Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2022 Jan 31;11:e74206. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74206

Pathogen infection and cholesterol deficiency activate the C. elegans p38 immune pathway through a TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition

Nicholas D Peterson 1,, Janneke D Icso 2,, J Elizabeth Salisbury 1, Tomás Rodríguez 3, Paul R Thompson 2,, Read Pukkila-Worley 1,
Editors: Jan Gruber4, Matt Kaeberlein5
PMCID: PMC8923663  PMID: 35098926

Abstract

Intracellular signaling regulators can be concentrated into membrane-free, higher ordered protein assemblies to initiate protective responses during stress — a process known as phase transition. Here, we show that a phase transition of the Caenorhabditis elegans Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain protein (TIR-1), an NAD+ glycohydrolase homologous to mammalian sterile alpha and TIR motif-containing 1 (SARM1), underlies p38 PMK-1 immune pathway activation in C. elegans intestinal epithelial cells. Through visualization of fluorescently labeled TIR-1/SARM1 protein, we demonstrate that physiologic stresses, both pathogen and non-pathogen, induce multimerization of TIR-1/SARM1 into visible puncta within intestinal epithelial cells. In vitro enzyme kinetic analyses revealed that, like mammalian SARM1, the NAD+ glycohydrolase activity of C. elegans TIR-1 is dramatically potentiated by protein oligomerization and a phase transition. Accordingly, C. elegans with genetic mutations that specifically block either multimerization or the NAD+ glycohydrolase activity of TIR-1/SARM1 fail to induce p38 PMK phosphorylation, are unable to increase immune effector expression, and are dramatically susceptible to bacterial infection. Finally, we demonstrate that a loss-of-function mutation in nhr-8, which alters cholesterol metabolism and is used to study conditions of sterol deficiency, causes TIR-1/SARM1 to oligomerize into puncta in intestinal epithelial cells. Cholesterol scarcity increases p38 PMK-1 phosphorylation, primes immune effector induction in a manner that requires TIR-1/SARM1 oligomerization and its intrinsic NAD+ glycohydrolase activity, and reduces pathogen accumulation in the intestine during a subsequent infection. These data reveal a new adaptive response that allows a metazoan host to anticipate pathogen threats during cholesterol deprivation, a time of relative susceptibility to infection. Thus, a phase transition of TIR-1/SARM1 as a prerequisite for its NAD+ glycohydrolase activity is strongly conserved across millions of years of evolution and is essential for diverse physiological processes in multiple cell types.

Research organism: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Caenorhabditis elegans

eLife digest

From worms to humans, animals have developed various strategies – including immune defences – to shield themselves from disease-causing microbes. A type of roundworm, called C. elegans, lives in environments rich in microbes, so it needs effective immune defences to protect itself. The roundworms share a key regulatory pathway with mammals that helps to control their immune responses. This so-called p38 pathway relies on proteins that interact with each other to activate protective immune defences.

Proteins contain different regions or domains that can give them a certain function. For example, proteins with a region called TIR play important roles in immune defences in both animals and plants. One such protein, called SARM1, is unique among animal and plant proteins in that it is an enzyme, which cleaves an important metabolite in the cell. In C. elegans, the SARM1 homolog, TIR-1, controls the p38 pathway during infection, but how TIR-1 activates it is unclear.

To find out more, Peterson, Icso et al. modified C. elegans to generate a fluorescent form of TIR-1 and infected the worms with bacteria. Imaging techniques revealed that infection caused TIR-1 in gut cells to cluster into organized structures, which increases the enzymatic activity of the protein to activate the p38 immune pathway. Moreover, stress situations, such as cholesterol nutrient withdrawal, activated the p38 pathway in the same way. This adaptive stress response allows the animal to defend itself against pathogen threats during times, when they are most susceptible to infections.

Cells in the gut provide a primary line of defence against infectious bacteria and are important for maintaining a healthy gut immune system. When the mechanisms for pathogen sensing and immune maintenance are disrupted, it can lead to inflammation and higher risk of infection. Peterson, Icso et al. show how a key regulator of gut immunity, TIR-1, provides protection in C. elegans, which may suggest that SARM1 could have a similar role in mammals.

Introduction

The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is a key regulator of stress responses and innate immune defenses in metazoans. The C. elegans p38 homolog PMK-1 is part of a classic MAPK signaling cascade that is activated by the MAPKKK NSY-1 and MAPKK SEK-1, which are the nematode homologs of mammalian ASK and MKK3/6, respectively (Kim et al., 2002). As in mammals, the C. elegans p38 PMK-1 pathway regulates the expression of secreted innate immune effectors and is required for survival during pathogen infection (Kim et al., 2002; Troemel et al., 2006; Peterson and Pukkila-Worley, 2018; Pukkila-Worley and Ausubel, 2012). However, the mechanisms that activate the NSY-1/SEK-1/p38 PMK-1 signaling cassette in C. elegans intestinal epithelial cells are poorly defined.

Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain-containing proteins serve essential functions in both animal and plant immunity (Zhang et al., 2017; Ve et al., 2015; O’Neill and Bowie, 2007). In mammals, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and downstream adaptor proteins contain TIR domains, which transduce intracellular signals upon pathway activation (Gay et al., 2014). Nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins in plants also contain TIR domains, which activate host defenses following recognition of pathogen-derived effector proteins (Lolle et al., 2020). In C. elegans, TIR-1, the homolog of mammalian sterile alpha and TIR motif-containing 1 (SARM1), acts upstream of NSY-1/ASK to control p38 PMK-1 activation (Liberati et al., 2004; Couillault et al., 2004). Interestingly, TIR-1/SARM1 is unique among animal and plant TIR domain-containing proteins in that it is an enzyme, which cleaves nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) (Essuman et al., 2017; Wan et al., 2019). The NAD+ glycohydrolase activity of TIR is activated upon oligomerization into a multimeric protein complex (Horsefield et al., 2019). NAD+ depletion in this manner promotes cell death in plants during pathogen infection and triggers axonal degeneration following neuronal injury (Gerdts et al., 2015; Gerdts et al., 2013). However, it is not known whether the NAD+ glycohydrolase activity of TIR is also required for immune function in metazoans.

Intracellular signaling regulators can be compartmentalized into membrane-less, higher-ordered protein assemblies with liquid droplet-like properties (Du and Chen, 2018; Chen et al., 2020; Alberti et al., 2019; Boeynaems et al., 2018; Alberti and Dormann, 2019; Patel et al., 2015; Verdile et al., 2019). Cytoplasmic de-mixing or phase transition of proteins in this manner concentrates signaling regulators to facilitate rapid and specific activation of protective defenses during stress (Du and Chen, 2018; Chen et al., 2020; Kroschwald et al., 2015). Interestingly, human SARM1 oligomerizes and undergoes a phase transition, which enhances its intrinsic NAD+ glycohydrolase activity (Loring et al., 2021). Induced multimerization of C. elegans TIR-1/SARM1 in neurons also correlated with enhanced axonal degeneration (Loring et al., 2021). Here, we show that a phase transition and NAD+ glycohydrolase activity of TIR-1/SARM1 is required for p38 PMK-1 immune pathway activation and pathogen resistance in C. elegans. We labeled the TIR-1/SARM1 protein with a fluorescent tag at its genomic locus and demonstrated that TIR-1/SARM1 forms visible puncta within the intestine in response to physiologic stimuli, including both pathogen infection and cholesterol deficiency. By promoting multimerization of TIR-1/SARM1 with macromolecular crowding agents in vitro, we demonstrate that a phase transition is required for the catalytic activity of TIR-1/SARM1. Accordingly, TIR-1/SARM1 containing mutations that either specifically prevent the phase transition or impair NAD+ hydrolysis shows decreased enzymatic activity in vitro. C. elegans carrying these same mutations, edited into the genome using CRISPR/Cas9, fail to induce p38 PMK phosphorylation, are unable to upregulate immune effector expression, and have enhanced susceptibility to bacterial infection.

We also report that a loss-of-function mutation in nhr-8, which alters cholesterol metabolism and is used to study conditions of sterol deficiency (Magner et al., 2013), induces TIR-1/SARM1 oligomerization and p38 PMK-1 pathway activation. C. elegans lacks the ability to synthesize cholesterol de novo and must acquire dietary sterols from the environment to support multiple aspects of cellular physiology, including development, fecundity, lifespan, and resistance against pathogen infection (Hieb and Rothstein, 1968; Chitwood, 1999; Shim et al., 2002; Merris et al., 2003; Yochem et al., 1999; Otarigho and Aballay, 2020; Cheong et al., 2011). Some, but not all, C. elegans larvae that encounter sterol-scarce environments enter an alternative developmental program, called dauer diapause, to promote animal survival (Burnell et al., 2005; Vanfleteren and De Vreese, 1996; Gerisch et al., 2001; Gerisch and Antebi, 2004; Motola et al., 2006). Here, we show that C. elegans larvae that do not enter dauer diapause in an environment devoid of dietary sterols adapt by promoting oligomerization of TIR-1/SARM1 in vivo to activate the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway through its intrinsic NAD+ glycohydrolase activity. Priming p38 pathway activation in this manner augments immune effector expression during a subsequent bacterial infection and reduces pathogen accumulation in the intestine. Thus, we propose that activation of the p38 PMK-1 pathway during conditions of low cholesterol availability is an adaptive response to preempt pathogen attack during a time of relative vulnerability to infection.

Results

Multimerization of TIR-1/SARM1 and its intrinsic NAD+ glycohydrolase activity are required for activation of the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway during pathogen infection

To determine if C. elegans TIR-1/SARM1 multimerizes to activate the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to insert the fluorescent protein wrmScarlet at the C-terminus of the endogenous C. elegans tir-1 locus, which labeled all tir-1 isoforms. In uninfected animals, TIR-1::wrmScarlet is barely detectable in intestinal epithelial cells (Figure 1A). However, P. aeruginosa infection caused TIR-1::wrmScarlet to multimerize into visible puncta within intestinal epithelial cells (Figure 1A and B). We distinguished TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta from autofluorescent gut granules by comparing images in the red and green fluorescence channels. TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta are those that are seen in the red, but not the green fluorescence channel (arrowheads in Figure 1A), as opposed to gut granules, which can be seen in both channels (asterisks in Figure 1A).

Figure 1. Multimerization of TIR-1/SARM1 and its intrinsic NAD+ glycohydrolase activity are required for activation of the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway during pathogen infection.

(A) Images of animals expressing TIR-1::wrmScarlet in the indicated conditions. All tir-1::wrmScarlet animals were treated with glo-3(RNAi) to deplete autofluorescent gut granules. Representative images for each condition are displayed. Red fluorescent channel images display both TIR-1::wrmScarlet fluorescence and autofluorescent signal, while the green fluorescent channel images only display signals from autofluorescent gut granules. TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta are indicated by arrowheads and autofluorescent gut granules by asterisks. Scale bar equals 20 μm (2 μm for the inset enlarged images). (B) The number of puncta present in the last posterior pair of intestinal epithelial cells in the red (tir-1::wrmScarlet), but not the green (autofluorescence) fluorescent channels were quantified using Fiji image analysis software. Each data point is the number of TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta from one animal. The n is indicated for each condition. *equals p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison testing). (C) Model of tir-1 showing the domains and the mutations that were introduced using CRISPR-Cas9. (D) Expression of the innate immune effector T24B8.5p::gfp in tir-1 mutants with predicted defects in oligomerization (tir-1ΔSAM, tir-1G747P and tir-1H833A) and NADase catalytic activity (tir-1E788A) during P. aeruginosa infection. Scale bar equals 200 μm. (E) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from the indicated genotypes probed with antibodies targeting the doubly phosphorylated TGY epitope in phosphorylated PMK-1 (phos-PMK-1), total PMK-1 protein (total PMK-1), and tubulin (α-tubulin). nsy-1(ag3) and pmk-1(km25) loss-of-function mutants are the controls, which confirm the specificity of the phospho-PMK-1 probing. (F) The band intensities of three biological replicates of the Western blot shown in (E) were quantified. Error bars reflect SEM. *equals p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett multiple comparison testing). (G) C. elegans pathogenesis assay with P. aeruginosa and C. elegans of indicated genotypes at the L4 larval stage are shown. Data are representative of three trials. Difference between wild-type and all tir-1 mutants is significant (p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves for each group, and the log-rank test was used for all statistical comparisons. Sample sizes, mean lifespan and p-values for all trials are shown in Supplementary file 4. See also Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Figure 1—source data 1. Figure 1B Quantification of the number of TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta present in the last posterior pair of intestinal epithelial cells.
Figure 1—source data 2. Figure 1F Quantification of p38 immunoblot analysis of lysates from the indicated genotypes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Multimerization of TIR-1/SARM1 and its intrinsic NAD + glycohydrolase activity are required for activation of the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway during pathogen infection.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from the indicated genotypes probed with an antibody that recognizes the FLAG epitope. (B) Images of T24B8.5p::gfp immune reporter expression in the indicated genotypes. Scale bars in all images equal 200 μm. See also Figure 1.

C. elegans TIR-1 protein has three characterized domains: a Heat/Armadillo repeat domain, a sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain, and a Toll-interleukin receptor (TIR) domain (Chuang and Bargmann, 2005; Figure 1C). C. elegans TIR-1 oligomerizes in vitro through interactions of its SAM domains (Horsefield et al., 2019). We used CRISPR-Cas9 to delete both SAM domains in tir-1 (tir-1ΔSAM) and to generate point mutants in two residues within the C. elegans TIR domain that are important for the self-association and activity of mammalian SARM1 (C. elegans tir-1G747P and tir-1H833A) (Horsefield et al., 2019; Figure 1D). The C. elegans tir-1ΔSAM, tir-1G747P and tir-1H833A mutants prevented activation of the p38 PMK-1-dependent immune reporter T24B8.5p::gfp in animals infected with P. aeruginosa (Figure 1D). Consistent with these data, the tir-1ΔSAM, tir-1G747P and tir-1H833A mutants have reduced levels of active, phosphorylated p38 PMK-1, equivalent to the tir-1(qd4) null allele (Shivers et al., 2009; Figure 1E and F). Additionally, these mutants are each markedly hypersusceptible to P. aeruginosa infection (Figure 1G).

The TIR domain of C. elegans, TIR-1, and its mammalian homolog, SARM1, possess intrinsic NADase activity (Essuman et al., 2017; Horsefield et al., 2019; Summers et al., 2016). Importantly, oligomerization of mammalian SARM1 and C. elegans TIR-1 is required for maximal NADase activity in vitro (Horsefield et al., 2019). The NADase activity in the TIR domain of mammalian SARM1 requires a putative catalytic glutamate residue (Essuman et al., 2017). We used CRISPR-Cas9 to mutate the homologous glutamate in C. elegans tir-1 (tir-1E788A) and found that it was required for the immunostimulatory activity of tir-1 – tir-1E788A mutants do not induce T24B8.5p::gfp following P. aeruginosa infection (Figure 1D), had less active, phosphorylated p38 PMK-1 (Figure 1E and F), and were more susceptible to P. aeruginosa infection (Figure 1G). We confirmed that tir-1E788A, tir-1ΔSAM and tir-1G747P mutants are translated and not degraded by introducing a 3xFLAG tag at the C-terminus of each mutant using CRISPR-Cas9 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A and B) and probing for epitope-tagged mutant protein in western blots with an anti-FLAG antibody (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). In addition, the 3xFLAG-tagged wild-type TIR-1 expressed T24B8.5p::gfp, but the tagged mutant TIR-1 proteins did not (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Collectively, these data demonstrate that multimerization of TIR-1 and its intrinsic NADase activity are required to activate the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway in the intestine during pathogen infection.

TIR multimerization and phase transition superactivates its intrinsic NAD+ glycohydrolase activity

To further characterize the mechanism of TIR-1/SARM1 activation, we recombinantly expressed and purified the TIR domain of the TIR-1 protein (called TIR) from E. coli and evaluated its NADase activity in vitro using an etheno-NAD+ (ε-NAD) activity assay, in which hydrolysis of the nicotinamide moiety of ε-NAD leads to an increase in fluorescence. Interestingly, purified TIR only shows very modest NADase activity even at high protein concentrations ( > 15 μM) (Figure 2A). Notably, the NADase activity of TIR increased parabolically with increasing TIR concentrations rather than linearly, suggesting that multimerization of TIR-1 potentiates its NADase activity (Figure 2A).

Figure 2. TIR multimerization and phase transition superactivates its intrinsic NAD + glycohydrolase activity.

(A) NADase activity of purified TIR at increasing TIR protein concentrations is shown. Activity was assessed by incubating TIR protein with 1 mM ε-NAD and monitoring the rate at which the fluorescent product ε-ADPR was produced. Curve represents a nonlinear regression fit of the NADase activity data points (n = 2). (B) NADase activity of 2.5 μM TIR incubated in the presence of 25% (w/v) of macro- (PEG 8000, PEG 3350, and dextran) and micro- (sucrose and glycerol) viscogens was assessed as described in A (n = 2). (C) Dose dependency of macroviscogens on the NADase activity of TIR is shown. A total of 2.5 μM TIR protein was incubated with the indicated PEG compounds at concentrations from 0% to 30% (w/v). NADase activity was assessed as described in A (n = 2). (D) Steady-state kinetic analysis of 2.5 µM TIR incubated in 0–30% (w/v) of PEG 3350 with the ε-NAD substrate at concentrations from 0 to 4000 μM was assessed as described in A. (n = 2). From the steady-state kinetic analysis performed in D, Km(E), kcat (F), and kcat/Km (G) were determined at each PEG 3350 concentration. (H) SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR protein fractions incubated with increasing concentrations of PEG 3350 precentrifugation (C) and after centrifugation, the soluble (S) and pellet (P) protein fractions. NADase activity of TIR protein in each fraction and at each concentration of PEG 3350 was assessed, as described in A, and is represented below the gel image (n = 2, representative image shown). (I) Steady-state kinetic analysis of TIR wild-type, oligomerization mutants (TIRG747P and TIRH833A), and catalytic mutants (TIRE788Q and TIRE788A) in 25% PEG 3350 with 0–2000 μM ε-NAD was assessed as described in D. The inset image outlined in red is an enlarged image of the mutant kinetic data. Kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, and kcat/Km) are shown in the table below the graph (n = 3). (J, K) SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P) and catalytic mutants (TIRE788Q and TIRE788A) precipitation in the presence of 25% PEG 3350. Gel represents the soluble (S) and pellet (P) protein fractions of wild-type and mutant TIR following incubation with PEG 3350 and centrifugation. TIRG747P and TIRE788Q were assessed with 10 μM protein in J, and TIRE788A was assessed with 3 μM protein in K (a lower concentration was used for TIRE788A assays because the yield of the purified TIRE788A mutant was low). Quantification of replicates represented below gel images (n = 4, representative images shown). *equals p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA in J and unpaired t-test in K. (L) Effect of 1,6-hexanediol on TIR NADase activity is shown. TIR protein was incubated in the presence or absence of either 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM citrate and treated with either 0 or 2% 1,6-hexanediol. The NADase activity of TIR for each condition was assessed using the ε-NAD substrate assay (n = 3). *equals p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test). (M) The NADase activity of TIR protein incubated with either 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM citrate before (precentrifugation, n = 2) and after centrifugation, the supernatant (n = 4) and precipitant (n = 2) fractions. Precipitation fractions were resuspended in buffer alone or buffer containing 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM citrate, and NADase activity was assessed. (N) Negative stain electron microscopy in either the absence or presence of 500 mM citrate (diameter of particles = 8.9 nm ± 1.2, n = 65). Representative circular particles are labeled with arrowheads. All error bars reflect SEM. See also Figure 2—figure supplements 1 and 2.

Figure 2—source data 1. Figure 2A NADase activity of purified TIR at increasing TIR protein concentrations.
Figure 2—source data 2. Figure 2B NADase activity of 2.5 μM TIR incubated in the presence of 25% (w/v) of macro- (PEG 8000, PEG 3350, and dextran) and micro- (sucrose and glycerol) viscogens.
Figure 2—source data 3. Figure 2C Dose dependency of macroviscogens on the NADase activity of TIR.
Figure 2—source data 4. Figure 2D Steady-state kinetic analysis of 2.5 μM TIR incubated in 0%–30% (w/v) of PEG 3350.
Figure 2—source data 5. Figure 2H NADase activity of TIR protein in each fraction and at each concentration of PEG 3350.
Figure 2—source data 6. Figure 2I Steady-state kinetic analysis of TIR wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P, TIRH833A), and catalytic mutants (TIRE788Q and TIRE788A) in 25% PEG 3350.
Figure 2—source data 7. Figure 2J Quantification of SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR: wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P) and catalytic mutant (TIRE788Q), precipitation in the presence of 25% PEG 3350.
Figure 2—source data 8. Figure 2K Quantification of SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR: wild-type and catalytic mutant (TIRE788A), precipitation in the presence of 25% PEG 3350.
Figure 2—source data 9. Figure 2L Effect of 1,6-hexanediol on TIR NADase activity.
Figure 2—source data 10. Figure 2M NADase activity of TIR protein incubated with either 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM citrate before (precentrifugation) and after centrifugation, the supernatant and precipitant fractions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. TIR multimerization and phase transition superactivates its intrinsic NAD + glycohydrolase activity.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Enzyme concentration dependence in the presence and absence of either 25 % PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate (n = 2). (B) Dose-dependence of TIR NADase activity on citrate concentration as described in Figure 2C, except using citrate (n = 2). (C) Steady-state kinetic analysis of TIR as described in Figure 2D, except in the presence of citrate (n = 2). (D–F) From the steady-state kinetic analysis performed in (C), Km(D), kcat (E), and kcat/Km (F) were determined at each citrate concentration. (G) Effect of citrate on TIR aggregation and associated activity as described in Figure 2H (n = 2, representative images shown). (H) Steady-state kinetic analysis of TIR mutants as described in Figure 2I, except in the presence of citrate (n = 3). (I, J) Precipitation of TIR mutants as described in Figure 2J and K, except in the presence of citrate (n = 4, representative images shown). See also Figure 2.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. 1A enzyme concentration dependence in presence and absence of either 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2. 1B Dose dependency of citrate on the NADase activity of TIR.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 3. 1C Steady-state kinetic analysis of 2.5 μM TIR incubated in 0–1000 mM sodium citrate.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 4. 1G NADase activity of TIR protein in each fraction and at each concentration of citrate.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 5. 1H Steady-state kinetic analysis of TIR wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P, TIRH833A), and catalytic mutants (TIRE788Q and TIRE788A) in 500 mM sodium citrate.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 6. 1I Quantification of SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR: wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P) and catalytic mutant (TIRE788Q), precipitation in the presence of 500 mM sodium citrate.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 7. 1J Quantification of SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR: wild-type and catalytic mutant (TIRE788A), precipitation in the presence of 500 mM sodium citrate.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. TIR multimerization and phase transition superactivates its intrinsic NAD + glycohydrolase activity.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A) SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR protein incubated first with 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM citrate and subsequently with 2% 1,6-hexanediol; analysis was performed on TIR samples taken precentrifugation (C) or on the soluble (S) and pellet (P) fractions taken after centrifugation (n = 2, representative image shown). (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR protein incubated first with 0 or 2% 1,6-hexanediol and subsequently with 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM citrate (n = 2, representative image shown); analysis of protein fractions as in (A). (C) SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR protein in the soluble (S) and pellet (P) fractions following incubation with either PEG 3350 or citrate and centrifugation (one spin). Pellet fractions were subsequently resuspended in only buffer or buffer containing 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM citrate and centrifuged a second time to isolate the soluble (S) and pellet (P) fractions (n = 2, representative image shown). (D) SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR in the soluble (S) and pellet (P) fractions incubated with or without 25% PEG 3350 at the indicated pH (n = 2, representative image shown). TIR steady-state kinetic parameters Km (E), kcat (F), kcat/Km (G) are shown at the indicated pH (n = 2). See also Figure 2.

Given that high concentrations of TIR are required to observe NADase activity, we hypothesized that molecular crowding might activate the enzyme. Therefore, we assessed the effect of several macro- and microviscogens on TIR activity. Macroviscogens reduce the free volume available for protein movement and thus promote aggregation of protein complexes that are capable of self-association (Gadda and Sobrado, 2018; Blacklow et al., 1988). Importantly, macroviscogens have minimal impact on the rate of diffusion of small molecules. By contrast, microviscogens, which are much smaller than most enzymes, affect the diffusion of substrates in solution and, thus, the frequency at which enzymes encounter their substrate (Blacklow et al., 1988). Interestingly, macroviscogens (polyethylene glycol [PEG] 3350 and PEG 8000), but not microviscogens (sucrose or glycerol), dramatically increased the NADase activity of TIR (Figure 2B). These effects were most pronounced with higher molecular weight PEGs, as treatment with smaller molecular weight PEGs (e.g. PEG 1500 and PEG 400) did not increase the enzymatic activity of TIR (Figure 2C). Specifically, PEGs 3350 and 8000 increase TIR activity in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2C). Crowding agents also increase the activity of the TIR domain of human SARM1, as well as plant TIR domains (Horsefield et al., 2019; Loring et al., 2021), suggesting that the mechanism of TIR regulation is strongly conserved.

Treatment with 25% PEG 3350 led to a roughly linear association between TIR concentration and NADase activity and markedly enhanced TIR activity at each enzyme concentration (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Consequently, lower amounts of enzyme (2.5 μM TIR) can be used to obtain robust kinetic data. Using these conditions, we determined the steady-state kinetic parameters (kcat, KM, and kcat/KM) with 2.5 μM TIR in the presence of increasing concentrations of PEG 3350 (Figure 2D). The Km of TIR increases and then decreases to level off at ~500 μM of ε-NAD with increasing concentration of PEG 3350 (Figure 2E). On the other hand, kcat increases nearly linearly with increasing concentrations of PEG 3350 (Figure 2F). In addition, the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) followed the same trend as kcat, indicating that increased TIR activity is due to increased substrate turnover by the enzyme and not tighter substrate binding (Figure 2G).

We found that the NAD hydrolase activity of TIR is also activated by the precipitant sodium citrate, providing an orthologous method to characterize the enzymatic activity of the TIR domain (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A and B). Notably, the response to increasing citrate concentration was switch-like, where a concentration of at least 250 mM sodium citrate was needed to observe enzyme activity (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B and C). By contrast, activation with PEG 3350 was more dose-dependent (Figure 2C and D). Nevertheless, the kinetic parameters obtained in the presence of citrate displayed similar trends to those found with PEG 3350: Km decreased to level off at ~400 µM of ε-NAD (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D), kcat increases with increasing sodium citrate concentration (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E), and kcat/Km follows the kcat trends (Figure 2—figure supplement 1F).

In the cytoplasm, high concentrations of macromolecules (proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, carbohydrates) cause molecular crowding and induce phase transitions of signaling proteins (Rivas and Minton, 2016). To determine if TIR undergoes a phase transition and whether its NADase activity correlates with the transition, we incubated purified TIR with different concentrations of PEG3350 or citrate, centrifuged the sample, and evaluated TIR NADase activity in the soluble and insoluble fractions (Figure 2H and Figure 2—figure supplement 1G). At low concentrations of both PEG and citrate, TIR protein was present in the supernatant. However, at high concentrations of both PEG and citrate, TIR was principally located in the pelleted (insoluble) fraction, as visualized by Coomassie staining on an SDS-PAGE gel (Figure 2H and Figure 2—figure supplement 1G). Importantly, robust NADase activity was observed in the pelleted fraction and not in the supernatant of samples treated with high concentrations of PEG or citrate (Figure 2H and Figure 2—figure supplement 1G). Taken together, these data demonstrate that precipitation/aggregation of TIR is required to activate the intrinsic NADase activity of TIR-1/SARM1.

To determine whether TIR-1 multimerization is also required for a phase transition and the NADase activity of TIR, we recombinantly expressed and purified the TIR domain of TIR-1, which contained mutations in residues required for oligomerization (TIRG747P and TIRH833A) and NAD+ hydrolysis (TIRE788A and TIRE788Q). Notably, TIRG747P and TIRE788Q mutants showed no apparent activity, and TIRE788A and TIRH833A showed a > 1 × 108­fold decrease in catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) compared to TIRWT (Figure 2I). Similarly, kinetic analysis of TIR oligomerization and catalytic mutants in 500 mM citrate revealed that all the mutants were catalytically dead, each showing no apparent activity (Figure 2—figure supplement 1H).

To further characterize the TIR phase transition, we evaluated the precipitation capacity of TIR oligomerization and catalytic mutants in the presence of PEG 3350 and citrate. Consistent with our genetic data, TIRG747P, which contains a mutation that prevents oligomerization of TIR, was unable to precipitate as readily as TIRWT (Figure 2J). Compared to TIRWT, the TIRG747P mutant in the presence of PEG 3350 demonstrated a 25% decrease in the amount of precipitated protein (Figure 2J). We observed similar results in the presence of citrate – compared to TIRWT, the TIRG747P mutant demonstrated a 22% decrease in precipitated protein compared to TIRWT (Figure 2—figure supplement 1I). Importantly, TIR proteins with two different mutations in the glutamate required for NAD+ catalysis, TIRE788A and TIRE788Q, precipitated to a similar extent as TIRWT (Figure 2J and K, and Figure 2—figure supplement 1I and J) but had minimal NADase activity (Figure 2I and Figure 2—figure supplement 1H). Collectively, these data demonstrate that a phase transition of TIR-1 is required for its NADase activity.

During phase separations, macromolecules partition into distinct biochemical compartments characterized by a higher concentration dense phase and a lower concentration dilute phase (Boeynaems et al., 2018; Alberti and Dormann, 2019; Verdile et al., 2019). The dense compartment can have either liquid-like properties in liquid-to-liquid phase separations or solid-like properties in liquid-to-solid phase transitions (Alberti and Dormann, 2019; Patel et al., 2015; Kroschwald et al., 2015; Peskett et al., 2018). To determine whether TIR undergoes a liquid-to-liquid or a liquid-to-solid phase transition, we assayed the enzyme activity of TIR in the presence of 1,6-hexanediol, an aliphatic alcohol that interferes with hydrophobic interactions prominent in liquid-to-liquid separations. Thus, 1,6-hexanediol disrupts liquid-like compartments, but not solid-like compartments (Boeynaems et al., 2018; Verdile et al., 2019; Kroschwald et al., 2015). In the presence of either PEG 3350 or citrate, we observed that 1,6-hexanediol decreases the NADase activity of TIR by <2 fold (Figure 2L). While significant, this modest decrease (the activity of 1,6-hexanediol-treated TIR remains two orders of magnitude higher than the activity of TIR without PEG 3350 or citrate addition) suggests that the NADase activity of TIR is predominantly associated with a solid, rather than a liquid, state or lies on a continuum between a liquid-like and solid-like state (Figure 2L). Notably, in the absence of PEG 3350 or citrate, the low-level TIR NADase activity can be inhibited by 1,6-hexanediol (Figure 2L), suggesting that this activity is driven by hydrophobic interactions. Importantly, 1,6-hexanediol does not interfere with TIR precipitation in the presence of PEG or citrate, regardless of whether it is added before or after precipitate formation (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A and B).

Next, we determined if this liquid-to-solid phase transition of TIR is reversible. The insoluble fraction following treatment of TIR with PEG 3350 or citrate was resuspended in either buffer alone or buffer plus the respective additive (PEG 3350 or citrate). If the phase transition is reversible, resuspension of precipitated TIR in buffer alone should disrupt enzymatic activity. However, if the phase transition is irreversible, activity should be detected when the pellet is resuspended in buffer alone. Notably, we observed some TIR enzymatic activity when the pellet was resuspended in buffer (Figure 2M). With PEG 3350, the activity was lower than that observed in the precentrifugation control or when the pellet was resuspended in buffer with PEG 3350. By contrast, with citrate, the activity was similar to both control conditions (precentrifugation or when the pellet was resuspended in buffer and citrate). These data indicate that the phase transition of TIR is partially reversible in PEG 3350 and irreversible in sodium citrate. To confirm these findings, we centrifuged the resuspended samples to examine the fractions visually by SDS-PAGE (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C). In the sample initially prepared with PEG 3350 and resuspended in buffer alone, a faint band was present in the supernatant fraction. However, this band was absent in the sample initially prepared with sodium citrate (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C). These data confirm that the TIR phase transition is partially reversible in PEG 3350 and irreversible in sodium citrate, at least under these conditions.

Next, we evaluated the effect of pH on TIR precipitation and NADase activity. There was virtually no increase in TIR precipitation in the absence of PEG. However, in the presence of 25% PEG, TIR precipitation increased with increasing pH (Figure 2—figure supplement 2D). Under these same conditions, no activity was apparent below pH 6, Km remained constant (Figure 2—figure supplement 2E), and kcat increased from pH 6.5 to pH 8.5 (Figure 2—figure supplement 2F). A corresponding increase in kcat/Km was responsible for the increase in catalytic efficiency above pH 7 (Figure 2—figure supplement 2G). Notably, the increase in kcat/Km correlated with precipitation (Figure 2—figure supplement 2D and G), again indicating that a phase transition increases TIR activity.

We performed negative stain electron microscopy to directly visualize TIR aggregation in vitro (Figure 2N). Protein visualization is not possible with PEG because macroviscogens themselves are stained, confounding image analysis. Therefore, we performed this experiment with citrate. In the absence of citrate, we observed borderline fibrillar structures and protein aggregates, but overall, there were no consistent structures (Figure 2N). However, in the presence of citrate, circular particles emerged (Figure 2N). These data corroborate our discovery that TIR-1::wrmScarlet aggregates in vivo into visible puncta within intestinal epithelial cells (Figure 1A).

Cholesterol deficiency activates the C. elegans p38 immune pathway through the multimerization and NADase activity of TIR-1/SARM1

C. elegans is a sterol auxotroph and requires dietary sterols for development, lifespan, fecundity, and resistance to pathogen infection (Hieb and Rothstein, 1968; Chitwood, 1999; Shim et al., 2002; Merris et al., 2003; Yochem et al., 1999; Otarigho and Aballay, 2020; Cheong et al., 2011). As such, 5 μg/mL of cholesterol is a standard additive in C. elegans laboratory growth medium (Brenner, 1974). We found that C. elegans grown in the absence of cholesterol supplementation activated GFP-based transcriptional reporters for two putative immune effector genes, T24B8.5p::gfp and irg-5p::gfp (Figure 3A and B). T24B8.5 and irg-5 are expressed in the intestine, induced during infection with multiple pathogens, including P. aeruginosa, and controlled by the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway (Troemel et al., 2006; Shivers et al., 2009; Bolz et al., 2010). qRT-PCR studies confirmed that C. elegans in a low cholesterol environment upregulate T24B8.5 and irg-5, as well as other innate immune effector genes (irg-4 and K08D8.4) (Figure 3C). These data suggest that host defense pathways are activated in the absence of pathogen infection when environmental sterols are scarce.

Figure 3. Cholesterol scarcity activates intestinal innate immune defenses.

Images of T24B8.5p::gfp (A) and irg-5p::GFP (B) transcriptional immune reporters in wild-type animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol) and in the absence of supplemented cholesterol ( + 0 μg/mL cholesterol). (C) qRT-PCR data of the indicated innate immune effector genes in wild-type C. elegans grown in the presence ( + 5 μg/mL) and absence ( + 0 μg/mL) of supplemented cholesterol. *equals p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test). (D and E) Data from mRNA-seq experiments comparing genes differentially regulated in uninfected nhr-8(hd117) mutants versus wild-type animals (D) or uninfected wild-type animals grown in the absence (0 μg/mL) versus presence (5 μg/mL) of supplemental cholesterol (E) (y-axis) are compared with genes differentially expressed in wild-type animals during P. aeruginosa infection (x-axis). All genes are shown in gray. Genes that are differentially expressed in both datasets are shown in black (Fold change >2, q < 0.01). Genes that are annotated as innate immune genes are shown in red. The location of the representative genes T24B8.5, irg-5, irg-4, and K08D8.4, whose expression is examined throughout this manuscript, are shown. (Of note, in the 0 μg/mL cholesterol mRNA-seq data set K08D8.4 did not meet our cut-off threshold, although was significantly upregulated, fold change = 1.79, q = 5.6 × 10–4). See also Supplementary files 1-3. (F, G, H) Images of T24B8.5p::gfp animals of the indicated genotypes grown under the indicated conditions are shown. (H) C. elegans were grown on media solidified with agarose rather than agar. (I, J, K, L) qRT-PCR data of the indicated genes in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated. For the qRT-PCR studies in (C, I, J, K and L), data are the average of three to six independent biological replicates, each normalized to a control gene with error bars representing SEM and are presented as the value relative to the average expression from all replicates of the indicated gene in wild-type animals on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol). *equals p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison testing). (M, N) Survival curves for C. elegans pathogenesis assays with P. aeruginosa and C. elegans of the indicated genotypes at the L4 larval stage and exposed to the indicated conditions. Data are representative of three trials. The difference between the nhr-8(hd117) mutant and the other conditions in both M and N is significant (p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves for each group, and the log-rank test was used for all statistical comparisons. Sample sizes, mean lifespan and p-values for all trials are shown in Supplementary file 4. (O) P. aeruginosa, isolated from the intestines of animals with the indicated genotypes, were quantified after 24 hr of bacterial infection. Data are colony-forming units (CFU) of P. aeruginosa and are presented as the average of 10 separate biological replicates, with each replicate containing 10–11 animals. *equals p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test). Scale bars in all images equal 200 μm. See also Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Figure 3—source data 1. Figure 3C qRT-PCR data of the indicated innate immune effector genes in wild-type C. elegans growing in the presence (+5 μg/mL) and absence (+0 μg/mL) of supplemented cholesterol.
Figure 3—source data 2. Figure 3I qRT-PCR data of T24B8.5 in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media (+5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated.
Figure 3—source data 3. Figure 3J qRT-PCR data of irg-4 in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media (+5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated.
Figure 3—source data 4. Figure 3K qRT-PCR data of irg-5 in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media (+5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated.
Figure 3—source data 5. Figure 3L qRT-PCR data of K08D8.4 in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media (+5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated.
Figure 3—source data 6. Figure 3O Colony-forming units (CFUs) of P. aeruginosa, isolated from the intestines of animals with the indicated genotypes, quantified after 24 hr of bacterial infection.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Cholesterol scarcity activates intestinal innate immune defenses.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) An mRNA-seq experiment as described in Figure 3D, except using a different nhr-8 mutant allele: nhr-8(ok186). (B) Data from mRNA-seq experiments as described in Figure 3D, except comparing genes differentially regulated in uninfected nhr-8(hd117) mutants versus wild-type animals (y-axis) with genes differentially expressed in uninfected wild-type animals grown in the absence (0 μg/mL) versus presence (5 μg/mL) of supplemental cholesterol (x-axis). (C) Images of T24B8.5p::gfp animals as described in Figure 3G. (D) Images of T24B8.5p::gfp on agarose media with 0.1% Tergitol in the presence of supplemented fatty acids, as indicated. See also Figure 3.

The nuclear hormone receptor, NHR-8, a homolog of mammalian liver X receptor (LXR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR), is required for the transport, distribution, and metabolism of cholesterol in C. elegans (Magner et al., 2013; Lindblom et al., 2001). Thus, nhr-8 loss-of-function mutant strains can be used as genetic tools to study conditions of low sterol content. Two previously characterized nhr-8 null alleles are nhr-8(hd117), which lacks the first exon (Magner et al., 2013) and nhr-8(ok186), which is missing most of the ligand-binding domain (Lindblom et al., 2001). Notably, the transcription profile of nhr-8(hd117) and nhr-8(ok186) animals mimics that of wild-type C. elegans infected with the bacterial pathogen P. aeruginosa (Figure 3D, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A, Supplementary files 1 and 2). The correlation between the transcriptional signatures of either the nhr-8(hd117) or the nhr-8(ok186) mutant with the genes that are changed in wild-type animals during pathogen infection was significant across all genes (r = 0.311 and r = 0.370, respectively). Of note, the correlation between these datasets is tighter when comparing only the differentially expressed genes (r = 0.763 and r = 0.849, respectively) and only genes that are also involved in innate immunity (r = 0.677 and r = 0.703, respectively) (Figure 3D and Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). Among the immune effectors that are upregulated in both the nhr-8(hd117) and nhr-8(ok186) mutants, and in wild type animals infected with P. aeruginosa, are T24B8.5, irg-4, irg-5, and K08D8.4; the same genes whose transcription are also induced by cholesterol deprivation (Figure 3C and D, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1A).

To validate these findings, we compared gene expression changes in wild-type C. elegans grown in media lacking supplemented cholesterol versus animals grown under standard culture conditions with 5 μg/mL of cholesterol. Consistent with our transcriptome profiling experiments of nhr-8 loss-of-function mutants, we discovered that innate immune effectors were strongly enriched among genes that were transcriptionally activated during cholesterol deprivation (Figure 3E). Specifically, the expression of innate immune effectors was significantly correlated in wild-type animals infected with P. aeruginosa and in wild-type nematodes starved for cholesterol (r = 0.610) (Figure 3E). Immune effectors that were induced during cholesterol starvation in qRT-PCR studies (irg-4, irg-5, K08D8.4, and T24B8.5) were again found among these differentially regulated genes, confirming the integrity of our RNA-seq analysis (Figure 3C). These observations were confirmed in a separate RNA-seq experiment (Otarigho and Aballay, 2021). Importantly, a comparison of the transcriptional changes in nhr-8(hd117) mutants with the genes regulated by low cholesterol revealed a remarkable correlation across all genes (r = 0.578) and differentially expressed genes (r = 0.836) (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). Together with previous work characterizing the role of nhr-8 in C. elegans cholesterol metabolism (Magner et al., 2013), these data support the use of nhr-8 mutants to study conditions of low sterol content. In summary, cholesterol-starved, wild-type C. elegans and two different nhr-8 loss-of-function mutants induce the transcription of innate immune defenses.

Two different supplementation experiments using the T24B8.5p::gfp immune reporter demonstrated that immune effector activation in nhr-8(hd117) mutants is due to sterol deficiency in these animals. First, supplementation of exogenous cholesterol at an increased concentration (80 μg/mL) fully suppressed T24B8.5p::gfp activation in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant (Figure 3F). Second, supplementation with the non-ionic detergents Tergitol or Triton X-100, which solubilize hydrophobic, amphipathic compounds, including sterols, suppressed T24B8.5p::gfp activation in nhr-8(hd117) animals in a manner that was dependent on the presence of added cholesterol in the growth media (Figure 3G and H, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). Nematode growth media solidified with agarose, rather than agar, contains markedly fewer contaminating sterols (Magner et al., 2013; Chitwood, 1999; Gerisch et al., 2001). Importantly, on agarose, the addition of Tergitol to the growth media also suppressed T24B8.5p::gfp activation in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant, but only in the presence of 5 μg/mL of cholesterol (Figure 3H). Notably, this effect was dose-dependent (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). These data establish that solubilization of cholesterol by Tergitol in standard nematode growth media suppresses immune activation in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant background. We used qRT-PCR to confirm these findings – Tergitol suppressed activation of T24B8.5, as well as the immune effectors irg-4, irg-5, and K08D8.4 in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant (Figure 3I–L). Of note, activation of immune defenses in nhr-8(hd117) animals is specific to cholesterol deprivation in this genetic background, as supplementation with individual saturated, mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are also misregulated in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant background (Magner et al., 2013), failed to suppress activation of T24B8.5p::gfp (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D). Together, these data confirm that cholesterol deprivation activates immune effector transcription independent of bacterial infection.

It has been previously shown that wild-type C. elegans raised on media without supplemented cholesterol are hypersusceptible to killing by P. aeruginosa, as are nhr-8(hd117) mutants on media with standard cholesterol supplementation (5 μg/mL) (Otarigho and Aballay, 2020). Importantly, we found that high doses of cholesterol (80 μg/mL) rescued the enhanced susceptibility of nhr-8(hd117) mutants to P. aeruginosa infection (Figure 3M). We confirmed this finding using an orthologous approach. Two detergents (Tergitol or Triton X-100), which solubilize cholesterol in nematode growth media, also restored wild-type pathogen resistance to the nhr-8(hd117) mutant (Figure 3N), consistent with their ability to modulate the expression of innate immune effectors (Figure 3G–L). Importantly, we found that the nhr-8(hd117) mutant accumulated less P. aeruginosa in its intestine during infection than wild-type animals (Figure 3O). Taken together, these data suggest that low cholesterol in the nhr-8(hd117) mutants reduces tolerance to pathogen infection, and that the robust transcriptional induction of immune effectors in this mutant background leads to reduced accumulation of P. aeruginosa during infection.

Additional analyses of the transcriptome profiling data revealed that targets of the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway were strongly enriched among the genes induced in wild-type animals during cholesterol deprivation (Figure 4A). Accordingly, the levels of active, phosphorylated PMK-1 were higher in wild-type animals grown on media without supplemented cholesterol than in animals grown under standard culture conditions (Figure 4B and C). Consistent with these data, the p38 PMK-1 pathway is also activated in nhr-8 loss-of-function mutants. A gene set enrichment analysis of the nhr-8(hd117) and nhr-8(ok186) transcriptome profiling experiments revealed strong enrichment of p38 PMK-1 pathway targets among the genes upregulated in each nhr-8 mutant (Figure 4D and Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). In addition, the nhr-8(hd117) and nhr-8(ok186) mutants had an increased ratio of phosphorylated PMK-1 relative to total PMK-1 compared to wild-type controls (Figure 4E and F). RNAi-mediated knockdown of tir-1, the most upstream component of the p38 signaling cassette (Liberati et al., 2004; Couillault et al., 2004), fully suppressed hyperactivation of T24B8.5p::gfp in nhr-8(hd117) animals (Figure 4G). The tir-1(qd4) loss-of-function mutation completely suppressed the induction of T24B8.5, irg-4, irg-5, and K08D8.4 in the nhr-8(hd117) background (Figure 4H–K). The transcription factors ATF-7 and SKN-1 link PMK-1 activity to its transcriptional outputs (Shivers et al., 2010; Inoue et al., 2005). In nhr-8(hd117) animals, knockdown of atf-7, but not skn-1, abrogated T24B8.5p::gfp activation (Figure 4G and Figure 4—figure supplement 1B and C). Finally, to further support our observation that cholesterol scarcity induces immune defenses upstream of p38 PMK-1, we used the MAPK phosphatase vhp-1, a negative regulator of PMK-1 (Kim et al., 2004). Solubilization of cholesterol with Tergitol was unable to suppress activation of T24B8.5p::gfp induced by knockdown of vhp-1 (Figure 4L).

Figure 4. Cholesterol scarcity activates the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway.

(A) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of p38 PMK-1 targets in the 0 μg/mL cholesterol mRNA-seq experiment. Fold change in expression of significantly differentially expressed genes (fold-change > 2 and q < 0.01) in uninfected animals grown in the absence (0 μg/mL) versus presence (5 μg/mL) of supplemental cholesterol are ranked from higher expression (red) to lower expression (blue). Normalized enrichment score (NES) and q-value are indicated. p38 PMK-1 targets found in the transcriptional profile are indicated by hit number in the left margin and black lines. (B) An immunoblot analysis of lysates from wild-type C. elegans grown on standard nematode growth media in the presence ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol) and in the absence ( + 0 μg/mL cholesterol) of supplemented cholesterol using antibodies that recognize the doubly phosphorylated TGY motif of PMK-1 (phos-PMK-1), total PMK-1 protein (total PMK-1), and tubulin (α-tubulin) is shown. PMK-1 is a 43.9 kDa protein and tubulin is a 50 kDa protein. (C) The band intensities of four biological replicates of the Western blot shown in A were quantified. Error bars represent SEM. *equals p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test) (D) GSEA of p38 PMK-1 targets in the nhr-8 mRNA-seq experiment as described in A. (E, F) Western blot experiment (E) and quantification (F) of four biological replicate experiments as described in B and C with the strains of the indicated genotypes. In B and E, pmk-1(km25) and nsy-1(ag3) are loss-of-function mutants that serve as controls to confirm the specificity of phos-PMK-1 and total PMK-1 probing. Error bars represent SEM. *equals p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison testing). (G) Images of T24B8.5p::gfp transcriptional immune reporter expression in wild-type animals and in nhr-8(hd117) mutants grown on control RNAi, tir-1(RNAi) or atf-7(RNAi) bacteria, as indicated. Quantification of GFP expression for this experiment is presented in Figure 4—figure supplement 1C. (H, I, J, K) qRT-PCR data of the indicated genes in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol). Data are the average of three to seven independent replicates, each normalized to a control gene with error bars representing SEM and are presented as the value relative to the average expression from all replicates of the indicated gene in wild-type animals. *equals p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison testing) (L) Images of T24B8.5p::gfp transcriptional immune reporter animals of the indicated genotypes grown in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol. Scale bars in all images equal 200 μm. (M) Survival curves of C. elegans pathogenesis assay with P. aeruginosa and C. elegans of the indicated genotypes at the L4 larval stage exposed to the indicated conditions. Data are representative of three trials. Difference between nhr-8(hd117) and all other conditions is significant (p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves for each group, and the log-rank test was used for all statistical comparisons. Sample sizes, mean lifespan, and p-values for all trials are shown in Supplementary file 4. See also Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Figure 4—source data 1. Figure 4C Quantification of p38 immunoblot analysis of lysates from wild-type C. elegans grown on standard nematode growth media in the presence ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol) and in the absence ( + 0 μg/mL cholesterol) of supplemented cholesterol.
Figure 4—source data 2. Figure 4F Quantification of p38 immunoblot analysis of lysates from the indicated C. elegans strains.
Figure 4—source data 3. Figure 4H qRT-PCR data of T24B8.5 in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
Figure 4—source data 4. Figure 4I qRT-PCR data of irg-4 in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
Figure 4—source data 5. Figure 4J qRT-PCR data of irg-5 in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
Figure 4—source data 6. Figure 4K qRT-PCR data of K08D8.4 in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Cholesterol scarcity activates the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of p38 PMK-1 targets in the mRNA-seq experiment as described in Figure 4D, except using a different nhr-8 mutant allele: nhr-8(ok186). (B) Images of T24B8.5p::gfp animals, as described in Figure 4G. (C) Fiji was used to quantify the GFP fluorescence of individual animals in the indicated conditions. The n for each condition is presented in the figure and indicates the number of animals quantified. Error bars represent SEM. *equals p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison testing). (D) Images of the transgenic C. elegans, in which gfp has been fused to the DAF-16 protein under the indicated conditions. Scale bars in all images equal 200 μm. See also Figure 4.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. 1C Quantification of T24B8.5p::gfp expression in the indicated conditions.

The c-JUN N-terminal kinase MAPK homolog kgb-1, the insulin signaling pathway forkhead box O family (FOXO) transcription factor daf-16, and the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) fshr-1, each function in parallel to the p38 PMK-1 pathway to regulate immune and stress responses in C. elegans (Troemel et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2004; Powell et al., 2009; Garsin et al., 2003). However, knockdown of each of these genes in nhr-8(hd117) animals failed to suppress T24B8.5p::gfp activation (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B), and RNAi-mediated knockdown of nhr-8 did not induce nuclear localization of DAF-16::GFP (Figure 4—figure supplement 1D). Thus, cholesterol scarcity induces C. elegans innate immune responses through specific activation of p38 PMK-1 immune pathway signaling.

Interestingly, tir-1(qd4);nhr-8(hd117) double mutants were more susceptible to P. aeruginosa infection than nhr-8(hd117) mutants (Figure 4M). These data suggest that the induction of the p38 PMK-1 pathway in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant background promotes resistance to P. aeruginosa infection. In addition, tir-1(qd4);nhr-8(hd117) double mutants were slightly, but significantly and reproducibly, more susceptible than the tir-1(qd4) mutant to killing by P. aeruginosa. We therefore hypothesize that the inherent susceptibility to pathogen-mediated killing in animals that lack sufficient cholesterol (e.g. the nhr-8(hd117) mutant) leads to additive pathogen susceptibility in animals that also lack a functioning p38 PMK-1 host defense pathway (e.g. the tir-1(qd4) mutant).

To determine if sterol scarcity induces oligomerization and the NAD+ glycohydrolase activity of TIR-1 to activate the p38 PMK-1 pathway, we examined TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant background (Figure 5A). Consistent with our studies during P. aeruginosa infection (Figure 1A), nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals induced TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation in intestinal epithelial cells (Figure 5A and B). Importantly, TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation in nhr-8(hd117) animals was entirely suppressed by solubilizing cholesterol in the growth media with Tergitol (Figure 5A and B). Additionally, treatment of nhr-8(hd117) animals expressing TIR-1::wrmScarlet with tir-1(RNAi) inhibited fluorescence and puncta formation (Figure 5A and B).

Figure 5. Sterol stress activates the C. elegans p38 immune pathway through the multimerization and NAD + glycohydrolase activity of TIR-1/SARM1.

Figure 5.

(A) Images of tir-1::wrmScarlet and nhr-8(hd117);tir-1::wrmScarlet animals as described in Figure 1A exposed to either 0.1% Tergitol or tir-1(RNAi). Scale bar equals 20 μm (2 µm for the inset enlarged images). (B) Quantification of the number of puncta present in the red (TIR-1::wrmScarlet), but not green (autofluorescence) channel with indicated conditions as described in Figure 1B. *equals p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison testing). (C,D) Images of T24B8.5p::gfp transcriptional immune reporter in tir-1 mutants with defects in oligomerization (tir-1ΔSAM, tir-1G747P, and tir-1H833A) and NADase catalytic activity (tir-1E788A) following nhr-8(RNAi) (C), and during cholesterol deprivation (D). Scale bar equals 200 μm. (E,F) qRT-PCR data of T24B8.5 (E) and irg-4 (F) in wild-type and mutant animals of the indicated genotypes grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol). Data are the average of three independent replicates, each normalized to a control gene with error bars representing SEM and are presented as the value relative to the average expression from all replicates in wild-type animals. *equals p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison testing).

Figure 5—source data 1. Figure 5B Quantification of the number of TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta present in the last posterior pair of intestinal epithelial cells in the indicated strains and conditions.
Figure 5—source data 2. Figure 5E qRT-PCR data of T24B8.5 in wild-type and mutant animals of the indicated genotypes grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
Figure 5—source data 3. Figure 5F qRT-PCR data of irg-4 in wild-type and mutant animals of the indicated genotypes grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).

Importantly, the C. elegans tir-1ΔSAM, tir-1G747P and tir-1H833A mutants, which contain specific mutations that block oligomerization of TIR-1, and the tir-1E788A strain that carries a mutation in the catalytic glutamine required for the NADase activity, each prevented activation of the p38 PMK-1-dependent immune reporter T24B8.5p::gfp in nhr-8(RNAi) animals (Figure 5C) and during cholesterol deprivation (Figure 5D). Using qRT-PCR, we confirmed that these mutations in tir-1 abrogated the induction of the T24B8.5 (Figure 5E) and irg-4 (Figure 5F) immune effectors in nhr-8(RNAi) animals. We also found that these tir-1 mutants phenocopied the effects of the p38 PMK-1 pathway mutants (tir-1(qd4), nys-1(ag3), and pmk-1(km25)) on the basal expression of these immune effector genes (Figure 5E and F).

It is possible that the organization of TIR-1::wrmScarlet into visible puncta in nhr-8 mutants is secondary to non-specific protein aggregation; however, the in vitro and in vivo data presented in this manuscript, when considered together, suggest that this is not the case. Organized multimerization of TIR-1 is a prerequisite for the NADase activity of the protein complex in vitro (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Accordingly, the mutations that specifically abrogate TIR-1 multimerization in vitro (Figure 2J, Figure 2—figure supplement 1I), also block p38 PMK-1 pathway activation (Figure 1D–F) and prevented immune effector induction in response to cholesterol deprivation in vivo (Figure 5C–F). Furthermore, Tergitol, which solubilizes cholesterol and fully suppresses p38 PMK-1 immune activation in nhr-8 mutants (Figure 3G-N), also suppresses TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation (Figure 5). Finally and perhaps most importantly, P. aeruginosa infection, a separate physiological stress, also induces TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation to activate the p38 PMK-1 pathway (Figure 1).

In summary, the above data demonstrate for the first time that physiological stresses, both pathogen and non-pathogen, induce TIR-1 multimerization into puncta within intestinal epithelial cells, which then activates the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway through the intrinsic NADase activity of the TIR-1 protein complex.

Sterol scarcity primes p38 PMK-1 immune defenses

Since C. elegans requires cholesterol to survive bacterial infection and must obtain this essential metabolite from its diet, we hypothesized that, when environmental sterols are limited, activation of the p38 PMK-1 pathway represents an evolutionary adaptation that primes immune effector expression to anticipate challenges from bacterial pathogens. To test this hypothesis, we examined the expression of innate immune effector genes during bacterial infection in the presence and absence of cholesterol supplementation. Interestingly, the induction of irg-4p::gfp (Figure 6A), irg-5p::gfp (Figure 6B), and T24B8.5p::gfp (Figure 6C) during P. aeruginosa infection was enhanced when nematodes were infected on media that did not contain supplemented cholesterol. Consistent with these data, P. aeruginosa infection also led to increased activation of irg-4p::gfp (Figure 6D) and irg-5p::gfp (Figure 6E) when nhr-8 was depleted by RNAi.

Figure 6. Sterol scarcity primes p38 PMK-1 immune defenses.

Figure 6.

(A, B, C, D, E) Images of the indicated transcriptional immune reporters under the indicated conditions. Scale bars in all images equal 200 μm. (F) A heat map compares the expression levels of the 184 genes that were both induced in wild-type animals during P. aeruginosa infection and differentially expressed (either induced or repressed) in nhr-8(hd117) mutants at baseline (each greater than two-fold, q < 0.05). To compare the expression of these genes in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutants, we scaled the expression level in each condition by calculating a z-score for each row and performed hierarchical clustering, which identified two main clusters (Cluster I contains 139 genes and Cluster II contains 45 genes). See also Supplementary file 5. (G) Enrichment of p38 PMK-1-dependent genes in Cluster I and II genes is shown. (H, I, J, K) mRNA-seq data for the indicated genes from the experiment described in (F) showing scaled reads per base from three biological replicates. Error bars represent SEM. *equals q < 0.05 from RNA-seq analysis. (L) Model of p38 PMK-1 pathway activation during sterol scarcity and pathogen infection.

Figure 6—source data 1. Figure 6H mRNA-seq data for T24B8.5 from the conditions indicated showing scaled reads per base.
Figure 6—source data 2. Figure 6I mRNA-seq data for irg-4 from the conditions indicated showing scaled reads per base.
Figure 6—source data 3. Figure 6J mRNA-seq data for irg-5 from the conditions indicated showing scaled reads per base.
Figure 6—source data 4. Figure 6K mRNA-seq data for K08D8.4 from the conditions indicated showing scaled reads per base.

To provide further support for this hypothesis, we analyzed the expression pattern of p38 PMK-1-dependent transcripts in nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals during P. aeruginosa infection. Of the 472 genes that were induced in wild-type animals during P. aeruginosa infection, 184 were also differentially regulated (either induced or repressed) in nhr-8(hd117) animals that were infected with P. aeruginosa. To perform this analysis in an unbiased manner, we scaled the expression level in each condition for each of these 184 genes by calculating a row z-score and performed hierarchical clustering (Figure 6F). We observed that these 184 genes group into two clusters: Cluster I had 139 genes and Cluster II contained 45 genes (Supplementary file 5). Cluster I was comprised mostly of genes whose expression in the absence of infection was higher in nhr-8(hd117) mutants than wild-type animals (129 of 139 genes). In addition, the majority of Cluster I genes were more strongly induced during P. aeruginosa infection in nhr-8(hd117) animals than wild-type animals. Cluster II, on the other hand, contained genes whose induction on P. aeruginosa were dependent on nhr-8. Importantly, p38 PMK-1-dependent genes were strongly enriched among Cluster I, but not Cluster II, genes (Figure 6G). Thirty-three of the 139 genes in Cluster I are known targets of the p38 PMK-1 immune pathway (24.17-fold enriched, hypergeometric P-value = 7.68 x 10–37), a group that includes the immune effectors T24B8.5 (Figure 6H), irg-4 (Figure 6I), irg-5 (Figure 6J), and K08D8.4 (Figure 6K). By contrast, only three genes in Cluster II are p38 PMK-1-dependent transcripts (6.95-fold enriched, hypergeometric p-value = 0.01) (Figure 6F and G).

These data demonstrate that sterol scarcity primes the induction of innate immune effectors by activating the p38 PMK-1 immune pathway. Subsequent challenge by P. aeruginosa further drives immune activation in a manner that leads to reduced pathogen accumulation in the intestine (Figure 3O).

Discussion

Here, we report two conceptual advances. First, we show that a phase transition of C. elegans TIR-1, an NADase homologous to mammalian SARM1, underlies p38 PMK-1 immune pathway activation in the C. elegans intestine (Figure 6L). Importantly, we demonstrate that physiologic stresses, both pathogen and non-pathogen, induce multimerization of TIR-1/SARM1 into visible puncta within intestinal epithelial cells. In vitro biochemical studies of purified protein and C. elegans genetic analyses revealed that multimerization and a phase transition of TIR-1/SARM1 engages its NADase activity to activate the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway and provide protection during bacterial infection.

Second, we show that cholesterol deficiency, as recapitulated in an nhr-8 loss-of-function mutant, causes TIR-1/SARM1 to oligomerize into puncta in intestinal epithelial cells and activate the p38 PMK-1 immune pathway through its intrinsic NADase activity. C. elegans lacks the ability to synthesize cholesterol de novo and must acquire dietary sterols to support multiple aspects of organismal physiology (Hieb and Rothstein, 1968; Chitwood, 1999; Shim et al., 2002; Merris et al., 2003; Yochem et al., 1999; Otarigho and Aballay, 2020; Cheong et al., 2011). We found that priming of innate immune defenses during conditions of low cholesterol availability augments immune effector induction and leads to decreased accumulation of pathogen in the intestine during a subsequent bacterial infection. We therefore propose that immune activation in this manner represents a new adaptive response that allows a metazoan host to anticipate environmental threats during cholesterol deprivation, a time of relative susceptibility to infection.

Loring et al. demonstrated that human SARM1 aggregates and undergoes a phase transition to potentiate its intrinsic NAD+ glycohydrolase activity (Loring et al., 2021). These authors studied SARM1 in the context of neuronal degeneration as it was previously demonstrated that loss of mammalian SARM1 protects against axonal degeneration following neuronal injury (Marion et al., 2019; Henninger et al., 2016; Geisler et al., 2016). Treatment with non-physiologic concentrations of citrate, a molecule that induces protein precipitation, led to puncta formation of C. elegans TIR-1 in neurons, which was correlated with enhanced axonal degeneration (Loring et al., 2021). Moreover, previous studies showed that human SARM1 forms oligomers (Bratkowski et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2020) and that dimerization, at least, is required for TIR domain activity (Gerdts et al., 2015; Summers et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2019). Thus, the demonstration here that C. elegans TIR-1/SARM1 aggregates in vivo in response to physiological stresses provides an important characterization of the mechanism inferred by Loring et al. and suggests that oligomerization favors the phase transition of TIR-1/SARM1 such that higher order structures are formed. Of note, the enzyme kinetics of TIR-1 are strikingly similar to mammalian SARM1 – the activity of both proteins is exquisitely dependent on precipitation. Thus, together, these studies demonstrate that a phase transition of TIR-1/SARM1 as a prerequisite for its NAD+ glycohydrolase activity is conserved across millions of years of evolution, occurs in multiple cell types, and is essential for diverse physiological processes, including intestinal immune regulation and axonal degeneration.

Currently, it is unknown how low cholesterol leads to the oligomerization and phase transition of C. elegans TIR-1/SARM1 and further studies are needed to characterize this mechanism. Cholesterol could be sensed to trigger this response, or low cholesterol could change the biophysical properties of the cell in a manner that favors oligomerization of TIR-1.

We demonstrate that cholesterol supplementation can fully rescue the enhanced susceptibility to pathogen-mediated killing in nhr-8 loss-of-function mutants (Figure 3M and N). These data suggest that cholesterol is required for pathogen tolerance in C. elegans; however, the mechanism behind this observation is unknown. The p38 PMK-1 pathway provides protection during pathogen infection in the nhr-8 mutant background (Figure 4M), suggesting that the enhanced susceptibility to pathogen-mediated killing in the nhr-8 mutant is not secondary to aberrant activation of the p38 PMK-1 pathway. Cholesterol-deficient animals may therefore have general reductions in organismal fitness that cause vulnerability to pathogen infection and a reduction in lifespan.

The robust activation of the p38 PMK-1 pathway and the reduced pathogen burden in nhr-8 mutants suggests that immune activation in this manner promotes pathogen resistance, which we propose is part of a mechanism to prime protective immune activation. It is also possible that activation of the p38 PMK-1 pathway during cholesterol deficiency could engage another protective host response that is unrelated to pathogen defense. We do not favor this hypothesis, however, considering the observed reduction in the pathogen burden of the nhr-8 mutants (Figure 3O).

We previously demonstrated that a C. elegans nuclear hormone receptor, NHR-86, a member of a family of ligand-gated transcription factors, surveys the chemical environment to activate the expression of immune effectors (Peterson et al., 2019). Interestingly, NHR-86 targets immune effectors whose basal regulation requires the p38 PMK-1 immune pathway. However, NHR-86 functions independently of PMK-1 and modulates the transcription of these infection response genes directly. NHR-86 is a nematode homolog of the mammalian nuclear hormone receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF4), a family of NHRs that expanded dramatically in C. elegans (259 HNF4 homologs are encoded in the C. elegans genome) (Sluder et al., 1999; Sluder and Maina, 2001). One potentially unifying hypothesis is that HNF4 homologs detect pathogen- or host-derived ligands that are associated with infection and activate pathogen-specific immune defenses. In this model, the p38 PMK-1 pathway functions as a rheostat that receives inputs from signals associated with potentially dangerous environmental conditions to prime host immune effector genes. Indeed, inputs from chemosensory neurons, bacterial density, tissue damage, and nucleotide metabolism also regulate the tonic level of p38 PMK-1 pathway activity (Couillault et al., 2004; Pujol et al., 2008; Tecle et al., 2021; Foster et al., 2020a; Wu et al., 2019; Anderson and Pukkila-Worley, 2020; Styer et al., 2008; Cao and Aballay, 2016; Cao et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2011), suggesting that p38 PMK-1 phosphorylation is adjusted to anticipate dangerous threats during periods of vulnerability. We hypothesize that mechanisms in C. elegans that detect specific pathogens can further augment immune effector induction.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli) OP50 CaenorhabditisGenetics Center
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli) HT115 CaenorhabditisGenetics Center
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli) BL21 (DE3) ThermoFisher Scientific EC0114 Chemically competent
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli) XL1-Blue Agilent 200,249 Chemically competent
Strain, strain background (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) UCBPP-PA14 PMID:7604262
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) N2; wild-type CGC, PMID:4366476 WormBase ID:WBStrain00000001 Laboratory reference strain/wild type
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) KU25 PMID:15116070/ WormBase ID: WBStrain00024040 Genotype: pmk-1(km25) IV
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) AU3 PMID:12142542 WormBase ID: WBStrain00000259 Genotype: nsy-1(ag3) II
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) ZD101 PMID:19837372 WormBase ID:WBStrain00040806 Genotype: tir-1(qd4) III
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) AA968 PMID:23931753 Genotype: nhr-8(hd117) IV
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) AE501 PMID:11516648 WormBase ID:WBStrain00000059 Genotype: nhr-8(ok186) IV
Strain, strain background (Caenorhadbditis elegans) AU78 PMID:19837372 WormBase ID:WBStrain00000262 Genotype: agIs219 [T24B8.5p::gfp::unc-54–3’UTR; ttx-3p::gfp::unc-54–3’UTR] III
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) AU307 PMID:24875643 Genotype: agIs44 [irg-4p::gfp::unc-54–3’UTR; myo-2p::mCherry]
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) AY101 PMID:20133945 WormBase ID:WBStrain00000322 Genotype: acIs101 [pDB09.1(irg-5p::gfp); pRF4(rol-6(su1006))]
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) TJ356 PMID:11747825 WormBase ID:WBStrain00034892 Genotype: zIs356 [daf-16p::daf-16a/b::gfp + pRF4(rol-6(su1006))]
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW278 This study Genotype: nhr-8(hd117);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW317 This study Genotype: tir-1(qd4);nhr-8(hd117)
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW339 This study Genotype: tir-1(ums47[E788A]);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW369 This study Genotype: tir-1(ums54[ΔSAM]);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW374 This study Genotype: tir-1(ums55[G747P]);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW381 This study Genotype: tir-1(ums56[H833A]);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW386 This study Genotype: tir-1(ums57[tir-1::3xFLAG]);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW387 This study Genotype: tir-1(ums58[tir-1[E788A]::3xFLAG]);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW388 This study Genotype: tir-1 (ums59[tir-1[ΔSAM]::3xFLAG]);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW 389 This study Genotype: tir-1(ums60[tir-1[G747P]::3xFLAG]);agIs219
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW403 This study Genotype: tir-1(ums63[tir-1::wrmScarlet])
Strain, strain background (Caenorhabditis elegans) RPW404 This study Genotype: nhr-8(hd117);tir-1(ums63[tir-1::wrmScarlet])
Antibody anti-total PMK-1(rabbit polyclonal) PMID:30668573 WB(1:1000)
Antibody anti-Phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182)(rabbit polyclonal) Cell Signaling Technology 9211 WB(1:1,000)
Antibody anti-FLAG(mouse monoclonal) Sigma-Aldrich F1804 WB(1:1,000)
Antibody anti-alpha-tubulin (mouse monoclonal) Sigma-Aldrich T5168 WB(1:2,000)
Antibody anti-mouse IgG-HRP (goat polyclonal) Abcam ab6789 WB(1:10,000)
Antibody anti-rabbit IgG-HRP(goat polyclonal) Cell Signaling Technology 7074 WB(1:10,000)
Chemical compound, drug Peptone Gibco 211820
Chemical compound, drug Agar Fisher BP9744
Chemical compound, drug Cholesterol Sigma Aldrich C3045
Chemical compound, drug Tri-Reagent Sigma Aldrich T9424
Chemical compound, drug TERGITOL solution (Type NP-40) Sigma Aldrich NP40S
Chemical compound, drug RIPA Buffer Cell Signaling Technology, Inc 89900
Chemical compound, drug Halt Protease and Phosphatase inhibitor ThermoFisher Scientific 78445
Chemical compound, drug NuPAGELDS sample buffer ThermoFisher Scientific NP0007
Chemical compound, drug 1,6-hexanediol Sigma Aldrich 240117
Chemical compound, drug Nicotinamide 1,N6-ethenoadenine dinucleotide; ε-NAD Sigma Aldrich N2630
Chemical compound, drug PEG 400 Sigma Aldrich 91893
Chemical compound, drug PEG 1500 Sigma Aldrich 86101
Chemical compound, drug PEG 3350 Sigma Aldrich 88276
Chemical compound, drug PEG 8000 Sigma Aldrich 89510
Chemical compound, drug Dextran Fisher Scientific ICN16011010
Chemical compound, drug Sucrose Sigma Aldrich S0389
Chemical compound, drug Glycerol Sigma Aldrich G5516
Chemical compound, drug Sodium citrate Sigma Aldrich S4641
Chemical compound, drug Kanamycin Research Products International K22000
Chemical compound, drug IPTG ThermoFisher Scientific R0392
Chemical compound, drug Pierce EDTA-free protease inhibitor mini tablets ThermoFisher Scientific A32955
Commercial assay or kit iProof High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc 172–5301
Commercial assay or kit iScript gDNA Clear cDNA Synthesis Kit Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc 172–5034
Commercial assay or kit iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc 1725120
Commercial assay or kit DreamTaq Green PCR ThermoFisher Scientific K1081
Commercial assay or kit DC protein assay Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc 5000116
Commercial assay or kit NuPAGE 4%–12% BisTris gels ThermoFisher Scientific NP0321BOX
Commercial assay or kit NuPAGE 3%–8% TrisAcetate gels ThermoFisher Scientific EA0375BOX
Commercial assay or kit SuperSignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate Thermo Fisher Scientific 34577
Commercial assay or kit SuperSignal West Femto PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate Thermo Fisher Scientific 34095
Commercial assay or kit Strep-Tactin XT Superflow high-capacity resin IBA Lifesciences 2-4030-025 Product discontinued; suitable replacement is Strep-Tactin XT 4Flow high capacity resin (2-5030-025)
Commercial assay or kit Wizard Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System Promega A1460
Commercial assay or kit TALON Metal Affinity Resin Takara 635,502
Peptide, recombinant protein Lysozyme Sigma Aldrich L6876
Peptide, recombinant protein DpnI NEB R0176S
Peptide, recombinant protein ADP-ribosyl cyclase Sigma Aldrich A9106
Peptide, recombinant protein SpCas9 Nuclease IDT 1081058
Recombinant DNA reagent pET-30a(+) TIR (plasmid) Loring et al., 2021 Referred to as pET30a+ Strep-ceTIR-HIS in reference
Software, algorithm Fiji/imageJ PMID:22743772
Software, algorithm OASIS 2 PMID:27528229
Software, algorithm R Console (Version 3.5) The R Foundation https://www.r-project.org/
Software, algorithm FastQC (Version 0.11.5) https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
Software, algorithm Kallisto (version 0.45.0) PMID:27043002
Software, algorithm Sleuth (version 0.30.0) PMID:28581496
Software, algorithm GSEA (version 4.1.0) PMID:16199517
Software, algorithm pheatmap (version 1.0.12) https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html
Software, algorithm DAVID Bioinformatics database PMID:19131956
Software, algorithm GraphPad Prism 9 Graphpad https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/

C. elegans and bacterial strains

The previously published C. elegans strains used in this study were: N2 Bristol (Brenner, 1974), KU25 pmk-1(km25) (Mizuno et al., 2004), AU3 nsy-1(ag3) (Kim et al., 2002), ZD101 tir-1(qd4) (Shivers et al., 2009), AA968 nhr-8(hd117) (Magner et al., 2013), AE501 nhr-8(ok186) (Lindblom et al., 2001), AU78 agIs219 [T24B8.5p::gfp::unc-54–3’UTR; ttx-3p::gfp::unc-54–3’UTR] (Shivers et al., 2009), AU306 agIs44 [irg-4p::gfp::unc-54–3’UTR; myo-2p::mCherry] (Pukkila-Worley et al., 2014), AY101 acIs101 [pDB09.1(irg-5p::gfp); pRF4(rol-6(su1006))] (Bolz et al., 2010), TJ356 zIs356 [daf-16p::daf-16a/b::gfp + pRF4(rol-6(su1006))] (Henderson and Johnson, 2001). The strains developed in this study were: RPW278 nhr-8(hd117);agIs219, RPW317 tir-1(qd4);nhr-8(hd117), RPW339 tir-1(ums47[E788A]);agIs219, RPW369 tir-1(ums54[ΔSAM]);agIs219, RPW374 tir-1(ums55[G747P]);agIs219, RPW381 tir-1(ums56[H833A]);agIs219, RPW386 tir-1(ums57[tir-1::3xFLAG]);agIs219, RPW387 tir-1(ums58[tir-1[E788A]::3xFLAG]);agIs219, RPW388 tir-1 (ums59[tir-1[ΔSAM]::3xFLAG]);agIs219, RPW 389 tir-1(ums60[tir-1[G747P]::3xFLAG]);agIs219, RPW403 tir-1(ums63[tir-1::wrmScarlet]), RPW404 nhr-8(hd117);tir-1(ums63[tir-1::wrmScarlet]). Bacteria used in this study are Escherichia coli OP50, E. coli DH5α, E. coli HT115(DE3), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 (Rahme et al., 1995).

C. elegans growth conditions and lipid supplementation

C. elegans strains were maintained on standard nematode growth medium (NGM) plates (0.25% bacto peptone, 0.3% sodium chloride, 1.7% agar [Fisher], 5 μg/mL cholesterol [Sigma-Aldrich, BioReagent grade], 25 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0, 1 mM magnesium sulfate, 1 mM calcium chloride)with E. coli OP50 as a food source, as described (Brenner, 1974). For low-cholesterol medium (0 μg/mL cholesterol), NGM was prepared without cholesterol supplementation, while 0.1% ethanol was added to maintain an equivalent ethanol concentration. For high-cholesterol medium, cholesterol was dissolved in ethanol at 20 mg/mL and added to NGM at a final concentration of 80 μg/mL immediately prior to pouring plates. For all assays with high-cholesterol medium, NGM containing 0.4% ethanol and 5 μg/mL cholesterol were used as control plates. Cholesterol solubilization assays were performed by supplementing NGM containing 5 μg/mL cholesterol with either 0.1% Tergitol (Sigma-Aldrich) or 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich). For assays using media solidified with agarose, NGM plates were prepared with 1.7% Ultrapure agarose (ThermoFisher Scientific) in place of agar. All fatty acids were purchased from Nu-Check-Prep Inc, and supplementation performed as previously described with modification (Anderson et al., 2019; Nandakumar and Tan, 2008). Fatty acids were dissolved in 50% ethanol and added at a final concentration of 1 mM to NGM agarose containing 0 μg/mL cholesterol and 0.1% Tergitol immediately prior to plate pouring. Prior to all assays, plates supplemented with lipids and control plates were seeded with E. coli OP50 and grown for 24 hr at room temperature. Assays were performed by picking 10–20 gravid adult animals to either lipid-supplemented or matched control plates. Animals were maintained on the plates for 14 hr at 20 °C, after which they were removed. Eggs laid on the plate were allowed to hatch and develop to the L4 stage at 20 °C. For low-cholesterol assays, animals were grown for two generations on NGM containing 0 μg/mL cholesterol.

C. elegans strain construction

CRISPR/Cas9 was used to generate tir-1 mutants in both wild-type and TIR-1::3xFLAG backgrounds, as described (Dokshin et al., 2018; Ghanta and Mello, 2020). All CRISPR/Cas9 reagents were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. Target guide sequences were selected using the CHOPCHOP web tool (Labun et al., 2019). ssODN and dsDNA repair templates contained indicated edits, deletions or insertions with 35 bp flanking homology arms. crRNA guide and ssODN sequences are listed in Supplementary file 6. For wrmScarlet dsDNA repair template, wrmScarlet was PCR amplified with 35 bp flanking homology arms. PCR was gel purified, diluted to 100 ng/μL, melted and reannealed using a thermal cycler (95 °C – 2 min; 85 °C – 10 s, 75 °C – 10 s, 65 °C – 10 s, 55 °C – 10 s, 45 °C – 10 s, 35 °C – 10 s, 25 °C – 10 s, 4 °C – hold. Ramp down 1 °C per s), and used immediately for injection. A mixture of 0.25 μg/μL Cas9, 0.1 μg/μL tracrRNA and 0.056 μg/μL crRNA were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. 0.11 μg/μL ssODN or 25 ng/μL dsDNA and 40 ng/μL pRF4(rol-6(su1006)) plasmid were added to the mixture, centrifuged, and microinjected into young adult animals carrying the agIs219 transgene, tir-1(ums57[tir-1::3xFLAG]);agIs219, or N2. The F1 progeny were screened for Rol phenotypes 3–4 days after injection and then for indicated edits using PCR and Sanger sequencing. Primer sequences used for genotyping are listed in Supplementary file 6.

Feeding RNAi

Knockdown of target genes was performed by feeding C. elegans E. coli HT115 expressing dsRNA targeting the gene of interest, as previously described with modification (Fire et al., 1998; Timmons et al., 2001; Conte et al., 2015). In brief, HT115 bacteria expressing dsRNA targeting genes of interest were grown in Lysogeny broth (LB) Lennox medium containing 50 μg/mL ampicillin and 15 μg/mL tetracycline overnight with shaking (250 rpm) at 37 °C. Overnight cultures were seeded onto NGM containing 5 mM IPTG and 50 μg/mL carbenicillin and incubated at 37 °C for 16 hr, after which synchronized L1 animals were transferred to bacterial lawns and allowed to grow until the L4 stage.

C. elegans bacterial infection and colonization assays

“Slow killing” P. aeruginosa infection experiments were performed as previously described (Tan et al., 1999; Foster et al., 2020b). Wild-type is either N2 or agIs219. In brief, a single colony of P. aeruginosa PA14 was inoculated into 3 mL of LB medium and grown with shaking (250 rpm) at 37 °C for 14 hr. Ten μL of overnight culture was spread onto 35 mm petri dishes containing 4 mL slow killing agar (0.35% peptone, 0.3% sodium chloride, 1.7% agar, 5 μg/mL cholesterol, 25 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0, 1 mM magnesium sulfate, 1 mM calcium chloride). Plates were incubated for 24 hr at 37 °C and for approximately 24 hr at 25 °C. Immediately prior to starting the assay, 0.1 mg/mL 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) was added on top of the agar to prevent progeny from hatching. Animals used in all assays were grown at 20 °C with specified growth conditions. For assays involving high cholesterol or nonionic detergents, slow-killing agar plates were prepared with either 80 μg/mL cholesterol (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1% Tergitol (Sigma-Aldrich), or 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich). For experiments using plates containing 80 μg/mL cholesterol, matched control plates containing the equivalent ethanol concentration (0.4%) and 5 μg/mL cholesterol were prepared. All pathogenesis and lifespan assays are representative of three biological replicates. Sample sizes, mean lifespan, and p values for all trials are shown in Supplementary file 4.

CFU of P. aeruginosa were quantified in the intestine of C. elegans as previously described with modifications (Foster et al., 2020b; Singh and Aballay, 2019). Briefly, C. elegans animals were exposed to lawns of P. aeruginosa, which were prepared as previously described, for 24 hr. Animals were then picked to NGM plates lacking bacteria and incubated for 10 min to remove external P. aeruginosa. Animals were then transferred to a second NGM plate, after which 10–11 animals per replicate were collected, washed with M9 buffer containing 25 mM tetramisole (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.01% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich), and ground with 1.0 mm silicon carbide beads (BioSpec Products). P. aeruginosa CFUs were quantified from serial dilutions of the lysate grown on LB agar.

Gene expression analysis and bioinformatics

A total of 2000 synchronized L1 stage C. elegans of the indicated genotypes were grown to the L4 stage and harvested by washing with M9. For expression analysis of C. elegans genes during P. aeruginosa infection, animals at the L4 stage animals were transferred by washing to plates containing E. coli OP50 or P. aeruginosa PA14 lawns. Animals were exposed for four hours and subsequently harvested by washing with M9. RNA was isolated using TriReagent (Sigma-Aldrich), column purified (Qiagen), and analyzed by 100 bp paired-end mRNA-sequencing using the BGISEQ-500 platform (BGIAmericasCorp) with > 20 million reads per sample. Raw fastq reads were evaluated by FastQC (version 0.11.5), clean reads were aligned to the C. elegans reference genome (WBcel235) and quantified using Kallisto (version 0.45.0) (Bray et al., 2016). Differentially expressed genes were identified using Sleuth (version 0.30.0) (Pimentel et al., 2017). Pearson correlation statistical analysis was performed using Prism 9.0. Innate immune genes were identified using DAVID Bioinformatics database biological process gene ontology (GO) term innate immune response (Huang et al., 2009). Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes were generated using pheatmap (version 1.0.12). Gene set enrichment analysis of RNA-seq was performed using GSEA (version 4.1.0) (Subramanian et al., 2005) with a custom gene set database (Supplementary file 7) containing p38 PMK-1-dependent genes generated by analyzing previously published RNA-seq of uninfected pmk-1(km25) animals (Fletcher et al., 2019) with the RNA-seq data analysis pipeline described above. Differential gene expression was defined as a fold change (FC) versus wild-type greater than two and q less than 0.01.

For the qRT-PCR studies, RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc), amplified and detected using Syber Green (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc) and a CFX384 machine (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc). The sequences of primers that were designed for this study are presented in Supplementary file 6. Other primers were previously published (Troemel et al., 2006; Taubert et al., 2008; Richardson et al., 2010; Estes et al., 2010). All values were normalized against the geometric mean of the control genes snb-1 and act-3. Fold change was calculated using the Pfaffl method (Pfaffl, 2001).

Immunoblot analyses

Protein lysates from 2000 C. elegans grown to the L4 larval stage on E. coli OP50 on NGM agar were prepared as previously described with modification (Peterson et al., 2019; Cheesman et al., 2016). Harvested animals were washed twice with M9 buffer and resuspended in RIPA Buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc) containing 1 x Halt Protease and Phosphatase inhibitor (ThermoFisher Scientific). Samples were lysed using a teflon homogenizer, centrifuged, and protein was quantified from the supernatant of each sample using the DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc). NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) was added to a concentration of 1 X, and 12.5–30 μg of total protein from each sample was resolved on NuPAGE 4–12% BisTris (Phospho-PMK-1 and Total-PMK-1) or NuPAGE 3–8% TrisAcetate (TIR-1::3xFLAG) gels (ThermoFisher Scientific), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc), blocked with 5% milk powder in TBST and probed with a 1:1,000 dilution of an antibody that recognizes the doubly-phosphorylated TGY motif of PMK-1 (Cell Signaling Technology, #9211), a previously characterized total PMK-1 antibody (Peterson et al., 2019), a monoclonal mouse anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, M2), or a monoclonal mouse anti-alpha-tubulin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Clone B-5-1-2). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit (Cell Signaling Technology, #7074) and anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (Abcam, #ab6789) were diluted 1:10,000 and used to detect the primary antibodies following the addition of ECL reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc), which were visualized using a BioRad ChemiDoc MP Imaging System. The band intensities were quantified using Fiji/ImageJ, and the ratio of active phosphorylated PMK-1 to total PMK-1 was calculated.

TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta visualization

For TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta visualization, all TIR-1::wrmScarlet expressing animals were depleted of autofluorescent gut granules by exposure to glo-3(RNAi) from the L1 stage prior to all experiments. P. aeruginosa was prepared as described for bacterial infection and colonization assays. L4 animals expressing TIR-1::wrmScarlet were transferred to either OP50 or P. aeruginosa containing plates for 24 hr. For imaging, animals were transferred to 2% agarose pads, paralyzed with 300 mM sodium azide, and imaged with a 63 x oil immersion lens. For Tergitol experiments, animals were grown on RNAi plates containing 0.1% Tergitol and the respective RNAi strains and imaged at the L4 stage.

Microscopy

Nematodes were mounted onto agar pads, paralyzed with 10 mM levamisole (Sigma) or 300 mM sodium azide and photographed using a Zeiss AXIO Imager Z2 microscope with a Zeiss Axiocam 506mono camera and Zen 2.3 (Zeiss) software.

Microscopy image analysis

Image processing and analysis were performed using Fiji image analysis software. In each panel, the exposure time and processing for all images were identical. To quantify T24B8.5p::gfp fluorescence intensity, the DIC channel was used to identify and select the intestine of each animal using the Freehand Tool. The integrated density, which is the product of the area and mean gray value, was then calculated for the green channel of each selected region using the Measurement function. To quantify TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta, the last posterior pair of intestinal epithelial cells were identified in the DIC channel and selected using the Freehand Tool. We then filtered the red and green channel images using Gaussian Smoothing (sigma radius = 1). The Find Maxima tool was then used to identify puncta in the red channel within the selected area. The Find Maxima settings used for the analysis of P. aeruginosa puncta were prominence: 5, strict: no, exclude edge maxima: no. The settings for the nhr-8(hd117) and Tergitol experiments were prominence: 15, strict: no, exclude edge maxima: no. We then overlayed the location of the red channel puncta in the green channel and determined if there was an autofluorescent puncta in this exact location. TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta were those that were present in the red, but not the green, channel. Importantly, we only reported puncta that were positively identified by the image analysis software.

TIR-1 TIR domain expression and purification

The recombinant C. elegans TIR-1 TIR domain (TIR) was expressed in bacteria as previously described (Loring et al., 2020). Briefly, the TIR domain cloned into the pET-30a(+) vector was transformed into chemically competent E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and maintained as a glycerol stock at –80 °C. An inoculation loop was used to transfer the transformed bacteria into 5 mL of LB media with 50 µg/mL (final concentration) of kanamycin, and the culture was grown overnight at 37 °C while rotating. The next day, the cultures were diluted 1:400 in LB media with 50 µg/mL (final concentration) of kanamycin and grown at 37 °C while shaking at 215 rpm until an OD600 of 0.7–0.8 was reached. After cooling, 50 µM IPTG (final concentration) was added to the culture to induce protein expression. The incubator temperature was decreased to 16 °C, and cells were incubated for an additional 16–18 hr. Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 3000 x g for 15 min at 4 °C, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C until purification.

For purification, bacterial pellets were thawed on ice and then resuspended in Lysis Buffer (50 mM Tris•HCl pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% (w/v) glycerol, 0.001% Tween 20) with Pierce EDTA-free protease inhibitor mini tablets (ThermoFisher Scientific). The resuspension was incubated with 100 µg/mL lysozyme for 10 min at 4 °C and sonicated with a Fisher Scientific Sonic Dismembrator sonicator (FB-705) in 50 mL batches at an amplitude of 30 for 20 s, pulsing for 1 sec on and 1 s off, followed by a delay period of 20 s for a series of 12 cycles. Crude lysate was clarified at 21,000 x g for 25 min at 4 °C, at which point the supernatant was applied to pre-equilibrated Strep-Tactin XT Superflow high-capacity resin (IBA Lifesciences) and allowed to enter the column by gravity flow; the Strep-Tactin resin had been equilibrated in Strep Wash Buffer (50 mM Tris•HCl pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl). The column was washed with 30 column volumes of Strep Wash Buffer, and the protein was eluted with 25 column volumes of Strep Elution Buffer (Strep Wash Buffer with 50 mM biotin). The protein eluted from the Strep-Tactin column was then applied to pre-equilibrated TALON Metal Affinity Resin (Takara) and allowed to enter the column by gravity flow; the TALON resin was equilibrated in His Wash 1 (50 mM Tris•HCl pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole). A series of 15 column volume washes were applied (His Wash 1; His Wash 2: 50 mM Tris•HCl pH 7.0, 150 NaCl, 10 mM imidazole), and the protein was eluted in 20 column volumes of His Elution Buffer (50 mM Tris•HCl pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 150 mM imidazole). The eluted protein was dialyzed overnight in Dialysis Buffer (50 mM Tris•HCl, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl). The next day, the protein was concentrated using a 10,000 NMWL Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Unit at 4 °C, and the protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay. TIR was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C in 25 µL aliquots.

Fluorescent NADase assay

Nicotinamide 1,N6-ethenoadenine dinucleotide (ε-NAD, Sigma-Aldrich) is a fluorescent analog of NAD+ and was utilized in kinetic assays as a TIR-1 substrate. TIR-1 cleaves the nicotinamide moiety from ε-NAD to release nicotinamide and etheno-ADPR (ε-ADPR), which fluoresces (λex = 330 nm, λem = 405 nm). Enzymatic activity was assayed in Assay Buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl; final concentration) using Corning 96–well Half Area Black Flat Bottom Polystyrene NBS Microplates for a final reaction volume of 60 μL, or Corning 384-well Low Volume Black Round Bottom Polystyrene NBS Microplates for a final volume of 20 µL; reactions were initiated by the addition of ε-NAD. ε-ADPR fluorescence intensity readings were taken in real time every 15 s for 15–30 min using Wallac EnVision Manager Software and a PerkinElmer EnVision 2,104 Multilabel Reader. Fluorescence intensity readings (λex = 330 nm, λem = 405 nm) were converted to [ε-ADPR] with an ε-ADPR standard curve, which was produced by incubating fixed concentrations (0–400 µM) of ε-NAD with excess ADP-ribosyl cyclase and plotting the peak fluorescence intensity values against [ε-ADPR]. The activity was linear with respect to time under all conditions tested.

Effect of crowding agents and sodium citrate on the activity of the TIR domain

The enzymatic activity of the TIR domain was evaluated using the Fluorescent Assay described above. First, the enzyme concentration dependence was determined. For purified protein, the enzyme (0–32.5 µM; final concentration) was added to Assay Buffer in duplicate, briefly incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and the reaction was initiated with 1 mM ε-NAD. Fluorescence intensity was monitored in real time every 15 s for 15 min.

To evaluate the effect of crowding agents and sodium citrate on TIR activity, stock solutions of the additives were made. 50% (w/v) solutions of PEGs 8000, 3500, 1500, and 400, as well as 60% (w/v) solutions of dextran, sucrose, and glycerol were prepared and filtered. Initially, the concentration dependence of TIR in the presence of PEG 3350 was determined. TIR (0–15 µM; final concentration) was added to Assay Buffer with 25% PEG 3350 (final concentration) in duplicate, incubated for 10 min at room temperature, initiated with 1 mM ε-NAD, and monitored every 15 sec for 15 min. The concentration dependence of TIR in 25% PEG 3350 was used to establish that 2.5 µM TIR could be used to enable robust kinetic analyses. Next, the effect of viscogens on TIR activity was evaluated by adding 2.5 μM TIR (final concentration) in duplicate to Assay Buffer with or without 25% w/v of the viscogens (final concentration). Following a brief 10-min incubation period, the reaction was initiated with 1 mM ε-NAD and monitored every 15 s for 20 min. The dose response of 2.5 μM TIR to the viscogens (0, 10, 20, and 30% final concentrations) was evaluated in the same manner and monitored every 15 s for 15 min.

Sodium citrate was prepared as a stock solution of 2 M and filtered. The concentration dependence of TIR in the presence of 500 mM sodium citrate was determined. TIR (0–15 µM; final concentration) was added to Assay Buffer with 500 mM citrate (final concentration) in duplicate, incubated for 10 min at room temperature, and then the reaction was initiated with 1 mM ε-NAD and monitored every 15 s for 15 min. Additionally, the dose dependence of sodium citrate was determined in duplicate. 2.5 µM TIR was added to Assay Buffer with (0–1000 mM) sodium citrate and briefly incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The reaction was initiated with 1 mM ε-NAD, and fluorescence was monitored every 15 s for 15 min.

In all cases, the fluorescence intensity was converted to ε-ADPR using the ε-ADPR standard curve described above. Slopes of the progress curves yielded the velocities of the reactions, which were plotted in GraphPad Prism.

Effect of PEG 3350 and sodium citrate on steady-state kinetics

Steady-state kinetic reactions were carried out in Assay buffer with either PEG 3350 (0%–25%; final concentration) or sodium citrate (0–1000 mM; final concentration); a constant concentration of 2.5 µM TIR was used in these assays. Reaction components were mixed in duplicate and incubated at room temperature for 10 min before initiating the reaction with ε-NAD (0–4000 µM, final concentration). Fluorescence intensity was monitored every 15 s for 15 min. Using the ε-ADPR standard curve, the fluorescence was converted to [ε-ADPR]. The velocity of the reactions was calculated from the slope of the progress curve at each ε-NAD concentration and plotted in GraphPad Prism. Kinetic parameters were determined by fitting these velocities to the Michaelis-Menten equation (Eq. 1) at each PEG 3350 or sodium citrate concentration. Km, kcat, and kcat/Km values were plotted against PEG 3350 or sodium citrate concentration.

,v=VmaxSKm+S (1)

where Vmax is the maximum velocity, [S] is the substrate concentration, and Km is the substrate concentration at half the maximum velocity.

The TIR domain precipitates in PEG3350 and sodium citrate

Five µM TIR was incubated in Assay Buffer with PEG 3350 (0, 10, 17.5, and 25%; final concentration) or sodium citrate (0, 125, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mM; final concentration) in duplicate at room temperature for 15 min. The precentrifugation control was removed, and the remainder of the sample was centrifuged at 17,000 x g at 4 °C for 10 min. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was separated from the pellet, and the pellet was resuspended in Assay Buffer with the respective concentration of PEG 3350 or sodium citrate. Samples were diluted 1:2 with gel loading buffer and run on an SDS-PAGE gel. Protein bands were stained by Coomassie and visualized on a BioRad Gel Doc EZ Gel Documentation System with Image Lab Software. Representative images are shown.

Following resuspension of the pellet, all fractions were analyzed in the Fluorescent Assay. After the samples were aliquoted into the assay plate in duplicate, the enzymatic reaction was initiated with 1 mM ε-NAD and monitored every 15 s for 15 min. Fluorescence intensity was converted to ε-ADPR concentration using the ε-ADPR standard curve. Slopes of the progress curves yielded the velocities of the reactions, which were plotted in GraphPad Prism.

Effect of 1,6-hexanediol on TIR domain activity and precipitation

To evaluate the effect of 1,6-hexanediol on TIR activity, the Fluorescent Assay was performed in triplicate in the absence and presence of PEG 3350 or sodium citrate. For pure protein, 35 µM TIR (final concentration) was incubated in Assay Buffer at room temperature for 10 min with or without 2% 1,6-hexanediol (final concentration). For PEG 3350 or citrate, 2.5 µM TIR was incubated in Assay Buffer with 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate (final concentrations) for 10 min at room temperature with or without 2% 1,6-hexanediol. The reactions were initiated with 1 mM ε-NAD and monitored every 15 s for 15 min. Using the ε-ADPR standard curve, fluorescence was converted to [ε-ADPR], and the reaction velocities (i.e. slopes of the progress curves) were obtained. Velocities were normalized for enzyme concentration, and these normalized velocities were plotted in GraphPad Prism.

To determine whether 1,6-hexanediol can alter TIR precipitation, 1,6-hexanediol was added either before or after TIR precipitation in duplicate. To assess whether 1,6-hexanediol disrupts TIR precipitation, TIR precipitates were formed first by incubating 10 μM TIR (final concentration) with 25% PEG3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate (final concentration) at room temperature for 15 min. 1,6-hexanediol (0, 1, or 2%; final concentrations) was added to the mixture and incubated at room temperature for an additional 10 min. The precentrifugation control was removed, and the remaining mixture was centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. Supernatant fractions were removed, and the pellet was resuspended in Assay Buffer with the respective additive and concentration of 1,6-hexanediol. All fractions were run on an SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue, and gels were imaged on a BioRad Gel Doc EZ Gel Documentation System with Image Lab Software. Next, we determined if 1,6-hexanediol could prevent TIR precipitation. 10 µM TIR was incubated in Assay Buffer with 1,6-hexanediol (0, 1, or 2%; final concentration) for 15 min at room temperature. 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate was added to the TIR-buffer-hexanediol mixture and incubated further for 10 min. Controls were removed and the samples were centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. As before, supernatant fractions were removed, and pellet fractions were resuspended in Assay Buffer with respective additives and hexanediol concentrations. Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE/Coomassie staining; representative images are shown.

Phase transition reversibility

To evaluate the reversibility of the TIR phase transition, 5 µM of TIR was mixed with Assay Buffer and 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate in duplicate (final concentrations). Following a 15-min incubation period at room temperature, precentrifugation controls were removed and the sample remaining was centrifuged at 17,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. Supernatant fractions were separated from the pellet, which was resuspended in either Assay Buffer alone or Assay Buffer with respective additive. All fractions were analyzed for enzymatic activity in the Fluorescent Assay. Briefly, the precentrifugation, supernatant, and pellet fractions were aliquoted into the assay plates in duplicate and the reaction was initiated with 1 mM ε-NAD. Fluorescence was converted to [ε-ADPR] concentration with the ε-ADPR curve to yield the progress curves. The velocity of the reactions was taken as the slope of the line and the velocities were plotted in GraphPad Prism.

To validate the kinetic data, 10 µM TIR (final concentration) was incubated in Assay Buffer with either 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate (final concentration) for 15 min at room temperature; control samples were incubated in Assay Buffer only. Samples were centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C, after which the supernatant was separated from the pellet. The pellets from samples initially prepared with additives were resuspended in either Assay Buffer alone or Assay Buffer plus the respective additive; this was not necessary for the sample initially prepared without additive since the protein is primarily located in the supernatant in this case. After removing another control sample (Additive lanes on gel), the resuspended samples were centrifuged again at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. As before, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in Assay Buffer with the respective additive. All samples were analyzed for protein content on an SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie Blue.

Effect of pH on TIR domain precipitation and kinetics

To determine the effect of pH on TIR precipitation, the experiments described above were carried out in duplicate at pH values from 4.5 to 9.0. Briefly, 5 µM TIR (final concentration) was mixed with Assay Buffer (50 mM buffer; 150 NaCl) with and without 25% PEG 3350 (final concentration); for pH 4.5–5, sodium acetate buffer was used; for pH 5.5–6.5, MES was used; for pH 7–9, Tris was used. The samples were incubated for 15 min at ambient temperature, at which point the samples were centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in either buffer alone or buffer with 25% PEG 3350 (final concentration); the presence or absence of 25% PEG 3350 and the buffer identity of the resuspension solution corresponded to the initial sample preparation. To neutralize the buffer, 10 µL of 1 M Tris (pH 6.8) was added to each sample before running on an SDS-PAGE gel and staining with Coomassie blue. Images of the gels were obtained on the BioRad Gel Doc EZ Gel Documentation System with Image Lab Software. Representative images are shown. ImageJ was used to quantify the bands, which were plotted in GraphPad Prism.

Steady-state kinetic analyses were also performed at each pH in 25% PEG 3350. A constant concentration of 2.5 µM TIR was used in these assays. Reaction components were mixed in quadruplicate and incubated at room temperature for 10 min before initiating the reaction with 0–2000 µM of ε-NAD (final concentration). Fluorescence intensity was monitored every 15 s for 15 min. Using the ε-ADPR standard curve, the fluorescence was converted to [ε-ADPR]. The velocity of the reactions was calculated from the slope of the progress curve at each ε-NAD concentration. Kinetic parameters were determined by fitting these velocities to the Michaelis-Menten equation (Eq. 1) at each pH. The log of Km, kcat, and kcat/Km values were determined and plotted in GraphPad Prism.

Negative stain electron microscopy

Negative stain EM on TIR (270 µg/mL) was performed in Assay Buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8; 150 mM NaCl) with or without 500 mM sodium citrate. Samples were applied to glow-discharged, carbon- and formvar-coated copper grids and allowed to sit for 1 min and 30 s before blotting excess liquid away. 1% uranyl acetate was used to fix the samples before imaging. Samples were imaged on an FEI Tecnai Spirit 12 microscope. The diameters of particles in the samples with citrate were analyzed in ImageJ.

TIR domain mutants

TIR domain mutants were made using PCR-based methods. The pET30a + TIR-1 TIR domain construct was used as a template (0.2–2 ng/µL; final concentration). The manufacturer’s protocol for iProof High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc) was followed using iProof HF buffer supplemented with 3% DMSO. 50 µL reaction volumes were used in the following protocol: initial denaturation for 3 min at 98 °C, denaturation for 45 s at 98 °C, annealing for 1:30 min at 45°C–72°C, extension for 6 min at 72 °C, final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. Denaturation, annealing, and extension steps were repeated 30 times. The following day, DpnI was added to the PCR reactions and incubated at 37 °C for 2 hr to digest the template DNA. The digest was transformed into chemically competent E. coli XL1-Blue cells. Transformants were grown overnight in LB media with 50 µg/mL kanamycin and mini-prepped (Promega). Mutagenesis was validated by Sanger sequencing (Genewiz). The mutants were expressed and purified as described for WT TIR.

Steady-state kinetic analyses of the mutants were carried out in Assay Buffer with 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate with 2.5 µM of the mutants (final concentrations). Reaction components were mixed in triplicate and incubated at room temperature for 10 min before initiating the reaction with 0–2000 µM of ε-NAD for PEG 3350 or 0–4000 µM for citrate. Fluorescence intensity was monitored every 15 s for 17.5 min. Using the ε-ADPR standard curve, the fluorescence was converted to [ε-ADPR]. The velocity of the reactions was calculated from the slope of the progress curve at each ε-NAD concentration and plotted in GraphPad Prism. Kinetic parameters were determined by fitting these velocities to the Michaelis-Menten equation (Eq. 1) for each mutant.

To evaluate the precipitation capacity of TIR mutants, 10 µM (WT, G747P, E788Q, and H833A) or 3 µM (WT, E788A) of the enzyme was mixed with Assay Buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0; 150 NaCl) with and without 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate (final concentrations). Precipitation of the TIRE788A mutant was evaluated at 3 µM due to low yields of the protein; WT TIR at 3 µM was included as the proper control. The samples were incubated for 15 min at ambient temperature, at which point the samples were centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended buffer with the respective additive (final concentration). Samples were diluted 1:1 with water before running on an SDS-PAGE gel. Stain-free images of the gels were obtained on the BioRad Gel Doc EZ Gel Documentation System with Image Lab Software. Representative images are shown. ImageJ was used to quantify the bands, which were plotted in GraphPad Prism.

Statistical analyses

Differences in the survival of C. elegans in the P. aeruginosa pathogenesis assays were determined with the log-rank test after survival curves were estimated for each group with the Kaplan-Meier method. OASIS two was used for these statistical analyses (Han et al., 2016). qRT-PCR studies, intestinal CFU quantification, western blot band intensity quantification, TIR NADase activity, and TIR protein precipitation are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical hypothesis testing was performed with Prism 9 (GraphPad Software) using methods indicated in the figure legends. Sample sizes, mean lifespan, and p-values for all trials are shown in Supplementary file 4.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Alexandra Byrne, Victoria Czech, Lauren O’Connor, and Heather Loring for helpful discussions. The authors are also grateful to Melanie Trombly and Merin MacDonald for critical reading of the manuscript. This research was supported by R01 AI130289 (to RPW), R01 AI159159 (to RPW), R21 AI163430 (to RPW), an Innovator Award from the Kenneth Rainin Foundation (to RPW), the Dan and Diane Riccio Fund for Neuroscience (to RPW and PRT), F30 AI150127 (to NDP), T32 AI132152 (to NDP and JDI), T32 GM107000 (to NDP), F31 NS122423 (to JDI), and R35 GM118112 (to PRT). Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Paul R Thompson, Email: Paul.Thompson@umassmed.edu.

Read Pukkila-Worley, Email: Read.Pukkila-Worley@umassmed.edu.

Jan Gruber, Yale-NUS College, Singapore.

Matt Kaeberlein, University of Washington, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01 AI130289 to Read Pukkila-Worley.

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01 AI159159 to Read Pukkila-Worley.

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R21 AI163430 to Read Pukkila-Worley.

  • Kenneth Rainin Foundation to Read Pukkila-Worley.

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases F30 AI150127 to Nicholas D Peterson.

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases T32 AI132152 to Nicholas D Peterson, Janneke D Icso.

  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences T32 GM107000 to Nicholas D Peterson.

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke F31 NS122423 to Janneke D Icso.

  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences R35 GM118112 to Paul R Thompson.

  • The Dan and Diane Riccio Fund for Neuroscience to Read Pukkila-Worley, Paul R Thompson.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Investigation, Validation.

Software.

Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Genes significantly differentially expressed in uninfected nhr-8(hd117) mutants compared to wild-type animals in the RNA-seq experiments presented in Figure 3D and Figure 3—figure supplement 1B.
elife-74206-supp1.xlsx (149.9KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 2. Genes significantly differentially expressed in uninfected nhr-8(ok186) mutants compared to wild-type animals in the RNA-seq experiments presented in Figure 3—figure supplement 1A.
elife-74206-supp2.xlsx (16.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 3. Genes significantly differentially expressed in uninfected wild-type animals in the absence (0 μg/mL) versus presence (5 μg/mL) of cholesterol supplementation in the RNA-seq experiments presented in Figure 3E and Figure 3—figure supplement 1B.
elife-74206-supp3.xlsx (258KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 4. Sample sizes, mean lifespan, and p values for the C. elegans pathogenesis assays.
elife-74206-supp4.xlsx (18.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 5. Genes in Cluster one and Cluster 2 of the heat map shown in Figure 6F.
elife-74206-supp5.xlsx (29.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 6. Primer, crRNA guide and ssODN sequences designed for this study.
elife-74206-supp6.xlsx (11KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 7. pmk-1 dependent genes used for GSEA analysis.
elife-74206-supp7.xlsx (18KB, xlsx)
Transparent reporting form
Source data 1. Raw and annotated gel and blot images 2 of 2.
elife-74206-data1.zip (92.1MB, zip)
Source data 2. Raw and annotated gel and blot images 1 of 2.
elife-74206-data2.zip (70MB, zip)

Data availability

The mRNA-seq datasets are available from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus using the accession numbers GSE178572 and GSE190585. Source data files are provided for all figures.

The following datasets were generated:

Peterson ND, Pukkila-Worley R. 2021. Sterol scarcity primes p38 immune defenses through a TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE178572

Peterson ND, Pukkila-Worley R. 2021. Pathogen infection and cholesterol deficiency activate the C. elegans p38 immune pathway through a TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE190585

The following previously published dataset was used:

Fletcher M, Butty V, Kim DH. 2019. Transcriptional profiling of C. elegans on pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE119292

References

  1. Alberti S, Dormann D. Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Disease. Annual Review of Genetics. 2019;53:171–194. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberti S, Gladfelter A, Mittag T. Considerations and Challenges in Studying Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Biomolecular Condensates. Cell. 2019;176:419–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson SM, Cheesman HK, Peterson ND, Salisbury JE, Soukas AA, Pukkila-Worley R. The fatty acid oleate is required for innate immune activation and pathogen defense in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLOS Pathogens. 2019;15:e1007893. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson SM, Pukkila-Worley R. Immunometabolism in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLOS Pathogens. 2020;16:10. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blacklow SC, Raines RT, Lim WA, Zamore PD, Knowles JR. Triosephosphate isomerase catalysis is diffusion controlled Appendix: Analysis of triose phosphate equilibria in aqueous solution by 31P NMR. Biochemistry. 1988;27:1158–1167. doi: 10.1021/bi00404a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boeynaems S, Alberti S, Fawzi NL, Mittag T, Polymenidou M, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J, Shorter J, Wolozin B, Van Den Bosch L, Tompa P, Fuxreiter M. Protein Phase Separation: A New Phase in Cell Biology. Trends in Cell Biology. 2018;28:420–435. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolz DD, Tenor JL, Aballay A. A conserved PMK-1/p38 MAPK is required in Caenorhabditis elegans tissue-specific immune response to Yersinia pestis infection. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285:10832–10840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.091629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bratkowski M, Xie T, Thayer DA, Lad S, Mathur P, Yang YS, Danko G, Burdett TC, Danao J, Cantor A, Kozak JA, Brown SP, Bai X, Sambashivan S. Structural and Mechanistic Regulation of the Pro-degenerative NAD Hydrolase SARM1. Cell Reports. 2020;32:107999. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nature Biotechnology. 2016;34:525–527. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burnell AM, Houthoofd K, O’Hanlon K, Vanfleteren JR. Alternate metabolism during the dauer stage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Experimental Gerontology. 2005;40:850–856. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cao X, Aballay A. Neural Inhibition of Dopaminergic Signaling Enhances Immunity in a Cell-Non-autonomous Manner. Current Biology. 2016;26:2329–2334. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cao X, Kajino-Sakamoto R, Doss A, Aballay A. Distinct Roles of Sensory Neurons in Mediating Pathogen Avoidance and Neuropeptide-Dependent Immune Regulation. Cell Reports. 2017;21:1442–1451. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheesman HK, Feinbaum RL, Thekkiniath J, Dowen RH, Conery AL, Pukkila-Worley R. Aberrant Activation of p38 MAP Kinase-Dependent Innate Immune Responses Is Toxic to Caenorhabditis elegans. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2016;6:541–549. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.025650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen D, Wang Z, Zhao YG, Zheng H, Zhao H, Liu N, Zhang H. Inositol Polyphosphate Multikinase Inhibits Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of TFEB to Negatively Regulate Autophagy Activity. Developmental Cell. 2020;55:588–602. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheong MC, Na K, Kim H, Jeong SK, Joo HJ, Chitwood DJ. A potential biochemical mechanism underlying the influence of sterol deprivation stress on Caenorhabditis elegans longevity. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286:7248–7256. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.189183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chitwood DJ. Biochemistry and function of nematode steroids. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 1999;34:273–284. doi: 10.1080/10409239991209309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chuang CF, Bargmann CI. A Toll-interleukin 1 repeat protein at the synapse specifies asymmetric odorant receptor expression via ASK1 MAPKKK signaling. Genes & Development. 2005;19:270–281. doi: 10.1101/gad.1276505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Conte D, MacNeil LT, Walhout AJM, Mello CC. RNA Interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 2015;109:26. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb2603s109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Couillault C, Pujol N, Reboul J, Sabatier L, Guichou J-F, Kohara Y, Ewbank JJ. TLR-independent control of innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans by the TIR domain adaptor protein TIR-1, an ortholog of human SARM. Nature Immunology. 2004;5:488–494. doi: 10.1038/ni1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dokshin GA, Ghanta KS, Piscopo KM, Mello CC. Robust Genome Editing with Short Single-Stranded and Long, Partially Single-Stranded DNA Donors in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2018;210:781–787. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Du M, Chen ZJ. DNA-induced liquid phase condensation of cGAS activates innate immune signaling. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2018;361:704–709. doi: 10.1126/science.aat1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Essuman K, Summers DW, Sasaki Y, Mao X, DiAntonio A, Milbrandt J. The SARM1 Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor Domain Possesses Intrinsic NAD+ Cleavage Activity that Promotes Pathological Axonal Degeneration. Neuron. 2017;93:1334–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Estes KA, Dunbar TL, Powell JR, Ausubel FM, Troemel ER. bZIP transcription factor zip-2 mediates an early response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Caenorhabditis elegans. PNAS. 2010;107:2153–2158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914643107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998;391:806–811. doi: 10.1038/35888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fletcher M, Tillman EJ, Butty VL, Levine SS, Kim DH. Global transcriptional regulation of innate immunity by ATF-7 in C. elegans. PLOS Genetics. 2019;15:e1007830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Foster KJ, Cheesman HK, Liu P, Peterson ND, Anderson SM, Pukkila-Worley R. Innate Immunity in the C. elegans Intestine Is Programmed by a Neuronal Regulator of AWC Olfactory Neuron Development. Cell Reports. 2020a;31:107478. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Foster KJ, McEwan DL, Pukkila-Worley R. Measurements of Innate Immune Function in C. elegans. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 2020b;2144:145–160. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0592-9_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gadda G, Sobrado P. Kinetic Solvent Viscosity Effects as Probes for Studying the Mechanisms of Enzyme Action. Biochemistry. 2018;57:3445–3453. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Garsin DA, Villanueva JM, Begun J, Kim DH, Sifri CD, Calderwood SB, Ruvkun G, Ausubel FM. Long-lived C. elegans daf-2 mutants are resistant to bacterial pathogens. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2003;300:1921. doi: 10.1126/science.1080147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gay NJ, Symmons MF, Gangloff M, Bryant CE. Assembly and localization of Toll-like receptor signalling complexes. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2014;14:546–558. doi: 10.1038/nri3713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Geisler S, Doan RA, Strickland A, Huang X, Milbrandt J, DiAntonio A. Prevention of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy by genetic deletion of SARM1 in mice. Brain. 2016;139:3092–3108. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gerdts J, Summers DW, Sasaki Y, DiAntonio A, Milbrandt J. Sarm1-mediated axon degeneration requires both SAM and TIR interactions. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2013;33:13569–13580. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1197-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gerdts J, Brace EJ, Sasaki Y, DiAntonio A, Milbrandt J. SARM1 activation triggers axon degeneration locally via NAD+ destruction. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2015;348:453–457. doi: 10.1126/science.1258366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gerisch B, Weitzel C, Kober-Eisermann C, Rottiers V, Antebi A. A hormonal signaling pathway influencing C. elegans metabolism, reproductive development, and life span. Developmental Cell. 2001;1:841–851. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00085-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gerisch B, Antebi A. Hormonal signals produced by DAF-9/cytochrome P450 regulate C. elegans dauer diapause in response to environmental cues. Development (Cambridge, England) 2004;131:1765–1776. doi: 10.1242/dev.01068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ghanta KS, Mello CC. Melting dsDNA Donor Molecules Greatly Improves Precision Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2020;216:643–650. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Han SK, Lee D, Lee H, Kim D, Son HG, Yang J-S, Lee S-JV, Kim S. OASIS 2: online application for survival analysis 2 with features for the analysis of maximal lifespan and healthspan in aging research. Oncotarget. 2016;7:56147–56152. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Henderson ST, Johnson TE. daf-16 integrates developmental and environmental inputs to mediate aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Current Biology. 2001;11:1975–1980. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00594-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Henninger N, Bouley J, Sikoglu EM, An J, Moore CM, King JA, Bowser R, Freeman MR, Brown RH., Jr Attenuated traumatic axonal injury and improved functional outcome after traumatic brain injury in mice lacking Sarm1. Brain. 2016;139:1094–1105. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hieb WF, Rothstein M. Sterol requirement for reproduction of a free-living nematode. Science (New York, N.Y.) 1968;160:778–780. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3829.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Horsefield S, Burdett H, Zhang X, Manik MK, Shi Y, Chen J, Qi T, Gilley J, Lai JS, Rank MX, Casey LW, Gu W, Ericsson DJ, Foley G, Hughes RO, Bosanac T, von Itzstein M, Rathjen JP, Nanson JD, Boden M, Dry IB, Williams SJ, Staskawicz BJ, Coleman MP, Ve T, Dodds PN, Kobe B. NAD+ cleavage activity by animal and plant TIR domains in cell death pathways. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2019;365:793–799. doi: 10.1126/science.aax1911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Inoue H, Hisamoto N, An JH, Oliveira RP, Nishida E, Blackwell TK, Matsumoto K. The C. elegans p38 MAPK pathway regulates nuclear localization of the transcription factor SKN-1 in oxidative stress response. Genes & Development. 2005;19:2278–2283. doi: 10.1101/gad.1324805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jiang Y, Liu T, Lee CH, Chang Q, Yang J, Zhang Z. The NAD+-mediated self-inhibition mechanism of pro-neurodegenerative SARM1. Nature. 2020;588:658–663. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2862-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim DH, Feinbaum R, Alloing G, Emerson FE, Garsin DA, Inoue H, Tanaka-Hino M, Hisamoto N, Matsumoto K, Tan M-W, Ausubel FM. A conserved p38 MAP kinase pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans innate immunity. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2002;297:623–626. doi: 10.1126/science.1073759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim DH, Liberati NT, Mizuno T, Inoue H, Hisamoto N, Matsumoto K, Ausubel FM. Integration of Caenorhabditis elegans MAPK pathways mediating immunity and stress resistance by MEK-1 MAPK kinase and VHP-1 MAPK phosphatase. PNAS. 2004;101:10990–10994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403546101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kroschwald S, Maharana S, Mateju D, Malinovska L, Nüske E, Poser I, Richter D, Alberti S. Promiscuous interactions and protein disaggregases determine the material state of stress-inducible RNP granules. eLife. 2015;4:e06807. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Labun K, Montague TG, Krause M, Torres Cleuren YN, Tjeldnes H, Valen E. CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47:W171–W174. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liberati NT, Fitzgerald KA, Kim DH, Feinbaum R, Golenbock DT, Ausubel FM. Requirement for a conserved Toll/interleukin-1 resistance domain protein in the Caenorhabditis elegans immune response. PNAS. 2004;101:6593–6598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308625101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lindblom TH, Pierce GJ, Sluder AE. A C. elegans orphan nuclear receptor contributes to xenobiotic resistance. Current Biology. 2001;11:864–868. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00236-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lolle S, Stevens D, Coaker G. Plant NLR-triggered immunity: from receptor activation to downstream signaling. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2020;62:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2019.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Loring HS, Icso JD, Nemmara VV, Thompson PR. Initial Kinetic Characterization of Sterile Alpha and Toll/Interleukin Receptor Motif-Containing Protein 1. Biochemistry. 2020;59:933–942. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b01078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Loring HS, Czech VL, Icso JD, O’Connor L, Parelkar SS, Byrne AB, Thompson PR. A phase transition enhances the catalytic activity of SARM1, an NAD+ glycohydrolase involved in neurodegeneration. eLife. 2021;10:e66694. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Magner DB, Wollam J, Shen Y, Hoppe C, Li D, Latza C, Rottiers V, Hutter H, Antebi A. The NHR-8 nuclear receptor regulates cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis in C. elegans. Cell Metabolism. 2013;18:212–224. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Marion CM, McDaniel DP, Armstrong RC. Sarm1 deletion reduces axon damage, demyelination, and white matter atrophy after experimental traumatic brain injury. Experimental Neurology. 2019;321:113040. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Merris M, Wadsworth WG, Khamrai U, Bittman R, Chitwood DJ, Lenard J. Sterol effects and sites of sterol accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans: developmental requirement for 4alpha-methyl sterols. Journal of Lipid Research. 2003;44:172–181. doi: 10.1194/jlr.m200323-jlr200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mizuno T, Hisamoto N, Terada T, Kondo T, Adachi M, Nishida E, Kim DH, Ausubel FM, Matsumoto K. The Caenorhabditis elegans MAPK phosphatase VHP-1 mediates a novel JNK-like signaling pathway in stress response. The EMBO Journal. 2004;23:2226–2234. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Motola DL, Cummins CL, Rottiers V, Sharma KK, Li T, Li Y, Suino-Powell K, Xu HE, Auchus RJ, Antebi A, Mangelsdorf DJ. Identification of ligands for DAF-12 that govern dauer formation and reproduction in C. elegans. Cell. 2006;124:1209–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nandakumar M, Tan MW. Gamma-linolenic and stearidonic acids are required for basal immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans through their effects on p38 MAP kinase activity. PLOS Genetics. 2008;4:e1000273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Otarigho B, Aballay A. Cholesterol Regulates Innate Immunity via Nuclear Hormone Receptor NHR-8. IScience. 2020;23:101068. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Otarigho B, Aballay A. Erratum: Cholesterol Regulates Innate Immunity via Nuclear Hormone Receptor NHR-8. IScience. 2021;24:103361. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. O’Neill LAJ, Bowie AG. The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2007;7:353–364. doi: 10.1038/nri2079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Patel A, Lee HO, Jawerth L, Maharana S, Jahnel M, Hein MY, Stoynov S, Mahamid J, Saha S, Franzmann TM, Pozniakovski A, Poser I, Maghelli N, Royer LA, Weigert M, Myers EW, Grill S, Drechsel D, Hyman AA, Alberti S. A Liquid-to-Solid Phase Transition of the ALS Protein FUS Accelerated by Disease Mutation. Cell. 2015;162:1066–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Peskett TR, Rau F, O’Driscoll J, Patani R, Lowe AR, Saibil HR. A Liquid to Solid Phase Transition Underlying Pathological Huntingtin Exon1 Aggregation. Molecular Cell. 2018;70:588–601. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Peterson ND, Pukkila-Worley R. Caenorhabditis elegans in high-throughput screens for anti-infective compounds. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2018;54:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2018.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Peterson ND, Cheesman HK, Liu P, Anderson SM, Foster KJ, Chhaya R, Perrat P, Thekkiniath J, Yang Q, Haynes CM, Pukkila-Worley R. The nuclear hormone receptor NHR-86 controls anti-pathogen responses in C. elegans. PLOS Genetics. 2019;15:e1007935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research. 2001;29:e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pimentel H, Bray NL, Puente S, Melsted P, Pachter L. Differential analysis of RNA-seq incorporating quantification uncertainty. Nature Methods. 2017;14:687–690. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Powell JR, Kim DH, Ausubel FM. The G protein-coupled receptor FSHR-1 is required for the Caenorhabditis elegans innate immune response. PNAS. 2009;106:2782–2787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813048106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Pujol N, Cypowyj S, Ziegler K, Millet A, Astrain A, Goncharov A, Jin Y, Chisholm AD, Ewbank JJ. Distinct innate immune responses to infection and wounding in the C. elegans epidermis. Current Biology. 2008;18:481–489. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Pukkila-Worley R, Ausubel FM. Immune defense mechanisms in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestinal epithelium. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2012;24:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Pukkila-Worley R, Feinbaum RL, McEwan DL, Conery AL, Ausubel FM. The evolutionarily conserved mediator subunit MDT-15/MED15 links protective innate immune responses and xenobiotic detoxification. PLOS Pathogens. 2014;10:e1004143. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rahme LG, Stevens EJ, Wolfort SF, Shao J, Tompkins RG, Ausubel FM. Common virulence factors for bacterial pathogenicity in plants and animals. Science (New York, N.Y.) 1995;268:1899–1902. doi: 10.1126/science.7604262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Richardson CE, Kooistra T, Kim DH. An essential role for XBP-1 in host protection against immune activation in C. elegans. Nature. 2010;463:1092–1095. doi: 10.1038/nature08762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rivas G, Minton AP. Macromolecular Crowding In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Between. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2016;41:970–981. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Shim YH, Chun JH, Lee EY, Paik YK. Role of cholesterol in germ-line development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2002;61:358–366. doi: 10.1002/mrd.10099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Shivers RP, Kooistra T, Chu SW, Pagano DJ, Kim DH. Tissue-specific activities of an immune signaling module regulate physiological responses to pathogenic and nutritional bacteria in C. elegans. Cell Host & Microbe. 2009;6:321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Shivers RP, Pagano DJ, Kooistra T, Richardson CE, Reddy KC, Whitney JK, Kamanzi O, Matsumoto K, Hisamoto N, Kim DH. Phosphorylation of the conserved transcription factor ATF-7 by PMK-1 p38 MAPK regulates innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLOS Genetics. 2010;6:e1000892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Singh J, Aballay A. Microbial Colonization Activates an Immune Fight-and-Flight Response via Neuroendocrine Signaling. Developmental Cell. 2019;49:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Sluder AE, Mathews SW, Hough D, Yin VP, Maina CV. The nuclear receptor superfamily has undergone extensive proliferation and diversification in nematodes. Genome Research. 1999;9:103–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sluder AE, Maina CV. Nuclear receptors in nematodes: themes and variations. Trends in Genetics. 2001;17:206–213. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02242-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Styer KL, Singh V, Macosko E, Steele SE, Bargmann CI, Aballay A. Innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans is regulated by neurons expressing NPR-1/GPCR. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2008;322:460–464. doi: 10.1126/science.1163673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. PNAS. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Summers DW, Gibson DA, DiAntonio A, Milbrandt J. SARM1-specific motifs in the TIR domain enable NAD+ loss and regulate injury-induced SARM1 activation. PNAS. 2016;113:E6271–E6280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601506113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sun J, Singh V, Kajino-Sakamoto R, Aballay A. Neuronal GPCR controls innate immunity by regulating noncanonical unfolded protein response genes. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2011;332:729–732. doi: 10.1126/science.1203411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Tan MW, Mahajan-Miklos S, Ausubel FM. Killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by Pseudomonas aeruginosa used to model mammalian bacterial pathogenesis. PNAS. 1999;96:715–720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Taubert S, Hansen M, Van Gilst MR, Cooper SB, Yamamoto KR. The Mediator subunit MDT-15 confers metabolic adaptation to ingested material. PLOS Genetics. 2008;4:e1000021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Tecle E, Chhan CB, Franklin L, Underwood RS, Hanna-Rose W, Troemel ER. The purine nucleoside phosphorylase pnp-1 regulates epithelial cell resistance to infection in C. elegans. PLOS Pathogens. 2021;17:e1009350. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Timmons L, Court DL, Fire A. Ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNAs can produce specific and potent genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene. 2001;263:103–112. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00579-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Troemel ER, Chu SW, Reinke V, Lee SS, Ausubel FM, Kim DH. p38 MAPK regulates expression of immune response genes and contributes to longevity in C. elegans. PLOS Genetics. 2006;2:11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Vanfleteren JR, De Vreese A. Rate of aerobic metabolism and superoxide production rate potential in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1996;274:93–100. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19960201)274:2&#x0003c;93::AID-JEZ2&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ve T, Williams SJ, Kobe B. Structure and function of Toll/interleukin-1 receptor/resistance protein (TIR) domains. Apoptosis. 2015;20:250–261. doi: 10.1007/s10495-014-1064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Verdile V, De Paola E, Paronetto MP. Aberrant Phase Transitions: Side Effects and Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Human Disease. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019;10:173. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wan L, Essuman K, Anderson RG, Sasaki Y, Monteiro F, Chung EH, Osborne Nishimura E, DiAntonio A, Milbrandt J, Dangl JL, Nishimura MT. TIR domains of plant immune receptors are NAD+-cleaving enzymes that promote cell death. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2019;365:799–803. doi: 10.1126/science.aax1771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wu Z, Isik M, Moroz N, Steinbaugh MJ, Zhang P, Blackwell TK. Dietary Restriction Extends Lifespan through Metabolic Regulation of Innate Immunity. Cell Metabolism. 2019;29:1192–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Yochem J, Tuck S, Greenwald I, Han M. A gp330/megalin-related protein is required in the major epidermis of Caenorhabditis elegans for completion of molting. Development (Cambridge, England) 1999;126:597–606. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.3.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhang X, Dodds PN, Bernoux M. What Do We Know About NOD-Like Receptors in Plant Immunity? Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2017;55:205–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhao ZY, Xie XJ, Li WH, Liu J, Chen Z, Zhang B, Li T, Li SL, Lu JG, Zhang L, Zhang L-H, Xu Z, Lee HC, Zhao YJ. A Cell-Permeant Mimetic of NMN Activates SARM1 to Produce Cyclic ADP-Ribose and Induce Non-apoptotic Cell Death. IScience. 2019;15:452–466. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Jan Gruber 1

Your manuscript makes an important contribution to delineating mechanisms involved in the activation of innate immune function in C. elegans. The reviewers as well as the editors find this study to be well-conducted, presenting a large amount of new and convincing data on the phase transition underlying p38 immune pathway activation, especially on the novel role of cholesterol metabolism in this process.

Decision letter

Editor: Jan Gruber1
Reviewed by: Emily R Troemel2

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "A TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition underlies p38 immune pathway activation in the C. elegans intestine" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Matt Kaeberlein as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Emily Troemel (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) Please add survival curves/cfu accumulation of a pmk-1;nhr-8 double mutant to the manuscript to validate the notion that the overactivation of the p38 MAPK pathway seen in the nhr-8 mutant is protective. If the double mutant is more sensitive than nhr-8, this would suggest that the p38 activation that is occurring is still protective, even if not up to wild type levels of survival. However, if the double mutant survives better than nhr-8, it suggests that the overactivation of p38 is having a detrimental effect.

2) Figure 1E: As T24B8.5p::gfp and T24B8.5 gene expression are used frequently as read-outs for p38 PMK-1 pathway activation in cholesterol deprivation assays, could the authors address why T24B8.5 is not shown as differentially expressed in the absence of cholesterol? Furthermore, why not use irg-4p::gfp (or another differentially expressed gene during cholesterol deprivation) as a reporter in main figures?

3) It is argued that knock-down of atf-7 abrogates T24B8.5::gfp activation in nhr-8 animals. However, the data in Figure 2G is not that convincing. The fluorescent phenotype appears in-between wild type and nhr-8. Can the fluorescent data be quantified or can another method be used such a qRT of the relevant genes in a nhr-8 animal with atf-7 RNAi?

4) The authors show that nhr-8 mutants have lowered P. aeruginosa load compared to wild-type animals and call this 'clearance'. Line 443: "promotes clearance of pathogenic bacteria from the intestine (Figure 1O)" However, to demonstrate clearance, the authors need to show more than one timepoint, demonstrating a higher level of pathogen at an earlier timepoint, and a lower level at a later timepoint. Based on previous studies with this pathogen, it is more likely that there is simply lowered accumulation of P. aeruginosa in nhr-8 mutants rather than active clearance. The authors either should modify their language, or do a time course to show clearance.

5) Analysis of transcriptional data: Please evaluate genes upregulated in nhr-8(ok186) and compare them to genes upregulated during infection and/or known to be associated with p38, establishing the significance of the intersection statistically.

6) Figure 5A: Would it be possible to test a solid-like compartment disrupting additive? To claim TIR undergoes a liquid-to-solid phase transition, it would be preferable to present a positive result (a solid-disrupting additive decreasing activity in support of the model) rather than the negative result that a disruption of liquid-like compartments does not sufficiently decrease NADase activity- especially as reduction in NADase activity due to liquid disruption is statistically significant.

7) The authors should better explain how the lowered P. aeruginosa levels in nhr-8 mutants is an example of increased pathogen resistance, which together with the lowered survival of these mutants is an example of decreased tolerance of infection. This distinction is an important aspect of pathogen infection studies, i.e. the difference between pathogen resistance (controlling levels of the pathogen) and tolerance (controlling the health impacts from the pathogen). As it stands the text is confusing, e.g. Lines 183-184: "Thus, even though nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals are more susceptible to pathogen killing, they are mounting effective anti-pathogen defenses toward an ingested pathogen".

8) Do the authors think that a lack of cholesterol is sensed by some unknown mechanism and leads to this response? Or do they favor a model in which the lack of cholesterol change the biophysical properties of the cell such that oligomerization of TIR-1 is favored? Some discussion on how the lack of cholesterol and pathogen exposure might stimulate TIR-1 oligomerization and signalling would be interesting.

9) The reviewers have questions regarding why lack of cholesterol is detrimental to survival under infection challenge, despite its effect on priming. They have suggested that additional care should be taken in discussing this result and its implication. Specific suggestions:

a. Could the authors comment on / show data on survival in the absence of infection (e.g. ageing?). Lack of cholesterol shortens nematode lifespan and has been reported to prevent benefits from caloric restriction and of some lifespan extending mutations (daf-2). What is the mechanism of such detriment? Does it make sense in the context of the proposed role in modulating innate immunity?

b. Furthermore, daf-2 mutation increases resistance to infection and this also requires p38. Given the suggested role of low cholesterol in priming nematodes for infection, how might this be reconciled? Does low cholesterol cause inappropriate / over activation of p38 which reduces survival during infection and also shortens lifespan under CR? If this is the case, how would the proposed priming be of benefit as it interferes with appropriate response to both types of challenges (lack of nutrients and infection??).

c. The authors claim that activation of p38 PMK-1 pathway in sterol-scarce environments is an "adaptive response that allows a metazoan host to anticipate environmental threats during micronutrient deprivation". However, the data could support alternative explanations for the upregulation of PMK-1 during sterol scarcity. For example, is there some other benefit to upregulating the PMK-1 pathway (in absence of sterols) that isn't related to pathogen defense? Could PMK-1 upregulation be a consequence of some other disturbance rather than a preemptive response? What other cellular processes are perturbed during cholesterol deprivation and does PMK-1 play a role in regulating these processes? The authors should consider framing the concept of an "adaptive response" in a more speculative manner and also address alternative explanations.

Reviewer #1:

The manuscript: "A TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition underlies p38 immune pathway activation in the C. elegans intestine" by Peterson et al. investigates aspects of the phase transition involved in p38 MAPK activation and innate immunity in C. elegans intestinal cells. The study investigates a mechanism for activation of the C. elegans p38 homolog, PMK-1, a required step in activation of innate immunity in C. elegans. The authors use a range of techniques, including fluorescence microscopy of tagged TIR-1 (Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain protein) to demonstrate that p38 PMK activation involves physical multimerization of TIR-1 and that this assembly induces NAD+ glycohydrolase activity, which in turn is required for p38 PMK activation.

The authors further show that mutations that interfere either with physical association or with NAD+ glycohydrolase activity prevent increased expression of immune effectors and cause increase susceptibility to bacterial pathogens. A similar mechanism, involving human SARM1 and NAD+ glycohydrolase activity has previously been demonstrated to function in the context of injury and axonal degeneration in human neurons. The demonstration that phase transition of TIR-1/SARM1 and increased NAD+ glycohydrolase activity is required for activation of innate immunity in C. elegans intestinal cells therefore demonstrates an evolutionarily conserved mechanism functioning in different tissues and in response to different stressors.

Finally, the authors demonstrate that low dietary cholesterol activates immune effector transcription independent of bacterial infection. It is surprising that, despite cholesterol scarcity apparently promoting p38-mediated innate immunity, worms on low cholesterol / with cholesterol related mutants (nhr-8) are more rather than less susceptible to pathogen killing. The reason for this susceptibility should be further investigated or at the very least more deeply discussed. This study is unusual in that it combines very different techniques to follow the stages of the phase transition and induction of innate immune factors. The analysis of transcriptional changes in the presence and absence of cholesterol is interesting but could be taken further. Despite some limitations, I have no doubt that the insights and tools presented here will be of valuable for future studies evaluating this conserved mechanism.

Comments for the authors:

I feel that the analysis of transcriptional data could be taken further. For example, are genes upregulated in nhr-8(ok186) statistically significantly more likely to be upregulated during infection (and vice versa for downregulated genes). How does this statistic depend on known association of these genes with p38.

I am also confused why, despite priming animals for infection, lack of cholesterol is detrimental during the challenge. Would the point of such priming not be to increase survival during infection?

Could the authors comment on / show data on survival in the absence of infection (e.g. ageing?). Lack of cholesterol shortens nematode lifespan and has been reported to prevent benefits from caloric restriction and of some lifespan extending mutations (daf-2). What is the mechanism of such detriment? Does it make sense in the context of the proposed role in modulating innate immunity?

Furthermore, daf-2 mutation increases resistance to infection and this also requires p38. Given the suggested role of low cholesterol in priming nematodes for infection, how might this be reconciled? Does low cholesterol cause inappropriate / over activation of p38 which reduces survival during infection and also shortens lifespan under CR? If this is the case, how would the proposed priming be of benefit as it interferes with appropriate response to both types of challenges (lack of nutrients and infection??).

Reviewer #2:

The p38 MAPK stress/immune signaling pathway is conserved across a wide range of organisms. In the nematode C. elegans, the PMK-1 p38 pathway controls expression of anti-microbials, and is among the best studied and most important pathways for defense against pathogen infection. Despite this key role, little is known about the upstream activators of the MAPK pathway.

In this paper, the authors show that cholesterol scarcity activates the PMK-1 p38 MAPK pathway, as measured by upregulation of PMK-1 phosphorylation and increased expression of PMK-1 controlled gene expression. They also show that nhr-8 mutants, which have impaired cholesterol metabolism, have activated PMK-1 signaling. These mutants also have lowered pathogen load upon P. aeruginosa infection, albeit with impaired survival. This manuscript also shows that the SARM1 homolog TIR-1, which many studies have shown acts upstream of MAPK in C. elegans, forms puncta upon exposure to triggers that activate p38 MAPK pathway, such as in nhr-8 mutants that have impaired cholesterol metabolism. They also demonstrate TIR-1 puncta are induced upon pathogen infection. These puncta appear to be important for activation of PMK-1, as mutations that block TIR-1 multimerization also block PMK-1 activation. This manuscript also shows that NAD-ase activity of TIR-1 is regulated by a phase transition of TIR-1, and NAD-ase activity requires multimerization. Importantly, NAD-ase activity and multimerization of TIR-1 appear important for immune defenses in vivo, as mutations that impair these features of TIR-1 lead to increased susceptibility to infection.

Overall this manuscript makes an important contribution to the field of C. elegans immunity. It shows that the assembly of TIR-1 and its NAD-ase activity trigger the p38 MAPK immune pathway. It also provides insight that lowered cholesterol activates these same processes, leading to p38 MAPK signaling and pathogen resistance. Although some of these results were preceded by similar findings about TIR-1 in other systems (e.g. TIR-1 puncta were shown in C. elegans neurons, and the importance of TIR phase transition, multimerization and NADase activity has been shown in other organisms), there is an impressive amount of rigorous data in this manuscript, and it is a significant contribution to bring all these mechanisms together in the context of C. elegans intestinal immunity. However, in some cases, the claims are a bit overstated based on the data shown, with actual evidence being more indirect. There are a lot of moving parts in this paper, and the order in which information is provided can be a bit confusing.

1. The abstract states that "TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition is modified by dietary cholesterol". However, those results were not apparent in the manuscript – rather, the authors show altered TIR-1 puncta in nhr-8 mutants, which have altered cholesterol metabolism. The authors should either show that lowered cholesterol induces TIR-1 puncta, or modify their language.

Related to this issue, the authors need to provide more information about what exactly is perturbed in nhr-8 mutants, given that these mutants are used in many experiments as a proxy for cholesterol scarcity. For example, Line 126-128: How tight is the correlation between transcriptional profiles of nhr-8 loss-of-function mutants and cholesterol-deprived animals? Including a plot comparing both would further support the use of nhr-8 mutants to study conditions of low sterol content. Also, Line 153: Does increased cholesterol supplementation or cholesterol solubilization result in increased cholesterol content in worms? Quantification of cholesterol levels within animals would strengthen the claim that "immune effector activation in nhr-8(hd117) mutants is due to sterol deficiency".

2. Line 404 " these data demonstrate for the first time that physiological stressors, both pathogen and non-pathogen, induce TIR-1 multimerization into puncta within intestinal epithelial cells, which superactivates the intrinsic NADase activity of this protein complex to activate the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway". This sentence implies all of these findings have been shown in intestinal cells. The authors show TIR-1 puncta in intestinal cells, and show that mutants defective in NADase activity have less p38 activation, but activation of NADase activity is shown in vitro. Recommend to revise language, or to show through purification of TIR-1 from C. elegans intestinal cells activated by these stressors that it there is increased NADase activity.

3. A major claim in the paper mentioned above is that physiologically relevant stressors induce TIR-1 multimerization in puncta, shown in Figure 6. However, it is unclear how puncta were counted. Did the authors count puncta in a z-stack or in just one optical plane? How did the authors resolve individual puncta from overlapping puncta? Furthermore, the authors normalize puncta fluorescence to autofluorescence, but autofluorescence is altered by many conditions. Either demonstrate that autofluorescence is not affected by these triggers and genetic backgrounds, or use a different normalization method.

In addition, the authors should eliminate the concern that nhr-8 mutants are simply prone to higher levels of protein aggregation in general, e.g. by showing lack of aggregation in some unrelated protein. Showing fewer puncta in the multimerization-defective TIR-1 mutant protein would also strengthen the case that the puncta formation is due to organized TIR-1 multimerization (like the model in Figure 7L), rather than non-specific aggregation.

Reviewer #3:

The p38 MAPK pathway is a crucial stress-sensing pathway involved in many processes including immune activation in metazoans. It has been heavily studied in both mammalian systems as well model hosts such Caenorhabditis elegans. However, the mechanisms by which this pathway are activated are not yet fully understood. Using C. elegans, the authors demonstrate that a component of this pathway, Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain protein (TIR-1), an NAD+ glycohydrolase homologous to mammalian sterile α and TIR motif-containing 1 (SARM1), is discovered to undergo a phase transition, forming a higher-ordered protein assembly that is necessary for activation. Strengths include robust genetic analysis as well as rigorous in vitro enzyme kinetic assys revealing that NAD+ glycohydrolase activity requires oligomerization and phase transition. This is similar to what was previously shown with mammalian SARM. What is new is that this oligomerization is visualized for the first time in live animals exposed to pathogen.

Another exciting discovery is that cholesterol limitation additionally induces oligomerization of TIR-1 and p38 MAPK pathway activation. Cholesterol, which C. elegans is not able to manufacture, is limited by not adding it to the medium or by preventing its adequate import using a nhr-8 mutant. nhr-8 mutants or animals raised without cholesterol are hyper-susceptible to pathogen killing. However, in this and previous work, cholesterol limitation is shown to upregulate p38 MAPK signaling. A major claim of the manuscript is that micronutrient deprivation primes C. elegans for pathogen defense. There are two major weaknesses with this claim. (1) It is overbroad in that cholesterol is the only micronutrient that the authors show has this effect. (2) The animals who are experiencing cholesterol deprivation survive worse on pathogen – yes, there is less pathogen accumulation and more p38 pathway activation, in fact mis/overactivation, but there is still early death. An alternative hypothesis is that the overactivation/misregulation of p38 observed in nhr-8/cholesterol-deprived animals on pathogen is maladaptive causing a detrimental effect – early death.

Comments for the authors:

1) I would like to see the survival curves/cfu accumulation of a pmk-1;nhr-8 double added to the manuscript to validate whether the authors can argue that the overactivation of the p38 MAPK pathway seen in the nhr-8 mutant is protective. If the double mutant is more sensitive than nhr-8, this would suggest that the p38 activation that is occurring is still protective, even if not up to wild type levels of survival. However, if the double mutant survives better than nhr-8, it suggests that the overactivation of p38 is having a detrimental effect.

2) Do the authors think that a lack of cholesterol is sensed by some unknown mechanism and leads to this response? Or do they favor a model in which the lack of cholesterol change the biophysical properties of the cell such that oligomerization of TIR-1 is favored? Some discussion on how the lack of cholesterol and pathogen exposure might stimulate TIR-1 oligomerization and signaling would be interesting.

3) It is argued that knock-down of atf-7 abrogates T24B8.5::gfp activation in nhr-8 animals. However, the data in Figure 2G is not that convincing. The fluorescent phenotype appears in-between wild type and nhr-8. Can the fluorescent data be quantified or can another method be used such a qRT of the relevant genes in a nhr-8 animal with atf-7 RNAi?

4) Inset in Figure 4I was not immediately clear and not described in the figure legend. It was hard to figure out what it was depicting at first. * are used to mark mutants with no activity, but there appears to be a mistake between E788Q and H833A.

[Editors' note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]

Thank you for submitting your article "Pathogen infection and cholesterol deficiency activate the C. elegans p38 immune pathway through a TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Matt Kaeberlein as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Emily R Troemel (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

The reviewers and editor feel that this is an strong paper and agree that you have successfully addressed most of the earlier comments. There are still two outstanding concerns that could however be addressed either by providing additional data or by adding appropriate caveats and further discussion to the final manuscript.

Essential revisions:

1) There is still a concern that the link between cholesterol deficiency and puncta formation is indirectly shown through nhr-8(hd117); tir-1::wrmScarlet animals. This claim would be strengthened by providing confocal images of tir-1::wrmScarlet animals grown under cholesterol-deficient conditions. Otherwise, we ask the authors to reflect comment through modification of their language (e.g. "We demonstrate that a loss-of-function mutation in nhr-8, which alters cholesterol metabolism, causes TIR-1/SARM-1 to oligomerize into puncta in epithelial cells…").

2) Another remaining concern is that TIR-1 puncta formation in nhr-8 mutants may be a result of non-specific aggregation (See Original reviews). While Tergitol does suppress TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation, it is possible that Tergitol would also suppress non-specific aggregation of TIR-1::wrmScarlet. Further, tir-1 RNAi data do not provide direct evidence that puncta formation is physiologically relevant. Puncta formation may be a consequence of non-specific aggregation due to dysregulation of other biological processes in nhr-8 mutants rather than a consequence of organized TIR-1 multimerization. Lack of puncta upon tir-1 RNAi treatment could reflect a reduction in TIR-1 protein levels such that non-specific aggregates are not visible. To strengthen the link between ordered multimerization and puncta formation, we ask the authors or show that multimerization mutants (i.e. tir-1∆SAM) exhibit decreased puncta or address these concerns in their interpretation

While these additional data would be beneficial, we feel that at this stage it is not essential, if appropriately addressed in the text.

Other than these two remaining points, there is consensus that you have addressed all previous concerns in full and that the manuscript makes an important contribution and is now suitable for publication in eLife.

eLife. 2022 Jan 31;11:e74206. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74206.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) Please add survival curves/cfu accumulation of a pmk-1;nhr-8 double mutant to the manuscript to validate the notion that the overactivation of the p38 MAPK pathway seen in the nhr-8 mutant is protective. If the double mutant is more sensitive than nhr-8, this would suggest that the p38 activation that is occurring is still protective, even if not up to wild type levels of survival. However, if the double mutant survives better than nhr-8, it suggests that the overactivation of p38 is having a detrimental effect.

We performed three biological replicates of the suggested experiment, and these data are now presented in Figure 4M of the manuscript and discussed in the text (Lines 386-394). We also discussed these findings in the Discussion section (Lines 494-499). These experiments revealed that tir-1(qd4);nhr-8(hd117) double mutants were more susceptible to P. aeruginosa infection than nhr-8(hd117) mutants. As noted by this reviewer, these data suggest that the induction of the p38 PMK-1 pathway in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant background provides protection from P. aeruginosa infection. In addition, tir-1(qd4);nhr-8(hd117) double mutants were slightly, but significantly and reproducibly, more susceptible than the tir-1(qd4) mutant to killing by P. aeruginosa. We therefore hypothesize that the susceptibility to pathogen-mediated killing in animals that lack sufficient cholesterol [e.g., the nhr-8(hd117) mutant] leads to the additive pathogen susceptibility in animals that also lack a functioning p38 PMK-1 host defense pathway [e.g., the tir-1(qd4) mutant].

2) Figure 1E: As T24B8.5p::gfp and T24B8.5 gene expression are used frequently as read-outs for p38 PMK-1 pathway activation in cholesterol deprivation assays, could the authors address why T24B8.5 is not shown as differentially expressed in the absence of cholesterol? Furthermore, why not use irg-4p::gfp (or another differentially expressed gene during cholesterol deprivation) as a reporter in main figures?

For the revised version of this manuscript, we performed a new RNA-seq experiment ourselves rather than rely on publicly available data. We compared C. elegans exposed to 0 μg/mL cholesterol with animals exposed to 5 μg/mL cholesterol (three biological replicates each). This study revealed that T24B8.5, among other innate immune effectors, is robustly activated during cholesterol starvation. These data are now presented in the manuscript in Figure 3E. We also used qRT-PCR in three different biological replicate samples to confirm that T24B8.5 was upregulated in animals exposed to 0 μg/mL cholesterol (Figure 3C). As we observed previously, innate immune effector genes were strongly enriched during cholesterol starvation. We also found that the transcriptional changes during cholesterol starvation mirror those in the nhr-8 loss-of-function mutants, which further supports the use of nhr-8 mutants to study conditions of low sterol content. This comparison is presented in a new supplemental figure (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B) and discussed in the text (Lines 315-318). T24B8.5p::gfp is widely used as a readout of activation of the p38 PMK-1 pathway. Thus, we chose to use this reporter in the main figures.

3) It is argued that knock-down of atf-7 abrogates T24B8.5::gfp activation in nhr-8 animals. However, the data in Figure 2G is not that convincing. The fluorescent phenotype appears in-between wild type and nhr-8. Can the fluorescent data be quantified or can another method be used such a qRT of the relevant genes in a nhr-8 animal with atf-7 RNAi?

We quantified the fluorescent images in Figure 2G (Now Figure 4G) as suggested by the reviewer and present the data in a new figure (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C). Knockdown of atf-7 by RNAi in nhr-8(hd117) animals significantly reduced T24B8.5p::gfp activation back to wild-type levels. In addition, treatment of nhr-8(hd117) animals with tir-1(RNAi) also decreased T24B8.5p::gfp activation.

4) The authors show that nhr-8 mutants have lowered P. aeruginosa load compared to wild-type animals and call this 'clearance'. Line 443: "promotes clearance of pathogenic bacteria from the intestine (Figure 1O)" However, to demonstrate clearance, the authors need to show more than one timepoint, demonstrating a higher level of pathogen at an earlier timepoint, and a lower level at a later timepoint. Based on previous studies with this pathogen, it is more likely that there is simply lowered accumulation of P. aeruginosa in nhr-8 mutants rather than active clearance. The authors either should modify their language, or do a time course to show clearance.

We have removed the word “clearance” from the manuscript. We now state that there is reduced accumulation of P. aeruginosa in the nhr-8(hd117) mutants, as suggested by this reviewer.

5) Analysis of transcriptional data: Please evaluate genes upregulated in nhr-8(ok186) and compare them to genes upregulated during infection and/or known to be associated with p38, establishing the significance of the intersection statistically.

In Figure 3—figure supplement 1A of the revised manuscript, we show that the genes that are upregulated during infection with P. aeruginosa and innate immune effector genes are strongly and significantly correlated in nhr-8(ok186) mutants (r=0.849 and 0.703, respectively, p<0.05 for each comparison). These data mirror the transcriptional changes in the nhr-8(hd117) mutant (Figure 3D).

6) Figure 5A: Would it be possible to test a solid-like compartment disrupting additive? To claim TIR undergoes a liquid-to-solid phase transition, it would be preferable to present a positive result (a solid-disrupting additive decreasing activity in support of the model) rather than the negative result that a disruption of liquid-like compartments does not sufficiently decrease NADase activity- especially as reduction in NADase activity due to liquid disruption is statistically significant.

The best-known solid disrupting reagents are detergents, which would denature the protein and lead to an artifactual loss in activity as opposed to true disruption of the solid phase. Notably, the fact that we can isolate the active fraction by centrifugation argues for a liquid-to-solid phase transition. However, given the statistical significance of the 1,6-hexanediol data, the active form of the enzyme may lie on a continuum between a liquid-to-liquid to liquid-to-solid phase transition or exist in a gel-like state. The text of the manuscript (Lines 230-234) has been updated to reflect this analysis.

7) The authors should better explain how the lowered P. aeruginosa levels in nhr-8 mutants is an example of increased pathogen resistance, which together with the lowered survival of these mutants is an example of decreased tolerance of infection. This distinction is an important aspect of pathogen infection studies, i.e. the difference between pathogen resistance (controlling levels of the pathogen) and tolerance (controlling the health impacts from the pathogen). As it stands the text is confusing, e.g. Lines 183-184: "Thus, even though nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals are more susceptible to pathogen killing, they are mounting effective anti-pathogen defenses toward an ingested pathogen".

We have edited this sentence, and the paragraph where it appears, to better highlight the important point raised by this reviewer. We now state: “These data suggest that low cholesterol in the nhr-8(hd117) mutants reduces tolerance to pathogen infection, and that the robust transcriptional induction of immune effectors in this mutant background leads to reduced accumulation of P. aeruginosa during infection.” (Lines 353-356) We also further discuss this observation in two new paragraphs in the Discussion section (Lines 491-506).

8) Do the authors think that a lack of cholesterol is sensed by some unknown mechanism and leads to this response? Or do they favor a model in which the lack of cholesterol change the biophysical properties of the cell such that oligomerization of TIR-1 is favored? Some discussion on how the lack of cholesterol and pathogen exposure might stimulate TIR-1 oligomerization and signalling would be interesting.

In the revised manuscript, we address this point in the Discussion section (Lines 487-490).

9) The reviewers have questions regarding why lack of cholesterol is detrimental to survival under infection challenge, despite its effect on priming. They have suggested that additional care should be taken in discussing this result and its implication. Specific suggestions:

In the revised Discussion section (Lines 491-506), we include two new paragraphs where we discuss some of the points raised below. In summary, we demonstrate that cholesterol supplementation can fully rescue the enhanced susceptibility to pathogen-mediated killing in nhr-8 loss-of-function mutants (Figure 3M and 3N). These data suggest that cholesterol is required for pathogen tolerance in C. elegans; however, the mechanism behind this observation is not known. The p38 PMK-1 pathway provides protection during pathogen infection in the nhr-8 mutant background (Figure 4M), suggesting that the enhanced susceptibility to pathogen-mediated killing in the nhr-8 mutant is not secondary to aberrant activation of the p38 PMK-1 pathway. Cholesterol-deficient animals may therefore have general reductions in organismal fitness that cause vulnerability to pathogen infection and reduce lifespan.

a. Could the authors comment on / show data on survival in the absence of infection (e.g. ageing?). Lack of cholesterol shortens nematode lifespan and has been reported to prevent benefits from caloric restriction and of some lifespan extending mutations (daf-2). What is the mechanism of such detriment? Does it make sense in the context of the proposed role in modulating innate immunity?

The reviewer raises some very interesting points about the intersection of aging and immune regulation as it pertains to cholesterol metabolism. We chose not to discuss the effect of cholesterol on aging in this manuscript, however, so that we could keep the focus on immune regulation.

b. Furthermore, daf-2 mutation increases resistance to infection and this also requires p38. Given the suggested role of low cholesterol in priming nematodes for infection, how might this be reconciled? Does low cholesterol cause inappropriate / over activation of p38 which reduces survival during infection and also shortens lifespan under CR? If this is the case, how would the proposed priming be of benefit as it interferes with appropriate response to both types of challenges (lack of nutrients and infection??).

As discussed above in point 1, we present data from a new experiment in the revised manuscript that the p38 PMK-1 pathway provides protection during pathogen infection in the nhr-8 mutant background (Figure 4M), which suggests that the enhanced susceptibility to pathogen-mediated killing in the nhr-8 mutant is not secondary to aberrant activation of the p38 PMK-1 pathway.

c. The authors claim that activation of p38 PMK-1 pathway in sterol-scarce environments is an "adaptive response that allows a metazoan host to anticipate environmental threats during micronutrient deprivation". However, the data could support alternative explanations for the upregulation of PMK-1 during sterol scarcity. For example, is there some other benefit to upregulating the PMK-1 pathway (in absence of sterols) that isn't related to pathogen defense? Could PMK-1 upregulation be a consequence of some other disturbance rather than a preemptive response? What other cellular processes are perturbed during cholesterol deprivation and does PMK-1 play a role in regulating these processes? The authors should consider framing the concept of an "adaptive response" in a more speculative manner and also address alternative explanations.

In a new paragraph in the Discussion section (Lines 500-506), we present the points raised in this critique. We also edited the manuscript to frame the concept of immune priming in a low cholesterol environment in a more speculative manner, as suggested.

Reviewer #1:

[…] The authors demonstrate that low dietary cholesterol activates immune effector transcription independent of bacterial infection. It is surprising that, despite cholesterol scarcity apparently promoting p38-mediated innate immunity, worms on low cholesterol / with cholesterol related mutants (nhr-8) are more rather than less susceptible to pathogen killing. The reason for this susceptibility should be further investigated or at the very least more deeply discussed.

Please see our response under point #9.

This study is unusual in that it combines very different techniques to follow the stages of the phase transition and induction of innate immune factors. The analysis of transcriptional changes in the presence and absence of cholesterol is interesting but could be taken further. Despite some limitations, I have no doubt that the insights and tools presented here will be of valuable for future studies evaluating this conserved mechanism.

Comments for the authors:

I feel that the analysis of transcriptional data could be taken further. For example, are genes upregulated in nhr-8(ok186) statistically significantly more likely to be upregulated during infection (and vice versa for downregulated genes). How does this statistic depend on known association of these genes with p38.

Please see our response under point #5.

Reviewer #2:

[…] Overall this manuscript makes an important contribution to the field of C. elegans immunity. It shows that the assembly of TIR-1 and its NAD-ase activity trigger the p38 MAPK immune pathway. It also provides insight that lowered cholesterol activates these same processes, leading to p38 MAPK signaling and pathogen resistance. Although some of these results were preceded by similar findings about TIR-1 in other systems (e.g. TIR-1 puncta were shown in C. elegans neurons, and the importance of TIR phase transition, multimerization and NADase activity has been shown in other organisms), there is an impressive amount of rigorous data in this manuscript, and it is a significant contribution to bring all these mechanisms together in the context of C. elegans intestinal immunity. However, in some cases, the claims are a bit overstated based on the data shown, with actual evidence being more indirect. There are a lot of moving parts in this paper, and the order in which information is provided can be a bit confusing.

1. The abstract states that "TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition is modified by dietary cholesterol". However, those results were not apparent in the manuscript – rather, the authors show altered TIR-1 puncta in nhr-8 mutants, which have altered cholesterol metabolism. The authors should either show that lowered cholesterol induces TIR-1 puncta, or modify their language.

In the revised abstract, we have eliminated the words “modified by dietary cholesterol.” We now state: “We demonstrate that cholesterol deficiency causes TIR-1/SARM1 to oligomerize into puncta in intestinal epithelial cells and engages its NAD+ glycohydrolase activity, which increases p38 PMK-1 phosphorylation, and primes immune effector induction in a manner that leads to reduced pathogen accumulation in the intestine during a subsequent infection.” (Lines 39-42)

Related to this issue, the authors need to provide more information about what exactly is perturbed in nhr-8 mutants, given that these mutants are used in many experiments as a proxy for cholesterol scarcity. For example, Line 126-128: How tight is the correlation between transcriptional profiles of nhr-8 loss-of-function mutants and cholesterol-deprived animals? Including a plot comparing both would further support the use of nhr-8 mutants to study conditions of low sterol content. Also, Line 153: Does increased cholesterol supplementation or cholesterol solubilization result in increased cholesterol content in worms? Quantification of cholesterol levels within animals would strengthen the claim that "immune effector activation in nhr-8(hd117) mutants is due to sterol deficiency".

We performed the experiment suggested by the reviewer and present the data in the revised manuscript in a new figure (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B) and in the text (Lines 315-320). We compared the transcriptional changes in the nhr-8(hd117) mutants with the genes that are induced in wild-type animals during cholesterol starvation and found a remarkable correlation between these datasets across all genes (r = 0.578) and differentially expressed genes (r = 0.836). Together with previous work that characterized the role of nhr-8 in cholesterol homeostasis in C. elegans (Cell Metab 2013;18:212), these data support the use of nhr-8 mutants to study conditions of low sterol content.

2. Line 404 " these data demonstrate for the first time that physiological stressors, both pathogen and non-pathogen, induce TIR-1 multimerization into puncta within intestinal epithelial cells, which superactivates the intrinsic NADase activity of this protein complex to activate the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway". This sentence implies all of these findings have been shown in intestinal cells. The authors show TIR-1 puncta in intestinal cells, and show that mutants defective in NADase activity have less p38 activation, but activation of NADase activity is shown in vitro. Recommend to revise language, or to show through purification of TIR-1 from C. elegans intestinal cells activated by these stressors that it there is increased NADase activity.

We edited this sentence as follows: “In summary, the above data demonstrate for the first time that physiological stresses, both pathogen and non-pathogen, induce TIR-1 multimerization into puncta within intestinal epithelial cells, which then activates the p38 PMK-1 innate immune pathway through the intrinsic NADase activity of the TIR-1 protein complex.” (Lines 413-416)

3. A major claim in the paper mentioned above is that physiologically relevant stressors induce TIR-1 multimerization in puncta, shown in Figure 6. However, it is unclear how puncta were counted. Did the authors count puncta in a z-stack or in just one optical plane? How did the authors resolve individual puncta from overlapping puncta? Furthermore, the authors normalize puncta fluorescence to autofluorescence, but autofluorescence is altered by many conditions. Either demonstrate that autofluorescence is not affected by these triggers and genetic backgrounds, or use a different normalization method.

In the revised manuscript, we devised a different method of quantifying TIR-1::wrmScarlet that was not subject to potential bias from differences in autofluorescence between experimental and control conditions. We present the details of this approach in a new section of the Materials and methods titled “Microscopy image analyses” (Lines 690-700). In summary, Fiji Image Analysis Software was used to identify TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta in an automated fashion in the red channel. Importantly, we used a stringent cut-off for puncta calling to maximize specificity. We then overlayed the location of the red channel puncta in the green channel and determined if there were autofluorescent puncta in this exact location. TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta were those that were present in the red, but not the green, channel. Importantly, we only reported puncta that were positively identified by the image analysis software. The result of this approach was a rigorous assessment of the difference in puncta between the experimental conditions, but one that, by design, under-called puncta numbers in the induced conditions (i.e., during P. aeruginosa infection or in the nhr-8 mutant). For example, occasionally, the image analysis software identified overlapping puncta as a single punctum. In this case, we reported the number as a single punctum rather than manually updating the count.

In addition, the authors should eliminate the concern that nhr-8 mutants are simply prone to higher levels of protein aggregation in general, e.g. by showing lack of aggregation in some unrelated protein. Showing fewer puncta in the multimerization-defective TIR-1 mutant protein would also strengthen the case that the puncta formation is due to organized TIR-1 multimerization (like the model in Figure 7L), rather than non-specific aggregation.

Two key observations demonstrate that the organization of TIR-1::wrmScarlet in nhr-8 mutants is physiologically relevant and not secondary to non-specific protein aggregation. First, Tergitol, which solubilizes cholesterol and fully suppresses immune activation in nhr-8 mutants, also suppresses TIR1::wrmScarlet puncta formation. Second, tir-1 RNAi ablates TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta and also suppresses immune activation.

Reviewer #3:

[…] A major claim of the manuscript is that micronutrient deprivation primes C. elegans for pathogen defense. There are two major weaknesses with this claim. (1) It is overbroad in that cholesterol is the only micronutrient that the authors show has this effect.

We removed the words “micronutrient deficiency” from the manuscript. We now use “cholesterol deficiency.”

(2) The animals who are experiencing cholesterol deprivation survive worse on pathogen – yes, there is less pathogen accumulation and more p38 pathway activation, in fact mis/overactivation, but there is still early death. An alternative hypothesis is that the overactivation/misregulation of p38 observed in nhr-8/cholesterol-deprived animals on pathogen is maladaptive causing a detrimental effect – early death.

Please see our response under point #1.

[Editors' note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]

Essential revisions:

1) There is still a concern that the link between cholesterol deficiency and puncta formation is indirectly shown through nhr8(hd117); tir-1::wrmScarlet animals. This claim would be strengthened by providing confocal images of tir-1::wrmScarlet animals grown under cholesterol-deficient conditions. Otherwise, we ask the authors to reflect comment through modification of their language (e.g. "We demonstrate that a loss-of-function mutation in nhr-8, which alters cholesterol metabolism, causes TIR-1/SARM-1 to oligomerize into puncta in epithelial cells…").

We have edited the sentence in the abstract as suggested by this reviewer (lines 39-41). This sentence is: “Finally, we demonstrate that a loss-of-function mutation in nhr-8, which alters cholesterol metabolism and is used to study conditions of sterol deficiency, causes TIR-1/SARM1 to oligomerize into puncta in intestinal epithelial cells.

We also made similar edits to the Introduction (lines 89-90) and Discussion (476-477).

2) Another remaining concern is that TIR-1 puncta formation in nhr-8 mutants may be a result of non-specific aggregation (See Original reviews). While Tergitol does suppress TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation, it is possible that Tergitol would also suppress non-specific aggregation of TIR-1::wrmScarlet. Further, tir-1 RNAi data do not provide direct evidence that puncta formation is physiologically relevant. Puncta formation may be a consequence of non-specific aggregation due to dysregulation of other biological processes in nhr-8 mutants rather than a consequence of organized TIR-1 multimerization. Lack of puncta upon tir-1 RNAi treatment could reflect a reduction in TIR-1 protein levels such that non-specific aggregates are not visible. To strengthen the link between ordered multimerization and puncta formation, we ask the authors or show that multimerization mutants (i.e. tir-1∆SAM) exhibit decreased puncta or address these concerns in their interpretation.

We added a paragraph to the manuscript to acknowledge the possibility that the TIR-1 puncta formation in nhr-8 mutants may be a result of non-specific protein aggregation and to point out that the in vitro and in vivo data presented in this manuscript, when considered together, suggest that this is not the case (lines 416-427). This paragraph is: “It is possible that the organization of TIR-1::wrmScarlet into visible puncta in nhr-8 mutants is secondary to non-specific protein aggregation; however, the in vitro and in vivo data presented in this manuscript, when considered together, suggest that this is not the case. Organized multimerization of TIR-1 is a prerequisite for the NADase activity of the protein complex in vitro (Figure 2). Accordingly, the mutations that specifically abrogate TIR-1 multimerization in vitro (Figures 2J, 2K, Figure 2—figure supplement 1I), also block p38 PMK-1 pathway activation (Figures 1E and 1F) and prevented immune effector induction in response to cholesterol deprivation in vivo (Figures 5C-F). Furthermore, Tergitol, which solubilizes cholesterol and fully suppresses p38 PMK-1 immune activation in nhr-8 mutants (Figure 5G-5N), also suppresses TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation (Figure 5A and 5B). Finally and perhaps most importantly, P. aeruginosa infection, a separate physiological stress, also induces TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta formation to activate the p38 PMK-1 pathway (Figure 1).”

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Peterson ND, Pukkila-Worley R. 2021. Sterol scarcity primes p38 immune defenses through a TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE178572
    2. Peterson ND, Pukkila-Worley R. 2021. Pathogen infection and cholesterol deficiency activate the C. elegans p38 immune pathway through a TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE190585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    3. Fletcher M, Butty V, Kim DH. 2019. Transcriptional profiling of C. elegans on pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE119292

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Figure 1B Quantification of the number of TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta present in the last posterior pair of intestinal epithelial cells.
    Figure 1—source data 2. Figure 1F Quantification of p38 immunoblot analysis of lysates from the indicated genotypes.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Figure 2A NADase activity of purified TIR at increasing TIR protein concentrations.
    Figure 2—source data 2. Figure 2B NADase activity of 2.5 μM TIR incubated in the presence of 25% (w/v) of macro- (PEG 8000, PEG 3350, and dextran) and micro- (sucrose and glycerol) viscogens.
    Figure 2—source data 3. Figure 2C Dose dependency of macroviscogens on the NADase activity of TIR.
    Figure 2—source data 4. Figure 2D Steady-state kinetic analysis of 2.5 μM TIR incubated in 0%–30% (w/v) of PEG 3350.
    Figure 2—source data 5. Figure 2H NADase activity of TIR protein in each fraction and at each concentration of PEG 3350.
    Figure 2—source data 6. Figure 2I Steady-state kinetic analysis of TIR wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P, TIRH833A), and catalytic mutants (TIRE788Q and TIRE788A) in 25% PEG 3350.
    Figure 2—source data 7. Figure 2J Quantification of SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR: wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P) and catalytic mutant (TIRE788Q), precipitation in the presence of 25% PEG 3350.
    Figure 2—source data 8. Figure 2K Quantification of SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR: wild-type and catalytic mutant (TIRE788A), precipitation in the presence of 25% PEG 3350.
    Figure 2—source data 9. Figure 2L Effect of 1,6-hexanediol on TIR NADase activity.
    Figure 2—source data 10. Figure 2M NADase activity of TIR protein incubated with either 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM citrate before (precentrifugation) and after centrifugation, the supernatant and precipitant fractions.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. 1A enzyme concentration dependence in presence and absence of either 25% PEG 3350 or 500 mM sodium citrate.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2. 1B Dose dependency of citrate on the NADase activity of TIR.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 3. 1C Steady-state kinetic analysis of 2.5 μM TIR incubated in 0–1000 mM sodium citrate.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 4. 1G NADase activity of TIR protein in each fraction and at each concentration of citrate.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 5. 1H Steady-state kinetic analysis of TIR wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P, TIRH833A), and catalytic mutants (TIRE788Q and TIRE788A) in 500 mM sodium citrate.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 6. 1I Quantification of SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR: wild-type, oligomerization mutant (TIRG747P) and catalytic mutant (TIRE788Q), precipitation in the presence of 500 mM sodium citrate.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 7. 1J Quantification of SDS-PAGE analysis of TIR: wild-type and catalytic mutant (TIRE788A), precipitation in the presence of 500 mM sodium citrate.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Figure 3C qRT-PCR data of the indicated innate immune effector genes in wild-type C. elegans growing in the presence (+5 μg/mL) and absence (+0 μg/mL) of supplemented cholesterol.
    Figure 3—source data 2. Figure 3I qRT-PCR data of T24B8.5 in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media (+5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated.
    Figure 3—source data 3. Figure 3J qRT-PCR data of irg-4 in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media (+5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated.
    Figure 3—source data 4. Figure 3K qRT-PCR data of irg-5 in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media (+5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated.
    Figure 3—source data 5. Figure 3L qRT-PCR data of K08D8.4 in wild-type and nhr-8(hd117) mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media (+5 μg/mL cholesterol) in the presence or absence of 0.1% Tergitol, as indicated.
    Figure 3—source data 6. Figure 3O Colony-forming units (CFUs) of P. aeruginosa, isolated from the intestines of animals with the indicated genotypes, quantified after 24 hr of bacterial infection.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Figure 4C Quantification of p38 immunoblot analysis of lysates from wild-type C. elegans grown on standard nematode growth media in the presence ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol) and in the absence ( + 0 μg/mL cholesterol) of supplemented cholesterol.
    Figure 4—source data 2. Figure 4F Quantification of p38 immunoblot analysis of lysates from the indicated C. elegans strains.
    Figure 4—source data 3. Figure 4H qRT-PCR data of T24B8.5 in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
    Figure 4—source data 4. Figure 4I qRT-PCR data of irg-4 in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
    Figure 4—source data 5. Figure 4J qRT-PCR data of irg-5 in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
    Figure 4—source data 6. Figure 4K qRT-PCR data of K08D8.4 in the indicated mutant animals grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
    Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. 1C Quantification of T24B8.5p::gfp expression in the indicated conditions.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Figure 5B Quantification of the number of TIR-1::wrmScarlet puncta present in the last posterior pair of intestinal epithelial cells in the indicated strains and conditions.
    Figure 5—source data 2. Figure 5E qRT-PCR data of T24B8.5 in wild-type and mutant animals of the indicated genotypes grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
    Figure 5—source data 3. Figure 5F qRT-PCR data of irg-4 in wild-type and mutant animals of the indicated genotypes grown on standard nematode growth media ( + 5 μg/mL cholesterol).
    Figure 6—source data 1. Figure 6H mRNA-seq data for T24B8.5 from the conditions indicated showing scaled reads per base.
    Figure 6—source data 2. Figure 6I mRNA-seq data for irg-4 from the conditions indicated showing scaled reads per base.
    Figure 6—source data 3. Figure 6J mRNA-seq data for irg-5 from the conditions indicated showing scaled reads per base.
    Figure 6—source data 4. Figure 6K mRNA-seq data for K08D8.4 from the conditions indicated showing scaled reads per base.
    Supplementary file 1. Genes significantly differentially expressed in uninfected nhr-8(hd117) mutants compared to wild-type animals in the RNA-seq experiments presented in Figure 3D and Figure 3—figure supplement 1B.
    elife-74206-supp1.xlsx (149.9KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 2. Genes significantly differentially expressed in uninfected nhr-8(ok186) mutants compared to wild-type animals in the RNA-seq experiments presented in Figure 3—figure supplement 1A.
    elife-74206-supp2.xlsx (16.3KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 3. Genes significantly differentially expressed in uninfected wild-type animals in the absence (0 μg/mL) versus presence (5 μg/mL) of cholesterol supplementation in the RNA-seq experiments presented in Figure 3E and Figure 3—figure supplement 1B.
    elife-74206-supp3.xlsx (258KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 4. Sample sizes, mean lifespan, and p values for the C. elegans pathogenesis assays.
    elife-74206-supp4.xlsx (18.5KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 5. Genes in Cluster one and Cluster 2 of the heat map shown in Figure 6F.
    elife-74206-supp5.xlsx (29.5KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 6. Primer, crRNA guide and ssODN sequences designed for this study.
    elife-74206-supp6.xlsx (11KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 7. pmk-1 dependent genes used for GSEA analysis.
    elife-74206-supp7.xlsx (18KB, xlsx)
    Transparent reporting form
    Source data 1. Raw and annotated gel and blot images 2 of 2.
    elife-74206-data1.zip (92.1MB, zip)
    Source data 2. Raw and annotated gel and blot images 1 of 2.
    elife-74206-data2.zip (70MB, zip)

    Data Availability Statement

    The mRNA-seq datasets are available from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus using the accession numbers GSE178572 and GSE190585. Source data files are provided for all figures.

    The following datasets were generated:

    Peterson ND, Pukkila-Worley R. 2021. Sterol scarcity primes p38 immune defenses through a TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE178572

    Peterson ND, Pukkila-Worley R. 2021. Pathogen infection and cholesterol deficiency activate the C. elegans p38 immune pathway through a TIR-1/SARM1 phase transition. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE190585

    The following previously published dataset was used:

    Fletcher M, Butty V, Kim DH. 2019. Transcriptional profiling of C. elegans on pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE119292


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES