Abstract
We studied the recovery of 1,270 fungal isolates from 176,144 Isolator blood cultures (0.72% positive) on bacterial and fungal media, under routine and differing incubation conditions. Except with Histoplasma capsulatum, chocolate agar incubated for only 3 days proved to be an excellent medium for the recovery of fungi from the Isolator system.
Fungemia is common in many patients with serious fungal disease and may be detected by a variety of blood culture systems (2–4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12–16, 18, 23–33, 35, 36). The Isolator lysis-centrifugation system (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) has been shown to be an accurate and effective method for detecting fungemia and fungal bloodstream infections (3, 7, 8, 10, 12–18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 32, 33, 36, 37). However, the use of excessive media with the Isolator system may be cost-prohibitive and may not reveal additional diagnostic information.
To determine if significant differences exist in the frequencies of recovery of fungi among five agar media used for routine blood culture, we retrospectively examined the recovery of 1,270 fungal isolates from 176,144 Isolator blood cultures performed at the Mayo Clinic during 1991 to 1995. No attempt was made to identify or remove repetitive cultures. For each culture, blood was collected in an Isolator tube and processed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sediment was inoculated onto five agar media. Sheep blood agar (SBA) (Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood, TSAII formulation; Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, Md.) and chocolate agar (CA) (Becton Dickinson) were inoculated primarily for the recovery of bacteria and were incubated at 35°C with 5 to 7% CO2. These plates were examined for 72 h and then discarded. Inhibitory Mold agar (IMA) (Remel Inc., Lexena, Kans.), brain-heart infusion agar (BHI) (Remel), and Sabouraud dextrose agar (SAB) (Remel) were inoculated for the recovery of fungi. Fungal cultures were incubated at 30°C with 10% humidity. They were examined daily for 6 days and then twice a week for a total incubation time of 21 days. Fungi that were recovered on any media were completely identified by standard methods in a mycology laboratory.
Only organisms (genus and species) that were recovered on ≥6 separate occasions were deemed suitable for statistical analysis. The isolation frequency for fungal isolates was determined for each agar medium (Table 1). Cochran's Q test (6) was used to assess if any significant differences existed in frequencies of recovery of each organism among the five media (Table 2). Pairwise sign tests were used to assess differences between the various media for each organism (Table 2). When a significant difference was found in the pairwise analysis, the data in Table 1 were used to determine which of the two media isolated the organism more frequently. Some statisticians promote an adjustment when multiple comparisons are made, such as a Bonferroni adjustment (22). The P values reported in Table 2 are the unadjusted P values, with significance assumed to be ≤0.05. Bonferroni's adjustment requires a significance level of ≤0.005. Data both with and without the Bonferroni adjustment are discussed.
TABLE 1.
Isolation frequencies by medium type
Species | % (no.) of isolates recovered on:
|
Total no. of isolates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBA | CA | IMA | BHI | SAB | ||
C. albicans | 64.7 (435) | 67.7 (455) | 62.9 (423) | 48.7 (327) | 63.8 (429) | 672 |
C. glabrata | 51.9 (83) | 58.1 (93) | 65.0 (104) | 61.9 (99) | 65.6 (105) | 160 |
C. parapsilosis | 73 (116) | 76.7 (122) | 71.1 (113) | 74.2 (118) | 73.6 (117) | 159 |
H. capsulatum | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 85.1 (86) | 89.1 (90) | 91.1 (92) | 101 |
C. tropicalis | 67.9 (57) | 65.5 (55) | 60.7 (51) | 60.7 (51) | 63.1 (53) | 84 |
C. neoformans | 54.8 (23) | 64.3 (27) | 81.0 (34) | 71.4 (30) | 83.3 (35) | 42 |
C. lusitaniae | 57.1 (12) | 57.1 (12) | 76.2 (16) | 80.9 (17) | 61.9 (13) | 21 |
Coccidioides immitis | 77.8 (7) | 77.8 (7) | 66.7 (6) | 88.9 (8) | 77.8 (7) | 9 |
Total | 58.7 (733) | 61.8 (771) | 66.7 (833) | 59.3 (740) | 68.2 (851) | 1,248 |
TABLE 2.
Significance of differences in frequencies of fungal recovery on agar media (unadjusted)
Organism | Cochran's Q test P value |
P value after pairwise comparison for recovery on:
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBA vs:
|
CA vs:
|
IMA vs:
|
BHI vs SAB | ||||||||
CA | IMA | BHI | SAB | IMA | BHI | SAB | BHI | SAB | |||
C. albicans | 0.0158 | 0.1542 | 0.4583 | 0.0786 | 0.7250 | 0.0392 | 0.0019 | 0.0963 | 0.3244 | 0.7015 | 0.1401 |
C. glabrata | 0.0147 | 0.2203 | 0.0099 | 0.0640 | 0.0062 | 0.1690 | 0.5323 | 0.1686 | 0.5224 | 1.0000 | 0.4614 |
C. neoformans | 0.0028 | 0.4240 | 0.0074 | 0.0923 | 0.0075 | 0.0923 | 0.5488 | 0.0768 | 0.1250 | 1.0000 | 0.1797 |
H. capsulatum | <0.0001 | 1.0000 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.3877 | 0.2379 | 0.8145 |
C. parapsilosis | 0.8168 | 0.3075 | 0.7359 | 0.8776 | 1.0000 | 0.1496 | 0.6076 | 0.5224 | 0.4731 | 0.5847 | 1.0000 |
C. lusitaniae | 0.1309 | 1.0000 | 0.2188 | 0.1250 | 1.0000 | 0.2891 | 0.1797 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.3750 | 0.2188 |
C. tropicalis | 0.6726 | 0.8388 | 0.3269 | 0.3269 | 0.5235 | 0.5235 | 0.5413 | 0.8145 | 1.0000 | 0.8318 | 0.8318 |
Coccidioides immitis | 0.8198 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.5000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
Underlined P values indicate significant values.
Four genera and eight species from 1,248 isolates met the inclusion criteria. The frequency of isolation of these organisms for each medium is presented in Table 1. The most frequently isolated fungus was Candida albicans. Cochran's Q analysis revealed that there were no significant differences detected among the five media for the recovery Candida lustaniae (P = 0.1309), Candida tropicalis (P = 0.6726), Candida parapsilosis (P = 0.8168), or Coccidioides immitis (P = 0.8198). Significant Cochran's Q P values (P ≤ 0.05), without adjustments for multiple comparisons, were found for C. albicans (P = 0.0158), Candida glabrata (P = 0.0147), Candida neoformans (P = 0.0028), and Histoplasma capsulatum (P < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons revealed that C. albicans was recovered significantly more frequently on CA than on IMA or BHI (P = 0.0392 and P = 0.0019, respectively). Although C. albicans was recovered more frequently on CA than SAB (455 versus 429 isolates), the difference was not significant (P = 0.0963). Similarly, although C. albicans was recovered more frequently on SBA than on any of the fungal agars, the differences were not significant. The pairwise comparisons for both C. glabrata and C. neoformans demonstrated that these fungi were recovered significantly more frequently on IMA and SAB than on SBA. Although these organisms were recovered slightly more frequently on the fungal agars than on CA, the differences were not statistically significant. After the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, no statistically significant differences were detected for C. albicans, C. glabrata, or C. neoformans. Only the recovery of H. capsulatum retained statistical significance after the Bonferroni adjustment.
Both with and without adjustments for multiple comparisons, H. capsulatum demonstrated significant P values by Cochran's Q analysis (P = <0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed that the difference was due to its recovery on the fungal agars, rather than that on the SBA or CA. There was no significant difference detected in frequencies of recovery of H. capsulatum among the fungal agar media. Although H. capsulatum was not recovered on SBA or CA, this was an expected finding since the incubation time for the CA and SBA plates, which were inoculated primarily for the recovery of bacteria, was only 72 h. Geha and Roberts analyzed four years of blood culture data using the Isolator lysis centrifugation system and found that the mean recovery time for H. capsulatum was 11.5 days, with a range of 6 to 21 days (11). Therefore, we feel confident that these results represent a selection bias against the slow-growing organism H. capsulatum. Unfortunately, this study is limited by its retrospective nature. Therefore, the recovery of H. capsulatum on SBA and CA, which were incubated for only 72 h, cannot fairly be compared with the fungal agars that were incubated for 21 days. This argument, however, is not necessary for the other fungal isolates that grow rapidly and whose recovery on CA was comparable to or better than that on the fungal agars. In this assessment, CA performed as well as or better than the fungal agars, even though cultures were incubated for a shorter period of time.
In the current climate of stringent medical economics, studies that provide insights into cost-effective means for providing effective laboratory diagnosis should be explored. The clinical laboratorian must allocate resources judiciously and establish diagnoses in the most cost-effective manner, without compromising the quality of the tests performed. The Isolator system is a proven method of diagnosing fungemia, but its cost-effectiveness has been questioned (19). Our study suggests that, with the exception of H. capsulatum, clinically relevant fungi that cause bloodstream infections will be adequately recovered on CA within 3 days of incubation using the Isolator system. Although isolates other than H. capsulatum were occasionally recovered after incubation times greater than 3 days, the number of these isolates was not enough to provide significant differences in favor of the fungal media. This study also suggests that the 5 to 7% CO2 atmospheric condition employed for the recovery of bacteria is, at least, not inhibitory to fungi.
Additional studies, which examine extended incubation of CA and SBA, are needed to determine the suitability of these media for the recovery of H. capsulatum. Until such a study has been performed, it would be prudent to continue the use of at least one of the proven fungal media. Among the fungal media, H. capsulatum was recovered most frequently on SAB compared with recoveries on IMA and BHI, but the differences in detection were not significant. The recovery of H. capsulatum on SBA and CA held for extended incubation times should be studied further. This may necessitate taping, bagging, or using 20 ml, rather than 15 ml, of SBA or CA to prevent desiccation. If a three-plate system (SBA, CA, and a fungal medium) is used, we recommend using all the Isolator sediment and extending incubation for the optimal recovery of fungi. The use of one, rather than three, fungal media with the Isolator system should substantially reduce laboratory costs without compromising the detection of fungemia.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ascher D P, Shoupe B A, Robb M, Maybee D A, Fischer G W. Comparison of standard and quantitative blood cultures in the evaluation of children with suspected central venous line sepsis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992;15:499–503. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90098-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benedict S, Colagreco J. Fungal infections associated with malignancies, treatments, and AIDS. Cancer Nurs. 1994;17:411–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Body B A, Pfaller M A, Durrer J, Koontz F, Groschel D H. Comparison of the lysis centrifugation and radiometric blood culture systems for recovery of yeast. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;7:417–420. doi: 10.1007/BF01962353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bow E J. Invasive fungal infections in patients receiving intensive cytotoxic therapy for cancer. Br J Haematol. 1998;101(Suppl.1):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Buck G E, Hanes V E, Kelly M T, Alexander J A. Clinical comparison of the Roche Septi-Chek and Dupont Isolator blood culture systems. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987;87:396–398. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.3.396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cochran W G. The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika. 1950;37:256–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cockerill F R, III, Torgerson C A, Reed G S, Vetter E A, Weaver A L, Dale J C, Roberts G D, Henry N K, Ilstrup D M, Rosenblatt J E. Clinical comparison of Difco ESP, Wampole isolator, and Becton Dickinson Septi-Chek aerobic blood culturing systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:20–24. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.1.20-24.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cockerhill F R, III, et al. Analysis of 281,797 consecutive blood cultures performed over an eight-year period: trends in microorganisms isolated and the value of anaerobic culture of blood. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:403–418. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Doern G V, Barton A, Rao S. Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2686–2689. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.9.2686-2689.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Engler H D, Fahle G A, Gill V J. Clinical evaluation of the BacT/Alert and Isolator aerobic blood culture systems. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;105:774–781. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/105.6.774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Geha D J, Roberts G D. Laboratory detection of fungemia. Clin Lab Med. 1994;14:83–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guerra-Romero L, Edson R S, Cockerhill III F R, Horstmeier C D, Roberts G D. Comparison of Du Pont Isolator and Roche Septi-Chek for detection of fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:1623–1625. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.9.1623-1625.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hellinger W C, Cawley J J, Alvarez S, Hogan S F, Harmsen W S, Ilstrup D M, Cockerill F R., III Clinical comparison of the isolator and BacT/Alert aerobic blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:1787–1790. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1787-1790.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Karlowsky J A, Zhanel G G, Klym K A, Hoban D J, Kabani A M. Candidemia in a Canadian tertiary care hospital from 1976 to 1996. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;29:5–9. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00068-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kellogg J A, Bankert D A, Manzella J P, Parsey K S, Scott S L, Cavanaugh S H. Clinical comparison of Isolator and thiol broth with ESP aerobic and anaerobic bottles for recovery of pathogens from blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:2050–2055. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2050-2055.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kelly M T, Roberts F J, Henry D, Geere I, Smith J A. Clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 660 resin media for blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:1925–1927. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1925-1927.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kirkley B A, Easley K A, Washington J A. Controlled clinical evaluation of Isolator and ESP aerobic blood culture systems for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:1547–1549. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1547-1549.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lyon R, Woods G. Comparison of the BacT/Alert and Isolator blood culture systems for recovery of fungi. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103:660–662. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/103.5.660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Morrell R M, Jr, Wasilauskas B L, Steffee C H. Performance of fungal blood cultures by using the Isolator collection system: is it cost-effective? J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:3040–3043. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.12.3040-3043.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mosca R, Curtas S, Forbes B, Meguid M M. The benefits of Isolator cultures in the management of suspected catheter sepsis. Surgery. 1987;102:718–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Murray P R. Comparison of the lysis-centrifugation and agitated biphasic blood culture systems for detection of fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:96–98. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.96-98.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Neter J, Wasserman J, Kutner M H. Applied linear statistical models. 2nd ed. Homewood, Ill: Richard Irwin, Inc.; 1985. pp. 582–584. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Perduca M, Marangoni E, Guanziroli A, Romero E, Filice G. Fungaemia in hospitalized patients. Mycoses. 1995;38:385–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1995.tb00069.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Petti C A, Zaidi A K, Mirrett S, Reller L B. Comparison of Isolator 1.5 and BACTEC NR660 aerobic 6A blood culture systems for detection of fungemia in children. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1877–1879. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.8.1877-1879.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pohlman J K, Kirkley B A, Easley K A, Washington J A. Controlled clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2525–2529. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2525-2529.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reimer L G, Wilson M L, Weinstein M P. Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:444–465. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.3.444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rex J H, Walsh T J, Anaissie E J. Fungal infections in iatrogenically compromised hosts. Adv Intern Med. 1998;43:321–371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ribeiro P, Sousa A B, Nunes O, Aveiro F, Fernandes J P, Gouveia J. Candidemia in acute leukemia patients. Support Care Cancer. 1997;5:249–251. doi: 10.1007/s005200050068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rubin R H. Fungal and bacterial infections in the immunocompromised host. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;12(Suppl. 1):S42–S48. doi: 10.1007/BF02389877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Siemann M, Rabenhorst G. Detection of fungemia from blood cultures using the BACTEC 9240 instrument. Zentbl Bakteriol. 1998;287:53–55. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(98)80143-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stratton C W. Blood cultures and immunocompromised patients. Clin Lab Med. 1994;14:31–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tarrand J J, Guillot C, Wenglar M, Jackson J, Lajeunesse J D, Rolston K V. Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator 10 blood culturing systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:2245–2249. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2245-2249.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Telenti A, Roberts G D. Fungal blood cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989;8:825–831. doi: 10.1007/BF02185855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Waite R T, Wood G L. Evaluation of BACTEC MYCO/F lytic medium for recovery of mycobacteria and fungi from blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1176–1179. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.5.1176-1179.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Weinstein M P, Mirrett S, Reimer L G, Wilson M L, Smith-Elekes S, Chuard C R, Joho K L, Reller L B. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:978–981. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.978-981.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wilson M L, Davis T E, Mirrett S, Reynolds J, Fuller D, Allen S D, Flint K K, Koontz F, Reller L B. Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter Isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:865–871. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.865-871.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yasuoka A, Kohno S, Maesaki S, Yamada H, Kaku M, Miyazaki T, Koga H, Hara K. Laboratory and clinical investigation of lysis centrifugation blood culture method for fungemia. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1991;65:838–843. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]