Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nano Lett. 2020 Nov 10;20(12):8427–8429. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04042

Viewpoint: Single Molecules at 31: What’s Next?

W E Moerner 1
PMCID: PMC8865335  NIHMSID: NIHMS1780606  PMID: 33170016

Abstract

Optical studies of single molecules have taught us much over the past three decades, but these individual quantum-mechanical objects continue to have promise as probes of nanoscale structure and dynamics in complex systems.


In the more than three decades since the first optical detection and spectroscopy of a single molecule in a condensed phase host in 1989 at low temperature1 and in 1990 at room temperature,2 a wide array of scientific developments have occurred. There is something particularly fascinating about pumping just one molecule at a time with light, and then detecting the signal from that molecule. The single molecule itself is typically 1–3 nm in size, so learning what this molecule is doing by detecting the fluorescence it emits provides an admittedly indirect but useful route to information at the nanoscale. Complex hosts such as cells, polymers, or functional materials feature heterogeneity in local environments, and single molecules such as enzymes or photosynthetic antennas can be in a diversity of chemical or photophysical states, so the removal of ensemble averaging is a wonderful approach to observe molecular mechanisms in deeper detail.3 This Viewpoint highlights some recent focus areas and speculates what might happen in future work.

The number of interesting physical processes that have been explored using single-molecule optical studies is quite astounding. Measurements of emission brightness (emitted photons per second), emission spectrum, excited state lifetimes, orientation of the molecule from polarization studies, and so on all can be used to infer what is happening with the molecule and its nanoenvironment.4 Similarly, sensing the degree of energy transfer (FRET, or Förster resonant energy transfer) between two fluorophores or between an emitter and quencher continues to be an excellent readout of molecular motions, orientations, and distances between the emitters on the 3–5 nm spatial scale.5,6 These measurements can be performed as a function of time to sense changes (depending upon the photon rate to define the time scale), and they can all be performed on immobilized single molecules as well as ones trapped in solution to avoid surface perturbations.7 The position of the single molecule is another useful variable to measure because time-dependent trajectories from single-molecule tracking8 can lead to insight about diffusion, local viscosity, and the presence of non-Brownian processes on the one hand, or on the other can be used to infer hydrodynamic radius and/or the mobility of the single object.9 Even quantum-mechanical effects can be observed such as photon antibunching,10 single-photon emission,11 Rabi splittings,12 and others. The single molecule interacts with the local electromagnetic field, and thus, can sense alterations in this field produced by metallic nanoantennas,13 or its scattering can be used to develop ways to detect the molecule without fluorescence.14 All these approaches have been used for ultrasensitive digital detection of biomolecules for biomedical applications15 including genetic sequencing with single molecules16 and exploration of the fibril structures of amyloid diseases.17

Of course, single molecules can also be used to achieve super-resolution microscopy,18 where optical detail beyond the optical diffraction limit of ~250 nm is derived from using molecular switching or blinking to control the emitting concentration at a low level during any imaging frame. Determining positions of single molecules as samples of locations on an extended structure then can lead to a reconstruction with extremely fine detail. This concept has been implemented in both 2D and 3D imaging,19 leading to new insights for cell biology from bacteria20 to eukaryotes,21 and a Perspective addressing this area has recently appeared.22

Turning to the future, the author proceeds with some trepidation since as Yogi Berra has said, “It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future,” and it is dangerous to predict that a particular experiment cannot be done! Given the amazing creativity of researchers worldwide, that prediction would simply be an invitation to be proven wrong. Certainly we can expect to see further expansion into other areas of chemistry such as catalysis or materials and polymers when proper assays are designed, whether they be fluorescence-based23 or not.24 Computational data analysis of single-molecule behaviors will continue to drive innovations in statistical analysis.25 Combinations of single-molecule imaging with other high resolution microscopies will provide useful ways to offset the advantages and disadvantages of complementary methods: an example would be using single-molecule positions from optical microscopy to annotate the locations of specific biomolecules in a cryo-electron tomography image of a cell.26 New emitting molecules with enhanced emissive properties will certainly lead to more information, precision, and new readout variables,27 and the DNA-PAINT binding-based detection strategy promises to expand.28 Fascinating new insights can be expected when single molecules interact with novel electromagnetic structures such as resonators, metallic plasmonic nanoobjects,29,30 or metamaterials. The ability of a single molecule in a solid to absorb light in a similar way to a Na atom in a low density gas will likely be used for quantum mechanical applications if the decoherence caused by decay through multiple vibrational states can be controlled. The possibilities are limited only by our imagination as to what can be learned by probing one individual nanoscale molecule, one at a time, by tickling it with light.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author thanks the many members and colleagues of the Moerner Lab for stimulating collaborations over the years. This work was supported in part by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant No. R35-GM118067 and by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, & Biosciences Division under Award No. DE-FG02-07ER15892 (Physical Biosciences Program).

Footnotes

Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04042

The author declares no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Moerner WE; Kador L Optical detection and spectroscopy of single molecules in a solid. Phys. Rev. Lett 1989, 62, 2535–2538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Brooks Shera E; Seitzinger NK; Davis LM; Keller RA; Soper SA Detection of Single Fluorescent Molecules. Chem. Phys. Lett 1990, 174, 553–557. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Gräslund A; Rigler R; Widengren J (Eds.) Single Molecule Spectroscopy in Chemistry, Physics and Biology: Nobel Symposium 138 Proceedings; Springer, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Squires AH; Moerner WE Direct single-molecule measurements of phycocyanobilin photophysics in monomeric C-phycocyanin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2017, 114 (37), 9779–9784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Roy R; Hohng S; Ha T A practical guide to single-molecule FRET. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 507–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Hellenkamp B; Schmid S; Doroshenko O; Opanasyuk O; Kuhnemuth R; Rezaei Adariani S; Ambrose B; Aznauryan M; Barth A; Birkedal V; Bowen ME; Chen H; Cordes T; Eilert T; Fijen C; Gebhardt C; Gotz M; Gouridis G; Gratton E; Ha T; Hao P; Hanke CA; Hartmann A; Hendrix J; Hildebrandt LL; Hirschfeld V; Hohlbein J; Hua B; Hubner CG; Kallis E; Kapanidis AN; Kim JY; Krainer G; Lamb DC; Lee NK; Lemke EA; Levesque B; Levitus M; McCann JJ; Naredi-Rainer N; Nettels D; Ngo T; Qiu R; Robb NC; Rocker C; Sanabria H; Schlierf M; Schroder T; Schuler B; Seidel H; Streit L; Thurn J; Tinnefeld P; Tyagi S; Vandenberk N; Vera AM; Weninger KR; Wunsch B; Yanez-Orozco IS; Michaelis J; Seidel CAM; Craggs TD; Hugel T Precision and accuracy of single-molecule FRET measurements-a multi-laboratory benchmark study. Nat. Methods 2018, 15 (9), 669–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Squires AH; Cohen AE; Moerner WE Anti-Brownian Traps. In Encyclopedia of Biophysics; Roberts GCK, Watts A, Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Shen H; Tauzin LJ; Baiyasi R; Wang W; Moringo N; Shuang B; Landes CF Single Particle Tracking: From Theory to Biophysical Applications. Chem. Rev 2017, 117 (11), 7331–7376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Wang Q; Moerner WE Single-molecule motions enable direct visualization of biomolecular interactions in solution. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 555–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Basché T; Moerner WE; Orrit M; Talon H Photon Antibunching in the Fluorescence of a Single Dye Molecule Trapped in a Solid. Phys. Rev. Lett 1992, 69, 1516–1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Lounis BL; Orrit M Single-Photon Sources. Rep. Prog. Phys 2005, 68, 1129–1179. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Gerhardt IWG; Zumofen G; Hwang J; Renn A; Sandoghdar V Coherent state preparation and observation of Rabi oscillations in a single molecule. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys 2009, 79, 011402 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.011402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Kinkhabwala A; Yu Z; Fan S; Avlasevich Y; Mullen K; Moerner WE Large single-molecule fluorescence enhancements produced by a bowtie nanoantenna. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 654–657. [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Ortega-Arroyo J; Kukura P Interferometric scattering microscopy (iSCAT): new frontiers in ultrafast and ultrasensitive optical microscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2012, 14, 15625–15636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Cohen L; Walt DR Single-Molecule Arrays for Protein and Nucleic Acid Analysis. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem 2017, 10 (1), 345–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Levene MJ; Korlach J; Turner SW; Foquet M; Craighead HG; Webb WW Zero-Mode Waveguides for Single-Molecule Analysis at High Concentrations. Science 2003, 299, 682–686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Ding T; Wu T; Mazidi H; Zhang O; Lew MD Single-molecule orientation localization microscopy for resolving structural heterogeneities between amyloid fibrils. Optica 2020, 7, 602–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Sahl SJ; Moerner WE Super-resolution fluorescence imaging with single molecules. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol 2013, 23 (5), 778–787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).von Diezmann A; Shechtman Y; Moerner WE Three-Dimensional Localization of Single Molecules for Super-Resolution Imaging and Single-Particle Tracking. Chem. Rev 2017, 117 (11), 7244–7275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Tuson HH; Biteen JS Unveiling the inner workings of live bacteria using super-resolution microscopy. Anal. Chem 2015, 87 (1), 42–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Sigal YM; Zhou R; Zhuang X Visualizing and discovering cellular structures with super-resolution microscopy. Science 2018, 361 (6405), 880–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Mockl L; Moerner WE Super-resolution Microscopy with Single Molecules in Biology and Beyond–Essentials, Current Trends, and Future Challenges. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 17828–17844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Bishop LD; Landes CF From a protein’s perspective: elution at the single-molecule level. Acc. Chem. Res 2018, 51 (9), 2247–2254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Heylman KD; Thakkar N; Horak EH; Quillin SC; Cherqui C; Knapper KA; Masiello DJ; Goldsmith RH Optical microresonators as single-particle absorption spectrometers. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10 (12), 788–795. [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Lee A; Tsekouras K; Calderon C; Bustamante C; Pressé S Unraveling the Thousand Word Picture: An Introduction to Super-Resolution Data Analysis. Chem. Rev 2017, 117 (11), 7276–7330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Dahlberg P; Saurabh S; Sartor A; Wang J; Mitchell P; Chiu W; Shapiro L; Moerner WE Cryogenic Single-Molecule Fluorescence Annotations for Electron Tomography Reveals In Situ Organization of Key Proteins in Caulobacter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2020, 117, 13937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Altman RB; Terry DS; Zhou Z; Zheng Q; Geggier P; Kolster RA; Zhao Y; Javitch JA; Warren JD; Blanchard SC Cyanine fluorophore derivatives with enhanced photostability. Nat. Methods 2012, 9 (1), 68–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Schlichthaerle T; Eklund AS; Schueder F; Strauss MT; Tiede C; Curd A; Ries J; Peckham M; Tomlinson D; Jungmann R Site-Specific Labeling of Affimers for DNA-PAINT Microscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2018, 57, 11060–11063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Wang M; Li M; Jiang S; Gao J; Xi P Plasmonics meets super-resolution microscopy in biology. Micron 2020, 137, 102916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Willets KA; Wilson AJ; Sundaresan V; Joshi PB Super-Resolution Imaging and Plasmonics. Chem. Rev 2017, 117 (11), 7538–7582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES