Abstract
Ivelayinisp. nov., is described from Guangdong, China based on morphological characters and molecular data. Adults, including genitalia and wing venation, and pupa are illustrated and compared to those of similar species. A key to Chinese Ivela species is provided. Assignment of the new species to Ivela Swinhoe is based primarily on a molecular phylogenetic analysis and is corroborated by morphology. Life histories of I.yini and Dendrophlepssemihyalina Hampson are discussed.
Keywords: adults, Dendrophleps , Leucomini, molecular data, phylogenetic analyses, pupae
Introduction
The tribe Leucomini of Lymantriinae (Erebidae), proposed by Hollоway (1999), is mainly distributed in the Oriental tropics and contains approximately 60 species in four genera (Wang et al. 2015). Adults of this tribe can be recognized by their appearance, often pale white, with translucent areas in male wings, and asymmetric male genitalia (Holloway 1999). Prior to this study, Ivela Swinhoe contained three species: I.auripes (Butler), I.ochropoda (Eversmann), and I.eleuterioides (Semper). Of these, I.auripes and I.ochropoda occur in China.
We report the discovery of a previously unrecognized species of tussock moth that resembles Dendrophlepssemihyalina Hampson. Based on multiple morphological characters of adults and pupae and molecular data of four gene regions, we describe it as a species of Ivela.
Materials and methods
Collecting and morphology
All examined specimens were collected in light traps. They are deposited in the Insect Collection of Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China. Adults and genitalia were treated following Wang et al. (2010, 2014). Terminology follows Holloway (1999) and Chao (2003).
Molecular taxa sampling
We sampled six species, including the type species of all genera of Leucomini, with two species of Lymantria Hübner as outgroups. Most sequences of Leucomini and those of the outgroup taxa were downloaded from NCBI. The detailed sampling data for molecular analyses are provided in Table 1.
Table 1.
Sampling data used for molecular analyses in this study.
Specimen voucher no. | Taxa | Locality | GenBank accession no. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COI | EF1-a | RPS5 | WNT | |||
LE114 | Ivelayini sp. nov. | Guangdong, China | OM242956 # | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
LE074 | Ivelayini sp. nov. | Guangdong, China | OM242952 # | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
LE118 | Ivelayini sp. nov. | Guangdong, China | OM242955 # | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
H340 | Ivelayini sp. nov. | China | KP081829.1 | KP082270.1 | ‒ | KP082761.1 |
LE124 | Ivelaauripes* | Guangdong, China | OM242951 # | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
H49 | Ivelaauripes* | China | KP081830.1 | KP082302.1 | ‒ | KP082762.1 |
H181 | Perinanuda* | Guangdong, China | KP081831.1 | KP082248.1 | KP082623.1 | KP082763 |
LE014 | Dendrophlepssemihyalina* | Guangdong, China | OM250083 # | OM328195 # | OM328197 # | OM328196 # |
LE115 | Dendrophlepssemihyalina* | Guangdong, China | OM242954 # | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
LE116 | Dendrophlepssemihyalina* | Guangdong, China | OM242953 # | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
GD385 | Dendrophlepssemihyalina* | Guangdong, China | OM242949 # | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
H377 | Leucoma sp. | China | KP081825.1 | KP082289.1 | KP082620.1 | KP082757.1 |
H351 | Leucomasalicis* | China | KP081826.1 | KP082276.1 | KP082621.1 | KP082758.1 |
H127 | Lymantriadissoluta | China | KP081854.1 | KP082225 | KP082643.1 | KP082781 |
H58 | Lymantriasimilis | China | KP081855.1 | KP082304.1 | KP082644.1 | KP082782.1 |
* Type species of genus. # Sequences obtained in this study. ‒ No data available.
Molecular data analyses
DNA was extracted from two or three legs of adult specimens using the TIANGEN DNA extraction kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. One mitochondrial gene, DNA barcode region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), and three nuclear genes, Elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1α), ribosomal protein S5 (RpS5), and wingless (WNT), were amplificated and sequenced following Folmer et al. (1994) and Wahlberg and Wheat (2008). Concatenation and sequence alignment was performed using MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018).
A neighbor-joining (NJ) analysis of DNA barcode was performed with MEGA X under the Kimura 2-Parameter (K2P) model (Kimura 1980), and bootstrap values were calculated with 1,000 replicates. A maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates, and the best-fitting model was automatically selected by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) implemented in IQ-TREE. A Bayesian-inference (BI) analysis was performed using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) under the GTR + F + G4 model, with two parallel runs for 2,000,000 generations. The first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to calculate posterior probabilities (PP).
Results
Phylogenetic relationships
The genetic distances of the DNA barcode data (a 658 bp region of the COI gene) of Leucomini species in China are given in Appendix 1. The interspecific genetic distances within Ivela ranged from 10.6 to 12.2% (I.yini sp. nov. and I.auripes); the intraspecific genetic distances from 1.1% (I.yini) to 1.9% (D.semihyalina); and the intergeneric genetic distances within Leucomini ranged from 12.0% (I.yini and Perinanuda (Fabricius)) to 19.3% (Leucomasalicis (Linnaeus) and D.semihyalina). The concatenated dataset of four genes consists of 2,851 nucleotide positions (658 bp for COI, 400 bp for WNT, 600 bp for RPS5 and 1,193 bp for EF-1α). The NJ analysis of the DNA barcode data indicates that the new species and I.auripes (the type species of Ivela) form a clade in Leucomini (Fig. 1). This clade is strongly supported by both BI and ML analyses of the concatenated dataset (Fig. 2: BP = 1.00, PP = 87).
Figure 1.
NJ tree of the selected samples of Leucomini based on DNA barcode data. Numbers near nodes represent support values.
Figure 2.
BI tree of the selected species of Leucomini inferred from the combined COI, EF-1α, RPS5, and WNT genes. Posterior probabilities from BI analysis and bootstrap values from ML analysis are indicated above the branches as PP/BP.
A key to Ivela from China
1 | Forewings with R3 and R4 coincident | I.auripes |
– | Forewings with R3 and R4 separated at near apex | 2 |
2 | Palpi white | I.yini |
– | Palpi yellow | I.ochropoda |
Species accounts
. Ivela yini
Xie & Wang sp. nov.
A836E550-60C3-526A-BB28-F0D1FACC1A74
http://zoobank.org/2BA5C644-7CCA-4686-A445-6395DFB1E239
Figs 3–6 , 9–11 , 14 , 15–16 , 21–24
Figures 3–8.
Adults 3‒6Ivelayini sp. nov. (3 male, holotype 4 female, paratype 5 male, paratype 6 female, paratype) 7, 8Dendrophlepssemihyalina (7 male 8 female). Scale bars: 10 mm.
Figures 9–13.
Field images of adults 9‒11Ivelayini sp. nov. male (9 dorsal view 10 lateral view 11 ventral view of head) 12, 13Dendrophlepssemihyalina (12 male, dorsal view 13 female, dorsal view).
Figure 14.
Wing venation of Ivelayini sp. nov. (male, paratype).
Figures 15–20.
Genitalia 15, 16Ivelayini sp. nov. (15 male, holotype 16 female, paratype) 17, 18I.auripes (17 male 18 female) 19, 20Dendrophlepssemihyalina (19 male 20 female).
Figures 21–24.
Pupa of Ivelayini sp. nov. 21 dorsal view 22 lateral view 23 ventral view 24 pupa on Idesiapolycarpa Maxim.
Diagnosis.
This new species is diagnosed by a combination of characters. Superficially, the thorax and abdomen of the adult are white without black markings (Figs 3–6, 9, 10), the palpi are white (Fig. 11), and the forelegs are orange with white rings on the tarsal segments (Figs 9–11). In the male, the asymmetrical valvae are wide and truncated, with a deeply concave cucullus (Fig. 15). The uncus of I.yini (Fig. 15) is more than twice as long as the uncus of I.auripes (Fig. 17) and I.ochropoda (Inoue 1956: fig. 25). The female corpus bursae of I.yini has a pair of caudal projections (Fig. 16). The pupa has white hairs on the prothorax, on segments A2 and A3, and near the posterior end (Figs 21–24).
Dendrophlepssemihyalina has black markings on the thorax and abdomen (Figs 7, 8, 12, 13), and its valvae are long, narrow, and without a deeply concave cucullus (Fig. 19). The corpora bursae of I.auripes and D.semihyalina lack caudal projections (Figs 18, 20).
Description.
Adult (Figs 3–6, 9–11, 14–16).
Head (Fig. 11). Antennae bipectinate, fuscous; frons and vertex covered densely with white hairs; labial palpi white, short.
Thorax (Figs 3–6, 9, 10, 14). Dorsum and venter covered with white scales, tegula white. Forewing length: 39‒42 mm male, 48‒50 mm female. Forewings translucent with dense white scales at basal area in male, white in female; R1 and R2 almost parallel, R3, R4, and R5 stalked, M1 arising from upper angle of discal cell, M2 and M3 arising from the lower angle of discal cell respectively, Cu1 and Cu2 approximately parallel, fringe white. Hindwings white, with a transparent area near apex in male; Rs and M1 short stalked, M2 and M3 short stalked in male but arising separately from the lower angle of discal cell in female, fringe white. Forelegs densely covered with orange scales, tarsi with white rings; mid- and hindlegs white, tarsi yellow with white rings but inconspicuous in male.
Abdomen. Male genitalia (Fig. 15). Uncus hook-shaped apically; tegumen broad; valvae moderately symmetric, left valva smaller than right, broad, extremely short, cucullus concave medially, densely covered with setae on the dorsal and ventral parts of cucullus; saccus well developed; aedeagus tubular, distal gradually slightly curve toward distal area; vesica simple, without cornuti.
Female genitalia (Fig. 16). Anterior apophysis almost as long as posterior apophysis; anal papillae larger; ostium larger; ductus bursae short, sclerotized; corpus bursae with a pair of terminal projections.
Pupa (Figs 21–24). Head white; prothorax white, with long, white hairs; mesothorax and metathorax chestnut-colored on dorsal surface, with dark brown hairs; wings white, with two black lines dorsally; forelegs and midlegs yellow, hindlegs white, with dark yellow dot terminally. Abdomen pale green laterally and ventrally, with chestnut-colored dots and spots dorsally; segments A1–A6 with a pair of black setae; segments A2 and A3 and terminal of abdomen with white hairs.
A single pupa of I.yini was discovered on Idesiapolycarpa Maxim. (Salicaceae) (Fig. 24). This suggests that this is the foodplant of this species.
Habitat.
Forest zone 1000‒1315 m elevation.
Materials examined.
Holotype: ♂, Nanling National Nature Reserve, Ruyuan County, Guangdong, 25.VI.2008, leg. Min Wang. Paratypes: 1♂, same data as holotype, altitude 1315 m, 12.VII.2010, leg. Min Wang. 1♀, same data as holotype, 3.VII.2011, leg. Min Wang. 1♂, same data as holotype, altitude 1000 m, 10.VII.2019, leg. Ran Yin & Xiao-juan Xing. 1♀, same data as holotype, 11‒14.VI.2019, leg. Hou-shuai Wang.
Distribution.
China (Guangdong).
Etymology.
The species is named after Ran Yin, who discovered the pupa of the new species. The name is in the genitive case.
Remarks.
The female genitalia of I.auripes (Fig. 18) and D.semihyalina (Fig. 20) have to our knowledge not been illustrated previously. They are illustrated here for comparative purposes.
The early stages of D.semihyalina are also newly reported as below (Figs 25–30):
Figures 25–30.
Immature stages and host plant of Dendrophlepssemihyalina25 host plant: Indocalamustessellatus (Munro) Keng f. 26, 27 last instar larva on the host plant 28‒30 pupa (28 dorsal view 29 lateral view 30 ventral view).
Host plant of D.semihyalina (Fig. 25): Indocalamustessellatus (Munro) Keng f. (Poaceae).
Last instar larva of D.semihyalina (Figs 26, 27): body white laterally and ventrally; dorsally black, with scattered white dots. A1 and A2 with reddish orange tufts dorsally. Verrucae pale yellow laterally, black dorsally, with long white or black hairs.
Pupa of D.semihyalina (Figs 28–30): body white laterally and ventrally, green-brown dorsally. Thorax and abdomen with irregular black spots on lateral and ventral surfaces. A1–A3 with a pair of green patches on dorsal surface. Wings with some mixed orange and black veins.
Discussion
Ivelayini is superficially similar to several tussock moths with which it is sympatric. We illustrated it with Dendrophlepssemihyalina and Ivelaauripes for comparative purposes. These species can be distinguished reliably by the combinations of superficial characters outlined above. The identification can be confirmed by dissection of the male and female genitalia if required.
The genetic distance values of DNA barcode data between Lepidoptera species are ordinarily greater than 3% (Hebert et al. 2003). Our analysis of Chinese Leucomini indicates that the DNA barcode of I.yini is 10.6% from the closest species I.auripes (Appendix 1). The NJ tree also strongly supports the validity of the new species (Fig. 1). Our phylogenetic analyses show that I.yini and I.auripes are a monophyletic clade (PP = 1.00, BP = 87) and strongly suggest that I.yini belongs in Ivela (Fig. 2). This arrangement is supported by morphology. All Ivela, including I.yini, share wide valvae, and their hindwings lack a row of oblique veinlets (accessory veins) between A2 and the dorsal margin. These veinlets are considered diagnostic for Dendrophleps (Holloway 1999; Mackey 2019).
Several hardwoods were reported as foodplants for I.auripes: Corylopsis multiflora Hance (Hamamelidaceae), Cornuscontroversa Hemsley (Cornaceae), C.brachypoda C.A. Mey (Cornaceae), Styraxjaponicus Sieb. et Zucc (Styracaceae), and S.obassis Siebold et Zucc (Styracaceae) (Inoue 1956; Chao 2003). While our discovery of a pupa of I.yini on Idesiapolycarpa is less than absolute proof that it is the foodplant of this moth, it does suggest that I.yini feeds on a broadleaved tree. In contrast, D.semihyalina was discovered to be a grass feeder. These foodplant differences support placement of these similar-appearing moths into different genera.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to three reviewers for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We are thankful Prof. Min Wang from South China Agricultural University for collecting the specimens. We are also thankful to Mr Ran Yin and Ms Xiao-juan Xing for discovering the pupa of the new species. This work was supported by a grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China to HSW (no. 31601879) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (no. 2022A1515012050).
Appendix 1
Table A1.
Kimura 2-parameter genetic distances based on COI barcodes among 13 samples of Leucomini and two outgroups.
Species code | Species name | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LE114 | Ivelayini sp. nov. | ||||||||||||||
LE074 | Ivelayini sp. nov. | 0.006 | |||||||||||||
LE118 | Ivelayini sp. nov. | 0.000 | 0.006 | ||||||||||||
H340 | Ivelayini sp. nov. | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |||||||||||
LE124 | Ivelaauripes | 0.122 | 0.119 | 0.122 | 0.120 | ||||||||||
H49 | Ivelaauripes | 0.110 | 0.106 | 0.110 | 0.108 | 0.020 | |||||||||
H181 | Perinanuda | 0.126 | 0.122 | 0.126 | 0.120 | 0.157 | 0.144 | ||||||||
LE116 | Dendrophlepssemihyalina | 0.154 | 0.156 | 0.154 | 0.154 | 0.183 | 0.165 | 0.170 | |||||||
LE115 | Dendrophlepssemihyalina | 0.152 | 0.154 | 0.152 | 0.152 | 0.181 | 0.163 | 0.168 | 0.002 | ||||||
GD385 | Dendrophlepssemihyalina | 0.144 | 0.146 | 0.144 | 0.144 | 0.167 | 0.150 | 0.161 | 0.019 | 0.017 | |||||
LE014 | Dendrophlepssemihyalina | 0.142 | 0.144 | 0.142 | 0.142 | 0.165 | 0.148 | 0.159 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.003 | ||||
H377 | Leucoma sp. | 0.169 | 0.173 | 0.169 | 0.171 | 0.174 | 0.155 | 0.172 | 0.187 | 0.187 | 0.182 | 0.181 | |||
H351 | Leucomasalicis | 0.159 | 0.161 | 0.159 | 0.161 | 0.163 | 0.149 | 0.182 | 0.193 | 0.191 | 0.188 | 0.187 | 0.127 | ||
H127 | Lymantriadissoluta | 0.138 | 0.135 | 0.138 | 0.142 | 0.153 | 0.136 | 0.131 | 0.157 | 0.155 | 0.149 | 0.147 | 0.159 | 0.167 | |
H58 | Lymantriasimilis | 0.133 | 0.129 | 0.133 | 0.133 | 0.139 | 0.121 | 0.137 | 0.154 | 0.154 | 0.146 | 0.145 | 0.144 | 0.163 | 0.071 |
Citation
Xie L-Z, Li K-Y, Chen L-S, Wang H-S () A new species of the genus Ivela Swinhoe (Lepidoptera, Erebidae,Lymantriinae) from Guangdong, China. ZooKeys 1097: 103–116. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1097.79109
Contributor Information
Liu-Sheng Chen, Email: lshchen2008@163.com.
Hou-Shuai Wang, Email: houshuaiwang@scau.edu.cn.
References
- Chao CL. (2003) LepidopteraLymantriidae. Fauna Sinica, Insecta 30. Science Press, Beijing, 484 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3(5): 294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 270(1512): 313–321. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holloway JD. (1999) The moths of Borneo [Part 5]: Family Lymantriidae. Malayan Nature Journal 53: 1–188. [Google Scholar]
- Inoue H. (1956) A revision of the Japanese Lymantriidae (I). Japanese Journal of Medical Science & Biology 9(4–5): 133–163. 10.7883/yoken1952.9.133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16(2): 111–120. 10.1007/BF01731581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackey P. (2019) A note on Dendrophlepslobipennis (Swinhoe, 1892) (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Lymantriinae) with a description of the female. Suara Serangga Papua 12(1): 1–7. [SUGAPA digital] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahlberg N, Wheat CW. (2008) Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: Designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of Lepidoptera. Systematic Biology 57(2): 231–242. 10.1080/10635150802033006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang HS, Xiong W, Wang M. (2010) Two new species of the genus Longipenis (Lepidoptera: Lecithoceridae) from China. The Florida Entomologist 93(3): 352–356. 10.1653/024.093.0305 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang HS, Fan XL, Owada M, Wang M, Nylin S. (2014) Phylogeny, systematics and biogeography of the genus Panolis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) based on morphological and molecular evidence. PLoS ONE 9(3): e90598. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang HS, Wahlberg N, Holloway JD, Bergsten J, Fan XL, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Wen LJ, Wang M, Nylin S. (2015) Molecular phylogeny of Lymantriinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea, Erebidae) inferred from eight gene regions. Cladistics 31(6): 579–592. 10.1111/cla.12108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.