Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Leukoc Biol. 2022 Feb 21;111(5):1057–1068. doi: 10.1002/JLB.2RU1021-573R

A Curious Case of Cyclin-dependent Kinases in Neutrophils

Ramizah Syahirah 1,6, Alan Y Hsu 1,2,3,6, Qing Deng 1,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC9035055  NIHMSID: NIHMS1779388  PMID: 35188696

Abstract

Neutrophils are terminally differentiated, short-lived white blood cells critical for innate immunity. Although cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are typically related to cell cycle progression, increasing evidence has shown that they regulate essential functions of neutrophils. This review highlights the roles of CDKs and their partners, cyclins, in neutrophils, outside cell cycle regulation. CDK1–10 and several cyclins are expressed in neutrophils, albeit at different levels. Observed phenotypes associated with specific inhibition or genetic loss of CDK2 indicate its role in modulating neutrophil migration. CDK4 and 6 regulate neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation, while CDK5 regulates neutrophil degranulation. CDK7 and 9 are critical in neutrophil apoptosis, contributing to inflammation resolution. In addition to the CDKs that regulate mature neutrophil functions, cyclins are essential in hematopoiesis and granulopoiesis. The pivotal roles of CDKs in neutrophils present an untapped potential in targeting CDKs for treating neutrophil-dominant inflammatory diseases and understanding the regulation of neutrophils.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1779388-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are serine/threonine kinases generally maintained at relatively constant levels in the cytosol1,2. Partnered with cyclins, CDKs are the main drivers in cell cycle entry and progression3,4. Recent studies have shown novel CDK functions outside the context of the traditional cell cycle regulation. Several reports and reviews have highlighted the progress of this paradigm by summarizing noncanonical functions of CDKs5 and featured the overlapping functions of CDKs6 in regulating other processes such as apoptosis7, cell migration8, and cell signaling9. In addition, cyclins also present significant roles in growth and development10 and the proliferation of immune cells11,12. These findings have encouraged studies involving CDKs in the context of the immune response, particularly, in neutrophils.

It was initially thought that CDKs might play a minimal role in neutrophils, which are terminally differentiated with limited proliferation ability. However, emerging evidence supports CDKs being essential for neutrophil development and functions. Whether certain CDKs are present in neutrophils is still debated. Since the discussions of CDKs in the context of neutrophils are currently limited, efforts to feature and relate their roles in neutrophils are essential to address the various views and contributions that prevail in the field.

Findings that expand the knowledge of CDKs from the classical view have opened avenues for targeting CDKs for various therapeutic use. The pan-CDK inhibitor roscovitine is in phase II clinical trial for colitis and cystic fibrosis, both neutrophil-mediated diseases13. CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, ribocilcib, and abemaciclib, are approved to treat metastatic breast cancer14,15. Since neutrophils also play a prominent role in the progression of cancer16, it is possible that neutrophil suppression contributed to the therapeutic outcome.

This review introduces the general background of neutrophils, CDKs, and cyclins. We summarize the current findings on CDKs and cyclins concerning neutrophil development and functions. We outline the observed phenotypes and molecular mechanisms involved in specific inhibition or genetic loss of certain CDKs in neutrophils. Finally, we address several central questions and challenges in the field and potential future directions to utilize CDKs as therapeutic targets in alleviating over-inflammation as seen in neutrophil-dominant inflammation-related diseases.

Neutrophils and Inflammation in Human Diseases

Neutrophils are the most abundant leukocytes in humans and play an integral role in the innate immune system. They act as the first line of defense, attacking invading pathogens by carrying out various effector functions after they reach the infection site. Neutrophils develop from common myeloid progenitors that undergo granulopoiesis17,18. Under homeostatic conditions, neutrophils are released from the bone marrow19 into the blood circulation, and this process further heightens during inflammation.

Signaling molecules such as chemokines generated during inflammation instruct neutrophils to extravasate and enter affected tissues via rolling, firm adhesion, and trans-endothelial migration. Various adhesion molecules on both endothelium cells and neutrophil surface20 facilitate these processes. In tissue, neutrophils perform multiple functions to combat the invading pathogen, such as phagocytosis, degranulation, and releasing cytokines and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Neutrophils secrete acute-phase pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-8, IL-1α, and TNF-β, providing positive feedback and enhancing inflammation response21. Another function of neutrophils is their ability to release neutrophil extracellular traps, or NETs, composed of DNA, granules, and histones, to entrap and kill bacteria extracellularly22. When neutrophils reach wounds, they upregulate expressions of genes that can recruit other inflammatory cells, encourage angiogenesis, and promote keratinocyte and fibroblast proliferation which are critical responses needed for wound healing23. After carrying out their functions at the wound site, neutrophils undergo apoptosis24 to resolve inflammation. Macrophages will then engulf the apoptotic neutrophils, release signaling molecules to resolve inflammation, and initiate the phase of wound healing25.

Neutrophil-dominant inflammation can be the primary driver of immunopathology in many human diseases. Although neutrophils produce relatively fewer cytokines than other leukocytes, their numbers during inflammation are significantly higher, contributing to a significant amount of local cytokines26. Such neutrophil-derived cytokines mediate complex neutrophil engagement with other cells inside or outside the immune system. Together with the degree of neutrophilic inflammation, these interactions point to disease severity and autoimmunity2729. A chronic state of inflammation from increased ROS production causes endothelial dysfunction and tissue injury30. Pathologic alterations that lead to autoimmune diseases31, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), may develop from the production of autoantibodies against components present in NETs32. Human neutrophils have a short lifespan of fewer than 24 hours in the bloodstream and are programmed to die33,34. Neutrophil apoptosis is accelerated during an infection to resolve inflammation35. Failure to do so can lead to chronic inflammation, as observed in cystic fibrosis, atherosclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary, and rheumatoid arthritis36.

Together, neutrophil homeostasis and function must be tightly regulated to avoid over-inflammation37,38 while maintaining normal immune functions. Due to the significant roles neutrophils play in inflammation pathology, they act as suitable targets for therapy39. Neutrophil-targeted strategies to inhibit their functions may involve lowering neutrophil production by utilizing monoclonal antibodies to block granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptors40 or using CDK inhibitors to promote apoptosis41. Neutrophil recruitment can also be reduced via selectin and integrin blockers42,43 or chemokine receptor inhibitors44,45. Neutrophil-derived mediators such as proteinase 3 and elastase have been targeted to block neutrophil degranulation46. Formation of NETs can be inhibited by targeting peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4)4749.

In addition to serving as therapeutic targets, due to their abundance of recruitment to inflammation sites, neutrophils are exploited as drug delivery systems50. Nanoparticles encapsulating drugs are internalized by activated neutrophils51, presenting a promising avenue for delivering nanotherapeutics across blood vessel barriers to tissues. For example, intake of albumin nanoparticles loaded with pyropheophorbide-a (Ppa) by neutrophils inhibited tumor growth52. Besides being used as whole cells, neutrophils are disrupted via physical force to generate membrane-formed nanovesicles that retain surface receptors and adhesion molecules53,54. When loaded with an anti-inflammation agent, these extracellular vesicle-like nanovesicles reduce lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung inflammation53.

CDKs and Cyclins

The mammalian CDK family members comprise 20 protein kinases (CDK1–20) grouped based on their sequences and functions55. CDK1–9 and CDK11 require association with regulatory subunits for biological activity56. CDK1–4 and CDK6 drive the cell cycle progression by partnering with cyclins among these heterodimeric kinases. Cyclins are classified by their amino acid sequence, and there are at least 15 different cyclins known from A to Y57. The phases in the cell cycle are characterized by the oscillating expression of specific cyclins that sets up the stage-specific timing of CDK activitation58. Cyclin-CDK complexes dictate the downstream substrates specificity59 and phosphorylate substrates appropriate in particular cell cycle phases60.

After binding cyclins, CDKs are phosphorylated at threonine residues, such as T172 in CDK4 and T160 in CDK2 in the T-loop CDK-activating kinase (CAK) and are activated46. Dual specificity kinases such as WEE1 and MYT1 can inhibit CDK-cyclin complexes by phosphorylation of adjacent threonine and tyrosine residues within the ATP-binding sites (T14 and Y15). Dephosphorylation of these residues ensures proper ATP alignment, thus releasing the inhibition9,61. The binding of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) to CDKs can restrain its activity. CKIs of the INK4 family can inactivate CDK4 and 6. The Cip and Kip families of CKIs are inhibitors of CDK2-cyclin A/E but are positive regulators of cyclin D-dependent kinases62,63.

CDKs and Cyclins in the Cell Cycle

It is appreciated that specific CDK-cyclin complexes catalyze certain cell-cycle transitions64. This canonical perspective is that cyclin D-CDK4/6 and cyclin E-CDK2 initiate the S phase, cyclin A with CDK1 or CDK2 allows the S phase’s progression and entry into mitosis, and the following cyclin B-CDK1 allow transition into mitosis65.

The cell cycle G1 phase first involves synthesizing D-type cyclins that bind and transport CDK4/6 into the nucleus56. They phosphorylate retinoblastoma (Rb) family proteins, including pRb, p107, and p130, that modulate the activity of E2F family transcription factors66, inducing gene transcriptions that mediate S phase entry. Cyclin D-CDK4/6 phosphorylates Rb by docking at the alpha-helix in the C-term of Rb67,68. CDK4 phosphorylates S807/S811 on Rb, and this partial phosphorylation is needed for CDK2 phosphorylation69. The activation of CDK2 completes the G1 phase and transitions the cell cycle to the S phase. CDK2 forms active complexes with A-type cyclins, D-type cyclins47, or cyclin B170. Unlike CDK4/6, phosphorylation by CDK2 with its partner, cyclin E, of Rb proteins inactivates them by allowing the release of E2F. Cyclin E-CDK2 targets the KxLxF sequence on Rb71. Cyclin C-CDK3 can also phosphorylate Rb at S807/811 and has shown to be involved in the cell cycle re-entry as it ensures G0 phase exit72,73. Activation of E2F-1, E2F-2, and partially E2F-3 by CDK3 also contributes to the progression into S-phase74.

During the S phase, A-type cyclins continue to accumulate and form complexes with CDK2 to phosphorylate multiple substrates involved in the completion of the S phase, such as regulators of cyclin A, transcription factors, and proteins involved in DNA replication and repair, and cell-cycle checkpoints42,75. Cyclin A also forms complexes with CDK1 and share similar substrates to CDK2-cyclin A complexes. B-type cyclins are synthesized in the transition from S to G2 phase when cyclin A degrades via ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Mitosis is activated after the G2 phase when CDK1 is dephosphorylated by Cdc25 and forms complexes with cyclin B, specifically B1 and B2. These complexes then phosphorylate many other substrates that play essential roles in the progression of mitosis, for instance, kinesin, Golgi matrix components, and nuclear lamins76.

Other CDK functions

Not all CDKs are involved in cell cycle regulation. In neurons, CDK5 mediates neuronal migration and synaptic transmission77 with its partners p35 and p39. The p35/CDK5 complex mediates the synaptic integrity of the central nervous system but triggers neurodegeneration under abnormal conditions. D- and E-type cyclins also bind to CDK5, although neither activates CDK5 kinase activity78. Cyclin E forms complexes with Cdk5 and restrains its activation, which is necessary for controlling synapse formation79.

Several CDKs regulate transcription. The CAK complex, consisting of CDK7, Cyclin H, and MAT1 (ménage a Trois)80, controls the activation of some CDKs such as CDK1, CDK2, CDK4, and CDK6. CDK7 is a core subunit of the general transcription factor TFIIH, important in promoter clearance and progression of transcription. CDK8/cyclin C is a component of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme complex81, implicated in the regulation of transcription. CDK8/cyclin C phosphorylates cyclin H, repressing TFIIH kinase activity and transcription82. CDK9 also affects transcription by phosphorylating RNA polymerase II holoenzyme at the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD). T-type cyclins (T1 and T2) and cyclin K activate CDK9 by forming the Positive-Transcription Elongation Factors (P-TEFb), which regulates transcriptional elongation positively and negatively83,84. CDK9 also interacts with TNF Receptor Associated Factor 2 (TRAF2) at a conserved domain in the TRAF-C region, a motif known to bind other kinases involved in TRAF-mediated signaling85.

CDK 10 is a member of the Cdc2 family of kinases and regulates the G2-M phase of the cell cycle86. In addition, CDK10 interacts with the N-terminus of the Ets2 transcription factor and inhibits Ets2 transactivation in mammalian cells87. CDK11, CDK12, and CDK14 are involved in the G1-S transition phase, while CDK12 and CDK13 regulate transcription and RNA splicing57. CDK11–16 and CDK19 are known to promote the progression of cancer88. CDK12 has been shown to control the expression of DNA damage response genes89,90. CDK15 can act as an anti-apoptotic protein by inducing BIRC5 phosphorylation at Thr-34, thus inhibiting TRAIL/TNSF10-induced apoptosis91.

CDKs and cyclins regulate hematopoiesis and granulopoiesis

The roles of these CDKs in hematopoiesis are expected, as blood generation depends on the cell cycle machinery. However, this is rarely the case with single CDK or cyclin deletion due to possible compensatory mechanisms92. CDK2 knockout mice are viable, albeit sterile and with more petite body sizes93, despite the inhibition of CDK2 causing cell cycle arrest in vitro94. CDK2 is essential only in the meiotic but not the somatic cell cycle in mice92. The only indispensable CDK is CDK1, where no cell division occurs when CDK1 is disrupted59. CDK1 is present throughout the cell cycle, likely compensating for the loss of CDK2. CDK1 binds all classical cyclins, though sometimes with lower affinity than other CDKs. When CDK2 is absent in mice, CDK1 binds to cyclin E to facilitate the G1-S phase transition48.

Like CDK2 knockout mice, CDK4 knockout mice display growth retardation and reproductive dysfunction66. CDK4 knockout fibroblasts exhibited significant delays to S phase entry, possibly due to increased binding of the CDK2 inhibitor, p27, to cyclin E/CDK2, and decreased activation, leading to decreased CDK2 activation and Rb phosphorylation. A similar decline in Rb phosphorylation is also observed in CDK2 knockout fibroblasts95. Mice with CDK2/4 double knockouts can develop up to embryonic day E16.5. The mice showed increased erythrocyte volume and died due to a lack of hematopoietic cells96.

Similarly, CDK6 knockout mice showed slight impairment of hematopoiesis, while CDK4/6 double knockout mice die during late stages of embryonic development due to severe anemia97. Embryonic fibroblasts of these CDK knockouts can proliferate in low serum conditions and respond to mitogenic stimuli, although at a lower rate. Hence, D-type cyclin-dependent kinases are required for hematopoiesis but are not essential for the proliferation of embryonic fibroblasts, highlighting the context-dependent mechanisms of cell cycle progression.

Besides CDKs, cyclin A is essential for the cell-cycle progression of hematopoietic and embryonic stem cells98. Knocking out both cyclin A1 and A2 in bone marrow cells of mice results in anemia, as observed by decreased red blood cell and platelet counts. Cyclin A ablation causes a significant reduction of hematopoietic stem cells and their lineage-committed descendants, but not more differentiated cells. Interestingly, its function is dispensable in fibroblasts of cyclin A knockout mice as the cells can still proliferate98. This observation highlights cyclin A’s functional specificity in the cell cycle of stem cells.

Mice lacking all D-cyclins develop up to E13.5 but die before E17.5 from cardiac abnormalities and severe anemia99. Hematopoietic stem cells cannot proliferate, and their numbers reduce significantly. Mice lacking individual D-cyclins are viable but show tissue-specific defects, indicating that they are required for proliferation only in selected cell types100. Deletion of cyclin D1 results in neuronal abnormality10. Cyclin D2 deletion impairs proliferation of B-lymphocytes11. Cyclin D3 deletion affects the development of immature T-lymphocytes12. Mice that express any one of the D type cyclins develop normally until late gestation, suggesting that these cyclins are interchangeable and functionally redundant to an extent101. In addition, D-cyclins can regulate the levels of p27 as the ablation of D-cyclins led to the downregulation of this CDK inhibitor.

Cyclin D3 plays a prominent role in granulopoiesis of neutrophils and is regulated by G-CSF signaling102. Mice lacking cyclin D3 are refractory to the stimulation by G-CSF, exhibiting significantly decreased numbers of mature granulocytes but increased numbers of immature granulocyte progenitors in the peripheral blood and the bone marrow. Consequently, cyclin D3 deficient mice are susceptible to bacterial infections due to the inability to undergo emergency granulopoiesis.

CDKs in neutrophil function

CDK and cyclin expression in neutrophils

Based on DNA staining, most mature neutrophils are in the G0/G1 phase. The activity of G1-phase CDKs peaks at the myeloblast and promyelocyte stage and decreases as neutrophils differentiate. Simultaneously, CDK2, 4, and 6 transcript levels decrease. This downregulation is also seen in the level of cyclins D1, D2, and D3. Cyclin E, however, is slightly upregulated during differentiation after the band cell stage, which is the stage before complete maturation of segmented neutrophils103. The low expression of these CDKs and D-type cyclins results in a lack of hyperphosphorylation of pRb103, leading to cell cycle arrest. In addition, the upregulation of the CKI p27 also contributes to cell cycle arrest in mature neutrophils.

Human neutrophils express CDK1 and CDK2 proteins7,41, despite some earlier studies that failed to detect CDK1 or CDK235. In neutrophil precursor cell lines, HL60 and PLB-985 cells, both of which can undergo neutrophil-like differentiation in vitro, the levels of CDKs vary. CDK7 and CDK9 are expressed at similar levels before and after differentiation at transcriptional levels. CDK5 and CDK6 are expressed at relatively low levels in primary human neutrophils but higher in undifferentiated neutrophil-like cell lines104. Levels of CDK and cyclin transcription and protein expression in primary human neutrophils and differentiated HL-60 cells are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

RNA and protein levels of CDK/cyclins in human neutrophils and HL60 cells.

CDK/cyclin RNA level in human neutrophils133139 Protein level
CDK1 −0.56 PMN: Detected41,49, not detected123. HL60: Detected123
CDK2 0.89 PMN: Detected41,49, not detected7,103,123. HL60: Detected7,123. Differentiated HL60: Detected109
CDK3 0.54 -
CDK4 0.49 PMN: Detected49,103,120,123, not detected123
CDK5 0.11 PMN: Detected120,121,123, HL60: Detected7,123
CDK6 0.16 PMN: Detected49,103, not detected123. HL60: Detected123
CDK7 1.16 PMN: Detected123. HL60: Detected7,123
CDK8 0.41 -
CDK9 1.58 PMN: Detected123. HL60: Detected7
CDK10 1.13 -
CDK11A 1.94 -
CDK11B 1.69 -
CDK12 1.45 -
CDK13 1.30 -
CDK14 1.16 -
CDK15 −0.71 -
CDK16 1.61 -
CDK17 1.35 -
CDK18 −1.04 -
CDK19 1.35 -
CDK20 −0.28 -
Cyclin A1 −1.33 PMN: Not detected103
Cyclin A2 −0.44
Cyclin B1 −0.20 -
Cyclin B2 −0.52 -
Cyclin B3 −3.04 -
Cyclin C 0.56 -
Cyclin D1 −0.68 PMN: Not detected49,103
Cyclin D2 0.73 PMN: Detected49,103
Cyclin D3 2.27 PMN: Detected49, not detected103
Cyclin E1 −0.43 PMN: Detected103
Cyclin E2 0.24
Cyclin F −0.91 -
Cyclin G1 0.98 -
Cyclin G2 1.87 -
Cyclin H 1.62 HL60: Detected7
Cyclin I 2.42 -
Cyclin J −0.10 -
Cyclin K 1.80 -
Cyclin L1 2.51 -
Cyclin L2 1.80 -
Cyclin O −4.00 -
Cyclin T1 1.02 PMN: Detected123. HL60: Detected7
Cyclin T2 1.27 -
Cyclin Y 1.88 -

Note: Expression values are fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads. Undetected transcripts are assigned −4.00133. Abbreviations: PMN = human PolyMorphoNuclear cells, HL60 = human leukemia cells.

Once neutrophils mature, genes involved in cell cycle regulation are mostly downregulated103. Hence, the question lies in whether certain CDKs exert specific functions in neutrophils. Only a handful of studies specifically observe CDK functions in neutrophils. The following section describes studies using various models to characterize CDK functions in neutrophils outside cell cycle regulation.

CDK2 regulates neutrophil migration

Neutrophils sense extracellular cues from their surface receptors and respond accordingly by activating signal transduction pathways105 to reach the site of infection. Chemokines and other chemoattractants initiate neutrophil migration by inducing cell polarization to generate a defined leading edge. Signaling molecules such as Rac106,107 and PI3K108 stimulate F-actin polymerization, pushing the membrane forward to develop the leading edge. Rho and its effector molecules regulate actomyosin fibers’ contraction in the trailing edge to retract the tail.

CDK2 was identified through a microRNA overexpression screen as a critical regulator for neutrophil migration. Hsu et al.109 first discovered that miR-199 overexpression led to reduced neutrophil motility in zebrafish. One of its direct targets, CDK2, was then found to regulate neutrophil migration. CDK2 specific inhibitors NU6140 and CVT313, and the pan-CDK inhibitor, roscovitine, blocked zebrafish neutrophil motility and recruitment to infected ear and tail wound sites without causing neutrophil apoptosis. The kinase activity of Cdk2 in zebrafish is essential since overexpressing the catalytically dead dominant-negative form (DN) of Cdk2 disrupted cell polarity and actin dynamics. In addition, NU6140 inhibited primary human neutrophils chemotaxis towards the chemokine IL-8, with a decreased chemotaxis index. To get to the molecular level, Hsu et al.109 used HL60 cell lines with CDK2 knockdown, which exhibited hampered chemotaxis and reduced cell polarization. After chemoattractant stimulation, the cells showed a decrease in PAK (P21 (RAC1) activated kinase) and AKT (protein kinase B) phosphorylation, indicating lower Rac activation and reduced level of phosphatidylinositol (3–5)-trisphosphate. For specificity, dHL60 with CDK2 knockdown did not affect other neutrophil functions such as NETosis. In addition, only CDK2, but not CDK1 or CDK5, is required for neutrophil migration. Remarkably, treating zebrafish with CDK2 inhibitors increased fish survival during infection and sterile inflammation conditions.

There are no human conditions associated with abnormal CDK2 function reported so far, possibly due to the overlapping roles of CDKs or the necessity of CDK2 for fertility. Given that CDK2 knockout mice are generally healthy and that neutrophil behavior can be affected through CDK2109, the inhibition of this kinase can be utilized to control neutrophil numbers at infection or injury sites, thus potentially preventing neutrophil-mediated over-inflammation. Subsequent discoveries on substrates of CDK2 also carry therapeutic potential as these substrates can potentially serve as novel drug targets in neutrophils. Currently, CDK2 inhibitor CVT313 has reduced the progression of colorectal cancer110. A selective CDK2 degrader that significantly reduces CDK2 levels in cell lines via ubiquitin degradation also promises acute myeloid leukemia therapy111.

CDK4/6 regulates the NET formation

A unique function of neutrophils in combating pathogens is the formation of NETs. Multiple stimuli induce NETs, including mitogen phorbol myristate (PMA)112, Candida albicans, Group B Streptococcus, and others113. The NET formation is activated through NADPH oxidase and an increase in anti-apoptotic proteins in the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway114. Independent of the NADPH pathway, NETosis can be induced by calcium ionophores through mitochondrial ROS and the calcium-activated small conductance potassium channel, SK3115.

NETosis involves the nuclear envelope breakdown, a feature observed during mitosis, markedly different from apoptosis. Amulic et al.49 demonstrated a mitogenic reactivation of cell-cycle regulators and a critical role of G1 kinases, CDK4 and 6, in NETs production. They first showed that cell division markers accompany NETosis in human neutrophils. Following NETosis induction, G1 kinase activation, as detected by the phosphorylation of pRb, is observed without the subsequent expression of S-phase genes. Phosphorylation of a mitotic marker, histone H3 at serine 10, and a marker for proliferating cells, the nuclear antigen Ki-67, are elevated. Phosphorylation of lamin A/C, which contributes to the nuclear envelope breakdown, is also upregulated. Inhibiting cyclin-CDK complexes using a synthesized peptide mimicking the cell cycle inhibitor p21cip1 (p21) interfered with the proper NET formation in human neutrophils. In neutrophils of p21 knockout mice, NETs were more abundant, supporting that G1 kinases (CDK4 and CDK6) activation is required to form NETs. Amulic et al.49 used CDK4/6 pharmacological inhibitor (abemaciclib/LY2835219) and found that it dose-dependently blocked NET formation without compromising other functions in human neutrophils. Neutrophils from CDK6 knockout mice also display impaired NET formation. The significance of Cdk6 in NETosis also extends to provide better survival in murine C. Albicans sepsis model as Cdk6 knockouts exhibited higher fungal load than WT mice, whereas neutrophil recruitment was intact. When Cdk6 was rescued in myeloid cells of knockout mice, the fungal burden was decreased, indicating restoration of antimicrobial defense. Although this observation suggests neutrophil function defect, it does not rule out impairments in other blood cells.

Despite the importance of NETs in protecting against foreign microbes, NETs play a significant role in autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis, and SLE. In RA, infiltrated neutrophils in the synovial cavity of RA patients are more ready to form NETs94, increasing inflammation due to autoantigens116. With the knowledge that the induction of NETs is dependent on CDK4 and 6, specific inhibitors can potentially be used to alleviate over-inflammation in RA and other autoimmune diseases.

CDK5 regulates neutrophil degranulation

Degranulation is when stored granules are released via exocytosis to fight off pathogens. Human neutrophils possess azurophilic granules containing myeloperoxidase and defensins. They also have specific granules containing lactoferrin, NADPH oxidase, and alkaline phosphatases117. The mechanism of degranulation actively involves the actin cytoskeleton and microtubule assembly118, elevated intracellular Ca2+, and hydrolysis of ATP and GTP. The GTP-dependent secretion mechanism involves a cytosolic factor that is not a member of the Rho or Rac families of GTPases but a complex with a GTP-binding protein119. Upon further investigation, the element was CDK5, and its activator, p35120.

Due to the observed roles of Cdk5 in regulating secretion from neurons, Rosales et al.120 sought to investigate the function of this kinase in neutrophil degranulation. Human neutrophil lysates contain active Cdk5 activity. Subsequent immunoprecipitation of the kinase from neutrophil subcellular fractions indicated that the Cdk5-p35 complex localizes primarily in the secretory granules and plays a vital function in its formation and secretion. The pan-CDK inhibitor roscovitine inhibited the GTP-stimulated lactoferrin secretion from specific granules. In mouse neutrophils, roscovitine reduced the expression of CD63, CD66b, markers of azurophil, and specific granules secretion. This partial inhibition is similarly observed in p35−/− mouse neutrophils, suggesting that Cdk5-p35 activity is required for maximum GTP-induced secretory response in neutrophils.

Upon characterization of the phosphorylated proteins by Cdk5, Lee et al.121 found Cdk5 phosphorylates vimentin explicitly at Ser56. Vimentin undergoes reorganization following GTP stimulation. Roscovitine blocked vimentin phosphorylation and partially inhibited neutrophil degranulation. Considering incomplete inhibition of roscovitine, other cellular proteins may regulate vimentin Ser56 phosphorylation, or other mechanisms may regulate vimentin activity. Furthermore, the authors used siRNA to knock down Cdk5 and found decreased secretion of β-hexosaminidase, lactoferrin, and matrix metalloprotease-9 from neutrophils stimulated with GTP. Together, Cdk5 is significantly involved in GTP-induced neutrophil degranulation, and its inhibition leads to a considerable decrease in the secretory process.

CDK7 and 9 regulate neutrophil apoptosis

Apoptotic neutrophils and their clearance by macrophages play a critical role in resolving inflammation122. Neutrophil apoptosis reduces overall circulating cytokines and further infiltration of neutrophils, thus promoting resolution35. CDK7 and CDK9 phosphorylate RNA polymerase II at the CTD to upregulate inducible genes that control neutrophil apoptosis, such as the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1. Inhibition of these CDKs by roscovitine and 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) (a specific inhibitor for CDK7 and 9) reduces the level of Mcl-1 and thus induces apoptosis in human neutrophils7,41. Roscovitine induces caspase-dependent apoptosis and resolves neutrophil-dependent inflammation in carrageenan-elicited acute pleurisy, bleomycin-induced lung injury, and passively induced arthritis in mice, highlighting its therapeutic potential7,41. Other inhibitors that can cause human neutrophil apoptosis include NG75 and hymenialdisine41, which may also reduce Mcl-1.

The maintenance of this short-lived, anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1 via CDK9 activity is confirmed by Wang et al.123. CDK9 and its partner cyclin T1 form part of the P-TEFb complex involved in transcriptional regulation, and its activity declines as neutrophils age. A potent CDK9 inhibitor, flavopiridol (AT7519), causes a rapid decrease in Mcl-1. In zebrafish, pharmacological inhibition, morpholino-mediated knockdown, or CRISPR/cas9-mediated knockout of CDK9 induces neutrophil apoptosis and increases inflammation resolution after tailfin injury124. The involvement of CDK9 with transcriptional regulation is confirmed with the knockdown of an endogenous negative regulator of the P-TEFb complex, La-related protein 7 (LaRP7), which leads to increasing neutrophilic inflammation at a wound site.

A small-molecule multi-CDK inhibitor, AT7519, inhibits RNA polymerase II phosphorylation carried out by CDK7 and 9125. Kaveh et al.126 have shown that in zebrafish, treatment with this inhibitor or flavopiridol resolves neutrophil infiltration by inducing reverse migration from the cardiac lesion in a cardiac injury model. AT7519 is found to be more selective to CDK9 than flavopiridol, and transient treatment with this inhibitor increases neutrophil resolution and improves the rate of myocardial wound closure through amplifying macrophage-dependent cardiomyocyte expansion. Further research involving the systemic inflammation model may help expand the roles of CDK7 and 9 in acute and chronic inflammatory diseases where neutrophil-dominant inflammation is widely present.

Concluding Remarks

In this review, we have summarized current findings that support the essential functions of CDKs and cyclins in not only neutrophil development but also their survival and immune function. These findings indicate a growing picture of the complexity CDKs may have in regulating innate immunity in response to challenges.

Current limitations and questions still exist in the neutrophil field regarding CDKs. First, the consensus of cyclins and CDKs present in neutrophils and their pairing for activation is lacking. Such discrepancies in results may arise from using different models like humans, mice, or zebrafish. The sharing of cyclins and co-factors between different CDKs due to similar binding motifs also complicates investigations into their specific interactions and roles6,92. CDK4/6 inhibitors used in clinics have been shown to cross-react and also inhibit CDK2 activity through promoting p21 dissociation from CDK4127. Indirect interactions of CDK and cyclins with CKI can also result in different phenotypes. Multiple knockouts of CDK, cyclin, and complex inhibitors may be needed to overcome compensatory effects and fully explore their specific interactions and functions. Specific CDK degraders can serve as a unique tool in understanding individual CDK functions. However, the possibility of compensation effects cannot be ruled out, and they may not be as potent as the pan-inhibitor of CDKs.

There are still knowledge gaps in how CDKs may facilitate other neutrophil functions not mentioned here, such as phagocytosis, cytokine release, ROS production, and immune presentation. Molecules related to CDK activation, their co-factors, and substrates in neutrophil function pathways have yet to be fully characterized. Since neutrophils play such a prominent role in inflammation, CDK substrates can be used as novel therapeutic targets to precisely control neutrophil behavior. For instance, targeting CDKs and their substrates involved in neutrophil ROS production can reduce tissue injury in chronic inflammation. Resolving inflammation by developing drugs that target CDKs functioning in neutrophil apoptosis can help alleviate many diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and cystic fibrosis.

Although terminally differentiated, neutrophils display heterogeneous populations, due to their plasticity in properties, depending on multiple factors and conditions128130. In tumors, similar cytokines and effector signals have been shown to affect the pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of neutrophils, leading to either tumor progression or suppression131. In COVID19 patients, multiple neutrophil populations exhibited a correlation with disease severity132. Exploring neutrophil CDKs while considering their plasticity in response to various conditions will be beneficial in developing neutrophil-targeted therapies catered for disease-specific pathologies.

In summary, a detailed understanding of CDKs and cyclins and their co-factors in neutrophils opens a promising avenue in manipulating this prominent immune cell type.

Figure 1. Overview of CDKs involved in several neutrophil functions.

Figure 1.

CDK2 phosphorylates molecules related to neutrophil migration as CDK2 inhibition hampered chemotaxis and cell polarization. CDK5 and p35 regulate neutrophil degranulation by phosphorylating vimentin upon GTP stimulation. CDK9 and CCNT1 form part of the P-ETFb complex, which LaRP7 negatively regulates. A decrease in complex activity will decrease Mcl-1 and induce apoptosis. A reduction of CDK7 activity will also reduce Mcl-1 levels and result in apoptosis. CDK4 and 6 phosphorylate Rb, histone H3 at serine 10 (H3S10), and lamin A/C, facilitating nuclear envelope breakdown and NETosis.

Table 2.

Functions of CDKs and cyclins in neutrophils and other cell types.

Function in neutrophils CDK/Cyclin Direct substrates Description
Migration CDK2 - Regulation of cytoskeleton arrangement109
Apoptosis CDK7/9 and CCNT1 Mcl1 Resolution of inflammation via neutrophil apoptosis7,123,124
Defense CDK4/6 Rb, lamin A/C, H3S10 Formation and release of NETs49
CDK5 and p53 Vimentin Formation of secretory granules120,121
Function in other cell types CDK/Cyclin Direct substrates Description
Hematopoiesis CDK2/4 - Regulation of erythrocyte formation96
Cyclin D1 - Promote neuronal differentiation10,140
Cyclin D2 - Development of B-lymphocytes11
Cyclin D3 - Progression of granulopoiesis102 and development of T-lymphocytes12
Migration CDK5 Rac1 Regulation of endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis8
CDK6 - Increase macrophage adhesion141
Cyclin A2 RhoA Regulation of RhoA activity in fibroblasts142

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank Dr. Kavita Shah and Dr. Andy Tao for the critical review of the manuscript and Han-jen Kuo for help with the illustration. The work was supported by research funding from the National Institutes of Health [R35GM119787 to DQ]. A.Y.H. was supported by the Cagiantas Fellowship, Purdue University.

Abbreviations

CDK

cyclin-dependent kinase

CKA

CDK-activating kinase

CKI

cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors

CTD

carboxy-terminal domain

DN

dominant negative

DRB

D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole

G-CSF

granulocyte-colony stimulating factor

IL

Interleukin

LaRP7

la-related protein 7

NETs

neutrophil extracellular traps

PAD4

peptidylarginine deiminase 4

PAK

p21-activated kinase

PMA

phorbol myristate

Ppa

pyropheophorbide-a

P-TEFb

positive-transcription elongation factors

RA

rheumatoid arthritis

Rb

retinoblastoma

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SLE

systemic lupus erythematosus

TRAF

TNF Receptor Associated Factor

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Graña X & Reddy EP Cell cycle control in mammalian cells: role of cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs), growth suppressor genes and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs). Oncogene 11, 211–219 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Control of the Cell Cycle - Biology 2e - OpenStax. https://openstax.org/books/biology-2e/pages/10-3-control-of-the-cell-cycle.
  • 3.Gao CY & Zelenka PS Cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases and differentiation. BioEssays 19, 307–315 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Srivastava LM CHAPTER 2 - Cell Wall, Cell Division, and Cell Growth. in Plant Growth and Development (ed. Srivastava LM) 23–74 (Academic Press, 2002). doi: 10.1016/B978-012660570-9/50142-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hydbring P, Malumbres M & Sicinski P Noncanonical functions of cell cycle cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 17, 280–292 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hochegger H, Takeda S & Hunt T Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell-cycle transitions: does one fit all? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 9, 910–916 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Leitch AE et al. Cyclin-dependent kinases 7 and 9 specifically regulate neutrophil transcription and their inhibition drives apoptosis to promote resolution of inflammation. Cell Death Differ. 19, 1950–1961 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liebl J et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 regulates endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem 285, 35932–35943 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lim S & Kaldis P Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development 140, 3079–3093 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fantl V, Stamp G, Andrews A, Rosewell I & Dickson C Mice lacking cyclin D1 are small and show defects in eye and mammary gland development. Genes Dev. 9, 2364–2372 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Solvason N et al. Cyclin D2 is essential for BCR-mediated proliferation and CD5 B cell development. Int. Immunol 12, 631–638 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sicinska E et al. Requirement for cyclin D3 in lymphocyte development and T cell leukemias. Cancer Cell 4, 451–461 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Laval J, Ralhan A & Hartl D Neutrophils in cystic fibrosis. Biol. Chem 397, 485–496 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu Y, Zhang Y, Pi H & Sheng Y Current Therapeutic Progress of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer. Cancer Manag. Res 12, 3477–3487 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Du Q et al. The application and prospect of CDK4/6 inhibitors in malignant solid tumors. J. Hematol. Oncol.J Hematol Oncol 13, 41 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mackey JBG, Coffelt SB & Carlin LM Neutrophil Maturity in Cancer. Front. Immunol 10, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yvan-Charvet L & Ng LG Granulopoiesis and Neutrophil Homeostasis: A Metabolic, Daily Balancing Act. Trends Immunol. 40, 598–612 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kwok I et al. Combinatorial Single-Cell Analyses of Granulocyte-Monocyte Progenitor Heterogeneity Reveals an Early Uni-potent Neutrophil Progenitor. Immunity 53, 303–318.e5 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim M-H et al. A late-lineage murine neutrophil precursor population exhibits dynamic changes during demand-adapted granulopoiesis. Sci. Rep 7, 39804 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kolaczkowska E & Kubes P Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol 13, 159– (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sica A et al. IL-1 transcriptionally activates the neutrophil chemotactic factor/IL-8 gene in endothelial cells. Immunology 69, 548–553 (1990). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brinkmann V et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 303, 1532–1535 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Theilgaard-Mönch K, Knudsen S, Follin P & Borregaard N The Transcriptional Activation Program of Human Neutrophils in Skin Lesions Supports Their Important Role in Wound Healing. J. Immunol 172, 7684–7693 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jones HR, Robb CT, Perretti M & Rossi AG The role of neutrophils in inflammation resolution. Semin. Immunol 28, 137–145 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Serhan CN, Chiang N & Van Dyke TE Resolving inflammation: dual anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution lipid mediators. Nat. Rev. Immunol 8, 349–361 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tecchio C, Micheletti A & Cassatella MA Neutrophil-derived cytokines: facts beyond expression. Front. Immunol 5, 508 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sreeramkumar V et al. Neutrophils scan for activated platelets to initiate inflammation. Science 346, 1234–1238 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Warnatsch A, Ioannou M, Wang Q & Papayannopoulos V Inflammation. Neutrophil extracellular traps license macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerosis. Science 349, 316–320 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lim K et al. Neutrophil trails guide influenza-specific CD8+ T cells in the airways. Science 349, (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mittal M, Siddiqui MR, Tran K, Reddy SP & Malik AB Reactive Oxygen Species in Inflammation and Tissue Injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal 20, 1126–1167 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Delgado-Rizo V et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Its Implications in Inflammation: An Overview. Front. Immunol 8, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Garcia-Romo GS et al. Netting Neutrophils Are Major Inducers of Type I IFN Production in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Sci. Transl. Med 3, 73ra20–73ra20 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McCracken JM & Allen L-AH Regulation of Human Neutrophil Apoptosis and Lifespan in Health and Disease. J. Cell Death 7, 15–23 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lahoz-Beneytez J et al. Human neutrophil kinetics: modeling of stable isotope labeling data supports short blood neutrophil half-lives. Blood 127, 3431–3438 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ren Y et al. Apoptotic Cells Protect Mice against Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Shock. J. Immunol 180, 4978–4985 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Amulic B, Cazalet C, Hayes GL, Metzler KD & Zychlinsky A Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol 30, 459–489 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sônego F, Alves-Filho JC & Cunha FQ Targeting neutrophils in sepsis. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol 10, 1019–1028 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sônego F et al. Paradoxical Roles of the Neutrophil in Sepsis: Protective and Deleterious. Front. Immunol 7, 155 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Németh T, Sperandio M & Mócsai A Neutrophils as emerging therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 19, 253–275 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Campbell IK et al. Therapeutic Targeting of the G-CSF Receptor Reduces Neutrophil Trafficking and Joint Inflammation in Antibody-Mediated Inflammatory Arthritis. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950 197, 4392–4402 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rossi AG et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors enhance the resolution of inflammation by promoting inflammatory cell apoptosis. Nat. Med 12, 1056–1064 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ley K, Rivera-Nieves J, Sandborn WJ & Shattil S Integrin-based therapeutics: biological basis, clinical use and new drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 15, 173–183 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chang J et al. GMI-1070, a novel pan-selectin antagonist, reverses acute vascular occlusions in sickle cell mice. Blood 116, 1779–1786 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moss RB et al. Safety and early treatment effects of the CXCR2 antagonist SB-656933 in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. Off. J. Eur. Cyst. Fibros. Soc 12, 241–248 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rennard SI et al. CXCR2 Antagonist MK-7123. A Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept Trial for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 191, 1001–1011 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Korkmaz B, Kellenberger C, Viaud-Massuard M-C & Gauthier F Selective inhibitors of human neutrophil proteinase 3. Curr. Pharm. Des 19, 966–976 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lewis HD et al. Inhibition of PAD4 activity is sufficient to disrupt mouse and human NET formation. Nat. Chem. Biol 11, 189–191 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Koushik S et al. PAD4: pathophysiology, current therapeutics and future perspective in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 21, 433–447 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Amulic B et al. Cell-Cycle Proteins Control Production of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Dev. Cell 43, 449–462.e5 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chu D, Dong X, Shi X, Zhang C & Wang Z Neutrophil-Based Drug Delivery Systems. Adv. Mater. Deerfield Beach Fla 30, e1706245 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang Z, Li J, Cho J & Malik AB Prevention of Vascular Inflammation by Nanoparticle Targeting of Adherent Neutrophils. Nat. Nanotechnol 9, 204–210 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chu D et al. Nanoparticle Targeting of Neutrophils for Improved Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater 5, 1088–1093 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gao J, Chu D & Wang Z Cell Membrane-formed Nanovesicles for Disease-Targeted Delivery. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc 224, 208–216 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gao J, Wang S & Wang Z High Yield, Scalable and Remotely Drug-Loaded Neutrophil-derived Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) for Anti-inflammation Therapy. Biomaterials 135, 62–73 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Malumbres M et al. Cyclin-dependent kinases: a family portrait. Nat. Cell Biol 11, 1275–1276 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Malumbres M & Barbacid M Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Biochem. Sci 30, 630–641 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gopinathan L, Ratnacaram CK & Kaldis P Established and Novel Cdk/Cyclin Complexes Regulating the Cell Cycle and Development. in Cell Cycle in Development (ed. Kubiak JZ) 365–389 (Springer, 2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19065-0_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Morgan DO Principles of CDK regulation. Nature 374, 131–134 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Malumbres M & Barbacid M Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 153–166 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Morgan DO Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 13, 261–291 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Morgan DO CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASES: Engines, Clocks, and Microprocessors. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 13, 261–291 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Denicourt C & Dowdy SF Cip/Kip proteins: more than just CDKs inhibitors. Genes Dev. 18, 851–855 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cerqueira A et al. Genetic Characterization of the Role of the Cip/Kip Family of Proteins as Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors and Assembly Factors. Mol. Cell. Biol 34, 1452–1459 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pagano M et al. Regulation of the cell cycle by the cdk2 protein kinase in cultured human fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol 121, 101–111 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nurse P A long twentieth century of the cell cycle and beyond. Cell 100, 71–78 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cobrinik D Pocket proteins and cell cycle control. Oncogene 24, 2796–2809 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Narasimha AM et al. Cyclin D activates the Rb tumor suppressor by mono-phosphorylation. eLife 3, e02872 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Topacio BR et al. Cyclin D-Cdk4,6 Drives Cell-Cycle Progression via the Retinoblastoma Protein’s C-Terminal Helix. Mol. Cell 74, 758–770.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Driscoll B et al. Discovery of a Regulatory Motif That Controls the Exposure of Specific Upstream Cyclin-dependent Kinase Sites That Determine Both Conformation and Growth Suppressing Activity of pRb*. J. Biol. Chem 274, 9463–9471 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Aleem E, Kiyokawa H & Kaldis P Cdc2–cyclin E complexes regulate the G1/S phase transition. Nat. Cell Biol 7, 831–836 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lowe ED et al. Specificity determinants of recruitment peptides bound to phospho-CDK2/cyclin A. Biochemistry 41, 15625–15634 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ren S & Rollins BJ Cyclin C/Cdk3 Promotes Rb-Dependent G0 Exit. Cell 117, 239–251 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Miyata Y et al. Cyclin C regulates human hematopoietic stem/progenitor sell quiescence. Stem Cells 28, 308–317 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hofmann F & Livingston DM Differential effects of cdk2 and cdk3 on the control of pRb and E2F function during G1 exit. Genes Dev. 10, 851–861 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sherr CJ & Roberts JM CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 13, 1501–1512 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nigg EA Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2, 21–32 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cruz JC & Tsai L-H A Jekyll and Hyde kinase: roles for Cdk5 in brain development and disease. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 14, 390–394 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kesavapany S et al. Neuronal cyclin-dependent kinase 5: role in nervous system function and its specific inhibition by the Cdk5 inhibitory peptide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Proteins Proteomics 1697, 143–153 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Odajima J et al. Cyclin E Constrains Cdk5 Activity to Regulate Synaptic Plasticity and Memory Formation. Dev. Cell 21, 655–668 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lolli G & Johnson LN CAK-Cyclin-dependent Activating Kinase: a key kinase in cell cycle control and a target for drugs? Cell Cycle Georget. Tex 4, 572–577 (2005). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cyclin C/CDK8 is a novel CTD kinase associated with RNA polymerase II. - Abstract - Europe PMC. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8700522. [PubMed]
  • 82.Akoulitchev S, Chuikov S & Reinberg D TFIIH is negatively regulated by cdk8-containing mediator complexes. Nature 407, 102–106 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Fu TJ, Peng J, Lee G, Price DH & Flores O Cyclin K functions as a CDK9 regulatory subunit and participates in RNA polymerase II transcription. J. Biol. Chem 274, 34527–34530 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Garriga J & Graña X Cellular control of gene expression by T-type cyclin/CDK9 complexes. Gene 337, 15–23 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.MacLachlan TK et al. Binding of CDK9 to TRAF2. J. Cell. Biochem 71, 467–478 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li S et al. The cdc-2-related kinase, PISSLRE, is essential for cell growth and acts in G2 phase of the cell cycle. Cancer Res. 55, 3992–3995 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kasten M & Giordano A Cdk10, a Cdc2-related kinase, associates with the Ets2 transcription factor and modulates its transactivation activity. Oncogene 20, 1832–1838 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhou Y, Shen JK, Hornicek FJ, Kan Q & Duan Z The emerging roles and therapeutic potential of cyclin-dependent kinase 11 (CDK11) in human cancer. Oncotarget 7, 40846–40859 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Blazek D et al. The Cyclin K/Cdk12 complex maintains genomic stability via regulation of expression of DNA damage response genes. Genes Dev. 25, 2158–2172 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Liang K et al. Characterization of Human Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 12 (CDK12) and CDK13 Complexes in C-Terminal Domain Phosphorylation, Gene Transcription, and RNA Processing. Mol. Cell. Biol 35, 928–938 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Park MH, Kim SY, Kim YJ & Chung Y-H ALS2CR7 (CDK15) attenuates TRAIL induced apoptosis by inducing phosphorylation of survivin Thr34. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 450, 129–134 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Satyanarayana A & Kaldis P Mammalian cell-cycle regulation: several Cdks, numerous cyclins and diverse compensatory mechanisms. Oncogene 28, 2925–2939 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Berthet C, Aleem E, Coppola V, Tessarollo L & Kaldis P Cdk2 Knockout Mice Are Viable. Curr. Biol 13, 1775–1785 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.van den Heuvel S & Harlow E Distinct roles for cyclin-dependent kinases in cell cycle control. Science 262, 2050–2054 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Berthet C et al. Combined Loss of Cdk2 and Cdk4 Results in Embryonic Lethality and Rb Hypophosphorylation. Dev. Cell 10, 563–573 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Jayapal SR et al. Hematopoiesis specific loss of Cdk2 and Cdk4 results in increased erythrocyte size and delayed platelet recovery following stress. Haematologica 100, 431–438 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Malumbres M et al. Mammalian Cells Cycle without the D-Type Cyclin-Dependent Kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6. Cell 118, 493–504 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kalaszczynska I et al. Cyclin A Is Redundant in Fibroblasts but Essential in Hematopoietic and Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell 138, 352–365 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kozar K et al. Mouse development and cell proliferation in the absence of D-cyclins. Cell 118, 477–491 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kozar K & Sicinski P Cell cycle progression without cyclin D-CDK4 and cyclin D-CDK6 complexes. Cell Cycle Georget. Tex 4, 388–391 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ciemerych MA et al. Development of mice expressing a single D-type cyclin. Genes Dev. 16, 3277–3289 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sicinska E et al. Essential role for cyclin D3 in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-driven expansion of neutrophil granulocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol 26, 8052–8060 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Klausen P, Bjerregaard MD, Borregaard N & Cowland JB End-stage differentiation of neutrophil granulocytes in vivo is accompanied by up-regulation of p27kip1 and down-regulation of CDK2, CDK4, and CDK6. J. Leukoc. Biol 75, 569–578 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Rincón E, Rocha-Gregg BL & Collins SR A map of gene expression in neutrophil-like cell lines. BMC Genomics 19, 573 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Mócsai A, Walzog B & Lowell CA Intracellular signalling during neutrophil recruitment. Cardiovasc. Res 107, 373–385 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Filippi M-D, Szczur K, Harris CE & Berclaz P-Y Rho GTPase Rac1 is critical for neutrophil migration into the lung. Blood 109, 1257–1264 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Pestonjamasp KN et al. Rac1 links leading edge and uropod events through Rho and myosin activation during chemotaxis. Blood 108, 2814–2820 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gambardella L & Vermeren S Molecular players in neutrophil chemotaxis—focus on PI3K and small GTPases. J. Leukoc. Biol 94, 603–612 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hsu AY et al. Phenotypical microRNA screen reveals a noncanonical role of CDK2 in regulating neutrophil migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 116, 18561–18570 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Somarelli JA et al. A Precision Medicine Drug Discovery Pipeline Identifies Combined CDK2 and 9 Inhibition as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy in Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther 19, 2516–2527 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Wang L et al. Discovery of a first-in-class CDK2 selective degrader for AML differentiation therapy. Nat. Chem. Biol 17, 567–575 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Park J et al. Cancer cells induce metastasis-supporting neutrophil extracellular DNA traps. Sci. Transl. Med 8, 361ra138–361ra138 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kenny EF et al. Diverse stimuli engage different neutrophil extracellular trap pathways. eLife 6, e24437 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hakkim A et al. Activation of the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Nat. Chem. Biol 7, 75–77 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Douda DN, Khan MA, Grasemann H & Palaniyar N SK3 channel and mitochondrial ROS mediate NADPH oxidase-independent NETosis induced by calcium influx. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 112, 2817–2822 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Khandpur R et al. NETs are a source of citrullinated autoantigens and stimulate inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Transl. Med 5, 178ra40 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lawrence SM, Corriden R & Nizet V The Ontogeny of a Neutrophil: Mechanisms of Granulopoiesis and Homeostasis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. MMBR 82, e00057–17 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Burgoyne RD & Morgan A Secretory Granule Exocytosis. Physiol. Rev 83, 581–632 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Rosales JL & Ernst JD GTP-dependent permeabilized neutrophil secretion requires a freely diffusible cytosolic protein. J. Cell. Biochem 80, 37–45 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rosales JL, Ernst JD, Hallows J & Lee K-Y GTP-dependent Secretion from Neutrophils Is Regulated by Cdk5. J. Biol. Chem 279, 53932–53936 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.LEE K-Y, LIU L, JIN Y, FU S-B & ROSALES JL Cdk5 Mediates Vimentin Ser56 Phosphorylation During GTP-Induced Secretion by Neutrophils. J. Cell. Physiol 227, 739–750 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Savill JS et al. Macrophage phagocytosis of aging neutrophils in inflammation. Programmed cell death in the neutrophil leads to its recognition by macrophages. J. Clin. Invest 83, 865–875 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wang K et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 activity regulates neutrophil spontaneous apoptosis. PloS One 7, e30128 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hoodless LJ et al. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of CDK9 drives neutrophil apoptosis to resolve inflammation in zebrafish in vivo. Sci. Rep 5, 36980 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Santo L et al. AT7519, A novel small molecule multi-cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma via GSK-3β activation and RNA polymerase II inhibition. Oncogene 29, 2325–2336 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kaveh A et al. Selective CDK9 inhibition resolves neutrophilic inflammation and enhances cardiac regeneration in larval zebrafish. Development (2021) doi: 10.1242/dev.199636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Pack LR, Daigh LH, Chung M & Meyer T Clinical CDK4/6 inhibitors induce selective and immediate dissociation of p21 from cyclin D-CDK4 to inhibit CDK2. Nat. Commun 12, 3356 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Silvestre-Roig C, Hidalgo A & Soehnlein O Neutrophil heterogeneity: implications for homeostasis and pathogenesis. Blood 127, 2173–2181 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Beyrau M, Bodkin JV & Nourshargh S Neutrophil heterogeneity in health and disease: a revitalized avenue in inflammation and immunity. Open Biol. 2, 120134 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Sagiv JY et al. Phenotypic diversity and plasticity in circulating neutrophil subpopulations in cancer. Cell Rep. 10, 562–573 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kalafati L, Mitroulis I, Verginis P, Chavakis T & Kourtzelis I Neutrophils as Orchestrators in Tumor Development and Metastasis Formation. Front. Oncol 10, 2799 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Reusch N et al. Neutrophils in COVID-19. Front. Immunol 12, 952 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Neutrophil Gene Expression Data | Collins Lab. https://collinslab.ucdavis.edu/neutrophilgeneexpression/.
  • 134.IL-17-producing γδ T cells and neutrophils conspire to promote breast cancer metastasis | Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 135.Taylor A et al. SRF is required for neutrophil migration in response to inflammation. Blood 123, 3027–3036 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Cusanovich DA et al. Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science 348, 910–914 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Thomas HB, Moots RJ, Edwards SW & Wright HL Whose Gene Is It Anyway? The Effect of Preparation Purity on Neutrophil Transcriptome Studies. PLOS ONE 10, e0138982 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Wright HL, Thomas HB, Moots RJ & Edwards SW RNA-Seq Reveals Activation of Both Common and Cytokine-Specific Pathways following Neutrophil Priming. PLOS ONE 8, e58598 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Jiang K et al. Disease-Associated Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms From Noncoding Regions in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Are Located Within or Adjacent to Functional Genomic Elements of Human Neutrophils and CD4+ T Cells. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67, 1966–1977 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Lukaszewicz AI & Anderson DJ Cyclin D1 promotes neurogenesis in the developing spinal cord in a cell cycle-independent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 108, 11632–11637 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Hennessy EJ, Sheedy FJ, Santamaria D, Barbacid M & O’Neill LAJ Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) down-regulates microRNA-107, increasing macrophage adhesion via cyclin-dependent kinase 6. J. Biol. Chem 286, 25531–25539 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Arsic N et al. A novel function for Cyclin A2: Control of cell invasion via RhoA signaling. J. Cell Biol 196, 147–162 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES