Skip to main content
Journal of Lipid Research logoLink to Journal of Lipid Research
. 2021 Dec 22;63(2):100164. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100164

The foundations and development of lipidomics

Xianlin Han 1,2,, Richard W Gross 3,4
PMCID: PMC8953652  PMID: 34953866

Abstract

For over a century, the importance of lipid metabolism in biology was recognized but difficult to mechanistically understand due to the lack of sensitive and robust technologies for identification and quantification of lipid molecular species. The enabling technological breakthroughs emerged in the 1980s with the development of soft ionization methods (Electrospray Ionization and Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization) that could identify and quantify intact individual lipid molecular species. These soft ionization technologies laid the foundations for what was to be later named the field of lipidomics. Further innovative advances in multistage fragmentation, dramatic improvements in resolution and mass accuracy, and multiplexed sample analysis fueled the early growth of lipidomics through the early 1990s. The field exponentially grew through the use of a variety of strategic approaches, which included direct infusion, chromatographic separation, and charge-switch derivatization, which facilitated access to the low abundance species of the lipidome. In this Thematic Review, we provide a broad perspective of the foundations, enabling advances, and predicted future directions of growth of the lipidomics field.

Supplementary key words: lipids, lipid metabolism, mass spectrometry, soft ionization, electrospray ionization, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, shotgun lipidomics, chromatographic separation, charge-switch derivatization

Abbreviations: CID, collision-induced dissociation; MDMS-SL, multi-dimensional mass spectrometry-based shotgun lipidomics; PC, choline glycerophospholipid; PI, inositol glycerophospholipid; PS, serine glycerophospholipid

Complexity of lipid biochemistry

Cellular lipids are comprised of a plethora of unique structures that contain many hundreds of thousands (or more) distinct lipid molecular species (1). Historically, lipids have been broken down into nonpolar lipids (e.g., triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol) and polar lipids (choline glycerophospholipid (PC), ethanolamine glycerophospholipid (PE), inositol glycerophospholipid (PI), etc.) (2). In 2005, the LIPID MAPS consortium published a classification scheme that placed individual lipid molecular species into eight categories, including fatty acyls, glycerolipids, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, sterol lipids, prenol lipids, and saccharolipids (1). In each category, individual lipid molecular species are further divided into lipid classes based on their polar head groups. For example, glycerophospholipids are grouped the classes of PC, PE, PI, serine glycerophospholipid (PS), etc. according to their polar head groups containing phosphocholine, phosphoethanolamine, phosphoinositol, phosphoserine, and others, respectively, linked to a glycerol backbone (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Summary of classes, subclasses, and molecular species in glycerophospholipid. The polar moiety (X), which is connected to the phosphate group, defines the individual class of glycerophospholipid (GPL). The linkage (i.e., ester, ether, and vinyl ether) of the aliphatic chain to the hydroxy group at the sn-1 position of glycerol defines the structure of an individual subclass of phosphatidyl-, plasmanyl-, or plasmenyl-, respectively. The identities at R1 and R2, which vary with different number of carbon atoms, number of double bonds, the location of the double bonds, etc. define the individual molecular species of each lipid class.

In addition, owing to the existence of some special structural similarity or unique characters, the molecular species in an individual class can be further classified into subclasses of the class. For example, based on the existence of different chemical bonds of the aliphatic chain to the sn-1 glycerol hydroxy group in glycerophospholipids, individual classes in this category are further grouped into three specific subclasses (Fig. 1). Specifically, the aliphatic chain at the sn-1 position of glycerol can be linked as a bond of ester, ether, or vinyl ether moiety in individual glycerophospholipid classes, which are termed as phosphatidyl-, plasmanyl-, or plasmenyl-, respectively, according to the recommended nomenclature by International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists (3). Similar subclasses of glycerolipids are also present in the classes of diglyceride (DG) and TG (4). In addition, due to differences in the backbone of sphingosine or sphinganine (i.e., with or without existence of a double bond between C4 and C5 of sphingoid base), an individual sphingolipid class can also be grouped into sphingolipid and dihydrosphingolipid subclasses.

A large number of aliphatic chains are present in lipids varying with lengths, degrees of unsaturation, locations of double bonds, cis-trans isomers, branched chains, etc. These variable aliphatic chains form a large number of individual molecular species. It can be readily derived that a total of N3 and N4 distinct molecular species (where N is the number of different aliphatic chains) can potentially be present in the classes of TG (5) and cardiolipin (6), respectively. In fact, the presence of hundreds of individual plasmenyl PE species in mammalian organs has previously been demonstrated (7).

Further excitement arose through the demonstration that many factors of biological and chemical significance could influence the variations in cellular lipids, which extended their biological effects through altering membrane charge, dynamics, and physical properties. For example, different organisms, cell types, intracellular organelles, subcellular membrane compartment, and membrane microdomains (e.g., caveola and/or rafts) contain very distinct cellular lipid molecular species and composition (8, 9, 10). These numerous molecular species change dynamically after perturbation of the environment, nutrient source, or intermolecular interactions (11, 12, 13, 14).

The complexity of the effects of lipids on biological processes is due, in part, to their distinct physical and chemical properties that are enabling for essential cellular functions (Fig. 2) (16). These include, but are not limited to, the following: i) forming cellular membranes in biological organisms and organelles to provide hydrophobic barriers to separate cellular compartments and establish membrane potentials; ii) dynamically modulating cellular membrane physical properties to provide necessary matrices to regulate the activity of transmembrane proteins; iii) serving as intra- and extra-cellular lipid second messengers during signal transduction; iv) providing energy storage depots for cellular metabolism used in many biological processes; and v) anchoring many proteins binding to the cellular surface and membranes. Numerous studies demonstrated that, in addition to the lysosomal storage diseases (17), aberration of lipid metabolism and homeostasis is associated with many human diseases (e.g., diabetes and obesity, atherosclerosis and stroke, cancer, psychiatric disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and neurological disorders, and autoimmune disorders) (see recent reviews for references (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25)), clearly demonstrating that lipids play many vital roles in human health and disease.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The pleiotropic roles of lipids in cellular functions. Lipids fulfill multiple roles in cellular function including cellular signaling (top left) through the following: i) harboring latent second messengers of signal transduction that are released by phospholipases; ii) covalent transformation of membrane lipids into biologically active ligands by kinases (e.g., PI 3,4,5-triphosphate); iii) providing molecular scaffolds for the assembly of protein complexes mediating receptor/effector coupling (e.g., G protein-coupled receptors); and iv) coupling the vibrational, rotational, and translational energies and dynamics of membrane lipids to transmembrane proteins such as ion channels and transporters (top right), thereby facilitating dynamic cooperative lipid-protein interactions that collectively regulate transmembrane protein function. Moreover, lipids play essential roles in mitochondrial cellular bioenergetics (bottom) through the use of fatty acids as substrates for mitochondrial β-oxidation (bottom left) that result in the production of reducing equivalents (e.g., NADH). The chemical energy in NADH is harvested through oxidative phosphorylation whose flux is tightly regulated by mitochondrial membrane constituents including cardiolipins, which modulate electron transport chain (ETC) supercomplex formation. A second mechanism modulating mitochondrial energy production is the dissipation of the proton gradient by the transmembrane flip-flop of fatty acids in the mitochondrial inner membrane bilayer and the fatty acid-mediated regulation of uncoupling proteins (UCP). Reprinted with permission from ref. (15). Copyright 2011 Elsevier Ltd.

Lipidomics and its relationship with metabolomics

The majority of early studies on lipid biochemistry focused on one molecular species, one class, or one enzyme-mediated pathway. In those studies, researchers have clearly recognized that the metabolism of lipid species and specific molecular classes and subclasses is interwoven. To understand the biological relevance of these changes demands a comprehensive study on lipid metabolism that greatly catalyzed the emergence of lipidomics. Those pioneering studies on lipid homeostasis, signaling, and transport truly demonstrated the power of lipidomic analysis by using a variety of tools. Most importantly, those studies also provided the initial insight into the utility of identifying alterations in membrane structures and functions that mediate salutary biological responses in health and maladaptive alterations during disease.

The term “lipidome”, which refers to the entire collection of chemically distinct lipid molecular species in a cell, an organ, or a biological system, first appeared in the peer-reviewed publication in 2001 (26). The term “functional lipidomics” was described as “the study of the role played by membrane lipids” by Rildfors and Lindblom in 2002 (27). In 2003, Han and Gross outlined the scope of the research in lipidomics discipline through incorporating multiple techniques to “i) quantify the precise chemical constituents in a cell’s lipidome, ii) identify their cellular organization (subcellular membrane compartments and domains), iii) delineate the biochemical mechanisms through which lipids interact with each other and with crucial membrane-associated proteins, iv) determine lipid-lipid and lipid-protein conformational space and dynamics, and v) quantify alterations in lipid constituents after cellular perturbations” in their thematic review (11). This definition identifies lipidomics as a new field heavily relying on the tools, technologies, and principles of analytical chemistry for the analysis of lipid structures, abundance of discrete molecular species, cell functions, and interactions that collectively identify the dynamic changes of lipids during cellular perturbations. Accordingly, lipidomics plays an essential role in defining the biochemical mechanisms underlying lipid-related disease processes through identification and quantification of alterations in cellular lipid signaling, metabolism, trafficking, and homeostasis.

Because lipids are cellular metabolic products, lipidomics falls under the larger umbrella of the general field of “metabolomics”. In fact, most metabolomics studies cover the analysis of some classes of lipids or expand lipid analysis to a certain degree (28). However, special physical and chemical characteristics of lipids in contrast to most other water-soluble cellular metabolites make lipidomics a distinct discipline from general metabolomics, as discussed below.

As previously stated, each of most lipid classes may contain hundreds to thousands or many tens of thousands of individual lipid molecular species. This large number of individual molecular species in a class are formed by de novo synthesis, phospholipase-acyltransferase remodeling (e.g., glycerophospholipids) or represent the consequence of different isoforms of enzymatic activity (e.g., sphingolipids). From a chemical perspective, an individual node of a metabolic network indicates the transformation of a molecule connected by upstream or downstream metabolites. Unfortunately, neither the content of individual lipid molecular species nor the mass of an entire lipid class can provide information on the flux into and out of a metabolic node. Typically, analysis of metabolic flux requires measurement of stable isotope labeling from pulse-chase experiments. Thus, an understanding of metabolism in lipidomics is much more complex than that in metabolomics.

In contrast to other cellular metabolites, lipid molecular species which contain at least one hydrophobic region are extractable with some type of organic solvents to a certain degree, and their solubility is dependent on the polar water-soluble group. This physical property makes the majority of lipids readily recovered and largely separated from other cellular metabolites. However, this amphiphilic structure also readily forms aggregates even in organic solvents as the concentration of lipids increases and exceeds the ability of a given solvent to solubilize them as monomers (16). This physical characteristic makes quantification of intact individual lipid molecular species difficult and inaccurate by MS under certain conditions since different aggregates show very different ionization response factors (29). Furthermore, the existence of a large number of isomeric/isobaric lipid species in cellular lipidomes makes very challenging and special in comparison to metabolomics.

The history of lipidomics development

Classical lipid analysis with a variety of analytical techniques

In the history of lipid analysis, many tools including gas chromatography (GC), HPLC, TLC, MS with different types of ion sources (e.g., electron ionization, chemical ionization, field desorption, thermal desorption, etc.), nuclear magnetic resonance, spectroscopic techniques, etc. have all been used for lipid analysis alone or coupled each other (2, 30, 31). Each of these techniques played important roles historically in elucidating lipid structures, identifying new lipids, and quantifying lipid abundance with appropriate internal standard(s) and with noted limitations (32, 33).

With the development of fast atom bombardment-MS and later atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-MS coupled with HPLC (online or offline), analysis of intact lipid molecular species became possible (34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41) without interfering amounts of in-source fragmentation. Using these techniques, class-specific analysis of individual molecular species was also practically performed with neutral loss or precursor ion monitoring of polar head groups (36). Remarkably, a prototype of functional lipidomics was demonstrated through profiling intact phospholipid molecular species. In brief, Gross exploited the power of HPLC and fast atom bombardment-MS and identified plasmalogens as the major phospholipid constituents of sarcolemma (34), sarcoplasmic reticulum, and their presence in mitochondrial membranes (35) of canine ventricular myocardium. Those studies demonstrated that arachidonic acid was highly enriched in plasmalogen molecular species in sarcolemma and sarcoplasmic reticulum. Because the release of arachidonic acid from their storage depots is the rate-limiting step in signal transduction in eicosanoid cascade, the aforementioned findings presaged the identification of plasmalogen-selective phospholipases in the release of arachidonic acid from plasmalogen species (42, 43, 44). Furthermore, through the use of specifically labeled diacyl and plasmalogen molecular species markedly differential molecular dynamics and averaged conformational states were identified for plasmalogens in comparison to their diacyl counterparts (45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50).

Prelipidomics era (before 2003) by ESI-MS and MALDI-MS analysis

Analysis of intact cellular lipids was greatly accelerated with the advances in ionization technologies, which was in large part fueled by the development of ESI and MALDI by Nobel Laureates, John Fenn, and Koichi Tanaka (e.g., (51, 52)), respectively, in late 1980’s. This is largely because of their much softer ionization and easier practice than any other previously developed ionization techniques. Applications of these techniques for the analysis of lipid species sequentially occurred in literature in early 1990 as exemplified as follows:

In 1991, Henion’s team, in collaboration with Shieh, analyzed the standard mixtures of monoglyceride, DG, and TG in chloroform/methanol (7:3, v/v) after direct infusion with a Sciex TAGA 6000E triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (53). This represents one of the earliest studies on neutral lipids by ESI-MS. They made four novel findings, including i) there was minimal in-source fragmentation; ii) the response factors of molecular ions depended on the polarity of the classes and on the number of double bonds; iii) magnitude of ionization was inversely correlated to the acyl-chain length (54); and iv) molecular ions with sodium or ammonium adducts could be readily formed. At a similar time, Weintraub’s group characterized the fragmentation pattern of sodiated platelet activation factor (1-O-hexadecyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) by ion source-induced fragmentation with a single quadrupole ESI mass spectrometer, which was further validated with experiments using a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (55).

Not long afterward, Han and Gross (56) reported quantitative analysis of phospholipids using ESI in both positive- and negative-ion modes and demonstrated the profiles of phospholipids in lipid extracts from human erythrocyte plasma membrane as sodium adducts in the positive-ion mode and deprotonated ions in the negative-ion mode with a Finnigan (now ThermoFisher) mass spectrometer using direct infusion. In their studies, they recognized the impact of the dipole in phospholipid head groups and electric field-induced charge separation on ionization of many cellular polar lipids. By appropriate matrix adjustments of lipid solutions (i.e., changing solution pH or ionic strength), the selective ionization of different lipid classes and/or categories was accomplished. This selective ionization of lipid classes represented a de facto separation method executed within the instrument’s ion source and has been referred to as intrasource separation (57, 58, 59). This concept was developed into an important component of a shotgun lipidomics technology called “multi-dimensional mass spectrometry-based shotgun lipidomics (MDMS-SL)” (60, 61). This technology enabled the accurate identification and quantification of hundreds to thousands of individual lipid molecular species directly from the extracts of biological samples. Examples from the early studies include changes of cellular lipidomes after activation of platelets (62) and in diabetic myocardium (63).

At a similar time, LC separation coupled with ESI-MS analysis was first reported by Kim et al. (64) after their successful application of LC-thermospray MS analysis of phospholipids (65, 66). In this first study, the researchers exploited a C18 column to separate individual phospholipid molecular species and monitored protonated and/or sodiated molecular ions. In the study, they characterized the fragments from molecular ions after collision-induced dissociation (CID) in the positive-ion mode. Furthermore, they examined the differences of dynamic range and response factors between lipid classes and between molecular species in a class after optimization of experimental conditions. The developed LC-ESI/MS method was then applied for determining phospholipid molecular species in C-6 glioma cells after incubation with 22:6 fatty acid for different time intervals. LC-ESI-MS/MS was soon applied for the analysis of long chain fatty acids and their esters (67). Characterization and quantitative comparison of PE, lysocardiolipin, and cardiolipin molecular species from lipid extracts from cytoplasmic membrane of bacteria offline after HPLC separation were also conducted by ESI-MS at the similar time (68).

At this early period, characterization of commercially available lipid species was reported in many publications. Kerwin et al. (69) characterized major phospholipid classes including their subclass constituents, as well as SM and ceramide molecular species in both positive- and negative-ion modes with different adducts of molecular ions after CID. Han and Gross (70) reported the fragmentation patterns of PC, PE, and SM from sodiated and chlorinated molecular ions, and deprotonated phosphatidic acid, PS, and cardiolipin after CID. The group determined the ratios of fatty acyl carboxylates yielded from sn-1 and -2 positions for discrimination of phospholipid regioisomers and proposed potential fragmentation mechanisms. These studies led to develop a method for discriminating the regioisomers of lysoPC (71). Different from these studies on characterizing broad lipid classes, deep characterization of lipids class by class was begun in this period. For example, Hsu and Turk started this type of research on sulfatide (72) and TG molecular species (73) and then virtually on all the classes of phospholipids, sphingolipids, and glycero- and glyco-lipids, and unraveled the fragmentation mechanisms of these classes (see the review (74) for an example). Murphy et al. characterized the location of double bond(s) in fatty acyl-chains of glycerophospholipids after reaction with ozone (75) and the fragmentation patterns of glycerophospholipids esterified with eicosanoids (76). It should be mentioned that MALDI-MS after postsource decay was also applied for profiling and/or characterization of glycerophospholipid and sphingolipid fragmentation (77, 78, 79), which was clearly served as a foundation for the applications of MALDI-MS for biological samples (80, 81).

In addition to the aforementioned intrasource separation for large scale analysis of lipids, other technologic developments for large scale lipid analysis were successfully pursued. This includes prototypes of shotgun lipidomics, which includes class-specific, MDMS-SL, and a new method based on high mass accuracy/resolution spectrometry as briefed below:

In 1997, Brügger et al. (82) described the method for profiling of different classes of glycerophospholipids via neutral loss or precursor ion scanning of a head group fragment specific to a class of lipids to a certain degree. With addition of two internal standards to correct for different ionization response factors of individual lipid species in the class, the team achieved the quantitation of these species present in a biological sample. This method becomes one of the shotgun lipidomics approaches (83) and has been applied for many lipidomic studies (84, 85, 86, 87).

In 2001, Han and Gross (54) described an approach for quantitative analysis of individual TG analysis using 2D MS constituted with all neutral loss scans of fatty acyls in the TG pool. In the method, the researchers mathematically presented the different types of correction factors for 13C isotopolog distribution at the first time and also demonstrated the correlation of response factor of lithiated TG molecular ions with the total numbers of double bonds and carbon atoms in the fatty acyl-chains of individual TG species. Unfortunately, it should be pointed out that the molecular species-dependent ionization response factors have not been well recognized in the lipidomics community. This 2D MS method for analysis of TG species combined with a simulation strategy enabled scientists to identify and quantify hundreds to thousands of individual TG species (88). Moreover, the principles described in the development of MDMS-SL were broadly applied in ratiometric measurements with appropriate internal standards (29, 57, 60, 89).

In 2002, Ekroos et al. (90) described a method for quantitative profiling of total extracts of endogenous phospholipids, in which simultaneous acquisition of precursor ion spectra of multiple fragment ions using a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer to detect major classes of phospholipids in a single experiment. A mixture of isotopically labeled endogenous lipids was used as comprehensive internal standards. This method was expanded to use other strategies such as the inclusion of neutral loss scanning, data-dependent driving, all ion fragmentation, etc. using high mass accuracy/resolution instruments such as quadrupole-orbitrap type instruments (91, 92, 93, 94).

There were two articles published in the early period of lipidomics development worthy to be mentioned. The study by Koivusalo et al. (95) extensively determined the effects of fatty acyl-chain lengths and lipid concentration on ionization response factors using a mixture of 14 PC molecular species. They found that response factors decreased as chain length increased, and the increased concentrations led to marked reduction of response factors of PC molecular species containing longer fatty acyl-chains. Unfortunately, two important factors regarding the processing of data failure to correct for 13C isotopolog distribution and lipid aggregation were not suitably considered. In contrast, a study by Delong et al. (96) demonstrated that LC separations resulted in variable losses of different classes of lipids. Further, they demonstrated the concentration-dependent linearity in the low concentration regime and the effects of CID energy on response factors. The knowledge obtained from these early studies greatly impacted the development of lipidomics and the broad utility of ESI-MS.

There were many studies during this early era of lipidomics that increased the power of this technology including large scale analyses of lipids, applications of ESI-MS for understanding biological phenomena, and the use of MALDI-MS with appropriate matrices for lipid analysis. Readers interested in these studies should find them in the literature in early review articles published in early 2000 (58, 80, 97, 98).

The emerging of lipidomics and names of various “types” of lipidomics

Despite the appearance of the terms “lipidome” (26), “functional lipidomics” (27), and “lipidomic analysis” (99) in literature before 2003, the emergence collection of thoughts in the field was facilitated through the use of definitive definitions in 2003 (11, 100), demonstration of the power of synergistic technologies (11, 101, 102), and the deeply penetrating power of lipidomics in biological applications (11, 103, 104, 105). Blair et al. (101) first demonstrated a novel technique to study eicosanoid enantiomers and regioisomers through use of electron capture atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-MS after chiral chromatography and quantified molecular species using stable isotope dilution.

At a similar time, the LIPID MAPS consortium which was led by Dr Edward A Dennis and funded by the National Institute of Health was formed to facilitate the development of lipidomics in multiple areas. These included systematic classification of lipids (1), preparation of lipid standards for quantification, and development of databases (106, 107). The aim of this consortium was to characterize lipid metabolites and to quantify changes in their levels and subcellular localization within a cell. This movement along with the publication of many informative review articles around 2005 (29, 58, 108, 109, 110, 111) greatly accelerated the growth and development of lipidomics.

The emerging of lipidomics was well indicated with the bloom of the books, and special issues described the methods and applications in lipidomics in this period. In the late years, lipidomics studies on a special category of lipids have been frequently given a subtitle of lipidomics, such as sphingolipidomics (112, 113, 114), phospholipidomics (115, 116), mediator lipidomics (110), oxidative lipidomics (117, 118), etc. Similarly, lipidomics applications to an area of research have also been commonly named a subtype of lipidomics, such as neurolipidomics (119, 120, 121), plant lipidomics (122, 123, 124), yeast lipidomics (125, 126), dynamic lipidomics (127, 128, 129), etc. It would like to be particularly emphasized that lipidomics is not a sole analytical science; the determined/annotated lipid molecular species have to follow the biological principles (130).

Current status of lipidomics

Lipidomics has undergone a fundamental distinction in the types of experiments and strategies that are performed. One strategy, now known as targeted lipidomics seeks to identify specific metabolites that are known to exist and alterations in their abundance. This type of research is often hypothesis driven. A second method, untargeted lipidomics identifies global alterations in lipid molecular species and their abundance for both known and unknown lipids. Untargeted lipidomics is typically used for hypothesis generation through identification of unanticipated changes in both known and unknown lipid molecular species and changes in their abundance. Typically, the latter is used to develop hypotheses and new perspectives that were not previously known. There exist some platforms which follows in-between. For example, MDMS-SL targets to individual lipid classes but untargets to individual molecular species of a lipid class of interest.

For targeted lipidomics, derivatization has been widely applied taking advantage of the physical properties of the analyte and functional groups in the targets that can easily be derivatized. For example, charge-switch derivatization can lead up to 100-fold increases in signal to noise ratios and be used to confirm the initial presence of the functional group and make a mass shift to remove target analytes from crowded regions of the mass spectrum. Of course, with increased sensitivity and high resolution/accurate mass measurement, the combination of technology development and derivatization can vastly improve definitive identification and quantification of extremely low abundance analytes for both shotgun lipidomics and LC-MS approaches (131). In global analyses, increase in the coverage of lipid classes and molecular species is a key factor. The broader the coverage is, the more likely the approach will allow dissection of entire metabolic pathways of lipid classes/subclasses and individual species in a system. Understanding the inter-relationship between classes and species within a metabolic pathway or connecting metabolic networks is essential for chemical characterization. Fortunately, multiple synergistic approaches have vastly improved the power of identification and quantitation in the understanding of the changes of hundreds to thousands of individual species (60, 93, 132, 133). It should be emphasized that LIPID MAPS, now supported by the Wellcome Trust and providing expanding databases, educational materials, and numerous tools and software, should be the rich resources for identification and quantification of cellular lipidomes.

In the last 20 years, development of lipidomics technologies has vastly improved by the following: i) extensive characterization of the structures of known lipid classes and subclasses and uncovering both new classes and new molecular species of lipids (e.g., (4, 74, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138)); ii) sensitive quantification of lipid species at attomole to femtomole levels from a variety of biological samples (e.g., (132, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146)); iii) applications for biomedical and biological studies through pathway/network analysis; iv) biomarker development that facilitates prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis of disease states (see recent reviews for references (83, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156)); v) determining the alterations of lipids in spatial distribution via mapping complex organs by MALDI imaging (see recent reviews for references (157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162)); and vi) advances in bioinformatics to facilitate real time data processing (e.g., (88, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174)).

Currently, in our view, the following areas become the focal points in lipidomics, which largely reflects the development of the field:

Deeply penetrating analysis of individual lipid molecular species

As the development of lipidomics proceeded, strategies for chemical analysis of lipid metabolites have greatly extended to identify regioisomers, stereoisomers, and diasterotopic molecular species. These include both the use of multistage fragmentation to identify sn-1 versus sn-2 chains, location of double bond(s) in fatty acyl-chains, and cis-trans isomerism. To this end, newly developed technology/instrumentation including ultraviolet photodissociation MS (175) and a variety of chemical reactions/derivatization approaches have been broadly used for deep analysis of lipid molecular structures, including Paternò–Büchi reaction (176, 177, 178) and click chemistry (179, 180, 181). Readers interested in this area of work can find the comprehensive review of deep phenotyping with chemical reaction/derivatization approaches by Xia in this Thematic Review series.

Accurate quantification and standardization

As discussed in the “Introduction” section and recognized by our group a decade ago (182), accurate quantification of lipid species is particularly important for lipidomics especially in confounding situations where special attention is needed to exclude structures with the same elemental composition. To this end, the use of internal standards can aid accurate quantification and diagnostic derivatization in this process, as previously discussed (183).

However, an inter-laboratory ring trial with quantification of lipids in human plasma has demonstrated the huge variations of the quantified levels of lipid molecular species (184), indicating the potential issues with accurate quantification of individual lipid species. Therefore, standardization and harmonization in an accurate, quantitative, high throughput manner has recently caught the attention of lipidomics community (185, 186, 187), leading to the formation of Lipidomics Standards Initiative Consortium and then the establishment of International Lipidomics Society. It becomes more and more clear that guidelines for the entire workflow of lipidomic analysis, from preanalytics, lipid extractions, MS, data processing and reporting, need to be developed and standardized. To this end, a guideline for reporting MS-based lipidomics has recently been proposed (187). Readers interested in this area of work could also find further discussion by Kofeler et al. (188) in this Thematic Review series.

Clinical lipidomics

Clinical lipidomics is a new extension of lipidomics, which aims to investigate metabolic pathways and networks through quantifying the complete spectrum of lipidomes in cells, biopsies, and/or body fluids of patients, and to link the lipidomic components to clinical proteomics, genomics, and phenomics to accurately diagnose human diseases (189, 190). This type of study expands the original biomarker discovery/development using the lipidomics approach into a much broader, clinic-related research area. This area of research includes i) identification of molecular mechanism(s) mediating diseases for potential therapeutic development; ii) connection of altered lipid profiles with gene variants of patients via a genome-wide association study on selected particular genes through which the metabolic pathways are mediated and the network is interconnected; and iii) all types of the information from lipidomes such as the content and composition of individual species, as well as the mass ratios of these species for subtyping disease phenotypes and/or subgroups of patients to serve the purpose of precision medicine for accurate treatment; etc. (e.g., (191, 192, 193, 194, 195)). Readers interested in this area of work could also find the comprehensive review by Meikle in this Thematic Review series (196).

Functional lipidomics

Defining the function of a class, a subclass, and individual molecular species of lipids in a cell, organ, or organism is a long-standing task of lipid biochemistry, which represents the definition of functional lipidomics (27). However, functional lipidomics not only includes this type of long-standing studies but has evolved further in studying altered lipids in specific disease states and stages of an organism’s life cycle. As illustrated in Fig. 3, functional lipidomics expands i) uncovering the altered lipids between states by lipidomic analysis; ii) identifying the alterations in metabolic pathways and networks leading to the changed lipidomes at proteome, transcriptome, and genome levels; iii) investigating the biological/pathological sequala of the altered lipids; and iv) developing potential therapeutics for the treatment of diseases and/or aging based on the identified signaling, regulators, and sequala.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic illustration of functional lipidomics. Functional lipidomics represents a new research direction in lipidomics, in which the altered lipids between different states are uncovered through lipidomic analysis; then the molecular mechanism(s) underpinning the changed lipids and the biological/pathological sequala of the changed lipids are identified; and finally, potential therapeutics for treatment of diseases and/or aging based on the identified signaling, regulators, and sequala are developed.

Functional lipidomics was proposed at the earliest stage of lipidomics development (27, 197, 198) and has been caught particular attention in the field and conducted in many studies (e.g., (150, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203)). It is regrettable that the majority of lipidomic studies are still at their basic levels, i.e., profiling lipidomes, and unable to penetrate into the interpretation of changes in lipidomes and identification of the underlying molecular mechanism(s) leading to lipid changes. This is largely because of the disconnect between analytical chemists who are capable of developing lipidomic methodology to conduct comprehensive lipidomic analysis and those possessing broad knowledge in lipid metabolism and having resource including animal models to test their theories of associated biology and the effects of drugs on the observed process.

Lipidomics of subcellular organelles

The cellular function is tightly associated with the internal organization of cells, in which multiple subcellular compartments exist possessing specialized roles. These organelles largely hold the secrets for normal cellular function, progression of disease, and a plethora of interactions among cellular molecules that define life. Lipids play a key role in organelle functions. Different organelles contain very different lipidomes, which are known to vary with a circadian rhythm (204) and patho(physio)logical conditions (10, 205). For example, ether lipids and polyphosphoinositides play important roles in exosomal biology (206). Therefore, lipidomics provides detailed information of these organelles, which has the potential for insights into the possible origin, structure, and functional alterations of individual organelles. Fingerprinting the changes of lipid molecular species of an organelle after a perturbation also has the power to connect changes in organelle function with the perturbation, thereby providing insights into molecular mechanism(s) of lipid changes and altered functions to a certain degree. Dynamic labeling of lipids in pulse chase experiments can determine the turnover rate and flux of individual lipid molecular species under specific perturbations, thereby providing a real time dynamic picture of lipid flux in individual organelles.

However, organelle lipidomics still remains as a challenge for many scientists largely because of the difficulty to isolate a large quantity of relatively pure organelles. Fortunately, this issue will likely be resolved with the development of sensitive and spatially focused methodologies including secondary ion MS, as previously demonstrated (207). Moreover, new technologies, robotic fluid handling systems, and spatial reconstruction methods should greatly facilitate lipidomics of subcellular organelles. Accordingly, it can be foreseen that lipidomics at the organelle levels will become a part of the armamentarium of lipidomics in the near future.

Perspective

In the near future, the focal points at the current lipidomics (see above) will inevitably evolve and be solved. Moreover, the following areas of research in lipidomics appear in demand and should be well developed in the future. These include, but are not limited to, i) further increases in the coverage of lipid classes and individual species (particularly for those very low abundance species) using an automated, quantitative, high throughput lipidomics in combination with instrumental advances and chemical breakthroughs; ii) single cell lipidomics, as stimulated with the fruitful development and powerful applications of single cell genomics and demonstrated with limited studies (208, 209, 210), will likely become a rising star; iii) MS imaging should evolve into more quantitative and multi-dimensional; iv) more complex dynamic studies in metabolic flux to reveal the reaction rates in lipid metabolism to comprehensively determine lipid metabolism in the molecular levels and provide true understanding of the roles of lipids in biomedical sciences; and v) integration of lipidomics with other omics considering the relationship with genes, transcripts, and enzyme data to perform metabolic pathway reconstruction and flux analyses is in high demand, which is still at the very early stage of development (211). Collectively, as an interdisciplinary field, lipidomics will continue its exponential growth and become fully integrated with the other omics technologies and phenotypic alterations.

Data availability

All data are contained within the article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by National Institute on Aging Grants RF1 AG061729, RF1 AG061872, and U19 AG069701, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant U54 NS110435, as well as from the UT Health SA intramural institutional research funds, the Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, and the Methodist Hospital Foundation.

Author contributions

X. H. writing–original draft; R. W. G. writing–review and editing.

References

  • 1.Fahy E., Subramaniam S., Brown H.A., Glass C.K., Merrill A.H., Jr., Murphy R.C., Raetz C.R., Russell D.W., Seyama Y., Shaw W., Shimizu T., Spener F., van Meer G., VanNieuwenhze M.S., White S.H., et al. A comprehensive classification system for lipids. J. Lipid Res. 2005;46:839–861. doi: 10.1194/jlr.E400004-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Christie W.W., Han X. 4th Ed. The Oily Press; Bridgwater, England: 2010. Lipid Analysis: Isolation, Separation, Identification and Lipidomic Analysis. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclatur The nomenclature of lipids (recommendations 1976) Eur. J. Biochem. 1977;79:11–21. 1977. Hoppe-Seylers Z. Physiol. Chem. 358: 617–631; 1977. Lipids. 12: 455–468; 1977. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 17: 157–171; 1978. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 21: 159–173; 1978. J. Lipid Res. 19: 114–128; 1978. Biochem. J. 171: 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bartz R., Li W.H., Venables B., Zehmer J.K., Roth M.R., Welti R., Anderson R.G., Liu P., Chapman K.D. Lipidomics reveals that adiposomes store ether lipids and mediate phospholipid traffic. J. Lipid Res. 2007;48:837–847. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600413-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Han X., Ye H. Overview of lipidomic analysis of triglyceride molecular species in biological lipid extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021;69:8895–8909. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schlame M., Rua D., Greenberg M.L. The biosynthesis and functional role of cardiolipin. Prog. Lipid Res. 2000;39:257–288. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7827(00)00005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang K., Zhao Z., Gross R.W., Han X. Shotgun lipidomics identifies a paired rule for the presence of isomeric ether phospholipid molecular species. PLoS One. 2007;2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hicks A.M., DeLong C.J., Thomas M.J., Samuel M., Cui Z. Unique molecular signatures of glycerophospholipid species in different rat tissues analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1761:1022–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pike L.J., Han X., Chung K.N., Gross R.W. Lipid rafts are enriched in arachidonic acid and plasmenylethanolamine and their composition is independent of caveolin-1 expression: a quantitative electrospray ionization/mass spectrometric analysis. Biochemistry. 2002;41:2075–2088. doi: 10.1021/bi0156557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brugger B. Lipidomics: analysis of the lipid composition of cells and subcellular organelles by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014;83:79–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Han X., Gross R.W. Global analyses of cellular lipidomes directly from crude extracts of biological samples by ESI mass spectrometry: a bridge to lipidomics. J. Lipid Res. 2003;44:1071–1079. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R300004-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guan X.L., Cestra G., Shui G., Kuhrs A., Schittenhelm R.B., Hafen E., van der Goot F.G., Robinett C.C., Gatti M., Gonzalez-Gaitan M., Wenk M.R. Biochemical membrane lipidomics during Drosophila development. Dev. Cell. 2013;24:98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tanner L.B., Chng C., Guan X.L., Lei Z., Rozen S.G., Wenk M.R. Lipidomics identifies a requirement for peroxisomal function during influenza virus replication. J. Lipid Res. 2014;55:1357–1365. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M049148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ferreira M.S., de Oliveira D.N., de Oliveira R.N., Allegretti S.M., Catharino R.R. Screening the life cycle of Schistosoma mansoni using high-resolution mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2014;845:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gross R.W., Han X. Lipidomics at the interface of structure and function in systems biology. Chem. Biol. 2011;18:284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vance D.E., Vance J.E. 5th Ed. Elsevier Science B.V.; Amsterdam: 2008. Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Breiden B., Sandhoff K. Mechanism of secondary ganglioside and lipid accumulation in lysosomal disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:2566. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Han X. Lipid alterations in the earliest clinically recognizable stage of Alzheimer's disease: implication of the role of lipids in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2005;2:65–77. doi: 10.2174/1567205052772786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Skrha J., Jr. Diabetes, lipids, and CV risk. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2021;23:8. doi: 10.1007/s11883-021-00905-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bornfeldt K.E., Linton M.F., Fisher E.A., Guyton J.R. JCL roundtable: lipids and inflammation in atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2021;15:3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2021.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou J., Zhao J., Su C. Role of aberrant lipid metabolism of cancer stem cells in cancer progression. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2021;21:631–639. doi: 10.2174/1568009619666210316112333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Morris G., Puri B.K., Walker A.J., Maes M., Carvalho A.F., Bortolasci C.C., Walder K., Berk M. Shared pathways for neuroprogression and somatoprogression in neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019;107:862–882. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Falabella M., Vernon H.J., Hanna M.G., Claypool S.M., Pitceathly R.D.S. Cardiolipin, mitochondria, and neurological disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2021;32:224–237. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2021.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kopin L., Lowenstein C. Dyslipidemia. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017;167:ITC81–ITC96. doi: 10.7326/AITC201712050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen W., Wang Q., Zhou B., Zhang L., Zhu H. Lipid metabolism profiles in rheumatic diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:643520. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.643520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kishimoto K., Urade R., Ogawa T., Moriyama T. Nondestructive quantification of neutral lipids by thin-layer chromatography and laser-fluorescent scanning: suitable methods for “lipidome” analysis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001;281:657–662. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lindblom G., Oradd G., Rilfors L., Morein S. Regulation of lipid composition in Acholeplasma laidlawii and Escherichia coli membranes: NMR studies of lipid lateral diffusion at different growth temperatures. Biochemistry. 2002;41:11512–11515. doi: 10.1021/bi0263098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Domenick T.M., Gill E.L., Vedam-Mai V., Yost R.A. Mass spectrometry-based cellular metabolomics: current approaches, applications, and future directions. Anal. Chem. 2021;93:546–566. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Han X., Gross R.W. Shotgun lipidomics: multi-dimensional mass spectrometric analysis of cellular lipidomes. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 2005;2:253–264. doi: 10.1586/14789450.2.2.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Robins S.J., Patton G.M. Separation of phospholipid molecular species by high performance liquid chromatography: potentials for use in metabolic studies. J. Lipid Res. 1986;27:131–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McCluer R.H., Ullman M.D., Jungalwala F.B. HPLC of glycosphingolipids and phospholipids. Adv. Chromatogr. 1986;25:309–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wood R., Harlow R.D. Structural analyses of rat liver phosphoglycerides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1969;135:272–281. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(69)90540-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wood R., Harlow R.D. Structural studies of neutral glycerides and phosphoglycerides of rat liver. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1969;131:495–501. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(69)90421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gross R.W. High plasmalogen and arachidonic acid content of canine myocardial sarcolemma: a fast atom bombardment mass spectroscopic and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopic characterization. Biochemistry. 1984;23:158–165. doi: 10.1021/bi00296a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gross R.W. Identification of plasmalogen as the major phospholipid constituent of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biochemistry. 1985;24:1662–1668. doi: 10.1021/bi00328a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cole M.J., Enke C.G. Direct determination of phospholipid structures in microorganisms by fast atom bombardment triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1991;63:1032–1038. doi: 10.1021/ac00010a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kayganich K.A., Murphy R.C. Fast atom bombardment tandem mass spectrometric identification of diacyl, alkylacyl, and alk-1-enylacyl molecular species of glycerophosphoethanolamine in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Anal. Chem. 1992;64:2965–2971. doi: 10.1021/ac00047a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Byrdwell W.C., Emken E.A., Neff W.E., Adlof R.O. Quantitative analysis of triglycerides using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. Lipids. 1996;31:919–935. doi: 10.1007/BF02522685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Byrdwell W.C. Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry for analysis of lipids. Lipids. 2001;36:327–346. doi: 10.1007/s11745-001-0725-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fenwick G.R., Eagles J., Self R. Fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry of intact phospholipids and related compounds. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1983;10:382–386. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Maffei Facino R., Carini M., Aldini G., Colombo L. Characterization of the intermediate products of lipid peroxidation in phosphatidylcholine liposomes by fast-atom bombardment mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry techniques. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1996;10:1148–1152. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ford D.A., Gross R.W. Identification of endogenous 1-O-alk-1'-enyl-2-acyl-sn-glycerol in myocardium and its effective utilization by choline phosphotransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:2644–2650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ford D.A., Gross R.W. Plasmenylethanolamine is the major storage depot for arachidonic acid in rabbit vascular smooth muscle and is rapidly hydrolyzed after angiotensin II stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989;86:3479–3483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hazen S.L., Stuppy R.J., Gross R.W. Purification and characterization of canine myocardial cytosolic phospholipase A2. A calcium-independent phospholipase with absolute sn-2 regiospecificity for diradyl glycerophospholipids. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:10622–10630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ford D.A., Gross R.W. Differential metabolism of diradyl glycerol molecular subclasses and molecular species by rabbit brain diglyceride kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:12280–12286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pak J.H., Bork V.P., Norberg R.E., Creer M.H., Wolf R.A., Gross R.W. Disparate molecular dynamics of plasmenylcholine and phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochemistry. 1987;26:4824–4830. doi: 10.1021/bi00389a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Han X., Zupan L.A., Hazen S.L., Gross R.W. Semisynthesis and purification of homogeneous plasmenylcholine molecular species. Anal. Biochem. 1992;200:119–124. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90286-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Han X., Gross R.W. Plasmenylcholine and phosphatidylcholine membrane bilayers possess distinct conformational motifs. Biochemistry. 1990;29:4992–4996. doi: 10.1021/bi00472a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Han X., Chen X., Gross R.W. Chemical and magnetic inequivalence of glycerol protons in individual subclasses of choline glycerophospholipids: implications for subclass-specific changes in membrane conformational states. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113:7104–7109. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Han X., Gross R.W. Nonmonotonic alterations in the fluorescence anisotropy of polar head group labeled fluorophores during the lamellar to hexagonal phase transition of phospholipids. Biophys. J. 1992;63:309–316. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81616-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fenn J.B. Electrospray wings for molecular elephants (Nobel lecture) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2003;42:3871–3894. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tanaka K. The origin of macromolecule ionization by laser irradiation (Nobel lecture) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2003;42:3860–3870. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Duffin K.L., Henion J.D., Shieh J.J. Electrospray and tandem mass spectrometric characterization of acylglycerol mixtures that are dissolved in nonpolar solvents. Anal. Chem. 1991;63:1781–1788. doi: 10.1021/ac00017a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Han X., Gross R.W. Quantitative analysis and molecular species fingerprinting of triacylglyceride molecular species directly from lipid extracts of biological samples by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 2001;295:88–100. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Weintraub S.T., Pinckard R.N., Hail M. Electrospray ionization for analysis of platelet-activating factor. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1991;5:309–311. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1290050702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Han X., Gross R.W. Electrospray ionization mass spectroscopic analysis of human erythrocyte plasma membrane phospholipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994;91:10635–10639. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Han X., Yang J., Cheng H., Ye H., Gross R.W. Towards fingerprinting cellular lipidomes directly from biological samples by two-dimensional electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 2004;330:317–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Han X., Gross R.W. Shotgun lipidomics: electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis and quantitation of the cellular lipidomes directly from crude extracts of biological samples. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2005;24:367–412. doi: 10.1002/mas.20023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Han X., Yang K., Yang J., Fikes K.N., Cheng H., Gross R.W. Factors influencing the electrospray intrasource separation and selective ionization of glycerophospholipids. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006;17:264–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang K., Cheng H., Gross R.W., Han X. Automated lipid identification and quantification by multi-dimensional mass spectrometry-based shotgun lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:4356–4368. doi: 10.1021/ac900241u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Han X., Yang K., Gross R.W. Multi-dimensional mass spectrometry-based shotgun lipidomics and novel strategies for lipidomic analyses. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2012;31:134–178. doi: 10.1002/mas.20342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Han X., Gubitosi-Klug R.A., Collins B.J., Gross R.W. Alterations in individual molecular species of human platelet phospholipids during thrombin stimulation: electrospray ionization mass spectrometry-facilitated identification of the boundary conditions for the magnitude and selectivity of thrombin-induced platelet phospholipid hydrolysis. Biochemistry. 1996;35:5822–5832. doi: 10.1021/bi952927v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Han X., Abendschein D.R., Kelley J.G., Gross R.W. Diabetes-induced changes in specific lipid molecular species in rat myocardium. Biochem. J. 2000;352:79–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kim H.Y., Wang T.C., Ma Y.C. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry of phospholipids using electrospray ionization. Anal. Chem. 1994;66:3977–3982. doi: 10.1021/ac00094a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yergey J.A., Kim H.Y., Salem N., Jr. High-performance liquid chromatography/thermospray mass spectrometry of eicosanoids and novel oxygenated metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid. Anal. Chem. 1986;58:1344–1348. doi: 10.1021/ac00298a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kim H.Y., Salem N., Jr. Application of thermospray high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for the determination of phospholipids and related compounds. Anal. Chem. 1987;59:722–726. doi: 10.1021/ac00132a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kuksis A., Myher J.J. Application of tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of long-chain carboxylic acids. J. Chromatogr. B. 1995;671:35–70. doi: 10.1016/0378-4347(95)00212-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hoischen C., Ihn W., Gura K., Gumpert J. Structural characterization of molecular phospholipid species in cytoplasmic membranes of the cell wall-less Streptomyces hygroscopicus L form by use of electrospray ionization coupled with collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry. J. Bacteriol. 1997;179:3437–3442. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.11.3437-3442.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kerwin J.L., Tuininga A.R., Ericsson L.H. Identification of molecular species of glycerophospholipids and sphingomyelin using electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 1994;35:1102–1114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Han X., Gross R.W. Structural determination of picomole amounts of phospholipids via electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995;6:1202–1210. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(95)00568-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Han X., Gross R.W. Structural determination of lysophospholipid regioisomers by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:451–457. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hsu F.-F., Bohrer A., Turk J. Electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric analysis of sulfatide. Determination of fragmentation patterns and characterization of molecular species expressed in brain and in pancreatic islets. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998;1392:202–216. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2760(98)00034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hsu F.-F., Turk J. Structural characterization of triacylglycerols as lithiated adducts by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using low-energy collisionally activated dissociation on a triple stage quadrupole instrument. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999;10:587–599. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00035-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hsu F.F., Turk J. Electrospray ionization with low-energy collisionally activated dissociation tandem mass spectrometry of glycerophospholipids: mechanisms of fragmentation and structural characterization. J. Chromatogr. B. 2009;877:2673–2695. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Harrison K.A., Murphy R.C. Direct mass spectrometric analysis of ozonides: application to unsaturated glycerophosphocholine lipids. Anal. Chem. 1996;68:3224–3230. doi: 10.1021/ac960302c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nakamura T., Bratton D.L., Murphy R.C. Analysis of epoxyeicosatrienoic and monohydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids esterified to phospholipids in human red blood cells by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997;32:888–896. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199708)32:8<888::AID-JMS548>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Harvey D.J. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of sphingo- and glycosphingo-lipids. J. Mass Spectrom. 1995;30:1311–1324. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Al-Saad K.A., Zabrouskov V., Siems W.F., Knowles N.R., Hannan R.M., Hill H.H., Jr. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of lipids: ionization and prompt fragmentation patterns. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003;17:87–96. doi: 10.1002/rcm.858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Schiller J., Suss R., Petkovic M., Zschornig O., Arnold K. Negative-ion matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of complex phospholipid mixtures in the presence of phosphatidylcholine: a cautionary note on peak assignment. Anal. Biochem. 2002;309:311–314. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(02)00308-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schiller J., Suss R., Arnhold J., Fuchs B., Lessig J., Muller M., Petkovic M., Spalteholz H., Zschornig O., Arnold K. Matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry in lipid and phospholipid research. Prog. Lipid Res. 2004;43:449–488. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2004.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Fuchs B., Suss R., Schiller J. An update of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in lipid research. Prog. Lipid Res. 2010;49:450–475. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Brugger B., Erben G., Sandhoff R., Wieland F.T., Lehmann W.D. Quantitative analysis of biological membrane lipids at the low picomole level by nano-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997;94:2339–2344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yang K., Han X. Lipidomics: techniques, applications, and outcomes related to biomedical sciences. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016;41:954–969. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Schneiter R., Brugger B., Sandhoff R., Zellnig G., Leber A., Lampl M., Athenstaedt K., Hrastnik C., Eder S., Daum G., Paltauf F., Wieland F.T., Kohlwein S.D. Electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) analysis of the lipid molecular species composition of yeast subcellular membranes reveals acyl chain-based sorting/remodeling of distinct molecular species en route to the plasma membrane. J. Cell Biol. 1999;146:741–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.4.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Brugger B., Graham C., Leibrecht I., Mombelli E., Jen A., Wieland F., Morris R. The membrane domains occupied by glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored prion protein and Thy-1 differ in lipid composition. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:7530–7536. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310207200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Welti R., Li W., Li M., Sang Y., Biesiada H., Zhou H.-E., Rajashekar C.B., Williams T.D., Wang X. Profiling membrane lipids in plant stress responses. Role of phospholipase Da in freezing-induced lipid changes in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:31994–32002. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205375200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Welti R., Wang X. Lipid species profiling: a high-throughput approach to identify lipid compositional changes and determine the function of genes involved in lipid metabolism and signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004;7:337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Han R.H., Wang M., Fang X., Han X. Simulation of triacylglycerol ion profiles: bioinformatics for interpretation of triacylglycerol biosynthesis. J. Lipid Res. 2013;54:1023–1032. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M033837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wang M., Han X. Multidimensional mass spectrometry-based shotgun lipidomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014;1198:203–220. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1258-2_13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ekroos K., Chernushevich I.V., Simons K., Shevchenko A. Quantitative profiling of phospholipids by multiple precursor ion scanning on a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2002;74:941–949. doi: 10.1021/ac015655c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Schwudke D., Oegema J., Burton L., Entchev E., Hannich J.T., Ejsing C.S., Kurzchalia T., Shevchenko A. Lipid profiling by multiple precursor and neutral loss scanning driven by the data-dependent acquisition. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:585–595. doi: 10.1021/ac051605m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ejsing C.S., Duchoslav E., Sampaio J., Simons K., Bonner R., Thiele C., Ekroos K., Shevchenko A. Automated identification and quantification of glycerophospholipid molecular species by multiple precursor ion scanning. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:6202–6214. doi: 10.1021/ac060545x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Almeida R., Pauling J.K., Sokol E., Hannibal-Bach H.K., Ejsing C.S. Comprehensive lipidome analysis by shotgun lipidomics on a hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap-linear ion trap mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2015;26:133–148. doi: 10.1007/s13361-014-1013-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sokol E., Ulven T., Faergeman N.J., Ejsing C.S. Comprehensive and quantitative profiling of lipid species in human milk, cow milk and a phospholipid-enriched milk formula by GC and MS/MS(ALL) Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2015;117:751–759. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.201400575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Koivusalo M., Haimi P., Heikinheimo L., Kostiainen R., Somerharju P. Quantitative determination of phospholipid compositions by ESI-MS: effects of acyl chain length, unsaturation, and lipid concentration on instrument response. J. Lipid Res. 2001;42:663–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.DeLong C.J., Baker P.R.S., Samuel M., Cui Z., Thomas M.J. Molecular species composition of rat liver phospholipids by ESI-MS/MS: the effect of chromatography. J. Lipid Res. 2001;42:1959–1968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Murphy R.C., Axelsen P.H. Mass spectrometric analysis of long-chain lipids. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2011;30:579–599. doi: 10.1002/mas.20284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Griffiths W.J. Tandem mass spectrometry in the study of fatty acids, bile acids, and steroids. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2003;22:81–152. doi: 10.1002/mas.10046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Serhan C.N., Hong S., Gronert K., Colgan S.P., Devchand P.R., Mirick G., Moussignac R.L. Resolvins: a family of bioactive products of omega-3 fatty acid transformation circuits initiated by aspirin treatment that counter proinflammation signals. J. Exp. Med. 2002;196:1025–1037. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Lagarde M., Geloen A., Record M., Vance D., Spener F. Lipidomics is emerging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003;1634:61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2003.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lee S.H., Williams M.V., DuBois R.N., Blair I.A. Targeted lipidomics using electron capture atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003;17:2168–2176. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Isaac G., Bylund D., Mansson J.E., Markides K.E., Bergquist J. Analysis of phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin molecular species from brain extracts using capillary liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2003;128:111–119. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(03)00168-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Esch S.W., Williams T.D., Biswas S., Chakrabarty A., Levine S.M. Sphingolipid profile in the CNS of the twitcher (globoid cell leukodystrophy) mouse: a lipidomics approach. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2003;49:779–787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Cheng H., Xu J., McKeel D.W., Jr., Han X. Specificity and potential mechanism of sulfatide deficiency in Alzheimer's disease: an electrospray ionization mass spectrometric study. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2003;49:809–818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Marcheselli V.L., Hong S., Lukiw W.J., Tian X.H., Gronert K., Musto A., Hardy M., Gimenez J.M., Chiang N., Serhan C.N., Bazan N.G. Novel docosanoids inhibit brain ischemia-reperfusion-mediated leukocyte infiltration and pro-inflammatory gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:43807–43817. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305841200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Sud M., Fahy E., Cotter D., Brown A., Dennis E.A., Glass C.K., Merrill A.H., Jr., Murphy R.C., Raetz C.R., Russell D.W., Subramaniam S. LMSD: LIPID MAPS structure database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D527–D532. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Cotter D., Maer A., Guda C., Saunders B., Subramaniam S. LMPD: LIPID MAPS proteome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D507–D510. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wenk M.R. The emerging field of lipidomics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005;4:594–610. doi: 10.1038/nrd1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.van Meer G. Cellular lipidomics. EMBO J. 2005;24:3159–3165. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Serhan C.N. Mediator lipidomics. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2005;77:4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2004.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Watson A.D. Thematic review series: systems biology approaches to metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. Lipidomics: a global approach to lipid analysis in biological systems. J. Lipid Res. 2006;47:2101–2111. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R600022-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Merrill A.H., Jr., Sullards M.C., Allegood J.C., Kelly S., Wang E. Sphingolipidomics: high-throughput, structure-specific, and quantitative analysis of sphingolipids by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Methods. 2005;36:207–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Merrill A.H., Jr., Stokes T.H., Momin A., Park H., Portz B.J., Kelly S., Wang E., Sullards M.C., Wang M.D. Sphingolipidomics: a valuable tool for understanding the roles of sphingolipids in biology and disease. J. Lipid Res. 2009;50:S97–S102. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800073-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Han X., Jiang X. A review of lipidomic technologies applicable to sphingolipidomics and their relevant applications. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2009;111:39–52. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.200800117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Willmann J., Leibfritz D., Thiele H. Hyphenated tools for phospholipidomics. J. Biomol. Tech. 2008;19:211–216. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Mitchell T.W., Turner N., Else P.L., Hulbert A.J., Hawley J.A., Lee J.S., Bruce C.R., Blanksby S.J. The effect of exercise on the skeletal muscle phospholipidome of rats fed a high-fat diet. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010;11:3954–3964. doi: 10.3390/ijms11103954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kagan V.E., Quinn P.J. Toward oxidative lipidomics of cell signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2004;6:199–202. doi: 10.1089/152308604322899260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kagan V.E., Borisenko G.G., Tyurina Y.Y., Tyurin V.A., Jiang J., Potapovich A.I., Kini V., Amoscato A.A., Fujii Y. Oxidative lipidomics of apoptosis: redox catalytic interactions of cytochrome c with cardiolipin and phosphatidylserine. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004;37:1963–1985. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Power C., Patel K.D. Neurolipidomics: an inflammatory perspective on fat in the brain. Neurology. 2004;63:608–609. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000138673.70347.c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Han X. Neurolipidomics: challenges and developments. Front. Biosci. 2007;12:2601–2615. doi: 10.2741/2258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Niemoller T.D., Bazan N.G. Docosahexaenoic acid neurolipidomics. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2010;91:85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2009.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Welti R., Shah J., Li W., Li M., Chen J., Burke J.J., Fauconnier M.L., Chapman K., Chye M.L., Wang X. Plant lipidomics: discerning biological function by profiling plant complex lipids using mass spectrometry. Front. Biosci. 2007;12:2494–2506. doi: 10.2741/2250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Horn P.J., Benning C. The plant lipidome in human and environmental health. Science. 2016;353:1228–1232. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Shulaev V., Chapman K.D. Plant lipidomics at the crossroads: from technology to biology driven science. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2017;1862:786–791. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Gaspar M.L., Aregullin M.A., Jesch S.A., Nunez L.R., Villa-Garcia M., Henry S.A. The emergence of yeast lipidomics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1771:241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Santos A.X., Riezman H. Yeast as a model system for studying lipid homeostasis and function. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:2858–2867. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hunt A.N. Dynamic lipidomics of the nucleus. J. Cell. Biochem. 2006;97:244–251. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Postle A.D., Hunt A.N. Dynamic lipidomics with stable isotope labelling. J. Chromatogr. B. 2009;877:2716–2721. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Brandsma J., Bailey A.P., Koster G., Gould A.P., Postle A.D. Stable isotope analysis of dynamic lipidomics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2017;1862:792–796. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Kofeler H.C., Eichmann T.O., Ahrends R., Bowden J.A., Danne-Rasche N., Dennis E.A., Fedorova M., Griffiths W.J., Han X., Hartler J., Holcapek M., Jirasko R., Koelmel J.P., Ejsing C.S., Liebisch G., et al. Quality control requirements for the correct annotation of lipidomics data. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4771. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24984-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Wang M., Wang C., Han R.H., Han X. Novel advances in shotgun lipidomics for biology and medicine. Prog. Lipid Res. 2016;61:83–108. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Quehenberger O., Armando A.M., Brown A.H., Milne S.B., Myers D.S., Merrill A.H., Bandyopadhyay S., Jones K.N., Kelly S., Shaner R.L., Sullards C.M., Wang E., Murphy R.C., Barkley R.M., Leiker T.J., et al. Lipidomics reveals a remarkable diversity of lipids in human plasma. J. Lipid Res. 2010;51:3299–3305. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M009449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hyotylainen T., Oresic M. Systems biology strategies to study lipidomes in health and disease. Prog. Lipid Res. 2014;55:43–60. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Murphy R.C. Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge, UK: 2015. Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Lipids: Molecular analysis of complex lipids. [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Tan B., Bradshaw H.B., Rimmerman N., Srinivasan H., Yu Y.W., Krey J.F., Monn M.F., Chen J.S., Hu S.S., Pickens S.R., Walker J.M. Targeted lipidomics: discovery of new fatty acyl amides. AAPS J. 2006;8:E461–E465. doi: 10.1208/aapsj080354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Guan Z. Discovering novel brain lipids by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B. 2009;877:2814–2821. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Yore M.M., Syed I., Moraes-Vieira P.M., Zhang T., Herman M.A., Homan E.A., Patel R.T., Lee J., Chen S., Peroni O.D., Dhaneshwar A.S., Hammarstedt A., Smith U., McGraw T.E., Saghatelian A., et al. Discovery of a class of endogenous mammalian lipids with anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory effects. Cell. 2014;159:318–332. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Wang C., Wang J., Qin C., Han X. Analysis of monohexosyl alkyl (alkenyl)-acyl glycerol in brain samples by shotgun lipidomics. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2020;1129:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Han X., Yang K., Yang J., Cheng H., Gross R.W. Shotgun lipidomics of cardiolipin molecular species in lipid extracts of biological samples. J. Lipid Res. 2006;47:864–879. doi: 10.1194/jlr.D500044-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Bollinger J.G., Thompson W., Lai Y., Oslund R.C., Hallstrand T.S., Sadilek M., Turecek F., Gelb M.H. Improved sensitivity mass spectrometric detection of eicosanoids by charge reversal derivatization. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:6790–6796. doi: 10.1021/ac100720p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Griffiths W.J., Crick P.J., Wang Y. Methods for oxysterol analysis: past, present and future. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013;86:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Gachumi G., Purves R.W., Hopf C., El-Aneed A. Fast quantification without conventional chromatography, the growing power of mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2020;92:8628–8637. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Kumari A.U.S.J., Acharya S.R., Bergquist J. A novel, fast and sensitive supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS) method for analysis of arachidonic acid metabolites. Analyst. 2018;143:3661–3669. doi: 10.1039/c8an00788h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Drotleff B., Illison J., Schlotterbeck J., Lukowski R., Lammerhofer M. Comprehensive lipidomics of mouse plasma using class-specific surrogate calibrants and SWATH acquisition for large-scale lipid quantification in untargeted analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2019;1086:90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kim J., Kang D., Lee S.K., Kim T.Y. Deuterium oxide labeling for global omics relative quantification: application to lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 2019;91:8853–8863. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Grzybek M., Palladini A., Alexaki V.I., Surma M.A., Simons K., Chavakis T., Klose C., Coskun U. Comprehensive and quantitative analysis of white and brown adipose tissue by shotgun lipidomics. Mol. Metab. 2019;22:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Han X. Lipidomics for studying metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016;12:668–679. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Afshinnia F., Rajendiran T.M., Wernisch S., Soni T., Jadoon A., Karnovsky A., Michailidis G., Pennathur S. Lipidomics and biomarker discovery in kidney disease. Semin. Nephrol. 2018;38:127–141. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Au A. Metabolomics and lipidomics of ischemic stroke. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2018;85:31–69. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Anthonymuthu T.S., Kim-Campbell N., Bayir H. Oxidative lipidomics: applications in critical care. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2017;23:251–256. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.O'Donnell V.B., Ekroos K., Liebisch G., Wakelam M. Lipidomics: current state of the art in a fast moving field. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2020;12 doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Zhuo C., Hou W., Tian H., Wang L., Li R. Lipidomics of the brain, retina, and biofluids: from the biological landscape to potential clinical application in schizophrenia. Transl. Psychiatry. 2020;10:391. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01080-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Ibanez C., Mouhid L., Reglero G., Ramirez de Molina A. Lipidomics insights in health and nutritional intervention studies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017;65:7827–7842. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Titz B., Gadaleta R.M., Lo Sasso G., Elamin A., Ekroos K., Ivanov N.V., Peitsch M.C., Hoeng J. Proteomics and lipidomics in inflammatory bowel disease research: from mechanistic insights to biomarker identification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2775. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Evans H.C., Dinh T.T.N., Hardcastle M.L., Gilmore A.A., Ugur M.R., Hitit M., Jousan F.D., Nicodemus M.C., Memili E. Advancing semen evaluation using lipidomics. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8:601794. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.601794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Mika A., Sledzinski T., Stepnowski P. Current progress of lipid analysis in metabolic diseases by mass spectrometry methods. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019;26:60–103. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666171003121127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Kurreck A., Vandergrift L.A., Fuss T.L., Habbel P., Agar N.Y.R., Cheng L.L. Prostate cancer diagnosis and characterization with mass spectrometry imaging. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018;21:297–305. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0011-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Abbas I., Noun M., Touboul D., Sahali D., Brunelle A., Ollero M. Kidney lipidomics by mass spectrometry imaging: a focus on the glomerulus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1623. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Xu G., Li J. Recent advances in mass spectrometry imaging for multiomics application in neurology. J. Comp. Neurol. 2019;527:2158–2169. doi: 10.1002/cne.24571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Chen K., Baluya D., Tosun M., Li F., Maletic-Savatic M. Imaging mass spectrometry: a new tool to assess molecular underpinnings of neurodegeneration. Metabolites. 2019;9:135. doi: 10.3390/metabo9070135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Scupakova K., Balluff B., Tressler C., Adelaja T., Heeren R.M.A., Glunde K., Ertaylan G. Cellular resolution in clinical MALDI mass spectrometry imaging: the latest advancements and current challenges. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2020;58:914–929. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Smith A., Piga I., Galli M., Stella M., Denti V., Del Puppo M., Magni F. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging in the study of gastric cancer: a mini review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2588. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Tabassum R., Ripatti S. Integrating lipidomics and genomics: emerging tools to understand cardiovascular diseases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021;78:2565–2584. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03715-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Worheide M.A., Krumsiek J., Kastenmuller G., Arnold M. Multi-omics integration in biomedical research - a metabolomics-centric review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2021;1141:144–162. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.10.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Henning P.A., Merrill A.H., Wang M.D. Dynamic pathway modeling of sphingolipid metabolism. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2004;4:2913–2916. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1403828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Ferreri C., Chatgilialoglu C. Membrane lipidomics and the geometry of unsaturated fatty acids from biomimetic models to biological consequences. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009;579:391–411. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-322-0_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Niemela P.S., Castillo S., Sysi-Aho M., Oresic M. Bioinformatics and computational methods for lipidomics. J. Chromatogr. B. 2009;877:2855–2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Haimi P., Chaithanya K., Kainu V., Hermansson M., Somerharju P. Instrument-independent software tools for the analysis of MS-MS and LC-MS lipidomics data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009;580:285–294. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-325-1_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Hubner G., Crone C., Lindner B. lipID--a software tool for automated assignment of lipids in mass spectra. J. Mass Spectrom. 2009;44:1676–1683. doi: 10.1002/jms.1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Kiebish M.A., Bell R., Yang K., Phan T., Zhao Z., Ames W., Seyfried T.N., Gross R.W., Chuang J.H., Han X. Dynamic simulation of cardiolipin remodeling: greasing the wheels for an interpretative approach to lipidomics. J. Lipid Res. 2010;51:2153–2170. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M004796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Yetukuri L., Soderlund S., Koivuniemi A., Seppanen-Laakso T., Niemela P.S., Hyvonen M., Taskinen M.R., Vattulainen I., Jauhiainen M., Oresic M. Composition and lipid spatial distribution of HDL particles in subjects with low and high HDL-cholesterol. J. Lipid Res. 2010;51:2341–2351. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M006494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Kind T., Liu K.H., Lee do Y., Defelice B., Meissen J.K., Fiehn O. LipidBlast in silico tandem mass spectrometry database for lipid identification. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:755–758. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Herzog R., Schuhmann K., Schwudke D., Sampaio J.L., Bornstein S.R., Schroeder M., Shevchenko A. LipidXplorer: a software for consensual cross-platform lipidomics. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Peng B., Kopczynski D., Pratt B.S., Ejsing C.S., Burla B., Hermansson M., Benke P.I., Tan S.H., Chan M.Y., Torta F., Schwudke D., Meckelmann S.W., Coman C., Schmitz O.J., MacLean B., et al. LipidCreator workbench to probe the lipidomic landscape. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2057. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15960-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Brodbelt J.S., Morrison L.J., Santos I. Ultraviolet photodissociation mass spectrometry for analysis of biological molecules. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:3328–3380. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Ma X., Xia Y. Pinpointing double bonds in lipids by Paterno-Buchi reactions and mass spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014;53:2592–2596. doi: 10.1002/anie.201310699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Zhang W., Shang B., Ouyang Z., Xia Y. Enhanced phospholipid isomer analysis by online photochemical derivatization and RPLC-MS. Anal. Chem. 2020;92:6719–6726. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Zhao J., Xie X., Lin Q., Ma X., Su P., Xia Y. Next-generation Paterno-Buchi reagents for lipid analysis by mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2020;92:13470–13477. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Yaghmour M.H., Thiele C., Kuerschner L. An advanced method for propargylcholine phospholipid detection by direct-infusion MS. J. Lipid Res. 2021;62:100022. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Garrido M., Abad J.L., Fabrias G., Casas J., Delgado A. Azide-tagged sphingolipids: new tools for metabolic flux analysis. ChemBioChem. 2015;16:641–650. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Kol M., Panatala R., Nordmann M., Swart L., van Suijlekom L., Cabukusta B., Hilderink A., Grabietz T., Mina J.G.M., Somerharju P., Korneev S., Tafesse F.G., Holthuis J.C.M. Switching head group selectivity in mammalian sphingolipid biosynthesis by active-site-engineering of sphingomyelin synthases. J. Lipid Res. 2017;58:962–973. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M076133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Yang K., Han X. Accurate quantification of lipid species by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry - meets a key challenge in lipidomics. Metabolites. 2011;1:21–40. doi: 10.3390/metabo1010021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Wang M., Wang C., Han X. Selection of internal standards for accurate quantification of complex lipid species in biological extracts by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry-what, how and why? Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2017;36:693–714. doi: 10.1002/mas.21492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Bowden J.A., Heckert A., Ulmer C.Z., Jones C.M., Koelmel J.P., Abdullah L., Ahonen L., Alnouti Y., Armando A.M., Asara J.M., Bamba T., Barr J.R., Bergquist J., Borchers C.H., Brandsma J., et al. Harmonizing lipidomics: NIST interlaboratory comparison exercise for lipidomics using SRM 1950-metabolites in frozen human plasma. J. Lipid Res. 2017;58:2275–2288. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M079012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Lipidomics Standards Initiative Consortium Lipidomics needs more standardization. Nat. Metab. 2019;1:745–747. doi: 10.1038/s42255-019-0094-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Liebisch G., Ekroos K., Hermansson M., Ejsing C.S. Reporting of lipidomics data should be standardized. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2017;1862:747–751. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.O'Donnell V.B., FitzGerald G.A., Murphy R.C., Liebisch G., Dennis E.A., Quehenberger O., Subramaniam S., Wakelam M.J.O. Steps toward minimal reporting standards for lipidomics mass spectrometry in biomedical research publications. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 2020;13 doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.120.003019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Kofeler H.C., Ahrends R., Baker E.S., Ekroos K., Han X., Hoffmann N., Holcapek M., Wenk M.R., Liebisch G. Recommendations for good practice in mass spectrometry-based lipidomics. J. Lipid Res. 2021;62:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Lv J., Zhang L., Yan F., Wang X. Clinical lipidomics: a new way to diagnose human diseases. Clin. Transl. Med. 2018;7:12. doi: 10.1186/s40169-018-0190-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Zhang L., Han X., Wang X. Is the clinical lipidomics a potential goldmine? Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2018;34:421–423. doi: 10.1007/s10565-018-9441-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Khan S.R., Mohan H., Liu Y., Batchuluun B., Gohil H., Al Rijjal D., Manialawy Y., Cox B.J., Gunderson E.P., Wheeler M.B. The discovery of novel predictive biomarkers and early-stage pathophysiology for the transition from gestational diabetes to type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2019;62:687–703. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4800-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.El-Ansary A., Chirumbolo S., Bhat R.S., Dadar M., Ibrahim E.M., Bjorklund G. The role of lipidomics in autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2020;24:31–48. doi: 10.1007/s40291-019-00430-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Arnold M., Nho K., Kueider-Paisley A., Massaro T., Huynh K., Brauner B., MahmoudianDehkordi S., Louie G., Moseley M.A., Thompson J.W., John-Williams L.S., Tenenbaum J.D., Blach C., Chang R., Brinton R.D., et al. Sex and APOE epsilon4 genotype modify the Alzheimer's disease serum metabolome. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1148. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14959-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Huynh K., Barlow C.K., Jayawardana K.S., Weir J.M., Mellett N.A., Cinel M., Magliano D.J., Shaw J.E., Drew B.G., Meikle P.J. High-throughput plasma lipidomics: detailed mapping of the associations with cardiometabolic risk factors. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019;26:71–84.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Park J.K., Coffey N.J., Limoges A., Le A. The heterogeneity of lipid metabolism in cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018;1063:33–55. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77736-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Meikle T.G., Huynh K., Giles C., Meikle P.J. Clinical lipidomics: realizing the potential of lipid profiling. J. Lipid Res. 2021;62:100127. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Feng L., Prestwich G.D. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; Boca Raton, FL: 2006. Functional Lipidomics. [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Gross R.W., Jenkins C.M., Yang J., Mancuso D.J., Han X. Functional lipidomics: the roles of specialized lipids and lipid-protein interactions in modulating neuronal function. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2005;77:52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Mouchlis V.D., Dennis E.A. Phospholipase A2 catalysis and lipid mediator lipidomics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2019;1864:766–771. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Lam S.M., Wang Z., Li B., Shui G. High-coverage lipidomics for functional lipid and pathway analyses. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2021;1147:199–210. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Kohno S., Keenan A.L., Ntambi J.M., Miyazaki M. Lipidomic insight into cardiovascular diseases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;504:590–595. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Tomczyk M.M., Dolinsky V.W. The cardiac lipidome in models of cardiovascular disease. Metabolites. 2020;10:254. doi: 10.3390/metabo10060254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Qiu S., Palavicini J.P., Wang J., Gonzalez N.S., He S., Dustin E., Zou C., Ding L., Bhattacharjee A., Van Skike C.E., Galvan V., Dupree J.L., Han X. Adult-onset CNS myelin sulfatide deficiency is sufficient to cause Alzheimer's disease-like neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment. Mol. Neurodegener. 2021;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00488-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Aviram R., Manella G., Kopelman N., Neufeld-Cohen A., Zwighaft Z., Elimelech M., Adamovich Y., Golik M., Wang C., Han X., Asher G. Lipidomics analyses reveal temporal and spatial lipid organization and uncover daily oscillations in intracellular organelles. Mol. Cell. 2016;62:636–648. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Xu J., Taubert S. Beyond proteostasis: lipid metabolism as a new player in ER homeostasis. Metabolites. 2021;11:52. doi: 10.3390/metabo11010052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Skotland T., Hessvik N.P., Sandvig K., Llorente A. Exosomal lipid composition and the role of ether lipids and phosphoinositides in exosome biology. J. Lipid Res. 2019;60:9–18. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R084343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Tian H., Sparvero L.J., Blenkinsopp P., Amoscato A.A., Watkins S.C., Bayir H., Kagan V.E., Winograd N. Secondary-ion mass spectrometry images cardiolipins and phosphatidylethanolamines at the subcellular level. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2019;58:3156–3161. doi: 10.1002/anie.201814256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Ellis S.R., Ferris C.J., Gilmore K.J., Mitchell T.W., Blanksby S.J., in het Panhuis M. Direct lipid profiling of single cells from inkjet printed microarrays. Anal. Chem. 2012;84:9679–9683. doi: 10.1021/ac302634u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Liu R., Yang Z. Single cell metabolomics using mass spectrometry: techniques and data analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2021;1143:124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Li Z., Cheng S., Lin Q., Cao W., Yang J., Zhang M., Shen A., Zhang W., Xia Y., Ma X., Ouyang Z. Single-cell lipidomics with high structural specificity by mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2869. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23161-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Gaud C., Sousa B.C., Nguyen A., Fedorova M., Ni Z., O'Donnell V.B., Wakelam M.J.O., Andrews S., Lopez-Clavijo A.F. BioPAN: a web-based tool to explore mammalian lipidome metabolic pathways on LIPID MAPS. F1000Res. 2021;10:4. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.28022.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article.


Articles from Journal of Lipid Research are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES