experiments. P.Z., X.X., X.F.X., and B.Y. performed the handling of colon tissues and fecal samples in vitro. Y.D., P.S., H.Z., H.L., and X.P. provided discussion and analyzed the experiment. All authors were given the chance to read and edit the paper.
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Venkatakrishna Jala and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
The datasets for gut microbiota generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO repository under accession code “GSE167138”. Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Classifier is “publicly available [https://sourceforge.net/projects/rdp-classifier/files/rdp-classifier/]”. All other relevant data supporting the key findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Pengchao Zhao, Xianfeng Xia, Xiayi Xu.
Contributor Information
Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Email: philipchiu@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk.
Liming Bian, Email: bianlm@scut.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-27463-6.
References
- 1.Ng SC, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet. 2017;390:2769–2778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32448-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torres J, Burisch J, Riddle M, Dubinsky M, Colombel J-F. Preclinical disease and preventive strategies in IBD: perspectives, challenges and opportunities. Gut. 2016;65:1061–1069. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Windsor JW, Kaplan GG. Evolving epidemiology of IBD. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2019;21:40. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0705-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jairath V, Feagan BG. Global burden of inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;5:2–3. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30358-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vass P, et al. Drying technology strategies for colon-targeted oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals. J. Control. Release. 2019;296:162–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Buchman AL. Side effects of corticosteroid therapy. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2001;33:289–294. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200110000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tibbitt MW, Dahlman JE, Langer R. Emerging frontiers in drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:704–717. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kotla NG, et al. Bioresponsive drug delivery systems in intestinal inflammation: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2019;146:248–266. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ahadian, S. et al. Micro and nanoscale technologies in oral drug delivery. Adv. Drug Del. Rev.157, 37–62 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Duraj‐Thatte AM, et al. Genetically programmable self‐regenerating bacterial hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:1901826. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yuk H, et al. Dry double-sided tape for adhesion of wet tissues and devices. Nature. 2019;575:169–174. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1710-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Deng, J. et al. Electrical bioadhesive interface for bioelectronics. Nat. Mater. 20, 229–236 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.Bu Y, et al. Tetra‐PEG based hydrogel sealants for in vivo visceral hemostasis. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:1901580. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang Y, et al. A phenol‐amine superglue inspired by insect sclerotization process. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2002118. doi: 10.1002/adma.202002118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu, X. et al. Bioadhesive hydrogels demonstrating pH-independent and ultrafast gelation promote gastric ulcer healing in pigs. Sci. Transl. Med.12, eaba8014 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Liu S, et al. Enzyme-mediated nitric oxide production in vasoactive erythrocyte membrane-enclosed coacervate protocells. Nat. Chem. 2020;12:1165–1173. doi: 10.1038/s41557-020-00585-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jeon O, Wolfson DW, Alsberg E. In‐situ formation of growth‐factor‐loaded coacervate microparticle‐embedded hydrogels for directing encapsulated stem cell fate. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:2216–2223. doi: 10.1002/adma.201405337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tang TD, et al. Fatty acid membrane assembly on coacervate microdroplets as a step towards a hybrid protocell model. Nat. Chem. 2014;6:527. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sing CE, Perry SL. Recent progress in the science of complex coacervation. Soft Matter. 2020;16:2885–2914. doi: 10.1039/d0sm00001a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khutoryanskiy VV. Supramolecular materials: longer and safer gastric residence. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:963–964. doi: 10.1038/nmat4432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Love C, et al. Reversible pH‐responsive coacervate formation in lipid vesicles activates dormant enzymatic reactions. Angew. Chem. 2020;132:6006–6013. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang Q, Schlenoff JB. The polyelectrolyte complex/coacervate continuum. Macromolecules. 2014;47:3108–3116. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chang L-W, et al. Sequence and entropy-based control of complex coacervates. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01249-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee Y, et al. Therapeutic luminal coating of the intestine. Nat. Mater. 2018;17:834. doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0106-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Martin, J. C., Bériou, G. & Josien, R. Dextran Sulfate Sodium (DSS)-Induced Acute Colitis in the Rat. In Suppression and Regulation of Immune Responses Ch. 12, pp. 197-203 (Springer, 2016). https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007%2F978-1-4939-3139-2_12. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Melgar S, et al. Validation of murine dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis using four therapeutic agents for human inflammatory bowel disease. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2008;8:836–844. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2008.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Deepankumar, K. et al. Liquid–liquid phase separation of the green mussel adhesive protein Pvfp‐5 is regulated by the post‐translated dopa amino acid. Adv. Mater. 2103828 (2021). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.202103828. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.Ahn BK, Lee DW, Israelachvili JN, Waite JH. Surface-initiated self-healing of polymers in aqueous media. Nat. Mater. 2014;13:867. doi: 10.1038/nmat4037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li L, Yan B, Yang J, Chen L, Zeng H. Novel mussel‐inspired injectable self‐healing hydrogel with anti‐biofouling property. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:1294–1299. doi: 10.1002/adma.201405166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Deng J-H, et al. π-π stacking interactions: non-negligible forces for stabilizing porous supramolecular frameworks. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaax9976. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax9976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Salonen LM, Ellermann M, Diederich F. Aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition: energetics and structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:4808–4842. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li F, et al. Responsive assembly of upconversion nanoparticles for pH‐activated and near‐infrared‐triggered photodynamic therapy of deep tumors. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1802808. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liao H, et al. Dynamic supraparticles for the treatment of age-related diseases. Sci. Bull. 2019;64:1850–1874. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhao P, et al. Nanoparticle‐assembled vacuolated coacervates control macromolecule spatiotemporal distribution to provide a stable segregated cell microenvironment. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2007209. doi: 10.1002/adma.202007209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shin M, et al. Complete prevention of blood loss with self-sealing haemostatic needles. Nat. Mater. 2017;16:147. doi: 10.1038/nmat4758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liang S, et al. Paintable and rapidly bondable conductive hydrogels as therapeutic cardiac patches. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1704235. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Akram Bhuiyan MS, et al. In situ deactivation of catechol-containing adhesive using electrochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:4631–4638. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gan D, et al. Plant-inspired adhesive and tough hydrogel based on Ag-Lignin nanoparticles-triggered dynamic redox catechol chemistry. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09351-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Grieco C, et al. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding modulates O‐H photodissociation in molecular aggregates of a catechol derivative. Photochem. Photobio. 2019;95:163–175. doi: 10.1111/php.13035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Grieco C, Hanes AT, Blancafort L, Kohler B. Effects of intra-and intermolecular hydrogen bonding on O–H bond photodissociation pathways of a catechol derivative. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2019;123:5356–5366. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b04573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhao P, et al. Mussel-mimetic hydrogels with defined cross-linkers achieved via controlled catechol dimerization exhibiting tough adhesion for wet biological tissues. Chem. Commun. 2017;53:12000–12003. doi: 10.1039/c7cc07215e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yang Y, Wang X, Yang F, Shen H, Wu D. A universal soaking strategy to convert composite hydrogels into extremely tough and rapidly recoverable double‐network hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:7178–7184. doi: 10.1002/adma.201601742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.He Q, Huang Y, Wang S. Hofmeister effect‐assisted one step fabrication of ductile and strong gelatin hydrogels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28:1705069. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rose S, et al. Nanoparticle solutions as adhesives for gels and biological tissues. Nature. 2014;505:382. doi: 10.1038/nature12806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhao Y, et al. Bio-inspired reversible underwater adhesive. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2218. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02387-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu J, Tan CSY, Scherman OA. Dynamic interfacial adhesion through cucurbit [n] uril molecular recognition. Angew. Chem. 2018;130:8992–8996. doi: 10.1002/anie.201800775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang YY, et al. Addressing the PEG mucoadhesivity paradox to engineer nanoparticles that “slip” through the human mucus barrier. Angew. Chem. 2008;120:9872–9875. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim K, Kim K, Ryu JH, Lee H. Chitosan-catechol: a polymer with long-lasting mucoadhesive properties. Biomaterials. 2015;52:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bouten PJ, et al. The chemistry of tissue adhesive materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014;39:1375–1405. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Annabi N, et al. Surgical materials: current challenges and nano-enabled solutions. Nano Today. 2014;9:574–589. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Christensen F, et al. The use of gamma scintigraphy to follow the gastrointestinal transit of pharmaceutical formulations. J. Pharm. Pharm. 1985;37:91–95. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1985.tb05013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang S, et al. An inflammation-targeting hydrogel for local drug delivery in inflammatory bowel disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:300ra128–300ra128. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa5657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hatton GB, Madla CM, Rabbie SC, Basit AW. All disease begins in the gut: influence of gastrointestinal disorders and surgery on oral drug performance. Int. J. Pharm. 2018;548:408–422. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fischer M, Siva S, Wo JM, Fadda HM. Assessment of small intestinal transit times in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease patients with different disease activity using video capsule endoscopy. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017;18:404–409. doi: 10.1208/s12249-016-0521-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Effinger A, O’Driscoll CM, McAllister M, Fotaki N. Impact of gastrointestinal disease states on oral drug absorption–implications for formulation design–a PEARRL review. J. Pharm. Pharm. 2019;71:674–698. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fedorak RN, et al. Colonic delivery of dexamethasone from a prodrug accelerates healing of colitis in rats without adrenal suppression. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:1688–1699. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90130-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ahn BK, et al. High-performance mussel-inspired adhesives of reduced complexity. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8663. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Seo S, et al. Microphase behavior and enhanced wet-cohesion of synthetic copolyampholytes inspired by a mussel foot protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:9214–9217. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wilson DS, et al. Orally delivered thioketal nanoparticles loaded with TNF-α–siRNA target inflammation and inhibit gene expression in the intestines. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:923–928. doi: 10.1038/nmat2859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kang H, et al. Immunoregulation of macrophages by dynamic ligand presentation via ligand–cation coordination. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1696. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09733-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Na, Y. R., Stakenborg, M., Seok, S. H. & Matteoli, G. Macrophages in intestinal inflammation and resolution: a potential therapeutic target in IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.16, 531–543 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 62.Jiang K, et al. Local release of dexamethasone from macroporous scaffolds accelerates islet transplant engraftment by promotion of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. Biomaterials. 2017;114:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kumar M, Gupta P, Bhattacharjee S, Nandi SK, Mandal BB. Immunomodulatory injectable silk hydrogels maintaining functional islets and promoting anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization. Biomaterials. 2018;187:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sang X, et al. Macrophage-targeted lung delivery of dexamethasone improves pulmonary fibrosis therapy via regulating the immune microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:393. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.613907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Aras S, Zaidi MR. TAMeless traitors: macrophages in cancer progression and metastasis. Br. J. Cancer. 2017;117:1583–1591. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lee, Y. et al. Hyaluronic acid–bilirubin nanomedicine for targeted modulation of dysregulated intestinal barrier, microbiome and immune responses in colitis. Nat. Mater.19, 118–126 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 67.Schluter, J. et al. The gut microbiota is associated with immune cell dynamics in humans. Nature588, 303–307 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Ni J, Wu GD, Albenberg L, Tomov VT. Gut microbiota and IBD: causation or correlation? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017;14:573. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nishida A, et al. Gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 2018;11:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12328-017-0813-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Cannarile L, et al. Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper is protective in Th1-mediated models of colitis. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:530–541. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yuan H, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of diammonium glycyrrhizinate in a rat model of ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006;12:4578. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i28.4578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets for gut microbiota generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO repository under accession code “GSE167138”. Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Classifier is “publicly available [https://sourceforge.net/projects/rdp-classifier/files/rdp-classifier/]”. All other relevant data supporting the key findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.