Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2021 Dec 10;12:7186. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27319-z

Ciliary Hedgehog signaling patterns the digestive system to generate mechanical forces driving elongation

Ying Yang 1, Pekka Paivinen 2, Chang Xie 1, Alexis Leigh Krup 1, Tomi P Makela 2, Keith E Mostov 1,3, Jeremy F Reiter 1,4,
PMCID: PMC8664829  PMID: 34893605

Abstract

How tubular organs elongate is poorly understood. We found that attenuated ciliary Hedgehog signaling in the gut wall impaired patterning of the circumferential smooth muscle and inhibited proliferation and elongation of developing intestine and esophagus. Similarly, ablation of gut-wall smooth muscle cells reduced lengthening. Disruption of ciliary Hedgehog signaling or removal of smooth muscle reduced residual stress within the gut wall and decreased activity of the mechanotransductive effector YAP. Removing YAP in the mesenchyme also reduced proliferation and elongation, but without affecting smooth muscle formation, suggesting that YAP interprets the smooth muscle-generated force to promote longitudinal growth. Additionally, we developed an intestinal culture system that recapitulates the requirements for cilia and mechanical forces in elongation. Pharmacologically activating YAP in this system restored elongation of cilia-deficient intestines. Thus, our results reveal that ciliary Hedgehog signaling patterns the circumferential smooth muscle to generate radial mechanical forces that activate YAP and elongate the gut.

Subject terms: Cell biology, Developmental biology


The mechanisms underlying tubular organ elongation remain poorly understood. Here, the authors show that primary cilia interpret Hedgehog signals to pattern the developing gut and that smooth muscle in the gut wall generates mechanical forces that direct longitudinal growth.

Introduction

Many of our organs, including the alimentary tract, are epithelial tubes surrounded by mesenchyme. In humans, the endodermal tube post-gastrulation is approximately 1 mm long, and, at birth, the alimentary tract is over 3 m long, representing a > 3,000-fold increase in length1. In contrast, the fetus itself elongates approximately 500-fold in the same time. In the postnatal intestine, applied distractive forces can lead to lengthening2. The sources of mechanical force in development and whether mechanical force contributes to developmental elongation have been unclear.

Mechanical forces during development can be generated by smooth muscle. During late gestation, smooth muscle generates biophysical cues that instruct the formation of the second longitudinal smooth muscle layer in the intestine3. Smooth muscle is also implicated in airway branching4. In the mouse gut, smooth muscle arises from mesoderm-derived stromal cells beginning at embryonic day (E) 11. During E12-13, these smooth muscle cells organize into a distinct circumferential layer5. The formation of this smooth muscle layer requires Hedgehog (HH) signaling3,69. Interestingly, Hedgehog (HH) ligands also participate in intestinal lengthening6,10. How HH signaling drives both smooth muscle differentiation and intestinal elongation and whether these two events are coupled have not been understood.

Mechanical stimuli can activate the Hippo pathway and lead to organ growth11,12. The primary transcriptional effectors of the Hippo pathway are Yes-associated protein (YAP, also called YAP1) and its related co-transcriptional factor TAZ (also called WWTR1)13,14. Different mechanical influences cause YAP and TAZ to localize to either the nucleus or the cytoplasm15,16. Nuclear YAP and TAZ promote cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis17,18. Although YAP restricts the HH-dependent differentiation of smooth muscle7, it has been unclear whether, conversely, HH signaling regulates YAP activity.

Vertebrate HH signaling is transduced by a specialized signaling organelle called the primary cilium. Most mammalian cells possess a single, non-motile primary cilium protruding from the cell surface. The primary cilium is comprised of a microtubule-based axoneme built atop a mother centriole and sheathed by a ciliary membrane enriched in specific signaling proteins19. HH signals trigger the entry of a seven-pass transmembrane protein, Smoothened (SMO), into the cilium where it activates the downstream transcriptional effectors of the HH pathway20. Although cilia transduce HH signals to pattern the limb and neural tube2124, whether cilia function in gut development has been unexplored.

In this work, we examined the development of the gut in mouse mutants with defective ciliary signaling and found that cilia are essential to regulate the formation of the circumferential smooth muscle to drive the elongation of developing intestine and esophagus.

Results

Cilia are critical for the elongation of tubular organs

Human mutations in Ciliogenesis associated kinase 1 (CILK1, also called Intestinal cell kinase or ICK) cause lethal endocrine-cerebro-osteodysplasia and short rib polydactyly syndromes2528. We and others found that CILK1 is a ciliary kinase important for ciliary morphology and HH signaling2932. To study the effects on intestinal development by impaired cilia, we generated mouse germline and conditional null alleles of Cilk1 (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Consistent with previous reports30,31, Cilk1−/− embryos survived until birth and displayed edema, shortened ribs and polydactyly (Supplementary Fig. 1B). These phenotypes are consistent with developmental roles for CILK1 in regulating ciliogenesis and ciliary HH signaling. In addition to previously described phenotypes, we observed that Cilk1−/− embryos exhibited dramatically shortened small intestines (Fig. 1A–B). An approximately 50% reduction in intestinal length was completely penetrant in Cilk1−/− from E14.5 (Fig. 1A–B). Other growth parameters, such as intestinal diameter or body length, were unchanged in Cilk1−/− embryos (Supplementary Fig. 1C–D), indicating that the intestinal shortening phenotype is not reflective of global growth defects.

Fig. 1. Mesenchymal cilia are essential for the cell proliferation and elongation of tubular organs.

Fig. 1

A E14.5 intestines after separation from the mesentery of Cilk1+/− and Cilk1−/− embryos. The length of the small intestine was measured from the caudal stomach (orange arrowheads) to the rostral cecum (purple arrowheads). Scale bar, 1 mm. B Lengths of the small intestines of Cilk1+/+ (n = 9, 4, 5, 5, 4), Cilk1+/− (n = 18, 7, 18, 12, 9), and Cilk1−/− (n = 10, 5, 9, 7, 7) embryos at E13.5, 14.5, 15.5, 16.5, and 17.5. C E16.5 esophagi of Cilk1+/− and Cilk1−/− embryos. The length of the esophagi was measured from the stomach (orange arrowheads) to the pharynx (purple arrowheads). Scale bar, 1 mm. D Lengths of the esophagi of Cilk1+/+ (n = 4 and 4), Cilk1+/− (n = 4 and 8), and Cilk1−/− (n = 5 and 4) embryos at E14.5 and E16.5 (adjusted P values are 0.0021 for Cilk1+/+ vs Cilk1−/− and 0.0003 for Cilk1+/− vs Cilk1−/−). E Immunofluorescence staining of E13.5 intestinal cross sections from Cilk1+/− and Cilk1−/− embryos for IFT88 (green), ciliary axonemes (TUBAc, red), basal bodies (γ-tubulin, white), and nuclei (Hoechst, blue). Right, higher magnifications of boxed cilia. White boxes highlight mesenchymal cilia and gray boxes highlight epithelial cilia. Scale bar of larger images, 5 μm. Scale bar of enlarged images, 2 μm. F Lengths of E13.5, E15.5, and E18.5 control (Cilk1lox/lox n = 3, 5, 3 and Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/+ n = 5, 7, 6) and Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox (n = 6, 10, 4) small intestines. G Immunofluorescence staining for EdU (white) and nuclei (Hoechst, blue) in E13.5 Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/+ and Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox intestines. Scale bar, 25 μm. Orange dotted lines outline the epithelium. H The percentage of EdU-positive cells in the whole intestine, the epithelial cells and the mesenchymal cells in Cilk1lox/lox (n = 3), Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/+ (n = 4) and Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox (n = 4) embryos at E13.5. For each intestine, we averaged the percentages from three sections. B, D, F, and H Each point in the scatter plots represents the value from an individual embryonic intestine or esophagus. Horizontal bars indicate means ± SD. ns, p > 0.05; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 indicate adjusted P values between indicated samples by two-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

Quantifying mitotic intestinal cells using immunofluorescence for phosphorylated histone H3 (pHH3) revealed that overall proliferation was reduced in E13.5 Cilk1−/− intestines (Supplementary Fig. 1E, F). Co-staining for α-tubulin-containing mitotic spindles distinguished radially and longitudinally dividing cells. Interestingly, the number of radially dividing cells was not affected by loss of CILK1 (Supplementary Fig. 1E, F). Thus, the reduced elongation of Cilk1−/− intestine is associated with decreased proliferation.

To investigate another part of the gut, we examined the developing esophagus. Like the small intestines, Cilk1−/− esophagi were shorter than those of control at E16.5 (Fig. 1C, D). To test whether, as in the intestine, the reduced elongation of Cilk1−/− esophagi was associated with decreased proliferation, we quantified 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation into Cilk1−/− and littermate control Cilk+/- esophagi at E14.5, a timepoint prior to the emergence of differences in esophageal length. The proportion of EdU-labeled cells was reduced in Cilk1−/− esophagi (Supplementary Fig. 1G). Thus, CILK1 promotes elongation in multiple parts of the developing gut through proliferation.

To begin to investigate how CILK1 regulates proliferation and elongation, we examined the intestinal cilia in Cilk1 mutants to assess whether CILK1 regulates the composition of cilia in the developing intestine. A ciliary protein, Intraflagellar Transport 88 (IFT88), was distributed along the length of control cilia. In contrast, IFT88 abnormally accumulated in the ciliary tips in both Cilk1−/− intestine epithelial (Fig. 1E, gray box) and mesenchymal cells (Fig. 1E, white box). This altered distribution of IFT88 indicates that CILK1 controls ciliary composition in the developing gut. As IFT88 is critical for intraciliary trafficking and ciliary signal transduction, these results further raise the possibility that the requirement for of CILK1 in tubular elongation could be dependent on cilia.

To test whether the role of CILK1 in intestinal development reflects its ciliary function, we examined intestines of other mutants affecting ciliary function, including mouse embryos lacking B9 domain-containing 1 (B9d1)33, or Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase (Inpp5e)34. In addition, we generated a loss-of-function allele of Tectonic 3 (Tctn3) (Supplementary Fig. 2A), encoding a component of the ciliary transition zone we previously identified35. Consistent with a previous report36, the Tctn3−/− embryos displayed microphthalmia and polydactyly at E13.5 (Supplementary Fig. 2B).

We investigated the B9d1, Inpp5e, and Tctn3 mouse mutants because the homozygous null mutants survive to gestational ages at which intestinal length can be ascertained and because they encode proteins that participate in ciliary signaling through distinct mechanisms. INPP5E generates a cilium-enriched phosphoinositide important for ciliary signaling3739. B9D1 and TCTN3 are components of the ciliary transition zone controlling ciliary composition35. Consistent with a function of TCTN3 at the transition zone, immunofluorescence staining for ARL13B, a transition zone-dependent ciliary component, revealed that E13.5 Tctn3−/− embryos displayed reduced numbers of ARL13B-positive cilia (Supplementary Fig. 2C).

Like Cilk1 null mutants, B9d1, Inpp5e, and Tctn3 mutants all exhibited shortened small intestines (Supplementary Fig. 2D–F). Thus, disrupting multiple aspects of ciliary function all resulted in shortened intestines, indicating that cilia promote elongation of the gut.

Mesenchymal cilia drive HH signaling and proliferation

Mesenchymal cells, which are the main HH responsive cells in the developing gut40, possessed cilia throughout development (Supplementary Fig. 3A, white boxes). In contrast, epithelial cells, which produce the HH ligands41, possessed cilia at E13.5 (Fig. 1E) but not at E18.5 (Supplementary Fig. 3A, gray boxes), consistent with a previous study42. As cilia were present in both the endoderm-derived epithelium and the mesoderm-derived mesenchyme surrounding the epithelium during early intestinal development, roles for cilia in intestinal elongation could reflect functions in the epithelium, the mesenchyme or both compartments. To distinguish between these possibilities, we removed CILK1 from either the epithelium or the mesenchyme and assessed intestinal length.

To remove CILK1 specifically from the epithelium, we generated ShhCre Cilk1lox/lox embryos, in which ShhCre 43 deleted Cilk1 specifically in the endodermal epithelium (Supplementary Fig. 3B). Consistent with paracrine HH signaling in the intestine40, the expression of HH target genes Gli1 and Ptch1 was enriched in the stromal compartment (Supplementary Fig. 3B). Gli1 and Ptch1 expression levels were unchanged in ShhCre Cilk1lox/lox embryos, and abrogating Cilk1 expression in the intestinal epithelium did not alter the length of ShhCre Cilk1lox/lox intestines at E18.5 (Supplementary Fig. 3B, C), suggesting that CILK1 in the epithelium is dispensable for intestinal elongation.

To remove CILK1 specifically from the mesenchyme, we generated Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox embryos. Dermo1Cre 44 was active in mesoderm-derived intestinal mesodermal cells, as revealed by Cre-dependent tdTomato expression (Supplementary Fig. 4A). In Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox intestine, the expression of Cilk1 was reduced as were the HH target genes Gli1 and Ptch1 (Supplementary Fig. 4B), indicating that CILK1 functions in the mesenchyme to transduce HH signals. These results demonstrate that mesenchymal cilia interpret HH signals in the developing gut. Unlike ShhCre Cilk1lox/lox embryos (Supplementary Fig. 3C), but like Cilk1−/− embryos (Fig. 1A, B), Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox embryos exhibited shortened intestines (Fig. 1F). Thus, intestinal lengthening during development depends upon CILK1 in the mesoderm-derived mesenchyme.

As in the intestine, depletion of CILK1 in the mesoderm-derived cells of Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox embryos shortened esophagi at E15.5 (Supplementary Fig. 4C). Thus, the lengthening of esophagus during development also depends upon ciliary signaling in the mesenchyme.

As CILK1 is required in the mesenchyme for both HH signal transduction and elongation, we hypothesized that ciliary HH signaling in the mesenchyme is essential for intestinal elongation. To test this hypothesis, we removed IFT88, essential for cilia assembly and maintenance45, in the mesenchyme (by generating Dermo1Cre Ift88lox/- embryos). Dermo1Cre Ift88lox/- embryos, like Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox embryos, exhibited shortened intestines at E14.5 (Supplementary Fig. 4D). Previous work demonstrated that depletion of epithelial HH ligands shortens intestinal length6. To test whether HH signals transduced by mesenchymal cilia promote elongation, we removed Smoothened (SMO), an essential component of the HH signal transduction pathway, from the mesenchyme. After generating Dermo1Cre Smolox/lox embryos and assessing their intestinal length at E14.5, we found that these intestines were shortened by approximately 55% (Supplementary Fig. 4E). Together, these results indicate that mesenchymal cilia transduce HH signals to drive elongation.

How might mesenchymal ciliary signaling promote elongation? As in Cilk1−/− esophagi (Supplementary Fig. 1G), the proportion of EdU-labeled cells was also reduced in Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox intestines (Fig. 1G, H). Interestingly, the decreased EdU labeling in Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox intestines was not restricted to the mesenchyme where CILK1 was deleted, but was also observed in the epithelium (Fig. 1G, H). These results demonstrate that mesenchymal CILK1 is essential for proliferation of both the mesenchyme and its associated epithelium, suggesting that the intestinal mesenchyme has important roles in promoting both proliferation and elongation in both cell compartments.

In addition to proliferation, programmed cell death also plays a role in regulating organ size4650. To assess whether increased apoptosis could account for decreased intestinal elongation, we quantified the prevalence of apoptotic cells marked by cleaved Caspase-3. We detected no increased in apoptosis in Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox guts (Supplementary Fig. 5A, B). Thus, CILK1 is essential for proliferative elongation of the gut tube.

Ciliary signaling patterns the circumferential smooth muscle

As HH signaling has been shown to regulate the patterning of smooth muscle cells3,69, we explored whether cilia participate in intestinal smooth muscle development. We stained for α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA), a marker of smooth muscle, at E13.5, prior to altered gut elongation in cilia mutants. We found that at E13.5 smooth muscle organization was disrupted in Cilk1−/− gut, as measured by increased variance of tangential alignment and increased radial distribution (Fig. 2A, B). This patterning defect was not due to the presence of more smooth muscle cells (Fig. 2C), but altered distribution in the gut wall (Fig. 2B). Therefore, CILK1 is not essential for smooth muscle differentiation or survival, but rather for its patterning and spatial organization.

Fig. 2. The circumferential smooth muscle cell layer is disrupted in the CILK1-deficient gut prior to length shortening.

Fig. 2

A Immunofluorescence staining for smooth muscle (αSMA, green) and nuclei (Hoechst, blue) in E13.5 Cilk1+/− and Cilk1−/− intestines. B The radial distribution of αSMA staining intensity from the center of the section to the outer section edge of E13.5 Cilk1+/− (n = 4) and Cilk1−/− (n = 4) intestines, subdivided into 15 ring bins. C The number of αSMA-positive cells per section from E13.5 Cilk1+/− (n = 3) and Cilk1−/− (n = 3) intestines. For each embryonic intestine, the number of αSMA-positive cells was averaged from 3–8 stained sections. Values are presented as means ± SD. ns, p > 0.05 by two-sided unpaired t test. D Immunofluorescence staining for smooth muscle (αSMA, green) and nuclei (Hoechst, blue) in E14.5 Cilk1+/− and Cilk1−/− esophagi. Upper panel, arrowheads indicate two layers of esophageal muscularis: lamina muscularis interna (purple) and the lamina muscularis externa (orange). E The radial distribution of αSMA staining intensity from the center of the section to the outer section edge of E14.5 Cilk1+/− (n = 3) and Cilk1−/− (n = 3) esophagi, subdivided into 15 ring bins. A, D right, higher magnifications of boxed regions. Scale bars, 25 μm. B, E The αSMA intensity fraction in each bin was averaged from 3–8 sections. Values are presented as means ± SEM. X axis, bin number. Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

To test whether the role of CILK1 in smooth muscle development is shared by other cilia-related proteins, we examined smooth muscle in Tctn3−/− gut. As with CILK1, TCTN3 was required for organization of the circumferential smooth muscle (Supplementary Fig. 6A, B). Together, these results indicate that cilia are required for the formation of the circumferential smooth muscle in the developing gut.

To assess whether mesenchymal cilia are specifically required for smooth muscle development, as they are for elongation, we examined smooth muscle of E13.5 in control and Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox guts (Supplementary Fig. 6C, D). Similar to Cilk1−/− smooth muscle, the smooth muscle of Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox guts was disorganized with increased radial distribution and disrupted circumferential alignment, indicating that cilia function specifically in the mesenchyme to pattern smooth muscle.

To examine whether mesenchymal ciliary signaling also patterns esophageal smooth muscle, we stained for αSMA in esophagi at E14.5, a timepoint before length is altered in Cilk1−/− embryos. As reported before3,51, at E14.5, αSMA was predominantly expressed by two layers of esophageal smooth muscle (Fig. 2D upper panel): lamina muscularis interna (purple arrowhead) and lamina muscularis externa (orange arrowhead). Both layers of lamina muscularis surround the esophageal epithelium (Fig. 2D upper panel). In Cilk1−/− esophagi, the spatial separation of the two smooth muscle layers was disrupted (Fig. 2D lower panel and Fig. 2E). This phenotype seemed not due to delayed development, because the two layers in E15.5 Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox esophagi were still not separated as those at E14.5 (Supplementary Fig. 6E, F). In addition, some smooth muscle fibers were misoriented in Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox esophagus (Supplementary Fig. 6E lower panel). Thus, as in the intestine, CILK1 also regulates the spatial organization of smooth muscle in the developing esophagus.

To test whether disrupting SMO also affects smooth muscle development, we analyzed smooth muscle in Dermo1Cre Smolox/lox and control embryos at E13.5. In Dermo1Cre Smolox/lox embryos, the circumferential smooth muscle layer was thinner (Supplementary Fig. 7A, B) and the number of αSMA-expressing cells was reduced (Supplementary Fig. 7C). Thus, both cilia and HH signaling are essential to pattern the intestinal circumferential smooth muscle.

Smooth muscle-generated residual stress drives elongation

Do disruptions in mesenchymal cilia or HH signaling independently impair smooth muscle development and decrease elongation, or do the defects in smooth muscle cause decreased elongation? To distinguish between these two possibilities, we tested whether smooth muscle itself is critical for elongation. Specifically, we partially ablated smooth muscle by expressing attenuated diphtheria toxin (DTA176) in smooth muscle under the control of the Myosin heavy polypeptide 11 (Myh11) regulatory elements (Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ embryos). To validate decreased smooth muscle, we co-stained the E15.5 intestine for αSMA and GFP. In the Myh11Cre-EGFP intestine, most αSMA-expressing cells also expressed GFP, indicating the Myh11Cre-EGFP is active in most smooth muscle cells (Supplementary Fig. 8A, upper panel). As expected, GFP expressing cells were mostly absent in Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ embryos (Supplementary Fig. 8A, lower panel). The number of αSMA-positive cells in Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ embryos was reduced to 63% of controls (Supplementary Fig. 8B).

Partially ablating the smooth muscle of Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ embryos did not grossly alter embryonic development at E15.5 (Supplementary Fig. 8C). However, Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ embryos exhibited shortened small intestines (Fig. 3A, B). Thus, the smooth muscle is critical for elongation, indicating that ciliary HH signaling patterns the smooth muscle to drive elongation.

Fig. 3. The circumferential smooth muscle creates residual stress to promote gut elongation.

Fig. 3

A Intestines from E15.5 control (Myh11Cre-EGFP and R26DTA176/+) and Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ embryos. Scale bar, 1 mm. The length of the small intestine was measured from the end of the stomach (orange arrowheads) to the beginning of cecum (purple arrowheads). B Lengths of E15.5 control (Myh11Cre-EGFP n = 4 and R26DTA176/+ n = 4) and Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ (n = 4) small intestines. Each point in the scatter plots represents the value from an individual embryo. Values are presented as means ± SD. *** adjusted P = 0.0007 by ordinary one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. C Schematic of method for measuring the opening angle to assess residual stress. We isolated approximately 1 mm long sections of E13.5 small intestine, cut the intestinal wall axially and measured the opening angle (θ), with the vertex at the midpoint of the inner epithelial surface and the rays intersecting the innermost edges of the cut wall. D The opening angles of intestinal segments from E13.5 control (wild type, n = 3, Myh11Cre-EGFP, n = 3 and R26DTA176/WT, n = 4) and Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ (n = 7) embryos. Adjusted P values are 0.0018 for Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ vs WT, 0.0054 for Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ vs Myh11Cre-EGFP, and 0.005 for Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ vs R26DTA176/WT. E The opening angles of intestinal segments from E13.5 Cilk1+/- (n = 4) and Cilk1−/− (n = 4) embryos. *p = 0.0138 by two-sided unpaired t test. F The opening angles of intestinal segments from E13.5 (Smolox/+, n = 6 and Dermo1Cre Smolox/+, n = 4) and Dermo1Cre Smolox/lox (n = 4) embryos. Adjusted P values are 0.0038 for Dermo1Cre Smolox/lox vs Smolox/+ and 0.0058 for Dermo1Cre Smolox/lox vs Dermo1Cre Smolox/+. G Representative E13.5 wild-type intestine segments opened axially (WT + cut) or not before (Day 0) and after culture in Matrigel for 2 days (Day 2). Scale bar, 1 mm. H Length fold change of the cultured intestine segments (WT: n = 3; WT + cut: n = 3) for indicated days. DF For each intestine, we calculated the median angle of 5–15 segments. DF and H values are presented as means ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test, except in E. Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

To understand how smooth muscle promotes elongation, we explored how the circumferential smooth muscle contributes to mechanical characteristics. Tubular organs, including the gut, exhibit a force called residual stress even in the absence of external loads52. We hypothesized that the smooth muscle is a source of circumferential residual stress. To test this hypothesis, we measured the opening angles (θ) resulting from longitudinally opening gut segments (Fig. 3C), indicators of tensile residual stress5355.

To assay whether intestinal residual stress is produced by smooth muscle, we measured the opening angle of intestinal segments of control and Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ embryos. The opening angles were reduced in Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ embryos (94.1° ± 8.0) as compared to controls (wild type 117.4° ± 10.4, Myh11Cre 114.4° ± 6.6, R26DTA176/+ 118.6° ± 4.2) (Fig. 3D). Therefore, smooth muscle contributes to circumferential residual stress. The residual stress measured by opening angles in the absence of supplemented extracellular calcium at room temperature likely reflect forces apart from any exerted by muscle contraction.

As partial ablation of the smooth muscle decreased residual stress in the intestine, we predicted that altered cilia function or mesenchymal HH signaling, both of which disrupt smooth muscle patterning, should also decrease residual stress. To begin to test this prediction, we examined the opening angles of Cilk1−/− intestines and found that compromising cilia function by loss of CILK1 reduced the opening angle by 31.1° ± 9.0 (Fig. 3E).

We also examined the opening angle of Dermo1Cre Smolox/lox intestines and found that disruption of mesenchymal HH signaling also reduced intestinal residual stress (Fig. 3F). Therefore, disruption of the smooth muscle by genetic ablation, impaired cilia, or decreased HH signaling, each reduces intestinal residual stress and compromises elongation. Together, these data raised the interesting possibility that residual stress produced by the circumferential smooth muscle promotes longitudinal growth.

To test this possibility, we established an in vitro culture system that supports intestinal elongation. Consistent with in vivo results, Dermo1Cre Cilk1lox/lox intestines exhibited decreased elongation in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 9A, B). To test whether residual stress is required for intestinal elongation in vitro, we released residual stress by incising intestines longitudinally. Cultured longitudinally incised intestines continued to proliferate and displayed no increase in apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. 9C, D). However, they failed to elongate (Fig. 3G, H), suggesting that residual stress in the intestine is important for its elongation.

Active contractions contribute to force produced by smooth muscle. In embryonic chicken intestine, the contractions of the circumferential smooth muscle promote anisotropic growth56. To assess mouse smooth muscle contractility in developing mouse intestine, we stained for phosphorylated Myosin Light Chain (phospho-MLC), a component of activated myosin57. Smooth muscle was positive for phospho-MLC at E18.5, but not at E13.5 (Supplementary Fig. 10A). Two-day treatment of Y-27632, a Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor58, did not alter the elongation of cultured mouse intestines (Supplementary Fig. 10B). As Y-27632 has been shown to inhibit muscle contraction at this concentration in multiple systems (but not confirmed here in the embryonic mouse gut)59,60, our data suggest that smooth muscle contraction may not be essential for mouse intestinal elongation at E13.5. Thus, smooth muscle contraction may contribute to generating intestinal forces and elongation at other stages or in specific species.

Smooth muscle activates YAP in the gut

How does force promote the elongation of tubular organs? In Drosophila development, mechanical strain is interpreted by the Hippo pathway61. The primary effector of the Hippo pathway is the transcriptional co-activator YAP, which translocates to the nucleus upon activation. To assess whether the Hippo pathway also interprets mechanical stresses in the developing gut, we stained E13.5 intestine for YAP. Interestingly, the nuclear localization of YAP depended on radial location: inner mesenchymal cells between the epithelium and the smooth muscle (peri-epi-me cells, Supplementary Fig. 11A) displayed higher levels of nuclear YAP, and more peripheral smooth muscle cells possessed lower levels of nuclear YAP (Fig. 4A, top panel).

Fig. 4. YAP nuclear levels and activity depend on CILK1.

Fig. 4

A Immunofluorescence staining of E13.5 Cilk1+/- and Cilk1−/− intestines for YAP (red), smooth muscle (αSMA, green), and nuclei (Hoechst, blue). Scale bar, 25 μm. Orange dotted lines outline the epithelium and smooth muscle cell boundaries, in between are the peri-epithelial mesenchymal cells. B Magnifications of the boxed areas from A. Scale bar, 25 μm. C Nuclear YAP intensities of peri-epithelial mesenchymal (peri-epi-me) cells in E13.5 Cilk1+/- (n = 4) and Cilk1−/− (n = 4) intestines. For each intestine, the nuclear YAP intensity per cell was averaged from three sections. Values are presented as means ± SEM. *p = 0.0176 by two-sided ratio paired t test. D Immunofluorescence staining of E14.5 Cilk1+/- and Cilk1−/− esophagi for YAP (red), smooth muscle (αSMA, green) and nuclei (Hoechst, blue). Scale bar, 25 μm. E Relative levels of End1, Ano5, and Ccl11 mRNA of E13.5 control Cilk1+/- (n = 4) and Cilk1−/− (n = 4) intestines. Values are presented as means ± SEM. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 by two-sided unpaired t test (0.0051 for Edn1, 0.0011 for Ano5 and 0.0114 for Ccl11). Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

If YAP responds to force generated in the intestine by the circumferential smooth muscle, we predicted that disrupting the smooth muscle would decrease YAP nuclear levels. To test this prediction, we examined YAP localization in Cilk1−/− intestine. Interestingly, the levels of nuclear YAP were decreased in Cilk1−/− peri-epithelial stromal cells, indicating that CILK1 regulates YAP activity in the intestinal wall, directly or indirectly (Fig. 4A–C). Similarly, in Cilk1−/− esophagus, smooth muscle organization was disrupted, and nuclear YAP was reduced (Fig. 4D and S11B). Consistent with the reduced YAP protein levels, the expression of YAP-regulated proliferative genes (Edn162, Ano563, and Ccl1164) was decreased in Cilk1−/− intestine (Fig. 4E).

Similarly, the levels of nuclear YAP were decreased in Dermo1Cre Smolox/lox peri-epithelial mesenchymal cells, revealing that mesenchymal HH signaling also promotes YAP nuclear levels (Supplementary Fig. 11C, D). Moreover, the levels of nuclear YAP were also decreased in Myh11Cre-EGFP R26DTA176/+ mesenchymal cells (Supplementary Fig. 11E, F). Together these results demonstrate that intestinal smooth muscle is critical for YAP activation. As mechanical strain activates YAP to drive cell proliferation in mammalian cells65, we hypothesized that YAP translates the force generated by the smooth muscle into growth.

Mesenchymal Hippo signaling promotes elongation

To test whether Hippo signaling participates in elongation, we generated Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ embryos. Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ embryos were grossly normal and exhibited no alteration in body size (Supplementary Fig. 12A). Dermo1Cre Yaplox/+ Tazlox/lox intestines were 10% shorter than controls (Fig. 5A, B), indicating that TAZ makes a more minor contribution to elongation. Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ intestines were 40% shorter than those of controls (Fig. 5A, B), demonstrating that mesenchymal YAP activity is critical for elongation.

Fig. 5. YAP functions in the mesenchyme to promote gut elongation and cell proliferation.

Fig. 5

A Photos of E13.5 Dermo1Cre Yaplox/+ Tazlox/+ and Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazox/+ intestines. Scale bar, 1 mm. The length of the small intestine was measured from the caudal stomach (orange arrowheads) to the rostral cecum (purple arrowheads). B Lengths of E13.5 in Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ (n = 3), Dermo1Cre Yaplox/+ Tazlox/lox (n = 7), Dermo1Cre Yaplox/+ Tazlox/+ (n = 5) and Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazox/+ (n = 9) intestines. Horizontal bars indicate means ± SD. ****p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. C Immunofluorescence staining of E12.5 Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ and Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ intestines for EdU (white) and nuclei (Hoechst, blue). Scale bar, 25 μm. Orange dotted lines outline the epithelium. D The percentage of EdU-positive cells in the E12.5 whole intestine, the epithelial cells or the mesenchymal cells in Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ (n = 4) and Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ (n = 3). For each intestine, we averaged the percentages in the indicated cell population from three stained sections. Horizontal bars indicate means ± SD. **p < 0.01 by two-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (adjusted P are 0.0031 for Total, 0.0014 for Epithelium and 0.0013 for Mesenchyme). E Relative levels of End1, Ano5, and Ccl11 mRNA in E13.5 control (Dermo1Cre Yaplox/+ Tazlox/+, n = 3) and Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ (n = 4) intestines. Values are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001 by two-sided unpaired t test (0.0114 for Edn1, 0.0005 for Ano5 and 0.0311 for Ccl11). F Immunofluorescence staining of E13.5 Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ and Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ intestines for YAP (red), smooth muscle (αSMA, green) and nuclei (Hoechst, blue). Higher magnifications of boxed regions are depicted in Supplementary Fig. 12B. Scale bar, 25 μm. Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

To examine whether mesenchymal YAP, like CILK1, promotes proliferation, we quantified EdU labeling of Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ and control intestines at E12.5. The percentage of EdU-labeled cells was reduced in Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ intestines both in the mesenchyme and epithelium (Fig. 5C, D), indicating that the proliferation is promoted by both CILK1 and YAP. The expression of pro-proliferative YAP-genes Edn1, Ano5 and Ccl11 is also decreased in Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ intestine as in Cilk1−/− intestine (Figs. 4E and 5E). E13.5 Dermo1Cre Yaplox/lox Tazlox/+ intestines displayed no alteration in smooth muscle development (Fig. 5F and S12B-C). These findings, that YAP is dispensable for smooth muscle generation, but critical for proliferation, is consistent with the hypothesis that mesenchymal YAP is downstream of the circumferential smooth muscle to promote growth.

Cilia drive elongation through mechanical activation of YAP

To test whether YAP mediates the elongation promoted by ciliary signaling, we treated cultured embryonic intestines with XMU-MP-1, a selective inhibitor of YAP upstream kinases MST1/2. Inhibiting MST1/2 kinase with XMU-MP-1 activates YAP65. As shown before (Supplementary Fig. 9A, B), the elongation of cilia-mutated intestine was reduced in culture comparing to controls (Fig. 6A, B, DMSO). Notably, XMU-MP-1 treatment restored the elongation of the Cilk−/− intestine (Fig. 6A, B, XMU-MP-1). This rescue indicates that the suppression of YAP activities in cilia-mutated intestine causes the intestinal shortening.

Fig. 6. Modulating the Hippo pathway restores elongation of Cilk1−/− intestine.

Fig. 6

A Representative E13.5 intestines of indicated genotypes before (Day 0) and after culture in Matrigel with DMSO or XMU-MP-1 for indicated days. Scale bar, 1 mm. B Fold change of intestinal length after culture in Matrigel with DMSO (WT, n = 6; Cilk1+/−, n = 5; Cilk1−/−, n = 4) or XMU-MP-1 (WT, n = 3; Cilk1+/−, n = 4; Cilk1−/−, n = 6) for indicated days. The values are presented as means ± SD. ns p > 0.05, **p < 0.01 by two-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (adjusted P values are 0.0046 for day 1 and 0.0025 for day 2 between Cilk1+/− DMSO and Cilk1-/- DMSO). C Immunofluorescence staining of E13.5 wild-type intestine cultured for one day in 50% or 90% Matrigel for YAP (red), smooth muscle (αSMA, green) and nuclei (Hoechst, blue). Scale bars, 25 μm. D Nuclear YAP intensities of peri-epithelial mesenchymal cells in C. n = 3 for each group. For each intestine, the nuclear YAP intensity per cell was averaged from three sections. Values are presented as means ± SEM. **p = 0.035 by two-sided paired t test. E Fold change of intestinal length after culture in 50% (Cilk1+/−, n = 6; Cilk1-/-, n = 4 or 90% (Cilk1+/−, n = 13; Cilk1-/-, n = 7) Matrigel for two days. The values are presented as means ± SD. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. Adjusted P value are: 0.0194 for Cilk1-/- 50% vs Cilk1-/- 90% and 0.0145 for Cilk1+/− 90% vs Cilk1-/- 90%. Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

To test how mechanical influences intestinal elongation, we cultured the embryonic intestines in different percentages of Matrigel. From 50% to 90%, the stiffness of Matrigel increases linearly66. Increased extracellular matrix stiffness promotes nuclear translocation of YAP67. Consistent with these observations, the nuclear levels of YAP were elevated in intestines cultured in 90% Matrigel (Fig. 6C, D). Interestingly, the elongation of Cilk−/− intestine was partially restored when cultured in 90% Matrigel (Fig. 6E). Together, our data suggest that the elongation of developing tubular organs is driven by YAP mechanically activated by cilia-patterned smooth muscle.

Discussion

Our results reveal a mechanism of tubular organ elongation by which intercellular signaling events create mechanical forces that are then translated into longitudinal growth. First, HH signals produced by epithelial cells are interpreted by the surrounding mesenchymal cells in a CILK1- and cilium-dependent manner. Second, ciliary HH signaling in the mesenchyme patterns the developing circumferential smooth muscle. Third, the smooth muscle contributes to residual stresses that exert mechanical forces on the mesenchymal cells. Fourth, these mesenchymal cells sense the smooth muscle-dependent forces, triggering nuclear accumulation of the Hippo pathway effector YAP. Fifth, nuclear YAP promotes cell proliferation, resulting in elongation. Thus, for the developing gut to elongate, morphogen-mediated patterning generates mechanical forces that drive YAP-promoted proliferation. As these findings apply to both the small intestine and the esophagus, we propose that the mechanical influences generated by ciliary signaling-patterned smooth muscle may be a general mechanism driving the elongation of tubular organs.

Our study provides a mechanistic explanation of how HH signaling regulates the intestinal length. The role of HH signaling in intestinal growth is therefore distinct from its roles in tissues such as the cerebellum and skin, where it directly induces the expression of drivers of the cell cycle68,69. Instead, the intestine represents a different model of how HH signaling functions in organ development: HH signaling patterns the gut, and this patterning, acting via mechanical influences interpreted by the Hippo pathway, promotes proliferation.

In support of the causal relationship between smooth muscle-generated forces and elongation, disruption of circumferential smooth muscle by any of three independent means (disrupting ciliary signaling, disrupting HH signaling, or genetic ablation of smooth muscle cells) each reduces elongation. Loss of ciliary proteins such as CILK alters the organization of the smooth muscle, whereas loss of SMO decreases the amount of smooth muscle. We propose that, as in other tissues, the different effects of loss of ciliary proteins and SMO on smooth muscle formation are attributable to differential processing of GLI transcription factors, the effectors of HH signaling21,70. Importantly, altering the organization or the number of smooth muscle cells decreases force within the developing intestine and the nuclear levels of YAP, presaging the emergence of decreased intestinal elongation. As mesenchymal YAP is essential for elongation and activating YAP can rescue the shortening of cultured cilia-compromised intestines, we propose that smooth muscle within the gut wall provides the mechanical growth cues which YAP interprets to drive elongation. This mechanism is likely to underlie the etiology of congenital short bowel in human ciliopathies that compromise HH signaling71. Prior to the development of the smooth muscle, intestinal elongation may be independent of mechanical forces or dependent on forces generated through other mechanisms, such as extracellular matrix stiffness or vitelline duct tension72.

It remains unclear how forces in the intestine and YAP activation lead to anisotropic growth. One possibility is that mechanical forces promote cell division oriented along the longitudinal axis, consistent with the decreased longitudinally-oriented mitoses in Cilk1 mutant intestines. Another possibility is that squeezing by the smooth muscle directly leads to intestinal elongation56. Still other possibilities exist, such as centripetal forces driving cell migration along the orthogonal longitudinal axis. As inhibiting the function of either CILK1 or YAP in the mesenchyme decreased proliferation in both the mesenchyme and the epithelium, there are likely to also be mechanisms for coordinating proliferation between the two cell types.

Many well studied cellular responses to mechanical forces are acute. For example, the cytoskeleton responds to forces within seconds73,74. Developmental processes typically occur over much longer timescales. In Drosophila, mechanical cues can affect epithelial planar organization to drive elongation75,76. In the mammalian gut, our findings reveal that the smooth muscle-generated residual stress stores durable spatially-organized mechanical information. We propose that residual stress persists to enable tissue-level responses, such as gut elongation, over developmental timescales. Interestingly, mechanical cues can also be stored in extracellular matrix-based basement membrane as a stiffness gradient to drive elongation of the Drosophila follicle77. Similar to our findings, mechanical forces activates YAP and elongates the Drosophila follicle, although proliferation is not involved61. Static forces can activate YAP via deformation of the nucleus78. Whether circumferential force activates YAP via nuclear stretching will be an interesting subject of further investigation.

The effects of mechanical forces in vertebrate tissue growth have been most extensively documented in bone remodeling79,80. During development, our data suggest that mechanical forces, as in bone, promote growth, but these forces are internally generated by smooth muscle within the gut wall. Longitudinal forces transmitted by the vitelline duct also promote elongation of embryonic intestine in the chick embryo72. The relative growth between the gut and its connecting tissues generates forces that shape the looping of gut tube across species81, suggesting that organ elongation is regulated by both internal and external forces.

As our data indicate that mechanical force can promote elongation of tubular organs during development, we speculate that activation of mechanotransducive signaling may also promote regeneration in adult tissues. This speculation is supported by emerging evidence showing that reversing the tissue mechanics associated with aging can rejuvenate the adult stem cells82. The adult intestine is one of the most proliferative organs, with human intestinal epithelial cells turning over every 2–5 days83 driven by intestinal epithelial stem cells which demonstrate robust regenerative capacity also in vitro84,85. However, guts do not display compensatory lengthening postnatally, either after injury or congenital defects that cause shortening. Consequently, individuals with short bowel syndrome do not recover intestinal length over time, leading to chronic water and nutrient absorption deficits86. Interestingly, application of longitudinal mechanical force can promote postnatal intestinal growth in animal models2. Our findings raise the possibility that application of radial forces may be therapeutically useful for promoting postnatal elongation of tubular organs.

We established an in vitro culture system that models the elongation of murine embryonic intestine in a way that recapitulates in vivo development. This culture system allows the explanted intestine to elongate and pharmacological rescue of the genetic phenotypes. We found that increasing the stiffness of the extracellular matrix increased YAP activity and promoted elongation of Cilk1 mutant intestines. The stiffness of the matrix may compensate for the reduced force imposed by Cilk1 mutant intestines. We propose that this in vitro system will be a valuable tool to further define the determinants of intestinal elongation.

To conclude, we uncovered an integrated molecular mechanism by which morphogen signaling patterns a tissue to create the mechanical cues that regulate organ size. During the development of the tubular organs, the activation of ciliary signaling in the mesenchyme patterns the wrapping smooth muscle layer, which generates intrinsic forces that activates the mechanotransducive effector YAP. Active YAP promotes proliferation resulting in growth. This cooperation between biochemical and mechanical signals to regulate organ elongation illustrated here may represent a general mechanism to control growth of tubular organs.

Methods

Mouse lines

All mouse experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Helsinki (license # ESAVI/3881/04.10.07/2015 and KEK15-001) and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF, protocol # AN178683).

The frozen sperm heterozygous for an Cilk1 mutant allele (also called Icktm1a(KOMP)Mbp) were generated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Knockout Mouse Project (KOMP) and obtained from the KOMP Repository (www.komp.org). The mutant mouse line was recovered using in vitro fertilization by the Transgenic Core Facility of Biocenter Oulu at the University of Oulu and transferred to the Laboratory Animal Center at the University of Helsinki. In this mouse line, the Cilk1 locus was modified by homologous recombination using a targeting vector PRPGS00177_A_B02 designed to insert a cassette expressing lacZ with polyA signal between exons 5 and 6, resulting in a predicted loss of function allele (Supplementary Fig. 1A, Cilk1-). Cilk1+/- mice were crossed to Tg(CAG-Flpe)2Arte transgenic mice ubiquitously expressing FlPe recombinase to generate the conditional Cilk1 allele with loxP sites flanking exon 6 (Supplementary Fig. 1A, Cilk1lox).

To generate Tctn3 loss of function allele (Supplementary Fig. 2A, Tctn3-), the targeting vector PRPGS00066_A_C10 was obtained from KOMP, linearized by restriction digestion with AsiSI (NEB), and electroporated into E14 mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC), followed by culture in G418-containing selection media. Homologous recombination was identified by PCR and a targeted clone was injected into blastocytes by the Transgenic/Gene-targeting Core Facility at the Gladstone Institute of UCSF.

To generate the Ift88 null allele (Ift88-), Ift88lox/lox mice were crossed to Tg(ACTB-cre)2Mrt transgenic mice expressing Cre under the control of a human beta-actin promoter.

The source and genetic background information of the mouse lines used in this study are detailed in Reporting summary.

Isolation of the small intestine and esophagus

Uteruses of euthanized pregnant female mice were isolated and placed in DPBS (Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline, without calcium or magnesium). The embryos were removed from the uterus and transferred to a Petri dish containing DPBS on ice. To isolate intestine and esophagus, embryos were transferred individually to another Petri dish filled with DPBS and imaged using a Zeiss Discovery V12 stereo microscope. The digestive tract including stomach, small intestine, colon, and cecum was separated from adjoining tissues and removed en bloc. Incisions in the stomach and cecum isolated the intestine, and the intestinal mesentery removed.

To isolate the esophagus, the heart and lung were gently removed to expose the esophageal-gastric junction. The esophagus was followed up from the stomach to pharynx to separate from the surrounding trachea, vasculature, and mesentery.

Intestinal and esophageal length measurement

The straightened intestine and esophagus, together with a ruler, were imaged using Zeiss Discovery V12 stereo microscope. Curves in the intestine and esophagus were accounted for by measuring the length using the ImageJ segmented line tool. Figures shown were prepared using Photoshop (Adobe) to remove background for a clear view of the tissue.

Matrigel culture of embryonic intestine

The culture medium was made of BGJb medium with L-Ascorbic acid for a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL87 and penicillin/streptomycin solution for a final concentration of 100 U penicillin/mL. Matrigel were thawed on ice and mixed with the culture medium at 1:1 for 50% or 9:1 for 90% final Matrigel concentration. E13.5 intestines were isolated as described and transferred into microcentrifuge tubes with 50% or 90% Matrigel as indicated in the figures. 40 μl of the Matrigel mix containing the tissue was aspirated and added to 24-well plate. After 20 min in 37 °C incubator, 200 μl of the culture medium was carefully added to surround the solidified Matrigel drop, followed by photo as Day 0. The culture medium was changed every day. For drug treatments, XMU-MP-1 was dissolved in DMSO and added to 50% Matrigel and culture medium for a final concentration of 500 nM. Y-27632 was applied at 10 μM. The culture medium was added with fresh drug and changed daily.

Cryosectioning

Embryonic intestines and esophagi were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 1 h to overnight at 4 °C. The fixed tissue was washed with DPBS once then submerged in 30% sucrose in DPBS. After overnight incubation at 4 °C, the tissue was transferred to a cryomold (4730, Tissue-Tek) and embedded in O.C.T. compound (4583, Tissue-Tek) on dry ice. The frozen blocks were stored at -80 °C until sectioning. 7 μm sections were cut at -20 °C using a cryostat (Leica CM3050 S) and mounted directly on Superfrost Plus microscope slides (12-550-15, Fisher Scientific).

Immunofluorescence staining

Immunostaining was performed on 7 μm O.C.T. frozen sections. The sections were post-fixed in 4% PFA for 10 min at room temperature (RT) and washed three times with DPBS. After the washes, each slide was placed on a slide rack (Thermo Scientific Shandon Sequenza) and permeabilized with 200 μl of DPBS-0.5% Triton for 20 min, followed by blocking with 200 μl of 10% donkey serum in DPBS-0.25% Triton for 1 h. After blocking, 200 μl of primary antibody was applied. After overnight incubation at RT, each slide was washed three times with 1 ml DPBS-0.25% Triton and then incubated at RT with secondary antibody for 2 h in the dark. Washing was repeated and 200 μl of 1 mg/ml Hoechst H33342 was applied for 5 min prior to the final wash, after which a cover glass (22266882, Fisher Scientific) was mounted to the stained slide in the presence of Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent (P36930, Thermo Fisher Scientific). To visualize γ-tubulin, the sections were incubated in 1% SDS in DPBS for 5 min and washed with DPBS three times before blocking. Detailed information about antibodies used in this study is included in the Reporting summary.

EdU labeling

EdU (E10187, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and thymidine (T9250, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were weighed and reconstituted in DPBS at 2.5 mg/ml and 25 mg/ml, respectively. At E13.5, EdU solution was intraperitoneally (IP) injected into pregnant female mice at 50 mg/kg body weight. After 10 mins, thymidine solution was IP injected at 500 mg/kg to quench EdU incorporation. The injected females were euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed by cervical dislocation. The embryonic intestines were fixed and sectioned, as described, then subjected to EdU staining after permeabilization. The EdU staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (C10269, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, 200 μl of Click-iT reaction cocktail was incubated with each slide for 30 min in the dark. After two washes with 3% BSA in DPBS, Hoechst staining was performed as described in “Immunofluorescence Staining”.

Confocal imaging

The stained sections were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 800 with 20X air or 63X oil objectives. The Zen version 2.5 blue edition software was used to acquire and export images.

Opening angle assay

E13.5 intestines were individually transferred to a Petri dish containing DPBS, examined using a Zeiss Discovery V12 stereo microscope and cut into approximately 1 mm cylinders. Using a 30 G needle, a single radial cut was made through one wall of the cylinder. A phase-contrast photomicrograph was taken immediately thereafter with a Zeiss Axiocam camera attached to the stereo microscope. Using the Angle Tool in ImageJ, the opening angle (θ) was measured between two lines intersecting the midpoint of the inner epithelial surface and extended to the inner edges of the cut wall, as shown in Fig. 3C.

Epithelial-mesenchymal separation of E18.5 embryonic small intestine

Small intestines from E18.5 embryos were cut longitudinally and incubated in ice-cold Cell Recovery Solution (354253, Corning) for 30–60 min with gentle shaking. The epithelium was gently separated from the mesenchyme with forceps. The isolated epithelium and mesenchyme were briefly washed in DPBS prior to lysing in TRIzol (15596026, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for RNA extraction.

RNA extraction

The tissue was incubated with 1 ml TRIzol in Lysing Matrix D (MP116913100, MP Biomedicals) and homogenized using TissueLyser II (85300, Qiagen) twice at a speed of 30 Hz for 30 s with an interval of 1 min. To each sample, 0.2 ml chloroform (372978, Sigma) was added and shaken again in a TissueLyser II (85300, Qiagen) at 30 Hz for 15 sec, followed by a 3 min incubation at RT and centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4 °C. The upper phase was transferred to an RNase-free tube with 0.5 ml isopropanol (I9516, Sigma) and inverted 10 times to precipitate RNA. After an incubation at RT for 10 min and centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C, the RNA pellet was washed with 1 ml 75% ethanol and air dried. The pellet was then dissolved in 50 μl RNase-free water, and RNA concentration was measured using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000, Thermo Fischer Scientific).

Real-Time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

800 ng to 1 μg of total RNA was used as template to generate cDNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (4368814, Thermo Fisher Scientific). To avoid RNase contamination, RNase-free reagents and 20U RNase inhibitor (N8080119, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used with each reaction. After thermal cycling according to the manufacture’s manual, the cDNA was diluted to 20 ng/μl in UltraPure DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (10977023, Thermo Fisher Scientific). 1 μl of the diluted cDNA was used as template in a 20 μl RT-qPCR reaction with KAPA SYBR FAST Universal 2X qPCR Master Mix (KK4602, Kapa Biosystems) and 200 nM forward and reverse primers (Sigma or Integrated DNA Technologies, sequences in Supplementary Table 1). The reactions were loaded into a 96-well plate and analyzed using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with an annealing temperature of 60 °C. The comparative threshold cycle method was used to analyze relative expression curves.

Genotyping

To genotype weaning-age pups, 100 μl of Buffer A (10 M NaOH, 500 mM EDTA) was added to mouse ear punches and incubated in PCR blots for 25 min at 99 °C and 5 min at 4 °C, followed by adding 100 μl of Buffer B (1 M Tris, pH 7.5). To genotype embryos, 100 μl of Buffer A was added to pieces of tail and incubated for 25 min at 99 °C and 5 min at 4 °C, followed by adding 100 μl of Buffer B with 0.5 mg/ml Proteinase K (03115828001, Roche) and incubated for 2 h at 55 °C, 10 min at 95 °C and 5 min at 4 °C. The DNA was stored at -20 °C until being assessed by PCR. To genotype alleles of Myh11Cre-EGFP, R26DTA176, Smolox, YAPlox and TAZlox, 1 μl of digested sample was added to a 20 μl reaction mixture with 200 nM forward and reverse primers and GoTaq G2 Green Master Mix (M7823, Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reactions were analyzed using a Biometra Trio Thermal Cycler (Analytik Jena) with an annealing temperature of 60 °C except for the YAPlox and TAZlox reactions which were annealed at 62 °C. For other alleles, 0.25 μl of digested sample was added to a 5 μl reaction mixture with 200 nM forward and reverse primers and PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (A25742, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reactions were analyzed using an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR machine with an annealing temperature of 60 °C. Melt curve analysis was performed using SDS Software version 2.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All the genotyping primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies and the sequences are included in Supplementary Table 1.

Statistics and reproducibility

All scatter plots, column, points & connecting line graphs and their associated statistical tests were generated using GraphPad Prism for macOS (version 8.1.2). The numbers of analyzed biological samples and the specific statistical analysis methods used for each experiment are described in the figure legends. The UCSF Clinical & Translational Science Institute biostatistics consultation service advised on the statistical tests and data presentation. Representative micrographs were drawn from experiments repeated at least three times as independent experiments.

CellProfiler analysis of αSMA staining

Quantification of αSMA staining was accomplished using a customized CellProfiler pipeline. The Hoechst and αSMA-stained images were imported to CellProfiler (version 3.1.8). To quantify the αSMA intensity distribution, a single object was created for the whole section area using the “Identify Primary Objects” and “Filter Objects” modules on Hoechst images. The center to the edge of the tissue section was divided into 15 areas of equal width, and the αSMA intensity within each area was measured using “FracAtD” in the “Measure Object Intensity Distribution” module on αSMA-stained images.

To quantify the αSMA-positive cell number, all the nuclei were identified by “Identify Primary Objects” with Hoechst staining as the input image. “Image Math” was used to multiply Hoechst by αSMA-stained images. After applied “Threshold”, the multiplied images were converted to binary images, which were then used to mask the identified nuclei objects with a defined “Fraction of object that must overlap”. The number of the resulted masked objects was used as the αSMA-positive cell number.

To quantify the αSMA area, αSMA signals were identified by “Identify Primary Objects” from αSMA-stained images. “Measure Image Area Occupied” was used to measure the area occupied by αSMA signals.

CellProfiler analysis of YAP intensity

The YAP intensity in the peri-epithelial stromal cells were done from staining of intestinal sections using customized CellProfiler pipelines. The Hoechst and YAP-stained images were imported to CellProfiler (version 3.1.8). The region occupied by peri-epithelial stromal cells were identified by “MaskImage” and “IdentifyObjectsManully” using merged images generated by “GrayToColor”. The nuclei number were measured using “IdentifyPrimaryObjects” in the region and the nuclear YAP intensity by “MeasureImageIntensity” with the nuclei in the region as the input objects. In each intestinal section, the total intensity of nuclear YAP was divided by the number of nuclei in the region to generate nuclear YAP intensity per cell.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (14.6MB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (279.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Elaine Carlson for help in generating Tctn3 mutant alleles and E Yu for husbandry and genotyping of the mice used in this study. We thank Amy E. Shyer, Tyler R. Huycke, Wallace Marshall, Zev J. Gartner and Ophir D. Klein for thoughtful discussions. We also thank the members of the Reiter lab and the Makela lab for critical comments and suggestions on the study. This work was funded by NIH NIGMS R01GM095941, R01 AR054396, and NICHD R01HD089918 to J.F.R., NIH P30 DK090868 to K.E.M., and UCSF Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research (PBBR) to K.E.M. and J.F.R.

Source data

Source Data (1.1GB, xlsx)

Author contributions

J.F.R. and Y.Y. conceived the study and designed the experiments, except for the observations in Figs. 1A, 1B, 1E, S1B, S1C, S1D, and S3, which were initially made by Y.Y. and P.P. with T.P.M. Y.Y. with K.E.M. and J.F.R made the findings in Fig. 1F, Supplementary Fig. 2B–F, and S4A-B. P.P. generated the data in Supplementary Fig. 3B–C and repeated the results in Figs. 1A, 1B, 1F, S1B, S4B independently. C.X. generated the data in Supplementary Fig. 4D. A.L.K. generated the Tctn3 mutant mouse line. Y.Y. performed all the other experiments. J.F.R and Y.Y. wrote and prepared the manuscript with input from all authors.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the main article and supplementary files. Source data are provided with this paper and are also available at [https://datadryad.org/stash/share/t9_ojoQ1CMESKEPYOsFXa0uPuK1N3ON5FU13QjYoqE8]. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

ImageJ macros and CellProfiler pipelines used for image analysis are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Nicolas Chevalier and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-27319-z.

References

  • 1.FitzSimmons J, Chinn A, Shepard TH. Normal length of the human fetal gastrointestinal tract. Pediatr. Pathol. 1988;8:633–641. doi: 10.3109/15513818809022320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stark R, Dunn JCY. Mechanical enterogenesis - a review. J. Healthc. Eng. 2012;3:229–242. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huycke TR, et al. Genetic and mechanical regulation of intestinal smooth muscle development. Cell. 2019;179:90–105.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim HY, et al. Localized smooth muscle differentiation is essential for epithelial bifurcation during branching morphogenesis of the mammalian lung. Dev. Cell. 2015;34:719–726. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chin AM, Hill DR, Aurora M, Spence JR. Morphogenesis and maturation of the embryonic and postnatal intestine. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017;66:81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mao J, Kim B-M, Rajurkar M, Shivdasani RA, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signaling controls mesenchymal growth in the developing mammalian digestive tract. Development. 2010;137:1721–1729. doi: 10.1242/dev.044586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cotton JL, et al. YAP/TAZ and Hedgehog coordinate growth and patterning in gastrointestinal mesenchyme. Dev. Cell. 2017;43:35–47.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ramalho-Santos M, Melton DA, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signals regulate multiple aspects of gastrointestinal development. Development. 2000;127:2763–2772. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.12.2763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huang H, et al. Specific requirement of Gli transcription factors in Hedgehog-mediated intestinal development. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:17589–17596. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.467498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Walton KD, Freddo AM, Wang S, Gumucio DL. Generation of intestinal surface: an absorbing tale. Development. 2016;143:2261–2272. doi: 10.1242/dev.135400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Panciera T, Azzolin L, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;18:758–770. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zheng Y, Pan D. The Hippo signaling pathway in development and disease. Dev. Cell. 2019;50:264–282. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huang J, Wu S, Barrera J, Matthews K, Pan D. The Hippo signaling pathway coordinately regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis by inactivating Yorkie, the Drosophila homolog of YAP. Cell. 2005;122:421–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lei Q-Y, et al. TAZ promotes cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition and is inhibited by the hippo pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008;28:2426–2436. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01874-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao B, et al. Inactivation of YAP oncoprotein by the Hippo pathway is involved in cell contact inhibition and tissue growth control. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2747–2761. doi: 10.1101/gad.1602907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dupont S, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;474:179–183. doi: 10.1038/nature10137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao B, et al. TEAD mediates YAP-dependent gene induction and growth control. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1962–1971. doi: 10.1101/gad.1664408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dong J, et al. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007;130:1120–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bangs F, Anderson KV. Primary cilia and mammalian Hedgehog signaling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017;9:a028175. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Corbit KC, et al. Vertebrate smoothened functions at the primary cilium. Nature. 2005;437:1018–1021. doi: 10.1038/nature04117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu A, Wang B, Niswander LA. Mouse intraflagellar transport proteins regulate both the activator and repressor functions of Gli transcription factors. Development. 2005;132:3103–3111. doi: 10.1242/dev.01894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.García-García MJ, et al. Analysis of mouse embryonic patterning and morphogenesis by forward genetics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2005;102:5913–5919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501071102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huangfu D, Anderson KV. Cilia and Hedgehog responsiveness in the mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2005;102:11325–11330. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505328102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liem KF, et al. The IFT-A complex regulates Shh signaling through cilia structure and membrane protein trafficking. J. Cell Biol. 2012;197:789–800. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201110049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lahiry P, et al. A multiplex human syndrome implicates a key role for intestinal cell kinase in development of central nervous, skeletal, and endocrine systems. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;84:822. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oud MM, et al. A novel ICK mutation causes ciliary disruption and lethal endocrine-cerebro-osteodysplasia syndrome. Cilia. 2016;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s13630-016-0029-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Paige Taylor S, et al. An inactivating mutation in intestinal cell kinase, ICK, impairs hedgehog signalling and causes short rib-polydactyly syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016;25:3998–4011. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fu Z, Gailey CD, Wang EJ, Brautigan DL. Ciliogenesis associated kinase 1: targets and functions in various organ systems. FEBS Lett. 2019;593:2990–3002. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang Y, Roine N, Mäkelä TP. CCRK depletion inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation in a cilium-dependent manner. EMBO Rep. 2013;14:741–747. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chaya T, Omori Y, Kuwahara R, Furukawa T. ICK is essential for cell type-specific ciliogenesis and the regulation of ciliary transport. EMBO J. 2014;33:1227–1242. doi: 10.1002/embj.201488175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moon H, et al. Intestinal cell kinase, a protein associated with endocrine-cerebro-osteodysplasia syndrome, is a key regulator of cilia length and Hedgehog signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111:8541–8546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323161111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tong Y, et al. An essential role of intestinal cell kinase in lung development is linked to the perinatal lethality of human ECO syndrome. FEBS Lett. 2017;591:1247–1257. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dowdle WE, et al. Disruption of a ciliary B9 protein complex causes Meckel syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;89:94–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jacoby M, et al. INPP5E mutations cause primary cilium signaling defects, ciliary instability and ciliopathies in human and mouse. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:1027–1031. doi: 10.1038/ng.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Garcia-Gonzalo FR, et al. A transition zone complex regulates mammalian ciliogenesis and ciliary membrane composition. Nat. Genet. 2011;43:776–784. doi: 10.1038/ng.891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang B, et al. Loss of Tctn3 causes neuronal apoptosis and neural tube defects in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:520. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0563-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Garcia-Gonzalo FR, et al. Phosphoinositides regulate ciliary protein trafficking to modulate Hedgehog signaling. Dev. Cell. 2015;34:400–409. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chávez M, et al. Modulation of ciliary phosphoinositide content regulates trafficking and sonic hedgehog signaling output. Dev. Cell. 2015;34:338–350. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dyson JM, et al. INPP5E regulates phosphoinositide-dependent cilia transition zone function. J. Cell Biol. 2017;216:247–263. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201511055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Madison BB, et al. Epithelial hedgehog signals pattern the intestinal crypt-villus axis. Development. 2005;132:279–289. doi: 10.1242/dev.01576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Motoyama J, et al. Overlapping and non-overlapping Ptch2 expression with Shh during mouse embryogenesis. Mechanisms Dev. 1998;78:81–84. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(98)00149-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Komarova IA, Vorob’ev IA. [The centrosome structure in enterocytes in the histogenesis of the mouse intestine] Ontogenez. 1995;26:390–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Harfe BD, et al. Evidence for an expansion-based temporal Shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities. Cell. 2004;118:517–528. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yu K, et al. Conditional inactivation of FGF receptor 2 reveals an essential role for FGF signaling in the regulation of osteoblast function and bone growth. Development. 2003;130:3063–3074. doi: 10.1242/dev.00491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pazour GJ, et al. Chlamydomonas IFT88 and its mouse homologue, polycystic kidney disease gene Tg737, are required for assembly of cilia and flagella. J. Cell Biol. 2000;151:709–718. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.3.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ishizuya-Oka A, Ueda S. Apoptosis and cell proliferation in the Xenopus small intestine during metamorphosis. Cell Tissue Res. 1996;286:467–476. doi: 10.1007/s004410050716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hakem R, et al. Differential requirement for caspase 9 in apoptotic pathways in vivo. Cell. 1998;94:339–352. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81477-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kuida K, et al. Reduced apoptosis and cytochrome c-mediated caspase activation in mice lacking caspase 9. Cell. 1998;94:325–337. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81476-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Haydar TF, Kuan CY, Flavell RA, Rakic P. The role of cell death in regulating the size and shape of the mammalian forebrain. Cereb. Cortex. 1999;9:621–626. doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.6.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Porteous, S., et al. Primary renal hypoplasiain humans and mice with PAX2 mutations: evidence of increased apoptosis in fetal kidneys of Pax21Neu +/– mutant mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 1–11 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 51.Kablar B, Tajbakhsh S, Rudnicki MA. Transdifferentiation of esophageal smooth to skeletal muscle is myogenic bHLH factor-dependent. Development. 2000;127:1627–1639. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.8.1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gregersen H, Kassab G. Biomechanics of the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 1996;8:277–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.1996.tb00267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fung YC. What are the residual stresses doing in our blood vessels? Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1991;19:237–249. doi: 10.1007/BF02584301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Han HC, Fung YC. Residual strains in porcine and canine trachea. J. Biomech. 1991;24:307–315. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90349-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhao J-B, Sha H, Zhuang F-Y, Gregersen H. Morphological properties and residual strain along the small intestine in rats. World J. Gastroenterol. 2002;8:312–317. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v8.i2.312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Khalipina D, Kaga Y, Dacher N, Chevalier NR. Smooth muscle contractility causes the gut to grow anisotropically. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2019;16:20190484. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Allen BG, Walsh MP. The biochemical basis of the regulation of smooth-muscle contraction. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994;19:362–368. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Uehata M, et al. Calcium sensitization of smooth muscle mediated by a Rho-associated protein kinase in hypertension. Nature. 1997;389:990–994. doi: 10.1038/40187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Narumiya S, Ishizaki T, Uehata M. Use and properties of ROCK-specific inhibitor Y-27632. Methods Enzymol. 2000;325:273–284. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)25449-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sims SM, Chrones T, Preiksaitis HG. Calcium sensitization in human esophageal muscle: role for RhoA kinase in maintenance of lower esophageal sphincter tone. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 2008;327:178–186. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.140806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fletcher GC, et al. Mechanical strain regulates the Hippo pathway in Drosophila. Development. 2018;145:dev159467. doi: 10.1242/dev.159467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tocci P, et al. β-arrestin1/YAP/mutant p53 complexes orchestrate the endothelin A receptor signaling in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3196–15. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11045-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lian I, et al. The role of YAP transcription coactivator in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1106–1118. doi: 10.1101/gad.1903310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen, J. et al. YAP activation in renal proximal tubule cells drives diabetic renal interstitial fibrogenesis. Diabetes10.2337/db20-0579 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65.Benham-Pyle BW, Pruitt BL, Nelson WJ. Cell adhesion. Mechanical strain induces E-cadherin-dependent Yap1 and β-catenin activation to drive cell cycle entry. Science. 2015;348:1024–1027. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zaman MH, et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2006;103:10889–10894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604460103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Aragona M, et al. A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through YAP/TAZ regulation by actin-processing factors. Cell. 2013;154:1047–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Raleigh DR, et al. Hedgehog signaling drives medulloblastoma growth via CDK6. J. Clin. Investig. 2018;128:120–124. doi: 10.1172/JCI92710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lopez-Rios J, et al. GLI3 constrains digit number by controlling both progenitor proliferation and BMP-dependent exit to chondrogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2012;22:837–848. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wijgerde M, McMahon JA, Rule M, McMahon AP. A direct requirement for Hedgehog signaling for normal specification of all ventral progenitor domains in the presumptive mammalian spinal cord. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2849–2864. doi: 10.1101/gad.1025702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bryson LJ, Flynn DM, Sabharwal A, Ahmed SF, Kinning E. A child with congenital short gut associated with DYNC2LI1 ciliopathy. Clin. Dysmorphol. 2020;30:66–68. doi: 10.1097/MCD.0000000000000341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chevalier NR, et al. Mechanical tension drives elongational growth of the embryonic gut. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:5995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24368-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.le Duc Q, et al. Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II-dependent manner. J. Cell Biol. 2010;189:1107–1115. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Salbreux G, Charras G, Paluch E. Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22:536–545. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Vichas A, Zallen JA. Translating cell polarity into tissue elongation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011;22:858–864. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Stooke-Vaughan GA, Campàs O. Physical control of tissue morphogenesis across scales. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2018;51:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Crest J, Diz-Munoz A, Chen DY, Fletcher DA, Bilder D. Organ sculpting by patterned extracellular matrix stiffness. Elife. 2017;6:773. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Elosegui-Artola A, et al. Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores. Cell. 2017;171:1397–1410.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Christen P, et al. Bone remodelling in humans is load-driven but not lazy. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4855–4855. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Vico L, et al. Effects of long-term microgravity exposure on cancellous and cortical weight-bearing bones of cosmonauts. Lancet. 2000;355:1607–1611. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02217-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Savin T, et al. On the growth and form of the gut. Nature. 2011;476:57–62. doi: 10.1038/nature10277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Segel M, et al. Niche stiffness underlies the ageing of central nervous system progenitor cells. Nature. 2019;573:1–27. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1484-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Darwich AS, Aslam U, Ashcroft DM, Rostami-Hodjegan A. Meta-analysis of the turnover of intestinal epithelia in preclinical animal species and humans. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2014;42:2016–2022. doi: 10.1124/dmd.114.058404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wells JM, Spence JR. How to make an intestine. Development. 2014;141:752–760. doi: 10.1242/dev.097386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tuveson D, Clevers H. Cancer modeling meets human organoid technology. Science. 2019;364:952–955. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw6985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Greig CJ, Oh PS, Gross ER, Cowles RA. Retracing our STEPs: four decades of progress in intestinal lengthening procedures for short bowel syndrome. Am. J. Surg. 2019;217:772–782. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Duh G, Mouri N, Warburton D, Thomas DW. EGF regulates early embryonic mouse gut development in chemically defined organ culture. Pediatr. Res. 2000;48:794–802. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200012000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (14.6MB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (279.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the main article and supplementary files. Source data are provided with this paper and are also available at [https://datadryad.org/stash/share/t9_ojoQ1CMESKEPYOsFXa0uPuK1N3ON5FU13QjYoqE8]. Source data are provided with this paper.

ImageJ macros and CellProfiler pipelines used for image analysis are available from the corresponding authors upon request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES