Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2022 Mar 7;13:847789. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.847789

Newly Developed MAGIC Population Allows Identification of Strong Associations and Candidate Genes for Anthocyanin Pigmentation in Eggplant

Giulio Mangino 1,, Andrea Arrones 1,, Mariola Plazas 2, Torsten Pook 3, Jaime Prohens 1, Pietro Gramazio 2,*, Santiago Vilanova 1,*
PMCID: PMC8940277  PMID: 35330873

Abstract

Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations facilitate the genetic dissection of complex quantitative traits in plants and are valuable breeding materials. We report the development of the first eggplant MAGIC population (S3 Magic EGGplant InCanum, S3MEGGIC; 8-way), constituted by the 420 S3 individuals developed from the intercrossing of seven cultivated eggplant (Solanum melongena) and one wild relative (S. incanum) parents. The S3MEGGIC recombinant population was genotyped with the eggplant 5k probes SPET platform and phenotyped for anthocyanin presence in vegetative plant tissues (PA) and fruit epidermis (FA), and for the light-insensitive anthocyanic pigmentation under the calyx (PUC). The 7,724 filtered high-confidence single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) confirmed a low residual heterozygosity (6.87%), a lack of genetic structure in the S3MEGGIC population, and no differentiation among subpopulations carrying a cultivated or wild cytoplasm. Inference of haplotype blocks of the nuclear genome revealed an unbalanced representation of the founder genomes, suggesting a cryptic selection in favour or against specific parental genomes. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis for PA, FA, and PUC detected strong associations with two myeloblastosis (MYB) genes similar to MYB113 involved in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, and with a COP1 gene which encodes for a photo-regulatory protein and may be responsible for the PUC trait. Evidence was found of a duplication of an ancestral MYB113 gene with a translocation from chromosome 10 to chromosome 1 compared with the tomato genome. Parental genotypes for the three genes were in agreement with the identification of the candidate genes performed in the S3MEGGIC population. Our new eggplant MAGIC population is the largest recombinant population in eggplant and is a powerful tool for eggplant genetics and breeding studies.

Keywords: multi-parent advanced generation inter crosses (MAGIC), eggplant (Solanum melongena L.), S. incanum, anthocyanins, pigmentation under calyx (PUC), genome wide association study (GWAS), candidate genes, SPET (single primer enrichment technology)

Introduction

Multi-parent experimental populations are of great interest for the genetic dissection of quantitative traits and for the development of new recombinant materials for plant breeding (Huang et al., 2015). Despite their complex management and resources requirement, multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations represent powerful next-generation mapping tools by combining a high genetic diversity and recombination with a low population structure (Arrones et al., 2020; Scott et al., 2020). MAGIC populations are already available in model species, such as Arabidopsis thaliana and in several crops, such as cereals, pulses, and vegetables (Kover et al., 2009; Bandillo et al., 2013; Pascual et al., 2015; Huynh et al., 2018), and have demonstrated their power to dissect the structure of complex traits (Dell’Acqua et al., 2015; Stadlmeier et al., 2018).

Although the available MAGIC populations have become a useful resource for genetic studies and breeding, most of them have only exploited intraspecific variation. The incorporation of crop wild relatives (CWRs) as founders could be a way of including multiple wild genomic fragments or introgressions into cultivated background genomes (Arrones et al., 2020). Apart from being of great interest for genetic analysis, interspecific MAGIC populations can be useful for broadening the genetic base of crops and provide new variation for breeding multiple traits, including those related to adaption to climate change (Gramazio et al., 2020a). However, so far, the potential of interspecific MAGIC populations for plant breeding has largely remained unexploited (Arrones et al., 2020).

Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) is a major vegetable crop of increasing importance, ranking fifth in global production among vegetables (FAOSTAT, 2019). Despite its economic importance, eggplant has lagged behind other major crops and little effort has been made to develop immortal experimental populations and genetic and genomic tools (Gramazio et al., 2018, 2019). So far, only one population of recombinant inbred lines (RIL) and one set of introgression lines (ILs) are publicly available (Lebeau et al., 2013; Gramazio et al., 2017a), while no multiparent population has been developed, so far. Conversely, in other related Solanaceae crops, such as tomato, several experimental populations have been developed, including MAGIC populations, which have allowed great advances in the genetic dissection of traits of interest (Pascual et al., 2015; Campanelli et al., 2019). For this reason, the development of this type of population would represent a landmark in eggplant breeding.

Anthocyanins are responsible for a set of specific and relevant traits in eggplant which can be used as a model plant for other crops (Moglia et al., 2020). Anthocyanins play a key role in plant defence mechanisms, and their synthesis and accumulation may vary in response to specific biotic and abiotic stresses (D’Amelia et al., 2018; Lv et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2019). In addition, anthocyanins may prevent and alleviate human chronic diseases and provide health benefits (Toppino et al., 2020). In eggplant, anthocyanins are responsible for the purple colour of the peel, one of the traits of greatest interest for eggplant breeding (Daunay and Hazra, 2012). Purple coloured eggplant fruits are the most demanded in various markets (Li et al., 2018), and developing dark purple-coloured eggplants, which results from the combination of anthocyanins with chlorophylls, is a major objective in eggplant breeding programmes. Eggplants are variable for the presence of anthocyanins not only in fruits, but also in other plant organs and tissues such as hypocotyl, stem, leaves, leaf veins, prickles, flower calyx, or corolla (Toppino et al., 2020). Anthocyanin biosynthesis has been widely studied in Solanaceae species (Van Eck et al., 1994; Borovsky et al., 2004; Gonzali et al., 2009), but its genetic control in eggplant has not been fully clarified. The anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway is a very conserved network in many plant species, where many enzymes and regulatory transcription factors (TFs) are involved (Albert et al., 2014).

The major anthocyanins in the eggplant fruit epidermis are delphinidin-3-p-coumaroylrutinoside-5-glucoside and delphinidin-3-rutinoside (Mennella et al., 2012; Moglia et al., 2020). Fruit anthocyanins (FA) are highly dependent on light (Jiang et al., 2016), however, the genotypes that carry the pigmentation under the calyx (PUC) mutation are able to independently synthetise the anthocyanins in the fruit epidermis of the incidence of light (Tigchelaar et al., 1968). Quantitative trait locus (QTL)-related studies using family based or genome-wide association (GWA) mapping approaches evidenced that chromosome 10 harbours most of the QTL/genes involved in anthocyanin formation, distribution, and accumulation (Doganlar et al., 2002; Barchi et al., 2012; Cericola et al., 2014; Frary et al., 2014; Toppino et al., 2016, 2020; Wei et al., 2020). The availability of high-quality eggplant genome sequences and transcriptomic data allowed the identification of putative candidate genes belonging to the myeloblastosis (MYB) family which controls the variation in anthocyanin content and fruit colour in eggplant (Docimo et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017, 2018, 2021; Xiao et al., 2018; Moglia et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2021), highlighting their synteny with other Solanaceae. However, the genes underlying the PUC phenotype have not been identified, so far.

Here, we report on the first eggplant MAGIC population derived from an interspecific cross of seven accessions of S. melongena and its wild relative S. incanum (Gramazio et al., 2019). It represents the largest experimental population described, so far, in eggplant, with a similar population size to MAGIC populations in other solanaceous crops. The population has been genotyped by applying the Single Primer Enrichment Technology (SPET) to explore its genetic architecture and the contribution of founders to the final population, and phenotyped for the presence of anthocyanins in the fruit epidermis and other plant organs and for the PUC trait. These traits were chosen due to their physiological, agronomic, and morphological relevance, high stability, and heritability. An association analysis has been performed to locate the genomic regions and to identify the candidate genes involved in the traits under study.

Materials and Methods

Multi-Parent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross Population Construction

The eggplant MAGIC population has been developed by intermating seven cultivated eggplants, i.e., MM1597 (A), DH ECAVI (B), AN-S-26 (D), H15 (E), A0416 (F), IVIA-371 (G) and ASI-S-1 (H), and the S. incanum accession MM577 (C) (Figure 1A). The wild relative founder was chosen for its tolerance to some biotic and abiotic stresses, mainly drought (Knapp et al., 2013), and for showing a high phenolic content (Prohens et al., 2013). The performance of the founders was comprehensively characterised in previous morphoagronomic and genetic diversity studies (Hurtado et al., 2014; Gramazio et al., 2017b; Kaushik et al., 2018). In addition, their genomes had been resequenced (Gramazio et al., 2019). The latter study highlighted that, in the founder parents, the residual heterozygosity was less than 0.06%.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) The funnel breeding design, used across the six generations (G1–G6), to develop the 420 S3 individuals of the S3MEGGIC population. The eight parents, coded from A to H and each with a different colour to represent their genomic background, are represented above at a scale based on the real fruit size. Scale bar represents 5 cm. The four two-way hybrids obtained in the G1 generation (AB, CD, EF, and GH) are also represented at the same scale as the founders. Phenotyping of founders and two-way hybrids for absence (red) or presence (green) of anthocyanins in vegetative plant tissues (PA) and fruit epidermis (FA), or anthocyanic pigmentation under the calyx (PUC). White dots for PUC mean uncertainty for non-anthocyanin fruits. (B) A representation of the phenotypic diversity of the S3 individuals found during the phenotyping. (C) Distribution of molecular markers across the chromosomes used for the genotyping.

In order to develop the eggplant S3 Magic EGGplant InCanum (S3MEGGIC) population, founder lines had been inter-crossed by following a simple “funnel” approach (Wang et al., 2017; Arrones et al., 2020; Figure 1A). The eight founders (A–H) had been pairwise inter-crossed to produce two-way or simple F1 hybrids (AB, CD, EF, and GH), which were subsequently inter-crossed in pairs (AB × CD and EF × GH) to obtain two four-way or double hybrids (ABCD and EFGH). In order to achieve a complete admixture of all founder genomes and to avoid assortative mating, the double hybrids were intercrossed following a chain pollination scheme, with each individual being used as female and male parents (Díez et al., 2002; Supplementary Figure 1A).

All the obtained eight-way or quadruple hybrids (S0 generation) presented all the eight randomly shuffled genomes and only differed on the cytoplasm inherited from the maternal parent. The S0 progenies obtained using the double hybrid ABCD, as a female parent carried the cytoplasm of the wild S. incanum MM577, while those derived using the double hybrid EFGH as a female parent carried the cytoplasm of the cultivated S. melongena ASI-S-1. Subsequently, the S0 progenies were selfed for three generations by a single seed descent (SSD) to obtain the S3 segregating individuals that were phenotyped and genotyped in this study. To ensure the continuity of the S0 progenies and to accelerate the self-fertilisation process, four plants of each S0 progeny were germinated, and only the first two that set a viable seed were selected for the next generation (S1; Supplementary Figure 1B). From each of the two S0 selected plants, two S1 plants were germinated, and only the first setting fruit was selected for the S2 generation. The same was done for the S3 generation so that for each progeny, two plants were germinated and phenotyped. Despite this, only one was used for originating the next generation. On the other hand, in the S3 progenies, if two individuals displayed some phenotypic differences, both of them were included in the S3MEGGIC population.

Cultivation Conditions

Seeds were germinated in Petri dishes, following the protocol developed by Ranil et al. (2015) and, subsequently, transferred to seedling trays in a climatic chamber under a photoperiod and temperature regime of 16 h light (25°C) and 8 h dark (18°C). After acclimatisation, plantlets were transplanted to 15 L pots and grown in a pollinator-free benched glasshouse of the Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Valencia, Spain (GPS coordinates: latitude, 39° 28′ 55″ N; longitude, 0° 20′ 11″ W; 7 m above sea level). Plants were spaced 1.2 m between rows and 1 m within the row, and fertirrigated using a drip irrigation system and trained with vertical strings. Pruning was done manually to regulate the vegetative growth and flowering. Phytosanitary treatments were performed when necessary. In order to shorten generation time of subsequent generations (S0–S3), plantlets were transplanted to individual thermoformed pots (1.3 L capacity) in a pollinator-free glasshouse, and selfings were stimulated by a mechanical vibration.

High-Throughput Genotyping

Young leaf tissue was sampled from 420 S3 individuals, the eight founders, and the four two-way hybrids. Genomic DNA was extracted using the silica matrix extraction (SILEX) extraction method (Vilanova et al., 2020) and checked for quality and integrity by agarose electrophoresis and NanoDrop ratios (260/280 and 260/230), while its concentration was estimated with Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). After dilution, the samples were sent to Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) Technology Services (IGATech, Udine, Italy) for library preparation and sequencing with NextSeq500 sequencer (150 paired-end) for a high-throughput genotyping using the SPET technology using the 5k probes eggplant SPET platform (Barchi et al., 2019a). The latter comprises 5,093 probes, and was developed by filtering out the most informative and reliable polymorphisms (3,372 of them in coding sequences or CDS and 1,721 in introns and untranslated regions or UTR regions) from the set of over 12 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified among the MAGIC founders (Gramazio et al., 2019).

Raw reads were demultiplexed and the adapters were removed using a standard Illumina pipeline and Cutadapt (Martin, 2011), while trimming was performed by ERNE (Del Fabbro et al., 2013). Clean reads were mapped onto the eggplant reference genome “67/3” (Barchi et al., 2019b) using BWA-MEM (Li, 2013) with default parameters, and only the uniquely aligned reads were selected for the variant calling performed with GATK 4.0 (DePristo et al., 2011), following the best practice recommended by the Broad Institute.1

The SNPs identified by SPET were filtered using the Trait Analysis by Association, Evolution, and Linkage (TASSEL) software (ver. 5.0, Bradbury et al., 2007) in order to retain the most reliable ones (minor allele frequency > 0.01, missing data < 10% and maximum marker heterozygosity < 70%). In addition, a linkage disequilibrium (LD) k-nearest neighbour genotype imputation method (LD KNNi) was performed to fill the missing calls or genotyping gaps.

Population Structure, Heterozygosity, and Haplotype Blocks Inferring

A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to assess the population structure of S3MEGGIC using the R package vcfR (Knaus and Grünwald, 2017) and the function glPCA of the Adegenet package (Jombart, 2008). Finally, the PCA was graphically plotted with ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016). An Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) was performed to estimate the population differentiation according to the cytoplasm (cultivated vs. wild) of the individuals of the S3MEGGIC population by using the function poppr.amova of the poppr R package (Kamvar et al., 2014). The residual heterozygosity and its distribution were evaluated with TASSEL software (ver. 5.0, Bradbury et al., 2007). Parental contribution to S3MEGGIC individuals and haplotype blocks were estimated by using R-package HaploBlocker (Pook et al., 2019).

Phenotyping and Genome-Wide Association Study

Phenotypic data were collected from the 420 S3 individuals grown during the 2019/2020 season. Three traits were screened using a binary classification (presence/absence), namely, anthocyanins presence in vegetative plant tissues (PA) and fruit epidermis (FA), and anthocyanic PUC (Supplementary Figure 4). The presence of PA was phenotyped when the purple coloration was observed in any vegetative plant parts such as in stem, branches, leaf veins, or prickles. For FA, anthocyanins were considered as present when the purple colouration was observed in the fruit epidermis regardless of their distribution (uniform, listed, etc.) or intensity. The PUC trait could only be phenotyped in anthocyanic fruits by removing the calyx and observing the presence of anthocyanins under it. FA and PUC traits were screened at the stage of commercial maturity (e.g., when the fruit was physiologically immature) which is the best stage for phenotyping these traits. Phenotypic characteristics of the eight founders and two-way hybrids are described in Figure 1A.

Using the phenotypic and genotypic data collected from the S3MEGGIC individuals, a Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) was performed for the selected traits using the TASSEL software (ver. 5.0, Bradbury et al., 2007). For the association study, mixed linear model (MLM) analyses were conducted. The MLM analysis uses both fixed and random effects, which incorporates the kinship among the individuals. The multiple testing was corrected with the Bonferroni and the false discovery rate (FDR) methods (Holm, 1979; Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995) to identify candidate-associated regions at the significance level of 0.05 (Thissen et al., 2002). SNPs with limit of detection (LOD) [−log10(p-value)] over these thresholds or cut off values were declared to be significantly associated with the anthocyanin presence. The R qqman package (Turner, 2018) was used to visualise the Manhattan plots and LDBlockShow (Dong et al., 2020) to determine the LD and the plot haplotype block structure. The pattern of pairwise LD between SNPs was measured by LD correlation coefficient (r2) by considering haplotype blocks with default r2 values greater than 0.5 supported by the solid spine of LD method (Gabriel et al., 2002; Barrett et al., 2005). The LD was used to narrow down the genomic regions with significant associations. The genes underlying the associated regions were retrieved from the “67/3” eggplant reference genome (ver. 3) (Barchi et al., 2019b). Genes were considered as potential candidates in controlling the assessed traits when carrying homozygous allelic variants classified as “high impact” according to SnpEff software v 4.2 prediction (Cingolani et al., 2012) of the eight MAGIC founders (Gramazio et al., 2019). The Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) tool was used for visual exploration of founder genome sequences to validate SnpEff results and to confirm the presence of the so-called “high impact” variants (Robinson et al., 2020). In addition, eggplant and tomato syntenies were assessed by a BLASTx search of candidate genes sequences against the tomato genome (version SL4.0) in the Sol Genomics Network database.2

Results

Multi-Parent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross Population Construction

Seven accessions of eggplant and one of the wild relative S. incanum were selected as founder parents (A-H) for the construction of the eggplant MAGIC population (S3MEGGIC). Following a funnel breeding scheme (Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure 1), a total of 420 individuals of the MAGIC populations were obtained. First, founders were pairwise inter-crossed to produce four two-way hybrids (AB, CD, EF, and GH), which were subsequently inter-crossed in pairs to obtain four-way hybrids (ABCD and EFGH). One-hundred and forty-nine individuals of each of the two four-way hybrids were inter-crossed using a chain pollination scheme (Supplementary Figure 1). Out of the theoretical maximum of 298 eight-way hybrid progenies (S0), seeds were obtained for 209 of them, of which 116 carried the S. melongena ASI-S-1 cytoplasm and 93 carried the S. incanum MM577 cytoplasm. Two plants per S0 progeny were used to advance the population, reaching 402 S1 progenies. These S1 progenies were advanced through single seed descend (SSD) to obtain the 391 S2 and 305 S3 MAGIC progenies. The final S3MEGGIC population was constituted by 420 S3 individuals, of which 348 individuals carried the cultivated cytoplasm and 72 the wild cytoplasm.

Single Primer Enrichment Technology Genotyping

The genotyping of the 420 S3 MAGIC individuals, the eight founders, and the four two-way hybrids by the eggplant SPET platform yielded 22,146 SNPs. After filtering, 7,724 high-confidence SNPs were retained for the subsequent analysis, and the low percentage of missing calls (0.53%) was imputed. Filtered SNPs were distributed across the entire eggplant genome, although the distribution of SNPs varied within and among chromosomes (Table 1 and Figure 1C). Chromosome 9 had the highest average marker density after the SNP filtering, with 173.07 SNPs per Mb, while chromosome 7 had the lowest with an average of 23.03 SNPs per Mb. Generally, most of the SNPs were located in regions with a high gene density and decayed around the centromere (Figure 1C). The S3 MAGIC individuals exhibited a heterozygosity average of 6.87%, with only 15 individuals (3.57%) with a proportion of residual heterozygosity higher than 20% (Figure 2).

TABLE 1.

Statistics of the genotyping using the eggplant 5k probes Single Primer Enrichment Technology (SPET) platform of the 420 S3MEGGIC population individuals using the “67/3” eggplant reference genome (Barchi et al., 2019b).

Chr Markers Filtered markers % Markers % Filtered markers Chr length (Mb) Marker density (Mb) Filtered marker density
1 3,234 1,205 14.60 15.60 13.66 236.82 88.24
2 1,119 424 5.05 5.49 8.34 134.21 50.85
3 2,004 758 9.05 9.81 9.71 206.41 78.07
4 1,567 588 7.08 7.61 10.57 148.23 55.62
5 1,438 571 6.49 7.39 4.39 327.80 130.16
6 2,108 794 9.52 10.28 10.90 193.38 72.84
7 2,483 328 11.21 4.25 14.24 174.34 23.03
8 1,392 550 6.29 7.12 10.96 126.98 50.17
9 1,841 625 8.31 8.09 3.61 509.80 173.07
10 2,069 798 9.34 10.33 10.67 193.86 74.77
11 1,260 453 5.69 5.86 7.23 174.23 62.64
12 1,631 630 7.36 8.16 10.05 162.33 62.70
Total 22,146 7,724 100.00 100.00 114.33
Average 215.70 76.85

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Heterozygosity and proportion of missing data from the S3MEGGIC population. The top histogram represents the observed heterozygosity which is skewed to the left (mean 6.87%; mode 5.02%). The lower graph reports the residual heterozygosity of S3 individuals as black dots copared against two-way hybrids represented as red dots.

Population Structure

Population stratification, performed by PCA, indicated the absence of subgroups in the S3 individuals since no clear clustering was observed (Figure 3). The first two principal components (PCs) account for 5.15% (PC1) and 3.30% of the total variation, respectively, while the first 10 PCs explain together only 25.14% of the total variation, revealing the absence of genetic structure in the S3MEGGIC population. No differentiated clusters among individuals carrying the wild (S. incanum MM577) or the cultivated (S. melongena ASI-S-1) cytoplasm were observed. An Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) was also performed, revealing that only 0.29% of the total sums of squares is accounted for the molecular variation among the S. melongena and S. incanum cytoplasm groups, thereby resulting in a very small phi-value of 0.0019, which indicates a low level of differentiation and supporting that no population structure exists.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Results of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on the S3MEGGIC population. (A) PCA of the first two principal components (PCs), including S3 individuals, founder lines, and two-way hybrids. S3 individuals with wild cytoplasm are represented with blue dots while those ones with cultivated cytoplasm are represented with purple triangles. (B) Scree plot of the PCs (x-axis) and their contribution to variance (left y-axis); bar blot of the PCs (x-axis) and the cumulative proportion of variance explained (right y-axis).

The genome mosaics reconstruction of the S3 MAGIC individuals, in terms of the eight founder haplotypes, showed different haplotype block proportions depending on the genomic position for all chromosomes (Figure 4). The estimated contribution of some founders to the overall S3MEGGIC population differed from the expected value of 12.5%. Two of the founder genomes (A0416 and IVIA-371) had a high representation in the genome of the S3 individuals (32.6% and 23.6%, respectively), while two others (AN-S-26 and H15) had a small representation (0.3% in both cases). The wild founder, S. incanum, had an average haplotype representation of 5.8%.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Genome-wide founder haplotype blocks assignment across the entire S3MEGGIC population. In the x-axis, 12 eggplant chromosomes are represented and in the y-axis the average percentage of founders contribution for the 420 S3 individuals. In the legend, the colour code associated with each founder as in Figure 1.

Phenotypic Variation Among Multi-Parent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross Individuals and Association Analysis

The screening for absence or presence of PA, FA, and PUC in purple fruits of the 420 S3 MAGIC individuals revealed a considerable variation (Figure 1B). Out of the 420 S3 individuals, 57.6% displayed PA and 37.5% FA. Among the individuals displaying FA, 64.3% had the PUC phenotype.

Given that no population structure was observed for the S3MEGGIC population, the phenotypic data, together with the genotypic information, were used for GWAS analysis (Figure 5). The GWAS was performed taking into account the kinship in an MLM leading to the identification of significant associations for the evaluated traits.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Genome-wide association mapping with linkage disequilibrium (LD) block heatmap of significant regions and potential candidate genes controlling PA, FA, and PUC in eggplant. (A,C,F) Manhattan plot for PA (A), FA (C), and PUC (F). Arrows indicate the position of main peaks detected for each trait. The red and green horizontal lines represent, respectively, FDR and Bonferroni significance thresholds at p = 0.05. (B,D,E,G–I) Local Manhattan plot (top) and LD heatmap (bottom) surrounding the peaks PA10 (B), FA1 (D), FA10 (E), PUC1 (G), PUC10.2 (H) and PUC10.3 (I). Pairwise LD between SNPs is indicated as values of R2 values: red indicates a value of 1 and white indicates 0. (J–L) Structure of candidate genes MYB113 (SMEL_010g351850.1) (J), MYB113 (SMEL_001g120500.1) (K), and COP1 (SMEL_010g339180.1) (L) and effect of the high-impact variants detected in those of the eight founders.

Plant Anthocyanins

The Manhattan plot for PA revealed two major peaks on chromosome 9 and 10 (PA9 and PA10), with seven significant SNPs over the FDR threshold (LOD > 4.09), and three of them over the Bonferroni threshold (LOD > 5.16) (Figure 5A). One SNP (LOD = 4.25) was mapped on PA9 region (between 17.0 and 17.4 Mb; Supplementary Figure 2A) and six SNPs, with an LOD between 4.31 and 6.48, were mapped on a PA10 region (between 91.08 and 94.81 Mb; Figure 5A).

Fruit Anthocyanins

For FA, 22 significant SNPs above FDR threshold (LOD > 3.6), which included 11 SNPs above the Bonferroni threshold (LOD > 5.16), were plotted on three major peaks located on chromosomes 1, 9, and 10 (FA1, FA9, and FA10, respectively) (Figure 5C). One SNP (LOD = 4.07) was detected on FA1 region (between 5.11 and 5.88 Mb) in position 5,346,977 (Figure 5D). Five SNPs, with an LOD between 3.86 and 4.22, were located on FA9 region (between 16.2 and 17.4 Mb; Supplementary Figure 2B), which overlapped with the PA9 region (Supplementary Figure 2A). The other sixteen SNPs (LOD between 4.52 and 9.06) were detected on FA10 region between 91.08 and 94.81 Mb (Figure 5E), corresponding to the PA10 region, where significant associations were detected for the PA (Figure 5B).

Pigmentation Under the Calyx

Among the three traits evaluated, PUC was the one with the highest number of significant associations. The Manhattan plot for PUC revealed seven main peaks on chromosomes 1 (PUC1), 3 (PUC3.1 and PUC3.2), and 10 (PUC10.1–10.4), with 36 SNPs over the FDR threshold (LOD > 3.7), and 23 of them are above the Bonferroni threshold (LOD > 5.16) (Figure 5F). One SNP with an LOD of 4.21 was located on the PUC1 region (between 5.11 and 5.88 Mb) in position 5,480,282 (Figure 5G), 133,305 bp away of the significant SNP on the FA1 region (Figure 5D). On the chromosome 3, four SNPs (LOD between 4.41 and 6.18) were detected on the PUC3.1 region (between 7.22 and 8.65 Mb; Supplementary Figure 2C) and one SNP (LOD = 4.58) on the PUC3.2 region (between 31.54 and 40.09 Mb; Supplementary Figure 2D). Thirty SNPs were mapped on chromosome 10 in four genomic regions. One of the SNPs (LOD = 4.2) was identified on the PUC10.1 region (between 2.08 and 2.67 Mb) in position 2,388,375 (Supplementary Figure 2E), and other one (LOD = 4.2) on the PUC10.2 region (between 3.94 and 4.34 Mb; Figure 5H). Another twelve SNPs were located on the PUC10.3 region, between 91.08 and 94.81 Mb (LOD between 3.86 and 12.44; Figure 5I), as observed for PA (Figure 5B) and FA (Figure 5D). The 16 remaining SNPs (LOD between 3.71 and 7.93) were found in the PUC10.4 region, between 98.25 and 100.55 Mb (Supplementary Figure 2F).

Candidate Genes for Anthocyanin Biosynthesis

Based on the results of the GWAS analysis, putative candidate genes were identified close to or within the LD blocks defined in the genomic regions with significant associations (Supplementary Table 1). On chromosome 10, in the genomic region (91.08–94.81 Mb) associated with all the evaluated traits (PA10, FA10, and PUC10.3), a candidate gene was identified as similar to MYB113 (SMEL_010g351850.1), a well-known regulatory transcription factor controlling anthocyanin synthesis in eggplant (Zhou et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2021). In addition, in the genomic region associated with FA and PUC (FA1 and PUC1) on chromosome 1 (5.11–5.88 Mb), another candidate gene was identified similar to MYB113 (SMEL_001g120500.1). Variants that predicted high impact effects on protein function were annotated by SnpEff for both MYB113 genes in the population founders (A, C, and F) that do not present anthocyanins in plants and fruits, as confirmed by aligning the founder gene sequences (Figures 5J,K). Specifically, for the founders A and C, single frameshift variants were identified in two different positions while a disruptive inframe deletion and a slice region variant were identified for the founder F in a third region of the eggplant gene SMEL_010g351850.1 (Figure 5J). For SMEL_001g120500.1, founders A and F exhibited the exact same splice donor, and the intron variant predicted as high impact, while in the founder C, a splice acceptor and intron variant were identified (Figure 5K). Founder reconstruction of the S3 individuals and haplotype blocks were estimated for both candidate gene regions (chromosome 10: 91.08–94.81 Mb; chromosome 1: 5.11–5.88 Mb) (Supplementary Figures 3A,B). Founders that contribute most to anthocyanin-related traits in these regions are IVIA-371 (111 and 97 S3 individuals, respectively) and ASI-S-1 (74 and 75 S3 individuals, respectively). Furthermore, a reciprocal best hit BLAST analysis of the SMEL_001g120500.1 onto the tomato genome indicated that this gene corresponded to the orthologue SlANT1-like with 70.99% identity. The eggplant SMEL_010g351850.1 corresponded to the tomato orthologue SlAN2-like with a 73.73% identity, which has been described as the best candidate gene for the anthocyanin fruit biosynthesis in tomato (Yan et al., 2020). These results suggest that a single duplication event and a translocation of a fragment of at least 357 kb from chromosome 10 to 1 ocurred during eggplant evolution (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Tomato-eggplant microsynteny representation of a tomato region from chromosome 10 (Solyc10), eggplant region of chromosome 10 (SMEL_010), and a 357 kb fragment of eggplant chromosome 1 (SMEL_001), where candidate genes for anthocyanins synthesis are located.

A candidate gene that corresponds to a COP1 (SMEL_010g339180.1), a gene that encodes for photo-regulatory proteins (Jiang et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018; He et al., 2019; Naeem et al., 2019), was reported in the genomic regions associated with PUC (PUC10.2) on chromosome 10 (3.94–4.34 Mb; Supplementary Table 1). High-effect variants were detected in COP1 gene in those founders that are able to synthesise anthocyanin under the calyx (B and G) and in the green wild species S. incanum (C) (Figure 5L). The C founder mutation was confirmed by the F1 hybrid phenotype from the C × D inter-cross, PUC (anthocyanic pigmentation under the calyx) × puc (no anthocyanic pigmentation under the calyx), which showed the anthocyanin fruits with pigmentation under the calyx (Figure 1A). The wild founder presented multiple SNPs compared with the rest that were predicted to cause a frameshift and missed variants, while founders B and G exhibited variants that were predicted to produce stop codons (Figure 5L). Founders with a higher haplotype representation contributing to PUC in this region (chromosome 10: 3.94–4.34 Mb) are IVIA-371 (113 S3 individuals) and DH_ECAVI (71 S3 individuals) (Supplementary Figure 3C).

Furthermore, we found two candidate genes annotated as similar to BHLH, basic helix loop helix protein A (SMEL_009g326640.1), and, similar to SPA3, protein SPA1-RELATED 3 (SMEL_010g338090.1), respectively (data not shown), close to LD blocks in the PA9 and FA9 (between 17,862,090 and 17,872,428 Mb), and PUC10.1 (between 3,128,678 and 3,143,068 Mb) regions. Although they were described as genes related to the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (Maier et al., 2013; Li et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2021), no high-effects variants were identified in these genes for any of the founders.

Discussion

Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations are outstanding genetic materials for identifying gene-trait associations with high resolution (Arrones et al., 2020; Scott et al., 2020). The introduction of multiple founders with an increased genetic and phenotypic diversity, together with the multiple rounds of inter-crossing and selfing, increases the number of accumulated recombinant events and, thus, improves the mapping accuracy (Scott et al., 2020). By introducing a wild relative as a founder parent, the genetic variability in the population increases, which is a key point for QTL identification (Gramazio et al., 2020a). Here, we present the first eggplant S3MEGGIC population of which one of the founders was one accession of the close wild relative S. incanum.

Large population sizes are essential to increase the power and mapping resolution in MAGIC populations (Collard et al., 2005; Valdar et al., 2006; Jaganathan et al., 2020). Following a simple “funnel” scheme design, the population was kept as large as possible to gather a large number of recombination events. However, a sharp reduction in the number of progenies was observed at the S0 generation, which might be related to the use of the wild species S. incanum (C) as a female founder and parent to obtain the simple (CD) and the double (ABCD) hybrids. This interspecific crossing dragged the maternal cytoplasmic background of the wild parent, which might have caused a partial sterility and bias in subsequent generations. Some studies confirmed a strong effect of wild Solanum cytoplasms in the reduction in pollen fertility of alloplasmic lines (Khan et al., 2020; Isshiki et al., 2021). However, the PCA highlighted the absence of a population structure, also confirmed by the lack of genetically differentiated cytoplasmic groups.

The genotyping of the S3MEGGIC population was carried out with the 5k probes eggplant SPET platform with a well-distributed marker density along all chromosomes (Barchi et al., 2019a). This genotyping strategy has already been used in the analysis of biparental populations (Herrero et al., 2020). In this study, we have verified that its use can be extended to multiparent populations. The genotyping revealed a low heterozygosity in the S3MEGGIC individuals, similar to the expected value for an F5-like biparental inter-cross generation (6.25%). The contributions of each of the founder parents to the S3MEGGIC population revealed that some parents had a higher representation than others. Apart from drift effects, several biological reasons could potentially explain cryptic selection processes, causing the unbalanced representation of the genomes (Rockman and Kruglyak, 2008; Thépot et al., 2015), including seed dormancy, delayed germination, precocity, reduced fertility, and parthenocarpy associated to some genomes which have already been reported in eggplant and other crops (Barchi et al., 2010; Khan et al., 2015; Prohens et al., 2017). The rather limited contribution of the wild species S. incanum to the final S3 MAGIC individuals may have been caused by a selection pressure, as progenies bred from crosses involving the two different species tend to suffer from a reduced fertility and show a segregation distortion (Lefebvre et al., 2002; Barchi et al., 2010). In addition, S. incanum has a recalcitrant germination and a very erratic flowering and fruit set, which strongly depends on environmental conditions (Gisbert et al., 2011; Mangino et al., 2020, 2021). Other reasons for the segregation distortion could be the inability of the current genotyping density to efficiently distinguish between the founders that are genetically closer, like AN-S-26 and H15 genotypes. This phenomenon has already been observed in previous MAGIC populations (Dell’Acqua et al., 2015). A deeper genotyping, resulting in a better haplotype reconstruction, might shed light on the mechanisms that have led to the unbalanced representation of the founder genomes in the S3MEGGIC population. Due to this low contribution, care should be taken in the future when analysing the traits that are present only in these founders.

The anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway is one of the most studied biochemical routes in plants due to its physiological importance. Major structural genes of this pathway are under the control of a regulatory complex, where myeloblastosis (MYB) TFs are recognised as main regulators alone or in complexes with other TFs (Ramsay and Glover, 2005; Kiferle et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2018). Activator or repressor MYB proteins directly and competitively bind the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) via the amino terminus domain and can act as positive or negative transcriptional regulators in a tissue-specific mode to modulate the anthocyanin synthesis (Barchi et al., 2019b; Moglia et al., 2020).

In eggplant, anthocyanin-related MYB protein-encoding genes have been reported to be related to fruit peel colouration (Zhang et al., 2014; Docimo et al., 2016; Xiao et al., 2018; Moglia et al., 2020; Toppino et al., 2020). In tomato, a cluster of four different MYB proteins was reported to be involved in the anthocyanin synthesis located on chromosome 10 and encoded by SlAN2, SlANT1, SlANT1-like, and SlAN2-like genes (Solyc10g086250, Solyc10g086260, Solyc10g086270, and Solyc10g086290, respectively). However, genetic associations to only two paralogue MYB113 genes were detected in the S3MEGGIC population on chromosomes 1 and 10 (SMEL_001g120500.1 and SMEL_010g351850.1). The same occurs in potato, in which, only two anthocyanin genes have been identified, i.e., Sotub10g028550 and Sotub10g028540, both located on chromosome 10. Similarly, in pepper, in addition to CA10g11690 and CA10g11650, a third gene (CA10g11710) has been identified as an orthologue to SlAN2-like (Barchi et al., 2019b). In eggplant, these two tomato orthologs were previously described as SmelANT1 and SmelAN2 (Docimo et al., 2016; Barchi et al., 2019b), corresponding to SlANT1 and SlAN2. However, the reciprocal best hit BLAST analysis of the eggplant coding proteins showed a stronger homology, respectively, to tomato SlANT1-like and SlAN2-like. Although previous studies in eggplant indicated that the overexpression of SmelANT1 accounts for constitutive upregulation of most anthocyanin biosynthetic genes (Zhang et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2021), we considered the SmelAN2 as the best candidate gene for different reasons. Previous studies in eggplant have located the major anthocyanin-related QTLs on chromosome 10 (Barchi et al., 2012; Cericola et al., 2014; Toppino et al., 2016), which are in agreement with the highest association signals for anthocyanin-related traits in our GWAS results. Furthermore, recent studies in tomato suggested that SlAN2-like functions as an activator to regulate biosynthesis genes, including SlANT1-like, and controls the accumulation of anthocyanins (Yan et al., 2020). However, in the S3MEGGIC population, high-impact variants on protein function were found in both MYB113 genes for non-anthocyanin fruits. These results could suggest that a duplication of function occurred during an eggplant evolution, and both genes may be required for anthocyanin synthesis.

Although it has been demonstrated that the activation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in eggplant is strongly regulated by light (Li et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2018), the PUC mutation confers to some genotypes the ability to synthesise anthocyanins under the calyx regardless of incidence of light (Tigchelaar et al., 1968). In this study, a candidate gene, related with light-dependent anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits, was detected at the beginning of chromosome 10. The constitutive photomorphogenic1 (COP1) gene has been reported to be a regulatory TF responsible for mediating a light-regulated gene expression and development (Jiang et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018; He et al., 2019; Naeem et al., 2019). The COP1 gene has been demonstrated to act as a light-inactivable repressor interacting with MYB TFs (Jiang et al., 2016), and is considered a “molecular switch” in metabolic processes, which are stimulated by light. In presence of light, COP1 expression is inhibited, and its concentration decreases rapidly, promoting anthocyanins synthesis. Under dark conditions, COP1 expression is induced and promotes the degradation of the photomorphogenesis-promoting TF and MYB inhibition by conforming the COP1/Suppressor of phya-105 (SPA) ubiquitin ligase complex (Maier et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018). Although PUC can only be observed in anthocyanic fruits, high-impact variants were also identified in the wild species S. incanum COP1 gene (founder C, green fruit). The PUC allele is more common in eggplants from western countries, where European markets demand for more homogeneously pigmentation eggplants. On the other hand, in Asian eggplants, it is more common to find the puc phenotype, such as in the ASI-S-1 founder.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the S3MEGGIC population represents a landmark breeding material and a tool of great value, which allows the study and fine-mapping of complex traits due to (i) the highly phenotypically diverse founders; (ii) the large population size, being the largest developed eggplant experimental population so far; (iii) the high degree of homozygosity of the final individuals, which constitute a population of fixed “immortal” lines nearly homozygous at each locus; and (iv) the tailored genotyping SPET platform used for the genetic analysis of the population, which has been developed from the whole genome sequencing (WGS) of the founders and allows the comparison with the genotyped materials with the same setup (Gramazio et al., 2020b). In addition, the S3MEGGIC population has demonstrated its potential usefulness for association studies, allowing the establishment of marker associations to anthocyanin-related genes and identification of candidate genes for plant and fruit anthocyanins, including the first identification of a candidate gene for an economically relevant breeding trait in eggplant such as PUC.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA392603.

Author Contributions

SV, PG, and JP conceived the idea and supervised the manuscript. GM, AA, MP, and PG performed the field trials. GM and AA prepared a first draft of the manuscript. All other authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Agencia Estatal de Investigación and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (grant RTI2018-094592-B-I00 from MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) and European Union’s Horizon, 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement no. 677379 (G2P-SOL project: Linking genetic resources, genomes and phenotypes of Solanaceous crops). AA is grateful to Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades for a pre-doctoral (FPU18/01742) contract. MP is grateful to Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación for a post-doctoral grant (IJC2019-039091-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). PG is grateful to Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación for a post-doctoral grant (FJC2019-038921-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). Funding for open access charge: Universitat Politècnica de València.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.847789/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1

(A) Chain pollination scheme of the four-way hybrids followed to obtain the eight-way hybrids. (B) For each S0 progeny, four plants were germinated, selecting for the next generation (S1) only the first two that set fruits with viable seed. For subsequent generations, two plants were germinated and only the first one that set fruit was selected for the next generation.

Supplementary Figure 2

Local Manhattan plot (top) and LD heatmap (bottom) surrounding the peaks PA9 (A), FA9 (B), PUC3.1 (C), PUC3.2 (D), PUC10.1 (E), and PUC10.4 (F). The red and green horizontal lines represent, respectively, FDR and Bonferroni significance thresholds. Pairwise LD between SNPs is indicated as values of R2 values: red indicates a value of 1 and white indicates 0.

Supplementary Figure 3

Founder haplotype blocks representation predicted for each of the S3 individuals for the three anthocyanin-related candidate gene regions: (A) MYB113 (SMEL_001g120500.1) on chromosome 1 between 5.11 and 5.88 Mb identified by the FA1 and PUC1 associations; (B) COP1 (SMEL_010g339180.1.01) on chromosome 10 between 3.94 and 4.34 Mb identified by the PUC10.2 association; and (C) MYB113 (SMEL_010g351850.1) on chromosome 10 between 91.08 and 94.81 Mb identified by the PA10, FA10, and PUC10.3 associations.

Supplementary Figure 4

Phenotyping of the S3MEGGIC population for presence or absence of PA, FA, and PUC.

References

  1. Albert N. W., Davies K. M., Lewis D. H., Zhang H., Montefiori M., Brendolise C., et al. (2014). A conserved network of transcriptional activators and repressors regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in Eudicots. Plant Cell 26 962–980. 10.1105/tpc.113.122069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrones A., Vilanova S., Plazas M., Mangino G., Pascual L., Díez M. J., et al. (2020). The dawn of the age of multi-parent magic populations in plant breeding: novel powerful next-generation resources for genetic analysis and selection of recombinant elite material. Biology 9 1–25. 10.3390/biology9080229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandillo N., Raghavan C., Muyco P. A., Sevilla M. A. L., Lobina I. T., Dilla-Ermita C. J., et al. (2013). Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice 6 1–15. 10.1186/1939-8433-6-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barchi L., Acquadro A., Alonso D., Aprea G., Bassolino L., Demurtas O., et al. (2019a). Single Primer Enrichment Technology (SPET) for high-throughput genotyping in tomato and eggplant germplasm. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1005. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barchi L., Pietrella M., Venturini L., Minio A., Toppino L., Acquadro A., et al. (2019b). A chromosome-anchored eggplant genome sequence reveals key events in Solanaceae evolution. Sci. Rep. 9 1–13. 10.1038/s41598-019-47985-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barchi L., Lanteri S., Portis E., Stàgel A., Valè G., Toppino L., et al. (2010). Segregation distortion and linkage analysis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Genome 53 805–815. 10.1139/g10-073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barchi L., Lanteri S., Portis E., Valè G., Volante A., Pulcini L., et al. (2012). A RAD tag derived marker based eggplant linkage map and the location of QTLs determining anthocyanin pigmentation. PLoS One 7:e43740. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barrett J. C., Fry B., Maller J., Daly M. J. (2005). Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21 263–265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 57 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  10. Borovsky Y., Oren-Shamir M., Ovadia R., De Jong W., Paran I. (2004). The A locus that controls anthocyanin accumulation in pepper encodes a MYB transcription factor homologous to Anthocyanin2 of Petunia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109 23–29. 10.1007/s00122-004-1625-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bradbury P. J., Zhang Z., Kroon D. E., Casstevens T. M., Ramdoss Y., Buckler E. S. (2007). TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23 2633–2635. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Campanelli G., Sestili S., Acciarri N., Montemurro F., Palma D., Leteo F., et al. (2019). Multi-parental advances generation inter-cross population, to develop organic tomato genotypes by participatory plant breeding. Agronomy 9:119. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cericola F., Portis E., Lanteri S., Toppino L., Barchi L., Acciarri N., et al. (2014). Linkage disequilibrium and genome-wide association analysis for anthocyanin pigmentation and fruit color in eggplant. BMC Genomics 15:896. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cingolani P., Platts A., Wang L. L., Coon M., Nguyen T., Wang L., et al. (2012). A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6 80–92. 10.4161/fly.19695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Collard B. C. Y., Jahufer M. Z. Z., Brouwer J. B., Pang E. C. K. (2005). An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: the basic concepts. Euphytica 142 169–196. [Google Scholar]
  16. D’Amelia V., Aversano R., Chiaiese P., Carputo D. (2018). The antioxidant properties of plant flavonoids: their exploitation by molecular plant breeding. Phytochem. Rev. 17 611–625. 10.1007/s11101-018-9568-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Daunay M. C., Hazra P. (2012). “Eggplant,” in Handbook of Vegetables, eds Peter K. V., Hazra P. (Houston, TX: Studium Press; ), 257–322. [Google Scholar]
  18. Del Fabbro C., Scalabrin S., Morgante M., Giorgi F. M. (2013). An extensive evaluation of read trimming effects on illumina NGS data analysis. PLoS One 8:e85024. 10.1371/journal.pone.0085024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dell’Acqua M., Gatti D. M., Pea G., Cattonaro F., Coppens F., Magris G., et al. (2015). Genetic properties of the MAGIC maize population: a new platform for high definition QTL mapping in Zea mays. Genome Biol. 16 1–23. 10.1186/s13059-015-0716-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. DePristo M. A., Banks E., Poplin R., Garimella K. V., Maguire J. R., Hartl C., et al. (2011). A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43 491–498. 10.1038/ng.806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Díez M. J., Picó B., Nuez F. (2002). Cucurbit Genetic Resources in Europe: Ad Hoc Meeting held in Adana, Turkey, 19 January 2002. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. [Google Scholar]
  22. Docimo T., Francese G., Ruggiero A., Batelli G., De Palma M., Bassolino L., et al. (2016). Phenylpropanoids accumulation in eggplant fruit: characterization of biosynthetic genes and regulation by a MYB transcription factor. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1233. 10.3389/fpls.2015.01233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Doganlar S., Frary A., Daunay M. C., Lester R. N., Tanksley S. D. (2002). Conservation of gene function in the Solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. Genetics 161 1713–1726. 10.1093/genetics/161.4.1713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dong S. S., He W. M., Ji J. J., Zhang C., Guo Y., Yang T. L. (2020). LDBlockShow: a fast and convenient tool for visualizing linkage disequilibrium and haplotype blocks based on variant call format files. Brief. Bioinform. 22:bbaa227. 10.1093/bib/bbaa227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. FAOSTAT (2019). FAOSTAT. Available online at: http://www.fao.org (accessed February 20, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  26. Frary A., Frary A., Daunay M. C., Huvenaars K., Mank R., Doğanlar S. (2014). QTL hotspots in eggplant (Solanum melongena) detected with a high resolution map and CIM analysis. Euphytica 197 211–228. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gabriel S. B., Schaffner S. F., Nguyen H., Moore J. M., Roy J., Blumenstiel B., et al. (2002). The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296 2225–2229. 10.1126/science.1069424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gisbert C., Prohens J., Nuez F. (2011). Treatments for improving seed germination in eggplant and related species. Acta Horticult. 898 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gonzali S., Mazzucato A., Perata P. (2009). Purple as a tomato: towards high anthocyanin tomatoes. Trends Plant Sci. 14 237–241. 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gramazio P., Pereira-Dias L., Vilanova S., Prohens J., Soler S., Esteras J., et al. (2020a). Morphoagronomic characterization and whole-genome resequencing of eight highly diverse wild and weedy S. pimpinellifolium and S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme accessions used for the first interspecific tomato MAGIC population. Horticult. Res. 7:174. 10.1038/s41438-020-00395-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gramazio P., Jaén-Molina R., Vilanova S., Prohens J., Marrero Á, Caujapé-Castells J., et al. (2020b). Fostering conservation via an integrated use of conventional approaches and high-throughput SPET genotyping: a case study using the endangered canarian endemics Solanum lidii and S. vespertilio (Solanaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 11:757. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gramazio P., Prohens J., Borràs D., Plazas M., Herraiz F. J., Vilanova S. (2017a). Comparison of transcriptome-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for genetic fingerprinting, diversity evaluation, and establishment of relationships in eggplants. Euphytica 213:264. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gramazio P., Prohens J., Plazas M., Mangino G., Herraiz F. J., Vilanova S. (2017b). Development and genetic characterization of advanced backcross materials and an introgression line population of Solanum incanum in a S. melongena background. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1477. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gramazio P., Prohens J., Plazas M., Mangino G., Herraiz F. J., García-Fortea E., et al. (2018). Genomic tools for the enhancement of vegetable crops: a case in eggplant. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 46 1–13. 10.15835/nbha46110936 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gramazio P., Yan H., Hasing T., Vilanova S., Prohens J., Bombarely A. (2019). Whole-genome resequencing of seven eggplant (Solanum melongena) and one wild relative (S. incanum) accessions provides new insights and breeding tools for eggplant enhancement. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1220. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. He Y., Chen H., Zhou L., Liu Y., Chen H. (2019). Comparative transcription analysis of photosensitive and non-photosensitive eggplants to identify genes involved in dark regulated anthocyanin synthesis. BMC Genomics 20:678. 10.1186/s12864-019-6023-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Herrero J., Santika B., Herrán A., Erika P., Sarimana U., Wendra F., et al. (2020). Construction of a high density linkage map in Oil Palm using SPET markers. Sci. Rep. 10 1–9. 10.1038/s41598-020-67118-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Holm S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  39. Huang B. E., Verbyla K. L., Verbyla A. P., Raghavan C., Singh V. K., Gaur P., et al. (2015). MAGIC populations in crops: current status and future prospects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128 999–1017. 10.1007/s00122-015-2506-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hurtado M., Vilanova S., Plazas M., Gramazio P., Andújar I., Herraiz F. J., et al. (2014). Enhancing conservation and use of local vegetable landraces: the Almagro eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) case study. Genet. Resourc. Crop Evol. 61 787–795. [Google Scholar]
  41. Huynh B. L., Ehlers J. D., Huang B. E., Muñoz-Amatriaín M., Lonardi S., Santos J. R. P., et al. (2018). A multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) population for genetic analysis and improvement of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Plant J. 93 1129–1142. 10.1111/tpj.13827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Isshiki S., Nakamura I., Ureshino K., Khan M. M. R. (2021). Pollen fertility differences in the progenies obtained from a cross between eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) as a seed parent and eggplant cytoplasmic substitution lines as pollen parents. Austral. J. Crop Sci. 15 233–237. 10.21475/ajcs.21.15.02.p2785 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jaganathan D., Bohra A., Thudi M., Varshney R. K. (2020). Fine mapping and gene cloning in the post-NGS era: advances and prospects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 133 1791–1810. 10.1007/s00122-020-03560-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jiang M., Ren L., Lian H., Liu Y., Chen H. (2016). Novel insight into the mechanism underlying light-controlled anthocyanin accumulation in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Sci. 249 46–58. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jombart T. (2008). Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24 1403–1405. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kamvar Z. N., Tabima J. F., Grr̈unwald N. J. (2014). Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2014 1–14. 10.7717/peerj.281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kaushik P., Plazas M., Prohens J., Vilanova S., Gramazio P. (2018). Diallel genetic analysis for multiple traits in eggplant and assessment of genetic distances for predicting hybrids performance. PLoS One 13:e0199943. 10.1371/journal.pone.0199943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Khan M. M. R., Arita T., Iwayoshi M., Ogura-Tsujita Y., Isshiki S. (2020). Development of the functional male sterile line of eggplant utilizing the cytoplasm of Solanum kurzii by way of the amphidiploid. Environ. Control Biol. 58 79–83. 10.2525/ecb.58.79 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Khan M. M. R., Hasnunnahar M., Iwayoshi M., Ogura-Tsujita Y., Isshiki S. (2015). Pollen degeneration in three functional male-sterile lines of eggplant with the wild Solanum cytoplasms. Horticult. Environ. Biotechnol. 56 350–357. 10.1007/s13580-015-0015-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kiferle C., Fantini E., Bassolino L., Povero G., Spelt C., Buti S., et al. (2015). Tomato R2R3-MYB proteins SlANT1 and SlAN2: same protein activity, different roles. PLoS One 10:e0136365. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Knapp S., Vorontsova M. S., Prohens J. (2013). Wild relatives of the eggplant (Solanum melongena L.: Solanaceae): new understanding of species names in a complex group. PLoS One 8:e57039. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Knaus B. J., Grünwald N. J. (2017). VCFR: a package to manipulate and visualize variant call format data in R. Mol. Ecol. Resourc. 17 44–53. 10.1111/1755-0998.12549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kover P. X., Valdar W., Trakalo J., Scarcelli N., Ehrenreich I. M., Purugganan M. D., et al. (2009). A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000551. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Lebeau A., Gouy M., Daunay M. C., Wicker E., Chiroleu F., Prior P., et al. (2013). Genetic mapping of a major dominant gene for resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in eggplant. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126 143–158. 10.1007/s00122-012-1969-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Lefebvre V., Pflieger S., Thabuis A., Caranta C., Blattes A., Chauvet J. C., et al. (2002). Towards the saturation of the pepper linkage map by alignment of three intraspecific maps including known-function genes. Genome 45 839–854. 10.1139/g02-053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Li H. (2013). Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv [Preprint]. arXiv, 1303.3997, [Google Scholar]
  57. Li J., He Y. J., Zhou L., Liu Y., Jiang M., Ren L., et al. (2018). Transcriptome profiling of genes related to light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) before purple color becomes evident. BMC Genomics 19:201. 10.1186/s12864-018-4587-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Li J., Ren L., Gao Z., Jiang M., Liu Y., Zhou L., et al. (2017). Combined transcriptomic and proteomic analysis constructs a new model for light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Cell Environ. 40 3069–3087. 10.1111/pce.13074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Li L., He Y., Ge H., Liu Y., Chen H. (2021). Functional characterization of SmMYB86, a negative regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Sci. 302:110696. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Liu Y., Tikunov Y., Schouten R. E., Marcelis L. F. M., Visser R. G. F., Bovy A. (2018). Anthocyanin biosynthesis and degradation mechanisms in Solanaceous vegetables: a review. Front. Chem. 6:52. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lv L. L., Feng X. F., Li W., Li K. (2019). High temperature reduces peel color in eggplant (Solanum melongena) as revealed by RNA-seq analysis. Genome 62 503–512. 10.1139/gen-2019-0021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Maier A., Schrader A., Kokkelink L., Falke C., Welter B., Iniesto E., et al. (2013). Light and the E3 ubiquitin ligase COP1/SPA control the protein stability of the MYB transcription factors PAP1 and PAP2 involved in anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 74 638–651. 10.1111/tpj.12153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Mangino G., Plazas M., Vilanova S., Prohens J., Gramazio P. (2020). Performance of a set of eggplant (Solanum melongena) lines with introgressions from its wild relative S. incanum under open field and screenhouse conditions and detection of QTLs. Agronomy 10:467. 10.3390/agronomy10040467 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Mangino G., Vilanova S., Plazas M., Prohens J., Gramazio P. (2021). Fruit shape morphometric analysis and QTL detection in a set of eggplant introgression lines. Sci. Horticult. 282:110006. 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Martin M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17 10–12. 10.1089/cmb.2017.0096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mennella G., Lo Scalzo R., Fibiani M., D’Alessandro A., Francese G., Toppino L., et al. (2012). Chemical and bioactive quality traits during fruit ripening in eggplant (S. melongena L.) and allied species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60 11821–11831. 10.1021/jf3037424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Moglia A., Francesco E. F., Sergio I., Alessandra G., Milani A. M., Cinzia C., et al. (2020). Identification of a new R3 MYB type repressor and functional characterization of the members of the MBW transcriptional complex involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in eggplant (S. melongena L.). PLoS One 15:e0232986. 10.1371/journal.pone.0232986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Naeem M., Muqarab R., Waseem M. (2019). The Solanum melongena COP1 delays fruit ripening and influences ethylene signaling in tomato. J. Plant Physiol. 240:152997. 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.152997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pascual L., Desplat N., Huang B. E., Desgroux A., Bruguier L., Bouchet J. P., et al. (2015). Potential of a tomato MAGIC population to decipher the genetic control of quantitative traits and detect causal variants in the resequencing era. Plant Biotechnol. J. 13 565–577. 10.1111/pbi.12282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pook T., Schlather M., De Los Campos G., Mayer M., Carolin Schoen C., Simianer H. (2019). HaploBlocker: creation of subgroup-specific haplotype blocks and libraries. Genetics 212 1045–1061. 10.1534/genetics.119.302283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Prohens J., Gramazio P., Plazas M., Dempewolf H., Kilian B., Díez M. J., et al. (2017). Introgressiomics: a new approach for using crop wild relatives in breeding for adaptation to climate change. Euphytica 213:158. [Google Scholar]
  72. Prohens J., Whitaker B. D., Plazas M., Vilanova S., Hurtado M., Blasco M., et al. (2013). Genetic diversity in morphological characters and phenolic acids content resulting from an interspecific cross between eggplant, Solanum melongena, and its wild ancestor (S. incanum). Ann. Appl. Biol. 162 242–257. 10.1111/aab.12017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ramsay N. A., Glover B. J. (2005). MYB-bHLH-WD40 protein complex and the evolution of cellular diversity. Trends Plant Sci. 10 63–70. 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ranil R. H. G., Niran H. M. L., Plazas M., Fonseka R. M., Fonseka H. H., Vilanova S., et al. (2015). Improving seed germination of the eggplant rootstock Solanum torvum by testing multiple factors using an orthogonal array design. Sci. Horticult. 193 174–181. [Google Scholar]
  75. Robinson J. T., Thorvaldsdóttir H., Turner D., Mesirov J. P. (2020). igv.js: an embeddable JavaScript implementation of the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV). bioRxiv [Preprint]. bioRxiv, 075499, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rockman M. V., Kruglyak L. (2008). Breeding designs for recombinant inbred advanced intercross lines. Genetics 179 1069–1078. 10.1534/genetics.107.083873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Scott M. F., Ladejobi O., Amer S., Bentley A. R., Biernaskie J., Boden S. A., et al. (2020). Multi-parent populations in crops: a toolbox integrating genomics and genetic mapping with breeding. Heredity 125 396–416. 10.1038/s41437-020-0336-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Shi S., Liu Y., He Y., Li L., Li D., Chen H. (2021). R2R3-MYB transcription factor SmMYB75 promotes anthocyanin biosynthesis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Sci. Horticult. 282:110020. 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Stadlmeier M., Hartl L., Mohler V. (2018). Usefulness of a multiparent advanced generation intercross population with a greatly reduced mating design for genetic studies in winter wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1825. 10.3389/fpls.2018.01825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Thépot S., Restoux G., Goldringer I., Hospital F., Gouache D., Mackay I., et al. (2015). Efficiently tracking selection in a multiparental population: the case of earliness in wheat. Genetics 199 609–623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Thissen D., Steinberg L., Kuang D. (2002). Quick and easy implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling the false positive rate in multiple comparisons. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 27 77–83. 10.3102/10769986027001077 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Tigchelaar E. C., Janick J., Erickson H. T. (1968). The genetics of anthocyanin coloration in eggplant (Solanum Melongena L.). Genetics 60 475–491. 10.1093/genetics/60.3.475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Toppino L., Barchi L., Lo Scalzo R., Palazzolo E., Francese G., Fibiani M., et al. (2016). Mapping quantitative trait loci affecting biochemical and morphological fruit properties in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Front. Plant Sci. 7:256. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Toppino L., Barchi L., Mercati F., Acciarri N., Perrone D., Martina M., et al. (2020). A new intra-specific and high-resolution genetic map of eggplant based on a RIL population, and location of QTLs related to plant anthocyanin pigmentation and seed vigour. Genes 11 1–29. 10.3390/genes11070745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Turner S. D. (2018). qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and manhattan plots. J. Open Source Softw. 3:731. 10.21105/joss.00731 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Valdar W., Flint J., Mott R. (2006). Simulating the collaborative cross: power of quantitative trait loci detection and mapping resolution in large sets of recombinant inbred strains of mice. Genetics 172 1783–1797. 10.1534/genetics.104.039313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Van Eck H. J., Jacobs J. M. E., Van Den Berg P. M. M. M., Stiekema W. J., Jacobsen E. (1994). The inheritance of anthocyanin pigmentation in potato (Solatium tuberosum L.) and mapping of tuber skin colour loci using RFLPs. Heredity 73 410–421. 10.1038/hdy.1994.189 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Vilanova S., Alonso D., Gramazio P., Plazas M., García-Fortea E., Ferrante P., et al. (2020). SILEX: a fast and inexpensive high-quality DNA extraction method suitable for multiple sequencing platforms and recalcitrant plant species. Plant Methods 16:110. 10.1186/s13007-020-00652-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang H., Guo X., Pandey M. K., Ji X., Varshney R. K., Nwosu V., et al. (2017). “History and impact of the international peanut genome initiative: the exciting journey toward peanut whole-genome sequencing,” in The Peanut Genome, eds Varshney R., Pandey M., Puppala N. (New York, NY: Springer.), 117–134. 10.1007/978-3-319-63935-2_8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wei Q., Wang W., Hu T., Hu H., Wang J., Bao C. (2020). Construction of a SNP-based genetic map using SLAF-Seq and QTL analysis of morphological traits in eggplant. Front. Genet. 11:178. 10.3389/fgene.2020.00178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wickham H. (2016). ggplot2 Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Use R!). New York, NY: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  92. Xiao X. O., Li K., Feng X. F., Jin H. (2018). Transcriptome analyses reveal anthocyanins biosynthesis in eggplant. PeerJ 6:e27289v1. 10.1186/s12870-019-1960-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yan S., Chen N., Huang Z., Li D., Zhi J., Yu B., et al. (2020). Anthocyanin Fruit encodes an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, SlAN2-like, activating the transcription of SlMYBATV to fine-tune anthocyanin content in tomato fruit. New Phytol. 225 2048–2063. 10.1111/nph.16272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhang Y., Hu Z., Chu G., Huang C., Tian S., Zhao Z., et al. (2014). Anthocyanin accumulation and molecular analysis of anthocyanin biosynthesis-associated genes in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 62 2906–2912. 10.1021/jf404574c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhou L., He Y., Li J., Liu Y., Chen H. (2019). CBFs function in anthocyanin biosynthesis by interacting with MYB113 in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Cell Physiol. 61 416–426. 10.1093/pcp/pcz209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

(A) Chain pollination scheme of the four-way hybrids followed to obtain the eight-way hybrids. (B) For each S0 progeny, four plants were germinated, selecting for the next generation (S1) only the first two that set fruits with viable seed. For subsequent generations, two plants were germinated and only the first one that set fruit was selected for the next generation.

Supplementary Figure 2

Local Manhattan plot (top) and LD heatmap (bottom) surrounding the peaks PA9 (A), FA9 (B), PUC3.1 (C), PUC3.2 (D), PUC10.1 (E), and PUC10.4 (F). The red and green horizontal lines represent, respectively, FDR and Bonferroni significance thresholds. Pairwise LD between SNPs is indicated as values of R2 values: red indicates a value of 1 and white indicates 0.

Supplementary Figure 3

Founder haplotype blocks representation predicted for each of the S3 individuals for the three anthocyanin-related candidate gene regions: (A) MYB113 (SMEL_001g120500.1) on chromosome 1 between 5.11 and 5.88 Mb identified by the FA1 and PUC1 associations; (B) COP1 (SMEL_010g339180.1.01) on chromosome 10 between 3.94 and 4.34 Mb identified by the PUC10.2 association; and (C) MYB113 (SMEL_010g351850.1) on chromosome 10 between 91.08 and 94.81 Mb identified by the PA10, FA10, and PUC10.3 associations.

Supplementary Figure 4

Phenotyping of the S3MEGGIC population for presence or absence of PA, FA, and PUC.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA392603.


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES