Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2021 Nov 16;32(12):2507–2515. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00473

Azide-Functionalized Naphthoxyloside as a Tool for Glycosaminoglycan Investigations

Daniel Willén , Roberto Mastio , Zackarias Söderlund , Sophie Manner , Gunilla Westergren-Thorsson , Emil Tykesson , Ulf Ellervik †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC8678990  PMID: 34784477

Abstract

graphic file with name bc1c00473_0007.jpg

We present a xylosylated naphthoxyloside carrying a terminal azide functionality that can be used for conjugation using click chemistry. We show that this naphthoxyloside serves as a substrate for β4GalT7 and induces the formation of soluble glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains with physiologically relevant lengths and sulfation patterns. Finally, we demonstrate its usefulness by conjugation to the Alexa Fluor 647 and TAMRA fluorophores and coupling to a surface plasmon resonance chip for interaction studies with the hepatocyte growth factor known to interact with the GAG heparan sulfate.

Introduction

Cellular communication is essential for tissue development, growth, adhesion, coagulation, and pathophysiological processes, for example, tumor development and infection.1 A vital part of cell-to-cell communication is mediated by carbohydrates anchored to the cellular membranes. Proteoglycan (PG), which consists of long linear chains of alternating disaccharides, i.e., glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), is one important class of cell surface carbohydrates. The pattern of alternating disaccharides further classifies the GAGs as heparan sulfate (HS, GlcNAc(β1–4)GlcA(β1–4)) or chondroitin/dermatan sulfate (CS/DS, GalNAc(β1–4)GlcA(β1–3)). These polymers are postsynthetically sulfated and epimerized to generate a vast structural diversity.

The biosynthesis of HS and CS/DS is initiated by xylosylation of a serine residue on the parent protein followed by galactosylation by β-1,4-galactosyltransferase 7 (β4GalT7). This disaccharide is then elongated by the addition of another galactose unit and a glucuronic acid moiety to form a common linker region, i.e., GlcA(β1–3)Gal(β1–3)Gal(β1–4)Xyl β (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Biosynthesis of the linker tetrasaccharide of HS and CS/DS from a xylosylated protein or an exogenously supplied xyloside with an aromatic aglycon. (b) Concept of this study: azide-functionalized xylosides that can prime GAGs and serve as tools for investigations of the biosynthesis and functions of GAGs.

Interestingly, the biosynthesis can be initiated by synthetic xylosides, i.e., small molecules composed of a xylose coupled to an aglycone. GAG chains primed by such xylosides are soluble and thus usually secreted into the extracellular matrix and compete with the endogenous production of PGs.

The composition of GAG chains primed by exogenously supplied xylosides is cell-specific but also, to a lesser extent, predetermined by the type of xyloside as well as the aglycon.2 The structure–activity relationships between aglycon and GAG structure are still not completely understood.3 The soluble GAG chains have been shown to have interesting properties such as antitumor effects,46 anticoagulant effects,7,8 lung development and regeneration,9 and promotion of neuronal growth.10

Since xylose is a relatively uncommon carbohydrate in mammalian cellular systems,11 apart from the GAG biosynthesis, it is only found in the Notch receptor and dystroglycan,12 the addition of xylosides can be used to investigate the GAG biosynthesis without disturbing other carbohydrate-mediated cellular systems. Xylosides can thus provide relatively large amounts of GAG chains that mirror the normal cell-specific PGs. These GAG chains can be used to explore the interaction with normal and tumor cells and pathogens such as bacteria and viruses.

To study the biological effects of soluble GAG chains, it is fundamental to design xylosides with aglycones that are optimized for the priming of GAG chains while also provided with a handle that can be used to make conjugates such as fluorescent probes, prodrugs, and linkers for binding to, e.g., surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor chips.

Recently, we presented a naphthoxyloside containing an amine function that was used in connection with a library of genetically modified knock-in/out cell lines with modifications in the GAG biosynthesis, i.e., a GAGome.13 The amine-functionalized naphthoxyloside induced the biosynthesis of soluble GAGs that could be used to assemble GAG microarrays. However, the amine functionality is far from optimal due to its high reactivity in cellular settings.

The Cu(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azides and alkynes is one of the most famous examples of a click reaction,14,15 i.e., reactions aiming at the facile and rapid assembly of more complex molecules.16 In the early 2000s, Bertozzi and co-workers developed a copper-free version of this reaction that relies on strain promotion using a cyclooctyne, which then cleanly reacts with the azide in a reaction orthogonal to normal cellular processes.17 Further optimizations of the cyclooctyne gave rise to high-yielding and highly reactive compounds, i.e., DBCO, for bioconjugations.18

In this study, we envisioned expanding the concept of GAG primers to include a terminal azide function. We hypothesize that naphthoxylosides carrying a terminal azide function will induce the production of soluble GAG chains that reflect the cells’ natural PGs and can be conjugated with any alkyne-containing functionality and thus be used as tools to determine important roles of GAGs in various biological systems (Figure 1B).

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of Azide-Functionalized Naphthoxylosides

As a first attempt toward azide-functionalized naphthoxylosides, we envisioned compounds 5 and 12, where the azide function is connected to the naphthol moiety via a short aliphatic linker. Starting from previously published materials 1(19) and commercially available 6, the azides were introduced using nucleophilic displacement, furbishing 10 and 2, respectively (Scheme 1A). Deacetylation then gave 4 and 11, which were xylosylated and deprotected to give 5 and 12, respectively. These reactions were surprisingly low-yielding, and we experienced purification problems. Furthermore, 5 and 12 were unstable in the buffer used for biological investigations. It is known that azides, in the presence of Brønstedt and Lewis acids, can give rise to rearrangements and cyclization reactions.20 These envisioned side reactions between the aromatic ring and the azide functionality rendered compounds 5 and 12 less suitable for further evaluation.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Target Xylosides.

Scheme 1

Reagents and conditions: (i) PBr3, CH2Cl2, 40 °C, 1.5 h, 56%; (ii) NaN3, DMSO, 40 °C, 2 h, 89%; (iii) 1 M NaOMe, MeOH, r.t., 2 h, 73%; (iv) acetic anhydride, pyridine, r.t., 24 h, 68%; (v) 2 M BH3·THF, THF, 0 °C to r.t., 20 h, 68%; (vi) MsCl, pyridine, 0 °C, 3 h, 79%; (vii) NaN3, DMF, 0 °C to r.t., 30 h, 74%; (viii) 1 M NaOMe, MeOH, r.t., 2 h, 89%; (ix) peracetylated xylose, BF3·OEt2, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to r.t., then (x) 1 M NaOMe, MeOH, r.t., 1 h, 5: 13% over two steps; 12: 16% over two steps; (xi) NH4OAc, THF, MeOH, H2O, o.n., 40 °C, 84%; (xii) 3-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propyl bromide. K2CO3, DMF, Ar(g), o.n., 40 °C; then (xiii) HCl, MeOH, 30 min, r.t., 63% over two steps; (xiv) MsCl, pyridine, 1,5 h, 0 °C to r.t., 89%; (xv) NaN3, DMF, 30 min, MW heating at 90 °C, 88%; and (xvi) K2CO3, MeOH, 1.5 h, r.t., 84%.

We decided to increase the linker length to avoid these side reactions, allowing synthetically simpler constructs, e.g., ethers. Conceptually, the synthesis of target XylNapN3 was straightforward (Scheme 1B).

Starting from the peracetylated 13, we deprotected the aromatic hydroxyl group using NH4OAc in a ternary mixture of THF:MeOH:H2O to give 14 in a good yield. This improved from a previously used methodology for the selective deprotection of aromatic acetyl groups, i.e., KCN in MeOH.21 To install the linker and minimize unwanted deprotection of the xylose moiety, we used K2CO3, followed by acidic desilylation of the crude 15 to give 16 in a good overall yield. The terminal hydroxyl group was then mesylated to give 17, followed by installation of the azide using microwave heating to generate 18 in an excellent yield. Final deacetylation using K2CO3 in MeOH furbished the final target XylNapN3. The control compounds XylNap and XylNapOH have been synthesized previously.5,22

Azide-Functionalized Naphthoxylosides as Substrates for β4GalT7

To confirm the ability to function as a substrate for β4GalT7, we evaluated XylNapN3 and compared it to XylNap in the galactosylation assay.23XylNapN3 displayed a similar kinetic profile as XylNap (Figure 2 and Table 1), suggesting that the azide functionalization does not influence the reaction with β4GalT7.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kinetic profile of XylNapN3 (filled triangles) compared to that of XylNap (filled circles).

Table 1. Galactosylation by β4GalT7.

compound Km (mM) Vmax (pmol/s) kcat (s–1) kcat/Km (mM–1 s–1)
XylNapN3 0.80 2.17 1.30 1.63
XylNap 1.19 1.98 1.19 1.00

Cellular Uptake and GAG-Priming of Azide-Functionalized Naphthoxylosides

To verify that XylNapN3 is taken up by cells and initiates the biosynthesis of soluble GAGs, A549 cells, i.e., adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells, were treated with XylNapN3. The known primers XylNap and XylNapOH were used as controls. All three compounds were taken up by the cells and functioned as primers of soluble GAG chains excreted to the cell medium. The GAGs were purified by ion-exchange chromatography and analyzed by fluorescence-coupled size-exclusion chromatography (Figure 3a). In comparison to XylNap and XylNapOH, the treatment of A549 cells with compound XylNapN3 resulted in greater diversity in the GAG chain length, i.e., slightly longer chains as well as shorter products.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Chromatogram from size-exclusion chromatography on an AdvanceBio SEC column of GAGs from A549 cells treated with XylNapN3 (dashed bold line), XylNap (solid line), and XylNapOH (line with long dashes). The indicated molecular weights were obtained using heparin standards. (B) Amount of GAGs primed by A549 cells, as determined by disaccharide analysis. (C) Disaccharide analysis results after the treatment of A549 cells with XylNap (black bars), XylNapOH (gray bars), or XylNapN3 (white bars).

The GAG chains were analyzed for the amount of primed GAGs and disaccharide composition (Figure 3B,C). XylNapN3 primed a similar amount of GAGs in comparison with XylNap and XylNapOH. In addition, the disaccharide composition is similar between the three compounds, and the GAGs consisted mainly of disaccharides sulfated in positions 4 and 6 of the GalNAc moieties. However, the treatment of A549 cells with XylNapN3 resulted in GAGs with a slightly lowered level of sulfation.

Applications of Azide-Functionalized Naphthoxylosides

Since most growth media used to cultivate mammalian cells contain high concentrations of serum-derived GAGs, many GAG structure-related experiments are performed in serum-free conditions, which induce unwanted artificial cell responses. We have shown that XylNapN3 can be taken up by cells and initiate the biosynthesis of soluble GAG chains provided with a handle suitable for functionalization. With such a handle, it is possible to perform experiments in the presence of exogenous GAGs and specifically pull down or derivatize only neosynthesized GAGs. To verify this concept, XylNapN3-primed GAGs, isolated from the cell medium by ion-exchange chromatography, were incubated with DBCO-containing Alexa Fluor 647 fluorophore and analyzed by fluorescence-coupled size-exclusion chromatography. The presence of fluorophore-conjugated GAGs was clearly shown, confirming the ability to functionalize the primed GAGs (Figure 4A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Chromatogram of cell medium before (solid line) and after (dashed line) click reaction between XylNapN3-primed GAGs and an Alexa Fluor 647 fluorophore. The broad peak between 5 and 10 min corresponds to xyloside-primed GAGs. The tall peak at 12 min corresponds to the excess fluorophore. Fluorescence was monitored at Ex/Em = 648/671 nm. (B) SPR sensorgram showing the interaction between XylNapN3-primed HS GAGs and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) at 3, 6, and 12 nM. Black curves show fitting using a 1:1 Langmuir model. (C) Confocal microscopy images of GFP-tagged A549 cells treated with XylNapN3–TAMRA conjugates. The compound is efficiently taken up by the cells and localizes to the perinuclear region.

We also labeled XylNapN3-primed GAGs, isolated from primary lung fibroblasts, with biotin via the azide handle. Using a streptavidin-coated surface plasmon resonance (SPR) chip, we performed kinetic studies with isolated heparan sulfate (HS) GAGs and the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) known to interact with HS (Figure 4B). The experiments revealed an association rate (kA) of 1.31 × 106/(M s) and a dissociation rate (kD) of 18 × 10–6/s, yielding a KD of 14 × 10–12 between HGF and GAGs isolated from the primary fibroblasts. The χ2/ndof residual was calculated to be 0.18 RU2.

Finally, XylNapN3 was labeled with a tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA) fluorophore, which is known to be efficiently taken up and evenly distributed in living cells.24 We treated GFP-tagged A549 cells with the XylNapN3–TAMRA conjugate and observed the uptake by confocal microscopy (Figure 4C). The compound localized to the perinuclear region, but no primed GAGs were observed in the conditioned cell medium, in line with what we have observed for XylPacBlue.25

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized a naphthoxyloside, XylNapN3, functionalized with an azide moiety. XylNapN3 was shown to be a substrate for β4GalT7 and was galactosylated with similar kinetics as the known XylNap. Furthermore, we have shown that XylNapN3 is taken up by A549 cells, where it initiated the biosynthesis of soluble GAGs of comparable sizes, and similar disaccharide composition, as GAGs from the known primers XylNap and XylNapOH. Furthermore, these GAG chains were efficiently reacted in a strain-promoted cycloaddition with a DBCO-containing Alexa Fluor 647 fluorophore. We also showed that XylNapN3, labeled with the TAMRA fluorophore, could be used for fluorescence localization microscopy experiments in vivo. Finally, GAGs isolated from primary fibroblast stimulated with XylNapN3 were successfully biotinylated via the azide handle and used in SPR experiments to determine the kinetic parameters for their interaction with the hepatocyte growth factor.

From these data, we argue that XylNapN3 is a valuable tool for isolating and manipulating cell-specific, soluble GAGs and investigate their interactions with biomolecules, such as growth factors. In addition, we propose that compound XylNapN3 will be a useful tool for coupling GAGs with, for example, fluorophores, polyhistidine tags, magnetic beads, and SPR sensor chips.

Experimental Methods

All moisture- and air-sensitive reactions were carried out under an atmosphere of dry nitrogen using oven-dried glassware. All solvents were dried using an MBRAUN SPS-800 Solvent purification system before use unless otherwise stated. Purchased reagents were used without further purification. Chromatographic separations were performed on Matrix silica gel (25–70 μm). Thin-layer chromatography was performed on precoated TLC glass plates with silica gel 60 F254 0.25 mm (Merck). Spots were visualized with UV light or by charring with an ethanolic anisaldehyde solution. Biotage Isolute phase separators were used for drying of combined organic layers. Preparative chromatography was performed on a Biotage Isolera One flash purification system using Biotage SNAP KP-Sil silica cartridges. Optical rotations were measured on a Bellingham and Stanley model ADP450 polarimeter and are reported as [α]DT (c = g/100 mL), where D indicates the sodium D line (589 nm) and T indicates the temperature. NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperatures on a Bruker Avance II at 400 MHz (1H) and 100 MHz (13C) or a Bruker Ascend at 500 MHz (1H) and 125 MHz (13C) and assigned using 2D methods (COSY, HMQC). Chemical shifts are reported in ppm, with reference to residual solvent peaks (δH CHCl3 = 7.26 ppm, CD3OH = 3.31 ppm) and solvent signals (δC CDCl3 = 77.0 ppm, CD3OD = 49.0 ppm). Coupling constant values are given in Hz. Mass spectra were recorded on Waters XEVO G2 (positive ESI). Infrared spectroscopy was recorded on a Bruker α II FT-IR spectrometer. IR was only used to confirm structural features, and only the peak of interest was reported.

The Swedish Research Ethical Committee approved this study in Lund (2008/413, 2011/581), and all experimental protocols were carried out in accordance with the guidelines approved by the ethical committee.

Synthesis of XylNapN3

(6-Hydroxynaphthalen-2-yl) 2,3,4-Tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (14)

13 (1.012 g, 2.20 mmol) was dissolved in THF (20 mL), followed by the addition of MeOH (10 mL) and H2O (5 mL) while stirring. After 5 min, NH4OAc (2.711 g, 35.17 mmol) was introduced, and the mixture was heated to 40 °C and left overnight. Upon completion, the reaction was diluted with H2O and extracted with DCM (4×). The organic phase was washed with NaCl (sat. aq), dried, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (heptane:EtOAc, 10–50%) to yield 14 (774 mg, 1.85 mmol, 84%) as an amorphous solid. The analysis was in accordance with the published data.21

(6-(3-Hydroxypropoxy)naphthalen-2-yl) 2,3,4-Tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (16)

14 (651 mg, 1.56 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (8 mL) under an Ar(g) atmosphere while stirring, followed by 3-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propyl bromide26 (524 mg, 2.07 mmol). K2CO3 (475 mg, 3.44 mmol) was introduced, and the mixture was heated to 40 °C and left overnight. Upon completion, the heating was removed and H2O was added. The aqueous phase was extracted with DCM (4×). The organic phase was then dried and coevaporated twice with toluene in vacuo. Crude 15 (933 mg) was then dissolved in MeOH (29.2 mL), followed by HCl (37%, 810 μL) while stirring. Upon completion after 30 min, the mixture was neutralized and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, heptane:EtOAc, 33–100%) to yield 16 (467 mg, 0.98 mmol, 63% over two steps) as an oily residue. [a]D25 −2.2° (c 0.46, CDCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65 (dd, J = 9.3, 4.6 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.17–7.12 (m, 3H), 5.29–5.20 (m, 3H), 5.04 (td, J = 7.5, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J = 12.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.91 (q, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.58 (dd, J = 12.1, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.15–2.07 (m, 11H).13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.12, 170.01, 169.58, 156.09, 153.06, 131.16, 129.59, 128.75, 128.48, 119.62, 119.41, 111.97, 106.98, 99.05, 70.85, 70.37, 68.69, 65.94, 62.05, 60.71, 32.14, 20.94, 20.92, 20.89. HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C24H28O10Na: 499.1580; found: 499.1582.

(6-(3-((Methylsulfonyl)oxy)propoxy)naphthalen-2-yl) 2,3,4-Tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (17)

16 (267 mg, 0.56 mmol) was dissolved in pyridine (5.6 mL) while stirring and cooled to 0 °C. Methanesulfonyl chloride (174 μL, 2.24 mmol) was then slowly added dropwise. After 20 min, the reaction was allowed to reach r.t. Upon completion after 1 h, the reaction was diluted with H2O and DCM. The aqueous phase was extracted with DCM (4×). The organic phase was then dried and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, heptane:EtOAc, 33–100%) to yield 17 (275 mg, 0.50 mmol, 89%) as an oily residue. [a]D25 −21,4° (c 1.0, CDCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65 (dd, J = 8.8, 4.3 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.32 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.20–7.09 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 5.31–5.18 (m, 3H, H-1, H-2, H-3), 5.04 (td, J = 7.3, 4.7 Hz, 1H, H-4), 4.49 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H, -CH2OMs), 4.27 (dd, J = 12.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H, H-5), 4.19 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H, -OCH2-), 3.58 (dd, J = 12.1, 7.6 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.00 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 2.29 (p, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H, -CH2-), 2.13–2.07 (m, 9H, 3× COCH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.10, 170.00, 169.56, 155.79, 153.15, 131.08, 129.69, 128.89, 128.50, 119.51, 119.45, 111.97, 106.99, 99.00, 70.81, 70.34, 68.67, 66.90, 63.40, 62.04, 37.42, 29.27, 20.93, 20.91, 20.89. HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C25H30O12SNa: 577.1346; found: 577.1360.

(6-(3-Azidopropoxy)naphthalen-2-yl) 2,3,4-Tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (18)

17 (275 mg, 0.50 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (4 mL), followed by NaN3 (65 mg, 0.99 mmol). The mixture was then heated in a microwave reactor for 30 min at 90 °C. Upon completion, the reaction was diluted with H2O and DCM. The aqueous phase was extracted with DCM (4×). The organic phase was then dried and coevaporated twice with toluene in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, heptane:EtOAc, 33–100%) to yield 18 (220 mg, 0.44 mmol, 88%) as an oily residue. [a]D25 −13.1° (c 1.0, CDCl3). IR 2099 cm–1 (N3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65 (dd, J = 8.9, 4.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.32 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.19–7.09 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 5.34–5.19 (m, 3H, H-1, H-2, H-3), 5.04 (td, J = 7.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H, H-4), 4.27 (dd, J = 12.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H, H-5), 4.15 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H, -CH2O-), 3.57 (dd, J = 12.1, 7.6 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.56 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H, -CH2-OH), 2.11 (p, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H, -CH2-), 2.11–2.09 (m, 9H, 3xCOCH3).13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.11, 170.00, 169.56, 155.99, 153.09, 131.13, 129.63, 128.79, 128.48, 119.60, 119.43, 112.00, 106.96, 99.05, 70.85, 70.37, 68.69, 64.72, 62.05, 48.46, 28.94, 20.93, 20.91, 20.89. HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C24H27N3O9Na: 524.1645; found: 524.1637.

(6-(3-Azidopropoxy)naphthalen-2-yl) β-d-Xylopyranoside (XylNapN3)

18 (216 mg, 0.43 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (10 mL), followed by the addition of K2CO3 (357 mg, 2.58 mmol). Upon completion after 1.5 h, the reaction was acidified, and the solvent was removed. The crude mixture was then recrystallized from H2O and filtered, yielding XylNapN3 (137 mg, 0.36 mmol, 84%) as a white solid. m.p.: 147–151 °C. [a]D25 −22.8° (c 0.57, MeOD4). IR 2098 cm–1 (N3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.68 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.37 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.27–7.20 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.12 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 4.97 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, H-1), 4.15 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H, -OCH2-), 3.96 (dd, J = 11.3, 5.2 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.65–3.38 (m, 6H, H-4, H-3, H-2, H-5′, -CH2N3), 2.09 (p, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, -CH2-). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOD) δ 157.17, 155.22, 132.30, 131.10, 129.57, 129.18, 120.41, 120.26, 112.44, 107.85, 103.26, 77.76, 74.83, 71.08, 66.97, 65.89, 48.98,1 29.87. HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C18H21N3O6(HCOO): 420.1407; found: 420.1400.

β4GalT7 Assay

The β4GalT7 enzymatic assay was performed as previously described.27 Briefly, β4GalT7 (50 ng) was mixed in 96-well polypropylene plates with UDP-Gal (1 mM final concentration) and various concentrations of xylosides in a final volume of 50 μL MES buffer (20 mM, pH 6.2) supplemented with MnCl2 (10 mM). Incubation was performed at 37 °C for 30 min, and the reaction was stopped by cooling at 4 °C and the addition of HPLC eluent (70% NH4OAc (60 mM, pH 5.6)–30% CH3CN (v/v)) before HPLC analysis.

Xyloside Stimulation of A549 Cells

Actin-EmGFP-modified A549 cells were prepared as previously described (REF XPB paper) and grown to approx. 70% confluence in DMEM/F-12/GlutaMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). A stock solution of XylNapN3 was prepared at 50 mM in DMSO and added to the cells in OptiPRO SFM medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a concentration of 100 μm. After 24 h of treatment, medium samples were either analyzed directly by fluorescence detection size-exclusion chromatography (FSEC) on an AdvanceBio SEC column (Agilent).

Glycosaminoglycan Purification

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) secreted into the cell medium were purified by anion-exchange chromatography, as described below. After supplementation with the Triton X-100 detergent (Sigma-Aldrich) to 0.1%, the medium was protease-treated with 0.5 mg/mL Pronase (Sigma-Aldrich) for 16 h at 50 °C, after which the protease was heat-inactivated at 95 °C for 10 min. To each sample, MgCl2 was added to 2 mM to aid degradation of nucleic acids with 50 U/mL turbonuclease (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at 37 °C. To facilitate the specific binding of GAGs to the DEAE-Sephacel ion-exchange resin, samples were buffered to pH 5.4 using a concentrated sodium acetate solution for a final concentration of 100 mM. Each 10 mL sample was then purified on a 100 v bed of DEAE-Sephacel (Cytiva Life Sciences) packed in 2 mL Pierce disposable columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The resin was washed twice with a 500 μL solution of sodium acetate (20 mM), NaCl (100 mM), and Triton X-100 (0.1%) and twice with a 500 μL solution of the same buffer without detergent added. GAGs were eluted using 500 μL of a 2 M solution of NaCl and precipitated overnight at −20 °C after the addition (3:1 v/v) of ethanol (>95%) saturated with sodium acetate. GAGs were pelleted by centrifugation at 20 000g, 4 °C, for 10 min, washed with 500 μL cold ethanol (>95%), and once again pelleted by centrifugation before being dried in a SpeedVac vacuum concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Disaccharide Analysis

Disaccharide analysis of xyloside-primed GAGs from A549 cells was essentially performed as previously described.28 Briefly, purified GAGs corresponding to 10% of the total medium sample from a T75 cell culture flask were split into two samples and treated for 6 h at 37 °C with 10 mIU/sample chondroitinase ABC (Sigma-Aldrich) and 20 + 20 mIU/sample heparinase II + III (prepared in-house), respectively, in 10 μL ammonium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.1). After GAG degradation, disaccharides were fluorescently labeled by reductive amination using 10 μL 2-aminoacridone (20 mM in acetic acid/DMSO 15/85, v/v, pH around 4–5) mixed with sodium cyanoborohydride (1 M final concentration). Labeled disaccharides were separated by reversed-phase HPLC, detected with a fluorescence detector, and quantified using labeled disaccharide standards (Iduron) of known concentration.

Glycosaminoglycan Biotinylation

For interaction studies between xyloside-primed GAGs and the growth factor HGF, primary lung fibroblast isolated from the distal lung tissue from a healthy subject was grown in DMEM/F-12/GlutaMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). A stock solution of XylNapN3 was prepared at 50 mM in DMSO and added to the cells at 100 μM. Cells were stimulated for 24 h, after which the GAGs were purified as above. Purified GAGs from 10 mL conditioned medium (from a T75 flask) were reacted with Click-iT biotin sDIBO alkyne (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a final concentration of 0.2 mg/mL in DPBS. Excess biotinylation reagent was removed using Amicon Ultra 10 kDa cutoff centrifugal filters (Merck Millipore).

Surface Plasmon Resonance Interaction between Glycosaminoglycans and Growth Factors

The GAG–biotin complexes were immobilized on a 30 nm streptavidin-derivatized linear polycarboxylate hydrogel with medium charge density (SPSM SAHC30M, Xantec). The surface was conditioned with 50 mM NaOH and 1 M NaCl, followed by running buffer until a stable baseline. Then, the ligand surface was immobilized at a flow rate of 10 μL/min for 1 min with HS GAGs, corresponding to ∼60% isolated chondroitinase ABC-treated GAGs from a T75 cell culture plate, in running buffer (PBS with 0.01% Tween 20) for a total RU of 93. To minimize unspecific binding, Click-iT biotin sDIBO alkyne (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was bound to free streptavidin sites by running 10 μg/mL for 1 min on both the channel with GAGs and the reference. The treatment was repeated once more to make sure all streptavidin sites were blocked. For the runs with HGF (R&D Systems), the protein was dissolved in running buffer and diluted in incremental steps of 2× (12.22, 6.11, and 3.05 nM final concentration). Injections were started at the lowest concentration with a 2 min association time, a 10 min dissociation time, and 2 min of regeneration repeated for all concentrations. Analysis and curve fitting were done in Sierra Analyzer 3.1.36 (Bruker), with the reference spot and the blank subtracted from each graph.

DBCO–Alexa Fluor 647 and DBCO–TAMRA Labeling

For labeling with the TAMRA fluorophore, XylNapN3 was dissolved in Dulbeccoʼs phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) at a concentration of 1.5 mM (from 50 mM stock in DMSO). Approximately 20 μg of lyophilized dibenzylcyclooctyne-PEG4-5/6-tetramethylrhodamine (Jena Bioscience) was added to the xyloside sample, and the sample was incubated for 1 h. The labeled xyloside was purified by reversed-phase chromatography before treatment of cells as described above.

A sample with XylNapN3-primed GAGs was labeled in the same manner as above but instead with dibenzylcyclooctyne–Alexa Fluor 647 (Jena Bioscience). Labeled GAGs were purified using Amicon Ultra 10 kDa cutoff centrifugal filters (Merck Millipore) and analyzed using FSEC (Abs/Em = 648/671 nm) on an AdvanceBio SEC column (Agilent).

Confocal Microscopy of A549 Cells

Localization experiments were performed on a Nikon Ti2 microscope equipped with a Crest X-Light V3 spinning disc unit. Images were captured using a 100× Plan Apo Lambda NA 1.45 objective with cells seeded on Lab-Tek 8-well (0.8 cm2) borosilicate (0.17 mm) slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cell layer was washed twice with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (Sigma-Aldrich) and then covered with an OptiPRO SFM medium before imaging. TAMRA-labeled xyloside (and its products) was detected at Abs/Em = 560/565 nm.

Acknowledgments

Lund University Bioimaging Centre (LBIC) is gratefully acknowledged for providing experimental resources, and the authors thank Sebastian Wasserstrom from LBIC for technical assistance with the confocal microscopy experiments. Figure 1B and TOC graphics are created by BioRender.com. This work was supported by grants from the Crafoord Foundation, Lund University, the Royal Physiographic Society in Lund, the Swedish Research Council 2020/01375, and the Medical Faculty, Lund University.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00473.

  • Synthesis and characterization of nonevaluated xylosides, and 1H- and 13C NMR of synthesized compounds (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Footnotes

1

Inferred from 2D 1H–13C HMQC experiment.

Supplementary Material

bc1c00473_si_001.pdf (2.3MB, pdf)

References

  1. Pomin V.; Mulloy B. Glycosaminoglycans and Proteoglycans. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 27. 10.3390/ph11010027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Persson A.; Ellervik U.; Mani K. Fine-Tuning the Structure of Glycosaminoglycans in Living Cells Using Xylosides. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 499–511. 10.1093/glycob/cwy049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chua J. S.; Kuberan B. Synthetic Xylosides: Probing the Glycosaminoglycan Biosynthetic Machinery for Biomedical Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2693–2705. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mani K.; Belting M.; Ellervik U.; Falk N.; Svensson G.; Sandgren S.; Cheng F.; Fransson L.-Å. Tumor Attenuation by 2(6-Hydroxynaphthyl)-β-d-Xylopyranoside Requires Priming of Heparan Sulfate and Nuclear Targeting of the Products. Glycobiology 2004, 14, 387–397. 10.1093/glycob/cwh035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mani K.; Havsmark B.; Persson S.; Kaneda Y.; Yamamoto H.; Sakurai K.; Ashikari S.; Habuchi H.; Suzuki S.; Kimata K.; et al. Heparan/Chondroitin/Dermatan Sulfate Primer 2-(6-Hydroxynaphthyl)-O-Beta-D-Xylopyranoside Preferentially Inhibits Growth of Transformed Cells. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 1099–1104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Persson A.; Tykesson E.; Westergren-Thorsson G.; Malmström A.; Ellervik U.; Mani K. Xyloside-Primed Chondroitin Sulfate/Dermatan Sulfate from Breast Carcinoma Cells with a Defined Disaccharide Composition Has Cytotoxic Effects in Vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 14871–14882. 10.1074/jbc.M116.716829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chicaud P.; Rademakers J. R.; Millet J. The Beneficial Effect of a β-D-Xyloside, Iliparcil, in the Prevention of Postthrombolytic Rethrombosis in the Rat. Haemostasis 1998, 28, 313–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Masson P. J.; Coup D.; Millet J.; Brown N. L. The Effect of the β-D-Xyloside Naroparcil on Circulating Plasma Glycosaminoglycans. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 2662–2668. 10.1074/jbc.270.6.2662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wigén J.; Elowsson-Rendin L.; Karlsson L.; Tykesson E.; Westergren-Thorsson G. Glycosaminoglycans: A Link Between Development and Regeneration in the Lung. Stem Cells Dev. 2019, 28, 823–832. 10.1089/scd.2019.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mendes F. A.; Onofre G. R.; Silva L. C. F.; Cavalcante L. A.; Garcia-Abreu J. Concentration-Dependent Actions of Glial Chondroitin Sulfate on the Neuritic Growth of Midbrain Neurons. Dev. Brain Res. 2003, 142, 111–119. 10.1016/S0165-3806(03)00036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thorsheim K.; Siegbahn A.; Johnsson R. E.; Stålbrand H.; Manner S.; Widmalm G.; Ellervik U. Chemistry of Xylopyranosides. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 418, 65–88. 10.1016/j.carres.2015.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Briggs D. C.; Yoshida-Moriguchi T.; Zheng T.; Venzke D.; Anderson M. E.; Strazzulli A.; Moracci M.; Yu L.; Hohenester E.; Campbell K. P. Structural Basis of Laminin Binding to the LARGE Glycans on Dystroglycan. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 810–814. 10.1038/nchembio.2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen Y.-H.; Narimatsu Y.; Clausen T. M.; Gomes C.; Karlsson R.; Steentoft C.; Spliid C. B.; Gustavsson T.; Salanti A.; Persson A.; et al. The GAGOme: A Cell-Based Library of Displayed Glycosaminoglycans. Nat. Methods 2018, 15, 881–888. 10.1038/s41592-018-0086-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bräse S.; Gil C.; Knepper K.; Zimmermann V. Organic Azides: An Exploding Diversity of a Unique Class of Compounds. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5188–5240. 10.1002/anie.200400657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kolb H. C.; Sharpless K. B. The Growing Impact of Click Chemistry on Drug Discovery. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 1128–1137. 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02933-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kolb H. C.; Finn M. G.; Sharpless K. B. Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Agard N. J.; Prescher J. A.; Bertozzi C. R. A Strain-Promoted [3 + 2] Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition for Covalent Modification of Biomolecules in Living Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15046–15047. 10.1021/ja044996f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Debets M. F.; Van Berkel S. S.; Schoffelen S.; Rutjes F. P. J. T.; Van Hest J. C. M.; Van Delft F. L. Aza-Dibenzocyclooctynes for Fast and Efficient Enzyme PEGylation via Copper-Free (3+2) Cycloaddition. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 97–99. 10.1039/B917797C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jin Y.; Yang H.; Wang C. Nickel-Catalyzed Asymmetric Reductive Arylbenzylation of Unactivated Alkenes. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 2724–2729. 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang D.; Yan G. Recent Advances in Reactions of Azides. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 1600–1619. 10.1002/adsc.201700103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnsson R.; Mani K.; Ellervik U. Evaluation of Fluorescently Labeled Xylopyranosides as Probes for Proteoglycan Biosynthesis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 2338–2341. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fritz T. A.; Lugemwa F. N.; Sarkar A. K.; Esko J. D. Biosynthesis of Heparan Sulfate on β-D-Xylosides Depends on Aglycone Structure. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 300–307. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)42349-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thorsheim K.; Clementson S.; Tykesson E.; Bengtsson D.; Strand D.; Ellervik U. Hydroxylated Oxanes as Xyloside Analogs for Determination of the Minimal Binding Requirements of B4GalT7. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 3466–3469. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.07.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cunningham C. W.; Mukhopadhyay A.; Lushington G. H.; Blagg B. S. J.; Prisinzano T. E.; Krise J. P. Uptake, Distribution and Diffusivity of Reactive Fluorophores in Cells: Implications toward Target Identification. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2010, 7, 1301–1310. 10.1021/mp100089k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mastio R.; Willen D.; Söderlund Z.; Westergren-Thorsson G.; Manner S.; Tykesson E.; Ellervik U.. Fluorescently Labeled Xylosides Offer Insight into the Biosynthetic Pathways of Glycosaminoglycans. RSC Adv. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Trapella C.; Fischetti C.; Pela’ M.; Lazzari I.; Guerrini R.; Calo’ G.; Rizzi A.; Camarda V.; Lambert D. G.; McDonald J.; et al. Structure–Activity Studies on the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptor Antagonist 1-Benzyl-N-{3-[Spiroisobenzofuran-1(3H),4′-Piperidin-1-Yl]Propyl} Pyrrolidine-2-Carboxamide. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 5080–5095. 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.05.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Siegbahn A.; Manner S.; Persson A.; Tykesson E.; Holmqvist K.; Ochocinska A.; Rönnols J.; Sundin A.; Mani K.; Westergren-Thorsson G.; et al. Rules for Priming and Inhibition of Glycosaminoglycan Biosynthesis; Probing the B4GalT7 Active Site. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3501. 10.1039/C4SC01244E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stachtea X. N.; Tykesson E.; van Kuppevelt T. H.; Feinstein R.; Malmström A.; Reijmers R. M.; Maccarana M. Dermatan Sulfate-Free Mice Display Embryological Defects and Are Neonatal Lethal Despite Normal Lymphoid and Non-Lymphoid Organogenesis. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0140279 10.1371/journal.pone.0140279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

bc1c00473_si_001.pdf (2.3MB, pdf)

Articles from Bioconjugate Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES