Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2021 Dec 15;7(12):1080. doi: 10.3390/jof7121080

Morphology, Phylogeny, and Pathogenicity of Pestalotioid Species on Camellia oleifera in China

Lingling Li 1,2,3, Qin Yang 1,2,3,4,*, He Li 1,2,3,4,*
Editors: Saowaluck Tibpromma, Samantha C Karunarathna
PMCID: PMC8705482  PMID: 34947061

Abstract

Tea-oil tree (Camellia oleifera) is an important edible oil woody plant with a planting area of over 3,800,000 hectares in southern China. Pestalotioid fungi are associated with a wide variety of plants worldwide along with endophytes, pathogens, and saprobes. In this study, symptomatic leaves of C. oleifera were collected from Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hunan, and Jiangsu Provinces and pestalotioid fungi are characterized based on combined sequence data analyses of internal transcribed spacer (ITS), beta tubulin (tub2), and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef-1α) coupled with morphological characteristics. As a result, seven species were confirmed, of which five species are described as new viz. N. camelliae-oleiferae, P. camelliae-oleiferae, P. hunanensis, P. nanjingensis, P. nanningensis, while the other two are reported as known species, viz., N. cubana and N. iberica. Pathogenicity assays showed that all species except for P. nanjingensis developed brown lesions on healthy leaves and P. camelliae-oleiferae showed stronger virulence.

Keywords: five new taxa, Neopestalotiopsis, Pestalotiopsis, phylogeny, taxonomy

1. Introduction

Tea-oil tree (Camellia oleifera Abel.) is a unique woody edible oil species in China, mainly distributed in the Qinling-Huaihe River area. It has a long history of cultivation and utilization for more than 2300 years since ancient China [1]. Statistical data for 2014 indicated that these plantations comprise over 3,800,000 hectares and produce 518,000 tons of edible oil (State-owned Forest Farms and Nurseries Station, State Forestry Administration of China, 2016). Camellia oil, obtained from C. oleifera seeds, is rich in unsaturated fatty acids and unique flavors, and has become a rising high-quality edible vegetable oil in China [2]. Thus, the development of the C. oleifera industry is of great significance for the national economy and poverty alleviation of local farmers in China.

The expanding cultivation of C. oleifera over the last several decades has also attracted increasing attention from plant pathologists to infectious diseases on this crop. Anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum species is one of the foremost diseases in southern China, which can infect leaves and fruits of C. oleifera, causing up to a 40% fruit drop and up to 40% camellia seeds loss [3]. Several studies have focused on the diversity and the pathogenicity of fungi in this special habitat [3,4,5]. However, relatively little is known about the taxonomy, genetic diversity, and pathogenicity of pestalotioid species on C. oleifera.

Pestalotioid species represent a cosmopolitan group of fungi occupying diverse ecological behavior as plant pathogens, endophytes, or saprobes, and are widely distributed throughout tropical and temperate regions [6,7,8]. However, species identification in this genus remains a major challenge because of overlapping conidial measurements [6,7,9,10]. Maharachchikumbura et al. [8] segregated Neopestalotiopsis and Pseudopestalotiopsis from Pestalotiopsis, based on conidial pigment color, conidiophores and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses. Neopestalotiopsis can be easily distinguished from Pseudopestalotiopsis and Pestalotiopsis by its versicolorous median cells [8]. Pseudopestalotiopsis differs from Pestalotiopsis by having three darker median cells and knobbed apical appendages [8]. Many novel species were introduced into this group during recent years through a polyphasic approaches together with morphology [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. This study aimed to identify the pestalotioid fungi associated with Camellia oleifera in China based on both morphological characters and molecular phylogeny.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Isolation

The isolates in this study were collected from Camellia oleifera with irregular, brownish-grey lesions on leaves, and accounted for 25% of the surveyed leaves. Samples were obtained from the main tea-oil camellia production fields in Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hunan, and Jiangsu Provinces in 2020. Small sections (3 × 3 mm) were cut from the margins of infected tissues, and surface-sterilized in 75% ethanol for 30 s, then sterilized in 5% (vol/vol) sodium hypochlorite for 1 min, followed by three rinses with sterilized water and finally dried on sterilized filter paper. The sections were then plated onto PDA plates and incubated at 25 °C. Fungal growth was examined daily for up to 7 d. Isolates were then transferred aseptically to fresh PDA and purified by single-spore culturing. All fungal isolates were placed on PDA slants and stored at 4 °C. Specimens and isolates of the new species have been deposited in the Central South University of Forestry and Technology Culture Collection (CSUFTCC).

2.2. Morphological and Cultural Characterization

Colony characteristics of cultures on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium were recorded after 7 d incubation at 25 °C. Fungal morphology was recorded from colonies grown in the dark for 14 d at 25 °C on PDA. The morphological characteristics were examined by mounting fungal structures in clear lactic acid and 30 measurements at ×1000 magnification were determined for each isolate using a Leica compound microscope (DM 2500) with interference contrast (DIC) optics. Descriptions, nomenclature, and illustrations of taxonomic novelties are deposited in MycoBank [22].

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from colonies grown on cellophane-covered PDA using a CTAB [cetyltrimethylammonium bromide] method [23]. For PCR amplifications of phylogenetic markers, three different primer pairs were used [19]. The PCR conditions were: an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 50 s at 48 °C (ITS), 54 °C (tef-1α), or 55 °C (tub2), and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final elongation step of 7 min at 72 °C. PCR amplification products were assayed via electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels. DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM® 3730XL DNA Analyzer with a BigDye Terminater Kit v.3.1 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) at the Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology Company Limited (Beijing, China).

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

The quality of our amplified nucleotide sequences was checked and combined by SeqMan v.7.1.0 and reference sequences (Table 1) were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), according to recent publications of the genus [19,20,21]. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v. 6 [24] and manually corrected using Bioedit 7.0.9.0 [25]. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out with maximum likelihood analysis (ML), which was performed at the CIPRES web portal [26], 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates were run with GTRGAMMA model of nucleotide evolution. Bayesian inference analysis (BI) was performed in MrBayes v. 3.2.0 [27,28]. The best-fit nucleotide substitution models for each gene were selected using jModelTest v. 2.1.7 [29] under the Akaike Information Criterion. GTR + I model was selected a best-fit model for the ITS (Neopestalotiopsis), HKY + I + G was selected as the best-fit model for the ITS (Pestalotiopsis), GTR + I + G model was selected as the best-fit model for the β-tubulin, HKY + G was selected as the best-fit model for the tef-1α. Phylogenetic trees were viewed in FigTree v1.4. The names of the isolates from the present study are marked in blue in the trees. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥50% (BT) and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.90 (PP) are given at the nodes, respectively. Alignment and trees were deposited in TreeBASE (submission ID: S29114 and S29115).

Table 1.

Isolates and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study.

Species Isolate Host/Substrate Location GenBank Accessions Numbers
ITS tub2 tef-1α References
Neopestalotiopsis acrostichi MFLUCC 17-1754 * Acrostichum aureum Thailand MK764272 MK764338 MK764316 [19]
MFLUCC 17-1755 Acrostichum aureum Thailand MK764273 MK764339 MK764317 [19]
N. alpapicalis MFLUCC 17-2544 * Rhizophora mucronata Thailand MK357772 MK463545 MK463547 [30]
MFLUCC 17-2545 Symptomatic Rhizophora Thailand MK357773 MK463546 MK463548 [30]
N. aotearoa CBS 367.54 * Canvas New Zealand KM199369 KM199454 KM199526 [6]
N. asiatica MFLUCC 12-0286 * Prunus dulcis China JX398983 JX399018 JX399049 [8]
N. australis CBS 114159 * Telopea sp. Australia KM199348 KM199432 KM199537 [8]
N. brachiata MFLUCC 17-1555 * Rhizophora apiculata Thailand MK764274 MK764340 MK764318 [19]
N. brasiliensis COAD 2166 * Psidium guajava Brazil MG686469 MG692400 MG692402 [31]
N. camelliae-oleiferae CSUFTCC81 * Camellia oleifera China OK493585 OK562360 OK507955 This study
CSUFTCC82 Camellia oleifera China OK493586 OK562361 OK507956 This study
N. cavernicola KUMCC 20-0269 * Cave China MW545802 MW557596 MW550735 [32]
N. chiangmaiensis MFLUCC 18-0113 * Pandanus sp. Thailand NA MH412725 MH388404 [18]
N. chrysea MFLUCC 12-0261 * Dead leaves China JX398985 JX399020 JX399051 [6]
MFLUCC 12-0262 Dead leaves China JX398986 JX399021 JX399052 [6]
N. clavispora MFLUCC 12-0281 * Magnolia sp. China JX398979 JX399014 JX399045 [6]
MFLUCC 12-0280 Magnolia sp. China JX398978 JX399013 JX399044 [6]
N. cocoës MFLUCC 15-0152 * Cocos nucifera Thailand NR 156312 NA KX789689 [19]
N. coffeae-arabicae HGUP4015 Coffea arabica China KF412647 KF412641 KF412644 [33]
HGUP4019 * Coffea arabica China KF412649 KF412643 KF412646 [33]
N. cubana CBS 600.96 * Leaf litter Cuba KM199347 KM199438 KM199521 [8]
CSUFTCC37 Camellia oleifera China OK493583 OK562358 OK507953 This study
CSUFTCC42 Camellia oleifera China OK493584 OK562359 OK507954 This study
N. dendrobii MFLUCC 14-0106 * Dendrobium cariniferum Thailand MK993571 MK975835 MK975829 [34]
MFLUCC 14-0099 Dendrobium cariniferum Thailand MK993570 MK975834 MK975828 [34]
N. drenthii BRIP 72263a Macadamia integrifolia Australia MZ303786 MZ312679 MZ344171 [21]
BRIP 72264a * Macadamia integrifolia Australia MZ303787 MZ312680 MZ344172 [21]
N. egyptiaca CBS 1401628 Mangifera indica Egypt KP943747 KP943746 KP943748 [35]
N. ellipsospora MFLUCC 12-02838 Dead plant material China JX398980 JX399016 JX399047 [6]
N. eucalyptorum CBS 147684 * Eucalyptus globulus Portugal MW794108 MW802841 MW805397 [20]
N. eucalypticola CBS 264.37 * Eucalyptus globulus NA KM199376 KM199431 KM199551 [8]
N. foedans CGMCC 3.9123 * Mangrove plant China JX398987 JX399022 JX399053 [6]
CGMCC 3.9178 Neodypsis decaryi China JX398989 JX399024 JX399055 [6]
N. formicarum CBS 362.72 * Dead ant Cuba KM199358 KM199455 KM199517 [8]
CBS 115.83 Plant debris Cuba KM199344 KM199444 KM199519 [8]
N. guajavae FMBCC 11.1 * Guava Pakistan MF783085 MH460871 MH460868 [36]
N. guajavicola FMBCC 11.4 * Guava Pakistan MH209245 MH460873 MH460870 [36]
N. hadrolaeliae EHJ6a Cattleya jongheana Brazil MK454709 MK465120 MK465122 [37]
N. hispanica CBS 147686 * Eucalyptus globulus Portugal MW794107 MW802840 MW805399 [20]
N. honoluluana CBS 114495 * Telopea sp. USA KM199364 KM199457 KM199548 [8]
CBS 111535 Telopea sp. USA KM199363 KM199461 KM199546 [8]
N. hydeana MFLUCC 20-0132 * Artocarpus heterophyllus Thailand MW266069 MW251119 MW251129 [38]
N. iberica CSUFTCC91 Camellia oleifera China OK493587 OK562362 OK507957 This study
CSUFTCC92 Camellia oleifera China OK493588 OK562363 OK507958 This study
CSUFTCC93 Camellia oleifera China OK493589 OK562364 OK507959 This study
CBS 147688 * Eucalyptus globulus Portugal MW794111 MW802844 MW805402 [20]
N. iraniensis CBS 137768 * Fragaria ananassa Iran KM074048 KM074057 KM074051 [39]
CBS 137767 Fragaria ananassa Iran KM074045 KM074056 KM074053 [39]
N. javaensis CBS 257.31 * Cocos nucifera Indonesia KM199357 KM199457 KM199548 [8]
N. keteleerie MFLUCC 13-0915 * Keteleeria pubescens China KJ503820 KJ503821 KJ503822 [40]
N. longiappendiculata CBS 147690 * Eucalyptus globulus Portugal MW794110 MW802845 MW805404 [20]
N. lusitanica CBS 147692 * Eucalyptus globulus Portugal MW794112 MW802843 MW805406 [20]
N. macadamiae BRIP 63737c * Macadamia integrifolia Australia KX186604 KX186654 KX186629 [14]
BRIP 63742a Macadamia integrifolia Australia KX186599 KX186657 KX186627 [14]
N. maddoxii BRIP 72266a * Macadamia integrifolia Australia MZ303782 MZ312675 MZ344167 [14]
N. magna MFLUCC 12-0652 * Pteridium sp. France KF582795 KF582793 KF582791 [41]
N. mesopotamica CBS 336.86 * Pinus brutia Iraq KM199362 KM199441 KM199555 [8]
CBS 299.74 Eucalyptus sp. Turkey KM199361 KM199435 KM199541 [8]
N. musae MFLUCC 15-0776 * Musa sp. Thailand KX789683 KX789686 KX789685 [19]
N. natalensis CBS 138.41 * Acacia mollissima South Africa KM199377 KM199466 KM199552 [8]
N. nebuloides BRIP 66617 * Sporobolus elongatus Australia MK966338 MK977632 MK977633 [42]
N. olumideae BRIP 72273a * Macadamia integrifolia Australia MZ303790 MZ312683 MZ344175 [21]
N. pandanicola KUMCC 17-0175 Pandanus sp. China NA MH412720 MH388389 [18]
N. pernambucana URM7148-01 * Vismia guianensis Brazil KJ792466 NA KU306739 [43]
URM7148-02 Vismia guianensis Brazil KJ792467 NA KU306740 [43]
N. perukae FMBCC 11.3 * Guava Pakistan MH209077 MH460876 MH523647 [36]
N. petila MFLUCC 17-1738 Rhizophora mucronata Thailand MK764275 MK764341 MK764319 [19]
MFLUCC 17-1737 * Rhizophora mucronata Thailand MK764276 MK764342 MK764320 [19]
N. phangngaensis MFLUCC 18-0119 * Pandanus sp. Thailand MH388354 MH412721 MH388390 [18]
N. piceana CBS 254.32 Cocos nucifera Indonesia KM199372 KM199452 KM199529 [8]
CBS 394.48 * Picea sp. UK KM199368 KM199453 KM199527 [8]
N. protearum CBS 114178 * Leucospermum cuneiforme cv. “Sunbird” Zimbabwe JN712498 KM199463 LT853201 [44]
N. psidii FMBCC 11.2 * Guava Pakistan MF783082 MH477870 MH460874 [36]
N. rhapidis GUCC 21501 * Rhododendron simsii China MW931620 MW980441 MW980442 [45]
N. rhizophorae MFLUCC 17-1550 * Rhizophora mucronata Thailand MK764277 MK764343 MK764321 [19]
MFLUCC 17-1551 Rhizophora mucronata Thailand MK764278 MK764344 MK764322 [19]
N. rhododendri GUCC 21504 * Rhododendron simsii China MW979577 MW980443 MW980444 [45]
GUCC 21505 Rhododendron simsii China MW979576 MW980445 MW980446 [45]
N. rosae CBS 101057 * Rosa sp. New Zealand KM199359 KM199429 KM199523 [8]
CBS 124745 Paeonia suffruticosa USA KM199360 KM199430 KM199524 [8]
N. rosicola CFCC 51992 * Rosa chinensis China KY885239 KY885245 KY885243 [15]
CFCC 51993 Rosa chinensis China KY885240 KY885246 KY885244 [15]
N. samarangensis CBS 115451 Unidentified tree China KM199365 KM199447 KM199556 [8]
N. saprophytica MFLUCC 12-0282 * Magnolia sp. China JX398982 JX399017 JX399048 [8]
N. scalabiensis MUM 21.34 * Vaccinium corymbosum Portugal MW969748 MW934611 MW959100 [46]
N. sichuanensis CFCC 54338 * Castanea mollissima China MW166231 MW218524 MW199750 [16]
SM15-1C Castanea mollissima China MW166232 MW218525 MW199751 [16]
N. sonneratae MFLUCC 17-1745 * Sonneronata alba Thailand MK764279 MK764345 MK764323 [19]
MFLUCC 17-1744 Sonneronata alba Thailand MK764280 MK764346 MK764324 [19]
Neopestalotiopsis sp.1 CSUFTCC61 Camellia oleifera China OK493590 OK562365 OK507960 This study
CSUFTCC62 Camellia oleifera China OK493591 OK562366 OK507961 This study
CSUFTCC63 Camellia oleifera China OK493592 OK562367 OK507962 This study
N. steyaertii IMI 192475 * Eucalyptus viminalis Australia KF582796 KF582794 KF582792 [8]
N. surinamensis CBS 450.74 * Soil under Elaeis guineensis Suriname KM199351 KM199465 KM199518 [8]
N. thailandica MFLUCC 17-1730 * Rhizophora mucronata Thailand MK764281 MK764347 MK764325 [19]
MFLUCC 17-1731 Rhizophora mucronata Thailand MK764282 MK764348 MK764326 [19]
N. umbrinospora MFLUCC 12-0285 * Unidentified plant China JX398984 JX399019 JX399050 [6]
N. vaccinii MUM 21.36 * Vaccinium corymbosum Portugal MW969747 MW934610 MW959099 [46]
N. vacciniicola MUM 21.35 * Vaccinium corymbosum Portugal MW969751 MW934614 MW959103 [46]
N. vheenae BRIP 72293a * Macadamia integrifolia Australia MZ303792 MZ312685 MZ344177 [21]
N. vitis MFLUCC 15-1265 * Vitis vinifera cv. “Summer black” China KU140694 KU140685 KU140676 [47]
MFLUCC 15-1270 Vitis vinifera cv. “Kyoho” China KU140699 KU140690 KU140681 [47]
N. zakeelii BRIP 72282a * Macadamia integrifolia Australia MZ303789 MZ312682 MZ344174 [21]
N. zimbabwana CBS 111495 * Leucospermum cunciforme Zimbabwe JX556231 KM199456 KM199545 [8]
Pestalotiopsis abietis CFCC 53011 * Abies fargesii China MK397013 MK622280 MK622277 [48]
CFCC 53012 Abies fargesii China MK397014 MK622281 MK622278 [48]
CFCC 53013 Abies fargesii China MK397015 MK622282 MK622279 [48]
P. adusta ICMP 6088 * Refrigerator door Fiji JX399006 JX399037 JX399070 [6]
MFLUCC 10-146 Syzygium sp. Thailand JX399007 JX399038 JX399071 [6]
P. aggestorum LC6301 * Camellia sinensis China KX895015 KX895348 KX895234 [12]
LC8186 Camellia sinensis China KY464140 KY464160 KY464150 [12]
P. anacardiacearum IFRDCC 2397 * Mangifera indica China KC247154 KC247155 KC247156 [8]
P. arceuthobii CBS 434.65 * Arceuthobium campylopodum USA KM199341 KM199427 KM199516 [8]
P. arenga CBS 331.92 * Arenga undulatifolia Singapore KM199340 KM199426 KM199515 [8]
P. australasia CBS 114126 * Knightia sp. New Zealand KM199297 KM199409 KM199499 [8]
CBS 114141 Protea sp. New South Wales KM199298 KM199410 KM199501 [8]
P. australis CBS 111503 Protea neriifolia × susannae cv. “Pink Ice” South Africa KM199331 KM199382 KM199557 [8]
CBS 114193 * Grevillea sp. New South Wales KM199332 KM199383 KM199475 [8]
P. biciliata CBS 124463 * Platanus × hispanica Slovakia KM199308 KM199399 KM199505 [8]
CBS 236.38 Paeonia sp. Italy KM199309 KM199401 KM199506 [8]
P. brachiata LC2998 * Camellia sp. China KX894933 KX895265 KX895150 [12]
LC8188 Camellia sp. China KY464142 KY464162 KY464152 [12]
LC8189 Camellia sp. China KY464143 KY464163 KY464153 [12]
P. brassicae CBS 170.26 * Brassica napus New Zealand KM199379 NA KM199558 [8]
P. camelliae MFLUCC 12-0277 * Camellia japonica China JX399010 JX399041 JX399074 [6]
P. camelliae-oleiferae CSUFTCC08 * Camellia oleifera China OK493593 OK562368 OK507963 In this study
CSUFTCC09 Camellia oleifera China OK493594 OK562369 OK507964 In this study
CSUFTCC10 Camellia oleifera China OK493595 OK562370 OK507965 In this study
P. chamaeropis CBS 186.71 * Chamaerops humilis Italy KM199326 KM199391 KM199473 [6]
LC3619 Camellia sp. China KX894991 KX895322 KX895208 [12]
P. clavata MFLUCC 12-0268 * Buxus sp. China JX398990 JX399025 JX399056 [6]
P. colombiensis CBS 118553 * Eucalyptus eurograndis Colombia KM199307 KM199421 KM199488 [8]
P. digitalis MFLU 14-0208 * Digitalis purpurea New Zealand KP781879 KP781883 NA [49]
P. dilucida LC3232 * Camellia sinensis China KX894961 KX895293 KX895178 [12]
LC8184 Camellia sinensis China KY464138 KY464158 KY464148 [12]
P. diploclisiae CBS 115449 Psychotria tutcheri China KM199314 KM199416 KM199485 [8]
CBS 115587 * Diploclisia glaucescens China KM199320 KM199419 KM199486 [8]
P. disseminata CBS 118552 Eucalyptus botryoides New Zealand MH553986 MH554652 MH554410 [12]
CBS 143904 Persea americana New Zealand MH554152 MH554825 MH554587 [12]
MEAN 1165 Pinus pinea Portugal MT374687 MT374712 MT374699 [50]
MEAN 1166 Pinus pinea Portugal MT374688 MT374713 MT374700 [50]
P. diversiseta MFLUCC 12-0287 * Rhododendron sp. China JX399009 JX399040 JX399073 [6]
P. doitungensis MFLUCC 14-0115 * Dendrobium sp. Thailand MK993574 MK975837 MK975832 [34]
P. dracaenicla MFLUCC 18-0913 * Dracaena sp. Thailand MN962731 MN962733 MN962732 [51]
P. dracontomelonis MFLU 14-0207 * Dracontomelon dao Thailand NA NA KP781880 [49]
P. ericacearum IFRDCC 2439 * Rhododendron delavayi China KC537807 KC537821 KC537814 [52]
P. etonensis BRIP 66615 * Sporobolus jacquemontii Australia MK966339 MK977634 MK977635 [42]
P. formosana NTUCC 17-009 * On dead grass China MH809381 MH809385 MH809389 [15]
P. furcata MFLUCC 12-0054 * Camellia sinensis Thailand JQ683724 JQ683708 JQ683740 [53]
LC6691 Camellia sinensis China KX895030 KX895363 KX895248 [12]
P. gaultheria IFRD 411-014 * Gaultheria forrestii China KC537805 KC537819 KC537812 [8]
P. gibbosa NOF 3175 * Gaultheria shallon Canada LC311589 LC311590 LC311591 [54]
P. grevilleae CBS 114127 * Grevillea sp. Australia KM199300 KM199407 KM199504 [8]
P. hawaiiensis CBS 114491 * Leucospermum sp. Hawaii KM199339 KM199428 KM199514 [8]
P. hollandica CBS 265.33 * Sciadopitys verticillata Netherlands KM199328 KM199388 KM199481 [8]
P. hispanica CBS 115391 * Protea cv. ‘Susara’ Spain MH553981 MH554640 MH554399 [8]
P. humus CBS 336.97 * Soil Papua New Guinea KM199317 KM199420 KM199484 [8]
P. hunanensis CSUFTCC15 * Camellia oleifera China OK493599 OK562374 OK507969 In this study
CSUFTCC18 Camellia oleifera China OK493600 OK562375 OK507970 In this study
CSUFTCC19 Camellia oleifera China OK493601 OK562376 OK507971 In this study
P. inflexa MFLUCC 12-0270 * Unidentified tree China JX399008 JX399039 JX399072 [6]
P. intermedia MFLUCC 12-0259 * Unidentified tree China JX398993 JX399028 JX399059 [6]
P. italiana MFLU 14-0214 * Cupressus glabra Italy KP781878 KP781882 KP781881 [49]
P. jesteri CBS 109350 * Fragraea bodenii Papua New Guinea KM199380 KM199468 KM199554 [8]
P. jiangxiensis LC4242 Eurya sp. China KX895035 KX895327 KX895213 [12]
LC4399 * Camellia sp. China KX895009 KX895341 KX895227 [12]
P. jinchanghensis LC6636 * Camellia sinensis China KX895028 KX895361 KX895247 [12]
LC8190 Camellia sinensis China KY464144 KY464164 KY464154 [12]
P. kandelicola NCYU 19-0355 * Kandelia candel China MT560723 MT563100 MT563102 [55]
P. kenyana CBS 442.67 * Coffea sp. Kenya KM199302 KM199395 KM199502 [8]
LC6633 Camellia sinensis China KX895027 KX895360 KX895246 [8]
P. knightiae CBS 111963 Knightia sp. New Zealand KM199311 KM199406 KM199495 [8]
CBS 114138 * Knightia sp. New Zealand KM199310 KM199408 KM199497 [8]
P. leucadendri CBS 121417 * Leucadendron sp. South Africa MH553987 MH554654 MH554412 [56]
P. licualacola HGUP 4057 * Licuala grandis China KC492509 KC481683 KC481684 [57]
P. linearis MFLUCC 12-0271 * Trachelospermum sp. China JX398992 JX399027 JX399058 [6]
P. longiappendiculata LC3013 * Camellia sinensis China KX894939 KX895271 KX895156 [12]
P. lushanensis LC4344 * Camellia sp. China KX895005 KX895337 KX895223 [12]
LC8182 Camellia sp. China KY464136 KY464156 KY464146 [12]
LC8183 Camellia sp. China KY464137 KY464157 KY464147 [12]
P. macadamiae BRIP 63738b * Macadamia integrifolia Australia KX186588 KX186680 KX186621 [14]
BRIP 63739a Macadamia integrifolia Australia KX186589 KX186681 KX186622 [14]
BRIP 63739b Macadamia integrifolia Australia KX186587 KX186679 KX186620 [14]
P. malayana CBS 102220 * Macaranga triloba Malaysia KM199306 KM199411 KM199482 [8]
P. monochaeta CBS 144.97 * Quercus robur Netherlands KM199327 KM199386 KM199479 [8]
CBS 440.83 Taxus baccata Netherlands KM199329 KM199387 KM199480 [8]
P. nanjingensis CSUFTCC16 * Camellia oleifera China OK493602 OK562377 OK507972 This study
CSUFTCC20 Camellia oleifera China OK493603 OK562378 OK507973 This study
CSUFTCC04 Camellia oleifera China OK493604 OK562379 OK507974 This study
P. nanningensis CSUFTCC10 * Camellia oleifera China OK493596 OK562371 OK507966 This study
CSUFTCC11 Camellia oleifera China OK493597 OK562372 OK507967 This study
CSUFTCC12 Camellia oleifera China OK493598 OK562373 OK507968 This study
P. neolitseae NTUCC 17-011 * On leaf of Neolitsea villosa Taiwan MH809383 MH809387 MH809391 [15]
P. novaehollandiae CBS 130973 * Banksia grandis Australia KM199337 KM199425 KM199511 [8]
P. oryzae CBS 111522 Telopea sp. USA KM199294 KM199394 KM199493 [8]
CBS 171.26 NA Italy KM199304 KM199397 KM199494 [8]
CBS 353.69 * Oryza sativa Denmark KM199299 KM199398 KM199496 [8]
P. pandanicola MFLUCC 16-0255 * Pandanus sp. Thailand MH388361 MH412723 MH388396 [18]
P. papuana CBS 331.96 * Coastal soil Papua New Guinea KM199321 KM199413 KM199491 [8]
CBS 887.96 Cocos nucifera Papua New Guinea KM199318 KM199415 KM199492 [8]
P. pallidotheae MAFF 240993 * Pieris japonica Japan NR111022 LC311584 LC311585 [58]
P. parva CBS 265.37 * Delonix regia NA KM199312 KM199404 KM199508 [8]
CBS 278.35 Leucothoe fontanesiana NA KM199313 KM199405 KM199509 [8]
P. photinicola GZCC 16-0028 * Photinia serrulata China KY092404 KY047663 KY047662 [59]
P. portugalica CBS 393.48 * NA Portugal KM199335 KM199422 KM199510 [8]
LC4324 Camellia chekiangoleosa China KX895001 KX895333 KX895219 [12]
P. pini MEAN 1092 * Pinus pinea Portugal MT374680 MT374705 MT374693 [50]
P. pinicola KUMCC 19-0183 * Pinus armandii China MN412636 MN417507 MN417509 [60]
P. rhododendri IFRDCC 2399 * Rhododendron sinogrande China KC537804 KC537818 KC537811 [52]
P. rhodomyrtus HGUP4230 * Rhodomyrtus tomentosa China KF412648 KF412642 KF412645 [33]
LC4458 Camellia sinensis China KX895010 KX895342 KX895228 [12]
P. rhizophorae MFLUCC 17-0416 * Rhizophora apiculata Thailand MK764283 MK764349 MK764327 [19]
P. rosea MFLUCC 12-0258 * Pinus sp. China JX399005 JX399036 JX399069 [6]
P. scoparia CBS 176.25 * Chamaecyparis sp. NA KM199330 KM199393 KM199478 [8]
P. sequoiae MFLUCC 13-0399 * Sequoia sempervirens Italy KX572339 NA NA [61]
P. spathulata CBS 356.86 * Gevuina avellana Chile KM199338 KM199423 KM199513 [8]
P. spathuliappendiculata CBS 144035 * Phoenix canariensis Australia MH554172 MH554845 MH554607 [56]
P. telopeae CBS 114137 Protea sp. Australia KM199301 KM199469 KM199559 [8]
CBS 114161 * Telopea sp. Australia KM199296 KM199403 KM199500 [8]
CBS 113606 Telopea sp. Australia KM199295 KM199402 KM199498 [8]
P. terricola CBS 141.69 * Soil Pacific Islands MH554004 MH554680 MH554438 [56]
P. thailandica MFLUCC 17-1616 * Rhizophora apiculata Thailand MK764285 MK764351 MK764329 [19]
P. trachicarpicola IFRDCC 2403 Podocarpus macrophyllus China KC537809 KC537823 KC537816 [52]
LC4523 Camellia sinensis China KX895011 KX895344 KX895230 [12]
MFLUCC 12-0264 Chrysophyllum sp. China JX399004 JX399035 JX399068 [6]
OP068 * Trachycarpus fortunei China JQ845947 JQ845945 JQ845946 [62]
P. unicolor MFLUCC 12-0276 * Rhododendron sp. China JX398999 JX399030 NA [6]
MFLUCC 12-0275 unidentified tree China JX398998 JX399029 JX399063 [6]
P. verruculosa MFLUCC 12-0274 * Rhododendron sp. China JX398996 NA JX399061 [6]
P. yanglingensis LC4553 * Camellia sinensis China KX895012 KX895345 KX895231 [12]
LC3412 Camellia sinensis China KX894980 KX895312 KX895197 [12]
P. yunnanensis HMAS 96359 * Podocarpus macrophyllus China AY373375 NA NA [63]

BRIP: Queensland Plant Pathology Herbarium, Brisbane, Australia; CBS: Culture Collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CFCC: China Forestry Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China; CGMCC: China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; COAD: Coleção Octávio Almeida Drummond, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil; CSUFTCC: Central South University of Forestry and Technology Culture Collection, Hunan, China; FMB: Fungal Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan; GZCC: Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Culture Collection, Guizhou, China; HGUP: Plant Pathology Herbarium of Guizhou University, Guizhou, China; HMAS: Mycological Herbarium, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; ICMP: International Collection of Micro-organisms from Plants, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand; IFRDCC: International Fungal Research and Development Culture Collection; IMI: Culture Collection of CABI Europe UK Centre, Egham, UK; KNU: Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea; KUMCC: Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection, Yunnan, China; LC: working collection of Lei Cai, housed at the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; MAFF: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; MEAN: Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária I. P.; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MUM: Micoteca of Universidade do Minho, Portugal; NCYU: National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan; NOF: The Fungus Culture Collection of the Northern Forestry Centre, Alberta, Canada; NTUCC: the Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University Culture Collection; URM: Culture Collection of the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil. Ex-type strains are labeled with *. NA: Not available.

2.5. Pathogenicity Testing

Young and healthy leaves of Camellia oleifera were collected from trees growing in the greenhouse. The leaves were washed with tap water, then submerged in 70% ethanol for 2 min, and finally rinsed in sterilized water twice. The petioles of leaves were wrapped with damp cotton wool and the leaves were placed into petri dishes, three leaves per dish. One piercing wounds of each leaf were made in the mid-region forming a tiny little dot using a sterilized needle. Three drops of 6 μL spore suspension (106 conidia/mL) were individually placed directly onto the leaf upper surfaces. For the control group, 6 μL of sterilized water was used. Each set of three leaves per petri dish was incubated with a different isolate. The petri dishes were placed inside a plastic box and the leaves incubated at 25 °C with humidity and 12/12 h fluorescent light/dark cycle. After 5 d, the leaves were examined for symptom development, and the diameter of diseased spot was measured.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

The first sequence datasets for the ITS, tef-1α and tub2, were analyzed in combination to infer the interspecific relationships within Neopestalotiopsis. The combined species phylogeny of the Neopestalotiopsis isolates consisted of 105 sequences, including the outgroup Pestalotiopsis trachicarpicola (culture OP068). A total of 1389 characters including gaps (479 for ITS, 498 for tef-1α, and 412 for tub2) were included in the phylogenetic analysis. Similar tree topologies were obtained by ML and BI methods, and the best scoring ML tree is shown in Figure 1. ML bootstrap values and BI posterior probabilities (MLBS/BIPP) are given at nodes of the phylogram (Figure 1). The phylogenetic tree inferred from the concatenated alignment resolved the ten Neopestalotiopsis isolates from symptomatic leaves of Camellia oleifera into four well-supported monophyletic clades that represent one novel species, one undetermined species and two known species of Neopestalotiopsis (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Phylogram generated from RAxML analysis based on combined ITS, tef-1α and tub2 sequence data of Neopestalotiopsis isolates. The tree was rooted to Pestalotiopsis trachicarpicola (OP068). The scale bar indicates 0.04 nucleotide changes per site. Isolates from this study are marked in red and the identified species is marked in yellow. Ex-type strains are labeled with *.

The second sequence datasets for the ITS, tef-1α and tub2 were analyzed in combination to infer the interspecific relationships within Pestalotiopsis. The combined species phylogeny of the Pestalotiopsis isolates consisted of 129 sequences, including the outgroup Neopestalotiopsis magna (culture MFLUCC 12-652). A total of 1557 characters including gaps (515 for ITS, 537 for tef-1α, and 505 for tub2) were included in the phylogenetic analysis. Similar tree topologies were obtained by ML and BI methods, and the best scoring ML tree is shown in Figure 2. ML bootstrap values and BI posterior probabilities (MLBS/BIPP) are given at nodes of the phylogram (Figure 2). The phylogenetic tree inferred from the concatenated alignment resolved the 12 Pestalotiopsis isolates from symptomatic leaves of Camellia oleifera into four well-supported monophyletic clades that represent four novel species of Pestalotiopsis (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Phylogram generated from RAxML analysis based on combined ITS, tef-1α and tub2 sequence data of Pestalotiopsis isolates. The tree was rooted to Neopestalotiopsis magna (MFLUCC 12-652). The scale bar indicates 0.04 nucleotide changes per site. Isolates from this study are marked in red and the identified species is marked in yellow. Ex-type strains are labeled with *.

3.2. Taxonomy

Neopestalotiopsis camelliae-oleiferae Q. Yang & H. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Neopestalotiopsis camelliae-oleiferae (CSUFTCC81). (a) Conidioma formed on PDA, (b) conidiogenous cells, and (cg) conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (bg) = 10 μm.

MycoBank: MB841476.

Etymology: Named after the host species, Camellia oleifera.

Holotype: CSUFT081.

Description:Conidiomata acervular in culture on PDA, globose, 300–800 μm diam., solitary or aggregated in clusters, exuding black conidial masses. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells ampulliform, hyaline, smooth, annelidic. Conidia fusiform to clavate, straight or slightly curved, 22.5–24(−26.5) × (7–)8.5–10 μm, 4-septate; basal cell conical, 3.5–4.5 μm, hyaline or sometimes pale brown, smooth, thin-walled; with a single appendage filiform, unbranched, centric, (4.5–)6–8(−9) μm long; three median cells doliiform, 14–16(−18) μm long, smooth, versicoloured, septa darker than the rest of the cell (second cell from base pale brown, 4.5–5.5 μm long; third cell medium to dark brown, 5–5.5(−6.5) μm long; fourth cell medium to dark brown, 4.5–6 μm long); apical cell conical, 2.5–4.5 μm long, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with 2–3 apical tubular appendages unbranched, filiform, (13.5–)15.5–18.5(−20.5) μm long. Sexual morph not observed.

Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 55 mm diameter after seven days at 25 °C. Colonies filamentous to circular, with dense aerial mycelium on surface, fruiting bodies black.

Material examined: CHINA, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, from leaf spots of Camellia oleifera, 25 Oct. 2020, H. Li (CSUFT081, holotype); ex-type living culture CSUFTCC81, living culture CSUFTCC82.

Notes:Neopestalotiopsis camelliae-oleiferae was collected from symptomatic leaves of C. oleifera in Jiangsu Province, China. Two isolates (CSUFTCC81 and CSUFTCC82) representing N. camelliae-oleiferae clustered in a well-support clade (ML/BI = 100/1). Neopestalotiopsis camelliae-oleiferae was sister to a clade containing N. longiappendiculata and N. vacciniicola. N. camelliae-oleiferae can be distinguished from N. longiappendiculata based on ITS, tef-1α and tub2 loci (3/449 in ITS, 3/450 in tef-1α , and 6/404 in tub2, no gaps). Morphologically, N. camelliae-oleiferae differs from N. longiappendiculata by wider conidia (8.5–10 vs. 7–7.8 μm); from N. vacciniicola by shorter apical tubular appendages (15.5–18.5 vs. 25.7–30.2 μm) [20]. Therefore, the collection in the present study is designated as a new species.

Neopestalotiopsis cubana Maharachch, K.D. Hyde & Crous, in Maharachchikumbura, Hyde, Groenewald, Xu & Crous, Stud. Mycol. 79: 138 (2014) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Neopestalotiopsis cubana (CSUFTCC37). (a) Conidiomata formed on PDA, (b) conidiogenous cells, and (cf) conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 500 μm, (bf) = 10 μm.

Description:Conidiomata acervular in culture on PDA, globose, 800–1350 μm diam., solitary or aggregated in clusters, exuding black conidial masses. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells ampulliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth, annelidic. Conidia fusoid to ellipsoidal, straight or slightly curved, (19.5–)21–25(−26.5) × (5.5–)6.5–8 μm, 4-septate; basal cell conical, 3.5–4.5 μm, hyaline or sometimes pale brown, smooth, thin-walled; with a single appendage filiform, unbranched, centric, 3–5.5 μm long; three median cells doliiform, 13.5–15(−16) μm long, smooth, versicoloured, septa darker than the rest of the cell (second cell from base pale brown, 3.5–5.5 μm long; third cell medium to dark brown, 4–5 μm long; fourth cell medium to dark brown, 3.5–4.5 μm long); apical cell conical, 3.5–4.5 μm long, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with 2–3 apical tubular appendages, unbranched, filiform, (21–)24–29(−31) μm long. Sexual morph not observed.

Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 70 mm diameter after seven days at 25 °C. Colonies filamentous to circular, medium dense, aerial mycelium on surface flat or raised, pycnidia abundant, fruiting bodies black.

Material examined: CHINA, Hainan Province, Chengmai County, from leaf spots of Camellia oleifera, 9 Nov. 2020, H. Li (CSUFT042); living cultures CSUFTCC37 and CSUFTCC42.

Notes:Neopestalotiopsis cubana was originally described from leaf litter in Cuba [8]. In the present study, two isolates from leaves of symptomatic C. oleifera were congruent with N. cubana based on morphology and DNA sequences data (Figure 1). We therefore describe N. cubana as a known species for this clade.

Neopestalotiopsis iberica E. Diogo, M.H. Bragança & A.J.L. Phillips, in Diogo, Gonçalves, Silva, Valente, Bragança & Phillips, Mycol. Progr. 20(11): 1449 (2021) (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Neopestalotiopsis iberica (CSUFTCC91). (a) Conidiomata formed on PDA, (b) conidiogenous cells, and (cf) conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (bf) = 10 μm.

Description:Conidiomata acervular in culture on PDA, globose, 600–1500 μm diameter, solitary or aggregated in clusters, exuding black conidial masses. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells ampulliform, hyaline, smooth, annelidic. Conidia fusiform to ellipsoidal, straight or slightly curved, (21.5–)22.5–24(−26.5) × 7–9(−10.5) μm, 4-septate; basal cell conical, 3.5–4.5 μm, hyaline or sometimes pale brown, smooth, thin-walled; with a single appendage filiform, unbranched, centric, 2.5–4 μm long; three median cells doliiform, 12.5–14.5(−15.5) μm long, smooth, versicoloured, septa darker than the rest of the cell (second cell from base pale brown, 4.5–5 μm long; third cell medium to dark brown, 4.5–5.5(−6) μm long; fourth cell medium to dark brown, 4.5–5.5 μm long); apical cell conical, 2.5–4 μm long, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with 2–3 apical tubular appendages, unbranched, filiform, 24–26(−29.5) μm long. Sexual morph not observed.

Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 70 mm diameter after seven days at 25 °C. Colonies filamentous to circular, medium dense, aerial mycelium on surface flat or raised, with filiform margin, fluffy, fruiting bodies black.

Material examined: CHINA, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, from leaf spots of Camellia oleifera, 25 Oct. 2020, H. Li (CSUFT091); living cultures LHNJ91, LHNJ92, and LHNJ93.

Notes:Neopestalotiopsis iberica was originally described from leaves and stems of Eucalyptus globulus in Portugal [30]. In the present study, three isolates from leaves of symptomatic C. oleifera were congruent with N. iberica based on morphology and DNA sequences data (Figure 1). We therefore describe N. iberica as a known species for this clade.

Pestalotiopsis camelliae-oleiferae Q. Yang & H. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Pestalotiopsis camelliae-oleiferae (CSUFTCC08). (a) Conidioma formed on PDA, (b) conidiogenous cells, and (cg) conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (bg) = 10 μm.

MycoBank: MB841478.

Etymology: Named after the host species, Camellia oleifera.

Holotype: CSUFT008.

Description:Conidiomata acervular in culture on PDA, globose, 1.0–2.6 mm diameter, solitary or aggregated in clusters, exuding black conidial masses. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells discrete or integrated, cylindrical to subcylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia fusoid, ellipsoid, straight or slightly curved, (19.5–)21.5–23(−25) × (5–)6–7 μm, 4-septate; basal cell conic to obconic with a truncate base, 3.5–5.5 μm, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with a single appendage filiform, unbranched, centric, 2.5–4.5 μm long; three median cells doliiform, 12.5–14 μm long, smooth, concolorous, brown, septa darker than the rest of the cell (second cell from base 4–4.5 μm long; third cell 4.5–5 μm long; fourth cell 3.5–4.5 μm long); apical cell conical, 2.5–4(−4.5) μm long, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with 2–3 apical tubular appendages, unbranched, filiform, (11–)12.5–14.5(−16) μm long. Sexual morph not observed.

Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 70 mm diameter after seven days at 25 °C. Colonies filamentous to circular, medium dense, with white sparse mycelium, fruiting bodies black.

Material examined: CHINA, Hunan Province, Changsha City, from leaf spots of Camellia oleifera, 30 Aug. 2020, H. Li (CSUFT008, holotype); ex-type living culture CSUFTCC08, living cultures CSUFTCC09 and CSUFTCC10.

Notes:Pestalotiopsis camelliae-oleiferae was sister to P. biciliata in a well-supported clade (ML/BI = 100/1) (Figure 2). Pestalotiopsis camelliae-oleiferae can be distinguished from P. biciliata based on ITS, tef-1α and tub2 loci (4/500 in ITS, 1/473 intef-1α , and 6/443 in tub2, no gaps). Morphologically, P. camelliae-oleiferae differs from P. biciliata by shorter conidia (21.5–23 vs. 22–28 μm) [8]. Therefore, the collection in the present study is designated as a new species.

Pestalotiopsis hunanensis Q. Yang & H. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Pestalotiopsis hunanensis (CSUFTCC15). (a) Conidioma formed on PDA, (b) conidiogenous cells, and (cg) conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (bg) = 10 μm.

MycoBank: MB841480.

Etymology: In reference to the Hunan Province, from where the fungus was first collected.

Holotype: CSUFT015.

Description:Conidiomata acervular in culture on PDA, globose, 500–1000 μm diameter, solitary or aggregated in clusters, exuding black conidial masses. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells discrete or integrated, cylindrical to subcylindrical, hyaline, smooth, annelidic. Conidia fusoid, ellipsoid, straight or slightly curved, (20.5–)23–25(−26.5) × (7–)9–10.5 μm, 4-septate; basal cell conic to obconic with a truncate base, 4–5.5 μm, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with a single appendage filiform, unbranched, centric, 3–3.5 μm long; three median cells doliiform, (14–)15–18 μm long, smooth, concolorous, brown, septa darker than the rest of the cell (second cell from base 4–5 μm long; third cell 5–6.5 μm long; fourth cell 4.5–5.5 μm long); apical cell conical, 2.5–3 μm long, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with 2–3 apical tubular appendages, unbranched, filiform, (13.5–)15–22(−26.5) μm long. Sexual morph not observed.

Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 50 mm diameter after seven days at 25 °C. Colonies filamentous to circular, with sparse aerial mycelium, fruiting bodies black.

Material examined: CHINA, Hunan Province, Xiangtan City, from leaf spots of Camellia oleifera, 7 Nov. 2020, H. Li (CSUFT015, holotype); ex-type living culture CSUFTCC15, living cultures CSUFTCC18 and CSUFTCC19.

Notes:Pestalotiopsis hunanensis was sister to P. rosae in a well-supported clade (ML/BI = 100/1) (Figure 2). Pestalotiopsis hunanensis can be distinguished from P. rosea based on ITS, tef-1α and tub2 loci (6/501 in ITS, 13/475 in tef-1α, and 7/446 in tub2, 12 gaps). Morphologically, P. hunanensis differs from P. rosae by lager conidia (23–25 × 9–10.5 vs. 17.5–21.8 × 5.7–7 μm) [6]. Therefore, the collection in the present study is designated as a new species.

Pestalotiopsis nanjingensis Q. Yang & H. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Pestalotiopsis nanjingensis (CSUFTCC16). (a) Conidioma formed on PDA, (b) conidiogenous cells, and (cf) conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (bf) = 10 μm.

MycoBank: MB841481.

Etymology: In reference to the Nanjing City, from where the fungus was first collected.

Holotype: CSUFT016.

Description:Conidiomata acervular in culture on PDA, globose, 1000–1600 μm diameter, solitary or aggregated in clusters, exuding black conidial masses. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells discrete or integrated, cylindrical to subcylindrical, hyaline, smooth, annelidic. Conidia fusoid, ellipsoid, straight or slightly curved, (19.5–)22–25 × (4.5–)5–6.5 μm, 4-septate; basal cell conic to obconic with a truncate base, 4.5–5 μm, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with a single appendage filiform, unbranched, centric, 2.5–3.5 μm long; three median cells doliiform, 13–14.5(−16) μm long, smooth, concolorous, brown, septa darker than the rest of the cell (second cell from base 4.5–5.5 μm long; third cell 4.5–5.5 μm long; fourth cell 3.5–4.5 μm long); apical cell conical, 3.5–4 μm long, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with two apical tubular appendages, unbranched, filiform, (11–)13.5–18(−20) μm long. Sexual morph not observed.

Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 60 mm diameter after seven days at 25 °C. Colonies filamentous to circular, medium dense, aerial mycelium on surface flat, fruiting bodies black.

Material examined: CHINA, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing city, from leaf spots of Camellia oleifera, 25 Oct. 2020, H. Li (CSUFT016, holotype); ex-type living culture CSUFTCC 16, living cultures CSUFTCC04 and CSUFTCC20.

Notes:Pestalotiopsis nanjingensis was sister to P. neolitseae in a well-supported clade (ML/BI = 100/1) (Figure 2). Pestalotiopsis nanjingensis can be distinguished from P. neolitseae based on ITS, tef-1α and tub2 loci (2/500 in ITS, 26/472 in tef-1α, and 2/442 in tub2, 5 gaps). Morphologically, P. nanjingensis differs from P. neolitseae by longer conidia (22–25 vs. 18–21 μm) and apical appendages (13.5–18 vs. 10–15 μm) [15]. Therefore, the collection in the present study is designated as a new species.

Pestalotiopsis nanningensis Q. Yang & H. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Pestalotiopsis nanningensis (CSUFTCC10). (a) Conidioma formed on PDA, (b) conidiogenous cells, and (cf) conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 500 μm, (bf) = 10 μm.

MycoBank: MB841479.

Etymology: In reference to the Nanning City, from where the fungus was first collected.

Holotype: CSUFT011.

Description:Conidiomata acervular in culture on PDA, globose, 750–1200 μm diameter, solitary or aggregated in clusters, exuding black conidial masses. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells discrete or integrated, cylindrical to subcylindrical, hyaline, smooth, annelidic. Conidia fusoid, ellipsoid, straight or slightly curved, (22–)24–26.5 × (6–)7–8(−9) μm, 4-septate; basal cell conical, 4.5–6 μm, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with a single appendage filiform, unbranched, centric, 4.5–6.5 μm long; three median cells doliiform, 13.5–15(−17) μm long, smooth, concolorous, brown, septa darker than the rest of the cell (second cell from base 4.5–5.5 μm long; third cell 5–6 μm long; fourth cell 4–5 μm long); apical cell conical, 3.5–4.5 μm long, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled; with 2–3 apical tubular appendages, unbranched, filiform, (13.5–)18–22.5(−26.5) μm long. Sexual morph not observed.

Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 80 mm diameter after seven days at 25 °C. Colonies filamentous to circular, medium dense, white aerial mycelium on surface flat or raised.

Material examined: CHINA, Guangxi Province, Nanning City, from leaf spots of Camellia oleifera, 20 Oct. 2020, H. Li (CSUFT011, holotype); ex-type living culture CSUFTCC11, living cultures CSUFTCC12 and CSUFTCC13.

Notes: Pestalotiopsis nanningensis was sister to P. formosana in a well-supported clade (ML/BI = 100/1) (Figure 2). Pestalotiopsis nanningensis can be distinguished from P. formosana based on ITS and tef-1α loci (4/500 in ITS, 2/472 in tef-1α , and 1/442 in tub2, no gaps). Morphologically, P. nanningensis differs from P. formosana by lager conidia (24–26.5 × 7–8 vs. 18–22 × 6–7 μm) and longer apical appendages (18–22.5 vs. 11–16 μm) [15]. Therefore, the collection in the present study is designated as a new species.

3.3. Pathogenicity Assay

After five days, for the pathogenicity tests, N. camelliae-oleiferae, N. cubana, N. iberica Neopestalotiopsis sp.1, P. camelliae-oleiferae, P. hunanensis , and P. nanningensis developed brown lesions on wounded leaves (right), whereas the controls showed no symptoms (left). Neopestalotiopsis sp.1 had the highest virulence, while P. nanjingensis did not cause obvious symptoms (Figure 10). Koch’s postulates were fulfilled by reisolating the same fungi and verifying its colony and morphological characters.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Pathogenicity of eight pestalotioid species from tea-oil leaves. (a) Induced symptoms on tea-oil leaves after 5 days. (b). The virulence of the isolates was evaluated by measuring the diameters of the necrotic lesions on infected tea-oil leaves 5 days after wounding.

4. Discussion

In this study, an investigation of C. oleifera diseases in China was carried out and Camellia leaf disease caused by pestalotioid fungi was observed as a common disease. Identification of our collections was conducted, based on isolates from symptomatic leaves of C. oleifera using three combined loci (ITS, tef-1α and tub2), as well as morphological characteristics. It includes N. cubana, N. iberica, as well as five new species named N. camelliae-oleiferae, P. camelliae-oleiferae, P. hunanensis, P. nanjingensis, and P. nanningensis.

The expanding cultivation of C. oleifera over the last several decades has attracted increasing attention from plant pathologists to infectious diseases on this crop. Therein, pestalotioid species are more frequently regarded as endophytes or latent pathogens causing diseases only on specific situations [4,6,12,63,64]. Understanding the diversity of pestalotioid species and the genetic variation within pathogen populations could help in developing sustainable disease management strategies.

Pestalotioid fungi (Pestalotiopsidaceae, Sordariomycetes) are species-rich asexual taxa, which are common pathogens that cause a variety of diseases, including leaf spots, shoot dieback, fruit rots and various post-harvest diseases [6,8,15,19,20,46,65]. As many peatalotioid species have overlapping morphological traits, sequence data is essential to resolve these three genera and introduce new species [8]. Combined gene sequence of ITS, tef-1α, and tub2 can provide a better resolution for Pestalotiopsis and Pseudopestalotiopsis. However, more genes are needed to provide better resolution and support in Neopestalotiopsis. Furthermore, this is the first systematic report of Neopestalotiopsis and Pestalotiopsis fungi associated with Camellia oleifera in China, which indicates that there may be a high undescribed diversity of fungi in this host.

Pathogenicity tests of eight pestalotioid species from Camellia oleifera showed that all species except for P. nanjingensis were capable of infecting wounded leaves. Neopestalotiopsis sp.1 and P. camelliae-oleiferae showed stronger virulence, with lesion diameters ranged from 14.7 to 17.8 mm on leaves of the Neopestalotiopsis sp.1 isolate (CSUFTCC61) and 13.5 to 15.5 mm on leaves of the P. camelliae-oleiferae isolate (CSUFTCC08). All pathogenicity tests were performed with a single C. camellia cultivar. Since different C. oleifera cultivars may have different resistance to pestalotioid species, more cultivars of C. oleifera should be studied for the variation of their resistance to pestalotioid pathogens. During the tests, the symptoms vary considerably with factors, such as relative humidity, temperature, and the inoculum concentration. In the future, field conditions with natural inoculum should be conducted rather than just in vitro artificial inoculation.

5. Conclusions

Seven peatalotioid species (two known species and five new species) were described and illustrated. This is the first systematic report of Neopestalotiopsis and Pestalotiopsis fungi associated with Camellia oleifera in China. The pathogenicity of these species on leaves were examined and showed that there were significant differences in the pathogenicity.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the assistance of Yuanhao He and Linxue Cao.

Author Contributions

Experiments, L.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, Q.Y.; Writing—review and editing, Q.Y. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the introduction of talent research start-up fund project of CSUFT, grant number 2019YJ025 and the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, grant number 19B608.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data are available in NCBI GenBank following the accession numbers in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Zhuang R.L. Camellia oleifera. 2nd ed. China Forestry Press; Beijing, China: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang W.J., Chen C.G., Cheng J. The medicinal active role of tea oil in health care. Food Nutr. China. 2007;9:48–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang Y., Chen J.Y., Xu X.W., Cheng J.Y., Zheng L., Huang J.B., Li D.W. Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose disease of Camellia oleifera in China. Plant Dis. 2020;104:474–482. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-18-1955-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yu J., Wu Y., He Z., Li M., Zhu K., Gao B. Diversity and antifungal activity of endophytic fungi associated with Camellia oleifera. Mycobiology. 2018;46:85–91. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2018.1454008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhou H., Hou C.L. Three new species of Diaporthe from China based on morphological characters and DNA sequence data analyses. Phytotaxa. 2019;422:157–174. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.422.2.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Guo L.D., Cai L., Chukeatirote E., Wu W.P., Sun X., Hyde K.D. A multi-locus backbone tree for Pestalotiopsis, with a polyphasic characterization of 14 new species. Fungal Divers. 2012;56:95–129. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0198-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Guo L.D., Chukeatirote E., Ekachai C., Bahkali A.H., Hyde K.D. Pestalotiopsis—morphology, phylogeny, biochemistry and diversity. Fungal Divers. 2011;50:167–187. doi: 10.1007/s13225-011-0125-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Hyde K.D., Groenewald J.Z., Xu J., Crous P.W. Pestalotiopsis revisited. Stud. Mycol. 2014;79:121–186. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jeewon R., Liew E.C.Y., Hyde K.D. Phylogenetic relationships of Pestalotiopsis and allied genera inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences and morphological characters. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002;25:378–392. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00422-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jeewon R., Liew E.C.Y., Simpson J.A., Hodgkiss I.J., Hyde K.D. Phylogenetic significance of morphological characters in the taxonomy of Pestalotiopsis species. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003;27:372–383. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Laringnonl P., Hyde K.D., Al-Sady A., Liu Z. Characterization of Neopestalotiopsis, Pestalotiopsis and Truncatella species associated with grapevine trunk diseases in France. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2016;55:380–390. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu F., Hou L.W., Raza M., Cai L. Pestalotiopsis and allied genera from Camellia, with description of 11 new species from China. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–19. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00972-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nozawa S., Yamaguchi K., Van Hop D., Phay N., Ando K., Watanabe K. Identification of two new species and asexual morph from the genus Pseudopestalotiopsis. Mycoscience. 2017;58:328–337. doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2017.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Akinsanmi O.A., Nisa S., Jeff-Ego O.S., Shivas R.G., Drenth A. Dry flower disease of macadamia in Australia caused by Neopestalotiopsis macadamiae sp. nov. and Pestalotiopsis macadamiae sp. nov. Plant Dis. 2017;101:45–53. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0630-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ariyawansa H.A., Hyde K.D. Hyde. Additions to Pestalotiopsis in Taiwan. Mycosphere. 2018;9:999–1013. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/9/5/4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jiang N., Bonthond G., Fan X.L., Tian C.M. Neopestalotiopsis rosicola sp. nov. causing stem canker of Rosa chinensis in China. Mycotaxon. 2018;133:271–283. doi: 10.5248/133.271. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsai I., Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Hyde K.D., Ariyawansa H.A. Molecular phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Pseudopestalotiopsis species of Ixora in Taiwan. Mycol. Prog. 2018;17:941–952. doi: 10.1007/s11557-018-1404-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tibpromma S., Hyde K.D., McKenzie E.H.C., Bhat D.J., Phillips A.J.L., Wanasinghe D.N., Samarakoon M.C., Jayawardena R., Dissanayake A.J., Tennakoon D.S., et al. Fungal diversity notes 840–928: Microfungi associated with Pandanaceae. Fungal Divers. 2018;93:1–160. doi: 10.1007/s13225-018-0408-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Norphanphoun C., Jayawardena R.S., Chen Y., Wen T.C., Meepol W., Hyde K.D. Morphological and phylogenetic characterization of novel pestalotioid species associated with mangroves in Thailand. Mycosphere. 2019;10:531–578. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Diogo E., Gonçalves C.I., Silva A.C., Valente C., Bragança H., Phillips A.J. Five new species of Neopestalotiopsis associated with diseased Eucalyptus spp. in Portugal. Mycol. Prog. 2021;20:1441–1456. doi: 10.1007/s11557-021-01741-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Prasannath K., Shivas R.G., Galea V.J., Akinsanmi O.A. Neopestalotiopsis species associated with flower diseases of Macadamia integrifolia in Australia. J. Fungi. 2021;7:771. doi: 10.3390/jof7090771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Crous P.W., Gams W., Stalpers J.A., Robert V., Stegehuis G. MycoBank: An online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Stud. Mycol. 2004;50:19–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Katoh K., Toh H. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1899–1900. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hall T. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Series. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miller M.A., Pfeiffer W., Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; New Orleans, LA, USA: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jiang N., Voglmayr H., Bian D.R., Piao C.G., Wang S.K., Li Y. Morphology and Phylogeny of Gnomoniopsis (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales) from Fagaceae Leaves in China. J. Fungi. 2021;7:792. doi: 10.3390/jof7100792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R., Posada D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar V., Cheewangkoon R., Gentekaki E., Maharachchikumbura S.S., Brahmanage R.S., Hyde K.D. Neopestalotiopsis alpapicalis sp. nov. a new endophyte from tropical mangrove trees in Krabi Province (Thailand) Phytotaxa. 2019;393:251–262. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.393.3.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bezerra J.D.P., Machado A.R., Firmino A.L., Rosado A.W.C., Souza C.A.F.D., Souza-Motta C.M.D., Freire K.T.L.D.S., Paiva L.M., Magalhães O.M.C., Pereira O.L., et al. Mycological diversity description I. Acta Bot. Bras. 2018;32:656–666. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu X., Tibpromma S., Zhang F., Xu J., Chethana K.W.T., Karunarathna S.C., Mortimer P.E. Neopestalotiopsis cavernicola sp. nov. from Gem Cave in Yunnan Province, China. Phytotaxa. 2021;512:1–27. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.512.1.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Song Y., Geng K., Hyde K.D., Zhao W., Wei J.G., Kang J.C., Wang Y. Two new species of Pestalotiopsis from Southern China. Phytotaxa. 2013;126:22–30. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.126.1.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ma X.Y., Maharachchikumbura S.S., Chen B.W., Hyde K.D., Mckenzie E.H., Chomnunti P., Kang J.C. Endophytic pestalotiod taxa in Dendrobium orchids. Phytotaxa. 2019;419:268–286. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.419.3.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Crous P.W., Wingfield M.J., Le Roux J.J., Richardson D.M., Strasberg D., Shivas R.G., Alvarado P., Edwards J., Moreno G., Sharma R., et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 371–399. Persoonia. 2015;35:264. doi: 10.3767/003158515X690269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ul Haq I., Ijaz S., Khan N.A. Genealogical concordance of phylogenetic species recognition-based delimitation of Neopestalotiopsis species associated with leaf spots and fruit canker disease affected guava plants. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2021;58:1301–1313. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Freitas E.F.S., Da Silva M., Barros M.V.P., Kasuya M.C.M. Neopestalotiopsis hadrolaeliae sp. nov., a new endophytic species from the roots of the endangered orchid Hadrolaelia jongheana in Brazil. Phytotaxa. 2019;416:211–220. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.416.3.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huanluek N., Jjayawardena R.S., Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Harishchandra D.L. Additions to pestalotioid fungi in Thailand: Neopestalotiopsis hydeana sp. nov. and Pestalotiopsis hydei sp. nov. Phytotaxa. 2021;479:23–43. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.479.1.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ayoubi N., Soleimani M.J. Strawberry fruit rot caused by Neopestalotiopsis iranensis sp. nov., and N. mesopotamica. Curr. Microbiol. 2016;72:329–336. doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0955-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Song Y., Maharachchikumbura S.S., Jiang Y.L., Hyde K.D., Wang Y. Pestalotiopsis keteleeria sp. nov., isolated from Keteleeria pubescens in China. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2014;41:885–893. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Maharachchikumbura S.S., Guo L.D., Chukeatirote E., Hyde K.D. Improving the backbone tree for the genus Pestalotiopsis; addition of P. steyaertii and P. magna sp. nov. Mycol. Prog. 2014;13:617–624. doi: 10.1007/s11557-013-0944-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Crous P.W., Wingfield M.J., Chooi Y.H., Gilchrist C.L.M., Lacey E., Pitt J.I., Roets F., Swart W.J., Cano-Lira J.F., Valenzuela-Lopez N., et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 1042–1111. Persoonia. 2020;44:301–459. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Silvério M.L., Cavalcanti M.A.Q., Silva G.A., Oliveira R.J.V., Bezerra J.L. A new epifoliar species of Neopestalotiopsis from Brazil. Agrotropica. 2016;28:151–158. doi: 10.21757/0103-3816.2016v28n2p151-158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Crous P.W., Summerell B.A., Swart L., Denman S., Taylor J.E., Bezuidenhout C.M., Palm M.E., Marincowitz S., Groenewald J.Z. Fungal pathogens of Proteaceae. Persoonia. 2011;27:20–45. doi: 10.3767/003158511X606239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang Q., Zeng X.Y., Yuan J., Zhang Q., He Y.K., Wang Y. Two new species of Neopestalotiopsis from southern China. Biodivers. Data J. 2021;9:e70446. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e70446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Santos J., Hilário S., Pinto G., Alves A. Diversity and pathogenicity of pestalotioid fungi associated with blueberry plants in Portugal, with description of three novel species of Neopestalotiopsis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2021;161:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10658-021-02419-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jayawardena R.S., Liu M., Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Zang W., Xing Q.K., Hyde K.D., Nilthong S., Li X., Yan J. Neopestalotiopsis vitis sp. nov. causing grapevine leaf spot in China. Phytotaxa. 2016;258:63–74. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.258.1.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gu M., Hu D., Han B., Jiang N., Tian C.M. Pestalotiopsis abietis sp. nov. from Abies fargesii in China. Phytotaxa. 2021;509:93–105. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.509.1.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu J.K., Hyde K.D., Jones E.G., Ariyawansa H.A., Bhat D.J., Boonmee S., Maharachchikumbura S., McKenzie E.H.C., Phookamsak R., Phukhamsakda C., et al. Fungal diversity notes 1–110: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species. Fungal Divers. 2015;72:1–197. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0324-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Silva A.C., Diogo E., Henriques J., Ramos A.P., Sandoval-Denis M., Crous P.W., Bragança H. Pestalotiopsis pini sp. nov., an Emerging Pathogen on Stone Pine (Pinus pinea L.) Forests. 2020;11:805. doi: 10.3390/f11080805. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chaiwan N., Wanasinghe D.N., Mapook A., Jayawardena R.S., Norphanphoun C., Hyde K.D. Novel species of Pestalotiopsis fungi on Dracaena from Thailand. Mycology. 2020;11:306–315. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2020.1801873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang Y., Maharachchikumbura S.S., Tian Q., Hyde K.D. Pestalotiopsis species on ornamental plants in Yunnan Province, China. Sydowia. 2013;65:113–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Chukeatirote E., Guo L.-D., Crous P.W., McKenzie E.H.C., Hyde K.D. Pestalotiopsis species associated with Camellia sinensis (tea) Mycotaxon. 2013;123:47–61. doi: 10.5248/123.47. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Watanabe K., Nozawa S., Hsiang T., Callan B. The cup fungus Pestalopezia brunneopruinosa is Pestalotiopsis gibbosa and belongs to Sordariomycetes. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hyde K.D., Jeewon R., Chen Y.J., Bhunjun C.S., Calabon M.S., Jiang H.B., Lin C.G., Norphanphoun C., Sysouphanthong P., Pem D., et al. The numbers of fungi: Is the descriptive curve flattening? Fungal Divers. 2020;103:219–271. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00458-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liu F., Bonthond G., Groenewald J.Z., Cai L., Crous P.W. Sporocadaeceae, a family of coelomycetous fungi with appendage-bearing conidia. Stud. Mycol. 2019;92:287–415. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Geng K., Zhang B., Hyde K.D., Kang J.C., Wang Y. A new species of Pestalotiopsis from leaf spots of Licuala grandis from Hainan, China. Phytotaxa. 2013;88:49–54. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.88.3.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Watanabe K., Motohashi K., Ono Y. Description of Pestalotiopsis pallidotheae: A new species from Japan. Mycoscience. 2010;51:182–188. doi: 10.1007/S10267-009-0025-Z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen Y.Y., Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Liu J.K., Hyde K.D., Nanayakkara R.R., Zhu G.S., Liu Z.Y. Fungi from Asian Karst formations I. Pestalotiopsis photinicola sp. nov., causing leaf spots of Photinia serrulata. Mycosphere. 2017;8:103–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tibpromma S., Mortimer P.E., Karunarathna S.C., Zhan F., Xu J., Promputtha I., Yan K. Morphology and multi-gene phylogeny reveal Pestalotiopsis pinicola sp. nov. and a new host record of Cladosporium anthropophilum from edible pine (Pinus armandii) seeds in Yunnan province, China. Pathogens. 2019;8:285. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8040285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li G.J., Hyde K.D., Zhao R.L., Hongsanan S., Abdel-Aziz F.A., Abdel-Wahab M.A., Alvarado P., Alves-Silva G., Ammirati J.F., Ariyawansa H.A., et al. Fungal diversity notes 253–366: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016;78:1–237. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0366-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang Y., Maharachchikumbura S.S., Mckenzie E.H., Hyde K.D. A novel species of Pestalotiopsis causing leaf spots of Trachycarpus fortunei. Cryptogamie Mycol. 2012;33:311–318. doi: 10.7872/crym.v33.iss3.2012.311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wei J.G., Phan C.K., Wang L., Xu T., Luo J.T., Sun X., Guo L.D. Pestalotiopsis yunnanensis sp. nov., an endophyte from Podocarpus macrophyllus (Podocarpaceae) based on morphology and ITS sequence data. Mycol. Prog. 2013;12:563–568. doi: 10.1007/s11557-012-0863-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wei J.G., Xu T., Guo L.D., Liu A.R., Pan X.H. Endophytic Pestalotiopsis species associated with plants of Podocarpaceae, Theaceae and Taxaceae in southern China. Fungal Divers. 2007;24:55–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sessa L., Abreo E., Lupo S. Diversity of fungal latent pathogens and true endophytes associated with fruit trees in Uruguay. J. Phytopathol. 2018;166:633–647. doi: 10.1111/jph.12726. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data are available in NCBI GenBank following the accession numbers in the manuscript.


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES