Abstract
Introduction:
Perinatal depression affects 13% of childbearing individuals in the U.S. and has been linked to increased risk of household economic insecurity in the short term. This study aims to assess the relationship between perinatal depression and long-term economic outcomes.
Methods:
This was a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of childbearing individuals from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study starting at delivery in 1998–2000 and followed until 2014–2017. Analysis was conducted in 2021. Maternal depression was assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview–Short Form 1 year after childbirth and the outcomes included measures of material hardship, household poverty, and employment. Associations between maternal depression and outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and group-based trajectory modelling.
Results:
In total, 12.2% of the sample met the criteria for a major depressive episode at 1 year postpartum. Maternal depression had a strong and sustained positive association with material hardship and not working for pay in Years 3, 5, 9, and 15 postpartum. Maternal depression also had a significant positive association with household poverty across Years 3–9, and with unemployment in Year 3. Trajectory modeling established that maternal depression was associated with increased probability of being in a persistently high-risk trajectory for material hardship, a high-risk trajectory for household poverty, and a high–declining risk trajectory for unemployment.
Conclusions:
Supporting perinatal mental health is crucial for strengthening the economic well-being of childbearing individuals and reducing the impact of maternal mental health disorders on intergenerational transmission of adversity.
INTRODUCTION
Perinatal depression affects 20% of childbearing individuals globally and 14% in the U.S., and disproportionately affects individuals with lower levels of income or education.1–3 Perinatal depression is characterized by depressed mood, decreased interest or pleasure in activities, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, and sometimes suicidal ideation.4,5 If untreated, perinatal depression diminishes ability to function effectively across emotional and social domains.4 Most previous studies have examined implications of this for mother–infant bonding; child neglect; and children’s health, cognitive, and behavioral development.6–12 Indeed, the reach of perinatal depression on child outcomes is long: Recent longitudinal studies have found that maternal depression is associated with adverse child development and offspring depression up to age 18 years.9,10,12–16
However, maternal depression and the resulting harms to women’s social functioning may have important implications for other aspects of their lives, namely, in areas of economic well-being such as employment and financial security.17 Recent studies have documented relationships between maternal depression and subsequent short-term risk of household food insecurity, housing instability, relationship dissolution, unemployment, and missed workdays.18–23 Scant research has examined how maternal depression is associated with women’s long-term economic outcomes.
Given the robust literature demonstrating lasting effects of maternal depression on children’s well-being, further research on long-term economic impacts on women is needed, especially considering financial hardship itself is a risk factor for depression. Maternal depression may therefore exacerbate cycles of disadvantage through which health disparities affect childbearing individuals and their families. Moreover, the dearth of evidence on long-run economic impacts of maternal depression may result in underestimates of both the toll maternal depression takes on quality of life and the cost effectiveness of interventions.24
This analysis uses the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study to examine how women who experience depression in the postpartum year fare economically over the long term. Data from primary caregiver interviews are combined with medical records, allowing for adjustment for a wide range of potentially confounding socioeconomic, demographic, and maternal and infant health variables. The objective is to assess the relationship between depression in the postpartum year and material hardship, poverty, and employment over a 15-year period. The primary hypothesis is that depression in the postpartum year will increase material hardship and poverty and decrease employment.
METHODS
Study Sample
The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study is a longitudinal birth cohort study that sampled 4,898 children born 1998–2000 in 75 hospitals in 20 large U.S. cities and has continued to follow them. This analysis uses data from all waves, including the latest publicly available data from 2014–2017. Cities with >200,000 people were selected using a stratified random sample. In 18 cities, all birth hospitals were included; in remaining cities, hospitals were randomly sampled. Within hospitals, births were randomly sampled, with a non-marital oversample because the study was designed to provide information about the life courses of unmarried parents and their children.25
Baseline interviews were conducted at the hospital right after birth, with follow-ups conducted when children were aged 1, 3, 5, 9, and 15 years. Additional data were extracted from childbearing individuals’ and infants’ medical records from the birth hospitalization. Surveys collected information on demographic characteristics, health, economic and employment status, and parenting behavior.25
Measures
Depression was measured using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview–Short Form (CIDI-SF), Section A,26 which is used to classify respondents according to the criteria for a major depressive episode. The CIDI is a standard tool for evaluating mental disorders for the purposes of epidemiological research and is consistent with the DSM-IV. The CIDI-SF generates the probability the participant would be positively diagnosed if given the full CIDI interview. Scoring followed the conservative scale used by Walters et al.27 and outlined by Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, resulting in a dichotomous variable indicating a major depressive episode in the past year. Although efforts were made to complete Year 1 interviews 12 months after birth, timings varied; 59% of childbearing individuals completed interviews between 9 and 15 months postpartum and 91% completed it within 19 months.
Outcomes were evaluated in Years 1, 3, 5, 9, and 15. Surveys at each timepoint asked respondents to report experience of material hardship in the past 12 months using 10 questions (Appendix Table 1). Following previous literature, a binary measure of an affirmative response to any of the questions was created, as well as binary measures in each domain: food hardship, inability to pay bills, housing insecurity, medical hardship, and utility shut-offs.28 Poverty was measured using an indicator for household income <100% of the federal poverty level (FPL), based on official poverty thresholds specified by the U.S. Census Bureau for the year preceding the interview, adjusted for household size. Employment was characterized using 2 binary measures, one for whether respondents worked for pay in the past week and another for being currently unemployed, defined as having looked for work but not worked in the past week.
Economic disadvantage is itself an important risk factor for maternal depression, which may confound the relationship between depression and later-life economic hardship.29 Understanding directionality of the association between economic disadvantage and depression is a key concern. This was addressed in 2 ways. First, in the main analysis, a rich set of potential confounders measured at the time of delivery (1 year prior to the measure of the exposure of interest) was included in the regression models, which included demographic, socioeconomic, and maternal and infant health factors. Appendix Table 2 lists the full set of covariates. Variables were measured at delivery to avoid adjusting for potential outcomes of exposure, apart from lifetime history of depression of the respondent’s biological parents, which was measured at Year 3 but included given the historical framing of the question. Second, sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine robustness of the results among women who were not economically disadvantaged in the year before delivery.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics for all variables were analyzed. The empirical analysis began by examining the long-run association between maternal depression and economic outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression was estimated to assess associations between maternal major depression during the postpartum period and economic outcomes at 15 years postpartum, reporting ORs and 95% CIs. Marginal effects were also computed.30 Both unadjusted and adjusted models were estimated, adding demographic, socioeconomic, and maternal and infant factors sequentially as controls.
Next, the relationship between maternal depression and economic outcomes across the life course was further examined in 2 ways. First, to assess dynamics of this relationship over time, logistic regressions were estimated on economic outcomes separately at 3, 5, and 9 years postpartum, in addition to 15 years postpartum, using fully adjusted models. For both parsimony and clarity of presentation, one outcome from each outcome group was examined: any material hardship, income <100% FPL, and unemployment. However, results were consistent for all outcomes (Appendix Table 8).
Second, to examine the extent to which maternal depression influenced the life trajectory of women’s economic outcomes, analysis was conducted using group-based trajectory analysis.31 In these models, a logit distribution was applied to identify distinct latent subgroups of participants with similar trajectories in economic indicators across the life course. All participants with ≥2 timepoints in which the outcome was measured were included, across Years 1–15. The same 3 main outcomes as in the previous analyses were assessed. To fit the model, analysts began with a 3-group cubic-order model, and iteratively increased/decreased the number of groups and decreased order terms until the final model was obtained. The posterior probability of assignment to each trajectory was calculated for participants, who were allocated to the trajectory that yielded the highest probability of membership. The final model was selected by the process recommended in the literature: comparing Bayesian Information Criteria, minimizing adjacent trajectory CI overlap, avoiding trajectories representing <2% of the population, and limiting to average posterior probabilities of ≥0.7.32 As 2 trajectories for each of the 3 outcomes were identified, a logistic regression was used to examine associations between depression in the postpartum year and trajectory membership.
For participants without linked medical records, all variables based on medical records were coded as 0 and an indicator for missing medical records was included in the regressions. All analyses were conducted in Stata version 16 in 2021.
Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness. First, the possibility of confounding due to reverse causality was assessed by excluding participants with household income <100% FPL at delivery (34% of the sample). The purpose of this analysis was to assess whether results were driven by economic disadvantage prior to delivery confounding the relationship between depression in the postpartum period and financial hardship in the long run. Next, participants with pre-pregnancy histories of mental illness diagnosis (9%) were excluded to minimize selection into maternal depression during the postpartum year among women with chronic mental disorders, which represents another source of potential confounding. Third, participants who had their “Year 1 interview” later than 15 months postpartum (42%) were excluded. Finally, to explore potential bias owing to attrition, differences in covariate distributions across survey years were examined using Pearson’s chi-squared test.
RESULTS
A total of 4,898 pregnant women were enrolled at delivery, and 4,364 completed follow up at Year 1. Of those, 4,362 had completed CIDI scores and were included in the analysis. At Years 3, 5, 9, and 15, the numbers (percentages) of the original sample who were included in the analysis were 4,008 (82%), 3,875 (79%), 3,298 (67%), and 2,964 (61%).
In the analysis sample, 12.2% met the criteria for a major depressive episode at 1 year postpartum, which is consistent with national estimates (Table 1).33 Women with major depression at 1 year postpartum were more likely to be U.S.-born, less likely to be married, more likely to have lower household income, and more likely to receive public assistance in the year before delivery (Table 1). Appendix Table 3 shows the full set of characteristics including all explanatory variables and outcomes. Characteristics were very similar over time, indicating low sample selection bias due to attrition based on observed factors (Appendix Table 4).
Table 1.
Characteristics of Participants at Delivery and Outcomes at Year 15, by Maternal Depression Status (n=4,362)
Characteristics | Did not experience
maternal depression (n=3,829) |
Experienced
maternal depression (n=533) |
p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Overall, % | 87.8 | 12.2 | |
Characteristics at delivery | |||
Age, years, n (%) | |||
15‒19 | 690 (18) | 92 (17) | 0.25 |
20‒24 | 1,359 (35) | 214 (40) | |
25‒29 | 898 (23) | 111 (21) | |
30‒34 | 524 (14) | 64 (12) | |
≥35 | 358 (9) | 52 (10) | |
Race/ethnicity,a n (%) | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 836 (22) | 109 (20) | 0.08 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 1,796 (47) | 281 (53) | |
Hispanic | 1,044 (27) | 124 (23) | |
Other/Missing | 153 (4) | 19 (4) | |
Born in U.S. n (%) | 3,190 (84) | 473 (89) | 0.001 |
Married to biological father, n (%) | 972 (25) | 99 (19) | <0.001 |
Education, n (%) | |||
Less than high school | 1,284 (34) | 190 (36) | 0.05 |
High school | 1,164 (30) | 163 (31) | |
Some college | 944 (25) | 138 (26) | |
College degree | 435 (11) | 39 (7) | |
Household poverty, n (%) | |||
0‒49% | 698 (18) | 110 (21) | <0.001 |
50%‒99% | 645 (17) | 102 (19) | |
100%‒199% | 965 (25) | 159 (30) | |
200%‒299% | 606 (16) | 78 (15) | |
≥300% | 915 (24) | 84 (16) | |
Lived with both parents until age 15 years, n (%) | 1,668 (44) | 191 (36) | <0.001 |
Biological father did not finish high school, n (%) | 1,068 (30) | 149 (31) | 0.90 |
Used public assistance in year prior to delivery,b n (%) | 1,665 (44) | 278 (53) | <0.001 |
On public insurance or uninsured during pregnancy, n (%) | 2,438 (64) | 360 (68) | 0.08 |
Outcomes at year 15, n (%)c | |||
Any material hardship | 1,092 (42) | 204 (58) | <0.001 |
Income <100% FPL | 785 (30) | 132 (38) | 0.004 |
Did not work for pay last week | 714 (27) | 135 (38) | <0.001 |
Unemployed | 312 (12) | 61 (17) | 0.004 |
Notes: P-value from Pearson’s chi-squared test. Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).
Hispanic may be of any race; respondents are only categorized in 1 racial/ethnic category in the survey.
Public assistance includes receipt of any of the following: welfare, food stamps, unemployment insurance, workmen’s compensation, disability, social security benefits, or rental assistance.
The sample size for outcomes at year 15 is 2,607 for those who did not experience maternal depression and 351 for those who did experience maternal depression.
FPL, federal poverty level.
Table 2 shows unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression estimates of associations between maternal major depression in the postpartum year and each outcome at Year 15. Estimates on the relative (OR) and absolute (marginal effects) scales are presented. Results of regression models that sequentially added in demographic, socioeconomic, and maternal and infant controls are shown in Appendix Table 5; these show a consistent reduction in point estimates as additional sets of controls are included, indicating that all sets of factors are confounders. In adjusted models, maternal major depression was associated with a 53% increase in the odds of any material hardship (OR=1.53, 95% CI=1.19, 1.95). For specific hardship types, maternal depression was associated with medical hardship (OR=2.59, 95% CI=1.71, 3.92), utility shut-offs (OR=1.48, 95% CI=1.12, 1.95), inability to pay bills (OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.03, 1.69), food hardship (OR=1.45, 95% CI=1.08, 1.96), and housing insecurity (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.02, 2.41). In unadjusted models, maternal depression was associated with increased odds of household income <100% FPL, but this was not significant in adjusted models (OR=1.21, 95% CI=0.92, 1.59). Maternal depression was associated with increased odds of not working in the past week (OR=1.48, 95% CI=1.14, 1.92) and marginally associated with unemployment (OR=1.35, 95% CI=0.96, 1.89). The authors contextualize the magnitude of these estimates with marginal effects estimates. Maternal depression was associated with between a 2 and 11 percentage point increase in the probability of experiencing these outcomes. The largest associated increases were in the probability of not working for pay (an 8.2 percentage point increase, compared with a baseline risk of 27%) and any material hardship (a 10.5 percentage point increase, compared to a baseline risk of 42%).
Table 2.
Association of Maternal Depression in the Postpartum Year With Economic Outcomes at Year 15
Outcome | Unadjusted Logit | Adjusted Logit | Adjusted Logit | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | Marginal effect (95% CI) | p-value | |
Material hardship | ||||||
Any material hardship (n=2,957) | 1.92 (1.53, 2.41) | <0.0001 | 1.53 (1.19, 1.95) | 0.001 | 0.105 (0.043, 0.166) | 0.0008 |
Medical hardship (n=2,922) | 3.28 (2.23, 4.81) | <0.0001 | 2.59 (1.71, 3.92) | <0.0001 | 0.045 (0.018, 0.071) | 0.001 |
Utilities shut-offs (n=2,954) | 1.85 (1.45, 2.37) | <0.0001 | 1.48 (1.12, 1.95) | 0.006 | 0.062 (0.014, 0.111) | 0.01 |
Inability to pay bills (n=2,953) | 1.66 (1.32, 2.08) | <0.0001 | 1.32 (1.03, 1.69) | 0.028 | 0.062 (0.005, 0.118) | 0.03 |
Food hardship (n=2,949) | 2.00 (1.53, 2.60) | <0.0001 | 1.45 (1.08, 1.96) |
0.014 | 0.045 (0.005, 0.084) | 0.03 |
Housing insecurity (n=2,922) | 1.94 (1.33, 2.84) | 0.001 | 1.57 (1.02, 2.41) | 0.041 | 0.022 (−0.003, 0.047) | 0.08 |
Poverty | ||||||
Income <100% FPL (n=2,957) | 1.40 (1.11, 1.77) | 0.004 | 1.21 (0.92, 1.59) | 0.169 | 0.037 (−0.017, 0.092) | 0.18 |
Employment | ||||||
Did not work for pay last week (n=2,950) | 1.66 (1.32, 2.1) | <0.0001 | 1.48 (1.14, 1.92) | 0.003 | 0.082 (0.024, 0.140) | 0.01 |
Unemployed (n=2,947) | 1.55 (1.15, 2.09) | 0.004 | 1.35 (0.96, 1.89) | 0.086 | 0.028 (−0.007, 0.062) | 0.12 |
Notes: The first 2 models show OR estimates from logistic regressions with 95% CIs and p-values, while the last model shows the marginal effects (risk difference) of the logit model with 95% CIs and p-values. All models apply robust SEs. Hardship outcomes asked about in the past year. Any material hardship indicates affirmative response to any item in material hardship index (Appendix Table 1). Unemployed indicates did not work for pay last week and is currently looking for work. Depression in the postpartum year measured via Composite International Diagnostic Interview–Short Form. Adjusted models adjusted for demographic factors (age, race/ethnicity, foreign-born status, marital status); socioeconomic factors (education, household poverty ratio, lived with both parents until age 15 years, biological father of the infant completed high school, received public assistance in year before the birth, insurance status during pregnancy); and maternal and infant health factors [pre-pregnancy BMI; illegal drug use, cigarette use, and alcohol use during pregnancy; pre-existing chronic condition during pregnancy (cardiac condition, diabetes, or hypertension); self-reported health status; pre-pregnancy diagnosis of mental illness; history of adversity (any self-reported history of family instability, suspected parenting inadequacy, unwanted pregnancy, domestic violence, or sexual abuse); whether respondent’s biological father or mother had a history of depression or anxiety; trimester began prenatal care; birth interval; complications at delivery; if infant was low birth weight; if infant was in a newborn intensive care unit; infant’s sex; and multiple birth]. Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).
FPL, federal poverty level.
Several control variables had significant relationships with material hardship at 15 years postpartum, including non-Hispanic Black race (1.60, 95% CI=1.26, 2.03), married status (0.74, 95% CI=0.59, 0.94), college education (0.59, 95% CI=0.40, 0.89), living with both parents at age 15 years (0.78, 95% CI=0.65, 0.93), receipt of public assistance (1.32, 95% CI=1.10, 1.58), and respondent’s mother having a history of depression (1.30, 95% CI=1.08, 1.57) (Appendix Table 6). Associations were generally consistent across other economic outcomes. Results were largely insensitive to alternatively restricting the sample to women with income >100% FPL at delivery, women with no prenatal or pre-pregnancy diagnosis of mental illness, and women who completed the CIDI before 15 months postpartum (Appendix Table 7).
Figure 1 shows associations of maternal depression with economic outcomes at each of Years 3, 5, 9, and 15. Panel A shows maternal depression had a strong and sustained association with material hardship across all years, with ORs ranging from 1.45 to 2.03. Panel B shows maternal depression had a significant association with income <100% FPL for Years 3–9, whereas Panel C indicates maternal depression had a significant association with unemployment only in Year 3, the earliest observed timepoint following the Year 1 interview. Results showing ORs and CIs are shown in Appendix Table 8.
Figure 1.
Association of maternal depression in the postpartum year with economic outcomes in years 3, 5, 9, and 15 postpartum.
Analysis using group-based trajectory analysis revealed 2 trajectories of any material hardship, low risk (51% of the sample) and persistently high risk (49%); 2 trajectories of poverty, low risk (53%) and high risk (47%); and 2 trajectories of unemployment, low risk (24%) and high declining risk (76%) (Table 3). Maternal depression was associated with twice the odds of membership to the persistently high trajectory for material hardship, a 28% increase in odds of membership in the high-risk trajectory for poverty, and a 42% increase in odds of membership in the high-declining trajectory for unemployment. Model fit parameters for all models are shown in Appendix Tables 9–10 and plotted trajectories are shown in Appendix Figure 1. Results were robust to sensitivity analysis including only participants with data at all survey waves (Appendix Table 11).
Table 3.
Associations of Maternal Depression in the Postpartum Year With Life Course Economic Trajectories
Outcome | n (%) | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Any material hardship | |||
Low risk trajectory | 2,327 (51) | 1.000 (ref) | |
Persistently high risk trajectory | 2,194 (49) | 2.19 (1.76, 2.73) | <0.0001 |
Income <100% FPL | |||
Low risk trajectory | 2,392 (53) | 1.000 (ref) | |
High risk trajectory | 2,127 (47) | 1.28 (1.00, 1.64) | 0.047 |
Unemployed | |||
Low risk trajectory | 3,433 (76) | 1.000 (ref) | |
High declining risk trajectory | 1,085 (24) | 1.42 (1.13, 1.78) | 0.003 |
Notes: OR from logistic regression with 95% CIs shown in parentheses. Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).
FPL, federal poverty level.
DISCUSSION
At 15 years postpartum, maternal major depression in the postpartum period was associated with higher odds of material hardship and unemployment, even after controlling for a wide range of socioeconomic, demographic, and maternal and infant health variables. It was also associated with specific domains of material hardship, including medical hardship, utility shut-offs, inability to pay bills, food hardship, and housing insecurity, with particularly high odds of medical hardship. Analyses examining the relationship between maternal depression and economic outcomes across the life course indicated a strong, sustained relationship between maternal depression in the postpartum year and increased risk of material hardship and poverty, while the relationship with unemployment was strongest in the first 3 years postpartum. Marginal effect estimates indicate that maternal depression is a substantively meaningful predictor of these outcomes in absolute terms, for example, raising risk of material hardship at Year 15 from 42% to 53%.
Findings are consistent with a growing literature demonstrating associations between maternal depression and increased risk of household food insecurity18,22,34 and children’s inadequate housing in the 5 years postpartum.19,20,22 This study examined the extent to which maternal depression affects individuals’ economic welfare and financial stability over a much longer period—15 years postpartum—and found large and persistent impacts of maternal depression on material hardship and unemployment, suggesting further pathways through which maternal depression may affect childbearing individuals and their children’s outcomes.
These findings highlight the importance of expanding access to mental health support services for low-income pregnant and postpartum individuals. Access to perinatal mental health treatment in the U.S. is limited owing to a myriad of patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers.35 Despite experiencing elevated rates of maternal depression, racial and ethnic minorities have the lowest rates of accessing care.36 Comprehensive interventions are needed to address barriers to depression screening and treatment,35,37 and to promote economic well-being and reduce health disparities.38,39 Collaborative care models integrating primary and behavioral health care have been found to be effective at decreasing depression severity.40 Recent research indicates home visitor and lay health worker interventions may also provide effective ways of screening for and treating maternal depression, while addressing clients’ social and economic challenges.41,42
This research also has implications for cost-effectiveness studies. Recently, the U.S. Prevention Task Force recommended clinicians provide or refer pregnant and postpartum individuals at increased risk of depression to counseling interventions.43 Presented estimates imply programs designed to lower prevalence of maternal depression should be viewed not only as interventions that promote population health, but also as interventions that increase economic well-being. A recent review of the lifetime costs of perinatal depression in the United Kingdom concluded that “three-quarters of the cost impact [of perinatal depression] relates to adverse impacts on the child, rather than the mother.”24 Yet, that report incorporated little empirical evidence on long-term effects on mothers. This study’s findings indicate analyses of the cost effectiveness of interventions that aim to prevent or treat maternal depression should incorporate the long-term economic benefits.
Limitations
This analysis has limitations. First, the data are observational and the presented results are associational. Although analyses controlled for history of self-reported past mental illness, and results were not sensitive to its omission, it is possible that pre-pregnancy undiagnosed mental illness confounds the relationship between major depression in the postpartum year and economic outcomes. Research assessing causal impacts of maternal depression on economic outcomes is an important direction for future analysis. That said, this study has established maternal major depression as a clear risk factor for adverse economic trajectories, which is useful information for the targeting of both mental health and anti-poverty interventions. Second, there is some attrition in the data. Although there were few significant differences in sample characteristics over time, there may have been unmeasured factors that led to differential attrition. Moreover, group-based trajectory analysis estimates can also be biased by attrition. Third, data reflect the social and economic context of the U.S. How maternal depression affects childbearing individuals’ economic well-being should be examined in other contexts. Finally, the analysis did not examine outcomes associated with long-term chronic depression or specific underlying diagnoses, and did not distinguish between economic outcomes associated with one-time episodes of depression and those associated with repeated episodes of depression. Given the findings from this study as well as from recent work indicating that postpartum depression can last for years,44 investigating trajectories of maternal depressive symptoms and their relationship with economic outcomes is an important area for future research. Identifying data that allow researchers to establish the contribution of the timing of the depressive episode (postpartum or other) and type of diagnosis (e.g., unipolar or bipolar) to later life outcomes should be a particular focus. Furthermore, future research should investigate other maternal psychological risk factors such as anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder and their associations with future economic well-being.
CONCLUSIONS
This study finds a sustained relationship between maternal depression and long-term economic adversity. Supporting perinatal mental health is crucial for strengthening childbearing individuals’ economic well-being and reducing the impact of maternal mental health disorders on intergenerational transmission of adversity.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, a component of NIH under award number UL1TR003017; HHS/Health Resources and Service Administration under award number U3DMD32755; and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through its support of the Child Health Institute of New Jersey (Grant 74260). The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing data collection was supported in part by awards R25HD074544, P2CHD058486, and 5R01HD036916 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, HRSA, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, or the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. The authors thank Dr. Paul Duberstein and the Fragile Families Working Group participants for helpful comments and suggestions.
The funders of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study and this research had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
SR, MEM, and NER conceptualized the study design. AVJ conducted the literature search and wrote the first draft of the study design section. SR, MEM, and AVJ conducted data analysis. SR, MEM, and NER interpreted the results. SR wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript. SR verified the underlying data.
This study has been granted ethical approval by Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences IRB and granted an exemption as secondary data analysis.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Credit
Slawa Rokicki: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration. Mark McGovern: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration. Annette Von Jaglinsky: Software, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization. Nancy E. Reichman: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hahn-Holbrook J, Cornwell-Hinrichs T, Anaya I. Economic and health predictors of national postpartum depression prevalence: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of 291 studies from 56 countries. Front Psychiatry. 2018;8:248. 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bauman BL, Ko JY, Cox S, et al. Vital signs: postpartum depressive symptoms and provider discussions about perinatal depression — United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(19):575‒581. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6919a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fisher J, Mello MC de, Patel V, et al. Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(2):139–149. 10.2471/blt.11.091850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Posmontier B Functional status outcomes in mothers with and without postpartum depression. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008;53(4):310–318. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Admon LK, Dalton VK, Kolenic GE, et al. Trends in suicidality 1 year before and after birth among commercially insured childbearing individuals in the United States, 2006‒2017. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;78(2):171‒176. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Slomian J, Honvo G, Emonts P, Reginster J-Y, Bruyère O. Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: a systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes. Womens Health. 2019;15:1745506519844044. 10.1177/1745506519844044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Herba CM, Glover V, Ramchandani PG, Rondon MB. Maternal depression and mental health in early childhood: an examination of underlying mechanisms in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(10):983–992. 10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30148-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, et al. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1800–1819. 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61277-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Netsi E, Pearson RM, Murray L, Cooper P, Craske MG, Stein A. Association of persistent and severe postnatal depression with child outcomes. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(3):247–253. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hammen C, Brennan PA. Severity, chronicity, and timing of maternal depression and risk for adolescent offspring diagnoses in a community sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(3):253–258. 10.1001/archpsyc.60.3.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rahman A, Iqbal Z, Bunn J, Lovel H, Harrington R. Impact of maternal depression on infant nutritional status and illness: a cohort study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(9):946–952. 10.1001/archpsyc.61.9.946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zou R, Tiemeier H, van der Ende J, et al. Exposure to maternal depressive symptoms in fetal life or childhood and offspring brain development: a population-based imaging study. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176(9):702–710. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18080970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Srinivasan R, Pearson RM, Johnson S, Lewis G, Lewis G. Maternal perinatal depressive symptoms and offspring psychotic experiences at 18 years of age: a longitudinal study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(5):431–440. 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30132-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pearson RM, Evans J, Kounali D, et al. Maternal depression during pregnancy and the postnatal period: risks and possible mechanisms for offspring depression at age 18 years. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1312–1319. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Marmorstein NR, Malone SM, Iacono WG. Psychiatric disorders among offspring of depressed mothers: associations with paternal psychopathology. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(9):1588–1594. 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pearson RM, Fernyhough C, Bentall R, et al. Association between maternal depressogenic cognitive style during pregnancy and offspring cognitive style 18 years later. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(4):434–441. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12050673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dooley D, Prause J, Ham-Rowbottom KA. Underemployment and depression: longitudinal relationships. J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41(4):421–436. 10.2307/2676295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Noonan K, Corman H, Reichman NE. Effects of maternal depression on family food insecurity. Econ Hum Biol. 2016;22:201–215. 10.1016/j.ehb.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Corman H, Curtis MA, Noonan K, Reichman NE. Maternal depression as a risk factor for children’s inadequate housing conditions. Soc Sci Med. 2016;149:76–83. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Curtis MA, Corman H, Noonan K, Reichman NE. Maternal depression as a risk factor for family homelessness. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(9):1664–1670. 10.2105/ajph.2014.301941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reichman NE, Corman H, Noonan K. Effects of maternal depression on couple relationship status. Rev Econ Househ. 2015;13(4):929–973. 10.1007/s11150-013-9237-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guerrero N, Wagner KM, Gangnon R, et al. Food insecurity and housing instability partially mediate the association between maternal depression and child problem behavior. J Prim Prev. 2020;41(3):245‒259. 10.1007/s10935-020-00588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ammerman RT, Chen J, Mallow PJ, Rizzo JA, Folger AT, Van Ginkel JB. Annual direct health care expenditures and employee absenteeism costs in high-risk, low-income mothers with major depression. J Affect Disord. 2016;190:386–394. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bauer A, Knapp M, Parsonage M. Lifetime costs of perinatal anxiety and depression. J Affect Disord. 2016;192:83–90. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Reichman NE, Teitler JO, Garfinkel I, McLanahan SS. Fragile families: sample and design. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2001;23(4–5):303–326. 10.1016/s0190-7409(01)00141-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, Ustun B, Wittchen H-U. The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview short-form (CIDI-SF). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1998;7(4):171–185. 10.1002/mpr.47. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Walters EE, Kessler RC, Nelson CB, Mroczek D. Scoring the World Health Organization’s composite international diagnostic interview short form (CIDI-SF). Geneva: WHO; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pilkauskas NV, Currie JM, Garfinkel I. The Great Recession, public transfers, and material hardship. Soc Serv Rev. 2012;86(3):401–427. 10.1086/667993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yim IS, Tanner Stapleton LR, Guardino CM, Hahn-Holbrook J, Dunkel Schetter C. Biological and psychosocial predictors of postpartum depression: systematic review and call for integration. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015;11(1):99–137. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-101414-020426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Norton EC, Dowd BE, Maciejewski ML. Marginal effects—quantifying the effect of changes in risk factors in logistic regression models. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1304–1305. 10.1001/jama.2019.1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nagin DS, Odgers CL. Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6(1):109–138. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kandola A, Lewis G, Osborn DPJ, Stubbs B, Hayes JF. Depressive symptoms and objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour throughout adolescence: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):262–271. 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30034-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Woody CA, Ferrari AJ, Siskind DJ, Whiteford HA, Harris MG. A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J Affect Disord. 2017;219:86–92. 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Garg A, Toy S, Tripodis Y, Cook J, Cordella N. Influence of maternal depression on household food insecurity for low-income families. Acad Pediatr. 2014;15(3):305–310. 10.1016/j.acap.2014.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Byatt N, Biebel K, Lundquist RS, et al. Patient, provider, and system-level barriers and facilitators to addressing perinatal depression. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2012;30(5):436–449. 10.1080/02646838.2012.743000. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kozhimannil KB, Trinacty CM, Busch AB, Huskamp HA, Adams AS. Racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum depression care among low-income women. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(6):619–625. 10.1176/ps.62.6.pss6206_0619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Silverstein M, Diaz-Linhart Y, Cabral H, et al. Efficacy of a maternal depression prevention strategy in Head Start: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(8):781–789. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sun J, Patel F, Rose-Jacobs R, Frank DA, Black MM, Chilton M. Mothers’ adverse childhood experiences and their young children’s development. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(6):882–891. 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Klein N, Kneib T, Marra G, Radice R, Rokicki S, McGovern ME. Mixed binary-continuous copula regression models with application to adverse birth outcomes. Stat Med. 2019;38(3):413–436. 10.1002/sim.7985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Grote NK, Swartz HA, Geibel SL, Zuckoff A, Houck PR, Frank E. A randomized controlled trial of culturally relevant, brief interpersonal psychotherapy for perinatal depression. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(3):313–321. 10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tandon SD, Perry DF, Mendelson T, Kemp K, Leis JA. Preventing perinatal depression in low-income home visiting clients: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79(5):707–712. 10.1037/a0024895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mundorf C, Shankar A, Moran T, et al. Reducing the risk of postpartum depression in a low-income community through a community health worker intervention. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22(4):520–528. 10.1007/s10995-017-2419-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, et al. Interventions to prevent perinatal depression: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;321(6):580–587. 10.1001/jama.2019.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Putnick DL, Sundaram R, Bell EM, et al. Trajectories of maternal postpartum depressive symptoms. Pediatrics. 2020;146(5):e20200857. 10.1542/peds.2020-0857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.