ABSTRACT
Viruses are ubiquitous in the oceans. Even in the deep sediments of the Mariana Trench, viruses have high productivity. However, little is known about their species composition and survival strategies in that environment. Here, we uncovered novel viral communities (3,206 viral scaffolds) in the upper slope sediments of the Mariana Trench via metagenomic analysis of 15 sediment samples. Most (99%) of the viral scaffolds lack known viral homologs, and ca. 59% of the high-quality viral genomes (total of 111 with completeness of >90%) represent novel genera, including some Phycodnaviridae and jumbo phages. These viruses contain various auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs) potentially involved in organic carbon degradation, inorganic carbon fixation, denitrification, and assimilatory sulfate reduction, etc. This study provides novel insight into the almost unknown benthic viral communities in the Mariana Trench.
IMPORTANCE The Mariana Trench harbors a substantial number of infective viral particles. However, very little is known about the identity, survival strategy, and potential functions of viruses in the trench sediments. Here, through metagenomic analysis, unusual benthic viral communities with high diversity and novelty were discovered. Among them, 59% of the viruses with a genome completeness of >90% represent novel genera. Various auxiliary metabolic genes carried by these viruses reflect the potential adaptive characteristics of viruses in this extreme environment and the biogeochemical cycles that they may participate in. This study gives us a deeper understanding of the peculiarities of viral communities in deep-sea/hadal sediments.
KEYWORDS: Mariana Trench sediment, metagenome, viral community, auxiliary metabolic gene
INTRODUCTION
The hadal zone, or hadopelagic zone, is the region of the ocean deeper than 6,000 m, lying within oceanic trenches (1). Hadal trenches account for the deepest 45% of the oceanic depth range (1). These places are characterized by their harsh environmental conditions, with high hydrostatic pressures (up to 1.1 tonnes per cm2) and near-freezing low temperatures (2, 3). Meanwhile, hadal trenches, like traps, capture various substances and contain diverse novel prokaryotes with special metabolic characteristics (4–6). For example, numerous microorganisms that can consume refractory organic matter (e.g., Oleibacter, Alcanivorax, and Chloroflexi) or have chemoautotrophic functions (e.g., Thaumarchaeota, Nitrospirae, and Nitrospinae) become dominant groups and form unique clades in hadal environments (2, 5, 7, 8). As well as being affected by the shaping effect of environmental factors, microbial communities are also regulated by viral infections (9, 10). This is especially so in environments such as deep-sea sediments where other microbial predators (e.g., zooplankton) are somewhat restricted (11, 12). Here, the regulatory roles of viruses are far more significant. For example, the fraction of prokaryote mortality due to viral lysis increases with water depth, with reported proportions of ca. 16% in coastal sediments, ca. 64% in mesopelagic sediments, and ca. 89% in deep-sea sediments at depths of >1,000 m (12). Most recently, it was reported that viral infection is also an important factor determining microbial mortality in the hadal sediments (13). Moreover, many viruses contain auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs), and they can remodel the metabolism of host cells during infection. Indeed, many bacteria in the ocean are phage-infected hosts, termed virocells, and they are in a metabolically distinct state (14). However, so far, little is known about these benthic viruses in terms of their identity, their survival strategy, and whether they contain novel auxiliary metabolic genes in this extreme environment.
The Mariana Trench is located in the Northwest Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1a) (15). Despite the extreme environmental conditions that exist in the Mariana Trench, there is still a high prokaryotic biomass (approximately 2.01 μg C g−1) and activity in the sediments of this region (10). Concurrently, viruses, which are major predators of microbial communities, also have high abundances (approximately 107 virus-like particles [VLPs] per g or cm3 sediments), with viral production of ca. 106 viruses h−1 g−1 in the sediments of this trench (9, 10, 13, 16–18). Multiple factors can affect the structure and function of virus communities. These include physicochemical conditions (such as nutrients, light, temperature, and salinity) and host community characteristics (19, 20). In view of the extreme environmental conditions and the uniqueness of the host microbial communities inhabiting the Mariana Trench sediments (MTSs) (5–7, 21), we speculated that the virus communities there might have some unusual characteristics, which will enhance our understanding of marine viruses.
During two cruises in 2016 and 2017, a total of 15 surface sediment samples were collected from the upper slopes of the Mariana Trench at depths of 5,481 to 6,707 m (see Table S1 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Here, novel viral communities were identified, and 111 high-quality benthic viral genomes were obtained. Of particular interest was that numerous novel viruses form independent branches throughout the phylogenetic trees. In addition, many auxiliary metabolic genes that assist in organic carbon degradation, inorganic carbon fixation, denitrification, and assimilatory sulfate reduction were discovered in the benthic viral metagenomes of the Mariana Trench.
RESULTS
Environmental parameters and overview of the benthic viromes.
Fifteen sediment samples were collected from eight different locations at various depths, mainly in the upper area of the north and south slopes of the Mariana Trench (5,481 to 6,707 m) (Fig. 1; see also Table S1 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). As for the environmental parameters of the sediments (11 samples available) in this study, no significant variation was observed among different sampling sites or sediment depths, except for the D147 site, with significantly lower ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N) levels (P < 0.05 by a permutation test) (see Fig. S1a in the supplemental material). Compared with the adjacent abyssal plain sediments (mainly in the Northwestern Pacific), the upper slope sediments of the Mariana Trench of this study are a relatively oligotrophic environment with significantly lower levels of nutrients (such as total carbon [TC] and total nitrogen [TN]) (P < 0.001) (Fig. S1b and c; see also Table S2 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Of all the sediment samples, the δ13C values ranged from −26.41‰ to −22.81‰ (average, −24.14‰), and the δ15N values ranged from 4.05‰ to 7.67‰ (average, 6.29‰), both suggesting that the organic matter therein was mainly derived from phytoplankton (22).
The mean abundances of viruses and prokaryotes in the sediments ranged from 1.72 × 107 to 4.11 × 108 virus-like particles (VLPs)/g (dry weight) and 1.22 × 107 to 1.75 × 108 cells/g (dry weight), respectively (Fig. 1b). The abundance of benthic viruses is comparable to that in the bottom sediments of the Mariana Trench (10,325 m and 10,901 m) and the adjacent abyssal plain (10, 16) but relatively lower than those in many bathypelagic or abyssopelagic sediments, which are up to 109 to 1010 VLPs/g (9, 23–25). However, the virus-to-prokaryote ratio (VPR) values (from 0.88 to 7.09) in the Mariana Trench sediments (Fig. 1c) were similar to those in bathypelagic or abyssopelagic sediments, as the prokaryotic abundance in the Mariana Trench sediments is also relatively low (12, 23, 25–27). Although the abundances of viruses (F = 17.87; P < 0.001) and prokaryotes (F = 9.194; P < 0.001) varied significantly at different sampling sites, there was a significant positive correlation between virus and prokaryote (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.79; P < 0.001) (Fig. 1d).
Through metagenomic sequencing and bioinformatic analysis of 15 sediment metagenomes of the Mariana Trench, a data set named MTS-VSs (Mariana Trench sediment viral scaffolds) was generated. This data set consists of 3,206 viral scaffolds (each scaffold is ≥5 kb, added up to ca. 40 Mbp of DNA sequences) and 61,810 open reading frames (ORFs). With regard to the viral scaffolds, in this data set, 1,012 were >10 kb, 3 were >100 kb, and 1 (the longest) was 217,265 bp (see Table S1 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Each scaffold represents a viral cluster based on shared gene content at the subfamily/genus level. The number of these viral scaffolds in every sediment metagenome ranged from 1,807 to 2,666 (Fig. 2a; see also Table S1 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). The GC content of each viral scaffold ranged from 27.40% to 70.98% (mean, 50.07%) (Fig. 2b). In the MTS-VSs data set, 111 viral scaffolds were predicted as high-quality viral genomes (>90% completeness), 82 of which were complete viral genomes (100% completeness and zero contamination) (see Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Among these high-quality viral genomes, most (103 out of 111) were 30 to 70 kb in length, and the longest and shortest ones were ∼217 kb and ∼7 kb in length, respectively (Fig. 2c).
Distribution of viral and prokaryotic communities in the trench sediments.
The host prokaryotic community structures in the trench slope sediments were also analyzed based on their metagenomic sequences. Among them, Proteobacteria (mainly Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria), Thaumarchaeota, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, and Nitrospirae were the most dominant groups at the phylum level (Fig. S2a). In addition, at the genus level, Woeseia, Gemmatimonas, Nitrosopumilus, “Candidatus Entotheonella,” Phycisphaera, Pseudomonas, Bradyrhizobium, Nitrospina, Tistlia, and “Candidatus Nitrosoarchaeum” were the most abundant prokaryotes (Fig. S2b).
The virus communities (Fig. S3a) displayed variation patterns in alpha diversity indexes (Chao1 and Simpson) similar to those of the prokaryotes (Fig. S3b). At some sites (such as sites B, D114, D119, and D144), the viruses exhibited lower community diversity and higher richness with an increase in sediment depth (Fig. S3a). No significant spatial patterns in the prokaryote or virus community structure were observed by principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis despite that the P values by ADONIS (permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices) and ANOSIM (analysis of similarity) were <0.05 (Fig. S3c to f). In addition, distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) showed that the benthic viral communities were most affected by NO3-N (explains, 31.01%; P < 0.05) and latitude (explains, 22.42%; P < 0.05) (Fig. S3g).
Novelty of the genetic profile of MTS viruses.
The vast majority of the viruses in the upper slope sediments of the Mariana Trench were previously unknown. Specifically, DNA sequence comparisons showed that 99.28% (3,183 out of 3,206) of the viral scaffolds were novel as they did not have any homolog in the Integrated Microbial Genome/Virus (IMG/VR) 3.0 database (see Table S4 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Even among the remaining 23 viral scaffolds with homologs, 22 were uncultured marine or sediment viruses (see Table S4 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). In addition, 93.08% of all the viral scaffolds (i.e., 2,984 out of 3,206) (see Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6) could not be determined with a clear taxonomic identification. Among others, 7 viral scaffolds were from the nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs), containing members of the Ascoviridae, Phycodnaviridae, and Marseilleviridae affiliated with the Nucleocytoviricota phylum (28, 29) (Fig. 2d; see also Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6); 215 viral scaffolds were from members of the Uroviricota phylum (Caudovirales order) (Fig. 2d).
Based on the genomic similarity (SG score) matrix, a proteomic tree containing 103 high-quality viral scaffolds and 230 reference viral genomes was constructed, which shows a long evolutionary distance between the branches of the MTS viral genomes and the reference viral genomes (Fig. 3). Using a threshold of an SG of >0.15, the best threshold for genus-level clustering of the viral genomic operational taxonomic units (gOTUs) (30), the 103 high-quality viral scaffolds were assigned to 98 different viral gOTUs. Among these, 62 gOTUs could not be clustered with any other reference viral genome and were therefore determined to be novel viral genera (Fig. 3). In addition, the proteomic tree of eukaryotic viruses (see Fig. S11 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6) showed that the other 8 high-quality viral scaffolds were assigned to 7 different viral gOTUs. However, each viral gOTU contained reference genomes of known viruses infecting eukaryotic algae and chordates.
Further analysis at the gene level revealed that only 8,807 (14.25%) and 27,706 (44.82%) of the viral genes (total of 61,810) in the MTS-VSs data set had homologs in the RefSeq virus protein database (Fig. 2e) and the IMG/VR v3.0 (proteins) database (see Table S5 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), respectively. Among the homologs in the RefSeq virus protein database, 94.60% were from the Caudovirales order (dominated by Siphoviridae, Myoviridae, and Podoviridae) of the Uroviricota phylum, and 3.90% were from Nucleocytoviricota (Fig. 2e). Phylogenetic analysis based on the phage terminase large-subunit domain gene (terL) also showed that the MTS viruses formed numerous independent and relatively long branches throughout the phylogenetic tree (Fig. S4), indicating their high diversity and novelty.
Meanwhile, 374 viral scaffolds were predicted to be potential proviruses (see Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), and 181 different ORFs were annotated as virus-encoded lysogenic infection markers (i.e., integrase, invertase, serine recombinase, and CI/Cro repressor) (see Table S6 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6).
Functional content and AMGs of the MTS viruses.
The predicted ORFs of the MTS viral scaffolds were annotated by searching against the clusters of orthologous groups (COG) in the eggNOG database. Only 16.69% of the viral ORFs (10,315 out of 61,810) were assigned to certain COG classes (see Table S5 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), among which as many as 42.39% (4,373 out of 10,315) were also found to belong to the “function unknown” class (Fig. S5a and b; see also Table S5 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). The ORFs with annotated functions were mainly assigned to “replication, recombination, and repair”; “transcription”; “translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis”; and “cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis,” containing viral structural proteins, all of which are known to be critical for virus reproduction and morphogenesis (Fig. S5a and b).
Many viral auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs) were also discovered by viral protein annotation using VIBRANT and DRAM-v software with manual curation. These AMGs were involved in a variety of metabolic pathways, such as carbohydrate metabolism, inorganic carbon fixation, nitrogen metabolism, sulfur metabolism, and cofactor biosynthesis (see Table S8 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). In silico, 22 AMGs had strongly supported (>98% confidence) structure predictions as enzymes participating in carbon, nitrogen, sulfur metabolism, and cofactor biosynthesis, and ca. 68% of them contained the conserved functional domains (see Table S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6).
Specifically, half (11 out of 22) of these high-confidence viral AMGs were involved in carbon metabolism. Among them, seven viral AMGs were involved in organic carbon degradation, including the genes of glycoside hydrolases (GH6, GH9, GH39, and GH87), polysaccharide lyase (PL1), and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM23) (Fig. 4a; see also Table S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Viral GH6, GH9, and GH39 family proteins were homologous to cellulases; the viral PL1 protein was homologous to pectate lyase. These viral carbohydrate metabolism enzymes might contribute to the degradation of polysaccharides in deep-sea sediments. Besides, there was a viral AMG encoding UDP-glucose 4-epimerase involved in galactose metabolism (Fig. 4; see also Table S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), likely contributing to energy production. Surprisingly, we also discovered two viral AMGs encoding pyruvate phosphate dikinase (PPDK) and one viral AMG encoding acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), which potentially participate in inorganic carbon fixation (Fig. 4; see also Table S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). PPDK participates in the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) and dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate (DC/4-HB) cycles, and ACC participates in the 3-hydroxypropionate (3-HP) or 3-HP/4-hydroxybutyrate (4-HB) cycles (31), which are the main pathways for dark carbon fixation by deep-sea microbes (31).
Moreover, there is a viral AMG (nosZ gene) assisting in nitrogen metabolism (see Table S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). The nosZ gene encodes nitrous oxide reductase (NosZ) catalyzing the final step of denitrification, i.e., the reduction of nitrous oxide to dinitrogen (32). Notably, in the nosZ-containing circular viral genome, 17 out of 25 annotated proteins (total of 130 viral proteins) were homologous to their counterparts from the archeal phylum Thaumarchaeota, including viral NosZ and an ammonium transporter (Fig. 5a, b, and d; see also Table S5 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6).
Meanwhile, six viral AMGs involved in sulfur metabolism were also identified (see Table S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Among them, five AMGs (cysH I to V) encoding phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate reductases (CysH) (Fig. 6) participate in assimilatory sulfate reduction (33). The remaining one was a viral cysK gene encoding cysteine synthase (CysK), which catalyzes the synthesis of l-cysteine from sulfide as well as the reverse reaction.
The viral AMGs usually come from the host through horizontal gene transfer (34). In order to predict the potential source of these viral AMGs, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis of these AMGs and reference host genes (35–37). The AMGs involved in the degradation of organic carbon (mainly cellulose and pectin) were likely transferred horizontally from Gemmatimonadetes, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria (Fig. S6). The viral PPDK gene potentially involved in carbon fixation might be transferred from Thaumarchaeota and Alphaproteobacteria (Fig. S7). The viral nosZ genes involved in nitrogen metabolism might be transferred from Thaumarchaeota (Fig. 5a and b). As for the AMGs involved in sulfur metabolism, viral cysH genes (I to V) were potentially transferred from Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Alphaproteobacteria (Fig. 6b), while the viral cysK gene might be transferred from Thaumarchaeota (Fig. S8c).
As for the viral AMGs involved in cofactor biosynthesis (see Table S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), four viral cobS genes encoding cobaltochelatases (CobS) participate in cobalamin (vitamin B12) biosynthesis, one of which was present in the longest complete viral genome (∼217 kb), i.e., the genome of a jumbo phage. In the genome of this jumbo phage, there were 263 functionally unknown genes, 4 DNA/RNA polymerase genes, 42 tRNA genes, and 28 structural protein genes (Fig. S9).
Prediction of viral hosts.
Only 6.11% of the viral scaffolds (196 out of 3,206) could be assigned to their putative hosts at the phylum level (14 phyla) and the genus level (134 genera). The former were dominated by Proteobacteria (mainly Gammaproteobacteria), Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes, whereas the latter were dominated by Pseudomonas, Salinispora, Geobacter, Bacillus, Bradyrhizobium, Magnetospirillum, and Vibrio (Fig. 7a; see also Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Notably, three viral scaffolds potentially infecting Firmicutes (Clostridium) species, Nitrospirae (Thermodesulfovibrio) species, and Bacteroidetes (Aquimarina) species were present in all the samples with the highest abundances (Fig. 7a). In addition, six viral scaffolds were predicted to be Salinispora (Actinobacteria) phages, which were rarely reported in the past (38) (see Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6).
DISCUSSION
At present (i.e., as of November 2021), more than 3.11 million viral sequences have been stored in GenBank. However, despite this, the vast majority of the benthic virus communities from the Mariana Trench sediments in this study lack any homologs in the current databases and are considered unknown novel viruses. Only 6.92% of the MTS viral scaffolds can be annotated with putative taxonomic identifications (see Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), and more than half of the MTS viral proteins do not have any homologs among all previously identified viral proteins. In addition, these novel viruses have very high diversity, as reflected by the numerous independent branches composed of only the MTS viruses throughout the phylogenetic trees (Fig. 3; see also Fig. S4 in the supplemental material).
We obtained a total of 111 high-quality metagenome-assembled viral genomes. After removing the potential eukaryotic virus genomes, more than 63% of the viral genera represented by these high-quality viral genomes were novel (Fig. 3). Among these novel viral genera, there was a jumbo phage whose genome was ∼217 kb in length (39) (gOTU13 in Fig. 3). A total of 79% of the ORFs in the genome of this jumbo phage were functionally unknown. This virus contains many more genes encoding DNA/RNA polymerase, tRNA, and structural proteins than other viruses (Fig. S9), which is a common feature of jumbo phages (40).
The order Caudovirales is the most populous virus order and accounts for approximately 30% of all recognized viral species (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV], March 2021, https://talk.ictvonline.org/). A similar phenomenon was also observed in this study (Fig. 2d and e) and many other deep-sea sediments (41–44). Besides Caudovirales, some MTS viral scaffolds and genes were taxonomically assigned to NCLDVs, which include the families Phycodnaviridae, Marseilleviridae, Ascoviridae, and Mimiviridae (Fig. 2d and e). In the upper slope sediments of the Mariana Trench, the most abundant NCLDV scaffolds and genes were from Phycodnaviridae viruses affecting eukaryotic phytoplankton (45) (Fig. 2d and e). We also assembled two complete viral genomes of Phycodnaviridae affiliated with the same genus (see Fig. S11 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), which contains a pelagophyte virus affecting Aureococcus anophagefferens (46). In fact, the discovery of Phycodnaviridae viruses in the sediments of the Mariana Trench is not unusual. The sequences of eukaryotic algal viruses have also been detected in the Baltic Sea subseafloor sediments (47), the sediments of Loki’s Castle hydrothermal vent (∼3,200 m below sea level) in the mid-Atlantic Ocean (29), and the abyssopelagic Yap Trench sediments (48). The presence of phytoplankton viruses might be explained if viruses cosink with eukaryotic phytoplankton from the upper water column via the sinking mechanism of the biological pump (47, 49). This speculation can be further verified by the dominance of phytoplankton-derived organic carbon (4) and the presence of diverse phytoplankton genes (50) in the Mariana Trench sediments and hadal seawater, respectively. We must acknowledge that it was difficult to accurately quantify how many of the identified viral genomes were affiliated with allochthonous or autochthonous viruses. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that even as allochthonous viruses in deep-sea sediments, some members may have the potential to infect their susceptible hosts, as they might maintain their activities in the deep ocean (51).
Based on the results of viral host prediction, we speculate that many benthic viruses in the Mariana Trench are indigenous predators of the prokaryotic groups dwelling in the deep sediments, such as Salinispora (52), Bradyrhizobium (53), Nitrospira (53), and Woeseia (54) (see Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Typically, six MTS phages were predicted to infect Salinispora. Salinispora species are globally distributed in marine sediments (52), whereas there has never been any specific information about their phages. Here, we also obtained two Salinispora phage genomes with a completeness of >50%; however, since 80% of their ORFs are functionally unknown (see Fig. S10 and Table S7 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), their potential life characteristics are difficult to predict. This highlights the absolute importance of virus isolation and cultivation from the sediments of the Mariana Trench in the future.
Lysogeny is prevalent in approximately half of bacteria in nature (55), and 374 viral scaffolds were predicted as proviruses to infect the dominant bacteria in this study (see Table S3 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). As reported previously, prophages can be protected from decay by lysogeny (55) and likely enhance the survival and competitiveness of bacterial hosts by assisting host metabolism based on the expression of some auxiliary metabolic genes carried by prophages (56) and the prevention of lysogens from subsequent phage infection (57). Thus, in harsh environments, lysogeny might be an effective environmental adaptive mechanism of viruses, contributing to the long-term coexistence of viruses and their hosts in the Mariana Trench sediments.
It has been reported that some of the viral AMGs are expressed during infection, thereby participating in host metabolism and driving biogeochemical cycling in different environments (58). For example, the psbA and psbD genes in cyanophage genomes can assist with the photosynthesis of their hosts (34). Various auxiliary genes encoding carbohydrate-active enzymes existing in viruses might assist their host in polysaccharide degradation in mangrove sediments (37). Moreover, six AMGs associated with nitrification, nitrate reduction, denitrification, and nitrite transport have been identified in virioplankton metagenomes across the minimum-oxygen zones of the Eastern Tropical South Pacific, and they potentially modulate nitrogen metabolism processes (59). In addition, AMGs involved in sulfur metabolisms, such as sulfur oxidation (60, 61), sulfate reduction (44), and sulfite reduction (62), were also identified in widespread marine viruses. Here, we also observed various viral AMGs that might participate in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur metabolism in the upper slope sediments of the Mariana Trench. Most of these viral AMGs were speculated to encode functionally active enzymes, as their protein products contained high-confidence structure models and the key functional domains.
The Mariana Trench is like a trap for capturing organic matter (4). Similar to a previous report (4), in this study, we also revealed that the organic matter in the upper slope sediments of the Mariana Trench might be primarily sourced from phytoplankton (22) (see Table S1 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). Glycosides and polysaccharides are among the main components of phytoplankton-derived carbohydrates (4, 63). Interestingly, viral AMGs encoding glycoside hydrolases (GH6, GH9, GH39, and GH87) and a polysaccharide lyase (PL1) that may assist in the degradation of algal cellulose and pectin were observed in the sediments of the Mariana Trench. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that these viral AMGs are likely transferred horizontally from the host bacteria of Proteobacteria (Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria) and Gemmatimonadetes (Fig. S6), and some strains of these bacterial groups found in hadal trenches had the potential to degrade cellulose (64, 65). We speculate that in order to better adapt to the trench sediment environment, the viruses may assist their hosts with the degradation of phytoplankton-derived organic matter during the infection process in the extreme benthic environment and thus provide energy for their own reproduction. Meanwhile, the increased prevalence of carbohydrate metabolic genes among viruses is likely due to the increased prevalence of these genes in host genomes in the Mariana Trench sediments.
Except for the viral AMGs involved in organic matter degradation, some viral AMGs potentially participating in dark carbon fixation were also discovered. In fact, autotrophic carbon fixation is an important way for microorganisms to obtain energy in the deep-sea environment (31, 66). As reported previously, dark chemoautotrophy rates range from 0.03 to 10.37 μmol C m−3 day−1 in the North Atlantic (67), and the chemoautotrophy in the dark ocean amounts to 15 to 53% of the export-production of phytoplankton (68). Here, the functional genes (e.g., PPDK and ACC) in viral genomes potentially participating in the main pathways (rTCA, DC/4-HB, 3-HP, and 3-HP/4-HB cycles) (31) of inorganic carbon fixation were discovered, and structural prediction suggests that the encoded products PPDK and ACC are functionally active (Fig. 4b). To the best of our knowledge, a viral AMG encoding ACC has never been reported in marine viruses. It is worth mentioning that although the PPDK and ACC proteins are not the key enzymes in carbon fixation pathways, we cannot rule out that they may participate in the dark carbon fixation process to improve the energy metabolic efficiency of their hosts. This hypothesis needs to be further verified in the future and may represent a previously unknown survival strategy for viriobenthos in deep sediments.
The MTS viruses also contained an AMG involved in denitrification (see Table S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6). In detail, the circular viral genome of “VIRSorter_k141_16118572_length_105477_cov_18_9918-circular-cat_2” contains a nosZ gene potentially participating in the reduction of N2O to N2. An ammonium transporter gene was also present in this viral genome (Fig. 5d). Notably, 68% of the annotated proteins of this viral scaffold were homologous to their counterparts in the archaeal phylum Thaumarchaeota, including these two nitrogen metabolic genes (Fig. 5a and b; see also Table S5 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6), which indicates that they were likely transferred from Thaumarchaeota. Indeed, the phylum Thaumarchaeota is the most dominant archaeal group in the sediments of the Mariana Trench (Fig. S2a). The distinctive feature of Thaumarchaeota regarding function is their capability for ammonium oxidation (69) and denitrification (i.e., converting NO to N2O) (70). As mentioned above, the nosZ gene can participate in the reduction of N2O to N2. Viruses containing the nosZ gene have the potential to participate in the denitrification process in the sediments of the Mariana Trench.
In addition, various auxiliary sulfur metabolic genes have recently been discovered in viral genomes (61). Here, viral cysH and cysK genes were discovered in the sediments of the Mariana Trench (Fig. 6 and Fig. S8). Among them, the CysH enzyme can participate in assimilatory sulfate reduction, which is necessary for the synthesis of cysteine and methionine (33, 71). Methionine is the substrate for the bacterial biosynthesis of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) (72), which has the highest concentration in the Mariana Trench sediments at a bathymetric depth of ∼6,000 m to protect bacteria against the extremely high hydrostatic pressure (6). Whether the viruses will assist the host in adapting to the high-hydrostatic-pressure environment in the Mariana Trench requires more in-depth studies in this area in the future.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that we did not perform prior virion separation from the Mariana Trench sediments for viromic analysis in this study. Considering that the recovery rate of virus particles separated from sediments is usually low and virion separation will usually neglect those viruses that are in the lysogenic cycle (either integrated into the host genome or as a plasmid), tightly attached to large particles, and those with a diameter of >0.22 μm (43, 73), despite that the accuracy of virus identification by using direct metagenomic analysis of sediments is not as high as the method of preseparation of virus particles from sediments, direct metagenomic analysis of sediment might have the advantage of showing a more complete picture of virus diversity in sediments (43). In addition, with the rapid development of bioinformatics, more and more advanced tools have emerged, such as VirSorter2 (74) and DeepVirFinder (75) for viral identification, VirHostMatcher-Net (76) for viral host prediction, and VPF-Class (77) for viral taxonomic assignment. Future research using these newly developed tools may provide a fuller picture of the viral communities.
In conclusion, the diverse novel viruses and the various viral AMGs that potentially contribute to organic carbon degradation, inorganic carbon fixation, denitrification, and assimilatory sulfate reduction provide novel insight into the composition of benthic viral communities in the upper slope sediments of the Mariana Trench.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection.
Eight push-core sediment samples were collected using the deep-sea human-occupied vehicle (HOV) Jiao Long Hao from eight locations (A, B, D114, D119, D120, D144, D146, and D147) along the northern and southern slopes of the Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench during cruises DY37II and DY38III in 2016 and 2017, respectively (Fig. 1). Information about longitude/latitude and sampling depth was recorded during field sampling. In addition, onboard, each core was cut into 2-cm-wide sections, and each section was then divided into two fractions. One fraction was immersed in RNAlater (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA) and stored at −80°C until metagenomic analysis. The other fraction was stored at −80°C directly for further physicochemical analyses. Back in the laboratory, the 0- to 2-cm, 2- to 4-cm, and 4- to 6-cm core sections were combined and called 0 to 6 cm (surface part [s]), and those from the 6- to 12-cm (middle part [m]) and 12- to 18-cm (bottom part [b]) sections were generated similarly, for subsequent analysis of their metagenomes and environmental parameters. The physicochemical parameters were also measured in the laboratory. For more information about sediment property analysis and the enumeration of viruses and prokaryotes, see Text S1 in the supplemental material.
DNA extraction, sequencing, and metagenomic analysis.
For DNA extraction, total nucleic acids were extracted from each sediment sample (5 to 15 g) using a FastDNA spin kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The final DNA concentrations were measured using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Finally, the total nucleic acid yield of 15 samples was extracted successfully and used for subsequent library construction and sequencing (see Table S2 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6).
The construction of the DNA library and high-throughput sequencing of the extracted DNA were carried out with an Illumina HiSeq2500 PE150bp platform and the HiSeq cluster kit v4 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to generate 150-bp paired-end reads. Paired-end reads were trimmed by Trim-galore v0.5.0 (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore) with default settings to remove adapter sequences and low-quality sequences (Phred score of <20). The resulting high-quality reads from each MTS sample were assembled with metaSPAdes v3.13.0 (78) using default parameters. Coassemblies of pooled reads from the 15 samples were also performed to improve the genomic representation of viruses using metaSPAdes. Following assembly, all assembled scaffolds (consisting of contigs separated by gaps) generated by metaSPAdes were used for further virus identification and clustering.
See Text S1 for information about the microbial metagenome (especially the prokaryotic community) analysis.
Identification and clustering of viral scaffolds.
In our metagenomic data set, the viral sequences probably originate from intracellular and extracellular lytic phages and temperate phages that integrate into the microbial genomes or exist as extrachromosomal elements. All scaffolds affiliated with viruses were identified and clustered according to a method reported previously (79) but with minor modifications. In brief, each of the 16 (co)assemblies (15 individual assemblies and 1 coassembly) was individually searched for viral scaffolds according to the following criteria. Scaffolds of ≥1.5 kb were piped through VirSorter v1.0.5 (80) and VirFinder v.1.0.0 (81) to predict the viral sequences. VirSorter is reliable software to determine viral sequences, especially for longer sequences with the hallmark viral genes (80). VirFinder is software that relies on k-mer signatures to predict viral sequences (81). Scaffolds (≥5 kb or ≥1.5 kb and circular), which were sorted with a VirFinder score of ≥0.7, a P value of <0.05, and/or VirSorter categories 1 to 6, were pooled for further analysis. Those scaffolds satisfying any one of the following conditions were then classified as being viral scaffolds: (i) VirSorter categories 1 and 2; (ii) a VirFinder score of ≥0.9 and a P value of <0.05; and (iii) VirSorter categories 1 to 6, a VirFinder score of ≥0.7, and a P value of <0.05. Any remaining scaffolds with <40% (based on an average gene size of 1,000) of the scaffold classified as bacterial, archaeal, or eukaryotic with the sequence annotation tool CAT v4.6 (82) were also considered viral scaffolds. The viral scaffolds obtained from 16 (co)assemblies were then merged and grouped into populations if they shared ≥95% nucleotide identity across ≥80% of the scaffold length using the BLASTn program in BLAST+ v2.10.1 (83, 84).
For each viral population, the open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal (85), and the resulting protein sequences were loaded into vConTACT2 v0.9.10 (86) to cluster the MTS viruses and known viruses from the viral RefSeq database (release 96) with parameters -rel-mode Diamond, -pcs-mode MCL, and -vcs-mode ClusterONE. Based on the protein-sharing network constructed by vConTACT2, MTS viral populations and known viruses were grouped into viral clusters. For those viral clusters containing MTS viral scaffolds, the longest MTS viral scaffold of each viral cluster was selected and merged to assemble a Mariana Trench sediment viral scaffolds (MTS-VSs) data set consisting of 3,206 unique viral scaffolds (all ≥5 kb, at the subfamily/genus level). The completeness of viral genomes represented by viral scaffolds was estimated using CheckV v0.7.0 (87).
Taxonomic assignments and abundance profiles of viral scaffolds.
Those viral scaffolds clustered with a virus from RefSeq by vConTACT2 were able to be assigned to a known viral taxonomic genus and family (79). Besides, BLAST analysis of viral scaffolds was also performed against the Integrated Microbial Genome/Virus (IMG/VR) system v.3.0 database (88) (BLASTn E value of ≤10−5, similarity of ≥90%, and covered length of ≥75%) to assign the taxonomies for viral scaffolds based on sequence similarity (49, 83). Additionally, a majority-rules approach was performed for the taxonomic assignments as previously described (48, 88). Briefly, predicted proteins from viral scaffolds were compared to NCBI viral RefSeq proteins (release 203) using DIAMOND v2.0.4 (89) (BLASTp; -subject-cover 50; –more-sensitive; -query-cover 50; -evalue 1e-5), and a viral scaffold was assigned to a taxonomy if ≥50% of the proteins were assigned to that taxonomy. Besides, CAT v5.0 (82) and ViralRecall v2.0 (-s 2) (28) were used to taxonomically classify viral scaffolds and detect nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs), respectively. To verify the novelty of MTS viruses, predicted proteins from MTS-VSs were compared to the IMG/VR protein database v3.0 using DIAMOND v2.0.4 (BLASTp; E value of <1e−5, identity of >30%, and coverage of >50%).
Metagenomic reads of all samples were mapped to all MTS-VSs and all predicted viral genes to calculate the relative abundances of viral scaffolds and genes, respectively, using the BBMap package v38.86 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/) (49). The read counts were normalized based on the transcripts per million (TPM) calculation (90) by BBMap, and the generated abundance matrix was thereafter used as an input for diversity analyses.
Phylogenetic analysis of viral scaffolds.
Phylogenetic trees of MTS viruses were generated based on the high-quality viral genomes (completeness of >90%) and a viral group-specific marker, the terL gene for Caudovirales (91). The proteomic trees of all the high-quality viral genomes were constructed as previously described but with minor modifications (30). The reference viral genomes homologous (all-against-all genomic similarity score [SG] of >0.15) to at least one of the MTS high-quality viral genomes were obtained from the Virus-Host DB (92) and IMG/VR 3.0 (88) databases, and the all-against-all distance matrix (calculated based on SG values, 0 ≤ SG ≤ 1) of the MTS viral genomes and selected reference viral genomes was used to build proteomic trees with BIONJ using ViPTreeGen v1.1.2 and the ViPTree online server (93). We used a threshold of an SG of >0.15 to cluster the branches into viral gOTUs, as proposed previously (30). For the terL gene phylogenetic analysis, all proteins predicted as the phage terminase large-subunit domain (TerL; Terminase_6; PF03237) were retrieved from MTS viral proteins and IMG/VR proteins (v3.0) (88). MTS viral TerL amino acid sequences were compared to those from the IMG/VR database using BLASTp (E value of <10−5) to recruit relevant reference sequences. All sequences were aligned and trimmed, and the maximum likelihood tree was constructed using IQ-tree v1.6.12 (94). The trees were then visualized with iTOL v6 (95). A more detailed description of this protocol is provided in Text S1.
Host predictions and provirus identification.
The potential microbial hosts of the benthic viruses found in the sediments of the Mariana Trench were predicted by PHISDector (released 14 July 2020) (96) using its default parameters. This software was used in silico based on the multiple phage-host interaction signals (PHISs), including prophages, oligonucleotide profile/sequence composition, alignment-based similarity, CRISPR targeting, protein-protein interactions, cooccurrence/coabundance patterns, and special host-related gene (i.e., virulence factor gene and antibiotic resistance gene) checks (96). Only one best microbial species was selected as the putative host of each viral scaffold based on the overall score or the most matches in the result file. In addition, tRNA sequences were retrieved and queried against the NCBI nr database of bacterial genomes using BLASTn, and only the best hits (i.e., with a minimum of 90% coverage and 90% identity) were considered putative hosts (19). Finally, these results of host prediction were combined and curated manually as previously reported (44, 97).
Provirus-like viral scaffolds were predicted by BLAST analysis against the microbial bins (BLASTn E value of 10−3, 70% similarity, and 75% of the viral scaffold length) (98) and using PHISDector (96), CheckV v0.7.0 (87), and VIBRANT v1.2.1 (99). In addition, viral scaffolds harboring lysogenic marker proteins, such as integrase, excisionase, invertase, serine recombinase, and CI/Cro repressor (48, 100, 101), are considered potential proviruses.
Functional profiles and identification of AMGs.
All virus-encoded proteins were queried against the eggNOG database (102) using a python script, emapper.py v1.0.3, with the parameters -m diamond and –seed_orthology_evalue 0.00001 (103), and the COG information for each protein was assigned. The functional profiles were determined for each sample by summing up the genetic abundances of the proteins belonging to the same COG.
The AMGs of MTS-VSs were identified as previously reported but with minor modifications (44). In detail, AMG annotations were performed using VIBRANT v1.2.1 (99) based on the KEGG, Pfam, and VOG annotations of each viral protein using default parameters. Specifically, the genes with the KEGG annotation “energy metabolism” were selected as the putative AMGs. In addition, viral scaffold annotations were also performed using DRAM-v, the viral model of DRAM v.1.2.0 (104). First, based on VirSorter v2.0 (74), 2,449 viral scaffolds were selected for further DRAM-v annotation due to their high viral scores (>0.5) (74), and the needed input files of DRAM-v were produced. Next, the selected viral scaffolds were run through DRAM-v using default parameters, and those genes with gene descriptions and auxiliary scores of <4 were considered putative AMGs. As suggested previously (44, 105), to be conservative, we did not consider the genes related to glycosyltransferases, ribosomal proteins, organic nitrogen, and nucleotide metabolism as viral AMGs. For all putative AMGs annotated by VIBRANT and DRAM-v and to avoid false-positive results for selected AMGs caused by possible pollution of host sequences, only the putative AMGs located between two viral hallmark genes or virus-like genes and those located alongside the viral hallmark genes or virus-like genes were considered high-confidence viral AMGs for further analysis. For the viral scaffolds containing AMGs, genes without annotations by VIBRANT and DRAM-v were searched against the NCBI nr and UniProt databases using BLASTp with an E value threshold of 0.001, an identity of 30%, and coverage of 50%. Amino acid sequences of AMGs were inputted into the Phyre2 (v2.0) Web portal to search the protein structure homology, and the predicted three-dimensional structures of viral proteins were obtained online (106). Conserved domains of viral AMGs were identified using the NCBI CD-search tool (107). Genome maps for AMG-containing viral scaffolds were visualized based on VIBRANT, DRAM-v, and VirSorter2 annotations.
It was previously shown that viral AMGs can be obtained and maintained from their hosts (34), so AMG phylogeny is an alternative method for predicting putative hosts (35–37). The relevant reference sequences of the relevant species were retrieved by comparing the amino acid sequences of AMGs against the nr database (online comparison) (BLASTp E value of ≤10−5 and bitscore of >50) (35, 37). The amino acid sequences of the reference sequences and AMG sequences were used to establish an AMG phylogenetic tree via the GGDC Web server (108), which is available at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/, using the DSMZ phylogenomics pipeline (109) adapted to single genes. iTOL v6 was also used to edit the trees manually.
Statistical analysis.
The R packages vegan (110) and ape (111) were used to estimate the alpha diversity indexes (Chao1 and Shannon) and perform PCoA, ADONIS, NMDS analysis, and ANOSIM of the viral and prokaryotic communities. Regression analyses and their visualization were performed using the R packages lme4 (112) and ggplot2 (113). Correlation analysis was performed using the cor.test function in R. Heat maps, box plots, and scatterplots were drawn using the ImageGP online tools (EHBio). Distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) was performed using the R packages vegan (110) and rdacca.hp (114) to interrogate the significant environmental variables affecting the viral and prokaryotic communities.
Data availability.
The quality-controlled reads for 15 metagenomes are stored in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession numbers SRR11659604 to SRR11659618 under BioProject accession number PRJNA629672 (see Table S2 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6) and the National Omics Data Encyclopedia (NODE) (https://www.biosino.org/node/index) with the accession number OEP001681. All the nucleotide sequence data for the viral scaffolds reported here were deposited in the Genome Warehouse in the National Genomics Data Center (115), Beijing Institute of Genomics (China National Center for Bioinformation), Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession number GWHASIT00000000, and they are publicly accessible at https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the pilots of the deep-sea HOV Jiao Long Hao and the crew of the R/V Tan Suo Yi Hao and Xiang Yang Hong 09 for their professional service during cruises DY37II and DY38III. Also, we thank Sarah Webb for her help with English.
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0309800); the NSFC project (41876174); the Senior User Project of RV KEXUE (KEXUE2019GZ03) supported by the Center for Ocean Mega-Science, CAS; the open task of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (QNLM2016ORP0311); the DICP&QIBEBT (DICP&QIBEBT UN201803); and the QIBEBT (QIBEBT ZZBS 201805), Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy (DNL), CAS.
Y.Z. and H.J. designed the study; H.J. collected the samples and performed the metagenomic sequencing; J.Z., Y.Z., Z.W., and L.W. analyzed the sediment parameters and metagenomic data; H.J., R.Z., X.X., F.C., and N.J. provided guidance and advice for the data analysis; and J.Z. and Y.Z. wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Hongmei Jing, Email: hmjing@idsse.ac.cn.
Yongyu Zhang, Email: zhangyy@qibebt.ac.cn.
Rachel Poretsky, University of Illinois at Chicago.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jamieson AJ, Fujii T, Mayor DJ, Solan M, Priede IG. 2010. Hadal trenches: the ecology of the deepest places on Earth. Trends Ecol Evol 25:190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gao Z-M, Huang J-M, Cui G-J, Li W-L, Li J, Wei Z-F, Chen J, Xin Y-Z, Cai D-S, Zhang A-Q, Wang Y. 2019. In situ meta-omic insights into the community compositions and ecological roles of hadal microbes in the Mariana Trench. Environ Microbiol 21:4092–4108. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jamieson AJ. 17 October 2011. Ecology of deep oceans: hadal trenches. In eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, United Kingdom. 10.1002/9780470015902.a0023606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Luo M, Gieskes J, Chen L, Shi X, Chen D. 2017. Provenances, distribution, and accumulation of organic matter in the southern Mariana Trench rim and slope: implication for carbon cycle and burial in hadal trenches. Mar Geol 386:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2017.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu J, Zheng Y, Lin H, Wang X, Li M, Liu Y, Yu M, Zhao M, Pedentchouk N, Lea-Smith DJ, Todd JD, Magill CR, Zhang WJ, Zhou S, Song D, Zhong H, Xin Y, Yu M, Tian J, Zhang XH. 2019. Proliferation of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes at the bottom of the Mariana Trench. Microbiome 7:47. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0652-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zheng Y, Wang J, Zhou S, Zhang Y, Liu J, Xue CX, Williams BT, Zhao X, Zhao L, Zhu XY, Sun C, Zhang HH, Xiao T, Yang GP, Todd JD, Zhang XH. 2020. Bacteria are important dimethylsulfoniopropionate producers in marine aphotic and high-pressure environments. Nat Commun 11:4658. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18434-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cui G, Li J, Gao Z, Wang Y. 2019. Spatial variations of microbial communities in abyssal and hadal sediments across the Challenger Deep. PeerJ 7:e6961. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hiraoka S, Hirai M, Matsui Y, Makabe A, Minegishi H, Tsuda M, Juliarni, Rastelli E, Danovaro R, Corinaldesi C, Kitahashi T, Tasumi E, Nishizawa M, Takai K, Nomaki H, Nunoura T. 2020. Microbial community and geochemical analyses of trans-trench sediments for understanding the roles of hadal environments. ISME J 14:740–756. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0564-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Danovaro R, Dell’Anno A, Corinaldesi C, Magagnini M, Noble R, Tamburini C, Weinbauer M. 2008. Major viral impact on the functioning of benthic deep-sea ecosystems. Nature 454:1084–1087. doi: 10.1038/nature07268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manea E, Dell’Anno A, Rastelli E, Tangherlini M, Nunoura T, Nomaki H, Danovaro R, Corinaldesi C. 2019. Viral infections boost prokaryotic biomass production and organic C cycling in hadal trench sediments. Front Microbiol 10:1952. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Engelhardt T, Sahlberg M, Cypionka H, Engelen B. 2011. Induction of prophages from deep-subseafloor bacteria. Environ Microbiol Rep 3:459–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Danovaro R, Corinaldesi C, Filippini M, Fischer UR, Gessner MO, Jacquet S, Magagnini M, Velimirov B. 2008. Viriobenthos in freshwater and marine sediments: a review. Freshw Biol 53:1186–1213. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01961.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Danovaro R, Dell’Anno A, Corinaldesi C, Rastelli E, Cavicchioli R, Krupovic M, Noble RT, Nunoura T, Prangishvili D. 2016. Virus-mediated archaeal hecatomb in the deep seafloor. Sci Adv 2:e1600492. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Howard-Varona C, Lindback MM, Bastien GE, Solonenko N, Zayed AA, Jang H, Andreopoulos B, Brewer HM, Glavina Del Rio T, Adkins JN, Paul S, Sullivan MB, Duhaime MB. 2020. Phage-specific metabolic reprogramming of virocells. ISME J 14:881–895. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0580-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang C, Xie Q, Wang D, Shu Y, Xu H, Xiao J, Zu T, Long T, Zhang T. 2018. Seasonal variability of water characteristics in the Challenger Deep observed by four cruises. Sci Rep 8:11791. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30176-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yoshida M, Takaki Y, Eitoku M, Nunoura T, Takai K. 2013. Metagenomic analysis of viral communities in (hado)pelagic sediments. PLoS One 8:e57271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Corinaldesi C, Dell’Anno A, Magagnini M, Danovaro R. 2010. Viral decay and viral production rates in continental-shelf and deep-sea sediments of the Mediterranean Sea. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72:208–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Middelboe M, Glud RN, Filippini M. 2011. Viral abundance and activity in the deep sub-seafloor biosphere. Aquat Microb Ecol 63:1–8. doi: 10.3354/ame01485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Coutinho FH, Silveira CB, Gregoracci GB, Thompson CC, Edwards RA, Brussaard CPD, Dutilh BE, Thompson FL. 2017. Marine viruses discovered via metagenomics shed light on viral strategies throughout the oceans. Nat Commun 8:15955. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mojica KD, Brussaard CP. 2014. Factors affecting virus dynamics and microbial host-virus interactions in marine environments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 89:495–515. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nunoura T, Nishizawa M, Hirai M, Shimamura S, Harnvoravongchai P, Koide O, Morono Y, Fukui T, Inagaki F, Miyazaki J, Takaki Y, Takai K. 2018. Microbial diversity in sediments from the bottom of the Challenger Deep, the Mariana Trench. Microbes Environ 33:186–194. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME17194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xu C, Yang B, Dan SF, Zhang D, Liao R, Lu D, Li R, Ning Z, Peng S. 2020. Spatiotemporal variations of biogenic elements and sources of sedimentary organic matter in the largest oyster mariculture bay (Maowei Sea), Southwest China. Sci Total Environ 730:139056. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wei M, Xu K. 2020. New insights into the virus-to-prokaryote ratio (VPR) in marine sediments. Front Microbiol 11:1102. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Middelboe M, Glud RN, Wenzhofer F, Oguri K, Kitazato H. 2006. Spatial distribution and activity of viruses in the deep-sea sediments of Sagami Bay, Japan. Deep Sea Res 1 Oceanogr Res Pap 53:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2005.09.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Danovaro R, Manini E, Dell’Anno A. 2002. Higher abundance of bacteria than of viruses in deep Mediterranean sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1468–1472. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1468-1472.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Danovaro R, Corinaldesi C, Luna GM, Magagnini M, Manini E, Pusceddu A. 2009. Prokaryote diversity and viral production in deep-sea sediments and seamounts. Deep Sea Res 2 Top Stud Oceanogr 56:738–747. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Danovaro R, Serresi M. 2000. Viral density and virus-to-bacterium ratio in deep-sea sediments of the Eastern Mediterranean. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1857–1861. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.1857-1861.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Aylward FO, Moniruzzaman M. 2021. ViralRecall—a flexible command-line tool for the detection of giant virus signatures in ‘omic data. Viruses 13:150. doi: 10.3390/v13020150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bäckström D, Yutin N, Jørgensen SL, Dharamshi J, Homa F, Zaremba-Niedwiedzka K, Spang A, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Ettema TJ. 2019. Virus genomes from deep sea sediments expand the ocean megavirome and support independent origins of viral gigantism. mBio 10:e02497-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02497-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nishimura Y, Watai H, Honda T, Mihara T, Omae K, Roux S, Blanc-Mathieu R, Yamamoto K, Hingamp P, Sako Y, Sullivan MB, Goto S, Ogata H, Yoshida T. 2017. Environmental viral genomes shed new light on virus-host interactions in the ocean. mSphere 2:e00359-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00359-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hugler M, Sievert SM. 2011. Beyond the Calvin cycle: autotrophic carbon fixation in the ocean. Annu Rev Mar Sci 3:261–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jones CM, Graf DR, Bru D, Philippot L, Hallin S. 2013. The unaccounted yet abundant nitrous oxide-reducing microbial community: a potential nitrous oxide sink. ISME J 7:417–426. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bick JA, Dennis JJ, Zylstra GJ, Nowack J, Leustek T. 2000. Identification of a new class of 5′-adenylylsulfate (APS) reductases from sulfate-assimilating bacteria. J Bacteriol 182:135–142. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.1.135-142.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sullivan MB, Lindell D, Lee JA, Thompson LR, Bielawski JP, Chisholm SW. 2006. Prevalence and evolution of core photosystem II genes in marine cyanobacterial viruses and their hosts. PLoS Biol 4:e234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Roux S, Brum JR, Dutilh BE, Sunagawa S, Duhaime MB, Loy A, Poulos BT, Solonenko N, Lara E, Poulain J, Pesant S, Kandels-Lewis S, Dimier C, Picheral M, Searson S, Cruaud C, Alberti A, Duarte CM, Gasol JM, Vaque D, Tara Oceans Coordinators, Bork P, Acinas SG, Wincker P, Sullivan MB. 2016. Ecogenomics and potential biogeochemical impacts of globally abundant ocean viruses. Nature 537:689–693. doi: 10.1038/nature19366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Edwards RA, McNair K, Faust K, Raes J, Dutilh BE. 2016. Computational approaches to predict bacteriophage-host relationships. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:258–272. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jin M, Guo X, Zhang R, Qu W, Gao B, Zeng R. 2019. Diversities and potential biogeochemical impacts of mangrove soil viruses. Microbiome 7:58. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0675-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wietz M, Millán-Aguiñaga N, Jensen PR. 2014. CRISPR-Cas systems in the marine actinomycete Salinispora: linkages with phage defense, microdiversity and biogeography. BMC Genomics 15:936. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Al-Shayeb B, Sachdeva R, Chen L-X, Ward F, Munk P, Devoto A, Castelle CJ, Olm MR, Bouma-Gregson K, Amano Y, He C, Méheust R, Brooks B, Thomas A, Lavy A, Matheus-Carnevali P, Sun C, Goltsman DSA, Borton MA, Sharrar A, Jaffe AL, Nelson TC, Kantor R, Keren R, Lane KR, Farag IF, Lei S, Finstad K, Amundson R, Anantharaman K, Zhou J, Probst AJ, Power ME, Tringe SG, Li W-J, Wrighton K, Harrison S, Morowitz M, Relman DA, Doudna JA, Lehours A-C, Warren L, Cate JHD, Santini JM, Banfield JF. 2020. Clades of huge phages from across Earth’s ecosystems. Nature 578:425–431. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2007-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yuan Y, Gao M. 2017. Jumbo bacteriophages: an overview. Front Microbiol 8:403. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Breitbart M, Felts B, Kelley S, Mahaffy JM, Nulton J, Salamon P, Rohwer F. 2004. Diversity and population structure of a near-shore marine-sediment viral community. Proc Biol Sci 271:565–574. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Corinaldesi C, Tangherlini M, Dell’Anno A. 2017. From virus isolation to metagenome generation for investigating viral diversity in deep-sea sediments. Sci Rep 7:8355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08783-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zheng X, Liu W, Dai X, Zhu Y, Wang J, Zhu Y, Zheng H, Huang Y, Dong Z, Du W, Zhao F, Huang L. 2021. Extraordinary diversity of viruses in deep-sea sediments as revealed by metagenomics without prior virion separation. Environ Microbiol 23:728–743. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li Z, Pan D, Wei G, Pi W, Zhang C, Wang JH, Peng Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Hubert CRJ, Dong X. 2021. Deep sea sediments associated with cold seeps are a subsurface reservoir of viral diversity. ISME J 15:2366–2378. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00932-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Van Etten JL, Graves MV, Muller DG, Boland W, Delaroque N. 2002. Phycodnaviridae—large DNA algal viruses. Arch Virol 147:1479–1516. doi: 10.1007/s00705-002-0822-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moniruzzaman M, LeCleir GR, Brown CM, Gobler CJ, Bidle KD, Wilson WH, Wilhelm SW. 2014. Genome of brown tide virus (AaV), the little giant of the Megaviridae, elucidates NCLDV genome expansion and host-virus coevolution. Virology 466–467:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cai L, Jorgensen BB, Suttle CA, He M, Cragg BA, Jiao N, Zhang R. 2019. Active and diverse viruses persist in the deep sub-seafloor sediments over thousands of years. ISME J 13:1857–1864. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0397-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jian H, Yi Y, Wang J, Hao Y, Zhang M, Wang S, Meng C, Zhang Y, Jing H, Wang Y, Xiao X. 2021. Diversity and distribution of viruses inhabiting the deepest ocean on Earth. ISME J 15:3094–3110. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00994-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liang Y, Wang L, Wang Z, Zhao J, Yang Q, Wang M, Yang K, Zhang L, Jiao N, Zhang Y. 2019. Metagenomic analysis of the diversity of DNA viruses in the surface and deep sea of the South China Sea. Front Microbiol 10:1951. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Guo R, Liang Y, Xin Y, Wang L, Mou S, Cao C, Xie R, Zhang C, Tian J, Zhang Y. 2018. Insight into the pico- and nano-phytoplankton communities in the deepest biosphere, the Mariana Trench. Front Microbiol 9:2289. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tian Y, Cai L, Xu Y, Luo T, Zhao Z, Wang Q, Liu L, Xiao X, Wang F, Jiao N, Zhang R. 2020. Stability and infectivity of allochthonous viruses in deep sea: a long-term high pressure simulation experiment. Deep Sea Res 1 Oceanogr Res Pap 161:103302. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2020.103302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Prieto-Davo A, Villarreal-Gomez LJ, Forschner-Dancause S, Bull AT, Stach JE, Smith DC, Rowley DC, Jensen PR. 2013. Targeted search for actinomycetes from nearshore and deep-sea marine sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 84:510–518. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Choi H, Koh HW, Kim H, Chae JC, Park SJ. 2016. Microbial community composition in the marine sediments of Jeju Island: next-generation sequencing surveys. J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:883–890. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1512.12036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hoffmann K, Bienhold C, Buttigieg PL, Knittel K, Laso-Perez R, Rapp JZ, Boetius A, Offre P. 2020. Diversity and metabolism of Woeseiales bacteria, global members of marine sediment communities. ISME J 14:1042–1056. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0588-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Breitbart M, Bonnain C, Malki K, Sawaya NA. 2018. Phage puppet masters of the marine microbial realm. Nat Microbiol 3:754–766. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0166-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Breitbart M. 2012. Marine viruses: truth or dare. Annu Rev Mar Sci 4:425–448. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hampton HG, Watson BNJ, Fineran PC. 2020. The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes. Nature 577:327–336. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1894-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hurwitz BL, U’Ren JM. 2016. Viral metabolic reprogramming in marine ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 31:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gazitua MC, Vik DR, Roux S, Gregory AC, Bolduc B, Widner B, Mulholland MR, Hallam SJ, Ulloa O, Sullivan MB. 2021. Potential virus-mediated nitrogen cycling in oxygen-depleted oceanic waters. ISME J 15:981–998. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00825-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Anantharaman K, Duhaime MB, Breier JA, Wendt KA, Toner BM, Dick GJ. 2014. Sulfur oxidation genes in diverse deep-sea viruses. Science 344:757–760. doi: 10.1126/science.1252229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kieft K, Zhou Z, Anderson RE, Buchan A, Campbell BJ, Hallam SJ, Hess M, Sullivan MB, Walsh DA, Roux S, Anantharaman K. 2021. Ecology of inorganic sulfur auxiliary metabolism in widespread bacteriophages. Nat Commun 12:3503. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23698-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Roux S, Hawley AK, Beltran MT, Scofield M, Schwientek P, Stepanauskas R, Woyke T, Hallam SJ, Sullivan MB. 2014. Ecology and evolution of viruses infecting uncultivated SUP05 bacteria as revealed by single-cell- and meta-genomics. Elife 3:e03125. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Baldan B, Andolfo P, Navazio L, Tolomio C, Mariani P. 2001. Cellulose in algal cell wall: an “in situ” localization. Eur J Histochem 45:51–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhao X, Liu J, Zhou S, Zheng Y, Wu Y, Kogure K, Zhang X-H. 2020. Diversity of culturable heterotrophic bacteria from the Mariana Trench and their ability to degrade macromolecules. Mar Life Sci Technol 2:181–193. doi: 10.1007/s42995-020-00027-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Peoples LM. 2018. Composition and functional potential of hadal microbial communities. PhD dissertation. University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Baltar F, Herndl GJ. 2019. Ideas and perspectives: is dark carbon fixation relevant for oceanic primary production estimates? Biogeosciences 16:3793–3799. doi: 10.5194/bg-16-3793-2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pachiadaki MG, Sintes E, Bergauer K, Brown JM, Record NR, Swan BK, Mathyer ME, Hallam SJ, Lopez-Garcia P, Takaki Y, Nunoura T, Woyke T, Herndl GJ, Stepanauskas R. 2017. Major role of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in dark ocean carbon fixation. Science 358:1046–1051. doi: 10.1126/science.aan8260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Reinthaler T, van Aken HM, Herndl GJ. 2010. Major contribution of autotrophy to microbial carbon cycling in the deep North Atlantic’s interior. Deep Sea Res 2 Top Stud Oceanogr 57:1572–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hatzenpichler R. 2012. Diversity, physiology, and niche differentiation of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:7501–7510. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01960-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Trimmer M, Chronopoulou PM, Maanoja ST, Upstill-Goddard RC, Kitidis V, Purdy KJ. 2016. Nitrous oxide as a function of oxygen and archaeal gene abundance in the North Pacific. Nat Commun 7:13451. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jones-Mortimer M. 1973. Mapping of structural genes for the enzymes of cysteine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium LT2. Heredity (Edinb) 31:213–221. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1973.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kiene RP, Linn LJ, Bruton JA. 2000. New and important roles for DMSP in marine microbial communities. J Sea Res 43:209–224. doi: 10.1016/S1385-1101(00)00023-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lopez-Perez M, Haro-Moreno JM, Gonzalez-Serrano R, Parras-Molto M, Rodriguez-Valera F. 2017. Genome diversity of marine phages recovered from Mediterranean metagenomes: size matters. PLoS Genet 13:e1007018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Guo J, Bolduc B, Zayed AA, Varsani A, Dominguez-Huerta G, Delmont TO, Pratama AA, Gazitua MC, Vik D, Sullivan MB, Roux S. 2021. VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome 9:37. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00990-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ren J, Song K, Deng C, Ahlgren NA, Fuhrman JA, Li Y, Xie X, Poplin R, Sun F. 2020. Identifying viruses from metagenomic data using deep learning. Quant Biol 8:64–77. doi: 10.1007/s40484-019-0187-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wang W, Ren J, Tang K, Dart E, Ignacio-Espinoza JC, Fuhrman JA, Braun J, Sun F, Ahlgren NA. 2020. A network-based integrated framework for predicting virus-prokaryote interactions. NAR Genom Bioinform 2:lqaa044. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pons JC, Paez-Espino D, Riera G, Ivanova N, Kyrpides NC, Llabrés M. 2021. VPF-Class: taxonomic assignment and host prediction of uncultivated viruses based on viral protein families. Bioinformatics 37:1805–1813. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. 2017. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 27:824–834. doi: 10.1101/gr.213959.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gregory AC, Zayed AA, Conceição-Neto N, Temperton B, Bolduc B, Alberti A, Ardyna M, Arkhipova K, Carmichael M, Cruaud C, Dimier C, Domínguez-Huerta G, Ferland J, Kandels S, Liu Y, Marec C, Pesant S, Picheral M, Pisarev S, Poulain J, Tremblay J-É, Vik D, Tara Oceans Coordinators, Babin M, Bowler C, Culley AI, de Vargas C, Dutilh BE, Iudicone D, Karp-Boss L, Roux S, Sunagawa S, Wincker P, Sullivan MB. 2019. Marine DNA viral macro- and microdiversity from pole to pole. Cell 177:1109–1123.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Roux S, Enault F, Hurwitz BL, Sullivan MB. 2015. VirSorter: mining viral signal from microbial genomic data. PeerJ 3:e985. doi: 10.7717/peerj.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ren J, Ahlgren NA, Lu YY, Fuhrman JA, Sun F. 2017. VirFinder: a novel k-mer based tool for identifying viral sequences from assembled metagenomic data. Microbiome 5:69. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0283-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.von Meijenfeldt FAB, Arkhipova K, Cambuy DD, Coutinho FH, Dutilh BE. 2019. Robust taxonomic classification of uncharted microbial sequences and bins with CAT and BAT. Genome Biol 20:217. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1817-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Paez-Espino D, Pavlopoulos GA, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2017. Nontargeted virus sequence discovery pipeline and virus clustering for metagenomic data. Nat Protoc 12:1673–1682. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bin Jang H, Bolduc B, Zablocki O, Kuhn JH, Roux S, Adriaenssens EM, Brister JR, Kropinski AM, Krupovic M, Lavigne R, Turner D, Sullivan MB. 2019. Taxonomic assignment of uncultivated prokaryotic virus genomes is enabled by gene-sharing networks. Nat Biotechnol 37:632–639. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0100-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Nayfach S, Camargo AP, Schulz F, Eloe-Fadrosh E, Roux S, Kyrpides NC. 2021. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat Biotechnol 39:578–585. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-00774-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Roux S, Paez-Espino D, Chen IA, Palaniappan K, Ratner A, Chu K, Reddy TBK, Nayfach S, Schulz F, Call L, Neches RY, Woyke T, Ivanova NN, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Kyrpides NC. 2021. IMG/VR v3: an integrated ecological and evolutionary framework for interrogating genomes of uncultivated viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D764–D775. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12:59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wagner GP, Kin K, Lynch VJ. 2012. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory Biosci 131:281–285. doi: 10.1007/s12064-012-0162-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Adriaenssens EM, Cowan DA. 2014. Using signature genes as tools to assess environmental viral ecology and diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4470–4480. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00878-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mihara T, Nishimura Y, Shimizu Y, Nishiyama H, Yoshikawa G, Uehara H, Hingamp P, Goto S, Ogata H. 2016. Linking virus genomes with host taxonomy. Viruses 8:66. doi: 10.3390/v8030066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Nishimura Y, Yoshida T, Kuronishi M, Uehara H, Ogata H, Goto S. 2017. ViPTree: the viral proteomic tree server. Bioinformatics 33:2379–2380. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Letunic I, Bork P. 2019. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W256–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Zhang F, Zhou F, Gan R, Ren C, Jia Y, Yu L, Huang Z. 2019. PHISDetector: a Web tool to detect diverse in silico phage-host interaction signals. bioRxiv 10.1101/661074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 97.Emerson JB, Roux S, Brum JR, Bolduc B, Woodcroft BJ, Jang HB, Singleton CM, Solden LM, Naas AE, Boyd JA, Hodgkins SB, Wilson RM, Trubl G, Li C, Frolking S, Pope PB, Wrighton KC, Crill PM, Chanton JP, Saleska SR, Tyson GW, Rich VI, Sullivan MB. 2018. Host-linked soil viral ecology along a permafrost thaw gradient. Nat Microbiol 3:870–880. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0190-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Dalcin Martins P, Danczak RE, Roux S, Frank J, Borton MA, Wolfe RA, Burris MN, Wilkins MJ. 2018. Viral and metabolic controls on high rates of microbial sulfur and carbon cycling in wetland ecosystems. Microbiome 6:138. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0522-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kieft K, Zhou Z, Anantharaman K. 2020. VIBRANT: automated recovery, annotation and curation of microbial viruses, and evaluation of viral community function from genomic sequences. Microbiome 8:90. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00867-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Knowles B, Silveira CB, Bailey BA, Barott K, Cantu VA, Cobián-Güemes AG, Coutinho FH, Dinsdale EA, Felts B, Furby KA, George EE, Green KT, Gregoracci GB, Haas AF, Haggerty JM, Hester ER, Hisakawa N, Kelly LW, Lim YW, Little M, Luque A, McDole-Somera T, McNair K, de Oliveira LS, Quistad SD, Robinett NL, Sala E, Salamon P, Sanchez SE, Sandin S, Silva GGZ, Smith J, Sullivan C, Thompson C, Vermeij MJA, Youle M, Young C, Zgliczynski B, Brainard R, Edwards RA, Nulton J, Thompson F, Rohwer F. 2016. Lytic to temperate switching of viral communities. Nature 531:466–470. doi: 10.1038/nature17193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Luo E, Eppley JM, Romano AE, Mende DR, DeLong EF. 2020. Double-stranded DNA virioplankton dynamics and reproductive strategies in the oligotrophic open ocean water column. ISME J 14:1304–1315. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0604-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernandez-Plaza A, Forslund SK, Cook H, Mende DR, Letunic I, Rattei T, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2019. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D309–D314. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2017. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol Biol Evol 34:2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Shaffer M, Borton MA, McGivern BB, Zayed AA, La Rosa SL, Solden LM, Liu P, Narrowe AB, Rodriguez-Ramos J, Bolduc B, Gazitua MC, Daly RA, Smith GJ, Vik DR, Pope PB, Sullivan MB, Roux S, Wrighton KC. 2020. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res 48:8883–8900. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ter Horst AM, Santos-Medellín C, Sorensen JW, Zinke LA, Wilson RM, Johnston ER, Trubl GG, Pett-Ridge J, Blazewicz SJ, Hanson PJ, Chanton JP, Schadt CW, Kostka JE, Emerson JB. 2021. Minnesota peat viromes reveal terrestrial and aquatic niche partitioning for local and global viral populations. Microbiome 9:233. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01156-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. 2015. The Phyre2 Web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc 10:845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Lu S, Wang J, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zhang D, Zheng C, Lanczycki CJ, Marchler-Bauer A. 2020. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D265–D268. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V, Fiebig A, Rohde C, Rohde M, Fartmann B, Goodwin LA, Chertkov O, Reddy TBK, Pati A, Ivanova NN, Markowitz V, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Göker M, Klenk H-P. 2014. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci 9:2. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-9-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Oksanen J, Blanchet F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin P, O’Hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P. 2018. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-2.
- 111.Paradis E, Schliep K. 2019. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35:526–528. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Christensen RHB, Singmann H, Dai B, Scheipl F, Grothendieck G, Green P, Fox J. 2019. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using ’Eigen’ and S4. R package version 1.1-21. https://github.com/lme4/lme4/. [Google Scholar]
- 113.Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2—elegant graphics for data analysis, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lai J, Zou Y, Zhang J, Peres-Neto P. 2021. rdacca.hp: an R package for generalizing hierarchical and variation partitioning in multiple regression and canonical analysis. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/2021.03.09.434308. [DOI]
- 115.National Genomics Data Center Members and Partners. 2020. Database resources of the National Genomics Data Center in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D24–D33. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The quality-controlled reads for 15 metagenomes are stored in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession numbers SRR11659604 to SRR11659618 under BioProject accession number PRJNA629672 (see Table S2 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5703367.v6) and the National Omics Data Encyclopedia (NODE) (https://www.biosino.org/node/index) with the accession number OEP001681. All the nucleotide sequence data for the viral scaffolds reported here were deposited in the Genome Warehouse in the National Genomics Data Center (115), Beijing Institute of Genomics (China National Center for Bioinformation), Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession number GWHASIT00000000, and they are publicly accessible at https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh.