Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2022 Apr 28;13:2292. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30028-w

Experimental evidence of tetrahedral symmetry breaking in SiO2 glass under pressure

Yoshio Kono 1,✉, Koji Ohara 2, Nozomi M Kondo 1, Hiroki Yamada 2, Satoshi Hiroi 2, Fumiya Noritake 3, Kiyofumi Nitta 2, Oki Sekizawa 2, Yuji Higo 2, Yoshinori Tange 2, Hirokatsu Yumoto 2,4, Takahisa Koyama 2,4, Hiroshi Yamazaki 2,4, Yasunori Senba 2,4, Haruhiko Ohashi 2,4, Shunji Goto 2,4, Ichiro Inoue 4, Yujiro Hayashi 4, Kenji Tamasaku 4, Taito Osaka 4, Jumpei Yamada 4, Makina Yabashi 4
PMCID: PMC9051114  PMID: 35484122

Abstract

Bimodal behavior in the translational order of silicon’s second shell in SiO2 liquid at high temperatures and high pressures has been recognized in theoretical studies, and the fraction of the S state with high tetrahedrality is considered as structural origin of the anomalous properties. However, it has not been well identified in experiment. Here we show experimental evidence of a bimodal behavior in the translational order of silicon’s second shell in SiO2 glass under pressure. SiO2 glass shows tetrahedral symmetry structure with separation between the first and second shells of silicon at low pressures, which corresponds to the S state structure reported in SiO2 liquid. On the other hand, at high pressures, the silicon’s second shell collapses onto the first shell, and more silicon atoms locate in the first shell. These observations indicate breaking of local tetrahedral symmetry in SiO2 glass under pressure, as well as SiO2 liquid.

Subject terms: Phase transitions and critical phenomena, Structure of solids and liquids, Chemical physics

Understanding the structural origin of the anomalous properties of SiO2 liquid and glass at high pressures is fundamental in wide range of scientific fields. Here, the authors find experimental evidence of a bimodal behavior in the translational order of silicon’s second shell and breaking of local tetrahedral symmetry in SiO2 glass under pressure.

Introduction

Understanding the structural origin of the anomalous properties of tetrahedral liquids and amorphous materials at high-temperature and high-pressure conditions is of great interest in a wide range of scientific fields such as physics, chemistry, geoscience, and materials science. The water anomaly is the most famous example. Water shows a density maximum at high temperatures and a compressibility maximum at high pressures1–5. Similar to water, SiO2 liquid shows anomalous density and compressibility behaviors at high temperatures and high pressures4,6–8. In addition, it has been known that SiO2 glass also shows compressibility maximum (bulk modulus minimum) at high pressures of ~2–3 GPa under room temperature condition9–11. Since SiO2 is ubiquitous on the Earth, understanding the SiO2’s anomaly is fundamental not only in physics, but also in geophysics to understand nature of silicate magmas in the Earth and planet, and in materials science as a prototype network-forming glass.

Theoretical studies of SiO2 liquid4,7 suggest that the second shell structure of silicon is the key to understand the anomalous properties of SiO2 liquid at high temperatures and high pressures. Structural parameters g5 (the average density of the fifth neighbor of silicon atom)7 and z (z = δji − δj′i, where δji and δj’i is the distance from each silicon atom i to the fifth nearest silicon neighbor j and to the fourth nearest oxygen neighbor j’)4 were developed to investigate the second shell structure in SiO2 liquid. The theoretical studies reported a bimodal distribution in these structural parameters with varying temperature4,7, and suggest the relevance of the two-state model description to SiO2 liquid. The S and ρ states are assigned to the high and low distributions in the parameter z, respectively4. The low-density S state in SiO2 liquid consists of four silicon neighbor atoms in the first shell and exhibits high tetrahedral order with a clear separation between the first and second shell. On the other hand, the ρ state has more silicon neighbor atoms in the first shell and shows lower tetrahedral order than the S state. The fraction of the S state with high tetrahedrality is considered to be the controlling parameter of the anomalous properties of SiO2 liquid at high temperatures and high pressures in theoretical study4. However, there has been no experimental observation of the structure of the silicon’s second shell in SiO2 liquid and/or glass at high temperature and/or high-pressure conditions.

Although the experimental investigation of the structure of SiO2 liquid at extremely high-temperature conditions has been still challenging, there have been several experimental studies for the structure of SiO2 glass at high pressures under room temperature conditions. However, structural investigations of the previous high-pressure experimental studies were limited mainly to the nearest neighbor Si-O distance and coordination number12–15, and/or fast sharp diffraction peak of the structure factor [S(Q)]13,16, due to experimental difficulties of structural analysis beyond the nearest neighbor distance at in situ high-pressure conditions. Although some recent studies have investigated S(Q) of SiO2 glass at a high Q range to ~17 Å−1 by using multi-angle energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction technique15,17, energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction measurement using white X-ray inevitably contains uncertainty in X-ray intensity profile as a function of energy and resultantly Q. Therefore, it was difficult to conduct detailed structural analysis in the previous studies15,17. On the other hand, a recent ambient pressure study has enabled precise structural analysis of SiO2 glass beyond the nearest neighbor distances by utilizing high-energy X-ray and neutron diffraction measurements combined with the MD (molecular dynamics simulation)-RMC (reverse Monte Carlo) modeling18. Such detailed structural analysis may open a new way to find the possible existence of the bimodal feature in the second shell structure of silicon in SiO2 glass. However, structural analysis of SiO2 glass samples recovered from high-pressure and high-temperature syntheses shows only a slight change in the translational order in the second shells of silicon18.

In this work, we carry out in situ high-pressure pair distribution function measurement of SiO2 glass by utilizing high-flux and high-energy X-rays from undulator sources at BL37XU and BL05XU beamlines in SPring-8 (see Methods). By combining the high-pressure experimental S(Q) precisely determined by using monochromatic X-ray at a wide range of Q up to 19–20 Å−1 with the MD-RMC modeling, we are able to investigate the detailed structural behavior of SiO2 glass beyond the nearest neighbor distances under in situ high-pressure conditions. We find bimodal features in the translational order of the silicon’s second shell in terms of the structural parameter z and in the void radius formed from silicon atoms in SiO2 glass under pressure. The bimodal behavior in the distribution of the parameter z observed in SiO2 glass with varying pressure in this study is consistent with that simulated in SiO2 liquid with varying temperature in the theoretical study4. The structure of SiO2 glass with the characteristic distribution of the parameter z at 2.4–2.7 Å shows a tetrahedral symmetry structure formed from the nearest four silicon atoms in the first shell, and the first and second shells are clearly separated as the fifth neighbor silicon atom locates in the second shell. The structural feature corresponds to the low-density S state structure reported in the theoretical study of SiO2 liquid4. On the other hand, the structure of SiO2 glass with the characteristic distribution of z at 1.7 Å shows that the fifth neighbor silicon atom locates in the first shell, which indicates the collapse of the silicon’s second shell onto the first shell and breaking of local tetrahedral symmetry in SiO2 glass under pressure, as well as theoretical observation in SiO2 liquid at high temperatures and high pressures4.

Results

Structure factor and pair distribution function

Figure 1 shows S(Q) of SiO2 glass determined at in situ high-pressure conditions up to 6.0 GPa. The S(Q) of SiO2 glass shows distinct changes at the pressure ranges between 2.3 and 4.4 GPa (Fig. 1). Above 4.4 GPa, a new second peak clearly starts to appear at ~2.9 Å−1 (Fig. 1b). In addition, the third peak in S(Q) at ~5 Å−1 shows a shoulder peak at the low Q side below 2.3 GPa, while it becomes a single broad peak above 4.4 GPa. The structure of SiO2 glass at high-pressure conditions are analyzed by the MD-RMC modeling based on the experimentally observed S(Q) (Fig. 1a). Supplementary Fig. 1 shows partial structure factors and partial pair distribution functions of Si-O [SSiO(Q) and gSiO(r)], O-O [SOO(Q) and gOO(r)], and Si-Si [SSiSi(Q) and gSiSi(r)], respectively, obtained by the MD-RMC modeling. Partial pair distribution functions of gSiO(r) (Supplementary Fig. 1d) and gOO(r) (Supplementary Fig. 1e) show no distinct change with varying pressure, indicating that the first neighbor Si-O and O-O structures stay the same up to 6.0 GPa. In contrast, there are marked changes in gSiSi(r) at high pressures (Supplementary Fig. 1f). The first neighbor Si-Si distance shortens with increasing pressure, indicating a decrease in Si-O-Si angle, which is consistent with the previous Raman spectroscopy observation19. In addition, we find a marked change in the second peak of gSiSi(r) at ~4–6 Å. The second shell structure of silicon is considered to be a key to understand the microscopic structural behavior of SiO2 liquid in theoretical studies4,7.

Fig. 1. Structure factor [S(Q)] of SiO2 glass at high pressures.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a Color lines represent experimentally observed S(Q), and black lines show S(Q) of the MD-RMC structure model derived based on the experimentally observed S(Q) at each pressure condition. S(Q) is displayed by a vertical offset of +0.5 with increasing pressure. b Enlarged view of the experimentally observed S(Q) at the Q range between 0 and 10 Å−1. S(Q) is displayed without vertical offset. There are clear changes in the oscillations at ∼2.9 and ∼5 Å−1 with increasing pressure.

Translational order of silicon’s second shell

Ref. 4 proposed a structural parameter z to measure the translational order of the silicon’s second shell in terms of the relative distance between the first and second shells of silicon. The parameter z is defined as z = δji − δj’i, where δji and δj’i is the distance from each silicon atom i to the fifth nearest silicon neighbor j and to the fourth nearest oxygen neighbor j′, respectively. Figure 2 shows the translational order in SiO2 glass under in situ high-pressure conditions, analyzed from our observed MD-RMC model structure. We find a bimodal feature in the distribution of the parameter z with varying pressure. There is a single distribution below 2.3 GPa, while another distribution at the z = 1.6–1.7 Å starts to increase rapidly with increasing pressure above 2.3 GPa. The behavior of the distribution of the parameter z observed in SiO2 glass with varying pressure in this study is consistent with that simulated in SiO2 liquid with varying temperature4.

Fig. 2. Translational order in SiO2 glass as a function of the parameter z with varying pressure.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

The parameter z is defined as z = δji − δj′i, where δji and δj′i is the distance from each silicon atom i to the fifth nearest silicon neighbor j and to the fourth nearest oxygen neighbor j′, respectively4. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

It is important to note that the change of the distribution of the parameter z at 1.6–1.7 Å (Fig. 2) closely correlates with the evolution of the second peak at ~2.9 Å−1 in the experimentally observed S(Q) (Fig. 1b). Supplementary Fig. 2 shows a simulated result of the influence of the second peak of S(Q) at ~2.9 Å−1 on the distribution of the parameter z. The final MD-RMC model reproduces the experimentally observed S(Q) of SiO2 glass at 5.2 GPa well including the second peak at ~2.9 Å−1 (solid black line in Supplementary Fig. 2a). On the other hand, a simulated MD-RMC model shown by a broken black line reproduces most of the oscillation features of the experimentally observed S(Q), while it does not reproduce the second peak at ~2.9 Å−1 (Supplementary Fig. 2a). The difference in the second peak of S(Q) at ~2.9 Å−1 between two MD-RMC models yields a marked difference in the distribution of the parameter z at 1.6–1.7 Å (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The final MD-RMC model shows a high fraction of the distribution of the parameter z at 1.6–1.7 Å (solid black line), while the broken black line shows a markedly low fraction at z = 1.6–1.7 Å. The data indicate that the evolution of the second peak of S(Q) at ~2.9 Å−1 closely correlates with the evolution of the distribution of the parameter z at 1.6–1.7 Å. Therefore, we consider that the evolution of the second peak at ~2.9 Å−1 in the experimentally observed S(Q) (Fig. 1b) represents the change in the translational order of the silicon’s second shell in SiO2 glass.

Distributions of void radius formed from silicon atoms

In order to understand distributions of silicon in SiO2 glass under pressure, we conducted void radius analysis for silicon atoms based on Delaunay tessellation20. Only silicon atoms were used in the tetrahedralization, and a circumscribed sphere of the tetrahedron is defined as a void. The results show a distinct difference in the void radius distributions formed from silicon atoms with varying pressure (Fig. 3). Void radius above 4.4 GPa shows a single distribution with the peak position at ~3.1 Å, and there is almost no distribution above 3.6 Å (Fig. 3c). In contrast, the void radius distribution below 2.2 GPa shows another distribution of void radius at ~3.7–3.8 Å (Fig. 3a), in addition to the distribution at ~3.1–3.2 Å. The distribution at ~3.7–3.8 Å gradually disappears with increasing pressure between 2.3 and 3.5 GPa (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3. Distributions of void radius formed from silicon atoms in SiO2 glass at high pressures.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a 0–2.2 GPa. b 2.3–3.5 GPa. c 4.4–6.0 GPa. The broken line at the void radius of 3.11 Å represents the ring size of a six-membered ring structure. The dotted line at the void radius of 3.75 Å is a guide for the eye. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Discussion

Our results show bimodal features in the void radius formed from silicon atoms (Fig. 3) and in the translational order of the silicon’s second shell (Fig. 2). Both structural parameters characterize the distribution of silicon in SiO2 glass. We observe two distributions in the void radius formed from silicon atoms below 2.2 GPa (Fig. 3a). We note that the characteristic void radius of ~3.1 Å in SiO2 glass (Fig. 3) corresponds to the ring size of a six-membered ring structure (3.11 Å based on a calculation of the radius of gyration (RG) for planar ring21 by RG=12Lcsc(π/K), where L is the Si-Si distance (3.11 Å) and K is the ring size of 6). In fact, ring size statistics analysis in our SiO2 glass also shows the mean ring size of ~6 at 0–6.0 GPa (Supplementary Fig. 3). These data indicate that SiO2 glass is composed of a six-membered ring structure throughout the entire pressure conditions of this study between 0 and 6.0 GPa. On the other hand, there is another characteristic void radius distribution at ~3.7–3.8 Å in SiO2 glass below 2.2 GPa (Fig. 3a), which suggests the presence of another large void structure below 2.2 GPa.

The fraction of the large void structure in SiO2 glass with varying pressure is calculated by defining the void radius larger than 3.6 Å as the >3.6 Å void radius structure (Fig. 4a). It is interesting to note that the threshold value of 3.6 Å in our SiO2 glass is consistent with the value used to identify the low-density and high-density structures in terms of the structural parameter g5 in SiO2 liquid in a simulation study7, which implies the relevance of the void radius analysis in this study to the second shell structures of silicon. The fraction of the >3.6 Å void radius structure decreases with increasing pressure, and it almost disappears above 3.3 GPa (Fig. 4a). We note that, at the same pressure condition as the disappearance of the >3.6 Å void radius structure, the volume fraction of cavity in SiO2 glass reaches that of the random loose packing condition of equal spheres (Fig. 4b). The random loose packing of equal spheres is considered to be 0.555 (ref. 22) and 0.536 (ref. 23), which corresponds to the fraction of cavity of 0.445 and 0.464, respectively. The volume fraction of the cavity in SiO2 glass increases at lower pressures, and it reaches that of the random loose packing limit at ~2.5–3.5 GPa (Fig. 4b). The random loose packing limit is considered to be the lowest limit of mechanically stable random packing arrangement of equal spheres, although the packing condition looser than the random loose packing limit is possible if spheres are strongly bonded as covalent bonding. Therefore, the cavity volume higher than the random loose packing limit in SiO2 glass below ~2.5–3.5 GPa (Fig. 4b) implies a mechanically unstable structure. In fact, we find that void space formed from silicon atoms (Si void space) anomalously shrinks more than the change of the bulk volume of SiO2 glass below ~2.3–3.5 GPa (Fig. 4c), which may be related to the anomalous properties of SiO2 glass at pressures below ~2–3 GPa (refs. 9–11). On the other hand, above 3.5 GPa, Si void space changes equally to the bulk volume change of SiO2 glass (Fig. 4c), and SiO2 glass exhibits normal behavior as the elastic properties start to increase with increasing pressure9–11. These data indicate that anomalous properties of SiO2 glass is related to the change in the distribution of silicon atoms under pressure.

Fig. 4. Variation of a void structure formed from silicon atoms and volume fraction of cavity at high pressures.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

a Volume fraction of >3.6 Å void radius structure at high pressures. b Volume fraction of cavity in SiO2 glass at high pressures. Green lines represent the volume fraction of the cavity of 0.445 (solid green line) and 0.464 (broken green line), corresponding to the random loose packing limit of equal spheres (0.555 (ref. 22) and 0.536 (ref. 23), respectively). c Change of void space formed from silicon atoms (Si void space) relative to the change of the bulk volume of SiO2 glass at high pressures. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

It has been known in theoretical studies of SiO2 liquid4,7 that the second shell structure of silicon is the key to understand the anomalous properties of SiO2 liquid at high temperatures and high pressures. Theoretical study of SiO2 liquid4 showed a bimodal feature in the structural parameter z with varying temperatures and suggested the relevance of a two-state description for SiO2 liquid. SiO2 liquid shows a single distribution of the parameter z at ~2.4–2.5 Å at low temperatures, while another distribution at z = ~1.6 Å increases with decreasing the distribution of z = ~2.4–2.5 Å at high temperatures. The theoretical study of SiO2 liquid4 assigned the S and ρ states to the high and low distributions in the parameter z, respectively, and showed that the fraction of the low-density S state is the controlling parameter of the anomalous density behavior of SiO2 liquid not only as a function of temperature at ambient pressure but also as a function of pressure at 5000 K.

Similar to the theoretical study of SiO2 liquid4, we observed a bimodal feature in the parameter z in SiO2 glass under pressure (Fig. 2), which implies the presence of two structural features in SiO2 glass as well SiO2 liquid. In order to clarify the two structural features in SiO2 glass, we conducted MD simulations using two potential models (BKS24 and MSD25 models) at 0 and 5.2 GPa (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 4). The BKS model has been used in the theoretical studies of SiO2 liquid4,7. Both BKS and MSD models at 0 GPa show a single distribution at the z = 2.4 Å (BKS model) and z = 2.7 Å (MSD model), which are consistent with our result by experiment combined with MD-RMC modeling (Exp+MD-RMC) at 0 GPa (Fig. 5a). The partial pair distribution functions of Si-Si [gSiSi(r)] at 0 GPa show a clear separation between the first and second shells of silicon distributions in both experiment and MD simulations (Fig. 5b). The structural feature corresponds to the low-density S state structure reported in the theoretical study of SiO2 liquid4. The structure of SiO2 glass with the distribution of z at 2.4–2.7 Å at 0 GPa shows a tetrahedral symmetry structure formed from the nearest four silicon atoms in the first shell, and the first and second shells are clearly separated as the fifth neighbor silicon atom locates in the second shell at a farther distance than 4.1 Å (Fig. 5d, e).

Fig. 5. Structural features of SiO2 glass under pressure.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

a Translational order in SiO2 glass as a function of the parameter z obtained in our experiment with MD-RMC modeling (Exp+MD-RMC) and MD simulations with BKS and MSD models at 0 and 5.2 GPa. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. b Partial pair distribution functions of Si-Si [gSiSi(r)]. The gSiSi(r) of the BKS and MSD models are displayed by a vertical offset of +2 and +4, respectively. c–e Structural features of SiO2 glass with the characteristic distribution of z = 1.7 Å in the BKS model at 5.2 GPa (c), z = 2.4 Å in the BKS model at 0 GPa (d), and z = 2.7 Å in the MSD model at 0 GPa (e). Blue and light blue spheres represent silicon atoms and red spheres represent oxygen atoms. Numbers represent distances to the nearest five silicon atoms (blue spheres) from a silicon atom shown by light blue.

On the other hand, our Exp + MD-RMC result at 5.2 GPa shows a marked increase in the distribution of z at ~1.6–1.7 Å accompanied by a decrease in the distribution of z at ~2.4 Å (Fig. 5a). In MD simulations, although the MSD model shows almost single distribution at z = 2.4 Å with a subtle increase in the distribution of z at 1.5–1.6 Å, the BKS model shows a clear bimodal feature in the distribution of z (Fig. 5a). The BKS model at 5.2 GPa shows a significant increase in the distribution of z at 1.7 Å accompanied by a decrease in the distribution of z at 2.4 Å, which is consistent with our Exp + MD-RMC result. The gSiSi(r) of our Exp + MD-RMC model and BKS model at 5.2 GPa show a marked increase of the intensity at ~3.3–4.0 Å, and the separation between the first and second shells of silicon distribution disappears (Fig. 5b). The structure of SiO2 glass with the distribution of z at 1.7 Å in the BKS model at 5.2 GPa shows that the fifth neighbor silicon atom locates in the first shell, which indicates the collapse of the second shell onto the first shell and breaking of local tetrahedral symmetry (Fig. 5c).

It is important to note that the two structural features obtained in SiO2 glass under pressure in this study correspond to the S and ρ state structures of SiO2 liquid reported in the theoretical study4. For SiO2 liquid, the low-density S state has four silicon neighbor atoms in the first shell and exhibits high tetrahedral order with a clear separation between the first and second shell4. On the other hand, the high-density ρ state of SiO2 liquid shows more than four silicon atoms in the first shell by collapsing the second shell onto the first shell and exhibits low tetrahedral order. The structural features of the S and ρ state of SiO2 liquid correspond to the two structural features obtained in SiO2 glass with the characteristic distribution of z at 2.4–2.7 Å (Fig. 5d, e) and 1.7 Å (Fig. 5c), respectively. These observations indicate the similarity of the structural behavior in SiO2 glass under pressure obtained in this study to that theoretically simulated in SiO2 liquid at high temperatures and high pressures4. SiO2 glass mainly consists of the low-density S state with tetrahedral symmetry structure at low pressures. On the other hand, the local tetrahedral symmetry structure breaks at high pressures, and the fraction of the low-density S state in SiO2 glass decreases under pressure, as well as theoretical observation in SiO2 liquid at high temperatures and high pressures4.

Methods

High-pressure experiment

High-pressure experiments were conducted by using Paris-Edinburgh (PE) press. We used a cup-shaped PE anvil with a 12 mm cup diameter and a 3 mm flat bottom, and a standard PE cell assembly, which is mainly composed of a ZrO2 cap, boron-epoxy gasket, and MgO ring26. SiO2 glass sample with a diameter of 2.5 mm and height of ~1.5 mm was placed into the MgO ring with a BN cap. Pressures were determined by the equation of the state of MgO27. Densities of SiO2 glass at high-pressure conditions were calculated from experimentally measured density up to 8.6 GPa28,29.

Pair distribution function measurement

Pair distribution function measurements were conducted at the beamlines BL37XU and BL05XU of SPring-8, Japan. At BL37XU, we used a monochromatic beam (ΔE/E = 1.8 × 10−5) with a double crystal monochromator that employs Si511 and Si333 for the first and second reflection, respectively, at a photon energy of 40.0 keV. The X-ray beam was focused from 1 to 0.2 mm in horizontal with a 0.7-m-long horizontal-deflection mirror so as to increase an available flux. On the other hand, a high-flux pink beam (ΔE/E = 1.7 × 10−2) at a photon energy of 40.3 keV was generated with a double multilayer monochromator at BL05XU30. The double multilayer monochromator with a wide energy bandwidth of 1.7% enhances the X-ray flux by three orders of magnitude, compared with that of a conventional beamline using a double crystal monochromator of silicon.

The structure of SiO2 glass was measured at in situ high-pressure conditions up to 6.0 GPa in the PE cell by high-energy X-ray diffraction measurement using a CdTe point detector (Amptek X-123) with double-slit collimation setup in front of the detector. The first and second collimation slits locate at 25 and 60 cm from the sample, respectively. The double-slit collimation setup yields a collimation length of <2.5 mm at the sample position at 2θ angles higher than 5.5°, and we can obtain signals only from the SiO2 glass sample. Sizes of incident slit and two collimation slits were adjusted with varying 2θ angle to maximize signal intensity by increasing collimation length within the diameter of the SiO2 glass sample. High-energy X-ray diffraction measurements were carried out by scanning the 2θ angle from 1° to 60° at the beamline BL37XU and from 1° to 70° at the beamline BL05XU. Analysis was conducted by using the method developed at the beamline BL04B2 of SPring-8 (ref. 31). We obtained the Faber–Ziman structure factor, S(Q), of SiO2 glass at the range of the momentum transfer Q up to 19 Å−1 at the beamline BL37XU and up to 20 Å−1 at the beamline BL05XU, which is almost two times larger than that in conventional high-pressure angle-dispersive X-ray diffraction measurements using monochromatic X-ray.

MD-RMC modeling

We determined the structural model of SiO2 glass at high pressures, which reproduces the experimentally observed S(Q) under in situ high-pressure conditions, by using the Reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) program (RMC_POT)32. The structural refinement of SiO2 glass was conducted by using an initial structure simulated by the molecular dynamics (MD) method, and the final structure model was determined by refining atomic configurations using the RMC program to reproduce the experimentally observed S(Q). This method is referred to as MD-RMC modeling, and it has been used by previous ambient pressure studies for SiO2 glass18. We first constructed an initial structure by MD simulation using DL-POLY Classic33. About 1600 atoms of silicon and 3200 atoms of oxygen are placed in the cell at a minimal distance of 1.0 Å. Then, the structural relaxation was performed at 5000 K followed by cooling to 300 K at the rate of 0.05 K/fs. All the simulations were conducted using NVT ensemble and empirical potential34. After preparing the initial structures using the MD method, we refined atomic configurations by the RMC program to fit the experimentally observed S(Q). The minimum bond lengths were set at 1.35 Å for Si-O, 2.00 Å for O-O, and 2.40 Å for Si-Si to avoid unrealistic atomic configurations. The final atomic configurations, whose structure factor is consistent with the experimentally observed S(Q), was obtained after more than 2,000,000 atomic movements.

The volume of the cavity in the MD-RMC structure model of SiO2 glass at in situ high-pressure conditions was analyzed by dividing the MD-RMC model volume into 100 × 100 × 100 cells. The size of the MD-RMC model in each direction is 41.709 Å at 0 GPa and 39.300 Å at 6.0 GPa, and the size of each cell for the cavity analysis is 0.41709 and 0.39300 Å, respectively. If there is no atom at the surrounding 1.35 Å distance from a cell, the cell is identified as cavity. The threshold value of 1.35 Å distance corresponds to the ionic radius of oxygen35.

Void radius analysis by the Delaunay tetrahedralization was performed for understanding the distribution of silicon in the MD-RMC structure model. The MD-RMC model is divided into the set of tetrahedra by the tetrahedralization. Only silicon atoms are used in the tetrahedralization. A circumscribed sphere of the tetrahedron is defined as a void. Only the largest void out of the overlapped smaller voids is used for the analysis. The radius of the void illustrates the spatial distribution of silicon in the MD-RMC structure of SiO2 glass under in situ high-pressure conditions.

MD simulation

MD simulations of SiO2 glass were performed using MXDORTO code36. The systems are composed of 1600 atoms of silicon and 3200 atoms of oxygen. We imposed periodic boundary conditions in all directions. Ewald summations were applied to evaluate the long-range Coulombic interactions. All the atoms were moved by applying the velocity Verlet algorithm37,38 at a time interval of 1.0 fs. The structural relaxation was performed at 4000 K with NPT ensembles for 5.0 ns, followed by cooling to 300 K by the rate of 5.0 × 1011 K/s. The pressure is kept at 0.0001 and 5.2 GPa, respectively, to compare with experiments. The structure was relaxed at 300 K with NPT ensembles for 2.0 ns, and the trajectories of atoms were obtained under NVT ensembles at 300 K for 1.0 ns by an interval of 1.0 ps. We adopted two potential models. One is the pair potential model proposed by ref. 24 with repulsion wall7 (BKS model). The BKS model has been used in theoretical studies of SiO2 liquid4,7. Another is the pair and three-body potential model proposed by ref. 25 (MSD model).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (824.9KB, pdf)
Peer Review File (404.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers: 19KK0093 and 20H00201 to Y.K.) and the SACLA/SPring-8 Basic Development Program. The experiments were performed at the BL37XU (JASRI Proposal No.: 2019B1111 and 2020A0600) and BL05XU beamlines of SPring-8.

Source data

Source Data (23.1KB, xlsx)

Author contributions

Y.K. devised the project and wrote the paper with input from all co-authors. Y.K. and K.O. developed pair distribution function measurement combined with PE press high-pressure experiment. Y.K., K.O., and N.M.K. carried out the experiments with support from K.N. and O.S. for the BL37XU beamline and from Y. Higo, Y.T., H. Yumoto, T.K., H. Yamazaki, Y.S., H.O., S.G., I.I., Y. Hayashi, K.T., T.O., J.Y., and M.Y. for BL05XU beamline. K.O., H. Yamada, and S.H. conducted the MD-RMC modeling. F.N. carried out the MD simulations. All authors discussed the results of the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Code availability

We used MXDORTO code for MD simulations, which is available from a co-author (Fumiya Noritake, fnoritake@yamanashi.ac.jp) upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-30028-w.

References

  • 1.Holten V, Palmer JC, Poole PH, Debenedetti PG, Anisimov MA. Two-state thermodynamics of the ST2 model for supercooled water. J. Chem. Phys. 2014;140:104502. doi: 10.1063/1.4867287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Russo J, Tanaka H. Understanding water’s anomalies with locally favoured structures. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3556. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singh RS, Biddle JW, Debenedetti PG, Anisimov MA. Two-state thermodynamics and the possibility of a liquid-liquid phase transition in supercooled TIP4P/2005 water. J. Chem. Phys. 2016;144:144504. doi: 10.1063/1.4944986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shi R, Tanaka H. Impact of local symmetry breaking on the physical properties of tetrahedral liquids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:1980–1985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717233115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tanaka H. Bond orientational order in liquids: towards a unified description of water-like anomalies, liquid-liquid transition, glass transition, and crystallization. Eur. Phys. J. E. 2012;35:1–84. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2012-12001-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Poole PH, Hemmati M, Angell CA. Comparison of thermodynamic properties of simulated liquid silica and water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997;79:2281. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2281. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saika-Voivod I, Sciortino F, Poole PH. Computer simulations of liquid silica: equation of state and liquid–liquid phase transition. Phys. Rev. E. 2000;63:011202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.011202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shell MS, Debenedetti PG, Panagiotopoulos AZ. Molecular structural order and anomalies in liquid silica. Phys. Rev. E. 2002;66:011202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.011202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zha C-s, Hemley RJ, Mao H-k, Duffy TS, Meade C. Acoustic velocities and refractive index of SiO2 glass to 57.5 GPa by Brillouin scattering. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50:13105–13112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.13105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsiok OB, Brazhkin VV, Lyapin AG, Khvostantsev LG. Logarithmic kinetics of the amorphous-amorphous transformations in SiO2 and GeO2 glasses under high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998;80:999–1002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.999. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yokoyama A, et al. Elastic wave velocities of silica glass at high temperatures and high pressures. J. Appl. Phys. 2010;107:123530–123535. doi: 10.1063/1.3452382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sato T, Funamori N. Sixfold-coordinated amorphous polymorph of SiO2 under high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;101:255502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.255502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benmore CJ, et al. Structural and topological changes in silica glass at pressure. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;81:054105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.054105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Prescher C, et al. Beyond sixfold coordinated Si in SiO2 glass at ultrahigh pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:10041–10046. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708882114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kono Y, Shu Y, Kenney-Benson C, Wang Y, Shen G. Structural evolution of SiO2 glass with Si coordination number greater than 6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020;125:205701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.205701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Inamura Y, Katayama Y, Utsumi W, Funakoshi K-I. Transformations in the intermediate-range structure of SiO2 glass under high pressure and temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;93:015501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.015501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Urakawa S, et al. X-ray and neutron study on the structure of hydrous SiO2 glass up to 10 GPa. Minerals. 2020;10:84. doi: 10.3390/min10010084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Onodera Y, et al. Structure and properties of densified silica glass: characterizing the order within disorder. NPG Asia Mater. 2020;12:1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41427-020-00262-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Deschamps T, Martinet C, De Ligny D, Champagnon B. Elastic anomalous behavior of silica glass under high-pressure: in-situ Raman study. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2009;355:1095–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wilson, M., Madden, P., Medvedev, N., Geiger, A. & Appelhagen, A. Voids in network-forming liquids and their influence on the structure and dynamics. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.94, 1221–1228 (1998).
  • 21.Stixrude L, Bukowinski M. Rings, topology, and the density of tectosilicates. Am. Mineral. 1990;75:1159–1169. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Onoda GY, Liniger EG. Random loose packings of uniform spheres and the dilatancy onset. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990;64:2727. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Song C, Wang P, Makse HA. A phase diagram for jammed matter. Nature. 2008;453:629–632. doi: 10.1038/nature06981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Beest B, Kramer GJ, Van Santen R. Force fields for silicas and aluminophosphates based on ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990;64:1955. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mahadevan TS, Sun W, Du J. Development of water reactive potentials for sodium silicate glasses. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123:4452–4461. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b02216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kono Y, Park C, Kenney-Benson C, Shen G, Wang Y. Toward comprehensive studies of liquids at high pressures and high temperatures: combined structure, elastic wave velocity, and viscosity measurements in the Paris–Edinburgh cell. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2014;228:269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2013.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kono Y, Irifune T, Higo Y, Inoue T, Barnhoorn A. P-V-T relation of MgO derived by simultaneous elastic wave velocity and in situ X-ray measurements: a new pressure scale for the mantle transition region. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2010;183:196–211. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2010.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meade C, Jeanloz R. Frequency-dependent equation of state of fused silica to 10 GPa. Phys. Rev. B. 1987;35:236. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kono Y, Yamada A, Wang Y, Yu T, Inoue T. Combined ultrasonic elastic wave velocity and microtomography measurements at high pressures. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2011;82:023906–023907. doi: 10.1063/1.3552185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yumoto, H. et al. In Advances in Metrology for X-Ray and EUV Optics IX. 114920 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2020).
  • 31.Ohara K, et al. Accurate synchrotron hard X-ray diffraction measurements on high-temperature liquid oxides. Int. J. Microgravity Sci. Appl. 2020;37:370202. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gereben O, Jóvári P, Temleitner L, Pusztai L. A new version of the RMC++ reverse Monte Carlo programme, aimed at investigating the structure of covalent glasses. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2007;9:3021. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Smith W, Forester T. DL_POLY_2. 0: a general-purpose parallel molecular dynamics simulation package. J. Mol. Graph. 1996;14:136–141. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00043-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pedone A, Malavasi G, Menziani MC, Cormack AN, Segre U. A new self-consistent empirical interatomic potential model for oxides, silicates, and silica-based glasses. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:11780–11795. doi: 10.1021/jp0611018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shannon RD. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A. 1976;32:751–767. doi: 10.1107/S0567739476001551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sakuma H, Kawamura K. Structure and dynamics of water on muscovite mica surfaces. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2009;73:4100–4110. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.05.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Verlet L. Computer” experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys. Rev. 1967;159:98. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.159.98. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Swope WC, Andersen HC, Berens PH, Wilson KR. A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: application to small water clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 1982;76:637–649. doi: 10.1063/1.442716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (824.9KB, pdf)
Peer Review File (404.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

We used MXDORTO code for MD simulations, which is available from a co-author (Fumiya Noritake, fnoritake@yamanashi.ac.jp) upon request.

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES