Skip to main content
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD logoLink to The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD
. 2022 Mar;24(3):219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.10.013

Failure to Detect Mutations in U2AF1 due to Changes in the GRCh38 Reference Sequence

Christopher A Miller ∗,†,, Jason R Walker , Travis L Jensen §, William F Hooper §, Robert S Fulton , Jeffrey S Painter , Mikkael A Sekeres , Timothy J Ley ∗,, David H Spencer ∗,†,∗∗, Johannes B Goll §, Matthew J Walter ∗,
PMCID: PMC8950341  PMID: 35041928

Abstract

The U2AF1 gene is a core part of mRNA splicing machinery and frequently contains somatic mutations that contribute to oncogenesis in myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, and other cancers. A change introduced in the GRCh38 version of the human reference build prevents detection of mutations in this gene, and others, by variant calling pipelines. This study describes the problem in detail and shows that a modified GRCh38 reference build with unchanged coordinates can be used to ameliorate the issue.


The U2AF1 gene encodes a core component of the mRNA splicing machinery that is frequently mutated in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and other cancers.1, 2, 3 Though predominantly associated with hematopoietic cancers (73%), mutations are also recurrent in lung tumors (6.5%) and have been reported in 24 other tumor types. Specifically, mutations at residues S34 and Q157 have been shown to promote exon skipping and are confirmed driver mutations contributing to cancer pathogenesis.4, 5, 6, 7

Materials and Methods

Genomic data were collected as part of the MDS National History Study or The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project and appropriate consent was received under those protocols.8,9 Sequencing reads from the MDS cohort were aligned to both masked and unmasked GRCh38 reference genomes using the BWA-MEM software package version 0.7.15 (https://github.com/lh3/bwa/releases/tag/v0.7.15),10 followed by sorting and deduplication, as detailed in a CWL (Common Workflow Language) workflow archived at https://git.io/JYbGl (last accessed December 1, 2021). Variants in the MDS cohort were called in single-sample mode using VarScan software version 2.4.2 with params “--min-coverage 20 --min-reads2 5 --min-var-freq 0.05 --strand-filter 1”.11 Data from TCGA acute myeloid leukemia samples were aligned using the same process, and somatic variants were called using an ensemble approach, described in detail in the CWL workflow at https://git.io/JYbGM (GitHub, last accessed December 1, 2021). The modified genome FASTA file used for these analyses is available at https://zenodo.org/record/4684553 (Zenodo, last accessed December 1, 2021).

Sequence data from the MDS cohort are available in the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) under accession id phs002714.v1.p1. The study is currently available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs002714.v1.p1 (dbGaP, last accessed January 23, 2022). TCGA acute myeloid leukemia data are available via the Genomic Data Commons at https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov (last accessed December 1, 2021). Pipelines used for variant calling are available at https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows (GitHub, last accessed December 1, 2021). All links in the Materials and Methods are to the specific versions of the workflows used.

Results

As part of the National Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Natural History Study (ClincialTrials.gov, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02775383), a targeted gene panel was used to sequence bone marrow samples from 120 patients either diagnosed with MDS or suspected to have MDS.8 Of these patients, 38 were eventually confirmed to have MDS or a myeloproliferative neoplasm. Initial analyses looking at sequencing quality metrics revealed coverage levels and mutation frequencies that closely matched expectations, with one exception: mutations in the U2AF1 spliceosome gene are typically observed in nearly 10% of MDS or myeloproliferative neoplasm patients, but only 2 of the 38 MDS or myeloproliferative neoplasm patients (5.2%) in this group had such mutations, both at the Q157 hotspot.1,12,13 Although this deviation was not significant (compared with the Walter et al12 cohort; P = 0.53 via Fisher's exact test), both mutations had only about 15% of the expected sequence coverage (mean of 204× depth), whereas the full targeted panel had a median coverage of 1337.3× (Supplemental Table S1). Nearly the entirety of the U2AF1 gene was likewise affected, with a median depth of only 130× and four exons with no coverage at all (Figure 1). Manual inspection of the alignments with Integrated Genomics Viewer (IGV) revealed that this poor coverage extended to a 150-kb region of the genome where the majority of reads had a mapping quality of zero (Figure 1).14 The sequence aligner BWA-MEM reserves this mapping quality zero score for reads that cannot be uniquely placed in the genome, and it generally indicates a highly repetitive sequence or problems with the underlying assemblies.10 The region with such problematic alignments spans the CBS, U2AF1, FRGCA, and CRYAA genes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Alignment issues across the U2AF1 locus. A: Sequence coverage of reads with mapping quality (MQ) >0 across the U2AF1 gene for 120 bone marrow samples sequenced after capture with a custom reagent. The mean coverage for realignments to GRCh38 are shown in red, whereas the mean coverage for alignments to the authors’ modified GRCh38 reference is shown in blue. Shading indicates the interquartile range (IQR) for each. Exons from the two primary protein-coding isoforms are shown below, and the locations of hotspot mutations at amino acids S34 and Q157 are indicated. B: An Integrated Genomics Viewer (IGV) view of sequence reads, with alignments to GRCh38 at top and alignments to the modified reference at bottom. Grey bars at top show overall coverage. Reads in white indicate multimapped reads, with mapping qualities of zero, whereas red and blue reads have higher quality alignments.

Further investigation revealed that in the GRCh38 reference build, content added to the p-arm of chromosome 21 (chr21:6427259-6580,181) contained sequence that replicated the sequence of the U2AF1 locus (chr21:43035875-43187577) with 99.0% identity. The same issue does not exist in prior reference builds GRCh36 or GRCh37. After consultation with members of the Genome Reference Consortium (GRC), it was determined that a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone (Nucleotide, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore; accession number FP236240.8) was incorrectly added to the reference genome, creating this duplicate sequence. This resulted in the alignment algorithm, BWA-MEM, splitting the reads among these two loci, thus lowering the overall coverage substantially (Figure 1, Supplemental Figure S1, and Supplemental Table S1). In addition, reads with mapping quality scores of zero are typically excluded or down-weighted during variant calling, due to the increased chance of artefactual calls, and these factors combined explained the paucity of mutations observed in U2AF1, especially at the S34F position.

To address this issue, the authors’ group created a modified version of GRCh38 that maintains the coordinate system, but masks the new duplicate sequence on chromosome 21p by replacing it with “N” characters. The authors realigned the data to this reference and observed a substantial increase in coverage and mapping qualities across the affected region. Over the exons of U2AF1, the coverage of reads with mapping quality >0 rose from a median of 0.3× to a median of 1195×. This enabled the discovery of an additional U2AF1 mutation (S34F) in this MDS cohort. The data were also aligned to GRCh37, and it was confirmed that this region was not problematic in the older reference, where the median coverage over the exons of U2AF1 was 1381× (Supplemental Table S1 and Supplemental Figure S2).

To validate this finding in an orthogonal data set, data were retrieved from acute myeloid leukemia patients sequenced for the TCGA paper.9 The data in this study were originally aligned to genome build GRCh36, and six mutations in the U2AF1 gene were reported from exome sequencing. After this paper was published, the Genomic Data Commons took this sequence dataset, realigned it (with BWA-MEM) to the stock GRCh38.d1.vd1 reference, and produced variant calls using four different algorithms.10,15 These variant files [in MAF (Mutation Annotation Format)] reported no U2AF1 mutations in the six expected samples. Their GRCh38 sequence alignments were then downloaded, and the same coverage and mapping quality issues on chromosome 21 were observed. One sample lacked any U2AF1 reads at all, due to unrelated sequencing problems (the TCGA consortium only identified the mutation using orthogonal assays). This sample was excluded from further analyses, leaving five evaluable samples.

Running another somatic variant calling pipeline on these alignments also did not reveal any U2AF1 mutations. However, after realigning the sequence data to the masked version of GRCh38, the same somatic pipeline identified all five expected mutations in U2AF1 (Supplemental Table S2).

Discussion

The reference genome is essential to modern cancer genomics, but problems with these assemblies have the potential to cause both false positive and negative results. In this study, the authors describe the latter, where changes introduced in the GRCh38 human reference build cause mutations in a cancer driver gene to be missed with standard analysis approaches. GRCh38 was first released in late 2013, but widespread adoption lagged somewhat, so some studies involving myeloid malignancies (TCGA, the Beat AML trial) have been spared this issue because they used older versions of the reference.9,16 Nonetheless, large cancer databases, including the National Cancer Institute's Genomic Data Commons, are likely missing many U2AF1 mutations due to this artefact. This also has clinical implications because U2AF1 mutations have strong associations with prognosis, and clinical trials of splice-modulating drugs are being planned or are underway.5,17,18

These findings have been reported to the GRC (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/grc/human/issues/HG-2544, last accessed December 10, 2021), but as there are no patches or new releases scheduled for the human reference genome, the problem remains unresolved in the current release of GRCh38 (GRCh38.p13). However, in the time since these analyses were performed, the GRC has released a masking file that includes this chr21 region, along with two other contaminating sequences on alternate contigs.19 Using this file to create a masked genome mirrors the approach that the authors’ analyses used and likewise resolves the issues in U2AF1 reported in this paper.

To apply this fix, the bed file can be downloaded from NCBI at https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCA/000/001/405/GCA_000001405.15_GRCh38/seqs_for_alignment_pipelines.ucsc_ids/GCA_000001405.15_GRCh38_GRC_exclusions.bed (last accessed December 1, 2021), then applied to a GRCh38 FASTA file using the bedtools maskfasta tool, followed by reindexing with the aligner of choice.20

Although masking the genome offers better quality alignments at this locus, the next leap forward will come with a new reference sequence, likely based on the draft genome recently produced by the Telomere-to-Telomere consortium.21 In the longer term, the genomics community can look forward to graph genome approaches capable of representing haplotypes from many different populations. These should further increase the accuracy of short-read genomic alignments, upon which many analyses, and increasingly clinical decisions, are based.

As these genome reference improvements are released, the genomics community will need to validate them before they can be used on clinical cases. Previous data sets will need to be realigned to ensure that changes are understood and problematic portions of assemblies that might alter diagnostic results are identified. Genomic annotations and pipelines will also need to be updated, which can be resource intensive. Hence, GRCh38 will likely remain in use for years. The use of GRC-released bed file is recommended to create a masked reference that is coordinate-compatible to be used interchangeably with the standard GRCh38 reference in cancer genomics applications. Especially, applications where detection of U2AF1 mutations is critical, including sequencing of hematological cancers or studies of spliceosome dysfunction.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nancy DiFronzo for leadership of the National MDS Natural History Study. The National MDS Natural History Study thanks the study participants, as well as the investigator teams at the participating clinical sites.

Footnotes

Supported by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Research Specialist Award R50 CA211782 (C.A.M.), Genomics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Program Project grant P01 CA101937 (T.J.L.), and the Edward P. Evans Foundation (M.J.W.). The National MDS Natural History Study has been supported by US Federal government contracts HHSN268201400003I and HHSN268201400002I from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and additional funding by the NCI to the participating member clinical centers in the NCORP and NCTN. This work has been supported in part by the Tissue Core Facility at Moffitt Cancer, an NCI designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30-CA076292).

Disclosures: None declared.

Supplemental material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.10.013.

Author Contributions

C.A.M., J.R.W., T.L.J., W.F.H., R.S.F., D.H.S., J.B.G., and M.J.W. conceptualized the study; J.S.P. led sample acquisition; C.A.M., J.R.W., T.L.J., and W.F.H. performed data analysis; C.A.M., J.R.W., and T.L.J. visualized the data; M.A.S., T.J.L., J.B.G., and M.J.W. provided supervision and funding; C.A.M., J.B.G., T.L.J., and M.J.W. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. C.A.M. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Supplemental Data

Supplemental Figure S1

Examples of poor coverage of other genes in the affected region. Examples shown are from exome sequencing of sample TCGA-AB-2912-11A. Integrated Genomics Viewer (IGV) views show sequence reads, with alignments to GRCh38 at top and alignments to the modified reference at bottom. Grey bars at top show overall coverage. Reads in white indicate multimapped reads, with mapping qualities of zero, whereas red and blue reads have higher quality alignments. A: Reads aligning to the CBS gene. B: Reads aligning to the CRYAA gene (FRGCA, the other gene in the affected region, was not targeted by this exome reagent).

mmc1.pdf (3.2MB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure S2

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) data aligned to GRCh37 from sample MDSEPID3178 (the same sample shown in Figure 1), showing no evidence of alignment issues. The U2AF1 transcript shown is ENST00000291552.9 (Ensembl, ensembl.org/index.html, last accessed January 10, 2022).

mmc2.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)
Supplemental Table S1
mmc3.xlsx (19.5KB, xlsx)
Supplemental Table S2
mmc4.docx (17KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Graubert T.A., Shen D., Ding L., Okeyo-Owuor T., Lunn C.L., Shao J., Krysiak K., Harris C.C., Koboldt D.C., Larson D.E., McLellan M.D., Dooling D.J., Abbott R.M., Fulton R.S., Schmidt H., Kalicki-Veizer J., O’Laughlin M., Grillot M., Baty J., Heath S., Frater J.L., Nasim T., Link D.C., Tomasson M.H., Westervelt P., DiPersio J.F., Mardis E.R., Ley T.J., Wilson R.K., Walter M.J. Recurrent mutations in the U2AF1 splicing factor in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet. 2011;44:53–57. doi: 10.1038/ng.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yoshida K., Sanada M., Shiraishi Y., Nowak D., Nagata Y., Yamamoto R., Sato Y., Sato-Otsubo A., Kon A., Nagasaki M., Chalkidis G., Suzuki Y., Shiosaka M., Kawahata R., Yamaguchi T., Otsu M., Obara N., Sakata-Yanagimoto M., Ishiyama K., Mori H., Nolte F., Hofmann W.-K., Miyawaki S., Sugano S., Haferlach C., Koeffler H.P., Shih L.-Y., Haferlach T., Chiba S., Nakauchi H., Miyano S., Ogawa S. Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia. Nature. 2011;478:64–69. doi: 10.1038/nature10496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sondka Z., Bamford S., Cole C.G., Ward S.A., Dunham I., Forbes S.A. The COSMIC Cancer Gene Census: describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:696–705. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0060-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Okeyo-Owuor T., White B.S., Chatrikhi R., Mohan D.R., Kim S., Griffith M., Ding L., Ketkar-Kulkarni S., Hundal J., Laird K.M., Kielkopf C.L., Ley T.J., Walter M.J., Graubert T.A. U2AF1 mutations alter sequence specificity of pre-mRNA binding and splicing. Leukemia. 2015;29:909–917. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shirai C.L., Ley J.N., White B.S., Kim S., Tibbitts J., Shao J., Ndonwi M., Wadugu B., Duncavage E.J., Okeyo-Owuor T., Liu T., Griffith M., McGrath S., Magrini V., Fulton R.S., Fronick C., O’Laughlin M., Graubert T.A., Walter M.J. Mutant U2AF1 expression alters hematopoiesis and pre-mRNA splicing in vivo. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:631–643. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ilagan J.O., Ramakrishnan A., Hayes B., Murphy M.E., Zebari A.S., Bradley P., Bradley R.K. U2AF1 mutations alter splice site recognition in hematological malignancies. Genome Res. 2015;25:14–26. doi: 10.1101/gr.181016.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fei D.L., Zhen T., Durham B., Ferrarone J., Zhang T., Garrett L., Yoshimi A., Abdel-Wahab O., Bradley R.K., Liu P., Varmus H. Impaired hematopoiesis and leukemia development in mice with a conditional knock-in allele of a mutant splicing factor gene U2af1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E10437–E10446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812669115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sekeres M.A., Gore S.D., Stablein D.M., DiFronzo N., Abel G.A., DeZern A.E., Troy J.D., Rollison D.E., Thomas J.W., Waclawiw M.A., Liu J.J., Al Baghdadi T., Walter M.J., Bejar R., Gorak E.J., Starczynowski D.T., Foran J.M., Cerhan J.R., Moscinski L.C., Komrokji R.S., Deeg H.J., Epling-Burnette P.K. The National MDS Natural History Study: design of an integrated data and sample biorepository to promote research studies in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60:3161–3171. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1616186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Ley T.J., Miller C., Ding L., Raphael B.J., Mungall A.J., Robertson A.G., et al. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2059–2074. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv [q-bioGN] 2013 arXiv:1303.3997 [Preprint] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Koboldt D.C., Zhang Q., Larson D.E., Shen D., McLellan M.D., Lin L., Miller C.A., Mardis E.R., Ding L., Wilson R.K. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012;22:568–576. doi: 10.1101/gr.129684.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Walter M.J., Shen D., Shao J., Ding L., White B.S., Kandoth C., Miller C.A., Niu B., McLellan M.D., Dees N.D., Fulton R., Elliot K., Heath S., Grillot M., Westervelt P., Link D.C., DiPersio J.F., Mardis E., Ley T.J., Wilson R.K., Graubert T.A. Clonal diversity of recurrently mutated genes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2013;27:1275–1282. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Papaemmanuil E., Gerstung M., Malcovati L., Tauro S., Gundem G., Van Loo P., et al. Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2013;122:3616–3627. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-08-518886. quiz 3699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Robinson J.T., Thorvaldsdóttir H., Winckler W., Guttman M., Lander E.S., Getz G., Mesirov J.P. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grossman R.L., Heath A.P., Ferretti V., Varmus H.E., Lowy D.R., Kibbe W.A., Staudt L.M. Toward a shared vision for cancer genomic data. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1109–1112. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tyner J.W., Tognon C.E., Bottomly D., Wilmot B., Kurtz S.E., Savage S.L., et al. Functional genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2018;562:526–531. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0623-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tefferi A., Finke C.M., Lasho T.L., Hanson C.A., Ketterling R.P., Gangat N., Pardanani A. U2AF1 mutation types in primary myelofibrosis: phenotypic and prognostic distinctions. Leukemia. 2018;32:2274–2278. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0078-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seiler M., Yoshimi A., Darman R., Chan B., Keaney G., Thomas M., et al. H3B-8800, an orally available small-molecule splicing modulator, induces lethality in spliceosome-mutant cancers. Nat Med. 2018;24:497–504. doi: 10.1038/nm.4493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wagner J., Olson N.D., Harris L., McDaniel J., Cheng H., Fungtammasan A., et al. Towards a comprehensive variation benchmark for challenging medically-relevant autosomal genes. bioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.06.07.444885. [Preprint]. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Quinlan A.R., Hall I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nurk S., Koren S., Rhie A., Rautiainen M., Bzikadze A.V., Mikheenko A., et al. The Complete Sequence of a Human Genome. bioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.05.26.445798. [Preprint]. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figure S1

Examples of poor coverage of other genes in the affected region. Examples shown are from exome sequencing of sample TCGA-AB-2912-11A. Integrated Genomics Viewer (IGV) views show sequence reads, with alignments to GRCh38 at top and alignments to the modified reference at bottom. Grey bars at top show overall coverage. Reads in white indicate multimapped reads, with mapping qualities of zero, whereas red and blue reads have higher quality alignments. A: Reads aligning to the CBS gene. B: Reads aligning to the CRYAA gene (FRGCA, the other gene in the affected region, was not targeted by this exome reagent).

mmc1.pdf (3.2MB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure S2

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) data aligned to GRCh37 from sample MDSEPID3178 (the same sample shown in Figure 1), showing no evidence of alignment issues. The U2AF1 transcript shown is ENST00000291552.9 (Ensembl, ensembl.org/index.html, last accessed January 10, 2022).

mmc2.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)
Supplemental Table S1
mmc3.xlsx (19.5KB, xlsx)
Supplemental Table S2
mmc4.docx (17KB, docx)

Articles from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES