Highlights
-
•
We report MR-spectroscopy in syndromes linked to frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).
-
•
NAA and glutamate concentrations in the frontal lobe are reduced by FTLD.
-
•
NAA and glutamate levels correlate with behavior in FTLD-related syndromes.
Keywords: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, Progressive supranuclear palsy, Corticobasal syndrome, spectroscopy, Glutamate
Abbreviations: FTLD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; PPA, primary progressive aphasia; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy; CBS, corticobasal syndrome; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; ACER, Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination – Revised; CBI-R, cambridge behavioral inventory – revised; FAB, frontal assessment battery; NAA, N-acetyl-aspartate
Abstract
There is an urgent need for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of cognitive impairment in syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Here, we used magnetic resonance spectroscopy to quantify metabolite deficits in sixty patients with a clinical syndrome associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia n = 11, progressive supranuclear palsy n = 26, corticobasal syndrome n = 11, primary progressive aphasias n = 12), and 38 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We measured nine metabolites in the right inferior frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus and right primary visual cortex. Metabolite concentrations were corrected for age, sex, and partial volume then compared with cognitive and behavioral measures using canonical correlation analysis. Metabolite concentrations varied significantly by brain region and diagnosis (region x metabolite x diagnosis interaction F(64) = 1.73, p < 0.001, corrected for age, sex, and atrophy within the voxel). N-acetyl aspartate and glutamate concentrations were reduced in the right prefrontal cortex in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and progressive supranuclear palsy, even after partial volume correction. The reduction of these metabolites was associated with executive dysfunction and behavioral impairment (canonical correlation analysis R = 0.85, p < 0.001).
1. Introduction
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a group of diseases characterized by focal neurodegeneration of frontal, temporal and subcortical regions including the basal ganglia and midbrain (MacKenzie et al., 2010). These progressive, incurable diseases cause a spectrum of clinical syndromes; behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasias (PPA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) (Armstrong et al., 2013; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011; Höglinger et al., 2017; Rascovsky et al., 2011). However, the clinical phenotypes associated with FTLD are heterogeneous and overlapping in their features (Murley et al., 2020a), and include higher cognitive changes which cause a high burden on the patient and their families and carers (Mioshi et al., 2013; Murley et al., 2021). There is a pressing need for a better mechanistic understanding of their pathophysiology, in support of new treatment strategies. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology is associated with many neurotransmitter deficits but there is limited evidence on how in vivo deficits relate to clinical phenotype (Murley et al., 2018). Our aim was to compare metabolite profiles in the frontal and temporal lobes, the cortical regions most typically affected in FTLD, and the occipital lobe as a relatively spared control region (Riedl et al., 2014). Using single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), we quantified in vivo the biochemical consequences of FTLD, including the neurotransmitter glutamate. We predefined MRS voxels over the right inferior frontal (IFG), superior temporal gyri (STG) and occipital lobes as regions of interest. The frontal and temporal lobes are affected by multiple FTLD syndromes (Kril and Halliday, 2011; MacKenzie et al., 2010) while the right IFG and STG in particular form part of a network regulating behavior in health (Aron et al., 2014) and disease (Borroni et al., 2012; Hughes et al., 2018; Ranasinghe et al., 2016). We tested the hypothesis that metabolites associated with neuronal structure and function would be reduced in the frontal and temporal lobes in disorders associated with FTLD, and that this metabolite deficit would correlate with the severity of cognitive and behavioral impairment.
2. Methods
2.1. Participant recruitment and testing
Participants were recruited as part of the PIPPIN (“Pick's disease and Progressive supranuclear palsy prevalence and incidence”) study, an epidemiological cohort study of FTLD-related syndromes in the East of England. Details of the study have been reported elsewhere (Coyle-Gilchrist et al., 2016; Murley et al., 2020a). In brief, PIPPIN aimed to recruit all patients living with a FTLD syndrome in the UK counties of Cambridgeshire and Norfolk. All patients met the clinical diagnostic criteria for a principal FTLD syndrome (Armstrong et al., 2013; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011; Höglinger et al., 2017; Rascovsky et al., 2011). We grouped all PSP phenotypes into the PSP group, and all progressive aphasia subtypes in to the PPA group, in view of the group size. Control participants with no neurological or psychiatric disease were recruited from the NIHR Join Dementia Research register. Participants were invited for clinical examination, cognitive testing, and MRI. Here, we report the subset of patients (n = 60) and age and sex matched healthy controls (n = 38) who completed magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We asked participants to abstain from alcohol and “as required” benzodiazepines or ‘Z-drugs’ for 24 hours prior to the scan but continue their regular medications. No participants in the study were taking memantine, regular ‘Z-drugs’ or benzodiazepines. All participants provided written informed consent or, if they lacked capacity to consent, their next of kin were consulted using the ‘personal consultee’ process established in UK law. The study had ethical approval from the Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (REC 12/EE/0475).
Each participant had a structured clinical examination which recorded the presence or absence of clinical features in the current consensus diagnostic criteria (Armstrong et al., 2013; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011; Höglinger et al., 2017; Rascovsky et al., 2011). We grouped these features into behaviors, language and sensorimotor “scores” based on the sum of features in each group. The behaviors score comprised impulsivity, apathy, loss of empathy, stereotyped and/or compulsive behaviors, hyperorality and dietary change. The language score included agrammatic, apraxic and logopenic speech and impaired semantic memory. The sensorimotor score comprised cortical sensory loss, apraxia and alien limb syndrome, and sensorimotor deficits. Participants completed formal cognitive testing including the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination – Revised (ACE-R) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), which is sensitive to executive dysfunction in FTLD syndromes (Hurtado-Pomares et al., 2018). Participants’ nearest relative or carer completed the revised Cambridge Behavioral Inventory (CBI-R).
2.2. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Participants were scanned at the Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge on a Siemens 3T PRISMA system. A T1-weighted structural sequence (MPRAGE TR = 2000 ms, TE = 2.93 ms, TI = 850 ms, FA = 8°, 208 slices, 1.1 mm isotropic voxels) was acquired for localization of the spectroscopy regions of interest (ROI) and partial volume correction. Single-voxel magnetic resonance spectra were acquired serially from 2 × 2 × 2 cm voxels placed manually by the same operator over the right inferior frontal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus and right primary visual cortex using anatomical landmarks (Fig. S1). Spectra were acquired using a short-echo semi-LASER sequence (64 repetitions, TR/TE = 5000/28 ms) (Deelchand et al., 2015; Öz and Tkáč, 2011) with FASTESTMAP shimming (Gruetter and Tkáč, 2000) and water-peak flip angle and VAPOR water suppression (Tkac et al., 1999). The 64 individual repetitions were saved separately then corrected for eddy current effect, frequency and phase shifts using MRspa (Dinesh Deelchand, University of Minnesota, www. cmrr.umn.edu/downloads/mrspa). All spectra were visually inspected for quality control. Spectra from 18 voxels (FTLD n = 9, Control n = 9) were excluded due to movement artefact, inadequate water suppression and/or lipid contamination.
Neurochemicals between 0.5 and 4.2 ppm were quantified using LCModel (Version 6.2–3) (Provencher, 1993) with water scaling and a simulated basis set that included an experimentally-acquired macromolecule spectrum. The fractions of grey matter, white matter and CSF were obtained from segmentation of the MPRAGE imaging using the standard voxel-based morphometry pre-processing pipeline in SPM12. Nine metabolites had a mean Cramer Rao Lower Bound lower than 20 and were saved for further analysis. Metabolites with correlation ≤-0.3 were reported together: (i) NAA and NAAG, (ii) choline and glycerophosphocholine, (iii) creatine and phosphocreatine, (iv) glucose and taurine and (v) ascorbate and glutathione. Measures of scan quality, including water linewidth and signal to noise, are reported in supplementary materials (Table S1).
2.3. Statistical analysis
A generalised linear model was used to remove the effect of age, sex and partial volume (of grey and white matter) from the metabolite concentrations. This model was weighted with the metabolite Cramer Rao Lower Bound and the residuals used for further analysis. The tissue correction method was the same as (Murley et al., 2020b). Factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare nineteen metabolite concentrations across three brain regions and between five groups. Dunnett's post hoc test was used to explore differences between control participants and the FTLD syndrome subtypes. Welch's t-test was used to test for differences in cognitive tests between healthy participants and those with a FTLD syndrome.
Since both cognition and metabolites are multivariate, we used canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to compare the frontal and temporal lobe metabolite profiles (as measured by MRS) and cognitive and behavioral impairment (as measured by the ACE-R, FAB, CBI and clinician rating of behavioral, language and sensorimotor impairment). CCA is a multivariate technique that measures the association between two sets of variables (Wang et al., 2020). It uses a data-driven approach to reveal latent, common factors, or canonical covariates, underlying these associations (Murley et al., 2020a; Tsvetanov et al., 2016). All variables were standardized into z-scores before CCA. The CCA was permuted 5000 times to determine significance and ensure stability of the final components.
2.4. Data availability
Anonymized data are available on reasonable request for academic use, subject to restrictions required to protect participant confidentiality.
3. Results
Participant characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There was no significant difference in the age and sex distributions of the patient and control groups. Patients had marked global cognitive and behavioral impairment, as rated by direct patient measures (ACE-R, FAB), structured carer interview (CBI-R) and clinician rating based on history and examination (Table 1). A full breakdown of test sub scores is in supplementary materials (Table S2).
Table 1.
Participant demographics and cognitive test results
| Control | FTLD (all) | t | ph | bvFTD | PSP | CBS | PPA | F | pi | Post-hoc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 38 | 60 | 11 | 26 | 11 | 12 | |||||
| Age | 67.9 (5.8) | 69.56 (7.23) | -1.23 | 0.222 | 63.7 (7.6) | 71.7 (6.6) | 71.2 (7.1) | 68.8 (5.8) | 3.94 | 0.013 | a |
| Sex (M/F) | 19/19 | 33/27 | 0.23g | 0.529 | 7/4 | 14/12 | 5/6 | 7/5 | 0.80g | 0.848 | |
| ACE-R Total | 96.5 (2.4) | 73.98 (20.53) | 8.4 | <0.001 | 72.4 (18.3) | 78.2 (14.9) | 78.5 (18.7) | 62.1 (30.2) | 2.02 | 0.122 | |
| FAB | 17.1 (0.8) | 11.66 (4.52) | 9.1 | <0.001 | 10.7 (5.4) | 12.1 (3.8) | 11.3 (5.7) | 12 (4.4) | 0.27 | 0.850 | |
| CBI-R Total | 6.2 (6.1) | 54.65 (32.97) | -11.1 | <0.001 | 89.3 (22.7) | 52 (31.6) | 46.9 (27.8) | 35.8 (27) | 7.46 | <0.001 | a,b,c |
| Clinician: behaviour | 0 (0) | 3.6 (3.37) | NA | NA | 8.9 (1.3) | 3.3 (2.7) | 1.5 (1.4) | 1.4 (1.7) | 31.7 | <0.001 | a,b,c |
| Clinician: language | 0 (0) | 2.52 (2.28) | NA | NA | 2.6 (2.6) | 1.5 (1.5) | 2.4 (1.6) | 4.8 (2.4) | 8.2 | <0.001 | c,d,e |
| Clinician: sensorimotor | 0 (0) | 1.15 (1.34) | NA | NA | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.6 (0.8) | 3.1 (0.9) | 1.6 (1.2) | 29.34 | <0.001 | b,c,d,e,f |
Clinician behavior, sensorimotor and language are the sum of the presence of features in each domain, t = Welch t-test comparing all FTLD syndromes with control.
Key: ACE-R, Addenbrooke's cognitive examination – revised; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; CBI-R, cambridge behavioral inventory – revised; CBS, corticobasal syndrome; FAB, frontal assessment battery; FTLD, all FTLD-related syndromes; NA, no variance in control group; PPA, primary progressive aphasia (all subtypes); PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy.
Post-hoc pairwise Tukey's tests (p < 0.05):
a = bvFTD vs. PSP,
b = bvFTD vs. CBS,
c = bvFTD vs. PPA,
d = PPA vs. PSP,
e = PPA vs. CBS,
f = CBS vs. PSP,
χ2 test,
p value of the t test between combined FTLD syndromes and controls, F = ANOVA of FTLD syndrome subtypes,
p value of the ANOVA across FTLD syndrome subtypes.
Our analyses proceeded in two stages. First, we used single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to measure nine metabolites in the frontal, temporal and occipital lobes. MRS quality control parameters are shown in supplementary materials (Table S1). Metabolite concentrations, after correction for age, sex, and atrophy within the voxel, varied significantly by region and diagnosis (region x metabolite x diagnosis interaction F(64) = 1.73, p < 0.001). In other words, there were regionally specific effects of disease, for some but not all metabolites. These can be understood in the context of the first order interactions and main effects (Table S3) as follows. Metabolite concentrations varied by region but there was no region by diagnosis interaction (F(8) = 1.23 p = 0.29), validating the effective partial volume correction of the metabolite concentrations. Main effect analysis showed that the region by metabolite by diagnosis interaction was due to differences in neurotransmitter glutamate and neuronal marker N-acetyl-aspartate and N-acetyl-asparate-glutamate (NAA+NAAG) concentration. Post hoc analyses revealed lower concentrations of the neurotransmitter glutamate and neuronal marker N-acetyl aspartate in bvFTD and PSP compared to controls (Fig. 1). A glutamate deficit was also found in PSP in the right superior temporal gyrus (Fig. 1). N-acetyl aspartate concentrations were low in the right visual cortex in PSP. Despite these significant group differences, there was wide variation in metabolite concentrations in all groups (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Boxplots of MRS metabolites, Boxplots of metabolites that are significantly different between FTLD-related syndromes and control participants after post-hoc testing from ANOVA of all metabolites, regions and diagnoses. Metabolite values are corrected for age, sex and partial volume. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. MRS: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy. FTLD, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration; NAA, N-acetyl-aspartate; NAAG, N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate; IFG, Inferior frontal gyrus; STG, Superior temporal gyrus; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy; CBS, corticobasal syndrome; PPA, primary progressive aphasia (all subtypes).
Correcting for the brain volume differences between groups (supplementary materials, Fig. S1), had a significant effect on the variation in metabolite concentrations (Factorial ANOVA including corrected and uncorrected data: region x metabolite x uncorrected/corrected x diagnosis F(64) = 7.94 p < 0.001). In the uncorrected data there were deficits in frontal and temporal lobe aspartate, glucose and creatine in addition to the changes seen in the corrected data (Supplementary materials, Table S4). Other correction methods, including ratio to creatine, did not remove the partial volume effect from the metabolite concentrations with a continued statistically significant correlation between brain volume and the “corrected” metabolite values (Supplementary materials, Fig. S2).
Second, we used canonical correlation analysis to test the association between (i) frontal and temporal lobe metabolites and (ii) behavioral and cognitive impairments. This revealed one significant component (all groups R = 0.85, p < 0.001). This component indicated an association between low glutamate and N-acetyl aspartate in the right inferior frontal gyrus (Fig. 2A) and the combination of executive dysfunction, low verbal fluency, low frontal assessment battery scores, and high clinician and carer rating of behavioral impairment (Fig. 2D). All FTLD-associated syndromes had strong positive correlations in this component (Fig. 2B), and this association was stronger in patients than controls (Fig. 2B). There was second component with a trend (p=0.037, not surviving correction for multiple comparisons) with a negative loading from right superior temporal gyrus glutamate, and correlation with carer ratings of impaired everyday skills and abnormal behaviors).
Fig. 2.
Canonical correlation analysis of MRS and cognitive and behavioral measures. First component from canonical correlation analysis of MRS metabolites and cognitive and behavioral measures. (A) Loadings from cognitive measures on the first CCA component. Bars colored blue have statistically significant loadings (family-wise error corrected p < 0.05) after permutation testing. Worse performance indicated by Negative ACE-R, positive CBI-R and clinician rating indicate worse cognition/behavior. (B) First CCA component correlation, color-coded by group. (D) MRS metabolite loadings onto the first CCA component. GSH: glutathione. PCh, phosphocholine; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; NAA, N-acetyl-aspartate; NAAG, N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate, PChr, phosphocreatine; Bars colored blue have statistically significant loadings (FWE p < 0;05) after permutation testing; CCA, canonical correlation analysis.
4. Discussion
There are two principal results of this study: (i) that N-acetyl aspartate and glutamate are reduced in the prefrontal cortex of people with diverse syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration; and (ii) these metabolite differences, as measured by in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy, correlate with the severity of cognitive and behavioral impairments. A group-wise deficit in these metabolites was seen in bvFTD and PSP versus controls, but the association with cognitive and behavioral impairment was found in each of the four major FTLD syndromes.
These findings have two implications. First, they strengthen the evidence that metabolite and neurotransmitter deficits are a promising treatment target for pharmacological amelioration of clinical features. Second, because the metabolite deficits in brain tissue are identified after stringent atrophy correction, and correlate with cognition even in syndromes like PSP in which lateral prefrontal cortical atrophy is not marked, the spectroscopy might detect early, even pre-symptomatic, disease before patients develop brain atrophy.
The hypotheses of this study were based on post mortem neurochemistry and pre-clinical evidence (Murley et al., 2018; Warmus et al., 2014), supported by later ultra-high field MRS (Murley et al., 2020b). We predicted an association in all FTLD-associated syndromes between glutamate concentration and clinically relevant carer- and clinician-measures of behavioral impairment. Pharmacological correction of such neurochemical deficits might be a tractable target for symptom treatment, especially where these have neurotransmitter functions in addition to metabolic roles. Such symptomatic treatment is a priority given the severe sequelae of cognitive impairment in FTLD (Benussi et al., 2019; Murley et al., 2021). However, it remains unclear to what extent our findings reflect a potentially reversible deficit of synaptic glutamate. MRS measures the total pool of unbound glutamate, involved in neuron and glia metabolism, protein synthesis and neurotransmission (Zhou and Danbolt, 2014). The NMDA antagonist memantine has been used commonly off-license in frontotemporal dementia treatments, but this is ineffective and anecdotally can worsen cognition in some patients (Boxer et al., 2013). Further work is therefore required to understand the relationship between synaptic loss in syndromes associated with FTLD and glutamate deficits (Holland et al., 2020). Healthy age-matched participants also had a weak but statistically significant correlation on this component, corroborating with previous research on glutamate deficits in healthy ageing (Zahr et al., 2013).
N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) is an abundant amino acid in the central nervous system and comprises the largest peak in the proton spectroscopy spectrum (Moffett et al., 2007). NAA is concentrated in neurons and is proposed as a marker of neuronal density, health and function (Moffett et al., 2007). Deficits are found in a wide range of neurological diseases associated with neuronal loss including Alzheimer's disease (Marjańska et al., 2019). NAA is therefore not specific to the proteinopathies associated with FTLD (Öz et al., 2014). However, our findings replicate previous studies in FTLD-related syndromes (Chen et al., 2019; Cheong et al., 2019) and suggest that NAA levels are a sensitive measure of neuronal loss, over and above structural MRI estimates of brain atrophy. As part of a multi-model MRI battery, NAA spectroscopy may be a useful endpoint in experimental medicine studies, and to understand phenotypic heterogeneity (Cope et al., 2021).
We did not replicate the previous studies that reported reduced choline (Mihara et al., 2006) and elevated myo-inositol (Kantarci et al., 2004), despite a relatively large sample size, high field strength and use of a consensus sequence and analysis pipelines (Öz et al., 2020). We did find that different partial volume correction methods change the conclusions regarding metabolite concentrations. It is therefore possible that our results are overly stringent in partial volume correction. This has important implications for the clinical use of MRS, because some correction methods (e.g., creatine ratios), may be less accurate in measuring metabolite levels in residual brain tissue. Unexpectedly, we found a reduction in occipital NAA in participants with PSP. This might be type I error, as the occipital lobe tauopathy is typically very late the least affected cortical region in PSP (Kovacs et al., 2020), although progressive occipital atrophy is reported in some studies of PSP (Höglinger et al., 2014). This occipital result is interpreted with caution and would benefit from replication.
Canonical correlation analysis indicated that glutamate and NAA concentrations in the right inferior frontal gyrus were associated with executive dysfunction and behavioral impairment. The first canonical correlate represented concordant neuropsychological, carer and clinician ratings. This emphasizes that frontal NAA and glutamate deficits are associated with clinically relevant cognitive impairment, building on earlier correlations with specific neuropsychological tasks (Murley et al., 2020b).
Metabolites with lower loadings on the first canonical correlate were not statistically significant, as estimated by permutation testing, but may still be of interest. For example, myo-inositol, which is concentrated in glia and elevated with neuroinflammation, had a positive loading. Neuroinflammation has been identified by TSPO-ligand position emission tomography, in bvFTD, PPA and PSP (Bevan-Jones et al., 2020; Malpetti et al., 2020), where it is not only elevated but also prognostic of a more rapid decline (Malpetti et al., 2020).
Our results are relevant to the nosology of syndromes associated with FTLD. The diseases of bvFTD, PSP, CBS, PPA are clinically and pathologically distinct in their classical phenotypes, and there are critical differences in underlying neuropathology even where there is tauopathy. We therefore used the current consensus diagnostic criteria for each clinical disorder. However, the clinical phenotypes associated with FTLD do not respect the diagnostic boundaries and many patients develop clinical features that would meet criteria for more than one disorder (Murley et al., 2020a). We have proposed an alternative, transdiagnostic, approach to encompass clinical heterogeneity and phenotypic overlap (Murley et al., 2020a). This approach, emphasizing commonalities in clinic-pathological correlations across the spectrum of FTLD, is supported by our data. The association between prefrontal glutamate, NAA and cognition was observed in all FTLD syndromes jointly, and individually. This is consistent with the metabolite deficits being down-stream of the disease-specific causes of brain injury, and more proximate to the clinical phenotype.
Our study has several limitations. First, we do not report GABA concentrations, despite preclinical and ultra-high field MRS evidence of GABA deficits in bvFTD and PSP (Murley et al., 2020b, 2018; Öz et al., 2014; Warmus et al., 2014). This decision is because of the low sensitivity and inadequate spectral resolution for GABA using semi-LASER sequence at 3T. Second, the deficits identified by magnetic resonance spectroscopy are unlikely to be specific to one proteinopathy. Participants were diagnosed according to the clinical diagnostic criteria (Armstrong et al., 2013; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011; Höglinger et al., 2017; Rascovsky et al., 2011) which have variable clinicopathological correlation (Gazzina et al., 2019; Perry et al., 2017). In particular, bvFTD is associated with either 3R or 4R tau or TDP-43 pathology, whereas PSP has a high clinicopathological correlation with 4R tau. Our cohort has limited pathological confirmation of the diagnosis but clinicopathological correlations in the PIPPIN study as whole match those found elsewhere (Murley et al., 2021, 2020a). Therefore, while spectroscopy may be a valuable measure of early disease and/or disease progression it is unlikely to differentiate FTLD syndromes according to their underlying proteinopathies. Third, due to small numbers we grouped non-fluent, semantic and logopenic variants of PPA together, although these sub-groups have different clinical and neuropathological features. Fourth, MRS accuracy can be affected by participant movement and other factors which may be greater in the FTLD cohort. To mitigate this, we used a consensus guideline with recommended sequence and analysis pipeline (Öz et al., 2020) and a within-participant control region in the occipital lobe. Fifth, participants medications might influence cortical metabolites. In particular, memantine is used to treat FTD in some countries, despite the lack of evidence for efficacy. Although no participants were taking memantine, we cannot rule out the effect of other medication such as dopaminergic agents used in PSP/CBS. A subset of FTLD participants were taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, which may have downstream effects on glutamate levels that could confound our results particularly for bvFTD (Musazzi et al., 2013). Finally, our findings are limited to the brain regions we imaged. We chose these regions because of our aim to associate metabolite deficits with behavioral impairment. However, other brain regions are relevant to the pathophysiology of FTLD syndromes, including the left frontal and temporal cortices. Advances in whole brain MRSI sequences may allow simultaneous measurement of metabolites in multiple regions, better accounting for the clinical and neuropathological heterogeneity in FTLD.
5. Conclusion
N-acetyl aspartate and glutamate deficits in the prefrontal cortex are associated with loss of executive function and behavioural impairment in each of the major syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (bvFTD, PSP, CBS, PPA), even after correction for atrophy. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy can detect clinically relevant differences in metabolites in vivo and may be a valuable adjunct to multi-modal imaging for detecting disease in early-stage disease, monitoring progression and response to disease-modifying treatment, and stratification for experimental studies of restorative pharmacology.
Disclosure statement
J.B.R. serves as an associate editor to Brain and is a non- remunerated trustee of the Guarantors of Brain, Darwin College Cambridge, and the PSP Association (UK). He has provided consultancy to Asceneuron, Biogen, UCB and has research grants from AZ-Medimmune, Janssen, Lilly and WAVE as industry partners in the Dementias Platform UK. The other authors have no disclosures.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the study participants and their families and carers, the radiographers at the Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge and Dr Dinesh Deelchand, University of Minnesota, for his MRSpa software (https://www.cmrr.umn.edu/downloads/mrspa/) and MRS basis set. This work was funded by the Holt Fellowship (RG86564), the Guarantors of Brain (G101149), the Wellcome Trust (103838), the PSP Association, the Medical Research Council (SUAG/051 G101400), the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014: The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care); the medical research council (SUAG/051 R101400) and the Cambridge Centre for Parkinson Plus. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Alexander G. Murley: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft. Kamen A. Tsvetanov: Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. Matthew A. Rouse: Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft. P. Simon Jones: Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. Katrine Sværke: Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft. Win Li: Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft. Adrian Carpenter: Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. James B. Rowe: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.
Footnotes
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.10.012.
Appendix. Supplementary materials
References
- Armstrong M.J., Litvan I., Lang A.E., Bak T.H., Bhatia K.P., Borroni B., Boxer A.L., Dickson D.W., Grossman M., Hallett M., Josephs K.A., Kertesz A., Lee S.E., Miller B.L., Reich S.G., Riley D.E., Tolosa E., Tröster A.I., Vidailhet M., Weiner W.J. Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology. 2013;80:496–503. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fd1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., Poldrack R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benussi A., Alberici A., Buratti E., Ghidoni R., Gardoni F., Luca M.Di, Padovani A., Borroni B. Toward a glutamate hypothesis of frontotemporal dementia. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1–9. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bevan-Jones W.R., Cope T.E., Jones P.S., Kaalund S.S., Passamonti L., Allinson K., Green O., Hong Y.T., Fryer T.D., Arnold R., Coles J.P., Aigbirhio F.I., Larner A.J., Patterson K., O'Brien J.T., Rowe J.B. Neuroinflammation and protein aggregation co-localize across the frontotemporal dementia spectrum. Brain. 2020;143:1010–1026. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borroni B., Grassi M., Premi E., Gazzina S., Alberici A., Cosseddu M., Paghera B., Padovani A. Neuroanatomical correlates of behavioural phenotypes in behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Behav Brain Res. 2012;235:124–129. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boxer A.L., Knopman D.S., Kaufer D.I., Grossman M., Onyike C., Graf-Radford N., Mendez M., Kerwin D., Lerner A., Wu C.K., Koestler M., Shapira J., Sullivan K., Klepac K., Lipowski K., Ullah J., Fields S., Kramer J.H., Merrilees J., Neuhaus J., Mesulam M.M., Miller B.L. Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:149–156. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70320-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z., Chen J.A., Shatunov A., Jones A.R., Kravitz S.N., Huang A.Y., Lawrence L., Lowe J.K., Lewis C.M., Payan C.A.M., Lieb W., Franke A., Deloukas P., Amouyel P., Tzourio C., Dartigues J.F., Ludolph A., Bensimon G., Leigh P.N., Bronstein J.M., Coppola G., Geschwind D.H., Al-Chalabi A. Genome-wide survey of copy number variants finds MAPT duplications in progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord. 2019;34:1049–1059. doi: 10.1002/mds.27702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheong I., Deelchand D.K., Eberly L.E., Marjańska M., Manousakis G., Guliani G., Walk D., Öz G. Neurochemical correlates of functional decline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:294–301. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cope T.E., Weil R.S., Düzel E., Dickerson B.C., Rowe J.B. Advances in neuroimaging to support translational medicine in dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92:263–270. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coyle-Gilchrist I.T.S., Dick K.M., Patterson K., Rodríquez P.V., Wehmann E., Wilcox A., Lansdall C.J., Dawson K.E., Wiggins J., Mead S., Brayne C., Rowe J.B. Prevalence, characteristics, and survival of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. Neurology. 2016;86:1736–1743. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deelchand D.K., Adanyeguh I.M., Emir U.E., Nguyen T.M., Valabregue R., Henry P.G., Mochel F., Öz G. Two-site reproducibility of cerebellar and brainstem neurochemical profiles with short-echo, single-voxel MRS at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:1718–1725. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gazzina S., Respondek G., Compta Y., Allinson K.S., Spillantini M.G., Molina-Porcel L., Guasp-Verdaguer M., Moftakhar S., Reich S.G., Hall D., Litvan I., Hoeglinger G., Rowe J.B. Neuropathological validation of the MDS-PSP criteria with PSP and other frontotemporal lobar degeneration. bioRxiv. 2019;520510 doi: 10.1101/520510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gorno-Tempini M.L., Hillis A.E., Weintraub S., Kertesz A., Mendez M., Cappa S.F., Ogar J.M., Rohrer J.D., Black S., Boeve B.F., Manes F., Dronkers N.F., Vandenberghe R., Rascovsky K., Patterson K., Miller B.L., Knopman D.S., Hodges J.R., Mesulam M.M., Grossman M. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011;76:1006–1014. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gruetter R., Tkáč I. Field mapping without reference scan using asymmetric echo-planar techniques. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43:319–323. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(200002)43:2<319::aid-mrm22>3.0.co;2-1. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200002)43:2<319::AID-MRM22>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Höglinger G.U., Huppertz H.J., Wagenpfeil S., Andrés M.v., Belloch V., León T., del Ser T. Tideglusib reduces progression of brain atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy in a randomized trial. Mov Disord. 2014;29:479–487. doi: 10.1002/mds.25815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Höglinger G.U., Respondek G., Stamelou M., Kurz Carolin, Josephs K.A., Lang A.E., Mollenhauer B., Müller U., Nilsson C., Whitwell J.L., Arzberger T., Englund E., Gelpi E., Giese A., Irwin D.J., Meissner W.G., Pantelyat A., Rajput A., van Swieten J.C., Troakes C., Antonini A., Bhatia K.P., Bordelon Y., Compta Y., Corvol J.C., Colosimo C., Dickson D.W., Dodel R., Ferguson L., Grossman M., Kassubek J., Krismer F., Levin J., Lorenzl S., Morris H.R., Nestor P., Oertel W.H., Poewe W., Rabinovici G., Rowe J.B., Schellenberg G.D., Seppi K., van Eimeren T., Wenning G.K., Boxer A.L., Golbe L.I., Litvan I., Boxer A.L., Rajput A., Pantelyat A., Antonini A., Lang A.E., Giese A., Mollenhauer B., Colosimo C., Kurz Caroline, Nilsson C., Troakes C., Irwin D.J., Dickson D.W., Gelpi E., Krismer F., Schellenberg G.D., Respondek G., Rabinovici G., Wenning G.K., Höglinger G.U., Morris H.R., Litvan I., Rowe J.B., Kassubek J., Corvol J.C., Whitwell J.L., Levin J., van Swieten J., Bhatia K.P., Josephs K.A., Seppi K., Golbe L.I., Grossman M., Nestor P., Dodel R., Lorenzl S., van Eimeren T., Arzberger T., Müller U., Meissner W.G., Poewe W., Oertel W.H., Compta Y., Bordelon Y. Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria. Mov Disord. 2017;32:853–864. doi: 10.1002/mds.26987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holland N., Jones P.S., Savulich G., Wiggins J.K., Hong Y.T., Fryer T.D., Manavaki R., Sephton S.M., Boros I., Malpetti M., Hezemans F.H., Aigbirhio F.I., Coles J.P., O'Brien J., Rowe J.B. Synaptic loss in primary tauopathies revealed by [11C]UCB-J positron emission tomography. Mov Disord. 2020;35:1834–1842. doi: 10.1002/mds.28188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes L.E., Rittman T., Robbins T.W., Rowe J.B. Reorganization of cortical oscillatory dynamics underlying disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2018;141:2486–2499. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hurtado-Pomares M., Carmen Terol-Cantero, M., Sánchez-Pérez A., Peral-Gómez P., Valera-Gran D., Navarrete-Muñoz E.M. The frontal assessment battery in clinical practice: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33:237–251. doi: 10.1002/gps.4751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kantarci K., Petersen R.C., Boeve B.F., Knopman D.S., Tang-Wai D.F., O'Brien P.C., Weigand S.D., Edland S.D., Smith G.E., Ivnik R.J., Ferman T.J., Tangalos E.G., Jack C.R. 1H MR spectroscopy in common dementias. Neurology. 2004;63:1393–1398. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000141849.21256.AC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kovacs G.G., Lukic M.J., Irwin D.J., Arzberger T., Respondek G., Lee E.B., Coughlin D., Giese A., Grossman M., Kurz C., McMillan C.T., Gelpi E., Compta Y., van Swieten J.C., Laat L.D., Troakes C., Al-Sarraj S., Robinson J.L., Roeber S., Xie S.X., Lee V.M.Y., Trojanowski J.Q., Höglinger G.U. Distribution patterns of tau pathology in progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neuropathologica. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00401-020-02158-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kril J.J., Halliday G.M. Pathological staging of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Mol Neurosci. 2011;45:379–383. doi: 10.1007/s12031-011-9528-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacKenzie I.R.A., Neumann M., Bigio E.H., Cairns N.J., Alafuzoff I., Kril J., Kovacs G.G., Ghetti B., Halliday G., Holm I.E., Ince P.G., Kamphorst W., Revesz T., Rozemuller A.J.M., Kumar-Singh S., Akiyama H., Baborie A., Spina S., Dickson D.W., Trojanowski J.Q., Mann D.M.A. Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update. Acta Neuropathologica. 2010;119:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0612-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malpetti M., Passamonti L., Jones P.S., Street D., Rittman T., Fryer T., Hong Y., Vasquez-Rodriguez P., Bevan-Jones W.R., Aigbirhio F., O'Brien J., Rowe J. Neuroinflammation predicts disease progression in progressive supranuclear palsy. medRxiv. 2020:1–23. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.19.20106393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marjańska M., Riley McCarten, J., Hodges J.S., Hemmy L.S., Terpstra M. Distinctive neurochemistry in Alzheimer's disease via 7 T in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Alzheimer's Dis. 2019;68:559–569. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mihara M., Hattori N., Abe K., Sakoda S., Sawada T. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic study of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia/Pick complex. NeuroReport. 2006;17(4):413–416. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203353.52622.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mioshi E., Foxe D., Leslie F., Savage S., Hsieh S., Miller L., Hodges J.R., Piguet O. The impact of dementia severity on caregiver burden in frontotemporal dementia and alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013;27:68–73. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318247a0bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moffett J.R., Ross B., Arun P., Madhavarao C.N., Namboodiri M.A.A. N-Acetylaspartate in the CNS: From Neurodiagnostics to Neurobiology. Prog Neurobiol. 2007;81:89–131. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.12.017.Two-stage. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murley A.G., Coyle-Gilchrist I., Rouse M.A., Jones P.S., Li W., Wiggins J., Lansdall C., Rodríguez P.V., Wilcox A., Tsvetanov K.A., Patterson K., Lambon Ralph, M.A., Rowe J.B., AG M., I C.-G., MA R., PS J., W L., J W., C L., PV R., A W., KA T., K P., MA L.R., JB R. Redefining the multidimensional clinical phenotypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. Brain. 2020;143:1555–1571. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murley A.G., Rouse M.A., Coyle-Gilchrist I.T.S., Jones P.S., Li W., Wiggins J., Lansdall C., Vázquez Rodríguez, P., Wilcox A., Patterson K., Rowe J.B. Predicting loss of independence and mortality in frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324903. jnnp-2020-324903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murley A.G., Rouse M.A., Jones P.S., Ye R., Hezemans F.H., O'Callaghan C., Frangou P., Kourtzi Z., Rua C., Carpenter T.A., Rodgers C.T., Rowe J.B. GABA and glutamate deficits from frontotemporal lobar degeneration are associated with disinhibition. Brain. 2020;143:3449–3462. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murley A.G., Rowe J.B., AG M., JB R. Neurotransmitter deficits from frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain. 2018;141:1263–1285. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musazzi L., Treccani G., Mallei A., Popoli M. The action of antidepressants on the glutamate system: regulation of glutamate release and glutamate receptors. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:1180–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Öz G., Alger J.R., Barker P.B., Bartha R., Bizzi A., Boesch C., Bolan P.J., Brindle K.M., Cudalbu C., Dinçer A., Dydak U., Emir U.E., Frahm J., Gilberto González, R., Gruber S., Gruetter R., Gupta R.K., Heerschap A., Henning A., Hetherington H.P., Howe F.A., Hüppi P.S., Hurd R.E., Kantarci K., Klomp D.W.J., Kreis R., Kruiskamp M.J., Leach M.O., Lin A.P., Luijten P.R., Marjańska M., Maudsley A.A., Meyerhoff D.J., Mountford C.E., Nelson S.J., Pamir N., Pan J.W., Peet A.C., Poptani H., Poptani H., Posse S., Pouwels P.J.W., Ratai E.M., Ross B.D., Scheenen T.W.J., Schuster C., Smith I.C.P., Soher B.J., Tkáč I., Vigneron D.B., Kauppinen R.A. Clinical proton MR spectroscopy in central nervous system disorders. Radiology. 2014;270:658–679. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Öz G., Deelchand D.K., Wijnen J.P., Mlynárik V., Xin L., Mekle R., Noeske R., Scheenen T.W.J., Tkáč I. Advanced single voxel 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques in humans: Experts’ consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2020:1–18. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Öz G., Tkáč I. Short-echo, single-shot, full-intensity proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for neurochemical profiling at 4 T: Validation in the cerebellum and brainstem. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:901–910. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perry D.C., Brown J.A., Possin K.L., Datta S., Trujillo A., Radke A., Karydas A., Kornak J., Sias A.C., Rabinovici G.D., Gorno-Tempini M.L., Boxer A.L., De May M., Rankin K.P., Sturm V.E., Lee S.E., Matthews B.R., Kao A.W., Vossel K.A., Tartaglia M.C., Miller Z.A., Seo S.W., Sidhu M., Gaus S.E., Nana A.L., Vargas J.N.S., Hwang J.H.L., Ossenkoppele R., Brown A.B., Huang E.J., Coppola G., Rosen H.J., Geschwind D., Trojanowski J.Q., Grinberg L.T., Kramer J.H., Miller B.L., Seeley W.W. Clinicopathological correlations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2017;140:3329–3345. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Provencher S.W. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localizedin vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:672–679. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910300604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ranasinghe K.G., Rankin K.P., Pressman P.S., Perry D.C., Lobach I.V., Seeley W.W., Coppola G., Karydas A.M., Grinberg L.T., Shany-Ur T., Lee S.E., Rabinovici G.D., Rosen H.J., Gorno-Tempini M.L., Boxer A.L., Miller Z.A., Chiong W., DeMay M., Kramer J.H., Possin K.L., Sturm V.E., Bettcher B.M., Neylan M., Zackey D.D., Nguyen L.A., Ketelle R., Block N., Wu T.Q., Dallich A., Russek N., Caplan A., Geschwind D.H., Vossel K.A., Miller B.L. Distinct subtypes of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia based on patterns of network degeneration. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:1078–1088. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rascovsky K., Hodges J.R., Knopman D., Mendez M.F., Kramer J.H., Neuhaus J., Van Swieten J.C., Seelaar H., Dopper E.G.P., Onyike C.U., Hillis A.E., Josephs K.A., Boeve B.F., Kertesz A., Seeley W.W., Rankin K.P., Johnson J.K., Gorno-Tempini M.L., Rosen H., Prioleau-Latham C.E., Lee A., Kipps C.M., Lillo P., Piguet O., Rohrer J.D., Rossor M.N., Warren J.D., Fox N.C., Galasko D., Salmon D.P., Black S.E., Mesulam M., Weintraub S., Dickerson B.C., Diehl-Schmid J., Pasquier F., Deramecourt V., Lebert F., Pijnenburg Y., Chow T.W., Manes F., Grafman J., Cappa S.F., Freedman M., Grossman M., Miller B.L. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134:2456–2477. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riedl L., Mackenzie I.R., Förstl H., Kurz A., Diehl-Schmid J. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:297–310. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S38706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tkac I., Starcuk Z., Choi I.-Y., Gruetter R. In vivo1H NMR spectroscopy of rat brain at 1 ms echo time. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41:649–656. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199904)41:4<649::aid-mrm2>3.0.co;2-g. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199904)41:4<649::AID-MRM2>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsvetanov K.A., Henson R.N.A., Tyler L.K., Razi A., Geerligs L., Ham T.E., Rowe J.B. Extrinsic and intrinsic brain network connectivity maintains cognition across the lifespan despite accelerated decay of regional brain activation. J Neurosci. 2016;36:3115–3126. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2733-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H.-T., Smallwood J., Mourao-Miranda J., Xia C.H., Satterthwaite T.D., Bassett D.S., Bzdok D. Finding the needle in a high-dimensional haystack: Canonical correlation analysis for neuroscientists. NeuroImage. 2020;216 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warmus B.A., Sekar D.R., McCutchen E., Schellenberg G.D., Roberts R.C., McMahon L.L., Roberson E.D. Tau-mediated NMDA receptor impairment underlies dysfunction of a selectively vulnerable network in a mouse model of frontotemporal dementia. J Neurosci. 2014;34:16482–16495. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3418-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zahr N.M., Mayer D., Rohlfing T., Chanraud S., Gu M., Sullivan E.V., Pfefferbaum A. In vivo glutamate measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Behavioral correlates in aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:1265–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Y., Danbolt N.C. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the healthy brain. J Neural Transm. 2014;121:799–817. doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1180-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Anonymized data are available on reasonable request for academic use, subject to restrictions required to protect participant confidentiality.


