Abstract
Environmentally relevant metagenomes and BONCAT-FACS derived translationally active metagenomes from Powder River Basin coal seams were investigated to elucidate potential genes and functional groups involved in hydrocarbon degradation to methane in coal seams with high- and low-sulfate levels. An advanced subsurface environmental sampler allowed the establishment of coal-associated microbial communities under in situ conditions for metagenomic analyses from environmental and translationally active populations. Metagenomic sequencing demonstrated that biosurfactants, aerobic dioxygenases, and anaerobic phenol degradation pathways were present in active populations across the sampled coal seams. In particular, results suggested the importance of anaerobic degradation pathways under high-sulfate conditions with an emphasis on fumarate addition. Under low-sulfate conditions, a mixture of both aerobic and anaerobic pathways was observed but with a predominance of aerobic dioxygenases. The putative low-molecular-weight biosurfactant, lichysein, appeared to play a more important role compared to rhamnolipids. The methods used in this study—subsurface environmental samplers in combination with metagenomic sequencing of both total and translationally active metagenomes—offer a deeper and environmentally relevant perspective on community genetic potential from coal seams poised at different redox conditions broadening the understanding of degradation strategies for subsurface carbon.
Subject terms: Water microbiology, Metagenomics
Introduction
The terrestrial subsurface contains the majority of Earth’s organic carbon (~90%)1, and much of the carbon can be converted to methane under anaerobic conditions through biogasification (i.e., biological decomposition of organic matter into methane and secondary gases). Biogasification can take place in coal, black shale, and petroleum reservoirs and is estimated to account for over 20% of the world’s natural gas resources2. Factors influencing biogasification include coal rank, redox conditions (e.g., sulfate and oxygen), and the genetic potential and activity of the microbial community. Coal is a heterogeneous and highly complex hydrocarbon consisting of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, alkylated benzenes, and long and short-chain n-alkanes3, and despite the recalcitrant nature of coal, degradation by microbial consortia has been shown in a variety of coal formations4–6. It is generally accepted that shallower coalbeds that contain sulfate do not produce methane because sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) outcompete methanogens for substrates (e.g., acetate, CO2, and hydrogen)5,7. In methanogenic coalbeds5,8, hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogens are commonly identified, including different types of acetoclastic methanogens (e.g., Methanothrix, Methanosarcina), which have distinct pathways for acetate utilization. It remains unknown what type of methanogenesis predominates in situ for different coal seams under different physicochemical conditions9,10.
New coal degradation pathways are still being discovered and the involvement of different pathways in the turnover of refractory carbon under various redox conditions (e.g., sulfate) remains largely unresolved11–13. The majority of coal degradation research has focused on fumarate addition, while less is known about alternate coal degradation strategies such as phenol degradation by carboxylation and hydroxylation of alkanes, benzene, and ethylbenzene14,15. The fumarate addition pathway involves the activation of n-alkanes by the addition of fumarate via the double bonds at the terminal or subterminal carbon14,16–20. Several fumarate addition genes (e.g., ass-alkylsuccinate synthase for alkanes, bss-benzylsuccinate synthase for alkylbenzenes, and nms-naphylmethylsuccinate synthase) are often used as catabolic biomarkers for anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation16–18. These genes have been characterized from many subsurface hydrocarbon-containing environments14,17,21–26, but the importance under different redox conditions is still unclear. Carboxylation and hydroxylation strategies are less well-documented mechanisms of anaerobic degradation, although, in recent years work has begun to suggest importance in anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation15,19,27,28, yet how these strategies vary across redox conditions in situ and detecting organisms responsible for degradation warrants further investigation.
While biosurfactants have not been identified in situ in coal seams and are not considered a necessary hydrocarbon degradation gene, previous laboratory-based research demonstrates a potentially important role in decreasing the hydrophobicity of the solid coal surface, allowing for cellular and/or protein interactions29. Therefore, biosurfactant-producing microorganisms likely play direct and indirect roles in hydrocarbon degradation29–32. The accumulation of the esterase hydrolase enzyme has been correlated to biosurfactant production and is often used as a biomarker for biosurfactant production33. Biosurfactants are routinely observed in environments that consist of complex hydrocarbons and are therefore hypothesized to be an interdependent, complex, and coordinated means of increasing coal bioavailability. However, studies that have demonstrated active biosurfactant-producing microorganisms in coal environments are lacking.
Aerobic hydrocarbon degradation is the most documented form of hydrocarbon degradation via the aerobic activation of alkanes with dioxygenase enzymes that use oxygen as an electron acceptor and as a reactant in hydroxylation34. Aerobic hydrocarbon degradation in coal environments is often disputed due to the uncertainty of the presence of oxygen and more research into anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation strategies has been performed in the last few decades. However, recent metagenomic analyses have indicated the presence of aerobic hydrocarbon degradation genes in coalbeds across Canada, but it is unknown whether these genes were present in active organisms in situ24.
The rate-limiting step in coal biogasification has been attributed to an initial biological breakdown of the refractory hydrocarbon matrix35. As discussed above, while several degradation strategies including the role of biosurfactants and aerobic hydrocarbon degradation have been observed, it remains challenging to link genetic potential to activity using traditional sequencing methodologies36. While traditional sequencing methodologies allow for an environmental snapshot of detectable genes, dead, dormant, or active groups are difficult to delineate.
In the described study, environmentally relevant samples from three separate coal seams located in the Powder River Basin (PRB) near Birney, Montana, were obtained with a Subsurface Environmental Sampler (SES; Patent # US10704993B2)37. The SES is an advanced sampling tool that enabled harvesting of in situ coal-associated biofilms representative of local environmental conditions. The SES-retrieved samples were analyzed via total and activity-based metagenomes (using BONCAT—Bioorthogonal noncanonical amino acid tagging) to examine metabolic potential across hydrologically isolated coal seams with varying redox conditions5,8. BONCAT methods have previously been used in combination with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (BONCAT-FACS) and SSU rRNA gene sequencing38,39, but metagenomic sequencing of active cells from BONCAT-FACS has yet to be performed. Total hydrocarbon degradation/surfactant potential and differences in microbial diversity from BONCAT-FACS- and shotgun metagenomes were compared across environments with different sulfate conditions. Investigation of the active microbial groups and functional potential in coalbed methane (CBM) habitats provided new insight into the hydrocarbon degradation strategies and the associated capacities for carbon cycling that vary with depth and sulfate conditions through shallow coal seams.
Results and discussion
Microbial communities and diversity under high and low-sulfate conditions
An SES37 was used to collect in situ coal-associated microbial communities for shotgun metagenomic sequencing in three geochemically diverse coal seams (Supplementary Fig. 1). Samples from a high-sulfate (Nance, N-H, 2002.4–2501.2 mg/L) coal seam and two low-sulfate (Flowers Goodale, FG-L; Terret, T-L, 0.7–16.3 mg/L) coal seams were co-assembled and used to determine differences in hydrocarbon degradation genes from the entire community and the taxonomic diversity was accessed with the high-quality (>80%) metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) (Fig. 1). There were 769,799 genes contained in all of the environmental metagenomes on 92,729 contigs. After refinement, 86 MAGs had >80% estimated completeness for the co-assembled environmental shotgun metagenomes (Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 1). The broad categories of gene classifications were largely similar across all samples (Supplementary Data 2).
The MAGs that were most closely related to organisms from the Desulfobacteraceae family were observed across all sampled coal seams regardless of sulfate level, although the highest coverage was in the high-sulfate coal seam (Fig. 2). The Desulfobacteraceae family consists of commonly studied sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and is known to be metabolically versatile and exhibits multiple electron transfer complexes suggesting alternative metabolic mechanisms40. Previous research has demonstrated an increased abundance of SRBs in high-sulfate coal seams compared to low-sulfate coals seams5. Although, dsrA genes have been detected in acetate-amended methane-producing coal seams, and these results suggest organisms with dsrA may play an important role in syntrophic biogasification in the absence of sulfate41.
In the high-sulfate coal seam (N-H), the dsrA gene was identified in MAGs taxonomically similar to Desulfobacteraceae (Bin 372) and Desulfatibacillum alkenivorans (Bin 369), whereas the FG-L and T-L low-sulfate coals were predominated by MAGs with <80% completion as well as Desulfococcus (Bin 21), Desulfuromonas (Bin 275), and Myxococcaceae (Bin 1 and Bin 37) (Fig. 3, Supplementary Data 3). Previous research on the Desulfococcus clade and the genus Desulfatibacillum alkenivorans reported the ability to anaerobically degrade alkanes42,43. Desulfatibacillum alkenivorans has also been described as being capable of using hexadecane as the sole carbon source in the presence of sulfate43. Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans (from the Myxococcaceae family) is a facultative anaerobe that utilizes acetate with nitrate, oxygen, and fumarate44.
The most predominant MAGs in the low-sulfate FG-L and T-L wells were most closely related to Anaeromyxobacter (Myxococcaceae), Desulfococcus (Desulfobacteraceae), and methylotrophic organisms from the Methylocystaceae family consisting of Methylocystis and Methylosinus (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Data 1). Methane-producing organisms such as acetoclastic methanogens, Methanothrix (Methanosaetaceae) and Methanococcoides (Methanosarcinaceae), and the hydrogentorphic methanogen, Methanoregula formicica (Methanoregulaceae), were also detected in the low-sulfate coal seams (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Data 1). Hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogens are commonly identified in methanogenic coalbeds5,8, and different types of acetoclastic methanogens (e.g., Methanothrix, Methanosarcina) have different pathways for acetate utilization. Active acetate utilization has been demonstrated in PRB coalbeds but the dominant microbial communities or metabolic pathways that generate or utilize acetate in these environments are generally unknown36. As stated above, Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans typically thrive in environments with acetate further supporting the possibility of acetate in the low-sulfate communities44. Previous laboratory investigations have demonstrated that acetoclastic methanogens produce a large fraction of biogenic methane in coal enrichments and it is therefore hypothesized that high methane-producing coal seams are abundant in acetoclastic methanogens45,46. In comparison to other methanogens, Methanothrix spp. have been reported to be better scavengers in low-acetate conditions10. However, recent isotopic analysis of PRB samples reveals that hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis can also be a significant methane-producing pathway45.
To further investigate the dominant methanogenic populations in the low-sulfate coal seams, the BONCAT-FACS active (BONCAT+) metagenome from the FG-L coal seam was analyzed and resulted in 24 MAGs (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 4). The entire BONCAT + library had 888 contigs with 31,748 genes, while the total SYTO stained population (BONCAT-Total) from the same experiment yielded 71,455 genes on 1748 contigs (Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 5). Comparison of the BONCAT-Total and BONCAT+ samples demonstrated that 29.3–36.3% of the recovered cells belonged to populations that were BONCAT+ (Supplementary Fig. 3). Six of the 24 BONCAT + MAGs were taxonomically similar to known methanogens, Methanothrix, an acetoclastic methanogen and Methanobacterium, a hydrogenotrophic methanogen (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 4). These results suggest there are likely multiple (hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic) active methanogenic pathways in situ5,45, although the Methanothrix MAG exhibited significantly higher quality (Fig. 4).
Notably, three BONCAT + MAGs had >70% completeness and were related to the Bacteroidetes, Chlorobi and Methanothrix (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 4). The Chlorobi and Methanothrix MAGs overlapped between the BONCAT+ and the BONCAT-Total metagenome as determined by average nucleotide identity (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 4, Supplementary Data 5 and Supplementary Data 6). Bacteroidetes and Chlorobi have previously been observed to dominate acetate-amended coal seams, and furthermore, microorganisms belonging to the Bacteroidetes phylum have been identified as a key lineage in hydrocarbon degradation41,47. These high-quality BONCAT + MAGs are examined in greater metabolic detail for potential involvement in coal degradation, acetate production, and subsequent acetoclastic methanogenesis in a separate study48.
Presence of biosurfactant genes
Presumptive biosurfactant genes for an esterase hydrolase enzyme (estAB), lichenysin synthetase (lchA), and surfactin synthetase (srfAB) were detected with the highest gene abundance in the FG-L coal seam (Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 7). The estAB gene had the highest abundance (between 21.2 and 32.3 RPKM) compared to any of the investigated biosurfactant genes and was primarily in MAGs from the environmental metagenomes with <80% estimated completeness (Fig. 3, Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 7, and Supplementary Data 3). The estAB gene was also observed in three of the 24 BONCAT + MAGs, two of which were most closely related to Geobacter and one related to Proteobacteria (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 4). Previous work has suggested the importance of esterases in the production of biosurfactants due to the correlation between the accumulation of the esterase hydrolase enzyme and the production of lichenysin and surfactin33. Lichenysin, surfactin and the esterase genes had the highest abundance in the low-sulfate coal seams and were identified in the BONCAT + metagenomes from FG-L (Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 4 and Supplementary Data 7).
In the low-sulfate environmental metagenomes (FG-L and T-L), the lchA and srfAB biosurfactant genes were most present in the MAGs that were <80% estimated completeness (Fig. 3) and one highly complete (>80%) MAG that was taxonomically similar to Legionella (Supplementary Data 3). Legionella spp. have previously been shown to have the ability to produce biosurfactants that contain a lipid structure and had a similar environmental response as surfactin produced from Bacillus subtilis49. Lichenysin and surfactin are part of the surfactin operon family and contain four open reading frames that include lchA and srfAB. Much like surfactin, lichenysin is a low-molecular-weight anionic cyclic lipopeptide biosurfactant previously shown to be produced by Bacillus licheniformis isolates50. Previous research has also demonstrated lichenysins are capable of enhancing oil recovery and degrading naphthalene and crude oil50,51. Biosurfactants have been suggested as having a potentially important role in decreasing the hydrophobicity of the solid coal surface, allowing for cellular and/or protein interactions at the coal surface29. Both lichenysin and surfactin are nonribosomal peptides and therefore are less energy-intensive and could be ideal for oligotrophic conditions such as coal seams50,52,53. These results suggest biosurfactants are likely important in coal biogasification in low-sulfate environments and could facilitate the initial steps in hydrocarbon breakdown.
The rhamnosyltransferase gene (rhlA) had the lowest gene abundance of any of the investigated biosurfactant-related genes. The greatest rhlA abundance was observed in the high-sulfate coal seam with little to no presence in the low-sulfate coal seams (Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 7). In addition, rhlA was not detected in the BONCAT + sample, although it was found in one MAG from the environmental shotgun metagenomes related to Pseudomonadaceae (Bin 302) (Figs. 3–5, Supplementary Data 4 and Supplementary Data 7). Rhamnolipid biosurfactants produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas stutzeri have previously shown the ability to enhance anaerobic degradation of the PAHs, phenanthrene and pyrene54–56. Pseudomonas stutzeri, a model biosurfactant-producing organism, was detected in formation water originating from volatile bituminous coal in the Appalachian Basin coalbed and is suggested to play an important role in enhanced oil recovery55–57. The greater prevalence of lchA and srfAB suggests that rhamnolipids may not be the dominant biosurfactants in all coal environments as previously hypothesized from benchtop coal enrichment experiments54–57.
Hydrocarbon degradation in high-sulfate environments
The phenylphosphate carboxylase gene (ppcC) had the highest abundance in the N-H coal seam (Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 7). Phenylphosphate carboxylase and phenylphosphate synthase can contribute to the anaerobic degradation of phenol, and phenylphosphate carboxylase is responsible for the conversion of phenylphosphate and CO2 into 4-hydroxybenzoate and has previously been identified in Geobacter metallireducens58. Consistent with this, one of the most prominent populations represented by MAGs with >80% estimated completeness in the high-sulfate coal seam (N-H) was taxonomically similar to Geobacter (Bin 360, Bin 373, Bin 34, and Bin 184) and contained the ppcC gene (Fig. 2, and Supplementary Data 3).
The gene with the next highest abundance for the high-sulfate coal seam was the alkylsuccinate synthase subunit D (assD) followed by hydroxybenzylsuccinate synthase (hbsD), and benzylsuccinate synthase subunit D (bssD) (Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 7). These genes (assD, hbsD, and bssD) are all involved in hydrocarbon degradation via fumarate addition, which is currently the only well-described, oxygen-independent alkane activation59. For the high-sulfate coal seam, fumarate addition genes were detected in MAGs that were most taxonomically similar to populations from the Desulfobacteraceae family (Bin 372) as well as others such as Desulfatibacillum alkenivorans (Bin 56) and the Desulfococcus clade (Bin 50, Bin 368) (Fig. 3). Previous research has shown these alkane-degrading organisms in the presence of sulfate42,43. Our results indicate fumarate addition may play a more crucial role in high-sulfate than low-sulfate coal seam environments for hydrocarbon degradation under high-sulfate conditions.
Low-sulfate hydrocarbon degradation: aerobic and anaerobic strategies
Previously reported methane concentrations for low-sulfate FG-L and T-L (33–67 mg/L8) are consistent with our detection of higher mcrA gene abundances compared to the high-sulfate (<0.15 mg/L methane) coal seam (Figs. 3, 5, Supplementary Data 7). The rate-limiting step in coal biogasification has been attributed to an initial biological breakdown of the refractory hydrocarbon matrix35. Analysis of the hydrocarbon degradation genes showed a mix of both aerobic and anaerobic strategies, yet there was a higher gene abundance of aerobic hydrocarbon degradation genes under low-sulfate compared to the high-sulfate coal seam. The homoprotocatechuate dioxygenase α subunit gene (ligB) was present in the BONCAT + metagenome (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 4, and Supplementary Data 7), and in the environmental metagenomes. The ligB had the highest abundance of all investigated aerobic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation genes60 regardless of sulfate level. Moreover, ligB had the highest gene abundance for any gene detected in the low-sulfate coal seams (Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 7). Homoprotocatechuate dioxygenase is involved in the initial deoxygenation of 4-hydroxyphenylacetate to homoprotocatechuate (and eventually to fumarate). The monocyclic α subunit (Mono_DIOX) and bicyclic extradiol α subunit dioxygenases genes (EXDO_bi) and gentisate dioxygenase α subunit gene (Gen) from the cupin superfamily were also in the BONCAT + metagenome (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 4), although at lower abundances across all shotgun metagenomes compared to the ligB dioxygenase (Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 7). The ligB dioxygenase was found in the putative methanogenic BONCAT + MAG that was most closely related to Methanothrix (discussed above) indicating possible activity of aerobic hydrocarbon degradation (ligB) in addition to anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation (via ppsAB and bssD). Possible oxygen-dependent or -tolerant properties of this putative methanogenic population are discussed in detail in a separate study48. Further, the bicyclic dioxygenases and the gentisate dioxygenases (Gen) were in a BONCAT + MAG taxonomically affiliated with Proteobacteria, while the monocyclic dioxygenases were detected in a different MAG within the β-Proteobacteria (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 4) indicating further aerobic degradation capabilities.
The anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation gene with the greatest abundance in the low-sulfate environments was ppcC and was identified in BONCAT + MAG most closely related to Geobacter (Figs. 4, 5, Supplementary Data 4 and Supplementary Data 7). The high abundance of ppcC in both high- and low-sulfate environments indicates that anaerobic phenol degradation is likely crucial in the degradation of PRB coal. Phenylphosphate carboxylase genes are often overlooked for the more well-documented fumarate addition genes14,15,19,27,28, but results presented herein suggest ppcC should be considered as a possible mechanism for anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation. Phenol degradation via the activation of phenylphosphate followed by carboxylation has previously been shown to only occur when in the presence of phenol and CO2 and is believed to be a strictly anaerobic process58. However, previous research suggests ppcC can exist in an inactive oxidized form until it is reduced and activated under anaerobic conditions61. Therefore, under fluctuating oxygen conditions, phenylphosphate carboxylase may play an important role.
While all the fumarate addition genes of interest were identified in the environmental shotgun metagenomes (Fig. 5) and belonged to predominant populations related to the Geobacter (Bin 34), Syntrophus aciditrophicus (Bin 84), Anaeromyxobacter (Bin 37), Luteitalea pratensis (Bin 10), and Desulfococcus (Bin 368 and Bin 50) (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Data 3), only two of the 24 BONCAT + MAGs displayed the presence of fumarate genes (related to Methanothrix and β-Proteobacteria) and of the seven fumarate genes investigated only three (assD, bssD, and tutE) were present (Figs. 4, 5, Supplementary Data 4, Supplementary Data 7). The functional significance and gene arrangement of these genes could be explored in future work. It is possible that the low-sulfate and methanogenic conditions were not able to support fumarate addition, due to the lack of available electron acceptors, which are necessary for fumarate addition and therefore needed to rely on other methods of carbon degradation.
Together, our results suggest that fumarate is an important intermediate substrate in hydrocarbon degradation for both high- and low-sulfate environments, but likely plays a more important role in high-sulfate PRB environments. Previous laboratory investigations have demonstrated an increase in assA gene abundance during carbon degradation in sulfate-reducing environments, with no such increase in corresponding methanogenic cultures15,19,21. In contrast, other oil field surveys and hydrocarbon degradation experiments demonstrate that fumarate addition is an important pathway under methanogenic conditions and organisms with the assA, such as Anaerolineaceae, have shown the ability to degrade n-alkanes to produce acetate, potentially creating a syntrophic relationship with the acetoclastic methanogen, Methanothrix23,26,62. Our observations suggest that in low-sulfate coal seams, prerequisite methanogenic substrates may result from both anaerobic and aerobic (homoprotocatechuate dioxygenase) hydrocarbon degradation as they are detected in higher gene abundances across all coal-dependent and active populations (Figs. 4, 5, Supplementary Data 4, and Supplementary Data 7).
The microbial environment of the terrestrial subsurface is one of the most complex and poorly understood microbiomes on Earth63. Due to diversity and high functional capacity, there have been many calls to better understand the diversity64 and the activity of in situ microorganisms and the potential implications on the cycling of old and new carbon between the lithosphere and atmosphere65. There has been much debate on possible pathways actively involved in the subsurface carbon cycle, specifically, the degradation of complex hydrocarbons to methanogenic substrates under varying conditions (e.g. sulfate). The subsurface environment constitutes a challenging environment to access and prior to this study, conclusions had been based primarily on laboratory benchtop enrichments, geochemical predictions, or shotgun metagenomic models2,5,24. The methods used in this work, accessing the subsurface and sampling of environmentally relevant in situ communities using the SES and the integration of metagenomes from active communities derived from BONCAT-FACS, expands both the gene and genome catalog of the subsurface environment as well as the activity of key carbon cycle genes indicative of hydrocarbon degradation. The active groups were putatively involved in both aerobic and anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation and biosurfactant production. The presented results demonstrated that active populations may have the ability to produce diverse biosurfactants and could play an important role in coal-dependent methanogenesis in low-sulfate coal seams. While this study proposes biosurfactants are important in low-sulfate coal seams, more work needs to be performed to determine the role and environmental triggers for biosurfactants from different coal ranks and sulfate concentrations.
Hydrocarbon degradation in coal seam environments is often assumed to be strictly anaerobic, although with advancements in metagenomics more research is beginning to suggest mixed aerobic and anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation24,66. Our results indicate that aerobic hydrocarbon degradation genes are associated with active populations in coal seam environments that span redox zones8 and are more prevalent in low-sulfate coal seams. Previously, enzymes belonging to the LigB superfamily had not been readily detected due to conventional screening techniques. In the advent of metagenomics, these enzymes have been broadly identified in the environment with enrichment in hydrocarbon-rich samples, suggesting enhanced importance in hydrocarbon degradation67,68. The BONCAT + metagenomes were predominated by both aerobic and anaerobic degradation genes that included ppcC, ppsA, ebdB, cmdB, assD, ligB, monocyclic, and bicyclic dioxygenases. Therefore, based on the active MAGs that contain aerobic genes, it is possible microaerophilic conditions could promote aerobic hydrocarbon degradation via dioxygenases such as the homoprotocatechuate dioxygenases from the LigB family. The source of oxygen in these environments is unknown, and likely depends on groundwater flow/recharge, surface water intrusion, water level changes, coal seam depth, and associated microbial activities24,47. Further work should determine the extent of oxia, potential oxygen sources, and potential segregation of hydrocarbon degradation and methanogenesis along with heterogeneous critical zone transitions in the shallow subsurface.
Methods
Site description and sample collection
The USGS Birney sampling site, located in the PRB of southeastern Montana (45.435606, −106.393309), has access to four subbituminous coal seams at different depths and within a 15 m lateral distance of each other8. Metagenomic samples were collected from a high-sulfate (23.78–26.04 mM) coal seam (N-H) at 65 m depth and two low-sulfate (0.01–0.38 mM) coal seams (FG-L and T-L) located at 117 m and 161 m depths. The low-sulfate coal seams have measurable methane (33–67 mg/L) while the high-sulfate coal seams have low methane (<0.15 mg/L)8. The hydrogeochemistry of these coal seams appear to remain relatively stable with sulfate and methane measurements fluctuating very little between 2011 and 20148 (Supplementary Data 8). Coal-associated microbial assemblages were collected with a diffusive microbial sampler (DMS)8 or with a next-generation subsurface environmental sampler (SES; Patent# US10704993B2) which are both designed to remain closed while lowered to the desired depth, then sampling is initiated once the sampler is opened. The DMSs were incubated down-well for three months and retrieved on June 12th, 2017. Once retrieved, the slurry (coal and groundwater) from the DMSs were aseptically removed and stored on dry ice in sterile falcon tubes until brought back to the lab, where they were stored at −80 °C until DNA extractions were performed.
DNA extraction, concentration, and sequencing for shotgun metagenomics
DNA was extracted from slurry in the DMS as described in Schweitzer et al5. using a FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedical). DNA was purified using One Step PCR Clean Up (Zymo Research). The DNA was quantified using Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen) before being sent to the MBL Keck sequencing facility (The University of Chicago, IL). The genomic DNA was concentrated using a SpeedVac (Thermo Scientific) and quantified using Picogreen (Invitrogen). DNA concentrations ranged between 138.6 ng (FG-L) and 1450 ng (T-L). Using a Covaris ultrasonicator, DNA was sheared to ~400 bp and libraries were constructed with NuGEN Ovation® Ultralow Library protocol (Tecan Genomics, CA). The amplified libraries were visualized on a Caliper HiSense Bioanalyzer and pooled to equimolar concentrations. The DNA was further size selected using a Sage PippinPrep 2% cassette. The pooled library was quantified using Kapa Biosystems qPCR library quantification before being sequenced in a 2 × 150 paired-end sequencing run using an Illumina NextSeq. The sequences were demultiplexed and the adapter sequences were trimmed using bcl2fastq conversion software. The sequences were archived with SRA (SRP292435) under the BioProject ID PRJNA678021.
BONCAT incubations, fluorescent labeling, cell sorting, and metagenomic sequencing
The following methods are also presented in our companion study, which examines four high-quality BONCAT + MAGs for their involvement in acetate production and acetoclastic methanogenesis48. Subsurface environmental samplers (SES, Patent # US10704993B2) that contained UV-sterile, crushed coal (size range 0.85–2.00 mm) were deployed at the screened interval in a methane-producing coal seam (FG-L; September 2017) at the USGS Birney Field Site8 and, after approximately nine months of down-well incubation, were retrieved. In contrast to DMSs used for shotgun sequencing, the use of the SES allowed for samples to be kept under anaerobic conditions and at formation pressures, an essential prerequisite for conducting representative BONCAT incubations. Upon retrieval, 10 mL of SES slurry was sampled via sealed ports (Swagelok) and were anaerobically transferred into gassed-out, sterile Balch tubes. Triplicate tubes were prepared for incubation with 250 μM L-homopropargylglycine (HPG, Click Chemistry Tools, Scottsdale, AZ, USA) prepared in sterile, degassed water (DEPC diethyl pyrocarbonate treated, pH 7). Control samples were prepared the same as other samples with the exception that HPG was not added (HPG negative control). Samples were incubated in the dark at 20 °C for 24 h. At the end of the incubation period cells were removed from coal by removing 1 mL of slurry and adding 5mls Tween® 20 dissolved in PBS (1X PBS) to a final concentration of 0.02% (Sigma–Aldrich). Samples were vortexed at maximum speed for 5 min followed by centrifugation at 500 × g for 5 min (Couradeau et al., 2019)38. The supernatant (containing the detached cells) was immediately cryopreserved at −20 °C in sterile 55% glycerol TE (11X) solution.
Translationally active cells were identified through a click reaction that added a fluorescent dye to HPG molecules that had been incorporated into newly synthesized protein. This BONCAT click reaction consisted of 5 mM sodium ascorbate, 5 mM aminoguanidine HCl, 500 uM THPTA, 100 uM CuSO4, and 5uM FAM picolyl azide in 1× phosphate buffered saline. Incubation time was 30 min, followed by three washes in 20 ml of 1X PBS for 5 min each. Cells were recovered from the filter by vortexing in 0.02% Tween for 5 min, and then stained using 0.5uM SYTOTM59 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Invitrogen, Eugene OR, USA) DNA stain (Couradeau et al., 2019)38.
Cells were sorted using a BD-InfluxTM (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) configured to capture total cells labeled with SYTOTM59 DNA stain and excited with a 640 nm red laser and BONCAT-positive cells labeled with FAM picolyl azide dye and excited with a 488 nm blue laser. BONCAT-positive cells were a subset to total SYTOTM59 stained cells, and were differentiated from the BONCAT-negative based on their FAM fluorescence (530/40BP) to background fluorescence from identical cells incubated without HPG, i.e., HPG negative control, that also underwent the same click reaction to add a FAM label. The two populations were sorted. The first population contained all DNA + cells (BONCAT-total), and the second population contained only those cells which were also BONCAT+ in comparison to the control. For each sample, we sorted 4 wells containing 5000 cells each, and 20 wells containing 300 cells each into 384-wells plates. Plates were frozen at −80 °C until further processing.
Cells from samples containing 5000 sorted cells were pelleted prior to sequencing via centrifugation at 6000 × g for 1 h at 10 °C. The supernatant was discarded by a brief inverted spin at <60 × g so as not to interfere with subsequent whole genome amplification reaction chemistry. Plates containing only 300 sorted cells were not pelleted. Sorted cells were lysed and amplified using 5 µl WGAX reactions following the optimized conditions described in Stepanauskas et al. (2017)69. Briefly, cells were lysed in 650 nl lysis buffer for 10 min at room temperature. The lysis buffer consisted of 300 nl TE + 350 nl of 400 mM KOH, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM DTT. Lysis reactions were neutralized by the addition of 350 nl of 315 mM HCl in Tris-HCl. Amplification reactions were brought to 5 µL with final concentrations of 1X EquiPhi29 reaction buffer (Thermo), 0.2 U/µl EquiPhi29 polymerase (Thermo), 0.4 mM dNTPs, 50 µM random heptamers, 10 mM DTT, and 0.5 µM SYTO13. Plates were incubated at 45 °C for 13 h.
Libraries for BONCAT+ and BONCAT-total metagenomic sequencing were created using the Nextera XT v2 kit (Illumina) with 12 rounds of PCR amplification. All volumes and inputs to Nextera reactions were reduced 10-fold from the manufacturer’s recommendations. Libraries were sequenced 2 × 150 bp mode on Illumina’s Nextseq platform. The sequences were archived under JGI GOLD Study ID Gs0141001.
Metagenomic analysis with Anvi’o
NextSeq-generated fastq files were filtered at a minimum quality read length of 0.75 using Anvi’o for Illumina (http://merenlab.org). The filtered reads were co-assembled using MEGAHIT v1.1.2 (The University of Hong Kong and L3 Bioinformatics Limited). All shotgun, BONCAT+, and BONCAT-Total replicates were co-assembled and kept separate for subsequent comparisons. Alignments were accomplished using bowtie2 v2.3.6 and samtools v1.9. All bam files were merged into individual profile databases for each sample prior to binning using Anvi’o. Bins were assembled using tetranucleotide frequency into 376 genomic clusters for the shotgun metagenomics samples and 20 bins for the BONCAT+ amplified metagenome and 38 bins for the BONCAT-Total amplified metagenome. To determine completeness, scanning of ribosomal single-copy genes for bacteria (Campbell et al. 201370) and archaea (Rinke et al. 201371) in each cluster was performed in Anvi’o. To identify open reading frames in contigs, Prodigal was used within Anvi’o. Functions were assigned in Anvi’o using NCBI’s Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COGs) and a Hidden Markov Model hit database was generated with Anvi’o. Coverage estimates, GC content, and N50 were calculated. Anvi’o Interactive Server (anvi-server.org) was used to create phylogenomic evaluation of genomic parameters for each MAG. All shotgun metagenome high quality (>80% completion), BONCAT+ and BONCAT-Total MAGs are archived under JGI GOLD Study ID Gs0153995.
Metagenomic analysis with curated database
Taxonomic identity was determined using NCBI BLASTn of all contigs for each bin. All blasted contigs with the best e-value and percent identity were then compared to select the most common ancestor to represent the most likely taxonomic identification for all the contigs for MAGs > 20× coverage. In order for a comprehensive assessment of up to date microbial hydrocarbon degradation strategies genes were analyzed using curated databases via direct protein sequence comparison. Curated databases for hydrocarbon degradation genes included aerobic (AromaDeg)60 and anaerobic (AnHyDeg)20 protein databases. Other functional gene databases (e.g., biosurfactant genes, dsrA, and mcrA) were generated from protein sequences by extracting HMM files from the Pfam database (EMBL-EBI) and from McKay et al. (2017)13. These protein databases were BLAST-searched against each protein sequence with an e-value cutoff of 1E-10 and above 40% identity. All duplicate gene hits were removed with the highest e-value hit being kept. All protein gene sequence coverages were normalized to give gene abundances by using Eq. (1) which calculates Reads (Coverage) per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM).
1 |
Genes were selected from the complete list of all genes (Supplementary Data 7) and classified as genes of interest for further analyses. The genes of interest were selected first by ensuring there were representatives from each of the four databases tested (AnHyDeg, AromaDeg, Biosurfactant, and Redox) and that only one subunit representative from the same gene family was further analyzed. To determine which of the gene subunit representatives were selected as a gene of interest, at least one of the following criteria had to be met: the gene had to either be identified in the BONCAT + sample or contained the highest gene abundance in one of the samples (FG-L, T-L, or N-H).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Metagenome sequencing was made possible by the Deep Carbon Observatory’s Census of Deep Life and was performed at the Marine Biological Laboratory (Woods Hole, MA, United States) and Joint Genome Institute CSP 503725. We are grateful for the assistance of Mitch Sogin, Joseph Vineis, Amelia Brumbaugh, and Hilary Morrison at MBL. The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, is supported under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Any use of trade, firm, or product name is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The US Geological Survey (E.P.B.) supported field work and sampling. The work was further supported by NSF 1736255 (L.J.M., R.G., and M.W.F.). We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Katie Davis and George Platt for their help in sample collection in the Powder River Basin.
Author contributions
H.D.S. and H.J.S. are coauthors and contributed equally to the manuscript. H.D.S., H.J.S., E.P.B., A.B.C. and M.W.F. designed the study. H.D.S., H.J.S. and E.P.B. wrote the paper. H.D.S., H.J.S. and E.P.B. collected samples from the field. H.D.S., H.J.S. and E.P.B. performed experiments. R.R.M. and D.G. performed cell sorting and sequencing. H.D.S. and H.J.S. performed analysis. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript. M.W.F. supervised research.
Data availability
All data are publicly available and archived under JGI GOLD Study IDs Gs0141001, Gs0153995, and under the BioProject ID PRJNA678021. The MAGs are all archived under their own Analysis Project under JGI Gold Study ID Gs0153995. All other relevant data are available upon request from the authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Hannah Schweitzer, Heidi Smith.
Contributor Information
Hannah D. Schweitzer, Email: hannah.schweitzer@uit.no
Heidi J. Smith, Email: Heidi.smith@montana.edu
Matthew W. Fields, Email: matthew.fields@montana.edu
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41522-022-00267-2.
References
- 1.Javoy M. The major volatile elements of the Earth: their origin, behavior, fate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1997;24:177–180. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ritter D, et al. Enhanced microbial coalbed methane generation: a review of research, commercial activity, and remaining challenges. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2015;146:28–41. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fakoussa RM, Hofrichter M. Biotechnology and microbiology of coal degradation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999;52:25–40. doi: 10.1007/s002530051483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Elder DJE, Kelly DJ. The bacterial degradation of benzoic acid and benzenoid compounds under anaerobic conditions: Unifying trends and new perspectives. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1994;13:441–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schweitzer H, et al. Changes in microbial communities and associated water and gas geochemistry across a sulfate gradient in coal beds: Powder River Basin, USA. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2019;245:495–513. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Robbins SJ, Evans PN, Esterle JS, Golding SD, Tyson GW. The effect of coal rank on biogenic methane potential and microbial composition. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2016;154–155:205–212. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Muyzer G, Stams AJM. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008;6:441–454. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barnhart EP, et al. Hydrogeochemistry and coal-associated bacterial populations from a methanogenic coal bed. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2016;162:14–26. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barnhart EP, et al. Potential role of acetyl-CoA synthetase (acs) and malate dehydrogenase (mae) in the evolution of the acetate switch in bacteria and archaea. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12498. doi: 10.1038/srep12498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Min H, Zinder SH. Kinetics of acetate utilization by two thermophilic acetotrophic methanogens: Methanosarcina sp. strain CALS-1 and Methanothrix sp. strain CALS-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989;55:488–491. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.2.488-491.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Borrel G, et al. Comparative genomics highlights the unique biology of Methanomassiliicoccales, a Thermoplasmatales-related seventh order of methanogenic archaea that encodes pyrrolysine. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:679. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haroon MF, et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature. 2013;500:567–570. doi: 10.1038/nature12375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McKay LJ, Hatzenpichler R, Inskeep WP, Fields MW. Occurrence and expression of novel methyl-coenzyme M reductase gene (mcrA) variants in hot spring sediments. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:7252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07354-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Callaghan AV, et al. Diversity of benzyl- and alkylsuccinate synthase genes in hydrocarbon-impacted environments and enrichment cultures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44:7287–7294. doi: 10.1021/es1002023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Callaghan AV, Tierney M, Phelps CD, Young LY. Anaerobic biodegradation of n-hexadecane by a nitrate-reducing consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:1339–1344. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02491-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Beller HR, Edwards EA. Anaerobic toluene activation by benzylsuccinate synthase in a highly enriched methanogenic culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66:5503–5505. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.12.5503-5505.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.von Netzer F, et al. Enhanced gene detection assays for fumarate-adding enzymes allow uncovering of anaerobic hydrocarbon degraders in terrestrial and marine systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;73:543–552. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02362-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Acosta-González A, Rosselló-Móra R, Marqués S. Diversity of benzylsuccinate synthase-like (bssA) genes in hydrocarbon-polluted marine sediments suggests substrate-dependent clustering. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:3667–3676. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03934-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Callaghan AV, Gieg LM, Kropp KG, Suflita JM, Young LY. Comparison of mechanisms of alkane metabolism under sulfate-reducing conditions among two bacterial isolates and a bacterial consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:4274–4282. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02896-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Callaghan, A. V. & Wawrik, B. AnHyDeg: A Curated Database of Anaerobic Hydrocarbon Degradation Genes. (2016). 10.5281/zenodo.61278.
- 21.Aitken CM, et al. Evidence that crude oil alkane activation proceeds by different mechanisms under sulfate-reducing and methanogenic conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2013;109:162–174. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tan B, Dong X, Sensen CW, Foght J. Metagenomic analysis of an anaerobic alkane-degrading microbial culture: Potential hydrocarbon-activating pathways and inferred roles of community members. Genome. 2013;56:599–611. doi: 10.1139/gen-2013-0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Berdugo-Clavijo C, Gieg LM. Conversion of crude oil to methane by a microbial consortium enriched from oil reservoir production waters. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:197. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.An D, et al. Metagenomics of hydrocarbon resource environments indicates aerobic taxa and genes to be unexpectedly common. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47:10708–10717. doi: 10.1021/es4020184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Johnson JM, Wawrik B, Isom C, Boling WB, Callaghan AV. Interrogation of Chesapeake Bay sediment microbial communities for intrinsic alkane-utilizing potential under anaerobic conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2015;91:1–14. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiu035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gieg, L. M. & Toth, C. R. A. In Boll, M. (ed.) Anaerobic Utilization of Hydrocarbons, Oils, and Lipids (Springer, 2020).
- 27.Zhou J, et al. Synthesis and characterization of anaerobic degradation biomarkers of n -Alkanes via hydroxylation/carboxylation pathways. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 2016;22:31–37. doi: 10.1255/ejms.1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meckenstock RU, Mouttaki H. Anaerobic degradation of non-substituted aromatic hydrocarbons. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011;22:406–414. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yin S, Tao X, Shi K. The role of surfactants in coal bio-solubilisation. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011;92:1554–1559. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Makkar RS, Rockne KJ. Comparison of synthetic surfactants and biosurfactants in enhancing biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003;22:2280–2292. doi: 10.1897/02-472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Barin R, Talebi M, Biria D, Beheshti M. Fast bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils by a consortium of biosurfactant/bioemulsifier producing bacteria. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;11:1701–1710. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gojgic-Cvijovic GD, et al. Biodegradation of petroleum sludge and petroleum polluted soil by a bacterial consortium: a laboratory study. Biodegradation. 2012;23:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10532-011-9481-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sekhon KK, Khanna S, Cameotra SS. Enhanced biosurfactant production through cloning of three genes and role of esterase in biosurfactant release. Microb. Cell Fact. 2011;10:49. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wentzel A, Ellingsen TE, Kotlar HK, Zotchev SB, Throne-Holst M. Bacterial metabolism of long-chain n-alkanes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;76:1209–1221. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wawrik B, et al. Field and laboratory studies on the bioconversion of coal to methane in the San Juan Basin. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012;81:26–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ulrich G, Bower S. Active methanogenesis and acetate utilization in Powder River Basin coals, United States. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2008;76:25–33. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Barnhart, E., Hyatt, R., Fields, M. W. & Cunningham, A. B. Subsurface environment sampler with actuator movable collection chamber. USPTO, Patent US10704993B2 (2020).
- 38.Couradeau E, et al. Probing the active fraction of soil microbiomes using BONCAT-FACS. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2770. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10542-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hatzenpichler R, et al. Visualizing in situ translational activity for identifying and sorting slow-growing archaeal−bacterial consortia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E4069–E4078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603757113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Plugge CM, Zhang W, Scholten JCM, Stams AJM. Metabolic flexibility of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2011;2:81. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Beckmann S, et al. Long-term succession in a coal seam microbiome during in situ biostimulation of coalbed-methane generation. ISME J. 2019;13:632–650. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0296-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kleindienst S, et al. Diverse sulfate-reducing bacteria of the Desulfosarcina/Desulfococcus clade are the key alkane degraders at marine seeps. ISME J. 2014;8:2029–2044. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shin B, et al. Anaerobic degradation of hexadecane and phenanthrene coupled to sulfate reduction by enriched consortia from northern Gulf of Mexico seafloor sediment. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1239. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36567-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sanford RA, Cole JR, Tiedje JM. Characterization and description of Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans gen. nov., sp. nov., an Aryl-halorespiring facultative anaerobic myxobacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:893–900. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.893-900.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vinson DS, Blair NE, Ritter DJ, Martini AM, McIntosh JC. Carbon mass balance, isotopic tracers of biogenic methane, and therole of acetate in coal beds: Powder River Basin (USA) Chem. Geol. 2019;530:119329. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jones EJP, Voytek MA, Corum MD, Orem WH. Stimulation of methane generation from nonproductive coal by addition of nutrients or a microbial consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010;76:7013–7022. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00728-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Strapoć D, et al. Biogeochemistry of microbial coal-bed methane. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2011;39:617–656. [Google Scholar]
- 48.McKay, L. J. et al. Activity-based, genome-resolved metagenomics uncovers key populations and pathways involved in subsurface coversions of coal to methane. ISME J. (2021). 10.1038/s41396-021-01139-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Stewart CR, Burnside DM, Cianciotto NP. The surfactant of legionella pneumophila is secreted in a TolC-dependent manner and is antagonistic toward other legionella species. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:5971–5984. doi: 10.1128/JB.05405-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Suthar H, Nerurkar A. Characterization of biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis TT42 having potential for enhanced oil recovery. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016;180:248–260. doi: 10.1007/s12010-016-2096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kumar AP, et al. Evaluation of orange peel for biosurfactant production by Bacillus licheniformis and their ability to degrade naphthalene and crude oil. 3 Biotech. 2016;6:43. doi: 10.1007/s13205-015-0362-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.McIntosh JA, Donia MS, Schmidt EW. Ribosomal peptide natural products: bridging the ribosomal and nonribosomal worlds. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009;26:537–559. doi: 10.1039/b714132g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Strieker M, Tanović A, Marahiel MA. Nonribosomal peptide synthetases: structures and dynamics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010;20:234–240. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yu H, Huang GH, Xiao H, Wang L, Chen W. Combined effects of DOM and biosurfactant enhanced biodegradation of polycylic armotic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil-water systems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014;21:10536–10549. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-2958-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhao F, et al. Heterologous production of Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhamnolipid under anaerobic conditions for microbial enhanced oil recovery. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015;118:379–389. doi: 10.1111/jam.12698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Singh DN, Tripathi AK. Coal induced production of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant by Pseudomonas stutzeri, isolated from the formation water of Jharia coalbed. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;128:215–221. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ross DE, Gulliver D. Reconstruction of a nearly complete Pseudomonas draft genome sequence from a coalbed methane-produced water metagenome. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e01024–16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01024-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schleinitz KM, et al. Phenol degradation in the strictly anaerobic iron-reducing bacterium Geobacter metallireducens GS-15. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:3912–3919. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01525-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wilkes H, Buckel W, Golding BT, Rabus R. Metabolism of hydrocarbons in n-alkane-utilizing anaerobic bacteria. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;26:138–151. doi: 10.1159/000442160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Duarte, M., Jauregui, R., Vilchez-Vargas, R., Junca, H. & Pieper, D. H. AromaDeg, a novel database for phylogenomics of aerobic bacterial degradation of aromatics. Database (Oxford)10.1093/database/bau118 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.Schmeling S, Fuchs G. Anaerobic metabolism of phenol in proteobacteria and further studies of phenylphosphate carboxylase. Arch. Microbiol. 2009;191:869–878. doi: 10.1007/s00203-009-0519-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Liang B, et al. Anaerolineaceae and Methanosaeta turned to be the dominant microorganisms in alkanes-dependent methanogenic culture after long-term of incubation. AMB Express. 2015;5:37. doi: 10.1186/s13568-015-0117-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Momper L, Jungbluth SP, Lee MD, Amend JP. Energy and carbon metabolisms in a deep terrestrial subsurface fluid microbial community. ISME J. 2017;11:2319–2333. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lemos LN, Mendes LW, Baldrian P, Pylro VS. Genome-resolved metagenomics is essential for unlocking the microbial black box of the soil. Trends Microbiol. 2021;29:279–282. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schweitzer H, et al. Innovating carbon-capture biotechnologies through ecosystem-inspired solutions. One Earth. 2021;4:49–59. [Google Scholar]
- 66.da Cruz GF, et al. Could petroleum biodegradation be a joint achievement of aerobic and anaerobic microrganisms in deep sea reservoirs? AMB Express. 2011;1:47. doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-1-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Suenaga H, Ohnuki T, Miyazaki K. Functional screening of a metagenomic library for genes involved in microbial degradation of aromatic compounds. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;9:2289–2297. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01342.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Terrón-González L, Martín-Cabello G, Ferrer M, Santero E. Functional metagenomics of a biostimulated petroleum-contaminated soil reveals an extraordinary diversity of extradiol dioxygenases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:2467–2478. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03811-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Stepanauskas R, et al. Improved genome recovery and integrated cell-size analyses of individual uncultured microbial cells and viral particles. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:84. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00128-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Campbell JH, et al. UGA is an additional glycine codon in uncultured SR1 bacteria from the human microbiota. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:5540–5545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303090110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rinke C, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature. 2013;499:431–437. doi: 10.1038/nature12352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are publicly available and archived under JGI GOLD Study IDs Gs0141001, Gs0153995, and under the BioProject ID PRJNA678021. The MAGs are all archived under their own Analysis Project under JGI Gold Study ID Gs0153995. All other relevant data are available upon request from the authors.