Abstract
Genomic sequencing and analysis of worldwide skipper butterfly (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) fauna points to imperfections in their current classification. Some tribes, subtribes and genera as they are circumscribed today are not monophyletic. Rationalizing genomic results from the perspective of phenotypic characters suggests two new tribes, two new subtribes and 50 new genera that are named here: Ceratrichiini Grishin, trib. n., Gretnini Grishin, trib. n., Falgina Grishin, subtr. n., Apaustina Grishin, subtr. n., Flattoides Grishin, gen. n., Aurivittia Grishin, gen. n., Viuria Grishin, gen. n., Clytius Grishin, gen. n., Incisus Grishin, gen. n., Perus Grishin, gen. n., Livida Grishin, gen. n., Festivia Grishin, gen. n., Hoodus Grishin, gen. n., Anaxas Grishin, gen. n., Chiothion Grishin, gen. n., Crenda Grishin, gen. n., Santa Grishin, gen. n., Canesia Grishin, gen. n., Bralus Grishin, gen. n., Ladda Grishin, gen. n., Willema Grishin, gen. n., Argemma Grishin, gen. n., Nervia Grishin, gen. n., Dotta Grishin, gen. n., Lissia Grishin, gen. n., Xanthonymus Grishin, gen. n., Cerba Grishin, gen. n., Avestia Grishin, gen. n., Zetka Grishin, gen. n., Turmosa Grishin, gen. n., Mielkeus Grishin, gen. n., Coolus Grishin, gen. n., Daron Grishin, gen. n., Barrolla Grishin, gen. n., Brownus Grishin, gen. n., Tava Grishin, gen. n., Rigga Grishin, gen. n., Haza Grishin, gen. n., Dubia Grishin, gen. n., Pares Grishin, gen. n., Chitta Grishin, gen. n., Artonia Grishin, gen. n., Lurida Grishin, gen. n., Corra Grishin, gen. n., Fidius Grishin, gen. n., Veadda Grishin, gen. n., Tricrista Grishin, gen. n., Viridina Grishin, gen. n., Alychna Grishin, gen. n., Ralis Grishin, gen. n., Testia Grishin, gen. n., Buzella Grishin, gen. n., Vernia Grishin, gen. n., and Lon Grishin, gen. n. In addition, the following taxonomic changes are suggested. Prada Evans is transferred from Hesperiinae to Trapezitinae. Echelatus Godman and Salvin, Systaspes Weeks, and Oenides Mabille are removed from synonymy and are treated as valid genera. The following genera are new junior subjective synonyms: Tosta Evans of Eantis Boisduval; Turmada Evans of Neoxeniades Hayward, Arita Evans of Tigasis Godman, and Alera Mabille of Perichares Scudder. Eantis pallida (R. Felder) (not Achlyodes Hübner), Gindanes kelso (Evans) (not Onenses Godman and Salvin), Isoteinon abjecta (Snellen) (not Astictopterus C. and R. Felder), Neoxeniades ethoda (Hewitson) (not Xeniades Godman), Moeris anna (Mabille) (not Vidius Evans), and Molo pelta Evans (not Lychnuchus Hübner) are new genus-species combinations. The following are species-level taxa: Livida assecla (Mabille) (not a subspecies of Livida grandis (Mabille), formerly Pythonides Hübner) and Alychna zenus (E. Bell) (not a junior subjective synonym of Alychna exclamationis (Mabille), formerly Psoralis Mabille); and Barrolla molla E. Bell (formerly Vacerra Godman) is a junior subjective synonym of Barrolla barroni Evans (formerly Paratrytone Godman). All these changes to taxonomic status of names are propagated to all names currently treated as subspecies (for species), subgenera (for genera) and synonyms of these taxa. Finally, taxa not mentioned in this work are considered to remain at the ranks and in taxonomic groups they have been previously assigned to.
Keywords: Genomics, higher classification, taxonomy, biodiversity, phylogeny
Introduction
Hesperiidae, commonly known as skippers, are a charismatic group of butterflies that frequently look moth-like due to their stout bodies (Watson 1893), mostly brown and gray colors and fast wing beats. Some are crepuscular and even come to light (Austin 2008). However, recent DNA-based studies argue that they may have originated deep within butterfly radiation, after the swallowtails (Papilionidae) have split from the common ancestor (Wahlberg et al. 2005; Kawahara and Breinholt 2014; Espeland et al. 2018).
Having worldwide distribution, Hesperiidae are highly speciose with more than 3500 species described. However, they have received less attention than other butterfly families. The major milestone works remain those of Evans, who offered a comprehensive taxonomic treatment of the group in six volumes (Evans 1937, 1949, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955). Refinement of this classification was catalyzed by new methodologies. The groundbreaking work of Warren et al. (2008, 2009) re-shaped the higher classification based on combination of DNA sequences of several genes with morphological characters. Several follow up studies employed a larger set of genes, up to several hundred (Sahoo et al. 2016, 2017; Toussaint et al. 2018). Then, a genome-scale revisionary work has followed (Li et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019b, c).
Genomic analyses revealed many nuances not readily apparent from a morphological standpoint. However, retrospective comparison of phenotypic characters is consistent with the picture emerging from the comparison of phylogenetic trees based on nuclear and mitochondrial genomes (Li et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019c). We carried out genomic sequencing of representative Hesperiidae species from all known genera. As a result, we found inconsistencies in assignment of species to genera, and many genera and some tribes and subtribes were not monophyletic as currently defined. While the details of the phylogenetic analysis and their implications for the higher classification of Hesperiidae will be presented elsewhere, some of these inconsistencies are corrected here by proposing new names for two tribes, two subtribes and 50 genera detected in phylogenetic trees. Here, we show only a subset of data necessary to justify our conclusions.
Materials and Methods
This study is based on whole genomic shotgun DNA sequences that were mostly obtained from pinned and dried specimens in collections. Many of these specimens were collected more than a century ago and a number of them were primary type specimens. See Table 1 for a brief data summary of the specimens used in this work, and Table S1 in the Supplemental file deposited at https://osf.io/5cfht/?view_only=21eb53b6f8f344afaee3de2be90bf5d2 for details. We use either an abdomen, pieces of muscle tissue taken from the thorax through the abdomen attachment site (for previously dissected specimens), or a leg for DNA extraction. The abdomen is used when genitalic dissection is needed. Muscle tissue is a viable alternative to the leg when leg material is not sufficient or using a leg is not possible. Legs were the most convenient choice because they were easier to sample and often yielded better-quality DNA. Therefore, most specimens were sequenced from legs. The details of protocols for DNA extraction, genomic library preparation, sequencing and analysis are given in our previous publications (Cong et al. 2015a, b, 2016a, b, 2017a, b, 2018; Shen et al. 2015, 2016a, b, 2017; Zhang et al. 2017a, b; Li et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019a, b). In the methods employed, this study is identical to that of Li et al. (2019), and only difference is that a larger number of species and specimens were used.
Table 1.
Data for 620 sequenced Hesperiidae specimens. See Table S1 in the Supplemental file deposited at https://osf.io/5cfht/?view_only=21eb53b6f8f344afaee3de2be90bf5d2 for detailed information about these specimens and Materials and Methods section for collection abbreviations. Type status abbreviations are: AT, allotype; HT, holotype; LT, lectotype; PT, paratype, ST, syntype; T, type.
| DNA voucher | Taxon name | Type | Brief data | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVG-18054G10 | Acada biseriata | Zimbabwe, 1993 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-18081B11 | Acerbas anthea | Malaysia, 1917, NHMUK_010430824, 0247275554 | BMNH | |
| NVG-17091E09 | Acerbas duris duris | Philippines, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-18074B03 | Acerbas sarala sarala | India, 1890 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-18011F11 | Achlyodes busirus busirus | French Guiana, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-18081B04 | Acleros leucopyga | Madagascar, 1921, NHMUK_010430828, 0247274717 | BMNH | |
| NVG-18081D02 | Actinor radians | India, 1885, NHMUK_010430809, 0247275546 | BMNH | |
| NVG-18015A06 | Adlerodea petrovna | T | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, old (around 1900) | USNM |
| NVG-7988 | Adopaeoides prittwitzi | USA: AZ, Santa Cruz Co., 1999 | USNM | |
| NVG-7915 | Aeromachus stigmata shanda | Myanmar, 2002 | USNM | |
| NVG-18038C05 | Aethilla chiapa | Honduras | RGallardo | |
| NVG-18013G10 | Aethilla echina | Costa Rica, 2005, 05-SRNP-20 | USNM | |
| NVG-18011F09 | Aethilla eleusinia | Peru, 2012 | USNM | |
| NVG-18056D08 | Aethilla gigas | Bolivia, old (around 1900) | ZfBS | |
| NVG-7891 | Aethilla lavochreaDHJ02 | Costa Rica, 2013, 13-SRNP-22231 | USNM | |
| NVG-14064D01 | Aethilla memmius | Venezuela, 1985 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012E06 | Aides duma argyrina | Bolivia?, no date?1970 | USNM | |
| NVG-18054H04 | Alenia namaqua | South Africa, 2002 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-15035E02 | Alychna degener | ST | no data | ZMHB |
| NVG-18042G08 | Alychna exclamationis | ST | Bolivia, old (around 1900) | ZMHB |
| NVG-8007 | Alychna victa | Ecuador, 2004 | USNM | |
| NVG-18027A06 | Alychna zenus | HT | Ecuador, 1939 | AMNH |
| NVG-6470 | Amblyscirtes vialis | USA: CO, Grand Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7288 | Ampittia dioscorides singa | Sri Lanka, 1971 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012A02 | Anastrus meliboea | Costa Rica, 1977 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013F12 | Anastrus neaeris | Costa Rica, 2008, 08-SRNP-2106 | USNM | |
| NVG-18011H11 | Anastrus obscurus | Brazil: Rondonia, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-18067H10 | Anastrus ulpianus | Brazil: Santa Catarina, 2000 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18056D06 | Anaxas obliqua | Bolivia, old (around 1900) | ZfBS | |
| NVG-4461 | Ancyloxypha numitor | USA: TX, Dallas Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18091C07 | Anisochoria pedaliodina pedaliodina | Ecuador, 2012 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-7909 | Anisochoria pedaliodina polysticta | Costa Rica, 2004, 04-SRNP-15751 | USNM | |
| NVG-18011G07 | Anisochoria quadrifenestrata | Colombia, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-18019B02 | Anisynta cynone | Australia, 1961 | AMNH | |
| NVG-17069F11 | Ankola fan | Kenya, 1955 | USNM | |
| NVG-17111E11 | Anthoptus epictetus | Brazil: Santa Catarina, 1999 | LACM | |
| NVG-10646 | Antigonus emorsa | Mexico: Michoacan, 1994 | TAMU | |
| NVG-7907 | Antigonus erosus | Costa Rica, 2013, 13-SRNP-56479 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014A03 | Antigonus nearchus | Costa Rica, 2006, 06-SRNP-32799 | USNM | |
| NVG-18082B12 | Antipodia chaostola | Australia, 1934, NHMUK_012824109, 0247278477 | BMNH | |
| NVG-18079E09 | Apallaga fulgens fulgens | Cameroon, 1987, EL63116 | MNHP | |
| NVG-18011B09 | Apallaga mokeezi | South Africa, 1978 | USNM | |
| NVG-17108C09 | Apallaga opalinus-cf | Kenya, 2001 | LACM | |
| NVG-18033B11 | Apallaga opalinus-cf | Uganda, 2008 | MWalker | |
| NVG-18055G03 | Apallaga pooanus obscuripennis | ST | Equatorial Guinea, 1906 | ZMHB |
| NVG-18079F03 | Apallaga rutilans rutilans | Cameroon, 1991, EL63122 | MNHP | |
| NVG-18012F08 | Apaustus menes | Peru, 2011 | USNM | |
| NVG-18064D06 | Argemma argyrosticta | Cameroon, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-7921 | Argon lota | Costa Rica, 2007, 07-SRNP-55877 | USNM | |
| NVG-17069C01 | Argopteron aureipennis | Chile, 1982 | USNM | |
| NVG-18019B09 | Arnetta atkinsoni | India, 1927 | AMNH | |
| NVG-5065 | Aroma aroma | Costa Rica, 04-SRNP-1707 | USNM | |
| NVG-5485 | Arteurotia tractipennis tractipennis | USA: TX, Hidalgo Co., 1972 | TAMU | |
| NVG-18012H06 | Artines aquilina | Brazil: Santa Catarina, 1999 | USNM | |
| NVG-18067F11 | Artitropa erinnys | Comoros, 1987 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-19022F06 | Artonia artona | Brazil: Parana, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-4881 | Asbolis capucinus | USA: FL, Monroe Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7394 | Astictopterus jama jama | Myanmar, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-3718 | Atalopedes campestris huron | USA: TX, Dallas Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18113D01 | Atalopedes flaveola (=clarkei) | HT | Venezuela, 1985 | USNM |
| NVG-17092D07 | Atalopedes lina | Colombia, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-5313 | Atalopedes mesogramma apa | Dominican Republic, 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7903 | Atarnes sallei | Costa Rica, 2007, 07-SRNP-59529 | USNM | |
| NVG-17119H02 | Aurivittia aurivittata | Myanmar, 2002 | USNM | |
| NVG-18033B05 | Aurivittia cameroni | Malaysia, 2003 | MWalker | |
| NVG-14101B01 | Austinus heroica | Colombia, 1946 | AMNH | |
| NVG-18067C09 | Austinus heros | Brazil: Para, 2009 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18014E05 | Avestia avesta | Malaysia, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-17091G11 | Baoris oceia | Phillipines, 1914 | USNM | |
| NVG-18089F07 | Barca bicolor | China: Shaanxi, 2009 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18026C12 | Barrolla molla | HT | Ecuador | AMNH |
| NVG-7246 | Bolla brennus brennus | Panama, 1981 | USNM | |
| NVG-17108F05 | Bolla cylindus | Mexico: Hidalgo, 1982 | LACM | |
| NVG-18071A09 | Bolla evippe | Costa Rica, 2009, 09-SRNP-57008 | USNM | |
| NVG-18011H02 | Bolla imbras | Panama, 1984 | USNM | |
| NVG-18083B12 | Bolla saletas | T | Guatemala, BMNH(E)_1669828, 0247277236 | BMNH |
| NVG-18067H11 | Bralus albida albida | Peru, 1994 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18025F01 | Brownus browni | HT | Costa Rica, 1946 | AMNH |
| NVG-17095E11 | Brownus browni | Costa Rica, 2006 | USNM | |
| NVG-17093D04 | Burca concolor concolor | Cuba, 2010 | USNM | |
| NVG-7552 | Burnsius communis | USA: TX, Bexar Co., 1977 | TAMU | |
| NVG-16108G04 | Butleria flavomaculatus valdivianus | Chile, 1979, USNMENT 00894446 | USNM | |
| NVG-8052 | Buzella mellanaformis | Panama, 1982 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013C12 | Buzyges idothea | Costa Rica, 1980 | USNM | |
| NVG-5721 | Cabirus procas | Ecuador, 2004 | USNM | |
| NVG-7754 | Caenides dacela | Liberia, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-17092C10 | Callimormus juventus | Costa Rica, 2012, 12-SRNP-20224 | USNM | |
| NVG-4591 | Calpodes ethlius | USA: TX, Cameron Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18013G01 | Camptopleura theramenes | Costa Rica, 2015, 15-SRNP-45798 | USNM | |
| NVG-7905 | Canesia canescens | Costa Rica, 2014, 14-SRNP-1649 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013H12 | Canesia meridensis | Costa Rica, 1997, 97-SRNP-1522 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012F06 | Cantha calva | Peru, 1986 | USNM | |
| NVG-18033B07 | Capila phanaeus | Cambodia, 2006 | MWalker | |
| NVG-7763 | Carcharodus alceae | Greece, 1990 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014A02 | Carrhenes fuscescens | Costa Rica, 1995, 95-SRNP-6819 | USNM | |
| NVG-18089C06 | Carterocephalus alcina | China: Sichuan, 2006 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18021G04 | Carterocephalus avanti flavostigma | Tibet, 1944 | AMNH | |
| NVG-17119H05 | Carterocephalus christophi | China, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-18089B05 | Carterocephalus gemmatus | China: Sichuan, 2002 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18089B08 | Carterocephalus houangty houangty | China: Sichuan, 2007 | EBrockmann | |
| PAO-69 | Carterocephalus mandan | USA: CA, Sierra Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18089C04 | Carterocephalus micio | China: Yunnan, 2006 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18038G04 | Carterocephalus silvicola | Russia: Buryatia, 2016, 5195 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18012D09 | Carystina lysiteles | Peru, 1999 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012D05 | Carystus jolus | Colombia, 1971 | USNM | |
| NVG-18011B06 | Celaenorrhinus aegiochus | Panama, 1981 | USNM | |
| NVG-18064A03 | Celaenorrhinus bettoni | Uganda, 1952 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013G07 | Celaenorrhinus eligius | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-20588 | USNM | |
| NVG-17093D03 | Celaenorrhinus ficulnea ficulnea | Malaysia, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-18011B04 | Celaenorrhinus monartus | Panama, 1981 | USNM | |
| NVG-18073G09 | Celaenorrhinus rosetta | Gabon, old (around 1900) | ZMHB | |
| NVG-18011B08 | Celaenorrhinus spilothyrus | Sri Lanka, 1976 | USNM | |
| NVG-18019A07 | Celaenorrhinus sumitra | Nepal, 1937 | AMNH | |
| NVG-7993 | Celaenorrhinus syllius | Ecuador, 2002, USNMENT 01321833 | USNM | |
| 11-BOA-13383BrockB12 | Celotes limpia | USA: TX, Brewster Co. | JPBrock | |
| NVG-3956 | Celotes nessus | USA: TX, Hidalgo Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-17067E03 | Celotes spurcus | PT | Mexico: Queretaro, 2007, CSU_ENT1024631 | CSUC |
| NVG-5684 | Cephise aelius | Costa Rica, 2014, 14-SRNP-70854 | USNM | |
| NVG-7398 | Ceratrichia flava | Cameroon, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-18053E03 | Ceratrichia nothus | no data | ZMHB | |
| NVG-7401 | Ceratrichia wollastoni | Cameroon, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-18087B09 | Ceratricula semilutea | Sierra Leone, 1906, EL62955 | MNHP | |
| NVG-18089G07 | Cerba martini | Malaysia, 1993 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18039B11 | Chaetocneme beata | Australia, old (around 1900) | FMNH | |
| NVG-17108C12 | Chaetocneme helirius | British New Guinea, 1962 | LACM | |
| NVG-17069A11 | Chamunda chamunda | India, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-7981 | Charidia lucaria | Peru, 2008 | USNM | |
| NVG-18057A01 | Chiomara gundlachi | Cuba, 2014 | ZSMC | |
| NVG-17109F12 | Chiomara mithrax | USA: AZ, Santa Cruz Co., 1992 | LACM | |
| NVG-14103A02 | Chiothion asychis asychis | Suriname | USNM | |
| NVG-17109F10 | Chiothion basigutta | Brazil: Goias, 1956 | LACM | |
| NVG-5100 | Chiothion georgina | USA: TX, Starr Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18081D11 | Chiothion khalili | Brazil: AM, 1929, NHMUK_010430875, 0247277240 | BMNH | |
| NVG-14102F02 | Chirgus limbata | Chile, 1952 | FMNH | |
| NVG-18025D04 | Chitta chittara (=alis) | HT | Brazil: Santa Catarina, old (around 1900) | AMNH |
| NVG-5271 | Choaspes hemixanthus furcata | China: Sichuan Prov., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-17069G10 | Chondrolepis niveicornis | Kenya, 1951 | USNM | |
| NVG-18117E12 | Choranthus radians | Cuba, 2010 | USNM | |
| NVG-14107C04 | Clito aberrans-cf | Peru, 1982 | USNM | |
| NVG-15117B05 | Clytius clytius | Mexico: Sinaloa, 2003, CSU_ENT1039479 | CSUC | |
| NVG-17108F02 | Clytius clytius | USA: AZ, Santa Cruz Co., 1991 | LACM | |
| NVG-18013A06 | Cobalopsis autumna | Costa Rica, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-7927 | Cobalus virbius | Costa Rica, 2012, 12-SRNP-22162 | USNM | |
| NVG-3354 | Cogia calchas | USA: TX, Hidalgo Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7963 | Conga chydaea | Costa Rica, 2009, 09-SRNP-68418 | USNM | |
| NVG-14107B12 | Conognathus platon | Ecuador, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-15104C09 | Coolus bushi | HT | Dominican Republic | AMNH |
| NVG-8381 | Copaeodes aurantiaca | USA: TX, Blanco Co., 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18063D07 | Cornuphallus onoribo | French Guiana, 2004, H21114 | BHermier | |
| NVG-18071C04 | Corra coryna conka | Costa Rica, 2007, 07-SRNP-35032 | USNM | |
| NVG-17092F04 | Corticea corticea | Costa Rica, 2012, 12-SRNP-70085 | USNM | |
| NVG-14064H09 | Crenda crenda | Brazil: Parana, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-18081D10 | Crenda crenda | HT | Brazil: Parana, NHMUK_010430876, 0247278431 | BMNH |
| NVG-17092G08 | Cumbre cumbre | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1994 | USNM | |
| NVG-7381 | Cupitha purreea | Myanmar, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-15117B07 | Cycloglypha thrasibulus thrasibulus | Mexico: Sinaloa, 2003, CSU_ENT1039523 | CSUC | |
| NVG-17105F01 | Cyclosemia herennius | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-4842 | Cymaenes tripunctus tripunctus | USA: FL, Collier Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7960 | Cynea cynea | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-35740 | USNM | |
| NVG-18054C11 | Dalla agathocles agathocles | Colombia, 1921 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-18017B10 | Dalla agathocles lanna | Ecuador, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014F05 | Dalla caicus inca | Peru, 2011 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014E11 | Dalla costala | Peru, 2011 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014F06 | Dalla cyprius quinka | Peru, 2013 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014E12 | Dalla dimidiatus lilla | Peru, 2011 | USNM | |
| NVG-18017B08 | Dalla dimidiatus pucer | Peru, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-18073F06 | Dalla eryonas | Panama, old (around 1900) | ZMHB | |
| NVG-18014F03 | Dalla frater | Peru, 2013 | USNM | |
| NVG-18017B04 | Dalla frontinia-cf | Ecuador, 1986 | USNM | |
| 11-BOA-13383BrockB09 | Dalla nona | Peru | JPBrock | |
| NVG-18017B05 | Dalla pincha | Ecuador, 1982 | USNM | |
| NVG-18017B12 | Dalla semiargentea | Colombia, 1965 | USNM | |
| NVG-17111B10 | Damas clavus | Brazil: Rondonia, 1993 | LACM | |
| NVG-7929 | Damas immacula | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-67003 | USNM | |
| NVG-7349 | Dardarina dardaris | Costa Rica, 2004, 04-SRNP-13073 | USNM | |
| NVG-18114D07 | Daron seron sexton | Ecuador, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-7330 | Darpa striata striata | Malaysia, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-17095C10 | Decinea decinea decinea | Brazil: Parana, 1995 | USNM | |
| 11-BOA-13385E10 | Diaeus lacaena | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1996 | USNM | |
| NVG-7893 | Doberes anticus | Costa Rica, 2004, 03-SRNP-23600 | USNM | |
| NVG-18054F12 | Dotta callicles | Namibia, 1992 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-17093B03 | Dotta stellata stellata | Kenya, 1957 | USNM | |
| NVG-8038 | Dubia dubia | Guyana, 1999 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012D08 | Dubiella dubius | Peru, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-17098F01 | Duroca duroca duroca | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1996, USNMENT 00913432 | USNM | |
| NVG-17108B11 | Eagris tigris | Kenya, 1985 | LACM | |
| NVG-15033A04 | Eantis minna | Brazil: Amazonas, 1886 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-18025A03 | Eantis minor | HT | Dominica, 1934 | AMNH |
| NVG-10487 | Eantis mithridates | Jamaica, 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18025A06 | Eantis munroei | HT | Cuba | AMNH |
| NVG-1931 | Eantis pallida | Mexico: Tamaulipas, 1974 | TAMU | |
| NVG-3758 | Eantis tamenund | USA: TX, Hidalgo Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-1900 | Eantis thraso | Brazil: Rondonia | TAMU | |
| NVG-16108E06 | Eantis tosta | Peru, 1999 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012A05 | Ebrietas osyris | Mexico: Oaxaca, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-7977 | Eburuncus unifasciata | Panama, 1984 | USNM | |
| NVG-7920 | Ebusus ebusus | Costa Rica, 2013, 13-SRNP-30669 | USNM | |
| NVG-7884 | Echelatus sempiternus | Costa Rica, 2007, 07-SRNP-12147 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013B09 | Enosis dognini | Peru, 1998 | USNM | |
| NVG-5730 | Entheus Burns01 | Costa Rica, 2008, 08-SRNP-35619 | USNM | |
| NVG-18019B11 | Eogenes alcides | Turkey, old (around 1900) | AMNH | |
| NVG-17093E07 | Ephyriades arcas | St. Croix, 1996 | USNM | |
| NVG-7897 | Eracon sarahburnsae | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-67957 | USNM | |
| NVG-7910 | Erionota thrax | USA: HI, Molokai, 2005 | USNM | |
| NVG-18068D04 | Erynnis tages | Russia: Siberia, 1999 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-15103B05 | Euschemon rafflesia rafflesia | Australia | USNM | |
| NVG-17092F09 | Eutocus facilisDHJ01 | Costa Rica, 2006, 06-SRNP-47351 | USNM | |
| NVG-18082B04 | Exometoeca nycteris | Australia, NHMUK_010430873, 0247277190 | BMNH | |
| NVG-18012E10 | Falga jeconia jeconia | Venezuela, 1985 | USNM | |
| NVG-18031H12 | Festivia adamantinus | Ecuador, 2002 | USNM | |
| NVG-2073 | Festivia cronion | Brazil: Parana, 2011 | MEM | |
| NVG-18031H06 | Festivia festiva | Ecuador, 1990 | USNM | |
| NVG-18032A03 | Festivia grippa | Ecuador, 2002 | USNM | |
| NVG-19017F02 | Fidius fido | Brazil: Parana, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-19017E10 | Flaccilla aecas | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-14101G07 | Flattoides amazonensis amazonensis | HT | Colombia, 1946 | AMNH |
| NVG-17092A07 | Fresna netopha | Uganda, 1960 | USNM | |
| NVG-7762 | Fulda coroller | Madagascar, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-7778 | Fulda rhadama | Madagascar, 1990 | USNM | |
| NVG-7808 | Galerga hyposticta | Madagascar, 1990 | USNM | |
| NVG-8020 | Gallio gallio | Peru, 1986 | USNM | |
| NVG-16108E10 | Gamia shelleyi | Uganda, 1953 | USNM | |
| NVG-16108F09 | Gangara thyrsis | Philippines, 1987 | USNM | |
| NVG-18057H08 | Ge geta | no data, 1894 | ZSMC | |
| NVG-7336 | Gerosis bhagava | Myanmar, 2003 | USNM | |
| NVG-7570 | Gesta gesta | Dominican Republic, 1981 | TAMU | |
| NVG-18011E10 | Gindanes brebisson | Peru, 2016 | USNM | |
| NVG-7901 | Gindanes brontinus | Costa Rica, 2008, 08-SRNP-57426 | USNM | |
| NVG-18067H12 | Gindanes kelso | Peru, 2000 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18026G08 | Ginungagapus schmithi | HT | Brazil: Santa Catarina | AMNH |
| NVG-18087G04 | Gomalia elma | Botswana, 1997 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18062A03 | Gorgopas chlorocephala chlorocephala | Peru, 2016 | USNM | |
| NVG-18019E12 | Gorgyra aburae | Uganda, 1954 | AMNH | |
| NVG-17067D06 | Gorgythion begga pyralina | Mexico: Sinaloa, 2003, CSU_ENT1039357 | CSUC | |
| NVG-18091C03 | Gorgythion beggina escalophoides | Ecuador, 2012 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-15101B07 | Gorgythion plautia (=beggoides) | ST | Trinidad, Type No. 5981 U.S.N.M. | USNM |
| NVG-7880 | Grais stigmaticus | Costa Rica, 2014, 14-SRNP-30242 | USNM | |
| NVG-18019F12 | Gretna cylinda | Uganda, 1953 | AMNH | |
| NVG-18053D11 | Gyrogra subnotata | Gabun, 1892 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-7979 | Haemactis sanguinalis | Ecuador, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013A12 | Halotus angellus | Panama, 1976 | USNM | |
| NVG-17119G01 | Halpe porus | Myanmar, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-18052D09 | Haza hazarma | LT | no data | ZMHB |
| NVG-15039D09 | Helias phalaenoides phalaenoides | Brazil: Rondonia, 1993 | FMNH | |
| NVG-7558 | Heliopetes arsalte | Mexico: San Luis Potosi, 1980 | TAMU | |
| NVG-18064E01 | Herila herilus | Tanzania, 1951 | USNM | |
| NVG-18068A06 | Hesperia comma | Russia: Yakutia, 1990 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-4767 | Hesperia meskei straton | USA: FL, Levy Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18026D09 | Hesperia nabokovi | AT | Haiti, 1922 | AMNH |
| NVG-8392 | Hesperia viridis | USA: TX, Blanco Co., 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-17069D12 | Hesperilla ornata | Australia, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-17067A10 | Hesperopsis alpheus alpheus | USA: CA, Kern Co., 2012, CSU_ENT1039256 | CSUC | |
| NVG-17067B02 | Hesperopsis gracielae | USA: CA, Riverside Co., 1997, CSU_ENT1039348 | CSUC | |
| NVG-17067A09 | Hesperopsis libya libya | USA: CA, Inyo Co., 2009, CSU_ENT1039161 | CSUC | |
| NVG-17069E08 | Heteropterus morpheus | France, 1966, USNMENT 00894386 | USNM | |
| NVG-17108D07 | Hewitsoniella migonitis | Papua New Guinea, 1996 | LACM | |
| NVG-7823 | Hidari irava | Singapore, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-18072H08 | Hollandus xanthopeplus | Cameroon, 1895 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-18072H07 | Hollandus xanthopeplus | Equatorial Guinea, 1906 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-7882 | Hoodus pelopidas | Costa Rica, 2008, 08-SRNP-55556 | USNM | |
| NVG-7816 | Hovala dispar-cf | Madagascar, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-7767 | Hovala pardalina | Madagascar, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-7766 | Hovala saclavus | Madagascar, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-3607 | Hylephila phyleus | USA: TX, Starr Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18081B02 | Hylephila venustus | Chile, 1960, NHMUK_010430840, 0247274697 | BMNH | |
| NVG-17091H02 | Hypoleucis tripunctata draga | Uganda, 1960 | USNM | |
| NVG-14103B04 | Iliana romulus | Peru | USNM | |
| NVG-17091E06 | Ilma irvina | Indonesia, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-18059B11 | Incisus incisus | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-18025A09 | Isoteinon abjecta (=niangarensis) | HT | Niangara, 1910 | AMNH |
| NVG-17091A07 | Isoteinon lamprospilus formosanus | Taiwan, 1980 | USNM | |
| NVG-14107C02 | Jera tricuspidata | Ecuador, 1984 | USNM | |
| NVG-7953 | Joanna joanna | Costa Rica, 2004, 04-SRNP-14377 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013B06 | Justinia justinianus | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-18053B08 | Katreus johnstonii apicalis | Sierra Leone, 1887 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-17108F10 | Kedestes lepenula | South Africa, 1943 | LACM | |
| NVG-17069F06 | Kobelana kobela | South Africa, 1978 | USNM | |
| NVG-18093B06 | Ladda connexa | LT | Colombia | SMF |
| NVG-18014F02 | Ladda eburones eburones | Peru, 2008 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014F01 | Ladda monospila | Peru, 2010 | USNM | |
| NVG-18093B08 | Ladda ochrolimbata | HT | Peru, old (around 1900) | SMF |
| NVG-18014F04 | Ladda plancus | Peru, 2013 | USNM | |
| NVG-18017B09 | Ladda puracensis cotopa | Ecuador, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-17111D10 | Ladda pura-cf | Ecuador, 1992 | LACM | |
| NVG-18014E10 | Ladda quadristriga | Peru, 2013 | USNM | |
| NVG-18017B07 | Ladda seirocastnia | Ecuador, 1986 | USNM | |
| 8041 | Lamponia lamponia | Brazil: Parana, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012F02 | Lento lento | Ecuador, 1998 | USNM | |
| NVG-18019G02 | Leona leonora dux | Malawi, 1938 | AMNH | |
| NVG-17069C05 | Leptalina unicolor | Japan, 1951 | USNM | |
| NVG-1769 | Lerema accius | USA: TX, Dallas Co., 2013 | USNM | |
| NVG-7738 | Lerema lineosa | Brazil: Mato Grosso, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-4062 | Lerodea eufala | USA: TX, Dallas Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18054G05 | Leucochitonea levubu | Namibia, 2002 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-17092D04 | Librita librita | Mexico: Oaxaca, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-18067H07 | Lindra simulius | Ecuador, 2012 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-16108E11 | Lissia lissa lima | Kenya, 1956 | USNM | |
| NVG-18056B11 | Livida assecla | Brazil: Goias, 1929 | ZfBS | |
| NVG-3288 | Lobocla liliana liliana | China: Yunnan, 2009 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18054C08 | Lon azin | Colombia, 1920 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-6175 | Lon hobomok hobomok | USA: VA, Augusta Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18115E11 | Lon inimica | Panama, 2007 | USNM | |
| NVG-18113H06 | Lon macneilli | HT | Colombia, 1975 | USNM |
| NVG-17111H01 | Lon melane melane | USA: CA, San Luis Obispo Co., 1994 | LACM | |
| NVG-18089H01 | Lon monticola | Mexico: Queretaro, 2004 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18115G04 | Lon niveolimbus | Mexico: Chiapas, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-9774 | Lon taxiles | USA: AZ, Cochise Co., 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-9209 | Lon zabulon | USA: AR, Montgomery Co., 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7373 | Lotongus calathus balta | Myanmar, 2003 | USNM | |
| 8026 | Lucida lucia | Brazil: Minas Gerais, 1994 | USNM | |
| NVG-7940 | Ludens ludens | Costa Rica, 2012, 11-SRNP-33493 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015A10 | Lurida lurida (=carinna) | T | Brazil: Parana, old (around 1900) | USNM |
| NVG-7987 | Lycas argentea | Argentina, 1998 | USNM | |
| NVG-18111A07 | Lycas godart boisduvalii | French Guiana, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-8009 | Lychnuchoides ozias | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-2076 | Lychnuchus celsus | Brazil: Parana, 2011 | MEM | |
| NVG-5688 | Marela tamba | Ecuador, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-7787 | Matapa aria | Philippines, 1986 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014E07 | Matapa cresta | Myanmar, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-1185 | Megathymus yuccae yuccae | USA: SC, Aiken Co., 2013 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18081D08 | Melphina melphis | Nigeria, 1958, NHMUK_010430880, 0247278457 | BMNH | |
| NVG-18074H11 | Melphinyet tarace | T | Sierra Leone, 1889 | ZMHB |
| NVG-17108A04 | Methion melas | Guatemala, 1963 | BMUW | |
| NVG-18064B11 | Methionopsis ina | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-43176 | USNM | |
| NVG-18054G04 | Metisella medea | Malawi, 1996 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-17093A02 | Metisella metis paris | Uganda, 1958 | USNM | |
| NVG-18054G03 | Metisella orientalis | Malawi, 1996 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-17091H09 | Meza meza | Cameroon, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-7874 | Mictris crispus | Costa Rica, 2009, 09-SRNP-71399 | USNM | |
| NVG-18093C03 | Mielkeus diana diana (=seitzi) | LT | Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, old (around 1900) | SMF |
| NVG-19022G01 | Mielkeus klugi | Guyana, 1999 | USNM | |
| NVG-19022G03 | Mielkeus lucretius | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-18071B01 | Mielkeus tertianus | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-72549 | USNM | |
| NVG-7904 | Milanion marciana | Costa Rica, 2005, 05-SRNP-41228 | USNM | |
| NVG-8043 | Miltomiges cinnamomea | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-7814 | Miraja varians | Madagascar, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-17069F02 | Misius misius | Guyana, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-17111C02 | Mnasicles geta | Mexico: San Luis Potosi, 1981 | LACM | |
| NVG-7968 | Mnasilus allubita | Costa Rica, 2002, 02-SRNP-13739 | USNM | |
| NVG-8030 | Mnasinous patage | Panama, 1996 | USNM | |
| NVG-8027 | Mnestheus ittona | Peru, 2012 | USNM | |
| NVG-8029 | Moeris anna | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1994 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012H11 | Moeris striga | French Guiana, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-7941 | Moeris stroma | Costa Rica, 2013, 13-SRNP-56538 | USNM | |
| NVG-15036C07 | Moeros moeros | T | Suriname, 1874 | ZMHB |
| NVG-18039F01 | Molo mango | Guyana, 2003 | FMNH | |
| NVG-18012D03 | Molo pelta | Peru, 2012 | USNM | |
| NVG-18019F10 | Moltena fiara | Natal, 1924 | AMNH | |
| NVG-17092G12 | Monca crispinus | Costa Rica, 2006, 06-SRNP-55847 | USNM | |
| NVG-17069H12 | Monza cretacea | Nigeria, 1951 | USNM | |
| NVG-17069H09 | Mopala orma | Cameroon, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-18019H04 | Morvina morvus morvus | Colombia, 1945 | AMNH | |
| NVG-18013A08 | Morys valerius | French Guiana, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-8048 | Mucia zygia | Colombia, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-18041E02 | Muschampia proto | France, 2012 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18015C07 | Mylon ander ander | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015D02 | Mylon cajus cajus | Peru, 2016 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015C03 | Mylon illineatus illineatus | Peru, 2016 | USNM | |
| NVG-7881 | Mylon lassia | Costa Rica, 2009, 09-SRNP-36601 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013F07 | Mylon maimon | Costa Rica, 2015, 15-SRNP-21203 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015C05 | Mylon mestor | Colombia, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015C04 | Mylon orsa | Panama, 1975 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013F09 | Mylon salvia | Costa Rica, 2006, 06-SRNP-1769 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015C01 | Mylon zephus albodiscus | Peru, 2008 | USNM | |
| 11-BOA-13385F09 | Myrinia myris | Brazil: Rondonia, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-7950 | Naevolus orius | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-72281 | USNM | |
| NVG-8137 | Nastra lherminier | USA: FL, Liberty Co., 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18053B01 | Neohesperilla croceus | Australia, 1892 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-17095F04 | Neoxeniades ethoda | Brazil: Santa Catarina, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-18069F03 | Neoxeniades luda | Costa Rica, 2012, 12-SRNP-1402 | USNM | |
| NVG-18082E06 | Neoxeniades musarion | Brazil: RJ, NHMUK_012824133, 0247279800 | BMNH | |
| NVG-7936 | Neoxeniades pluviasilva | Costa Rica, 2012, 12-SRNP-30105 | USNM | |
| NVG-17112B12 | Neoxeniades turmada | Peru, 1986 | LACM | |
| NVG-18113B11 | Neposa heras | Mexico, old (around 1900) | BMNH | |
| NVG-14063B05 | Nerula fibrena | Venezuela, 1985 | USNM | |
| NVG-17091B06 | Nervia nancy | Kenya, 1960 | USNM | |
| NVG-16106A03 | Netrocoryne repanda | Australia, 1963 | LACM | |
| NVG-18053D01 | Netrocoryne thaddeus | Indonesia, 1894 | ZMHB | |
| NVG-18013B02 | Niconiades xanthaphes | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-18011G09 | Nisoniades mimas | Peru, 1982 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015E03 | Noctuana lactifera lactifera | Costa Rica, 2003, 03-SRNP-22972 | USNM | |
| NVG-18086D12 | Noctulana noctula | Ivory Coast, EL63203 | MNHP | |
| NVG-3845 | Nyctelius nyctelius | USA: TX, Cameron Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-15036C01 | Nyctus crinitus | ST | Peru, old (around 1900) | ZMHB |
| NVG-17068C03 | Oarisma poweshiek | USA: MN, Pipestone Co., 1986, CSU_ENT1025108 | CSUC | |
| NVG-14112G12 | Ocella albata | Peru, no date | TLS | |
| PAO-23 | Ochlodes agricola | USA: CA, Sierra Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18039E08 | Ochlodes subhyalina | Korea, 1956 | FMNH | |
| PAO-263 | Ochlodes sylvanoides | USA: CO, Larimer Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7746 | Ochlodes venata venata | Japan, 1933 | USNM | |
| NVG-17114B06 | Ochlodes yuma | USA: CO, Mesa Co., 2001, LepNet 1024498 | CSUC | |
| NVG-5686 | Oechydrus chersis chersis | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1996, 14063A12 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014F09 | Oenides vulpina | Peru, 2016 | USNM | |
| NVG-18021D06 | Oeonus pyste | Mexico: San Luis Potosi, 1967 | AMNH | |
| NVG-14063C11 | Oileides fenestratus | French Guiana, 1993, Hermier No 4771 | USNM | |
| NVG-18067C02 | Oileides fenestratus | French Guiana, 2009 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18098F04 | Oileides guyanensis | French Guiana, 2002, H19994 | BHermier | |
| NVG-18057C09 | Oileides vulpinus | Brazil: Espirito Santo, old (around 1900) | ZSMC | |
| NVG-5727 | Oileides vulpinus | Brazil: Espirito Santo, 1969 | USNM | |
| NVG-15117B01 | Onenses hyalophora | Mexico: Tamaulipas, 2003, CSU_ENT1039476 | CSUC | |
| NVG-17092D06 | Onespa nubis | Mexico: Oaxaca, 1990 | USNM | |
| NVG-8040 | Onophas columbaria | Ecuador, 2002 | USNM | |
| NVG-17109G08 | Orphe gerasa | Venezuela, 1993 | LACM | |
| NVG-2761 | Orphe vatinius | Colombia, 1976 | JAScott | |
| NVG-7956 | Orses cynisca | Costa Rica, 2008, 08-SRNP-40358 | USNM | |
| NVG-18111A01 | Orses itea | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-8061 | Orthos orthos | Brazil: Parana, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-18026A06 | Orthos orthos hyalinus | HT | Brazil: Santa Catarina, old (around 1900) | AMNH |
| NVG-17119C02 | Osmodes laronia | Uganda, 1961 | USNM | |
| NVG-18073E04 | Osphantes ogowena | ST | Gabon, 1888 | ZMHB |
| NVG-18011G05 | Ouleus fridericus | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-7894 | Ouleus salvinaDHJ01 | Costa Rica, 2011, 11-SRNP-57460 | USNM | |
| NVG-14113A02 | Oxynetra aureopecta | HT | Mexico: Hidalgo, 1987 | LACM |
| 7962 | Oxynthes coruscaDHJ02 | Costa Rica, 2011, 11-SRNP-23410 | USNM | |
| NVG-7899 | Paches loxus | Costa Rica, 2003, 03-SRNP-30995 | USNM | |
| NVG-18025B01 | Pachyneuria lineatopunctata (=phintias) | HT | Peru, 1931 | AMNH |
| NVG-15033D07 | Pachyneuria obscura | T | Peru, old (prior to 1888) | ZMHB |
| NVG-4155 | Panoquina panoquin | USA: TX, Jefferson Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-17111G07 | Papias subcostulata | Mexico: Hidalgo, 1981 | LACM | |
| NVG-8037 | Paracarystus hypargyra | Peru, 2013 | USNM | |
| NVG-18063A09 | Parachoranthus magdalia | Cuba, 2009 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-17092H10 | Paracleros biguttulus | Uganda, 1956 | USNM | |
| NVG-18027E08 | Paramimus scurra scurra | Guyana, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015E01 | Paratrytone rhexenor | Mexico: Veracruz, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-17108G05 | Pardaleodes edipus | Zaire, 1981 | LACM | |
| NVG-18026E08 | Pares pares | HT | Paraguay | AMNH |
| NVG-7290 | Parnara guttatus | Myanmar, 2002 | USNM | |
| NVG-17108G12 | Paronymus ligora | Sierra Lione, 1974 | LACM | |
| NVG-18013A05 | Parphorus storax | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-17094H03 | Passova gellias | Costa Rica, 2013, 13-SRNP-6248 | USNM | |
| NVG-18082E01 | Pastria pastria | Papua NG, 1982, NHMUK_010430882, 0247277187 | BMNH | |
| NVG-17116A09 | Pellicia dimidiata dimidiata | Mexico: Tamaulipas, 1974 | TAMU | |
| NVG-18013C07 | Penicula bryanti | Ecuador, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-18011F04 | Penicula subviridis | Brazil: Santa Catarina, 1990 | USNM | |
| NVG-7955 | Perichares adela | Costa Rica, 2013, 13-SRNP-65013 | USNM | |
| NVG-18065F12 | Perichares butus | Peru, 2015 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18105G06 | Perichares deceptus fulvimargo | Peru, 2013 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014F08 | Perichares furcata | Ecuador, 1976 | USNM | |
| NVG-7986 | Perichares haworthiana | Brazil: Rondonia, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-18105F10 | Perichares lotus | Trinidad, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-18027A09 | Perichares metallica (=zikani) | HT | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro | AMNH |
| NVG-10247 | Perichares philetes | Jamaica, 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18058H07 | Perus coecatus (=tadus) | ST | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro | USNM |
| NVG-7826 | Perus cordillerae | Peru, 1999 | USNM | |
| NVG-19055F06 | Perus menuda | ST | Bolivia, 1899 | MCZ |
| NVG-18059C09 | Perus minor | Ecuador, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-17092F05 | Phanes aletesDHJ02 | Costa Rica, 2015, 15-SRNP-71060 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012F07 | Pheraeus odilia epidius | Panama, 1982 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013C03 | Phlebodes pertinax | Brazil: Amazonas, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-5316 | Phocides pigmalion okeechobee | USA: FL, Monroe Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-3990 | Pholisora catullus | USA: TX, Starr Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7976 | Pholisora mejicanus | USA: NM, Colfax Co., 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-17068A11 | Piruna aea mexicana | USA: AZ, Santa Cruz Co., 2016, CSU_ENT1033276 | CSUC | |
| NVG-6454 | Piruna pirus | USA: CO, Grand Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-17108G10 | Platylesches picanini | South Africa, 1944 | LACM | |
| NVG-7982 | Plumbago plumbago | Brazil: Rondonia, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-939 | Poanes aaroni bordeloni | USA: LA, 2011 | UTSW | |
| NVG-4704 | Poanes aaroni howardi | USA: FL, Levy Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-17114B07 | Poanes massasoit | USA: MD, Dorchester Co., 1976, LepNet 1031028 | CSUC | |
| NVG-6711 | Poanes viator zizaniae | USA: TX, Dallas Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7046 | Poanes yehl | USA: TX, Hopkins Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-8170 | Polites baracoa baracoa | USA: FL, Miami-Dade Co., 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-5968 | Polites carus | USA: AZ, Santa Cruz Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-4276 | Polites peckius peckius | USA: IN, Montgomery Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-4255 | Polites themistocles themistocles | USA: IN, Montgomery Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-7875 | Polyctor polyctor | Costa Rica, 2012, 12-SRNP-4870 | USNM | |
| NVG-18115C01 | Pompeius amblyspila | Brazil: Amazonas, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-17106B02 | Pompeius pompeius | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-103576 | USNM | |
| NVG-18038D12 | Potamanaxas flavofasciata flavofasciata | Ecuador, 2008 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18082C08 | Prada rothschildi | PT | Papua NG, 1899, NHMUK_012824115, 0247281590 | BMNH |
| NVG-18082C09 | Prada rothschildi | PT | Papua NG, 1899, NHMUK_010430826, 0247278442 | BMNH |
| NVG-18114H04 | Propapias sipariana | French Guiana, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-7331 | Pseudocoladenia dan fabia | Myanmar, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-8050 | Pseudocopaeodes eunus | USA: CA, Inyo Co., 1950 | USNM | |
| 11-BOA-13382A03 | Pseudodrephalys hypargus | Ecuador | USNM | |
| NVG-18113B05 | Pseudorphe pyrex | Peru, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-17112C01 | Pseudosarbia phoenicicola | Uruguay, 1967 | LACM | |
| NVG-18021B02 | Psoralis idee | Bolivia, old (around 1900) | AMNH | |
| NVG-7757 | Pteroteinon laufella | Liberia, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-7771 | Pyrgus malvae | Greece, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-8060 | Pyrrhocalles antiqua | Dominican Republic, 1994 | USNM | |
| NVG-17094C09 | Pyrrhopyge hadassa pseudohadassa | Peru, 2013, USNMENT 00894886 | USNM | |
| NVG-7984 | Pyrrhopygopsis socrates | Brazil: Mato Grosso, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-7896 | Pythonides amaryllis | Costa Rica, 2006, 06-SRNP-7674 | USNM | |
| 11-BOA-13382B01 | Pythonides jovianus jovianus | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-14102D02 | Pythonides lerina | Guyana, 2003 | FMNH | |
| NVG-7902 | Quadrus cerialis | Costa Rica, 2008, 08-SRNP-1186 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013H08 | Quadrus lugubris | Costa Rica, 2008, 08-SRNP-57856 | USNM | |
| NVG-18018A03 | Quadrus truncata | Ecuador, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-18015B10 | Quasimellana mexicana | Mexico: Oaxaca, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-7959 | Quinta cannae | Costa Rica, 2012, 12-SRNP-75508 | USNM | |
| NVG-18057H02 | Rachelia extrusus | Papua New Guinea, old (around 1900) | ZSMC | |
| NVG-18012A12 | Racta plasma | Peru, 2011 | USNM | |
| NVG-17092G01 | Radiatus bradus | Guyana, 1999 | USNM | |
| NVG-18091D12 | Ralis concolor | Ecuador, 2012 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-19021E08 | Ralis coyana | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1996 | USNM | |
| NVG-17092C08 | Remella remus | Costa Rica, 2006, 06-SRNP-6640 | USNM | |
| NVG-18081A02 | Repens repens | PT | Paraguay, 1904, NHMUK_010430831, 0247279233 | BMNH |
| NVG-17069G04 | Rhabdomantis galatia | Uganda, 1958 | USNM | |
| NVG-17116C08 | Rhinthon osca | USA: TX, Hidalgo Co., 1974 | TAMU | |
| NVG-18093C02 | Rigga auristriga | HT | Bolivia, old (around 1900) | SMF |
| NVG-19019G04 | Rigga hesia | Ecuador, 2002 | USNM | |
| NVG-18093C05 | Sacrator sacrator (=stupenda) | HT | Colombia, old (around 1900) | SMF |
| NVG-18012E03 | Saliana salius | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-8024 | Saniba sabina | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1996 | USNM | |
| NVG-18025B08 | Santa santes | HT | Peru, 1924 | AMNH |
| 11-BOA-13382F10 | Santa trifasciatus | Guyana | USNM | |
| NVG-7345 | Sarangesa dasahara | Myanmar, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-18037G08 | Satarupa nymphalis | China: Sichuan, 2010 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18013C01 | Saturnus saturnus | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-7803 | Semalea pulvina | Cameroon, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-7760 | Signeta flammeata | Australia, 1985 | USNM | |
| NVG-7970 | Sodalia sodalis | Costa Rica, 2011, 11-SRNP-75366 | USNM | |
| NVG-14107C10 | Sophista aristoteles aristoteles | Peru, 2013 | USNM | |
| NVG-18011H10 | Sostrata bifasciata | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-7247 | Sostrata nordica | Mexico: Veracruz, 1906 | USNM | |
| NVG-18032A04 | Sostrata pusilla pulsa | Ecuador, 1976 | USNM | |
| NVG-18032A10 | Sostrata pusilla pusilla | Peru, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-17108E02 | Spialia galba galba | India, 1961 | LACM | |
| NVG-18013H11 | Spioniades artemides | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-67995 | USNM | |
| NVG-18071A04 | Staphylus ascalaphus | Costa Rica, 2016, 16-SRNP-56091 | USNM | |
| NVG-18071A05 | Staphylus caribbea | Costa Rica, 2009, 09-SRNP-42728 | USNM | |
| NVG-9694 | Staphylus ceos | USA: AZ, Santa Cruz Co., 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18025B10 | Staphylus musculus (=similis) | HT | Brazil: Sta Catarina, old (around 1900) | AMNH |
| NVG-18025B03 | Staphylus putumayo | HT | Peru, 1931 | AMNH |
| NVG-18011H08 | Staphylus vincula | Mexico: Oaxaca, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-18071A12 | Staphylus vulgata | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-55088 | USNM | |
| NVG-6016 | Stinga morrisoni | USA: TX, Jeff Davis Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-8044 | Styriodes lyco | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012D04 | Synale hylaspes | Argentina, 1998 | USNM | |
| NVG-7937 | Synapte salenus salenus | Costa Rica, 2007, 07-SRNP-21744 | USNM | |
| NVG-3621 | Systasea pulverulenta | USA: TX, Duval Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-6008 | Systasea zampa | USA: TX, El Paso Co., 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18011E02 | Systaspes corrosus | Mexico: Oaxaca, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-7333 | Tagiades litigiosus litigiosus | Myanmar, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012D01 | Talides sinois | Peru, 2015 | USNM | |
| NVG-7375 | Taractrocera maevius sagara | Myanmar, 2003 | USNM | |
| NVG-18116E01 | Tava tavola | ST | Trinidad, old (around 1900) | USNM |
| NVG-18026A03 | Tava tavola (=hoffmanni) | HT | Brazil: Santa Catarina, 1913 | AMNH |
| NVG-5726 | Telemiades fides | Costa Rica, 2011, 11-SRNP-20768 | USNM | |
| NVG-8008 | Tellona variegata | Brazil: Rondonia, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-17119H08 | Teniorhinus watsoni watsoni | Uganda, 1961 | USNM | |
| NVG-18026F01 | Testia potesta | HT | Peru, 1931 | AMNH |
| NVG-18098F08 | Thargella caura | French Guiana, 2005, H22106 | BHermier | |
| 11-BOA-13386C12 | Theagenes aegides | Costa Rica, 1980 | USNM | |
| 11-BOA-13386C11 | Theagenes albiplaga | Peru, 2008 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013B04 | Thoon modius | Ecuador, 1992 | USNM | |
| NVG-7383 | Thoressa masoni | Myanmar, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-17112B06 | Thracides phidon | Venezuela, 1993 | LACM | |
| NVG-18022H12 | Thymelicus acteon acteon | Spain, 1953 | AMNH | |
| NVG-7888 | Tiana niger | Costa Rica, 2011, 11-SRNP-35371 | USNM | |
| NVG-7944 | Tigasis arita | Costa Rica, 2011, 11-SRNP-32281 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013A11 | Tigasis zalates | Ecuador, 1977 | USNM | |
| NVG-7883 | Timochares trifasciata | Costa Rica, 2005, 05-SRNP-12097 | USNM | |
| NVG-7908 | Timochreon satyrus | Costa Rica, 2007, 07-SRNP-58884 | USNM | |
| NVG-18118A08 | Tirynthia conflua | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-18081D03 | Toxidia thyrrhus | Australia, 1911, NHMUK_010430805, 0247281664 | BMNH | |
| NVG-16106A10 | Trapezites symmomus | Australia, 1963 | LACM | |
| NVG-19023C11 | Tricrista advena | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| 8049 | Tricrista crista | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-18025G05 | Tricrista cristatus | HT | Brazil: Santa Catarina, old (around 1900) | AMNH |
| NVG-7983 | Trina geometrina | French Guiana, 1993 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012D02 | Tromba tromba | Peru, 2014 | USNM | |
| NVG-18019E10 | Tsitana tsita | South Africa, 1924 | AMNH | |
| NVG-18111G06 | Turesis complanula | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-18082D06 | Turmosa camposa | Brazil: RJ, 1883, NHMUK_012824124, 0247279797 | BMNH | |
| NVG-18056F01 | Turmosa camposa | LT | no data | ZSMC |
| NVG-5699 | Typhedanus ampyx | Mexico: Oaxaca, 1992, 14104H07 | USNM | |
| NVG-17108H12 | Unkana ambasa | no data, no date | LACM | |
| NVG-18081C02 | Unkana mytheca | Indonesia, 1914, NHMUK_010430823, 0247278996 | BMNH | |
| NVG-4894 | Urbanus proteus proteus | USA: FL, Miami-Dade Co., 2015 | UTSW | |
| NVG-17095C06 | Vacerra litana | Venezuela, 1975 | USNM | |
| NVG-17098F07 | Veadda veadeira | Brazil: Mato Grosso, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-17111G04 | Vehilius stictomenes illudens | Mexico: San Luis Potosi, 1980 | LACM | |
| NVG-8022 | Venas evans | Guyana, 2000 | USNM | |
| NVG-18021D01 | Vernia dares | Mexico: San Luis Potosi, 1966 | AMNH | |
| NVG-18014H01 | Vernia verna | USA: OH, Summit Co., 2012 | USNM | |
| NVG-18013B11 | Vertica verticalis | Peru, 1983 | USNM | |
| NVG-18014G01 | Vettius phyllus phyllus | Guyana, 2001 | USNM | |
| NVG-18071C05 | Vettius picaDHJ01 | Costa Rica, 2015, 15-SRNP-71571 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012H07 | Vidius vidius | Paraguay, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-15097D10 | Vinpeius tinga (=freemani) | HT | Mexico: Veracruz | CMNH |
| NVG-18011G11 | Viola alicus | ST | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, old (around 1900) | USNM |
| NVG-18061D04 | Viola minor | Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, 1995 | USNM | |
| NVG-7973 | Viola violella | Brazil: Mato Grosso, 1991 | USNM | |
| NVG-18012F11 | Virga virginius | Paraguay, 1986 | USNM | |
| NVG-18026H05 | Viridina subviridis | HT | Ecuador, 1938 | AMNH |
| NVG-19055F04 | Viridina viridenex | HT | Bolivia, 1899 | MCZ |
| NVG-15104C11 | Viridina viridis | HT | Ecuador, 1938 | AMNH |
| NVG-18028C11 | Viuria licisca | Costa Rica, 2003, 03-SRNP-27671 | USNM | |
| NVG-7972 | Viuria lista | French Guiana, 1988 | USNM | |
| NVG-17107B06 | Wahydra kenava | Venezuela, 1978 | USNM | |
| NVG-7421 | Wallengrenia drury | Dominican Republic, 1981 | USNM | |
| NVG-17098E07 | Wallengrenia ophites | French Antilles, 1989 | USNM | |
| NVG-17098E12 | Wallengrenia premnas | Brazil: Mato Grosso, 1990 | USNM | |
| NVG-10332 | Wallengrenia vesuria | Jamaica, 2017 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18079C02 | Willema tsadicus (=birbiranus) | T | Ethiopia, 1925, EL63085 | MNHP |
| NVG-18063B11 | Willema willemi | Tanzania, old (around 1900) | ZSMC | |
| NVG-17069E09 | Willema willemi | Zimbabwe, 1961 | USNM | |
| NVG-15102D03 | Windia windi | Mexico: Sonora, 1984 | USNM | |
| NVG-7765 | Xanthodisca vibius | Cameroon, 1987 | USNM | |
| NVG-17091D05 | Xanthoneura corissa corissa | Malaysia, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-18064D07 | Xanthonymus xanthioides | Cameroon, old (around 1900) | USNM | |
| NVG-17112A11 | Xeniades orchamus | Brazil: Santa Catarina, 1999 | LACM | |
| NVG-7906 | Xenophanes tryxus | Costa Rica, 2010, 10-SRNP-103428 | USNM | |
| NVG-15033D08 | Xispia quadrata | T | Brazil: Amazonas, prior to 1889 | ZMHB |
| NVG-17105B08 | Zalomes biforis | Colombia, 1965 | USNM | |
| NVG-18074B01 | Zela excellens | T | Palawan, 1888 | ZMHB |
| NVG-18098G05 | Zela smaragdinus | Malaysia, 2016 | UTSW | |
| NVG-18126A12 | Zela zenon | Sabah, 1984 | KMaruyama | |
| NVG-18126A05 | Zela zeus optima | Langkawi, 2018 | UTSW | |
| NVG-17112A04 | Zenis jebus hemizona | Venezuela, 1993 | LACM | |
| NVG-18038B10 | Zera hosta | Honduras | RGallardo | |
| NVG-18091C05 | Zera phila | Ecuador, 2012 | EBrockmann | |
| NVG-18011E12 | Zera zera | Peru, 2014 | USNM | |
| NVG-18027A07 | Zetka zeteki | HT | Panama, 1928 | AMNH |
| NVG-15104C01 | Zobera albopunctata | HT | Mexico: Colima | AMNH |
| NVG-17091C04 | Zographetus satwa | no data | USNM | |
| NVG-17069H08 | Zophopetes dysmephila | South Africa, 1953 | USNM | |
| NVG-6998 | Zopyrion sandace | Mexico: Oaxaca, 1981 | TAMU | |
| NVG-1670 | Pterourus glaucus glaucus | USA: TX, Denton Co., 2013 | USNM |
Due to this very large number of specimens we have sequenced, the phylogenetic trees were built for smaller phylogenetic groups (subfamilies, tribes and subtribes) and analyzed together with the “backbone” tree for the entire family constructed with selected reference species and given in Li et al. (2019). Type species (or their close relatives when the type is not available) of available genus-level names (including the names treated as synonyms) were marked on the trees to ensure that any available name for each clade is used. Manual analysis of the trees involved searching for non-monophyletic genera and checking clades that are prominently separated from others. Both nuclear genome and mitogenome trees were checked side-by-side to evaluate the consistency between them. Statistical support values (bootstrap) were taken into consideration to judge the validity of each observed clade. When a clade without an available name was found, identification of specimens in the clade was confirmed by the analysis of their wing patterns and genitalia. These new clades and the genus of former placement of each species proposed as a type species of a new genus name were rationalized in terms of genitalic morphology and wing patterns to search for diagnostic characters in phenotype. Finally, genitalia and wing patterns were used to decide the generic placement of species for which DNA data were not available.
Diagnostic DNA characters were identified in nuclear genomic sequences using our recently published procedure (see SI Appendix to Li et al. 2019). The positions in exons were found that are most likely synapomorphic to the clade defined as a genus. For the clades where we had several species sequenced, positions that are invariant in all species from this clade and have a base pair different from a (mostly invariant) base pair in the outgroups were found and those with the smallest number of species with missing data were selected. If a genus has only one species sequenced, it is difficult to distinguish between characters of the genus and characters of the species. Therefore, we frequently resorted to a different method of defining DNA characters of a genus that would increase the robustness of these characters. First, we looked for characters to define the sister clade of the genus. Sister clades usually included more than one species, and thus characters for the sister clade were better defined. We find the characters for the sister clade and take their states that differ from those in the sister clade as diagnostic for the genus in question. Second, we found synapomorphic characters for the clade that leads to the common ancestor of the genus and its sister clade. We used the combination of these latter characters with the diagnostic ones to define the genus. Such a treatment increases the chances that the character found is not a random non-conserved change or a sequencing error. Number of sequence reads covering this position was taken into account in choosing the characters, and those positions with better coverage were given priority. The character states are given in diagnoses below as abbreviations. For example, aly728.44.1:G672C means position 672 in exon 1 of gene 44 from scaffold 728 of the Cecropterus [formerly Achalarus] lyciades (aly) reference genome (Shen et al. 2017) is C, changed from G in the ancestor. When characters were found for the sister clade of the diagnosed taxon, the following statement was used: aly5294.20.2:A548A (not C), which means that position 547 in exon 2 of gene 20 on scaffold 5294 is occupied by the ancestral base pair A, which was changed to C in the sister clade (so it is not C in the diagnosed taxon). The sequences of exons from the reference genome with the positions used as character states highlighted in green are given in the supplemental file deposited at https://osf.io/5cfht/?view_only=21eb53b6f8f344afaee3de2be90bf5d2. Distribution of these sequences together with this publication ensures that the numbers given in the diagnoses can be easily associated with actual sequences. This publication has been registered with ZooBank as http://zoobank.org/BA35690A-FC73-4E5A-A805-FE9550275FEC and individual ZooBank registration numbers for each new name are given below.
The specimens were examined and sampled for sequencing in the following collections (abbreviations in parenthesis, used in Table 1 and Table S1 in the Supplemental file deposited at https://osf.io/5cfht/?view_only=21eb53b6f8f344afaee3de2be90bf5d2): American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA (AMNH), Natural History Museum, London, UK (BMNH), Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, Seattle, WA, USA (BMUW), Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (CMNH), Colorado State University Collection, Fort Collins, CO, USA (CSUC), The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, FL, USA (FMNH), Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Los Angeles, CA, USA (LACM), Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA (MCZ), Mississippi Entomological Museum, Starkville, MS, USA (MEM), Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (MNHP), Natural History Museum, Frankfurt, Germany (SMF), Texas A&M University Insect Collection, College Station, TX, USA (TAMU), National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA (USNM), University of Texas Southwestern, freezers of the Grishin lab, Dallas, TX, USA (UTSW), Zentrum fur Biodokumentation des Saarlandes, Schiffweiler, Germany (ZfBS), Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany (ZMHB), Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Germany (ZSMC), and research collections of Jim P. Brock (JPBrock), Ernst Brockmann (EBrockmann), Robert Gallardo (RGallardo), Bernard Hermier (BHermier), Kiyoshi Maruyama (KMaruyama) James A. Scott (JAScott), Texas Lepidoptera Survey, Houston, TX, USA (TLS, since then donated to McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Gainesville, FL, USA, MGCL), and Mark Walker (MWalker).
Results and Discussion
Analysis of the trees revealed rampant inconsistencies in the current classification of Hesperiidae into genera. These inconsistencies were not evenly distributed among phylogenetic lineages of Hesperiidae. Fewer problems were observed among the Old World taxa due to better knowledge about them, and maybe due to their smaller number. Most problems involved non-monophyletic genera with one or more clades of the former genus not having an available name. In several instances, a genus remained monophyletic as currently circumscribed but was prominently divided into two clades. Genetic diversification within each clade was comparable to that in other genera. For instance, the COI barcode difference taken as a proxy for diversification was typically below 10%, and the distances in nuclear and mitochondrial genomic DNA trees were about the same as in other species-rich genera. However, the distance between the clades was prominently larger than within each clade, typically more than 10% identity in the barcode.
These clades are named here and the following are the standardized descriptions of new taxa found during this analysis. The names were chosen to be simple and short, and mostly either reflect names or properties of their type species to facilitate memorization, or are fusions of genus names, euphonized and shortened. For each genus, a ZooBank registration number is given. The type species name is listed in its original genus combination and spelling, followed by the author and year the name was made available (not a bibliographic reference, but part of the name). Definition section indicates closest genera, mostly sisters or a group of genera if there are no clear sister genera, states the generic placements prior to this study (type species are given where appropriate to help assign a clade to a genus), gives reference to diagnostic characters as they are given in previous publications mostly in the Evans volumes (Evans 1937, 1949, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955). It was almost always possible to trace the genus observed in the phylogenetic trees to the morphological characters given in the Evans’ identification keys. We think that referencing the keys rather than comprehensively listing all the characters would facilitate identification. Nevertheless, a brief morphological diagnosis for each genus is given, summarizing the most prominent phenotypic traits. DNA characters found by our recently developed method (Zhang et al. 2019c) are given at the end of each definition. This method should increase the robustness of the generic-level characters allowing for addition of species to a genus once they are sequenced. Then the gender of the name and an explanation about its origin is provided, species placed in the genus are listed (in their original genus-species name combinations with authors and dates), a parent taxon (mostly a subtribe, tribe or subfamily per Li et al. (2019)) is given, sometimes followed by comments about species involved and proposed additional taxonomic changes.
All of the changes to taxonomic status of names are propagated to all names currently treated as subspecies (for species), subgenera (for genera) and synonyms of these taxa. For instance, we do not list subspecies and synonyms unless changes are made to their status, and we assume that these names go with the species they were previously placed with. Finally, taxa not mentioned in this work are considered to remain at the ranks and in taxonomic groups they have been previously assigned to (Evans 1937, 1949, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955; Mielke 2005; Li et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019b).
Furthermore, several tribes and subtribes would no longer be monophyletic if the higher-level classification remained unchanged. To solve this problem, we establish two new tribes and two new subtribes, which are described here. The following sections follow the standardized format and are either new taxa descriptions or taxonomic changes to existing taxa, as stated in the titles of these sections. Sections dealing with family-group names are given first, so that the new names can be used in the following sections dealing with genus-group names. Then, the sections are arranged in phylogenetic order approximating how these taxa appear in the figured trees.
Ceratrichiini Grishin, new tribe
http://zoobank.org/FC72EB8A-495D-4439-AA53-C310CD0735DE
Type genus.
Ceratrichia Butler, [1870].
Definition.
Placed near the mostly African tribe Astictopterini Swinhoe, 1912, this tribe is a sister to all Hesperiinae except Aeromachini Tutt, 1906. Backed by the maximal statistical support in all trees (Fig. 1), this clade of closely related genera keys to VI.A.(b) or VII.B.(a)(a1) in Evans (1937). Antennae long, longer than half of costa, 2nd segment of palpi directed up, forewing vein CuA2 originates in the middle of discal cell, end of discal cell straight, hindwing vein M2 prominent, originates closer to vein M1 than M3, vein CuA2 originates before or opposite to RS, vein 3A long. Male genitalia simple in most species: uncus undivided (except Herila), terminally narrows to a point, narrow in lateral view, gnathos either short or lacking, valva 2–3 times longer than wide, without prominent elaborations, may have small teeth on harpe. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1121.3.2:A429G, aly669.27.2:A50G, aly374.13.3:A242T, aly216.78.1:A568C, aly1155.14.6:T406G.
Figure 1.

Genomic trees of representative Hesperiidae. The trees are built from protein-coding regions in different genomic partitions: a) Nuclear genome; b) Z chromosome; c) Mitochondrial genome. The trees are rooted with Pterourus glaucus (NVG-1670), not shown. See Table 1 and Table S1 in the Supplemental file deposited at https://osf.io/5cfht/?view_only=21eb53b6f8f344afaee3de2be90bf5d2 for additional data about these specimens. Names of species placed in new tribes and subtribes described in this work are highlighted in yellow and clades representing new taxa are colored in red. Clades for tribes and subtribes where species of the new taxa were placed previously are colored in blue and green arrow points from the former taxon to the new taxon (only on nuclear genome tree). Statistical support values are shown by nodes in all but the COI barcode trees. COI barcode NJ dendrogram is given for comparison and is not expected to reflect phylogeny. Subfamilies, tribes and subtribes for species included in the trees are shown to the right of the nuclear tree. Sequenced specimens of the type species of the new tribes and subtribes are illustrated in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views and indicated by blue arrows.
Genera included.
Ceratrichia Butler, [1870], Meza Hemming, 1939, Herila Larsen and Collins, 2012, Pardaleodes Butler, 1870, Ankola Evans, 1937, and a new genus described below.
Parent taxon.
Subfamily Hesperiinae Latreille, 1809.
Comments.
Judging from the genomic trees, this tribe consists of closely related species, but their wing patterns and colors are quite different from each other and may resemble genera outside the tribe. We were not able to find an obvious morphological synapomorphy for the tribe and, as it frequently is the case, the tribe is best diagnosed by DNA characters.
Gretnini Grishin, new tribe
http://zoobank.org/E7F984DE-BC49-4617-8624-9630FCEE18F3
Type genus.
Gretna Evans, 1937.
Definition.
Placed as a sister to all other Hesperiinae but Aeromachini Tutt, 1906, Ceratrichiini trib. n. and Astictopterini Swinhoe, 1912 in all genomic trees, this stand-alone lineage has no close relatives (Fig. 1). Keys to VIII.B.(b)(b1)(a2)(a3)(a4) in Evans (1937), and the description of Gretna given by Evans (1937: 149) applies to the tribe. Most prominently it is distinguished from other Hesperiinae by a combination of large stout palpi with tiny 3rd segment, curved forewing vein 1A+2A, well-defined hindwing vein M2, narrow hindwing cells M1-M2 and M2-M3 around it and unusual vein structure at the origin of vein RS in males, which is close to the origin of vein Sc+R1, and veins M1 and RS are curved at their divergence point, U-shaped rather than V-shaped. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly2012.5.1:A98C, aly2195.3.11:A37G, aly349.39.4:C152G, aly276378.25.8:A84T, aly6398.6.4:A46C.
Genera included.
Only the type genus.
Parent taxon.
Subfamily Hesperiinae Latreille, 1809.
Comments.
Uniqueness of Gretna as a stand-alone phylogenetic lineage of the tribal rank was not readily apparent from morphology and the genomic approach was critical in revealing its distinctness.
Falgina Grishin, new subtribe
http://zoobank.org/B32D24C6-8946-44DC-BFCF-15E5582B3ABE
Type genus.
Falga Mabille, 1898.
Definition.
An assemblage of genera previously placed in three subtribes (Carystina Mabille 1878, Anthoptina A. Warren, 2009 and Moncina A. Warren, 2008), the subtribe is characterized by the maximal statistical support values in all genomic trees (Fig. 1) and is in the same clade with Anthoptina and Moncina. Keys to I.1, I.2, J.8, J.13., J.16c, J.31, J.47, J.49, or K.1 in Evans (1955). The lack of spines on mid-tibiae is the unifying morphological character of this morphologically diverse group best diagnosed by the combination of the following synapomorphic DNA characters: aly1186.4.1:A962T, aly48.2.12:C1493A, aly345.16.5:A563T, aly536.1.3:A312G, aly276378.18.1:A1489G.
Genera included.
Falga Mabille, 1898, Justinia Evans, 1955, Thargella Godman, 1900, Propapias O. Mielke, 1992, Synapte Mabille, 1904, Turesis Godman, 1901, Flaccilla Godman, 1901, Methion Godman, 1900, Mnasinous Godman, 1900, Miltomiges Mabille, 1903, Methionopsis Godman, 1901 and a new genus described below.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Hesperiini Latreille, 1809.
Comments.
This subtribe is yet another unexpected assemblage of genera with disparate morphology. However, its monophyly is very strongly supported in all trees (Fig. 1). No phenotypic synapomorphy is apparent to unify these taxa, and the ultimate diagnosis is possible on the basis of synapomorphic DNA characters.
Apaustina Grishin, new subtribe
http://zoobank.org/05EF9D2F-DACA-45DC-B6D7-7960424D3C33
Type genus.
Apaustus Hübner, [1819].
Definition.
A subtribe without clear phylogenetic affinities within Hesperiini, but not a sister to Thymelicina (Fig. 1). Keys to J.1, M.1, or M4 or in Evans (1955). Characterized by elongated wings, weak flight, short antennae and gracile bodies. Diagnosed by a combination of: flattened antennal club without apiculus, long and thin 3rd segment of palpi extending beyond the 2nd segment (less so in Adopaeoides), the lack of spines on mid-tibiae (except Apaustus), and the lack of brands or stigmas on wings. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly3507.5.1:A578C, aly1297.14.4:A4190C, aly123.4.7:A70T, aly123.4.7:G71C, aly315.4.4:A453C.
Genera included.
Apaustus Hübner, [1819], Adopaeoides Godman, 1900, and Ancyloxypha C. Felder, 1862.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Hesperiini Latreille, 1809.
Comments.
Our genomic findings corroborate recent anchored phylogenomic results (Toussaint et al. 2018) in dividing the former Thymelicina into two phylogenetic lineages of different origins (Fig. 1). While the association of Apaustus, formerly placed in Moncina A. Warren, 2008, with the other two genera formerly placed in Thymelicina Tutt, 1905, was unexpected at first, it makes morphological sense considering similarities in wing shapes and the gracile bodies of these butterflies.
Composition of the subtribes Calpodina Clark, 1948 and Thymelicina Tutt, 1905
Separated from Carystina Mabille 1878 in Li et al. (2019), Calpodina is a sister and a close relative of Thymelicina (Fig. 1). In addition to the type genus Calpodes Hübner, [1819], we keep three genera in this subtribe: Saliana Evans, 1955, Panoquina Hemming, 1934, and Zenis Godman, 1900. All other genera previously placed in Calpodina (Warren et al. 2008, 2009) belong to Carystina or other subtribes as detailed in Li et al. (2019) and this work. Its sister Thymelicina, after removal of the two genera being placed in the new subtribe described above, is composed of only three genera: Thymelicus Hübner, [1819], Oarisma Scudder, 1872, and Copaeodes Speyer, 1877.
Flattoides Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/9D7A5387-08F8-4C25-B584-B67F90EEC43A
Type species.
Codatractus amazonensis Bell, 1947.
Definition.
A sister genus to Oileides Hübner, [1825] (type species Oileides vulpinus Hübner, [1825]), where C. amazonensis was placed previously (Fig. 2). However large genetic distance between O. vulpinus and O. amazonensis (COI barcodes differ by 12.3%, the difference is typically smaller than 10% for species within a genus) argues for their distinction. Keys to D.9.4 in Evans (1952). Genitalia illustrated by Bell in his fig. 2 (Bell 1947). Distinguished from its relatives by the following combination of characters: shorter than tegumen and broad uncus with small (not longer than wide) arms; prominent gnathos not shorter than uncus; valva gradually curved dorsad, ending with two pointed teeth; tuft of apricot-colored modified scales in a groove along the vein near the base of ventral hindwing in males; forewing with a macular white band from mid-costa to tornus. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly8661.4.1:A916G, aly10226.44.1:C1975G, aly709.1.2:T194C, aly36556.1.1:T2416T (not A), aly274.33.1:A188A (not G), aly82.28.5:T398T (not G).
Figure 2.

Genomic trees of Eudaminae and representatives of other Hesperiidae subfamilies. The trees are built from protein-coding regions in different genomic partitions: a) Nuclear genome. b) Z chromosome. c) Mitochondrial genome; d) COI barcode. The trees are rooted with Pterourus glaucus (NVG-1670), not shown. See Table 1 and Table S1 in the Supplemental file deposited at https://osf.io/5cfht/?view_only=21eb53b6f8f344afaee3de2be90bf5d2 for additional data about these specimens. Where possible, taxa are ordered similarly to that in the nuclear genome tree. Names of species placed in new genera described in this work are highlighted in yellow and clades of these genera are colored in red. Clades for genera where these species were placed previously are colored in blue and green arrow points from the former genus to the new genus (only on nuclear genome tree). Names of genera resurrected from synonymy are highlighted in cyan. Names of genera that form new genus-species combinations proposed in this work are highlighted in magenta. Statistical support values are shown by nodes in all but the COI barcode trees. COI barcode NJ dendrogram is given for comparison and is not expected to reflect phylogeny. The same notations are used in Fig. 2–13.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, for the type species that resembles butterflies from the genus Celaenorrhinus known as “Flats” in some English-speaking countries.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Oileidina Grishin, 2019.
Aurivittia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/C2C0299C-67C8-4F0E-ACB8-29A7292E10BD
Type species.
Plesioneura aurivittata Moore, 1878.
Definition.
Surprisingly, a possible sister genus to Alenia Evans, 1935 (type species: Pyrgus sandaster Trimen, 1868), and in the same clade with Apallaga Strand, 1911 (type species Apallaga separata Strand, 1911), but genetically far removed from these and all other taxa (Fig. 3). Species in this genus were formerly placed in Celaenorrhinus Hübner, [1819] (type species Papilio eligius Stoll, [1781];) and key to B.6.30 in Evans (1949), notably lacking hair pencil on hind tibiae, which other Celaenorrhinus-like taxa possess. Morphologically, distinguished from Celaenorrhinus (sensu stricto) by essentially undivided uncus, sometimes with small knobs (not processes) as arms and the lack of hair pencil on hind tibiae; and from Alenia (a genus with undivided uncus) by the shape of valva that is not terminally split like a crab claw, and the presence of yellow band across the forewing. In male genitalia most similar to Apallaga, a genus with many species characterized by undivided uncus, but differs in longer gnathos (not less than half of the uncus length), thicker penis, valva with more robust and broad harpe that is gradually curved dorsad (not ventrad), does not carry any processes and is not forked, but narrows to a single point, and ampulla with a long process (style) along the harpe. In wing patterns, hindwing is not prominently variegated dorsally and is mostly unmarked, forewing with a compact yellow discal band with regular edges that does not extend into the discal cell and frequently with a triplet of apical yellow spots. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly2532.2.1:T488A, aly997.12.1:C310A, aly527.19.4:T178A, aly822.15.1:C589A, aly235.8.18:G1178A.
Figure 3.

Genomic trees of Tagiadinae. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed to reflect the golden stripe on the forewing, similar to the name of the type species.
Species included.
The type species, Plesioneura cameroni Distant, 1882, and Celaenorrhinus viet-namicus Devyatkin, 1998.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Celaenorrhinini Swinhoe, 1912.
Comments.
These south Asian butterflies are not so prominently distinct from the striped species of Celaenorrhinus. Therefore, their uniqueness was not apparent prior to our genomic study, although genitalic features revealed a posteriori can diagnose the genus morphologically. Phylogenetic placement of this Asian genus in the African clade of Celaenorrhinini Swinhoe, 1912 is interesting.
Viuria Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/1D91E55F-38B7-4E1E-997F-49FBFD10CE02
Type species.
Pellicia licisca Plötz, 1882.
Definition.
A sister genus to Viola Evans, 1953, distant from Pachyneuria Mabille, 1888 (type species Pachyneuria obscura Mabille, 1888), where species of this genus were formerly placed (Fig. 4). Keys to E.20.7 in Evans (1953). Differs from Pachyneuria by the presence of long tufts of scales near hindwing costa above in males and swollen hindwing vein Sc+R1, similar to Viola and Nisoniades Hübner, [1819], among others. Differ from Viola and other genera in genitalia and diagnosed by asymmetric uncus with asymmetric processes, reduced harpe of the right valva compared to the expanded rounded ampulla. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1222.46.1:A28C, aly207.4.6:C1025G, aly1019.7.7:T59A, aly2012.7.7:C98G, aly638.27.5:T694A.
Figure 4.

Genomic trees of Carcharodini. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, a fusion of Vi[ola] and [Pachyne]uria.
Species included.
The type species, Pachyneuria lista Evans, 1953, and Pellicia herophile Hayward, 1940.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Carcharodini Verity, 1940.
Clytius Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/AEAE278A-4A9B-45C3-9903-E886FBCEA5F7
Type species.
Pholisora clytius Godman and Salvin, [1897].
Definition.
Not closely related to any other genus. Formerly placed in Bolla (type species Bolla pullata Mabille, 1903, currently a junior subjective synonym of Staphylus imbras Godman and Salvin, [1896]), but is not monophyletic with Bolla species (Fig. 4). Keys to E.31.22 in Evans (1953). Morphologically, distinguished from Bolla species by broad-ended valva without processes, but with concave costa ending with bulky ampulla weakly separated from short serrated harpe, and the lack of gray or ochreous overscaling on wings above. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly997.12.1:G125C, aly536.106.2:A2067G, aly127.74.3:A1567G, aly320.9.2:A806G, aly1011.11.1:A34C.
Etymology.
The name, a masculine noun in the nominative singular, echoes the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Carcharodini Verity, 1940.
Incisus Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/2ED74AC8-4CCF-4796-952B-0292620F0855
Type species.
Antigonus incisus Mabille, 1878.
Definition.
A genus without close relatives. Formerly placed in Staphylus Godman and Salvin, [1896], incisus is not monophyletic with the Staphylus type species Helias ascalaphus Staudinger, 1876, nor with Scantilla opites Godman and Salvin, [1896] (a junior subjective synonym of Tagiades vincula Plötz, 1886) the type species of Scantilla Godman and Salvin, [1896], a genus-group name treated as a subjective synonym of Staphylus (Fig. 4). Keys to E.32.35b in Evans (1953). Readily distinguished from its relatives by the wing shape: forewing inner margin concave, hindwing outer margin excavate; forewing with hyaline apical spots; uncus long and narrow, pointed at the tip, without side processes, no defined gnathos, valva less than twice longer than wide, penis shorter that in Staphylus, with a spined cornutus. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly23605.8.3:C247T, aly5294.23.1:A538C, aly9588.6.1:T843C, aly1370.7.2:A1760G, aly345.13.8:A62C.
Etymology.
The name, a masculine noun in the nominative singular, echoes the type species name.
Species included.
The type species, Staphylus fasciatus Hayward, 1933 and Pholisora (?) angulata Bell, 1937.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Carcharodini Verity, 1940.
Comments.
Steinhauser doubted the placement of some of these species in Staphylus on the basis of morphological analysis (Steinhauser 1989), and he was correct.
Perus Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/349FEEDB-0503-4302-AA25-B985D8A8CB45
Type species.
Pholisora cordillerae Lindsey, 1925.
Definition.
Not closely related to any other genus. Formerly placed in Staphylus Godman and Salvin, [1896], cordillerae is not monophyletic with the Staphylus type species Helias ascalaphus Staudinger, 1876, nor with Scantilla opites Godman and Salvin, [1896] (a junior subjective synonym of Tagiades vincula Plötz, 1886) the type species of Scantilla Godman and Salvin, [1896], a genus-group name treated as a subjective synonym of Staphylus (Fig. 4). Keys to E.32.16, E.32.24b, E.32.26, or E.32.34 in Evans (1953). Distinguished from Staphylus species by the following combination of characters: head and palpi above mostly brown, more prominent submarginal pale spots on both wings above, harpe shorter than or the same length as moderately expanded ampulla, directed posteriad, end of uncus pointed, tegumen expanded on the sides, bulbous, with a pair of side processes in some species. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly3014.2.4:A833G, aly9588.14.1:C77A, aly171.12.3:A1360C, aly2532.10.1:A1294C, aly2790.11.3:A787C.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, derived from Peru, the locality of the type species and the county where many other species of this genus occur.
Species included.
The type species, Staphylus mossi Evans, 1953, Staphylus minor Schaus, 1902, Antigonus coecatus Mabille, 1891, and Nisoniades menuda Weeks, 1902.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Carcharodini Verity, 1940.
Tosta Evans, 1953 is a synonym of Eantis Boisduval, 1836
Phylogenetic analysis confidently reveals (Fig. 5) that Tosta Evans, 1953 (type species Tosta tosta Evans, 1953) originates within Eantis Boisduval, [1836] (type species Urbanus thraso Hübner, [1807]) and therefore is best considered its junior subjective synonym.
Figure 5.

Genomic trees of Achlyodini. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Eantis pallida (R. Felder, 1869), new combination
In all trees, Helias pallida R. Felder, 1869 is not monophyletic with Papilio busirus Cramer, [1779], the type species of Achlyodes Hübner, [1819], but originates within Eantis Boisduval, [1836] (type species Urbanus thraso Hübner, [1807]) (Fig. 5). Therefore, H. pallida is placed in this genus to form a new combination: Eantis pallida.
Pythonides assecla Mabille, 1883, reinstated status
We consider Pythonides assecla Mabille, 1883 to be a species distinct from Pythonides grandis Mabille, 1878 due to difference in size and extent of the blue coloration of the hindwing, both in males and females, and differences in shade of blue, being paler in P. grandis.
Livida Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/24179CB6-20EF-4DF2-B545-CFF25554444C
Type species.
Pythonides assecla Mabille, 1883.
Definition.
A genus clearly near Gindanes Godman and Salvin, 1895, Pythonides Hübner, [1819], Quadrus Lindsey, 1925, Zera Evans, 1953 and Ouleus Lindsey, 1925, but without closer affinity to any one of them (Fig. 5). The species included here in this genus were formerly placed in Pythonides, but are not monophyletic with the type species of this genus, Papilio jovianus Stoll, 1782. Keys to E.41.5 in Evans (1953). Morphologically, distinguished from related genera by the combination of the shape of uncus (flattened at the tip with a short and thin central projection) with the shape of valva (broad at the base with concave costa and diamond-shaped harpe longer than the rest of the valva, with serrated dorsoposterior edge), only one upper spur on hind tibiae, the lack of tuft in hind tibiae and thoracic pouch in males, ventral hindwing mostly pale blue, dorsal hindwing pale blue in males at least near tornus. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1672.3.1:T128G, aly1672.3.1:C110G, aly2618.5.1:C3626G, aly140.1.2:T1822T (not A), aly1349.7.9:C1010C (not G), aly1877.13.1:A785A (not C), aly23605.1.46:T5641T (not A), aly23605.1.46:C5642C (not G), aly536.102.1:C56C (not A), aly1935.2.1:G242G (not C), aly345.3.1:C328C (not G), aly767.12.13:C118C (not A).
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, from the Latin lividus (blue), to indicate the distinctive cornflower blue color of the hindwing in males of the type species.
Species included.
The type species and Pythonides grandis Mabille, 1878.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Pythonidina Grishin, 2019.
Comments.
Another genus that would be very difficult to detect without genomic data, because by appearance the adults of this species do not look noticeably different from Pythonides. However, genomic analysis suggests that the two are distant.
Gindanes kelso (Evans, 1953), new combination
Phylogenetic analysis shows (Fig. 5) that Onenses kelso Evans, 1953 falls within Gindanes Godman and Salvin, [1895] (type species Gindanes panaetius Godman and Salvin, [1895], treated as a subspecies of Hesperia brebisson Latreille, [1824]) and in a different tribe (Achlyodini) from Onenses Godman and Salvin, [1895] (type species Leucochitonea hyalophora R. Felder, 1869, tribe Pyrgini). Therefore, we introduce a new combination: Gindanes kelso.
Festivia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/16737C47-F8DA-40C1-8D05-B670F1E6FDD0
Type species.
Syrichthus [sic] festiva Erichson, [1849].
Definition.
A sister genus of Sostrata Godman and Salvin, 1895 (Type species. Leucochitonea scintillans Mabille, 1876, which is treated as a junior subjective synonym of Sostrata bifasciata (Ménétriés, 1829)), where these species were placed before (Fig. 6). Keys to E.42.1a in Evans (1953). Distinguished from Sostrata by blue ventral hindwing, broader wings and in male genitalia by longer harpe, clearly separated from the rest of valva. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly276665.9.3:C95G, aly923.23.1:G274A, aly2790.3.6:A367C, aly923.23.1:T688G, aly2101.22.7:A31C.
Figure 6.

Genomic trees of Erynnini. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, given for the type species and for the festive looks that distinguish this genus from Sostrata.
Species included.
The type species, Leucochitonea cronion C and R. Felder, 1867, Pythonides caerulans Mabille and Boullet, 1917, Pythonides adamantinus Mabille, 1898, Sostrata grippa Evans, 1953, and Sostrata jinna Evans, 1953.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Erynnina Brues and Carpenter, 1932.
Comments.
Although this genus does not disrupt monophyly of the former concept of Sostrata that included these species, genetic distance between these sister genera is not less than that between Potamanaxas and Anaxas, gen. n., or between Mylon and Anastrus. This comparatively large genetic differentiation is present in both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. The two genera are also clearly diagnosed by wing patterns and shapes.
Echelatus Godman and Salvin, [1894] is a valid genus
Echelatus Godman and Salvin, [1894] (type species Anastrus varius Mabille, 1883, which is a junior subjective synonym of Achlyodes sempiternus Butler and Druce, 1872) is reinstated as a valid genus from its synonymy with Anastrus Hübner, [1824], because the group of species that includes Anastrus obscurus Hübner, [1824] (the type species of Anastrus) is sister to Mylon Godman and Salvin, [1894] (type species Leucochitonea lassia Hewitson, 1868) and thus is not monophyletic with the type species of Echelatus (Fig. 6), as suggested by Austin (1998).
Hoodus Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/CC847380-9804-439B-9370-DD2CE72BB0FE
Type species.
Hesperia pelopidas Fabricius, 1793.
Definition.
A sister genus to Echelatus Godman and Salvin, [1894] (type species Anastrus varius Mabille, 1883, which is a junior subjective synonym of Anastrus sempiternus (Butler and Druce, 1872)) (Fig. 6). Species of this new genus were placed in Mylon (type species Leucochitonea lassia Hewitson, 1868) previously, key to E.50.10 in Evans (1953), and were defined as the “pelopidas” group by Austin (2000) who gave a detailed morphological diagnosis on p. 5 and 7, which is not repeated here. Most importantly, the two unique diagnostic characters are: vinculum in male genitalia is expanded dorsad on both sides to cover most of tegumen and uncus arms are very short. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1735.8.1:T625C, aly3616.13.2:A50G, aly1036.5.1:A436C, aly1735.8.1:C695T, aly1735.8.1:A772C.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, for the vinculum expanded as a hood over tegumen.
Species included.
The pelopidas species group as defined by Austin (2000), which consists of the type species, Mylon cristata Austin, 2000, Leucochitonea jason Ehrmann, 1907, Mylon ozema var. exstincta Mabille and Boullet, 1917, Mylon simplex Austin, 2000, and Mylon argonautarum Austin, 2000.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Erynnina Brues and Carpenter, 1932.
Anaxas Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/FE71A883-25C6-491B-B1BE-3EC4F82C62B1
Type species.
Antigonus obliqua Plötz, 1884.
Definition.
A likely sister genus to Potamanaxas Lindsey, 1925, and thus not monophyletic with Anastrus Hübner, [1824] (type species Anastrus obscurus Hübner, [1824]), where these species were formerly placed (Fig. 6). The need for this genus has been suggested previously (Austin 1998). Keys to F.6.3. in Evans (1953). Genitalia illustrated by Grishin in his fig. 30–39 (Grishin 2012). Morphologically, distinguished from Anastrus and Echelatus by having processes on sacculus of the valva and a second pair of uncus arms, from the ventral side of uncus, similar to some species of its sister Potamanaxas, but uncus itself is essentially undivided with arms reduced to small knobs. Primary uncus arms are well-developed in Potamanaxas. In facies, characterized by brown wings above with several dark-brown stripes and often with some bluish scaling between the stripes. Below, wings plain brown and some species with slate overscaling on the posterior third of hindwing. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly3570.7.4:A85T, aly3570.7.4:G86C, aly9673.2.5:T298A, aly1735.8.1:C820C (not T), aly16.28.2:C88C (not A), aly16.28.2:A89A (not T).
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, a group of species that were formerly placed in Ana[strus], but are phylogenetically closer to [Potamana]xas.
Species included.
The type species, its sister Anastrus isidro Grishin, 2012 and Pellicia petius Möschler, 1877.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Erynnina Brues and Carpenter, 1932.
Chiothion Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/2A17E48E-AD11-46D1-B987-2213B42EEE24
Type species.
Pyrgus georgina Reakirt, 1868.
Definition.
A sister genus to Gorgythion Godman and Salvin, [1896]. Formerly placed in Chiomara Godman and Salvin, 1899 (type species Achlyodes mithrax Möschler, 1879), but are not monophyletic with the type species (Fig. 6). Keys to F.13.1a or F.13.4 in Evans (1953). Morphologically, characterized by asymmetry in male and female genitalia and distinguished from all other Erynnini general by a likely synapomorphy: corpus bursae in female genitalia with an additional sack-like compartment stemming from its distal end, separated from the corpus by a narrow neck and folded inside the abdomen to point caudad. In wing patterns, distinguished from Chiomara and Crenda gen. n. by a discal dark bar in the cell of dorsal forewing, also present in its sister Gorgythion. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1264.13.9:G91T, aly595.7.8:A121C, aly525.18.1:T1397A, aly536.219.9:C2312G, aly260.4.1:G877C.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, a fusion of Chio[mara], where these species were formerly placed, and [Gorgy]thion, near where they ended up.
Species included.
The type species, Papilio asychis Stoll, [1780], Achlyodes basigutta Plötz, 1884, and Chiomara khalili Riley, 1934.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Erynnina Brues and Carpenter, 1932.
Crenda Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/3E0B892C-FC8F-4FA4-A68F-4181F33333BF
Type species.
Chiomara crenda Evans, 1953.
Definition.
A genus without close relatives (Fig. 6). Keys to F.13.5 in Evans (1953) who gives a detailed diagnosis. Importantly, genitalia (except saccus and penis) are close to symmetrical, especially the uncus. Both uncus and valvae are highly asymmetrical in Chiomara Godman and Salvin, 1899 and other related genera such as Theagenes Godman and Salvin, 1896, Gorgythion Godman and Salvin, 1896. Symmetrical uncus with a pair of side processes on each side at its base, diagnostic of the genus. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly318.44.1:C664A, aly114.5.7:A142T, aly114.5.7:G143C, aly1294.17.1:A1681C, aly536.188.2:G103C.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, and is a tautonymous name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Erynnina Brues and Carpenter, 1932.
Santa Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/86DDFA39-B2D5-44DB-843C-CA314846FBF4
Type species.
Carrhenes santes Bell, 1940.
Definition.
A genus related to Plumbago Evans, 1953, Paches Godman and Salvin, 1895 and Carrhenes Godman and Salvin, 1895 (Fig. 7). Keys to E.43.3 or E.52.4 in Evans (1953), one species previously placed in Paches Godman and Salvin, [1895] (type species Pythonides loxus Westwood, [1852]) the other one in Carrhenes Godman and Salvin, 1895 (type species Leucochitonea fuscescens Mabille, 1891). Distinguished from others by brown wings with darker spots and stripes above and a black spot near the hindwing tornus below. Male genitalia with a process (style) from ampulla, uncus divided, arms about as long as wide, harpe longer than wide. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly5021.3.22:G847C, aly2103.4.2:G472A, aly528.2.2:G1190T, aly528.2.2:G1191T, aly839.26.5:A464T.
Figure 7.

Genomic trees of Pyrgini. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, derived from the type species name.
Species included.
The type species and Paches trifasciatus Lindsey, 1925.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Pyrgini Burmeister, 1878.
Comment.
While neither of these two species fit well into the genera they were assigned to previously, due to differences in genitalia and wing patterns between the two species, their sister relationship is not obvious without genomic analysis.
Systaspes Weeks, 1905 is a valid genus
Inspection of Pyrgini trees (Fig. 7) reveals that Antigonus corrosus Mabille, 1878, the type species of Systaspes Weeks, 1905, is a sister to Celotes Godman and Salvin, [1899] (type species Pholisora nessus Edwards, 1877) and is not monophyletic with Antigonus Hübner, [1819] (type species Urbanus erosus Hübner, [1812]). Therefore, we reinstate the genus Systaspes and the combination Systaspes corrosus.
Canesia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/38584341-521B-4D1E-8115-80FA17A39E30
Type species.
Leucochitonea canescens R. Felder, 1869.
Definition.
A sister genus to Xenophanes Godman and Salvin, 1895 (type species Papilio tryxus Stoll, 1780), not so closely related to Carrhenes Godman and Salvin, 1895 (type species Leucochitonea fuscescens Mabille, 1891), where these species were placed previously (Fig. 7). Keys to E.51.2b in Evans (1953), defined as the canescens group by Austin (2000), but excluding C. santes, a species placed here in Santa, gen. n. Morphologically, distinguished from Carrhenes by the lack of mushroom-shaped process from the ampulla. The ampulla process in this genus is small, and harpe is small and narrow giving valva the appearance of a crab claw. Forewing without hyaline discal spots near costa. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1146.42.8:A2540T, aly27.16.1:A577C, aly275211.5.4:T821C, aly536.106.2:A296T, aly536.106.2:C295A.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, inspired by the name of the type species and a Latin word for crab (cancer), indicating the crab-claw shape of the genitalic valva.
Species included.
The “canescens” group of Austin (2000), including the type species, Achlyodes leada Butler, 1870, Carrhenes lilloi Hayward, 1947, Carrhenes recurva Austin, 2000, Carrhenes callipetes Godman and Salvin, [1895], Carrhenes meridensis Godman and Salvin, [1895].
Parent taxon.
Tribe Pyrgini Burmeister, 1878.
Bralus Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/48DF0762-C1E2-4E1D-90C1-EA30A5063308
Type species.
Anisochoria albida Mabille, 1888.
Definition.
A genus related to Zopyrion Godman and Salvin, 1896 (type species Zopyrion sandace Godman and Salvin, [1896]), Timochreon Godman and Salvin, 1896 (type species Helias satyrus C. and R. Felder, [1867]), and Anisochoria Mabille, 1876 (type species Anisochoria polysticta Mabille, 1876, now considered a subspecies of Anisochoria pedaliodina (Butler, 1870)) with its junior subjective synonym Dicrosema Bryk, 1953 (type species Dicrosema quadrifenestrata Bryk, 1953), but without obvious affinity to either one of these genera (Fig. 7). Keys to E.59.8 in Evans (1953). Morphologically, distinguished from its relatives by almost symmetric valvae with smaller unmodified harpe, ampulla without a process (just with a small knob), and uncus with a pair of short and thin processes at its distal end, between the arms that are widely set apart. Hindwing above with a wide whitish area. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly8048.1.4:A65G, aly3881.2.1:A178G, aly1097.18.4:G805C, aly1443.3.4:T238T (not G), aly1443.3.4:C239C (not A), aly890.35.8:T164T (not A).
Etymology.
The name, a masculine noun in the nominative singular, is a fusion of br[unneis], a[lbum], and lu[teu]s: the three colors of the type species.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Pyrgini Burmeister, 1878.
Comments.
Yet another genus that would be difficult to detect without DNA analysis.
Ladda Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/4BBF25C1-3C31-4B69-9499-516C8251D74E
Type species.
Cyclopides eburones Hewitson, 1877.
Definition.
A sister genus to Dalla Mabille, 1904 (type species Cyclopides eryonas Hewitson, 1877), where these species were placed previously (Fig. 8). Consists of the ibhara, part of quadristriga and part of caenides groups of Evans (1955) and keys to H.6.56b, H.6.44b, or H.6.53b. Distinguished by the combination of straight (non-concave) costa of forewing with unmarked, dark brown above hindwing. If hindwing is spotted above, then the spot is single, centered around the cell, ventral hindwing not plain yellow and without a pale ray from base to margin and if a pale spot is present in M3-CuA1 cell, then it is either joined with the spot in CuA1-CuA2 cell, or closer the discal cell spot than to margin and ventral hindwing, and the pale spot in CuA1-CuA2 cell on ventral hindwing is not connected with distal margin by a broadening pale area (but could be connected with the area of the same width as the spot or narrower). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly103.37.1:A134T, aly638.15.11:T5060C, aly23605.1.35:A566G, aly1139.25.1:G552T, aly23605.1.35:C580G.
Figure 8.

Genomic trees of Heteropterinae and Trapezitinae. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, a play of letters, from Dalla.
Species included.
The type species, Dalla tona Evans, 1955, Dalla decca Evans, 1955, Butleria morva Mabille, 1898, Thanaos ibhara Butler, 1870, Carterocephalus plancus Hopffer, 1874, Cyclopides crithote Hewitson, 1874, Dalla calima Steinhauser, 1991, Dalla rosea Evans, 1955, Butleria granites Mabille, 1898, Dalla parma Evans, 1955, Dalla mars Evans, 1955, Pamphila cuadrada Weeks, 1901, Butleria quadristriga Mabille, 1889, Dalla rubia Evans, 1955, Argopteron xicca Dyar, 1913, Dalla pedro Steinhauser, 2002, Dalla connexa Draudt, 1923, Dalla disconnexa Steinhauser, 2002, Dalla vista Steinhauser, 2002, Butleria ticidas Mabille, 1898, Cyclopides caenides Hewitson, 1868, Dalla bos Steinhauser, 1991, Dalla pura Steinhauser, 1991, Dalla mora Evans, 1955, Dalla carnis Evans, 1955, Butleria monospila Mabille, 1898, Dalla simplicis Steinhauser, 1991, Dalla seirocastnia Draudt, 1923, Dalla celsus Steinhauser, 2002, Dalla pantha Evans, 1955, Dalla puracensis Steinhauser, 1991, Dalla ochrolimbata Draudt, 1923.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Heteropterini Aurivillius, 1925.
Comments.
Although this genus does not disrupt the monophyly of Dalla when combined with it, Ladda is split from Dalla, due to the large genetic distance between the two genera, each forming a tight cluster of species well separated from the other. Genetic differentiation between these two genera is similar to that between traditional genera such as Heteropterus Duméril, 1806 and Leptalina Mabille, 1904, or Carterocephalus Lederer, 1852 and Metisella Hemming, 1934.
Willema Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/D92BF2E1-F842-44C6-A924-023F495F9589
Type species.
Heteropterus willemi Wallengren, 1857.
Definition.
A sister genus to Hovala Evans, 1937 (type species Cyclopides pardalina Butler, 1879), more distant from Metisella Hemming, 1934 (type species Papilio metis Linnaeus, 1764), where it was placed previously (Fig. 8). Keys to IV.20.B in Evans (1937). Shares many features with Metisella, such as hindwing discal cell longer than half of the wing, forewing veins R1 and R2 very near each other or touching (not separated). Distinguished from its relatives by the pattern of hindwing underside, which is with dark web-like pattern along veins with some streaks across and orange, ochreous, yellow or white spots. Hindwing below pale-yellow with dark web-like pattern along veins with some streaks across, but without darker markings. Genitalia with narrow and long penis, uncus with tegumen bulbous in dorsal view, uncus narrows to a point (except in W. willemi where distal end is mushroom-shaped and base of uncus with side processes), gnathos better developed than in Metisella, ampulla separated from harpe, protruding beyond its caudal end (except in W. willemi where harpe upturned embracing ampulla). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly363.37.1:A929C, aly1450.10.1:A576G, aly283.4.1:T1129C, aly3555.2.2:T116C, aly451.23.2:C1177A.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, derived from the type species name.
Species included.
The type species, Cyclopides formosus var. tsadicus Aurivillius, 1905, Cyclopides angolana Karsch, 1896, Metisella kumbona Evans, 1937, Cyclopides carsoni Butler, 1898, Heteropterus formosus Butler, 1894, and Cyclopides perexcellens Butler, 1896.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Heteropterini Aurivillius, 1925.
Prada Evans, 1949 belongs to Trapezitinae Waterhouse and Lyell, 1914
Prada (type species Plastingia rothschildi Evans, 1928) is transferred to Trapezitinae because it is monophyletic with this subfamily, receiving the strongest statistical support in all trees (Fig. 8), and is not monophyletic with Hesperiinae where it was formerly placed (Warren et al. 2009).
Argemma Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/3A82BAF3-A287-4EBD-8969-327471780BC1
Type species.
Apaustus argyrosticta Plötz, 1879.
Definition.
A sister genus of Ceratrichia Butler, [1870] (type species Papilio nothus Fabricius, 1787), where these species were formerly placed, but separated from it by a prominent genetic distance consistent with how other genera are defined (Fig. 9). Keys to VI.31.B in Evans (1937) and differs from its relatives by pale apical spot on ventral hindwing in cell R5-M1 is in line with the spots in cells next to it (not offset strongly basad); uncus bulbous in ventral view, which gives tegumen with uncus a bowling duckpin shape; harpe widening distad, separated from ampulla; ventral hindwing ochreous with many small silvery spots, dorsal forewing brown with large orange-yellow spots. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly669.9.1:A231G, aly214.13.5:A98G, aly4389.5.1:G869A, aly1329.4.13:T479C, aly214.13.5:A97C.
Figure 9.

Genomic trees of Astictopterini and relatives. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, a fusion of the Latin words Arg[entum] (silver) and [g]emma (jewel), for the shiny, silvery gem-like spots on the hindwing below.
Species included.
The type species, Ceratrichia aurea Druce, 1910, Ceratrichia maesseni Miller, 1971, Ceratrichia mabirensis Riley, 1925, and Ceratrichia bonga Evans, 1946.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Ceratrichiini, trib. n.
Nervia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/22F7A77E-E3FF-448C-853D-165AB8D0582A
Type species.
Hesperia nerva Fabricius, 1793.
Definition.
A sister genus to Tsitana Evans, 1937 (type species Cyclopides tsita Trimen, 1870) and not monophyletic with Kedestes Watson, 1893 (type species Hesperia lepenula Wallengren, 1857), where it was previously placed (Fig. 9). Kedestes nerva group (Hancock and Gardiner 1982), keys to V.27.A. in Evans (1937). Distinguished from Kedestes by mostly dark below antennae (not pale or checkered), orange submarginal markings on forewing above (at least in females), rusty ventral hindwing margin, narrow uncus, upturned almost rectangular harpe with serrated dorsal edge, not separated from ampulla. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly6841.65.2:C1166G, aly2578.13.2:C1091A, aly127.64.1:A1342T, aly83.5.1:A418C, aly904.15.14:C3808G.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed from the type species name.
Species included.
The type species, Hesperia mohozutza Wallengren, 1857, Kedestes protensa Butler, 1901, Pyrgus chaca Trimen, 1873, Kedestes heathi Hancock and Gardiner, 1982, Kedestes ekouyi Vande weghe and Albert, 2009, Kedestes michaeli Gardiner and Hancock, 1982, Kedestes monostichus Hancock and Gardiner, 1982, Kedestes nancy Collins and Larsen, 1991, and Kedestes pinheyi Hancock and Gardiner, 1982.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Astictopterini Swinhoe, 1912.
Isoteinon abjecta (Snellen, 1872), new combination
Phylogenetic analysis shows (Fig. 9) that Pamphila abjecta Snellen, 1872 is not monophyletic with Astictopterus jama C. and R. Felder, 1860, the type species of the genus Astictopterus C. and R. Felder, 1860, where Isoteinon abjecta was previously placed, and instead forms a clade with Isoteinon lamprospilus C. and R. Felder, 1862, the type and the only species of Isoteinon C. and R. Felder, 1862. Therefore, we reinstate the combination Isoteinon abjecta.
Dotta Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/1579BF7B-B1B2-4B01-B428-6593A087A665
Type species.
Ceratrichia stellata Mabille, 1891.
Definition.
A genus without close relatives, but not monophyletic with Astictopterus C. and R. Felder, 1860 (type species Astictopterus jama C. and R. Felder, 1860), Kedestes Watson, 1893 (type species Hesperia lepenula Wallengren, 1857), or Isoteinon C. and R. Felder, 1862 (type species Isoteinon lamprospilus C. and R. Felder, 1862) (Fig. 9). Keys to V.27.12 or IV.24.4 in Evans (1937). Distinguished from its relatives by long gnathos well-separated from and about the same length as uncus, terminally narrowing uncus, harpe terminally bulbous, finely serrated, separated from ampulla by a gap, black edged pale dots or spots on ventral hindwing, pale spots or dots above. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly274.20.6:A1605C, aly84.28.1:G1033C, aly274.20.6:T1601A, aly144.50.1:G193A, aly3194.1.2:C65A.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, for the white dots on the wings.
Species included.
The type species and Cyclopides callicles Hewitson, 1868 (formerly placed in Kedestes).
Parent taxon.
Tribe Astictopterini Swinhoe, 1912.
Comments.
Without DNA analysis, it would be challenging to pull these two species out of the genera they have been assigned to and join them in a single genus. Nevertheless, retrospectively observed genitalic similarity agrees with such placement.
Lissia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/C9B3D4FD-98CF-4117-B30A-8A3D80CFD7EA
Type species.
Leona lissa Evans, 1937.
Definition.
A genus more related to Gamia Holland, 1896 (type species Proteides galua Holland, 1891) and Artitropa Holland, 1896 (type species Pamphila erynnis Trimen, 1862) than to Leona Evans, 1937 (type species Hesperia leonora Plötz, 1879) (Fig. 9). Keys to VIII.59.C(b) in Evans (1937) and differs from its relatives, including Leona, by a well-defined gnathos reaching about half of uncus length (in lateral view); tegumen plus uncus twice as long as wide, hour-glass shaped in ventral view; uncus divided, arms short and stout, knob-like; valva with harpe close to rectangular; hindwing with a postdiscal band of spots above. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly127.66.15:T199A, aly1149.1.1:A1727G, aly822.30.12:A417C, aly490.3.1:A60A (not G), aly6339.4.1:G167G (not T), aly1121.3.2:C344C (not T).
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed from the type species name.
Species included.
The type species and Plastingia luehderi Plötz, 1879.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Astictopterini Swinhoe, 1912.
Xanthonymus Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/964F4410-339B-486C-8993-30E005481233
Type species.
Pardaleodes xanthioides Holland, 1892.
Definition.
A sister genus to Hollandus Larsen and Collins, 2015 (type species Pardaleodes xanthopeplus Holland, 1892), formerly placed in Paronymus Aurivillius, 1925 (type species Hesperia ligora Hewitson, 1876), but is not monophyletic with it (Fig. 9). Keys to VII.45.4 in Evans (1937) and differs from its relatives by narrow, beak-like uncus; tegumen narrowing into uncus gradually, their junctions slightly concave in ventral view; lack of gnathos; harpe gradually upturned, finely serrated at its short but nearly dorsal margin, with a tooth directed dorsad near its base; hindwing outer margin and tornus brown below. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly822.30.12:C365T, aly1089.8.4:G53A, aly164.3.1:A811G, aly5294.20.2:A547A (not T), aly5294.20.2:A548A (not C), aly838.12.1:T458T (not A).
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, fusion of the type species name with the genus name where it was placed previously: Xanth[ioides] and [Par]onymus.
Species included.
The type species and Xanthodisca astrape.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Astictopterini Swinhoe, 1912.
Cerba Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/199EACE1-E34F-4266-8CAA-46783F667A0A
Type species.
Zea martini Distant and Pryer, 1887.
Definition.
Previously placed in Acerbas de Nicéville, 1895 (type species Hesperia anthea Hewitson, 1868), this genus is not monophyletic with it and is sister to Zela de Nicéville, 1895 (type species Zela zeus de Nicéville, 1895) instead (Fig. 10). Keys to J.22.4 in Evans (1949). Diagnosed by the following combination of characters: mostly brown above wings with small forewing spots, milky areas by hindwing anal margin and broad central band on hindwing below; forewing vein CuA2 originates in the middle between wing base and the origin of vein CuA1; uncus broad, bilobed caudad, indistinctly separated from tegumen; tegumen with small side processes and a long central process; penis bulky and stout; valva twice as long as broad, with a prominent and rounded ampulla that is separated from a narrow but large harpe gradually upturned and rounded at the dorsal end protruding above ampulla. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly103.51.12:A1212T, aly2618.5.1:T1489A, aly420.23.4:A277C, aly276561.5.1:G1724G (not C), aly276561.5.1:A1721A (not G), aly1624.1.10:G534G (not A).
Figure 10.

Genomic trees of Erionotini, Carystina and relatives. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed by removing the first and last letters from the name of the genus that the type species was previously attributed to.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Erionotini Distant, 1886.
Avestia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/F54B9854-755F-4050-8D47-88EDB994DCED
Type species.
Hesperia avesta Hewitson, 1868.
Definition.
A genus sister to Acerbas de Nicéville, 1895 (type species Hesperia anthea Hewitson, 1868) with Zela de Nicéville, 1895 (type species Zela zeus de Nicéville, 1895), previously placed in Lotongus Distant, 1886 (type species Eudamus calathus Hewitson, 1876), but not monophyletic with it (Fig. 10). Keys to J.11.4 in Evans (1949). Morphologically, distinguished from its relatives by hourglass-shaped, terminally bulbous uncus in ventral view; harpe terminally rounded, not prominently separated from ampulla, with a single tooth directed caudad; ventral hindwing yellow band from costa to anal margin, closer to the base, veins brown below (not yellow). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1838.39.2:A631G, aly2165.18.2:A22T, aly2096.50.1:A679T, aly1405.13.10:C136C (not G), aly537.26.8:A1279A (not G), aly1264.14.2:A37A (not T).
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed from the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Tribe Erionotini Distant, 1886.
Zetka Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/C331EB66-E1BB-4C06-9A8B-22A293353C6D
Type species.
Mnasitheus zeteki Bell, 1931.
Definition.
Formerly placed in Styriodes Schaus, 1913 (type species Styriodes lyco Schaus, 1913, in Moncina, Fig. 10–12) this genus does not have close relatives, but belongs in the same clade as Neoxeniades Hayward, 1938 (type species Neoxeniades musarion Hayward, 1938). Keys to K.2.6. in Evans (1955). Can be told apart from its relatives by the following combination of characters: males with long brands over vein 1A+2A and under vein CuA2 but not above vein CuA2, antennae as long as forewing discal cell, palpi broad, 3rd segment short, stout, wings and body brown. Genitalia illustrated by Bell (1931: fig. 1), uncus shorter than tegumen, stout, with small rounded arms, gnathos as long as uncus, saccus vestigial, valva twice as long as wide, harpe angled and squared caudad, upturned dorsocephalad, serrated at the dorsal end that protrudes from valva (Bell 1931). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1146.42.8:A1629G, aly1222.14.14:T7181A, aly1405.10.1:C373T, aly251.9.1:C1499T, aly103.32.1:A1000G.
Figure 12.

Mitochondrial genome and COI barcode trees of Moncina and relatives. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular formed from the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Carystina Mabille 1878.
Neoxeniades ethoda (Hewitson, [1866]), new combination
Hesperia ethoda Hewitson, [1866] is transferred to Neoxeniades, where it is positioned in the genomic trees (Fig. 10), not being monophyletic with Xeniades Godman, [1900] (type species Papilio orchamus Cramer, [1777]), where it was placed previously, to form the new combination Neoxeniades ethoda (Hewitson, [1866]). The differences in unci between the two genera agree with this transfer. Uncus arms are well-developed and widely apart in Xeniades, but are vestigial (uncus almost undivided) in Neoxeniades.
Turmada Evans, 1955 is a synonym of Neoxeniades Hayward, 1938
Turmada originates within Neoxeniades (Fig. 10), and genetic distance between the type species of these genera is small (COI barcode difference 5.5%, and differences as much as 10% are frequent between congeners). Therefore, Turmada is designated a new junior subjective synonym of Neoxeniades.
Turmosa Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/E6AD0703-A3E7-4397-84C6-F4D16308504E
Type species.
Hesperia camposa Plötz, 1886.
Definition.
A sister genus to Orthos Evans, 1955 (type species Eutychide orthos Godman, 1900) and in a different clade from Turmada Evans, 1955 (type species Dion turmada Druce, 1912), where it was placed previously (Fig. 10). Keys to K.16.2 in Evans (1955). Differs from other Hesperiidae by unspotted metallic blue-green wings above, hindwing below shiny orange-green with dark veins and narrow discal black band. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly276634.6.3:C296A, aly320.9.2:A59G, aly276634.6.3:C353T, aly5965.2.3:G988A, aly2582.35.2:A932T.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, a fusion of two words in a former name: Turm[ada] and [camp]osa.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Carystina Mabille 1878.
Mielkeus Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/DED1D74F-CC56-48CC-8F38-E4C6AE84D70B
Type species.
Cobalus tertianus Herrich-Schäffer, 1869.
Definition.
A genus in the same clade with Neoxeniades Hayward, 1938 (type species Neoxeniades musarion Hayward, 1938) and Coolus gen. n., and in a different subtribe (Carystina) from Vettius Godman, [1901] (type species Papilio phyllus Cramer, [1777]), which is in Moncina (Fig. 10). Keys to J.45.21 and J.45.15b. Distinguished from other Hesperiidae by the following combination of characters: uncus almost undivided, arms medium to short; gnathos small, narrow, about the same as uncus in lateral view; valva plate-like without processes, harpe about half of the valva, with a small notch on dorsal margin; no brands on forewing; mid tibiae smooth; milky-white areas on hindwing below, especially near the base, gradually turning brown towards outer margin; veins not darker. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly294.13.2:A968C, aly1249.14.7:A1222T, aly822.47.3:A218G, aly1838.8.2:A172C, aly127.74.5:T874C.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, named both for the milky pattern on the hindwing below and to honor skipper taxonomist Olaf H. H. Mielke.
Species included.
The type species, Carystus klugi Bell, 1941, Hesperia lucretius Latreille, [1824], and Hesperia diana Plötz, 1886.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Carystina Mabille 1878.
Coolus Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/64340957-82B3-48A9-BF06-16E2726987FE
Type species.
Rhinthon bushi Watson, 1937.
Definition.
A genus in the same clade with Neoxeniades Hayward, 1938 (type species Neoxeniades musarion Hayward, 1938) and far removed from Rhinthon Godman, [1900] (type species Proteides chiriquensis Mabille, 1889 treated as a junior subjective synonym of Hesperia osca Plötz, 1882) where it was previously placed, but does not belong (Fig. 10) in agreement with Burns et al. (Burns et al. 2010) and Smith et al. (Smith et al. 1994), who also questioned its position in Rhinthon but did not propose a proper genus for it. Keys to L.8.2 in Evans (1955). Distinguished from all other Hesperiidae by unique pattern in the basal half of brown ventral hindwing consisting of five spots: three connected, silvery-white, the one in the distal half of discal cell framed yellow, and two others towards tornus, and two small yellow ones, near the base of the cell and past it; and orange fringes in tornal area of both wings, dark brown elsewhere. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly2487.23.1:C242G, aly13410.9.1:G2107T, aly2700.17.1:G706A, aly1407.7.6:A2449C, aly1283.9.1:A694G.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular meant to suggest the incredibly unique looks of this awesome skipper with icy patches on the hindwing below.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Carystina Mabille 1878.
Daron Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/D4A2E257-03F9-4DA7-B668-CDB6BBE9C420
Type species.
Thracides seron Godman, [1901].
Definition.
Removed from Neoxeniades Hayward, 1938 (type species Neoxeniades musarion Hayward, 1938) where it was formerly placed and a sister to Damas Godman, 1901 (type species Goniloba clavus Herrich-Schäffer, 1869), this genus differs from it by about 12% in the COI barcode region (Fig. 10). Keys to O.16.5 in Evans (1955). Distinguished from its relatives by the following combination of characters: antennae longer than 2/3 of costa, palpi flattened and pointed upwards, 3rd segment short, stout, mid-tibiae without spines, forewings elongated, discal cell without pale spots, as long as inner margin, uncus two times shorter than tegumen, with small knob-like rounded arms, penis undulate, valva simple, twice as long as wide, ampulla leveled with the rest of the valva, harpe about 1/3 of the valva length, slightly upturned, broad, with serrate dorsal margin. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly767.14.7:A754C, aly1775.4.5:A83T, aly140.7.3:T104A, aly851.3.4:C1900C (not T), aly536.9.2:A221A (not T), aly531.4.3:G193G (not T).
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, a fusion of the type species names Da[mas+se]ron.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Carystina Mabille 1878.
Vacerra molla E. Bell, 1959 is a synonym of Paratrytone barroni Evans, 1955
This species is known only from one female of Paratrytone barroni Evans, 1955 and one male of Vacerra molla E. Bell, 1959, both from Ecuador, which have similar distinct wing patterns. In particular, like in no other Hesperiidae, the hindwing below has a single cream band from mid-costa to the outer margin at cell CuA2-1A+2A, continuing as white fringes, and partly seen on the dorsal surface as a straight streak of spots. Therefore, V. molla is designated a junior subjective synonym of Paratrytone barroni Evans, 1955.
Barrolla Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/3BFA1AE8-9838-4E31-AC12-D139E3636083
Type species.
Paratrytone barroni Evans, 1955.
Definition.
A possible sister to Falga Mabille, 1898 (type species Carystus jeconia Butler, 1870) and in a different subtribe from Vacerra Godman, [1900] (type species Hesperia litana Hewitson, [1866]) (Fig. 10). Keys to M.23.9. in Evans (1955). Diagnosed by large and broad square palpi that are longer than the head, 2nd segment longer than usual and directed forward rather than dorsad, and 3rd segment very small; hindwing with a middle straight cream band on both sides. Genitalia illustrated by Bell (1959, fig. 18): uncus shorter than tegumen, arms rounded, gnathos longer than tegumen, saccus is very short, almost vestigial, valva broadens caudad, harpe short, upturned, joint with ampulla, without teeth or processes (Bell 1959). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1603.20.1:G64A, aly84.28.1:C2633G, aly707.2.13:T749A, aly798.5.3:G284G (not A), aly291.21.2:T2561T (not G), aly102.6.2:G1936G (not A).
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed as a fusion of the species names: senior and junior synonyms referring to the Type species. Bar[roni + m]olla.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Falgina trib. n., described above.
Comments.
A genus with surprising phylogenetic placement that yet again indicates the value of DNA-based methods at the genomic scale, and instills confidence in the results due to the large datasets used for phylogeny reconstruction and highly confident nodes in phylogenetic trees.
Brownus Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/99C1730A-E965-410D-A15A-D8754C5E3FF0
Type species.
Paratrytone browni Bell, 1959.
Definition.
Unexpectedly, a relative of Amblyscirtes Scudder, 1872 (type species Hesperia vialis Edwards, 1862) and is sister to Remella Hemming, 1939 (type species Hesperia remus Fabricius, 1798) with Mnasicles Godman, [1901] (type species Mnasicles geta Godman, 1901), which all are in a different subtribe (Moncina) from Paratrytone Godman, [1900] (type species Paratrytone rhexenor Godman, 1900) (in Hesperiina) where this lineage was placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Distinguished from its relatives by sacculus about as long as vinculum with tegumen in lateral view, valva simple, nearly diamond-shaped with vary narrow harpe ending in a point directed dorsoposteriad and not separated from ampulla, very long antennae reaching apical spots near costa, all (except the small cell spot) forewing spots forming a continuous line (separated by black veins only) and most spots in a line on ventral hindwing. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly28779.8.7:T461C, aly577.34.1:C115G, aly1370.21.5:A2861G, aly531.10.5:G517C, aly2124.3.99:A3193G.
Figure 11.

Nuclear genome and Z chromosome trees of Moncina and relatives. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, for the type species.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Tava Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/A4C0707B-1BB7-410C-9682-7ACC79306988
Type species.
Phanis tavola Schaus, 1902.
Definition.
A genus without apparent close relatives, although in the same clade with Phanes Godman, [1901] (type species Thracides aletes Geyer, 1832), where it was placed previously but not monophyletic with it, Cumbre Evans, 1955 (type species Phanis cumbre Schaus, 1902), Lamponia Evans, 1955 (type species Hesperia lamponia Hewitson, 1876), and Pheraeus Godman, [1900] (type species Carystus epidius Mabille, 1891) among others (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.23.5 in Evans (1955). Similar to many species in this group of relatives in having characteristic nearly square in many specimens, semi-hyaline spots near the bases of cells M3-CuA1 and CuA1-CuA2 on forewing. Differs from them by the combination of the following characters: antennae about 2/3 of costa length, nudum of 11 segments, palpi longer than wide in ventral view, 3rd segment short and conical, mid-tibiae with spines, forewing discal cell with well-developed recurrent vein, stigma V-shaped, inconspicuous, at the base of CuA1-CuA2 cell along veins, wings without apical spots, rufous brown below, hindwings mostly unspotted, in some specimens with a trace of small postdiscal yellowish spots (Bell 1940). Genitalia as figured by Bell (1940: fig. 6), distinctive in the shape of harpe, rather straight, only slightly upturned and narrowing to a point, ampulla with a small tooth, penis wider than harpe, longer than valva, tegumen and uncus shorter than harpe. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly671.22.3:T167A, aly374.12.1:G1087C, aly2874.22.6:A1535G, aly671.22.3:A155T, aly420.67.1:A1631T.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, derived from the beginning of the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Comments.
We sequenced a syntype of Phanis tavola and the holotype of Phanes hoffmanni Bell, 1940. Analysis of these genomic sequences confirms the synonymy previously suggested for these two taxa (Mielke 1995). For instance, their COI barcodes differ by only one position (0.15%).
Rigga Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/5D98B6E8-8FF9-478D-B37B-D19DACCA9E31
Type species.
Vorates auristriga Draudt, 1923.
Definition.
A likely sister to Misius Evans, 1955 (type and the only species Pamphila misius Mabille, 1891), this genus is removed from Parphorus Godman, 1900 (type species Phlebodes storax Mabille, 1891), where it was placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.34.9 or J.34.10a in Evans (1955). Diagnosed by long and prominent triangular hyaline yellow spot filling out forewing cell R5-M1 from the base to about a third of its length (except paramus E. Bell, 1947, which has typical for the genus genitalia), and no other apical forewing hyaline spots, hindwing below with more or less prominent pale ray along vein M1 from wing base to outer margin. Genitalia differ from relatives by a combination of the following characters: uncus twice as long as tegumen, arms parallel and narrow, gnathos vestigial, valva twice as long as wide, harpe not extending much beyond bulky rounded ampulla, upturned and not separated from ampulla. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly536.116.6:A107G, aly2124.4.17:G268T, aly6377.1.2:A4462G, aly208.50.8:T236A, aly536.108.1:C2126T.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, containing the last four letters of the type species name with an extra ‘g’ added to avoid a homonym.
Species included.
The type species, Hesperia hesia Hewitson, 1870, Apaustus ira Butler, 1870, Euroto oeagrus Godman, [1900], Vorates paramus Bell, 1947, and Vorates sapala Godman, [1900].
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Haza Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/78B60979-8EA8-437D-8B48-24DE9AA92587
Type species.
Hesperia hazarma Hewitson, 1877.
Definition.
A sister to Penicula Evans, 1955 (type species Pamphila bryanti Weeks, 1906), this genus is away from Cobalopsis Godman, [1900] (type species Pamphila edda Mabille, 1891, which is a junior subjective synonym of Hesperia autumna Plötz, 1882) (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.37.9 in Evans (1955), but very variable in hindwing patterns, from virtually brown unspotted to pale cream with brown-yellow veins and several central black spots surrounded by yellow or brown. Diagnosed by male genitalia with uncus not protruding from tegumen, very broad caudad with tiny knob-like arms on the side, uncus together with tegumen almost square in dorsal view, valva with very narrow extended hook-shaped harpe like no other Hesperiini. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly274.33.1:A430C, aly2202.27.1:C668A, aly2613.3.2:A2043C, aly2613.3.2:C2248A, aly587.20.1:T1522C.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, containing the first four letters of the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Dubia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/DBA6AFEC-D3DE-4C61-9FA9-7332B4BE5293
Type species.
Euroto (?) dubia Bell, 1932.
Definition.
A sister genus to Phlebodes Hübner, [1819] (type species Papilio pertinax Stoll, [1781]), but not monophyletic with and far removed from Thoon Godman, [1900] (type species Proteides modius Mabille, 1889), where it was previously placed (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.48.4 in Evans (1955). Genitalia illustrated by Bell in his fig. 3 (Bell 1932). Distinguished from its relatives by elongated uncus with short arms; gnathos widely separated from uncus, about half of its length in lateral view; saccus long, about the same length as valva, valva hourglass shaped in lateral view, harpe rounded, with finely serrated dorsal margin, not separated from ampulla; dorsal forewing with two hyaline spots in discal cell and small brands at the origin and between veins CuA1 and CuA2; 2–5 small postdiscal dark spots, some with hyaline centers, placed along smooth curve on brown hindwing below. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1281.8.1:A614T, aly390.17.1:T17C, aly1260.9.2:T347G, aly158825.1.3:A37A (not G), aly6286.5.7:A87A (not T), aly5543.13.1:A1601A (not G).
Etymology.
The name, a feminine noun in the nominative singular, echoes the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Pares Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/2DD85F52-3615-4008-81A3-52AD86257662
Type species.
Phlebodes pares Bell, 1959.
Definition.
A genus near Joanna Evans, 1955 (type species Joanna joanna Evans, 1955) and Vinpeius Austin, 1997 (type and the only species Pompeius tinga Evans, 1955), and in same clade with Niconiades Hübner, [1821] (type species Niconiades xanthaphes Hübner, [1821]), where it was placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Indeed resembles some Niconiades species due to the presence of large hyaline spots on hindwing and green scaling of the body, but genitalia (illustrated by Bell 1959: fig. 22 and Nicolay 1980: fig. 8) quite distinctive and diagnostic: short uncus and tegumen, together not longer than valva height, uncus rounded and weakly bilobed caudad, saccus long, about half of vinculum length, penis narrowing caudad, valva broad, more than half of its length, ampulla transitions to harpe without a break, harpe projecting caudad as a broad straight tooth, indented before the tooth along ventral margin. (Bell 1959; Nicolay 1980). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly890.44.9:C94G, aly9673.13.1:C269G, aly3555.4.2:G923A, aly1041.12.1:T93T (not C), aly537.7.1:T984T (not C), aly1038.8.1:A1367A (not C), aly8857.2.1:G1234G (not A), aly1041.22.3:A377A (not G), aly517.17.2:G336G (not C).
Etymology.
The name, a masculine noun in the nominative singular, echoes the type species name.
Species included.
The type species and Thoon maritza Nicolay, 1980.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Chitta Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/BCD865CA-926C-43DB-9EEB-8E14E7296149
Type species.
Phlebodes chittara Schaus, 1902.
Definition.
A possible sister to the clade with Thoon Godman, [1900] (type species Proteides modius Mabille, 1889) and Halotus Godman, [1900] (type species Hesperilla saxula Mabille, 1891, a subjective junior synonym of Hesperia angellus Plötz, 1886) (Fig. 11–12). Not monophyletic with Psoralis Mabille, 1904 (type species Psoralis sabaeus Mabille, 1904, currently considered a junior subjective synonym of Pamphila idee Weeks, 1901) where it was placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Immediately distinguished from Psoralis by greenish ventral colors and a pattern of four pale dots on hindwing below, indeed reminiscent of Thoon. Genitalia illustrated by Bell (1959: fig. 24, as Psoralis alis Bell, 1959, a junior subjective synonym of Chitta chittara), quite distinctive and diagnostic: uncus and tegumen very short, look compressed, penis with a long titillator diverging from penis, valva peculiar, crooked with three teeth on harpe, directed dorsad, caudad and ventrad (Bell 1959). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1107.9.6:A335C, aly13410.7.2:T37C, aly1838.8.3:G730G (not C), aly127.64.1:G1182G (not A), aly4966.20.2:A1499A (not G).
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular formed from the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Artonia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/48FE4172-440B-4E90-90E7-F0CD8BDA61F2
Type species.
Hesperia artona Hewitson, 1868.
Definition.
A likely sister to Cobalopsis Godman, [1900] (type species Pamphila edda Mabille, 1891, which is a subjective junior synonym of Hesperia autumna Plötz, 1882) and is in a different clade from Vettius Godman, [1901]; (type species Papilio phyllus Cramer, [1777]) (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.45.13 in Evans (1955). Superficially indeed similar to some Vettius species in the gist of ventral wing patters, but differs from them in lacking brands in males, lacking white streak in cell 1A+2A-3A on dorsal hindwing, but having white spot in cell CuA2-1A+2A on dorsal forewing and white veins on ventral hindwing. In male genitalia, uncus short and broad, arms far apart, short, gnathos not expanded in lateral view, penis narrow, curved, harpe close to ampulla, upturned, ends in a finger-like process protruding dorsad from the valva. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly423.31.1:C427T, aly423.31.1:A428C, aly2548.21.8:T1491C, aly6841.51.2:A710T, aly1405.20.15:G592A.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular formed from the name of the type species.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Lurida Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/569CDC39-86BD-4E74-ABE2-E52FD84E8EEE
Type species.
Cobalus lurida Herrich-Schäffer, 1869.
Definition.
A genus near Cymaenes Scudder, 1872 (type species Cobalus tripunctus Herrich-Schäffer, 1865) and not monophyletic with Nastra Evans, 1955 (type species Hesperia lherminier Latreille, [1824]), where it was placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.26.10 in Evans (1955). Distinguished from its relatives by terminally broad and concave nearly divided uncus; gnathos reaches the end of uncus, weakly separated from it; harpe ventrally excavated, shaped like can opener (with a notch); dark brown cheeks; wings rather rounded, with areas of violet-gray overscaling at outer margins below; a curve of small pale postdiscal spots on ventral hindwing. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly386.7.5:A205C, aly5582.8.1:A1097T, aly138.11.7:G998C, aly84.96.4:G40A, aly5582.8.1:C1037T.
Etymology.
The name, a feminine noun in the nominative singular, echoes the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Corra Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/D013B16C-CC3F-43F5-8B00-6E861AA3B149
Type species.
Hesperia coryna Hewitson, [1866].
Definition.
A sister genus to Lurida gen. n. and is in a different clade from Vettius Godman, [1901] (type species Papilio phyllus Cramer, [1777]) where it was placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.45.20 in Evans (1955). No brands or stigmas in males, forewing above with pale scaling along anal margin, hindwing below with dark costa and pale ray from base to outer margin above the middle of discal cell and a dark ray below it. Uncus and gnathos deeply divided, arms narrow, far apart, gnathos the same length as uncus, saccus long, as vinculum in lateral view, valva broad, not longer than twice the width, harpe narrow, short and upturned, rounded at the tip. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly686.30.9:A280T, aly345.16.1:A127T, aly527.10.7:A209G, aly451.23.2:A331C, aly529.9.1:C862A.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed from the beginning of the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Fidius Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/F4BFE58B-3E0D-4E6F-950D-8A3BD8430313
Type species.
Vidius fido Evans, 1955.
Definition.
A possible sister to Cymaenes Scudder, 1872 (type species Cobalus tripunctus Herrich-Schäffer, 1865) and far removed from Vidius Evans, 1955 (type species Narga vidius Mabille, 1891) where it was placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.24.1 in Evans (1955). Genitalia illustrated by Mielke in his fig. 5–8 (Mielke 1980). Distinguished from its relatives by antennae shorter than half of costa length, wings rounded, broad, scales in fringes long, especially on forewing, nearly the same as palpi in length, wings almost entirely unmarked, chocolate brown, in some specimens, wings below with faint, blotchy yellowish spots consisting of a few scales and forming postdiscal bands and a discal cell spot on hindwing. Valva narrow, ~2–3 times longer than wide, harpe distally slightly to moderately upturned not well-separated from valva, costa of valva straight, uncus narrowly divided, arms short, close together, gnathos the same length as uncus, saccus as long as tegumen with uncus, penis narrow, twice as long as saccus. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly2096.50.1:A1451C, aly349.40.1:A898C, aly164.63.12:C436A, aly164.63.12:A437T, aly5965.2.3:C1150G.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular. It is a fusion of the type species name with its original genus name: Fid[o] + [Vid]ius.
Species included.
The type species and Vidius ochraceus O. Mielke, 1980.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Veadda Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/49E3A1A5-0F8B-4374-AA86-6EA2C1EEFCB6
Type species.
Lerema veadeira Mielke, 1968.
Definition.
Not closely related to any other genus, but falls near the clade of many Moncina genera, among which are Parphorus Godman, [1900] (type species Phlebodes storax Mabille, 1891), Phlebodes Hübner, [1819] (type species Papilio pertinax Stoll, 1781), Cantha Evans, 1955 (type species Cantha calva Evans, 1955), Saturnus Evans, 1955 (type species Papilio saturnus Fabricius, 1787), Penicula Evans, 1955 (type species Pamphila bryanti Weeks, 1906), and Duroca Grishin, 2019 (type species Hesperia duroca Plötz, 1882). Not closely related to Lerema Scudder, 1872 (type species Papilio accius Smith, 1797), where it was originally placed (Fig. 11–12). Distinguished from them by a combination of the following characters: uncus divided, arms long, very close together; gnathos broader than uncus in ventral view, about 2/3 of uncus length; saccus nearly the same length as vinculum in lateral view; harpe short, less than 1/3 of valva, upturned, ending in a tooth directed dorsad, not separated from ampulla and not serrated; dorsal forewing with small ochre spots and tripartite gray stigma, lined with black scales basad; mostly ferruginous (a rather unusual color for Hesperiidae) below, with faint ochreous spots on both wings. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly318.7.1:A1032G, aly1042.23.2:G113T, aly1042.23.2:A115G, aly1487.4.1:A662G, aly164.9.1:A1676T.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed from the first part of the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Tricrista Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/97A09601-6840-4813-A346-31A073A507D4
Type species.
Penicula crista Evans, 1955.
Definition.
A sister genus to Vettius Godman, [1901] (type species Papilio phyllus Cramer, 1777) and far removed from Penicula Evans, 1955 (type species Pamphila bryanti Weeks, 1906) (Fig. 11–12), where these species were placed previously due to the characteristic tuft of hair-like scales in the discal area of hindwing above, apparently a convergent feature different in details between them. Keys to L.10.2a in Evans (1955). Distinguished from its relatives (including Penicula) by the structure of its dorsal hindwing area with the tuft of scales: the dense (not thin) tuft from upper part of discal cell at its base, covering gray (not black) area by the thickened bases of veins CuA2 and CuA2 (not reaching vein 1A+2A). No hyaline spots in forewing cell M2-M3. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly2041.22.2:G133A, aly563.7.2:A292G, aly208.38.3:A886T, aly536.2.4:A94A (not T), aly3721.1.24:A167A (not G), aly3721.1.24:A169A (not C).
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, and it denotes that three species in the genus have “crist” in their names.
Species included.
The type species, Penicula cristina Evans, 1955, Cobalus cristatus Bell, 1930, Penicula roppai Mielke, 1980, and Rinthon [sic] advena Draudt, 1923.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Viridina Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/0A14CB25-9511-4311-8B76-746AA38011C1
Type species.
Lerema (?) viridis Bell, 1942.
Definition.
A close sister genus to Moeris Godman, [1900] (type species Talides striga Geyer, [1832]). Not in the same clade as Lerema Scudder, 1872 (type species Papilio accius Smith, 1797), Tigasis Godman, [1900] (type species Tigasis zalates Godman, [1900]) or its subjective synonym Alerema Hayward, 1942 (type species Alerema aeteria Hayward, 1942 treated as junior subjective synonym of Phlebodes simplex Bell, 1930), where species from this genus were placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.44.10 or J.41.6. in Evans (1955). Genitalia illustrated by Bell in his fig. 9 (Bell 1942). Distinguished from its relatives by a combination of the following characters: uncus undivided, narrowing to a point; in ventral view: uncus sides slightly concave, gnathos arms widely apart, crescent-shaped, the same length as uncus, forming an φ together with it; saccus short, about the length of uncus, penis stout; harpe shorter than 1/3 of valva, slightly upturned, finely serrated at the distal margin, with a small tooth near ampulla, separated from it by a small notch; antennae longer than half of costa, checkered; wings produced; narrow complete stigma on forewing from base of vein CuA1 to vein 1A+2A in males; hindwing below greenish-ochreous with a postdiscal irregular row of indistinct pale blotch-like spots. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly1019.13.1:C3748G, aly208.17.4:G1754C, aly1475.19.1:A667G, aly1041.11.5:G116G (not A), aly1294.15.2:A1078A (not T), aly272.12.6:A338A (not G).
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, and denotes that all three species placed in this genus have “virid” in their names.
Species included.
The type species, Pamphila viridenex Weeks, 1901, which is a very close relative, and Oeonus subviridis Hayward, 1940.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Moeris anna (Mabille, 1898), new combination
Pamphila anna Mabille, 1898 was previously placed in Vidius Evans, 1955 (type species Narga vidius Mabille, 1891), but is not monophyletic with it (Fig. 11–12). Instead, it groups closely with Moeris Godman, [1900] (type species Talides striga Geyer, [1832]): compare with its sister, the Viridina, gen. n., cluster in Fig. 11 and 12. Despite obvious differences in wing patterns, the wing shapes and genitalia structures (even the shape of the valva with a somewhat expanded harpe) are quite similar between these species. The COI barcode difference between P. anna and M. striga is 7.4%, suggesting a close relationship. For these reasons, instead of proposing a new genus name for P. anna, we establish a new combination, Moeris anna.
Arita Evans, 1955 is a synonym of Tigasis Godman, [1900]
Inspection of Tigasis reveals its close relationship with Arita Evans, 1955 (type species Cobalus arita Schaus, 1902) (Fig. 11–12). For instance, COI barcodes of the type species in these genera differ by only about 3%. Therefore, we treat Arita as a new junior subjective synonym of Tigasis.
Alychna Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/D9C177B1-6CE7-4A1E-9B76-BD7D29AE18E6
Type species.
Pamphila exclamationis Mabille, 1898.
Definition.
A sister genus of Zalomes Bell, 1947 (type species Zalomes colobus Bell, 1947, considered to be a junior subjective synonym of Hesperia biforis Weymer, 1890) and in a different clade from both Psoralis Mabille, 1904 (type species Psoralis sabaeus Mabille, 1904, which is a junior subjective synonym of Pamphila idee Weeks, 1901) and from Lychnuchus Hübner, [1831] (type species Lychnuchus olenus Hübner, [1831] considered to be a junior subjective synonym of Hesperia celsus Fabricius, 1793), where species of this genus were placed previously (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.43.3d, J.43.6, or K.12.1 in Evans (1955). Morphologically, distinguished from its relatives by a combination of the following characters: uncus broad, the same width and length, if divided, arms very short, spike-like; gnathos not shorter than uncus, close to it in lateral view; valva broad, harpe not well-separated from ampulla, varying in shape depending on species, mostly rectangular with irregular margins, in the type species with a hook-like projections narrowly separated from harpe; stigma black, di- or tripartite; pale scales or hyaline spot distad of stigma on forewing; frequently a curved line of small pale spots in discal area of hindwing below. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly4645.10.1:T700C, aly4645.10.1:G701T, aly1877.13.1:T1118A, aly1877.13.1:G1159A, aly274.43.1:C170A.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed from the first five letters of Lychnuchus (where one species was formerly placed) with “a” added on both sides to stress that it is not that genus.
Species included.
The type species, Lychnuchus victa Evans, 1955, Oeonus zenus Bell, 1942, Psoralis mirnae Siewert, Nakamura and Mielke, 2014, Psoralis darienensis Gaviria, Siewert, Mielke and Casagrande, 2018, Hesperia degener Plötz, 1882, and Psoralis venta Evans, 1955.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Comments.
The two species Lychnuchus celsus and Alychna victa are so close to each other in wing patterns that their placement in two distantly related genera is totally unexpected. This is probably the most surprising discovery in our analysis. Retrospective analysis of genitalia reveals significant differences between these two species that agree with the DNA-guided placement (Fig. 11–12).
Molo pelta (Evans, 1955), new combination
To add to the Lychnuchus surprise, we transfer another mimic, Lychnuchus pelta Evans, 1955, to Molo Godman, [1900] (type species Hesperia heraea Hewitson, 1868, considered to be a junior subjective synonym of Hesperia mango Guenée, 1865), because it is not in the same clade as Lychnuchus celsus (the type species of Lychnuchus) but instead is closely related to Molo mango (COI barcode difference only 2.7%, indicating congeneric relationship). Therefore, we form the new combination Molo pelta (Fig. 10–12).
Alychna zenus (E. Bell, 1942), reinstated species status
We conclude that Oeonus zenus E. Bell, 1942 (type locality Ecuador) is a species-level taxon, not a junior subjective synonym of Pamphila exclamationis Mabille, 1898 (type locality Bolivia). COI barcodes differ by more than 3% (Fig. 12), the stigma is broader and more curved in A. zenus compared to Alychna exclamationis and has more extensive black overscaling around it, and the hindwing is more produced at the tornus in A. zenus.
Ralis Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/55719473-C71C-4492-B44C-00BB0CFFE700
Type species.
Lerema coyana Schaus, 1902.
Definition.
A genus without close relatives, but not monophyletic with Psoralis Mabille, 1904 (type species Psoralis sabaeus Mabille, 1904, which is a junior subjective synonym of Pamphila idee Weeks, 1901) (Fig. 11–12). Keys to J.43.9 in Evans (1955). Morphologically, distinguished from its relatives by a very conspicuous, large gray stigma and nearly unmarked dark brown hindwing ventral (sometimes with small pale dots). Male genitalia distinctive, see Nicolay (1980: fig. 7): uncus broad, not narrowing in the middle, tegumen with a pair of long dorsal processes directed caudad, gnathos the same length and width as uncus, prominent in lateral view, penis stout caudad with elongated phallobase, valva nearly oval, twice as long and wide with shirt harpe pointed dorsad, closely approaching ampulla (Nicolay 1980). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly25.7.1:A134C, aly2532.12.2:A142C, aly594.9.1:G589A, aly423.4.2:C199G, aly25.7.1:A226G.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, denoting the second half of [Pso] Ralis, the genus where these species were placed previously.
Species included.
The type species and Psoralis concolor Nicolay, 1980.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Moncina A. Warren, 2008.
Testia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/7063BAAB-1F7C-4EF5-905C-DF50960CCB02
Type species.
Atrytone (?) potesta Bell, 1941.
Definition.
A sister genus to Oxynthes Godman, [1900] (type species Goniloba corusca Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) combined with Oeonus Godman, [1900] (type species Oeonus pyste Godman, [1900]) and in the same clade with Lindra Evans, 1955 (type species Carystus simulius Druce, 1876) (Fig. 13). Not monophyletic with Orthos Evans, 1955 (type species Eutychide orthos Godman, [1900]), which is in a different subtribe (Carystina Mabille 1878). Keys to L.15.5 in Evans (1955). Distinguished from its relatives by a combination of the following characters (Bell 1941). Antennae about 2/3 of costa in length, male no secondary sexual characters, wings unmarked dark brown above with shiny green hair-like scales in tornal area of hindwing (and on body), with cream spots below: on hindwing near its middle plus diffuse cream area in distal half of CuA2-1A+2A cell, small spots on hindwing in discal cell and as a postdiscal row in each cell between veins M2 and 1A+2A. Male genitalia (see Bell 1941: fig. 3 for illustration) with uncus deeply divided, arms long (only slightly shorter than tegumen), parallel, near each other, penis widening terminally (nearly as wide as valva), bulky, with terminal spikes, valva nearly rectangular, sacculus without processes, harpe short (shorter than 1/3 of valva), angular, with a stout tooth pointed dorsad, separated from ampulla by a narrow notch. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly2874.22.9:G1030A, aly3512.12.2:T234C, aly2811.6.1:T166C, aly1139.93.1:C452C (not G), aly862.12.2:A1755A (not C), aly5021.5.1:G1325G (not C), aly537.7.1:A181A (not G), aly2012.14.2:T317T (not C), aly577.34.1:A485A (not T).
Figure 13.

Genomic trees of Hesperiina, Pericharini and relatives. See Fig. 2 legend for notations.
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed from the type species name.
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Hesperiina Latreille, 1809.
Buzella Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/3B8255CA-FE24-4197-B04C-0876533EABF7
Type species.
Buzyges mellanaformis Austin and A. Warren, 2009.
Definition.
Not monophyletic with Buzyges idothea Godman, [1900], the type species of Buzyges Godman, [1900], this genus is placed in a different clade instead (Fig. 13). Detailed diagnosis of mellanaformis given by Austin and Warren (2009:28, fig. 70, 82, 90) can be applied to this genus (Austin and Warren 2009). In brief, differs from related genera by long antennae, the lack of stigma, short tegumen and uncus and relatively small valva with broad trapezoid harpe (shared with Buzyges), but penis narrower and cornuti are smaller than in Buzyges (see Fig. 70 and 82 in Austin and Warren (2009)), mid- and hind-tibiae without spines characteristic of Buzyges and forewing outer margin more convex. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly386.7.5:A874T, aly207.4.6:A367T, aly320.7.8:G428A, aly128.6.20:C131C (not G), aly708.6.1:A1197A (not G), aly1838.58.4:T1070T (not C), aly536.174.1:A1825A (not C), aly2582.33.4:A512A (not T), aly3071.1.1:C135C (not T).
Etymology.
The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular, formed from the type species original name Buz[yges m]ella[naformis].
Species included.
Only the type species.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Hesperiina Latreille, 1809.
Vernia Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/980834C1-C6C5-4172-B5BB-151246B12F1A
Type species.
Pamphila verna Edwards, 1862.
Definition.
A genus in the same clade with Hesperia Fabricius, 1793 (type species: Papilio comma Linnaeus, 1758), Atalopedes Scudder, 1872 (type species Hesperia huron Edwards, 1863), and Pseudocopaeodes Skinner and Williams, 1923 (type species Copaeodes eunus Edwards, 1881), but not closely related with any particular one. Pompeius Evans, 1955 (type species Hesperia pompeius Latreille, [1824]), where species from this genus were placed previously, is in a different clade from them (Fig. 13). Keys to M.15.2 or M.15.5 in Evans (1955). Distinguished from its relatives by divided uncus with short and stout arms; thin gnathos arms, longer than uncus; valva with harpe about half of its length, unturned, terminating with two broad teeth directed dorsocaudad, no bristles; apiculus of six segments, nudum not black; stigma tripartite on dorsal forewing of males; pale spot distad of stigma segment in dorsal forewing cell CuA1-CuA2 occupies the whole width of the cell. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly443.32.2:G99C, aly2487.36.2:T119G, aly443.32.2:A97G, aly887.14.12:A1715G, aly2096.38.5:A32C.
Etymology.
The name, a feminine noun in the nominative singular, reflects the type species name.
Species included.
The type species and Hesperia dares Plötz, 1883.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Hesperiina Latreille, 1809.
Lon Grishin, new genus
http://zoobank.org/4CFECC3F-DEDA-4533-9F5C-4418BADA0ABB
Type species.
Hesperia zabulon Boisduval and Le Conte, [1837].
Definition.
A sister genus to Stinga Evans, 1955 (type species Pamphila morrisoni Edwards, 1878) combined with Poanes Scudder, 1872 (type species Hesperia massasoit Scudder, 1863) including its junior subjective synonym Phycanassa Scudder, 1872 (type species Hesperia viator Edwards, 1865) (Fig. 13). Species of this genus were formerly placed in Poanes, but are not monophyletic with it if Stinga is considered a valid genus, because Stinga is sister to Poanes with exclusion of this genus. This genus constitutes the “ordinary terrestrial species” subgroup of Burns (Burns 1992) who gave and illustrated diagnostic genitalic characters for it, in contrast to “marsh dwellers” that are the true Poanes. Most obvious diagnostic character is a very long (extending well beyond the body of aedeagus) and armed with spikes titillator in penis (in addition to two smaller ones), so prominent that it is even shown on Evans sketches (Evans 1955). Harpe upturned and touches ampulla, instead of being directed largely distad and leaving a gap between it at ampulla in Poanes. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: aly525.55.2:G476C, aly378.21.7:A1612G, aly84.28.1:A602G, aly2631.4.13:T68A, aly85.22.2:T1259C.
Etymology.
The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular, and is formed from the last syllable of the type species name.
Species included.
The type species, Hesperia hobomok T. Harris, 1862, Pamphila inimica Butler and Druce, 1872, Pamphila taxiles Edwards, 1881, Pamphila azin Godman, 1900, Poanes macneilli Burns, 1992, Hesperia ulphila Plötz, 1883, Atrytone monticola Godman, [1900], Pamphila niveolimbus Mabille, 1889, Hesperia melane Edwards, 1869.
Parent taxon.
Subtribe Hesperiina Latreille, 1809.
Alera Mabille, 1891 is a synonym of Perichares Scudder, 1872
We find (Fig. 13) that Alera furcata Mabille, 1891 and Perichares philetes (Gmelin, [1790]), the type species of both genera (technically, Papilio coridon Fabricius, 1775, a homonym, considered to refer to Perichares philetes, is the type species of Perichares) are genetically close (COI barcodes differ by about 6.5%). Moreover, several species of Alera that we sequenced are not monophyletic and are interspersed between species of Perichares. For these reasons, we consider Alera to be a subjective junior synonym of Perichares.
Oenides Mabille, 1904 is a valid genus
Hesperia vulpina C. and R. Felder, 1867 is not monophyletic with Alera furcata, the type species of Alera, where H. vulpina was previously placed, and since it is the type species of the available genus-group name Oenides Mabille, 1904, that was considered a subjective synonym of Alera, we resurrect this genus from synonymy and use it as a monotypic valid genus with the species Oenides vulpina (Fig. 13).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to David Grimaldi and Courtney Richenbacher (American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA), Blanca Huertas, David Lees and Geoff Martin (Natural History Museum, London, UK), Jonathan Pelham (Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, Seattle, WA, USA), John Rawlins (Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), Paul A. Opler and Boris Kondratieff (Colorado State University Collection, Fort Collins, CO, USA), Crystal Maier and Rebekah Baquiran (Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, FL, USA), Weiping Xie (Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Los Angeles, CA, USA), Naomi Pierce, Philip Perkins and Rachel Hawkins (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA), John R. MacDonald and Richard L. Brown (Mississippi Entomological Museum, Starkville, MS, USA), Rodolphe Rougerie (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France), Wolfgang A. Nässig (Natural History Museum, Frankfurt, Germany), Edward G. Riley, Karen Wright, and John Oswald (Texas A&M University Insect Collection, College Station, TX, USA), Robert K. Robbins, John M. Burns, and Brian Harris (National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA), Wolfram Mey and Viola Richter (ZMHB: Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany), Axel Hausmann and Ulf Buchsbaum (Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Germany) for granting access to the collections under their care and for stimulating discussions; to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (Natural Resources Program Director David H. Riskind) for the research permit 08-02Rev; to U.S. National Park Service (Wildlife Biologist Raymond Skiles) for the Big Bend National Park research permit BIBE-2004-SCI-0011; to the National Environment & Planning Agency of Jamaica for the permission to collect specimens; to Paul A. Opler and Rongjiang Wang for specimens; to Jim P. Brock, Ernst Brockmann, Robert Gallardo, Bernard Hermier, the late Edward C. Knudson (specimens now at McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Gainesville, FL, USA), John MacDonald, Kiyoshi Maruyama, James A. Scott, and Mark Walker for leg samples of their specimens, to Ernst Brockmann for help with sampling specimens for DNA, to Gerardo Lamas, Bernard Hermier and Jonathan Pelham for fruitful discussions and to Bernard Hermier for critical reading of the manuscript at its early stages and copious helpful suggestions and corrections. We are indebted to Paul Opler and John Shuey for critical reviews of the manuscript. We acknowledge the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) at The University of Texas at Austin for providing HPC resources. The study was supported in part by the grants (to NVG) from the National Institutes of Health GM094575 and GM127390 and the Welch Foundation I-1505.
Contributor Information
Qian Cong, Institute for Protein Design and Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, HSB J-405, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA.
Jing Zhang, Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-8816 USA.
Jinhui Shen, Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-8816 USA.
Nick V. Grishin, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9050 USA
Literature Cited
- Austin GT 1998. Hesperiidae of Rondônia, Brazil: Anastrus and Tosta, with descriptions of two new species (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Pyrginae). Tropical Lepidoptera 9(suppl. 2): 19–25. [Google Scholar]
- Austin GT 2000. Hesperiidae of Rondônia, Brazil: “Antigonus” genus group (Pyrginae), with taxonomic comments and descriptions of new species from Brazil and Guatemala. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 54(1): 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Austin GT 2008. Hesperiidae of Rondonia, Brazil: Taxonomic comments on ‘night’ skippers, with descriptions of new genera and species (Lepidoptera: Eudaminae). Insecta Mundi 29: 1–36. [Google Scholar]
- Austin GT, and Warren AD. 2009. New looks at and for Onespa, Buzyges, and Librita (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae), with new combinations and descriptions of a new genus and six new species. Insecta Mundi 89: 1–55. [Google Scholar]
- Bell EL 1931. A list of Hesperiidæ from Barro Colorado Island, Canal Zone, and adjacent Panama, with a description of a new species. Journal of The New York Entomological Society 39(1): 81–108. [Google Scholar]
- Bell EL 1932. Notes on some American Hesperiidae and descriptions of new species (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 12(3): 131–141. [Google Scholar]
- Bell EL 1940. A new genus and some new species of neotropical Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). American Museum Novitates 1064: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Bell EL 1941. New species of neotropical Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). American Museum Novitates 1125: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Bell EL 1942. New genera and new species of neotropical Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). American Museum Novitates 1205: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Bell EL 1947. A new genus and some new species and subspecies of neotropical Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). American Museum Novitates 1354: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Bell EL 1959. Descriptions of some new species of neotropical Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). American Museum Novitates 1962: 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Burns JM 1992. Genitalic recasting of Poanes and Paratrytone (Hesperiidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 46(1): 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hajibabaei M, and Hebert PDN. 2010. Genitalia, DNA barcodes, larval facies, and foodplants place the mimetic species Neoxeniades molion in Rhinthon (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 64(2): 69–78. [Google Scholar]
- Cong Q, Borek D, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2015a. Skipper genome sheds light on unique phenotypic traits and phylogeny. BMC Genomics 16: 639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cong Q, Borek D, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2015b. Tiger swallowtail genome reveals mechanisms for speciation and caterpillar chemical defense. Cell Reports 10(6): 910–919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cong Q, Li W, Borek D, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2018. The bear giant-skipper genome suggests genetic adaptations to living inside yucca roots. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 294(1): 211–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cong Q, Shen J, Borek D, Robbins RK, Opler PA, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2017a. When COI barcodes deceive: complete genomes reveal introgression in hairstreaks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284(1848): 20161735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cong Q, Shen J, Borek D, Robbins RK, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2016a. Complete genomes of hairstreak butterflies, their speciation, and nucleo-mitochondrial incongruence. Scientific Reports 6: 24863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cong Q, Shen J, Li W, Borek D, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2017b. The first complete genomes of metalmarks and the classification of butterfly families. Genomics 109: 485–493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cong Q, Shen J, Warren AD, Borek D, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2016b. Speciation in cloudless sulphurs gleaned from complete genomes. Genome Biology and Evolution 8(3): 915–931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espeland M, Breinholt J, Willmott KR, Warren AD, Vila R, Toussaint EFA, Maunsell SC, Aduse-Poku K, Talavera G, Eastwood R, Jarzyna MA, Guralnick R, Lohman DJ, Pierce NE, and Kawahara AY. 2018. A comprehensive and dated phylogenomic analysis of butterflies. Current Biology 28(5): 770–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans WH 1937. A catalogue of the African Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum. British Museum (Natural History); London. xii + 212 p., 30 pl. [Google Scholar]
- Evans WH 1949. A catalogue of the Hesperiidae from Europe, Asia, and Australia in the British Museum (Natural History). British Museum (Natural History); London. xix + 502 p., 53 pl. [Google Scholar]
- Evans WH 1951. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part I. Introduction and Group A Pyrrhopyginae. British Museum (Natural History); London. x + 92 p., pl. 1–9 [Google Scholar]
- Evans WH 1952. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part II. Pyrginae. Section I. British Museum (Natural History). London. v + 178 p., pl. 10–25 [Google Scholar]
- Evans WH 1953. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part III. Pyrginae. Section 2. British Museum (Natural History); London. v + 246 p., pl. 26–53 [Google Scholar]
- Evans WH 1955. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part IV. Hesperiinae and Megathyminae. British Museum (Natural History); London. v + 499 p., pl. 54–88 [Google Scholar]
- Grishin NV 2012. A new Central American Anastrus with unexpectedly distinct genitalia (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae, Pyrginae). Tropical Lepidoptera Research 22(1): 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Hancock DL, and Gardiner AJ. 1982. The Kedestes nerva group of species (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Arnoldia Zimbabwe 9(8): 105–123. [Google Scholar]
- Kawahara AY, and Breinholt JW. 2014. Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1788): 20140970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W, Cong Q, Shen J, Zhang J, Hallwachs W, Janzen DH, and Grishin NV. 2019. Genomes of skipper butterflies reveal extensive convergence of wing patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116(13): 6232–6237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mielke CGC 1995. Papilionoidea e Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera) de Curitiba e seus arrededores, Paraná, Brasil, com notas taxonômicas sobre Hesperiidae. Revista brasileira de Zoologia 11(4): 759–776. [Google Scholar]
- Mielke OHH 1980. Contribuição ao estudo faunístico dos Hesperiidae americanos. VI. Nota suplementar às espécies de Hesperiinae do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil (Lepidoptera). Acta Biologica Paranaense 8–9: 127–172. [Google Scholar]
- Mielke OHH 2005. Catalogue of the American Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera). Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia; Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. xiii + 1536 p. [Google Scholar]
- Nicolay SS 1980. Descriptions of new Hesperiidae from Panama and Ecuador (Pyrginae and Hesperiinae). Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 59: 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Sahoo RK, Warren AD, Collins SC, and Kodandaramaiah U. 2017. Hostplant change and paleoclimatic events explain diversification shifts in skipper butterflies (Family: Hesperiidae). BMC Evolutionary Biology 17(1): 174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahoo RK, Warren AD, Wahlberg N, Brower AV, Lukhtanov VA, and Kodandaramaiah U. 2016. Ten genes and two topologies: an exploration of higher relationships in skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae). PeerJ 4: e2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen J, Cong Q, Borek D, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2017. Complete genome of Achalarus lyciades, the first representative of the Eudaminae subfamily of skippers. Current Genomics 18(4): 366–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen J, Cong Q, and Grishin NV. 2015. The complete mitochondrial genome of Papilio glaucus and its phylogenetic implications. Meta Gene 5: 68–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen J, Cong Q, and Grishin NV. 2016a. The complete mitogenome of Achalarus lyciades (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources 1(1): 581–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen J, Cong Q, Kinch LN, Borek D, Otwinowski Z, and Grishin NV. 2016b. Complete genome of Pieris rapae, a resilient alien, a cabbage pest, and a source of anti-cancer proteins. F1000Research 5: 2631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith DS, Miller LD, and Miller JY. 1994. The butterflies of the West Indies and South Florida. Oxford Univ. Press; Oxford, New York, Tokyo. x + 264 p. [Google Scholar]
- Steinhauser SR 1989. Taxonomic notes and descriptions of new taxa in the Neotropical Hesperiidae. Part I. Pyrginae. Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 127: 1–70. [Google Scholar]
- Toussaint EFA, Breinholt JW, Earl C, Warren AD, Brower AVZ, Yago M, Dexter KM, Espeland M, Pierce NE, Lohman DJ, and Kawahara AY. 2018. Anchored phylogenomics illuminates the skipper butterfly tree of life. BMC Evolutionary Biology 18(1): 101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahlberg N, Braby MF, Brower AV, de Jong R, Lee MM, Nylin S, Pierce NE, Sperling FA, Vila R, Warren AD, and Zakharov E. 2005. Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272(1572): 1577–1586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warren AD, Ogawa JR, and Brower AVZ. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of subfamilies and circumscription of tribes in the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea). Cladistics 24(5): 642–676. [Google Scholar]
- Warren AD, Ogawa JR, and Brower AVZ. 2009. Revised classification of the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea) based on combined molecular and morphological data. Systematic Entomology 34(3): 467–523. [Google Scholar]
- Watson EY 1893. A proposed classification of the Hesperiidae, with a revision of the genera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1893(1): 3–132. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Cong Q, Rex EA, Hallwachs W, Janzen DH, Grishin NV, and Gammon DB. 2019a. Gypsy moth genome provides insights into flight capability and virus-host interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116(5): 1669–1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Cong Q, Shen J, Brockmann E, and Grishin NV. 2019b. Genomes reveal drastic and recurrent phenotypic divergence in firetip skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae: Pyrrhopyginae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286(1903): 20190609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Cong Q, Shen J, Brockmann E, and Grishin NV. 2019c. Three new subfamilies of skipper butterflies (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Zookeys 861: 91–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Cong Q, Shen J, Fan XL, Wang M, and Grishin NV. 2017a. The complete mitogenome of Euschemon rafflesia (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources 2(1): 136–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Cong Q, Shen J, Wang R, and Grishin NV. 2017b. The complete mitochondrial genome of a skipper Burara striata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources 2(1): 145–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
