Jiang et al. report that oncogenic KRAS signaling induces ferrous iron (Fe2+) accumulation throughout mutant KRAS-mediated transformation. Converting an FDA-approved MEK inhibitor into a ferrous iron–activatable drug conjugate (FeADC) achieves potent MAPK blockade in tumor cells with superior systemic tolerability.
Abstract
KRAS mutations drive a quarter of cancer mortality, and most are undruggable. Several inhibitors of the MAPK pathway are FDA approved but poorly tolerated at the doses needed to adequately extinguish RAS/RAF/MAPK signaling in the tumor cell. We found that oncogenic KRAS signaling induced ferrous iron (Fe2+) accumulation early in and throughout mutant KRAS-mediated transformation. We converted an FDA-approved MEK inhibitor into a ferrous iron–activatable drug conjugate (FeADC) and achieved potent MAPK blockade in tumor cells while sparing normal tissues. This innovation allowed sustainable, effective treatment of tumor-bearing animals, with tumor-selective drug activation, producing superior systemic tolerability. Ferrous iron accumulation is an exploitable feature of KRAS transformation, and FeADCs hold promise for improving the treatment of KRAS-driven solid tumors.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
The uptake, transport, and storage of essential divalent metals such as iron and copper are tightly controlled in biology but often dysregulated in cancer (Chang, 2015). Transcriptional profiling has revealed links between elevated iron levels and poor prognosis in gliomas (Han et al., 2018), breast cancer (Torti and Torti, 2013a), and prostate cancer (Tesfay et al., 2015), but clinical studies based on iron chelation have failed (Buss et al., 2003). New appreciation for the crucial importance of iron homeostasis has been revealed through genome-wide association studies and the use of a new small-molecule iron probes with oxidation-state specificity (Aron et al., 2018; Bruemmer et al., 2020; Chang, 2015; Hirayama, 2019). Indeed, a recent functional screen found that the single indispensable function of the lysosome in cell proliferation was the pH-dependent unloading, reduction, and delivery of bioavailable Fe2+ to the cell (Weber et al., 2020). Intriguingly, elevated Fe2+ is linked by an unknown mechanism to a drug-tolerant cancer cell state (Hangauer et al., 2017) that is also highly susceptible to ferroptosis (Dixon and Stockwell, 2014; Stockwell et al., 2017). Taken together, these studies suggest that access to bioavailable Fe2+ (as opposed to total iron) is an important factor in cancer cell survival and proliferation. On the other hand, a role for copper in signaling through MEK1 has been proposed, with reduced bioavailability of Cu decreasing MEK kinase activity and oncogenic BRAF-driven tumorigenesis (Brady et al., 2014). Conversely, oncogenic BRAFV600E and KRASG12D mutations lead to a decreased intracellular labile Cu(I) pool (Chung et al., 2019). Despite these new insights into altered metal ion homeostasis and cancer biology, therapeutic approaches that aimed at exploiting such changes have been slow to emerge.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is among the most aggressive and lethal solid tumors with a 5-yr survival rate of ∼9% (Siegel et al., 2018). Systemic therapies are only marginally effective in this disease, and no targeted therapies against somatic aberrations are currently available. KRAS mutation is a cardinal feature of PDA. Constitutive RAS activation drives uncontrolled proliferation and enhances the survival of cancer cells and also sensitizes tumor cells to ferroptosis (Dixon et al., 2012). Here, we explore the elevation of intracellular Fe2+ in mutant KRAS-driven tumor cells in vitro and in vivo and target these tumors with a prototypical ferrous iron–activatable drug conjugate (FeADC) that ablates MAPK signaling in tumor while sparing tissues that are dependent on physiologic RAS–MAPK signaling for tissue homeostasis, which allows a dramatically improved therapeutic window.
Results
A ferrous iron signature is prognostic in pancreatic adenocarcinoma
To evaluate tumor iron metabolism in an unbiased manner, we first evaluated mRNA transcriptional data from 23 tumor types profiled by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with a focus on iron homeostatic programs using biological pathway activity method (Ding et al., 2019). The cancer types with the highest Z-scores for iron metabolism were all RAS–MAPK pathway-driven malignancies, which include glioblastoma multiforme, lung adenocarcinoma, and PDA (PAAD; Fig. 1 A). STEAP3 (a lysosomal ferrireductase) and TFRC (transferrin receptor) encode key genes in iron homeostasis. We compared levels of STEAP3 and TFRC mRNA to overall patient survival (OS) in PDA, a disease with the highest rate of KRAS mutation. Both STEAP3 and TFRC expression are associated with shorter OS by Cox regression analysis (Fig. 1 B). Liver metastasis is a uniformly poor prognostic feature in PDA. We examined STEAP3 expression in an independent primary and metastatic PDA dataset (Aguirre et al., 2018) and found STEAP3 expression to be higher in liver metastases than in all other metastatic sites (P = 0.0001; Fig. 1 C). Gallium-68 citrate is a clinically studied radiotracer that mimics (Fe3+-loaded) holotransferrin and can quantify iron demand in cancer patients (Behr et al., 2018; Larson et al., 1980). To assess iron avidity in PDA, we conducted an exploratory human imaging study with Ga-68 citrate positron emission tomography (PET) in our PDA patients. Quantitative analysis of the imaging data showed that visceral and bony PDA metastases were highly avid for Gallium-68 compared to normal tissues, which is consistent with an iron avid phenotype in PDA (Fig. 1 D).
We next measured avidity for Fe3+ and Fe2+ in xenograft mouse models, to better understand our clinical observations. We observed enhanced uptake of Gallium-68 in oncogenic KRAS-driven PDA xenografts as compared to breast cancer xenografts with wild-type KRAS (Fig. 1 E). To assess levels of ferrous iron (Fe2+) in the same tumors, we used 18F-TRX, our recently described radiotracer designed specifically to detect Fe2+ (Muir et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2021). We found that oncogenic KRAS-driven PDA tumors (as compared to the KRAS wild-type breast cancer examined) were enriched in Fe2+, which mirrors the findings with 68Ga (Fig. S1 A). Together, these findings suggest that increased iron uptake and its reduction to the labile ferrous form is a common feature of PDA and is associated with poor prognosis in patients.
Oncogenic KRAS drives accumulation of labile ferrous iron
We next investigated the mechanism(s) by which oncogenic KRAS drives Fe2+ accumulation. To temporally control KrasG12D expression in primary cells, we isolated primary dermal fibroblasts from a novel Lox–Stop–Lox Kras (LSL-KrasG12D) conditional mouse model, in which high expression of KrasG12D is initiated by the removal of a Cre recombinase-sensitive transcriptional stop element. We activated the LSL-KrasG12D allele with adenovirus-expressing Cre recombinase (AdCre). We collected protein from primary fibroblasts at 24, 48, and 72 h after AdCre infection and observed robust expression of KrasG12D protein and also increased MAPK signaling, as demonstrated by phospho-ERK induction (Fig. 2 A). Intracellular labile Fe2+ also increased, as measured with the Fe2+-selective fluorescent dye SiRhoNox (Aron et al., 2018; Hirayama et al., 2019; Hirayama et al., 2017; Fig. 2, B and C). Proliferation slowed upon KrasG12D expression and p21CIP levels increased, which is consistent with oncogene-induced senescence (Serrano et al., 1997; Fig. S1, B and C). We also isolated primary pancreatic ductal cells (Reichert et al., 2013) from Lox–Stop–Lox Kras (KrasLSL_G12D); Trp53flox/flox animals and again activated expression of KrasG12D with AdCre transduction. We again observed increased Fe2+ levels at 72 h after AdCre (Fig. 2, A and D; and Fig. S1 D). Similarly, we observed increased intracellular ferrous iron in both HPDE (immortalized human pancreatic ductal epithelial cells) and HBEC cells (immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells) after the expression of KRASG12D by lentiviral transduction (Fig. 2 E). Evaluation of a larger panel of human malignant cell lines from PDA and breast cancer confirmed that cells harboring mutant KRAS had consistently higher levels of total intracellular ferrous iron (Fig. S1 E). We next deployed previously reported genetically engineered mouse PDA cancer cell lines (designated iKrasG12D) in which the expression of KrasG12D is dependent upon continuous doxycycline exposure (Ying et al., 2012) to probe the requirement for sustained oncogenic KRAS signaling to support iron metabolism and transport. We observed decreased intracellular labile Fe2+ within 48 h of doxycycline withdrawal in two iKras lines: AK196 and AK210 (Figs. 2 F and S1 F). These results demonstrate early and sustained increases in Fe2+ as a consistent effect of oncogenic KRAS expression and distinctly uncouple Fe2+ accumulation from cellular proliferation in primary cells, since replicative arrest (i.e., oncogene-induced senescence) is observed in the Fe2+-rich state upon acute induction of KRASG12D signaling.
We next examined the transcription of a panel of iron regulatory genes in three nontransformed cell lines: HPDE, AALE (immortalized alveolar airway epithelial cells), and MEFs, with or without the expression of oncogenic KRAS. We observed significant elevation of STEAP3 expression and decreased FPN (ferroportin, an iron exporter) expression in the presence of oncogenic KRAS (Fig. 2 G; and Fig. S1, G and H). Conversely, abrogation of oncogenic KRAS expression after Dox withdrawal in iKRAS cell lines (AK196, AK210, and AK38) resulted in directionally opposite effects on STEAP3 and FPN (Figs. 2 H and S1 I). These data suggest that oncogenic KRAS is necessary and sufficient to maintain an elevated ferrous iron pool, at least in part by increased expression of ferrireductase and reduced iron efflux at a transcription level. Finally, overexpression of STEAP3 in iKRAS cell lines (AK196 and AK210) led to a moderate elevation of Fe2+ in the absence of oncogenic KRAS but exhibited no additional additive effect on Fe2+ levels when oncogenic KRAS is present (Figs. 2 I and S1 J). This suggests that oncogenic KRAS establishes an elevated basal level of labile Fe2+ in the cancer cell, but that homeostatic control over this new state is retained, and thus cannot be further augmented by, for example, overexpression of STEAP3.
FeADC targets KRAS-induced cell state
KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in human cancer but has proven difficult to target pharmacologically. RAF-MEK-MAPK is the major RAS effector arm in PDA (Collisson et al., 2012), acute myeloid leukemia (Burgess et al., 2017), and lung adenocarcinoma (Karreth et al., 2011). Fe2+-dependent pharmacology (wherein a drug is activated through Fenton-type reaction with ferrous iron) has been established in the antimalarial artemisinin and related compounds but is mostly unexplored outside of antiprotozoal therapies. Since we found elevated Fe2+ levels to be driven by oncogenic KRAS, we hypothesized that mutant KRAS-driven PDA tumor cells might be selectively targeted with a FeADC based on 1,2,4-trioxolane (“TRX”) chemistry (Fontaine et al., 2014). To determine whether a FeADC approach might be effective in mutant KRAS-driven malignancies, we studied PDA cells with the Fe2+ probe TRX-PURO, a Fe2+-activatable conjugate of the aminonucleoside puromycin (Spangler et al., 2016b). Puromycin is released from TRX-PURO in cells selectively via reaction with Fe2+ (Fig. 3 A), and PURO release can be quantified with an anti-puromycin antibody. We treated primary skin fibroblasts harboring Cre-inducible KRASG12D with TRX-PURO after synchronously inducing high levels of oncogenic KRASG12D. We observed a time-dependent increase in puromycin signal out to 72 h after infection (Fig. S1 K), closely mirroring our findings with SiRhoNox (Fig. 2, B–D) and indicating efficient Fe2+-dependent activation of TRX-PURO in cells expressing oncogenic KRAS.
Having established that mutant RAS signaling elevates intracellular Fe2+, as measured with both SiRhoNox and TRX-PURO, we next sought to target the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway in PDA with a conditionally activated (FeADC-type) inhibitor of this pathway. Targeting MEK with allosteric inhibitors of MEK1/2 has shown clinical benefit, but the approach suffers from on-target toxicities that are dose-limiting in the eye, skin, gut, and other organs. Clinical experience has shown that sustainable dosing of these agents is typically only ∼25% of the FDA-approved dose (Saunders et al., 2020) severely hampering the dose intensity achievable in the tumor cell and ultimately limiting clinical efficacy. To model MEK inhibitor toxicity in animals, we administered the MEK inhibitor binimetinib to healthy mice for 3 wk. We observed thinning of the epidermal keratinocyte layer in tail skin (Fig. S2 A), confirming the conserved, essential role for MEK1/2 in the cellular epidermal layer (Azan et al., 2017; Danilenko et al., 2016). We hypothesized that a FeADC targeting MEK1/2 would be efficiently activated by Fe2+ in oncogenic KRAS-driven tumors, but not in healthily mouse epidermis, where normal iron homeostasis is preserved. We synthesized FeADCs bearing the FDA-approved allosteric MEK inhibitor cobimetinib (COBI) and based on either enantiomeric form of the Fe2+-targeting TRX moiety, yielding the novel agents (R,R)-TRX-COBI and (S,S)-TRX-COBI (Fig. 3, A and B). Incubation of these FeADCs in mouse and human liver microsomes revealed somewhat superior metabolic stability of (R,R)-TRX-COBI (Table S1), and so, we used this form in subsequent studies (henceforth denoted simply TRX-COBI). We next evaluated the pharmacokinetic properties of TRX-COBI in NSG (NOD scid gamma) mice following a single 15 mg/kg dose by the intraperitoneal (IP) route. We observed a favorable exposure profile, with an elimination half-life of ∼6.9 h, Cmax = 1,421 ng/ml, and AUCinf = 6,462 h ng/ml (full parameters provided in Table S2). Significantly, the extent of free COBI released from its FeADC form was minimal, ∼2% of the total dose by Cmax and AUCinf. Overall, the pharmacokinetic properties of TRX-COBI were similar to that reported previously for COBI in Nu/Nu mice (Choo et al., 2012), suggesting TRX-COBI as a suitable comparator and FeADC prototype for in vivo study.
We compared the growth inhibitory effects of TRX-COBI and COBI across a panel of human PDA cells harboring oncogenic KRAS and found that TRX-COBI was efficiently activated, as evidenced by similar phospho-ERK reductions at equimolar exposure of COBI (Fig. 3 C). We further explored the relationship(s) among cell type, cell genotype, and TRX-COBI activation in an unbiased manner using the PRISM platform (Yu et al., 2016). We screened COBI and TRX-COBI in eight-point dose response across 750 cancer cell lines spanning 18 tumor types. Briefly, cell lines were treated with inhibitors for 5 d, and proliferation measurements allowed growth inhibitory doses (GI50) of TRX-COBI and COBI for each cell line to be calculated as described (Yu et al., 2016). We next calculated a TRX-COBI susceptibility ratio (i.e., GI50COBI/GI50TRX-COBI) for 520 out of 750 cell lines passing the criteria needed for index creation. PDA-derived cell lines exhibited the highest mean TRX-COBI GI50 ratio across the 18 types of tumor cells interrogated (Fig. 3 D). Additionally, BRAF- and RAS-mutated cancer cell lines also had significantly higher TRX-COBI GI50 ratios than wild-type RAS lines (P < 0.001; Fig. 3 E), indicating more efficient activation of the FeADC in MAPK-driven tumor cells and in PDA in general.
To show that TRX-COBI activation is Fe2+ dependent in PDA cells, we used shRNA to deplete STEAP3 in MiaPaca2 and Capan1 cells and observed the expected decrease (∼50%) in intracellular Fe2+ levels as measured by SiRhoNox (Fig. S2 C). Importantly, STEAP3 depletion also decreased the conversion efficiency of TRX-COBI to COBI as measured by phospho-ERK/ERK ratios (Fig. S2, D and E). Since FeADC activation involves Fenton chemistry and the formation of ROS as reaction intermediates (Spangler et al., 2016a), we considered whether ferroptosis (Dixon et al., 2012) induction might contribute to cell killing by TRX-COBI treatment. Contrary to this hypothesis, we observed similar levels of lipid peroxidation and ROS generation in untreated, COBI, and TRX-COBI–treated MiaPaca2 cells (Fig. S2, F and G). Furthermore, we found in both MiaPaca2 and PANC02.03 cells that the cell death induced by COBI or TRX-COBI was not rescued by the antioxidant ferrostatin-1 nor by the iron chelator desferrioxamine (DFO), whereas cell death was induced by the bona fide ferroptosis inducer erastin (Fig. S2 H). These findings indicate that TRX-COBI induces nonferroptotic cell death through payload (COBI) release and MEK inhibition.
Together, the cellular data indicated that a prototypical MEK inhibitor FeADC is effective in KRAS-driven PDA cells and that FeADC activation depends, at least in part, on the cellular ferroreductive machinery under partial control of oncogenic KRAS.
An FeADC of COBI exhibits potent antitumor activity in vivo
We next evaluated the FeADC approach to MEK1/2 inhibition in vivo. We orthotopically implanted mouse KrasLSL_G12D, Trp53f/+, Pdx1Cre (KPC) cells into syngeneic FVB mice and treated with equimolar doses of either TRX-COBI or COBI. Both drug forms were comparably growth inhibitory (Fig. 4, A and B) and showed equivalent suppression of phospho-ERK levels, at equimolar doses in this orthotopic PDA model (Fig. 4, G and H). We next evaluated the effects of COBI and TRX-COBI on overall survival in a widely used autochthonous KrasLSL-G12D/+; Trp53flox/flox, (KP) mouse lung cancer model (Jackson et al., 2001). We initiated treatment with equimolar doses of COBI, TRX-COBI, or vehicle 8 wk after adenoviral tumor induction for 60 d. Mice receiving either COBI or TRX-COBI had fewer lung lesions (as evidenced by LSL-Tomato fluorescence) and showed prolonged overall survival compared to vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 4, C and D). We further examined the therapeutic efficacy of TRX-COBI in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. We used two KRASG12D-driven PDA PDX models (PDX260) and a KRASG12C-driven nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) PDX (PDX TM00186). Equimolar dosing of COBI or TRX-COBI significantly inhibited tumor growth relative to vehicle-treated tumors (Fig. 4, E and F). In addition, tumor lysates and tumor immunohistochemistry from PDA260 showed that TRX-COBI reduced phospho-ERK as effectively as parental COBI (Fig. 4, G and H). Collectively, these data demonstrate equivalent in vivo antitumor activity with equimolar doses of TRX-COBI or COBI in multiple relevant oncogenic KRAS-driven models of lung and pancreatic adenocarcinoma in vivo.
FeADC approach mitigates MEK inhibitor on-target, off-tumor toxicities
We next asked whether the FeADC approach might mitigate on-target, off-tumor toxicities of systemic MEK inhibition, reasoning that TRX-COBI should remain inactive (TRX-caged) in normal tissues (skin, retina) that are adversely impacted by systemic MEK inhibition in cancer patients. We used retinal cells and keratinocytes as experimentally tractable models of two tissues of known MEK inhibitor toxicity. We found that human retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPE-1) and keratinocytes (HaCaT) were about 10-fold less sensitive than PDA cells to TRX-COBI, as evidenced by intact phospho-ERK levels in the nontumor cells at drug concentrations sufficient to completely abolish phospho-ERK in PDA cells. In stark contrast, COBI more potently inhibited phospho-ERK in keratinocytes than in PDA cells (Fig. 5 A). Furthermore, uninduced iKras cells were resistant to TRX-COBI inhibition of MEK but were sensitive to COBI inhibition of MEK as measured by phospho-ERK levels (Fig. 5 B). These results suggest that the FeADC approach can realize improved therapeutic index in KRAS-driven cancers.
Next, we explored the tissue-selective activation of FeADCs in animals. We administered a single, equimolar dose of TRX-COBI, COBI, or vehicle, to mice bearing subcutaneous SW1990 and MiaPaca2 tumors in each flank followed 7 h later by collection of tissue from brain, liver, spleen, tail skin, plasma, and tumor. We calculated a COBI exposure ratio by dividing the concentration of free COBI in the tumor/tissues of mice receiving TRX-COBI with those receiving COBI directly, that is, COBI exposure ratio = [COBI]TRX-COBI treated/[COBI]COBI treated. We observed higher COBI exposure ratios in both SW1990 and MiaPaca2 tumors compared to plasma, liver, and spleen (Fig. 5 C). Phospho-ERK was significantly and comparably reduced in tumor and nontumor tissues of the COBI-treated mice, reflecting unsurprisingly equivalent MEK inhibition in tumor and healthy tissues alike. In contrast, phospho-ERK was extinguished in the tumors of TRX-COBI-treated mice to an equivalent degree as in COBI-treated mice, while phospho-ERK was spared (similar to vehicle control) in the brain, spleen, liver, and tail skin (Figs. 5 D and S3 A). This effect was consistent with the higher COBI exposure ratios observed in tumor vs. normal tissues and indicates that TRX-COBI remains mostly caged and thus inactive in normal tissues of tumor-bearing animals while still extinguishing KRAS-induced MAPK signaling in the tumor itself via KRAS-driven uncaging of COBI payload. To model the cumulative toxicities of chronic, systemic MEK inhibition, we collected tail skin samples from mice dosed with equimolar amounts of TRX-COBI, COBI, or vehicle for 20 d and measured the cellular epidermal layer. We consistently observed thinning of the epidermal layer in mice dosed with COBI (Figs. 5 E and S3 B) but not in TRX-COBI–dosed animals. Together, these findings show that many of the MEK1/2-dependent (on-target) extratumoral toxicities (Scholl et al., 2009; Balagula et al., 2011) of MEK inhibition are substantially mitigated by the FeADC approach, which might improve the poor therapeutic index of RAS-RAF-MAPK blockade in the clinic.
MEK inhibition with FeADC form enables dose intensity in combination therapies
The inherently low therapeutic index of MEK inhibitors has hindered development of MEKi-containing therapeutic combinations. Our encouraging data with TRX-COBI monotherapy suggested that MEKi-anchored combination treatment schemes might be better tolerated with an FeADC, due to relatively less active MEK inhibition in off-target tissues. Inhibition of SHP2 can sensitize many cycling-dependent KRAS-mutant or KRAS-amplified cancers to MEK inhibitors (Ruess et al., 2018). While such vertical blockade holds tremendous promise, combination therapy of SHP2 and MEK inhibitors negatively effects tolerability in mice (Fedele et al., 2018). Indeed, we found that combinations of tolerable monotherapy doses of COBI and the SHP2 inhibitor SHP099 (Novartis) induced study-terminating body weight loss from baseline within 3 wk when combined in non–tumor-bearing NSG mice (Fig. S4 A).
We next compared the efficacy and tolerability of TRX-COBI to COBI when anchoring combination therapy with the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 (Revolution Medicines) in KRASG12C NSCLC (TM00186) PDX model. Six separate groups of mice were administered vehicle, 30 mg/kg RMC-4550 monotherapy, or combinations comprising 30 mg/kg of RMC-4550 combined with COBI at either 7.5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg, or RMC-4550 with comparable (equimolar) 12.5 mg/kg or 16 mg/kg doses of TRX-COBI. Of note, mice receiving the combination of COBI 10 mg/kg plus RMC 30 mg/kg lost weight (∼10%; Fig. 6 A) and exhibited lassitude. Tumor and spleen lysates both showed profound inhibition of the generation of phospho-ERK (Fig. 6, C and D). Remarkably, the equivalent combination of TRX-COBI 16 mg/kg with RMC 30 mg/kg induced more pronounced tumor growth inhibition without measurable weight loss (Fig. 6 B) and showed comparatively minor effects on the levels of phospho-ERK in the spleen (Fig. 6, C and D).
To assess the potential of an FeADC to improve the toxicity profile of vertical MAPK pathway blockade, we next assessed cytotoxicity of combined MEK + SHP2 dual inhibition in PDA (MiaPaca2) vs. normal (RPE-1 and HaCaT) cells. Treatment of nonmalignant RPE-1 and HaCaT cells with increasing concentrations of COBI enhanced cell growth inhibition of SHP2 inhibitor (SHP099, 10 µM), while equimolar combinations of TRX-COBI/SHP2i were less toxic to these normal cells (Fig. S4, B and C). In contrast, KRASG12C MiaPaca-2 cells showed equivalent sensitivity to the two combinations (Fig. S4 D), indicating a potentially improved safety profile with and comparable efficacy of TRX-COBI in MEK inhibitor–based combination therapies. Together, these data indicate that FeADC-based MEK inhibition combined with SHP2 blockade exhibits superior tolerability and improved efficacy in KRAS-driven tumors. Consistent with this interpretation, we observed that combining TRX-COBI with a structurally distinct SHP2 inhibitor (SHP099) similarly improved tolerability (as judged by body weight) when compared to combinations involving COBI (Fig. S4 A).
Discussion
Iron homeostasis is tightly controlled at the level of the cell and organism (Torti and Torti, 2013b). Consistent with previous observations in breast cancer (Miller et al., 2011; Pinnix et al., 2010), prostate cancer (Tesfay et al., 2015), and glioblastoma (Schonberg et al., 2015), we have now confirmed an altered iron metabolic state in PDA characterized by the elevation of cytosolic labile ferrous iron. The metabolic or other benefits gleaned by the PDA cell through this change are unclear, but the liabilities it presents are obvious. Labile iron promotes Fenton chemistry and contributes to lipid peroxidation, thus making cells highly dependent on constitutive antioxidant responses mediated by GPX4 (Forcina and Dixon, 2019; Liu et al., 2018) and/or FSP1 (Bersuker et al., 2019; Doll et al., 2019) to avoid a default ferroptotic cell death program. On the one hand, our findings in oncogenic KRAS-driven cells and tumor models provide further evidence linking oncogenic KRAS to elevated Fe2+ and a vulnerability to ferroptosis (Dixon et al., 2012). Beyond this, we show that KRAS-driven “ferroaddiction” can be exploited with FeADC-based therapy independent of ferroptotic pathways.
The mechanism(s) by which specific oncogenes alter iron homeostasis to promote tumor growth remain to be fully elucidated. Here, we show that KRAS signaling is necessary and sufficient to empower Fe2+ demand in PDA cells. In particular, oncogenic KRAS exerts control over the sole iron exporter and lysosomal ferrireductase to maintain an expanded pool of bioavailable Fe2+. Ras oncogenes have been shown to alter nutrient metabolism (Hensley et al., 2016; Perera and Bardeesy, 2015; Ying et al., 2012), so it is unsurprising that this control would extend to iron nutrient. Previously, oncogenic H-Ras was shown to repress Ferritin expression and thereby expand the labile iron pool and support tumor cell growth (Kakhlon et al., 2002). Notably, we find that oncogenic KRAS signaling does not appear to act on the ferritin axis, but significantly through STEAP3 and FPN. Taken together, these findings suggest that oncogenes can employ diverse means to elevate labile iron, and that therapeutic modalities targeting labile iron directly (rather than indirectly via iron modulatory genes) may be effective across a broader range of cancers. Moreover, it has been widely demonstrated that multiple tumor local immune components, including tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils, display a strong iron-release phenotype that promotes tumor cell proliferation and growth (Corna et al., 2010; Recalcati et al., 2010). Thus, we expect that the tumor-associated macrophages likely contribute to an iron-enriched tumor microenvironment which support the observed increased intracellular iron storage in the mutant KRAS-driven tumor cells.
Most KRAS-mutant cancers depend on sustained expression and signaling of KRAS, thus making it a high-priority therapeutic target (Papke and Der, 2017; Stephen et al., 2014). Unfortunately, the development of direct small molecule inhibitors of mutant K/N/HRAS proteins has been elusive until very recently (Kim et al., 2020; Seton-Rogers, 2020). Moreover, single-agent inhibition of KRAS effectors (e.g., MEK-MAPK pathway) in KRAS-mutant cancers has been disappointing to date (Adjei et al., 2008; Infante et al., 2012; Ko et al., 2016; Zhao and Adjei, 2014). On-target MEK inhibition in healthy tissues dramatically limits the tolerable dose and also the feasibility of MEK inhibitor–based combination therapy. The cellular pathways influenced by dominant acting oncogenes are often essential for homeostatic maintenance of healthy tissues in patients. As a result, potent inhibitors of pathways downstream of mutated oncogenes often have deleterious effects in healthy tissues. This manifests as clinical toxicity. Furthermore, since pathway flux is often greater in cancer cells than in normal cells, the amount of inhibitor required for therapeutic efficacy in the tumor often closely approaches or even exceeds the dose that is tolerable clinically, due to toxicities in healthy tissues.
The Fe2+-mediated Fenton reaction underlies the pharmacology of artemisinins and related endoperoxide antimalarials (Ansari et al., 2013; O’Neill and Posner, 2004). Leveraging this clinically proven chemistry, we introduced (Fontaine et al., 2014; Mahajan et al., 2012) the concept of FeADCs. Having uncovered in the current study an elevation of Fe2+ stemming from oncogenic RAS/MAPK signaling, we synthesized and evaluated TRX-COBI, a novel FeADC designed to target the MAPK pathway in KRAS-driven PDA. Notably, we show with TRX-COBI tumor-selective activation that enables ablation of MAPK signaling in PDA tumor cells and xenografts, while sparing the pathway in normal cells and tissues, including in major organs of iron storage (liver) and targets of MEK inhibitor–induced toxicity (skin and central nervous system). We thus decouple MAPK signaling from elevated Fe2+ status in normal and tumor cells and present a therapeutic strategy that exploits these distinctions to enable more tolerable and efficacious combination therapy targeting the MAPK pathway in KRAS-driven PDA. The discovery of pharmacologically exploitable ferroaddiction in RAS-driven cancers holds promise to improve the treatment of deadly cancers through a practicable and generalizable approach to FeADC design, development, and clinical testing.
Materials and methods
Key resources
Key resources are listed in Table S3.
Experimental model and subject details
Cell lines
MiaPaca-2, HPAF II, HPAC, Panc 10.05, and Panc 02.03 are from American Type Culture Collection. Capan1 was provided by S.K. Batra (University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE). MDAMB231, MDAMB468, ZR75-1, SKBR3, and T47-D were provided by M.M. Moasser (University of California, San Francisco [UCSF], San Francisco, CA). iKras lines AK38, AK196, and AK210 were provided by R. Perera (UCSF, San Francisco, CA). Skin fibroblast isolation from LSL-KRASG12D mouse was performed as described (Khan and Gasser, 2016). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2. Cells were grown in appropriate media as recommended by ATCC and supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). All cell lines tested were negative for mycoplasma contamination.
Patient characteristics and accrual
This study was approved by the UCSF Institutional Review Board (IRB) and was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Informed consent was obtained from all patients enrolled into the study.
Patient inclusion criteria were (1) histologically confirmed/clinically suspected pancreatic cancer, (2) at least one lesion ≥1 cm, (3) age >18, (4) a signed informed consent indicating that they are aware of the investigational nature of this study, (5) negative for HIV, and (6) not be pregnant or breastfeeding.
Patient demographic information including age and sex were recorded as well as their tumor locations and histological grade.
Mice models
All experiments were conducted in the AAALAC-accredited UCSF in accordance with all applicable local requirements, including approval by the IACUC.
Small animal PET/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution studies
6-wk-old male NSG mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory.
Orthotopic pancreas xenografts
Derivation of the p53 2.1.1 FVB/n mice has been described (Collisson et al., 2012).
KPT lung tumor model
KrasLSL-G12D/+,p53flox/flox,R26LSL-tdTomato (KPT) mice have been previously described. Mice were bred on a mixed background.
PDXs
For generation of the PDX 260 model, informed consent was obtained from the patient as per an open IRB-approved protocol at UCSF. Tumors were implanted in NSG mice (Jackson Laboratory).
Method details
Reagents and antibodies
The following antibodies were used: KRAS G12D (14429; dilution: 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology); KRAS (53270; dilution: 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology); phospho-Erk1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204; 4370; dilution: 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology); Erk1/2 (4696; dilution: 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology); GAPDH (5,174; dilution: 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology); STEAP3 (17186; dilution: 1:1,000; Proteintech); and ferroportin (NBP1-21502SS; dilution: 1:1,000; Novus Biologicals). COBI and SHP099 were purchased from MedChemExpress. RMC-4550 material used in these studies was provided by Revolution Medicines, Inc., in collaboration with Sanofi, Paris, France.
General synthetic methods
All reactions were performed under an Argon atmosphere using anhydrous solvents obtained from commercial suppliers in oven-dried, round-bottom flasks containing Teflon-coated stirrer bars, unless otherwise noted. All anhydrous solvents used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Solvents used during flash column chromatography and reaction workup procedures were purchased from either Sigma-Aldrich or Fisher Scientific and were used without further purification. All other reagents were obtained commercially and used without further purification, unless otherwise stated. Air and/or moisture sensitive reagents were transferred via syringe and were introduced into reaction vessels through rubber septa. Reactions were monitored using TLC, performed on 0.25-mm EMD precoated glass-backed silica gel 60 F-254 plates. Column chromatography was performed on Silicycle Sili-prep cartridges using a Biotage Isolera Four automated flash chromatography system. Compounds were visualized under UV light or through staining with permanganate, iodine, or most preferably for trioxolane analogs, Seebach’s “Magic” stain (composed of the following: 2.5 g phosphomolybdic acid, 1.0 g cerium sulfate, 6 ml concentrated sulfuric acid, and 94 ml water). Solutions containing crude reaction mixtures, as well as those obtained upon reaction workup, and chromatography fractions were first concentrated by rotary evaporation at temperatures under 40°C, at 20 Torr and then subsequently placed under Hi-Vac at 0.5 Torr, unless otherwise indicated. (R)- and (S)-4-nitrophenyl carbonate intermediates were prepared as reported previously (Blank et al., 2020).
Instrumentation
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III HD 400 MHz (with 5 mm BBFO Z-gradient Smart Probe), calibrated to CH(D)Cl3 as an internal reference (7.26 and 77.00 ppm for 1H and 13C NMR spectra, respectively). Data for 1H NMR spectra are reported in terms of chemical shift (δ, ppm), multiplicity, coupling constant (Hz), and integration. Data for 13C NMR spectra are reported in terms of chemical shift (δ, ppm), with multiplicity and coupling constants in the case of C–F coupling. The following abbreviations are used to denote the multiplicities: s = singlet; d = doublet; t = triplet; q = quartet; quin = quintet; sept = septet; m = multiplet; app = apparent; or combinations of these. Where required, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC were used for the assignment of protons and carbons. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) and compound purity were determined using Waters Micromass ZQ 4000, equipped with a Waters 2795 separation module, a Waters 2996 photodiode array detector, and a Waters 2424 ELSD. HPLC was performed on a Waters 2535 separation module with a Waters 2998 photodiode array detector using an XBridge BEH C18, 3.5 µm, 4.6 × 20 mm column, at ambient temperature (unregulated) using a mobile phase of water–methanol containing a constant 0.05% formic acid. High-resolution mass spectroscopy (HRMS) spectra were obtained using a Finnigan LTQFT mass spectrometer by the mass spectrometry facility at the University of California, Berkeley. All compounds synthesized were ≥95% pure as determined by LCMS and 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR.
Synthetic procedures for (1″R, 3″R)-TRX-COBI and (1″S, 3″S)-TRX-COBI
To an oven-dried round-bottom flask containing a magnetic stir bar under an Ar(g) atmosphere was added COBI (0.150 mg, 0.28 mmol, 1.0 equivalents [equiv]) and (1″R,3″R)-dispiro[adamantane-2,3′-[1,2,4]trioxolane-5′,1″-cyclohexan]-3″-yl (4-nitrophenyl) carbonate (0.150 mg, 0.34 mmol, 1.2 equiv) followed by dimethylformamide (10 ml), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.30 ml, 1.74 mmol, 6.0 equiv), and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (0.038 g, 0.34 mmol, 1.2 equiv; Scheme 1). Reactions were stirred at room temperature (RT) for 3–72 h while monitoring reaction progress by LCMS. The reaction was then diluted with deionized H2O (100 ml) and extracted with EtOAc (1 × 100 ml). The organic layer was washed repeatedly with a saturated aqueous (satd. aq.) NaHCO3 solution until the aqueous layer was colorless and no longer yellow (indicating that most of the p-nitrophenol had been successfully removed from the organic layer). The organic layer was then dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to a viscous yellow oil. The crude material was then purified using flash column chromatography (40 g silica gel cartridge, initially using 0–50% EtOAc–Hexanes and then switching to 0–15% MeOH [containing 0.7 N NH3]/CH2Cl2, product eluted during 40% EtOAc–Hex, unreacted COBI eluted during 15% MeOH [containing 0.7 N NH3]/CH2Cl2 to yield the desired product [1″R,3″R] TRX-COBI [30–50%] as a colorless solid [9:1 diastereomeric ratio (dr), trans:cis]). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.60 (br s, 1H), 8.41 (br s, 1H), 7.39 (dd, J = 10.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (br s, 1H), 6.82 (app q, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (app td, J = 8.5, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (br s, 1H), 4.88 (br s, 1H, minor diastereomer), 4.76 (app sept, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.11–4.25 (m, 2H), 3.93–4.11 (m, 3H), 3.22–3.44 (m, 1H), 2.87 (br s, 1H), 2.07–2.25 (m, 1H), 1.86–2.02 (m, 8H), 1.72–1.85 (m, 7H), 1.46–1.65 (m, 6H), 1.21–1.46 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.1, 155.4, 153.2 (br d, J = 249.7 Hz), 152.8 (br d, J = 253.4 Hz), 152.4 (br d, J = 251.2 Hz), 143.5 (br d, J = 246.1 Hz), 132.9 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 132.6 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 130.8 (d, J = 10.3 Hz), 124.4, 124.2, 119.9, 119.6, 119.2, 111.8, 111.8 (minor diastereomer), 109.1 (br d, J = 17.5 Hz), 108.5, 108.3, 81.6 (d, J = 7.3 Hz), 77.3, 72.0, 70.9 (br s), 65.2, 64.9, 60.3, 60.1, 48.0 (br s), 39.6, 36.7, 36.4, 36.3, 34.9, 34.7, 34.0, 33.9 (minor diastereomer), 30.5, 30.2 (minor diastereomer), 29.7, 26.9, 26.4, 25.4, 25.0 (br s), 24.1 (br s), 19.5, 19.4 (minor diastereomer), several minor diastereomer peaks overlapping or not observed; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −126.9, −127.0, −127.1 (br s), −131.3 (br s), −141.4 (br s); LRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calculated (calcd) for C38H43F3IN3O7Na: 860.20, found: 860.15, retention time = 13.1 min (diode array), HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C38H43F3IN3O7Na: 860.1995, found: 860.1975.
To a 20-ml scintillation vial containing a magnetic stir bar under an Ar(g) atmosphere was added COBI (238 mg, 0.45 mmol, 2.50 equiv), (1″S, 3″S)-dispiro[adamantane-2,3′-[1,2,4]trioxolane-5′,1″-cyclohexan]-3″-yl (4-nitrophenyl)carbonate (80 mg, 0.18 mmol, 1.0 equiv), N,N-dimethylformamide (1.60 ml), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (78 µl, 0.45 mmol, 2.50 equiv), and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (28.6 mg, 0.23 mmol, 1.3 equiv; Scheme 2). The reaction was stirred at RT for 12 h and monitored by TLC and LCMS. The reaction was then diluted with satd. aq. NaHCO3 (15 ml) and EtOAc (15 ml), and the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was further extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 ml), and the combined organic phases were washed repeatedly with satd. aq. NaHCO3 until the aqueous layer was colorless and no longer yellow (indicating that most of the p-nitrophenol had been successfully removed from the organic layer). The organic phase was then dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a crude viscous yellow oil. The crude material was purified by preparative HPLC (40–100% MeOH–water + 0.05% formic acid), and the product-bearing fractions were combined, concentrated, and lyophilized to give (1″S,3″S)-TRX-COBI (65.2 mg, 0.078 mmol, 43%) as a colorless lyophilized solid (9:1 dr, trans:cis). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.57 (br s, 1H), 8.43 (br s, 1H), 7.41 (dd, J = 10.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (br d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.17 (m, 1H), 6.83 (br d, J = 7.1 Hz), 6.62 (td, J = 8.6, 5.4 Hz), 5.2–5.8 (m, 1H), 4.85–4.93 (m, 1H, minor diastereomer), 4.74 (br s, 1H), 4.09–4.29 (m, 2H), 3.91–4.09 (m, 3H), 3.40 (br s, 1H), 3.27 (br s, 1H), 2.92 (br s, 1H), 2.24 (br d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 1.88–2.03 (m, 8H), 1.74–1.88 (m, 7H), 1.56–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.43–1.56 (m, 3H), 1.23–1.42 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.1, 155.4, 153.7 (br d, J = 249.7), 152.7 (br d, J = 252.7), 152.6 (br d, J = 251.9), 143.5 (br d, J = 238.1 Hz), 132.9 (br d, J = 2.9 Hz), 132.4–132.7 (m), 132.1–132.4 (m), 130.8 (br d, J = 12.4 Hz), 124.4, 124.2, 119.8, 119.6, 119.3, 111.8, 111.8 (minor diastereomer), 109.2 (br d, J = 18.3 Hz), 108.6, 81.6 (d, J = 5.9 Hz), 77.2, 72.1, 72.0 (minor diastereomer), 70.9 (br s), 65.1, 64.9 (br s), 60.3, 60.1, 47.8 (br s), 40.0, 39.6 (minor diastereomer), 36.7, 36.3, 36.3, 34.8, 34.8, 33.9, 33.8 (minor diastereomer), 30.6, 30.2 (minor diastereomer), 26.9, 26.4, 25.4, 25.0, 24.1 (br s), 19.6, several minor diastereomer peaks overlapping or not observed; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −126.9, −127.1, −131.3 (dd, J = 7.5, 11.3 Hz), −141.4 (d, J = 19.1 Hz); LRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C38H43F3IN3O7Na: 860.20, found: 860.22, retention time = 13.58 min (ELSD); HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C38H43F3IN3O7Na [M + Na]+: 860.1995, found: 860.1979.
Imaging protocol
Patients were injected with up to 15 mCi (555 MBq; average 7.42 mCi [274.6 MBq], range 3.7–11.9 mCi [136.9–438.5 MBq]) 68Ga-citrate intravenously. PET acquisition was acquired between 120 and 263 min after injection (average 210 min). Images were acquired on either a PET/CT or PET/magnetic resonance (MR). PET/CT examinations were performed on either a Biograph 16 (Hi-Rez) PET/CT scanner (Siemens AG) with an integrated PET and 16-MDCT scanner or a Discovery VCT PET/CT scanner (GE Medical Systems) with an integrated PET and 64-MDCT scanner. A low-dose CT was acquired for PET attenuation correction. PET/MR images were performed on a SIGNA PET/MR (GE Medical Systems). Attenuation correction for PET reconstruction was performed using a MR-based attenuation correction technique provided by the scanner manufacturer.
Image analysis
Maximum intensity projection, axial, coronal, and sagittal reconstructions and PET/MR fused images were reviewed on an Advantage Windows workstation. PET images were evaluated by trained nuclear medicine physician blinded to the results of conventional imaging scans as well as clinical/genomic features of the case and scored for the presence of PET avid lesions. Lesions were considered PET positive if uptake was focal, greater than the adjacent background soft tissue and not in an expected physiologic structure such as the urinary bladder, vessels, or salivary glands.
For semiquantitative analysis, a volume of interest was manually drawn around PET avid lesions and SUVmax values (SUV, standardized uptake value) were recorded. The location of abnormal radiotracer uptake was compared to CT and nuclear medicine bone scans. Additionally, SUVmean values were recorded in the liver, paraspinous soft tissues, bone (right sacrum), and mediastinal blood pool for the determination of normal structures.
With conventional imaging, soft tissue metastases were considered positive if >1 cm in long axis, except for lymph nodes that were considered positive if >1.5 cm in short axis. Bone lesions on radionuclide scan were considered positive if uptake was focal and not in a pattern consistent with arthritis or antecedent trauma/fracture.
Small animal PET/CT and biodistribution studies
6-wk-old male NSG mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. Mice were inoculated with 107 cells subcutaneously into one flank in a 1:1 mixture (vol/vol) of media and Matrigel. Tumors were palpable within 20 d after transplantation. 68Ga-citrate was prepared by the radiopharmacy core facility at UCSF as previously reported (Behr et al., 2016). 18F-TRX was prepared using the previously developed protocol. Radiotracers were administered via tail vein injection (150–250 µCi/mouse). Imaging data were acquired 4 h after injection of 68Ga-citrate and 90 min after injection of 18F-TRX. The image acquisition was performed on the Siemens Inveon micro-PET/CT under anesthesia by using 2.5% isoflurane at 4 h after injection. The resulting imaging data were directly reconstructed, decay corrected, and analyzed using AMIDE software, which was also used to place the region of interest to calculate SUV data from the static acquisition. After the imaging data were collected, animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation. Tissues were removed, weighed, and counted on a Hidex automatic gamma counter for accumulation activity. The mass of the injected radiotracer was measured and used to determine the total number of CPM by comparison with a standard of known activity. The data were background and decay corrected and expressed as the percentage of the injected dose/weight of the biospecimen in grams (%ID/g).
Orthotopic pancreas xenografts
Derivation of the p53 2.1.1 FVB/n mice has been described (Collisson et al., 2011). These cells were labeled in vitro with a lentiviral vector encoding a firefly luciferase to give rise p53 2.1.1syn_Luc. Overall, 1,000 cells were orthotopically implanted in 6-wk-old FVB/n mice in 20 μl composed 1:1 mixture (vol/vol) of media and Matrigel. Mice were treated with 7.5 mg/kg of COBI, 12 mg/kg TRX-COBI, or vehicle control (saline) by daily IP for 3 wk. Bioluminescent imaging was performed twice a week to monitor tumor growth.
KPT lung tumor model
KrasLSL-G12D/+,p53flox/flox,R26LSL-tdTomato (KPT) mice have been previously described. Mice were bred on a mixed background. Adenovirus-expressing Cre recombinase (Viraquest, University of Iowa) was administrated intratracheally as previously described (DuPage et al., 2009). Briefly, 2–3-mo-old mice were infected with 2 × 107 or 108 pfu of adenovirus-expressing Cre recombinase. After 40 d, 10 mg/kg of COBI, 16 mg/kg of TRX-COBI, or vehicle control (saline) were dosed by IP 5 d a week for 6 wk. Mice OS was analyzed, and images of tumors expressing tdTomato were acquired with a Zeiss AxioImager microscope.
PDXs
For generation of the PDX 260 model, informed consent was obtained from the patient as per an open IRB-approved protocol at UCSF. Tumors were implanted in NSG mice (Jackson Laboratory). TM00186 were obtained from Jackson Laboratory. Both tumors were used at low passage for the experiments described herein. In Fig. 4, once tumors reached an average volume of ∼300 mm3, mice were treated with 7.5 mg/kg of COBI, 12 mg/kg TRX-COBI, or vehicle control (saline) by daily IP for 25 d. In Fig. 6, when tumors reached an average volume of ∼300 mm3, animals were randomized into six groups as indicated. RMC-4550 was dosed by oral at 30 mg/kg. Measurement of tumor volume and body weight were performed twice a week.
TRX-PURO assay
Automated cell imaging was conducted using a GE IN Cell2000 automated cell imager. Graphing and analysis of data was performed in GraphPad Prism 6. A total of 3,000 cells per well were plated in 96-well black μClear tissue culture plates (Greiner). The following day, cells were incubated with a mixture of growth medium and adeno-Cre viral supernatant for 6 h. Cells were then exposed to puromycin or TRX-PURO at 1 μM (diluted in cell culture medium from 1,000× DMSO stocks) in medium for 24, 48, and 73 h before medium was removed and cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformadehyde for 10 min at RT, and then washed twice with PBS and once with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. Cells were then stained with Kerafast anti-puromycin antibody (3RH11; 1:500) in PBS with 10% FBS and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were washed once with PBS and once with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and then stained with anti-mouse secondary FITC (488 nm excitation, 535 nm emission) antibody (1:100) and Hoechst nuclear stain at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml in PBS with 10% FBS and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were washed once with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and once with PBS and then stored in PBS and imaged using an IN Cell 2000 automated cell imager at 10× magnification with six to nine images per well in FITC and DAPI channel fluorescence. Images were analyzed for nuclei count and puromycin incorporation using IN Cell Developer software. Puromycin incorporation was assessed by mean cellular fluorescence density in the FITC channel for each cell as defined by targets seeded with nuclei in the DAPI channel. Average cellular fluorescence density under each condition was determined, and reported values represent the mean average per well across triplicates ±SEM. Signal in cells treated with the TRX-PURO was normalized to that in cells treated with free puromycin. These values were then normalized to untreated cells and reported at percent change from untreated.
Cell viability assays
3,000–5,000 cells optimized for each cell line were seeded on day 1, drug was added on day 2 (using DMSO normalized to 0.1%), and the cell viability was determined using CellTiter-glo (Promega) on day 4. Viability curves were generated using GraphPad Prism 6.
Histological analysis
H&E staining and immunohistochemistry were performed on 4-μm-thick sections of 4% paraformaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. Tail sections were decalcified by incubation of trimmed paraffin blocks for 10–15 min on paper towels soaked in 1 N HCl. Epidermis thickness was measured using a Zeiss AxioImager microscope. Tumor sections were stained with phospho-p44/42 (Thr202/Tyr204, 9,101, 1:50).
PRISM screening
Cancer cell line profiling was performed using the PRISM platform, as previously described (Hensley et al., 2016). Cell treatment and data analysis were performed as described in https://depmap.org/ repurposing. Raw Luminex signal was converted to EC50 values for each cell line.
Detection of labile ferrous iron
Cells were seeded and cultured overnight. Culture medium was removed on the following day rinse twice gently with PBS. A final concentration of 5 µM of SiRhoNox (GORYO Chemical; FerroFarRed) in a serum-free culture medium was added to the dish and incubated for 1 h at 37°C.
Fluorescence images were then acquired with a Zeiss spinning-disk confocal microscope. Immunofluorescence was quantified using ImageJ software.
Pharmacokinetic assays
NSG mice were administered a single IP dose of COBI (7.5 mg/kg, n = 3) or TRX-COBI (12 mg/kg, n = 3). Blood, tumor, liver, and spleen were collected after 7 h and analyzed by Integrated Analytical Solutions, Inc.
Western blotting
Tumor tissue and organ tissues were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in M-PER lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) plus Halt protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein concentrations were determined with the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), extracts were loaded onto NuPAGE Bis–Tris SDS gels, and immunoblots were visualized using a LiCOR Odyssey system.
STEAP3 knockdown
For stable and lentivirally transfected shRNA-based knockdown experiments, viruses were generated in HEK293T cells transfected with lentiviral packaging vectors along with vectors expressing pGIPZ-shSTEAP3 using Fugene6 (Promega). Two distinct hairpins were chosen for the experiments. Their sequences are as follows: STEAP3-1, 5ʹ-TGAAGAACTTGTTCTGGCT; STEAP3-2, 5ʹ-TGACCACTGTGCAAGTGGG-3ʹ. Viral supernatant collected from confluent monoculture was filtered and used to infect MiaPaca-2 and Capan1 pancreatic cancer cells. A total of 0.5 × 106 cells were seeded in one well of a 6-well chamber and allowed to grow for overnight. The following day, cells were incubated with a 1:2 mixture of growth medium and viral supernatant collected from HEK293T cells. Polybrene was added at 8 μg ml/liter.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 or the R language. A two-sided two-sample t-test was used for comparisons of the means of data between two groups. One-way ANOVA was used for comparisons among multiple independent groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess OS, while the Kaplan–Meier method was used to visualize STEAP3 expression when stratified into high versus low. For animal studies, animals were randomized before treatments, and all animals treated were included for the analyses.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows how oncogenic KRAS elevates and maintains the ferrous iron pool. Fig. S2 shows how TRX-COBI acts through ferrous iron–mediated payload (COBI) release and resultant MEK inhibition. Fig. S3 shows how TRX-COBI spares skin toxicity. Fig. S4 shows how FeADC-based MEK inhibition is tolerable in vivo and less toxic to normal cells. Table S1 lists stability of (1″R, 3″R)-TRX-COBI and (1″S, 3″S)-TRX-COBI conjugates in mouse liver microsomes (MLMs). Table S2 lists pharmacokinetic parameters for (1″R, 3″R)-TRX-COBI and (released) COBI following a single 15 mg/kg IP dose of (1″R, 3″R)-TRX-COBI to NSG mice. Table S3 lists key resources used in this study. Data S1 contains scans of NMR, HMRS spectra, and LCMS chromatograms.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Bob Nichols, Mallika Singh, Rushika Perera, and Trever Bivona for their scientific advice and comments. We also thank the Preclinical Therapeutics Core and the Laboratory for Cell Analysis core at UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute grants R01 (CA178015, CA222862, CA227807, CA239604, CA230263), U24 (CA210974), and U54 (CA224081; E.A. Collisson); NIH grant P30CA082103 (A.B. Olshen); NIH (AI105106) and Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (W81XWH1810763 and W81XWH1810754) grants (A.R. Renslo); American Cancer Society Research Scholar grant 130635-RSG-17-005-01-CCE (M.J. Evans); and the Shorenstein, Rhombauer, and Preston Families. Content does not reflect the views of the funders.
Author contributions: Conception and design: H. Jiang, E.A. Collisson, and A.R. Renslo. Development of methodology: H. Jiang, R.K. Muir, E.A. Collisson, and A.R. Renslo. Data acquisition: H. Jiang, R.K. Muir, R.L. Gonciarz, J.E. Korkola, E.A. Collisson, and A.R. Renslo. Analysis and interpretation of data: H. Jiang, R.K. Muir, R.L. Gonciarz, A.B. Olshen, I. Yeh, B.C. Hann, N. Zhao, Y. Wang, S.C. Behr, M.J. Evans, E.A. Collisson, and A.R. Renslo. Writing and review of the manuscript: H. Jiang, E.A. Collisson, and A.R. Renslo. Study supervision: E.A. Collisson and A.R. Renslo.
References
- Adjei, A.A., Cohen R.B., Franklin W., Morris C., Wilson D., Molina J.R., Hanson L.J., Gore L., Chow L., Leong S., et al. 2008. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral, small-molecule mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with advanced cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 26:2139–2146. 10.1200/jco.2007.14.4956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aguirre, A.J., Nowak J.A., Camarda N.D., Moffitt R.A., Ghazani A.A., Hazar-Rethinam M., Raghavan S., Kim J., Brais L.K., Ragon D., et al. 2018. Real-time genomic characterization of advanced pancreatic cancer to enable precision medicine. Cancer Discov. 8:1096–1111. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ansari, M.T., Saify Z.S., Sultana N., Ahmad I., Saeed-Ul-Hassan S., Tariq I., and M .Khanum. 2013. Malaria and artemisinin derivatives: An updated review. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 13:1879–1902. 10.2174/13895575113136660097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aron, A.T., Reeves A.G., and Chang C.J.. 2018. Activity-based sensing fluorescent probes for iron in biological systems. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 43:113–118. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azan, A., Caspers P.J., Bakker Schut T.C., Roy S., Boutros C., Mateus C., Routier E., Besse B., Planchard D., Seck A., et al. 2017. A novel spectroscopically determined pharmacodynamic biomarker for skin toxicity in cancer patients treated with targeted agents. Cancer Res. 77:557–565. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balagula, Y., Barth Huston K., Busam K.J., Lacouture M.E., Chapman P.B., and Myskowski P.L.. 2011. Dermatologic side effects associated with the MEK 1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886). Invest New Drugs. 29:1114–1121. 10.1007/s10637-010-9567-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behr, S.C., Aggarwal R., Seo Y., Aparici C.M., Chang E., Gao K.T., Tao D.H., Small E.J., and Evans M.J. 2016. A feasibility study showing [(68)Ga]citrate PET detects prostate cancer. Mol. Imaging Biol. 18:946–951. 10.1007/s11307-016-0966-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behr, S.C., Villanueva-Meyer J.E., Li Y., Wang Y.H., Wei J., Moroz A., Lee J.K., Hsiao J.C., Gao K.T., Ma W., et al. 2018. Targeting iron metabolism in high-grade glioma with 68Ga-citrate PET/MR. JCI Insight. 3. e. 10.1172/jci.insight.93999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bersuker, K., Hendricks J.M., Li Z., Magtanong L., Ford B., Tang P.H., Roberts M.A., Tong B., Maimone T.J., Zoncu R., et al. 2019. The CoQ oxidoreductase FSP1 acts parallel to GPX4 to inhibit ferroptosis. Nature. 575:688–692. 10.1038/s41586-019-1705-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blank, B.R., Gonciarz R.L., Talukder P., Gut J., Legac J., Rosenthal P.J., and Renslo A.R. 2020. Antimalarial trioxolanes with superior drug-like properties and in vivo efficacy. ACS Infect. Dis. 6:1827–1835. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brady, D.C., Crowe M.S., Turski M.L., Hobbs G.A., Yao X., Chaikuad A., Knapp S., Xiao K., Campbell S.L., Thiele D.J., et al. 2014. Copper is required for oncogenic BRAF signalling and tumorigenesis. Nature. 509:492–496. 10.1038/nature13180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruemmer, K.J., Crossley S.W.M., and Chang C.J. 2020. Activity-based sensing: A synthetic methods approach for selective molecular imaging and beyond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59:13734–13762. 10.1002/anie.201909690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgess, M.R., Hwang E., Mroue R., Bielski C.M., Wandler A.M., Huang B.J., Firestone A.J., Young A., Lacap J.A., Crocker L., et al. 2017. KRAS allelic imbalance enhances fitness and modulates MAP kinase dependence in cancer. Cell. 168:817–829.e15. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buss, J.L., Torti F.M., and Torti S.V. 2003. The role of iron chelation in cancer therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 10:1021–1034. 10.2174/0929867033457638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang, C.J. 2015. Searching for harmony in transition-metal signaling. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11:744–747. 10.1038/nchembio.1913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choo, E.F., Belvin M., Boggs J., Deng Y., Hoeflich K.P., Ly J., Merchant M., Orr C., Plise E., Robarge K., et al. 2012. Preclinical disposition of GDC-0973 and prospective and retrospective analysis of human dose and efficacy predictions. Drug Metab. Dispos. 40:919–927. 10.1124/dmd.111.043778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chung, C.Y., Posimo J.M., Lee S., Tsang T., Davis J.M., Brady D.C., and Chang C.J. 2019. Activity-based ratiometric FRET probe reveals oncogene-driven changes in labile copper pools induced by altered glutathione metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 116:18285–18294. 10.1073/pnas.1904610116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collisson, E.A., Sadanandam A., Olson P., Gibb W.J., Truitt M., Gu S., Cooc J., Weinkle J., Kim G.E., Jakkula L., et al. 2011. Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy. Nat. Med. 17:500–503. 10.1038/nm.2344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collisson, E.A., Trejo C.L., Silva J.M., Gu S., Korkola J.E., Heiser L.M., Charles R.P., Rabinovich B.A., Hann B., Dankort D., et al. 2012. A central role for RAF->MEK->ERK signaling in the genesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2:685–693. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corna, G., Campana L., Pignatti E., Castiglioni A., Tagliafico E., Bosurgi L., Campanella A., Brunelli S., Manfredi A.A., Apostoli P., et al. 2010. Polarization dictates iron handling by inflammatory and alternatively activated macrophages. Haematologica. 95:1814–1822. 10.3324/haematol.2010.023879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Danilenko, D.M., Phillips G.D., and Diaz D.. 2016. In vitro skin models and their predictability in defining normal and disease biology, pharmacology, and toxicity. Toxicol. Pathol. 44:555–563. 10.1177/0192623316632074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding, H., Blair A., Yang Y., and Stuart J.M.. 2019. Biological process activity transformation of single cell gene expression for cross-species alignment. Nat. Commun. 10:4899. 10.1038/s41467-019-12924-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon, S.J., Lemberg K.M., Lamprecht M.R., Skouta R., Zaitsev E.M., Gleason C.E., Patel D.N., Bauer A.J., Cantley A.M., Yang W.S., et al. 2012. Ferroptosis: An iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 149:1060–1072. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon, S.J., and Stockwell B.R.. 2014. The role of iron and reactive oxygen species in cell death. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10:9–17. 10.1038/nchembio.1416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doll, S., Freitas F.P., Shah R., Aldrovandi M., da Silva M.C., Ingold I., Grocin A.G., Xavier da Silva T.N., Panzilius E., Scheel C.H., et al. 2019. FSP1 is a glutathione-independent ferroptosis suppressor. Nature. 575:693–698. 10.1038/s41586-019-1707-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DuPage, M., Dooley A.L., and Jacks T.. 2009. Conditional mouse lung cancer models using adenoviral or lentiviral delivery of Cre recombinase. Nat. Protoc. 4:1064–1072. 10.1038/nprot.2009.95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fedele, C., Ran H., Diskin B., Wei W., Jen J., Geer M.J., Araki K., Ozerdem U., Simeone D.M., Miller G., et al. 2018. SHP2 inhibition prevents adaptive resistance to MEK inhibitors in multiple cancer models. Cancer Discov. 8:1237–1249. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fontaine, S.D., DiPasquale A.G., and Renslo A.R.. 2014. Efficient and stereocontrolled synthesis of 1,2,4-trioxolanes useful for ferrous iron-dependent drug delivery. Org. Lett. 16:5776–5779. 10.1021/ol5028392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forcina, G.C., and Dixon S.J.. 2019. GPX4 at the crossroads of lipid homeostasis and ferroptosis. Proteomics. 19:e1800311. 10.1002/pmic.201800311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han, M., Xu R., Wang S., Yang N., Ni S., Zhang Q., Xu Y., Zhang X., Zhang C., Wei Y., et al. 2018. Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate 3 predicts poor prognosis and promotes glioblastoma growth and invasion. Neoplasia. 20:543–554. 10.1016/j.neo.2018.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hangauer, M.J., Viswanathan V.S., Ryan M.J., Bole D., Eaton J.K., Matov A., Galeas J., Dhruv H.D., Berens M.E., Schreiber S.L., et al. 2017. Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells are vulnerable to GPX4 inhibition. Nature. 551:247–250. 10.1038/nature24297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hensley, C.T., Faubert B., Yuan Q., Lev-Cohain N., Jin E., Kim J., Jiang L., Ko B., Skelton R., Loudat L., et al. 2016. Metabolic heterogeneity in human lung tumors. Cell. 164:681–694. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirayama, T. 2019. Fluorescent probes for the detection of catalytic Fe(II) ion. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 133:38–45. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirayama, T., Inden M., Tsuboi H., Niwa M., Uchida Y., Naka Y., Hozumi I., and Nagasawa H.. 2019. A Golgi-targeting fluorescent probe for labile Fe(II) to reveal an abnormal cellular iron distribution induced by dysfunction of VPS35. Chem. Sci. 10:1514–1521. 10.1039/c8sc04386h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirayama, T., Tsuboi H., Niwa M., Miki A., Kadota S., Ikeshita Y., Okuda K., and Nagasawa H.. 2017. A universal fluorogenic switch for Fe(II) ion based on N-oxide chemistry permits the visualization of intracellular redox equilibrium shift towards labile iron in hypoxic tumor cells. Chem. Sci. 8:4858–4866. 10.1039/c6sc05457a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Infante, J.R., Fecher L.A., Falchook G.S., Nallapareddy S., Gordon M.S., Becerra C., DeMarini D.J., Cox D.S., Xu Y., Morris S.R., et al. 2012. Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data for the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib: A phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol. 13:773–781. 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70270-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, E.L., Willis N., Mercer K., Bronson R.T., Crowley D., Montoya R., Jacks T., and Tuveson D.A.. 2001. Analysis of lung tumor initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. Genes Dev. 15:3243–3248. 10.1101/gad.943001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kakhlon, O., Gruenbaum Y., and Cabantchik Z.I.. 2002. Ferritin expression modulates cell cycle dynamics and cell responsiveness to H-ras-induced growth via expansion of the labile iron pool. Biochem. J. 363:431–436. 10.1042/0264-6021:3630431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karreth, F.A., Frese K.K., Denicola G.M., Baccarini M., and Tuveson D.A.. 2011. C-Raf is required for the initiation of lung cancer by K-Ras(G12D). Cancer Discov. 1:128–136. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-10-0044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M., and Gasser S.. 2016. Generating primary fibroblast cultures from mouse ear and tail tissues. J. Vis. Exp. 10:53565. 10.3791/53565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D., Xue J.Y., and Lito P.. 2020. Targeting KRAS(G12C): From inhibitory mechanism to modulation of antitumor effects in patients. Cell. 183:850–859. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ko, A.H., Bekaii-Saab T., Van Ziffle J., Mirzoeva O.M., Joseph N.M., Talasaz A., Kuhn P., Tempero M.A., Collisson E.A., Kelley R.K., et al. 2016. A multicenter, open-label phase II clinical trial of combined MEK plus EGFR inhibition for chemotherapy-refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 22:61–68. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larson, S.M., Rasey J.S., Allen D.R., Nelson N.J., Grunbaum Z., Harp G.D., and Williams D.L. 1980. Common pathway for tumor cell uptake of gallium-67 and iron-59 via a transferrin receptor. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 64:41–53 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H., Schreiber S.L., and Stockwell B.R. 2018. Targeting dependency on the GPX4 lipid peroxide repair pathway for cancer therapy. Biochemistry. 57:2059–2060. 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahajan, S.S., Gut J., Rosenthal P.J., and Renslo A.R. 2012. Ferrous iron-dependent delivery of therapeutic agents to the malaria parasite. Future Med. Chem. 4:2241–2249. 10.4155/fmc.12.174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller, L.D., Coffman L.G., Chou J.W., Black M.A., Bergh J., D’Agostino R. Jr., Torti S.V., and Torti F.M.. 2011. An iron regulatory gene signature predicts outcome in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 71:6728–6737. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muir, R.K., Zhao N., Wei J., Wang Y.H., Moroz A., Huang Y., Chen Y.C., Sriram R., Kurhanewicz J., Ruggero D., et al. 2019. Measuring dynamic changes in the labile iron pool in vivo with a reactivity-based probe for positron emission tomography. ACS Cent. Sci. 5:727–736. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Neill, P.M., and Posner G.H.. 2004. A medicinal chemistry perspective on artemisinin and related endoperoxides. J. Med. Chem. 47:2945–2964. 10.1021/jm030571c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papke, B., and Der C.J.. 2017. Drugging RAS: Know the enemy. Science. 355:1158–1163. 10.1126/science.aam7622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perera, R.M., and Bardeesy N.. 2015. Pancreatic cancer metabolism: Breaking it down to build it back up. Cancer Discov. 5:1247–1261. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinnix, Z.K., Miller L.D., Wang W., R. D’Agostino, Jr., Kute T., Willingham M.C., Hatcher H., Tesfay L., Sui G., Di X., et al. 2010. Ferroportin and iron regulation in breast cancer progression and prognosis. Sci. Transl Med. 2:43ra56. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Recalcati, S., Locati M., Marini A., Santambrogio P., Zaninotto F., De Pizzol M., Zammataro L., Girelli D., and Cairo G.. 2010. Differential regulation of iron homeostasis during human macrophage polarized activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 40:824–835. 10.1002/eji.200939889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reichert, M., Takano S., Heeg S., Bakir B., Botta G.P., and Rustgi A.K. 2013. Isolation, culture and genetic manipulation of mouse pancreatic ductal cells. Nat. Protoc. 8:1354–1365. 10.1038/nprot.2013.079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruess, D.A., Heynen G.J., Ciecielski K.J., Ai J., Berninger A., Kabacaoglu D., Gorgulu K., Dantes Z., Wormann S.M., Diakopoulos K.N., et al. 2018. Mutant KRAS-driven cancers depend on PTPN11/SHP2 phosphatase. Nat. Med. 24:954–960. 10.1038/s41591-018-0024-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders, I.M., Goodman A.M., and Kurzrock R.. 2020. Real-world toxicity experience with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with Erdheim-Chester disease. Oncologist. 25:e386–e390. 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scholl, F.A., Dumesic P.A., Barragan D.I., Harada K., Charron J., and Khavari P.A.. 2009. Selective role for Mek1 but not Mek2 in the induction of epidermal neoplasia. Cancer Res. 69:3772–3778. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schonberg, D.L., Miller T.E., Wu Q., Flavahan W.A., Das N.K., Hale J.S., Hubert C.G., Mack S.C., Jarrar A.M., Karl R.T., et al. 2015. Preferential iron trafficking characterizes glioblastoma Stem-like cells. Cancer Cell. 28:441–455. 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serrano, M., Lin A.W., McCurrach M.E., Beach D., and Lowe S.W.. 1997. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell. 88:593–602. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81902-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seton-Rogers, S. 2020. KRAS-G12C in the crosshairs. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 20:3. 10.1038/s41568-019-0228-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siegel, R.L., Miller K.D., and Jemal A.. 2018. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68:7–30. 10.3322/caac.21442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spangler, B., Fontaine S.D., Shi Y., Sambucetti L., Mattis A.N., Hann B., Wells J.A., and Renslo A.R.. 2016a. A novel tumor-activated prodrug strategy targeting ferrous iron is effective in multiple preclinical cancer models. J. Med. Chem. 59:11161–11170. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spangler, B., Morgan C.W., Fontaine S.D., Vander Wal M.N., Chang C.J., Wells J.A., and Renslo A.R. 2016b. A reactivity-based probe of the intracellular labile ferrous iron pool. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12:680–685. 10.1038/nchembio.2116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephen, A.G., Esposito D., Bagni R.K., and McCormick F.. 2014. Dragging ras back in the ring. Cancer Cell. 25:272–281. 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stockwell, B.R., Friedmann Angeli J.P., Bayir H., Bush A.I., Conrad M., Dixon S.J., Fulda S., Gascon S., Hatzios S.K., Kagan V.E., et al. 2017. Ferroptosis: A regulated cell death Nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. 171:273–285. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tesfay, L., Clausen K.A., Kim J.W., Hegde P., Wang X., Miller L.D., Deng Z., Blanchette N., Arvedson T., Miranti C.K., et al. 2015. Hepcidin regulation in prostate and its disruption in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 75:2254–2263. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torti, S.V., and Torti F.M.. 2013a. Cellular iron metabolism in prognosis and therapy of breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 18:435–448. 10.1615/critrevoncog.2013007784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torti, S.V., and Torti F.M.. 2013b. Iron and cancer: More ore to be mined. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 13:342–355. 10.1038/nrc3495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber, R.A., Yen F.S., Nicholson S.P.V., Alwaseem H., Bayraktar E.C., Alam M., Timson R.C., La K., Abu-Remaileh M., Molina H., et al. 2020. Maintaining iron homeostasis is the key role of lysosomal acidity for cell proliferation. Mol. Cell. 77:645–655.e7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ying, H., Kimmelman A.C., Lyssiotis C.A., Hua S., Chu G.C., Fletcher-Sananikone E., Locasale J.W., Son J., Zhang H., Coloff J.L., et al. 2012. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell. 149:656–670. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu, C., Mannan A.M., Yvone G.M., Ross K.N., Zhang Y.L., Marton M.A., Taylor B.R., Crenshaw A., Gould J.Z., Tamayo P., et al. 2016. High-throughput identification of genotype-specific cancer vulnerabilities in mixtures of barcoded tumor cell lines. Nat. Biotechnol. 34:419–423. 10.1038/nbt.3460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, N., Huang Y., Wang Y.H., Muir R.K., Chen Y.C., Wei J., Hooshdaran N., Viswanath P., Seo Y., Ruggero D., et al. 2021. Ferronostics: Measuring tumoral ferrous iron with PET to predict sensitivity to iron-targeted cancer therapies. J. Nucl. Med. 62:949–955. 10.2967/jnumed.120.252460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y., and Adjei A.A.. 2014. The clinical development of MEK inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 11:385–400. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.