A scheelite crystal with residual concentration of erbium is cooled down to 10 mK, yielding a record spin coherence time of 23 ms.
Abstract
Erbium ions embedded in crystals have unique properties for quantum information processing, because of their optical transition at 1.5 μm and of the large magnetic moment of their effective spin-1/2 electronic ground state. Most applications of erbium require, however, long electron spin coherence times, and this has so far been missing. Here, by selecting a host matrix with a low nuclear-spin density (CaWO4) and by quenching the spectral diffusion due to residual paramagnetic impurities at millikelvin temperatures, we obtain a 23-ms coherence time on the Er3+ electron spin transition. This is the longest Hahn echo electron spin coherence time measured in a material with a natural abundance of nuclear spins and on a magnetically sensitive transition. Our results establish Er3+:CaWO4 as a potential platform for quantum networks.
INTRODUCTION
Future quantum networks will require coherent interfaces between optical photons and other long-lived degrees of freedom or processing units. Trivalent erbium ions (Er3+) embedded in a crystal are uniquely suited for this task. They have an optical transition at 1.5 μm that is well suited for fiber-based telecommunication (1). Their electronic ground state also forms an effective spin-1/2 with a large magnetic moment, which can couple to other quantum systems such as superconducting circuits or nuclear spins (2). Thanks to these properties, they may be used for optical and microwave quantum memories (2, 3), as well as optical-to-microwave coherent conversion (4, 5) making it possible, for instance, to interface distant superconducting quantum processors. These potential applications require a long electron spin coherence time (for the memory) and a narrow electron spin linewidth (for the optical-microwave conversion), none of which have been so far reported for erbium.
Dilute paramagnetic impurities in a crystal lose phase coherence by interacting with the surrounding fluctuating magnetic moments of other paramagnetic species and nuclear spins of the host matrix. To obtain long coherence times, it is thus beneficial to use crystals that have minimal concentrations of paramagnetic impurities and a low nuclear-spin density. For instance, Hahn echo coherence times close to 1 s were obtained with low-doped phosphorus donor spins in a chemically pure silicon crystal that was isotopically enriched in the nuclear spin–free 28Si isotope (6).
However, host matrices for rare-earth ions (REIs) are often based on yttrium, such as Y2SiO5 (YSO) and YVO4, and tend to have high residual REI paramagnetic impurities due to the chemical similarity among rare-earth elements. Moreover, Y has only one natural isotope with nuclear spin I = 1/2 in 100% abundance, so it cannot be isotopically enriched to suppress nuclear magnetic noise. Therefore, it has been difficult to achieve long coherence times with magnetically sensitive electron-spin transitions in these materials. Whereas Hahn echo coherence times up to 4 ms have been measured on the optical transition of Er3+:YSO (7, 8), Hahn echo electron spin coherence times no greater than 10 μs were reported for Er3+ ions in Y-based materials (3) because of their high first-order magnetic sensitivity reaching up to 200 GHz/T. For this reason, most demonstrations of long spin coherence in yttrium-based matrices have relied on magnetically insensitive electron-spin transitions such as zero-first-order Zeeman (ZEFOZ) or clock transitions (9–11). Although such approaches have demonstrated coherence times up to 5 ms in Yb3+:YSO and 2 s in Bi:Si (12, 13), the required transition frequencies are often highly constrained, leading to potential incompatibility with quantum technologies that require tuneable or broadband microwave transitions. In all these systems, dynamical decoupling can be used to further extend the coherence time, at the expense of more complex pulse sequences (14–16).
Here, we use a non–yttrium-based crystal, namely, calcium tungstate (CaWO4), as the host matrix for Er3+, and demonstrate long electron spin coherence times without having to resort to ZEFOZ transitions or isotopic purification. Most nuclei in CaWO4 have no spin. Only the 183W isotope of tungsten (14% natural abundance) contributes substantially to magnetic noise, with nuclear spin I = 1/2 and a relatively low gyromagnetic ratio of 1.8 MHz/T. This results in one of the lowest nuclear magnetic moment densities among natural-abundance crystals, leading to recent predictions that a Hahn echo electron spin coherence time of 20 ms should be achievable in this matrix (17). To characterize spin coherence, we rely throughout this article on the Hahn echo pulse sequence, because its widespread use enables direct comparison with other spin systems and materials.
Calcium tungstate has a tetragonal body-centered structure with lattice constants a = b = 0.524 nm and c = 1.137 nm (as shown in Fig. 1A), in which Er3+ ions substitute Ca2+ with compensation of the additional positive charge occurring in the crystal. At low temperatures, only the two lowest energy levels are occupied. Known as a Kramers doublet, they form an effective electron spin S = 1/2 system whose g tensor is diagonal in the crystal frame with values gaa = gbb = 8.38 ≡ g⊥ and gcc = 1.247 ≡ g∥ (18, 19). Here, we will consider only the zero-nuclear-spin isotopes of erbium, thus excluding 167Er. The large magnetic moment in the ab plane, up to four times larger than a free electron, makes it particularly interesting for coupling to superconducting circuits (20).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Experimental setup
The sample used in this study is a CaWO4 crystal grown from high-purity natural-abundance materials and the boule from which the sample has been extracted is described in an independent article (21). Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy reveals that all trivalent paramagnetic REIs are present at a level of ∼1 to 100 parts per billion (ppb); in particular, [Er3+] = 0.7 ± 0.1 ppb (see sections S1.1 and S1.5). Such concentrations are barely detectable with standard EPR spectroscopy; therefore, we use quantum-limited EPR spectroscopy with superconducting resonators and amplifiers that offer higher detection sensitivity (22, 23). We measure the spin coherence at millikelvin temperatures, where decoherence due to residual paramagnetic impurities is quenched owing to their polarization in the ground state.
Schematic descriptions of the sample and setup are shown in Fig. 1 (B and C). The sample is cut from a larger CaWO4 crystal into a 3 mm by 6 mm rectangular slab with 0.5 mm thickness in the c-axis direction. A dc magnetic field B0 is applied parallel to the sample surface in the ab crystallographic plane, with a controllable amplitude and angle φ with respect to the a axis, determined using x-ray diffraction with a precision of ±2°. Three superconducting microresonators with frequency ω0 are patterned in a 50-nm niobium thin film deposited on top of the crystal. They allow us to independently probe the spins at frequencies between 7 and 8 GHz. They consist of an interdigitated capacitor in parallel with a few-micrometer-wide wire inductor (2 μm for one resonator and 5 μm for the two others) (22). At the single-photon level, all three resonators have an internal loss rate κint lower than 106 s−1 (corresponding to an internal quality factor larger than 4 × 104), which is sufficient for high-sensitivity spin detection. The resonators allow for detection of Er3+ electron spins located in the vicinity of the inductor, the latter generating an oscillating magnetic field B1 that couples to each spin with strength g0 = (μB/ℏ)〈0∣S∣1〉 · g · δB1. Here, δB1 is the rms vacuum fluctuations of the field at the spin location. Because of the spatial variation of δB1, g0 varies with the spin location in the plane perpendicular to the wire as shown in Fig. 1C when the dc field B0 is applied along the wire (φ = φw). The angle made by the resonator inductor with the crystalline a axis is determined from the maximum of the integrated echo line shape as a function of φ and corresponds to φw = 51∘ ± 3∘.
Each resonator is capacitively coupled with a rate κc to a measurement line through which microwave pulses are applied at the resonance frequency ω0. These pulses induce Rabi nutations of the spins at a frequency , where is the pulse amplitude in (number of photons per second)1/2, Pin is the input power, and κ = κc + κint is the total energy damping rate (24). The Rabi frequency is proportional to g0 and thus also varies spatially so that a given pulse amplitude applies different Rabi rotations to spins at different locations. Here, we measure spin coherence using the Hahn echo pulse sequence (Figs. 1D and 2A); it is composed of two pulses of same duration Δt and amplitudes β/2 and β, respectively, separated by a delay τ, leading to the emission of a spin echo at a delay τ after the second pulse. Because the spins contributing the most to the Hahn echo are those undergoing rotations of first π/2 then π, an echo with pulse amplitude β probes mainly spins with a coupling constant close to (24). The reflected pulses, together with the spin signals, are amplified through a low-noise detection chain consisting of a Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier (JTWPA) (25), followed by a high–electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) (Fig. 1B), and demodulated at room temperature.
Spectroscopy
An echo-detected field sweep of the erbium line shape (see section S1.3) is shown in Fig. 1D, around B0 = 67.2 mT, for several magnetic field angles φ in the ab plane. We used a pulse power such that bulk-like spins (several micrometers from the surface) are probed. An approximately Lorentzian line shape is observed, with a full width at half maximum strongly dependent on φ, reaching a minimum value of Γ/2π = 1 MHz for φ = φ0 = 31∘ (Fig. 1E). A similar orientation-dependent linewidth was previously observed by Mims and Gillen (26). Mims explained this phenomenon by inhomogeneous internal electric fields, likely caused by the presence of charged defects around the erbium ions and possibly related to charge compensation. He showed that in CaWO4, when the magnetic field B0 is applied in the ab plane, applying an external electric field has an impact on the perpendicular g factor g⊥ of the erbium ions through its component along the c axis, Ec. Therefore, ∂ω/∂Ec takes a finite value except when B0 is applied along φ0, where ∂ω/∂Ec = 0 (27). In our sample, a typical electric field value of 32 kV/cm yields quantitative agreement with the data following the analysis of Mims and Gillen (26) (see section S1.4). The 1-MHz linewidth at φ = φ0 is likely due to a combination of dipolar coupling to nuclear spins and to other paramagnetic species in the sample and to a slight misalignment of B0 from the ab plane; we note that erbium-erbium dipolar interactions are however negligible owing to the low concentration. We estimate that the erbium concentration may be increased up to a few parts per million without significantly broadening the linewidth. To our knowledge, this is the narrowest inhomogeneous linewidth reported for erbium electron spins, supporting the application of erbium to microwave-optical conversion (4).
Hahn echo coherence time
To measure the longest possible spin coherence in this system, we first cool the sample to 10 mK, the base temperature of the cryostat. A Hahn echo pulse sequence is applied with sufficient microwave power to probe bulk-like spins. The spin-echo integral Ae is recorded as a function of the delay 2τ (Fig. 2A). Here, the angle is φ = 47∘, close to the wire direction φw = 51∘ so that B0 is orthogonal to B1 for all spins. A modulation of the spin-echo envelope around the overall Gaussian decay is visible and is due to the coupling to the proximal 183W nuclear spins (see section S1.7). A fit to the square of the magnitude (28), with C being a spurious vertical shift due to noise rectification (see section S1.6), yields a coherence time T2 = 23.2 ± 0.5 ms and x = 2.4 ± 0.1. This value of T2 is nearly three orders of magnitude longer than previous measurements of Er3+ electron spin coherence in CaWO4 at 2 K (29). We attribute this drastic improvement to both the low residual paramagnetic impurity concentration and enhanced thermal spin polarization at 10 mK, both of which greatly reduce electronic spin-spin interactions in the crystal. Also, this is more than an order of magnitude longer than previous state-of-the-art measurements of electron spin coherence in a natural-abundance material (30), away from a ZEFOZ transition.
In Fig. 2A, we plot simulations of the echo signal decay calculated using the cluster-correlation expansion method (31, 32) (see section S2), which describes the effect of the magnetic dipole interactions between the measured Er3+ and the 183W nuclear spin bath. The similarity between simulation and experiment indicates that the measured coherence time is mostly limited by the nuclear spin bath dynamics. This suggests in particular that instantaneous diffusion (ID) (6) caused by the other erbium ions is negligible, due to the low erbium concentration and to the inhomogeneous broadening (signatures of ID were observed at φ ≃ φ0 where the linewidth is narrower; see section S1.8). We also note that the simple formula derived in (17) predicts a coherence time of 8 ms, a factor of 3 shorter than both our simulation and experiment. This discrepancy is attributed to the random nuclear spin positions assumed in (17), whereas in CaWO4, the nuclear spins occupy random sites on a regular lattice, which has been taken into account in the simulations of the present work (see section S2.3).
As explained above, the data are averaged in magnitude to mitigate global magnetic field noise, which causes the echo to be emitted with a random phase for values of τ larger than ∼2 ms (see section S1.6). Such magnitude averaging is frequently used in EPR (6, 33) and optical (7–11, 14–16) echo measurements. Future applications to quantum memories will therefore require active stabilization of B0 or, alternatively, to encode the quantum states in a way that is insensitive to the global echo phase, for instance, using time-bin qubits (34).
We then measure T2 as a function of cryostat temperature (Fig. 2B) and observe a decrease in coherence time with increasing temperature. Since the nuclear-spin contribution is temperature independent in the experimental range, we attribute this decrease to spectral diffusion caused by all the other paramagnetic impurities present in similar or larger concentrations than erbium (see section S1.1). This spectral diffusion is quenched at low temperatures when most paramagnetic impurities are highly polarized into their ground state (30, 35, 36). We use the theoretical nuclear spin decoherence curve of Fig. 2A to quantitatively extract the paramagnetic contribution; Fig. 2B shows that the latter is suppressed by a factor of ∼20 by cooling the sample from 500 to 10 mK.
Relaxation time and Purcell effect
We now turn to measurements of the longitudinal spin relaxation time T1, using an inversion-recovery pulse sequence. A Hahn echo measures the longitudinal polarization at delay T after application of a first pulse of the same amplitude and duration as the refocusing pulse. We use CPMG (Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequences) to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; see Materials and Methods). The echo integral is shown in Fig. 3A as a function of T, for various pulse amplitudes β. The data are well fitted by an exponential, yielding a spin relaxation time T1 that is strongly dependent on β. Figure 3B shows T1(β) for two resonators. An approximately quadratic increase of T1 with β is observed for small β, followed by a saturation at a maximum value for larger β.
This dependence of T1 on β can be understood qualitatively by the competition between two relaxation channels: the Purcell relaxation rate (37) and the spin-lattice relaxation rate Γsl. Low-β measurements probe spins with a large g0, close to the inductive wire, where Purcell relaxation dominates, whereas spin-lattice relaxation becomes the limiting rate for weakly coupled spins, far from the resonator, measured with large β. This is validated by simulations that take into account the distribution of theoretical coupling constants as well as Purcell and spin-lattice relaxation (24). We obtain quantitative agreement with the data for all three resonator geometries, where the attenuation of the input line and Γsl are the only adjustable parameters (data for two resonators are shown on Fig. 3B). The spin-lattice relaxation times measured for the three resonators (at high power) show a frequency dependence compatible with the expected ω−5 dependence for the direct-phonon process in a Kramers ion (Fig. 3B) (38). Because of the anisotropy of the spin-lattice coupling, the relaxation rate in Kramers ions is itself often anisotropic (38, 39); here, we also observe such anisotropy in the high-power relaxation time, whose dependence on φ shown in Fig. 3C is well accounted for by the model described in (39).
Conclusion
Our observation of a near–nuclear spin–limited coherence time of 23 ms in Er3+:CaWO4 at millikelvin temperature is meaningful for several reasons. It proves that decoherence due to paramagnetic impurities in a REI-doped crystal can be almost entirely suppressed by spin-polarizing the impurities through cooling, which places Er3+:CaWO4 among some of the most coherent spin systems currently known, such as donors in isotopically purified silicon. It also confirms the predictions that CaWO4 is among the best natural-abundance host crystals for long coherence time paramagnetic defects (17). We note that the growth of a calcium tungstate crystal enriched in the nuclear spin–free tungsten isotopes is also feasible and should lead to even longer coherence times. Combined with the observation of Purcell spin relaxation, our work establishes Er3+:CaWO4 as a potential platform for implementing a microwave quantum memory as well as microwave-to-optical conversion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Microwave resonator properties
The measurements are performed using three microwave resonators with different frequencies.
• Resonator 1 has frequency ω0/2π = 7.025 GHz, coupling rate κc = 2 × 105 s−1, internal loss rate κint = 1.0 × 106 s−1, and total energy damping rate κ = κc + κint. It was used for the data of Fig. 3 (A and B, orange curve) and inset of Fig. 3B.
• Resonator 2 has frequency ω0/2π = 7.508 GHz, coupling rate κc = 3.1 × 106 s−1, internal loss rate κint = 7 × 105 s−1, and total energy damping rate κ = κc + κtint. It was used for the data of the inset of Fig. 3B.
• Resonator 3 has frequency ω0/2π = 7.881 GHz, coupling rate κc = 1.7 × 106 s−1, internal loss rate κint = 5 × 105 s−1, and total energy damping rate κ = κc + κtint. It was used for all other data of the main text.
Pulse sequence
In all the data shown in the main text, 4-μs-long pulses were used. This pulse length of Δt = 4 μs corresponds to a pulse bandwidth Δωpulse/2π ≈ 250 kHz, which roughly matches the cavity bandwidth of resonator 3, κ/2π = 350 kHz.
CPMG enhanced T1 measurements
Except for the relaxation measurements presented in Fig. 3 (A and B), all data presented in the manuscript are taken with high pulse powers. For the relaxation measurements in Fig. 3 (A and B), however, the SNR is insufficient for Hahn echo measurements at low pulse powers. It is therefore necessary to use CPMG sequences to enhance the SNR in this low power regime. Thus, the usual Hahn echo sequence (π/2 − τ − π − τ − echo) is followed by a CPMG sequence consisting in a chosen number N-1 of refocusing pulses (τ − π − τ − echo) × (N-1) (40).
In the measurement presented in Fig. 3 (A and B), τ is chosen to be 30 μs, the spacing between the CPMG pulses is 2τ = 60 μs, and N is set to 333. The spin-echo amplitude is then computed as the weighted average of the N. Here, the weights are measured from the integral of each refocused echo when no initial inversion pulse is applied. The data presented in Fig. 3C are recorded without CPMG pulses, as the high pulse powers give sufficient SNR with just single-shot Hahn echoes.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge technical support from P. Sénat, D. Duet, P.-F. Orfila, and S. Delprat, and we are grateful for fruitful discussions within the Quantronics group. We acknowledge IARPA and Lincoln Labs for providing the Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier.
Funding: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 765267 (QuSCO) and no. 792727 (SMERC). E.F. acknowledges support from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) grant DARKWADOR:ANR-19-CE47-0004. We acknowledge support from the ANR through the Chaire Industrielle NASNIQ under contract ANR-17-CHIN-0001 cofunded by Atos and through the project MIRESPIN under contract ANR-19-CE47-0011 and of the Region Ile-de-France through the DIM SIRTEQ (REIMIC project). We acknowledge support of the AIDAS virtual joint laboratory. This work was supported by the ANR–Hong Kong RGC Joint Scheme (ANR-17-CHIN-0001 and A-CUHK403/15). S.L. was supported by the Impact Postdoctoral Fellowship of CUHK. S.B. thanks the support of the CNRS research infrastructure RENARD (FR 3443).
Author contributions: M.L.D., M.R., E.F., and P.B. designed the experiment. A.E. grew the CaWO4 crystal. The sample was provided by S.B. and was cut, polished, and analyzed with x-ray diffraction by P.G. S.B. performed the EPR spectroscopy at 8 K. M.L.D. fabricated the resonators, with the help of E.B. and D.V. M.L.D. and M.R. performed the measurements with help from D.V., D.F., and P.B. M.L.D., M.R., E.F., and P.B. analyzed the data. S.L. and R.B.L. performed the CCE simulations. M.L.D. performed the relaxation time simulations, with the help of V.R. and P.B. M.L.D., M.R., and P.B. wrote the manuscript. T.C., P.G., S.B., D.F., D.V., and D.E. contributed to useful input to the manuscript. P.B. and E.F. supervised the project.
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Replication data can be found on Harvard Dataverse at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9VSAUT.
Supplementary Materials
This PDF file includes:
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Saglamyurek E., Jin J., Verma V. B., Shaw M. D., Marsili F., Nam S. W., Oblak D., Tittel W., Quantum storage of entangled telecom-wavelength photons in an erbium-doped optical fibre. Nat. Photonics 9, 83–87 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Afzelius M., Sangouard N., Johansson G., Staudt M. U., Wilson C. M., Proposal for a coherent quantum memory for propagating microwave photons. New J. Phys. 15, 065008 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Probst S., Rotzinger H., Ustinov A. V., Bushev P. A., Microwave multimode memory with an erbium spin ensemble. Phys. Rev. B 92, 014421 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Williamson L. A., Chen Y.-H., Longdell J. J., Magneto-optic modulator with unit quantum efficiency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 203601 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fernandez-Gonzalvo X., Chen Y.-H., Yin C., Rogge S., Longdell J. J., Coherent frequency up-conversion of microwaves to the optical telecommunications band in an Er:YSO crystal. Phys. Rev. A 92, 062313 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tyryshkin A. M., Tojo S., Morton J. J. L., Riemann H., Abrosimov N. V., Becker P., Pohl H.-J., Schenkel T., Thewalt M. L. W., Itoh K. M., Lyon S. A., Electron spin coherence exceeding seconds in high-purity silicon. Nat. Mater. 11, 143–147 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Böttger T., Thiel C., Cone R., Sun Y., Effects of magnetic field orientation on optical decoherence in Er3+:Y2SiO5. Phys. Rev. B 79, 115104 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Merkel B., Ulanowski A., Reiserer A., Coherent and Purcell-enhanced emission from erbium dopants in a cryogenic high-Q resonator. Phys. Rev. X 10, 041025 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhong M., Hedges M. P., Ahlefeldt R. L., Bartholomew J. G., Beavan S. E., Wittig S. M., Longdell J. J., Sellars M. J., Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time. Nature 517, 177–180 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ortu A., Tiranov A., Welinski S., Frowis F., Gisin N., Ferrier A., Goldner P., Afzelius M., Simultaneous coherence enhancement of optical and microwave transitions in solid-state electronic spins. Nat. Mater. 17, 671–675 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rakonjac J. V., Chen Y.-H., Horvath S. P., Longdell J. J., Long spin coherence times in the ground state and in an optically excited state of 167Er3+:Y2SiO5 at zero magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 101, 184430 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wolfowicz G., Tyryshkin A. M., George R. E., Riemann H., Abrosimov N. V., Becker P., Pohl H.-J., Thewalt M. L. W., Lyon S. A., Morton J. J. L., Atomic clock transitions in silicon-based spin qubits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 561–564 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ranjan V., O’Sullivan J., Albertinale E., Albanese B., Chanelière T., Schenkel T., Vion D., Esteve D., Flurin E., Morton J., Bertet P., Multimode storage of quantum microwave fields in electron spins over 100 ms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 210505 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abobeih M. H., Cramer J., Bakker M. A., Kalb N., Markham M., Twitchen D. J., Taminiau T. H., One-second coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment. Nat. Commun. 9, 2552 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen S., Raha M., Phenicie C. M., Ourari S., Thompson J. D., Parallel single-shot measurement and coherent control of solid-state spins below the diffraction limit. Science 370, 592–595 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Merkel B., Fariña P. C., Reiserer A., Dynamical decoupling of spin ensembles with strong anisotropic interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 030501 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.S. Kanai, F. J. Heremans, H. Seo, G. Wolfowicz, C. P. Anderson, S. E. Sullivan, G. Galli, D. D. Awschalom, H. Ohno, Generalized scaling of spin qubit coherence in over 12,000 host materials. arXiv:2102.02986 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Mims W. B., Nassau K., McGee J. D., Spectral diffusion in electron resonance lines. Phys. Rev. 123, 2059–2069 (1961). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Antipin A., Katyshev A., Kurkin I., Shekun L., Paramagnetic resonance and spin-lattice relaxation of Er3+ and Tb3+ ions in CaWO4 crystal lattice. Sov. Phys. Solid State 10, 468 (1968). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haikka P., Kubo Y., Bienfait A., Bertet P., Moelmer K., Proposal for detecting a single electron spin in a microwave resonator. Phys. Rev. A 95, 022306 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Erb A., Lanfranchi J.-C., Growth of high-purity scintillating CaWO4 single crystals for the low-temperature direct dark matter search experiments CRESST-II and EURECA. CrystEngComm 15, 2301–2304 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bienfait A., Pla J. J., Kubo Y., Stern M., Zhou X., Lo C. C., Weis C. D., Schenkel T., Thewalt M. L. W., Vion D., Esteve D., Julsgaard B., Mølmer K., Morton J. J. L., Bertet P., Reaching the quantum limit of sensitivity in electron spin resonance. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 253–257 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ranjan V., Probst S., Albanese B., Schenkel T., Vion D., Esteve D., Morton J. J. L., Bertet P., Electron spin resonance spectroscopy with femtoliter detection volume. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 184002 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ranjan V., Probst S., Albanese B., Doll A., Jacquot O., Flurin E., Heeres R., Vion D., Esteve D., Morton J. J. L., Bertet P., Pulsed electron spin resonance spectroscopy in the Purcell regime. J. Magn. Reson. 310, 106662 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Macklin C., O’Brien K., Hover D., Schwartz M. E., Bolkhovsky V., Zhang X., Oliver W. D., Siddiqi I., A near-quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier. Science 350, 307–310 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mims W. B., Gillen R., Broadening of paramagnetic-resonance lines by internal electric fields. Phys. Rev. 148, 438–443 (1966). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mims W. B., Electric field shift in paramagnetic resonance for four ions in a calcium tungstate lattice. Phys. Rev. 140, A531–A535 (1965). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Böttger T., Thiel C. W., Sun Y., Cone R. L., Optical decoherence and spectral diffusion at 1.5 μm in Er3+ : Y2SiO5 versus magnetic field, temperature, and Er3+ concentration. Phys. Rev. B 73, 075101 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bertaina S., Gambarelli S., Tkachuk A., Kurkin I. N., Malkin B., Stepanov A., Barbara B., Rare-earth solid-state qubits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 39–42 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li P.-Y., Liu C., Zhou Z.-Q., Liu X., Tu T., Yang T.-S., Li Z.-F., Ma Y., Hu J., Liang P.-J., Li X., Huang J.-Y., Zhu T.-X., Li C.-F., Guo G.-C., Hyperfine structure and coherent dynamics of rare-earth spins explored with electron-nuclear double resonance at subkelvin temperatures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 024080 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Witzel W. M., de Sousa R., Das Sarma S., Quantum theory of spectral-diffusion-induced electron spin decoherence. Phys. Rev. B 72, 161306 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yang W., Liu R.-B., Quantum many-body theory of qubit decoherence in a finite-size spin bath. Phys. Rev. B 78, 085315 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tyryshkin A. M., Lyon S. A., Astashkin A. V., Raitsimring A. M., Electron spin relaxation times of phosphorus donors in silicon. Phys. Rev. B 68, 193207 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sangouard N., Simon C., de Riedmatten H., Gisin N., Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 33–80 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Takahashi S., Hanson R., van Tol J., Sherwin M. S., Awschalom D. D., Quenching spin decoherence in diamond through spin bath polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 047601 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rančić M., Hedges M. P., Ahlefeldt R. L., Sellars M. J., Coherence time of over a second in a telecom-compatible quantum memory storage material. Nat. Phys. 14, 50–54 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bienfait A., Pla J., Kubo Y., Zhou X., Stern M., Lo C.-C., Weis C., Schenkel T., Vion D., Esteve D., Morton J., Bertet P., Controlling spin relaxation with a cavity. Nature 531, 74–77 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.A. Abragam, B. Bleaney, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Transition Ions (OUP Oxford, 2012); Google-Books-ID: ASNoAgAAQBAJ. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Antipin A. A., Bumagina L. A., Malkin B. Z., Rakhmatullin R. M., Anisotropy of Er3+ spin-lattice relaxation in LiYF4 crystals. Soviet J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 23, 2700–2707 (1981). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Albanese B., Probst S., Ranjan V., Zollitsch C. W., Pechal M., Wallraff A., Morton J. J. L., Vion D., Esteve D., Flurin E., Bertet P., Radiative cooling of a spin ensemble. Nat. Phys. 16, 751–755 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Golding R. M., Kestigian M., Tennant C. W., EPR of high-spin Fe3+ in calcium tungstate, CaWO4. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 11, 5041–5049 (1978). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Diniz I., Portolan S., Ferreira R., Gérard J. M., Bertet P., Auffèves A., Strongly coupling a cavity to inhomogeneous ensembles of emitters: Potential for long-lived solid-state quantum memories. Phys. Rev. A 84, 063810 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ranjan V., de Lange G., Schutjens R., Debelhoir T., Groen J. P., Szombati D., Thoen D. J., Klapwijk T. M., Hanson R., DiCarlo L., Probing dynamics of an electron-spin ensemble via a superconducting resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 067004 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kubo Y., Ong F. R., Bertet P., Vion D., Jacques V., Zheng D., Dréau A., Roch J.-F., Auffeves A., Jelezko F., Wrachtrup J., Barthe M. F., Bergonzo P., Esteve D., Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to a superconducting resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 140502 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ma W.-L., Wolfowicz G., Zhao N., Li S.-S., Morton J. J. L., Liu R.-B., Uncovering many-body correlations in nanoscale nuclear spin baths by central spin decoherence. Nat. Commun. 5, 4822 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Probst S., Zhang G., Rančić M., Ranjan V., Le Dantec M., Zhang Z., Albanese B., Doll A., Liu R. B., Morton J., Chanelière T., Goldner P., Vion D., Esteve D., Bertet P., Hyperfine spectroscopy in a quantum-limited spectrometer. Magn. Reson. 1, 315–330 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.A. Schweiger, G. Jeschke, Principles of Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (Oxford Univ. Press, 2001). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.