Abstract
Abnormalities in brain glucose metabolism and accumulation of abnormal protein deposits called plaques and tangles are neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but their relationship to disease pathogenesis and to each other remains unclear. Here we show that succinylation, a metabolism-associated post-translational protein modification (PTM), provides a potential link between abnormal metabolism and AD pathology. We quantified the lysine succinylomes and proteomes from brains of individuals with AD, and healthy controls. In AD, succinylation of multiple mitochondrial proteins declined, and succinylation of small number of cytosolic proteins increased. The largest increases occurred at critical sites of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and microtubule-associated tau. We show that in vitro, succinylation of APP disrupted its normal proteolytic processing thereby promoting Aβ accumulation and plaque formation and that succinylation of tau promoted its aggregation to tangles and impaired microtubule assembly. In transgenic mouse models of AD, elevated succinylation associated with soluble and insoluble APP derivatives and tau. These findings indicate that a metabolism-linked PTM may be associated with AD.
Subject terms: Chemical modification, Alzheimer's disease
Succinylation is a metabolism-associated post-translational protein modification. Here the authors describe changes to the succinylation of proteins in the brain of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease.
Introduction
Misfolded deposits of the amyloid beta peptide (Aβ)1,2 and the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT)3 are pivotal pathological features in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), wherein reduced brain regional glucose metabolism and synaptic density are correlated with the development of clinical cognitive dysfunction4. Preclinical research studies show that reduced glucose metabolism exacerbates learning and memory deficits concurrent with the accumulation of Aβ oligomers and plaques5 and misfolded hyperphosphorylated tau6,7. However, the interrelationship(s) linking these keys but apparently disparate pathological processes remain unknown. While identification of proamyloidogenic and/or immune-inflammatory genetic factors has played a prominent role in advancing our understanding of AD, more recent formulations have expanded the scope of molecular underpinnings of the disease8,9. Sims and colleagues coined the term “multiplex hypothesis of AD” to highlight the increasingly recognized shortcomings of the “amyloid hypothesis of AD”9.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins provide an efficient and rapid biological regulatory mechanism that links metabolism to protein and cell functions. PTMs contribute to the functional diversity of proteomes without the formation of new proteins or a change in their abundance by covalent addition of functional groups that can alter protein charge, structure, and their interactions. Protein PTMs play a central role in the pathology of neurological diseases. The function of tau can be altered via its phosphorylation10, acetylation11, methylation12, and O-GlcNAcylation13. Protein succinylation of lysine residues is a relatively understudied PTM and changes the net charge from positive to negative. The interactions of lysine succinylation and acetylation play important roles in metabolic pathways14. However, succinylation is poorly studied in the nervous system; our previous work demonstrated that lysine succinylation functionally modifies enzymes of energy metabolism15.
There is an increasing interest in defining the precise metabolic pathways involved in the pathogenesis of AD9,16–19. A significant correlation between reduced brain regional glucose metabolism and decreased α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (KGDHC)20,21 has been described in AD. Inhibition of KGDHC activity leads to a widespread reduction in regional brain post-translational lysine succinylation, for which the succinyl donor is presumably succinyl-CoA, both in yeast22 and cultured neurons15,23,24. Studies of organisms deficient in NAD+-dependent desuccinylase sirtuin 5 (SIRT5)25 provide evidence of the regulatory importance of succinylation in metabolic processes26–30. However, the role of succinylation in metabolic pathways of the human nervous system or in neurodegenerative diseases is unknown. Our research examines the human brain succinylome and its changes in AD. The results suggest that succinylation may link AD-related metabolic deficits to structural, functional, and pathological alterations involving APP and tau.
Results
Human brain succinylome and proteome
Analysis of two cohorts each consisting of brain tissues from five controls and five AD patients (information provided in Supplementary Data 1) was performed to maximize the precision and reproducibility of the succinylome (Fig. 1a, b) and the proteome (Fig. 1c, d) determinations. When the two independent cohorts were taken together, 1908 succinylated peptides from 314 unique proteins were identified across a total sample size of 20 brains (Fig. 1b). Over 90% of succinylated peptides being identified were equivalent to 0 miss-cleavage and 10% contained 1 miss-cleavage site in our data, which is consistent with what we observed in our regular global proteomics. The parallel global proteomic analysis detected 4678 proteins (Fig. 1d). Nearly all the succinylated proteins identified during the study were found in the global proteomes of the same samples (Fig. 1e).
To understand the role of succinylation in cell function, subcellular localization analysis of 314 succinylated proteins in 20 human brains was performed (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Data 2). Succinylated proteins were mapped to multiple subcellular compartments. Interestingly, ~73% (229/314) of the succinylated proteins were mitochondrial (Fig. 2a). The pyruvate dehydrogenase complex E1 component subunit alpha (PDHA1), which links glycolysis to the TCA cycle, was significantly succinylated. The eight enzymes of the TCA cycle located within the mitochondrial matrix and their multiple subunits were also extensively succinylated. Furthermore, succinylation of proteins was detected in the cytosol (95 proteins, ~30%) and nucleus (73 proteins, ~23%) (Fig. 2b). Mitochondrial distribution of succinylated proteins has also been observed in the mouse liver29,30.
The mole fraction of succinylation sites per protein varied from 1 to 23 (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Data 2). Our assessment found 40% (125/314) of proteins with one succinylated site, 20% (60/314) showing two sites, and the remaining 40% (127/314) having three or more succinylated sites. The bulk of mitochondrial proteins (~89%) contain more than two succinylated lysines. In addition, the most extensively succinylated proteins with over ten distinct succinylated sites/peptides were all mitochondrial proteins; 61% (14/21) of these were exclusively mitochondrial proteins, including isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH2), fumarate hydratase (FH), and malate dehydrogenase (MDH2) (Supplementary Data 2). Overall, these succinylated proteins typically appeared in metabolism-associated processes and were linked to multiple disease pathways in the KEGG enrichment analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Data 3).
Since no specific motifs for lysine succinylation in human tissues have been reported, a succinylation motif analysis of all 1908 succinylated peptides using Motif-X was performed. A total of five conserved motifs were identified (Fig. 2d) in which nonpolar, aliphatic residues including alanine, valine and isoleucine surround the acceptor succinylated lysines. The succinylated lysine site analysis indicated a strong bias for alanine residues, which is consistent with motifs identified in tomato27. IceLogo heat maps assessed the preference of each residue in the position of a 15 amino-acid-long sequence context (Fig. 2e). Isoleucine was detected downstream of lysine-succinylation sites, while alanine and lysine (two of the most conserved amino-acid residues) were found upstream. Valine residues occurred both upstream and downstream. Tryptophan, proline or serine residues had the lowest probability to occur in succinylated peptides.
Succinylome and proteome changes in AD brains
Completion of the human brain succinylome and global proteome analyses allowed direct comparison between brains from controls and AD patients. Without enrichment of succinylated peptide in global proteome data, the number of succinylated peptides identified is 0.13% total peptides for cohort 1 and 0.28% for cohort 2. The notable difference in ratio of succinylated peptides over total peptides between the two cohorts of global proteome datasets is not surprising, since succinylation has relatively low occupancy level. Therefore, there will be an anticipated variation between two cohorts’ datasets for detection of those low abundance succinylated peptides under global and complex quantitative proteomics analysis. This assessment also indicates that the enrichment is important for identifying the succinylated peptides in large cohorts. After enrichment, we found that the average enrichment of succinylated peptides was found to be 33.9% in two cohorts while 0.2% of succinylated peptide was identified in global proteome without enrichment. Of 1908 succinylated peptides identified in two independent analyses, 932 succinylated peptides were quantifiable (Fig. 1a). A volcano plot revealed that succinylation of 434 unique peptides declined with AD while the abundance of 498 unique succinylated peptides was increased (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Data 4). Succinylation of 29 peptides from 20 distinct proteins differed significantly (two-tailed Student’s t-test, p < 0.05) between AD and control subjects (Fig. 3a, b). Ten succinylated peptides were increased while succinylation of 19 peptides declined in AD. Proteomic analysis of 20 samples in two cohorts (Fig. 1c) showed that of the 4678 identified proteins, 4442 common proteins were quantifiable in both AD and controls (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Data 5 and Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). A comparison of the succinylome with the proteome demonstrated minimal AD-related changes in protein levels of those succinylated proteins, and therefore the succinylation variations are most likely independent from the changes of the abundance of each corresponding protein (Fig. 3c). The proteomic analysis showed that 81 proteins changed significantly (two-tailed Student’s t-test, p < 0.05 and |log2FC | >0.25). Eight proteins decreased in brains from AD patients while 73 protein levels were increased (Supplementary Fig. 2a). In a recent large-scale proteomic scan, the protein abundance of PDHA, PDHB, and DLD were all decreased in AD, which is consistent with our finding, representing a decreased abundance of proteins in impaired mitochondrial states17. Thus, changes in protein levels and succinylation may be important in AD. Relatively small fold-changes between control and AD brain samples were probably due to a well-known ratio compression caused by the co-isolation of isobaric-labeled background ions in MS2-based TMT quantitative proteomics.
The majority of the peptides (16/19) with AD-related decreases in succinylation were mitochondrial, and more than half of them showed exclusive localization within mitochondria (Supplementary Data 6). A novel association of the ATP5H/KCTD2 locus with AD has been reported31. Moreover, ATP-synthase activity declines in the AD brain32. In line with these findings, we identified the maximal AD-associated decrease (−1.33 in log2FC) was localized to ATP-synthase subunit d (ATP5H), with two additional peptides from ATP5H down at −0.52 and −0.49 in log2FC. In addition, two peptides from the ATP-synthase subunit b (ATP5F1) were also reduced (log2FC at −0.47 and −0.32) in the brain of AD patients. Succinylation of three lysine residues (Lys77, Lys244, and Lys344) of PDHA1 were significantly diminished in AD cases (Fig. 3a, b).
The highest AD-related increases in succinylation were in non-mitochondrial proteins (Fig. 3a, b). Succinylation of four peptides from brain cytosolic and/or extracellular brain hemoglobin subunits alpha and beta increased by 1.91 (0.978 in log2FC) to 2.18 fold (1.127 in log2FC) in AD subjects. Strikingly, two extramitochondrial peptides with the largest AD-associated increases in succinylation were from two proteins critical to AD pathology: APP and tau. Both proteins were succinylated at critical sites in nine out of ten AD brain samples, whereas succinylation at those sites in APP or tau was not detectable in control brains (Fig. 3b, c).
Subcellular responses of succinylation to impaired mitochondrial function
Subcellular succinylation in response to perturbed mitochondrial function was determined by compromising the function of mitochondria in HEK293T cells through mild inhibition of complex I. Mitochondrial dysfunction causes a reduction in succinylation in whole-cell lysates and mitochondrial fractions (Fig. 4a), consistent with previous findings in N2a cells23. However, alterations in mitochondrial function increased succinylation of 30–70 kDa proteins in the non-mitochondrial fractions. We previously demonstrated that mitochondrial dysfunction can alter mitochondrial/cytosolic protein signaling33. Here we extend this line of investigation by showing that mitochondrial dysfunction resulted in a release of mitochondrial proteins including all subunits of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHC) and KGDHC (Fig. 4b, c). This was not due to disruption of the mitochondrial integrity because cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 isoform 1 (COX-IV), an integral membrane protein in mitochondria, did not increase in the cytosol fraction. Confocal microscopy further confirmed that rotenone caused a redistribution of mitochondrial proteins without mitochondrial lysis, as mitochondria were clearly outlined by COX-IV immunolabeling. Exogenous administration of rotenone increased the amount of the cytosolic E2k component of KGDHC (DLST) outside of mitochondria defined by COX-IV (Fig. 4d). Thus, impaired mitochondrial function induced a metabolic disturbance leading to an increased leakage of mitochondrial proteins into the cytosol, including DLST. Consistent with its identity as a succinytransferase34 and succinyl-CoA generator35, DLST was associated with elevated succinylation in non-mitochondrial fractions.
Functional significance of succinylation of APP
AD-associated succinylation of APP occurred at a critical site (K612) in nine of ten brains from AD patients but not in brains from age-matched subjects with no dementia (Fig. 5a, b), and the following experiments demonstrated it to be pathologically important. Immunofluorescence staining with antibodies to pan-lysine-succinylation and to Aβ oligomers (NU-4)36 or Aβ plaques (β-Amyloid, D3D2N) showed an early increase in lysine succinylation that appeared to parallel oligomer accumulation (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 3a) in the hippocampus of a transgenic mouse model of AD (Tg19959 mice), which carries the human APP with two pathogenic familial AD mutations. However, the immunoreactivity of lysine succinylation was significantly decreased in 10-month-old wild-type and transgenic mice relative to 4-month-old mice, which results in a reduced colocalization between lysine succinylation and Aβ plaque accumulation (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 3b). This could result either from a decrease in lysine succinylations or from their sequestration into a context (e.g., perhaps in the form of Aβ plaques) that prevents Succi-K antibody from access to possibly buried succinylation sites. These findings suggest that APP succinylation might be involved in early Aβ aggregation events in vivo, while its role and mechanism in later events leading to subsequent plaque development remain to be further explored.
The generation of Aβ is a highly regulated process by the secretases. β-secretase initiates the amyloidogenic pathway, while α-secretase is part of the non-amyloidogenic pathway, bisecting the Aβ domain and thereby inhibiting the formation of Aβ. In subsequent experiments, we tested the relationship between succinylation and APP processing by the secretase enzymes. K612-L613 is the APP α-secretase scissile bond, and missense mutation at K612N produces early-onset AD37. Furthermore, global proteomics showed an increase in β-secretase (BACE1) abundance of 31% in 5 AD brains compared to 5 controls, while no changes occurred for either α-secretase or the sirtuin (SIRT) family (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Seyfried et al.38 quantified a total of 2745 proteins in two regions (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (FC, Brodmann Area 9) and precuneus (PC, Brodmann Area 7). The number that overlapped was about 2332 proteins (85.3%) compared with our data (4442 proteins from 10 controls and 10 AD, Brodmann area 44/45). The four disintegrin metalloproteinase (ADAM) family members identified in that paper were also identified in our proteome. The protein level of ADAM 10, 22, 23 neither changed in that paper nor our data, while ADAM11 showed a similar decrease in the two cases; SIRT2 and SIRT5 levels did not vary38. Further, protein levels of SIRTs do not necessarily reflect activity, which are often regulated by substrates and post-translational modifications.
Thus, succinylation of APP at K612 in AD may promote Aβ production by inhibiting cleavage by α-secretase. To test this hypothesis, synthetic peptides comprised of residues 6–29 in Aβ42 (numbering with respect to the N-terminal aspartase of Aβ42), which span the α-secretase cleavage site, with or without succinylation at K16 (corresponding to K612 in APP695), were assayed for α-secretase cleavage susceptibility. Recombinant human disintegrin metalloproteinase 10 (rhADAM10), the main basal α-secretase acting in the non-amyloidogenic processing of APP, cleaved the native (control) peptide (substrate) with 84% efficiency, whereas no cleavage of its succinylated counterpart was detectable following a 24 h incubation (Fig. 5e). Measurement of the two fragments that are produced by α-secretase activity confirmed a strong inhibition of catalysis at the α-secretase site (Supplementary Fig. 3c–g).
Residue K16 (K612 in APP) is critical for both aggregation and toxicity of Aβ422,39. Aβ oligomers are widely regarded as the most toxic and pathogenic form of Aβ40. To assess whether succinylation can directly alter Aβ oligomerization, aggregation of succinylated and non-succinylated Aβ42 was determined by anti-Aβ oligomer antibody NU-236 and electron microscopy (EM). After 24 and 48 h incubations, succinylated Aβ appeared to undergo more robust oligomerization (Fig. 5f). Moreover, EM microscopy clearly revealed elevated levels of oligomeric, protofibrillar, and fibrillar Aβ41 in the succinylation reaction mixture at t = 24 or 48 h (Fig. 5g). These data suggest that succinylation of K612 of APP may contribute to Aβ oligomerization. Taken together, our findings suggest that succinylation of K678 might lead to early-onset and/or enhanced generation, oligomerization, and accumulation of Aβ, consistent with the effects of known pathogenic mutations at this site37,42.
Functional significance of succinylation of tau
Tau has two important nucleating sequences that initiate the aggregation process: paired helical filament 6 (PHF6, residues 306–311) and PHF6* (residues 275–280) (Fig. 6a)43,44. PHF6* is located at the beginning of the second repeat (R2) and is only present in four-repeat tau isoforms, while PHF6 is located at the beginning of the third repeat (R3) and is present in all tau isoforms. Post-translational modifications within these two hexapeptide regions can alter protein function and may provide a critical link to pathological hallmarks of tauopathies. Acetylation of K280 of PHF6* in tau is a well-characterized modification that affects tau function3, and has become a prognostic factor and a new potential therapeutic target for treating tauopathies. Until now, very little evidence of post-translational modifications within the PHF6 region have been uncovered. Tau succinylation on K311 within the PHF6 hexapeptide 306VQIVYK311 was detected in nine of ten AD brain samples but was undetectable in all control samples (Fig. 6b). Previous studies indicate the removal of residue K311 in PHF6 abrogates fibril formation45, but the structural and functional implications of K311 succinylation are unknown. Thus, exploring the influence of tau succinylation on K311 may be important as we seek to develop a comprehensive understanding of its biological importance.
To characterize tau succinylation in a transgenic mouse model of tauopathy, we used high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscopy to compare the presence of lysine succinylation with that of tau oligomers (T22)46 and phospho-tau (AT8) in the hippocampus of wild-type and TgP301S mice (Fig. 6c, d and Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). At 4 months of age, the fluorescence signal of succinyl lysine was significantly increased in parallel with the oligomeric tau T22 (green) and phospho-tau AT8 (green). Similar to what we observed found in Aβ deposits, 10-month-old wild-type and transgenic tau mice displayed a significant reduction in the levels of succinyl lysine in comparison to 4-month-old mice, thereby leading to an attenuated colocalization between succinylation epitopes and tauopathy epitopes.
The heparin-induced thioflavin S (ThS) tau aggregation assay was used to test the influence of tau succinylation at K311 on the ability of PHF6 to self-aggregate. PHF6* and K280-acetylated PHF6* (A-PHF6*) were also used as controls in parallel assays (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Surprisingly, at peptide concentration of 10 μM in the presence of 2.5 μM heparin, neither PHF6* nor A-PHF6* fibrillized during an 80 min incubation period. Although PHF6* is an initiation site for tau aggregation, its potency is much lower than that of PHF647, possibly explaining the observed lack of aggregation under these conditions. In contrast, PHF6 and K311-succinylated PHF6 (S-PHF6) fibrillized by 20 and 80 min, respectively (Fig. 7a). The aggregation of PHF6 was remarkably accelerated by the K311 succinylation. A substantial enhancement of PHF6-induced aggregation occurred even with a mixture containing 90% PHF6 and only 10% S-PHF6, suggesting that succinylated tau can promote aggregation of unmodified protein (Fig. 7a). Longer incubation time (24 h) with PHF6, S-PHF6, and a 90%/10% mixture was visualized by EM (Fig. 7b–d). All the reactions exhibited fibrils with a typical paired helical filament appearance. However, the succinylated peptide formed abundant short filaments, a feature of brain-derived Alzheimer PHFs48–50, while unmodified PHF6 filaments are longer and sparser, morphologies more typical of recombinant tau peptide fibers (Fig. 7e, f). Thus, both ThS and EM results support an important role of succinylation in promoting pathological tau aggregation.
To understand the role of succinylation in tau function, tubulin polymerization was assessed using the tau K19 peptide, a 99-residue 3-repeat tau microtubule-binding domain (MBD) fragment (MQ244-E372), and succinylated K19 (Supplementary Fig. 4d–f). Native tau K19 promoted tubulin assembly as determined by increased light scattering at 350 nm, as previously reported3,51. Nevertheless, succinyl-CoA treated K19, which is succinylated at multiple lysine residues including Lys311, showed a complete suppression of tubulin assembly activity (Fig. 7g). These findings suggest that succinylation of tau leads to a loss of normal tau function in regulating microtubule dynamics.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to investigate whether succinylation-induced loss of tau microtubule assembly resulted from a loss of tau-tubulin interactions. The binding of the tau MBD fragment K19 to a construct composed of two tubulin heterodimers stabilized by a stathmin-like domain (T2R), was monitored as described52. In the presence of T2R, a number of NMR HSQC resonances show a decreased intensity compared to corresponding resonances of matched samples of K19 in the absence of T2R (Fig. 7h). This reduced resonance intensity indicates an interaction between the corresponding K19 residue and the much larger T2R complex. The most highly attenuated resonances (intensity ratios < 0.2) within the MBD corresponded to residues ranging from positions 308–323, located in R2 of the MBD and included most of the PHF6 sequence. Succinylation of 15N-labeled K19 (Supplementary Fig. 4g–i) largely abrogated this interaction as observed by the increased intensity ratios across all residues compared to unmodified K19 (Fig. 7i). These results indicate that succinylation of K19 negatively modulates the interaction with the T2R tubulin tetramer.
To establish whether succinylation of K311 specifically was sufficient to decrease tau-tubulin interactions, 1H STD NMR was employed to analyze the tubulin interactions of a tau peptide (residues 296–321) that was previously shown to comprise a high affinity microtubule-binding motif within tau53–55. STD signals were observed for unmodified tau peptide (296–321) in the presence of tubulin (Fig. 7j), as previously reported55, indicative of binding. Succinylation of residue K311 within the tau peptide (296–321) resulted in a dramatic loss of STD signals (Fig. 7k), indicating that K311 succinylation results in a significantly decreased binding affinity of this microtubule-binding tau peptide for tubulin. The recently reported structure of tau repeat 2 bound to microtubules shows that K280, the R2 equivalent of K311, lies along the microtubule surface54. K280/K311 have their positively charged amino group in close proximity to residue E415 of α-tubulin (Supplementary Fig. 4j). Therefore, it seems possible that succinylation at K311 might result in an electrostatic clash between the negatively charged succinyl group and the glutamate residue. A decreased affinity of K311-succinylated tau for tubulin and/or microtubules could contribute to the progression of tau pathology in AD.
Discussion
Our study provides a system level view of the human brain succinylome as a marker of metabolic activity, particularly in mitochondria, and reveals a dramatic alteration of succinylation in AD brain. Our results raise the possibility that succinylation may provide a link between the signature metabolic reductions and proteinopathies in AD. We show that changes in protein succinylation, as a molecular signal, correlate with altered cerebral metabolic function in AD as the disease progresses. Other PTMs, such as ubiquitination, acetylation, and phosphorylation, have been recently shown to affect Aβ clearance56,57 and tauopathy56–59, thereby contributing to progression of the severities of those proteinopathies. It is not perhaps surprising that succinylation would have such an effect since it increases the size of the lysine side chain considerably and could lead to steric hindrance of intermolecular interactions. Moreover, as noted, succinylation reversing the net charge of the lysyl side chain (Supplementary Fig. 4j).
The mechanisms and control of both nonenzymatic and enzymatic succinylation by cellular succinyltransferases and desuccinylases are unknown. Our data clearly demonstrate that impairing mitochondrial function decreases mitochondrial succinylation and promotes succinylation of specific non-mitochondrial proteins by altering the distribution of succinyltransferases from the mitochondria to cytosol. A precedent for this concept is provided by results showing that translocation of the DLST subunit of KGDHC to the nucleus increases histone succinylation35. Rotenone induces translocation of PDHC from mitochondria to other compartments60. The decline in succinylation of mitochondrial proteins appears to be due, at least in part, to a failure in maintaining succinylation levels. This raises the possibility that activators of desuccinylases (e.g., sirtuins) and/or interventions that elevate levels of NAD+ should be considered. The large increase in succinylation in 4-month-old Tg19959 mice in which abnormal mitochondrial function in AD promotes the release of KGDHC and subsequent increases succinylation is consistent with our hypothesis that succinylation status may represent a therapeutic opportunity.
We showed that transgenic mouse strains of either tauopathy or amyloidosis phenotype, exhibit widespread increases in lysine succinylation at 4 months of age, which is not exclusive to tau and APP but parallels the early appearance of these proteinopathies. This suggests that each transgene is altering common processes (e.g., mitochondria/metabolism) in addition to tau or APP processing. Metabolism is altered even in embryonic cultures of mouse models of AD61. The data in Fig. 4 demonstrate that disrupted mitochondrial function increases succinyl transferase in the cytosol. Indeed, the widespread succinylation in both models provides further evidence of that possibility. Interestingly, a pharmacological increase in vitamin B1 (a key vitamin in metabolism) significantly reduces Aβ burden62 and tauopathy63 in mice and also showed encouraging results in AD patients64, suggesting these fundamental processes are critical even in mice genetically engineered to create the pathologies. A more precise interpretation requires knowing which proteins are succinylated since the human brain succinylome probably involves hundreds of succinylated proteins.
Decreases in succinylation status at 10 months are observed in the brains of mouse models of both amyloidosis and tauopathy, suggesting that this reduction is not an artefact of staining protocols or efficiencies. The changes in succinylation status that we observed between wild-type and transgenic mice and between 4- and 10-month-old mice were consistent across comparisons with two different Aβ antibodies, with two different tau antibodies, and also between the different transgenic mice, provide further evidence that pathology-related changes in succcinylation status are unlikely to be attributable to interindividual variability in tissue processing and/or staining.
While proteins in addition to tau or APP are succinylated, APP and tau succinylation status increase in brains from AD patients, which suggests that increased tau and APP succinylation may play a role in the development of AD pathology. Intriguingly, lysine-succinylation levels decrease in 10-month-old mice over 4-month mice, while both amyloid aggregation and tauopathy continued to increase. This change is not likely to be a technical artifact. All sections were stained at the same time under the same conditions (solutions, washing, temperature, antibody preparation, etc.) and analyzed under identical experimental settings. In addition, perusal of the first column of panel in the Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4 show that the immunoreactivity of MAP2 (a neuronal marker, cyan) does not change during aging, either in WT or Aβ/tau transgenic mice. The decline in succinylation may reflect either desuccinylation processes, or sequestration of succinylated sites away from labeling antibodies. Notably, both K16 in Aβ and K311 in tau are buried in the structured core of their respective aggregated forms65,66. The decrease in the association between succinylation and pathology at 10 months may be due to results at least in part incorporation of succinylated sites inside aggregated species, preventing detection by immunohistochemistry. However, based on the current data, it is not possible to rule out alternative explanations, including potential changes in metabolism leading to desuccinylation reactions that may be related, or unrelated, to the progression of pathology and disease. Importantly, some precedent is provided by reports in which tau acetylation at residue K280 also peaks and decays during the course of tangle formation and cell death, leading to the suggestion that this epitope is either masked in PHFs or else is subjected to deacetylation in later stages of aggregate maturation67. An adequate explanation requires a complete accounting of which proteins are involved (i.e., a complete mouse brain succinylome at multiple ages) and knowing which proteins are incorporated into deposits in both humans and mouse models. The mitochondrial succinylome in human brain tissues was significantly reduced in AD while succinylation of APP and tau was increased. Despite these remaining questions, our results suggest that the modification of metabolism in disease may lead to critical succinyl-mediated modifications of extramitochondrial proteins including APP and tau leading to aggregation and deposition. Preventing APP and tau succinylation and/or increasing mitochondrial succinylation may provide novel therapeutic targets for the prevention and/or treatment of AD and associated pathologies24.
Lysines are highly modified residues. Understanding the relationship(s) of succinylation to the other PTM(s) is critical to a complete understanding of its role in AD pathology. A direct comparison is difficult because each PTM requires a different enrichment strategy. Lysine311 of tau has been reported to be subjected to ubiquitination, dimethylation, and acetylation in transgenic mice68. Our experiments raise the question of whether precise changes in mitochondria are required to alter modification of specific proteins. Succinylation appears directly linked to KGDHC and mitochondria. Whether other post-translational modifications are also linked to mitochondrial dysfunction remains to be determined.
Overall, our data report the human brain succinylome and its implications for mitochondrial function as well as for the molecular pathogenesis of amyloidosis and tauopathy, two of the cardinal proteinopathies of AD. We provide a rich resource for functional analyses of lysine succinylation and for the dissection of metabolic networks in AD. The current studies also lay the foundation for future investigation into the crosstalk between different PTMs, including acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination and succinylation associated with AD and tau pathology. The discovery that succinylation links mitochondrial dysfunction to amyloidosis and tauopathy may provide new molecular diagnostics as well as potential targets for therapies. Since both succinylated Aβ and tau are closely associated with disease state, future investigations may reveal additional succinylated proteins that are associated with AD or other neurodegenerative diseases.
Methods
All experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Weill Cornell Medicine. All human brains used were obtained from Neurobiobank and Mount Sinai School of Medicine. All brain tissues were procured, stored, and distributed according to applicable state and federal guidelines and regulations involving consent, protection of donor anonymity. Consistent with institutional policies and procedures as well as requirements of New York State Department of Health for Tissue Bank Operations (License number NA083), written consent for postmortem brain donation for diagnosis and research use was obtained from the legal next of kin of each donor. The deidentified specimens used in this research were exempt from Institutional Review Boards (IRB) review.
Human brain tissue samples
All brain tissues from Broca’s area (BM-44/45, frontal lobe) were from the NIH Neurobiobank and Mount Sinai School of Medicine. All patient information including diagnosis, clinical dementia rating (CDR), age, sex, postmortem interval (PMI) disease status, and neuropathological diagnostic criteria (including mean plaques, and Braak staging) are detailed in Supplementary Data 1. Neuropathological evaluation of amyloid plaque distribution was based on the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD) criteria, while the extent of spread of neurofibrillary tangle pathology was performed according to the Braak staging system.
Quantitative proteomics and succinylome
The experimental strategy and workflow are present in Fig. 1. The analysis of two independent batches of brains tested for replicability. In each batch, samples from five patients and five controls were analyzed in parallel for TMT-based comparative proteomics and label-free quantitation of their succinylome after enrichment of succinylated peptides. After a complete analysis of the first batch, the second batch was analyzed. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange69,70 Consortium via the PRIDE71 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD015124.
Protein extraction, digestion, and TMT10-plex labeling
These procedures followed the PTMScan Succinyl-Lysine Motif [Succ-K] kit protocol (Cat # 13764 Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). Brain tissue powders were denatured in 20 mM HEPES pH = 8.0, 9 M Urea, 1 mM Sodium orthavanadate, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophate, and then homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer. After centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 15 min at room temperature (r.t.), the supernatant was into a new tube. The protein concentration for each sample was determined by BCA assay using BSA as the standard.
Further processing of the proteins was then performed according to TMT Mass Tagging Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Reagents protocol (http://www.piercenet.com/instructions/2162073.pdf) with a slight modification72,73. A total of 50 µg protein of each sample was reduced with 10 mM DTT for 1 h at 34 °C, alkylated with 50 mM iodoacetamide for 30 min in the dark and then quenched with of 38 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Each sample diluted with 50 mM tetraethylammonium bromide (TEAB) to a final concentration of 1 M Urea. Each sample was digested with 5 μg trypsin (1:10 w/w) for 18 h at 35 °C. Samples were then dried down in speed vac and reconstituted to a final volume of 100 μL in 50 mM TEAB prior to labeling. The Tandem Mass Tag™ (TMT™) 10-plex labels (dried powder) were reconstituted with 50 µL of anhydrous acetonitrile prior to labeling and added with 1: 2 ratio to each of the tryptic digest samples for labeling over 1 hour at r.t.. The peptides from the 10 samples (5 controls and 5 AD cases) were mixed each tag respectively with 126-tag, 127N-tag, 127C-tag, 128N-tag, 128C-tag, 129N-tag, 129C-tag, 130N-tag, 130C-tag, and 131-tag. The order of labeling each of the 10 samples by TMT10-plex was randomized. Same labeling as above was also conducted for the second sets of additional 10 samples. After checking label incorporation using Orbitrap Fusion (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) by mixing 5 µL aliquots from each sample and desalting with SCX ziptip (Millipore, Billerica, MA), the 10 digested samples were pooled together. The pooled peptides were evaporated to 200 µL and subjected to cleanup by solid phase extraction (SPE) on Sep-Pak Cartridges (Waters, Milford, MA). The eluted tryptic peptides were evaporated to dryness, and ready for the first dimensional LC fractionation via a high pH reverse-phase chromatography as described below.
High pH reverse-phase (hpRP) fractionation
The hpRP chromatography was carried out using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC system with the built-in micro fraction collection option in its autosampler and UV detection (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) as reported previously72,73. Specifically, the TMT10-plex tagged tryptic peptides were reconstituted in buffer A (20 mM ammonium formate pH = 9.5 in water), and loaded onto an XTerra MS C18 column (3.5 µm, 2.1 × 150 mm) from Waters (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with 20 mM ammonium formate (NH4FA), pH = 9.5 as buffer A and 80% ACN/20% 20 mM NH4FA as buffer B. The LC was performed using a gradient from 10 to 45% of buffer B in 30 min at a flow rate 200 µL/min. Forty-eight fractions were collected at 1 min intervals and pooled into a total of 10 fractions based on the UV absorbance at 214 nm and with multiple fraction concatenation strategy72. Each of the 10 fractions was dried and reconstituted in 125 µL of 2% ACN/0.5% FA for nanoLC-MS/MS analysis.
Protein digestion and enrichment of succinylated peptides by Anti-succiK antibody beads
For global succinylome analysis, 1 mg of proteins of each sample was reduced with 10 mM DTT for 1 h at 34 °C, alkylated with 50 mM iodoacetamide for 1 h in the dark and then quenched by additional of 38 mM DTT. Each sample was diluted with 50 mM TEAB to a final concentration of 1 M Urea. Each sample was digested with 55 μg trypsin (1:18 w/w) for 18 h at 35 °C. The digests were cleaned up with Bond Elute C18 100 mg/mL cartridge (Agilent) and peptides were eluted with 50% ACN-0.1% TFA and dried down by a SpeedVacuum. Subsequent enrichment for succinylated peptides was conducted using a PTMScan® Succinyl-Lysine Motif [Succ-K] kit (Cat # 13764, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) following the vendor’s recommended procedures. Specifically, the peptides from each sample were reconstituted in 350 μL immunoaffinity purification (IAP) buffer and transferred to the vial containing 20 μL equilibrated Succ-K motif antibody beads, incubated on a vortex mixer at 4 °C for 2 h. After centrifugation at 2000 × g for 30 s, the beads were washed twice with 250 μL IAP buffer and three times by water. Finally, the enriched peptides were eluted three times with 55 μL of 0.15% TFA. The eluted fractions were pooled together, dried down and reconstituted in 22 µL of 0.5% formic acid (FA) for subsequent label-free quantitative analysis by nanoscale LC-MS/MS.
Nanoscale reverse-phase chromatography and tandem MS (nanoLC-MS/MS)
The nanoLC-MS/MS analysis was carried out using an Orbitrap Fusion (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) mass spectrometer equipped with a nanospray Flex Ion Source using high energy collision dissociation (HCD) similar to previous reports74,75 and coupled with the UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Each reconstituted fraction (4 μL = 0.8 μg for global proteomics fractions and 20 μL for enriched SuccK samples) was injected onto a PepMap C18 RP nano trap column (3 µm, 100 µm × 20 mm, Dionex) with nanoViper Fittings at 20 μL/min flow rate for online desalting and then separated on a PepMap C18 RP nano column (3 µm, 75 µm × 25 cm), and eluted in a 120 min gradient of 5–35% acetonitrile (ACN) in 0.1% formic acid at 300 nL/min., followed by a 8 min ramping to 95% ACN-0.1% FA and a 9 min hold at 95% ACN-0.1% FA. The column was re-equilibrated with 2% ACN-0.1% FA for 25 min prior to the next run. The Orbitrap Fusion is operated in positive ion mode with nanospray voltage set at 1.6 kV and source temperature at 275 °C. External calibration for FT, IT and quadrupole mass analyzers was performed. The instrument was operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode using FT mass analyzer for one survey MS scan for selecting precursor ions followed by 3 second “Top Speed” data-dependent HCD-MS/MS scans in Orbitrap analyzer for precursor peptides with 2–7 charged ions above a threshold ion count of 10,000 with normalized collision energy of 38.5%. MS survey scans at a resolving power of 120,000 (fwhm at m/z 200), for the mass range of m/z 400–1600 with AGC = 3e5 and Max IT = 50 ms, and MS/MS scans at 60,000 resolution with AGC = 1e5, Max IT = 120 ms and with Q isolation window (m/z) at 1.6 for the mass range m/z 105–2000 in TMT10-plex fractions.
For label-free SuccK peptides analysis, one MS survey scan was followed by 3 second “Top Speed” data-dependent CID ion trap MS/MS scans with normalized collision energy of 30%. Dynamic exclusion parameters were set at 1 within 45 s exclusion duration with ±10 ppm exclusion mass width. Ten samples for both control and AD cases were analyzed in Orbitrap in random order for data acquisition. All data are acquired under Xcalibur 3.0 operation software and Orbitrap Fusion Tune 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Data processing, protein identification, and data analysis
All MS and MS/MS raw spectra from each set of TMT10-plex experiments were processed and searched using the Sequest HT search engine within the Proteome Discoverer 2.2 (PD 2.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The Homo sapiens NCBI UniprotKB.fasta database containing 20,153 entries downloaded on October 17, 2016 were used for database searches. The default search settings used for 10-plex TMT quantitative processing and protein identification in PD 2.2 searching software were: two mis-cleavage for full trypsin with fixed carbamidomethyl modification of cysteine, fixed 10-plex TMT modifications on lysine and N-terminal amines and variable modifcations of methionine oxidation, deamidation on asparagines/glutamine residues and protein N-terminal acetylation. The peptide mass tolerance and fragment mass tolerance values were 10 ppm and 0.02 Da, respectively. Identified peptides were filtered for maximum 1% FDR using the Percolator algorithm in PD 2.2 along with additional peptide confidence set to high. The TMT10-plex quantification method within Proteome Discoverer 2.2 software was used to calculate the reporter ion abundances that were corrected for the isotopic impurities. Both unique and razor peptides were used for quantitation. Signal-to-noise (S/N) values were used to represent the reporter ion abundance with a co-isolation threshold of 50% and an average reporter S/N threshold of 10 and above required for quantitation spectra to be used. The S/N values of peptides, which were summed from the S/N values of the PSMs, were summed to represent the abundance of the proteins. For relative ratio between the two groups, normalization on total peptide amount for each sample was applied.
For label-free quantitative data analysis of succinylated peptides, fragment ion tolerance 0.5 Da was used for the ion trap analyzer and an additional succinylation on Lys residue with mass shift (+100.0160 Da) was specified as variable modifications. In addition, methionine oxidation (+15.995 Da), acetylation (+42.011) on N-terminal proteins and deamidation (+0.984 Da) on asparagines/glutamine were also setup as variable modifications. For each relative ratio of succinylated peptides/sites, no normalization was applied. The search result including ratio, p-value, succinylated peptide abundance for each sample was output to Microsoft Excel software (MicroSoft Office 365) for further data analysis. The threshold of succinylation localization score was set at PSM grouper node of consensus workflow in Proteome Discoverer (PD) 2.2 database searching software, and succinylation localization scores for each succinylated peptide must be greater than 75 and it lies in between 75–100. In combination with threshold score (≥75) for succinylation localization, falsely localized succinylated peptides were further filtered out under peptide validator node in consensus workflow where q values and PEPs are validated for available PSMs and assigned the PSMs confidences based on the user defined target FDRs in percolator node (Target FDR-0.01). In addition, data analysis for all identified succinylated peptides indicated that the average number of missed cleavages for each succinylated peptides = 1 (Supplementary Data 7). This is not surprising, as lysine succinylation would prohibit trypsin from cut the modification site creating one missed cleavage. As a result, we found that over 90% of succinylated peptides being identified were equivalent to 0 miss-cleavage and 10% contained 1 miss-cleavage site in our data, which is consistent with what we observed in our regular global proteomics.
α-cleavage assay
Synthetic C- and S-Aβ6–29 peptides were purchased from GenScript USA Inc. (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Recombinant human ADAM 10 protein (rhADAM10) was purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The C-Aβ6–29 and S-Aβ6–29 peptides were dissolved in DMSO to reach a final concentration of 1 mM, respectively. rhADAM10 was diluted with assay buffer (25 mM Tris, 2 μM ZnCl2, 0.005% (w/v) Brij-35, pH = 9.0) to reach a final concentration of 0.1 μg/μL. C-Aβ6–29 and S-Aβ6–29 peptide solution (10 μL) was added to 170 μL assay buffer together with 20 μL rhADAM10 or assay buffer, briefly mixed and then incubated at 37 °C for different time intervals with continuous shaking. Reactions were stopped and saved at −80 °C.
The assay reactions were conducted in triplicate at each timepoints for C-Aβ6–29 and S-Aβ6–29 peptides. The reaction samples were cleaned up by SPE as described previously. The eluted peptides with 50% ACN-0.1% FA were dried down and reconstituted in 100 µL of 0.1% FA with 2% acetonitrile and spiked with 0.4 pmol/μL Angiotensin I peptide (used as an Internal Standard). The samples were analyzed by LC-MS.
The resulting samples were subject to quantitative analysis for C-Aβ6–29 peptide, S-Aβ6–29 peptide and their respective cleaved product peptides (fragment 1, fragment 2 and fragment 3) by LC-MS/MS using an Exion LC coupled with the X500B Q-TOF mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). Each of 24 samples (6 µL) were injected onto a Luna C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm i.d., 3 μm; Phenomenex) and eluted with 5–40% B (solvent B = 99.9% ACN-0.1% FA; solvent A = 0.1% FA) at 200 µL/min in a 6-min gradient, followed by ramp up to 70% B in 1.5 min and 95% B in 0.5 min. The gradient at 95% B was holding for 2 min prior back to 5% B in 0.5 min for subsequent 5.5 min of column equilibration. The X500B instrument was calibrated using the integrated calibrant delivery system (CDS). The source temperature (350 °C), spray voltage (4.5 kV) and gas conditions (with 30 arbitrary units for gas 1, gas 2 and curtain gas) were initially optimized and obtained using a positive TOF-MS survey scan by tee-in with infusion of 5 pmol/µL Angiotensin I. Quantitative data were acquired under MRM-HR mode optimized for the C-Aβ6-29 and S-Aβ6-29 peptides using a Guided MRM-HR module. The detected MRM transitions used for quantitation with corresponding precursor ion dependent parameters were given in Supplementary Fig. 3f. For quantitation of each peptide, the 2 most highest intensity m/z precursors ions with having 2–4 charges and 2 singly charged product ions (whose m/z masses are larger than their precursor m/z) generated for each precursor m/z were selected for MRM-HR data acquisition of all 24 samples using Sciex OS 1.3 software. The final MRM-HR method includes a TOF-MS scan with m/z 300 to 1400 with 0.15 sec accumulation time followed by 12 targeted TOF-MS/MS scans for 5 peptides plus an IS peptide with 0.1 sec accumulation time and unit Q1 resolution for each scan with start/stop mass = 100/1400 Da.
Quantitative data were processed using Analytics module in Sciex OS 1.3 software for automatically integrating peaks for each precursor m/z in TOF-MS scan and MS/MS scan. One of the MRM-HR transition data with highest intensity signal was used for quantitation of each peptide. A peak area ratio for each peptide against IS peptide was calculated for all 24 samples, and used for determining relative quantitation of both C-Aβ6–29 and S-Aβ6–29 peptides and their cleavage cleaved peptides for each timepoints against the time point of 24 h without rhADAM10 (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 3f, g).
Aβ42 aggregation assay
The Beta Amyloid (1-42) Aggregation Kit (Cat # A-1170-2) was from rPeptide (Watkinsville, GA, USA). Rabbit pan-specific anti-succinyllysine (Cat # PTM-401) antibody and anti-β-Amyloid 1-16 Antibody 6E10 were purchased from PTM Biolab, Inc (Chicago, IL, USA) and BioLegend, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA), respectively. To remove the preformed aggregates, the peptides were pretreated by the method76 with minor modifications. Aβ42 peptides were monomerized with a 2 h pre-treatment with 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3-Hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) at 25 °C, and the solvent was evaporated. This process was repeated three times to remove any preformed aggregates. Samples were stored at −20 °C. Right before the experiments, 1 mg Aβ42 was dissolved in 100 mM NaOH (1.1 mL), sonicated for 5 min and the solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter. The solution was diluted with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (100 μM final concentration).
Aβ42 (final concentration of 80 μM) was mixed with Thioflavin T (ThT, final concentration 24 μM) and succinyl-CoA (final concentration 3 mM) or ddH2O in the TBS. Aliquots (100 μL) were immediately added to each well of a 96-well plate. The plate was maintained at a temperature of 37 °C for 24–48 h. Samples were taken during the time course of peptide aggregation to perform the experiments described below.
Aβ42 aggregates negative stain electron microscopy
Eighty μM Aβ42 peptide aggregated in vitro in the presence of succinyl-CoA (final concentration 3 mM) or ddH2O for 24–48 h, which was prepared as mentioned in the Aβ42 aggregation assay. Samples (5 µL) were placed on 400-mesh formvar-carbon coated copper grid and allowed to settle to 2 min. Excess fluid was removed, and the grids were negatively stained with one drop of 1.5% uranyl acetate solution and left for 2 min. Then the grids were picked up and excess negative stain was wicked off, and the grids were allowed to air dry. The samples were viewed using a JEM-1400 TEM (JEOL, Ltd, Peabody, MA, USA), operated at 100 kV and imaged on a Veleta 2 K × 2 K CCD camera (EMSIS GmbH, Munster, Germany).
Western blot analysis of SDS-PAGE
Aβ42 aggregate samples were diluted with Tricine SDS Sample Buffer (Cat # LC1676, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and separated on a 10–20% Tris-Tricine gel using Tricine SDS Running Buffer (Cat # LC1675, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The separated bands were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and detected with the mouse monoclonal anti-Aβ oligomer specific antibody NU-2 (1:4000; Klein’s lab) and the mouse monoclonal anti-β-Amyloid antibody 6E10 (1:1000; Cat # 803001, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The membrane was probed with s680RD Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Secondary Antibody (1:10,000; Cat # 926-68071, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) and 800CW Goat anti-Mouse IgG Secondary Antibody (1:10,000; Cat # 926-32210, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). The protein bands were quantified by the Image Studio Lite software (version 5.2, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Molecular weights were estimated using a prestained protein ladder from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, U.S.A.).
Tau peptide self-aggregation assay
Synthetic peptides (Supplementary Fig. 4c)were purchased from GL Biochem (Shanghai, China). In order to avoid pre-aggregation, all of these peptides were pretreated with HFIP for the aggregation assays as detailed77,78. The synthetic lyophilized peptides were monomerized in HFIP for 10 min. HFIP was removed by evaporation, and the peptides were dissolved in ddH2O and sonicated for 10 min. Aggregation was induced by incubating a final concentration of 10 μM peptides and 100 μM Thioflavin S at 25 °C in 20 mM MOPS, 0.15 M NaCl, pH = 7.2. Heparin (2.5 μM) was added immediately prior to the readings in order to initiate the aggregation43,44. The data were collected in triplicate at 20 s intervals using a kinetic assay mode with a Gemini EM microplate fluorescence reader (Molecular Devices, USA). The excitation and emission wavelengths were 440 and 490 nm, respectively.
Tau peptide negative stain electron microscopy
Fifty μM synthetic peptides reassembled in vitro in the presence of the polynomic cofactor heparin (12.5 μM) for 24 h, which was prepared as mentioned in the self-aggregation assay. Samples (5 µL) were placed for 1 min on 400-mesh copper grids covered with carbon-stabilized Formvar film. Excess fluid was removed, and the grids were negatively stained with 4 successive drops of 1.5% uranyl acetate solution, blotting excess stain between drops. After the final drop and blotting, the grids were allowed to air dry. The samples were viewed using a JEM-1400 TEM (JEOL, Ltd, Peabody, MA), operated at 100 kV and imaged on a Veleta 2 K × 2 K CCD camera (EMSIS GmbH, Munster, Germany).
ImageJ (version 1.52a) was used for the quantification of the width and height of the fiber helix. All photographed examples were measured in three cases, and the results averaged. All statistical analysis and visualization were implemented in Graphpad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Expression and purification of recombinant tau K19
Recombinant K19 protein was expressed in E. coli BL21/DE3 cells (Novagen, San Diego, CA, USA) transfected with plasmids for the tau fragment K19 under the control of a T7 promoter, as previously described79. Briefly, to produce 15N-labeled protein, cells were grown in a minimal medium containing 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate as the sole source of nitrogen. Over-expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG at mid-log growth phase at 37 °C. 3 h after induction, cells were collected by low speed centrifugation and lysed by sonication in a solution containing 3 mM Urea, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM Tris, and 1 mM PMSF followed by ultracentrifugation at 193,000 × g for 1 h in a Beckman ultracentrifuge using a Ti 50.2 rotor. The supernatant was dialyzed against 25 mM Tris, 20 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT before being purified by cation exchange chromatography, eluting with an NaCl gradient. Fractions containing tau K19 were pooled and dialyzed against 5% acetic acid before further purification by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on a C4 column eluted with an acetonitrile gradient with 1% trifluoroacetic acid. Purified protein was dialyzed against dH2O before being lyophilized and stored at −20 °C. Purity was confirmed by SDS-page.
In vitro succinylation of purified K19 and 15N-labeled K19
Purified K19 (a final concentration 28 μM) was mixed with 80 mM PIPES, pH 6.8, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM GTP, and 0.5 mM EGTA. The reaction was initiated by the addition of Succinyl-CoA (final concentration of 1.5 mM) or the equivalent amount of buffer for control. Samples were incubated for 30 min at 27 °C after addition of Succinyl-CoA. The samples were concentrated by ultra-centrifugal filters for Succinyl-CoA removal, then diluted to 75 μL, and were ready for immediate use. 10 μL samples were stored at −80 °C, and then digested by trypsin. After sample cleanup by SPE, the samples were analyzed by nanoLC-MS/MS analysis and database search using PD 2.2 as described above.
Purified 15N-labeled K19 (a final concentration 99 μM) was mixed with Succinyl-CoA (a final concentration 2.88 mM) or the equivalent amount of buffer for control in the same reaction buffer for 30 min incubation at 27 °C. The samples were concentrated by ultra-centrifugal filters for Succinyl-CoA removal and stored on ice until use. Ten microliters samples were stored at −80 °C, and then digested by trypsin followed by LC-MS/MS analysis and database search using PD 2.2 as described above.
RB3-SLD expression and purification
Stathmin-like RB3 domain (RB3SLD) containing two point mutations (C14A, F20W, stathmin numbering) was expressed in E. coli BL21/DE3 cells transfected with a PET-3d plasmid (a kind gift from Benoit Gigant) as previously described52. Briefly, over-expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG at mid-log growth phase at 37 °C. 3 h after induction, cells were collected by low speed centrifugation and lysed by sonication in a solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT at pH = 8.0, followed by ultracentrifugation for 15 min at 20,000 × g in a Beckman ultracentrifuge using a Ti 50.2 rotor. The supernatant was subjected to thermal denaturation (80 °C for 15 min then 10 min on ice) and was centrifuged again, followed by nucleic acid precipitation using 20 mM spermine-HCL at pH = 7.0 for 30 min at 4 °C with gentle agitation, and additional centrifugation (1 h at 100,000 × g). The supernatant was dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EGTA at pH 8.0 before further purification by anion exchange, eluting with an NaCl gradient. Purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE before concentrating the purified protein to ca. 420 μM and buffer exchanging into 50 mM Phosphate, 0.1 M NaCl at pH = 7.0 using a gel filtration column. Final protein solution was flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use. SDS-PAGE analysis was used to estimate the concentration of final protein stocks.
T2R preparation
Stathmin-like RB3 domain (RB3) binds to heterodimeric tubulin with a 1:2 stoichiometry, forming a longitudinal dimer of tubulin dimers. For 1H,15N HSQC NMR experiments, 15N K19, succinylated or unmodified, was dissolved to a final concentration of 48 μM in Tris-d11 buffer (25 mM Tris-d11, 25 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 1.5 mM DTT with 10% D2O at pH 6.7) followed by addition of 53 μM of RB3-SLD stock solution. This mixture was then used to take up 4 mg of lyophilized tubulin (Cytoskeleton Inc., CO, USA) for a final T2R concentration of 50 μM.
Microtubule assembly assay
Tubulin (32 μM; Cat # T240-B, Cytoskeleton, Inc., Denver, CO, USA) in 80 mM PIPES, pH = 6.8, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM GTP, and 0.5 mM EGTA was incubated for 2 min at 37 °C. The polymerization was started by adding 20 μL concentrated succinylated or normal K19 (a final concentration of 60 μM). The data were collected at 350 nm (20 s intervals) using a kinetic assay mode, using a SpectraMax 250 plate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).
NMR spectroscopy
Samples for NMR 1H,15N HSQC experiments of free K19 were prepared by resuspending lyophilized 15N-labeled K19 in Tris-d11 buffer (25 mM Tris-d11, 25 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 1.5 mM DTT with 10% D2O at pH = 6.7). Samples for 1H saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR were prepared by dissolving synthetic tau peptides (GenScript USA Inc, NJ, USA) in GPEM buffer (80 mM PIPES, 2 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM EGTA, at pH = 6.9) to a final concentration of 1 mM. Peptide solutions were then used to take up lyophilized tubulin to a final concentration of 20 μM.
All NMR spectra were collected on a Bruker AVANCE 600-MHz spectrometer equipped with a cryogenic triple resonance probe analyzed using Topspin4.1.1 and NMRView 9.2.0. 1H,15N HSQC spectra were collected at 20 °C with 1024 complex points in the 1H dimension, 256 complex point in the 15N dimension, spectral widths of 13 and 26 ppm in the proton and nitrogen dimensions, with the carrier positions on water in the 1H dimension. Assignments were based on previously published assignments of K1979,80. Intensity ratios (I/I0) were calculated in which I0 represents the resonance intensity of residues when the protein is in a free-state, and I represents the resonance intensity of residues when the protein is in the presence of T2R (bound-state). 1H STD data were collected at 10 °C, with 4096 scans, a saturation time of 3 seconds, and on/off-resonance frequencies set to −0.5 ppm and 60 ppm, respectively.
Bioinformatics analysis and statistical analysis
These two cohorts were combined by protein ID. Filtering base on the unique GI number or UniProtKB accession number, identical protein data in these two batch results were merged together and the final result set included only the proteins or succinylated peptides that were present in both batches.
Subcellular localization analysis
Subcellular localization of the identified candidates was determined using Cytoscape (version 3.6.1)81 and stringAPP (version 1.4.0)82 software. All the parameters were set to the default values, but only these highest compartment scores equal 5 as the high confidence localization were kept. The result was visualized in FunRich (version 3.1.3).
Succinylated peptide sequence motif discovery and iceLogo heatmap
To determine the sequence motif for succinylation, succinylated peptides were extracted cytowithin seven amino acids upstream and downstream of identified succinylation sites. The web-based Motif-X program (version 1.2 10.05.06) (http://motif-x.med.harvard.edu/)83,84 was used to identify statistically significant motifs from the large post-translational modification peptide sequences. The motif width was chosen to be a length of 15, the occurrences number was set at 5, and the significance threshold was set at 0.00001. Since all proteins were derived from human brain, the “IPI Human Proteome” was used as the background database.
Heatmap of 15 amino-acid compositions is used to create an overview of all possibilities in a 2D space compared to the central succinylated site, on the IceLogo tool85. The precompiled Swiss-Prot composition was chosen to be Homo sapiens and the start position was set at −7. Only significantly up and downregulated elements, according to the given p-value (p-value = 0.05), are colored in, respectively, a shade of green and red. The nonregulated elements are colored black.
Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis
Analysis and visualization of Gene Ontology terms associated to succinylated proteins was performed with ClueGO (version 2.5.1)86. The following parameters were used when running ClueGO: Min GO Level = 3; Max GO Level = 8; Minimum Number of Genes associated to GO term = 3; Minimum Percentage of Genes associated to GO term = 4. Enrichment p-values were based on a two-sided hypergeometric test and Bonferroni step-down method corrected for multiple testing correction. P-value cutoff of 0.01 and a minimum of five genes per ontology were used as filters prior to pruning the ontologies.
Peptide and protein quantitation
Perseus software87 (version 1.6.0.7) was used for statistical analysis of the peptide and protein abundance data. In brief, quantitation was performed on these defined as quantifiable peptide and protein set including only those identified in both two batches and in a minimum of eight replicate in each group. The abundance ratio of AD and control peptides or proteins was defined as fold change (FC), and we used the logarithmic transformation of fold change (log2FC) to represent the AD/control difference. Then the significant differences in succinylated peptide and protein levels were computed using two-tailed Student’s t-test and significant succinylated peptide level changes were defined as p-value < 0.05. Significant protein level changes were defined as p-value < 0.05 and |log2FC | > 0.25. The search result including ratio, p-value, succinylated peptide abundance for each sample was output to Microsoft Excel software (MicroSoft Office 365) for further data analysis. All the succinylated peptides and proteins with log2FC and corresponding p-value are available in Supplementary Data 4 and 5.
Hierarchical clustering
Global proteomic proteins data (rows) were clustered using uncentered pearson correlation and samples (columns) were clustered using city block distance, with an average linkage clustering method by Cluster 3.088. Clustering results were visualized using Java TreeView3.0 beta01 (https://bitbucket.org/TreeView3Dev/treeview3/).
Cell culture
HEK293T cells (Cat # CtRL-3216) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and was cultured following ATCC protocol. Unless otherwise noted, all cell culture supplies and medium were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
Immunocytochemistry, image acquisition, and image analysis
HEK293T cells were cultured on the Poly-D-Lysine-coated Delta T dishes (25 µg/mL) at a seeding density of 5 × 104 cells /dish. The next day, cells were treated with 100 nM Rotenone in complete medium (DMEM + 10% FBS) for 60 min at 37 °C. After 60 min, the cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS (Image-iT Fixative Solution, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at R.T. for 15 min. After washing in PBS and pre-incubation (1% Triton-X100 in PBS for 10 min at R.T. and PBS + 2% BSA for 60 min at r.t.), they were labeled with a mixture of rabbit anti-DLST (1:600; Cat # 11954, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA, USA) and mouse anti-COX-IV (1:1,000; Cat # 11967, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) antibodies. The primary antibodies were diluted in PBS + 0.5% BSA and incubated overnight followed by a mixture of the secondary antibodies (Donkey anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 (1:1,000; Cat # A21202, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 568 (1:1,000; Cat # A10042, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)) for 1 h at r.t.. Confocal stacks were taken using a ×100 oil objective in 0.4 µm z-steps under inverted Nikon C1 confocal microscope. Image analysis was performed in Fiji software (Fiji, RRID:SCR_002285). From a confocal stack, all images (6–13 images) were taken for further analysis. Mitochondria were outlined using an automated thresholding of COX-IV-positive particles. Cytoplasm was defined as an area surrounding mitochondria. The created masks of mitochondria and cytoplasm were separately applied to the correspondent DLST images and integrated density of DLST was determined in mitochondria and cytoplasm, respectively. Integrated density of DLST was normalized to the area of mitochondria.
MEAN integrated intensity was calculated from all particles in mitochondrial or cytosolic region in each field. Error bars represent SEM deviation from the mean (n = 98 fields from 19 dishes from two experiments; mitochondrial (52 control; 46 treated); cytosol (52 control; 46 control); Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).
Preparation of the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions
HEK293T cells were cultured on the 10 cm dishes. After two days, cells (80% confluent) were treated with or without rotenone (100 nM or 5 μM) in balanced salt solution (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, and 2.5 m M CaCl2, pH = 7.4) for 20 min at 37 °C. Cells were then washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (Cat # 14190250; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions were prepared as described previously34.
Immunoprecipitation and western blots
Samples were prepared as described34 with the following antibodies: Pan anti-succinyl lysine (1:200 for immunoprecipitation; 1:1000 for western blot; Cat # PTM-401, PTM Biolabs Inc., Chicago, IL, USA); Anti-Pyruvate dehydrogenase E2/E3bp antibody (1:1000; Cat # ab110333, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Antibody (1:500; Cat # 2784, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA); Anti-beta Actin antibody (1:4000; Cat # ab8226, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); COX-IV (3E11) Rabbit monoclonal antibody (1:3000; Cat # 4850, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA); Anti-KGDHC E1k (1:1,000; Rockland, Limerick, PA, USA); Anti-KGDHC E2k (1:1,000; Rockland, Limerick, PA, USA); Anti-KGDHC E3 (Lipoamide Dehydrogenase Antibody) (1:2000; Cat # 200-4160 S, Rockland, Limerick, PA, USA); β-Actin (13E5) Rabbit antibody (1:1,000; Cat # 4970, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA); s680RD Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Secondary Antibody (1:10,000; Cat # 926-68071, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) and 800CW Goat anti-Mouse IgG Secondary Antibody (1:10,000; Cat # 926-32210, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA).
All the quantification of immunoblotting analyses was taken in Image Studio Lite (version 5.2, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA), and all statistical analysis and visualizations were implemented in Graphpad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Animals
All the experiments were carried out in four and 10-month-old transgenic mouse models of AD. Tg19959 mice (that overexpress a double mutant form of the human amyloid precursor protein) were obtained from Dr. George Carlson (McLaughlin Research Institute, Great Falls, MT, USA). Tg19959 mice were constructed by injecting FVB X 129S6 F1 embryos with a cosmid insert containing human APP695 with 2 familial AD mutations (KM670/671NL and V717F), under the control of the hamster PrP promoter89. P301S (PS19, that overexpress the human tau gene harboring the P301S mutation) transgenic mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The transgenic mice used in this study express the human pathogenic mutation P301S of tau together with the longest human brain tau isoform (htau40) under control of the neuron-specific mThy1.2 promoter90. Animals were maintained under standard conditions of 12 h light/dark cycle, 22 ± 1 °C r.t., and 50–70% humidity. Subjects were given ad libitum access to food and water. All experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Weill Cornell Medicine.
Immunofluorescence
All brain tissue sections were stained at the same time under the same conditions (solutions, washing, temperature, etc.) and analyzed under identical experimental settings. Our results were expressed as the mean with SEM representative of the average of ∼900–1000 pyramidal neurons comprised in 3–4 different brain sections per animal (n = 4 mice per each group). For fluorescence analysis, tissue was washed six times in PBS for 10 min each at r.t. After blocking in 10% normal donkey serum in PBS for 1 h, sections were incubated using primary antibodies (anti-MAP2 Antibody (Cat # AB15452, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA); pan anti-succinyl lysine (Cat # PTM-401, PTM Biolabs Inc., Chicago, IL, USA); anti-mouse NU-4 (Klein’s lab); anti-mouse β-amyloid (Cat #15126 S, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA); anti-mouse T22 (Kayed’s lab); anti-phospho-tau AT8 (Cat # MN1020, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)) in PBS with 1% normal donkey serum overnight at 4 °C. Next, hippocampal sections were rinsed three times in PBS for 10 min each and subsequently incubated with conjugated secondary antibodies (donkey anti-mouse IgG (H + L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 (1:500; Cat # A21202, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); Cy3 AffiniPure donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (1:500; Cat # 711-165-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA); 647 AffiniPure donkey anti-Chicken IgY (IgG) (H + L) (1:500; Cat # 703-005-155, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA)) for 2 h. After three washes in PBS for 10 min, the samples were mounted directly onto plus-coated slides and coverslipped using gelvatol mounting media.
Image analysis
The immunoreactivity of succinyl lysine was assessed in three confocal images for the CA1 region and two images for the CA2 region. For quantitative analysis, confocal fluorescence micrographs were obtained with the ×40 objective lens. Representative images were captured using ×60 magnification at high resolution (100 µs). Values are mean ± SEM representative of the average of ∼900–1000 MAP2 neurons or 60 Aβ plaques comprised in 3–4 different hippocampal sections per animal. The fluorescence intensity of succinyl lysine was normalized to the number of pyramidal neurons. Four mice per group. Data were expressed as the mean with SEM representative of the average of ∼900–1000 MAP2 neurons or 60 Aβ plaque comprised in 3–4 different hippocampal CA1 sections per animal (n = 4 per each group). The fluorescence intensity of succinyl lysine was normalized to the number of pyramidal neurons or the number of plaques. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was performed.
Statistics and reproducibility
Data were presented as mean ± SEM unless indicated otherwise. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was applied when comparing data from two groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were performed for data with more than two groups. For studies with repeated measures, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s or Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test was performed. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 statistical software or Microsoft Excel software (MicroSoft Office 365). Sample sizes and statistical details are indicated in figure legends.
All cell culture experiments presented in the manuscript were repeated at least three times independently with similar results.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The studies were supported by: NIH-NIA grants P01AG014930 (G.E.G., M.F.B., and S.Z.) and R37AG019391 (D.E.); R01-EY026576 and R01-EY029796 (B.T.S.); NIH SIG 1S10 OD017992-01 (S.Z.); HHSN271201300031C (V.H.); AG18877 & AG22547 (W.L.K.); AG059319 and AG058469 (S.G.); AG005138 and AG066514 (to Mary Sano); R37AG019391 and RF1AG066493 (D.E.) and F31AG069416 (D.A.); S10OD016320 (William Clay Bracken, director of WCM NMR facility) Burke Neurological Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine; Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LGF21H090018 (Y.Y.); Integrated Medicine Research Center for Neurological Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China (Dean J. Chen). We thank L. Cohen-Gould, MS, director of the Microscopy and Image Analysis Core Facility (Weill Cornell Medicine) for the EM and C. Bracken, PhD, director of the NMR Facility (Weill Cornell Medicine) for help with NMR experiments. We thank E. Ivanova and Structural and Functional Imaging Core at the Burke Neurological Institute for the technical assistance. We are grateful to the NIH Neurobiobank for providing the carefully characterized human brains. We thank Dr. R. Kayed (Department Neurology, University of Texas Medical Branch) for kindly providing the T22 antibody for tau aggregates. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD015124. For public access by webpage: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD015124 and for FTP download: ftp://ftp.pride.ebi.ac.uk/pride/data/archive/2021/12/PXD015124.
Source data
Author contributions
Y.Y. and G.G. conceived the research program and designed the experiments. V.H. contributed to the patient consent, collection of samples. V.H., X.H., and E.T.A. processed the brain samples. R.B. and S.Z. performed nanoLC-MS/MS analysis. Y.Y. performed data analyses. Y.Y. and X.H. performed biochemical experiments. Y.Y., X.H., and H.C. performed the cell experiments. X.H., H.C., E.I., and B.T.S. performed immunofluorescence on the rotenone treated cells and analyzed the data. D.A. and D.E. designed and performed NMR analysis, processed and interpreted the data and prepared figures. V.T participated in the design and conceptualization of the animal study, analyzed the data, and prepared the figures. M.F.B. participated in the design and conceptualization of the animal study. H.L. participated in the experimental design and write-up. S.G., W.K., and K.V. provided antibodies and contributed to the design. Y.Y. and G.G. wrote and edited the manuscript. J.C. contributed to the additional experiments in revision of the manuscript. All authors discussed the results, and Y.Y., G.G., S.Z., D.E., S.G., V.H., V.T., B.T.S, H.L., and E.I. contributed to the writing. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks David Katz and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions of this study are available in the manuscript, in the supplementary information files or from the data bases listed in the manuscript. The mass spectrometry proteomics data files including raw MS files, peak list files and search results files were deposited to PRIDE database by ProteomeXchange (PXD015124). Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-27572-2.
References
- 1.Usui K, et al. Site-specific modification of Alzheimer’s peptides by cholesterol oxidation products enhances aggregation energetics and neurotoxicity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:18563–18568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804758106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tjernberg LO, et al. Arrest of -amyloid fibril formation by a pentapeptide ligand. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:8545–8548. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.15.8545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cohen TJ, et al. The acetylation of tau inhibits its function and promotes pathological tau aggregation. Nat. Commun. 2011;2:252. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gordon BA, et al. Spatial patterns of neuroimaging biomarker change in individuals from families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:241–250. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30028-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dumont M, et al. Mitochondrial dihydrolipoyl succinyltransferase deficiency accelerates amyloid pathology and memory deficit in a transgenic mouse model of amyloid deposition. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009;47:1019–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blass JP, Baker AC, Ko L, Black RS. Induction of alzheimer antigens by an uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation. Arch. Neurol. 1990;47:864–869. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530080046009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cheng B, Mattson MP. Glucose deprivation elicits neurofibrillary tangle-like antigenic changes in hippocampal neurons: prevention by NGF and bFGF. Exp. Neurol. 1992;117:114–123. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(92)90120-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Caselli RJ, Knopman DS, Bu G. An agnostic reevaluation of the amyloid cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer‘s disease pathogenesis: The role of APP homeostasis. Alzheimer‘s Dementia. 2020;16:1582–1590. doi: 10.1002/alz.12124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sims R, Hill M, Williams J. The multiplex model of the genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2020;23:311–322. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0599-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bramblett GT, et al. Abnormal tau phosphorylation at Ser396 in Alzheimer’s disease recapitulates development and contributes to reduced microtubule binding. Neuron. 1993;10:1089–1099. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90057-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Min S-W, et al. Acetylation of tau inhibits its degradation and contributes to tauopathy. Neuron. 2010;67:953–966. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Engstrom AK, et al. The inhibition of LSD1 via sequestration contributes to tau-mediated neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2020;117:29133–29143. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013552117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu F, Iqbal K, Grundke-Iqbal I, Hart GW, Gong C-X. O-GlcNAcylation regulates phosphorylation of tau: a mechanism involved in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:10804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400348101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fukushima A, et al. Acetylation and succinylation contribute to maturational alterations in energy metabolism in the newborn heart. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016;311:H347–H363. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00900.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nishida Y, et al. SIRT5 regulates both cytosolic and mitochondrial protein malonylation with glycolysis as a major target. Mol. Cell. 2015;59:321–332. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mapstone M, et al. Metabolic correlates of prevalent mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease in adults with Down syndrome. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020;12:e12028. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Johnson ECB, et al. Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nat. Med. 2020;26:769–780. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0815-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Arnold M, et al. Sex and APOE ε4 genotype modify the Alzheimer’s disease serum metabolome. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1148. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14959-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Swarup V, et al. Identification of Conserved Proteomic Networks in Neurodegenerative Dementia. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107807. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mastrogiacomo F, Bergeron C, Kish SJ. Brain α-ketoglutarate dehydrotenase complex activity in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 1993;61:2007–2014. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb07436.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gibson GE, et al. Reduced activities of thiamine-dependent enzymes in the brains and peripheral tissues of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Arch. Neurol. 1988;45:836–840. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520320022009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weinert BT, et al. Lysine succinylation is a frequently occurring modification in prokaryotes and eukaryotes and extensively overlaps with acetylation. Cell Rep. 2013;4:842–851. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen H, et al. Mild metabolic perturbations alter succinylation of mitochondrial proteins. J. Neurosci. Res. 2017;95:2244–2252. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang Y, Gibson GE. Succinylation links metabolism to protein functions. Neurochem. Res. 2019;44:2346–2359. doi: 10.1007/s11064-019-02780-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Du J, et al. Sirt5 is a NAD-dependent protein lysine demalonylase and desuccinylase. Science. 2011;334:806. doi: 10.1126/science.1207861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pan J, Chen R, Li C, Li W, Ye Z. Global analysis of protein lysine succinylation profiles and their overlap with lysine acetylation in the marine bacterium Vibrio parahemolyticus. J. Proteome Res. 2015;14:4309–4318. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xu H, et al. Lysine acetylation and succinylation in HeLa cells and their essential roles in response to UV-induced stress. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30212. doi: 10.1038/srep30212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Colak G, et al. Identification of lysine succinylation substrates and the succinylation regulatory enzyme CobB in Escherichia coli. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2013;12:3509–3520. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Park J, et al. SIRT5-mediated lysine desuccinylation impacts diverse metabolic pathways. Mol. Cell. 2013;50:919–930. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rardin MJ, et al. SIRT5 regulates the mitochondrial lysine succinylome and metabolic networks. Cell Metab. 2013;18:920–933. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Boada M, et al. ATP5H/KCTD2 locus is associated with Alzheimer’s disease risk. Mol. Psychiatry. 2013;19:682. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Terni B, Boada J, Portero-Otin M, Pamplona R, Ferrer I. Mitochondrial ATP-synthase in the entorhinal cortex is a target of oxidative stress at stages I/II of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:222–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2009.00266.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Banerjee K, et al. Mild mitochondrial metabolic deficits by α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase inhibition cause prominent changes in intracellular autophagic signaling: Potential role in the pathobiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem. Int. 2016;96:32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2016.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gibson GE, et al. Alpha‐ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex‐dependent succinylation of proteins in neurons and neuronal cell lines. J. Neurochem. 2015;134:86–96. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang Y, et al. KAT2A coupled with the alpha-KGDH complex acts as a histone H3 succinyltransferase. Nature. 2017;552:273–277. doi: 10.1038/nature25003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lambert MP, et al. Monoclonal antibodies that target pathological assemblies of Abeta. J. Neurochem. 2007;100:23–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kaden D, et al. Novel APP/Aβ mutation K16N produces highly toxic heteromeric Aβ oligomers. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012;4:647–659. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201200239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Seyfried NT, et al. A multi-network approach identifies protein-specific co-expression in asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Syst. 2017;4:60–72.e64. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sinha S, Lopes DHJ, Bitan G. A key role for lysine residues in amyloid β-protein folding, assembly, and toxicity. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2012;3:473–481. doi: 10.1021/cn3000247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cline EN, Bicca MA, Viola KL, Klein WL. The amyloid-beta oligomer hypothesis: beginning of the third decade. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64:S567–S610. doi: 10.3233/JAD-179941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Friedman R. Aggregation of amyloids in a cellular context: modelling and experiment. Biochem. J. 2011;438:415–426. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Suh J, et al. ADAM10 missense mutations potentiate β-amyloid accumulation by impairing prodomain chaperone function. Neuron. 2013;80:385–401. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.von Bergen M, et al. Assembly of τ protein into Alzheimer paired helical filaments depends on a local sequence motif (306VQIVYK311) forming β structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:5129–5134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Goux WJ, et al. The formation of straight and twisted filaments from short tau peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:26868–26875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402379200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li W, Lee VM-Y. Characterization of two VQIXXK motifs for tau fibrillization in vitro. Biochemistry. 2006;45:15692–15701. doi: 10.1021/bi061422+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lasagna-Reeves CA, et al. Identification of oligomers at early stages of tau aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 2012;26:1946–1959. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-199851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li W, Lee VMY. Characterization of two VQIXXK motifs for tau fibrillization in vitro. Biochemistry. 2006;45:15692–15701. doi: 10.1021/bi061422+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.von Bergen M, et al. The core of tau-paired helical filaments studied by scanning transmission electron microscopy and limited proteolysis. Biochemistry. 2006;45:6446–6457. doi: 10.1021/bi052530j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fitzpatrick AW, et al. Cryo-EM structures of tau filaments from Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2017;547:185. doi: 10.1038/nature23002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Barghorn S, Davies P, Mandelkow E. Tau paired helical filaments from Alzheimer’s disease brain and assembled in vitro are based on β-structure in the core domain. Biochemistry. 2004;43:1694–1703. doi: 10.1021/bi0357006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lu P-J, Wulf G, Zhou XZ, Davies P, Lu KP. The prolyl isomerase Pin1 restores the function of Alzheimer-associated phosphorylated tau protein. Nature. 1999;399:784. doi: 10.1038/21650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gigant B, et al. Mechanism of tau-promoted microtubule assembly as probed by NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:12615–12623. doi: 10.1021/ja504864m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kadavath H, et al. Tau stabilizes microtubules by binding at the interface between tubulin heterodimers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:7501–7506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504081112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kellogg EH, et al. Near-atomic model of microtubule-tau interactions. Science. 2018;360:1242–1246. doi: 10.1126/science.aat1780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kadavath H, et al. Tau stabilizes microtubules by binding at the interface between tubulin heterodimers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:7501–7506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504081112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hong L, Huang HC, Jiang ZF. Relationship between amyloid-beta and the ubiquitin-proteasome system in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol. Res. 2014;36:276–282. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bellia F, et al. Ubiquitin binds the amyloid β peptide and interferes with its clearance pathways. Chem. Sci. 2019;10:2732–2742. doi: 10.1039/c8sc03394c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Min S-W, et al. Critical role of acetylation in tau-mediated neurodegeneration and cognitive deficits. Nat. Med. 2015;21:1154. doi: 10.1038/nm.3951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Carlomagno Y, et al. An acetylation-phosphorylation switch that regulates tau aggregation propensity and function. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:15277–15286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.794602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sutendra G, et al. A nuclear pyruvate dehydrogenase complex is important for the generation of acetyl-CoA and histone acetylation. Cell. 2014;158:84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Trushina E, et al. Defects in mitochondrial dynamics and metabolomic signatures of evolving energetic stress in mouse models of familial Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pan X, et al. Powerful beneficial effects of benfotiamine on cognitive impairment and β-amyloid deposition in amyloid precursor protein/presenilin-1 transgenic mice. Brain. 2010;133:1342–1351. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tapias V, et al. Benfotiamine treatment activates the Nrf2/ARE pathway and is neuroprotective in a transgenic mouse model of tauopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018;27:2874–2892. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gibson GE, et al. Benfotiamine and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease: results of a randomized placebo-controlled phase IIa clinical trial. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2020;78:989–1010. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Goedert, M. et al. in Frontotemporal Dementias: Emerging Milestones of the 21st Century (eds. Ghetti, B., Buratti, E., Boeve, B. & Rademakers, R.) 177–199 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).
- 66.Zhang W, et al. Heparin-induced tau filaments are polymorphic and differ from those in Alzheimer’s and Pick’s diseases. eLife. 2019;8:e43584. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Irwin DJ, et al. Acetylated tau, a novel pathological signature in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. Brain. 2012;135:807–818. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Morris M, et al. Tau post-translational modifications in wild-type and human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2015;18:1183–1189. doi: 10.1038/nn.4067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Deutsch EW, et al. The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2017: supporting the cultural change in proteomics public data deposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;45:D1100–D1106. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. PRIDE inspector toolsuite: moving toward a universal visualization tool for proteomics data standard formats and quality assessment of ProteomeXchange datasets. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2016;15:305–317. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O115.050229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:D442–D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yang Y, et al. Evaluation of different multidimensional LC–MS/MS pipelines for isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based proteomic analysis of potato tubers in response to cold storage. J. Proteome Res. 2011;10:4647–4660. doi: 10.1021/pr200455s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chen J-W, et al. Proteomic comparison of historic and recently emerged hypervirulent Clostridium difficile strains. J. Proteome Res. 2013;12:1151–1161. doi: 10.1021/pr3007528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yang S, et al. Parallel comparative proteomics and phosphoproteomics reveal that cattle myostatin regulates phosphorylation of key enzymes in glycogen metabolism and glycolysis pathway. Oncotarget. 2018;9:11352. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Thomas CJ, Cleland TP, Zhang S, Gundberg CM, Vashishth D. Identification and characterization of glycation adducts on osteocalcin. Anal. Biochem. 2017;525:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2017.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hatai J, Motiei L, Margulies D. Analyzing amyloid beta aggregates with a combinatorial fluorescent molecular sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:2136–2139. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b10809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.KrishnaKumar VG, Paul A, Gazit E, Segal D. Mechanistic insights into remodeled Tau-derived PHF6 peptide fibrils by Naphthoquinone-Tryptophan hybrids. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:71. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18443-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Frenkel-Pinter M, et al. Naphthoquinone-tryptophan hybrid inhibits aggregation of the tau-derived peptide PHF6 and reduces neurotoxicity. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51:165–178. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Eliezer D, et al. Residual structure in the repeat domain of Tau: echoes of microtubule binding and paired helical filament formation. Biochemistry. 2005;44:1026–1036. doi: 10.1021/bi048953n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Eliezer D, et al. Residual structure in the repeat domain of tau: echoes of microtubule binding and paired helical filament formation. Biochemistry. 2005;44:1026–1036. doi: 10.1021/bi048953n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Shannon P, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Szklarczyk D, et al. STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;43:D447–D452. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Schwartz D, Gygi SP. An iterative statistical approach to the identification of protein phosphorylation motifs from large-scale data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005;23:1391. doi: 10.1038/nbt1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Chou MF, Schwartz D. Biological sequence motif discovery using motif‐x. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 2011;35:13.15. 11–13.15. 24. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1315s35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Colaert N, Helsens K, Martens L, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K. Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo. Nat. Methods. 2009;6:786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1109-786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bindea G, et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1091–1093. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tyanova S, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:731. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.De Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:1453–1454. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chishti MA, et al. Early-onset amyloid deposition and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice expressing a double mutant form of amyloid precursor protein 695*. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:21562–21570. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100710200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pennanen L, Welzl H, D’Adamo P, Nitsch RM, Götz J. Accelerated extinction of conditioned taste aversion in P301L tau transgenic mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2004;15:500–509. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions of this study are available in the manuscript, in the supplementary information files or from the data bases listed in the manuscript. The mass spectrometry proteomics data files including raw MS files, peak list files and search results files were deposited to PRIDE database by ProteomeXchange (PXD015124). Source data are provided with this paper.