Abstract
The Balbiani body (Bb) is the first marker of polarity in vertebrate oocytes. The Bb is a conserved structure found in diverse animals including insects, fish, amphibians, and mammals. During early zebrafish oogenesis, the Bb assembles as a transient aggregate of mRNA, proteins, and membrane-bound organelles at the presumptive vegetal side of the oocyte. As the early oocyte develops, the Bb appears to grow slowly, until at the end of stage I of oogenesis it disassembles and deposits its cargo of localized mRNAs and proteins. In fish and frogs, this cargo includes the germ plasm as well as gene products required to specify dorsal tissues of the future embryo. We demonstrate that the Bb is a stable, solid structure that forms a size exclusion barrier similar to other biological hydrogels. Despite its central role in oocyte polarity, little is known about the mechanism behind the Bb’s action. Analysis of the few known protein components of the Bb is insufficient to explain how the Bb assembles, translocates, and disassembles. We isolated Bbs from zebrafish oocytes and performed mass spectrometry to define the Bb proteome. We successfully identified 77 proteins associated with the Bb sample, including known Bb proteins and novel RNA-binding proteins. In particular, we identified Cirbpa and Cirbpb, which have both an RNA-binding domain and a predicted self-aggregation domain. In stage I oocytes, Cirbpa and Cirbpb localize to the Bb rather than the nucleus (as in somatic cells), indicating that they may have a specialized function in the germ line. Both the RNA-binding domain and the self-aggregation domain are sufficient to localize to the Bb, suggesting that Cirbpa and Cirbpb interact with more than just their mRNA targets within the Bb. We propose that Cirbp proteins crosslink mRNA cargo and proteinaceous components of the Bb as it grows. Beyond Cirbpa and Cirbpb, our proteomics dataset presents many candidates for further study, making it a valuable resource for building a comprehensive mechanism for Bb function at a protein level.
Keywords: Oocyte development, Balbiani body, membraneless organelles, proteomics, liquid-solid phase separation, hydrogel, CIRBP
Introduction:
Oogenesis primes the fertilized egg for embryonic development. In zebrafish and Xenopus embryos, asymmetry of the oocyte is essential for determining the fertilization site, germ cell specification, and establishing the anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes (Berois, Arezo et al. 2011, Escobar-Aguirre, Elkouby et al. 2017, Jamieson-Lucy and Mullins 2019a). During mouse oogenesis, the oocyte is also organized into distinct cytoplasmic domains, which are important for fertilization and oocyte maturation (Kotani, Yasuda et al. 2013, Takahashi, Kotani et al. 2014), like in fish and frogs. A conserved oocyte structure that acts as one of the first markers of oocyte asymmetry is the Balbiani body (Bb) (Oh and Houston 2017). The Bb is observed in a wide variety of organisms from insects to fish, mice, and humans (Hertig 1968, Pepling, Wilhelm et al. 2007). It is comprised of a membraneless aggregate, containing a variety of membrane-bound organelles such as mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, ribonucleoprotein particles, and an electron dense substance called nuage (Bradley, Kloc et al. 2001, Kloc, Dougherty et al. 2002, Kloc, Jedrzejowska et al. 2014). In fish and frogs, the Bb carries maternal mRNAs to the prospective vegetal pole, where it disassembles, releasing its cargo at the cortex where it is tethered until the start of embryonic development (Howley and Ho 2000, Houston 2013). These maternal mRNAs are important for axial patterning and generating the germ plasm (Houston and King 2000, Houston and King 2000, Marlow 2010, Ge, Grotjahn et al. 2014).
Understanding membraneless organelles such as the Bb can give us insights into a wide variety of cellular processes. Other membraneless organelles include stress granules and P-bodies in mammalian cells, which function in mRNA sequestration and processing during stress (Protter and Parker 2016, Luo, Na et al. 2018), and P granules in C elegans, which act in germ cell determination (Marnik and Updike 2019). To separate from the cytoplasm, these membraneless organelles undergo phase separation with P granules undergoing a liquid to liquid phase transition (Brangwynne, Eckmann et al. 2009, Khong, Jain et al. 2018, Schuster, Reed et al. 2018). Other membraneless structures form dense, stable proteinaceous aggregates within the cytoplasm. This type of aggregate is of clinical significance because of their similarity to non-functional, detrimental structures found in degenerative diseases such as ALS and Alzheimer’s (Blennow, de Leon et al. 2006, Ramesh and Pandey 2017). The Bb shares structural qualities with these aggregates; it is comprised in part of amyloid-like fibrils, similar to those that form the hallmark plaques of Alzheimer’s disease (Boke, Ruer et al. 2016). However, the Bb differs importantly from these structures: it is a functional component of oogenesis and disassembles naturally (Wallace and Selman 1990). This makes the Bb an attractive model for studying membraneless organelles and other aggregates.
To identify novel components of the Bb, we isolated Bbs and subjected them to proteomics analysis to identify the protein content. We identified four previously known Bb-resident proteins, validating the approach. Among the 77 proteins identified, we focused on the Cold Inducible RNA-Binding Proteins A and B (Cirbpa and Cirbpb), because they stood out among our candidates for having predicted self-aggregation properties as well as RNA-binding ability. We speculate that they may play a functional role within the Bb.
Results:
The Balbiani body is a robust, stable structure
We found that the Balbiani body (Bb) is a stable structure that grows slowly over the course of oocyte development. As the oocyte progresses through stage I, its size steadily increases, and we can therefore use oocyte diameter as a proxy for its development over time. When we isolated oocytes and compared Bb diameter to the whole oocyte diameter, we observed that Bb size increased along with oocyte size in an approximately linear fashion (Figure 1A). Many membraneless organelles employ dynamic liquid-liquid phase separation mechanisms (Hyman and Simons 2012), but the apparent slow growth of the Bb indicates a more stable, solid structure. This is consistent with Xenopus FRAP experiments which show that mRNA and proteins do not move quickly within the Bb (Chang, Torres et al. 2004, Boke, Ruer et al. 2016). Anecdotally, we noticed that when crushed against a glass dish or slide, the Bb smears as if it is made of putty. To demonstrate its solid nature experimentally, we isolated Bbs from stage I oocytes and placed them in PBS, using the membrane dye DiOC6 to visualize them. Even over the course of two hours, we observed no change in the overall shape of the Bb (Figure 1B). By contrast, the material in liquid-liquid phase-separated droplets dissipates when disturbed (Brangwynne, Eckmann et al. 2009).
Figure 1: The Balbiani body exhibits hydrogel-like properties.

a) Bb diameter plotted against oocyte diameter. b) Time course of isolated Bbs in PBS (scale bar: 50 μm. n=6 Bbs). c) Schematic depicting injection technique. d) Live stage I oocytes injected with TRITC-labeled dextran and incubated for 2 hours before imaging for DiOC6 and TRITC (4.4 kD: n=12 oocytes, 40 kD: n=9, 70 kD: n=17, 155 kD: n=16 oocytes). Solid arrows: Bb; open arrows: Bb position.
These results led us to consider that the Bb behaves more like a hydrogel than a droplet. Hydrogels such as the nuclear pore complex (Bonner 1975) and associated P granules in C elegans (Updike, Hachey et al. 2011) are capable of forming size exclusion barriers, where nonspecific molecules over a certain size cannot penetrate the structure. In the Bb, even specific cargo mRNAs can take upwards of 24 hours to fully penetrate into the structure (Chang, Torres et al. 2004); we hypothesized that a general size-exclusion barrier may prevent the uptake of non-specific molecules into the Bb. We tested if the Bb forms a size exclusion barrier by injecting differently sized fluorescently-labeled dextran molecules into stage I oocytes. To introduce small molecules such as fluorescent dextran or synthetic mRNA into the oocyte, we needed to develop a new technique. One-cell stage embryos are approximately 500 μm in diameter, while stage I oocytes range from 50 to 100 μm in diameter, five to ten times smaller than embryos and a thousand-fold smaller in volume. We adapted the zebrafish embryo injection method to a much smaller scale and were able to successfully inject and image live oocytes by embedding them in a thin layer of agarose (Figure 1C) (Kobayashi et al., 2021).
We found that the Bb did not exclude 4.4 kD dextran molecules. As the size increased to 40, 70, and 155 kD, we found that the Bb partially excluded the larger dextrans after a two-hour incubation (Figure 1D). This implies that the Bb structure may exclude non-specific molecules. However, unlike the nuclear pore complex where molecules under 40 kD can enter the nucleus and anything larger than 40 kD is excluded, the Bb only partially excluded large molecules. This may be because the Bb is a heterogeneous structure with many protein components contributing to a hydrogel-like material.
The stable, solid nature of the Bb makes it a good candidate for isolation and analysis compared to other membraneless organelles. We next took advantage of this property to investigate the protein components of the Bb.
Generating a more complete zebrafish Balbiani body proteome
Despite the Bb’s importance to oogenesis and utility as a model for membraneless organelles, the protein components of the zebrafish Bb have not previously been characterized. Proteomics studies in Xenopus have identified a number of Bb proteins, however, those results included very high levels of yolk proteins and hemoglobin, not expected in stage I oocytes. In these previous studies, the only validated Bb protein was the Xenopus homolog of the previously known zebrafish resident Bb protein Bucky ball (Xvelo) (Bontems, Stein et al. 2009, Heim, Hartung et al. 2014, Boke, Ruer et al. 2016). Less than a dozen resident Bb proteins have been validated across all model organisms, but given the Bb’s complex function throughout development, we expected many more functional protein components. To gain a more complete view of Bb resident proteins and better understand the mechanisms of formation, growth, and disassembly of the Bb, we set out to identify the zebrafish Bb proteome. Using zebrafish as a model, grants us access to a library of genetic tools that we can use in the future to study the functions of the Bb proteins identified.
We isolated Bbs from zebrafish stage I oocytes as described (Elkouby and Mullins 2017, (Jamieson-Lucy and Mullins 2019b)) and performed proteomics. We collected the Bbs stained with DiOC6 and analyzed them by LC/MS mass spectrometry (Figure 2A, Table 1). This generated a proteomics dataset of over 200 proteins, with 77 replicated hits found over the course of five independent experiments (Supplemental Table 1).
Figure 2. Mass spectrometry identifies novel Balbiani body resident candidate proteins and reveals similarities to other membraneless organelles.

a) Experimental setup: stage I oocytes are harvested from juvenile zebrafish ovaries, stained with DiOC6, and lysed to release Bbs. Bbs are collected and sent for LC/MS mass spectrometry. 5 independent experiments yielded 217 total identified proteins and 77 replicated protein hits (present in at least 2 experiments). b) STRING network showing predicted interactions between Balbiani body proteins. Heavier lines between proteins indicate more evidence of a relationship between the two proteins. Proteins with RNA-binding properties are highlighted in red. c) Gene ontology (GO) for replicated hits. Fold enrichment: enrichment over background frequency of GO term in full Danio rerio genome. Percent: percent of analyzed Bb proteomic hits annotated with GO term. d) All identified proteins compared to previously identified Bb proteins and known stress granule/p body proteome, and e) the reported Xenopus Bb proteome. f) Peptide count (total) for all replicated proteins plotted against RPKM from RNAseq of early stage I oocytes (40–70 μm).
Table 1.
Top 25 identified proteins by total peptide count.
| Gene Name | Gene Symbol | Also known as | Peptide count | Granule association | Function | Phenotype | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSM family member 14B | Lsm14b* | Rap55 | 109 | Balbiani body (mouse, fly) | Translation control and mRNA binding activity | - | (Cai-Lian, Qi-Wen et al. 2010) |
| DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box helicase 6 | Ddx6* | p54a | 86 | Balbiani body, p bodies | Translation suppression and mRNA degradation | Morpholino causes tail defect in zebrafish | (Ayache, Bénard et al. 2015, Huang, Ku et al. 2017) |
| Elongation factor 1-alpha (si:dkey-37o8.1) | Eef1a | Ef-1 alpha | 74 | Promotes aggresome formation | Translational elongation | Mutants implicated in neurological disorders in mammals | (Meriin, Zaarur et al. 2012, Idigo, Soares et al. 2020) |
| poly(A) binding protein cytoplasmic 1-like | Pabpc1l | ePAB | 70 | Stress granules | mRNA binding and post-trancriptional regulation | Mouse mutant females are infertile | (Friend, Brook et al. 2012, Kobayashi, Winslow et al. 2012) |
| Zygote arrest 1 | Zar1 | - | 68 | Granules in 2-cell mouse embryo | Required for oocyte development | In zebrafish oocytes apoptose and adult mutants become all male | (Miao, Yuan et al. 2017) |
| Y-box binding protein 1 | Ybx1 | Yb1, Nsep1 | 66 | Stress granules | Cold shock response and mRNA regulation | Zebrafish maternal effect mutant: embryos display cleavage defects and fail to undergo MZT | (Kumari, Gilligan et al. 2013, Sun, Yan et al. 2018) |
| Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 3 | Igf2bp3 | Vg1-RBP | 62 | mRNA vegetally localized in zebrafish oocytes | mRNA transport and localization | Maternal effect causes severe developmental defects in zebrafish | (Ren, Lin et al. 2020) |
| Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1 | Eif4enif1 | 4E-T | 61 | P bodies | Translation factor shuttling | - | (Ayache, Bénard et al. 2015) |
| Si:dkey-208k4.2 protein (P43 5S RNA-binding protein, medaka) | 42Sp43 | Thesaurin-b | 44 | Not found in Xenopus Balbiani body | Zinc-finger, RNP storage particle component | - | (Joho, Darby et al. 1990, Schneider, Dabauvalle et al. 2010) |
| Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 1b | Cpeb1b | Zorba | 33 | Stress granules | mRNA binding and post-transcriptional regulation, Dazl regulator | Mutations associated with human ovarian deficiency | (Wilczynska, Aigueperse et al. 2005, Sousa Martins, Liu et al. 2016) |
| Heat shock protein 5 | Hspa5 | BiP, Grp78 | 30 | - | Protein folding and assembly | Zebrafish mutant is lethal | (Amsterdam, Nissen et al. 2004, Moreno and Tiffany-Castiglioni 2015) |
| Cold inducible RNA-binding protein a | Cirbpa* | - | 28 | Stress granules | Cold shock response and mRNA regulation | Mouse mutant males have imparied spermatogonia proliferation, otherwise fertile | (De Leeuw, Zhang et al. 2007, Masuda, Itoh et al. 2012) |
| Heat shock protein 90alpha1.2 | Hsp90aa1.2 | Cb820 | 27 | - | Protein folding and assembly | Zebrafish mutant has PGC migration defects | (Du, Li et al. 2008, Pfeiffer, Tarbashevich et al. 2018) |
| ATP synthase F1 subunit alpha | Atp5fa1 | Atp5a1 | 25 | - | ATP synthesis | - | (Jonckheere, Renkema et al. 2013) |
| Cold inducible RNA-binding protein b | Cirbpb* | - | 25 | Stress granules | Cold shock response and mRNA regulation | Mouse mutant female produce morphologically normal oocytes but embryos fail to complete MZT | (De Leeuw, Zhang et al. 2007, Masuda, Itoh et al. 2012) |
| Piwi-like RNA-mediated gene silencing 1 | Piwil1 | Ziwi | 22 | Nuage, Germ granules | germ cell development and piRNA metabolic process | Loss of Ziwi Triggers Germ Cell Apoptosis | (Houwing, Kamminga et al. 2007) |
| Poly(A) binding protein nuclear 1-like | Pabpn1l | - | 20 | Nuclear aggregates | mRNA binding and post-transcriptional regulation | Mouse mutant female produce morphologically normal oocytes but embryos fail to complete MZT | (Zhao, Zhu et al. 2020) |
| Heat shock 60 protein 1 | Hspd1 | Hsp60 | 20 | - | Protein folding and assembly | Zebrafish mutant has regeneration defects | (Pei, Tanaka et al. 2016) |
| PAT1 homolog2 | Patl2 | - | 20 | P bodies | Translational repression | Mutations in mice and humans cause female infertility | (Nakamura, Tanaka et al. 2010, Ozgur, Chekulaeva et al. 2010, Chen, Zhang et al. 2017) |
| ATP synthase F1 subunit beta | Atp5f1b | - | 19 | - | ATP synthesis | - | (Jonckheere, Renkema et al. 2013) |
| Bucky ball | Buc* | - | 18 | Balbiani body | Balbiani body formation, oocyte polarity | Zebrafish mutant lacks Balbiani body, AV polarity defects | (Marlow and Mullins, 2008, Bontems, Stein et al. 2009) |
| Elongation factor 1-alpha (eef1a1b) | Eef1a | Ef-1 alpha | 18 | Promotes aggresome formation | Translational elongation | Mutants implicated in neurological disorders in mammals | (Meriin, Zaarur et al. 2012, Idigo, Soares et al. 2020) |
| ELAV like neuron-specific RNA binding protein 2 | Elavl2 | HuB | 17 | Germ granules | mRNA binding and post-transcriptional regulation | suggested to be involved in germ-cell maintenance in Xenopus | (Mickoleit, Banisch et al. 2011, Wiszniak, Dredge et al. 2011) |
| Elongation factor 1-alpha (eef1a1l1) | Eef1a | Ef-1 alpha | 17 | Promotes aggresome formation | Translational elongation | Mutants implicated in neurological disorders in mammals | (Meriin, Zaarur et al. 2012, Idigo, Soares et al. 2020) |
| Malate dehydrogenase 2, NAD (mitochondrial) | Mdh2 | - | 17 | - | carbohydrate metabolic process and malate metabolic process | Human ortholog(s) of this gene implicated in developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 51 | (Gebriel, Prabhudesai et al. 2014, Ait-El-Mkadem, Dayem-Quere et al. 2017) |
An * indicates that the protein has been validated as a Bb component.
Importantly, we found several previously identified resident Bb proteins, validating our approach, as well as proteins from mitochondria and ER, organelles that are abundant within the Bb. Also present were ribosomal components and RNA-binding proteins. STRING analysis showed that our Bb protein set was significantly enriched for predicted interactions compared to the whole genome (Figure 2B). The top GO terms for the replicated proteomics dataset are related to RNA-binding and translation (Figure 2C), which conforms to expectations of the Bb as an RNA-rich structure that functions in the regulation of maternal mRNAs. We found significant overlap between proteins in our Bb proteome and those found in stress granules, P bodies, and the Xenopus Bb (Figure 2D–E) (Boke, Ruer et al. 2016, Youn, Dyakov et al. 2019). For example, our lab previously discovered Bucky ball (Buc) as an essential protein for formation of the Bb (Dosch, Wagner et al. 2004, Marlow and Mullins, 2008, Bontems, Stein et al. 2009), and it is a known Bb component that was present both in our proteomics dataset and in the Xenopus Bb (Boke, Ruer et al. 2016). Lsm14b, Ddx6, Cirbpa and Cirbpb are additional examples of proteins shared between the zebrafish, Xenopus, and stress granule/P-body proteomes (Weston and Sommerville 2006, Pepling, Wilhelm et al. 2007).
We then narrowed our focus to the 77 proteins that were present in at least two of five proteomics experiments. To ensure that we were not simply identifying the most abundant proteins in the oocytes, we compared the number of peptide hits for each protein to mRNA expression level in oocytes at a similar stage as an estimate for protein abundance. Expression data were generated by performing RNAseq on stage I oocytes between 40 and 70 μm in diameter and their associated follicle cells to compare to our Bb data. Oocytes of this size have formed a mature Bb but not started the Bb disassembly process. We found that our proteomics dataset included both high and low expression genes, and several very highly expressed genes in the oocyte had only a few peptide hits, supporting that our proteomics work identified genuine Bb components and is not simply a recapitulation of the whole oocyte proteome (Figure 2F). This set of zebrafish Bb proteins will be a useful resource for future studies of the Bb.
Cirbpa and Cirbpb are RNA-binding proteins with predicted self-aggregation properties
With an interest in pursuing further proteins contributing to the amyloid like structure within the Bb, we performed a search for predicted self-aggregating properties among our proteomic hits. We used a primary sequence-based algorithm PLAAC (Prion-Like Amino Acid Composition) to search our proteomics data set for proteins with predicted self-aggregating or prion-like domains (PrLDs). This search returned three proteins with presumptive PrLDs. One result was the known Bb protein Buc, with a predicted PrLD at its N-terminus (Figure 3A). Buc is essential for Bb formation, and has been shown to form aggregates in vitro that are dependent on its self-aggregating N-terminus (Marlow and Mullins, 2008, Bontems, Stein et al. 2009, Boke, Ruer et al. 2016). The two other results were Cold Inducible RNA-Binding Proteins A and B (Cirbpa and Cirbpb), with predicted PrLDs at the C-terminus (Figure 3A). These proteins are teleost paralogs and are 67.5% identical at the amino acid level, and have identical domain structures.
Figure 3. Amino acid sequence-based analysis shows Cirbpa and b have predicted self-aggregating properties similar to Buc and FUS.

a) PLAAC results predicting prion-like self aggregation domains. Peach shading indicates predicted self-aggregating sequence. b) FoldIndex disorder predictions. c) Comparison of [S/G]Y[S/G] repeats between Cirbpa, Cirbpb, Buc and FUS. d) Domain structure of Cirbpa and Cirbpb.
The Cirbp RNA-binding proteins contain a predicted N-terminal RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) domain and a disordered C-terminal region. Cirbp’s RNA-binding specificity is predicted to be relatively low; analysis of its mRNA targets in the mouse testis reveal a preference for uracil repeats, but no specific sequence motif (Xia, Zheng et al. 2012). Cirbp proteins are highly expressed in the gonads, particularly in the testis in response to cold stress (Nishiyama, Danno et al. 1998). In cells stressed by cold or other insults, Cirbp expression increases, and the protein shuttles from its usual location in the nucleus to stress granules in the cytoplasm (De Leeuw, Zhang et al. 2007, Liao, Tong et al. 2017). Like the Bb, stress granules are membraneless, RNA-rich structures, and have been shown to have a phase-separated liquid-like outer layer and a more solid aggregate core (Wheeler, Jain et al. 2017).
To further strengthen our prediction that Cirbpa and b may have self-aggregating properties, we compared their sequences to both Buc and RNA-binding protein Fused in Sarcoma/Translocated in Sarcoma (FUS), a well-characterized RNA-binding and aggregating protein that forms amyloid-like plaques in degenerative diseases including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) (Baloh 2012, Lu, Lim et al. 2017, Lee, Ghosh et al. 2020). As expected, the PLAAC algorithm predicted that FUS contains large PrLDs (Figure 3A).
Another characteristic of self-aggregating proteins is the presence of disordered regions (Schuster, Dignon et al. 2020). Disordered domains within proteins have no fixed tertiary structure unless induced by interacting with another protein or molecule. As many as one third of all proteins have significant stretches of disordered sequence, which correlates with functions such as RNA/DNA binding and protein-protein interactions (Shimizu and Toh 2009). Conversely, highly ordered proteins with very stable tertiary structures are correlated with enzymatic activity and receptor proteins. We used FoldIndex to predict disordered versus ordered regions in the primary sequences of Cirbpa, Cirbpb, Buc and FUS. We found that Cirbpa was predicted to be 80.5% disordered, and Cirbpb 99.5% (Figure 3B). The largest disordered regions spanned the entire C-terminus for both proteins, consistent with the N-terminus containing a conserved RRM domain. The Buc amino acid sequence is 70.4% disordered, while FUS is 90.5% (Figure 3B).
An essential feature of the FUS protein to form amyloid-like aggregates is a series of serine/glycine-tyrosine-serine/glycine repeats ([S/G]Y[S/G]) (Kato, Han et al. 2012). Cirbpa and Cirbpb also have [S/G]Y[S/G] repeats in their PrLDs (Figure 3C). Cirbpa has five copies of this motif, and Cirbpb has eight. When adjusted for protein length, this is a similar frequency to the repeats in the FUS protein (FUS ratio repeats:amino acid 1:25, Cirbpa 1:37, Cirbpb 1:25). Conversely, Buc does not contain this motif anywhere in its sequence, and neither did any other candidates in our proteomics dataset. This made Cirbpa and Cirbpb attractive candidates for further validation and functional study. We hypothesized that Cirbpa and Cirbpb bind to maternal mRNAs via their N-terminus RRM domain, while their C-terminus consists of a disordered tail with aggregating properties that may function in interacting with other proteins or forming amyloid-like structures or fibrils that contribute to the Bb (Figure 3D).
Cirbpa and Cirbpb localize to the Balbiani body in vivo
The first step in our further study of Cirbp was to examine its behavior in vivo. We generated Cirbpa-Venus and Cirbpb-Venus constructs to inject into living cells. We injected mRNA encoding the tagged Cirbp fusion proteins into live oocytes and observed their localization. When injected as a positive mRNA control, Venus-Buc localizes to the Bb as expected (Figure 4A), and a negative control of Venus alone did not show enrichment in the Bb (Figure 4D).
Figure 4. Cirbpa and Cirbpb localize to the Bb in vivo.

a-d) Stage I oocytes injected with a) Buc-Venus (n=15 oocytes) b) Cirbpa-Venus (n=9 oocytes), c) Cirbpb-Venus (n=13 oocytes) or d) Venus (n=6) (green) and stained with mitotracker (red). The Bb is visible in brightfield images. All results representative of at least 2 experiments.
Both Cirbpa-Venus and Cirbpb-Venus localized to the Bb, validating our proteomics results and indicating that they are genuine Bb components in vivo (Figure 4B, C). In addition to fluorescence within the Bb, we also observed that the exogenous proteins spontaneously formed smaller granules within the cytoplasm. This may be an artifact of overexpression, especially in the case of Buc, which endogenously localizes exclusively to the Bb at this stage. It is of interest, however, if components of the Bb such as Buc and Cirbp are able to spontaneously nucleate smaller aggregates that could contribute to the growth of the Bb over the course of oocyte development.
Interestingly, we observed no nuclear localization of Cirbpa-Venus or Cirbpb-Venus in injected stage I oocytes. This was unexpected, given that Cirbp is a nuclear protein in mammalian cells (De Leeuw, Zhang et al. 2007). When we injected one-cell stage zebrafish embryos with mRNA encoding zebrafish Cirbpa-Venus, in contrast, it localized to the nucleus (Figure 5A). Cirbp’s nuclear localization is mediated by a nonclassical nuclear localization signal (Bourgeois, Hutten et al. 2020), which must be disabled in the oocyte, allowing for its unique localization pattern in stage I oocytes compared to other cells. This localization is also stage-specific; in stage II oocytes, after Bb disassembly, Cirbpa-Venus and Cirbpb-Venus are ubiquitous throughout the cytoplasm and also present within the nucleus (Figure 5B). The protein also no longer forms granules in the cytoplasm. In contrast, stage II oocytes injected with Venus-Buc have fluorescence arranged asymmetrically along the cortex, recapitulating endogenous localization (Figure 5B). Oocytes do not have time to progress from stage I to stage II between injection and imaging, indicating that exogenous Buc can correctly dock at the cortex without first localizing to the Bb.
Figure 5. Oocyte and stage-specific localization of Cirbp by its RRM and PrLD.

a) Dome stage embryo (animal z-slice) injected at the 1-cell stage with mRNA encoding Cirbpa-Venus (green) and H3.3-mCherry to label the nucleus (red) (n=6 embryos). b) Stage II oocytes injected with mRNA encoding Buc-Venus (n=13 oocytes), Cirbpa-Venus (n=3 oocytes), or Cirbpb-Venus (n=3 oocytes) (green) and stained with mitotracker (red). All results representative of at least 2 experiments. c) Stage I oocytes co-injected with CirbpaΔ84−185-Venus (RRM, lacking the carboxy-terminal PrLD) or CirbpaΔ1−83-Venus (PrLD, lacking the amino-terminal RRM) (green) and Cirbpa-mCherry (red). A white arrowhead denotes the Bb.
Both the RRM domain and PrLD are sufficient to enrich Cirbpa within the Balbiani body
Finally we examined the role of Cirbpa’s RRM and PrLD domains in Bb localization. We hypothesized that the PrLD of Cirbpa functions to localize the protein to the Bb, while the RRM domain binds maternal mRNA targets that are carried by the Bb. To test functional roles of each domain within Cirbpa, we generated Venus tagged truncation constructs and examined their localization in stage I oocytes. The first construct deletes the carboxy terminus of the protein (CirbpaΔ84−185-Venus), removing the entire PrLD and leaving only the RRM. The second removes the amino-terminal RRM (CirbpaΔ1−83-Venus) and leaves the full PrLD intact. We predicted that the PrLD would be necessary and sufficient for Bb localization. We injected oocytes with CirbpaΔ1−83-Venus and found that the PrLD can localize to the Bb without the RRM domain, as expected. However, when we injected CirbpaΔ84−185-Venus mRNA into stage I oocytes, we were surprised that the RRM alone was sufficient to enrich the protein within the Bb, showing that the PrLD is not an absolute requirement (Figure 5C). This experiment shows that both the RRM and the PrLD can associate with the Bb.
Discussion:
We identified a large number of candidate resident Bb proteins, including proteins known to be present in the Bb of other organisms, as well as proteins previously not found. Some of these proteins may be specific to zebrafish or may not have been detected yet in other organisms. Our Bb proteomics runs were limited by the number of Bbs that could be collected at one time (~100–200/collection) and were not exhaustive. Some known Bb localized proteins, such as Rbpms2/Hermes and Macf1, were not identified in our proteome, consistent with a non-exhaustive Bb proteome identification. However, we found many candidate proteins shared between the Bb and other ribonuclear protein aggregate structures, such as stress granules and P bodies (Figure 2D,E). Moreover, some candidate proteins, such as Vasa, Eif4enif1, Hspd1, Cirbpa, and Cirbpb, were also found enriched in an embryo germ plasm (Buc-GFP pulldown) proteomics study (Krishnakumar, Riemer et al. 2018). Further functional studies of these candidate proteins may lead to shared mechanisms across membraneless organelles.
We found that the Bb proteome is highly enriched for RNA-binding proteins, consistent with the large number of RNAs known to localize to the Bb. More surprisingly, we found many ribosomal subunits and proteins involved in translational control, which raises the still-unanswered question of if the Bb is translationally active or quiescent. Aggregates like stress granules sequester and translationally suppress mRNA transcripts, so we are inclined to speculate that mRNAs in the Bb are similarly translationally repressed. However, if ribosomes are present or even enriched, that might not be the case.
Of the proteins we identified in our proteomics, Cirbpa and b stood out because of their RNA-binding ability and predicted self-aggregating properties. The Bb stains positively for amyloid-like fibrils (Boke, Ruer et al. 2016), and we find that the Bb forms a robust, solid hydrogel-like structure within the cytoplasm. Our results support the hypothesis that Cirbpa and b have a stage I oocyte-specific function. Cirbpa and Cirbpb can localize to the Bb, validating our proteomics results. They do not localize to the nucleus as in somatic cells, and can spontaneously form granules in the oocyte. However, their localization patterns are unique compared to Buc in stage II oocytes, indicating that they likely function differently in the oocyte from Buc. In particular, the transition from associated with Buc in the Bb to no longer associated with Buc at the oocyte cortex suggests a change in Cirbp during Bb disassembly. Any functional insights into Bb disassembly are of interest, as understanding how the oocyte naturally dismantles a large protein aggregate may provide avenues for studying how to reverse deleterious aggregates in human disease.
Beyond their function in the cold stress response, Cirbps are involved in a variety of cellular and disease processes. They mitigate damage from hypoxia by inhibiting apoptosis, and are classified as proto-oncogenes due to this apoptosis-suppressing function; they also have been implicated in pro-inflammatory pathways, and are neuroprotective post CNS injury. Cirbp is also a component of stress granules, and can spontaneously form phase-separated liquid-liquid droplets in vitro (Bourgeois, Hutten et al. 2020). Since zebrafish Cirbpa and Cirbpb are also predicted to self-aggregate in addition to bind RNA (Figure 3D), there may be shared mechanisms between the two structures.
In the Bb, we found that both the RRM and the PrLD of Cirbp can localize to the Bb independently. We hypothesize that the RRM domain may bind to the enriched mRNA within the Bb and therefore becoming enriched itself. It is important to note that PrLDs do not all function similarly in vivo and are not necessarily interchangeable. In Xenopus, when the PrLD of Xvelo, the Buc ortholog, was replaced by the PrLD of the prion-like protein FUS, it failed to localize to the Bb (Boke, Ruer et al. 2016). Here we show that the PrLD of Cirbp is sufficient to localize to the Bb; however, whether it could substitute for the Buc PrLD will require further studies. Our results open up the possibility of multivalent interactions where each Cirbpa protein has multiple binding partners, and together the PrLD and RRM integrate mRNA cargo into the Bb or stabilize the Bb by crosslinking mRNAs to the amyloid-like aggregates within the structure. In our model, Cirbp spontaneously self-aggregates via the PrLD tail, while the RRM binds to mRNA cargo. As the Bb grows, Cirbp, Buc, and other protein components of the Bb form a fibrous tangle around mRNA, mitochondria and other smaller organelles (Figure 6). By validating Cirbpa and Cirbpb as Bb resident proteins, we added another link between the Bb and other membraneless organelles, and an avenue into further functional studies of the Bb in the zebrafish.
Figure 6. Schematic depicting a model of Cirbp’s integration into the Balbiani body.

Hypothetical model for how Cirbp may self-aggregate into fibers and contribute to the hydrogel structure of the Bb. Cirbp may form homogenous or heterogeneous fibrils while binding to Bb mRNAs. Mitochondria reside within the structure, which solidifies into a densely cross-linked network.
Methods
Animal Husbandry:
Adult zebrafish were kept at 28° C in a 13-hr light/11-hr dark cycle. All experiments and animal husbandry were done in compliance with NIH guidelines and those of the University of Pennsylvania and were approved by the University of Pennsylvania IACUC. The Tübingen (TU) strain was used as wild type. Ovaries were dissected from juvenile female zebrafish (approximately 8 weeks post fertilization, standard length 15–21 mm) as described (Elkouby and Mullins 2017).
Size quantification:
Stage I oocytes were isolated (Elkouby and Mullins 2017) and stained with DiOC6 at a concentration of 20 nM for 1 hr followed by two 30 min washes with L-15 media, then imaged by confocal microscopy. Image stacks were sectioned using MATLAB to generate outlines of the oocyte and Bb. A 3D ellipsoid was fit to the outlines, and the lengths of the principal axes were averaged to obtain a value for the oocyte and Bb diameter.
Balbiani body collection and proteomics:
Bbs were collected as described in (Jamieson-Lucy and Mullins 2019b). Briefly, we dissociated the ovaries to release single oocytes by incubating with digestive enzymes (Collagenase I, Collagenase II and Hyaluronidase) and manual separation. Bbs were visualized using DiOC6, then the oocytes where lysed into a protease inhibitor cocktail by passing them multiple times through a 30-gauge needle, freeing the labeled Bbs. The Bbs were then collected using a microinjection needle and transferred to a minimal volume of protease inhibitor cocktail and stored at −80 °C until nanoLC/nanospray/MS/MS. The University of Pennsylvania proteomics core facility performed the analysis and data were acquired with Xcalibur 2.0 (ThermoFisher) and analyzed with Scaffold 3 (Proteome Software) software package. Cutoffs: Peptide p-value: <95%; Protein p-value <99.0%.
RNAseq:
Whole adult zebrafish ovaries were dissociated using the same process as described in the Bb proteomics. Oocytes were then separated by size to isolate different stages, and their mRNA extracted (Elkouby and Mullins 2017). After RNA extraction, samples were treated with oligo(dT) beads to enrich for poly(A)+ RNA, according to the manufacturer protocol. RNA-seq libraries were prepared using strand-specific TruSeq Illumina adapters and sequenced by the Yale Center for Genome Analysis. For record keeping and bioinformatics analysis, sample annotations were stored in LabxDB (Vejnar and Giraldez 2020). The “import_ensembl” tool from the FONtools (Vejnar) was used (a) to import Ensembl release 78 (Howe, Achuthan et al. 2020), (b) to create an index for the Zv9 zebrafish genome, and (c) to generate FON1 files containing genes (or “metagenes”) that concatenates the isoforms of each gene together using the “--method union” option of the “fon_transform” tool (Vejnar). Raw reads were mapped onto zebrafish genome Zv9 using STAR (Dobin, Davis et al. 2012) with default parameters. Read counts per gene were computed by summing the total number of reads overlapping at least 10 nucleotides the gene annotation. Reads mapping to multiple loci accounted for 1 divided by the number of loci to which the read was mapped to. Counts were normalized to RPKM using gene length and the total number of reads mapped to the zebrafish genome.
Protein primary sequence and network analysis:
Primary protein sequences were analyzed using Foldindex (Prilusky, Felder et al. 2005) to predict protein order and disordered sequences, and PLAAC (Prion-Like Amino Acid Composition) (Lancaster, Nutter-Upham et al. 2014) to identify possible self-aggregating domains. The STRING network (Szklarczyk, Gable et al. 2019) was generated using the subset of the 77 replicated protein hits which could be identified by the Danio rerio STRING v11 dataset.
Oocyte injections:
Starting with juvenile ovaries with few late-stage oocytes, we used forceps to manually remove oocytes larger than stage II. Oocyte injections were performed as described (Kobayashi et al, 2021). The oocytes were embedded in a thin layer of low-melt agarose to immobilize them, and microinjected with a minimal volume of either dextran (final concentration 4 mg/ml) or mRNA. mRNA for injection was generated using the SP6 MMessage Machine kit (ThermoFisher Science AM1340). After injection, oocytes were incubated overnight in L-15 media and then stained with either Mitotracker red at a concentration of 100 nM or DiOC6 at a concentration of 20 nM for 1 hr followed by two 30 min washes with L-15 media. The layer of agarose was then pressed against a cover slip and imaged using confocal microscopy.
Supplementary Material
Table S1: Full list of identified Balbiani body proteins.
Table S2: Transcript levels of identified Balbiani body proteins in stage I oocytes. Expression levels measured by RNAseq of oocytes between 40 and 70 μm in diameter. RPKM represents the average of two technical replicates.
Video S1: Isolated Balbiani body timelapse. Isolated Balbiani body in PBS, stained with DiOC6 to visualize it. One frame taken every 5 minutes.
Highlights.
The solid membraneless oocyte Balbiani body aggregate as a size exclusion barrier
Balbiani body isolation, collection, and proteomics reveals 77+ proteins
Cold Inducible RNA Binding Protein validated as Balbiani body resident protein
Cirbp Prion-like domain and RRM independently localize to the Balbiani body
Acknowledgements
We thank the University of Pennsylvania Cell and Developmental Biology Department Microscopy Core, in particular Dr. Andrea Stout for guidance in use of the confocal microscopes. This work was funded by from the National Institutes of Health: R35-GM131908 to MCM, F31-GM115066 and T32 GM008216 to AJL, and R35-GM122580 to AG.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References:
- Amsterdam A, Nissen RM, Sun Z, Swindell EC, Farrington S and Hopkins N (2004). “Identification of 315 genes essential for early zebrafish development.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(35): 12792–12797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ayache J, Bénard M, Ernoult-Lange M, Minshall N, Standart N, Kress M and Weil D (2015). “P-body assembly requires DDX6 repression complexes rather than decay or Ataxin2/2L complexes.” Mol Biol Cell 26(14): 2579–2595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baloh RH (2012). “How do the RNA-binding proteins TDP-43 and FUS relate to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal degeneration, and to each other?” Curr Opin Neurol 25(6): 701–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berois N, Arezo MJ and Papa NG (2011). “Gamete interactions in teleost fish: the egg envelope. Basic studies and perspectives as environmental biomonitor %J Biological Research.” 44: 119–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blennow K, de Leon MJ and Zetterberg H (2006). “Alzheimer’s disease.” Lancet 368(9533): 387–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boke E, Ruer M, Wühr M, Coughlin M, Lemaitre R, Gygi SP, Alberti S, Drechsel D, Hyman AA and Mitchison TJ (2016). “Amyloid-like Self-Assembly of a Cellular Compartment.” Cell 166(3): 637–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonner WM (1975). “Protein migration into nuclei. I. Frog oocyte nuclei in vivo accumulate microinjected histones, allow entry to small proteins, and exclude large proteins.” J Cell Biol 64(2): 421–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bontems F, Stein A, Marlow F, Lyautey J, Gupta T, Mullins MC and Dosch R (2009). “Bucky ball organizes germ plasm assembly in zebrafish.” Curr Biol 19(5): 414–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourgeois B, Hutten S, Gottschalk B, Hofweber M, Richter G, Sternat J, Abou-Ajram C, Göbl C, Leitinger G, Graier WF, Dormann D and Madl T (2020). “Nonclassical nuclear localization signals mediate nuclear import of CIRBP.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(15): 8503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bradley JT, Kloc M, Wolfe KG, Estridge BH and Bilinski SM (2001). “Balbiani bodies in cricket oocytes: development, ultrastructure, and presence of localized RNAs.” Differentiation 67(4–5): 117–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brangwynne CP, Eckmann CR, Courson DS, Rybarska A, Hoege C, Gharakhani J, Julicher F and Hyman AA (2009). “Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation.” Science 324(5935): 1729–1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai-Lian -Z, Qi-Wen -Y, Jia-Rui -H, Ding -Y, Wu-Ming -G, Hai-Ying -L and Z -X (2010). “- Identification of zRAP55, a gene ?preponderantly expressed in Stages I and II oocytes of zebrafish.” - Zoological Research - 31(- 5): - 469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang P, Torres J, Lewis RA, Mowry KL, Houliston E and King ML (2004). “Localization of RNAs to the mitochondrial cloud in Xenopus oocytes through entrapment and association with endoplasmic reticulum.” Mol Biol Cell 15(10): 4669–4681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen B, Zhang Z, Sun X, Kuang Y, Mao X, Wang X, Yan Z, Li B, Xu Y, Yu M, Fu J, Mu J, Zhou Z, Li Q, Jin L, He L, Sang Q and Wang L (2017). “Biallelic Mutations in PATL2 Cause Female Infertility Characterized by Oocyte Maturation Arrest.” Am J Hum Genet 101(4): 609–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Leeuw F, Zhang T, Wauquier C, Huez G, Kruys V and Gueydan C (2007). “The cold-inducible RNA-binding protein migrates from the nucleus to cytoplasmic stress granules by a methylation-dependent mechanism and acts as a translational repressor.” Exp Cell Res 313(20): 4130–4144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M and Gingeras TR (2012). “STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.” Bioinformatics 29(1): 15–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dosch R, Wagner DS, Mintzer KA, Runke G, Wiemelt AP and Mullins MC (2004). “Maternal control of vertebrate development before the midblastula transition: mutants from the zebrafish I.” Dev Cell 6(6): 771–780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du SJ, Li H, Bian Y and Zhong Y (2008). “Heat-shock protein 90α1 is required for organized myofibril assembly in skeletal muscles of zebrafish embryos.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(2): 554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elkouby YM and Mullins MC (2017). “Methods for the analysis of early oogenesis in Zebrafish.” Dev Biol 430(2): 310–324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Escobar-Aguirre M, Elkouby YM and Mullins MC (2017). “Localization in Oogenesis of Maternal Regulators of Embryonic Development.” Adv Exp Med Biol 953: 173–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friend K, Brook M, Bezirci FB, Sheets MD, Gray NK and Seli E (2012). “Embryonic poly(A)-binding protein (ePAB) phosphorylation is required for Xenopus oocyte maturation.” The Biochemical journal 445(1): 93–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ge X, Grotjahn D, Welch E, Lyman-Gingerich J, Holguin C, Dimitrova E, Abrams EW, Gupta T, Marlow FL, Yabe T, Adler A, Mullins MC and Pelegri F (2014). “Hecate/Grip2a acts to reorganize the cytoskeleton in the symmetry-breaking event of embryonic axis induction.” PLoS Genet 10(6): e1004422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heim AE, Hartung O, Rothhamel S, Ferreira E, Jenny A, and Marlow FL (2014). “Oocyte polarity requires a Bucky ball-dependent feedback amplification loop.” Development, 141(4), 842–854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hertig AT (1968). “The primary human oocyte: some observations on the fine structure of Balbiani’s vitelline body and the origin of the annulate lamellae.” Am J Anat 122(1): 107–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houston DW (2013). “Regulation of cell polarity and RNA localization in vertebrate oocytes.” Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 306: 127–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houston DW and King ML (2000). “A critical role for Xdazl, a germ plasm-localized RNA, in the differentiation of primordial germ cells in Xenopus.” Development 127(3): 447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houston DW and King ML (2000). “Germ plasm and molecular determinants of germ cell fate.” Curr Top Dev Biol 50: 155–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howe KL, Achuthan P, Allen J, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, Amode MR, Armean IM, Azov AG, Bennett R, Bhai J, Billis K, Boddu S, Charkhchi M, Cummins C, Da Rin Fioretto L, Davidson C, Dodiya K, El Houdaigui B, Fatima R, Gall A, Garcia Giron C, Grego T, Guijarro-Clarke C, Haggerty L, Hemrom A, Hourlier T, Izuogu OG, Juettemann T, Kaikala V, Kay M, Lavidas I, Le T, Lemos D, Gonzalez Martinez J, Marugán JC, Maurel T, McMahon AC, Mohanan S, Moore B, Muffato M, Oheh DN, Paraschas D, Parker A, Parton A, Prosovetskaia I, Sakthivel MP, Salam Ahamed I A., Schmitt BM, Schuilenburg H, Sheppard D, Steed E, Szpak M, Szuba M, Taylor K, Thormann A, Threadgold G, Walts B, Winterbottom A, Chakiachvili M, Chaubal A, De Silva N, Flint B, Frankish A, Hunt SE, IIsley GR, Langridge N, Loveland JE, Martin FJ, Mudge JM, Morales J, Perry E, Ruffier M, Tate J, Thybert D, Trevanion SJ, Cunningham F, Yates AD, Zerbino DR and Flicek P (2020). “Ensembl 2021.” Nucleic Acids Research 49(D1): D884–D891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howley C and Ho RK (2000). “mRNA localization patterns in zebrafish oocytes.” Mech Dev 92(2): 305–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang JH, Ku WC, Chen YC, Chang YL and Chu CY (2017). “Dual mechanisms regulate the nucleocytoplasmic localization of human DDX6.” Sci Rep 7: 42853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyman AA and Simons K (2012). “Beyond Oil and Water—Phase Transitions in Cells.” Science 337(6098): 1047–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Idigo Nwamaka J., Soares Dinesh C. and Abbott Catherine M. (2020). “Translation elongation factor 1A2 is encoded by one of four closely related eef1a genes and is dispensable for survival in zebrafish.” Bioscience Reports 40(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jamieson-Lucy A and Mullins MC (2019b). “Isolation of Zebrafish Balbiani Bodies for Proteomic Analysis.” Methods Mol Biol 1920: 295–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jamieson-Lucy A and Mullins MC (2019a). “The vertebrate Balbiani body, germ plasm, and oocyte polarity.” Curr Top Dev Biol 135: 1–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joho KE, Darby MK, Crawford ET and Brown DD (1990). “A finger protein structurally similar to TFIIIA that binds exclusively to 5S RNA in Xenopus.” Cell 61(2): 293–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jonckheere AI, Renkema GH, Bras M, van den Heuvel LP, Hoischen A, Gilissen C, Nabuurs SB, Huynen MA, de Vries MC, Smeitink JAM and Rodenburg RJT (2013). “A complex V ATP5A1 defect causes fatal neonatal mitochondrial encephalopathy.” Brain 136(5): 1544–1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kato M, Han TW, Xie S, Shi K, Du X, Wu LC, Mirzaei H, Goldsmith EJ, Longgood J, Pei J, Grishin NV, Frantz DE, Schneider JW, Chen S, Li L, Sawaya MR, Eisenberg D, Tycko R and McKnight SL (2012). “Cell-free formation of RNA granules: low complexity sequence domains form dynamic fibers within hydrogels.” Cell 149(4): 753–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khong A, Jain S, Matheny T, Wheeler JR and Parker R (2018). “Isolation of mammalian stress granule cores for RNA-Seq analysis.” Methods 137: 49–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kloc M, Dougherty MT, Bilinski S, Chan AP, Brey E, King ML, Patrick CW Jr. and Etkin LD (2002). “Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of RNA distribution within germinal granules of Xenopus.” Dev Biol 241(1): 79–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kloc M, Jedrzejowska I, Tworzydlo W and Bilinski SM (2014). “Balbiani body, nuage and sponge bodies--term plasm pathway players.” Arthropod Struct Dev 43(4): 341–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi T, Winslow S, Sunesson L, Hellman U and Larsson C (2012). “PKCα binds G3BP2 and regulates stress granule formation following cellular stress.” PloS one 7(4): e35820–e35820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi M, Jamieson-Lucy A, and Mullins MC (2021).”Microinjection Method for Analyzing Zebrafish Early Stage Oocytes.” Front Cell Dev Biol. 9:753642 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.753642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotani T, Yasuda K, Ota R and Yamashita M (2013). “Cyclin B1 mRNA translation is temporally controlled through formation and disassembly of RNA granules.” J Cell Biol 202(7): 1041–1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krishnakumar P, Riemer S, Perera R, Lingner T, Goloborodko A, Khalifa H, Bontems F, Kaufholz F, E!-Brolosy M, Dosch R (2018) “Functional equivalence of germ plasm organizers.” PLoS Genet 14(11): e1007696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumari P, Gilligan PC, Lim S, Tran LD, Winkler S, Philp R and Sampath K (2013). “An essential role for maternal control of Nodal signaling.” Elife 2: e00683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lancaster AK, Nutter-Upham A, Lindquist S and King OD (2014). “PLAAC: a web and command-line application to identify proteins with prion-like amino acid composition.” Bioinformatics 30(17): 2501–2502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee M, Ghosh U, Thurber KR, Kato M and Tycko R (2020). “Molecular structure and interactions within amyloid-like fibrils formed by a low-complexity protein sequence from FUS.” Nat Commun 11(1): 5735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao Y, Tong L, Tang L and Wu S (2017). “The role of cold-inducible RNA binding protein in cell stress response.” Int J Cancer 141(11): 2164–2173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Y, Lim L and Song J (2017). “RRM domain of ALS/FTD-causing FUS characteristic of irreversible unfolding spontaneously self-assembles into amyloid fibrils.” Sci Rep 7(1): 1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo Y, Na Z and Slavoff SA (2018). “P-Bodies: Composition, Properties, and Functions.” Biochemistry 57(17): 2424–2431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marlow FL (2010). Developmental Biology. Maternal Control of Development in Vertebrates: My Mother Made Me Do It! San Rafael (CA), Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences; Copyright (c) 2010 by Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marlow FL, and Mullins MC (2008). Bucky ball functions in Balbiani body assembly and animal-vegetal polarity in the oocyte and follicle cell layer in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 321(1):40–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marnik EA and Updike DL (2019). “Membraneless organelles: P granules in Caenorhabditis elegans.” Traffic 20(6): 373–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masuda T, Itoh K, Higashitsuji H, Higashitsuji H, Nakazawa N, Sakurai T, Liu Y, Tokuchi H, Fujita T, Zhao Y, Nishiyama H, Tanaka T, Fukumoto M, Ikawa M, Okabe M and Fujita J (2012). “Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (Cirp) interacts with Dyrk1b/Mirk and promotes proliferation of immature male germ cells in mice.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(27): 10885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meriin AB, Zaarur N and Sherman MY (2012). “Association of translation factor eEF1A with defective ribosomal products generates a signal for aggresome formation.” Journal of cell science 125(Pt 11): 2665–2674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miao L, Yuan Y, Cheng F, Fang J, Zhou F, Ma W, Jiang Y, Huang X, Wang Y, Shan L, Chen D and Zhang J (2017). “Translation repression by maternal RNA binding protein Zar1 is essential for early oogenesis in zebrafish.” Development 144(1): 128–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreno JA and Tiffany-Castiglioni E (2015). “The chaperone Grp78 in protein folding disorders of the nervous system.” Neurochem Res 40(2): 329–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura Y, Tanaka KJ, Miyauchi M, Huang L, Tsujimoto M and Matsumoto K (2010). “Translational repression by the oocyte-specific protein P100 in Xenopus.” Dev Biol 344(1): 272–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishiyama H, Danno S, Kaneko Y, Itoh K, Yokoi H, Fukumoto M, Okuno H, Millán JL, Matsuda T, Yoshida O and Fujita J (1998). “Decreased expression of cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) in male germ cells at elevated temperature.” Am J Pathol 152(1): 289–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oh D and Houston DW (2017). RNA Localization in the Vertebrate Oocyte: Establishment of Oocyte Polarity and Localized mRNA Assemblages. Oocytes: Maternal Information and Functions. Kloc M. Cham, Springer International Publishing: 189–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozgur S, Chekulaeva M and Stoecklin G (2010). “Human Pat1b connects deadenylation with mRNA decapping and controls the assembly of processing bodies.” Mol Cell Biol 30(17): 4308–4323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pei W, Tanaka K, Huang SC, Xu L, Liu B, Sinclair J, Idol J, Varshney GK, Huang H, Lin S, Nussenblatt RB, Mori R and Burgess SM (2016). “Extracellular HSP60 triggers tissue regeneration and wound healing by regulating inflammation and cell proliferation.” NPJ Regen Med 1: 16013-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pepling ME, Wilhelm JE, O’Hara AL, Gephardt GW and Spradling AC (2007). “Mouse oocytes within germ cell cysts and primordial follicles contain a Balbiani body.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(1): 187–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfeiffer J, Tarbashevich K, Bandemer J, Palm T and Raz E (2018). “Rapid progression through the cell cycle ensures efficient migration of primordial germ cells – The role of Hsp90.” Developmental Biology 436(2): 84–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prilusky J, Felder CE, Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, Rydberg EH, Man O, Beckmann JS, Silman I and Sussman JL (2005). “FoldIndex: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded.” Bioinformatics 21(16): 3435–3438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Protter DSW and Parker R (2016). “Principles and Properties of Stress Granules.” Trends Cell Biol 26(9): 668–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramesh N and Pandey UB (2017). “Autophagy Dysregulation in ALS: When Protein Aggregates Get Out of Hand.” Front Mol Neurosci 10: 263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren F, Lin Q, Gong G, Du X, Dan H, Qin W, Miao R, Xiong Y, Xiao R, Li X, Gui JF and Mei J (2020). “Igf2bp3 maintains maternal RNA stability and ensures early embryo development in zebrafish.” Commun Biol 3(1): 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider H, Dabauvalle M-C, Wilken N and Scheer U (2010). “Visualizing protein interactions involved in the formation of the 42S RNP storage particle of Xenopus oocytes.” Biology of the Cell 102(8): 469–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuster BS, Dignon GL, Tang WS, Kelley FM, Ranganath AK, Jahnke CN, Simpkins AG, Regy RM, Hammer DA, Good MC and Mittal J (2020). “Identifying sequence perturbations to an intrinsically disordered protein that determine its phase-separation behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(21): 11421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuster BS, Reed EH, Parthasarathy R, Jahnke CN, Caldwell RM, Bermudez JG, Ramage H, Good MC and Hammer DA (2018). “Controllable protein phase separation and modular recruitment to form responsive membraneless organelles.” Nature communications 9(1): 2985–2985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu K and Toh H (2009). “Interaction between intrinsically disordered proteins frequently occurs in a human protein-protein interaction network.” J Mol Biol 392(5): 1253–1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sousa Martins JP, Liu X, Oke A, Arora R, Franciosi F, Viville S, Laird DJ, Fung JC and Conti M (2016). “DAZL and CPEB1 regulate mRNA translation synergistically during oocyte maturation.” J Cell Sci 129(6): 1271–1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J, Yan L, Shen W and Meng A (2018). “Maternal Ybx1 safeguards zebrafish oocyte maturation and maternal-to-zygotic transition by repressing global translation.” Development 145(19). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Doncheva NT, Morris JH, Bork P, Jensen LJ and Mering CV (2019). “STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets.” Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1): D607–D613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahashi K, Kotani T, Katsu Y and Yamashita M (2014). “Possible involvement of insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 in zebrafish oocyte maturation as a novel cyclin B1 mRNA-binding protein that represses the translation in immature oocytes.” Biochem Biophys Res Commun 448(1): 22–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Updike DL, Hachey SJ, Kreher J and Strome S (2011). “P granules extend the nuclear pore complex environment in the C. elegans germ line.” J Cell Biol 192(6): 939–948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vejnar CE “FONtools: Feature Object Notation.” from https://github.com/vejnar/fontools.
- Vejnar CE and Giraldez AJ (2020). “LabxDB: versatile databases for genomic sequencing and lab management.” Bioinformatics 36(16): 4530–4531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallace RA and Selman K (1990). “Ultrastructural aspects of oogenesis and oocyte growth in fish and amphibians.” J Electron Microsc Tech 16(3): 175–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weston A and Sommerville J (2006). “Xp54 and related (DDX6-like) RNA helicases: roles in messenger RNP assembly, translation regulation and RNA degradation.” Nucleic Acids Res 34(10): 3082–3094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wheeler JR, Jain S, Khong A and Parker R (2017). “Isolation of yeast and mammalian stress granule cores.” Methods 126: 12–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilczynska A, Aigueperse C, Kress M, Dautry F and Weil D (2005). “The translational regulator CPEB1 provides a link between dcp1 bodies and stress granules.” J Cell Sci 118(Pt 5): 981–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xia Z, Zheng X, Zheng H, Liu X, Yang Z and Wang X (2012). “Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) regulates target mRNA stabilization in the mouse testis.” FEBS Lett 586(19): 3299–3308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Youn JY, Dyakov BJA, Zhang J, Knight JDR, Vernon RM, Forman-Kay JD and Gingras AC (2019). “Properties of Stress Granule and P-Body Proteomes.” Mol Cell 76(2): 286–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao LW, Zhu YZ, Chen H, Wu YW, Pi SB, Chen L, Shen L and Fan HY (2020). “PABPN1L mediates cytoplasmic mRNA decay as a placeholder during the maternal-to-zygotic transition.” EMBO Rep 21(8): e49956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1: Full list of identified Balbiani body proteins.
Table S2: Transcript levels of identified Balbiani body proteins in stage I oocytes. Expression levels measured by RNAseq of oocytes between 40 and 70 μm in diameter. RPKM represents the average of two technical replicates.
Video S1: Isolated Balbiani body timelapse. Isolated Balbiani body in PBS, stained with DiOC6 to visualize it. One frame taken every 5 minutes.
