Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2022 Mar 23;95:153755. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2022.153755

Regioselective alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehydes and 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenones

Aziza Frank , Negar Hamidi , Fengtian Xue †,*
PMCID: PMC9053733  NIHMSID: NIHMS1795132  PMID: 35495552

Abstract

We report a cesium bicarbonate-mediated alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehyde and 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone to generate 4-alkylated products in acetonitrile at 80 °C with excellent regioselectivity, up to 95% isolated yields, and broad substrate scope.

Keywords: Regioselective, Alkylation, Cesium bicarbonate, Scalable

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1795132-f0001.jpg

Introduction

4-Alkoxy-2-hydroxybenzaldehydes and 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxyacetophenones represent privileged building blocks that have found applications in a broad range of fields. As key fragments and synthetic precursors of small molecule therapeutics, 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxybenzaldehydes and 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxyacetophenones have been used in numerous chemical scaffolds with promising therapeutic effects for the treatment of human diseases including different types of cancers,[1] bacterial[2] and fungal infections,[3] type 2 diabetes,[4] and Alzheimer’s Disease[5]. Additionally, 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxybenzaldehydes and 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxyacetophenones have been used in the construction of compounds that can be used as fluorescent probes and imaging agents,[6] selective labeling agents of protein[7] and DNA,[1d, 8] antioxidants,[9] ligands for metal-based catalysts for organic transformations,[10] and linkers for solid-phase peptide synthesis.[11]

Available syntheses of 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxybenzaldehydes and 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxyacetophenones often involve a direct alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehyde or 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone using alkyl halides as an electrophile in the presence of an inorganic base such as Na2CO3, NaHCO3, K2CO3, and KHCO3 under vigorous heating in polar aprotic solvents including DMF, DMSO, acetone, THF, and CH3CN.[112] Although these conditions lead to the formation of the desired products, they usually suffer from limitations from low isolated yields to extended reaction times. Importantly, upon prolonged heating, the reactions commonly result in a complicated mixture of the target product contaminated by side products resulting from double alkylation and compound decomposition, which can create additional challenges in the purification step, especially for large reactions with multi-gram scales.

During our ongoing efforts in the development of novel antibiotics for infections by the gram-negative opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we aimed to synthesize gallium salophen-based complexes as inhibitors for the P. aeruginosa extracellular hemophore HasAp, via a route employing 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxybenzaldehydes and 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxyacetophenones as key building blocks.[13] Here we report our discovery of a practical CsHCO3-mediated alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehydes and 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenones that efficiently provide 4-alkylated products with excellent regioselectivity, good isolated yields, and a broad substrate scope.

Results and discussion

We began our studies with a solvent screen using a model reaction employing 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehyde (1a) as the starting material, KHCO3 as the base, and 1,2-dibromoethane as the alkylating agent (Table 1). The reactions in either DMSO (entry 1) or DMF (entry 2) indicated complete consumption of starting material after 4 h. However, these reactions produced complicated mixtures containing multiple side products in addition to the desired product 2a[6a, 12i] and the bis-alkylation product 2a’. Moreover, the reactions in MeOH, acetone, THF, and DCE led to minimum formation of product 2a after heating at 60 °C for 4 h (entries 3–6). On the other hand, the reaction in CH3CN, although produced product 2a in low yields, indicated a clean conversion without the formation of any side products (entry 7). It was also encouraging to see that with increased temperature, a significant improvement of yields was observed (entries 8–9). Thus, we decided to keep our further optimization in CH3CN at 80°C.

Table 1.

Solvent screen for the formation of compounds 2a and 2a’ from starting material 1aa

graphic file with name nihms-1795132-t0004.jpg
entry solvent temp. (°C) yield of 2ab (%) yield of 2a’b (%)

1 DMSO 60 37 6
2 DMF 60 35 5
3 MeOH 60 < 3 NDd
4 acetone 60 < 3 NDd
5 THF 60 < 3 NDd
6 DCE 60 -c NDd
7 CH3CN 60 9 NDd
8 CH3CN 70 20 NDd
9 CH3CN 80 40 NDd
a

A mixture of substrate 1a (0.5 mmol), 1,2-dibromoethane (3.0 equiv) in solvent (5.0 mL) was stirred at the given temperature for 4 h. DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide, DMF = dimethylformamide, MeOH = methanol, THF = tetrahydrofuran, DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane, CH3CN = acetonitrile.

b

NMR yields.

c

The starting material 1a was not soluble, and the corresponding yield was not determined.

d

ND = not detected

Next, the effects of different bases used in the reaction was investigated (Table 2). When the potassium ion of KHCO3 was replaced by a harder sodium ion, the reaction gave no significant formation of product 2a (entry 1). Interestingly, when a softer cesium ion was used to replace the potassium ion of KHCO3, the reaction indicated a clean conversion of the starting material 1a to the product 2a with a yield of over 60% (entry 2). We reasoned that the significantly improved yield of the CsHCO3 reaction was due to the higher solubility and decreased coordination interaction of the softer cesium ion to the phenoxide anion that could favor ligand exchange.[14] The more basic carbonate salts were also evaluated (entries 3–5). Reactions using Na2CO3 and Cs2CO3 gave low yields and while the one employing K2CO3 provided modest yields. However, the usage of all three carbonate bases led to the formation of a significant amount of bis-alkylated side product 2a’, through deprotonation of both hydroxy groups of compound 1a. Furthermore, organic bases TEA (entry 6) and DIPEA (entry 7) were also tested, and the results indicated that both tertiary amine-mediated reactions led to low yields.

Table 2.

The effects of bases used in the formation of compound 2a from 1aa

graphic file with name nihms-1795132-t0005.jpg
entry base yield of 2ab (%) yield of 2a’b (%)

1 NaHCO3 < 3 NDc
2 CsHCO3 61 4
3 Na2CO3 7 NDc
4 K2CO3 53 14
5 Cs2CO3 15 16
6 TEA 11 NDc
7 DIPEA 26 NDc
a

A mixture of substrate 1a (0.5 mmol), 1,2-dibromoethane (3.0 equiv) in CH3CN (5.0 mL) was stirred at 80 °C for 4 h. NaHCO3 = sodium bicarbonate, Na2CO3 = sodium carbonate, KHCO3 = potassium bicarbonate, K2CO3 = potassium carbonate, Cs2CO3 = cesium carbonate, CsHCO3 = cesium bicarbonate, TEA = triethylamine, DIPEA = N,N-diisopropylethylamine.

b

NMR yields.

c

ND = not detected

We then assessed the reagent ratio and reaction time (Table 3). Increasing the equivalence of CsHCO3 from 1.5 equiv to 3.0 equiv led to a significant increase of the yield (entry 1) although further increasement of CsHCO3 indicated no additional benefit to the reaction outcome (entry 2). The effects of increasing equivalence of 1,2-dibromoethane were also studied (entries 3–4), and the results showed that extra equivalence of the electrophile had no obvious contribution to the yields. Extension of the reaction time to 6–8 h also indicated minimum change in reaction yields (entries 5–6). Interestingly, prolonged reaction time was detrimental to the yield of the reaction (entries 7–8).

Table 3.

Impact of reagent equivalence and reaction time on the formation of 2a from 1aa

graphic file with name nihms-1795132-t0006.jpg
entry dibromoethane/equiv CsHCO3/equiv time yield of 2ab (%)

1 3.0 3.0 4 h 83
2 3.0 4.5 4 h 86
3 6.0 3.0 4 h 81
4 9.0 3.0 4 h 87
5 3.0 3.0 6 h 78
6 3.0 3.0 8 h 81
7 3.0 3.0 24 h 55
8 3.0 3.0 48 h 40
a

A mixture of substrate 1a (0.5 mmol), 1,2-dibromoethane, and CsHCO3 in 5.0 mL CH3CN was stirred at 80 °C for the given reaction time.

b

NMR yields.

With the optimal conditions in hands, we next explored the substrate scope of alkyl bromides in the reaction on a 5 mmol scale (Scheme 1).[15] Under the optimized conditions, the product of the model reaction, 2a, was isolated in 73% yield. Alkylations using dibromoalkanes with different linkers led to the generation of compounds 3a,[1b, 1d, 2b, 6bd, 10a, 10b] and 4a with high regioselectivity in similar modest yields. Using 1-bromopropane or 1-bromobutane, the corresponding alkylation reactions went smoothly to give compounds 5a[1a, 1g] and 6a[12a, 12b, 12d, 12f, 12j] in good yields. In addition, substrates containing an ester group provided compound 7a[2a, 7a, 7b, 11] in good yields, while the substrate containing a Boc-protected amino group led to compound 8a with a low isolated yield. This low yield is likely due to the decomposition of the tert-butyl-carbamate group under heating and the cyclization of the resulting 2-bromoethylamine. Alkyl bromides containing either an ether or an alcohol groups were well-tolerated to generate the desired product 9a,[12k] 10a,[4a, 12k] and 11a[2a] in good yields. Moreover, the alkyne- and alkene-containing substrates generated compounds 12a[1e, 2c, 4b, 6e, 6f, 10c, 12l] and 13a in good yields. Furthermore, alkylation reactions involving substrates including phenyl or cyano groups led to the generation of compounds 14a, 15a, and 16a[2a] in good yields. Finally, the reaction using a secondary alkyl bromide was studied. Although the reaction proceeded slower than the ones employing primary alkyl bromides, it produced the target compound 17a in high yields after 24 h with excellent regioselectivity.

Scheme 1. Substrate scope for the alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehyde[15].

Scheme 1.

.

The substate scope of the alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone was also studied (Scheme 2).[15] Using 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,3-dibromopropane, or 1,4-dibromobutane as the substrate, the corresponding alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone went smoothly with high regioselectivity to generate compounds 2b,[1h, 1i] 3b,[5ad, 6d, 7c] and 4b[1j, 1k, 3b, 5] in good yields. Although the alkylations of 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone took longer time to complete compared to those of 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehyde, no obvious formation of either the 2,4-dialkyl or double-alkylated side products was detected. Alkylation using 1-bromopropane and 1-bromobutane gave compounds 5b[1f, 1g] and 6b[3a] in excellent yields. The reactions employing alkyl bromides containing an ester functionality indicated clean conversion of the starting material to provide compound 7b in high yields. Similar to the alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehyde, the Boc-protected amino-containing substate went slower and gave product 8b in low yield. Moreover, the reactions utilizing ether- or alcohol-containing substrates indicated clean conversion to give 4-selective alkylated products 9b, 10b, and 11b[9] in good yields. The alkyne and alkene groups were also well-tolerated in the reactions to provide compounds 12b[2e, 12c, 12e, 12g] and 13b in good yields. Furthermore, the alkyl bromides containing phenyl and cyano groups also brought the desired 4-alkylated products 14b,[12m] 15b, and 16b in good yields. Finally, secondary alkyl bromide was tolerated to give excellent isolated yield after extended reaction time.

Scheme 2. Substrate scope for the alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone[15].

Scheme 2.

.

In summary, 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxybenzaldehydes and 4-alkoxy-2-hydroxyacetophenones are important building blocks that are widely used in different fields. Although their synthesis is known, available conditions usually require a long reaction time, and generate unsatisfactory regioselectivity and low yields. By screening different reaction conditions, we have developed a CsHCO3-mediated regioselective alkylation of 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehydes and 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenones. Under our conditions, the reactions proceed smoothly to generate the desired mono-alkylation product in up to 95% isolated yield. Compared to stronger carbonate bases, CsHCO3 offers the favorable basicity for selective alkylation on the 4-hydroxy group of the substrates to give the desired products with the minimum formation of bis-alkylated site products. In addition, compared to sodium and potassium bicarbonate salts, the CsHCO3 reaction indicated significantly improved yield due to its higher solubility and decreased coordination interaction of the softer cesium ion to the phenoxide anion that could favor ligand exchange.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease R21AI161313 to FX; the Maryland Innovation Initiative (Project #0920–011) to FX; and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. AF acknowledges a Chemistry/Biology Interface Training Program (NIGMS/NIH T32GM066706) and the IMSD Meyerhoff Graduate Program (NIH 5T37TW000090–06).

Footnotes

Declaration of Competing Interest

None

Supporting Information

Supporting information associated with this article can be found in the online version.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • [1].a) Zhang J, Tan Y, Li G, Chen L, Nie M, Wang Z, Ji H, Molecules 26 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ali A, Kamra M, Roy S, Muniyappa K, Bhattacharya S, Chem. Asian J. 11(2016) 2542–2554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Khungar B, Rao MS, Pericherla K, Nehra P, Jain N, Panwar J, Kumar A, C.R. Chim 15 (2012) 669–674. [Google Scholar]; d) Mandal SS, Varshney U, Bhattacharya S, Bioconjug. Chem. 8 (1997) 798–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Johnson CN, Adelinet C, Berdini V, Beke L, Bonnet P, Brehmer D, Calo F, Coyle JE, Day PJ, Frederickson M, Freyne EJE, Gilissen RAHJ, Hamlett CCF, Howard S, Meerpoel L, Mevellec L, McMenamin R, Pasquier E, Patel S, Rees DC, Linders JTM, ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 6 (2015) 31–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Marquina S, Maldonado-Santiago M, Sanchez-Carranza JN, Antunez-Mojica M, Gonzalez-Maya L, Razo-Hernandez RS, Alvarez L, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 27 (2019) 43–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Kuo H-M, Hsu Y-T, Wang Y-W, Lee G-H, Lai CK, Tetrahedron 71 (2015) 7729–7738. [Google Scholar]; h) Truong VV, Nam TD, Hung TN, Nga NT, Quan PM, Chinh LV, Jung SH, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25 (2015) 5182–5185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Luu Van C, Truong Ngoc H, Nguyen Thi N, Le p., Le Huu C, Vu Tien C, Soo Un K, Tran Khac V, Lett. Org. Chem 12 (2015) 251–261. [Google Scholar]; j) Evangelista FCG, Bandeira MO, Silva GD, Silva MG, Andrade SN, Marques DR, Silva LM, Castro WV, Santos FV, Viana GHR, Villar JAFP, Sabino AP, Varotti FP, Med. Chem. Res. 26 (2017) 27–43. [Google Scholar]; k) Da Silva GD, Da Silva MG, Souza EMPVE, Barison A, Simões SC, Varotti FP, Barbosa LA, Viana GHR, Villar JAFP, Molecules 17 (2012) 10331–10343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].a) Thomas MG, Lawson C, Allanson NM, Leslie BW, Bottomley JR, McBride A, Olusanya OA, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 423–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Nehra P, Khungar B, Singh RP, Sivasubramanian SC, Jha PN, Saini V, Inorg. Chim. Acta 478 (2018) 260–267. [Google Scholar]; c) Selvarani V, Annaraj B, Neelakantan MA, Sundaramoorthy S, Velmurugan D, Polyhedron 54 (2013) 74–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Zbancioc AM, Miron A, Tuchilus C, Rotinberg P, Mihai CT, Mangalagiu II, Zbancioc G, Med. Chem. 10 (2014) 476–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Bojtár M, Janzsó-Berend PZ, Mester D, Hessz D, Kállay M, Kubinyi M, Bitter I, Beilstein J Org. Chem. 14 (2018) 747–755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].a) Zhang RR, Liu J, Zhang Y, Hou MQ, Zhang MZ, Zhou F, Zhang WH, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 116 (2016) 76–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Andrade JT, Santos FRS, Lima WG, Sousa CDF, Oliveira LSFM, Ribeiro RIMA, Gomes AJPS, Araújo MGF, Villar JAFP, Ferreira JMS, J. Antibiot 71 (2018) 702–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].a) Rikimaru K, Wakabayashi T, Abe H, Tawaraishi T, Imoto H, Yonemori J, Hirose H, Murase K, Matsuo T, Matsumoto M, Nomura C, Tsuge H, Arimura N, Kawakami K, Sakamoto J, Funami M, Mol CD, Snell GP, Bragstad KA, Sang BC, Dougan DR, Tanaka T, Katayama N, Horiguchi Y, Momose Y, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20 (2012) 3332–3358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Güngör SA, Tümer M, Köse M, Erkan S, J. Mol. Struct. 1206 (2020) 127780. [Google Scholar]
  • [5].a) Zhu G, Wang K, Shi J, Zhang P, Yang D, Fan X, Zhang Z, Liu W, Sang Z, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 29 (2019) 126625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sang Z, Song Q, Cao Z, Deng Y, Tan Z, Zhang L, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 216 (2021) 113310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Sang Z, Wang K, Zhang P, Shi J, Liu W, Tan Z, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 180 (2019) 238–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Sang Z, Wang K, Wang H, Wang H, Ma Q, Han X, Ye M, Yu L, Liu W, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 27 (2017) 5046–5052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Sang Z, Wang K, Shi J, Liu W, Cheng X, Zhu G, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Qiao Z, Wu A, Tan Z, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 192 (2020) 112180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].a) Xie D, Jing J, Cai Y-B, Tang J, Chen J-J, Zhang J-L, Chem. Sci. 5 (2014) 2318–2327. [Google Scholar]; b) Choi H, Kim S, Lee S, Kim C, Ryu JH, ACS Omega 3 (2018) 9276–9281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wang X, Song P, Peng L, Tong A, Xiang Y, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2016)609–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Nunes da Silva R, Costa CC, Santos MJG, Alves MQ, Braga SS, Vieira SI, Rocha J, Silva AMS, Guieu S, Chem. Asian J. 14 (2019) 859–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Liu G, Shi G, Sheng H, Jiang Y, Liang H, Liu S, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 8686–8691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Jiang Y, Liu G, Wang X, Hu J, Zhang G, Liu S, Macromolecules 48 (2015) 764–774. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].a) Adusumalli SR, Rawale DG, Rai V, Org. Biomol. Chem. 16 (2018) 9377–9381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Adusumalli SR, Rawale DG, Singh U, Tripathi P, Paul R, Kalra N, Mishra RK, Shukla S, Rai V, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 15114–15123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Gu H, Ghosh S, Staples RJ, Bane SL, Bioconjugate Chem. 30 (2019) 2604–2613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Deeyaa BD, Rokita SE, Org. Biomol. Chem. 18 (2020) 1671–1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Enes RF, Farinha ASF, Tomé AC, Cavaleiro JAS, Amorati R, Petrucci S, Pedulli GF, Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 253–262. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].a) Dias GG, Paz ERS, Kadooca JY, Sabino AA, Cury LA, Torikai K, de Simone CA, Fantuzzi F, da Silva Júnior EN, J. Org. Chem. 86 (2021) 264–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Nehra P, Khungar B, Pericherla K, Sivasubramanian SC, Kumar A, Green Chem. 16 (2014) 4266–4271. [Google Scholar]; c) Zhou Q, Wan Z, Yuan X, Luo J, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 30 (2016) 215–220. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Okayama T, Burritt A, Hruby VJ, Org. Lett. 2 (2000) 1787–1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].a) Punjani V, Mohiuddin G, Kaur S, Choudhury AR, Paladugu S, Dhara S, Ghosh S, Pal SK, Chem. Eur. J. 26 (2020) 5859–5871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Nayak RA, Bhat SA, Rao DSS, Yelamaggad CV, Bull. Mater. Sci. 43 (2020) 188. [Google Scholar]; c) Ortalli M, Ilari A, Colotti G, De Ionna I, Battista T, Bisi A, Gobbi S, Rampa A, Di Martino RMC, Gentilomi GA, Varani S, Belluti F, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 152 (2018) 527–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Krishnammagari SK, Lim KT, Cho BG, Tae Jeong Y, Phosphorus Sulfur 193 (2018) 574–581. [Google Scholar]; e) Kiran K, Sarasija M, Rao BA, Jeyanthi A, Rao AS, Ashok D, Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 88 (2018) 2410–2419. [Google Scholar]; f) Nafees A, Sinha A, Rao NVS, Kalita G, Mohiuddin G, Paul MK, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 43069–43079. [Google Scholar]; g) Jung EH, Hwang JS, Kwon MY, Kim KH, Cho H, Lyoo IK, Shin S, Park JH, Han IO, Neurochem. Int. 100 (2016) 35–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Zbancioc G, Zbancioc AM, Mangalagiu II, Ultrason. Sonochem. 21 (2014) 802–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Oliveri IP, Failla S, Colombo A, Dragonetti C, Righetto S, Di Bella S, Dalton Trans. 43 (2014) 2168–2175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Gude V, Upadhyaya K, Mohiuddin G, Nandiraju VSR, Liq. Cryst. 40 (2013) 120–129. [Google Scholar]; k) Gichinga MG, Striegler S, Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 4917–4922. [Google Scholar]; l) Liu G, Zhang J, Wu B, Wang J, Org. Lett. 9 (2007) 4263–4266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; m) Dixit M, Tripathi BK, Srivastava AK, Goel A, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 3394–3397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Centola G, Deredge DJ, Hom K, Ai Y, Dent AT, Xue F, Wilks A, ACS Infect. Dis. 6 (2020) 2073–2085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].a) Zhuang Z, Yu J, Nature 577 (2020) 656–659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Antien K, Viault G, Pouységu L, Peixoto PA, Tetrahedron 73 (2017) 3684–3690. [Google Scholar]; c) Metz AE, Berritt S, Dreher SD, Kozlowski MC, Org. Lett. 14 (2012) 760–763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Pearson RG, J. Chem. Educ. 45 (1968) 581–587. [Google Scholar]; e) Pearson RG, J. Chem. Educ. 45 (1968) 643–648. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].To a solution of either 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehyde (5.0 mmol) or 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone (5.0 mmol) in CH3CN (25 mL) alkyl bromide (15.0 mmol) was added, followed by CsHCO3 (2.9 g, 15 mmol). The reaction was heated in a pressure vessel at 80 °C for 4 hours (for 2,4-dihydroxybenzyaldehyde) or 6 hours (for dihydroxyacetophenone) with vigorous stirring. The reaction was cooled to room temperature, filtrated to remove the solid, and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography in EtOAc/Hexanes to give the alkylated products.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES