Skip to main content
Microorganisms logoLink to Microorganisms
. 2021 Dec 19;9(12):2623. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122623

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Virulence: A Review

Judah Ssekitoleko 1,2, Lonzy Ojok 1,3, Ahmed Abd El Wahed 4,*, Joseph Erume 1, Ahmad Amanzada 5, ElSagad Eltayeb 6,7, Kamal H Eltom 8, Julius Boniface Okuni 1,*
Editor: Coad Thomas Dow
PMCID: PMC8707695  PMID: 34946224

Abstract

To propose a solution for control of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) infections in animals as well as in humans, and develop effective prevention, diagnostic and treatment strategies, it is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms of MAP pathogenesis. In the present review, we discuss the mechanisms utilised by MAP to overcome the host defense system to achieve the virulence status. Putative MAP virulence genes are mentioned and their probable roles in view of other mycobacteria are discussed. This review provides information on MAP strain diversity, putative MAP virulence factors and highlights the knowledge gaps regarding MAP virulence mechanisms that may be important in control and prevention of paratuberculosis.

Keywords: Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, Johne’s disease, virulence, pathogenesis

1. Introduction

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) is a weakly Gram-positive acid-fast bacterium which causes Johne’s disease or paratuberculosis in animals especially ruminants [1,2]. It is also implicated in the cause of Crohn’s disease (inflammatory bowel disease) in humans [3]. Paratuberculosis is one of the most serious infectious diseases of dairy cattle worldwide, causing considerable loss in production in terms of reduced milk yield, reduced weight gain, culling/deaths and increased cost of disease control [4].

Among the attributes for a potentially pathogenic bacterium are its ability to gain access to a susceptible host, establish itself through evasion of the host defense mechanisms and multiply in the host, leading to disease or tissue damage and eventual dissemination to other hosts [5]. Genetic factors that enable the organism to achieve these pathogenic attributes are considered to be virulence factors. A lot still remains to be understood regarding the pathogenesis of MAP and its virulence in its numerous hosts. There are reports of differences in virulence among the various strains as well as differences in host susceptibilities [6]. This review is an attempt to elucidate the basis and mechanisms of differential virulence of MAP strains and isolates as reported to date.

2. Taxonomic Classification of MAP

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis is a Gram-positive bacillus, aerobic, nonmotile, non-spore-forming and acid-fast bacterium belonging to the genus Mycobacterium of the family Mycobacteriacea and is a member of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) [7]. MAC are widely distributed in the environment, in healthy animals and humans and do not usually cause disease unless the host is debilitated or immunocompromised. Other members in the MAC complex include: M. avium avium, M. avium silvaticum, M. colombiense and M. intracellulare. They belong to the slow-growing group of mycobacteria, taking between 8–16 weeks to produce visible colonies on solid media such as Egg-based media such as Löwenstein–Jensen medium, Herrold’s egg-yolk medium and synthetic media such as Middlebrook 7H9, 7H10 and 7H11, though some strains may take up to 6 months [2,6]. MAP is classified biochemically as being dependent on externally provided mycobactin, though some strains have been found to be mycobactin independent.

3. MAP Strain Diversity

Principally, three broad MAP strain groups are recognised depending on their growth characteristics, colony pigmentation and host associations: Sheep type or “Type S”, the Cattle type or “Type C” and the Bison or “B-type” [8]. Some of the molecular techniques used in MAP strain typing for identification of genetic diversity include: IS900 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) [9], IS1311 RFLP, IS1311 polymerase chain reaction–restriction enzyme analysis (PCR-REA) [10], pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) [11]; short sequence repeat (SSR) [12], mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) analysis [13] and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing [14]. These typing techniques have divided MAP into Type I, II and III (Figure 1). Type I is predominantly isolated from sheep (Type S) and Type II is for isolates from cattle and other animals as well as humans. Type III is a subgroup of Type S. Based on SNP analysis of the IS1311, MAP first isolated from bison from Montana, USA, has been classified as Type B [15]. With further molecular analysis, this bison type was found to differ from a similar type from India giving rise to the Indian bison type [16]. Type B strains are a subtype of Type C but are not restricted to the bison. Type III and Type I appear to be subgroups of Sheep type [13]. Recent studies recommend that MAP characterisation should be based on whole genome sequence (WGS) analysis of genetic markers such as insertion elements, repetitive sequences and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) [13,17] for better resolution, although this would be very expensive for small epidemiological studies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

An illustration of MAP strain differentiation based on whole genome SNP-based phylogenetic analysis [13].

4. MAP Pathogenesis

4.1. Transmission

MAP is transmitted in cattle mainly through the fecal–oral mode and infection occurs mostly in young calves [1,18]. Risk factors for MAP transmission include: importation or introduction of new animals whose MAP infection status is unknown, pooled milk feeding of calves and lack of or failure to use maternity pens on the farm [19,20]. Infected animals shed MAP in manure, colostrum and milk and young animals become infected through ingestion of colostrum and milk from the infected animals, contaminated water and pasture [21,22]. Upon ingestion, MAP enters the intestinal wall through the ileal mucosa via the microfold (M) cells residing in the Peyer’s patches [23]. It has also been demonstrated that MAP can cross the gut mucosa even in areas without Peyer’s patches entering through enterocytes [24]. Here, they resist intracellular degradation and eventually get phagocytosed by subepithelial macrophages. Infected macrophages migrate to local lymphatics and spread to regional lymph nodes where the organisms stimulate inflammatory and immunological responses [25,26].

4.2. Immune Responses

Infected macrophages stimulate T-helper lymphocytes and clonal expansion of two T-helper cell subpopulations: T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2), which secrete different cytokines [25,27]. The Th1 cells produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interferon gamma (IFNγ), interleukin 2 (IL-2), IL-12 and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) while Th2 cells produce anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-13 [28,29]. These cytokines are believed to orchestrate cell-mediated and humoral immune responses that aim to contain the intracellular infection but unfortunately end up augmenting the disease process. The early immune response to MAP infection consists of numerous infected macrophages with increased amounts of adhesion molecules, which result in formation of granulomas in which the bacilli remain secluded for a long period of time [27]. The animal in this state presents no clinical symptoms and it can remain in this subclinical phase for a period of 2–5 years while the bacilli are contained in macrophages and microscopic granulomas [30,31]. Infected animals may not manifest clinical disease throughout their lifetime, yet they continue to contaminate the environment through shedding of MAP [32,33,34]. What determines the length of this duration both at host and pathogen levels is still unknown. With the failure of macrophages to destroy MAP, the organisms begin to multiply intracellularly with production of immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibodies characteristic of the late humoral response in MAP infection [28].

5. Fate of MAP inside Macrophages

Mononuclear phagocytes, principally macrophages, serve as the intracellular niche for MAP survival and multiplication [35]. Macrophages possess several receptors involved in mycobacterial uptake which include complement receptors (CR1, CR3 and CR4), mannose receptors, immunoglobulin receptors and the scavenger receptors [36,37,38]. Reports suggest that complement opsonisation is important for the uptake of MAP by bovine mononuclear phagocytes and that these phagocytes can synthesise and secrete complement proteins to opsonise particles for phagocytosis [39].

The innate immune system also employs germline-encoded pattern-recognition receptors for the initial detection of microbes. There are several classes, some of which include the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and Nucleotide-binding oligomerisation domain-like receptors (NLRs) [40]. Antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages express these TLRs, which initiate immune responses mediated by different cytokines. Reports have indicated that TLRs and NLRs are involved in the recognition of MAP by the innate immune system [41].

Mechanisms of virulence responsible for MAP colonisation, entry and persistence in macrophages and eventual disease development remain elusive. Several mycobacterial factors are believed to interplay and interact with host factors to determine the virulence and pathogenesis of MAP within the animal host (Figure 2). Once inside macrophages, MAP survives and proliferates in the phagosome using means which are not fully understood. One such means is the ability of MAP to disable the reactive oxygen anion intermediates (ROI) such as superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals [42], which have a mycobactericidal effect. MAP secretes superoxide dismutase, which is a possible counter mechanism for protection of the bacilli in macrophages [43]. Macrophages also produce reactive nitrogen intermediates such as nitric oxide (NO) when stimulated with IFN-γ and TNF-α which are also known to have a mycobactericidal effect [44]. Macrophages infected with M. tuberculosis (MTB) have been shown to inhibit recruitment of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in phagosomes containing mycobacterium as a measure to counteract NO production [45]. A similar mechanism is believed to work in macrophages infected with MAP, though this requires further investigation since [46] found little evidence of iNOS activity in Johne’s disease lesions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Schematic representation of putative MAP virulence mechanisms and associated host factors. The virulence mechanisms enable MAP to gain entry, survive, multiply and cause disease in the host by interacting and sometimes disabling the host defense mechanism and metabolism. Because limited information is available concerning the expression and actions of virulence factors in MAP, most of the current understanding of MAP virulence is imputed from the functions of such factors in related mycobacteria.

Another microbicidal mechanism by phagocytes is the phagosome–lysosome fusion to form a functional phagolysosome in which the lysosomal vacuoles containing hydrolytic enzymes kill and degrade invading microbes [47,48]. Live MAP has been shown to perforate this vacuole by secreting lipids that create pores in the membrane surrounding the vacuole. Mycobacteria are also known to interfere with phagosomal maturation through inhibition of the ATP-dependent proton pump (H+-ATPase) which maintains an acidic environment necessary for optimal activity of the hydrolytic enzymes [49]. MAP cells have been shown to inhibit phagosome–lysosome fusion and phagosomal acidification in murine cells [50,51]. This is through blocking of Rab5 activity, therefore preventing the fusion of early endosomes. Activation of MAP-infected murine macrophages with IFN-γ and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) resulted in enhanced phagosome–lysosome fusion and increased killing of MAP cells intracellularly as compared to the unstimulated [52]. MAP cells have been shown to stimulate production of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, which counteracts the effects of IFN-γ in macrophage infection and aids MAP survival [53]. Consequently, downregulation of IL-10 gene resulted in reduced survival of MAP but also increased production of INF-γ in bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) [53,54]. Similar reports have showed that infection of bovine macrophages with MAP resulted in reduced apoptosis of macrophages [51,55] which enhances MAP survival.

Mycobacteria, unlike other pathogenic bacteria, lack the classical virulence factors such as toxins; they uses other virulence mechanisms which enable them to survive in the macrophage intracellular environment [56]. The mechanisms utilised by MAP to enter and survive in the host macrophages include resistance to intracellular degradation by macrophages and inhibition of apoptosis and interference with cytokines production by macrophages. Cytokines control different processes in the cell through protein regulation to overcome the infection. MAP, however, modifies the response of macrophages to infection so that it is able to survive inside the macrophage [26].

Although the mechanisms for the intracellular survival of MAP within macrophages are not entirely understood, several reports suggest that these mechanisms have a genetic basis [8,57]. Khalifeh and Stabel reported that formation of persistently infected macrophages is associated with upregulation of IL-10, transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) and reduction in IFNγ [58]. It has been shown that MAP interferes with CD40 signalling, which is mediated by IL–12P40 and inducible Nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in monocytes-derived macrophages [59]. The CD40 pathway is responsible for the activation of macrophages by the T cells. Failure of T cell activation and consequently macrophage activation leads to persistently infected macrophages incapable of destroying the pathogen that instead act as a vehicle for propagation and dispersal of the organism leading to infection [25,60]. Activated macrophages are capable of killing MAP and control their growth; however, at high multiplicity of infection, MAP is cytotoxic to macrophages and also inhibits apoptosis [61,62].

6. MAP Virulence Factors

Virulence factors facilitate adhesion, invasion and colonisation of host cells by pathogenic bacteria; they include enzymes of several lipid pathways, cell surface protein regulators and signal transduction systems molecules (Figure 2). Bacterial virulence genes may be located on transmissible genetic elements such as transposons, bacteriophages, plasmids or within the bacterial genome organised in a contiguous region known as the pathogenicity island [63]. A gene will probably contribute to virulence if it is present in a pathogen but absent in a closely related nonpathogenic organism or inactivation of the gene results in attenuation of the virulence phenotype and replacement with an intact copy of the inactivated gene restores virulence [64].

6.1. Factors That Facilitate Adhesion, Colonisation, Entry and Persistence

From studies so far conducted, it has been demonstrated that certain genetic elements within the pathogen genome are responsible for virulence. Once removed or disrupted, the organism displays an attenuation phenotype. The disruption of genes can be achieved experimentally by means of insertion or deletion mutagenesis and construction of transposon mutant libraries. Using a transposable element Tn5367 introduced into the MAP genome by means of a conditionally replicating mycobacteriophage phAE94, Harris and colleagues generated a library of 5620 MAP insertion mutants and also demonstrated that the transposon insertion sites are distributed relatively randomly throughout the MAP genome [65]. In a related study, Shin and coworkers constructed a library of transposon mutants whose genes were phenotypically involved in membrane transport protein, iron, tryptophan, or mycolic acid metabolic pathways [66]. In the aforementioned study, the transposable element Tn5367 was used to generate a library of MAP mutants. A total of 5060 mutants were generated, of which 1150 mutants were characterised by sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. Out of these, using a mouse model of paratuberculosis, seven novel virulence determinants were identified. Bacteriological and histological analyses employed in the study were able to categorise the putative colonisation virulence factors into two classes: those that exhibited impaired organ colonisation and low inflammatory scores; and those that showed low colonisation rates but at a later stage of infection, implying a role for persistence in macrophages. These genetic factors are involved in M. tuberculosis (MTB) virulence and might have significance in MAP virulence as well.

In Table 1, we present a list of virulence factors of MAP and related mycobacteria which are believed to play a role in MAP virulence and pathogenesis. The gene gcpE encodes a protein involved in isoprenoid biosynthesis via the mevalonate-independent 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) pathway [67]. It is considered an essential gene in Escherichia coli (E. coli) [68]. In a study using a calf model in which MAP strains were deposited in the ileum, mutants of the gcpE gene were unable to traverse the intestinal barrier to the mesenteric lymph nodes, unlike the wild-type strain. This indicated that the mutant was less invasive, throwing more light on the process of MAP pathogenesis and virulence mechanism [69]. However, more information is required on the probable use of the gcpE gene as a potential target for vaccine development in paratuberculosis control.

Table 1.

Factors believed to influence virulence in MAP and other mycobacteria.

Virulence Factor Name/Function Probable Role in MAP Virulence References
GcpE Protein involved in isoprenoid biosynthesis Involved in the MEP pathway. Important in tissue invasion during early MAP infection [69]
PstA Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase Glycopeptidolipid biosynthesis and associated with biofilm formation [70]
KdpC Probable potassium-transporting ATPase C chain An inducible high-affinity potassium uptake system. In MAP it has been associated with organ colonisation and granuloma formation [66,76]
PapA2 Conserved polyketide synthase-associated protein Virulence-enhancing lipids of MTB. In MAP it is associated with tissue colonisation [66,77]
ImpA Inositol monophosphatase protein Involved in cell wall permeability and persistence in macrophages [66,78]
FabG2_2 Putative oxidoreductase Involved in colonisation and persistence in macrophages during MAP infection [66,79]
UmaA1 Mycolic acid methyltransferase Involved in cell wall biosynthesis and tissue/organ colonisation [79,80]
MptD (MAP3733c) Putative ATP binding cassette transporter Important in MAP adaptation during early infection through lipid metabolism [81]
PknG (MAP3893c) Serine/threonine protein kinase G Contributes to biofilm and granuloma formation in MTB. In MAP it induces production of IFNγ leading to macrophage phosphorylation [82,83]
MAP0949 Probable diguanylate cyclase Involved in bacterial cell surface adhesions. Important in adaptation and evasion of the host immune system. [84,85]
MAP2291 Haemoglobin-like oxygen carrier—glbO Protects MAP against oxidative stress [86]
MAP3634 Hypothetical protein of mycobacterial L,D-transpeptidases Involved in bacterial cell wall synthesis through polymerisation of peptidoglycans [86]

The nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene (pstA) encodes an enzyme involved in glycopeptidolipid biosynthesis which is associated with biofilm formation [70]. It has been described in mycobacteria such as MTB, M. smegmatis and M. avium [71,72,73]. Glycopeptidolipids are species-specific mycobacterial lipids and have been demonstrated to be major constituents of cell envelopes of several nontuberculous mycobacteria, both pathogenic and nonpathogenic [74]. Biofilm formation is believed to contribute to bacterial virulence by inducing a persistent source of infection and may contribute to antibiotic resistance [75]. According to Shin and coworkers, pstA mutants showed significant reduction in tissue colonisation in a mouse model of paratuberculosis [66]. In a more recent study, pstA mutants were shown to be deficient in the ability to form biofilm when compared with the intact MAP strain [70], an indication that PstA could contribute to biofilm formation in MAP. In the same study, it was observed that pstA mutants also exhibited significant reduction in bacilli length compared to the parent strain, which raises the question of whether cell elongation could contribute to biofilm formation. The exact role of PstA in MAP pathogenesis requires further scrutiny.

The kdpC gene is a probable potassium-transporting ATPase C chain which encodes an inducible high-affinity potassium uptake system of E. coli. It is part of the Kdp complex, which are membrane bound subunits comprising the KdpC, KdpF, KdpB and KdpA [76]. The role of the kdpC gene in mycobacterial pathogenesis is not yet clear. From the study by [66], mutants for this gene were deficient in the ability to colonise mouse organs (liver and intestines) and this could possibly be due to a defect in the potassium-shuttling mechanism which resulted in the attenuation phenotype exhibited by the mutants. The kdpC-deficient mutants showed limited granuloma formation compared to the wild types.

Similarly, disruption of the papA2 gene in MAP resulted into attenuation in a murine model of paratuberculosis [66]. The papA2 gene is a member of the conserved polyketide synthase-associated protein (Pap) family which encodes virulence-enhancing lipids of MTB [77].

The impA gene encodes an inositol monophosphatase protein which earlier studies showed that it played a role in cell wall permeability in M. smegmatis and in the synthesis of phosphatidylinositol dimannoside [78,87]. On the other hand, fabG2_2 gene encodes a putative oxidoreductase activity in MAP [79]. Both mutants of impA and fabG2_2 genes exhibited low colonisation levels late in the infection experiment, which implied that they could possibly play a role in bacterial defense in the persistence stage of MAP infection [66].

The umaA1 gene, which encodes a mycolic acid methyltransferase, is involved in cell wall biosynthesis [79]. Disruption of umaA1 resulted in reduced colonisation levels of mutants in mice [66]. This is, however, in contrast to a similar model for MTB in which umaA1 mutants exhibited a hypervirulence phenotype [88] and this may suggest a difference in role played by the gene in MTB from that of MAP. MAP umaA1 together with fabG2_2 gene mutants have been tested for their vaccine potential in mice and were found to induce a MAP specific IFN-γ important for eliciting cell-mediated immunity. The umaA1 mutants further induced production of IL-17a, a cytokine important for mycobacterial protective immunity. Indeed, mice vaccinated with the umaA1 and fabG2_2 gene mutants exhibited significant reduction in organ colonisation and low histological scores compared to control animals when challenged with a virulent MAP strain [80].

Though the above-described virulence genes have been identified, there is little understanding of the pathways through which they act and whether the same effects observed in vitro and in mouse models can be observed in ruminant models of paratuberculosis. Moreover, similar genes in closely related species may play different roles in pathogenesis due to differences in gene organisation on the genomic island, as was observed in MAP and Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium [89,90]. How virulence factors affect host–pathogen interactions is still only left to speculation. These probable virulence determinants could represent novel functional classes necessary for mycobacterial survival during infection and could provide suitable targets for vaccine and drug development.

6.2. Factors Which Affect Metabolism of MAP

Different pathogenic bacteria have been demonstrated to undergo metabolic adaptations that enable them to utilise the host metabolites that would otherwise have been toxic. An example is M. tuberculosis, which has the ability to break down the host fatty acids, detoxify the products and utilise the resulting molecules to acquire carbon during intracellular infection. The ability of pathogens to acquire nutrients within the host environment is part of the crucial processes contributing to bacterial virulence [91].

MAP has been shown to undergo significant genetic modifications during host–pathogen interaction within macrophages. One such modification is iron limitation, which triggers nitric oxide build-up linked to nitric oxide synthase production, which prompts MAP to enter into an iron sequestration program. This kind of pathway is likely to contribute to MAP virulence by aiding MAP establishment and long-term survival within host macrophages [92]. However, it is not known how MAP influences the host metabolic state for its benefit and whether the genetic factors contributing to MAP virulence are also involved in these processes. To date, only a couple of genes have been shown to modulate MAP virulence within macrophages (Figure 2).

Meissner and others [81] studied the role of MAP mptD gene (map3733c) to deduce its potential role in the host during MAP infection. The mptD gene whose operon is predicted to encode a putative ATP-binding cassette transporter belongs to a small group of functionally uncharacterised genes. Macrophage infection experiments were performed in which the gene was observed to have a significant role in MAP adaptation during early infection. Metabolic profiling revealed profound disorders in lipid metabolism, hence pointing to the probable importance of mptD gene in metabolic adaptation required for MAP persistence in the host.

In a recent study, Philips and others used an Acanthamoeba castellanii (amoeba) model to predict virulence mechanisms of MAP [86]. A library of gene knockout mutants generated by Mycomart7 (Mmt7) transposon was used to identify MAP clones that can either enhance or inhibit the amoeba metabolic activity, and this mirrored the pattern of MAP survival or attenuation in macrophages. They observed that MAP mutants that induced high amoeba metabolic activity were defective in the intracellular growth inside macrophages. From bioinformatic analysis of mutant sequences, several genes were identified that could possibly be responsible for the altered ability for survival of MAP mutants in the RAW 264.7 macrophages [86].

The map3893c gene encodes the serine/threonine-protein kinase G (PknG) which is a well-characterised virulence factor in MTB where it is known to contribute to biofilm development and granuloma formation [82,93]. It is also known to block the recruitment of active Rab711-GTP to phagosomes containing the pathogen, thereby inhibiting the phago-lysosome fusion [94,95]. It appears that the role of PknG in MAP pathogenesis contributes to macrophage phosphorylation signalling and other adaptor molecules by inducing an immune response through production of IFN-γ [83]. The exact role of PknG in MAP is not fully understood, but because it shares high homology with that of the MTB complex, it is anticipated to perform similar roles. This, however, needs further investigation.

The second macrophage-related putative virulence factor is MAP0949, a probable diguanylate cyclase whose absence results in severe attenuation of MAP during macrophage infection. Its wild phenotype is, however, restored once the disrupted gene is complemented by the functional gene [86]. In other bacteria, it has been postulated that it is involved in stimulating degradation of second messenger cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) involved in bacterial cell surface adhesions [84]. The c-di-GMP and c-AMP second messenger signalling molecules control expression of a variety of environmental and quorum sensing signals as well as regulating several key virulence mechanisms required for bacterial adaptation and evasion of the host immune system [85,96,97].

Inducible nitroxide synthase (iNOS) is an important enzyme responsible for the activation of reactive nitrogen oxide species that kill intracellular mycobacteria. Virulence of mycobacteria is probably mediated by the map2291 gene, a haemoglobin-like oxygen carrier (glbO) which encodes the globin protein occurring across the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). It is 86% homologous to MTB oxygen-binding glbO which have a function related to oxygen affinity and reactivity [98]. MTB-truncated haemoglobin O (trHbO) displays moderate NO-scavenging activity which signifies involvement in both NO detoxification and aerobic respiration [99]. Since map2291 consists of MTB glbO-like domain, it can be hypothesised that the map2291 gene prevents intracellular killing of MAP by protecting the pathogen from microaerophilic conditions and oxidative stress [86]. Moreover, one study also showed evidence of limited iNOS activity in MAP granulomas [46].

Virulence of MAP may also be determined by the map3634 gene, which encodes a hypothetical protein that contains IgD-like repeat domain of mycobacterial L,D-transpeptidases and is responsible for the final polymerisation steps involved in the formation of glycan strands and cross-linking peptide stems of the peptidoglycan cell wall in most bacteria [100]. Inactivation of these transpeptidases has been demonstrated to be detrimental to MTB and M. abscessus [101,102], signifying its importance as a virulence factor in these organisms. MAP mutants lacking map3634 gene exhibit reduced survival rate in macrophages, presumably due to defective bacterial cell wall synthesis [86].

6.3. Factors That Affect Aggregation and Clumping

The PE/PPE proteins are among the probable factors contributing to MAP virulence. The PE/PPE proteins are large families of proteins with each member sharing a conserved N-terminal domain with the characteristic motifs Proline–Glutamate (Pro–Glu or PE) or Proline–Proline–glutamate (PPE) that are an important domain in mycobacteria and have been for long believed to play a role in virulence [103]. They have been well characterised in MTB, though they also occur in other mycobacteria such as M. leprae, M. avium and M. bovis [104]. They are thought to be virulence factors responsible for evasion of host immune responses and a potential source of antigenic variation in MTB [105]. It is reported that some PE/PPE families are deleted from avirulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis [106]. Zheng and colleagues also showed that a number of PE/PPE genes found in virulent strains of MTB contain single nucleotide variations [107]. Differential expression of PE/PPE genes in M. tuberculosis and M. bovis seems to suggest host specificity. At least one M. tuberculosis PE protein is known to cause cell death while another causes apoptosis of host macrophages [108]. There is some evidence that inactivation of the PE-polymorphic GC-rich repetitive sequence (PE-PGRS) gene in M. bovis BCG strain will lead to loss of cell aggregation (clumping), dispersed growth and reduced infection of macrophages [109]. The iron-dependent regulator (IdeR) of MTB has been reported to control several PE/PPE proteins such as Rv0279, Rv0285 and Rv2123, and the fact that iron is necessary for virulence points to the PE/PPE proteins being virulence factors [110,111]. In MAP the PE/PPE family comprises 1% of the genome and lacks the intact PE-PGRS subfamily present in MTB and other mycobacteria such as M. bovis and M. marinam [79].

The exact role of PE/PPE proteins in MAP virulence has, however, not yet been elucidated. PE-PGRS family proteins Rv0834c, Rv3097c, Rv097 are expressed within 24 h post infection in macrophages and are believed to aid the establishment of the infection in macrophages [105]. It is suggested that PE-PGRS Rv1759 binds to the cytoskeletal protein, fibronectin thereby facilitating entry of MAP into the host through opsonisation [112]. Another PE-PGRS protein, Rv1787 (PPE25) has been shown to be important for growth of M. smegmatis within macrophages, while Rv1196 (PPE18) and PPE44 trigger responses that favour a switch from Th1 to Th2 by shifting IL-10/IL-12 balance and down regulating IL-12/TNFα. Because of the high degree of polymorphisms among the PE-PGRS genes observed even among the different strains of mycobacteria [113], they are potential determinants of differential virulence in mycobacterial strains. As has been recommended for other mycobacteria, the macrophage infection model of MAP can be used to answer questions about activation of various PE/PPE genes, their regulators and mRNA stability [111]. Another aspect of MAP pathogenesis and virulence is to understand how this organism modulates IL-10/IL-12 response.

6.4. Global Gene Regulators and Stress Induced Genes

Global gene regulators (GGR) are involved in the control of several other genes such as the sigma factors which have been shown to be important in regulating MAP virulence. In one of the studies by [92], of the 19 alternative sigma factors encoded in MAP [79], only SigL was induced at an early stage when subjected to stressors to mimic the host microenvironment such as oxidative and cell wall stressors. It has been suggested that sigL regulates the synthesis of cell envelope lipids and is responsible for modification of secreted proteins in MTB [114]. The importance of SigL in MAP survival in macrophages during early adaptation and the ability of mutants to produce protective immune response against paratuberculosis [57] further highlighted the importance of GGR in possible development of effective live attenuated vaccines.

Wu and colleagues studied the gene expression profiles of MAP under different stress conditions such as heat shock, acidity and oxidative stress. Several sigma factors such as SigH, SigE were differentially coregulated with a large number of genes. Deletion mutagenesis revealed attenuation of gene mutants that included; lipN, lpqP, aceAB, and prrA in a murine model of paratuberculosis which could participate in tissue colonisation indicating their role in MAP pathogenesis [115]. Pribylova and coworkers also reported that SigE, SigL, SigF, alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) and the major membrane protein (MMP) are over expressed during heat stress in MAP [116]. Further analysis of the role of stress-induced genes in MAP pathogenesis and virulence is needed.

6.5. The Role of Polymorphism in the MAP Genome on its Virulence

Microbial genetic variations may be as a result of spontaneous mutations due to the unstable nature of the purine and pyrimidine bases, as a result of errors that may occur during replication or be induced by exposure to certain environmental factors such as UV light [8].

Whole genome sequence analysis of the MAP genome has revealed occurrence of large sequence polymorphisms (LSPs) emanating from deletions, insertions, inversions, duplications or dislocations. These events can cause DNA rearrangements resulting in major phenotypic changes such as acquisition of virulence genes through insertions. Other sources of genetic variations include: insertion sequences, repeat sequences and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [8]. The MAP genome comprises 19 different insertion sequences which are useful in mycobacterial species and subspecies differentiation such as IS1311 and IS900, which is MAP-specific [117]. Repeat sequences are also important in genomic typing for strain differentiation and molecular diagnosis such as the mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units–variable-number tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTRs) and short-sequence repeats (SSRs) [118]. SNPs are the substitutions of a single nucleotide with another or a deletion or insertion of one nucleotide. Single-nucleotide substitutions in protein synthesis can be synonymous—resulting in no amino acid change—or nonsynonymous, which results in amino acid changes. SNPs can be utilised in intra-strain differentiation and offer the greatest microbial genomic variation and may contribute to variations in pathogenicity among MAP strains [8,14,117]. Genetic variations, including single nucleotide polymorphisms in PE/PPE-PGRS genes, have been found to occur more frequently in virulent strains of M. tuberculosis compared to the avirulent ones. All these different polymorphisms could play important roles in differential virulence in MAP but further study is required to determine if this is true.

7. Conclusions

Differences in MAP strain virulence have been reported by several studies, but the slow growth of MAP and its long incubation period have made it very difficult to understand the mechanisms for its pathogenesis and virulence in its natural hosts. Most of the current understanding is based on inference from other mycobacteria, with a few studies attempting to replicate these studies using MAP itself. The key highlights of MAP virulence focus on genes such as the PE/PPE—PGRS family, mycobacterial protein kinases (PknG) and the modulation of IL-12/IL-10 switch during infection. There are still many knowledge gaps in our understanding of how differential expression, stability and secretion of these gene products affect MAP uptake, persistence, frustration of phagocytosis and toxicity, which are the hallmarks of mycobacterial virulence in its hosts. Future studies need to focus on elucidating the different protein pathways involved during mycobacterial pathogenesis.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the open access fund at the University of Leipzig for covering the publication fees.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, J.S., J.B.O., A.A.E.W., L.O. and K.H.E.; reviewing of literature, J.S., J.B.O., L.O., K.E., A.A.E.W., J.E., A.A. and E.E.; writing–original draft preparation, J.S., J.B.O., J.E., A.A.E.W.; supervision, J.B.O., A.A.E.W. and K.H.E.; funding acquisition, A.A.E.W., J.B.O. and K.H.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), grant number: 404935781.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the manuscript text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Cousins D., Condron R., Eamens G., Whittington R., De Lisle G. Paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease) Aust. N. Z. Stand. Diagn. Proced. 2002;1:1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olsen I., Sigurgardottir G., Djonne B. Paratuberculosis with special reference to cattle. A review. Vet. Q. 2002;24:12–28. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2002.9695120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hermon-Taylor J., Bull T.J., Sheridan J.M., Cheng J., Stellakis M.L., Sumar N. Causation of Crohn’s Disease by Mycobacterium avium Subspecies Paratuberculosis. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2000;14:798305. doi: 10.1155/2000/798305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Correa-Valencia N., García-Tamayo Y.M., Fernández-Silva J.A. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Colombia (1924-2016): A review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2018;31:165–179. doi: 10.17533/udea.rccp.v31n3a01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Webb S.A., Kahler C.M. Bench-to-bedside review: Bacterial virulence and subversion of host defences. Crit. Care. 2008;12:234. doi: 10.1186/cc7091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Verna A.E., Garcia-Pariente C., Muñoz M., Moreno O., García-Marin J.F., Romano M.I., Paolicchi F., Perez V. Variation in the Immuno-pathological Responses of Lambs after Experimental Infection with Different Strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Zoonoses Public Health. 2007;54:243–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saviola B., Bishai W. The Prokaryotes. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2006. The Genus Mycobacterium–Medical; pp. 919–933. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stevenson K. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis and the influence of strain type on infection and pathogenesis: A review. Vet. Res. 2015;46:64. doi: 10.1186/s13567-015-0203-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Conde C., Price-Carter M., Cochard T., Branger M., Stevenson K., Whittington R., Bannantine J.P., Biet F. Whole-Genome Analysis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis IS900 Insertions Reveals Strain Type-Specific Modalities. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:660002. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.660002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hodgeman R., Mann R., Savin K., Djitro N., Rochfort S., Rodoni B. Molecular characterisation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Australia. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:101. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02140-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dimareli-Malli Z., Stevenson K., Sarris K., Sossidou K. Study of microbiological and molecular typing aspects of paratuberculosis in sheep and goats in Northern Greece. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2009;56:285–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2009.01071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sevilla I., Li L., Amonsin A., Garrido J.M., Geijo M.V., Kapur V., Juste R.A. Comparative analysis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates from cattle, sheep and goats by short sequence repeat and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:204. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bryant J.M., Thibault V.C., Smith D.G., McLuckie J., Heron I., Sevilla I.A., Biet F., Harris S.R., Maskell D.J., Bentley S.D., et al. Phylogenomic exploration of the relationships between strains of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:79. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2234-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leao C., Goldstone R.J., Bryant J., McLuckie J., Inacio J., Smith D.G., Stevenson K. Novel Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Assay for Genotyping Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016;54:556–564. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01958-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Whittington R.J., Marsh I.B., Whitlock R.H. Typing of IS 1311 polymorphisms confirms that bison (Bison bison) with paratuberculosis in Montana are infected with a strain of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis distinct from that occurring in cattle and other domesticated livestock. Mol. Cell Probes. 2001;15:139–145. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sevilla I., Singh S., Garrido J., Aduriz G., Rodriguez S., Geijo M., Whittington R., Saunders V., Whitlock R., Juste R. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis strains from different hosts and regions. Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties. 2005;24:1061. doi: 10.20506/rst.24.3.1634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lim J., Park H.T., Ko S., Park H.E., Lee G., Kim S., Shin M.K., Yoo H.S., Kim D. Genomic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: Pangenomic approach for highlighting unique genomic features with newly constructed complete genomes. Vet. Res. 2021;52:46. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00905-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sweeney R.W. Pathogenesis of paratuberculosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2011;27:537–546. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cashman W., Buckley J., Quigley T., Fanning S., More S., Egan J., Berry D., Grant I., O’Farrell K. Risk factors for the introduction and within-herd transmission of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) infection on 59 Irish dairy herds. Ir. Vet. J. 2008;61:1–4. doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-61-7-464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vilar A.L., Santos C.S., Pimenta C.L., Freitas T.D., Brasil A.W., Clementino I.J., Alves C.J., Bezerra C.S., Riet-Correa F., Oliveira T.S., et al. Herd-level prevalence and associated risk factors for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in cattle in the State of Paraiba, Northeastern Brazil. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015;121:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Manning E., Collins M. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: Pathogen, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 2001;20:133–150. doi: 10.20506/rst.20.1.1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.World Organisation for Animal Health Terrestrial Animal Health Code. [(accessed on 12 October 2021)]. Available online: https://rr-africa.oie.int/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/en_csat-vol1-2012.pdf.
  • 23.Arsenault R.J., Maattanen P., Daigle J., Potter A., Griebel P., Napper S. From mouth to macrophage: Mechanisms of innate immune subversion by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Vet. Res. 2014;45:1–15. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-45-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bermudez L.E., Petrofsky M., Sommer S., Barletta R.G. Peyer’s patch-deficient mice demonstrate that Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis translocates across the mucosal barrier via both M cells and enterocytes but has inefficient dissemination. Infect. Immun. 2010;78:3570–3577. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01411-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Coussens P.M. Mycobacterium paratuberculosis and the bovine immune system. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2001;2:141–162. doi: 10.1079/AHRR200134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tessema M.Z., Koets A.P., Rutten V.P., Gruys E. How does Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis resist intracellular degradation? Vet. Q. 2001;23:153–162. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2001.9695105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Coussens P.M. Model for immune responses to Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in cattle. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:3089–3096. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3089-3096.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coussens P.M., Verman N., Coussens M.A., Elftman M.D., McNulty A.M. Cytokine gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tissues of cattle infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: Evidence for an inherent proinflammatory gene expression pattern. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:1409–1422. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1409-1422.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Coussens P.M., Pudrith C.B., Skovgaard K., Ren X., Suchyta S.P., Stabel J.R., Heegaard P.M. Johne’s disease in cattle is associated with enhanced expression of genes encoding IL-5, GATA-3, tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 2, and factors promoting apoptosis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2005;105:221–234. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stevenson K. Studying the pathogenesis of paratuberculosis: The enduring challenge; Proceedings of the 8th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis; Copenhagen, Denmark. 13–17 August 2005; pp. 88–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tanaka S., Sato M., Onitsuka T., Kamata H., Yokomizo Y. Inflammatory cytokine gene expression in different types of granulomatous lesions during asymptomatic stages of bovine paratuberculosis. Vet. Pathol. 2005;42:579–588. doi: 10.1354/vp.42-5-579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lombard J.E. Epidemiology and economics of paratuberculosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2011;27:525–535. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wolf R., Barkema H.W., De Buck J., Slomp M., Flaig J., Haupstein D., Pickel C., Orsel K. High herd-level prevalence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Western Canadian dairy farms, based on environmental sampling. J. Dairy Sci. 2014;97:6250–6259. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Corbett C.S., Naqvi S.A., Bauman C.A., De Buck J., Orsel K., Uehlinger F., Kelton D.F., Barkema H.W. Prevalence of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infections in Canadian dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101:11218–11228. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tooker B., Burton J., Coussens P. Survival tactics of M. paratuberculosis in bovine macrophage cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2002;87:429–437. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2427(02)00065-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stokes R.W., Doxsee D. The receptor-mediated uptake, survival, replication, and drug sensitivity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within the macrophage-like cell line THP-1: A comparison with human monocyte-derived macrophages. Cell. Immunol. 1999;197:1–9. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1999.1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cirillo J.D. Entry mechanisms of mycobacteria. Front. Biosci. 2001;6:d737–d747. doi: 10.2741/A638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Underhill D.M., Ozinsky A. Phagocytosis of microbes: Complexity in action. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002;20:825–852. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.103001.114744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Woo S.-R., Czuprynski C.J. Tactics of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis for intracellular survival in mononuclear phagocytes. J. Vet. Sci. 2008;9:1–8. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2008.9.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kawasaki T., Kawai T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ferwerda G., Kullberg B.J., de Jong D.J., Girardin S.E., Langenberg D.M., van Crevel R., Ottenhoff T.H., Van der Meer J.W., Netea M.G. Mycobacterium paratuberculosis is recognized by Toll-like receptors and NOD2. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007;82:1011–1018. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0307147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Werling D., Hope J.C., Howard C.J., Jungi T.W. Differential production of cytokines, reactive oxygen and nitrogen by bovine macrophages and dendritic cells stimulated with Toll-like receptor agonists. Immunology. 2004;111:41–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.01781.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu X., Feng Z., Harris N.B., Cirillo J.D., Bercovier H., Barletta R.G. Identification of a secreted superoxide dismutase in Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001;202:233–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.MacMicking J., Xie Q.-w., Nathan C. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1997;15:323–350. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Miller B.H., Fratti R.A., Poschet J.F., Timmins G.S., Master S.S., Burgos M., Marletta M.A., Deretic V. Mycobacteria inhibit nitric oxide synthase recruitment to phagosomes during macrophage infection. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:2872–2878. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.5.2872-2878.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hostetter J., Huffman E., Byl K., Steadham E. Inducible nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivity in the granulomatous intestinal lesions of naturally occurring bovine Johne’s disease. Vet. Pathol. 2005;42:241–249. doi: 10.1354/vp.42-3-241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bainton D.F. The discovery of lysosomes. J. Cell Biol. 1981;91:66s–76s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.66s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vergne I., Chua J., Singh S.B., Deretic V. Cell biology of mycobacterium tuberculosis phagosome. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004;20:367–394. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.114015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sturgill-Koszycki S., Schlesinger P.H., Chakraborty P., Haddix P.L., Collins H.L., Fok A.K., Allen R.D., Gluck S.L., Heuser J., Russell D.G. Lack of acidification in Mycobacterium phagosomes produced by exclusion of the vesicular proton-ATPase. Science. 1994;263:678–681. doi: 10.1126/science.8303277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kuehnel M.P., Goethe R., Habermann A., Mueller E., Rohde M., Griffiths G., Valentin-Weigand P. Characterization of the intracellular survival of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis: Phagosomal pH and fusogenicity in J774 macrophages compared with other mycobacteria. Cell. Microbiol. 2001;3:551–566. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Woo S.R., Heintz J.A., Albrecht R., Barletta R.G., Czuprynski C.J. Life and death in bovine monocytes: The fate of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Microb. Pathog. 2007;43:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2007.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hostetter J.M., Steadham E.M., Haynes J.S., Bailey T.B., Cheville N.F. Cytokine effects on maturation of the phagosomes containing Mycobacteria avium subspecies paratuberculosis in J774 cells. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2002;34:127–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2002.tb00613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Buza J.J., Hikono H., Mori Y., Nagata R., Hirayama S., Aodon g., Bari A.M., Shu Y., Tsuji N.M., Momotani E. Neutralization of interleukin-10 significantly enhances gamma interferon expression in peripheral blood by stimulation with Johnin purified protein derivative and by infection with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in experimentally infected cattle with paratuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:2425–2428. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2425-2428.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Weiss D.J., Evanson O.A., de Souza C., Abrahamsen M.S. A critical role of interleukin-10 in the response of bovine macrophages to infection by Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2005;66:721–726. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Weiss D., Evanson O., Deng M., Abrahamsen M. Gene expression and antimicrobial activity of bovine macrophages in response to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Vet. Pathol. 2004;41:326–337. doi: 10.1354/vp.41-4-326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Forrellad M.A., Klepp L.I., Gioffre A., Sabio y Garcia J., Morbidoni H.R., de la Paz Santangelo M., Cataldi A.A., Bigi F. Virulence factors of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Virulence. 2013;4:3–66. doi: 10.4161/viru.22329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ghosh P., Steinberg H., Talaat A.M. Virulence and immunity orchestrated by the global gene regulator sigL in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2014;82:3066–3075. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00001-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Khalifeh M.S., Stabel J.R. Upregulation of transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10 in cows with clinical Johne’s disease. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2004;99:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sommer S., Pudrith C.B., Colvin C.J., Coussens P.M. Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis suppresses expression of IL-12p40 and iNOS genes induced by signalling through CD40 in bovine monocyte-derived macrophages. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2009;128:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.10.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Simutis F.J., Jones D.E., Hostetter J.M. Failure of antigen-stimulated gammadelta T cells and CD4+ T cells from sensitized cattle to upregulate nitric oxide and mycobactericidal activity of autologous Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis-infected macrophages. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2007;116:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bannantine J.P., Stabel J.R. Killing of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis within macrophages. BMC Microbiol. 2002;2:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-2-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Marino R., Capoferri R., Panelli S., Minozzi G., Strozzi F., Trevisi E., Snel G.G.M., Ajmone-Marsan P., Williams J.L. Johne’s disease in cattle: An in vitro model to study early response to infection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis using RNA-seq. Mol. Immunol. 2017;91:259–271. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hacker J., Blum-Oehler G., Mühldorfer I., Tschäpe H. Pathogenicity islands of virulent bacteria: Structure, function and impact on microbial evolution. Mol. Microbiol. 1997;23:1089–1097. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3101672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Falkow S. Molecular Koch’s postulates applied to bacterial pathogenicity—a personal recollection 15 years later. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;2:67–72. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Harris N.B., Feng Z., Liu X., Cirillo S.L., Cirillo J.D., Barletta R.G. Development of a transposon mutagenesis system for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999;175:21–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shin S.J., Wu C.W., Steinberg H., Talaat A.M. Identification of novel virulence determinants in Mycobacterium paratuberculosis by screening a library of insertional mutants. Infect. Immun. 2006;74:3825–3833. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01742-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sassetti C.M., Boyd D.H., Rubin E.J. Comprehensive identification of conditionally essential genes in mycobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:12712–12717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231275498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Altincicek B., Kollas A.K., Sanderbrand S., Wiesner J., Hintz M., Beck E., Jomaa H. GcpE is involved in the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:2411–2416. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.8.2411-2416.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wu C.W., Livesey M., Schmoller S.K., Manning E.J., Steinberg H., Davis W.C., Hamilton M.J., Talaat A.M. Invasion and persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis during early stages of Johne’s disease in calves. Infect. Immun. 2007;75:2110–2119. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01739-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wu C.W., Schmoller S.K., Bannantine J.P., Eckstein T.M., Inamine J.M., Livesey M., Albrecht R., Talaat A.M. A novel cell wall lipopeptide is important for biofilm formation and pathogenicity of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Microb. Pathog. 2009;46:222–230. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ojha A.K., Baughn A.D., Sambandan D., Hsu T., Trivelli X., Guerardel Y., Alahari A., Kremer L., Jacobs W.R., Hatfull G.F. Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis biofilms containing free mycolic acids and harbouring drug-tolerant bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;69:164–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06274.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Recht J., Kolter R. Glycopeptidolipid acetylation affects sliding motility and biofilm formation in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:5718–5724. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.19.5718-5724.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yamazaki Y., Danelishvili L., Wu M., Macnab M., Bermudez L.E. Mycobacterium avium genes associated with the ability to form a biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:819–825. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.819-825.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Billman-Jacobe H., McConville M.J., Haites R.E., Kovacevic S., Coppel R.L. Identification of a peptide synthetase involved in the biosynthesis of glycopeptidolipids of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol. Microbiol. 1999;33:1244–1253. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Falkinham III J.O. Growth in catheter biofilms and antibiotic resistance of Mycobacterium avium. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007;56:250–254. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46935-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gaßel M., Altendorf K. Analysis of KdpC of the K+-transporting KdpFABC complex of Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001;268:1772–1781. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Onwueme K.C., Ferreras J.A., Buglino J., Lima C.D., Quadri L.E. Mycobacterial polyketide-associated proteins are acyltransferases: Proof of principle withMycobacterium tuberculosisPapA5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:4608–4613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306928101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Nigou J., Besra G.S. Characterization and regulation of inositol monophosphatase activity in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biochem. J. 2002;361:385–390. doi: 10.1042/bj3610385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Li L., Bannantine J.P., Zhang Q., Amonsin A., May B.J., Alt D., Banerji N., Kanjilal S., Kapur V. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:12344–12349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505662102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Settles E.W., Kink J.A., Talaat A. Attenuated strains of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis as vaccine candidates against Johne’s disease. Vaccine. 2014;32:2062–2069. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Meissner T., Eckelt E., Basler T., Meens J., Heinzmann J., Suwandi A., Oelemann W.M., Trenkamp S., Holst O., Weiss S., et al. The Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis specific mptD gene is required for maintenance of the metabolic homeostasis necessary for full virulence in mouse infections. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2014;4:110. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Khan M.Z., Bhaskar A., Upadhyay S., Kumari P., Rajmani R.S., Jain P., Singh A., Kumar D., Bhavesh N.S., Nandicoori V.K. Protein kinase G confers survival advantage to Mycobacterium tuberculosis during latency-like conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:16093–16108. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.797563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bach H., Richard-Greenblatt M., Bach E., Chaffer M., Lai W., Keefe G., Begg D.J. Protein Kinase G Induces an Immune Response in Cows Exposed to Mycobacterium avium Subsp. paratuberculosis. BioMed Res. Int. 2018;2018:1450828. doi: 10.1155/2018/1450828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Purcell E.B., Tamayo R. Cyclic diguanylate signaling in Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016;40:753–773. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hall C.L., Lee V.T. Cyclic-di-GMP regulation of virulence in bacterial pathogens. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA. 2018;9 doi: 10.1002/wrna.1454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Phillips I.L., Everman J.L., Bermudez L.E., Danelishvili L. Acanthamoeba castellanii as a Screening Tool for Mycobacterium avium Subspecies paratuberculosis Virulence Factors with Relevance in Macrophage Infection. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1571. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Parish T., Liu J., Nikaido H., Stoker N.G. A Mycobacterium smegmatis mutant with a defective inositol monophosphate phosphatase gene homolog has altered cell envelope permeability. J. Bacteriol. 1997;179:7827–7833. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.24.7827-7833.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.McAdam R.A., Quan S., Smith D.A., Bardarov S., Betts J.C., Cook F.C., Hooker E.U., Lewis A.P., Woollard P., Everett M.J., et al. Characterization of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv transposon library reveals insertions in 351 ORFs and mutants with altered virulence. Microbiology. 2002;148:2975–2986. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-10-2975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wu C.W., Glasner J., Collins M., Naser S., Talaat A.M. Whole-genome plasticity among Mycobacterium avium subspecies: Insights from comparative genomic hybridizations. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188:711–723. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.2.711-723.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Rathnaiah G., Zinniel D.K., Bannantine J.P., Stabel J.R., Grohn Y.T., Collins M.T., Barletta R.G. Pathogenesis, Molecular Genetics, and Genomics of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, the Etiologic Agent of Johne’s Disease. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017;4:187. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lee W., VanderVen B.C., Fahey R.J., Russell D.G. Intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis exploits host-derived fatty acids to limit metabolic stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:6788–6800. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.445056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ghosh P., Wu C.W., Talaat A.M. Key role for the alternative sigma factor, SigH, in the intracellular life of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis during macrophage stress. Infect. Immun. 2013;81:2242–2257. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01273-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wolff K.A., de la Pena A.H., Nguyen H.T., Pham T.H., Amzel L.M., Gabelli S.B., Nguyen L. A redox regulatory system critical for mycobacterial survival in macrophages and biofilm development. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004839. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Walburger A., Koul A., Ferrari G., Nguyen L., Prescianotto-Baschong C., Huygen K., Klebl B., Thompson C., Bacher G., Pieters J. Protein kinase G from pathogenic mycobacteria promotes survival within macrophages. Science. 2004;304:1800–1804. doi: 10.1126/science.1099384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Pradhan G., Shrivastva R., Mukhopadhyay S. Mycobacterial PknG Targets the Rab7l1 Signaling Pathway To Inhibit Phagosome-Lysosome Fusion. J. Immunol. 2018;201:1421–1433. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Johnson R.M., McDonough K.A. Cyclic nucleotide signaling in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: An expanding repertoire. Pathog. Dis. 2018;76 doi: 10.1093/femspd/fty048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Römling U., Galperin M.Y., Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: The first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013;77:1–52. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00043-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bustamante J.P., Radusky L., Boechi L., Estrin D.A., Ten Have A., Marti M.A. Evolutionary and Functional Relationships in the Truncated Hemoglobin Family. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2016;12:e1004701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pawaria S., Lama A., Raje M., Dikshit K.L. Responses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis hemoglobin promoters to in vitro and in vivo growth conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:3512–3522. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02663-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mainardi J.L., Villet R., Bugg T.D., Mayer C., Arthur M. Evolution of peptidoglycan biosynthesis under the selective pressure of antibiotics in Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008;32:386–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sabe V.T., Tolufashe G.F., Ibeji C.U., Maseko S.B., Govender T., Maguire G.E., Lamichhane G., Honarparvar B., Kruger H.G. Identification of potent L, D-transpeptidase 5 inhibitors for Mycobacterium tuberculosis as potential anti-TB leads: Virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Model. 2019;25:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00894-019-4196-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kumar P., Chauhan V., Silva J.R.A., Lameira J., d’Andrea F.B., Li S.-G., Ginell S.L., Freundlich J.S., Alves C.N., Bailey S. Mycobacterium abscessus l, d-transpeptidases are susceptible to inactivation by carbapenems and cephalosporins but not penicillins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00866-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00866-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cole S., Brosch R., Parkhill J., Garnier T., Churcher C., Harris D., Gordon S., Eiglmeier K., Gas S., Barry C.r. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998;396:190. doi: 10.1038/24206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Cole S.T. Comparative and functional genomics of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complexaa. This review is based on the 2002 Marjory Stephenson Prize Lecture delivered by the author at the 150th Meeting of the Society for General Microbiology, 9 April 2002. Microbiology. 2002;148:2919–2928. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-10-2919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Akhter Y., Ehebauer M.T., Mukhopadhyay S., Hasnain S.E. The PE/PPE multigene family codes for virulence factors and is a possible source of mycobacterial antigenic variation: Perhaps more? Biochimie. 2012;94:110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2011.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Garcia-Pelayo M.C., Caimi K.C., Inwald J.K., Hinds J., Bigi F., Romano M.I., van Soolingen D., Hewinson R.G., Cataldi A., Gordon S.V. Microarray analysis of Mycobacterium microti reveals deletion of genes encoding PE-PPE proteins and ESAT-6 family antigens. Tuberculosis. 2004;84:159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2003.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zheng H., Lu L., Wang B., Pu S., Zhang X., Zhu G., Shi W., Zhang L., Wang H., Wang S., et al. Genetic basis of virulence attenuation revealed by comparative genomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Ra versus H37Rv. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Basu S., Pathak S.K., Banerjee A., Pathak S., Bhattacharyya A., Yang Z., Talarico S., Kundu M., Basu J. Execution of macrophage apoptosis by PE_PGRS33 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by Toll-like receptor 2-dependent release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:1039–1050. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604379200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Brennan M.J., Delogu G., Chen Y., Bardarov S., Kriakov J., Alavi M., Jacobs W.R., Jr. Evidence that mycobacterial PE_PGRS proteins are cell surface constituents that influence interactions with other cells. Infect. Immun. 2001;69:7326–7333. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7326-7333.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Prakash P., Yellaboina S., Ranjan A., Hasnain S.E. Computational prediction and experimental verification of novel IdeR binding sites in the upstream sequences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis open reading frames. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2161–2166. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Mohareer K., Tundup S., Hasnain S.E. Transcriptional regulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE/PPE genes: A molecular switch to virulence? J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011;21:97–109. doi: 10.1159/000329489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Bannantine J.P., Bermudez L.E. No holes barred: Invasion of the intestinal mucosa by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2013;81:3960–3965. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00575-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Fleischmann R.D., Alland D., Eisen J.A., Carpenter L., White O., Peterson J., DeBoy R., Dodson R., Gwinn M., Haft D., et al. Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains. J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:5479–5490. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.19.5479-5490.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hahn M.Y., Raman S., Anaya M., Husson R.N. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis extracytoplasmic-function sigma factor SigL regulates polyketide synthases and secreted or membrane proteins and is required for virulence. J. Bacteriol. 2005;187:7062–7071. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.20.7062-7071.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Wu C.W., Schmoller S.K., Shin S.J., Talaat A.M. Defining the stressome of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in vitro and in naturally infected cows. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:7877–7886. doi: 10.1128/JB.00780-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Pribylova R., Kralik P., Donnelly N., Matiasovic J., Pavlik I. Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis and the expression of selected virulence and pathogenesis genes in response to 6 c, 65 c and ph 2.0. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011;42:807–817. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Bannantine J.P., Wu C.-w., Hsu C., Zhou S., Schwartz D.C., Bayles D.O., Paustian M.L., Alt D.P., Sreevatsan S., Kapur V. Genome sequencing of ovine isolates of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis offers insights into host association. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:1–14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Thibault V.C., Grayon M., Boschiroli M.L., Willery E., Allix-Beguec C., Stevenson K., Biet F., Supply P. Combined multilocus short-sequence-repeat and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem-repeat typing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:4091–4094. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01349-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the manuscript text.


Articles from Microorganisms are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES