Abstract
Diamond Blackfan Anemia (DBA) results from haploinsufficiency of ribosomal protein subunits in hematopoietic progenitors in the earliest stages of committed erythropoiesis. Nemo-like kinase (NLK) is chronically hyperactivated in committed erythroid progenitors and precursors in multiple human and murine models of DBA. Inhibition of NLK activity, or suppression of NLK expression, both improve erythroid expansion in these models. Metformin is a well-tolerated drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus with multiple cellular targets. Here we demonstrate that metformin improves erythropoiesis in human and zebrafish models of DBA. Our data shows that the effects of metformin on erythroid proliferation and differentiation is mediated by suppression of NLK expression through induction of miR-26a, which recognizes a binding site within the NLK 3’UTR to facilitate transcript degradation. We propose that induction of miR-26a is a potentially novel approach to treat DBA and could improve anemia in DBA patients without the potentially adverse side effects of metformin in a DBA patient population.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Diamond Blackfan Anemia (DBA) is one of the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes and presents with a macrocytic red blood cell aplasia usually within the first year of life (1). Over 70% of patients carry genetic mutations that lead to haploinsufficiency in one of at least 22 genes encoding ribosomal proteins (2). RPS19 and RPL11 genes are commonly mutated and account for approximately 25% and 5% of cases respectively (1). Ribosomal insufficiency leads to reduced translational efficiency of a subset of mRNA transcripts, including the master erythropoiesis transcription factor GATA1 (3). Irrespective of the driving ribosomal gene mutation, ribosomal insufficiency increases p53 protein stabilization (1, 4), contributing to aberrant activation of the serine-threonine protein kinase, nemo like kinase (NLK). Suppression of NLK expression or functional activity, significantly improves expansion of DBA erythroblasts in pre-clinical models, with minimal impact on other hematopoietic lineages (5).
NLK protein expression is significantly higher in erythroblasts than other hematopoietic lineages, and is not influenced by ribosome insufficiency. Rather, the increased activity in DBA is due to post-translational stimulation (5). Unlike in wild type hematopoietic lineages, NLK kinase activity increases in megakaryocyte and erythroid progenitors (MEPs) in DBA, and is maintained through the progenitor and precursor stages (5). The erythroid-specific effects of ribosome-insufficiency are partially due to the erythroid-specific expression of NLK, and may also explain why targeting NLK does not affect other lineages (5).
NLK is an orthologue of the Drosophila Nemo. It is an atypical member of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) family. The kinase domain shares a high degree of sequence conservation with other MAPKs and cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) (6) which has hampered attempts to develop small molecules that specifically inhibit NLK. Off-target inhibition of NLK kinase activity with broad kinase inhibitors, such as SD208, have improved erythropoiesis in pre-clinical DBA models, but these compounds are not clinically useful due to low potency and poor solubility (data not shown). Therefore, alternative strategies to suppress NLK offer promise in the treatment of diseases affected by aberrant NLK activity.
Previous work has shown that NLK expression is significantly suppressed in response to a number of microRNAs (miRNAs), including miR-181 (7), miR-208 (8), miR-101 (9), miR-199 (10) and miR-221 (11). MicroRNAs are small RNAs, 21–24 base in length that are key regulators of post-transcriptional gene expression and RNA silencing. Hundreds of miRNAs have been identified with expression often highly tissue specific (12). Most miRNAs exert an inhibitory effect through binding a short 6–8 nucleotide sequence in the 3’ untranslated region (3’UTR) of a target gene transcript. Binding is facilitated by the complementary seed sequence within the miRNA, which triggers recruitment of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) leading to mRNA degradation (13). Often miRNAs only moderately perturb expression of the targeted transcript (13), however the significant susceptibility of NLK mRNA offers the potential to facilitate targeted regulation of NLK expression by the modulation of specific miRNAs.
One strategy to modulate miRNA function and, in turn, NLK expression could involve metformin, a synthetic analog of guanidine and approved therapeutic for type 2 diabetes. Metformin use has increased dramatically for pediatric type 2 diabetes and has been used in the adult population for many years. The drug is well tolerated and remains the mainstay of therapy along with diet and exercise (14). In addition to treatment of type 2 diabetes, metformin is effective in polycystic ovary syndrome and is being explored as an antiviral and anticancer agent in adult populations (15). Notably, although the mechanistic effect of metformin on NLK activity has not been thoroughly investigated, one study has demonstrated that metformin does suppress NLK expression in lung carcinoma models (16). Furthermore, metformin has been reported to deregulate miRNA profiles in a myriad of tissues (17). Collectively, these data led us to hypothesize that metformin may suppress NLK expression through miRNA modulation. Indeed, many of the miRNA perturbations mediated by metformin have potential clinical implications including the modulation of disease and homeostasis in healthy individuals (18–26).
Although metformin is well tolerated in a general pediatric population and the promise of NLK suppression is exciting, the mechanism of suppression is not understood and potential side-effects may adversely impact DBA patients. For example, metformin is known to reduce mTOR signaling and protein synthesis; this effect would likely be deleterious in DBA where there is already reduced translation brought about by ribosomal-insufficiency. Understanding the mechanism through which metformin suppresses NLK will facilitate design of more NLK-specific inhibitors without the potentially adverse side-effects associated with metformin.
Here we report the impact of metformin on erythroid expansion in human, murine and zebrafish DBA models and define the mechanism through which metformin suppresses NLK to mediate this effect.
Methods
Cell culture –
Human CD34+ HSPCs were purified from cord blood (New York Blood Center) using magnetic-activated cell sorting (Miltenyi Biotec) and differentiated as described previously (5). Luciferase, or luciferase fused to various permutations of the NLK 3’ or 5’UTRs, were cloned in pcDNA3.1 expressing RFP and transfected into K562 or Kp53A1 cells using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Thermo Fisher).
Lentiviral transduction –
CD34+ cells were transduced as published (27) with lentivirus expressing shRNA against RPS19, RPL11, or luciferase (Luc). Virus co-expressed GFP, RFP, mCherry or puromycin to enable selection.
Metformin and miRNAs –
Metformin was purchased from SelleckChem and added to cells at indicated concentrations with a final DMSO concentration of 0.5%. MISSION® synthetic miRNAs, inhibitors and mimetics were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and transfected according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Colony assays –
Sorted HSPCs were seeded in cytokine-containing methylcellulose medium (H4434; STEMCELL Technologies) in triplicate, with 1000 cells per plate. Erythroid (burst-forming unit erythroid) and myeloid (colony-forming unit, granulocyte-macrophage) colonies were counted 14–18 days later.
Flow cytometry –
cells were incubated with human Fc receptor binding inhibitor (#14–9161-73; eBioscience) followed by primary antibodies CD235-APC (#306607; BioLegend) and CD11b-PE/Cy5 (#101209; BioLegend). Data were collected on a DxP10 flow cytometer (Cytek) and analyzed by using FlowJo Software, v.9.7.2.
Kinase Assays, Western blotting –
NLK kinase activity was performed as published (5). For Western blotting, antibodies against NLK (#AB97642; Abcam; 1:1000 dilution) and GAPDH (#MAB374; Millipore; 1:10000) were used according to manufacturer’s instructions.
qRT-PCR –
MessengerRNA was quantified as described (5). MicroRNA was quantified using TaqMan® Small RNA Assays (Applied Biosystems) as per manufacturer’s directions and normalized to snoRNA.
Luciferase Assay –
The NLK minimal promoter (1019 5’nucleotides) and or NLK 3’UTR (1885 3’ nucleotides) were cloned upstream, or downstream respectively, of firefly luciferase and transfected into K562 cells. Transfection efficiency was normalized by RFP expression and firefly luciferase activity determined by Luciferase Assay Reagent II (LAR II) from Dual-Luciferase® Reporter (DLR™) Assay System (Promega). Luminescence was assessed using a Synergy™ H1 hybrid multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek®). Mutations and truncations in NLK 3’UTR were introduced using QuikChange® II XL Site-directed Mutagenesis (Agilent).
Mice –
The RPS19- and RPL11-deficient mouse models have been described previously (5, 28–30). Kit+ progenitors were isolated from E14.5 liver cells of tet-shRPS19-expressing fetuses and differentiated in vitro in the presence or absence of doxycycline. Lin−Kit+ HSPCs were isolated from femur bone marrow of inducible RPL11 heterozygous deletion adult mice. All animal experiments were performed with consent from the Lund University animal ethics committee or the Ethical Committee of the Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain (#54–2013-v2) and in agreement with the recommendations of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Association (FELASA).
Zebrafish –
Zebrafish were reared and injected with control or rps19-specific morpholino (MO) at the 1-cell stage as previously described (27), and treated with 20 mM metformin 4 to 5 hours post fertilization (hpf). At day 3, embryos were stained with o-dianizidine to detect hemoglobin. Embryos were obtained by natural spawning. UCLA Animal Committee approved the study.
Statistics –
P values for statistical significance were obtained by using a paired Student t test. Significance was designated as p<0.05. The data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments. When possible, variability between replicates was normalized for by designating values of controls to 100% (or 1-fold), and comparing variables against that.
Results
Metformin suppresses NLK expression leading to improved erythropoiesis in human models of Diamond Blackfan Anemia.
Transduction of shRNA against RPS19 and RPL11 into CD34+ HSPCs have been demonstrated to induce erythroid defects as a model of DBA (27, 31, 32). CD235+ erythroid progenitors are reduced to 5.7% (p=0.0004) of control in RPS19-insufficiency and 16.4% (p=0.0032) in RPL11-insufficiency when expanded in erythroid liquid culture (Fig 1A upper). A mild reduction in the non-erythroid CD11b+ myeloid population occurs (13% (p=0.0436) and 7% (p=0.2758) reduction in RPS19- and RPL11-insufficiency respectively) (Fig 1B upper). When cultured in the presence of 50 mM metformin, CD235+ erythroid expansion increased from 5.7% to 33.3% (p=0.0008) and 16.4% to 32.7% (p=0.0951), which constituted an increase of 5.9-fold and 2.0-fold in RPS19- and RPL11-insufficiency respectively (Fig 1A lower). The presence of metformin had a negligible influence on CD11b+ expansion (Fig 1B – lower). Metformin EC50 was 11.4mM and significant erythroid improvement was detected at concentrations above 8mM.
Metformin also improved erythropoiesis in colony assays. Compared to vector control (shLuc), BFU-E erythroid colonies were increased from 7.7% to 16.3% (p=0.0292) in RPS19-insufficiency and 8.2% to 14.3% (p=0.0257) in RPL11-insufficiency (Fig 1C upper), corresponding to 2.9- and 2.2-fold increases (Fig 1D lower). Metformin did not affect CFU-GM colonies (Fig 1D). RPS19-insufficient progenitors formed markedly smaller BFU-E colonies than controls. Metformin treatment appeared to only modestly improve the size of these colonies (Fig 1E).
As metformin influences NLK in other cell systems (16), we examined NLK activity and expression in RPS19-insufficiency in the presence and absence of metformin. NLK immunoprecipitated from 5000 differentiating RPS19-insufficient progenitor cells robustly phosphorylated NLK, c-Myb and raptor in vitro (Fig 2A). Metformin treatment reduced NLK activity from the same number of RPS19-insufficient progenitors, reducing phosphorylation of NLK, c-Myb and raptor by 48.5%, 39.8% and 40.2% respectively (Fig 2A). SD208 is a Transforming Growth Factor-beta receptor small molecule inhibitor that inhibits NLK activity as an off-target in these cells (5). The effects of SD208 and metformin were compared. Examination of NLK expression in metformin-treated cultures revealed significantly less NLK expression, independent of RPS19 status. Metformin treatment reduced NLK protein expression by 62.6% and 65.4% in control and RPS19-insufficient cultures respectively. In contrast, SD208 did not significantly influence NLK expression (Fig 2B).
SD208 inhibited the kinase activity of NLK (5) (Fig 2A), but did not reduce NLK expression (Fig 2B). We speculated that metformin reduced NLK kinase activity and improved erythropoiesis through suppression of NLK expression, rather than inhibiting the kinase activity directly. The addition of metformin to activated NLK in in vitro kinase assays did not influence NLK activity, supporting our hypothesis that reduced intracellular NLK activity is due to reduced NLK expression, rather than inhibition of kinase activity (Fig 2C). NLK activity was robustly inhibited by SD208 (Fig 2C). Expression of siRNA against NLK improved erythropoiesis in RPS19-insufficiency by 7.0-fold (4.9% – 34.2% of control; p=<0.0001), however metformin treatment did not significantly increase CD235+ erythroblast expansion (7.0- to 7.5-fold; p=0.6284) (Fig 2D) in control cultures. SD208 and NLK silencing similarly improve erythropoiesis in both RPS19 and RPL11-insufficient models (5). Because of this, we propose the observed effect of metformin in RPL11-insufficient cultures (Fig 1) is also the result of NLK suppression.
Metformin improves erythroid expansion in zebrafish but not murine models of DBA.
NLK activation has been observed to contribute to erythropoiesis defects in murine models of DBA (29, 33). However, metformin treatment did not rescue Ter119+ erythroblast expansion in RPS19- or RPL11-insufficiency (Fig 3A). In contrast to human models, metformin had no impact on NLK expression (Fig 3B) or NLK activity (Fig 3C) in control or either RPS19- or RPL11-insufficient mice. In zebrafish (Danio rerio) anemia reminiscent of DBA occurs with RPS19-insufficiency (34). We induced RPS19-insufficiency by morpholino in the presence or absence of 20 mM metformin and examined hematopoiesis/hemoglobin activity in embryos by O’dianisidine staining. In RPS19-insufficiency, loss of O’dianisidine staining was significant, along with accompanying heart failure (Fig 3D middle). Although heart conditions persisted, metformin dramatically restored O’diansidine staining, particularly along the midline (Fig 3D right).
Metformin sensitivity is mediated through a miR-26a-binding site within the NLK 3’UTR.
Having demonstrated that metformin improved erythropoiesis in ribosomal-insufficiency through NLK suppression in human models, we sought to determine the mechanism of action. The influence of miRNA on gene expression is often subtle (13), but it has been demonstrated that NLK expression can be extensively suppressed by miR-181 (7), miR-208 (8), miR-199 (10), miR-101 (9) and miR-221 (11). As miRNA influence is typically through binding to elements within the 3’UTR (13) we asked if metformin induced NLK degradation through the NLK 3’UTR.
Fusion of the NLK 3’UTR to the luciferase gene, but not 5’ promoter sequence, resulted in a dose-dependent, metformin-mediated degradation of luciferase (67.5% decrease at 50 mM) similar to endogenous NLK suppression (Fig 4A). Expression of luciferase alone, or fused with an alternative 3’UTR from SATB1, did not result in metformin sensitivity. In parallel with measuring luciferase activity, the response of endogenous NLK protein expression was monitored by Western blot analysis with a high degree of correlation.
Having determined that the suppressive effect of metformin on NLK in human hematopoietic cells is mediated by the 3’UTR, we asked if the lack of metformin sensitivity in mice was due to differences in the murine 3’UTR sequence. When expressed in human K562 cells, human, murine and zebrafish 3’UTR sequences all facilitated a dose-dependent reduction in luciferase activity (Fig 4B), indicating all 3 species retain a conserved metformin-responsive element within the 3’UTR. The human 3’UTR facilitated a 65.4% (p=0.0056) decrease while the murine and zebrafish sequence reduced luciferase activity by 61.6% (p=0.008) and 43.6% (p=0.031) respectively (Fig 4B).
The NLK 3’UTR sequence contains approximately 30 potential miRNA binding sequences. We generated a series of truncations in the human NLK 3’UTR sequence and analyzed the metformin-responsiveness (Fig 5A). Luciferase fused to 3’UTR sequence lacking only the smallest deletions (truncations 1 and 2) retained metformin-sensitivity, while deletion of more nucleotides lost sensitivity (Fig 5B). We conclude that the 261 nucleotides between truncations 2 and 3 are required for metformin-mediated suppression. This includes potential binding sites for 4 miRNA species; let-7, miR-30, miR-181 and two sequential binding sites for miR-26a (Fig 5C). While comparison of human and mouse nucleotide sequence in this region reveals a high degree of sequence conservation (92.7% identical), the zebrafish sequence shares little conservation with the exception of a small region containing a miR-181 and one copy of the miR-26a binding sequences. Let-7, miR-181 and both miR-26a binding sequences are shared between human and mouse, while the miR-30 binding sequence found in the human sequence is lost in mice (Fig 5D).
NLK suppression is mediated by miR26a induction by metformin in human, but not murine models of DBA.
To identify which miRNA was responsible for metformin-induced NLK suppression, we compared the expression of a number of miRNA species between untreated and metformin-treated CD34+ progenitors differentiating in erythroid media. As the metformin-responsive region of the NLK 3’UTR contained predicted binding sites for let-7, miR-30, miR-181 and miR-26a, we initially focused on these. With the exception of miR-26a, metformin did not alter the expression of any miRNA species. In contrast, miR-26a was upregulated 2.4-fold in response to metformin (Fig 6A upper). Comparison of the entire 3’UTR between human, mouse and zebrafish revealed that, apart from miR-181 and miR-26a within the metformin-response element, the only other miRNA-binding sites conserved between all 3 species was miR-199 and miR-144. However, metformin did not alter expression of either of these miRNAs in human erythropoiesis (Fig 6A upper). As the murine 3’UTR sequence of NLK is metformin-responsive when expressed in human cells, we examined the miRNA expression profile in response to metformin in differentiating Lin-Kit+ murine progenitors. In contrast to the human system, none of the miRNA species examined demonstrated significant upregulation (Fig 6A lower).
Having observed upregulation of miR-26a in response to metformin, and the presence of a miR-26a binding site within the metformin-responsive element of the NLK 3’UTR, we asked whether the metformin response is due to miR-26a upregulation. In human K562 cells expressing luciferase fused to a wild-type human NLK 3’UTR, recombinant expression of a miR-26a mimetic, but not miR-30 or miR-34 mimetics, reduced luciferase activity and endogenous NLK protein expression by 58.8% (p=0.0155) and 55.1% respectively (p=0.0311) (Fig 6B). The effect of miR-26a mimetics reduced luciferase and endogenous NLK expression similarly to that observed with metformin treatment (72.5% and 68.6%). A striking suppression of NLK has been reported in response to miR-181(7). Suppression of luciferase activity and endogenous NLK by miR-181 mimetics was more extensive (85.6% and 88.0%) than was observed in response to metformin or miR-26a mimetics (Fig 6B). Furthermore, expression of a miR-26a inhibitor reduced both the luciferase and endogenous NLK metformin-response by 74.1% (p=0.0416) and 70.3% (p=0.0449) respectively, whereas a miR-34 inhibitor had a negligible effect (Fig 6C).
The preceding data support a model in which metformin induces miR-26a expression in differentiating human hematopoietic cells. MiR-26a binds a sequence within the NLK 3’UTR facilitating NLK mRNA degradation. The mouse NLK 3’UTR sequence does include miR-26a binding sites, however in differentiating hematopoietic cells no miR-26a induction was observed in response to metformin in mice.
As metformin increases erythropoiesis in RPS19-insufficient human CD71+ progenitors, we compared CD235+ erythroid expansion in response to metformin, with expression of miR-26a mimetics, or a combination of both. RPS19-insufficiency decreased production of CD235+ erythroblasts to 8.3% of controls, however miR-26a mimetics, metformin treatment, and the combination all improved erythropoiesis similarly (3.4-fold; p=0.0324, 3.6-fold; p=0.0394 and 3.5-fold; 0.0279 respectively). No significant difference was observed between miR-26a mimetic alone compared to metformin alone (p=0.8544) or when treated together with metformin (p=0.9615). Negligible effects on erythropoiesis were observed in control (shLuc) with any treatment (Fig 7A upper).
NLK expression was similarly suppressed by metformin, miR-26a, and the combination in both RPS19-insufficient and control cells (Fig 7A middle). Metformin increased miR-26a in both RPS19-insufficiency (2.5-fold, p=0.0001) and control (2.4-fold, p=0.0088), while miR-26a mimetics elevated levels to 3.6-fold (p=0.005) and 3.5-fold (p=0.0012). Combined treatment did not significantly increase miR-26a expression relative to either treatment alone (Fig 7A lower). Despite not responding to metformin (Fig 3A), the expression of miR-26a mimetics in murine Lin-Kit+ induced a moderate (1.75-fold; p=0.0166) increase in ter119+ erythroid expansion (Fig 7B upper), with corresponding NLK suppression (Fig 7B middle).
Collectively, we demonstrate that metformin improves erythroid expansion in RPS19- and RPL11-insufficient human (Fig 1) and zebrafish (Fig 3) models of DBA. The effect appears to be exclusively mediated through the suppression of NLK expression (Fig 2). Our results showed that metformin induces miR-26a (Fig 6) that binds a consensus sequence in the NLK 3’UTR (Figs 4 & 5). Furthermore, the expression of miR-26a mimetics had no significant difference with metformin treatment regarding improvement of erythropoiesis in human models of DBA (Fig 7). While metformin did not improve erythropoiesis in murine models of DBA (Fig 3) due to a failure to induce miR-26a (Fig 6), expression of miR26a mimetics improved erythroid expansion in the murine model (Fig 7).
Discussion
Here we report that metformin treatment improves erythropoiesis in human and zebrafish models of DBA. We hypothesized NLK-independent metformin effects would inhibit human erythropoiesis in ribosomal insufficiency. We detected no evidence to support this in vitro and metformin was well tolerated at the indicated doses. In human cells, metformin-induces upregulation of miR-26a, which targets NLK for degradation. In murine models, metformin failed to induce miR-26a, however inducing miR-26a expression with transduced cDNA effectively suppressed NLK expression and improved erythropoiesis.
In addition to miR-26a, the 3’UTR of NLK is particularly susceptible to miR-181 binding, a feature that has been documented in hepatocellular carcinoma (35) and natural killer (NK) cell development (7). It is intriguing that the NLK 3’UTR is more sensitive to miRNA-mediated degradation than others. While a complementary miRNA seed sequence is critical, numerous other factors contribute to defining the efficacy with which a miRNA will bind and/or degrade a transcript. These include GC content, sequence and secondary structures that dictate stability of both miRNA and RISC complex binding, as well as intrinsic diversity of 3’UTR length and structure across copies of some transcripts (36). While mouse and human NLK 3’UTR sequences are highly conserved, the zebrafish 3’UTR is highly divergent. Nevertheless, one copy of the miR-26a binding site and the miR-181-binding site is conserved. The upregulation of miR-181 after the MEP stage is critical for megakaryocyte lineage differentiation (37). Indeed, upregulation of miR-181 is induced in all non-erythroid lineages (37–41). Mutation of the miR-181 binding site in the NLK 3’UTR increased NLK expression in non-erythroid progenitors resulting in adverse lineage expansion (5). The importance of NLK expression in lineage differentiation may contribute to the evolution of the highly sensitive NLK 3’UTR. It is also possible that the highly conserved role of miR-181 in the regulation of hematopoiesis provides evolutionary pressure to conserve the region surrounding miR-181, thus maintaining the miR-26a binding site by association.
Metformin treatment did improve o-dianizidine in RPS19-insufficient zebrafish. However, the staining was predominantly along the midline and did not restore cardiac defects, as have been seen upon p53 suppression (42). This may be due to the incomplete rescue by NLK suppression, or that heart defects are an NLK-independent effect of RPS19 insufficiency in fish. Zebrafish carry two nlk homologues, nlk1 and nlk2. Nlk2 is implicated in similar signaling pathways as human and murine homologues, but a role in hematopoiesis has not been examined (43). We have no direct evidence that nlk1 or 2 is activated, nor that metformin suppresses NLK expression in RPS19-insufficient zebrafish erythroid cells. However, given that metformin improved erythropoiesis in RPS19-insufficient embryos and metformin treatment degraded zebrafish NLK 3’UTR transcripts, it is highly probable that NLK is similarly deregulated in and metformin-sensitive as human erythroblasts.
Another interesting result was the failure of miR-26a induction in response to metformin in murine erythroblasts. The deregulation of miRNAs in response to metformin has been evaluated in numerous cell and animal models. Effects of metformin have ranged from no miRNA deregulation (44) to hundreds (45). As miRNA expression profiles commonly differ across cell type and species, it is not surprising that miR-26a is not upregulated in response to metformin in RPS19-insufficient hematopoietic cells of all species. Metformin-mediated upregulation of miR-26a has been previously reported, inducing apoptosis in oral cancer cells (46) and contributing to reduced incidence and increased survival in breast cancer patients (47).
MiR-26a has been primarily linked to apoptosis, serving as pro-apoptotic (48–50) and anti-apoptotic (51), depending on the cell context. Other cellular roles attributed to miR-26a include activation of mTOR signaling by suppression of PTEN (52) (which would be potentially beneficial in DBA), suppression of ERBB2 (53), and suppression of HMGA1 (54).
Suppression of another MAPK-family kinase by miR-26a has been previously reported (55) in rats but the miR-26a-binding site present in the rat MAPK6 3’UTR sequence is not retained in the human sequence. Analysis of 3’UTR sequences across the human MAPK/cdk kinase family indicate no predicted miR-26a-binding sites within MAPK1–10 or MAP2K1–6 and 1 in each of MAP3K1 and MAP3K2 but none in MAP3K3–8. There were three miR-26a-binding sites within the 3’UTR of cdk8 but none were identified in cdk1–7, 9 or 10.
As NLK expression can have both tumor suppressive (9, 35, 56–59) and oncogenic (10, 16, 60–67) functions, depending on the origin of the malignancy, systemic NLK suppression may have significant risks. In a disease such as DBA in which most patients present early in life and some require life-long therapy (1), minimizing effects beyond the affected tissue becomes even more prudent. Many miRNAs demonstrate differential expression between tissues (13), so miRNA mimetics that suppress NLK in tissues of interest, but preserve NLK activity in tissues where NLK expression is favorable, may be advantageous. While the mechanism of metformin is through upregulation of miR-26a, improved NLK suppression and/or tissue-specificity may be engineered by targeting other miRNA-binding sites within the 3’UTR.
P53 suppression, mTOR stimulation and steroid regimes, impact regulators of multiple critical cellular processes. Targeting NLK may offer less potential side-effects. NLK null mice are viable and grow normally (68). NLK expression is not ubiquitous and enzymatic activity, like other kinases, is highly regulated (69). NLK likely plays no role during normal hematopoiesis and NLK expression is suppressed in all non-erythroid hematopoietic lineages. In normal erythroblasts, NLK activity is low and silencing NLK has no apparent impact on erythropoiesis. An influence of NLK on erythropoiesis is only established upon aberrant activation, which occurs downstream of p53-stabilization in DBA (5). These properties make agents that specifically target NLK expression in hematopoietic cells highly attractive.
Targeting miR-26a mimetics to hematopoietic cells in a murine system has already been effectively demonstrated using aptamer-based target delivery (70). Murine HSPCs highly express c-kit and Tanno and a miRNA-aptamer chimera containing miR-26a mimic and c-kit-targeting aptamer was successfully delivered miR-26a into HSPCs to attenuate the toxicity of 5’fluorouracel and carboplatin. Specific targeting of NLK in RP-insufficient hematopoietic cells coupled with naturally limited expression of NLK within non-erythroid lineages, offers a more selective therapeutic approach for DBA patients.
Highlights.
Metformin improves erythropoiesis in human and zebrafish models of DBA.
Metformin suppresses nemolike-kinase (NLK) expression to rescue erythroid expansion.
Metformin induces miR-26a that binds the NLK 3’untranslated region to promote transcript degradation.
Acknowledgments
We thank Javier Leon for supplying Kp53A1 cells. This work was supported by NIDDK T32 training grant (DK098132) and Stanford Maternal Child Health Research Institute fellowship (MCW); DBA Foundation, DOD W81XWH-19-1-0431, and NIH DK107286 (KMS and SL).
Footnotes
Competing Interests Statement
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References:
- 1.Da Costa L, Narla A, Mohandas N. An update on the pathogenesis and diagnosis of Diamond-Blackfan anemia. F1000Research. 2018;7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ulirsch JC, Verboon JM, Kazerounian S, Guo MH, Yuan D, Ludwig LS, et al. The Genetic Landscape of Diamond-Blackfan Anemia. American journal of human genetics. 2018. Dec 6;103(6):930–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khajuria RK, Munschauer M, Ulirsch JC, Fiorini C, Ludwig LS, McFarland SK, et al. Ribosome Levels Selectively Regulate Translation and Lineage Commitment in Human Hematopoiesis. Cell. 2018. Mar 22;173(1):90–103.e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dutt S, Narla A, Lin K, Mullally A, Abayasekara N, Megerdichian C, et al. Haploinsufficiency for ribosomal protein genes causes selective activation of p53 in human erythroid progenitor cells. Blood. 2011. Mar 3;117(9):2567–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wilkes MC, Siva K, Chen J, Varetti G, Youn MY, Chae H, et al. Diamond Blackfan anemia is mediated by hyperactive Nemo-like kinase. Nature communications. 2020. 2020/07/03;11(1):3344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cargnello M, Roux PP. Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR. 2011. Mar;75(1):50–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cichocki F, Felices M, McCullar V, Presnell SR, Al-Attar A, Lutz CT, et al. Cutting edge: microRNA-181 promotes human NK cell development by regulating Notch signaling. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2011. Dec 15;187(12):6171–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yan X, Liu J, Wu H, Liu Y, Zheng S, Zhang C, et al. Impact of miR-208 and its Target Gene Nemo-Like Kinase on the Protective Effect of Ginsenoside Rb1 in Hypoxia/Ischemia Injuried Cardiomyocytes. Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology. 2016;39(3):1187–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shen Q, Bae HJ, Eun JW, Kim HS, Park SJ, Shin WC, et al. MiR-101 functions as a tumor suppressor by directly targeting nemo-like kinase in liver cancer. Cancer letters. 2014. Mar 28;344(2):204–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Han Y, Kuang Y, Xue X, Guo X, Li P, Wang X, et al. NLK, a novel target of miR-199a-3p, functions as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2014. Jun;68(5):497–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He XY, Tan ZL, Mou Q, Liu FJ, Liu S, Yu CW, et al. microRNA-221 Enhances MYCN via Targeting Nemo-like Kinase and Functions as an Oncogene Related to Poor Prognosis in Neuroblastoma. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2017. Jun 1;23(11):2905–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lazare SS, Wojtowicz EE, Bystrykh LV, de Haan G. microRNAs in hematopoiesis. Experimental cell research. 2014. Dec 10;329(2):234–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wilkes MC, Repellin CE, Sakamoto KM. Beyond mRNA: The role of non-coding RNAs in normal and aberrant hematopoiesis. Molecular genetics and metabolism. 2017. Nov;122(3):28–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Onge ES, Miller SA, Motycka C, DeBerry A. A review of the treatment of type 2 diabetes in children. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2015. Jan-Feb;20(1):4–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dowling RJ, Goodwin PJ, Stambolic V. Understanding the benefit of metformin use in cancer treatment. BMC medicine. 2011. Apr 6;9:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Suwei D, Liang Z, Zhimin L, Ruilei L, Yingying Z, Zhen L, et al. NLK functions to maintain proliferation and stemness of NSCLC and is a target of metformin. Journal of hematology & oncology. 2015. Oct 26;8:120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jiang X, Ma N, Wang D, Li F, He R, Li D, et al. Metformin inhibits tumor growth by regulating multiple miRNAs in human cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015. Feb 20;6(5):3178–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ortega FJ, Mercader JM, Catalan V, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Pueyo N, Sabater M, et al. Targeting the circulating microRNA signature of obesity. Clinical chemistry. 2013. May;59(5):781–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ortega FJ, Mercader JM, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Rovira O, Guerra E, Esteve E, et al. Profiling of circulating microRNAs reveals common microRNAs linked to type 2 diabetes that change with insulin sensitization. Diabetes care. 2014;37(5):1375–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bye A, Rosjo H, Aspenes ST, Condorelli G, Omland T, Wisloff U. Circulating microRNAs and aerobic fitness--the HUNT-Study. PloS one. 2013;8(2):e57496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang Y, Dai W, Chu X, Yang B, Zhao M, Sun Y. Metformin inhibits lung cancer cells proliferation through repressing microRNA-222. Biotechnology letters. 2013. Dec;35(12):2013–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yu Y, Kanwar SS, Patel BB, Oh PS, Nautiyal J, Sarkar FH, et al. MicroRNA-21 induces stemness by downregulating transforming growth factor beta receptor 2 (TGFbetaR2) in colon cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2012. Jan;33(1):68–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nangia-Makker P, Yu Y, Vasudevan A, Farhana L, Rajendra SG, Levi E, et al. Metformin: a potential therapeutic agent for recurrent colon cancer. PloS one. 2014;9(1):e84369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wahdan-Alaswad RS, Cochrane DR, Spoelstra NS, Howe EN, Edgerton SM, Anderson SM, et al. Metformin-induced killing of triple-negative breast cancer cells is mediated by reduction in fatty acid synthase via miRNA-193b. Hormones & cancer. 2014. Dec;5(6):374–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li W, Yuan Y, Huang L, Qiao M, Zhang Y. Metformin alters the expression profiles of microRNAs in human pancreatic cancer cells. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2012. May;96(2):187–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oliveras-Ferraros C, Cufi S, Vazquez-Martin A, Torres-Garcia VZ, Del Barco S, Martin-Castillo B, et al. Micro(mi)RNA expression profile of breast cancer epithelial cells treated with the anti-diabetic drug metformin: induction of the tumor suppressor miRNA let-7a and suppression of the TGFbeta-induced oncomiR miRNA-181a. Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex). 2011. Apr 1;10(7):1144–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bibikova E, Youn MY, Danilova N, Ono-Uruga Y, Konto-Ghiorghi Y, Ochoa R, et al. TNF-mediated inflammation represses GATA1 and activates p38 MAP kinase in RPS19-deficient hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 2014. Dec 11;124(25):3791–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Narla A, Vlachos A, Nathan DG. Diamond Blackfan anemia treatment: past, present, and future . Seminars in hematology. 2011. Apr;48(2):117–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Morgado-Palacin L, Varetti G, Llanos S, Gomez-Lopez G, Martinez D, Serrano M. Partial Loss of Rpl11 in Adult Mice Recapitulates Diamond-Blackfan Anemia and Promotes Lymphomagenesis. Cell reports. 2015. Oct 27;13(4):712–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wilkes MC, Siva K, Chen J, Varetti G, Dever DP, Nishimura T, et al. Diamond Blackfan Anemia is mediated by Hyperactive Nemo-like Kinase. Under Review. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Flygare J, Kiefer T, Miyake K, Utsugisawa T, Hamaguchi I, Da Costa L, et al. Deficiency of ribosomal protein S19 in CD34+ cells generated by siRNA blocks erythroid development and mimics defects seen in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood. 2005. Jun 15;105(12):4627–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Miyake K, Flygare J, Kiefer T, Utsugisawa T, Richter J, Ma Z, et al. Development of cellular models for ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19)-deficient diamond-blackfan anemia using inducible expression of siRNA against RPS19. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2005. Apr;11(4):627–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jaako P, Flygare J, Olsson K, Quere R, Ehinger M, Henson A, et al. Mice with ribosomal protein S19 deficiency develop bone marrow failure and symptoms like patients with Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood. 2011. Dec 1;118(23):6087–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Danilova N, Sakamoto KM, Lin S. Ribosomal protein S19 deficiency in zebrafish leads to developmental abnormalities and defective erythropoiesis through activation of p53 protein family. Blood. 2008. Dec 15;112(13):5228–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen HW, Qiao HY, Li HC, Li ZF, Zhang HJ, Pei L, et al. Prognostic significance of Nemo-like kinase expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2015. Nov;36(11):8447–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Didiano D, Hobert O. Molecular architecture of a miRNA-regulated 3’ UTR. Rna. 2008. Jul;14(7):1297–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li X, Zhang J, Gao L, McClellan S, Finan MA, Butler TW, et al. MiR-181 mediates cell differentiation by interrupting the Lin28 and let-7 feedback circuit. Cell death and differentiation. 2012. Mar;19(3):378–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zimmerman EI, Dollins CM, Crawford M, Grant S, Nana-Sinkam SP, Richards KL, et al. Lyn kinase-dependent regulation of miR181 and myeloid cell leukemia-1 expression: implications for drug resistance in myelogenous leukemia. Molecular pharmacology. 2010. Nov;78(5):811–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Weng H, Lal K, Yang FF, Chen J. The pathological role and prognostic impact of miR-181 in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer genetics. 2015. May;208(5):225–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li QJ, Chau J, Ebert PJ, Sylvester G, Min H, Liu G, et al. miR-181a is an intrinsic modulator of T cell sensitivity and selection. Cell. 2007. Apr 06;129(1):147–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Su R, Lin HS, Zhang XH, Yin XL, Ning HM, Liu B, et al. MiR-181 family: regulators of myeloid differentiation and acute myeloid leukemia as well as potential therapeutic targets. Oncogene. 2015. Jun;34(25):3226–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Taylor AM, Humphries JM, White RM, Murphey RD, Burns CE, Zon LI. Hematopoietic defects in rps29 mutant zebrafish depend upon p53 activation. Experimental hematology. 2012. Mar;40(3):228–37.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thorpe CJ, Moon RT. nemo-like kinase is an essential co-activator of Wnt signaling during early zebrafish development. Development (Cambridge, England). 2004. Jun;131(12):2899–909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Steffensen LB, Feddersen S, Preil SR, Rasmussen LM. No detectable differential microRNA expression between non-atherosclerotic arteries of type 2 diabetic patients (treated or untreated with metformin) and non-diabetic patients. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2018. May 17;17(1):72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Katsura A, Morishita A, Iwama H, Tani J, Sakamoto T, Tatsuta M, et al. MicroRNA profiles following metformin treatment in a mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. International journal of molecular medicine. 2015. Apr;35(4):877–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang Z, Zhang D, Hu Z, Cheng J, Zhuo C, Fang X, et al. MicroRNA-26a-modified adipose-derived stem cells incorporated with a porous hydroxyapatite scaffold improve the repair of bone defects. Molecular medicine reports. 2015. Sep;12(3):3345–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cabello P, Pineda B, Tormo E, Lluch A, Eroles P. The Antitumor Effect of Metformin Is Mediated by miR-26a in Breast Cancer. International journal of molecular sciences. 2016. Aug 10;17(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kota J, Chivukula RR, O’Donnell KA, Wentzel EA, Montgomery CL, Hwang HW, et al. Therapeutic microRNA delivery suppresses tumorigenesis in a murine liver cancer model. Cell. 2009. Jun 12;137(6):1005–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang B, Liu XX, He JR, Zhou CX, Guo M, He M, et al. Pathologically decreased miR-26a antagonizes apoptosis and facilitates carcinogenesis by targeting MTDH and EZH2 in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2011. Jan;32(1):2–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Suh JH, Choi E, Cha MJ, Song BW, Ham O, Lee SY, et al. Up-regulation of miR-26a promotes apoptosis of hypoxic rat neonatal cardiomyocytes by repressing GSK-3beta protein expression. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2012. Jun 29;423(2):404–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Xu BY, Li YL, Luan B, Zhang YL, Jia TM, Qiao JY. MiR-26a protects type II alveolar epithelial cells against mitochondrial apoptosis. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2018. Jan;22(2):486–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Peng J, He X, Zhang L, Liu P. MicroRNA26a protects vascular smooth muscle cells against H2O2induced injury through activation of the PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway. International journal of molecular medicine. 2018. Sep;42(3):1367–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tan S, Ding K, Chong QY, Zhao J, Liu Y, Shao Y, et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of ERBB2 by miR26a/b and HuR confers resistance to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2017. Aug 18;292(33):13551–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sekimoto N, Suzuki A, Suzuki Y, Sugano S. Expression of miR26a exhibits a negative correlation with HMGA1 and regulates cancer progression by targeting HMGA1 in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Molecular medicine reports. 2017. Feb;15(2):534–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang Y, Su Z, Liu HL, Li L, Wei M, Ge DJ, et al. Effects of miR-26a-5p on neuropathic pain development by targeting MAPK6 in in CCI rat models. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2018. Nov;107:644–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Emami KH, Brown LG, Pitts TE, Sun X, Vessella RL, Corey E. Nemo-like kinase induces apoptosis and inhibits androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer cells. The Prostate. 2009. Oct 1;69(14):1481–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang J, Yang ZH, Chen H, Li HH, Chen LY, Zhu Z, et al. Nemo-like kinase as a negative regulator of nuclear receptor Nurr1 gene transcription in prostate cancer. BMC cancer. 2016. Mar 31;16:257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jung KH, Kim JK, Noh JH, Eun JW, Bae HJ, Xie HJ, et al. Targeted disruption of Nemo-like kinase inhibits tumor cell growth by simultaneous suppression of cyclin D1 and CDK2 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2010. Jun 1;110(3):687–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sa JK, Yoon Y, Kim M, Kim Y, Cho HJ, Lee JK, et al. In vivo RNAi screen identifies NLK as a negative regulator of mesenchymal activity in glioblastoma. Oncotarget. 2015. Aug 21;6(24):20145–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen J, Han Y, Zhao X, Yang M, Liu B, Xi X, et al. Nemolike kinase expression predicts poor survival in colorectal cancer. Molecular medicine reports. 2015. Feb;11(2):1181–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li SZ, Zeng F, Li J, Shu QP, Zhang HH, Xu J, et al. Nemo-like kinase (NLK) primes colorectal cancer progression by releasing the E2F1 complex from HDAC1. Cancer letters. 2018. Sep 1;431:43–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang XW, Chen SY, Xue DW, Xu HH, Yang LH, Xu HT, et al. Expression of Nemo-like kinase was increased and negatively correlated with the expression of TCF4 in lung cancers. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology. 2015;8(11):15086–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang W, He J, Du Y, Gao XH, Liu Y, Liu QZ, et al. Upregulation of nemo-like kinase is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. World journal of gastroenterology. 2015. Aug 7;21(29):8836–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Dong JR, Guo N, Zhao JP, Liu PD, Feng HH, Li Y. Inhibition of nemo-like kinase increases taxol sensitivity in laryngeal cancer. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2013;14(12):7137–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tai J, Rao Y, Fang J, Huang Z, Yu Z, Chen X, et al. Lentivirusdelivered nemolike kinase small interfering RNA inhibits laryngeal cancer cell proliferation in vitro. Molecular medicine reports. 2015. Oct;12(4):5619–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lv M, Li Y, Tian X, Dai S, Sun J, Jin G, et al. Lentivirus-mediated knockdown of NLK inhibits small-cell lung cancer growth and metastasis. Drug design, development and therapy. 2016;10:3737–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yasuda J, Ichikawa H. Mammalian Nemo-like kinase enhances beta-catenin-TCF transcription activity in human osteosarcoma and neuroblastoma cells. Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B, Physical and biological sciences. 2007. Feb;83(1):16–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kortenjann M, Nehls M, Smith AJ, Carsetti R, Schuler J, Kohler G, et al. Abnormal bone marrow stroma in mice deficient for nemo-like kinase, Nlk. European journal of immunology. 2001. Dec;31(12):3580–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ishitani T, Ishitani S. Nemo-like kinase, a multifaceted cell signaling regulator. Cellular signalling. 2013. Jan;25(1):190–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tanno T, Zhang P, Lazarski CA, Liu Y, Zheng P. An aptamer-based targeted delivery of miR-26a protects mice against chemotherapy toxicity while suppressing tumor growth. Blood advances. 2017. Jun 27;1(15):1107–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]