Skip to main content
Cardiovascular Research logoLink to Cardiovascular Research
. 2021 Mar 5;118(3):667–685. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab063

Sex differences in acute cardiovascular care: a review and needs assessment

Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula 1,2,3,4, Dhiran Verghese 5, Viral K Desai 6, Pranathi R Sundaragiri 7, Virginia M Miller 8,9,
PMCID: PMC8859628  PMID: 33734314

Abstract

Despite significant progress in the care of patients suffering from cardiovascular disease, there remains a persistent sex disparity in the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of these patients. These sex disparities are seen across the spectrum of cardiovascular care, but, are especially pronounced in acute cardiovascular care. The spectrum of acute cardiovascular care encompasses critically ill or tenuous patients with cardiovascular conditions that require urgent or emergent decision-making and interventions. In this narrative review, the disparities in the clinical course, management, and outcomes of six commonly encountered acute cardiovascular conditions, some with a known sex-predilection will be discussed within the basis of underlying sex differences in physiology, anatomy, and pharmacology with the goal of identifying areas where improvement in clinical approaches are needed.

Keywords: Acute heart failure, Acute myocardial infarction, Cardiac arrest, Cardiogenic shock, Female, Sex differences, Spontaneous coronary artery dissection, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) being the most common conditions.1–3 Despite significant progress in the care of patients suffering from CVD, there remains a persistent sex disparity in the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of these patients.4–8 Results from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study noted that the smallest difference in cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality in men and women was in high-income counties and the largest difference was reported in low-income countries.9 However, for countries at all economic levels, women were less likely to have echocardiograms, stress tests, coronary angiograms, or revascularization procedures.9 The sex disparity seen across the spectrum of cardiovascular care is especially pronounced in acute cardiovascular care. The spectrum of acute cardiovascular care encompasses critically ill or tenuous patients with cardiovascular conditions that require urgent or emergent decision-making and interventions. The lack of consideration of sex as an essential biological variable in both preclinical and clinical studies has crucial downstream consequences on the development of therapeutic targets in CVD.10 In this narrative review, the disparities in the clinical course, management, and outcomes of six commonly encountered acute cardiovascular conditions, some with a known sex-predilection will be discussed within the basis of underlying sex differences in physiology, anatomy, and pharmacology with the goal of identifying areas where improvement in clinical approaches is needed. Sex is a critical and easily addressable factor influencing healthcare disparities.

2. Acute cardiovascular care conditions

2.1 Acute myocardial infarction

Historically, CVD was considered to be a male-predominant disease, likely due to extrapolation from early trials that had a high proportion of male participants.11–13 This extrapolation led to a sex bias in the diagnosis and standard of care provided by physicians.12,14 Women presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) represent a systematically different cohort with regards to comorbidities, age of onset, and outcomes.15,16 Women often do not experience the same pattern of chest pain as men and physicians are less likely to attribute their symptoms to CAD.17,18 Although there are no sex-based difference in the guideline recommendations for the management of ST-segment elevation (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), the use of angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and prescription of medications for secondary prevention are lower in women than for men resulting in a higher risk of 30-day mortality among women.6,19–25

2.1.1 Distinct clinical profile of women

Women with AMI are more likely to present with dissimilar symptoms to men, delay to presentation, and have increased comorbidities and increased incidence of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA).26 Obstructive atherosclerotic epicardial disease is the most common cause of AMI in both men and women, but other pathophysiological causes such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC), vasospastic angina, and microvascular dysfunction that can lead to AMI are more common in women.14,27 Women experience fluctuations in their prothrombotic state because of menstrual cycles, pregnancy, use of oral contraceptive pills, menopause, and menopausal hormone treatments.28,29 The 2019 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines recommend the need to routinely assess a detailed history of pregnancy complications as a part of routine cardiovascular risk assessment for primary prevention.30,31 The current European Society of Cardiology–European Atherosclerosis Society Dyslipidemia Guideline (ESC/EAS), however, do not list pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, or premature menopause for women as risk enhancers for assessment of cardiovascular risk and primary prevention.32 Pregnancy induced-hypertension, gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia increase metabolic stress during pregnancy and their occurrence present a long-term risk for development of CVD.33,34 Systemic inflammatory diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis are more common in women and increase the risk of CHD. However, these differences in the cardiovascular profile of women do not fully explain the higher early mortality and lower long-term survival.35 Women with AMI tend to have more comorbidities including metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease when compared to men.36 Women presenting with AMI on average were older, more often had hypertension and diabetes but were less likely to be smokers. Women with AMI often have a lower prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia and peripheral vascular disease compared to men.15,16,37,38 Women more frequently have NSTEMI and less frequently STEMI.35

2.1.2 Cardiovascular effects of oestrogen

Oestrogen improves vascular function, reduces atherosclerosis, ischaemia–reperfusion injury and impacts cardiovascular health by direct effects on the vascular cells and cardiomyocytes, as well as, indirect effects mediated systemically through altered autonomic and renal function.39 In addition to oestrogen regulating gene transcription by binding to nuclear receptors (Erα, Erβ), oestrogen also binds to receptors located at the plasma membrane (G-protein-coupled oestrogen receptor, GPER) that activate membrane signalling cascades (Figure 1).40 Oestrogen affects ion channels that modulate cardiac repolarization, intra-cellular calcium regulation that affects contractility, and reactive oxygen species that define oxidative stress.39 Several preclinical studies provide evidence that females develop less cardiac hypertrophy and less ischaemia–reperfusion injury than males.41,42 In non-human primates, oestrogen reduced formation of atherosclerotic plaque when administered soon after ovariectomy.43 The mechanisms involve, in part, regulation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide through activation of Erα.39,44,45 Other preclinical studies indicate that oestrogen also regulates angiotensin-converting enzyme, angiotensin receptors, and β-adrenergic receptors, thus, these regulatory pathways have important implications for sex differences in development and treatment for hypertension in women.46–48 Oral forms of oestrogenic treatments, specifically conjugated equine oestrogen and micronized 17β oestradiol, reduce hepatic production of low-density lipoproteins, and, thus, reduce the lipid contribute to the development of atherosclerosis.49–52 Large clinical trials to investigate whether the use of menopausal hormone treatments reduce cardiovascular risk have provided useful information. First, oral conjugated equine oestrogen did not provide secondary prevention for CVD [Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS)].53–55 Second, oral conjugated equine oestrogen reduced development of coronary calcification and carotid artery intima-medial thickening when treatment began within 5 years of menopause.52,56 For women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy prior to the age of natural menopause, oestrogen treatments (oral and transdermal) reduced the risk of cardiovascular morality.57,58

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Summary schematic of potential mechanisms by which sex steroids affect cellular functions. At the genetic level, the basic difference between females and males are the presence of XX chromosomes in females and XY in males. The genes on these chromosomes direct the development of reproductive organs, affect gene transcription of functions related other physiological systems and can alter expression of genes on some autosomes. Sex steroids are produced from the gonads. Testosterone is aromatized to 17β oestradiol in males and females but circulating levels of testosterone are greater in males than females, while circulating levels of 17β oestradiol are greater in reproductively competent females than males. These sex steroids can diffuse into the cell to bind to cellular receptors which migrate to the nucleus to affect gene transcription, as well, as bind to surface receptors that affect ion channel function and initiate a cascade of signalling pathways that direct cell function or indirectly affect gene transcription. ARom: aromatase; E2: 17β oestradiol; eNOS: endothelium-derived nitric oxide; ERα: Oestrogen receptor alpha; ERα/β: either oestrogen receptor alpha or beta; GPR30: G-coupled protein receptor 30; IGF1: insulin-like growth factor 1; mRNA: messenger ribonucleic acid; NO: nitric oxide.

2.1.3 Diagnostic and treatment disparities and outcomes

Despite advances in cardiovascular care, there exists a significant sex disparity in management and outcomes of AMI.59,60 These sex disparities reflect the differences in age, comorbidities, and presentation that lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment. However, even after adjusting for demographics and cardiovascular risk profile women were noted to have an excess mortality suggesting that underlying basic physiological parameters that differ between female and males are not considered in diagnostic and treatment guidelines.15,61 Several studies including the SWEDHEART (Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry, CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) quality improvement registry and AHA-Get with the Guidelines registry noted that women presenting with AMI were less likely to receive reperfusion and revascularization, a trend that was re-demonstrated by Wilkinson et al.15,16,35,62 in their study of AMI in England and Wales. Wilkinson et al.35 noted that provision of coronary angiography within 72 h for NSTEMI showed the highest sex discrepancy compared to other quality measures in AMI. AHA Get with the Guidelines registry noted a lower achievement of the guideline recommended 90-min door to balloon/door to PCI time among women <65 years of age compared to men of the same age group.62 Evidence from the ARIC63 community surveillance study, SWEADHEART registry, and CRUSADE registry demonstrated that women were less likely to be prescribed guideline indicated pharmacological therapies including aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy, lipid-lowering medications, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB).15,16,35,62 Risk stratification is used to determine the need and timing for coronary angiography in NSTEMI. There is a risk of physicians underestimating the cardiovascular risk in women.64 Women have unique risk factors for CVD such as poly-cystic ovarian disease, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy loss, and early menopause.31,65 Women should be considered as likely as men to have AMI and should receive the same standard of care as an age-adjusted male would in this setting. In a study using data from the Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (MINAP), implementing the provision of guideline-indicated care was noted to reduce excess mortality and potentially avoidable deaths.66

It is conceivable that the lower adherence to guideline therapy could partly be attributed to a higher incidence of MINOCA in women.67,68 Patients with MINOCA have fewer conventional risk factors when compared with AMI patients and typically do not have plaque erosion or coronary thrombosis.69–71 Despite recent data suggesting beneficial effects of statins and ACEI/ARB on long-term outcomes, these medications are typically under prescribed for women with MINOCA.72

2.1.4 Conclusion

The number of studies reporting sex-differences in risk factors and outcomes from AMI has grown in recent years. However, women’s cardiovascular health and outcomes has yet to be optimized. In light of the results of the various studies, it is likely that sex differences in AMI mortality are potentially modifiable through improved concordance with guideline-indicated care. In addition, improved outcomes for women with AMI will result from better understanding of physiological factors influencing development and risk for disease, as well as elimination of bias in guidelines based on male models of disease. Inclusion of pregnancy-associated complications including preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and gestational diabetes as risk enhancers in the assessment of atherosclerotic CVD should be standard practice. Risk stratification scores used in the emergency department and in-hospital to assess the need for angiography in patients presenting with NSTEMI should include female-specific risk factors. The first step in minimizing negative effects of bias is increasing awareness of implicit stereotypes and being motivated to counteract them to ensure that bias does not influence behaviour.73,74 Therefore, efforts to ensure equity of care for women should be focused on improving the evidence base by including more women participants in future clinical trials and providing effective sex-specific guideline recommendations for management of AMI in women with a discrete focus on sex-specific risk factors and presentation.37,73

2.2 Cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) occurs in about 5–10% of patients presenting with AMI and is more common in patients with STEMI than NSTEMI.75,76 From nearly 100% in-hospital mortality, the use of emergent revascularization has decreased the overall in-hospital mortality to 30–40% in the contemporary era.77,78 Among patients presenting with AMI, CS has been reported to occur more frequently in women when compared to men.79–83

In a series of studies that spanned data collected from 1995 to 2010, women presenting with STEMI had higher rates of acute heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, and CS even after adjusting for age, type of MI and baseline characteristics.79,82,84–87 In addition to the presence of obstructive CAD, female susceptibility to endothelial dysfunction, and microvascular disease could inherently, from a biological standpoint, increase the risk of females developing more frequent complications from AMI, including a higher incidence of CS.88 Women with AMI often have atypical presentation and a delay in seeking medical care for their symptoms resulting in an increase in total ischaemic time with an associated risk for the development of prehospital CS.15,26,61 Furthermore, women with AMI were less likely to receive reperfusion and revascularization and less frequently received guideline recommended pharmacological therapies at discharge.35,37,62

2.2.1 Patient characteristics

Both randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-world data from registries and hospitals have consistently demonstrated women with CS tend to be older, with a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and other comorbidities.4,79,89–97 While there are limited data on the effects of reproductive age on CS, the loss of oestrogen is likely to increase inflammatory processes associated with development of microvascular damage and inflammation as time progresses past menopause.98

2.2.2 In-hospital management and outcomes

In both female and male patients presenting with AMI-CS, the majority of infarcts involved the anterior ventricular wall. Coronary angiography, PCI, and surgical revascularization rates were similar in both men and women.89 Haemodynamics did not differ by sex except for cardiac index measured on ionotropic support which was significantly lower in women.89 In a study assessing sex differences in 173, 473 admissions of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in AMI-CS using the NIS database, after adjusting for baseline and hospital characteristics, there was no sex disparity in the use of MCS or the timing of MCS placement.99

The lack of sex differences in treatment and in the 1, 6-months and 1-year outcomes are consistent in several contemporary studies.87,89,90,94,95 There are only few contemporary observational studies that demonstrated female sex as an independent predictor of mortality. In a Dutch multicentre registry of 227 CS patients, Velders et al.100 reported female sex as an independent effect modifier causing higher 1-year mortality after STEMI-CS. Studies analysing sex disparities in AMI-CS using the NIS database noted that women had a higher in-hospital mortality compared to men on multivariate analysis which extended to all racial and ethnic groups.4,96,97,99 Despite compelling differences in the management and outcomes of AMI, in the setting of AMI-CS there seems to be an absence of sex disparities in treatment and outcome.15,37,89,90,99 It is likely that the acuity in patients with CS influences decisions regarding management and long-term therapy.

2.2.3 Conclusion

Among patients with AMI, CS occurs more frequently in women when compared to men. This difference might reflect a higher cardiovascular risk profile and a prehospital delay for women than men.90,95 Several studies have demonstrated a longer pre-hospital delay in female patients with AMI with and without CS.90,94,100 Prompt revascularization has shown to improve survival and incidence of CS in patients with AMI.101

2.3 Cardiac arrest (CA)

Out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) is a major public health concern and there are approximately 420 000 cases in the United States and 275 000 cases in Europe annually.102–104 Prior studies suggest that sex differences exist among CA victims with regards to witnessed arrests, resuscitation efforts, shockable rhythms, PCIs, survival and neurological outcomes.105–107 Despite the Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference Cardiovascular Resuscitation Working Group identifying sex- and gender-specific OHCA research as one of the research priorities in emergency medicine, there are limited studies.108 Patients with OHCA depend on lay rescuers to recognize the patients arrest, call for help, and initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation.109,110

2.3.1 Sex disparities in recipients of bystander CPR in OHCA

Recognition of CA and initiation of CPR are the most important links in the chain of survival for CA resuscitation.110,111 For every minute delay in CPR in a person with OHCA, the chance of survival decreases by 7–10%.112 Bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) use has a synergistic positive effect on outcome and when used together can more than double the rate of survival from OHCA.113 Despite the robust evidence in favour of bystander CPR and the systematic efforts at promoting this by professional organizations, the number of OHCA patients who receive bystander CPR remains low at 10–65%.114–116 Several studies have noted a disparity in bystander CPR between males and females.117–119 Males were more likely to receive bystander CPR than females.117–120 This disparity was particularly significant in CA occurring in the public environment, but it was not found in the home environment.117 Understanding barriers and facilitators to provision of bystander CPR globally can help to further contextualize the differences that prevail when discussing why women receive less CPR.121 Modesty and social norms regarding exposing/touching a woman’s chest, bias created by educational programs, and under recognition of cardiac disease in women all contribute to lower bystander CPR in women.122–126 In the home environment, responders may have increase motivation and less fear of legal implications of their actions.117 In a national survey on public perceptions on why women receive lower bystander CPR,121 three major themes emerged: (i) sexualization of women’s bodies and fear of accusations regarding sexual harassment, (ii) women being weak and frail and, therefore, prone to injury, and (iii) misperceptions about women in acute medical distress.121 Several male respondents in the study expressed that their actions would be misconstrued as inappropriate or that it might have legal ramifications regarding accusations of sexual assault.121 An elimination of bias in training by increasing the use of realistic female patient simulators in CPR training may alleviate some of this reluctance and help overcome the social stigma associated regarding the physical attributes of patient sex and thus improve bystander CPR.122 In a study in Austria, it was found that women were less willing to provide by stander CPR or apply an AED to a person who had collapsed from CA.127 Increase in encouragement, empowerment, and education of women to provide bystander CPR might help to mitigate this disparity.121

2.3.2 Baseline characteristics and prehospital care

Female patients with OHCA tend to be older with more comorbidities, have a higher probability of being in non-public locations, less often have witnessed arrests, more often have a non-shockable rhythm, and a lower probability of receiving resuscitation efforts during prehospital care than men.119,128,129 The interval between collapse and arrival of the ambulance was similar in men and women.130 The prevalence of non-atherosclerotic ischaemic as the cause of CA (28.3% vs. 24.3%) could be one of the reasons why women present more often with non-shockable rhythms.128,131–133

A higher early mortality in men is accentuated by a higher predilection for smoking and hyperlipidaemia leading to a higher risk for CAD and poorer outcomes after CA.118,134 Effects of testosterone on the cardiovascular system are controversial. Much of the literature suggests that low testosterone levels are associated with increased CVD.135,136 Deleterious effects of testosterone have been reported on vasoconstriction, on accelerating inflammation and the death cascade.134,137–140 These contradictory effects suggests that testosterone may simultaneously benefit and harm the cardiovascular system by different pathways.138 Although testosterone may also bind to surface and nuclear receptors, the aromatization of testosterone to oestrogen may counter balance the direct effects of testosterone on nuclear and membrane receptor binding. Additional studies are required to better understand the complex effects of testosterone on the cardiovascular system.

2.3.3 Childbearing age and effect of oestrogen

Women have increased chest wall compliance compared to men making chest compressions and resuscitation efforts easier and more effective.118 Data from registry and prospective studies suggest that females of childbearing age are more likely to survive a CA event, despite being more likely to have arrest characteristics that are associated with poor outcomes (unwitnessed arrest, private location, non-shockable rhythm).141–143 Preclinical studies showed that neurons and cardiac cells derived from female and male animals react differently to ischaemia and hypoxia.144,145 This difference may reflect anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of oestrogen that contribute to reduced ischaemia–reperfusion-induced myocardial injuries in mice, cats and guinea pigs.146–148 Furthermore, oestrogen also stabilizes the mitochondrial membrane, preventing influx of calcium and potassium into the cell that alleviates the death cascade initiated by CA.149 In preclinical studies, oestrogen treatments reduced global ischaemia-induced neuronal death and cognitive deficits following cardiac arrest.129,150,151

2.3.4 In-hospital management

2.3.4.1 Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

Immediate coronary angiography and PCI improve outcomes in CA with STEMI.152,153 Thus, current guidelines from both the American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology recommend emergent coronary angiography for patients with OHCA with ST-segment elevation or suspected AMI, as well, as for patients with haemodynamic or electric instability including shock and recurrent ventricular arrhythmias.154,155 In spite of these recommendations, several studies continue to report and confirm that women undergo fewer coronary angiography procedures and PCI in post-resuscitation care (28% vs. 50% P < 0.001), PCI (17% vs. 30% P < 0.001) as well as coronary artery bypass grafting (0.4% vs. 30% P < 0.001).128,152,156,157 However, revascularization in women is associated with ∼2-fold higher bleeding risk, which might influence the decision towards a lower use of angiography and PCI when the aetiology of CA is not known.128

2.3.4.2 Targeted temperature management

There is a wide variability in use of TTM though the rates of implementation of TTM have been steadily increasing.128,158–160 Two RCTs demonstrated clinical benefit of TTM in patients with CA with shockable rhythms.161–163 The 2015 Guidelines for Advanced Cardiac Life Support recommends TTM for all unresponsive adult post-cardiac arrest patients.164 The ACC/AHA guidelines give a Class I recommendation for TTM in successfully resuscitated patients with VT/VF and a Class II b for other types of rhythms.165 There is a paucity of literature that specifically addresses the question of sex disparities in application of TTM.108 In a national database study in the USA, TTM was used less often in females in both VF/VT and non-shockable rhythms, but not in pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole arrests.128 A study from Columbia University Medical Center between September 2015 and July 2017 noted that only 37.5% of patients considered for TTM were female.166 Winther-Jensen et al.156 demonstrated that TTM was less frequently used in women (47% vs. 61% P < 0.01). It is concerning to see sex-discrepancies in the use of TTM. There needs to be increased awareness and earnest efforts by the medical community to close this sex-based gap in order to improve survival and neurological recovery in women post-CA.

2.3.5 Outcomes

2.3.5.1 Mortality

The association of sex with mortality from OHCA is controversial. Some studies report improved survival in females,106,141,143,167 while others noted a lower survival in males.118,120 A Korean study of 20 675 OHCA patients reported no sex-disparity in survival.157 A Danish registry study and a registry from Japan noted that females had a lower unadjusted odds of survival, however, on multivariate analysis after adjusting for baseline characteristics and treatment, females were associated with increased odds of survival.106,143 The greater survival on multivariate analysis is best explained by a difference in baseline characteristics as noted in the studies. Specifically, women were older, received less frequent bystander CPR and less often had an OHCA outside the home, had lower rates of coronary angiography, PCI and TTM, therefore, mitigating the signal of higher mortality in women.167 Reports of sex-disparities in survival-to-hospital-admission in patients with OHCA have also been conflicting with demonstration of higher survival rates in women in a Swedish study and no sex-specific variation in survival in a Canadian study.118,168 It is conceivable that the conflicting results on survival could be due to differences in demographics, risk factors, prehospital care, and healthcare systems in various countries.

Efforts to lower the incidence and mortality of CA in women needs to begin right from the level of primary preventive care that should focus at aggressively managing and reducing cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. Early diagnosis and timely revascularization with adherence to guideline-recommended medications for secondary prevention might help lower the incidence of CA in women. Women presenting with OHCA are older and have factors that have been associated with worse outcomes after CA such as lower rate of BCPR and lower use of AED, angiography and TTM. Increasing awareness of CVD in women, prehospital care and a strict adherence to guideline-recommended in-hospital management could mitigate the sex disparities in mortality and improve survival in women with CA.

2.3.5.2 Neurological outcomes

Clinical and demographic factors underlying the sex disparities are likely to be complex and the pre-hospital and clinical factors predisposing to sex disparities in neurological outcomes are unknown.128 The influence of sex of the patient on response to TTM and neurological outcome has not been consistent in different clinical studies.169 The mechanisms behind this can only be speculated on with likely reasons being males and females having differential level of neuronal injury following CPR, effect of sex hormones on ischaemic–reperfusion injury and the different ages of male and female patients included in the studies.170,171 Kim et al.,128 in a study from Korea, reported overall higher mortality in females and lower odds of having good neurological outcome. The lower mortality in men noted in that study is contradictory to most of the other studies which noted female sex to be associated with better survival. Studies have shown racial, ethnic, and regional disparities in OHCA.172–174 It is conceivable that the conflicting results noted by Kim et al. could be due to racial and regional disparities, or to differences in the underlying risk of OHCA, local approach to organized emergency response, and post-resuscitation care. In a meta-analysis, Zhang et al.169 demonstrated that male sex was associated with a higher rate of good neurological outcome, but it was not associated with a higher rate of survivors. A multicentre registry study demonstrated that sex did not influence the neurological outcomes of TTM-treated OHCA patients.175

2.3.6 Conclusion

There is an urgent need to identify causes and barriers to eliminate the sex disparities in post-CA care. The lay public associates CA with male sex, thereby risking a delay (or total absence) of CA recognition in females in situations of a collapse. Such lack of knowledge should be addressed in CPR training. Public health measures aimed at increasing bystander CPR for women and early referral of eligible women for internal defibrillator placement should be undertaken.117,118 The absence of realistic female patient simulators may bias training for and research into patient care and increased use of female simulators should be implemented.122 Aggressive post-resuscitation care, including emergent coronary angiography, and TTM should be emphasized upon irrespective of sex and is likely to result in favourable outcomes.

2.4 Acute decompensated heart failure

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is the most common presentation of heart failure (HF) and bodes a poor prognosis. Registries and national statistics show that slightly more than 50% of hospitalized HF patients are women. Of the 2 two broad phenotypes, women account for approximately 40% of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and 60% of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.176,177 Even with improving trends there still is a low rate of sex-specific reporting in pre-clinical and clinical cardiovascular studies.10,178 There continues to be substantial under-representation of women in most major HF RCTs likely causing reporting of underpowered sex–drug interaction.179,180 This under-representation combined with the absence of sex-specific reporting has significant ramifications on the development, implementation, and outcomes of definitive HF therapies for women.179

2.4.1 Risk factors

The patient’s biological sex is associated with significant differences in phenotype, aetiology, age of initial diagnosis, clinical presentations, management, and prognosis.177,179,181 Compared with men, women hospitalized with acute HFpEF are older, are more likely to be obese, and to have hypertension disease, depression, and chronic kidney. Furthermore, women are less likely to have CAD (which is more frequently associated with HFrEF),177,179,182 atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or smoking; and to have a similar prevalence of diabetes mellitus.1,183,184 Diabetes is a strong mortality predictor in HF and confers worse outcomes in women compared to men.185,186 Even though men and women being hospitalized for ADHF differ substantially in their baseline characteristics, they share similar in-hospital mortality177,182,187 and length of stay, as well as comparable short-term outcomes post-discharge irrespective of the type of LV dysfunction.188,189

2.4.2 Anatomical and pathophysiological differences

Women have smaller ventricular chambers, higher LV elastance, and higher ejection fraction compared to age-matched men.190,191 Ageing women have relatively attenuated decline in cardiomyocyte number and mass, as well as a lower tendency towards cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and eccentric LV remodelling compared to men.191,192 Women are at a higher risk of developing HFpEF as cardiac ageing predisposes women more than men to develop LV concentric remodelling, LVDD and stiffening.191–193 Women show a greater decline in arterial ventricular coupling ratio reserve with age194 due to worsening arterial stiffness195 and a higher LV diastolic elastance at any given age compared to men. Interestingly, in addition to fundamental structural differences in the normal heart, women with HFpEF show a greater degree of LV dysfunction not only at rest but also with exercise as evidenced by a lower e′ (early diastolic mitral annulus velocity), higher E/e′ ratio (E, trans-mitral early peak velocity) which is a surrogate for diastolic filling pressures, and a higher Ed (end-diastolic elastance) during exercise on echocardiography.196 Additionally, lower systemic and vascular compliance and impaired oxygen utilization attributes to worse exercise intolerance in women with HFpEF as compared to men.196

On a cellular level, sex differences exist due to the combined genetic effects of the sex chromosomes and in steroid hormones. Oestrogen, through production of endothelium-derived nitric oxide promotes vasodilatation, the hormone also increases expression of heat shock proteins, acts as an antioxidant, and alters inflammation through cytokines associated with immune function.191,192,197,198 Depletion of oestrogen, especially after menopause, contributes to the development of HFpEF in women through changes in mitochondrial function, which leads to increase in oxidative species and myocardial inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, and decreased calcium reuptake, which leads to prolonged relaxation of cardiomyocytes characterizing ventricular dysfunction.199 Another mechanism predisposing women to HFpEF postulates the role of activated renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system as the decline in oestrogen with menopause would increase reactive oxygen and collagen synthesis leading to ventricular stiffening and diastolic dysfunction.197 Preclinical studies indicate that oestrogen regulates mitochondrial function and biogenesis by activating molecules such as mitochondrial transcription factor to activate gene expression.199 LVDD appears to be closely dependent of mitochondrial energy production as it is observed that in ovariectomized mice, oestrogen replacement decreases E/A ratio (signifying restrictive LV diastolic filling pattern) and prolonged isovolumic relaxation time both of which are significantly correlated with mitochondrial ATP levels.199 Sexually dimorphic gene expression has recently been identified in human hearts showing differential expression of mRNA for cytokines which promote proinflammatory signalling, myocardial hypertrophy, and mitochondrial dysfunction.200

Additionally, many genes encode inflammatory responses in cardiac tissue leading to enhanced inflammatory pathways are up-regulated in the female myocardium.191 Furthermore, telomere shortening is not age-dependent phenomenon in healthy humans but it occurs regardless of chronological age in patients with HF, suggesting that cardiomyocyte cellular ageing is exacerbated in HF. Telomere length in the presence of the disease is better preserved in females than males, an effect that suggests that the telomere length required for the onset of HF may occur later in life in women than in men.201

2.4.3 Biomarkers

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) is used clinically as a diagnostic and prognostic maker of the severity of HF. Prognostic value NT-proBNP by determining in-hospital mortality and HF readmission in all HF phenotypes is well known,202,203 but sex differences in its prognostic value is still in question. Baseline levels of NT-proBNP levels are higher in women than men indicating a need for age and sex-specific levels in clinical guidelines.204,205 Though some studies show that, NT-pro BNP levels were a more valuable marker of predicting long-term mortality and HF readmission in men,203 other studies indicated that higher BNP levels were a more powerful predictor of death in women.206 Nonetheless, there is no significant sex difference in the ability of BNP in predicting in hospital mortality.207 Because of these differences, interpretation of NT-proBNP levels should be combined with other biomarkers, i.e. highly sensitive cardiac troponin-T, to provide a better estimation of prognosis than either biomarker alone.208

2.4.4 Women and heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction

Women account for more than two-thirds of patient with HFpEF. The reason because of which women are overrepresented in this phenotype of HF is complex and multifold. First, as mentioned in Section 2.4.2, there are fundamental anatomical and pathophysiological differences between the two sexes which disproportionately predisposes women to develop HFpEF. After menopause higher free/total testosterone levels and higher testosterone/oestradiol ratio secondary to lower levels sex hormone binding globulin is associated with elevated LV mass in both men and women.209 Nonetheless, not only does this androgenic pattern cause a higher mass to volume ratio (concentric hypertrophy) but also it increases HF events in postmenopausal women.209,210 Since hypertension is more common in women with HFpEF and the fact that women respond differently to pressure overload with a more prominent remodelling of concentric nature than eccentric,191 cardiac ageing predisposes women more than men to develop LVDD and stiffening which are hallmarks HFpEF.191,193,199 Along with the differences in LV, women also have lower right ventricular mass, smaller volumes and overall better right ventricular systolic function compared to men.211 Oestrogen promotes pulmonary vascular remodelling and vasoconstriction which is one of the mechanisms for the development of pulmonary hypertension which a key pathophysiologic feature of HFpEF.191,211 Paradoxically, even though there is markedly higher prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in women, in both preclinical and clinical studies oestrogen treatments reduced right ventricular failure in women with pulmonary hypertension.211

Second, myocardial metabolic response to obesity is modulated by sex. Female sex independently predicts greater fatty acid metabolism and relates to inefficiency in fatty acid metabolism.212 Patients with ‘obese HFpEF’ exhibit increased plasma volume, more concentric LV hypertrophy, and greater right ventricular dilatation. Furthermore, higher global prevalence of obesity in women, obesity and metabolic syndrome contribute to development of HFpEF in women compared to men.213

Third, the higher prevalence of autoimmune disorders and an overall stronger immune response compared to inflammation in women may contribute to the progression of HFpEF.191 Unlike men who have a higher incidence of obstructive CAD, women generally tend to have microvascular and endothelial dysfunction and non-obstructive CAD causing microvascular dysfunction leading to myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis.214 It is also thought that various comorbidities common to HFpEF (e.g. obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease) which are predominantly seen in women, lead to systemic inflammation and coronary endothelial inflammation and coronary microvascular dysfunction which eventually leads to LV diastolic stiffening and HFpEF.214,215 Fifth, anaemia (with a lower blood haemoglobin cut off for females) is a strong prognostic factor in patients with heart failure. It is strongly predictive of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death in women with HFpEF admitted for ADHF.216 Finally, other special risk factors unique to women like pregnancy and preeclampsia may predispose to LV remodelling and LVDD and thus a 4-fold increase in future HF and hospitalizations.217

There is an important overlap between atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Though atrial fibrillation can be seen in patients with HFrEF, it is seen predominantly in patients with HFpEF218 often leading to adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF.219 Atrial fibrillation is not only associated with a greater risk of hospitalization in women compared with men with HFpEF219,220 but it is also associated with worse RV dysfunction in patients with HfpEF,221 which may be contributing to the overall poor prognosis especially in women hospitalized for ADHF and atrial fibrillation.183

Compared to women, men have a higher lifetime risk of overall HF and HFrEF with a similar lifetime risk of HFpEF.222 Though IHD is the most common cause of HFrEF in men, non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, hypertension, and diabetes are major underlying comorbidities predisposing women to HFrEF. Advanced New York Heart Association symptoms and ischaemic aetiology confers worse outcome in women with ADHF due to HfrEF.223 Other forms of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy presenting as HFrEF are stress cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo cardiomyopathy) and peripartum cardiomyopathy.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a possibly fatal form of cardiomyopathy unique to females characterized by impaired systolic function and presents as ADHF in the last month of pregnancy or within 5 months postpartum with no pre-existing cardiac disease or identifiable cause.178 Aetiology remains unknown, but potential causes include myocarditis, abnormal immune response to pregnancy, increased myocyte apoptosis, genetic predisposition, and proteolytic cleavage of prolactin during oxidative stress. Risk factors include advanced maternal age, pre-eclampsia, and multiple gestations.178,224 It is estimated that approximately half of peripartum cardiomyopathy patients recover normal systolic function within 6 months and another 20% deteriorate/die/require heart transplant.178 There are limited data on the risk with subsequent pregnancies.

2.4.5 Management

Large RCTs have shown that ACEIs reduce mortality and morbidity in HF patients regardless of degree of symptoms.179 Based on post hoc analyses of retrospective studies, β-blockers, aldosterone antagonists, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and ivabradine, a cardiotonic agent from a class of drugs that inhibits hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels, seem beneficial in women with HFrEF.225 The combination of hydralazine and isosorbide was studied in black women with HFrEF and found to reduce mortality, reduce hospitalizations, and improve quality of life.225 Valsartan/sacubitril is a composite drug consisting of an ARB and a neprilysin inhibitor and recommended in replacement of ACEI or an ARB in HFrEF patients who remain symptomatic despite standard drug therapy. In spite of the lack of a sex-specific analysis, the post hoc analysis of the PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of sacubitril-valsartan with ARB Global Outcomes in HFpEF) trial showed that patients with HFpEF who were recently hospitalized, particularly those with multiple recent hospitalizations, faced 2- to 3-fold higher risks of rehospitalization and cardiovascular death. Early initiation (<30 days post-discharge) of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFpEF recently hospitalized for ADHF were shown to have a 25–30% risk reduction for cardiovascular events like rehospitalization and cardiovascular death.226 Clinical guidelines give recommendations on the management of HF based on major RCTs. Given the myriad of differences, women have an increased risk of developing adverse drug reactions and these adverse events are generally more serious in women than in men179,227,228 due in part to different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties between men and women, leading to up to 2.5-fold higher drug plasma levels of with same dose of the drug compared to men.227 Women have a lower bodyweight, higher proportion of body fat, and lower plasma volume. These factors can contribute to a longer duration of action of lipophilic drugs and higher peak plasma concentrations of hydrophilic drugs in women.227 Thus, in the era of ‘individualized medicine’, this kind of ‘sex-uniform’ guidelines needs to be addressed. On the other hand, it is also seen that women with HFrEF are less often treated with guideline-directed medical therapy, are less often admitted to cardiology wards, have a lower frequency of assessment of LV function,181,229 and also continue to receive suboptimal treatment for, compared with men, with no obvious explanation for these disparities.230

Lastly, the use of guideline-directed cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator231 use was associated with substantially increased survival in eligible men and women with HFrEF.232 Although there has been a sustained rise in the percentage of women getting ICD placements, there still exist is a significant disparity in the utilization of CRT and ICD between men and women with up to 2.5-fold higher utilization of device therapy by men in some studies.233–236 This disparity remained even after adjusting for socioeconomic status as well as level of education.236

Female patients are underrepresented in the population of MCS patients and, when they are supported, left ventricle assist device (LVAD) implantation is more often under emergency circumstances.237 Women tend to receive less ventricular assistive device support despite a more critical HF state at admission.237,238 Both sexes differed for implanted device types with implantation of smaller device pumps in women while the overall survival in women was significantly worse.238 Consistent with the earlier theme enrollment of women in trials with implantable pulsatile-flow devices has often been low because of the large volume-displacement chambers with inadequate space for the pump housing in small women.237 Women are seen to have a higher incidence of major bleeding, arrhythmias, and a worse early and long-term survival.238 Even though the incidence of LVAD complications are similar between the two sexes,239 LVAD implantation as a bridge to transplantation is associated with longer duration of inotropic support and higher requirement for postoperative mechanical right ventricular support in women.240 Nonetheless, women have similar postoperative and midterm survival, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and postoperative complications.239,240

2.5 Spontaneous coronary artery dissection

SCAD is defined as an epicardial coronary artery dissection that is not associated with atherosclerosis or trauma and not iatrogenic.241 True prevalence of SCAD is unknown mostly because it is vastly under-recognized and misdiagnosed.241 A low suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in young women even in the presence of classic presenting symptoms,238 limitations of current coronary angiographic techniques, and lack of clinician familiarity with the condition and its different variants are all potential reasons for under diagnosis of SCAD in the contemporary era.241,242 With the use of intracoronary imaging techniques, SCAD is now estimated to be the cause of approximately 1%–4% of ACS cases overall.243 It is vastly more prevalent in women than men with >90% cases reported in women and predominantly affects young women. Data on men with SCAD are scarce, though one study reports that men may present at a slightly younger age than women (mean age, 48.6 ± 9.8 vs. 52.3 ± 9.2 years; P = 0.05).241,244 It accounts for the cause of ACS in up to 43% and 35% of pregnant women and women ≤50 years old, respectively.241

2.5.1 Risk factors and pathophysiology

The natural history of disease progression in SCAD is multifaceted and is affected by hormonal influences, arteriopathies, genetic factors, and systemic inflammatory diseases; precipitated by environmental factors and stressors. Peri-partum SCAD or ‘pregnancy-associated SCAD’ is the most common cause of pregnancy-associated AMI.241 It commonly occurs in the third trimester or early postpartum period, with the highest prevalence in the first postpartum month and, in particular, in the first postpartum week.241,245 The cause of pregnancy-associated SCAD is not fully understood. It is thought that hormones and unique pregnancy-related complications like gestational hypertension and preeclampsia contribute. In addition, there is a higher use of fertility treatments and hormone replacement therapy in patients with SCAD than in general population.243,245 One hypothesis is that oestrogen and progesterone receptors in the coronary arteries mediate structural changes in the arterial wall, culminating in rupture, IMH, and onset of clinical symptoms,241 which may explain why SCAD is more frequent in multiparous women.245 Women with pregnancy-associated SCAD seem to have a poorer prognosis than women with non-pregnancy-associated SCAD. Patients with pregnancy-associated SCAD have a more severe clinical presentation than those patients with non-pregnancy-associated SCAD, often with multivessel dissections and acute heart failure.245 Arteriopathies such as fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) which have a higher prevalence in women, are commonly associated with SCAD.241,242 Structurally, women have a smaller vessel diameter, more coronary tortuosity compared to men that can lead to a higher dissection rate.243,246

In addition to the underlying diseases, SCAD is also precipitated by emotional and physical stressors.241,243,244 SCAD is poorly studied in men as its prevalence is extremely low. Vigorous physical exercises such as weightlifting and body building, have been described as the most common SCAD precipitants in men.241,242 In a prospective SCAD study, FMD was only present 48% of the time in men, yet was identified in 73% of the women in that cohort,244 further suggesting sex differences in the pathophysiology of SCAD.

2.5.2 Clinical presentation

The clinical presentation of SCAD can range from classic angina to CS or sudden death. All patients present with elevated troponins and chest discomfort.241,242 Middle and distal portions of the left anterior descending artery are the most commonly affected but other arteries can also be affected.241 Unfortunately, even with the advancement in imaging and diagnostics studies, as well as increased awareness, sex-related bias leads to a low level of suspicion among healthcare providers. This disparity is driven by the fact that women present more often with symptoms like shortness of breath, fatigue, back pain and headaches, and have non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In a landmark study, researchers found that women under the age of 55 who experienced ACS type symptoms were seven times more likely to be misdiagnosed and discharged from the emergency department compared to their male counterparts presenting with identical symptoms with a non-diagnostic EKG being one main of the criteria for discharging.247 Since only 13–69% patients with SCAD present with EKG changes241 and one of the most common presentations includes angina there is a concern for underdiagnosing SCAD in women. Angiographically, type 1 SCAD variant is defined by a double lumen appearance and type 2 is characterized by diffuse stenosis of varying severity with changes in the arterial caliber.248 Men are more likely to have Type 1 than Type 2 SCAD despite the higher prevalence of Type 2 dissection in the overall SCAD population.243 Intracoronary imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography249 are also recommended to increase the diagnostic yield since angiography may miss the diagnosis of SCAD, especially type 2. Other imaging techniques like cardiac MRI and coronary CT angiography can also be useful to differentiate between ischaemic diseases like dissection from non-ischaemic diseases.242

Coexistence of SCAD and TTC has been reported in five case reports and one retrospective case series until today, including a totality of 14 patients.250 Nonetheless, to avoid underdiagnosing SCAD, all patients diagnosed with TTC should be evaluated for SCAD and their angiograms reviewed thoroughly, preferably by an experienced interventionalist.

2.5.3 Management

Although American and European guidelines for the management of ACS advocate an early invasive strategy with revascularization of culprit lesions instead of conservative therapy alone,241 conservative management is the mainstay for management. In the setting of underlying weak architecture of the coronary arteries in SCAD due to underlying arteriopathies as well as smaller coronary vessel diameter, greater tortuosity compared to men, studies have uniformly demonstrated that PCI increases risk of complications and renders poor outcomes by causing iatrogenic dissection and extension of dissections.241,246,251 Hence, revascularization is reserved in patients who are haemodynamically unstable or having ongoing ischaemia or clinically stable patient with left main or severe proximal two-vessel dissection.241 Effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has only been studied in patients with SCAD of left main artery or proximal dissections, technical failure of attempted PCI or after complications occurring after attempted PCI.241 On the other hand, conservative approach with medications like ACE inhibitors/ARBs and beta blockers as well as controversial therapies like anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs and statins in SCAD alleviate symptoms, improve short- and long-term outcomes, and prevent recurrent SCAD.241

Management of SCAD during pregnancy requires multidisciplinary approach by including the cardiology and obstetric service to encompass maternal care as well as foetal wellbeing. Maintaining a strong suspicion to avoid missing a diagnosis and early diagnostic angiography to avoid iatrogenic dissection,252 keeping into account foetal radiation exposure and finally aiming for conservative management if there is no evidence of ongoing ischaemia or infarction, haemodynamic instability, or particularly high-risk anatomy253 are key components of pregnancy-associated SCAD management.

2.6 Takotsubo cardiomyopathy

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy254 also known as stress cardiomyopathy, apical ballooning syndrome or broken heart syndrome, was first described in Japan in 1990 is characterized by transient systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction accompanied with different wall motion abnormalities. There is a 9:1 female to male ratio in some studies,255,256 but, in Japan, TTC is more prevalent among men.255 TTC may be more heterogeneous than previously thought7,212,224,255–257 as studies have shown higher incidence in men and younger population.258 One study found that the mean age of diagnosis of TTC in males is lower in females (61.6 vs. 66.5 years; P < 0.001) and male predominance is typically seen in the younger population <35 years of age at the time of diagnosis (21.2% of males vs. 9.5% of females).256 Though, approximately two-thirds of patients have identifiable triggering events like an emotional or a physical stressor,255,257,258 its absence does not preclude its diagnosis.255 Microvascular vasoconstriction of the coronary artery secondary to catecholamine excess may contribute to the development of TTC.257,259 Autonomic dysfunction due to increased reactivity of sympathetic nervous system seen in subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroidism could explain the increased incidence of TTC in this subgroup.260

Interestingly, while emotional triggers are more prevalent in women, men usually present with physical stressors like medical conditions or procedures261 which cause a higher heart rate, thus a greater sustained catecholamine surge causing cardiac dysfunction by increasing the risk of developing CS via pump failure due to large ballooning area and/or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction due to hyper contractility of the basal segment.257,262 While, in women, low oestrogen may contribute to the excessive sympatho-adrenal and renin–angiotensin system activation and oxidative stress.263,264 However, post-menopausal hormone therapy does not decrease the risk for developing TTC in females >50 years old,265 eliciting the fact that the pathophysiology of TTC is much more complex and still poorly understood.

TTC and ACS have a similar presentation in clinical symptoms, ECG, and cardiac biomarker changes.255 Even though coronary angiography with left ventriculography is considered gold standard, contrary to previous notion, it is essential to rule out only obstructive CAD, to diagnose TTC.259 Concomitant CAD is reported with a prevalence ranging from 10 to 29%255 and is reported CAD may itself trigger TTC.259

Male sex, Killip class 3–4 on admission, and diabetes mellitus were identified as independent predictors of long-term mortality in TTC patients.266 A retrospective observational study of 406 patients from data collected from the InterTAK (International Takotsubo) registry demonstrated that a delayed resolution of wall motion abnormality was associated with a higher mortality at 1-year.267 Males were found to have a longer recovery time for wall motion abnormality and presented with lower LVEF and higher troponin and inflammatory marker levels on admission and thus these results are clinically important because patients with these characteristics should be monitored closely after hospitalization, given the higher risk of potential clinical complications.265,267 Although less common TTC in men is associated with a marked increase in in-hospital morbidity and mortality and a higher probability of acute complications such as ICU admissions, CS, ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia, and acute kidney injury along with longer length of hospital stay of more than 5 days and hospital costs compared to females.256,268 This difference can be explained by the increased risk of death and overall short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with secondary TTC (presence of a physical trigger) compared with patients with primary TTC (emotional or no trigger).257,266 Thus, more careful monitoring and intensive therapies may be required for men with TTC than for women with the same condition during hospitalization.

3. Conclusions

In summary, there remain persistent sex disparities in the care and management of patients with acute cardiac conditions (Figure 2). In general, for all conditions, female patients typically receive less frequent guideline-directed care and have poor short- and long-term outcomes. Though significant success has been achieved in decreasing the in-hospital mortality in most acute cardiac emergencies, it is crucial to continue to address easily identifiable risk factors and to use the information regarding sex differences in physiology and pharmacology to guide treatment strategies (Figure 3 and Table 1). Furthermore, there are limited data on the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing gender reassignment, and the heterogeneous timing for initiation of treatments, and types of treatments affecting the sex hormonal milieu present a challenging but crucial next steps in this field. Studies in cardiovascular medicine, specifically acute cardiovascular care, will benefit from additional preclinical studies of acute cardiovascular conditions, enrolment of similar proportion of men and women in clinical trials, sex-specific reporting of trial outcomes, and consideration of sex-hormones as effect-modifiers in healthcare delivery.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gaps in care in acute cardiovascular conditions. ADHF: acute decompensated heart failure; AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CS: cardiogenic shock; GDMT: guideline-directed medical therapy; HF: heart failure; HFpEF: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LV: left ventricular; MCS: mechanical circulatory support; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RCT: randomized controlled trials; SCAD: spontaneous coronary artery dissection; TTM: targeted temperature management; TTS: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Influence of sex chromosomes in cardiovascular disease presentation, response to treatment and outcomes. The sex chromosomes direct development of some organs prior to the development of the reproductive organs and production of sex steroids hormones. The sex steroid hormones (oestrogen and testosterone) are present in both females and males, albeit in different proportions, and their concentrations changes with age from birth to puberty to reproductive senescence. The collective effect of the sex chromosome and hormones influence cellular regulatory pathways that influence organ structure and function, metabolism, and response to stress and reparative functions. Environmental, cultural, life style factors which contribute to the psychosocial construct of gender influence biology. Insufficient knowledge of sex differences in physiology and pathophysiology limit development of sex-specific care and treatment guidelines. Investigations into sex differences in physiological and pharmacological mechanisms, reporting clinical trial data by sex, identifying modifiable behaviours, and embedding concepts of sex differences into science and medical curricula will reduce sex disparities in treatment and outcomes.

Table 1.

Summary of sex-disparities in acute cardiovascular care

Condition Epidemiology and risk factors Management Outcomes Future directions
Acute myocardial infarction

Women tend to be older with a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and a lower prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia and smoking

More frequent non-ST-segment elevation and atypical presentation

Less likely to receive reperfusion, revascularization, lower achievement of 90-min door-to-balloon time Higher mortality Improve primary prevention, secondary prevention including GDMT and in-hospital management
Acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock

Women tend to be older with a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes

Higher rates of CS

Similar rates of angiography, PCI, CABG, MCS, and haemodynamics Similar 1, 6-month and 1-year outcomes Improve management of AMI to reduce incidence of CS. Continue sex equality management strategies
Cardiac arrest Women are older, higher comorbidities, more often have a non-shockable rhythm. Lower rates of bystander CPR Lower use of angiography, PCI, CABG, TTM Conflicting results on mortality and neurological outcomes Increase awareness, improve bystander CPR, increase female mannequins in CPR training, and reduce sex disparities in in-hospital management
Acute decompensated heart failure

Women tend to be older with comorbidities like hypertension, obesity, and kidney disease with higher prevalence of HFpEF

Diabetes tends poor prognosis in women

Women are less likely to receive goal directed medical therapy

Different pharmacokinetics/dynamics has led to higher risk of women developing adverse reaction to drugs

Similar in-hospital morality, length of stay, and short-term post-hospital outcomes Women are still largely under-represented in major RCTs impacts development, implementation and outcomes of HF therapies. Hence there is a need to address this ‘sex-uniform’ guidelines
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection Women tend to younger, have arthropathies (like FMD) and systemic inflammatory diseases. Pregnancy is a major risk factor Smaller coronary vessel diameter, greater tortuosity compared to men, leading to increased risk of complications with PCI and renders poor outcomes in women with SCAD Higher mortality in females Increase awareness of this disease and having a lower suspicion for SCAD especially in women
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy Women tend to have microvascular dysfunction and emotional stress, while men tend to be younger and have emotional stress More careful monitoring and intensive therapies may be required for men with TTC than for women during hospitalization Higher mortality in males Increase awareness of TTC in men and improving outcomes

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Funding

S.V. is supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) (UL1 TR000135) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH. V.M.M. is supported by grants from the NIH (U54 AG 44170) and the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

References

  • 1. Yiu KH, de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM, Marsan NA, Veltman CE, de Roos A, Pazhenkottil A, Kroft LJ, Boersma E, Herzog B, Leung M, Maffei E, Leung DY, Kaufmann PA, Cademartiri F, Bax JJ, Jukema JW.. Age- and gender-specific differences in the prognostic value of CT coronary angiography. Heart 2012;98:232–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, Grobbee R, Maniadakis N, Flather M, Wilkins E, Wright L, Vos R, Bax J, Blum M, Pinto F, Vardas P; ESC Scientific Document Group. European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. Eur Heart J 2018;39:508–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR, Delling FN, Djousse L, Elkind MSV, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Jordan LC, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Kwan TW, Lackland DT, Lewis TT, Lichtman JH, Longenecker CT, Loop MS, Lutsey PL, Martin SS, Matsushita K, Moran AE, Mussolino ME, O'Flaherty M, Pandey A, Perak AM, Rosamond WD, Roth GA, Sampson UKA, Satou GM, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Spartano NL, Stokes A, Tirschwell DL, Tsao CW, Turakhia MP, VanWagner LB, Wilkins JT, Wong SS, Virani SS; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019;139:e56–e528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vallabhajosyula S, Ya'Qoub L, Dunlay SM, Vallabhajosyula S, Vallabhajosyula S, Sundaragiri PR, Jaffe AS, Gersh BJ, Kashani K.. Sex disparities in acute kidney injury complicating acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail 2019;6:874–877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vallabhajosyula S, Prasad A, Dunlay SM, Murphree DH Jr, Ingram C, Mueller PS, Gersh BJ, Holmes DR Jr, Barsness GW.. Utilization of palliative care for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a 15-year national perspective on trends, disparities, predictors, and outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e011954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Vallabhajosyula S, El Hajj SC, Bell MR, Prasad A, Lerman A, Rihal CS, Holmes DR Jr, Barsness GW.. Intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and fractional flow reserve use in acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020;96: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vallabhajosyula S, Deshmukh AJ, Kashani K, Prasad A, Sakhuja A.. Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy in severe sepsis: nationwide trends, predictors, and outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vallabhajosyula S, Arora S, Sakhuja A, Lahewala S, Kumar V, Shantha GPS, Egbe AC, Stulak JM, Gersh BJ, Gulati R, Rihal CS, Prasad A, Deshmukh AJ.. Trends, predictors, and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support for postcardiac surgery cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 2019;123:489–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Walli-Attaei M, Joseph P, Rosengren A, Chow CK, Rangarajan S, Lear SA, AlHabib KF, Davletov K, Dans A, Lanas F, Yeates K, Poirier P, Teo KK, Bahonar A, Camilo F, Chifamba J, Diaz R, Didkowska JA, Irazola V, Ismail R, Kaur M, Khatib R, Liu X, Mańczuk M, Miranda JJ, Oguz A, Perez-Mayorga M, Szuba A, Tsolekile LP, Prasad Varma R, Yusufali A, Yusuf R, Wei L, Anand SS, Yusuf S.. Variations between women and men in risk factors, treatments, cardiovascular disease incidence, and death in 27 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;396:97–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Vallabhajosyula S, Ponamgi SP, Shrivastava S, Sundaragiri PR, Miller VM.. Reporting of sex as a variable in cardiovascular studies using cultured cells: a systematic review. Faseb J 2020;34:8778–8786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Multiple risk factor intervention trial. Risk factor changes and mortality results. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. JAMA 1982;248:1465–1477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Murphy ML, Hultgren HN, Detre K, Thomsen J, Takaro T.. Treatment of chronic stable angina. A preliminary report of survival data of the randomized Veterans Administration cooperative study. N Engl J Med 1977;297:621–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2017;66:1–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chandrasekhar J, Gill A, Mehran R.. Acute myocardial infarction in young women: current perspectives. IJWH 2018;10:267–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Alabas OA, Gale CP, Hall M, Rutherford MJ, Szummer K, Lawesson SS, Alfredsson J, Lindahl B, Jernberg T.. Sex differences in treatments, relative survival, and excess mortality following acute myocardial infarction: national cohort study using the SWEDEHEART registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Blomkalns AL, Chen AY, Hochman JS, Peterson ED, Trynosky K, Diercks DB, Brogan GX Jr, Boden WE, Roe MT, Ohman EM, Gibler WB, Newby LK; CRUSADE Investigators. Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:832–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rubini Gimenez M, Reiter M, Twerenbold R, Reichlin T, Wildi K, Haaf P, Wicki K, Zellweger C, Hoeller R, Moehring B, Sou SM, Mueller M, Denhaerynck K, Meller B, Stallone F, Henseler S, Bassetti S, Geigy N, Osswald S, Mueller C.. Sex-specific chest pain characteristics in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:241–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mehta LS, Beckie TM, DeVon HA, Grines CL, Krumholz HM, Johnson MN, Lindley KJ, Vaccarino V, Wang TY, Watson KE, Wenger NK; American Heart Association Cardiovascular Disease in Women and Special Populations Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Acute myocardial infarction in women: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016;133:916–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Marrugat J, Garcia M, Elosua R, Aldasoro E, Tormo MJ, Zurriaga O, Aros F, Masia R, Sanz G, Valle V, Lopez De Sa E, Sala J, Segura A, Rubert C, Moreno C, Cabades A, Molina L, Lopez-Sendon JL, Gil M; IBERICA Investigators; PRIAMHO Investigators; RESCATE Investigators; PEPA Investigators; REGICOR Investigators. Short-term (28 days) prognosis between genders according to the type of coronary event (Q-wave versus non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction versus unstable angina pectoris). Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1161–1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2018;39:119–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Agarwala A, Michos ED, Samad Z, Ballantyne CM, Virani SS.. The use of sex-specific factors in the assessment of women's cardiovascular risk. Circulation 2020;141:592–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Cenko E, Yoon J, Kedev S, Stankovic G, Vasiljevic Z, Krljanac G, Kalpak O, Ricci B, Milicic D, Manfrini O, van der Schaar M, Badimon L, Bugiardini R.. Sex differences in outcomes after STEMI: effect modification by treatment strategy and age. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:632–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bathini T, Thongprayoon C, Chewcharat A, Petnak T, Cheungpasitporn W, Boonpheng B, Prasitlumkum N, Chokesuwattanaskul R, Vallabhajosyula S, Kaewput W.. Acute myocardial infarction among hospitalizations for heat stroke in the United States. J Clin Med 2020;9:1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Rayes HA, Vallabhajosyula S, Barsness GW, Anavekar NS, Go RS, Patnaik MS, Kashani KB, Jentzer JC.. Association between anemia and hematological indices with mortality among cardiac intensive care unit patients. Clin Res Cardiol 2020;109:616–627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Vallabhajosyula S, Prasad A, Gulati R, Barsness GW.. Contemporary prevalence, trends, and outcomes of coronary chronic total occlusions in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2019;24:100414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nguyen HL, Saczynski JS, Gore JM, Goldberg RJ.. Age and sex differences in duration of prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:82–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Naderi S. Microvascular coronary dysfunction-an overview. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2018;20:7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mukamal KJ, Muller JE, Maclure M, Sherwood JB, Mittleman MA.. Variation in the risk of onset of acute myocardial infarction during the menstrual cycle. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:49–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bairey Merz CN, Johnson BD, Sharaf BL, Bittner V, Berga SL, Braunstein GD, Hodgson TK, Matthews KA, Pepine CJ, Reis SE, Reichek N, Rogers WJ, Pohost GM, Kelsey SF, Sopko G.. Hypoestrogenemia of hypothalamic origin and coronary artery disease in premenopausal women: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:413–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bezanson JL, Dolor RJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, Newby LK, Pina IL, Roger VL, Shaw LJ, Zhao D, Beckie TM, Bushnell C, D'Armiento J, Kris-Etherton PM, Fang J, Ganiats TG, Gomes AS, Gracia CR, Haan CK, Jackson EA, Judelson DR, Kelepouris E, Lavie CJ, Moore A, Nussmeier NA, Ofili E, Oparil S, Ouyang P, Pinn VW, Sherif K, Smith SC Jr, Sopko G, Chandra-Strobos N, Urbina EM, Vaccarino V, Wenger NK.. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women–2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association. Circulation 2011;123:1243–1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, Himmelfarb CD, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones D, McEvoy JW, Michos ED, Miedema MD, Muñoz D, Smith SC Jr, Virani SS, Williams KA Sr, Yeboah J, Ziaeian B.. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:1376–1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Stone NJ, Blumenthal RS, Lloyd-Jones D, Grundy SM.. Comparing primary prevention recommendations: a focused look at United States and European Guidelines on Dyslipidemia. Circulation 2020;141:1117–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Bellamy L, Casas J-P, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ.. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007;335:974–974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Stuart JJ, Tanz LJ, Missmer SA, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, James-Todd TM, Rich-Edwards JW.. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and maternal cardiovascular disease risk factor development: an observational cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:224–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wilkinson C, Bebb O, Dondo TB, Munyombwe T, Casadei B, Clarke S, Schiele F, Timmis A, Hall M, Gale CP.. Sex differences in quality indicator attainment for myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study. Heart 2019;105:516–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ruiz-Garcia J, Lerman A, Weisz G, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Fahy M, Xu K, Lansky AJ, Cristea E, Farah TG, Teles R, Botker HE, Templin B, Zhang Z, de Bruyne B, Serruys PW, Stone GW.. Age- and gender-related changes in plaque composition in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PROSPECT study. EuroIntervention 2012;8:929–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Arora S, Stouffer GA, Kucharska-Newton AM, Qamar A, Vaduganathan M, Pandey A, Porterfield D, Blankstein R, Rosamond WD, Bhatt DL, Caughey MC.. Twenty year trends and sex differences in young adults hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2019;139:1047–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Lam CSP, McEntegart M, Claggett B, Liu J, Skali H, Lewis E, Kober L, Rouleau J, Velazquez E, Califf R, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer M, Solomon S.. Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes after myocardial infarction: insights from the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT). Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:301–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Murphy E. Estrogen signaling and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 2011;109:687–696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Menazza S, Murphy E.. The expanding complexity of estrogen receptor signaling in the cardiovascular system. Circ Res 2016;118:994–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Babiker FA, Joseph S, Juggi J.. The protective effects of 17beta-estradiol against ischemia-reperfusion injury and its effect on pacing postconditioning protection to the heart. J Physiol Biochem 2014;70:151–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Skavdahl M, Steenbergen C, Clark J, Myers P, Demianenko T, Mao L, Rockman HA, Korach KS, Murphy E.. Estrogen receptor-beta mediates male-female differences in the development of pressure overload hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005;288:H469–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Adams MR, Kaplan JR, Manuck SB, Koritnik DR, Parks JS, Wolfe MS, Clarkson TB.. Inhibition of coronary artery atherosclerosis by 17-beta estradiol in ovariectomized monkeys. Lack of an effect of added progesterone. Arteriosclerosis 1990;10:1051–1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hodgin JB, Krege JH, Reddick RL, Korach KS, Smithies O, Maeda N.. Estrogen receptor alpha is a major mediator of 17beta-estradiol's atheroprotective effects on lesion size in Apoe-/- mice. J Clin Invest 2001;107:333–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sudhir K, Chou TM, Messina LM, Hutchison SJ, Korach KS, Chatterjee K, Rubanyi GM.. Endothelial dysfunction in a man with disruptive mutation in oestrogen-receptor gene. Lancet 1997;349:1146–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Brosnihan KB, Weddle D, Anthony MS, Ferrario CM.. B10Does chronic estrogen act as a converting enzyme inhibitor in postmenopausal cynomolgous monkeys? Am J Hypertens 1995;8:107A. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Baiardi G, Macova M, Armando I, Ando H, Tyurmin D, Saavedra JM.. Estrogen upregulates renal angiotensin II AT1 and AT2 receptors in the rat. Regul Pept 2005;124:7–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Lehmkuhl E.. Heart failure and its treatment in women. Role of hypertension, diabetes, and estrogen. Herz 2005;30:356–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hart EC, Charkoudian N, Wallin BG, Curry TB, Eisenach J, Joyner MJ.. Sex and ageing differences in resting arterial pressure regulation: the role of the β-adrenergic receptors. J Physiol 2011;589:5285–5297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bush TL, Barrett-Connor E, Cowan LD, Criqui MH, Wallace RB, Suchindran CM, Tyroler HA, Rifkind BM.. Cardiovascular mortality and noncontraceptive use of estrogen in women: results from the Lipid Research Clinics Program Follow-up Study. Circulation 1987;75:1102–1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Lobo RA, Shoupe D, Sevanian A, Mahrer PR, Selzer RH, Liu CR, Liu CH, Azen SP; Estrogen in the Prevention of Atherosclerosis Trial Research Group. Estrogen in the prevention of atherosclerosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:939–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Henderson VW, Shoupe D, Budoff MJ, Hwang-Levine J, Li Y, Feng M, Dustin L, Kono N, Stanczyk FZ, Selzer RH, Azen SP.. Vascular effects of early versus late postmenopausal treatment with estradiol. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1221–1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J; Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:321–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Shlipak MG, Chaput LA, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Bittner V, Knopp RH, Hulley SB; Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study Investigators. Lipid changes on hormone therapy and coronary heart disease events in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS). Am Heart J 2003;146:870–875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Boardman HM, Hartley L, Eisinga A, Main C, Roqué I Figuls M, Bonfill Cosp X, Gabriel Sanchez R, Knight B.. Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;3:CD002229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Manson JE, Allison MA, Rossouw JE, Carr JJ, Langer RD, Hsia J, Kuller LH, Cochrane BB, Hunt JR, Ludlam SE, Pettinger MB, Gass M, Margolis KL, Nathan L, Ockene JK, Prentice RL, Robbins J, Stefanick ML.. Estrogen therapy and coronary-artery calcification. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2591–2602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Shuster LT, Gostout BS, Grossardt BR, Rocca WA.. Prophylactic oophorectomy in premenopausal women and long-term health. Menopause Int 2008;14:111–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Rocca WA, Gazzuola-Rocca L, Smith CY, Grossardt BR, Faubion SS, Shuster LT, Kirkland JL, Stewart EA, Miller VM.. Accelerated accumulation of multimorbidity after bilateral oophorectomy: a population-based cohort Study. Mayo Clin Proc 2016;91:1577–1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Garcia M, Mulvagh SL, Merz CNB, Buring JE, Manson JE.. Cardiovascular disease in women: clinical perspectives. Circ Res 2016;118:1273–1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Lee KK, Ferry AV, Anand A, Strachan FE, Chapman AR, Kimenai DM, Meex SJR, Berry C, Findlay I, Reid A, Cruickshank A, Gray A, Collinson PO, Apple FS, McAllister DA, Maguire D, Fox KAA, Newby DE, Tuck C, Keerie C, Weir CJ, Shah ASV, Mills NL, Mills NL, Strachan FE, Tuck C, Shah ASV, Anand A, Ferry AV, Lee KK, Chapman AR, Sandeman D, Adamson PD, Stables CL, Vallejo CA, Tsanasis A, Marshall L, Stewart SD, Fujisawa T, Hautvast M, McPherson J, McKinlay L, Mills NL, Newby DE, Fox KAA, Berry C, Walker S, Weir CJ, Ford I, Mills NL, Newby DE, Gray A, Fox KAA, Berry C, Walker S, Collinson PO, Apple FS, Reid A, Cruikshank A, Findlay I, Amoils S, McAllister DA, Maguire D, Stevens J, Norrie J, Weir C, Shah ASV, Anand A, Chapman AR, Lee KK, Andrews JPM, Adamson PD, Moss A, Anwar MS, Hung J, Mills NL, Walker S, Malo J, Reid A, Cruikshank A, Collinson PO, Fischbacher CM, Croal BL, Leslie SJ, Keerie C, Parker RA, Walker A, Harkess R, Tuck C, Wackett T, Weir C, Armstrong R, Flood M, Stirling L, MacDonald C, Sadat I, Finlay F, Charles H, Linksted P, Young S, Alexander B, Duncan C.. Sex-specific thresholds of high-sensitivity troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:2032–2043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Diercks DB, Owen KP, Kontos MC, Blomkalns A, Chen AY, Miller C, Wiviott S, Peterson ED.. Gender differences in time to presentation for myocardial infarction before and after a national women's cardiovascular awareness campaign: a temporal analysis from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress ADverse Outcomes with Early Implementation (CRUSADE) and the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG). Am Heart J 2010;160:80–87.e83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Jneid H, Fonarow GC, Cannon CP, Hernandez AF, Palacios IF, Maree AO, Wells Q, Bozkurt B, Labresh KA, Liang L, Hong Y, Newby LK, Fletcher G, Peterson E, Wexler L.. Sex differences in medical care and early death after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2008;118:2803–2810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Pearte CA, Myerson M, Coresh J, McNamara RL, Rosamond W, Taylor H, Manolio TA.. Variation and temporal trends in the use of diagnostic testing during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction by age, gender, race, and geography (the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities Study). Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1219–1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Barnhart J, Lewis V, Houghton JL, Charney P.. Physician knowledge levels and barriers to coronary risk prevention in women: survey results from the Women and Heart Disease Physician Education Initiative. Womens Health Issues 2007;17:93–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Cho L, Davis M, Elgendy I, Epps K, Lindley KJ, Mehta PK, Michos ED, Minissian M, Pepine C, Vaccarino V, Volgman AS; ACC CVD Womens Committee Members. Summary of updated recommendations for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2602–2618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Dondo TB, Hall M, Timmis AD, Gilthorpe MS, Alabas OA, Batin PD, Deanfield JE, Hemingway H, Gale CP.. Excess mortality and guideline-indicated care following non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2017;6:412–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Pasupathy S, Tavella R, Beltrame JF.. Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): the past, present, and future management. Circulation 2017;135:1490–1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Baron T, Hambraeus K, Sundstrom J, Erlinge D, Jernberg T, Lindahl B; TOTAL-AMI study Group. Impact on long-term mortality of presence of obstructive coronary artery disease and classification of myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2016;129:398–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Patel MR, Chen AY, Peterson ED, Newby LK, Pollack CV Jr, Brindis RG, Gibson CM, Kleiman NS, Saucedo JF, Bhatt DL, Gibler WB, Ohman EM, Harrington RA, Roe MT.. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and insignificant coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early. Am Heart J 2006;152:641–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.CDC. National Diabetes Statistics Report: Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2017.
  • 71. Jamal A, Phillips E, Gentzke AS, Homa DM, Babb SD, King BA, Neff LJ.. Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;67:53–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Lindahl B, Baron T, Erlinge D, Hadziosmanovic N, Nordenskjold A, Gard A, Jernberg T.. Medical therapy for secondary prevention and long-term outcome in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation 2017;135:1481–1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Daugherty SL, Blair IV, Havranek EP, Furniss A, Dickinson LM, Karimkhani E, Main DS, Masoudi FA.. Implicit gender bias and the use of cardiovascular tests among cardiologists. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e006872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Zestcott CA, Blair IV, Stone J.. Examining the presence, consequences, and reduction of implicit bias in health care: a narrative review. Group Process Intergroup Relat 2016;19:528–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Barsness GW, Rihal CS, Holmes DR Jr, Prasad A.. Hospital-level disparities in the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 2019;124:491–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Vallabhajosyula S, Patlolla SH, Dunlay SM, Prasad A, Bell MR, Jaffe AS, Gersh BJ, Rihal CS, Holmes DR Jr, Barsness GW.. Regional variation in the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock in the United States. Circ Heart Fail 2020;13:e006661–e006661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Harjola V-P, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GMC, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P; Document Reviewers. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:891–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX.. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013;82:E1–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Isorni M-A, Aissaoui N, Angoulvant D, Bonello L, Lemesle G, Delmas C, Henry P, Schiele F, Ferrieres J, Simon T, Danchin N, Puymirat E.. Temporal trends in clinical characteristics and management according to sex in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: the FAST-MI programme. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2018;111:555–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Abdel-Qadir HM, Ivanov J, Austin PC, Tu JV, Džavík V.. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock treatment and outcomes among Ontario patients with myocardial infarction between 1992 and 2008. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2011;4:440–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Carnendran L, Abboud R, Sleeper LA, Gurunathan R, Webb JG, Menon V, Dzavik V, Cocke T, Hochman JS.. Trends in cardiogenic shock: report from the SHOCK Study. The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? Eur Heart J 2001;22:472–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, Charbonnier B, Schiele F, Lefevre T, Durand E, Blanchard D, Simon T, Cambou J-P, Danchin N.. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2535–2543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Wayangankar SA, Bangalore S, McCoy LA, Jneid H, Latif F, Karrowni W, Charitakis K, Feldman DN, Dakik HA, Mauri L, Peterson ED, Messenger J, Roe M, Mukherjee D, Klein A.. Temporal trends and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a report from the CathPCI registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:341–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Jeger RV, Radovanovic D, Hunziker PR, Pfisterer ME, Stauffer J-C, Erne P, Urban P; for the AMIS Plus Registry Investigators. Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:618–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Fang J, Mensah GA, Alderman MH, Croft JB.. Trends in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, 1979-2003, United States. Am Heart J 2006;152:1035–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, Mujib M, Palaniswamy C, Sule S, Jain D, Gotsis W, Ahmed A, Frishman WH, Fonarow GC.. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000590–e000590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Kunadian V, Qiu W, Bawamia B, Veerasamy M, Jamieson S, Zaman A.. Gender comparisons in cardiogenic shock during ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:636–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Hochman JS, Tamis JE, Thompson TD, Weaver WD, White HD, Van de Werf F, Aylward P, Topol EJ, Califf RM.. Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999;341:226–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Wong SC, Sleeper LA, Monrad ES, Menegus MA, Palazzo A, Dzavik V, Jacobs A, Jiang X, Hochman JS; SHOCK Investigators. Absence of gender differences in clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. A report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1395–1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Fengler K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Neumann F-J, Olbrich H-G, de Waha A, de Waha S, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Bohm M, Poess J, Strasser R, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K, Zeymer U, Thiele H.. Gender differences in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial. Clin Res Cardiol 2015;104:71–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Danchin N, Vaur L, Genes N, Renault M, Ferrieres J, Etienne S, Cambou JP.. Management of acute myocardial infarction in intensive care units in 1995: a nationwide French survey of practice and early hospital results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1598–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Hanania G, Cambou JP, Gueret P, Vaur L, Blanchard D, Lablanche JM, Boutalbi Y, Humbert R, Clerson P, Genes N, Danchin N.. Management and in-hospital outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to intensive care units at the turn of the century: results from the French nationwide USIC 2000 registry. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2004;90:1404–1410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Hanssen M, Cottin Y, Khalife K, Hammer L, Goldstein P, Puymirat E, Mulak G, Drouet E, Pace B, Schultz E, Bataille V, Ferrieres J, Simon T, Danchin N.. French Registry on Acute ST-elevation and non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction 2010. FAST-MI 2010. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2012;98:699–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Koeth O, Zahn R, Heer T, Bauer T, Juenger C, Klein B, Gitt AK, Senges J, Zeymer U.. Gender differences in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Clin Res Cardiol 2009;98:781–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Abdel-Qadir HM, Ivanov J, Austin PC, Tu JV, Džavík V.. Sex differences in the management and outcomes of Ontario patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:691–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Vallabhajosyula S, Ya'Qoub L, Singh M, Bell MR, Gulati R, Cheungpasitporn W, Sundaragiri PR, Miller VM, Jaffe AS, Gersh BJ, Holmes DR Jr, Barsness GW.. Sex disparities in the management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in the young. Circ Heart Fail 2020;13:e007154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Vallabhajosyula S, Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Hayes SN, Best PJM, Brenes-Salazar JA, Lerman A, Gersh BJ, Jaffe AS, Bell MR, Holmes DR Jr, Barsness GW.. Sex and gender disparities in the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock in older adults. Mayo Clin Proc 2020;95:1916–1927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Meyer MR, Barton M.. ERalpha, ERbeta, and gpER: novel aspects of oestrogen receptor signalling in atherosclerosis. 2009. 605–610. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 99. Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Barsness GW, Miller PE, Cheungpasitporn W, Stulak JM, Rihal CS, Holmes DR, Bell MR, Miller VM.. Sex disparities in the use and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock. CJC Open 2020;2:462–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Velders MA, Boden H, van Boven AJ, van der Hoeven BL, Heestermans AACM, Cannegieter SC, Umans VAWM, Jukema JW, Hofma SH, Schalij MJ.. Influence of gender on ischemic times and outcomes after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:312–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Berger JS, Elliott L, Gallup D, Roe M, Granger CB, Armstrong PW, Simes RJ, White HD, Van de Werf F, Topol EJ, Hochman JS, Newby LK, Harrington RA, Califf RM, Becker RC, Douglas PS.. Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2009;302:874–882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JGP, Koster RW.. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 2010;81:1479–1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD.. Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 2005;67:75–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jimenez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Mackey RH, Matsushita K, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Thiagarajan RR, Reeves MJ, Ritchey M, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sasson C, Towfighi A, Tsao CW, Turner MB, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017;135:e146–e603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Bray JE, Stub D, Bernard S, Smith K.. Exploring gender differences and the "oestrogen effect" in an Australian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest population. Resuscitation 2013;84:957–963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Wissenberg M, Hansen CM, Folke F, Lippert FK, Weeke P, Karlsson L, Rajan S, Søndergaard KB, Kragholm K, Christensen EF, Nielsen SL, Køber L, Gislason GH, Torp-Pedersen C.. Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to sex: a nationwide registry-based study. Resuscitation 2014;85:1212–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Bosson N, Kaji AH, Fang A, Thomas JL, French WJ, Shavelle D, Niemann JT.. Sex differences in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the era of regionalized systems and advanced post-resuscitation care. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e004131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Wigginton JG, Perman SM, Barr GC, McGregor AJ, Miller AC, Napoli AM, Napoli AF, Safdar B, Weaver KR, Deutsch S, Kayea T, Becker L.. Sex- and gender-specific research priorities in cardiovascular resuscitation: proceedings from the 2014 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference Cardiovascular Resuscitation Research Workgroup. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:1343–1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Kronick SL, Kurz MC, Lin S, Edelson DP, Berg RA, Billi JE, Cabanas JG, Cone DC, Diercks DB, Foster JJ, Meeks RA, Travers AH, Welsford M.. Part 4: systems of care and continuous quality improvement: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015;132:S397–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Deakin CD. The chain of survival: not all links are equal. Resuscitation 2018;126:80–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Brady WJ, Mattu A, Slovis CM.. Lay responder care for an adult with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2019;381:2242–2251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Link MS, Atkins DL, Passman RS, Halperin HR, Samson RA, White RD, Cudnik MT, Berg MD, Kudenchuk PJ, Kerber RE.. Part 6: electrical therapies: automated external defibrillators, defibrillation, cardioversion, and pacing: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010;122:S706–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Sayre MR, Berg RA, Cave DM, Page RL, Potts J, White RD; American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Hands-only (compression-only) cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a call to action for bystander response to adults who experience out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: a science advisory for the public from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Circulation 2008;117:2162–2167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2005;112(24 Suppl):IV1–IV203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, Castren M, Smyth MA, Olasveengen T, Monsieurs KG, Raffay V, Grasner J-T, Wenzel V, Ristagno G, Soar J; Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation section Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015;95:81–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres J-P, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB.. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;131:e29-322–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Blewer AL, McGovern SK, Schmicker RH, May S, Morrison LJ, Aufderheide TP, Daya M, Idris AH, Callaway CW, Kudenchuk PJ, Vilke GM, Abella BS; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Investigators. Gender disparities among adult recipients of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the public. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2018;11:e004710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Safdar B, Stolz U, Stiell IG, Cone DC, Bobrow BJ, deBoehr M, Dreyer J, Maloney J, Spaite DW.. Differential survival for men and women from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies by age: results from the OPALS study. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:1503–1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Ahn KO, Shin SD, Hwang SS.. Sex disparity in resuscitation efforts and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1810–1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Karlsson V, Dankiewicz J, Nielsen N, Kern KB, Mooney MR, Riker RR, Rubertsson S, Seder DB, Stammet P, Sunde K, Søreide E, Unger BT, Friberg H.. Association of gender to outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a report from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry. Crit Care 2015;19:182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Perman SM, Shelton SK, Knoepke C, Rappaport K, Matlock DD, Adelgais K, Havranek EP, Daugherty SL.. Public perceptions on why women receive less bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation than men in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2019;139:1060–1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Kramer CE, Wilkins MS, Davies JM, Caird JK, Hallihan GM.. Does the sex of a simulated patient affect CPR? Resuscitation 2015;86:82–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Wallen R, Tunnage B, Wells S.. The 12-lead ECG in the emergency medical service setting: how electrode placement and paramedic gender are experienced by women. Emerg Med J 2014;31:851–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Merrigan OH. Are there any cultural barriers to automated external defibrillator use in Middle Eastern Countries? Circulation 2011;124: 229. [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Greenberg MR, Pierog JE.. Evaluation of race and gender sensitivity in the American Heart Association materials for advanced cardiac life support. Gend Med 2009;6:604–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Chang AM, Mumma B, Sease KL, Robey JL, Shofer FS, Hollander JE.. Gender bias in cardiovascular testing persists after adjustment for presenting characteristics and cardiac risk. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:599–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Krammel M, Schnaubelt S, Weidenauer D, Winnisch M, Steininger M, Eichelter J, Hamp T, van Tulder R, Sulzgruber P.. Gender and age-specific aspects of awareness and knowledge in basic life support. PLoS One 2018;13:e0198918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Kim LK, Looser P, Swaminathan RV, Horowitz J, Friedman O, Shin JH, Minutello RM, Bergman G, Singh H, Wong SC, Feldman DN.. Sex-based disparities in incidence, treatment, and outcomes of cardiac arrest in the United States, 2003-2012. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e003704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Noppens RR, Kofler J, Grafe MR, Hurn PD, Traystman RJ.. Estradiol after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation is neuroprotective and mediated through estrogen receptor-beta. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009;29:277–286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Perers E, Abrahamsson P, Bang A, Engdahl J, Lindqvist J, Karlson BW, Waagstein L, Herlitz J.. There is a difference in characteristics and outcome between women and men who suffer out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 1999;40:133–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Morrison C, Woodward M, Fitzpatrick B, Watt G.. Sex differences in myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the Scottish MONICA population of Glasgow 1985 to 1991. Presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and 28-day case fatality of 3991 events in men and 1551 events in women. Circulation 1996;93:1981–1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Haukilahti MAE, Holmstrom L, Vahatalo J, Kentta T, Tikkanen J, Pakanen L, Kortelainen M-L, Perkiomaki J, Huikuri H, Myerburg RJ, Junttila MJ.. Sudden cardiac death in women. Circulation 2019;139:1012–1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Halvorsen S, Eritsland J, Abdelnoor M, Holst Hansen C, Risøe C, Midtbø K, Bjørnerheim R, Mangschau A.. Gender differences in management and outcome of acute myocardial infarctions treated in 2006-2007. Cardiology 2009;114:83–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Thorgeirsson G, Thorgeirsson G, Sigvaldason H, Witteman J.. Risk factors for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Reykjavik Study. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1499–1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Ohlsson C, Barrett-Connor E, Bhasin S, Orwoll E, Labrie F, Karlsson MK, Ljunggren O, Vandenput L, Mellström D, Tivesten A.. High serum testosterone is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events in elderly men. The MrOS (Osteoporotic Fractures in Men) study in Sweden. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1674–1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Alkamel A, Shafiee A, Jalali A, Boroumand M, Nozari Y.. The association between premature coronary artery disease and level of testosterone in young adult males. Arch Iran Med 2014;17:545–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Ammar EM, Said SA, Hassan MS.. Enhanced vasoconstriction and reduced vasorelaxation induced by testosterone and nandrolone in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Pharmacol Res 2004;50:253–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Herring MJ, Oskui PM, Hale SL, Kloner RA.. Testosterone and the cardiovascular system: a comprehensive review of the basic science literature. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000271–e000271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Crisostomo PR, Wang M, Wairiuko GM, Morrell ED, Meldrum DR.. Brief exposure to exogenous testosterone increases death signaling and adversely affects myocardial function after ischemia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006;290:R1168–R1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Liva SM, Voskuhl RR.. Testosterone acts directly on CD4+ T lymphocytes to increase IL-10 production. J Immunol 2001;167:2060–2067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Johnson MA, Haukoos JS, Larabee TM, Daugherty S, Chan PS, McNally B, Sasson C.. Females of childbearing age have a survival benefit after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013;84:639–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Kitamura T, Iwami T, Nichol G, Nishiuchi T, Hayashi Y, Nishiyama C, Sakai T, Kajino K, Hiraide A, Ikeuchi H, Nonogi H, Kawamura T; Utstein Osaka Project. Reduction in incidence and fatality of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in females of the reproductive age. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1365–1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Akahane M, Ogawa T, Koike S, Tanabe S, Horiguchi H, Mizoguchi T, Yasunaga H, Imamura T.. The effects of sex on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. Am J Med 2011;124:325–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Zhao X, Eghbali-Webb M.. Gender-related differences in basal and hypoxia-induced activation of signal transduction pathways controlling cell cycle progression and apoptosis, in cardiac fibroblasts. Endocrine 2002;18:137–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Lang JT, McCullough LD.. Pathways to ischemic neuronal cell death: are sex differences relevant? J Transl Med 2008;6:33–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Kuhar P, Lunder M, Drevensek G.. The role of gender and sex hormones in ischemic-reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts. Eur J Pharmacol 2007;561:151–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Delyani JA, Murohara T, Nossuli TO, Lefer AM.. Protection from myocardial reperfusion injury by acute administration of 17 beta-estradiol. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1996;28:1001–1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Jovanović S, Jovanović A, Shen WK, Terzic A.. Low concentrations of 17beta-estradiol protect single cardiac cells against metabolic stress-induced Ca2+ loading. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:948–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Wigginton JG, Pepe PE, Idris AH.. Rationale for routine and immediate administration of intravenous estrogen for all critically ill and injured patients. Crit Care Med 2010;38(10 Suppl):S620–S629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Lebesgue D, Chevaleyre V, Zukin RS, Etgen AM.. Estradiol rescues neurons from global ischemia-induced cell death: multiple cellular pathways of neuroprotection. Steroids 2009;74:555–561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Jover-Mengual T, Miyawaki T, Latuszek A, Alborch E, Zukin RS, Etgen AM.. Acute estradiol protects CA1 neurons from ischemia-induced apoptotic cell death via the PI3K/Akt pathway. Brain Res 2010;1321:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Geri G, Dumas F, Bougouin W, Varenne O, Daviaud F, Pène F, Lamhaut L, Chiche JD, Spaulding C, Mira JP, Empana JP, Cariou A.. Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved short- and long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Lemkes JS, Janssens GN, van der Hoeven NW, Jewbali LSD, Dubois EA, Meuwissen M, Rijpstra TA, Bosker HA, Blans MJ, Bleeker GB, Baak R, Vlachojannis GJ, Eikemans BJW, van der Harst P, van der Horst ICC, Voskuil M, van der Heijden JJ, Beishuizen A, Stoel M, Camaro C, van der Hoeven H, Henriques JP, Vlaar APJ, Vink MA, van den Bogaard B, Heestermans T, de Ruijter W, Delnoij TSR, Crijns H, Jessurun GAJ, Oemrawsingh PV, Gosselink MTM, Plomp K, Magro M, Elbers PWG, van de Ven PM, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, van Royen N.. Coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1397–1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Callaway CW, Donnino MW, Fink EL, Geocadin RG, Golan E, Kern KB, Leary M, Meurer WJ, Peberdy MA, Thompson TM, Zimmerman JL.. Part 8: post-cardiac arrest care: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015;132:S465–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Noc M, Fajadet J, Lassen JF, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Olivecrona GK, Windecker S, Spaulding C; Stent for Life (SFL) Group. Invasive coronary treatment strategies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a consensus statement from the European association for percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI)/stent for life (SFL) groups. EuroIntervention 2014;10:31–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Winther-Jensen M, Hassager C, Kjaergaard J, Bro-Jeppesen J, Thomsen JH, Lippert FK, Køber L, Wanscher M, Søholm H.. Women have a worse prognosis and undergo fewer coronary angiographies after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest than men. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2018;7:414–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Jeong JS, Kong SY, Shin SD, Ro YS, Song KJ, Hong KJ, Park JH, Kim TH.. Gender disparities in percutaneous coronary intervention in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med 2019;37:632–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Maznyczka AM, Gershlick AH.. Therapeutic hypothermia in patients with out-of-hospital arrest. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2015;101:1265–1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Stub D, Schmicker RH, Anderson ML, Callaway CW, Daya MR, Sayre MR, Elmer J, Grunau BE, Aufderheide TP, Lin S, Buick JE, Zive D, Peterson ED, Nichol G.. Association between hospital post-resuscitative performance and clinical outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015;92:45–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Bouwes A, Binnekade JM, Kuiper MA, Bosch FH, Zandstra DF, Toornvliet AC, Biemond HS, Kors BM, Koelman JHTM, Verbeek MM, Weinstein HC, Hijdra A, Horn J.. Prognosis of coma after therapeutic hypothermia: a prospective cohort study. Ann Neurol 2012;71:206–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, Smith K.. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002;346:557–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2002;346:549–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Lascarrou J-B, Merdji H, Le Gouge A, Colin G, Grillet G, Girardie P, Coupez E, Dequin P-F, Cariou A, Boulain T, Brule N, Frat J-P, Asfar P, Pichon N, Landais M, Plantefeve G, Quenot J-P, Chakarian J-C, Sirodot M, Legriel S, Letheulle J, Thevenin D, Desachy A, Delahaye A, Botoc V, Vimeux S, Martino F, Giraudeau B, Reignier J; CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Group. Targeted temperature management for cardiac arrest with nonshockable rhythm. N Engl J Med 2019;381:2327–2337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Soar J, Callaway CW, Aibiki M, Bottiger BW, Brooks SC, Deakin CD, Donnino MW, Drajer S, Kloeck W, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Neumar RW, Nicholson TC, Nolan JP, Okada K, O'Neil BJ, Paiva EF, Parr MJ, Wang T-L, Witt J; Advanced Life Support Chapter Collaborators. Part 4: advanced life support: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation 2015;95:e71-120–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX.. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:e78–e140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Agarwal S, Presciutti A, Verma J, Pavol MA, Anbarasan D, Brodie D, Rabbani LE, Roh DJ, Park S, Claassen J, Stern Y.. Women have worse cognitive, functional, and psychiatric outcomes at hospital discharge after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2018;125:12–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Adielsson A, Hollenberg J, Karlsson T, Lindqvist J, Lundin S, Silfverstolpe J, Svensson L, Herlitz J.. Increase in survival and bystander CPR in out-of-hospital shockable arrhythmia: bystander CPR and female gender are predictors of improved outcome. Experiences from Sweden in an 18-year perspective. Heart 2011;97:1391–1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Young M, Angquist K-A, Holmberg S.. Is female sex associated with increased survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Resuscitation 2004;60:197–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Zhang Q, Qi Z, Liu B, Li C.. Predictors of survival and favorable neurological outcome in patients treated with targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung 2018;47:602–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Greenberg MR, Ahnert AM, Patel NC, Bennett CE, Elliott N, Lundquist M, Miller A, Feiner EC, Kurt A, Glenn-Porter B, Scott M, Burmeister DB.. Sex differences in cardiac arrest survivors who receive therapeutic hypothermia. Am J Emerg Med 2014;32:545–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Niemann JT, Rosborough JP, Youngquist S.. Is the tumour necrosis factor-alpha response following resuscitation gender dependent in the swine model? Resuscitation 2008;77:258–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Shah KSV, Shah ASV, Bhopal R.. Systematic review and meta-analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and race or ethnicity: Black US populations fare worse. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014;21:619–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Zhao D, Post WS, Blasco-Colmenares E, Cheng A, Zhang Y, Deo R, Pastor-Barriuso R, Michos ED, Sotoodehnia N, Guallar E.. Racial differences in sudden cardiac death. Circulation 2019;139:1688–1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW, Hedges J, Powell JL, Aufderheide TP, Rea T, Lowe R, Brown T, Dreyer J, Davis D, Idris A, Stiell I.. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA 2008;300:1423–1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Oh SH, Park KN, Lim J, Choi SP, Oh JS, Cho IS, Lee BK, Kim YH, Kim Y-M, Kim HJ, Youn CS, Kim SH; On behalf of the Korean Hypothermia Network Investigators. The impact of sex and age on neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with targeted temperature management. Crit Care 2017;21:272–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Hoshida S, Watanabe T, Shinoda Y, Ikeoka K, Minamisaka T, Fukuoka H, Inui H, Ueno K, Suna S, Nakatani D, Hikoso S, Yamada T, Yasumura Y, Fuji H, Sakata Y; on behalf of PURSUIT HFpEF Investigators. Sex-related differences in left ventricular diastolic function and arterial elastance during admission in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the PURSUIT HFpEF study. Clin Cardiol 2018;41:1529–1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Galvao M, Kalman J, DeMarco T, Fonarow GC, Galvin C, Ghali JK, Moskowitz RM.. Gender differences in in-hospital management and outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure: analysis from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). J Card Fail 2006;12:100–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Hsich EM, Piña IL.. Heart failure in women: a need for prospective data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:491–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Levinsson A, Dubé MP, Tardif JC, de Denus S.. Sex, drugs, and heart failure: a sex-sensitive review of the evidence base behind current heart failure clinical guidelines. ESC Heart Fail 2018;5:745–754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Rathore SS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM.. Sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin for the treatment of heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1403–1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Lenzen MJ, Rosengren A, Op Reimer WJMS, Follath F, Boersma E, Simoons ML, Cleland JGF, Komajda M.. Management of patients with heart failure in clinical practice: differences between men and women. Heart 2008;94:e10–e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Hsich EM, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC.. Sex differences in in-hospital mortality in acute decompensated heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Am Heart J 2012;163:430–437. 437.e431–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Goyal P, Paul T, Almarzooq ZI, Peterson JC, Krishnan U, Swaminathan RV, Feldman DN, Wells MT, Karas MG, Sobol I, Maurer MS, Horn EM, Kim LK.. Sex- and race-related differences in characteristics and outcomes of hospitalizations for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Lam CS, Carson PE, Anand IS, Rector TS, Kuskowski M, Komajda M, McKelvie RS, McMurray JJ, Zile MR, Massie BM, Kitzman DW.. Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) trial. Circ Heart Fail 2012;5:571–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Johansson I, Dahlström U, Edner M, Näsman P, Rydén L, Norhammar A.. Risk factors, treatment and prognosis in men and women with heart failure with and without diabetes. Heart 2015;101:1139–1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Martínez-Sellés M, Doughty RN, Poppe K, Whalley GA, Earle N, Tribouilloy C, McMurray JJ, Swedberg K, Køber L, Berry C, Squire I; on behalf of the Meta-Analysis Global Group In Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC). Gender and survival in patients with heart failure: interactions with diabetes and aetiology. Results from the MAGGIC individual patient meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:473–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Zsilinszka R, Shrader P, DeVore AD, Hardy NC, Mentz RJ, Pang PS, Peacock WF, Fonarow GC, Hernandez AF.. Sex differences in the management and outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute heart failure. J Card Fail 2016;22:781–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Scrutinio D, Guida P, Passantino A, Lagioia R, Raimondo R, Venezia M, Ammirati E, Oliva F, Stucchi M, Frigerio M.. Female gender and mortality risk in decompensated heart failure. Eur J Intern Med 2018;51:34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Kajimoto K, Minami Y, Sato N, Otsubo S, Kasanuki H.. Gender differences in left ventricular ejection fraction and outcomes among patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:1623–1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Ha JW, Lee HC, Park S, Choi EY, Seo HS, Shim CY, Kim JM, Ahn JA, Lee SW, Rim SJ, Oh JK, Chung N.. Gender-related difference in left ventricular diastolic elastance during exercise in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circ J 2008;72:1443–1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Beale AL, Meyer P, Marwick TH, Lam CSP, Kaye DM.. Sex differences in cardiovascular pathophysiology: why women are overrepresented in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2018;138:198–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Gori M, Lam CS, Gupta DK, Santos AB, Cheng S, Shah AM, Claggett B, Zile MR, Kraigher-Krainer E, Pieske B, Voors AA, Packer M, Bransford T, Lefkowitz M, McMurray JJ, Solomon SD; for the PARAMOUNT Investigators. Sex-specific cardiovascular structure and function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:535–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Chen C, Sung KT, Shih SC, Liu CC, Kuo JY, Hou CJ, Hung CL, Yeh HI.. Age, gender and load-related influences on left ventricular geometric remodeling, systolic mid-wall function, and NT-ProBNP in asymptomatic Asian Population. PLoS One 2016;11:e0156467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Borlaug BA, Rodeheffer RJ, Kass DA.. Age- and gender-related ventricular-vascular stiffening: a community-based study. Circulation 2005;112:2254–2262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Kim HL, Kim MA, Choi DJ, Han S, Jeon ES, Cho MC, Kim JJ, Yoo BS, Shin MS, Seong IW, Ahn Y, Kang SM, Kim YJ, Kim HS, Chae SC, Oh BH, Lee MM, Ryu KH; on behalf of the Korean Heart Failure Registry. Gender difference in the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide in patients with heart failure - a report from the Korean Heart Failure Registry (KorHF). Circ J 2017;81:1329–1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Beale AL, Nanayakkara S, Segan L, Mariani JA, Maeder MT, Van Empel V, Vizi D, Evans S, Lam CSP, Kaye DM.. Sex differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction pathophysiology. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:239–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Zhao Z, Wang H, Jessup JA, Lindsey SH, Chappell MC, Groban L.. Role of estrogen in diastolic dysfunction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014;306:H628–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Knowlton AA, Lee AR.. Estrogen and the cardiovascular system. Pharmacol Ther 2012;135:54–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Li S, Gupte AA.. The role of estrogen in cardiac metabolism and diastolic function Methodist DeBakey. Cardiovasc J 2017;13:4–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Inanloorahatloo K, Liang G, Vo D, Ebert A, Nguyen I, Nguyen PK.. Sex-based differences in myocardial gene expression in recently deceased organ donors with no prior cardiovascular disease. PLoS One 2017;12:e0183874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Sharifi-Sanjani M, Oyster NM, Tichy ED, Bedi KC Jr, Harel O, Margulies KB, Mourkioti F.. Cardiomyocyte-specific telomere shortening is a distinct signature of heart failure in humans. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Lam CSP, Gamble GD, Ling LH, Sim D, Leong KTG, Yeo PSD, Ong HY, Jaufeerally F, Ng TP, Cameron VA, Poppe K, Lund M, Devlin G, Troughton R, Richards AM, Doughty RN.. Mortality associated with heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a prospective international multi-ethnic cohort study. Eur Heart J 2018;39:1770–1780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Dreyer RP, Dharmarajan K, Kennedy KF, Jones PG, Vaccarino V, Murugiah K, Nuti SV, Smolderen KG, Buchanan DM, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM.. Sex differences in 1-year all-cause rehospitalization in patients after acute myocardial infarction: a prospective observational study. Circulation 2017;135:521–531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Redfield MM, Rodeheffer RJ, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Burnett JC Jr,. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration: impact of age and gender. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:976–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Suthahar N, Meijers WC, Ho JE, Gansevoort RT, Voors AA, van der Meer P, Bakker SJL, Heymans S, van Empel V, Schroen B, van der Harst P, van Veldhuisen DJ, de Boer RA.. Sex-specific associations of obesity and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels in the general population. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:1205–1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Christ M, Laule-Kilian K, Hochholzer W, Klima T, Breidthardt T, Perruchoud AP, Mueller C.. Gender-specific risk stratification with B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with acute dyspnea: insights from the B-type natriuretic peptide for acute shortness of breath evaluation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1808–1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Hsich EM, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Hernandez AF, Eapen ZJ, Xian Y, Schwamm LH, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC.. Relationship between sex, ejection fraction, and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients hospitalized with heart failure and associations with inhospital outcomes: findings from the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure Registry. Am Heart J 2013;166:1063–1071. e1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. de Antonio M, Lupon J, Galan A, Vila J, Urrutia A, Bayes-Genis A.. Combined use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide improves measurements of performance over established mortality risk factors in chronic heart failure. Am Heart J 2012;163:821–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Subramanya V, Zhao D, Ouyang P, Lima JA, Vaidya D, Ndumele CE, Bluemke DA, Shah SJ, Guallar E, Nwabuo CC, Allison MA, Heckbert SR, Post WS, Michos ED.. Sex hormone levels and change in left ventricular structure among men and post-menopausal women: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Maturitas 2018;108:37–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. Zhao D, Guallar E, Ouyang P, Subramanya V, Vaidya D, Ndumele CE, Lima JA, Allison MA, Shah SJ, Bertoni AG, Budoff MJ, Post WS, Michos ED.. Endogenous sex hormones and incident cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:2555–2566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Hester J, Ventetuolo C, Lahm T.. Sex, gender, and sex hormones in pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure. Compr Physiol 2019;10:125–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Peterson LR, Soto PF, Herrero P, Mohammed BS, Avidan MS, Schechtman KB, Dence C, Gropler RJ.. Impact of gender on the myocardial metabolic response to obesity. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:424–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Savji N, Meijers WC, Bartz TM, Bhambhani V, Cushman M, Nayor M, Kizer JR, Sarma A, Blaha MJ, Gansevoort RT, Gardin JM, Hillege HL, Ji F, Kop WJ, Lau ES, Lee DS, Sadreyev R, van Gilst WH, Wang TJ, Zanni MV, Vasan RS, Allen NB, Psaty BM, van der Harst P, Levy D, Larson M, Shah SJ, de Boer RA, Gottdiener JS, Ho JE.. The association of obesity and cardiometabolic traits with incident HFpEF and HFrEF. JACC Heart Fail 2018;6:701–709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Paulus WJ, Tschöpe C.. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:263–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Shah SJ, Lam CSP, Svedlund S, Saraste A, Hage C, Tan RS, Beussink-Nelson L, Ljung Faxén U, Fermer ML, Broberg MA, Gan LM, Lund LH.. Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3439–3450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Kajimoto K, Minami Y, Sato N, Otsubo S, Kasanuki H.. Gender differences in anemia and survival in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2017;120:435–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, Babu A, Kotronias RA, Rushton C, Zaman A, Fryer AA, Kadam U, Chew-Graham CA, Mamas MA.. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017;10: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Ho JE, Gona P, Pencina MJ, Tu JV, Austin PC, Vasan RS, Kannel WB, D'Agostino RB, Lee DS, Levy D.. Discriminating clinical features of heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in the community. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1734–1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. O'Neal WT, Sandesara P, Hammadah M, Venkatesh S, Samman-Tahhan A, Kelli HM, Soliman EZ.. Gender differences in the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:1785–1790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Emdin CA, Wong CX, Hsiao AJ, Altman DG, Peters SA, Woodward M, Odutayo AA.. Atrial fibrillation as risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death in women compared with men: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ 2016;532:h7013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Melenovsky V, Hwang SJ, Lin G, Redfield MM, Borlaug BA.. Right heart dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2014;35:3452–3462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Pandey A, Omar W, Ayers C, LaMonte M, Klein L, Allen NB, Kuller LH, Greenland P, Eaton CB, Gottdiener JS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Berry JD.. Sex and race differences in lifetime risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation 2018;137:1814–1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Frazier CG, Alexander KP, Newby LK, Anderson S, Iverson E, Packer M, Cohn J, Goldstein S, Douglas PS.. Associations of gender and etiology with outcomes in heart failure with systolic dysfunction: a pooled analysis of 5 randomized control trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1450–1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Eisenberg E, Di Palo KE, Piña IL.. Sex differences in heart failure. Clin Cardiol 2018;41:211–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Mentzer G, Hsich EM.. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in women: epidemiology, outcomes, and treatment. Heart Fail Clin 2019;15:19–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Desai AS, Anker SD, Perrone SV, Janssens S, Milicic D, Arango JL, Packer M, Shi VC, Lefkowitz MP, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD.. Prior heart failure hospitalization, clinical outcomes, and response to sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in HFpEF. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:245–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Soldin OP, Mattison DR.. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacokinet 2009;48:143–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Santema BT, Ouwerkerk W, Tromp J, Sama IE, Ravera A, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Hillege H, Samani NJ, Zannad F, Dickstein K, Lang CC, Cleland JG, Ter Maaten JM, Metra M, Anker SD, van der Harst P, Ng LL, van der Meer P, van Veldhuisen DJ, Meyer S, Lam CSP, Voors AA, Richards AM, Lam CSP, Anand I, Hung C-L, Ling LH, Liew HB, Narasimhan C, Ngarmukos T, Park SW, Reyes E, Siswanto BB, Shimizu W, Zhang S.. Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet 2019;394:1254–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Greene SJ, Butler J, Albert NM, DeVore AD, Sharma PP, Duffy CI, Hill CL, McCague K, Mi X, Patterson JH, Spertus JA, Thomas L, Williams FB, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC.. Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the CHAMP-HF registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:351–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Dewan P, Rørth R, Jhund PS, Shen L, Raparelli V, Petrie MC, Abraham WT, Desai AS, Dickstein K, Køber L, Mogensen UM, Packer M, Rouleau JL, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Zile MR, McMurray JJV.. Differential impact of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:29–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. Sticherling C, Arendacka B, Svendsen JH, Wijers S, Friede T, Stockinger J, Dommasch M, Merkely B, Willems R, Lubinski A, Scharfe M, Braunschweig F, Svetlosak M, Zurn CS, Huikuri H, Flevari P, Lund-Andersen C, Schaer BA, Tuinenburg AE, Bergau L, Schmidt G, Szeplaki G, Vandenberk B, Kowalczyk E, Eick C, Juntilla J, Conen D, Zabel M; EU-CERT-ICD Investigators. Sex differences in outcomes of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: combined registry data from eleven European countries. Europace 2018;20:963–970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. Wilcox JE, Fonarow GC, Zhang Y, Albert NM, Curtis AB, Gheorghiade M, Heywood JT, Mehra MR, O'Connor CM, Reynolds D, Walsh MN, Yancy CW.. Clinical effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in men and women with heart failure: findings from IMPROVE HF. Circ Heart Fail 2014;7:146–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Yin FH, Fan CL, Guo YY, Zhu H, Wang ZL.. The impact of gender difference on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0176248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Steffel J, Varma N, Robertson M, Singh JP, Bax JJ, Borer JS, Dickstein K, Ford I, Gorcsan J 3rd, Gras D, Krum H, Sogaard P, Holzmeister J, Brugada J, Abraham WT, Ruschitzka F.. Effect of gender on outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex: a subgroup analysis of the EchoCRT trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2016;9:e003924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Patel NJ, Edla S, Deshmukh A, Nalluri N, Patel N, Agnihotri K, Patel A, Savani C, Patel N, Bhimani R, Thakkar B, Arora S, Asti D, Badheka AO, Parikh V, Mitrani RD, Noseworthy P, Paydak H, Viles-Gonzalez J, Friedman PA, Kowalski M.. Gender, racial, and health insurance differences in the trend of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) utilization: a United States experience over the last decade. Clin Cardiol 2016;39:63–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. El-Chami MF, Hanna IR, Bush H, Langberg JJ.. Impact of race and gender on cardiac device implantations. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:1420–1426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Potapov E, Schweiger M, Lehmkuhl E, Vierecke J, Stepanenko A, Weng G, Pasic M, Huebler M, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Hetzer R, Krabatsch T.. Gender differences during mechanical circulatory support. Asaio j 2012;58:320–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Magnussen C, Bernhardt AM, Ojeda FM, Wagner FM, Gummert J, de By T, Krabatsch T, Mohacsi P, Rybczynski M, Knappe D, Sill B, Deuse T, Blankenberg S, Schnabel RB, Reichenspurner H.. Gender differences and outcomes in left ventricular assist device support: the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2018;37:61–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Tsiouris A, Morgan JA, Nemeh HW, Hodari A, Brewer RJ, Paone G.. Sex-specific outcomes in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular devices as a bridge to transplantation or destination therapy. ASAIO J 2014;60:199–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. Weymann A, Patil NP, Sabashnikov A, Mohite PN, García Sáez D, Amrani M, Bahrami T, De Robertis F, Wahlers T, Banner NR, Popov AF, Simon AR.. Gender differences in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy as a bridge to transplantation: a risk-adjusted comparison using a propensity score-matching analysis. Artif Organs 2015;39:212–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241. Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, Adlam D, Arslanian-Engoren C, Economy KE, Ganesh SK, Gulati R, Lindsay ME, Mieres JH, Naderi S, Shah S, Thaler DE, Tweet MS, Wood MJ; American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine; and Stroke Council. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: current state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018;137:e523–e557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242. Lebrun S, Bond RM.. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD): the underdiagnosed cardiac condition that plagues women. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2018;28:340–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243. Sharma S, Kaadan MI, Duran JM, Ponzini F, Mishra S, Tsiaras SV, Scott NS, Weinberg I, Ghoshhajra B, Lindsay M, Gibson CM, Chi G, Michalak N, Wood MJ.. Risk factors, imaging findings, and sex differences in spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol 2019;123:1783–1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244. Fahmy P, Prakash R, Starovoytov A, Boone R, Saw J.. Pre-disposing and precipitating factors in men with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:866–868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Codsi E, Gulati R, Rose CH, Best PJM.. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection associated with pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:426–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246. Presbitero P, Carcagnì A.. Gender differences in the outcome of interventional cardiac procedures. Ital Heart J 2003;4:522–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247. Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woolard RH, Feldman JA, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP.. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1163–1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248. Sharma S, Kaadan MI, Duran JM, Ponzini F, Mishra S, Tsiaras SV, Scott NS, Weinberg I, Ghoshhajra B, Lindsay M, Gibson CM, Chi G, Michalak N, Wood MJ.. Risk factors, imaging findings, and sex differences in spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol 2019;123:1783–1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249. Guagliumi G, Capodanno D, Saia F, Musumeci G, Tarantini G, Garbo R, Tumminello G, Sirbu V, Coccato M, Fineschi M, Trani C, De Benedictis M, Limbruno U, De Luca L, Niccoli G, Bezerra H, Ladich E, Costa M, Biondi Zoccai G, Virmani R; OCTAVIA Trial Investigators. Mechanisms of atherothrombosis and vascular response to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in women versus men with acute myocardial infarction: results of the OCTAVIA study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:958–968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250. Buccheri D, Zambelli G.. The link between spontaneous coronary artery dissection and takotsubo cardiomyopathy: analysis of the published cases. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:5489–5492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, Simari RD, Lerman A, Lennon RJ, Gersh BJ, Khambatta S, Best PJ, Rihal CS, Gulati R.. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation 2012;126:579–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252. Jeejeebhoy FM, Zelop CM, Lipman S, Carvalho B, Joglar J, Mhyre JM, Katz VL, Lapinsky SE, Einav S, Warnes CA, Page RL, Griffin RE, Jain A, Dainty KN, Arafeh J, Windrim R, Koren G, Callaway CW; American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, Council on Cardiovascular Diseases in the Young, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;132:1747–1773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253. Elkayam U, Jalnapurkar S, Barakkat MN, Khatri N, Kealey AJ, Mehra A, Roth A.. Pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction: a review of contemporary experience in 150 cases between 2006 and 2011. Circulation 2014;129:1695–1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254. Boeckel J-N, Palapies L, Klotsche J, Zeller T, von Jeinsen B, Perret MF, Kleinhaus SL, Pieper L, Tzikas S, Leistner D, Bickel C, Stalla GK, Lehnert H, Lindahl B, Wittchen H-U, Silber S, Baldus S, Maerz W, Dimmeler S, Blankenberg S, Munzel T, Zeiher AM, Keller T.. Adjusted troponin I for improved evaluation of patients with chest pain. Sci Rep 2018;8:8087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255. Templin C, Ghadri JR, Diekmann J, Napp LC, Bataiosu DR, Jaguszewski M, Cammann VL, Sarcon A, Geyer V, Neumann CA, Seifert B, Hellermann J, Schwyzer M, Eisenhardt K, Jenewein J, Franke J, Katus HA, Burgdorf C, Schunkert H, Moeller C, Thiele H, Bauersachs J, Tschöpe C, Schultheiss HP, Laney CA, Rajan L, Michels G, Pfister R, Ukena C, Böhm M, Erbel R, Cuneo A, Kuck KH, Jacobshagen C, Hasenfuss G, Karakas M, Koenig W, Rottbauer W, Said SM, Braun-Dullaeus RC, Cuculi F, Banning A, Fischer TA, Vasankari T, Airaksinen KE, Fijalkowski M, Rynkiewicz A, Pawlak M, Opolski G, Dworakowski R, MacCarthy P, Kaiser C, Osswald S, Galiuto L, Crea F, Dichtl W, Franz WM, Empen K, Felix SB, Delmas C, Lairez O, Erne P, Bax JJ, Ford I, Ruschitzka F, Prasad A, Lüscher TF.. Clinical features and outcomes of Takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2015;373:929–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256. Lemor A, Ramos-Rodriguez AJ, De La Villa R, Hosseini Dehkordi SH, Vazquez de Lara F, Lee S, Rodriguez Rivera M, Casso Dominguez A, Argulian E.. Impact of gender on in-hospital outcomes in patients with Takotsubo syndrome: a nationwide analysis from 2006 to 2014. Clin Cardiol 2019;42:13–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257. Ghadri JR, Kato K, Cammann VL, Gili S, Jurisic S, Di Vece D, Candreva A, Ding KJ, Micek J, Szawan KA, Bacchi B, Bianchi R, Levinson RA, Wischnewsky M, Seifert B, Schlossbauer SA, Citro R, Bossone E, Münzel T, Knorr M, Heiner S, D'Ascenzo F, Franke J, Sarcon A, Napp LC, Jaguszewski M, Noutsias M, Katus HA, Burgdorf C, Schunkert H, Thiele H, Bauersachs J, Tschöpe C, Pieske BM, Rajan L, Michels G, Pfister R, Cuneo A, Jacobshagen C, Hasenfuß G, Karakas M, Koenig W, Rottbauer W, Said SM, Braun-Dullaeus RC, Banning A, Cuculi F, Kobza R, Fischer TA, Vasankari T, Airaksinen KEJ, Opolski G, Dworakowski R, MacCarthy P, Kaiser C, Osswald S, Galiuto L, Crea F, Dichtl W, Empen K, Felix SB, Delmas C, Lairez O, El-Battrawy I, Akin I, Borggrefe M, Horowitz J, Kozel M, Tousek P, Widimský P, Gilyarova E, Shilova A, Gilyarov M, Winchester DE, Ukena C, Bax JJ, Prasad A, Böhm M, Lüscher TF, Ruschitzka F, Templin C.. Long-term prognosis of patients with Takotsubo syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:874–882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258. Sharkey SW, Windenburg DC, Lesser JR, Maron MS, Hauser RG, Lesser JN, Haas TS, Hodges JS, Maron BJ.. Natural history and expansive clinical profile of stress (tako-tsubo) cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:333–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259. Ghadri J-R, Wittstein IS, Prasad A, Sharkey S, Dote K, Akashi YJ, Cammann VL, Crea F, Galiuto L, Desmet W, Yoshida T, Manfredini R, Eitel I, Kosuge M, Nef HM, Deshmukh A, Lerman A, Bossone E, Citro R, Ueyama T, Corrado D, Kurisu S, Ruschitzka F, Winchester D, Lyon AR, Omerovic E, Bax JJ, Meimoun P, Tarantini G, Rihal C, Y-Hassan S, Migliore F, Horowitz JD, Shimokawa H, Lüscher TF, Templin C.. International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part I): clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and pathophysiology. Eur Heart J 2018;39:2032–2046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260. Lyon AR, Bossone E, Schneider B, Sechtem U, Citro R, Underwood SR, Sheppard MN, Figtree GA, Parodi G, Akashi YJ, Ruschitzka F, Filippatos G, Mebazaa A, Omerovic E.. Current state of knowledge on Takotsubo syndrome: a Position Statement from the Taskforce on Takotsubo Syndrome of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:8–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261. Patel SM, Chokka RG, Prasad K, Prasad A.. Distinctive clinical characteristics according to age and gender in apical ballooning syndrome (takotsubo/stress cardiomyopathy): an analysis focusing on men and young women. J Cardiac Fail 2013;19:306–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262. Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Murphree DH Jr, Barsness GW, Sandhu GS, Lerman A, Prasad A.. Cardiogenic shock in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy versus acute myocardial infarction: an 8-year national perspective on clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:469–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263. Fischer M, Baessler A, Schunkert H.. Renin angiotensin system and gender differences in the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc Res 2002;53:672–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264. Del RG, Velardo A, Zizzo G, Avogaro A, Cipolli C, Della CL, Marrama P, Macdonald IA.. Effect of estradiol on the sympathoadrenal response to mental stress in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;79:836–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265. Patel SM, Chokka RG, Prasad K, Prasad A.. Distinctive clinical characteristics according to age and gender in apical ballooning syndrome (takotsubo/stress cardiomyopathy): an analysis focusing on men and young women. J Card Fail 2013;19:306–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266. Stiermaier T, Moeller C, Oehler K, Desch S, Graf T, Eitel C, Vonthein R, Schuler G, Thiele H, Eitel I.. Long-term excess mortality in takotsubo cardiomyopathy: predictors, causes and clinical consequences. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:650–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267. Jurisic S, Gili S, Cammann VL, Kato K, Szawan KA, D'Ascenzo F, Jaguszewski M, Bossone E, Citro R, Sarcon A, Napp LC, Franke J, Noutsias M, Knorr M, Heiner S, Burgdorf C, Koenig W, Pott A, Kherad B, Rajan L, Michels G, Pfister R, Cuneo A, Jacobshagen C, Karakas M, Meyer P, Arroja JD, Banning A, Cuculi F, Kobza R, Fischer TA, Vasankari T, Airaksinen KEJ, Dworakowski R, Kaiser C, Osswald S, Galiuto L, Dichtl W, Chan C, Bridgman P, Beug D, Delmas C, Lairez O, Kozel M, Tousek P, Winchester DE, Gilyarova E, Shilova A, Gilyarov M, El-Battrawy I, Akin I, Galuszka J, Ukena C, Poglajen G, Paolini C, Bilato C, Carrilho-Ferreira P, Pinto FJ, Opolski G, MacCarthy P, Kobayashi Y, Prasad A, Rihal CS, Widimský P, Horowitz JD, Di MC, Crea F, Tschöpe C, Pieske BM, Hasenfuß G, Rottbauer W, Braun-Dullaeus RC, Felix SB, Borggrefe M, Thiele H, Bauersachs J, Katus HA, Schunkert H, Münzel T, Böhm M, Bax JJ, Lüscher TF, Ruschitzka F, Ghadri JR, Templin C.. Clinical predictors and prognostic impact of recovery of wall motion abnormalities in Takotsubo Syndrome: results from the International Takotsubo Registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e011194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268. Murakami T, Yoshikawa T, Maekawa Y, Ueda T, Isogai T, Sakata K, Nagao K, Yamamoto T, Takayama M.. Gender differences in patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy: multi-center registry from Tokyo CCU network. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cardiovascular Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES