Abstract
Mitochondria host key metabolic processes vital for cellular energy provision and are central to cell fate decisions. They are subjected to unique genetic control by both nuclear DNA and their own multi-copy genome - mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Mutations in mtDNA often lead to clinically heterogeneous, maternally inherited diseases that display different organ-specific presentation at any stage of life. For a long time, genetic manipulation of mammalian mtDNA has posed a major challenge, impeding our ability to understand the basic mitochondrial biology and mechanisms underpinning mitochondrial disease. However, an important new tool for mtDNA mutagenesis has emerged recently, namely double-stranded DNA deaminase (DddA)-derived cytosine base editor (DdCBE). Here, we test this emerging tool for in vivo use, by delivering DdCBEs into mouse heart using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors and show that it can install desired mtDNA edits in adult and neonatal mice. This work provides proof-of-concept for use of DdCBEs to mutagenize mtDNA in vivo in post-mitotic tissues and provides crucial insights into potential translation to human somatic gene correction therapies to treat primary mitochondrial disease phenotypes.
Subject terms: Mitochondria, Mitochondrial genome, Genome
Mutations in mitochondrial DNA can lead to clinically heterogeneous disease. Here the authors demonstrate in vivo base editing of mouse mitochondrial DNA in a post-mitotic tissue by AAV delivery of DddA-derived cytosine base editor (DdCBE).
Introduction
Mitochondria play a central role in energy provision to the cell and in several key metabolic pathways, such as thermogenesis, calcium handling, iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis, and apoptosis1,2. Mitochondria produce energy in the form of ATP, which is synthesized in the process of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), involving sequential redox reactions coupled with proton pumping performed by mitochondrial membrane-embedded respiratory chain complexes (I–IV) and ATP synthase (complex V). In mammals, the mitochondrial proteome comprises ~1200 proteins3, with most of them being nuclear DNA (nDNA)-encoded. However, 13 essential OXPHOS polypeptides, and 22 tRNAs, and 2 rRNAs required for their translation reside inside the mitochondrial matrix, encoded by the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)—a 16.5 kb, maternally inherited multicopy circular genome.
Mitochondrial diseases are genetic disorders, caused by mutations, either in nDNA or mtDNA, that lead to mitochondrial energy production impairment and perturbations in other aspects of cellular homeostasis. With a prevalence of ~23 in 100,000, mitochondrial disorders are among the most common inherited diseases, and are often associated with severe disability and shortened lifespan4. There are currently no effective treatments for these disorders and clinical management focuses on treating complications5. Mutations in mtDNA and mitochondrial dysfunction have also been implicated in many common diseases with high societal impact and ageing6,7. Mammalian cells can contain 100–1000 s copies of mtDNA8. Pathogenic variants in mtDNA can either be present in all copies (homoplasmy) or only in a portion of genomes (heteroplasmy), with mutant load varying across cells, tissues, and organs9. In heteroplasmic cells, the mutant load required for clinical expression must exceed a threshold, which is highly variable and is dependent on the mtDNA variant, affected tissues/organ(s), and genetic/environmental contexts, but is usually more than 60%10.
Despite the ongoing genome-engineering revolution enabled by the CRISPR/Cas-based systems, mammalian mtDNA has been resistant to genetic modifications, in a large part owing to ineffective nucleic acid import into the mitochondria11. The inability to edit mtDNA sequences in mammalian mitochondria within cells has hampered the research of normal mtDNA processes, the development of in vivo models and therapies for mtDNA diseases. For many years the approaches towards manipulation of mtDNA in mammals have been mainly limited to mitochondrially targeted restriction enzymes12–14 and programmable nucleases15–21. These nucleases have been used to eliminate undesired mtDNA molecules from heteroplasmic populations, to move the mutant mtDNA heteroplasmy below the pathogenicity threshold22. Following extensive trials in vitro, the mitochondrial nuclease-based approaches have reached in vivo proof-of-concept. Delivered by adeno-associated virus (AAV) in heteroplasmic mouse models, mtRE, mtZFN, mitoTALEN, or mitoARCUS demonstrated specific elimination of the mutant mtDNA in the target tissues23,24, which in some models and approaches was accompanied by the molecular and physiological rescue of disease phenotypes25–27.
While programmable nucleases have proven useful in changing the existing heteroplasmy, they are unable to introduce novel mtDNA variants. However, recently a novel tool has emerged: DddA-derived cytosine base editor (DdCBE), which catalyzes site-specific C:G to T:A conversions in mtDNA with good target specificity in human cultured cells28. DdCBE is based upon a modified bacterial toxin DddAtox (separated, non-toxic halves fused to TALE proteins) which is targeted to the mitochondrial matrix to catalyze the deamination of cytidines within dsDNA at sequence determined by TALE design28. Current DdCBEs deaminate cytidines (in the TC:GA sequence context) to uracil leading to a TC:GA > TT:AA mutations upon subsequent replication28. An initial proof-of-concept of successful installment of mtDNA edits by delivering DdCBEs mRNA into embryos in the mouse29 and zebrafish30 has also recently been provided.
In this study, we provide proof-of-concept for the use of DdCBEs in vivo in somatic tissue. We used the mouse heart as a surrogate of a post-mitotic tissue and showed that DdCBE delivered using AAV can install the desired mtDNA mutations in adult and neonatal mice. To the best of our knowledge, such a result has not been reported in the literature thus far. This work demonstrates that the DdCBE platform could be used for tissue-specific mtDNA mutagenesis in vivo and potentially for future therapies based upon somatic mitochondrial gene correction to treat mtDNA-linked mitochondrial diseases.
Results
Design of DdCBE and mtDNA editing in mouse cultured cells
With the intention of testing the emerging mtDNA editing DdCBE technology, we set off to induce de novo mutations in mouse mitochondrial complex I in cultured cells and in somatic tissues upon AAV delivery. We aimed at editing the GGA glycine 40 codon in mouse MT-Nd3 (mtDNA positions: m.9576 G and m.9577 G) by targeting the complementary cytosine residues with DdCBE (Fig. 1a, C12 C13). To enable this, we designed four DdCBE pairs, containing TALE domains binding the mtDNA light (L) and heavy (H) strands (mtDNA positions m.9549–m.9564 and m.9584–m.9599, respectively) and different combinations of DddAtox splits (G1333 or G1397), targeting a 19 bp-long sequence in the mouse MT-Nd3 gene (mtDNA positions: m.9565–m.9583) (Fig. 1a-b) and named them DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 to 4. The previous study has shown that for the sites containing two consecutive cytosines (preceded by a thymine), both of these cytosines can be edited by DdCBEs, with the following potential consequences TCC:GGA > TTC:GAA, TCC:GGA > TCT:AGA, TCC:GGA > TTT:AAA (edited C underlined)28. In line with this, we predicted three possible outcomes of m.9576 G and m.9577 G editing (Fig. 1b): [i] deamination of both complementary cytosines (Fig. 1b, C12 and C13), would result in glycine to lysine mutation (G40K), [ii] deamination of C13 would lead to a glycine to glutamic acid mutation (G40E), whereas [iii] exclusive editing of C12 would lead to a premature AGA stop codon (G40*), according to the mitochondrial genetic code (Fig. 1b). The three predicted mutations are located in the conserved ND3 loop, involved in active/deactive state transition of complex I (Fig. 1c-d)31,32.
Next, we transiently delivered DdCBE-Nd3-9577 pairs into mouse cultured NIH/3T3 cells and selected the transfectants using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) at 24 h post-transfection and allowed for a 6 day-long recovery (Fig. 2a). After 7 days, we detected efficient editing of target cytosines by Sanger sequencing for the DdCBE-Nd3-9577 pairs 1, 2 and 3 (Fig. 2b). Although the targeted 19 bp sequence region between the TALE binding sites contained five cytosine residues with the correct thymine-cytosine (TC) consensus (Fig. 1a, C6, C12, C13, C17, and C18), positioning of the DddAtox deaminase domain allowed for editing of C12, C13 leading to the expected changes in the MT-Nd3 GGA glycine 40 codon (Fig. 2b). Next, we performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of the DdCBE-Nd3-9577-mediated mutagenesis to quantify the editing in each target cytosine and measure the proportion of editing resulting in the G40K, G40E, G40* mutations. This analysis revealed up to ~43% editing of C12 and C13 for DdCBE-Nd3-9577 pair 1, ~20–35% editing for pairs 2 and 3, and confirmed negligible editing activity of pair 4 (Fig. 2c). Furthermore, most of the NGS reads for pair 1 contained editing of both C12 and C13 translating to G40K mutation (~92.5%), whereas DNA reads corresponding to the G40E and G40* changes constituted only ~4.5% and 3%, respectively (Fig. 2d). A similar editing pattern, but with a higher proportion of reads corresponding to G40E, was observed for pair 3 (G40K: ~83%, G40E: 14% G40*: 3%) (Fig. 2d). However, the mutagenesis pattern detected for pair 2 was skewed towards G40E, as compared to pairs 1 and 3, with reads corresponding to G40E accounting for 45.5% of C12 and C13-edited reads (G40K: ~53% and G40*: 1.5%) (Fig. 2d). The NGS analysis revealed a low level (below 3%) of C6 (mtDNA position m.9570 G) for pairs 1–3, which is predicted to install the E38K change (Fig. 2c). To confirm that the observed mtDNA editing is indeed a result of the catalytic activity of DddAtox, we used the DdCBE-Nd3-9577 pairs harboring a catalytically inactive DddAtox (E1347A) in a control transient transfection experiment. The NGS analysis showed that none of the catalytically inactive DdCBEs exerted detectable deamination activity that would lead to mtDNA editing, with the mutagenesis frequency being at the level of wild-type cells (Fig. 2c). Based on these in vitro results, we concluded that the DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 pair is the most suitable for efficient installation of G40K and decided to proceed with in vivo experiments using this set.
AAV-based in vivo DdCBE editing of mtDNA in adult mice
To provide a proof-of-concept for in vivo mtDNA gene editing of somatic cells, we encapsidated the catalytically active and inactive versions of the DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 monomers into the cardiotropic AAV9.45 serotype and administered them systemically via tail-vein injection at 1 × 1012 viral genomes (vg) per monomer per 8-week-old adult mouse (Fig. 3a). At 3- and 24-weeks post-injection, we confirmed successful DdCBE DNA delivery to the cardiac tissue by quantitative PCR (Supplementary Fig. 1a-b) and detected its expression in total mouse heart tissue by western blotting (Supplementary Fig. 1c) and immunohistochemistry (Supplementary Fig. 1d-e). At 3 weeks after DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 AAV injections, we detected low-level editing (1–2%) of the target C12 and C13 bases (corresponding to m.9576G > A and m.9577G > A) by NGS, but not by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 3b-c). The NGS analysis revealed C12 and C13 mutagenesis in the hearts of animals injected with catalytically active DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1, but not in those injected with a vehicle or catalytically inactive DdCBE, with the C12 and C13 editing pattern resembling the one observed in in vitro experiments (Fig. 3d). Notwithstanding, at 24-weeks post-injection robust editing (10–20%) of C12 and C13 was observed in the cardiac tissue of mice injected with catalytically active DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 by Sanger sequencing and NGS, with no detectable changes being detected for vehicle and catalytically inactive controls (Fig. 3e-f). Further analysis confirmed that in the majority (94%) of the NGS reads both C12 and C13 were edited, translating into the G40K MT-Nd3 mutation (Fig. 3g). We did not detect any adverse effect on mtDNA copy number in DdCBE AAV-transduced cardiac tissue as compared to vehicle-injected controls (Supplementary Fig. 1f-g). Taken together, these results established that DdCBE editing can be applied to install mtDNA mutations in vivo in post-mitotic tissues.
AAV-based in vivo DdCBE editing of mtDNA in neonates
Having established that de novo mutations can be installed in vivo in the post-mitotic tissue of adult mice following AAV-assisted DdCBE transduction, we set off to investigate whether transgene delivery to younger subjects could enhance the editing. To this end, we injected neonatal subjects (first 24 h of life) with DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 AAV9.45 and its catalytically inactive version via temporal vein injection at 1 × 1012 vg per monomer per animal (Fig. 4a). Upon sacrificing the animals at 3-weeks post-injection, we confirmed successful DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 AAV delivery (Supplementary Fig. 2a) and robust expression in the total mouse heart (Supplementary Fig. 2b-c). At this time-point we observed high efficiency of editing of mtDNA in mouse heart, with Sanger sequencing and NGS revealing 20–30% of C > T (G > A) changes of C12 and C13 in the DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1-targeted spacing region (Fig. 4b-c). No editing of these bases was observed in the control pups injected with a vehicle and the catalytically inactive DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 AAVs (Fig. 4c). The vast majority of NGS reads (95%) contained simultaneous edits of C12 and C13 (corresponding to m.9576 G > A and m.9577 G > A), translating into the G40K MT-ND3 mutation (Fig. 4d). We did not observe any significant changes in mtDNA copy number in the AAV-treated mice as compared to the vehicle-injected controls (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Taken together, these data not only further confirm that DdCBE-mediated mtDNA editing is possible in post-mitotic tissues upon AAV delivery, but also show that treatment of the younger subjects is beneficial for the efficacy of mtDNA modification.
Off-target editing by DdCBE in adult and neonatal mice followed AAV delivery
To score mtDNA-wide off-targeting in the mice, we analyzed mtDNA from hearts of vehicle-injected controls and mice injected with active or inactive versions of the DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 pair. Vehicle-injected and catalytically inactive editor samples were used as a control in order to distinguish DdCBE-induced C:G-to-T:A single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) from natural background heteroplasmy. The average frequencies of mtDNA-wide off-target C:G-to-T:A editing by DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 in the adult animals treated for 3 weeks were comparable to those of the vehicle-injected and catalytically inactive-DdCBE controls (0.026–0.046%) (Supplementary Fig. 3a). However, the adult mice treated with DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 for 24 weeks showed ~7-fold higher average off-target editing frequency (0.22-0.30%) as compared with the controls (Supplementary Fig. 3a). We observed the highest off-target editing in the neonates treated with DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1, which was ~3-fold higher than the one observed for 24-week AAV-treated adult mice (Supplementary Fig. 3a). There was a positive correlation between on-target and off-target editing, with increased m.9576 G and m.9577 G modification being accompanied by higher levels of C:G-to-T:A SNVs (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Next, we tested off-target editing at nuclear pseudogenes, which are identical or share a high degree of sequence homology with mtDNA (nuclear mitochondrial DNAs, NUMTs). We did not observe editing beyond the background at the tested NUMTs, even though one of them was identical with the mtDNA on-target sites (Supplementary Fig. 4). This result is consistent with previous reports of exclusive mitochondrial localization of DdCBEs28. Taken together, our data show that, while no detectable off-targeting is observed in nDNA upon AAV delivery of DdCBE, substantial off-targets are observed in mtDNA, especially when the on-target modification is also high. The latter result suggests that future development of DdCBE must focus on further improvement of the precision of this emerging tool.
Discussion
The discovery of a bacterial cytidine deaminase acting on double-stranded DNA (DddA) led to the development of mitochondrial DddA-derived cytosine base editors (DdCBEs), which is likely to revolutionize the field of mammalian mtDNA genetic modification28. The DdCBE technology provides the potential to reverse engineer the mitochondrial genome in animal cells and eventually correct homo- and heteroplasmic pathogenic point mutations in mtDNA. Generation of novel animal models is now expected to proceed in an expedited fashion, either by DdCBE-mediated manipulation of Embryonic Stem (ES) cells, direct modification of mouse embryos or, as shown here, by somatic delivery. As with any emerging technologies, the DdCBE approach needs to be tested in multiple systems to validate its usefulness. Thus far, the versatility of DdCBEs was shown by successfully base editing five mtDNA genes with efficiencies ranging between 5 and 50% in human cells in vitro28. Further proof-of-concept exemplified the use of base editing in mouse embryos and reported successful germline transmission of DdCBE-induced mtDNA edits29. In the latter report, mutations in MT-Nd5, generated by delivering DdCBE mRNAs in mouse zygotes were maintained throughout development and differentiation. These mutations were successfully transmitted to offspring (F1) with heteroplasmy levels of up to 26%, providing evidence that DdCBEs can be used to generate mouse models with bespoke mtDNA mutations29. In this study, we used somatic AAV delivery of DdCBEs, providing a proof-of-concept for an alternative in vivo mtDNA mutagenesis means. The presented successful AAV-based mtDNA editing is also critical for in vivo proof-of-concept and insights into potential clinical translation to human somatic mitochondrial gene correction therapies to treat primary mitochondrial disease (PMD) phenotypes in worst-affected tissues. These future therapies could be crucial for mtDNA-associated PMDs, whose de novo genetics and hard-to-predict penetrance make preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) screening difficult.
We predicted two possible issues that could prevent efficient mtDNA editing by DdCBEs in vivo. [i] The editing of mitochondrial genomes with the current DdCBEs involves inhibition of mitochondrial base excision repair (BER), to allow the retention of uracil in DNA (the result of cytosine deamination) and a sufficient level of active mtDNA replication allowing for the conversion of uracil into thymine28. The efficacy of mitochondrial BER had not been fully investigated in vivo and it was possible that it operates at the level of preventing efficient DdCBE-mediated editing. [ii] Previous reports highlighted that mammalian mtDNA is replicated continuously even in post-mitotic cells33, but whether its activity is sufficient to achieve successful editing by DdCBEs was unknown. The successful mtDNA editing in mouse hearts reported here show that [i] the efficacy of BER operating in mouse heart does not lead to immediate excision of uracil in DNA, precluding efficient editing, and [ii] the level of mtDNA replication is high enough for fixing C-to-U deamination events into C-to-T mutations within 3 or 24 weeks after DdCBE treatment of neonatal or adult mice, respectively.
In neonates, our data also show that DdCBE administration earlier during development results in higher editing efficiency. A partial explanation for this finding could be that [i] at earlier vector administration, the greater AAV vector-to-cell ratio promoted higher transduction of the DdCBEs in the neonate heart and [ii] the postnatal development of mouse cardiomyocytes involves substantial mtDNA replication leading to an almost 13-fold increase of mtDNA copy number during the first four weeks of postnatal life34, increasing the probability of fixing C-to-U deamination events into C-to-T mutations. Considering future therapeutic interventions based on DdCBE-mediated mtDNA correction, this observation may be encouraging in the context of those mitochondrial diseases with early-onset and a rapid progression, for which administration of potential therapies in adults would be inadequate. Nonetheless, further studies on the gene correction potential of AAV-delivered DdCBEs would be required in mtDNA-disease mouse model. However, none of the four currently available mouse models harboring pathogenic mtDNA point mutations is suitable for a DdCBE-mediated gene correction study either due to the nature of mutation (MT-ND6: m.13997 G > A, MT-MK: m.7731 G > A, MT-TA: m.5024 C > T) or incompatible sequence context upstream of a T-to-C mutation (MT-COI: m.6589 T > C)35. The latter means that, in addition to DdCBE-based approaches, the field should continue generating novel mouse mtDNA mutated mouse lines using the established, phenotype-first pipeline, as it can generate any mtDNA mutations (not only C:G to T:A offered by DdCBEs)36.
Our results confirm the previous observation that each DddAtox split edits the TC sites with a preference for specific windows in the spacing region. They also highlight that for any given target sequence, testing G1397 and G1333 splits in both orientations are required to achieve on-target editing. Here we demonstrate that the pair DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 combining the G1333-C split in the TALE targeting the L-strand with G1333-N on the TALE targeting the H-strand produces more robust base editing of C12 and C13 located on the H-strand. Such observations fall in line with the previous reported preference of this split combination, which favors base editing of H-strand Cs present in the center of the editing window between the TALEs28.
Our off-target editing analysis revealed that adult mice treated with DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 for 24 weeks show ~0.25% of C:G-to-T:A SNV frequencies mtDNA-wide, which is higher than these reported previously for DdCBEs transiently expressed for 3 days in human cells, which ranged between ~0.05 to ~0.15%28. Also, the C:G-to-T:A SNV off-target frequencies detected in the neonates injected with the active DdCBE-Nd3-9577-1 pair for 3 weeks were on average at ~0.8%, which was ~5 times higher than the least “precise” mitochondrial base editor reported by Mok et al.28. We attribute these differences to longer mtDNA-DdCBE exposure time (weeks vs days) in our experiments and conclude that further optimization of mitochondrial DdCBE concentration and specificity will be required, especially in long-term in vivo experiments.
In the present study MT-Nd3 G40K was installed to provide a proof-of-concept of somatic mtDNA editing. However, this mutation is located in the conserved ND3 loop involved in active/deactive state transition31,32. It is expected that high G40K heteroplasmy will result in mitochondrial dysfunction by permanently locking complex I in active confirmation, which warrants further studies. In addition, it has been previously shown that targeting the reversible S-nitrosation of the neighboring ND3 residue C3937 protects against ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. In this line, the G40K mutant could be explored in the context of changes in exposure of Cys39 in models of IR injury.
In conclusion, DdCBE is a promising tool for de novo mtDNA editing in post-mitotic tissue, which upon further research and optimization could be used to revert pathogenic mtDNA variants in patients affected with mitochondrial disease.
Methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were approved by the local Animal Welfare Ethical Review Body (AWERB) at the University of Cambridge and carried out in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (Procedure Project Licence: P6C20975A) and EU Directive 2010/63/EU.
Plasmid construction and viral vectors
The DdCBE architectures used were as reported in28. A catalytically dead DddAtox (E1347A) was used in the “inactive” control experiments. TALE arrays were designed using the Repeat Variable Diresidues (RVDs) containing NI, NG, NN, and HD, recognizing A, T, G, and C, respectively. To construct the plasmids used in the cell screen, all DdCBEs ORFs were synthesized as gene blocks (GeneArt, Thermo Fisher) and cloned into pVax vectors downstream of a mitochondrial localization signal (MLS) derived from SOD2, using the 5´ KpnI and 3´ BglII restriction sites (Supplementary Sequences 1). Vector construction of DdCBEs intended for AAV production was achieved by PCR amplification of the transgenes to include 5´ NotI and 3´ BamHI sites, allowing cloning into a rAAV2-CMV backbone (Supplementary Sequences 2), previously reported in26. The resulting plasmids were used to generate recombinant AAV2/9.45 viral particles at the UNC Gene Therapy Center, Vector Core Facility (Chapel Hill, NC).
Cell culture and transfections
NIH/3T3 cells (CRL-1658TM, American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)) were cultured at 37 °C under 5 % (vol/vol) CO2 and in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (4.5 g/L glucose 2 mM glutamine, 110 mg/ml sodium pyruvate), supplemented with 10% calf bovine serum with iron and 5% penicillin/streptomycin (all from Gibco). Mycoplasma tests in the culture medium were negative. The cell line was not authenticated in this study. For DdCBE pair screen, NIH/3T3 mouse cells plated in six-well tissue culture plates at a confluency of 70% were transfected with 3200 ng of each monomer (L and H), to a total of 6400 ng of plasmid DNA using 16 µl of FuGENE-HD (Promega), following manufacturer´s guidelines. After 24 h, cells were collected for Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and sorted for GFP and RFP double-positive cells using a BD FACSMelodyTM Cell sorter. The collected double-positive cells were allowed to recover for another 6 days and then used for DNA extraction, as described below.
Animals
Mice in a C57BL/6J background were obtained from Charles River Laboratories. The animals were maintained in a temperature- and humidity-controlled animal care facility with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle and free access to water and food, and they were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. In adult experiments, 8-week-old male mice were administered systemically by tail-vein injection with 1 × 1012 AAV particles of each monomer [AAV- DdCBE (L) - Nd3-9577 - G1333-C and AAV- DdCBE (H) - Nd3-9577- G1333-N]. An equal dose was applied in newborn pups (Postnatal day 1—males and females) via the temporal vein, using a 30 G, 30° bevelled needle syringe. Control mice were injected with similar volumes of vehicle buffer (1× PBS, 230 mM NaCl and 5% w/v D-sorbitol).
Genomic DNA isolation and Sanger sequencing of MT-Nd3 locus
NIH/3T3 mouse cells were collected by trypsinization, washed once in PBS, and re-suspended in lysis buffer (1 mM EDTA, 1% Tween 20, 50 mM Tris (pH = 8)) with 200 µg/ml of proteinase K. Lysates were incubated at 56 °C with agitation (300 RPM) for 1 h, and then incubated 95 °C for 10 min before use in downstream applications. Genomic DNA from mouse heart samples (~50 mg) was extracted with a Maxwell® 16 Tissue DNA Purification Kit in a Maxwell® 16 Instrument (Promega), according to the manufacturer´s instructions.
For Sanger sequencing, the MT-Nd3 edited region was PCR-amplified with GoTaq G2 DNA polymerase (Promega) using the following primers: Mmu_Nd3_Fw: 5´- GCA TTC TGA CTC CCC CAA AT -3´; and Mmu_Nd3_Rv: 5´- GGC CTA GAG ATA GAA TTG TGA CTA GAA -3´. The PCR was performed with an initial heating step of 1 min at 95 °C followed by 35 cycles of amplification (30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 63 °C, 30 s at 72 °C), and a final step of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR purification and Sanger sequencing were carried out by Source Bioscience (UK) with the Mmu_Nd3_Rv primer.
High-throughput targeted amplicon sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted as described above. For high-throughput targeted amplicon resequencing of the MT-Nd3 region, a 15,781 bp fragment was first amplified by long-range PCR to avoid amplification of nuclear mtDNA pseudogenes (NUMTs), with PrimeSTAR GXL DNA polymerase (TAKARA) using the following primers: LongR_mtDNA_Fw: 5´- GAG GTG ATG TTT TTG GTA AAC AGG CGG GGT -3´; and LongR_mtDNA_Fw: 5´-GGT TCG TTT GTT CAA CGA TTA AAG TCC TAC GTG -3´. The PCR was performed with an initial heating step of 1 min at 94 °C followed by 10 cycles of amplification (10 s at 98 °C, 13 min at 68 °C), and a final step of 10 min at 72 °C. All PCR reactions from this and the following steps were cleaned up AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, A63881). An aliquot of the purified long-range PCR reactions was amplified with primers containing an overhang adapter sequence, compatible with Illumina index and sequencing primers, in a 25 µl reaction, with Phusion® Hot Start Flex 2X Master Mix (NEB, M0536S) using the following primers: Nd3adapter_Fw: 5’– TCG TCG GCA GCG TCA GAT GTG TAT AAG AGA CAG TTC TGA ATA AAC CCA GAA GAG AGT -3’; and Nd3adapter_Rv: 5’- GTC TCG TGG GCT CGG AGA TGT GTA TAA GAG ACA GGG TAG ACG TGC AGA GCT TGT -3’. The PCR was performed with an initial heating step of 30 s at 98 °C followed by 12 cycles of amplification (10 s at 98 °C, 15 s at 62.2 °C, 15 s at 72 °C), and a final step of 5 min at 72 °C. The indexing PCR was performed using the Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, FC-131-1096) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. The PCR was performed with an initial heating step of 30 s at 98 °C followed by 6 cycles of amplification (30 s at 98 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, 30 s at 72 °C), and a final step of 5 min at 72 °C. Libraries were subjected to high-throughput sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform (PE75) and demultiplexed using the Illumina MiSeq manufacturer´s software.
For mtDNA-wide off-targets analysis, two overlapping long amplicons (8331 bp and 8605 bp) covering the full mtDNA molecule were amplified by long-range with PrimeSTAR GXL DNA polymerase (TAKARA) using the following primers: mmu_ND2_Fw: 5´- TCT CCG TGC TAC CTA AAC ACC -3´; with mmu_ND5_Rv: 5´- GGC TGA GGT GAG GAT AAG CA -3´; and mmu_ND2_Rv: 5´- GTA CGA TGG CCA GGA GGA TA -3´; with mmu_ND5_Fw: 5´- CTT CCC ACT GTA CAC CAC CA -3´. The PCR was performed with an initial heating step of 1 min at 94 °C followed by 16 cycles of amplification (30 s at 98 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, 9 min at 72 °C), and a final step of 5 min at 72 °C.
For nuclear DNA off-targets assessment, two regions with high homology to the MT-Nd3 targeted region were analyzed. A region with 100% identity in chromosome 1 was amplified by long-range with PrimeSTAR GXL DNA polymerase (TAKARA) using the following primers: G40K_NUMT100_Fw2: 5´- TGC ACT GCT GAC CCA TTA AT -3´; with G40K_NUMT100_Rv2: 5´- ACA CAC ACT AGA CAA CAC CCA -3´. The second region with 86% identity in chromosome 14 was amplified using the following primers: G40K_NUMT86_Fw1: 5´- CTG GTG GTC ACT TGG TGT GT -3´; with G40K_NUMT86_Rv1: 5´- TGT TAC ATG TTT CTC TGT TTT TGC T -3´.
The PCR was performed with an initial heating step of 1 min at 94 °C followed by 20 cycles of amplification (30 s at 98 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, 9 min at 72 °C), and a final step of 5 min at 72 °C. Tagmentation and the indexing PCR were performed using the Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, FC-131-1096) according to the manufacturer´s instructions and as described above. Libraries were subjected to high-throughput sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform (PE250) and demultiplexed using the Illumina MiSeq manufacturer´s software.
Processing and mapping of high-throughput data
Quality trimming and 3’ end adaptor clipping of sequenced reads were performed simultaneously, using Trim Galore! (--paired)38. For targeted amplicon resequencing of the MT-Nd3 region and for mtDNA-wide off-targets analysis reads were aligned to ChrM of the mouse reference genome (GRCm38) with Bowtie2 (--very-sensitive; --no-mixed; --no-discordant)39. For nuclear DNA off-targets assessment reads were aligned to the two regions with high homology (GRCm38). Count tables for targeted amplicon resequencing of the MT-Nd3 region were generated with samtools mpileup (-q 30)40 and varscan41. To study the editing pattern per reading and to determine the percentage of reads that had edits at C12 and C13, we used cutadapt (-e = 0; --action=none; --discard-untrimmed)42 for the 10nt surrounding the editing site in combination with the samtools flagstat command. For the mtDNA-wide and nuclear DNA off-targets analysis REDItools2.043 was used (-bq 30) to generate count tables. The average mtDNA-wide C•G-to-T•A off-target editing frequency was assessed by summation of all off-target C-to-T and G-to-A editing frequencies divided by the total number of C•G sites in mouse mtDNA (5990).
Quantification of viral genomes copy number and relative mtDNA content by quantitative real-time PCR
All quantitative real-time PCR reactions were performed in a QuantStudioTM 3 system (Thermo Fisher), using a TaqMan™ Gene Expression Master Mix (Thermo Fisher), according to manufacturer´s instructions and Ct values obtained using the built-in software. Reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 µl in technical triplicates and each dataset represents samples from an individual mouse. Determination of viral genomes copy number of AAV-DdCBE (L) was performed using primers and probe detecting the DddAtox split G1333-C: VG_1333C_Fw: 5´- GGA ACT TGC GGA TTT TGT GT -3´; VG_1333C_Rv: 5´- TTT GGG AGA ATT GGA GTT GC-3´; VG_1333C_probe: 5´-/56-FAM/ CGT AAA ACG /ZEN/ GGG AGC TAC AG /3IABkFQ/ -3´. Copy number of AAV-DdCBE (H) was performed using primers and probe detecting the DddAtox split G1333-N: VG_1333N_Fw: 5´- CAT ACG CAC TTG GCC CTT AC -3´; VG_1333N_Rv: 5´- AAC ACC TTG CTC TCC AGT CC -3´; VG_1333N_probe: 5´-/56-FAM/ CAA CTG CCT /ZEN/ GCA TAC AAT GG /3IABkFQ/ -3´. DNA input was normalized to the nuclear gene Actin, using the primers and probe: Mmu_Actin_Fw: 5´- CTG CTC TTT CCC AGA CGA GG -3´; Mmu_Actin_Rv: 5´- AAG GCC ACT TAT CAC CAG CC -3´; Mmu_Actin_probe: 5´-/56-TAMN/ ATT GCC TTT CTG ACT AGG TG /3BHQ/ -3´. Standard curves were generated using tenfold serial dilutions of an individual plasmid DNA encoding both G1333-C and G1333-N splits, from 2.5 × 10−6 to 10−3 ng/reaction. Copy numbers were obtained by plotting the logarithm of the plasmid quantity against the measured Ct values from samples.
For relative mtDNA content in heart samples, mtDNA levels were quantified using primers and probe detecting MT-ND1: Mmu_Nd1_Fw: 5´- GAG CCT CAA ACT CCA AAT ACT CAC T -3´; Mmu_Nd1_Rv: 5´- GAA CTG ATA AAA GGA TAA TAG CTA TGG TTA CTT CA -3´; Mmu_Nd1_probe: 5´-/56-FAM/ CCG TAG CCC /ZEN/ AAA CAA T /3IABkFQ / -3´. Levels of MT-ND1 were normalized to the nuclear gene Actin, using the primers and probe: Mmu_Actin_Fw: 5´- CTG CTC TTT CCC AGA CGA GG -3´; Mmu_Actin_Rv: 5´- AAG GCC ACT TAT CAC CAG CC -3´; Mmu_Actin_probe: 5´-/56-TAMN/ ATT GCC TTT CTG ACT AGG TG /3BHQ/ -3´. The Ct values for each sample were used to calculate relative mtDNA copy number using the ΔΔCt analysis, using vehicle-injected mice as control.
Immunoblotting of DdCBEs in mouse hearts
Heart samples (~50 mg) were homogenized in 200 uL of ice-cold RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1.0% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0) containing 1X cOmpleteTM mini EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, UK), using a gentleMACSTM dissociator. Homogenates were incubated on ice for 20 mins and then clear by centrifugation (20,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C). Protein lysates (~20 μg) were mixed with 10 X NuPAGE™ sample reducing agent and 4X NuPAGE™ LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen), and incubated for 5 min at 95 °C. The boiled protein samples were then separated in a Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris (Thermo Fisher) pre-cast gel and later transferred to a PVDF membrane using an iBlot 2 gel transfer system (Thermo Fisher), according to the manufacturer´s recommendations. The residual proteins that remained in the gel were detected using SimpleBlue SafeStain (Thermo Fisher) and used as a loading control. The membrane was blocked in 5% milk in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-T) for 1 h at room temperature (RT) and then incubated with either rat anti-HA-tag antibody (Roche, 11867423001), 1:1000 diluted in 5% milk in PBST or mouse anti-FLAG-M2-tag (Sigma–Aldrich, F3165), 1:2000 diluted in 5% milk in PBST. Membranes were washed three times with PBS-T for 10 min at RT and then incubated with HRP-linked secondary antibodies, either anti-rat IgG (Cell Signaling, 7077 S) or anti-mouse IgG (Promega, W4021), 1:5000 diluted in 5% milk in PBST. The membranes were washed another three times as before and imaged digitally with an Amersham Imager 680 blot and gel imager (GE Healthcare), upon incubation with Amersham ECLTM Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE Healthcare).
Immunohistochemistry and microscopy
At sacrifice, mouse heart samples were frozen by immersion in isopentane cooled in liquid nitrogen. For immunohistochemistry analysis, heart samples were mounted in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT) and sectioned on a cryostat at −20 °C to a thickness of 8 μm. Sections were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (SIGMA, HT501128) at RT. After three washes in PBS, samples were permeabilized using 0.2% Triton X- 100 in PBS for 15 min at RT, followed by three washes in PBS, and then blocked in 5% normal goat serum + 2% BSA in PBS for 1 h at RT. After three washes in PBS, samples were incubated with the rabbit anti-HA-Tag (Cell Signaling, 3724) primary antibody 1:2000 in DAKO solution (Agilent, S3022) for 1 h at RT, followed by three additional washes in PBS. Sections were then incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) AlexaFluor diluted 1:300 in DAKO diluent solution 568 for 1 h at RT, washes three times in PBS and finally coverslip with prolonged diamond antifade mountant with DAPI (Thermo Fisher, P36962). All confocal images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM880 microscope using identical acquisition parameters.
Statistics
Graphical visualization of data and all statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0). All numerical data are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test was used for multiple comparisons. Animals were randomized and no blinding to the operator was used.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the members of the Mitochondrial Genetics Group (MRC-MBU, University of Cambridge) for useful discussion during the course of this research. We would like to thank Ahmed-Noor Agip for his help with Fig. 1c. This work was supported by core funding from Medical Research Council UK (MC_UU_00015/4). P.S.-P. and P.A.N. are additionally supported by The Champ Foundation and The Lily Foundation, respectively.
Source data
Author contributions
P.S.-P. and M.M. planned and designed experiments; P.A.N. and C.D.M. performed the immunohistochemistry and NGS experiments; L.V.H. and P.S.-P. analyzed the NGS experiments; K.T. managed the animal work and performed the histology experiments; P.S.-P. performed the remaining experiments. P.S.-P. and M.M. drafted the manuscript. M.M. supervised the study. All authors revised the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files, apart from proprietary scripts which are available upon request by contacting the authors. The NGS files generated in this study have been deposited in GEO: GSE184064. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
On and off-target effects from next-generation sequencing data were calculated with Varscan2, source code: https://github.com/Jeltje/varscan2, written by Koboldt et al.41.
Competing interests
M.M. is a co-founder, shareholder and member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Pretzel Therapeutics, Inc. P.S.-P., P.A.N., and C.D.M. provide consultancy services for Pretzel Therapeutics, Inc. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-28358-w.
References
- 1.Vafai SB, Mootha VK. Mitochondrial disorders as windows into an ancient organelle. Nature. 2012;491:374–383. doi: 10.1038/nature11707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Suomalainen A, Battersby BJ. Mitochondrial diseases: the contribution of organelle stress responses to pathology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:77–92. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rath S, et al. MitoCarta3.0: an updated mitochondrial proteome now with sub-organelle localization and pathway annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1541–D1547. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gorman GS, et al. Prevalence of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA mutations related to adult mitochondrial disease. Ann. Neurol. 2015;77:753–759. doi: 10.1002/ana.24362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Russell OM, Gorman GS, Lightowlers RN, Turnbull DM. Mitochondrial diseases: hope for the future. Cell. 2020;181:168–188. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kauppila TES, Kauppila JHK, Larsson NG. Mammalian mitochondria and aging: an update. Cell Metab. 2017;25:57–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yonova-Doing E, et al. An atlas of mitochondrial DNA genotype-phenotype associations in the UK Biobank. Nat. Genet. 2021;53:982–993. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00868-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Filograna R, Mennuni M, Alsina D, Larsson NG. Mitochondrial DNA copy number in human disease: the more the better? FEBS Lett. 2021;595:976–1002. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stewart JB, Chinnery PF. Extreme heterogeneity of human mitochondrial DNA from organelles to populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021;22:106–118. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-00284-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gorman GS, et al. Mitochondrial diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2:16080. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gammage PA, Moraes CT, Minczuk M. Mitochondrial genome engineering: the revolution may not be CRISPR-Ized. Trends Genet. 2018;34:101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Srivastava S, Moraes CT. Manipulating mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy by a mitochondrially targeted restriction endonuclease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10:3093–3099. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.26.3093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tanaka M, et al. Gene therapy for mitochondrial disease by delivering restriction endonuclease SmaI into mitochondria. J. Biomed. Sci. 2002;9:534–541. doi: 10.1159/000064726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alexeyev MF, et al. Selective elimination of mutant mitochondrial genomes as therapeutic strategy for the treatment of NARP and MILS syndromes. Gene Ther. 2008;15:516–523. doi: 10.1038/gt.2008.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Minczuk M, Papworth MA, Miller JC, Murphy MP, Klug A. Development of a single-chain, quasi-dimeric zinc-finger nuclease for the selective degradation of mutated human mitochondrial DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:3926–3938. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Minczuk M, Kolasinska-Zwierz P, Murphy MP, Papworth MA. Construction and testing of engineered zinc-finger proteins for sequence-specific modification of mtDNA. Nat. Protoc. 2010;5:342–356. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bacman SR, Williams SL, Pinto M, Peralta S, Moraes CT. Specific elimination of mutant mitochondrial genomes in patient-derived cells by mitoTALENs. Nat. Med. 2013;19:1111–1113. doi: 10.1038/nm.3261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gammage PA, Rorbach J, Vincent AI, Rebar EJ, Minczuk M. Mitochondrially targeted ZFNs for selective degradation of pathogenic mitochondrial genomes bearing large-scale deletions or point mutations. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014;6:458–466. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201303672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hashimoto M, et al. MitoTALEN: A general approach to reduce mutant mtDNA loads and restore oxidative phosphorylation function in mitochondrial diseases. Mol. Ther. 2015;23:1592–1599. doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gammage PA, et al. Near-complete elimination of mutant mtDNA by iterative or dynamic dose-controlled treatment with mtZFNs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:7804–7816. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang Y, et al. Targeted elimination of mutant mitochondrial DNA in MELAS-iPSCs by mitoTALENs. Protein Cell. 2018;9:283–297. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0499-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Silva-Pinheiro, P. & Minczuk, M. The potential of mitochondrial genome engineering. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10.1038/s41576-021-00432-x (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 23.Bayona-Bafaluy MP, Blits B, Battersby BJ, Shoubridge EA, Moraes CT. Rapid directional shift of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in animal tissues by a mitochondrially targeted restriction endonuclease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:14392–14397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502896102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bacman SR, Williams SL, Duan D, Moraes CT. Manipulation of mtDNA heteroplasmy in all striated muscles of newborn mice by AAV9-mediated delivery of a mitochondria-targeted restriction endonuclease. Gene Ther. 2012;19:1101–1106. doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bacman SR, et al. MitoTALEN reduces mutant mtDNA load and restores tRNA(Ala) levels in a mouse model of heteroplasmic mtDNA mutation. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1696–1700. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0166-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gammage PA, et al. Genome editing in mitochondria corrects a pathogenic mtDNA mutation in vivo. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1691–1695. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0165-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zekonyte U, et al. Mitochondrial targeted meganuclease as a platform to eliminate mutant mtDNA in vivo. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:3210. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23561-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mok BY, et al. A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature. 2020;583:631–637. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2477-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee H, et al. Mitochondrial DNA editing in mice with DddA-TALE fusion deaminases. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1190. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21464-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guo J, et al. Precision modeling of mitochondrial diseases in zebrafish via DdCBE-mediated mtDNA base editing. Cell Discov. 2021;7:78. doi: 10.1038/s41421-021-00307-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Agip AA, et al. Cryo-EM structures of complex I from mouse heart mitochondria in two biochemically defined states. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018;25:548–556. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0073-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Blaza JN, Vinothkumar KR, Hirst J. Structure of the deactive state of mammalian respiratory complex I. Structure. 2018;26:312–319 e313. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gross NJ, Getz GS, Rabinowitz M. Apparent turnover of mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid and mitochondrial phospholipids in the tissues of the rat. J. Biol. Chem. 1969;244:1552–1562. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)91795-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Silva Ramos E, et al. Mitochondrial fusion is required for regulation of mitochondrial DNA replication. PLoS Genet. 2019;15:e1008085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stewart JB. Current progress with mammalian models of mitochondrial DNA disease. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2021;44:325–342. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kauppila JHK, et al. A phenotype-driven approach to generate mouse models with pathogenic mtDNA mutations causing mitochondrial disease. Cell Rep. 2016;16:2980–2990. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chouchani ET, et al. Cardioprotection by S-nitrosation of a cysteine switch on mitochondrial complex I. Nat. Med. 2013;19:753–759. doi: 10.1038/nm.3212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Krueger, F., James, F., Ewels, P., Afyounian, E. & Schuster-Boeckler, B. FelixKrueger/TrimGalore: v0.6.7. Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.5127899 (2021).
- 39.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience10.1093/gigascience/giab008 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Koboldt DC, et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012;22:568–576. doi: 10.1101/gr.129684.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 2011;17:10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Flati T, et al. HPC-REDItools: a novel HPC-aware tool for improved large scale RNA-editing analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020;21:353. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03562-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files, apart from proprietary scripts which are available upon request by contacting the authors. The NGS files generated in this study have been deposited in GEO: GSE184064. Source data are provided with this paper.
On and off-target effects from next-generation sequencing data were calculated with Varscan2, source code: https://github.com/Jeltje/varscan2, written by Koboldt et al.41.